Pharmaceutical and other packaging with low oxygen transmission rate

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11077233
  • Patent Number
    11,077,233
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, August 18, 2016
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 3, 2021
    3 years ago
Abstract
Processing an evacuated blood sample collection tube or other vessel by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition to apply a tie coating or layer (289), a barrier coating or layer (288), and optionally one or more additional coatings or layers. The tie coating or layer of SiOxCy is applied under partial vacuum and, while maintaining the partial vacuum unbroken in the lumen, the barrier coating or layer is applied. Then optionally, while maintaining the partial vacuum unbroken in the lumen, a pH protective coating or layer of SiOxCy can be applied. As a result of this processing, a coated vessel is produced having a lower gas permeation rate constant into the lumen than a corresponding vessel made by the same process except breaking the partial vacuum in the lumen between applying the tie coating or layer and applying the barrier coating or layer. Retention features are also described for keeping the vessels stoppered during exposure to reduced ambient pressure.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to the technical field of barrier coated surfaces, for example interior surfaces of pharmaceutical packages or other vessels for storing or other contact with fluids. Examples of suitable fluids include foods, nutritional supplements, drugs, inhalation anaesthetics, diagnostic test materials, or biologically active compounds or body fluids, for example blood. The present invention also relates to a blood collection tube or other vessel having a gas barrier coating and optionally a pH protective coating to protect the gas barrier coating.


The present disclosure also relates to improved methods for processing pharmaceutical packages or other vessels, for example multiple identical pharmaceutical packages or other vessels used for pharmaceutical preparation storage and delivery, venipuncture and other medical sample collection (for example evacuated blood sample collection tubes), and other purposes.


The present disclosure also relates to the resulting packages pharmaceutical packages or other vessels. Such pharmaceutical packages or other vessels are used in large numbers, and must be relatively economical to manufacture and yet highly reliable in storage and use.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

One important consideration in manufacturing pharmaceutical packages or other vessels for storing or other contact with fluids, for example vials, pre-filled syringes, or sample collection tubes, is that the contents of the pharmaceutical package or other vessel desirably will have a substantial shelf life. During this shelf life, it is important to isolate any material contained in the pharmaceutical package or other vessel from the vessel wall containing it, or from barrier layers or other functional layers applied to the pharmaceutical package or other vessel wall to avoid extracting material from the pharmaceutical package or other vessel wall, barrier layer, or other functional layers into the prefilled contents or vice versa.


Some companies have turned to plastic pharmaceutical packages or other vessels, which provide greater dimensional tolerance and less breakage than glass, but the use of plastic for primary pharmaceutical packaging remains limited due to its relatively high gas (oxygen) permeation rate: Plastic allows small molecule gases to permeate into (or out of) the article. The permeation rate constants of plastics to gases are significantly greater than that of glass and, in many cases (as with oxygen-sensitive drugs such as epinephrine), plastics have been unacceptable for that reason.


The problem of the relatively high permeation rate constant of thermoplastic vessels has been addressed by adding a barrier coating or layer to the vessel wall. One such barrier layer is a very thin coating of SiOx, as defined below, applied by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition to the internal surface of the wall defining the lumen. But, current SiOx barrier layers deposited on a package by PECVD are etched off by aqueous contents of the vessels having pH-values greater than 4, particularly at higher pH values. This reduces the useful shelf life of the vessel as its barrier efficacy is reduced.


Consider more particularly evacuated blood sample collection tubes, which are sold with the lumen evacuated. The vacuum is used to draw blood from a patient into the tube, and the level of vacuum determines its draw volume capacity—how much blood the tube can draw before the pressure is equalized and flow stops. Evacuated blood sample collection tubes made of polymeric thermoplastic material are permeable to atmospheric gases such as air or its component gases such as oxygen and nitrogen, which reduce the vacuum level within the tube as time passes. If the vacuum is reduced too much, insufficient blood will be drawn to meet the specifications of the sample tube. A common specification is that, throughout its shelf life, the evacuated blood sample collection tube must maintain a draw volume capacity of at least 90% of the draw volume capacity of a newly evacuated vessel of the same kind. A barrier coating or layer is useful to prevent atmospheric gases from entering the thermoplastic polymeric vessel during its shelf life and thus provide a tube that meets this specification over a desirably long shelf life.


Many such sample tubes also contain a reagent which is introduced at the time of manufacture and remains in the lumen until blood or another sample is introduced and contacted with the reagent. The reagent may be in contact with the vessel wall and any coatings on the wall for as long as the shelf life of the sample collection tube. Many such aqueous reagents, for example the buffered sodium citrate reagent commonly used to prevent coagulation of blood introduced into the blood sample collection tube, may damage the SiOx barrier coating or layer if directly in contact with the barrier coating or layer. Consequently, it has been found useful to apply over the barrier protective coating or layer a pH protective coating or layer to prevent direct contact between the barrier coating or layer and the reagent or other contents in the lumen.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An aspect of the invention is a method of processing a vessel to apply a tie coating or layer (289), a barrier coating or layer, and optionally one or more additional coatings or layers.


To carry out the process, a vessel is provided including a wall consisting essentially of thermoplastic polymeric material defining a lumen. The wall has an inside surface (303) facing the lumen and an outside surface.


During the process, a partial vacuum is drawn in the lumen. While maintaining the partial vacuum unbroken in the lumen, a tie coating or layer of SiOxCy is applied by a tie PECVD coating process. The tie PECVD coating process is carried out by applying sufficient power to generate plasma within the lumen while feeding a gas suitable for forming the coating. The gas feed includes a linear siloxane precursor, optionally oxygen, and optionally an inert gas diluent. The values of x and y are as determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Then, while maintaining the partial vacuum unbroken in the lumen, the plasma is extinguished. A tie coating or layer of SiOxCy, for which x is from about 0.5 to about 2.4 and y is from about 0.6 to about 3, is produced on the inside surface as a result.


Later during the process, while maintaining the partial vacuum unbroken in the lumen, a barrier coating or layer is applied by a barrier PECVD coating process. The barrier PECVD coating process is carried out by applying sufficient power to generate plasma within the lumen while feeding a gas. The gas feed includes a linear siloxane precursor and oxygen. A barrier coating or layer of SiOx, wherein x is from 1.5 to 2.9 as determined by XPS is produced between the tie coating or layer and the lumen as a result.


Then optionally, while maintaining the partial vacuum unbroken in the lumen, the plasma is extinguished.


Later, as a further option, a pH protective coating or layer of SiOxCy can be applied. In this formula as well, x is from about 0.5 to about 2.4 and y is from about 0.6 to about 3, each as determined by XPS. The pH protective coating or layer is optionally applied between the barrier coating or layer and the lumen, by a pH protective PECVD coating process. This process includes applying sufficient power to generate plasma within the lumen while feeding a gas including a linear siloxane precursor, optionally oxygen, and optionally an inert gas diluent.


As a result of this processing, a coated vessel is produced having a lower gas permeation rate constant into the lumen than a corresponding vessel made by the same process except breaking the partial vacuum in the lumen between applying the tie coating or layer and applying the barrier coating or layer.


Another aspect of the invention is an evacuated blood collection tube made according to any of the methods described above.


Another aspect of the invention is a coated vessel comprising a wall, a tie coating or layer, a barrier coating or layer, and optionally a pH protective coating or layer, made by the process defined below.


The wall consists essentially of thermoplastic polymeric material defining a lumen. The wall has an interior surface facing the lumen and an exterior surface.


The tie coating or layer consists essentially of SiOxCy, wherein x is from about 0.5 to about 2.4 and y is from about 0.6 to about 3, each as determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), on the interior surface.


The barrier coating or layer consists essentially of SiOx, wherein x is from 1.5 to 2.9 as determined by XPS, between the tie coating or layer and the lumen.


The optional pH protective coating or layer consists essentially of SiOxCy, wherein x is from about 0.5 to about 2.4 and y is from about 0.6 to about 3, each as determined by XPS, between the barrier coating or layer and the lumen.


The coated vessel is formed by a process comprising several steps. A vessel is provided comprising the wall. A partial vacuum is drawn in the lumen. While maintaining the partial vacuum unbroken in the lumen, the tie coating or layer of SiOxCy is applied by a tie PECVD process comprising applying sufficient power (alternatively the same concept is referred to in this specification as “energy”) to generate plasma within the lumen while feeding a gas comprising a linear siloxane precursor, optionally oxygen, and optionally an inert gas diluent.


Then, while maintaining the partial vacuum unbroken in the lumen, the plasma is extinguished. After that, while still maintaining the partial vacuum unbroken in the lumen, the barrier coating or layer is applied by a barrier PECVD process comprising applying sufficient power to generate plasma within the lumen while feeding a gas comprising a linear siloxane precursor and oxygen.


If the optional pH protective coating or layer is applied, this may optionally be done according to the following process.


Optionally after applying the barrier coating or layer, while maintaining the partial vacuum unbroken in the lumen, the plasma is extinguished.


Then optionally, while maintaining the partial vacuum unbroken in the lumen, the pH protective coating or layer of SiOxCy is applied by a pH protective PECVD process. The pH protective PECVD process comprises applying sufficient power to generate plasma within the lumen while feeding a gas comprising a linear siloxane precursor, optionally oxygen, and optionally an inert gas diluent.


The result of the process is a coated vessel.


Surprisingly, the coated vessel made by this process has a lower gas permeation rate constant into the lumen than a corresponding vessel made by the same process except breaking the partial vacuum in the lumen between applying the tie coating or layer and applying the barrier coating or layer. Alternatively, the coated vessel made by this process including the optional steps has a lower gas permeation rate constant into the lumen than a corresponding vessel made by the same process except breaking the partial vacuum in the lumen between applying the tie coating or layer and the barrier coating or layer, and also breaking the partial vacuum in the lumen between applying the barrier coating or layer and the pH protective coating or layer.


Another aspect of the invention is an evacuated blood collection tube comprising a coated vessel as defined above and a closure sealing the lumen. The lumen has a vacuum level sufficient to draw blood from a patient's vein into the lumen.


Still another aspect of the invention is an evacuated blood collection tube which can be a thermoplastic vessel wall having a top defining an opening, an inside surface defining a lumen, an outside surface, and a stopper contact area on the inside surface adjacent to the top. The stopper contact area is tapered inward from 0 to 1.3 degrees.


A still further aspect of the invention is an evacuated blood collection tube including: a thermoplastic vessel wall having a top, an inside surface defining a lumen, and an outside surface. A retention lip projects radially inward from the inside surface. The inside surface includes a stopper contact area adjacent to and below the retention lip.


Further aspects, features, and embodiments of the invention are provided in the following description and claims.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic sectional view of a vessel according to any embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 2 is an enlarged detail view of a portion of the vessel wall and coatings of FIG. 1.



FIG. 3 is a plot of oxygen permeability rate constant (OPRC) vs. storage time with pH 9 buffered phosphate solution for 6 mL vials made according to the present invention (“all combined”) with a trilayer coating, compared to similar vials made with a vacuum break between layers.



FIG. 4 is a top plan view of a more detailed embodiment of a pharmaceutical package or vessel of FIGS. 1 and 2, suitable for use as an evacuated blood collection tube.



FIG. 5 is a longitudinal section of the embodiment of FIG. 4, taken along the section line 5-5 of FIG. 4.



FIG. 6 is an enlarged fragmentary detail view of FIG. 5.



FIG. 7 is a Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrophotometer (FTIR) plot for a pH protective layer made according to the present description.





The following reference characters are used in the drawing figures:















210
Pharmaceutical package or vessel


212
Lumen


214
Wall


216
Closure


285
Vessel coating or layer set


286
pH protective coating or layer


288
Barrier coating or layer


289
Tie coating or layer


291
Stopper contact area (of 210)


293
Retention lip


295
Top (of 210)


297
Lower end (of 293)


299
Lower ramp


301
Upper ramp


303
Inside surface (of 214)


305
Outside surface (of 214)


307
Lower end (of 301)









Definitions

In the context of the present invention, the following definitions and abbreviations are used:


RF is radio frequency.


The term “at least” in the context of the present invention means “equal or more” than the integer following the term. The word “comprising” does not exclude other elements or steps, and the indefinite article “a” or “an” does not exclude a plurality unless indicated otherwise. Whenever a parameter range is indicated, it is intended to disclose the parameter values given as limits of the range and all values of the parameter falling within said range.


“First” and “second” or similar references to anything refer to the minimum number of such things that are present, but do not necessarily represent the order or total number of such things or require additional such things beyond the stated number. For example, a “first” deposit in the context of this specification can be either the only deposit or any one of plural deposits, without limitation. In other words, recitation of a “first” deposit allows but does not require an embodiment that also has a second or further deposit.


For purposes of the present invention, an “organosilicon precursor” is a compound having at least one of the linkages:




embedded image



which is a tetravalent silicon atom connected to an oxygen or nitrogen atom and an organic carbon atom (an organic carbon atom being a carbon atom bonded to at least one hydrogen atom). A volatile organosilicon precursor, defined as such a precursor that can be supplied as a vapor in a PECVD apparatus, is an optional organosilicon precursor. Optionally, the organosilicon precursor is selected from the group consisting of a linear siloxane, a monocyclic siloxane, a polycyclic siloxane, a polysilsesquioxane, an alkyl trimethoxysilane; a linear silazane, a monocyclic silazane, a polycyclic silazane, a polysilsesquiazane, and a combination of any two or more of these precursors.


