Damascene processing techniques are used in many modern integrated circuit manufacturing schemes because these techniques require fewer processing steps and generally offer higher yields than other methods. Damascene processing involves forming metal conductors on integrated circuits by depositing corresponding inlaid metal lines in trenches and vias in a dielectric layer. As part of Damascene processing, a layer of photoresist is deposited on a dielectric layer. The photoresist is a light-sensitive organic polymer, which can be “spun on” in a liquid form and dried to form a solid film. The photoresist is then patterned by passing light through a mask. This operation may be followed by plasma etching of the patterned photoresist (e.g., exposed portions of the dielectric layer) to form vias and trenches in the dielectric layer. The photoresist is then stripped, and any etch-related residues are removed before subsequent processing. Generally, photoresist stripping employs plasma formed from one or more processes gases, which may include oxygen or other oxidizing reagents. The highly reactive plasma etches the organic photoresist to form volatile components, which are evacuated from the processing chamber. Substrate temperature should be precisely control during this stripping process (for example, to avoid undesirable variations in etch rates).
Examples of novel semiconductor processing pedestals and apparatuses including such pedestals are described. These pedestals are specifically configured to provide uniform heat transfer to semiconductor substrates and to reduce maintenance complexity and/or frequency. Specifically, a pedestal may include a removable cover positioned over a metal platen of the pedestal. The removable cover is configured to maintain a consistent and uniform temperature profile of its substrate-facing surface even though the platen's upper-surface, which supports the cover and is in thermal communication with the cover, may have a much less uniform temperature profile. The cover may be made from certain ceramic materials and shaped as a thin plate. These materials are resistant to the processing environments and maintain their thermal characteristics over many processing cycles. The cover can be easily removed from the platen and replaced with a new one without a need for major disassembly of the entire apparatus.
Provided is a pedestal for supporting a semiconductor substrate. The pedestal may be used in an apparatus for processing such substrates. The pedestal includes a metal platen and a removable cover positioned over the platen. The platen has an upper surface for providing heat to the semiconductor substrate through the cover. The cover is configured to distribute this heat and to provide substantially uniform heat transfer to the substrate, which is positioned over the substrate-facing surface of the cover during processing. The cover may be made from one or more ceramic materials, further described below, or some other materials suitable for processing environments and capable of providing substantially uniform heat transfer to the substrate.
The cover is positioned over the upper surface of the platen. The cover typically includes a platen-facing surface opposite of the substrate-facing surface. A substantial portion of the platen-facing surface may be in direct contact with the upper surface of the platen in the assembled and operational pedestal. Alternatively, the platen-facing surface may be positioned at a predetermined distance from the upper surface of the platen in the assembled and operational pedestal. This distance provides additional heat resistance between the cover and platen and may be used when the heat flux should be further restricted to provide more uniform heat distribution. In certain embodiments, a metal platen is made from one or more of the following materials: aluminum 6061, aluminum 7075, and aluminum 3003. A metal platen may include a heater arranged within the metal platen for heating the upper surface of the platen. The output of the heater may be sufficient to maintain the upper surface at a temperature of between about 100° C. and 450° C. or various more specific ranges as further described below.
In certain embodiments, a substrate-facing surface of the cover includes a set of supports for supporting a substrate above the substrate-facing surface at an average, predetermined distance. This distance may be between about 0.001 inches and 0.015 inches or, more specifically, between about 0.004 inches and 0.007 inches. The set of supports may include at least six individual supports arranged in two or more circular patterns. The center of these patterns may correspond to the center of the cover. In other embodiments, substrate supports are provided on the upper surface of the metal platen. These supports protrude through openings in the removable cover and extend above the substrate-facing surface of the cover. These supports are likewise configured to support a substrate above the substrate-facing surface of the cover at an average, predetermined distance from the surface. This distance may fall within the ranges listed above. Examples of these supports include ceramic balls (e.g., sapphire balls) positioned on the free ends of extensions attached to the metal platen. The cover openings may have an elongated shape extending radially from the center of the cover to accommodate for thermal expansion differences between the cover and platen.
In certain embodiments, a pedestal is configured such that the temperature profile of the substrate-facing surface is within less than about 3° C. for a 400° C. set temperature. The upper facing surface may have much larger temperature deviations at this operating regime. In some embodiments, a removable cover has a thickness of between about 0.075 inches and 0.500 inches. The platen-facing and substrate-facing surfaces of the cover may be parallel within less than about 0.002 inches deviation.
A removable cover may be made from one or more of the following ceramic materials: aluminum oxide, aluminum nitride, barium titanate, boron nitride, silicon aluminium oxynitride, silicon carbide, silicon nitride, magnesium silicate, titanium carbide, zinc oxide, and zirconium dioxide. In certain embodiments, a substrate-facing surface of the removable cover has an average emissivity of less than about 0.35. A platen-facing surface of the cover may have a surface roughness of less than 10 micro-inches. In the same or other embodiments, an upper surface of the metal platen has a surface roughness of less than 10 micro-inches. Polished surfaces generally provide better heat transfer due to the more extensive contact between the two surfaces.
In certain embodiments, a removable cover includes a guiding pin extending from a center of the platen-facing surface. During pedestal assembly, the guiding pin protrudes into a corresponding guiding recess in the upper surface of the metal platen in order to maintain the relative positions of the cover and platen. In the same or other embodiments, a removable cover includes two or more retaining posts extending from the platen-facing surface and into respective upper retaining cavities on the upper surface of the platen for securing the cover with respect to the platen in at least the vertical direction. A pedestal may also include two or more retaining keys extending into side retaining cavities of the platen and engaging with corresponding retaining posts of the cover. In these embodiments, the pedestal may also include corresponding retaining covers for insertion into the side retaining cavities and for covering the retaining keys inside the cavities.
In certain embodiments, a removable cover includes a cover edge protrusion extending above the substrate-facing surface of the cover. The cover edge protrusion is configured to capture an outer edge of the semiconductor substrate during processing. In other embodiments, a metal platen includes a platen edge protrusion extending above the substrate-facing surface of the cover. The platen edge protrusion is configured for capturing an outer edge of the substrate, and the removable cover is positioned within a cavity formed by the platen edge protrusion.
In certain embodiments, an upper surface of the metal platen includes one or more outgassing grooves. The grooves may have a depth of between about 0.005 inches and 0.025 inches. The grooves may include at least one groove extending radially and away from the center of the platen. The radial groove extends to an outer edge of the platen and is open to the chamber environment. The grooves may include at least one concentric groove in addition to the radial groove. The concentric groove overlaps with the radial outgassing grooves and allows gases to flow in between the two grooves. In certain embodiments, an upper surface of the platen has two concentric outgassing grooves evenly spaced between the center and the outer edge of the platen. The upper surface also has eight radial outgassing grooves extending between the center of the platen and outer edge.
