The present invention relates to a detection unit for an interferometer.
In an interferometry apparatus, two coherent beams are interfered together to form a spatial fringe field in the form of interference fringes at a detection unit, which contains electronics, such as photodiodes and amplifiers etc.
It would be advantageous to have a detection unit in which no electronics are required. This would allow the size of the detection unit to be reduced. Furthermore, if the detection unit does not have electronics the problem of electronic noise from other components (such as motors) is eliminated.
The electronics in the detection unit are a heat source which can cause measurement error due to expansion of parts of the apparatus such as the detection unit itself and the system which the interferometer is measuring. Thus it is desirable to remove this heat source.
The present invention provides interferometry apparatus comprising:
a measurement light beam and a reference light beam which interact with each other to cause a spatial fringe pattern;
an optical device which interacts with the spatial fringe pattern, such that light is spatially separated into different directions;
and wherein the intensity modulation in two or more directions of the spatially separated light is phase shifted.
The optical device may interact with the spatial fringe pattern such that within a fringe of the spatial fringe pattern, light is spatially separated into different directions.
The light may be spatially separated over at least a portion of one or more fringes of the spatial fringe pattern.
The light may be spatially separated into two or more sub-beams.
The spatially separated light in different directions may be detected by optical detectors. The spatially separated light may reach the detectors via optical fibres.
At least one focussing means may be provided to focus the spatially separated light in the different directions into the optical fibres or onto the optical detectors.
The optical device may comprise at least one fresnel lens.
The optical device may be a diffractive device.
In one embodiment, the optical device comprises a plurality of segments, wherein light from the spatial fringe field incident on each segment is diffracted into a different diffraction direction, thereby spatially separating the spatial fringe field.
The optical device may have a plurality of segments having different structures, the different segments being arranged in a repeating pattern. Two or more segments of the plurality of the segments may comprise blaze gratings, wherein the blaze gratings extend in different directions. One of the plurality of segments may have no structure.
The optical device may comprise a diffractive optical element.
The optical device may be a refractive device.
In one embodiment, the optical device may comprise a plurality of segments, wherein light from the spatial fringe field incident on each segment is refracted into a different direction, thereby spatially separating the spatial fringe field.
The optical device may have a profiled surface, such that refraction at the profiled surface causes spatial separation of the spatial fringe field.
The optical device may be configured such that the phase difference of the spatially separated light beam enables outputs of the detectors to be combined to generate two signals with a known phase difference. The optical device may be configured such that the phase difference of the spatially separated light beam enables outputs of the detectors to be combined to generate quadrature signals.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described by way of example and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
a illustrates the real and imaginary parts of the grating amplitude for a first solution;
b illustrates the phase and intensity of the grating for the first solution;
c illustrates the output intensity against angular displacement of the four resulting beams for the first solution;
a illustrates the real and imaginary parts of the grating amplitude for a second solution;
b illustrates the phase and intensity of the grating for the second solution;
c illustrates the output intensity against angular displacement of the four resulting beams for the second solution;
a illustrates the real and imaginary parts of the grating amplitude for a third solution;
b illustrates the phase and intensity of the grating for the third solution;
c illustrates the output intensity against angular displacement of the four resulting beams for the third solution;
a illustrates the real and imaginary parts of the grating amplitude for a 3-phase splitting grating;
b illustrates the phase and intensity of the grating for a 3-phase splitting grating;
c illustrates the output intensity against angular displacement of the four resulting beams for a 3-phase splitting grating;
The polarising beam splitter 3 also produces a second, reflected beam 2c, which forms the reference arm of the interferometer. The reflected beam is directed towards a second retroreflector 7 which is fixed with respect to the beam splitter 3 and then reflected by the retroreflector back to the polarising beam splitter. On its return the beam 2d is reflected from the polarising beam splitter towards the detection unit.
As previously mentioned, this arrangement causes beams 2b and 2d to have different polarisation states.
A birefringent prism 8 refracts the beams 2b, 2d through different angles causing them to converge and the polarising element 9 mixes their polarisation states so that they interfere and generate a spatial fringe field.
The detection unit 4 is placed in the path of the overlapping beams to receive the spatial fringe field. The detector used is an electrograting. Such a detector is known from our European Patent No. 0543513 and consists of a semiconductor substrate upon which a plurality of elongate, substantially parallel photosensitive elements are provided.
The present invention provides a detection unit in which signals are created from the spatial fringe field without the requirement of an electrograting.
When the detection unit 10 is illuminated by the cosine fringes four beams 30,32,34,36 are formed which are focused by lens 14 onto detectors 16,18,20,22. The lens could be integral with the DOE. Alternatively four individual lenses could be used. The four beams are 90° out of phase and thus the intensities detected at the detectors vary in quadrature as the cosine fringes are translated across the detection unit.
It can be seen that the intensities at each detector 16,18,20,22 vary cyclically and are 90° out of phase with one another.
The invention is not restricted to producing four light beams. For example the DOE may be designed to create three beams which are π/2 or 4π/3 out of phase depending upon the design. The output of the detectors may be combined to generate quadrature signals which may be used to interpolate the magnitude and direction of relative movement between the fringes and the periodic light pattern. The method of combining outputs from three detectors to generate such quadrature signals is disclosed in our earlier published International Patent Application WO87/07944.