The feed amounts of PECVD precursors, gaseous reactant or process gases, and carrier gas are sometimes expressed in “standard volumes” in the specification and claims. The standard volume of a charge or other fixed amount of gas is the volume the fixed amount of the gas would occupy at a standard temperature and pressure (without regard to the actual temperature and pressure of delivery). Standard volumes can be measured using different units of volume, and still be within the scope of the present disclosure and claims. For example, the same fixed amount of gas could be expressed as the number of standard cubic centimeters, the number of standard cubic meters, or the number of standard cubic feet. Standard volumes can also be defined using different standard temperatures and pressures, and still be within the scope of the present disclosure and claims. For example, the standard temperature might be 0° C. and the standard pressure might be 760 Torr (as is conventional), or the standard temperature might be 20° C. and the standard pressure might be 1 Torr. But whatever standard is used in a given case, when comparing relative amounts of two or more different gases without specifying particular parameters, the same units of volume, standard temperature, and standard pressure are to be used relative to each gas, unless otherwise indicated.


The corresponding feed rates of PECVD precursors, gaseous reactant or process gases, and carrier gas are expressed in standard volumes per unit of time in the specification. For example, in the working examples the flow rates are expressed as standard cubic centimeters per minute, abbreviated as sccm. As with the other parameters, other units of time can be used, such as seconds or hours, but consistent parameters are to be used when comparing the flow rates of two or more gases, unless otherwise indicated.


A “vessel” in the context of the present invention can be any type of vessel with a wall defining an inner or interior surface. Though the invention is not necessarily limited to sample collection tubes, pharmaceutical packages, or other vessels of a particular volume, pharmaceutical packages or other vessels are contemplated in which the lumen has a void volume of from 0.5 to 250 mL, optionally from 1 to 20 mL, optionally from 0.5 to 12 mL, optionally from 1 to 3 mL. The substrate surface can be part or all of the inner or interior surface of a vessel having at least one opening and an inner or interior surface. Some examples of pharmaceutical and other packages and vessels include, but are not limited to, a sample collection tube, an evacuated blood sample collection tube (which commonly is provided in a small size containing about 6 mL or a large size containing about 12 mL), a sample storage tube, a vial, a plastic-coated vial, a syringe, a plastic coated syringe, a blister pack, an ampoule, a plastic coated ampoule, a cartridge, a bottle, a plastic coated bottle, a centrifuge tube, a chromatography vial, tubing, a pouch, a pump, a sprayer, a stopper, a needle, a plunger, a cap, a stent, a catheter or an implant.


Additionally, a vessel according to the present invention can be a sample tube, for example for collecting or storing biological fluids like blood or urine, a syringe part, for example a syringe barrel, for storing or delivering a biologically active compound or composition, for example a medicament or pharmaceutical composition, a vial for storing biological materials or biologically active compounds or compositions, a pipe or tubing, for example a catheter for transporting biological materials or biologically active compounds or compositions, or a cuvette for holding fluids, for example for holding biological materials or biologically active compounds or compositions.


A vessel can be of any shape. A vessel having a substantially cylindrical wall adjacent to at least one of its open ends is preferred. Generally, the interior wall of the vessel is cylindrically shaped, like, for example in a sample tube or a syringe barrel. Sample tubes and syringes or their parts (for example syringe barrels) are contemplated.


The values of w, x, y, and z are applicable to the empirical composition SiwOxCyHz throughout this specification, and the same values of x and y are applicable to the empirical composition SiOxCy throughout this specification. The values of w, x, y, and z should be understood as ratios or an empirical formula (for example for a coating or layer), rather than as a limit on the number or type of atoms in a molecule. For example, octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane, which has the molecular composition Si4O4C8H24, can be described by the following empirical formula, arrived at by dividing each of w, x, y, and z in the molecular formula by 4, the largest common factor: Si1O1C2H6. The values of w, x, y, and z are also not limited to integers. For example, (acyclic) octamethyltrisiloxane, molecular composition Si3O2C8H24, is reducible to Si100.67C2.67H8.


The atomic ratio of SiwOxCyHz can only be partially determined by XPS, since H atoms are not detectable by XPS. Hydrogen atoms are, however, detectable using a different analysis, for example Rutherford Backscattering or Rutherford Forward Scattering. A particular coating or layer may thus in one aspect be expressed by the formula SiwOxCyHz, for example where w is 1, x is from about 0.5 to about 2.4, y is from about 0.6 to about 3, and z is from about 2 to about 9. The same particular coating or layer can alternatively be characterized by XPS only, without accounting for hydrogen, and thus expressed by the formula SiOxCy, in which x is from about 0.5 to about 2.4 and y is from about 0.6 to about 3. SiOxCy, has no subscript following Si, which has the same meaning as a subscript w of 1 in the formula SiwOxCyHz. In this specification, XPS is generally used without accounting for hydrogen, and the atomic ratio is expressed as SiOxCy. Typically, such coating or layer would hence contain 36% to 41% carbon normalized to 100% carbon plus oxygen plus silicon.


The term “syringe” is broadly defined to include cartridges, injection “pens,” and other types of barrels or reservoirs adapted to be assembled with one or more other components to provide a functional syringe. “Syringe” is also broadly defined to include related articles such as auto-injectors, which provide a mechanism for dispensing the contents.


Processing a vessel “while maintaining the partial vacuum unbroken in the lumen” of a vessel means continuing processing of the vessel without introducing sufficient gas into the lumen to bring its pressure to substantially, exactly, or more than ambient atmospheric pressure.


The gas permeation rate constant into the lumen (abbreviated as GPRC) is a characteristic of the vessel wall, and means the instantaneous rate of permeation of the atmosphere or some other specified gas (in μmol or micromoles per day) from outside a closed container into the lumen of the container through its wall, for a wall surface area of 1 cm2 and a gas partial pressure difference of 1 atmosphere (standard atmosphere pressure) across the wall. The gas permeation rate constant can be measured in units of μmol/(day×cm2×atm.) This term does not include gas bypassing the wall, as by leaking between the wall and a closure or permeating through the closure.


“The coated vessel having lower gas permeation rate constant into the lumen than a corresponding vessel made by the same process except breaking the partial vacuum in the lumen between applying the adhesion coating or layer and applying the barrier coating or layer” is largely self-explanatory. In the context of this language, “breaking the partial vacuum in the lumen” means introducing sufficient gas into the lumen to bring its pressure to substantially, exactly, or more than ambient atmospheric pressure.


The shelf life of a vessel is defined as the period of time after the date of manufacture when the vessel can be used and function properly. For example, the shelf life of an evacuated blood collection tube is the period of time after the date of evacuation when the evacuated blood collection tube maintains a draw volume capacity of at least 90% of the draw volume capacity of a newly evacuated vessel of the same kind.


The change in draw volume capacity can be measured directly by a physical measurement of draw volume versus time, or it can be estimated by applying a multiplier to the oxygen permeation rate constant (OPRC) to account for the nitrogen permeation rate constant of the vessel in question, then determining the combined oxygen plus nitrogen permeation rate constant. The remaining gases in ambient air are usually too dilute to be determined for this calculation.


As a rule of thumb, the ratio of nitrogen and oxygen permeation rate constants is fairly constant for a wide range of polymers (D. W. van Krevelen, Properties of Polymers, 1990, Table 18.6). The permeation rate constant of oxygen is about 3.8 times the permeation rate constant of nitrogen in the same polymer.









TABLE 18.6







Relative values of permeability parameters (Rules of thumb)














Gas
P
D
S
EP
ED


















N2 = 1)
1  
1
1
1  
1  



CO
1.2
1.1
1.1
1  
1  



CH4
3.4
0.7
4.9
(1)  
(1)  



O2
3.8
1.7
2.2
0.86
0.90



He
15  
60
0.25
0.62
0.45



H2
22.5 
30
0.75
0.70
0.65



CO2
24  
1
24
0.75
1.03



H2O
(550)   
5

0.75
0.75










DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention will now be described more fully, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which several embodiments are shown. This invention can, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth here. Rather, these embodiments are examples of the invention, which has the full scope indicated by the language of the claims. Like numbers refer to like or corresponding elements throughout. The following disclosure relates to all embodiments unless specifically limited to a certain embodiment.


Vessels and Coating Sets


The contemplated coated vessel, including the vessel illustrated in FIGS. 1, 2, and 4-6, comprises a wall 214 and a vessel coating or layer set 285, comprising a tie coating or layer 289, a barrier coating or layer 288, and optionally a pH protective coating or layer 286 on at least a portion of the wall 214 facing the lumen 212, made by the process defined below.


The vessel may be more specifically a sample collection tube such as an evacuated blood collection tube, a vial, a syringe, a blister pack, an ampoule, a cartridge, a bottle, a pouch, a pump, a sprayer, a stopper, a needle, a plunger, a cap, a stent, a catheter or an implant, or any other type of container or conduit for a fluid. FIGS. 1 and 2 show a vessel having at least a single opening, and should be understood to include a vessel having two or more openings, such as a syringe, or a vessel having no openings, such as a pouch, blister pack, or ampoule. The wall can be made of any thermoplastic polymeric material, which optionally comprises a polyester, polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyethylene naphthalate (PEN); a polyolefin, cyclic olefin polymer (COP), cyclic olefin copolymer (COC), polypropylene (PP), or a polycarbonate, preferably COP. If water permeability is less important than oxygen permeability, a PET wall is expressly contemplated, as PET has more water permeability but roughly an order of magnitude less oxygen permeability than COP.


An embodiment of the vessel coating or layer set 285 is at least one tie coating or layer 289, at least one barrier coating or layer 288, and at least one pH protective coating or layer 286 (which is optional), illustrated in FIGS. 1, 2. This embodiment of the vessel coating or layer set with all three coatings is sometimes known as a “trilayer coating” in which the barrier coating or layer 288 of SiOx is protected against contents having a pH otherwise high enough to remove it by being sandwiched between the pH protective coating or layer 286 and the tie coating or layer 289, each an organic layer of SiOxCy as defined in this specification. Specific examples of this trilayer coating is provided in this specification.


In addition to its average atomic proportions expressed by the formula SiOxCy, the pH protective coating or layer 286 can be characterized by its FTIR spectrum, a representative example of which is shown in FIG. 7. The peak assignments for the pH protective coating or layer 286 are:












Chemical Bonds Wavenumber (cm−1)


















Si—O—Si (asymmetric stretch)
1080-1200



Si—O—Si (symmetric stretch)
1020-1080



C—H
2960



Si—H
2100



Si—CH3
1273



Si—(CH3)x
800-830










Commonly in the FTIR spectrum for the pH protective coating or layer 286, the Si—O—Si symmetric stretch and asymmetric stretch peaks appear to merge, forming a simple peak, while in the spectra for lubricity coatings (referred to for example in U.S. Pat. No. 7,985,188) the Si—O—Si symmetric stretch and asymmetric stretch peaks form a compound peak having a shoulder on the lower wave number side (the right side in FIG. 7), the shoulder being indicative of asymmetric stretch.


The contemplated thicknesses of the respective layers in nm (preferred ranges in parentheses) are given in the Trilayer Thickness Table 1.












Trilayer Thickness Table 1









Adhesion
Barrier
Protection





 5-100
 20-200
 50-500


(5-20)
(20-30)
(100-200)









The trilayer coating set 285 optionally includes as a first layer an adhesion or tie coating or layer 289 that improves adhesion of the barrier coating or layer to the COP substrate. The adhesion or tie coating or layer 289 is also believed to relieve stress on the barrier coating or layer 288, making the barrier layer less subject to damage from thermal expansion or contraction or mechanical shock. The adhesion or tie coating or layer 289 is also believed to decouple defects between the barrier coating or layer 288 and the COP substrate. This is believed to occur because any pinholes or other defects that may be formed when the adhesion or tie coating or layer 289 is applied tend not to be continued when the barrier coating or layer 288 is applied, so the pinholes or other defects in one coating do not line up with defects in the other. The adhesion or tie coating or layer 289 has some efficacy as a barrier layer, so even a defect providing a leakage path extending through the barrier coating or layer 289 is blocked by the adhesion or tie coating or layer 289.


The trilayer coating set 285 includes as a second layer a barrier coating or layer 288 that provides a barrier to oxygen that has permeated the COP barrel wall. The barrier coating or layer 288 also is a barrier to extraction of the composition of the barrel wall 214 by the contents of the lumen 214.


The trilayer coating set 285 optionally includes as a third layer a pH protective coating or layer 286 that provides protection of the underlying barrier coating or layer 288 against contents of the vessel having a pH from 4 to 8 or more, including where a surfactant is present. For a prefilled vessel that is in contact with the contents of the vessel from the time it is manufactured to the time it is used, the pH protective coating or layer 286 prevents or inhibits attack of the barrier coating or layer 288 sufficiently to maintain an effective oxygen barrier over the intended shelf life of the prefilled vessel.


The rate of erosion, dissolution, extraction, or leaching (different names for related concepts) of the pH protective coating or layer 286, if directly contacted by a fluid having a pH of from 5 to 9, is less than the rate of erosion of the barrier coating or layer 288, if directly contacted by the fluid having a pH of from 5 to 9. The pH protective coating or layer 286 is effective to isolate a fluid 218 having a pH between 5 and 9 from the barrier coating or layer 288, at least for sufficient time to allow the barrier coating to act as a barrier during the shelf life of the pharmaceutical package or other vessel 210.


Oxygen permeation rate constant (OPRC) is deemed appropriate to verify integrity of barrier coatings.


Tie Coating or Layer


The tie coating or layer consists essentially of SiOxCy, wherein x is from about 0.5 to about 2.4 and y is from about 0.6 to about 3, each as determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), on the interior surface.