Also provided is a removable cover that can be positioned on a metal platen during assembly of the pedestal, and using this pedestal for processing semiconductor substrates. The cover includes a substrate-facing surface for providing uniform heat transfer to a substrate positioned over the substrate-facing surface. The cover also includes a platen-facing surface for positioning on a metal platen of the pedestal or, more specifically, on an upper-surface of the platen. The cover may be made from various ceramic materials described above. In certain embodiments, the cover has multiple supports for supporting a substrate at a predetermined average distance above the substrate-facing surface.
Provided also is an apparatus for processing semiconductor substrates. The apparatus includes a chamber configured to receive a substrate, a plasma source for producing plasma in the chamber, and a pedestal for supporting and heating the substrate. The pedestal may include a metal platen having an upper surface. This surface may be heated and provide heat to the substrate through a removable cover positioned over this surface. The removable cover is configured to redistribute this heat and provide substantially uniform heat transfer to the substrate positioned over its substrate-facing surface. The apparatus may be a part of the system that also includes a stepper.
A method of stripping photoresist from semiconductor substrates is also provided. The method may involve positioning a substrate onto or over a pedestal in the semiconductor-processing chamber. The pedestal may include a metal platen having an upper surface for providing heat to the substrate through a removable cover positioned over this surface. The removable cover is configured to redistribute this heat and provide substantially uniform heat transfer to the substrate positioned over its substrate-facing surface. The method may proceed with removing some or all of the photoresist from the substrate and then moving the substrate away from the pedestal. These operations may be repeated for additional substrates. During processing, the pedestal may be heated to at least about 120° C. prior to providing substrates. At this temperature set point, the temperature profile of the substrate-facing surface may deviate by less than about 3° C. This uniform temperature profile ensures uniform heat transfer to the substrate during processing.
In certain embodiments, a method involves replacing a removable cover with a new cover after processing, for example, at least about 10,000 substrates using the original cover. In more specific embodiments, the original pedestal may be used to process at least about 100,000 substrates without the need for cover replacement. During processing, the cover may maintain its thermal characteristics including, for example, its emissivity, at substantially the same initial level.
The method may also involve conditioning a new cover prior to introducing another substrate for processing. Such conditioning may be used to stabilize emissivity characteristics of the new cover or, more specifically, emissivity of its substrate-facing surface. The method may also involve applying photoresist to the substrate, exposing the photoresist to light, patterning the photoresist as well as transferring the pattern to the semiconductor substrate, and selectively removing the photoresist from the semiconductor substrate.
These and other features are described further below with reference to the figures.
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the presented concepts. The presented concepts may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well known process operations have not been described in detail so as to not unnecessarily obscure the described concepts. While some concepts will be described in conjunction with the specific embodiments, it will be understood that these embodiments are not intended to be limiting.
Introduction
Semiconductor processing apparatuses may use pedestals for supporting semiconductor substrates during various processing operations performed on these substrates. These pedestals may be configured to heat and/or cool or, more generally, to control the temperature of the supported substrate. For example, a pedestal may be equipped with a heater positioned within its metal body and configured to provide a heat flux through its substrate-facing surface to the substrate. The substrate may be positioned at a predetermined distance (e.g., a few thousands of an inch) above the substrate-facing surface and may be heated by a combination of radiation and convection heat transfer methods. To achieve uniform heat transfer, the substrate-facing surface needs to be maintained as a uniform temperature (over its entire surface and/or during multiple processing cycles). Furthermore, the substrate-facing surface needs to have a uniform emissivity.
For purposes of this document, a substantially uniform temperature is defined as a temperature profile that has a deviation of less than some predetermined value. This value may be determined by various processing requirements. For example, for some ashing operations described below, this deviation may be less than about 5° C., or even less than about 2° C. As noted above, this temperature profile may be considered over the entire substrate-facing surface of the pedestal or, more specifically, over the surface portion actually designed to face a substrate during processing. Other portions, such as edge protrusions, may be ignored for purposes of constructing this temperature profile. Furthermore, uniformity of the profile may be considered within one processing cycle and over multiple cycles, such as at least about 10,000 cycles or even at least about 100,000 cycles. Semiconductor processes are validated for specific characteristics of the processing equipment. As such, shifts in these characteristics, including shifts in the temperature of the substrate-facing surface, should be minimized. A “substantially uniform heat transfer” is defined as a heat transfer provided by a pedestal-facing surface having a substantially uniform temperature profile. Furthermore, this surface should maintain substantially constant emissivity over a predetermined number of cycles. One having ordinary skills in the arts would appreciate specific requirements of a particular semiconductor process with respect to temperature and emissivity uniformity.
In this document, the terms “semiconductor substrate,” “semiconductor wafer,” “wafer,” and “partially fabricated integrated circuit” are used interchangeably. One skilled in the art would understand that these terms may refer to various substrates, such as 200-millimeter wafers and 300-millimeter wafers, at various stages of integrated circuit fabrication processes. While the following detailed description may repeatedly refer to methods and apparatuses being implemented to process a silicon wafer, the scope is not so limited. Overall, semiconductor substrates may have various shapes, sizes, and materials. Some examples include printed circuit boards, displays, and the like. Pedestal structures or, more specifically, the various configurations of removable covers described herein, may be specifically modified to process such substrates.
Such apparatuses that include pedestals with removable covers may be used for various semiconductor fabrication processes, including, but not limited to, bulk stripping and/or high-dose implant stripping (HDIS) processes. The bulk stripping process may be used remove photoresist that has not been exposed to high dose ion implants and, as a result, does not have major crust formations on its surface. The HDIS process may be used to remove photoresist that has been exposed to high dose ion implants and, therefore, contains such crust formations. The HDIS process typically involves a staged approach with initial stripping stages, optimized for removing the crust in order to expose the bulk photoresist, followed by main stripping stages, optimized differently for removing the bulk photoresist. One or both stages in the HDIS process may use different process conditions than the bulk stripping process. For example, a bulk process may involve heating a substrate to at least about 250° C., for example to about 280° C., very rapidly. The ashing is then performed at this temperature in the presence of, for example, oxygen-containing plasma. In contrast, an HDIS process may start with heating a substrate to a lower temperature, for example, to between about 120° C. and 140° C. The oxygen-containing plasma is used to remove the crust while the substrate is kept at these lower temperatures. The substrate is then heated to at least about 250° C., for example to about 280° C., at which point the plasma ashes the underlying (and now exposed) bulk photoresist. These examples illustrate pedestals being exposed to chemical and thermal conditions, which may degrade their performance. Furthermore, the same pedestal may be used to provide different process conditions, such as different substrate temperatures, during the same HDIS process cycle. These process conditions often have a limited operating window that has to be maintained continuously over many processing cycles.
Some components of pedestals are often made from aluminum. Aluminum is a good material choice from both a cost and manufacturability perspective. Aluminum components may have protective coatings, such as a hard anodize. Some coatings may be used to provide specific performance characteristics, such as emissivity. Substrate-facing surfaces of pedestals typically need to have low emissivity. As such, bare aluminum surfaces are often used. However, these unprotected surfaces tend to deteriorate in harsh processing environments and change their surface characteristics.