The mathematical specification of the DOE may be calculated as follows with reference to
where x is the linear displacement; Δx is the change in linear displacement; and p is the periodicity of the complex amplitude field produced by the interference of the two incident beams. The periodicity of the intensity interference pattern is p/2.
The output complex amplitude Ωout(ω) of the DOE is given by the Fourier transform of the product of the cosine fringes (Ufringes (x)) and the DOE as shown below. Output coordinates are
x=ω·λz
where λ is the wavelength of the incident light, ω is the spatial angular frequency of the co-ordinate system, and z is the propagation distance.
where Ft is the Fourier Transform.
The form of the complex amplitude of the grating Ωgrating(ω) must be such that when convolved with the complex amplitude of the fringes Ωfringes(ω) it produces at least four beams. Furthermore as the intensity of the four beams is required to vary in quadrature with Δx, it is necessary for the complex amplitude of each beam to consist of at least two components so that the required phase relationship can be imposed. (Single component beams are not suitable as they would have constant intensity.) A possible solution is illustrated in
φ=2πΔx/p
The output intensity is given by the square of the modulus of the output amplitude. The intensities of the four beams can then be equated to the required quadrature signals:
In(Δx)=1+q Cos (2φ+nπ/2)
where q is the AC modulation with a DC level of unity.
Let I1 be the modulus squared of the complex amplitude of the first output beam resulting from the combination of the incident beams and the property of the DOE, then
This can be related to the required modulated intensity terms by
Similarly
Thus
The equations on the right hand side are just complex conjugates of the left hand side ones and can be neglected.
Starting with an arbitrary A value.
Now let A=1,q=½, then the values of A−E are
A=1
B=1
C=−i
D=+i
E=−1
This system is illustrated in
Two alternative solutions are also possible, which differ only in the order of the phases. These are illustrated in
a shows the real and imaginary parts of the grating amplitude against displacement x,
A=1
B=ei0π/2/A
C=ei1π/2/B
D=ei3π/2/C
E=ei2π/2/D
Thus
a shows the real and imaginary parts of the grating amplitude against displacement x,
A=1
B=ei0π/2/A
C=ei2π/2/B
D=ei1π/2/C
E=ei3π/2/D
Thus
It is also possible to use the D.O.E. to produce three resultant beams. A possible solution is illustrated in
A=1
B=e−i.1.π/2/A
C=ei.0.π/2/B
D=ei.1.π/2/C
a illustrates the real and imaginary parts of the grating amplitude for a three phase splitter grating,
b illustrates the phase and intensity of the three phase splitter grating and
The above solutions are specific analytical solutions. Numerical optimisation of the DOE will typically use a computer and produce designs that may not be of the above form but may make the DOE easier to make and use.
An alternative optical device for forming a plurality of light beams from spatial fringe field will now be described with reference to
This profile may be formed from a saw tooth profile, in which the top third is removed (for example, by polishing).
A spatial fringe field comprising cosine fringes 62 is formed at the optical device 50 by the interference of two coherent light beams 64,66.
Detectors (not shown) are provided to detect the three resultant light beams 68,70,72. Alternatively, optical fibres may be provided to couple the three resultant light beams to their respective remote detectors.
In a reverse arrangement, the coherent light beams 64,66 are incident on the plane face of the optical device, so that the light travels across the profiled glass/air boundary from the glass side. In this arrangement the angle of incidence of the light beams 64,66 will be greater than the arrangement illustrated in
The incident beams which interfere with each other to produce an interference pattern do not have to be at an angle to one another.
Another type of profiled optical element will now be described with reference to
The profiled surface 84 of the optical device is divided into a repeating pattern of segments 88,90,92, the pattern of segments extending parallel with the direction of the light fringes 86.
Light incident on the different segments of the profiled surface of the optical device is diffracted into different directions. Light incident on the first segment without any structure passes straight through the optical device (i.e. 0th order of diffraction). Light incident on the second and third segments is refracted at different angles.
Use of a blazed grating has the advantage that the lens 96 may be incorporated into the optical device 80 by superimposing a Fresnel zone plate onto the blazed grating, thus reducing the total size of the system.
A coherent optical fibre bundle may replace both the optical device and the discrete optical fibres. In this case one end of the individual optical fibres in the bundle are positioned adjacent the spatial fringe field and spaced so that light of different phases travels through different optical fibres to different detectors.
If heat from the electronics is acceptable then photodetectors could be used instead of the optical fibres. Here the photodetectors could be separate, or housed within the same unit or they may even have a common substrate as in quadcells or linear arrays.
Although
All of the above embodiments provide alternatives for an opto-electronic grating, thus providing a detection unit in which no electronics are required. Furthermore, as the detectors may be provided remotely from the detection unit (i.e. by use of optical fibres), the size of the readhead may be greatly reduced.
The detection units described above are suitable for use with any interferometer in which a spatial fringe field is produced.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0404829.4 | Mar 2004 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB05/00814 | 3/4/2005 | WO | 8/24/2006 |