The tie coating or layer 289 has at least two functions. One function of the tie coating or layer 289 is to improve adhesion of a barrier coating or layer 288 to a substrate, in particular a thermoplastic substrate, although a tie layer can be used to improve adhesion to a glass substrate or to another coating or layer. For example, a tie coating or layer, also referred to as an adhesion layer or coating, can be applied to the substrate and the barrier layer can be applied to the adhesion layer to improve adhesion of the barrier layer or coating to the substrate.


Another function of the tie coating or layer 289 has been discovered: a tie coating or layer 289 applied under a barrier coating or layer 288 can improve the function of a pH protective coating or layer 286 applied over the barrier coating or layer 288.


The tie coating or layer 289 can be composed of, comprise, or consist essentially of SiOxCy, in which x is between 0.5 and 2.4 and y is between 0.6 and 3. The atomic ratios of Si, 0, and C in the tie coating or layer 289 are, as several options:

    • Si 100: O 50-150: C 90-200 (i.e. w=1, x=0.5 to 1.5, y=0.9 to 2);
    • Si 100: O 70-130: C 90-200 (i.e. w=1, x=0.7 to 1.3, y=0.9 to 2)
    • Si 100: O 80-120: C 90-150 (i.e. w=1, x=0.8 to 1.2, y=0.9 to 1.5)
    • Si 100: O 90-120: C 90-140 (i.e. w=1, x=0.9 to 1.2, y=0.9 to 1.4), or
    • Si 100: O 92-107: C 116-133 (i.e. w=1, x=0.92 to 1.07, y=1.16 to 1.33) The atomic ratio can be determined by XPS.


Optionally, the tie coating or layer can be similar or identical in composition with the pH protective coating or layer 286 described elsewhere in this specification, although this is not a requirement.


The tie coating or layer 289 is contemplated in any embodiment generally to be from 5 nm to 100 nm thick, preferably from 5 to 20 nm thick, particularly if applied by chemical vapor deposition. These thicknesses are not critical.


Commonly but not necessarily, the tie coating or layer 289 will be relatively thin, since its function is to change the surface properties of the substrate.


Barrier Layer


The barrier coating or layer consists essentially of SiOx, wherein x is from 1.5 to 2.9 as determined by XPS, between the tie coating or layer and the lumen.


A barrier coating or layer 288 optionally can be deposited by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) or other chemical vapor deposition processes on the vessel of a pharmaceutical package, in particular a thermoplastic package, to prevent oxygen, carbon dioxide, or other gases from entering the vessel and/or to prevent leaching of the pharmaceutical material into or through the package wall.


The barrier coating or layer for any embodiment defined in this specification (unless otherwise specified in a particular instance) is a coating or layer, optionally applied by PECVD as indicated in U.S. Pat. No. 7,985,188. The barrier layer optionally is characterized as an “SiOx” coating, and contains silicon, oxygen, and optionally other elements, in which x, the ratio of oxygen to silicon atoms, is from about 1.5 to about 2.9, or 1.5 to about 2.6, or about 2. These alternative definitions of x apply to any use of the term SiOx in this specification. The barrier coating or layer is applied, for example to the interior of a pharmaceutical package or other vessel, for example a sample collection tube, a syringe barrel, a vial, or another type of vessel.


The barrier coating 288 comprises or consists essentially of SiOx, wherein x is from 1.5 to 2.9, from 2 to 1000 nm thick, the barrier coating 288 of SiOx having an interior surface 220 facing the lumen 212 and an outer surface 222 facing the wall 214 article surface 254, the barrier coating 288 being effective to reduce the ingress of atmospheric gas into the lumen 212 compared to an uncoated vessel 250. One suitable barrier composition is one where x is 2.3, for example. For example, the barrier coating or layer such as 288 of any embodiment can be applied at a thickness of at least 2 nm, or at least 4 nm, or at least 7 nm, or at least 10 nm, or at least 20 nm, or at least 30 nm, or at least 40 nm, or at least 50 nm, or at least 100 nm, or at least 150 nm, or at least 200 nm, or at least 300 nm, or at least 400 nm, or at least 500 nm, or at least 600 nm, or at least 700 nm, or at least 800 nm, or at least 900 nm. The barrier coating or layer can be up to 1000 nm, or at most 900 nm, or at most 800 nm, or at most 700 nm, or at most 600 nm, or at most 500 nm, or at most 400 nm, or at most 300 nm, or at most 200 nm, or at most 100 nm, or at most 90 nm, or at most 80 nm, or at most 70 nm, or at most 60 nm, or at most 50 nm, or at most 40 nm, or at most 30 nm, or at most 20 nm, or at most 10 nm, or at most 5 nm thick. Ranges of 20-200 nm, optionally 20-30 nm, are contemplated. Specific thickness ranges composed of any one of the minimum thicknesses expressed above, plus any equal or greater one of the maximum thicknesses expressed above, are expressly contemplated.


The thickness of the SiOx or other barrier coating or layer can be measured, for example, by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and its composition can be measured by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The primer coating or layer described herein can be applied to a variety of pharmaceutical packages or other vessels made from plastic or glass, for example to plastic tubes, vials, and syringes.


A barrier coating or layer 286 of SiOx, in which x is between 1.5 and 2.9, is applied by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) directly or indirectly to the thermoplastic wall 214 (for example a tie coating or layer 289 can be interposed between them) so that in the filled pharmaceutical package or other vessel 210 the barrier coating or layer 286 is located between the inner or interior surface 220 of the thermoplastic wall 214 and the fluid 218.


The barrier coating or layer 286 of SiOx is supported by the thermoplastic wall 214. The barrier coating or layer 286 as described elsewhere in this specification, or in U.S. Pat. No. 7,985,188, can be used in any embodiment.


Certain barrier coatings or layers 286 such as SiOx as defined here have been found to have the characteristic of being subject to being measurably diminished in barrier improvement factor in less than six months as a result of attack by certain relatively high pH contents of the coated vessel as described elsewhere in this specification, particularly where the barrier coating or layer directly contacts the contents. This issue can be addressed using a pH protective coating or layer as discussed in this specification.


pH Protective Coating or Layer


The optional pH protective coating or layer consists essentially of SiOxCy, wherein x is from about 0.5 to about 2.4 and y is from about 0.6 to about 3, each as determined by XPS, between the barrier coating or layer and the lumen.


The inventors have found that barrier layers or coatings of SiOx are eroded or dissolved by some fluids, for example aqueous compositions having a pH above about 4, alternatively above about 5. Since coatings applied by chemical vapor deposition can be very thin—tens to hundreds of nanometers thick—even a relatively slow rate of erosion can remove or reduce the effectiveness of the barrier layer in less time than the desired shelf life of a product package. This is particularly a problem for fluid pharmaceutical compositions, since many of them have a pH of roughly 7, or more broadly in the range of 5 to 9, similar to the pH of blood and other human or animal fluids. The higher the pH of the pharmaceutical preparation, the more quickly it erodes or dissolves the SiOx coating. Optionally, this problem can be addressed by protecting the barrier coating or layer 288, or other pH sensitive material, with a pH protective coating or layer 286.


Optionally, the pH protective coating or layer 286 can be composed of, comprise, or consist essentially of SiwOxCyHz (or its equivalent SiOxCy) or SiwNxCyHz or its equivalent Si(NH)xCy). The atomic ratio of Si:O: C or Si:N:C can be determined by XPS (X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy). The pH protective coating or layer may thus in one aspect have the formula SiOxCy, where x is from about 0.5 to about 2.4 and y is from about 0.6 to about 3. The same pH protective coating or layer may thus in another aspect have the formula SiOxCyHz, where x is from about 0.5 to about 2.4 and y is from about 0.6 to about 3, and z is from about 2 to about 9.


Typically, expressed as the formula SiwOxCy, where w=1, the atomic ratios of Si, 0, and C are, as several options:

    • Si 100: O 50-150: C 90-200 (i.e. w=1, x=0.5 to 1.5, y=0.9 to 2);
    • Si 100: O 70-130: C 90-200 (i.e. w=1, x=0.7 to 1.3, y=0.9 to 2)
    • Si 100: O 80-120: C 90-150 (i.e. w=1, x=0.8 to 1.2, y=0.9 to 1.5)
    • Si 100: O 90-120: C 90-140 (i.e. w=1, x=0.9 to 1.2, y=0.9 to 1.4)
    • Si 100: O 92-107: C 116-133 (i.e. w=1, x=0.92 to 1.07, y=1.16 to 1.33), or
    • Si 100: O 80-130: C 90-150.


Alternatively, the pH protective coating or layer can have atomic concentrations normalized to 100% carbon, oxygen, and silicon, as determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of less than 50% carbon and more than 25% silicon. Alternatively, the atomic concentrations are from 25 to 45% carbon, 25 to 65% silicon, and 10 to 35% oxygen. Alternatively, the atomic concentrations are from 30 to 40% carbon, 32 to 52% silicon, and 20 to 27% oxygen. Alternatively, the atomic concentrations are from 33 to 37% carbon, 37 to 47% silicon, and 22 to 26% oxygen.


The thickness of the pH protective coating or layer can be, for example, from 10 nm to 1000 nm; alternatively from 10 nm to 1000 nm; alternatively from 10 nm to 900 nm; alternatively from 10 nm to 800 nm; alternatively from 10 nm to 700 nm; alternatively from 10 nm to 600 nm; alternatively from 10 nm to 500 nm; alternatively from 10 nm to 400 nm; alternatively from 10 nm to 300 nm; alternatively from 10 nm to 200 nm; alternatively from 10 nm to 100 nm; alternatively from 10 nm to 50 nm; alternatively from 20 nm to 1000 nm; alternatively from 50 nm to 1000 nm; alternatively from 10 nm to 1000 nm; alternatively from 50 nm to 800 nm; alternatively from 100 nm to 700 nm; alternatively from 300 to 600 nm.


Optionally, the atomic concentration of carbon in the protective layer, normalized to 100% of carbon, oxygen, and silicon, as determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), can be greater than the atomic concentration of carbon in the atomic formula for the organosilicon precursor. For example, embodiments are contemplated in which the atomic concentration of carbon increases by from 1 to 80 atomic percent, alternatively from 10 to 70 atomic percent, alternatively from 20 to 60 atomic percent, alternatively from 30 to 50 atomic percent, alternatively from 35 to 45 atomic percent, alternatively from 37 to 41 atomic percent.


Optionally, the atomic ratio of carbon to oxygen in the pH protective coating or layer can be increased in comparison to the organosilicon precursor, and/or the atomic ratio of oxygen to silicon can be decreased in comparison to the organosilicon precursor.


Optionally, the pH protective coating or layer can have an atomic concentration of silicon, normalized to 100% of carbon, oxygen, and silicon, as determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), less than the atomic concentration of silicon in the atomic formula for the feed gas. For example, embodiments are contemplated in which the atomic concentration of silicon decreases by from 1 to 80 atomic percent, alternatively by from 10 to 70 atomic percent, alternatively by from 20 to 60 atomic percent, alternatively by from 30 to 55 atomic percent, alternatively by from 40 to 50 atomic percent, alternatively by from 42 to 46 atomic percent.


As another option, a pH protective coating or layer is contemplated in any embodiment that can be characterized by a sum formula wherein the atomic ratio C:O can be increased and/or the atomic ratio Si:O can be decreased in comparison to the sum formula of the organosilicon precursor.


The pH protective coating or layer 286 commonly is located between the barrier coating or layer 288 and the fluid 218 in the finished article. The pH protective coating or layer 286 is supported by the thermoplastic wall 214.


The pH protective coating or layer 286 optionally is effective to keep the barrier coating or layer 288 at least substantially undissolved as a result of attack by the fluid 218 for a period of at least six months.


The pH protective coating or layer can have a density between 1.25 and 1.65 g/cm3, alternatively between 1.35 and 1.55 g/cm3, alternatively between 1.4 and 1.5 g/cm3, alternatively between 1.4 and 1.5 g/cm3, alternatively between 1.44 and 1.48 g/cm3, as determined by X-ray reflectivity (XRR). Optionally, the organosilicon compound can be octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane and the pH protective coating or layer can have a density which can be higher than the density of a pH protective coating or layer made from HMDSO as the organosilicon compound under the same PECVD reaction conditions.


The pH protective coating or layer optionally can prevent or reduce the precipitation of a compound or component of a composition, in particular can prevent or reduce insulin precipitation or blood clotting, in comparison to the uncoated surface and/or to a barrier coated surface using HMDSO as precursor.


The pH protective coating or layer optionally can have an RMS surface roughness value (measured by AFM) of from about 5 to about 9, optionally from about 6 to about 8, optionally from about 6.4 to about 7.8. The Ra surface roughness value of the pH protective coating or layer, measured by AFM, can be from about 4 to about 6, optionally from about 4.6 to about 5.8. The Rmax surface roughness value of the pH protective coating or layer, measured by AFM, can be from about 70 to about 160, optionally from about 84 to about 142, optionally from about 90 to about 130.


The interior surface of the pH protective optionally can have a contact angle (with distilled water) of from 90° to 110°, optionally from 80° to 120°, optionally from 70° to 130°, as measured by Goniometer Angle measurement of a water droplet on the pH protective surface, per ASTM D7334-08 “Standard Practice for Surface Wettability of Coatings, Substrates and Pigments by Advancing Contact Angle Measurement.”


The passivation layer or pH protective coating or layer 286 (“passivation layer” and “pH protective coating or layer” are two different names for the same thing) optionally shows an O-Parameter measured with attenuated total reflection (ATR) Fourier-transform infrared spectrometry (FTIR) of less than 0.4, measured as:







O


-


Parameter

=


Intensity





at





1253






cm

-
1




Maximum





intensity





in





the





range





1000





to





1100






cm

-
1








The O-Parameter is defined in U.S. Pat. No. 8,067,070, which claims an O-parameter value of most broadly from 0.4 to 0.9. It can be measured from physical analysis of an FTIR amplitude versus wave number plot to find the numerator and denominator of the above expression. The O-Parameter can also be measured from digital wave number versus absorbance data.