It has been found in a series of experiments that substrate-facing surfaces often change their emissivity characteristics, which results in inconsistent and non-uniform heat transfer. Specifically, a pedestal made from aluminum 6061 was subjected to about 10,000 cycles of a typical bulk stripping process as described above. In a normal operating regime, an apparatus goes through that many cycles in only about a week. The substrate-facing surface of this pedestal was bare aluminum, and it was significantly discolored at the end of the test. The center of the pedestal was much darker than its edges. Without being restricted to any particular theory, it is believed that this grade of aluminum, which has a relatively high magnesium concentration, allows some of this magnesium to migrate to the substrate-facing surface. An emissivity map of the substrate-facing surface indicated that the darker center portion had an emissivity of about 0.15, while the lighter edge portions had an emissivity of only about 0.4. The emissivity of the original bare aluminum surface prior to the test was more than 0.4. Such deviations have a negative impact on the heat transfer, particularly on a portion of the heat flux transferred by radiation.
In a further experiment, three different pedestals were used to process multiple wafers using the same processing conditions. Processed wafers were then inspected to determine ashing rates corresponding to each pedestal. The results of this experiment are presented in
Pedestal replacement is a very time consuming process, which may involve breaking various pressure/vacuum seals of the processing chamber and forming new seals. Pedestal replacement may require a new alignment of the pedestal with respect to other components, such as an internal substrate-handling robot and a load lock transfer mechanism. An entire pedestal also tends to be a very complex and expensive component. Frequent maintenance and replacement of pedestals should be avoided to the extent possible. At the same time, pedestals should maintain their heat transfer characteristics in between maintenance shutdowns, which may be difficult to accomplish with aluminum substrate-facing surfaces, as evidenced above. Furthermore, even a new aluminum pedestal may have substantial temperature variations on its substrate-facing surface.
It has been found that substantially uniform heat transfer can be consistently provided to a semiconductor substrate by positioning a specifically configured cover over a metal platen of the pedestal. This cover may be referred to as “a removable cover” as it can be easily removed from the platen and replaced with a new one, instead of replacing the platen. The cover is made from a chemically and temperature stable material that can operate within specific processing environments without deteriorating various thermal characteristics of the cover. Some of these materials may have a relatively low initial emissivity (after an initial “seasoning” cycle) and are capable of maintaining this emissivity substantially unchanged over a large number of cycles.
In certain embodiments, a removable cover is made from a material that has a thermal conductivity substantially lower than that of a corresponding metal platen. A ratio between these two thermal conductivities may be at least about 2 or even at least about 5. This lower thermal conductivity may help smooth any hot spots on the upper platen surface and avoid corresponding spots on the substrate-facing surface of the cover. In other words, the cover may be used as a thermal spreader.
Furthermore, a removable cover allows for the easy adjustment of thermal characteristics of the pedestal when, for example, the same pedestal is used to perform different types of processes that required different heating conditions. A removable cover may be easily replaced with another cover that has different heat transfer characteristics, or the pedestal may be left uncovered.
Overall, pedestals with removable covers may be configured to provide more stable and uniform heat transfer to and from substrates, and they are easier to maintain and operate.
Apparatus Examples
To provide a better understanding and context to various features of pedestals having removable covers, a brief description of a processing apparatus is provided herein.
Apparatus 100 has a plasma source 101 and a processing chamber 103, which may be separated from plasma source 101 by a showerhead assembly 105. Plasma source 101 is connected to a process gas inlet 111, which supplies one or more process gasses through showerhead assembly 105 into processing chamber 103. A low-pressure environment is attained in processing chamber 103 via the vacuum pump and conduit 119. A showerhead 109 forms the bottom of showerhead assembly 105. Processing chamber 103 encloses a pedestal that has a metal platen 117, and a removable cover 118 positioned over the upper surface of platen 117. The pedestal is used to support a semiconductor substrate 116 and, in certain embodiments, to heat and/or cool semiconductor substrate 116. As such, platen 117 may be fitted with a heating/cooling element. In some embodiments, platen 117 is also configured for applying a bias to semiconductor substrate 116.
During processing, one or more process gases are introduced via gas inlet 111 through plasma source 101. The gases may contain one or more chemically active species. Plasma source 101 may be used to ionize the gases in order to generate activated species and to form plasma. Plasma source 101 may be equipped with Radio Frequency (RF) induction coils 115. Showerhead 109 then directs this plasma into processing chamber 103 through showerhead holes 121. There may be any number and arrangement of the showerhead holes 121 to maximize the uniformity of the plasma/gas mixture and distribution towards the surface of semiconductor substrate 116.
Platen 117 may be temperature controlled and used for heating semiconductor substrate 116. In some embodiments, heat flux is transferred through removable cover 118. There may be some gap between removable cover 118 and semiconductor substrate 116 during processing. The gap may be provided by minimum contact area (MCA) supports, which are further described below with reference to
Some heat flux may be provided by thermal conduction. Some additional heat flux may be provided by radiation. The relative contributions of these two heat transfer methods depend on the size of the gap between removable cover 118 and substrate 116, emissivity of the substrate-facing surface of removable cover 118, pressure inside processing chamber 103, and other factors. In certain embodiments, thermal conduction is the largest contributor to the overall heat flux.
Pedestal Assembly
Specifically,
As stated above, removable cover 206 may be used to provide substantially uniform heat transfer to a semiconductor substrate positioned over its substrate-facing surface. The heat is supplied by metal platen 204, which may be equipped with a heater. In certain embodiments, a heater is a resistive electrical heater, such as a current carrying coil in a metal tube arranged within one or more of the underside grooves of platen 204. The heating tube may be welded to platen 204. In other embodiments, a heater includes a heat exchanging fluid circulating through platen 204.
Returning to
Top portion 202 of pedestal 200 may have also multiple recesses 210 to accommodate internal wafer transfer robot fingers or chamber pegs. For example,
Top portion 202 may also include one or more edge protrusions for supporting a semiconductor substrate in the horizontal direction (i.e., in parallel to the substrate-facing surface). The edge protrusions may be provided on a metal platen, on a cover, or on both of these components.
In this configuration, substrate 400 is supported by cover edge protrusion 406. A small gap 408 may exist between substrate 400 and protrusion 406 to allow for positioning and removing the substrate, and to accommodate for thermal expansion differences between substrate 400 and cover 406 during processing. At the same time, gap 408 should be sufficiently small to maintain substrate alignment and to prevent collection of contaminant in the gap. In certain embodiments, an inside diameter of the cover edge protrusion is about 11.987 inches for supporting and/or aligning 300-millimeter wafers. Cover 404 is supported on metal platen 402 using various retaining features further, as described below.
Removable Cover
Accordingly, removable covers may be manufactured with or without cover edge protrusions. Covers with cover edge protrusions will now be described in more detail with reference to
Substrate-facing surface 502 is shown to have multiple MCA supports 506. MCA supports may be standalone components, such as sapphire balls positioned within recesses of the cover (or the platen), or integrated into the cover (or the platen). The height of MCA supports extending above the substrate-facing surface may be specifically selected to control heat transfer and to prevent excessive contact between the substrate and the surface. In certain embodiments, this height is between about 0.001 inches and 0.010 inches or, more specifically, between about 0.004 inches and 0.007 inches. This height creates a gap between the back side of the substrate and substrate-facing surface 502 of the removable cover 500. In certain embodiments, substrates may sag in between these MCA supports and even touch the substrate-facing surface. Therefore, the gap is generally referred to as an average gap. This average gap may be less than the height of MCA supports extending above the substrate-facing surface.
Six supports illustrated in
A removable cover is made from a chemical and temperature resistant material that has particular thermal characteristics suitable for providing uniform heat transfer. Some examples of thermal characteristics include a heat transfer coefficient, specific heat, and emissivity. These characteristics should remain substantially stable while used in typical operating environments over a reasonably large number of cycles. Some initial pre-processing (e.g., “seasoning,” or “burn in”) of the cover may be performed to ensure subsequent stability. For example, a cover may be subjected to one or more processing cycles without any substrates positioned over its substrate-facing surface to adjust its emissivity characteristics.
Examples of materials suitable for removable covers include various ceramic materials, such as aluminum oxide, aluminum nitride, barium titanate, boron nitride, silicon aluminium oxynitride, silicon, silicon oxide, silicon carbide, silicon nitride, magnesium silicate, titanium carbide, zinc oxide, and zirconium dioxide. In a specific embodiment, a cover is made from aluminum oxide or, more specifically, from at least about 99.5% pure aluminum oxide or, even more specifically, from at least about 99.9% pure aluminum oxide. High purity levels help to avoid outgassing and particle formation when the cover is later exposed to the processing. The 99.5% and 99.9% purity levels are also applicable to the other ceramic materials listed above.
Materials for removable covers may be also characterized based on their thermal characteristics. In certain embodiments, a cover material has a heat transfer coefficient (at the room temperature) of less than about 100 W/(m K) or, more specifically, less than about 50 W/(m K), or even less than about 25 W/(m K). As previously stated, low heat transfer coefficients may help with “thermal spreading” and avoiding hot spots on the substrate-facing surface of the removable cover.
Another characteristic for characterizing removable covers is emissivity of their substrate-facing surfaces. This characteristic may depend on the material, the surface finish, and other factors. In certain embodiments, an average emissivity of the substrate-facing surface is less than about 0.07 or, more specifically, less than about 0.03, or even less than about 0.01. Covers are generally configured in such a way that these emissivity characteristics remain stable over many cycles. In certain embodiments, the initial emissivity changes by less than about 50% after about 10,000 cycles or, more specifically, by less than about 25%, or even by less than about 5%. This stability may be achieved by selecting particularly stable materials for the cover as well as by controlling the roughness of the substrate-facing surface. Without being restricted to any particular theory, it is believed that a rougher surface experiences less emissivity drift than a more polished surface. In certain embodiments, a substrate-facing surface has a surface roughness of between about 0.001 inches and 0.025 inches.
The emissivity values specified above are defined for typical operating temperatures of the pedestal and typical angles at which emissivity is measured. In a radiating body, temperature affects the spectral distribution emitted energy. Thus, the emissivity values provided herein are for the spectral region where emission is the strongest under operating conditions. For example, the emissivity values for wafer-facing surfaces of platens that are at between about 350° C. and 400° C. generally correspond to wavelengths of between about 2 and 8 micrometers and emissivity angles of about 90°. Further, the provided emissivity values are, in the appropriate context, averages or integrals over the wafer-facing surface of a platen. It should be understood that local emissivity values may differ among various points on the surface. For example, platens may develop scratches and/or local discolorations on their wafer-facing surfaces during operation and therefore have localized emissivity peaks. It should be also understood that wafer-facing surfaces of platens may be periodically refinished to bring their emissivity within the specified ranges.
Fabricating a guiding pin and/or retaining posts as separate components allows more precision during the fabrication of other features, such as the platen-facing surface and substrate-facing surface. For example, one or both of these surfaces may fabricated with more precise roughness specifications or made more flat and/or parallel than would be otherwise possible. A number of different techniques, such as glaze bonding or brazing, may be used for attachment. For example, brazing involves placing some small-grain ceramic material in between two pre-fabricated ceramic components that have large grains. This stack is then subjected to heating and, in certain embodiments, to pressure, in order to melt the small-grain ceramic material and fuse it into the other two components, thereby forming a continuous metallurgical bond.
Some additional features of removable cover 500, such as its thickness and a profile of the cover edge protrusion (if one is present) will now be described in more detail with reference to
Metal Platen
Various features of metal platens will now be described in more detail with reference to
A thickness of metal platen 700 may be at least about 0.5 inches or, more specifically, at least about 1 inch (for example, about 1.4 inches). A thicker platen generally provides more a uniform and stable temperature distribution from a heater. Platen 700 may be configured to maintain its upper surface 702 at a set point of between about between about 100° C. and 450° C. Some operating range examples include a temperature of between about 120° C. and 140° C. (e.g., about 130° C.), between about 280° C. and 320° C. (e.g., about 300° C.), or between about 375° C. and 425° C. (e.g., about 400° C.).
Metal platen 702 also includes multiple recesses 704 for accommodating internal wafer transfer robot fingers or pegs attached to the chamber. During pedestal assembly, recesses 704 are aligned with the corresponding recesses of the cover. Metal platen 700 may also have one or more upper retaining cavities 708 and one or more side retaining cavities 710. Each upper retaining cavity 708 may have a corresponding side retaining cavity 710. The two cavities 708, 710 intersect such that a retaining pin of the cover inserted into upper retaining cavity 708 can be engaged with a retaining key inserted into side retaining cavity 710, as is further explained with reference to
Upper surface 702 may have one or more outgassing grooves 712a and 712b. These grooves are configured to provide paths to an outside edge 714 of platen 700 from various points on upper surface 702. When a cover is positioned over upper surface 702, small pockets may be formed between upper surface 702 and the platen-facing surface of the cover due to flatness variations between the two surfaces. When a pressure inside the chamber is changed, gases will try to evacuate from these pockets (e.g., during vacuuming of the chamber) or will try to fill these pockets (e.g., when the pressure inside the chamber is increased). This phenomenon is sometimes referred to as the “outgassing” of the pedestal. Outgassing grooves 712a and 712b help to expedite outgassing by providing less obstructed pathways from and to the pockets. Because the positions and sizes of the pockets are hard to predict and may vary over time (e.g., due to deformation of the metal platen and cover caused by temperature, pressure, and other factors), outgassing grooves 712a and 712b may be evenly distributed throughout upper surface 702. A depth of the outgassing grooves may be between about 0.005 inches and 0.025 inches (for example, about 0.015 inches).