U.S. Pat. No. 8,067,070 asserts that the claimed O-parameter range provides a superior pH protective coating or layer. Surprisingly, it has been found by the present inventors that 0-parameters outside the ranges claimed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,067,070 provide better results than are obtained in U.S. Pat. No. 8,067,070.


Alternatively in the embodiment of FIGS. 1-2, the O-parameter has a value of from 0.1 to 0.39, or from 0.15 to 0.37, or from 0.17 to 0.35.


Even another aspect of the invention is a composite material as just described, exemplified in FIGS. 1-5, wherein the passivation layer shows an N-Parameter measured with attenuated total reflection (ATR) Fourier-transform infrared spectrometry (FTIR) of less than 0.7, measured as:







N


-


Parameter

=



Intensity





at





840






cm

-
1




Intensity





at





799






cm

-
1




.





The N-Parameter is also described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,067,070, and is measured analogously to the O-Parameter except that intensities at two specific wave numbers are used—neither of these wave numbers is a range. U.S. Pat. No. 8,067,070 claims a passivation layer with an N-Parameter of 0.7 to 1.6. Again, the present inventors have made better coatings employing a pH protective coating or layer 286 having an N-Parameter lower than 0.7, as described above. Alternatively, the N-parameter has a value of at least 0.3, or from 0.4 to 0.6, or at least 0.53.


The rate of erosion, dissolution, extraction, or leaching (different names for related concepts) of the pH protective coating or layer 286, if directly contacted by the fluid 218, is less than the rate of erosion, dissolution, extraction, or leaching of the barrier coating or layer 288, if directly contacted by the fluid 218.


The thickness of the pH protective coating or layer is contemplated in any embodiment to be from 50-500 nm, with a preferred range of 100-200 nm.


The pH protective coating or layer 286 is effective to isolate the fluid 218 from the barrier coating or layer 288, at least for sufficient time to allow the barrier coating to act as a barrier during the shelf life of the pharmaceutical package or other vessel 210.


The inventors have further found that certain pH protective coatings or layers of SiOxCy or Si(NH)xCy formed from siloxane precursors, which pH protective coatings or layers have a substantial organic component, do not erode quickly when exposed to fluids, and in fact erode or dissolve more slowly when the fluids have higher pHs within the range of 5 to 9. For example, at pH 8, the dissolution rate of a pH protective coating or layer is quite slow. These pH protective coatings or layers of SiOxCy or Si(NH)xCy can therefore be used to cover a barrier layer of SiOx, retaining the benefits of the barrier layer by protecting it from the fluid in the pharmaceutical package. The protective layer is applied over at least a portion of the SiOx layer to protect the SiOx layer from contents stored in a vessel, where the contents otherwise would be in contact with the SiOx layer.


Effective SiOxCy or Si(NH)xCy pH protective coatings or layers can be deposited, for example, from linear siloxane or linear silazane precursors, for example hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDSO) or tetramethyldisiloxane (TMDSO), or from cyclic siloxane precursors, for example octamethylenecyclotetrasiloxane (OMCTS).


Optionally an FTIR absorbance spectrum of the pH protective coating or layer 286 of any embodiment has a ratio greater than 0.75 between the maximum amplitude of the Si—O—Si symmetrical stretch peak normally located between about 1000 and 1040 cm-1, and the maximum amplitude of the Si—O—Si asymmetric stretch peak normally located between about 1060 and about 1100 cm-1. Alternatively in any embodiment, this ratio can be at least 0.8, or at least 0.9, or at least 1.0, or at least 1.1, or at least 1.2. Alternatively in any embodiment, this ratio can be at most 1.7, or at most 1.6, or at most 1.5, or at most 1.4, or at most 1.3. Any minimum ratio stated here can be combined with any maximum ratio stated here, as an alternative embodiment of the invention of FIGS. 1-5.


Optionally, for the pH protective coating or layer 286 in any embodiment, the silicon dissolution rate by a 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer diluted in water for injection, adjusted to pH 8 with concentrated nitric acid, and containing 0.2 wt. % polysorbate-80 surfactant, (measured in the absence of the medicament, to avoid changing the dissolution reagent), at 40° C., is less than 170 ppb/day. (Polysorbate-80 is a common ingredient of pharmaceutical preparations, available for example as Tween®-80 from Uniqema Americas LLC, Wilmington Del.) Alternatively contemplated dissolution reagents in the testing of this paragraph are:

    • a potassium phosphate buffer for pH 3;
    • a sodium citrate buffer for pH 6;
    • a potassium phosphate buffer for pH 7;
    • a potassium phosphate buffer for pH 8;
    • a tris buffer for pH 9;
    • a potassium phosphate buffer for pH 12.


Optionally, for the pH protective coating or layer 286 in any embodiment, the silicon dissolution rate is less than 160 ppb/day, or less than 140 ppb/day, or less than 120 ppb/day, or less than 100 ppb/day, or less than 90 ppb/day, or less than 80 ppb/day. Optionally, in any embodiment of FIGS. 13-26 the silicon dissolution rate is more than 10 ppb/day, or more than 20 ppb/day, or more than 30 ppb/day, or more than 40 ppb/day, or more than 50 ppb/day, or more than 60 ppb/day. Any minimum rate stated here can be combined with any maximum rate stated here for the pH protective coating or layer 286 in any embodiment.


Optionally, for the pH protective coating or layer 286 in any embodiment the total silicon content of the pH protective coating or layer and barrier coating, upon dissolution into a test composition with a pH of 8 from the vessel, is less than 66 ppm, or less than 60 ppm, or less than 50 ppm, or less than 40 ppm, or less than 30 ppm, or less than 20 ppm.


pH Protective Coating or Layer Properties of any Embodiment


Theory of Operation


The inventors offer the following theory of operation of the pH protective coating or layer described here. The invention is not limited by the accuracy of this theory or to the embodiments predictable by use of this theory.


The dissolution rate of the SiOx barrier layer is believed to be dependent on SiO bonding within the layer. Oxygen bonding sites (silanols) are believed to increase the dissolution rate.


It is believed that the pH protective coating or layer bonds with the SiOx barrier layer to “heal” or passivate the SiOx surface and thus dramatically reduces the dissolution rate. In this hypothesis, the thickness of the pH protective coating or layer is not the primary means of protection—the primary means is passivation of the SiOx surface. It is contemplated in any embodiment that a pH protective coating or layer as described in this specification can be improved by increasing the crosslink density of the pH protective coating or layer.


Optionally in any embodiment, each linear siloxane precursor used to deposit the tie coating or layer and the barrier coating or layer, and optionally also the pH protective coating or layer, can be hexamethylenedisiloxane (HMDSO) or tetramethylenedisiloxane (TMDSO), preferably HMDSO. Optionally in any embodiment, the same linear siloxane precursor is used in each coating process, which can be, for example the tie PECVD coating process, the barrier PECVD coating process, and optionally the pH protective PECVD coating process. Using the same siloxane allows for the use of the same coating equipment without the need for valving arrangements to feed a different siloxane, and also avoids manufacturing errors in which the wrong precursor is used in one or more coating steps, which might be difficult to detect after the coating has been applied.


Optionally in any embodiment, the technology can be further generalized to the use of any plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition process using any precursors to generate multiple coatings, employing a process as described in this specification or claims.


Another aspect of the technology is an evacuated blood collection tube comprising a coated vessel as defined above and a closure sealing the lumen. The lumen has a vacuum level sufficient to draw blood from a patient's vein into the lumen.


Optionally in any embodiment, the evacuated blood collection tube has a shelf life of at least 6 months, the shelf life defined by maintaining at least 90% of its as-manufactured draw volume capacity.


Optionally in any embodiment, the evacuated blood collection tube has a shelf life under the same definition of at least 12 months, alternatively at least 18 months, alternatively at least 24 months, alternatively from 6 to 12 months, alternatively from 12 to 18 months, alternatively from 18 to 24 months, alternatively from 24 to 30 months, alternatively from 30 to 36 months, alternatively from 36 to 42 months. Longer shelf lives are also contemplated.


As defined here, the shelf life can be measured by the classic destructive method in which a collection of (typically) identically made evacuated blood collection tubes is exposed to external gas such as air at one atmosphere pressure or oxygen at its usual partial pressure in the atmosphere, and tested at various times for a reduction of the vacuum compared to the as-manufactured level. The shelf life can also be measured by other, typically accelerated measurement methods, for example in which the external pressure is increased, a smaller reduction in vacuum is measured after a shorter period of time and extrapolated to longer times, a test reagent or the intended contents of the tube are sealed in the tube, optionally maintained at harsher conditions known to accelerate a diminution in vacuum, and other measurement methods known in the art. One particular accelerated test method contemplated here is an oxygen permeation rate constant test.


Optionally in any embodiment, the evacuated blood collection tube has a minimum oxygen permeation rate constant (OPRC) of 0.0001, alternatively 0.00016, alternatively 0.0002, alternatively 0.0005, alternatively 0.001, alternatively 0.0016, alternatively 0.002 micromol O2/(day×cm2×atm.). Optionally in any embodiment, the evacuated blood collection tube has a maximum OPRC of 0.01, alternatively 0.005, alternatively 0.002 micromol O2/(day×cm2×atm.). Any minimum OPRC can be combined with any equal or greater maximum OPRC to construct a range.


Optionally in any embodiment, the evacuated blood collection tube has an oxygen permeation rate constant of from 0.0001 to 0.01, alternatively from 0.0002 to 0.005, alternatively from 0.0005 to 0.003, alternatively from 0.0016 to 0.003 micromol O2/(day×cm2×atm.).


Optionally in any embodiment, the evacuated blood collection tube has a fluid composition in the lumen, for example comprising a blood anticoagulation reagent. Optionally in any embodiment, the blood anticoagulation reagent comprises, for example, a citrate, for example buffered sodium citrate solution. Other reagents known for use in blood collection tubes are also contemplated for this purpose.


PECVD Process for Trilayer Coating


The PECVD trilayer coating described in this specification can be applied, for example, as follows for a 1 to 5 mL vessel such as a blood sample collection tube useful as an evacuated blood sample collection tube. Larger or smaller vessels will call for adjustments in parameters that a person of ordinary skill can carry out in view of the teaching of this specification.


The apparatus and process used is the PECVD apparatus as described generally in FIG. 2 and the accompanying text and PECVD protocols of U.S. Pat. No. 7,985,188, except that at least the tie or adhesion coating or layer and the barrier coating or layer, and optionally the pH protective layer, are applied in the same apparatus, without breaking vacuum between the application of the adhesion coating or layer and the barrier coating or layer or, optionally, between the barrier coating or layer and the pH protective coating or layer. The entire text and drawings of U.S. Pat. No. 7,985,188 is incorporated here by reference.


Examples of specific coating parameters that have been used for a 1 mL vessel and 5 mL vial are shown in the PECVD Trilayer Process Specific Parameters Tables 2 (1 mL vial) and 3 (5 mL vial):












PECVD Trilayer Process


Specific Parameters Table 2 (1 mL vessel)













Parameter
Units
Tie
Barrier
Protection

















Power
W
70
140
70



TMDSO Flow
sccm
4
None
4



HMDSO Flow
sccm
None
1.56
None



O2 Flow
sccm
2
20
2



Argon Flow
sccm
80
0
80



Ramp Time
seconds
None
None
None



Deposition Time
seconds
2.5
20
10



Tube Pressure
Torr
1
0.59
1




















PECVD Trilayer Process


Specific Parameters Table 3 (5 mL vial)











Parameter
Units
Adhesion
Barrier
Protection














Power
W
20
40
20


TMDSO Flow
sccm
2
0
2


HMDSO Flow
sccm
0
3
0


O2 Flow
sccm
1
50
1


Argon Flow
sccm
20
0
20


Ramp Time
seconds
0
2
2


Deposition Time
seconds
2.5
10
10


Tube Pressure
Torr
0.85
1.29
0.85









The O-parameter and N-parameter values for the pH protective coating or layer applied to the 1 mL vessel as described above are 0.34 and 0.55, respectively.


The O-parameter and N-parameter values for the pH protective coating or layer applied to the 5 mL vessel are 0.24 and 0.63, respectively.


Referring to FIGS. 1, 2, and 4-6, another aspect of the invention is a method of processing a vessel 210 to apply a tie coating or layer 289, a barrier coating or layer 288, and optionally one or more additional coatings or layers. Optionally in any embodiment, the vessel 210 can be configured as a sample collection tube, for example an evacuated blood collection tube; a sample storage tube, a centrifuge tube, a chromatography vial, or tubing. The coated vessel can be formed by a process comprising several steps.


To carry out the process, a vessel 210 is provided including a wall 214 consisting essentially of thermoplastic polymeric material defining a lumen 212. Optionally in any embodiment, the wall includes a polyester, polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyethylene naphthalate (PEN); a polyolefin, cyclic olefin polymer (COP), cyclic olefin copolymer (COC), polypropylene (PP), or a polycarbonate, preferably COP. Optionally in any embodiment, the vessel lumen has a capacity of from 2 to 12 mL, optionally from 3 to 5 mL, optionally from 8 to 10 mL


The wall 214 has an inside surface 303 facing the lumen and an outside surface 305.


A partial vacuum is drawn in the lumen. While maintaining the partial vacuum unbroken in the lumen, the tie coating or layer 289 of SiOxCy is applied by a tie PECVD process comprising applying sufficient power (alternatively the same concept is referred to in this specification as “energy”) to generate plasma within the lumen while feeding a gas comprising a linear siloxane precursor, optionally oxygen, and optionally an inert gas diluent. The values of x and y are as determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS).