In certain embodiments, outgassing grooves may include radial outgassing grooves 712a and concentric outgassing grooves 712b. Specifically, radial outgassing grooves 712a extend to outside edge 714 of platen 700 and provide paths to the chamber environment of the chamber. Radial outgassing grooves 712a may or may not pass through the center of platen 700. Specifically,
Retaining Mechanism
Various features of retaining mechanisms will now be described in more detail with reference to
A retaining mechanism may include one or more retaining posts rigidly attached to the platen-facing surface of the cover. Specifically,
Multi-Station Apparatus Examples
Various pedestal examples described above may be used in a single station apparatus or a multi-station apparatus.
A semiconductor substrate to be processed in apparatus 900 is loaded from one of the cassettes 903 through one or both load-locks 905a and 905b into the station 911. An external robot 907 may be used to transfer the substrate between the cassette 903 and load-locks 905a and 905b. In the depicted embodiment, there are two separate load locks 905a and 905b. Load locks 905a and 905b are used to transfer substrates between one pressure environment (e.g., an atmospheric pressure outside of process chamber 901) and another pressure environment (e.g., a much lower pressure inside process chamber 901). Once the pressure is equilibrated to a level corresponding to the internal environment of process chamber 901, another transferring device (not shown) may be used to move the substrate from load-lock 905a onto the station 911. The same or another transferring device may be used to move a substrate from station 916 back into load lock 905b for removal from processing chamber 901. An internal robot 909 may be used to transfer substrates among processing stations 911-916. Internal robot 909 may include a spindle assembly having multiple arms extending towards processing stations. Each arm may have four fingers (e.g., two fingers on each side of the arm extending towards the stations). These fingers are used to lift, lower, and position substrates within the processing stations.
Before a substrate is positioned onto station 911, the corresponding arms of the internal robot 909 are positioned such that four fingers (i.e., two fingers on each side of the two adjacent arms positioned on opposite sides of station 911) reside within the recesses of the platen and/or removable cover. As explained above, these recesses are adapted for receiving such fingers. The fingers may then be lifted from the recesses of station 911 to support the substrate above station 911 and to move the substrate onto another station. Accordingly, the recesses of other stations are also configured for receiving these fingers. Overall, the recesses of any station are configured to receive any sets of fingers of internal robot 909. Internal robot 909 and the pedestals of stations 911-916 are configured to move vertically with respect to each other in order to raise the substrate above the pedestals' surfaces or to position the substrate onto the pedestal surface. It would be understood by one having ordinary skills in the art that positioning the substrate onto the pedestal's surface may or may not involve a direct contact between substantial portions of these components. For example, a pedestal may be equipped with a MCA support to prevent excessive contact with the back side of the substrate. For purposes of describing overall semiconductor processing apparatus embodiments and processing embodiments, the substrate is said to be positioned on the pedestal even though it is supported by the MCA supports. Furthermore, internal robot 909 and the pedestals of stations 911-916 are configured to move rotationally with respect to each other in order to move substrate from one station to another. Since all stations are present in the same environment, there is no need for load locks or other types of transfer ports in between the stations. One substrate may be processed (including heating) on each station or a selected sub-set of stations.
One station (e.g., station 911) may be reserved for the initial heating of the newly received substrate wafer. This station may be equipped with a heating lamp positioned above the station. The initial temperature of the substrate may be around room temperature (e.g., about 25° C.). The temperature after this pre-heating operation may exceed 300° C. and is generally determined by the subsequent operation, such as crust stripping or bulk stripping.
Other stations (e.g., stations 912, 913, 914, 915, and 916) may be used for other types of processing. Processing on multiple stations in the apparatus may be performed sequentially or in parallel. In certain embodiments, all or some selected processing stations of apparatus 900 may have pedestals with removable covers. As noted above, some or all of the processing stations may be provided with its own Radio Frequency (RF) power supply, such as a downstream inductively coupled plasma RF source. These stations may also be equipped to apply a bias to a substrate positioned on the pedestal surface. Furthermore, some or all of the platens may be equipped with a heating element.
Different stations may have pedestals at different vertical positions with respect to internal robot 909. For example, stations 912 and 913 may have their pedestals residing in lowered positions to have lower heat transfer fluxes from these pedestals. These stations may be used, for example, to remove an implant crust from a photoresist. Thus, there may be a gap between the substrates and pedestals (e.g., removable covers) during this operation to keep the substrates at lower temperatures than during other operations performed on other stations. This gap may be between about 0.1 inches and 3 inches or, more specifically, between about 1.5 inches and 2.5 inches. The gap may be selected and/or adjusted during processing based on one or more factors, such as the emissivity of a wafer-facing surface of the platen, temperature of the platen, initial temperature of the wafer when it is transferred to the station, wafer temperature requirements during the operation, thermal budget of the wafer, resistivity of the wafer, type of the photoresist on the substrate, and other process parameters. A lowered position of the pedestal is defined as any position where the pedestal (i.e., its substrate-facing surface or MCA supports) is not in the contact with the substrate. These differences in the vertical orientations of the pedestals (i.e., between the raised and lowered positions) allows for achieving different substrate temperatures while maintaining substantially similar pedestal heating configurations (both in terms of the pedestals' structures and heating elements' output). Alternatively, different stations may have different types of pedestals or, more specifically, different types of covers. For example, pedestals of station 912 and 913, where lower substrate temperatures are needed, may be equipped with thicker substrate covers. In the same or other embodiments, these pedestals may have covers made from less thermally conductive materials. Furthermore, the heaters' outputs may be controlled to achieve different substrate temperatures. In certain embodiments, various combinations of these techniques (i.e., the pedestals' vertical positions, removable covers' heat transfer characteristics, and heaters' outputs) may be used to control substrates' temperatures.
Some examples of an HDIS strip process using multi-station apparatus 900 will now be briefly described. Further details of the process are provided below with reference to
Then the substrate is moved station 914 to start bulk stripping. The substrate temperature may need to be increased to at least about 250° C. or, more specifically, to about 280° C. The pedestal of this station may be in a raised position, such that a removable cover is in contact with the substrate. Also, this pedestal may be equipped with a removable cover having good heat transfer properties.
In certain embodiments, an apparatus is used to process different substrate types. For example, the same apparatus may be used to strip “un-crusted” photoresist, which generally requires high-temperature conditions, and crusted photoresist, which needs lower temperature conditions. To switch between these different temperature operating regimes, pedestal covers may be changed for more precise control. This structural change of the apparatus may be coupled with changes in heater outputs and/or the vertical position of the pedestal.
In certain embodiments, a system controller 921 is used to control process conditions for various operations of the stripping process described below. For example, system controller 921 may control positions of the pedestals in each station 911-916 as well as their heater outputs. System controller 921 may receive input from various sensors (e.g., thermocouples measuring temperatures of the pedestal, substrate, and other components) as well as from a user interface (e.g., specifying types of covers used on each pedestal). System controller 921 typically includes one or more memory devices and one or more processors. The processor may include a central processing unit (CPU) or computer, analog and/or digital input/output connections, stepper motor controller boards, and the like.
System controller 921 may control some or even most of the activities of apparatus 900. For example, system controller 921 may execute system control software including sets of instructions for controlling the timing of various processing operations, pedestal positions of stations 911-916, substrate and pedestal temperatures, pressure inside chamber 901, and other process parameters. Other computer programs may be stored on memory devices associated with system controller 921. These programs may be used for various processing and maintenance tasks. The computer program code for controlling the processing operations can be written in any conventional computer readable programming language: for example, assembly language, C, C++, Pascal, Fortran, or others. Compiled object code or script is executed by the processor to perform the tasks identified in the program.
In certain embodiments, system controller 921 has a user interface associated with it. The user interface may include a display screen, graphical software displays of the apparatus and/or process conditions, and user input devices such as pointing devices, keyboards, touch screens, microphones, and the like.
The controller parameters relate to process conditions such as, for example, timing of the processing steps, flow rates and temperatures of precursors and other process gases, temperature of the substrate (as controlled by, for example, the position of a pedestal with respect to the substrate and/or the energy/power delivered to the pedestal), pressure of the chamber, and other parameters of a particular process. These parameters are provided to the user in the form of a recipe and may be entered utilizing the user interface.
The system software may be designed or configured in many different ways. For example, various chamber component subroutines or control objects may be written to control operation of the chamber components necessary to carry some operations described herein. Examples of programs or sections of programs for this purpose include substrate timing of the processing steps code, flow rates and temperatures of precursors and other processing gases code, and a code for pressure of the chamber.
The system controller 921 may receive input from the user interface (e.g., an operator entering process parameters, such as a substrate type, temperature requirements, and duration of various stripping operations) and/or various sensors (e.g., thermocouples measuring substrate and platen temperatures, radiation measuring devices, sensors registering positions of a substrates and a platen, pressure measuring devices, and others). The system controller 921 may be connected to actuator mechanisms of each station 911-916 inside the processing chamber 901 and configured to control positions (e.g., raised, lowered, intermediate, variable, or any other position) of each platen based on the input provided to the system controller 911. Various control recipes are presented in the description of the stripping process and other parts of this document. For example, the system controller 921 may receive input that indicates that the next substrate to be processed on station 912 has low-resistivity and that a HDIS striping method should be used. The system controller 921 may verify certain process conditions from one or more sensors (e.g., the temperature of the next substrate as it is received on a platen of the station 912, a temperature of the platen, or substrate resistivity). The system controller 921 may determine that based on all available input, the pedestal should be in a lowered position and may verify the current position of the pedestal. The system controller 921 may then instruct the actuator of the station 912 to move the pedestal into the lowered position. Further, receiving input and adjusting the positions of pedestals may be a dynamic process. The system controller 921 may continuously receive input (e.g., a temperature of a substrate) and readjust the positions of the pedestals throughout operations in order to control substrates' temperatures with greater precision.
Multi-Chamber Apparatus Example
Multi-chamber apparatus 1000 may also have a shared substrate handling robot 1007 for transferring wafers between load locks 1021-1025 and one or more cassettes 1009 or some other components. Each chamber, and even each individual station, may be controlled by a system controller 1011, which may be configured similar to the ones described above with reference to
Processing Examples
Process 1100 may continue with positioning a substrate over the heated pedestal in operation 1102. In certain embodiments, the substrate surface includes low-k dielectric materials or other materials employed in Back End of Line (BEOL) processing. Alternatively, the surface may include silicon (e.g., single crystalline and/or polysilicon) or other materials used in Front End of Line (FEOL) processing.
The pedestal may be in the raised position and be used to support the wafer (either by a direct contact with the substrate-facing surface or a direct contact with a MCA support or both). Alternatively, the pedestal may be in a lowered position and the wafer supported, for example, by fingers of the wafer transfer robot. As indicated above, the temperature of the pedestal, the type of the removable cover, and the vertical position of the pedestal are determined by the temperature requirements of the substrate, which may be different for bulk stripping and HDIS stripping.
Process 1100 then proceeds with removing some or all of the photoresist from the substrate in operation 1104. The pedestal may be retained in the original position or may be adjusted during this operation to achieve more precise temperature control. Plasma may be used to assist with stripping the photoresist. An inert gas may be used, for example, along with an oxidizing agent, such as oxygen, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, carbon tetra-fluoride. Any known plasma source may be used, such as RF plasma, DC plasma, microwave plasma, or any other known plasma source. In a preferred embodiment, a downstream RF plasma source is used. Typically, the RF plasma power for a 300 mm wafer ranges between about 300 Watts to about 10 Kilowatts. In a preferred embodiment, the RF plasma power is between about 3000 Watts and 6000 Watts. The process chamber may be kept at a pressure of between about 300 mTorr to 2 Torr or, more specifically, between about 0.9 Torr and 1.1 Torr. Wafer temperatures may be kept at between about 220° C. and about 300° C.
Process 1100 may proceed with removing the processed substrate from the pedestal in operation 1106. For example, a set of fingers of the internal robot that were residing within the pedestal recesses during processing may raise the substrate and move it to another station or deliver it to another transferring mechanism for removal from the chamber.
Process 1100 may involve periodic inspection of the substrate-facing surface of the pedestal to determine any temperature variations, discolorations, and/or contamination. This inspection may be performed after processing a certain predetermined number of substrates or after each wafer. For example, one or more thermocouples may provide feedback to the system controller about temperature conditions of the substrate-facing surface.
Temperature measurements may be performed by any suitable device including a thermocouple, a pyrometer, an emissometer that measures the infrared radiation coming off the wafer, and the like. Generally, a no-contact temperature measuring device is used to avoid tainting or damaging the wafer. If a contact device is used, it may be contact the underside or edge of the wafer rather than the topside. In a particular embodiment, a blackbody may be placed next to the wafer, with a thermocouple in the blackbody to monitor temperature. In certain embodiments, one or more thermocouples are suspended or supported near the wafer. Multiple thermocouples placed at different points may used to supply additional temperature information. The thermocouple outputs a direct voltage that is an indicator of temperature.
As indicated, the temperature sensing device sends wafer temperature information to a controller, generally in the form of an output voltage. The controller analyzes the data and, in turn, sends instructions to a linear motor to modulate the wafer-pedestal gap and keep the temperature at the desired level. In general, accurate feedback control with small overshoot is necessary. In certain embodiments, the controller is programmed with Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) algorithms for stable and accurate control. In certain embodiments, the motor used to move the pedestal and/or wafer support is a servo controlled linear actuator motor, which receives instructions for a prescribed motion based on input from the thermometry equipment. The motor may have embedded logic circuitry to support the PID closed loop algorithms for gap variance.
Process may include a periodic check for one or more predetermined parameters (block 1108), which may trigger replacement of the removable cover may be replaced in operation 1110. Certain aspects of this replacement operation are described above with reference to
Process 1100 may continue with an inquiry 1112 as to whether additional wafers need to be processed. If so, operations 1102-1110 may be repeated as described above. It should be noted that some process conditions may be different in this new cycle. In fact, the removable cover may be replaced in the previous operation 1100 specifically to change to or to adapt to new process conditions.