Then, while maintaining the partial vacuum unbroken in the lumen, the plasma is extinguished, which has the effect of stopping application of the tie coating or layer of SiOxCy. Optionally in any embodiment, after the plasma used in the tie PECVD coating process is extinguished and before the barrier PECVD coating process is commenced, the feed of the gas employed in the tie PECVD coating process can be stopped. A tie coating or layer of SiOxCy, for which x is from about 0.5 to about 2.4 and y is from about 0.6 to about 3, is produced on the inside surface 303 as a result.


Later during the process, while still maintaining the partial vacuum unbroken in the lumen, the barrier coating or layer 288 is applied by a barrier PECVD process comprising applying sufficient power (alternatively the same concept is referred to in this specification as “energy”) to generate plasma within the lumen while feeding a gas comprising a linear siloxane precursor and oxygen


Optionally in any embodiment, the power provided to generate plasma within the lumen for applying the barrier coating or layer in a 1-Up coater is from 30 to 80 watts, optionally from 40 to 80 watts, optionally from 50 to 80 watts, optionally from 55 to 65 watts, or optionally in a 4-Up coater is from 175 to 200 watts, optionally from 180 to 190 watts.


Optionally in any embodiment, the plasma generated for applying the barrier coating or layer is applied for 12 to 20 seconds, optionally for 15 to 20 seconds.


Optionally in any embodiment, the barrier coating or layer is applied using a siloxane precursor feed rate, optionally of HMDSO, of from 0.5 to 2 sccm, optionally 0.7 to 1.3 sccm.


Optionally in any embodiment, the barrier coating or layer is applied using a pressure of from 0.5 to 3.5 Torr, optionally from 1 to 2.5 Torr.


Optionally after applying the barrier coating or layer, while maintaining the partial vacuum unbroken in the lumen, the plasma is extinguished, which has the effect of stopping application of the barrier coating or layer. Optionally in any embodiment, after the plasma used in the barrier PECVD coating process is extinguished and before the optional pH protective PECVD coating process, if used, is commenced, the feed of the gas employed in the barrier PECVD coating process can be stopped. A barrier coating or layer of SiOx, wherein x is from 1.5 to 2.9 as determined by XPS is produced between the tie coating or layer and the lumen as a result of barrier coating.


Then optionally, while maintaining the partial vacuum unbroken in the lumen, the pH protective coating or layer 286 of SiOxCy is later applied by a pH protective PECVD process. In this formula, x is from about 0.5 to about 2.4 and y is from about 0.6 to about 3, each as determined by XPS. The pH protective coating or layer is optionally applied between the barrier coating or layer and the lumen, by a pH protective PECVD coating process. The pH protective PECVD process comprises applying sufficient power (alternatively the same concept is referred to in this specification as “energy”) to generate plasma within the lumen while feeding a gas comprising a linear siloxane precursor, optionally oxygen, and optionally an inert gas diluent.


Surprisingly, as a result of this processing, the coated vessel 210 made by this process has a lower gas permeation rate constant into the lumen than a corresponding vessel 210 made by the same process except breaking the partial vacuum in the lumen between applying the tie coating or layer and applying the barrier coating or layer.


Alternatively, the coated vessel made by this process including the optional steps has a lower gas permeation rate constant into the lumen than a corresponding vessel made by the same process except breaking the partial vacuum in the lumen between applying the tie coating or layer and applying the barrier coating or layer, and also breaking the partial vacuum in the lumen between applying the barrier coating or layer and the pH protective coating or layer. Optionally in any embodiment, the coated vessel 210 has an oxygen permeation rate constant (OPRC) of from 0.002 to 0.1, optionally from 0.01 to 0.1, optionally from 0.14 to 0.05, optionally from 0.002 to 0.02, optionally from 0.003 to 0.12 μmol/day/cm2/atm.


Optionally in any embodiment, the coated vessel 210 has an oxygen transfer rate of from 0.5 to 12, optionally from 3 to 22, optionally from 3.4 to 12, optionally from 0.5 to 3, optionally from 0.7 to 2 cc/m2/day.


Optionally in any embodiment, the wall has a water vapor transmission rate of less than 2.5 g/m2/day at 50° C. and 90% relative humidity.


Optionally in any embodiment, the PECVD process for applying the tie coating or layer, the barrier coating or layer, and/or the pH protective coating or layer, or any combination of two or more of these, is carried out by applying pulsed power (alternatively the same concept is referred to in this specification as “energy”) to generate plasma within the lumen.


Alternatively, the tie PECVD coating process, or the barrier PECVD coating process, or the pH protective PECVD coating process, or any combination of two or more of these, can be carried out by applying continuous power to generate plasma within the lumen.


As a still further alternative, pulsed power can be used for some steps, and continuous power can be used for others. For example, when preparing a trilayer coating or layer composed of a tie coating or layer, a barrier coating or layer, and a pH protective coating or layer, an option specifically contemplated for the tie PECVD coating process and for the pH protective PECVD coating process is pulsed power, and an option contemplated for the corresponding barrier layer is using continuous power to generate plasma within the lumen.


Optionally in any embodiment, the present process further includes the subsequent step of providing a fluid composition in the lumen.


Optionally in any embodiment, the fluid composition includes a blood anticoagulation reagent, for example, buffered sodium citrate solution.


Another aspect of the current invention relates to a sample collection tube incorporating stopper retention features. The following description will focus on blood sample collection tubes, but is equally applicable to tubes for collecting other types of medical samples.


It is sometimes desirable or necessary to collect a sample of blood or another body fluid in one location, then pack the sample to prepare it for transportation to another location, for example to collect a large number of samples from geographically diverse locations at a central laboratory for analysis, or at a central repository for storage after analysis. Since blood or other body fluids collected for medical diagnostic use frequently are infectious substances, it is important to pack the sample carefully so it will not leak during transportation.


One particular aspect of medical sample collection bearing on this problem is that a medical sample in a stoppered vessel is commonly contained at substantially ambient atmospheric pressure at the time and place of collection. Even a blood sample collected in an evacuated blood collection tube commonly is at or near atmospheric pressure just after collection, as the initial vacuum in the sample tube is consumed by drawing the sample into the vessel.


According to 49 CFR 173.196 relating to transportation of Category A and B Infectious Substances, the packing for infectious substances “must be capable of withstanding, without leakage, an internal pressure producing a pressure differential of not less than 95 kPa (0.95 bar, 14 psi).” This translates to an altitude of 70,000 feet.


Accordingly, standard sample collection tubes desirably are designed to satisfy this transportation standard, so they will be useful for transporting medical samples that potentially are infectious agents.


Several aspects of this invention are various adaptations of the vessel 210 shown in FIGS. 1-2 and 4-6 specially adapting it to carry samples without leakage in accord with the requirements of 49 CFR 173.196.


Refer now to FIGS. 4-6. In the illustrated embodiment, the vessel 210 can have a thermoplastic wall 214, although the vessel 210 instead could be made of glass, thermoset plastic, or other materials without limitation, although transparent materials are commonly preferred. The vessel 210 has a top 295 defining an opening, an inside surface 303 defining a lumen 212, an outside surface 305, and a stopper contact area 291 on the inside surface 303 adjacent to the top 295.


One retention feature of the vessel, which may be used alone or in combination with other features, is that the stopper contact area 291 is tapered inward between 0 and 1.3 degrees, for example, which is less than the typical molding taper for a blood sample collection tube. “Tapered inward” means that the diameter of the lumen 212 is reduced regularly going axially from the top (nearest the top 295 of the vessel) to the bottom of the stopper contact area 291, so the inside surface 303 in the stopper contact area 291 defines the sidewall of a truncated cone. For the present purpose, a “taper” of exactly zero degrees is defined as “between” 0 and 1.3 degrees, even though a “taper” of zero is in fact a cylinder that does not taper at all. Additionally, any taper greater than zero degrees to any extent and not greater than 1.3 degrees is within this range of the invention, including a taper of exactly 1.3 degrees. In other words, “between” two numerical limits according to the present definition is inclusive of both limits.


It is also contemplated that a taper of zero is not the absolute lower limit, and a negative taper (tapered outward) can function according to the present invention, although it is less preferred because in some instances fabrication of a negatively tapered part will require more specialized, although well known, techniques, such as a two- or multi-part core, machining, or lost-wax casting.


Alternatively, the stopper contact area 291 can be tapered inward between 0 and 1 degree, optionally between 0 to 0.9 degree, optionally between 0 to 0.8 degree, optionally between 0 to 0.7 degree, optionally between 0 to 0.6 degree, optionally between 0 to 0.5 degree, optionally between 0.3 to 1.3 degrees, optionally between 0.3 to 1 degree, optionally between 0.3 to 0.9 degree, optionally between 0.3 to 0.8 degree, optionally between 0.3 to 0.7 degree, optionally between 0.3 to 0.6 degree, optionally between 0.3 to 0.5 degree, optionally between 0.5 to 1.3 degrees, optionally between 0.5 to 1 degree, optionally between 0.5 to 0.9 degree, optionally between 0.5 to 0.8 degree, optionally between 0.5 to 0.7 degree, optionally between 0.5 to 0.6 degree, optionally 0.5 degree.


Preferably the tapering change is only in the stopper contact area 291. The tapering reduction preferably is not substantially below the stopper contact area 291, as that would change the internal volume. If a change in the internal volume is not important in a given instance, however, the tapering change can extend further than the stopper contact area 291. Additionally, the tapering reduction does not need to extend throughout the entire stopper contact area 291, as tapering reduction over at least a portion of the stopper contact area 291 may be sufficient to provide the desired retention.


Additionally, in any embodiment, to implement limitation of the tapering reduction to the stopper contact area 291, at least a portion of the inside surface 303 of the evacuated blood collection tube located below the stopper contact area 291, is tapered at least 0.7 degree, optionally at least 1 degree, optionally at least 1.5 degree, and as a separately selected option can be tapered at least 0.1 degree more than the stopper contact area 291. A greater taper below the stopper contact area 291 has the benefit of easing simple removal of a one-part core from a mold when the vessel 210 is injection molded.


The effect achieved by reducing the inward taper in the stopper contact area 291 is to reduce or eliminate the tendency of the stopper 216 to loosen if it moves upward with respect to the stopper contact area 291. A resilient stopper compressed by the stopper contact area 291 is biased to expand laterally outward, and thus to move upward toward a region of slightly larger diameter within the stopper contact area 291. This biasing force is reduced by reducing the taper in the stopper contact area 291.


Another retention feature of the vessel 210, which may be used alone or in combination with other retention features, is that a retention lip 293 projects radially inward from the inside surface 305. The inside surface 305 includes a stopper contact area 291 adjacent to and below the retention lip 293. The retention lip 293 functions by bearing down on a stopper 216 lodged in the stopper contact area, requiring the stopper 216 to be further compressed if it is to pass axially across the retention lip 293.


Optionally in any embodiment, the retention lip 293 includes an upper ramp 301 defining an inward taper, optionally a curved inward taper, optionally a convexly curved inward taper, relative to the opening at the top 295, the upper ramp having a lower end 307. Optionally in any embodiment, the retention lip further includes a lower ramp 299 defining an outward taper, optionally a curved outward taper, optionally a convexly curved outward taper, relative to the lower end 307.


Optionally in any embodiment the stoppers 216 are siliconized in a tumbler before use to prevent the stoppers 216 from sticking to each other.


Several other features that apply to each disclosed embodiment are the following. Optionally in any embodiment, the evacuated blood collection tube includes a closure sealing the lumen. Optionally, the closure maintains a vacuum level in the lumen, relative to ambient pressure at sea level, sufficient to draw blood from a patient's vein into the lumen.


Optionally in any embodiment, the closure remains seated in the stopper contact area 291 at a vacuum level of 97.5 kPa below ambient pressure.


Optionally in any embodiment, the evacuated blood collection tube has a shelf life of at least 6 months. As used in this context, the “shelf life” is defined by the amount of time after evacuation the tube maintains a draw volume capacity of at least 90% of the draw volume capacity of a newly evacuated vessel 210 of the same kind.


Optionally in any embodiment, the evacuated blood collection tube has a shelf life of from 6 to 12 months, alternatively from 12 to 18 months, alternatively from 18 to 24 months, alternatively from 24 to 30 months, alternatively from 30 to 36 months, alternatively from 36 to 42 months.


Optionally in any embodiment, the evacuated blood collection tube further includes a fluid composition in the lumen, alternatively an aqueous fluid composition, alternatively including a blood anticoagulation reagent, for example, buffered sodium citrate solution.


Optionally in any embodiment, the evacuated blood collection tube has an oxygen permeation rate constant of from 0.0001 to 0.01, alternatively from 0.0002 to 0.005, alternatively from 0.0005 to 0.003, alternatively from 0.0016 to 0.003 micromol O2/(day×cm2×atm.).


Optionally in any embodiment, the evacuated blood collection tube has a minimum oxygen permeation rate constant of 0.0001, alternatively 0.00016, alternatively 0.0002, alternatively 0.0005, alternatively 0.001, alternatively 0.0016, alternatively 0.002 micromol O2/(day×cm2×atm).


Optionally in any embodiment, the evacuated blood collection tube has a maximum oxygen permeation rate constant of 0.01, alternatively 0.005, alternatively 0.002 micromol O2/(day×cm2×atm


Optionally in any embodiment, the evacuated blood collection tube has a water vapor transmission rate of less than 2.5 g/m2/day at 50° C. and 90% relative humidity.