In some embodiments, the stripping apparatus may also be used in stripping processes associated with a PLAD (Plasma Assisted Doping) process, which provides very high concentrations (e.g., 1×1016 cm−2 or more) of dopant (typically boron, arsenic, or phosphorous). Higher concentrations make it more difficult to remove crust because dopants that are trapped in the crust are generally less volatile than the oxidized photoresist material. Sometimes, a fluorine-containing compound is added to the plasma to enhance the removal process. In other examples, the substrate is exposed to the first plasma formed from oxygen and a forming gas. The forming gas may include hydrogen (e.g., between about 0.5 and 10 molar percent or, more specifically, between about 4 and 6 molar percent, or, even more specifically, about 5 molar percent). This method may also include a step of forming a thin oxide on the substrate using the oxygen and forming gas in the first plasma. The oxide may be sufficiently thick to prevent or, at least, minimize the loss of silicon when the substrate is exposed to fluorine radicals. For example, the oxide may be between about 0 and 5 nanometers thick or, more specifically, between about 0 and about 2 nanometers.
The forming gas in the first plasma serves as a reducing agent to reduce the crust of the photoresist. In particular, the hydrogen quite effectively reduces boron oxide to more volatile species via the mechanism:
B2O3+H+→BXHY+OZ.
These volatile species can be more easily removed from the semiconductor substrate than the un-reduced crust. In certain embodiments, the first plasma includes an oxygen-to-forming gas ratio of between about 0:1 and 1:0 or, more specifically, between about 1:19 and 19:1 (for example, about 4:1).
After the semiconductor substrate has been exposed to the first plasma for a time sufficient to remove a portion of the photoresist and permit an oxide layer to form on the substrate, the substrate is then subjected to a second plasma. In certain embodiments, the second plasma is formed from oxygen, a forming gas or an inert dilutant (such as, for example, nitrogen or helium), and a fluorine-containing gas that serves as a source of fluorine radicals. The fluorine-containing gas can be nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), hexafluoroethane (C2F6), tetrafluoromethane (CF4), trifluoromethane (CHF3), difluoromethane (CH2F2), octofluoropropane (C3F8), octofluorocyclobutane (C4F8), octofluoro[1-]butane (C4F8), octofluoro[2-]butane (C4F8), octofluoroisobutylene (C4F8), fluorine (F2), and the like. In certain embodiments, the second plasma is formed from oxygen, forming gas or nitrogen, and CF4. In certain embodiments, the second plasma is formed from oxygen present in the range of about 10% to about 100%, forming gas or nitrogen present in the range of about 0% to about 50%, and CF4 present in the range of about 0% to about 20%. In more specific embodiments, the second plasma is formed from oxygen, forming gas or nitrogen, and CF4 in a ratio of oxygen:forming gas or nitrogen:CF4 of about 16:2:0.05. Forming gas may allow for more accurate control of silicon loss because the hydrogen bonds with fluorine radicals. The second plasma removes the photoresist residue and, at a much slower rate, the thin oxide layer while minimizing the silicon consumed during the second plasma process.
In certain embodiments, the semiconductor substrate is maintained at or heated to a temperature in the range of about 16° C. (i.e., room temperature) to about 300° C. during exposure to the second plasma. The time during which the semiconductor substrate is exposed to the second plasma is a function of the thickness of the photoresist residue after the first plasma process. The semiconductor substrate is also maintained at a pressure in the range of about 1 mTorr to about 1 Atmosphere and preferably about 0.1 Ton to about 10 Torr. It will be understood that exposure to the first plasma and exposure to the second plasma can be performed as two discrete steps, for example, with a purge step performed therebetween, or can be performed as one continuous plasma flow step with the composition of the continuous plasma flow changing from the composition of the first plasma to the composition of the second plasma. Overall, a removable cover of the pedestal is made from one or more materials resistant to the processing environments describe above.
Patterning Method/Apparatus Examples
The apparatus/process described herein above may be used in conjunction with lithographic patterning tools or processes, for example, for the fabrication or manufacture of semiconductor devices, displays, LEDs, photovoltaic panels and the like. Typically, though not necessarily, such tools/processes will be used or conducted together in a common fabrication facility. Lithographic patterning of a film typically includes some or all of the following steps, with each step enabled with a number of possible tools: (1) application of photoresist on a workpiece (i.e., substrate) using a spin-on or spray-on tool; (2) curing of photoresist using a hot plate, furnace, or UV curing tool; (3) exposing the photoresist to visible, UV, or x-ray light with a tool such as a wafer stepper; (4) developing the resist so as to selectively remove resist and thereby pattern it using a tool such as a wet bench; (5) transferring the resist pattern into an underlying film or workpiece by using a dry or plasma-assisted etching tool; and (6) removing the resist using a tool such as an RF or microwave plasma resist stripper.
Experimental Results
That a ceramic cover positioned over an aluminum pedestal has proved to be an effective thermal spreader is supported by the experimental results presented in
The results show that a large portion of the substrate-facing surface of cover 1204 was at 397.8° C., while a smaller outer edge portion was at 398.4° C. At the same time, an upper surface of pedestal 1202 was evenly divided into a 401.1° C. zone, 401.6° C. zone, and 402.2° C. zone. Without being restricted to any particular theory, it is believed that the temperature profile of the upper surface may have been even less uniform if cover 1204 was not used. It is believed that cover 1204 may have also helped with heat distribution in the upper surface of the pedestal 1202. Overall, these results indicate that the addition of a cover provides a much more uniform temperature profile of the substrate-facing surface than does a pedestal without a cover.
Although the foregoing concepts have been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be apparent that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the appended claims. It should be noted that there are many alternative ways of implementing the processes, systems, and apparatuses. Accordingly, the present embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive.
This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/086,010, filed Apr. 13, 2011, and titled “PEDESTAL COVERS,” which is incorporated herein by this reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3612825 | Chase et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
4457359 | Holden | Jul 1984 | A |
4535835 | Holden | Aug 1985 | A |
4563589 | Scheffer | Jan 1986 | A |
4615755 | Tracy et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4949783 | Lakios et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5113929 | Nakagawa et al. | May 1992 | A |
5178682 | Tsukamoto et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5228208 | White et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5282121 | Bornhorst et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5447431 | Muka | Sep 1995 | A |
5558717 | Zhao et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5562947 | White et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5588827 | Muka | Dec 1996 | A |
5811762 | Tseng | Sep 1998 | A |
5942075 | Nagahata et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6072163 | Armstrong et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6087632 | Mizosaki et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6200634 | Johnsgard et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6214184 | Chien et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228438 | Schmitt | May 2001 | B1 |
6307184 | Womack et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6320736 | Shamouilian et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6394797 | Sugaya et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6413321 | Kim et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6435869 | Kitamura | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6467491 | Sugiura et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6544340 | Yudovsky | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6559424 | O'Carroll et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6561796 | Barrera et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6563092 | Shrinivasan et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6563686 | Tsai et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6639189 | Ramanan et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6753508 | Shirakawa | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6768084 | Liu et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6800173 | Chiang et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6851403 | Durr et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6860965 | Stevens | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6887523 | Zhuang et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6895179 | Kanno | May 2005 | B2 |
6899765 | Krivts et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7024105 | Fodor et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7105463 | Kurita et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7138606 | Kanno et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7154731 | Kueper | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7189432 | Chiang et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7194199 | Yoo | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7253125 | Bandyopadhyay et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7265061 | Cho et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7311782 | Strang et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7318869 | Chiang et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7327948 | Shrinivasan et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7410355 | Granneman et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7576303 | Natsuhara et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7665951 | Kurita et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7845891 | Lee et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7941039 | Shrinivasan et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7960297 | Rivkin et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7981763 | Van Schravendijk et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8033771 | Gage et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8047706 | Goodman et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8052419 | Nordin et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8137465 | Shrinivasan et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8273670 | Rivkin et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8288288 | Gage et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8371567 | Angelov et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8454294 | Gage et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
20020117109 | Hazelton et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020162630 | Satoh et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030013280 | Yamanaka | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030113187 | Lei et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040018751 | Kusuda | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040023513 | Aoyama et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040060917 | Liu et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040183226 | Newell et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040187790 | Bader et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050006230 | Narushima et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050045616 | Ishihara | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050173412 | Kondou et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050226793 | Sakakura et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050258164 | Hiramatsu et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060018639 | Ramamurthy et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060075960 | Borgini et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060081186 | Shinriki et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060196425 | Hwang et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070029046 | Li et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070107845 | Ishizawa et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070205788 | Natsuhara et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070243057 | Shimada et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070283709 | Luse et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080102644 | Goto et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080134820 | Bjorck et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080217319 | Saule et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090060480 | Herchen | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090142167 | Gage et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090147819 | Goodman et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090277472 | Rivkin et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100163183 | Tanaka et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100270004 | Landess et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110318142 | Gage et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120264051 | Angelov et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130175005 | Gowdaru et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 746 009 | Dec 1996 | EP |
61264649 | Nov 1986 | JP |
62-229833 | Oct 1987 | JP |
01-107519 | Apr 1989 | JP |
06037054 | Feb 1994 | JP |
07-090582 | Apr 1995 | JP |
07147274 | Jun 1995 | JP |
08-316215 | Nov 1996 | JP |
09-092615 | Apr 1997 | JP |
2000-286243 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2002-246375 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002-373862 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003-324048 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2005116655 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2006-210372 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2007-158074 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2009-218536 | Sep 2009 | JP |
20030096732 | Dec 2003 | KR |
10-0836183 | Jun 2008 | KR |
0019492 | Apr 2000 | WO |
0211911 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 2009001866 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2010068598 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO 2010101191 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO 2012141722 | Oct 2012 | WO |
WO 2013103594 | Jul 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 11/751,584, filed May 21, 2007, entitled “Cast pedestal with heating element on coaxial heat exchanger”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/370,579, filed Feb. 10, 2012, entitled “Single-chamber sequential curing of semiconductor wafers”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/546,189, filed Oct. 10, 2006, entitled “Concave Pedestal for Uniform Heating of Silicon Wafers”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/102,858, filed May 6, 2011, entitled “Load Lock Design for Rapid Wafer Heating”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/276,202, filed Oct. 18, 2011, “Closed Loop Temperature Heat Up and Control Utilizing Wafer-To-Heater Pedestal Gap Modulation”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/140,196, filed Jun. 16, 2008, entitled “Transferring Heat in Loadlocks”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/050,880, filed May 6, 2008, entitled “Photoresist Stripping Method and Apparatus”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/129,266, filed May 12, 2005, “Tailored profile pedestal for thermo-elastically stable cooling for heating of substrates”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/086,010, filed Apr. 13, 2011, entitled “High Temperature Pedestal Overlay for Stable & Uniform Heat Transfer”. |
US Office Action, dated Oct. 3, 2007, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/115,576. |
US Final Office Action, dated May 2, 2008, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/115,576. |
US Office Action, dated Oct. 17, 2008, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/115,576. |
US Final Office Action, dated Apr. 22, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/115,576. |
US Office Action, dated Apr. 15, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/115,576. |
US Office Action, dated Jul. 18, 2006, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/184,101. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee Due, dated Jan. 25, 2007, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/184,101. |
US Office Action, dated Jun. 8, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/851,310. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 5, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/851,310. |
US Office Action, dated Jun. 16, 2008, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/546,189. |
US Final Office Action, dated Oct. 16, 2008, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/546,189. |
US Office Action, dated Apr. 26, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/608,185. |
US Office Action, dated Nov. 26, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/608,185. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 22, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/608,185. |
US Office Action, dated Aug. 8, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/102,858. |
US Office Action, dated Jan. 23, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/102,858. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 26, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/102,858. |
US Office Action, dated Apr. 9, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,364. |
US Final Office Action, dated Dec. 27, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,364. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 19, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,364. |
US Office Action, dated Oct. 24, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/276,202. |
US Office Action, dated Jan. 4, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/140,196. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 15, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/140,196. |
US Office Action, dated Dec. 28, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/435,890. |
US Final Office Action, dated Apr. 12, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/435,890. |
US Office Action, dated Aug. 22, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/435,890. |
US Office Action, dated Dec. 27, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/333,239. |
US Final Office Action, dated Mar. 9, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/333,239. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 27, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/333,239. |
US Office Action, dated Oct. 22, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/227,160. |
US Office Action, dated Feb. 20, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/129,266. |
US Office Action, dated Oct. 28, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/129,266. |
US Office Action, dated Feb. 6, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,170. |
US Final Office Action, dated Jun. 20, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,170. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Oct. 10, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/086,010. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Apr. 6, 2012, issued in WO Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/034819. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Aug. 2, 2010, issued in WO Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/067040. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/621,060, filed Sep. 15, 2012, entitled “Transferring Heat in Loadlocks”. |
US Final Office Action, dated Jun. 6, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/276,202. |
US Office Action, dated Feb. 28, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/435,890. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 27, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/227,160. |
PCT International Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Jun. 3, 2011, issued in PCT/US2009/067040. |
Chinese First Office Action dated Jan. 23, 2013 issued in CN 200980149339.5. |
Chinese Second Office Action dated Sep. 11, 2013 issued in CN 200980149339.5. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Oct. 24, 2013, issued in PCT/US2011/034819. |
JP Notice of Reasons for Rejection dated Apr. 9, 2013 issued in JP 2013-510129. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Apr. 12, 2013 issued in PCT/US2012/071976. |
US Final Office Action, dated Jan. 30, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/276,202. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130122431 A1 | May 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13086010 | Apr 2011 | US |
Child | 13736410 | US |