Example 1

A trilayer coating as described in this specification is applied by adjusting the flows of a single organosilicon monomer (HMDSO) and oxygen and also varying the PECVD generating power between each layer (without breaking vacuum between any two layers).


The vessel (here a 6 mL COP vial) is placed on a vessel holder, sealed, and a vacuum is pulled within the vessel. Vials are used to facilitate storage while containing fluid as indicated below. Proportional results are contemplated if blood sample collection tubes are used. After pulling vacuum, the gas feed of precursor, oxygen, and argon is introduced, then at the end of the “plasma delay” continuous (i.e. not pulsed) RF power at 13.56 MHz is turned on to form the tie coating or layer. Then power is turned off, gas flows are adjusted, and after the plasma delay power is turned on for the second layer—an SiOx barrier coating or layer. This is then repeated for a third layer before the gases are cut off, the vacuum seal is broken, and the vessel is removed from the vessel holder. The layers are put down in the order of Tie then Barrier then pH Protective. The process settings are as shown in Table 4:















TABLE 4











Deposition



O2
Ar
HMDSO
Power
Time



(sccm)
(sccm)
(sccm)
(W)
(sec)





















Tie
1
40
2
20
2.5


Barrier
100
0
1
60
15


pH Protective
1
40
2
20
10









As a control, a similar coating process is carried out again, except that when each layer has been deposited the vacuum is broken (causing a “vacuum break”) by introducing ambient air into the vessel. After each vacuum break, the vessel is evacuated before applying the next layer.


Each vial except those measured for oxygen permeation rate constant initially is charged with a standard amount of an aqueous phosphate-buffered solution (PBS) of pH 9 at 40° C. and held for the amount of time, in days, indicated in FIG. 3. Then, after each time interval indicated in FIG. 3, groups of vials are cooled, drained, and measured for oxygen permeation rate constant (OPRC) at ambient temperature, reported as μmol (micromole) O2/(day×cm2×atm.), with the results shown in FIG. 3 and tabulated (summary) in Table 5.


Vessels prepared without vacuum breaks (“all combined” runs on the right side of FIG. 3) are compared to the vessels prepared with vacuum breaks (“all separate” runs on the left side of FIG. 3), respecting their oxygen permeation rate constants.










TABLE 5








STORAGE TIME, Days













0
3
7
14
28





Mean OPRC,
0.00287
0.00518
0.00274
0.00518
0.00540


All Combined







Std. Dev.
0.00123
0.00128
0.00094
0.00087
0.00087


Mean OPRC,
0.00774
0.01563
0.00959
0.01543
0.01827


All Separate







Std. Dev.
0.00138
0.00425
0.00449
0.00334
0.00720









Surprisingly, as shown in FIG. 3 and the tabulated summary of Table 5, at each storage time the vials processed without intermediate vacuum breaks have much lower (better) OPRC than those processed with intermediate vacuum breaks. It should be noted that the usual oxygen permeation rate constant of corresponding uncoated vials is about 0.122 μmol O2/(day×cm2×atm.), so the vials processed without intermediate vacuum breaks have about 5% of the OPRC of uncoated vials after four weeks of storage.


Example 2

Similar testing on a 6 mL blood sample collection tube is carried out, and in one test the OPRC of a tube coated according to the present “combined” process is 0.00344 μmol O2/(day×cm2×atm.), with a standard deviation of 0.0011.


A parallel test is carried out in which all conditions are the same except that, instead of the plasma-creating power (alternatively the same concept is referred to in this specification as “energy”) being applied continuously, it is applied in pulses having a frequency of 5 Hz and a duty cycle of 50%. This means that the full power indicated (W) is applied for 0.1 second, then power is off for 0.1 second, then back on for 0.1 second, then back off for 0.1 second. The result is an OPRCof 0.00380 μmol O2/(day×cm2×atm.), with a standard deviation of 0.0015 under pulsed power. In either case, the OPRC is about 8% of the OPRC of a similar uncoated vessel.


Example 3

A test similar to Example 1 is carried out, except that, instead of the plasma-creating power (alternatively the same concept is referred to in this specification as “energy”) being applied continuously, it is applied in pulses having a frequency of 5 Hz and a duty cycle of 50%, repeating for the total time indicated in Table 6.

















TABLE 6











Deposition

Duty



O2
Ar
HMDSO
Power
Time
Frequency
Cycle



(sccm)
(sccm)
(sccm)
(W)
(sec)
(Hz)
(%)























Tie
1
40
2
20
2.5
5
50


Barrier
100
0
1
60
15
5
50


Protective
1
40
2
20
10
5
50









OPRC results approximately proportional to those obtained with continuous power are observed.


Example 4

This study was carried out to determine the effect of applied electrical power during the coating process on the resulting Oxygen Transmission Rates (OTR) or Oxygen Permeation Rate Constant (OPRC) of the coating or layer.


A trilayer coating or layer as described in this specification was applied to a vessel (here a 4 mL COP blood sample collection tube, and the same in other tests except as otherwise indicated) by applying a tie layer using the process settings shown in Table 7 for a 1-Up unit, then a barrier layer using the process settings shown in Table 8, and finally a pH protective layer using the process settings shown in Table 7 for a 1-Up unit. The 1-Up coating unit was a PECVD station where vacuum supply, process gases, and RF power were supplied to one individual article to deposit the barrier coating or layer system on the inside of said article.


The PECVD generating power and other process settings were changed between each layer of the trilayer coating or layer (without breaking vacuum between any two layers). During the trilayer coating process, the power for the tie layer and the pH protective layer (i.e. the first and the third layer) was kept unchanged. The power for the barrier coating or layer was varied as shown in Table 8 to see how it affected the barrier performance (expressed as oxygen transmission rate (OTR) or oxygen permeation rate constant (OPRC)).









TABLE 7







Coating Parameters for Tie layer and pH Protective Layer

















Argon
Oxygen
HMDSO
Power
Time



Duty


Layer
sccm
sccm
sccm
(W)
(s)
Pressure
Pulsing
Hz
Cycle










1-Up Adhesive/Protective Process
















Adhesive
40
1
2
35
5
1.9 Torr
Yes
5
50%


Protective
40
1
2
35
10
1.9 Torr
Yes
5
50%







4-Up Adhesive/Protective Process
















Adhesive
40
2
4
150
5
1.9 Torr
Yes
5
50%


Protective
40
2
4
150
10
1.9 Torr
Yes
5
50%









The coating process was carried out as follows. The vessel was placed on a vessel holder, sealed, and a vacuum was pulled within the vessel. After pulling vacuum, the gas feed of precursor, oxygen, and argon was introduced, then after a plasma delay, RF power was turned on in pulses to generate plasma and form the tie coating or layer. The power was applied in pulses having a frequency of 5 Hz and a duty cycle of 50%. This means that the full power indicated (W) was applied for 0.1 second, then power was off for 0.1 second, then back on for 0.1 second, then back off for 0.1 second. Then power was turned off, gas flows were adjusted, and after the plasma delay, the RF power was turned on in the same unit for the second layer—a SiOx barrier coating or layer. The RF power for the barrier coating or layer was applied continuously. The same pulsed RF power as for the tie coating or layer was then repeated for a third layer before the gases were cut off, the vacuum seal was broken, and the vessel was removed from the vessel holder. The layers were put down in the order of tie then barrier then pH protective.


Each blood sample collection tube was measured for oxygen permeation rate constant (OPRC) at ambient temperature, reported as μmol (micromole) O2/(day×cm2×atm) with the results of OPRC and OTR shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B and tabulated in Table 8. “Part pressure” in Table 8 is the total pressure of all constituents within one part or vessel.


Table 8 shows that higher electrical power results in a barrier coating or layer with lower OPRC (i.e. better barrier performance). After 60 W, continued increasing of electrical power does not improve the barrier performance any more, as dependent on the volume of the article in this case blood sample collection tube.









TABLE 8







Effect Of Electrical Power


HMDSO (sccm) = 1.0, O2 (sccm) = 100.0, Time(s) = 10.0









Permeance
Oxygen Transmission
Process Information











(OPRC,
Rate

Part



μmol/day/cm2/atm)
(OTR, cc/m2/day)
Power
Pressure













Avg.
2*St. Dev.
Avg.
2*St. Dev.
(W)
(Torr)
Unit
















0.105
0.0053
25.74
1.31
20.0
3.92
1-Up


0.090
0.0152
21.90
3.71
30.0
3.92
1-Up


0.049
0.0392
12.06
9.58
40.0
3.92
1-Up


0.018
0.0054
4.47
1.33
50.0
3.92
1-Up


0.014
0.0031
3.45
0.76
60.0
3.92
1-Up


0.017
0.0031
4.05
0.77
70.0
3.92
1-Up


0.017
0.0096
4.22
2.34
80.0
3.92
1-Up











0.16
0.0052
38.69
1.27
Uncoated









Example 5

This study was to determine the effect of coating time on the resulting Oxygen Transmission Rates (OTR) or Oxygen Permeation Rate Constant (OPRC) of the coating or layer.


A trilayer coating or layer as described in this specification was applied, adjusting the coating time (without breaking vacuum between any two layers), and the resulting OPRC and OTR were compared. During the trilayer process, the coating parameters for tie layer and pH protective layer (i.e. the first and the third layer) were those of Table 7 for a 1-Up unit. The coating parameters for the barrier coating or layer (i.e. the second layer) were those of Table 9. The coating time for the barrier coating or layer was varied as shown in Table 9 to see how it affected the barrier performance (expressed as oxygen transmission rate (OTR) or oxygen permeation rate constant (OPRC)). The results are shown in Table 9 and FIGS. 5A and 5B.









TABLE 9







Effect Of Coating Time


HMDS(sccm) = 1.0, O2(sccm) = 100, Power(w) = 60










Oxygen Transmission
Process Information











Permeance
Rate

Part



μmol/day/cm2/atm
cc/m2/day
Time
Pressure













Avg.
2*St. Dev.
Avg.
2*St. Dev.
(s)
(Torr)
Unit
















0.0150
0.0063
3.68
1.53
10.0
3.92
1-Up


0.0031
0.0025
0.76
0.62
15.0
3.92
1-Up


0.0029
0.0017
0.71
0.42
20.0
3.92
1-Up









The results show that the barrier coating or layer performance was improved with the increase of coating time until the time reached 15 seconds. After 15 seconds, continued increasing the coating time did not improve the barrier performance any more, as dependent on the volume of the article in this case blood tube.


Example 6

This study was to determine the effect of feeding rate of the coating or layer precursor HMDSO during the barrier coating process on the resulting Oxygen Transmission Rates (OTR) or Oxygen Permeation Rate Constant (OPRC) of the trilayer coating or layer.


A trilayer coating or layer as described in this specification was applied essentially as before, using the conditions of Table 7 for the tie coating or layer and pH protective coating or layer, and the conditions of Table 10 for the barrier coating or layer, without breaking vacuum between any two layers. The effects of different HMDSO feeding rates for the barrier layer were compared.


These tests were carried out both using the 1-Up unit previously described and a 4-Up unit. The 4-Up unit was similar to the 1-Up unit, but the vacuum supply, process gases, and RF power were uniformly split and supplied uniformly to four individual vessels. By maintaining uniformity with vacuum supply and process gases, the pressure within each vessel of a 4-Up remains the same as the single vessel of a 1-Up.


During the trilayer coating process, HMDSO feeding rate for tie layer and pH protective layer (i.e. the first and the third layer) were kept unchanged. HMDSO feeding rate for the barrier coating or layer was varied to see how it affects the barrier performance (expressed as oxygen transmission rate (OTR) or oxygen permeation rate constant (OPRC)).


The results are shown in Table 10. The barrier coating or layer performance was improved with decrease of HMDSO feeding rate until the feeding rate reached 1 sccm. After 1 sccm, continued lowering HMDSO feeding rate did not improve the barrier performance any more, as dependent on the volume of the article in this case blood sample collection tube.









TABLE 10





Effect Of HMDSO feeding rate







Time(s) = 10.0, O2(sccm) = 100, Power(w) = 60









Process Information











Permeance
Oxygen Transmission Rate

Part



μmol/day/cm2/atm
cc/m2/day
HMDSO
Pressure













Avg.
2*St. Dev.
Avg.
2*St. Dev.
(sccm)
(Torr)
Unit





0.117
0.0130
28.63
3.18
3.0
3.92
1-Up


0.0267
0.0163
6.52
3.98
2.0
3.92
1-Up


0.0041
0.0019
0.99
0.46
1.0
3.92
1-Up


0.0090
0.0026
2.20
0.63
0.5
3.92
1-Up










Time(s) = 15.0, O2(sccm) = 100, Power(w) = 60









Process Information













Permeance




Part



μmol/day/cm2/atm
cc/m2/day

HMDSO
Power
Pressure














Avg.
2*St. Dev.
Avg.
2*St. Dev.
(sccm)
(W)
(Torr)
Unit





0.127
0.0050
31.01
1.22
6.0
145.0
3.92
4-Up


0.0746
0.0050
18.24
1.22
3.0
145.0
3.92
4-Up


0.0341
0.0132
8.35
3.24
1.0
175.0
3.92
4-Up









Example 7

In this example, the power, HMDSO feeding rate, and coating time were varied to optimize the coating conditions to obtain the best barrier coating or layer performance (i.e. the lowest OPRC and OTR). The process information is shown in Table 7 (4-Up) for the tie coating or layer and pH protective coating or layer and Table 11 for the barrier layer. The results are shown in Table 11. The best results were achieved in the second test with a feed of 1.0 sccm HMDSO, power of 185.0 watts, and time of 15.0 sec.









TABLE 11







Effect of Power, HMDSO Feeding Rate and Time


O2(sccm) = 100










Oxygen Transmission
Process Information













Permeance
Rate



Part



μmol/day/cm2/atm
cc/m2/day
HMDSO
Power
Time
Pressure















Avg.
2*St. Dev
Avg.
2*St. Dev.
(sccm)
(W)
(s)
(Torr)
Unit


















0.053
0.0264
12.85
6.45
1.0
175.0
10.0
3.92
4-Up


0.0162
0.0023
3.97
0.57
1.0
185.0
15.0
3.92
4-Up


0.0234
0.0050
5.73
1.22
1.0
185.0
10.0
3.92
4-Up


0.0215
0.0044
5.26
1.08
2.0
200.0
15.0
3.92
4-Up









Example 8

This study was to determine the effect of applied pressure during the coating process on the resulting Oxygen Transmission Rates (OTR) or Oxygen Permeation Rate Constant (OPRC) of the trilayer coating or layer. Compared to Examples 4-7 wherein the applied pressure was 3.92 torr, in Example 8, the applied pressure was 1.6 torr. The results were shown in Table 12.









TABLE 12







Effect Of Pressure


O2 (sccm) = 75.0, Power(w) = 200










Oxygen Transmission
Process Information












Permeance
Rate


Part



μmol/day/cm2/atm
cc/m2/day
HMDSO
Time
Pressure














Avg.
2*St. Dev.
Avg.
2*St. Dev.
(sccm)
(s)
(Torr)
Unit

















0.0043
0.0028
1.04
0.69
1.0
10.0
1.60
4-Up


0.0044
0.0084
1.08
2.06
1.5
10.0
1.60
4-Up


0.0049
0.0034
1.20
0.83
1.0
15.0
1.60
4-Up


0.0039
0.0040
0.96
0.99
1.5
15.0
1.60
4-Up









The results show that lower pressure improved the barrier coating or layer performance.


Example 9

This was a Pressure Differential Test and the testing conditions were set to mimic ambient atmospheric pressure at an altitude of 70,000 feet. This testing was done to determine if the trilayer coated bloodtubes with the retention features described in the specification can stay intact and endure the pressure change. This testing was important to predict if the bloodtubes of this invention were fit for transporting infectious blood samples. It was a pass/fail testing.


10 mL trilayer coated COP blood sample collection tubes including both retention features described above (a retention lip 293 and a taper of about 0.5° in the stopper contact area 291) were sealed with stoppers which had been siliconized (coated with silicone oil) in a tumbler to prevent them from sticking to each other. The sealed blood sample collection tubes were evacuated and filled with 9.33 mL±0.03 mL of red colored water before they were placed upright and inverted into a 700 mL beaker, which was then placed within a metal canister for pressurization/vacuum. A maximum quantity of 10 filled blood sample collection tubes were tested at once. Once the metal canister was sealed, the vacuum valve was opened slowly to reduce the pressure to −28.8 in. Hg gauge (−14.1 psig, or a pressure differential of 97.5 kPa). This method approximates the effect of filling and stoppering the vessels at sea level ambient pressure, then elevating them to 70,000 feet above sea level, since a standardized pressure difference is applied regardless of the elevation or barometric pressure where the tubes are filled.


Filled blood sample collection tube samples were held at this vacuum level for 30 minutes. After the 30 minutes passed, the vacuum level was slowly raised to ambient pressure. Samples were then removed and inspected for stopper movement and leaks.


The blood sample collection tubes with the retention features described in the specification passed Pressure Differential Testing with no leaks. The same blood sample collection tubes without the retention features failed the Pressure Differential Testing.

Claims
  • 1. An evacuated blood collection tube comprising: a thermoplastic vessel wall; anda stopper;the thermoplastic vessel wall having a top defining an opening,an inside surface defining a lumen, the inside surface having one or more coatings applied by PECVD,an outside surface, anda stopper contact area adjacent to the top, the stopper contact area being a portion of the inside surface that contacts the stopper;the stopper being seated in the stopper contact area and sealing the lumen;wherein the stopper contact area is tapered inward between 0 and 1.3 degrees and the entirety of the inside surface below the stopper contact area is tapered inward at least 0.1 degree more than the stopper contact area; andwherein the stopper contact area is continuous with the inside surface below the stopper contact area.
  • 2. The evacuated blood collection tube of claim 1, in which the entirety of the inside surface below the stopper contact area is tapered at least 1.5 degrees.
  • 3. The evacuated blood collection tube of claim 1, the stopper maintaining a vacuum level in the lumen, relative to ambient pressure at sea level, sufficient to draw blood from a patient's vein into the lumen.
  • 4. The evacuated blood collection tube of claim 3, in which the stopper remains seated in the stopper contact area at a vacuum level of 97.5 kPa below ambient pressure.
  • 5. The evacuated blood collection tube of claim 3, having a shelf life of at least 6 months, the shelf life defined by the amount of time after evacuation the tube maintains a draw volume capacity of at least 90% of the draw volume capacity of a newly evacuated vessel of the same kind.
  • 6. The evacuated blood collection tube of claim 3, further comprising a fluid composition in the lumen.
  • 7. The evacuated blood collection tube of claim 6, wherein the fluid composition comprises a blood anticoagulation agent.
  • 8. The evacuated blood collection tube of claim 7, wherein the blood anticoagulation agent is a buffered sodium citrate solution.
  • 9. The evacuated blood collection tube of claim 3, having an oxygen permeation rate constant of from 0.0001 to 0.01 micromol O2/(day×cm2×atm).
  • 10. The evacuated blood collection tube of claim 3, in which the wall has a water vapor transmission rate of less than 2.5 g/m2/day at 50° C. and 90% relative humidity.
  • 11. The evacuated blood collection tube of claim 1, wherein the inside surface comprises: a barrier layer of SiOx applied by a PECVD coating process, wherein x is from 1.5 to 2.9 as determined by XPS, andat least one of: a tie layer of SiOxCy applied by a PECVD coating process, anda pH protective layer of SiOxCy applied by a PECVD coating process.
  • 12. The evacuated blood collection tube of claim 1, wherein the inside surface comprises: a tie layer of SiOxCy applied by a PECVD coating process,a barrier layer of SiOx applied by a PECVD coating process, wherein x is from 1.5 to 2.9 as determined by XPS, between the tie coating or layer and the lumen, anda pH protective layer of SiOxCy applied by a PECVD coating process, wherein x is from about 0.5 to about 2.4 and y is from about 0.6 to about 3, each as determined by XPS, between the barrier layer and the lumen.
  • 13. The evacuated blood collection tube of claim 1, in which the stopper contact area is tapered inward between 0.3 and 1 degree.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a U.S. National Phase of International Application No. PCT/US2016/047622 filed Aug. 18, 2016, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/206,637 filed Aug. 18, 20115, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. This application claims the priority of provisional U.S. patent application Ser. No. 62/206,637, filed Aug. 18, 2015. The specification and drawings of Ser. No. 62/206,637, as well as the specification and drawings of U.S. Pat. No. 7,985,188 and U.S. Ser. No. 14/751,435, filed Jun. 26, 2015, are incorporated here by reference in their entirety. The incorporated patent and application describe apparatus, vessels, precursors, coatings or layers and methods (in particular coating methods and test methods for examining the coatings or layers) which can generally be used in performing the present invention, in some cases as modified herein. They also describe SiOxCy tie coatings or layers and pH protective coatings or layers and SiOx barrier coatings or layers to which reference is made herein.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/US2016/047622 8/18/2016 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2017/031354 2/23/2017 WO A
US Referenced Citations (928)
Number Name Date Kind
3274267 Chow Sep 1966 A
3297465 Connell Jan 1967 A
3355947 Karlby Dec 1967 A
3442686 Jones May 1969 A
3448614 Muger Jun 1969 A
3590634 Pasternak Jul 1971 A
3838598 Tomkins Oct 1974 A
3957653 Blecher May 1976 A
4111326 Percarpio Sep 1978 A
4134832 Heimreid Jan 1979 A
4136794 Percapio Jan 1979 A
4162528 Maldonado Jul 1979 A
4168330 Kaganowicz Sep 1979 A
4186840 Percarpio Feb 1980 A
4187952 Percarpio Feb 1980 A
4226333 Percarpio Oct 1980 A
4289726 Potoczky Sep 1981 A
4290534 Percarpio Sep 1981 A
4293078 Percarpio Oct 1981 A
4338764 Percarpio Jul 1982 A
4391128 McWorter Jul 1983 A
4392218 Plunkett, Jr. Jul 1983 A
4422896 Class Dec 1983 A
4452679 Dunn Jun 1984 A
4478873 Masso Oct 1984 A
4481229 Suzuki Nov 1984 A
4483737 Mantei Nov 1984 A
4484479 Eckhardt Nov 1984 A
4486378 Hirata Dec 1984 A
4522510 Rosencwaig Jun 1985 A
4524089 Hague Jun 1985 A
4524616 Drexel Jun 1985 A
4552791 Hahn Nov 1985 A
4576204 Smallborn Mar 1986 A
4609428 Fujimura Sep 1986 A
4610770 Saito Sep 1986 A
4648107 Latter Mar 1987 A
4648281 Morita Mar 1987 A
4652429 Konrad Mar 1987 A
4664279 Obrist May 1987 A
4667620 White May 1987 A
4668365 Foster May 1987 A
4683838 Kimura Aug 1987 A
4697717 Grippi Oct 1987 A
4703187 Hofling Oct 1987 A
4716491 Ohno Dec 1987 A
4721553 Saito Jan 1988 A
4725481 Ostapchenko Feb 1988 A
4741446 Miller May 1988 A
4756964 Kincaid Jul 1988 A
4767414 Williams Aug 1988 A
4778721 Sliemers Oct 1988 A
4799246 Fischer Jan 1989 A
4808453 Romberg Feb 1989 A
4809876 Tomaswick Mar 1989 A
4824444 Nomura Apr 1989 A
4841776 Kawachi Jun 1989 A
4842704 Collins Jun 1989 A
4844986 Karakelle Jul 1989 A
4846101 Montgomery Jul 1989 A
4853102 Tateishi Aug 1989 A
4869203 Pinkhasov Sep 1989 A
4872758 Miyazaki Oct 1989 A
4874497 Matsuoka Oct 1989 A
4880675 Mehta Nov 1989 A
4883686 Doehler Nov 1989 A
4886086 Etchells Dec 1989 A
4894256 Gartner Jan 1990 A
4894510 Nakanishi Jan 1990 A
4897285 Wilhelm Jan 1990 A
4926791 Hirose May 1990 A
4948628 Montgomery Aug 1990 A
4973504 Romberg Nov 1990 A
4991104 Miller Feb 1991 A
4999014 Gold Mar 1991 A
5000994 Romberg Mar 1991 A
5016564 Nakamura May 1991 A
5021114 Saito Jun 1991 A
5028566 Lagendijk Jul 1991 A
5030475 Ackermann Jul 1991 A
5032202 Tsai Jul 1991 A
5039548 Hirose Aug 1991 A
5041303 Wertheimer Aug 1991 A
5042951 Gold Aug 1991 A
5044199 Drexel Sep 1991 A
5064083 Alexander Nov 1991 A
5067491 Taylor Nov 1991 A
5079481 Moslehi Jan 1992 A
5082542 Moslehi Jan 1992 A
5084356 Deak Jan 1992 A
5085904 Deak Feb 1992 A
5099881 Nakajima Mar 1992 A
5113790 Geisler May 1992 A
5120966 Kondo Jun 1992 A
5131752 Yu Jul 1992 A
5144196 Gegenwart Sep 1992 A
5147678 Foerch Sep 1992 A
5154943 Etzkorn Oct 1992 A
5189446 Barnes Feb 1993 A
5192849 Moslehi Mar 1993 A
5198725 Chen Mar 1993 A
5203959 Hirose Apr 1993 A
5204141 Roberts Apr 1993 A
5209882 Hattori May 1993 A
5216329 Pelleteir Jun 1993 A
5224441 Felts Jul 1993 A
5225024 Hanley Jul 1993 A
5232111 Burns Aug 1993 A
5252178 Moslehi Oct 1993 A
5260095 Affinito Nov 1993 A
5266398 Hioki Nov 1993 A
5271274 Khuri-Yakub Dec 1993 A
5272417 Ohmi Dec 1993 A
5272735 Bryan Dec 1993 A
5275299 Konrad Jan 1994 A
5286297 Moslehi Feb 1994 A
5292370 Tsai Mar 1994 A
5294011 Konrad Mar 1994 A
5294464 Geisler Mar 1994 A
5297561 Hulon Mar 1994 A
5298587 Hu Mar 1994 A
5300901 Krummel Apr 1994 A
5302266 Grabarz Apr 1994 A
5308649 Babacz May 1994 A
5314561 Komiya May 1994 A
5320875 Hu Jun 1994 A
5321634 Obata Jun 1994 A
5330578 Sakama Jul 1994 A
5333049 Ledger Jul 1994 A
5338579 Ogawa et al. Aug 1994 A
5346579 Cook Sep 1994 A
5354286 Mesa Oct 1994 A
5356029 Hogan Oct 1994 A
5361921 Burns Nov 1994 A
5364665 Felts Nov 1994 A
5364666 Williams Nov 1994 A
5372851 Ogawa et al. Dec 1994 A
5374314 Babacz Dec 1994 A
5378510 Thomas Jan 1995 A
5381228 Brace Jan 1995 A
5395644 Affinito Mar 1995 A
5396080 Hannotiau Mar 1995 A
5397956 Araki Mar 1995 A
5409782 Murayama Apr 1995 A
5413813 Cruse May 1995 A
5423915 Murata Jun 1995 A
5429070 Campbell Jul 1995 A
5433786 Hu Jul 1995 A
5434008 Felts Jul 1995 A
5439736 Nomura Aug 1995 A
5440446 Shaw Aug 1995 A
5443645 Otoshi Aug 1995 A
5444207 Sekine Aug 1995 A
5449432 Hanawa Sep 1995 A
5452082 Sanger Sep 1995 A
5468520 Williams Nov 1995 A
5470388 Goedicke Nov 1995 A
5472660 Fortin Dec 1995 A
5485091 Verkuil Jan 1996 A
5486701 Norton Jan 1996 A
5494170 Burns Feb 1996 A
5494712 Hu Feb 1996 A
5495958 Konrad Mar 1996 A
5508075 Roulin Apr 1996 A
5510155 Williams Apr 1996 A
5513515 Mayer May 1996 A
5514276 Babock May 1996 A
5521351 Mahoney May 1996 A
5522518 Konrad Jun 1996 A
5531060 Fayet Jul 1996 A
5531683 Kriesel Jul 1996 A
5536253 Haber Jul 1996 A
5543919 Mumola Aug 1996 A
5545375 Tropsha Aug 1996 A
5547508 Affinito Aug 1996 A
5547723 Williams Aug 1996 A
5554223 Imahashi Sep 1996 A
5555471 Xu Sep 1996 A
5565248 Piester Oct 1996 A
5569810 Tsuji Oct 1996 A
5571366 Ishii Nov 1996 A
5578103 Araujo Nov 1996 A
5591898 Mayer Jan 1997 A
5593550 Stewart Jan 1997 A
5597456 Maruyama Jan 1997 A
5616369 Williams Apr 1997 A
5620523 Maeda Apr 1997 A
5632396 Burns May 1997 A
5633711 Nelson May 1997 A
5643638 Otto Jul 1997 A
5652030 Delperier Jul 1997 A
5654054 Tropsha Aug 1997 A
5656141 Betz Aug 1997 A
5658438 Givens Aug 1997 A
5665280 Tropsha Sep 1997 A
5667840 Tingey Sep 1997 A
5674321 Pu Oct 1997 A
5677010 Esser Oct 1997 A
5679412 Kuehnle Oct 1997 A
5679413 Petrmichl Oct 1997 A
5683771 Tropsha Nov 1997 A
5686157 Harvey Nov 1997 A
5690745 Grunwald Nov 1997 A
5691007 Montgomery Nov 1997 A
5693196 Stewart Dec 1997 A
5699923 Burns Dec 1997 A
5702770 Martin Dec 1997 A
5704983 Thomas et al. Jan 1998 A
5716683 Harvey Feb 1998 A
5718967 Hu Feb 1998 A
5725909 Shaw Mar 1998 A
5733405 Taki Mar 1998 A
5736207 Walther Apr 1998 A
5737179 Shaw Apr 1998 A
5738233 Burns Apr 1998 A
5738920 Knors Apr 1998 A
5744360 Hu Apr 1998 A
5750892 Huang May 1998 A
5763033 Tropsha Jun 1998 A
5766362 Montgomery Jun 1998 A
5769273 Sasaki Jun 1998 A
5779074 Burns Jul 1998 A
5779716 Cano Jul 1998 A
5779802 Borghs Jul 1998 A
5779849 Blalock Jul 1998 A
5788670 Reinhard Aug 1998 A
5792940 Ghandhi Aug 1998 A
5798027 Lefebvre Aug 1998 A
5800880 Laurent Sep 1998 A
5807343 Tucker Sep 1998 A
5807605 Tingey Sep 1998 A
5812261 Nelson Sep 1998 A
5814257 Kawata Sep 1998 A
5814738 Pinkerton Sep 1998 A
5820603 Tucker Oct 1998 A
5823373 Sudo Oct 1998 A
5824198 Williams Oct 1998 A
5824607 Trow Oct 1998 A
5833752 Martin Nov 1998 A
5837888 Mayer Nov 1998 A
5837903 Weingand Nov 1998 A
5840167 Kim Nov 1998 A
5849368 Hostettler Dec 1998 A
5853833 Sudo Dec 1998 A
5855686 Rust Jan 1999 A
5861546 Sagi Jan 1999 A
5871700 Konrad Feb 1999 A
5877895 Shaw Mar 1999 A
5880034 Keller Mar 1999 A
5888414 Collins Mar 1999 A
5888591 Gleason Mar 1999 A
5897508 Konrad Apr 1999 A
5900284 Hu May 1999 A
5900285 Walther May 1999 A
5902461 Xu May 1999 A
5904952 Lopata May 1999 A
5913140 Roche Jun 1999 A
5914189 Hasz Jun 1999 A
5919328 Tropsha Jul 1999 A
5919420 Niermann Jul 1999 A
5935391 Nakahigashi Aug 1999 A
5945187 Buch-Rasmussen Aug 1999 A
5951527 Sudo Sep 1999 A
5952069 Tropsha Sep 1999 A
5955161 Tropsha Sep 1999 A
5961911 Hwang Oct 1999 A
5968620 Harvey Oct 1999 A
5972297 Niermann Oct 1999 A
5972436 Walther Oct 1999 A
5985103 Givens Nov 1999 A
6001429 Martin Dec 1999 A
6009743 Mayer Jan 2000 A
6013337 Knors Jan 2000 A
6017317 Newby Jan 2000 A
6018987 Mayer Feb 2000 A
6020196 Hu Feb 2000 A
6027619 Cathey Feb 2000 A
6032813 Niermann Mar 2000 A
6035717 Carodiskey Mar 2000 A
6050400 Taskis Apr 2000 A
6051151 Keller Apr 2000 A
6054016 Tuda Apr 2000 A
6054188 Tropsha Apr 2000 A
6068884 Rose May 2000 A
6077403 Kobayashi Jun 2000 A
6081330 Nelson Jun 2000 A
6082295 Lee Jul 2000 A
6083313 Venkatraman et al. Jul 2000 A
6085927 Kusz Jul 2000 A
6090081 Sudo Jul 2000 A
6106678 Shufflebotham Aug 2000 A
6110395 Gibson, Jr. Aug 2000 A
6110544 Yang Aug 2000 A
6112695 Felts Sep 2000 A
6116081 Ghandhi Sep 2000 A
6117243 Walther Sep 2000 A
6118844 Fischer Sep 2000 A
6124212 Fan Sep 2000 A
6125687 McClelland Oct 2000 A
6126640 Tucker Oct 2000 A
6136275 Niermann Oct 2000 A
6139802 Niermann Oct 2000 A
6143140 Wang Nov 2000 A
6149982 Plester Nov 2000 A
6153269 Gleason Nov 2000 A
6156152 Ogino Dec 2000 A
6156399 Spallek Dec 2000 A
6156435 Gleason Dec 2000 A
6160350 Sakemi Dec 2000 A
6161712 Savitz Dec 2000 A
6163006 Doughty Dec 2000 A
6165138 Miller Dec 2000 A
6165542 Jaworowski Dec 2000 A
6165566 Tropsha Dec 2000 A
6171670 Sudo Jan 2001 B1
6175612 Sato Jan 2001 B1
6177142 Felts Jan 2001 B1
6180185 Felts Jan 2001 B1
6180191 Felts Jan 2001 B1
6188079 Juvinall Feb 2001 B1
6189484 Yin Feb 2001 B1
6190992 Sandhu Feb 2001 B1
6193853 Yumshtyk Feb 2001 B1
6196155 Setoyama Mar 2001 B1
6197166 Moslehi Mar 2001 B1
6200658 Walther Mar 2001 B1
6200675 Neerinck Mar 2001 B1
6204922 Chalmers Mar 2001 B1
6210791 Skoog Apr 2001 B1
6213985 Niedospial Apr 2001 B1
6214422 Yializis Apr 2001 B1
6217716 Fai Lai Apr 2001 B1
6223683 Plester May 2001 B1
6236459 Negahdaripour May 2001 B1
6245190 Masuda Jun 2001 B1
6248219 Wellerdieck Jun 2001 B1
6248397 Ye Jun 2001 B1
6251792 Collins Jun 2001 B1
6254983 Namiki Jul 2001 B1
6261643 Hasz Jul 2001 B1
6263249 Stewart Jul 2001 B1
6271047 Ushio Aug 2001 B1
6276296 Plester Aug 2001 B1
6277331 Konrad Aug 2001 B1
6279505 Plester Aug 2001 B1
6284986 Dietze Sep 2001 B1
6306132 Moorman Oct 2001 B1
6308556 Sagi Oct 2001 B1
6322661 Bailey, III Nov 2001 B1
6331174 Reinhard et al. Dec 2001 B1
6346596 Mallen Feb 2002 B1
6348967 Nelson Feb 2002 B1
6350415 Niermann Feb 2002 B1
6351075 Barankova Feb 2002 B1
6352629 Wang Mar 2002 B1
6354452 DeSalvo Mar 2002 B1
6355033 Moorman Mar 2002 B1
6365013 Beele Apr 2002 B1
6375022 Zurcher Apr 2002 B1
6376028 Laurent Apr 2002 B1
6379757 Iacovangelo Apr 2002 B1
6382441 Carano May 2002 B1
6394979 Sharp May 2002 B1
6396024 Doughty May 2002 B1
6399944 Vasilyev Jun 2002 B1
6402885 Loewenhardt Jun 2002 B2
6410926 Munro Jun 2002 B1
6413645 Graff Jul 2002 B1
6432494 Yang Aug 2002 B1
6432510 Kim Aug 2002 B1
6470650 Lohwasser Oct 2002 B1
6471822 Yin Oct 2002 B1
6475622 Namiki Nov 2002 B2
6482509 Buch-Rasmussen et al. Nov 2002 B2
6486081 Ishikawa Nov 2002 B1
6500500 Okamura Dec 2002 B1
6503579 Murakami Jan 2003 B1
6518195 Collins Feb 2003 B1
6524448 Brinkmann Feb 2003 B2
6539890 Felts Apr 2003 B1
6544610 Minami Apr 2003 B1
6551267 Cohen Apr 2003 B1
6558679 Flament-Garcia et al. May 2003 B2
6562189 Quiles May 2003 B1
6565791 Laurent May 2003 B1
6582426 Moorman Jun 2003 B2
6582823 Sakhrani et al. Jun 2003 B1
6584828 Sagi Jul 2003 B2
6595961 Hetzler Jul 2003 B2
6597193 Lagowski Jul 2003 B2
6599569 Humele Jul 2003 B1
6599594 Walther Jul 2003 B1
6602206 Niermann Aug 2003 B1
6616632 Sharp Sep 2003 B2
6620139 Plicchi Sep 2003 B1
6620334 Kanno Sep 2003 B2
6623861 Martin Sep 2003 B2
6638403 Inaba Oct 2003 B1
6638876 Levy Oct 2003 B2
6645354 Gorokhovsky Nov 2003 B1
6651835 Iskra Nov 2003 B2
6652520 Moorman Nov 2003 B2
6656540 Sakamoto Dec 2003 B2
6658919 Chatard Dec 2003 B2
6662957 Zurcher Dec 2003 B2
6663601 Hetzler Dec 2003 B2
6670200 Ushio Dec 2003 B2
6673199 Yamartino Jan 2004 B1
6680091 Buch-Rasmussen et al. Jan 2004 B2
6680621 Savtchouk Jan 2004 B2
6683308 Itagaki Jan 2004 B2
6684683 Potyrailo Feb 2004 B2
6702898 Hosoi Mar 2004 B2
6706412 Yializis Mar 2004 B2
6746430 Lubrecht Jun 2004 B2
6749078 Iskra Jun 2004 B2
6752899 Singh Jun 2004 B1
6753972 Hirose Jun 2004 B1
6757056 Meeks Jun 2004 B1
6764714 Wei Jul 2004 B2
6765466 Miyata Jul 2004 B2
6766682 Engle Jul 2004 B2
6774018 Mikhael Aug 2004 B2
6796780 Chatard Sep 2004 B1
6800852 Larson Oct 2004 B2
6808753 Rule Oct 2004 B2
6810106 Sato Oct 2004 B2
6815014 Gabelnick Nov 2004 B2
6818310 Namiki Nov 2004 B2
6827972 Darras Dec 2004 B2
6837954 Carano Jan 2005 B2
6844075 Saak Jan 2005 B1
6853141 Hoffman Feb 2005 B2
6858259 Affinito Feb 2005 B2
6863731 Elsayed-Ali Mar 2005 B2
6864773 Perrin Mar 2005 B2
6866656 Tingey Mar 2005 B2
6872428 Yang Mar 2005 B2
6876154 Appleyard Apr 2005 B2
6885727 Tamura Apr 2005 B2
6887578 Gleason May 2005 B2
6891158 Larson May 2005 B2
6892567 Morrow May 2005 B1
6899054 Bardos May 2005 B1
6905769 Komada Jun 2005 B2
6910597 Iskra Jun 2005 B2
6911779 Madocks Jun 2005 B2
6919107 Schwarzenbach Jul 2005 B2
6919114 Darras Jul 2005 B1
6933460 Vanden Brande Aug 2005 B2
6946164 Huang Sep 2005 B2
6952949 Moore Oct 2005 B2
6960393 Yializis Nov 2005 B2
6962671 Martin Nov 2005 B2
6965221 Lipcsei Nov 2005 B2
6981403 Ascheman Jan 2006 B2
6989675 Kesil Jan 2006 B2
6995377 Darr Feb 2006 B2
7029755 Terry Apr 2006 B2
7029803 Becker Apr 2006 B2
7039158 Janik May 2006 B1
7052736 Wei May 2006 B2
7052920 Ushio May 2006 B2
7059268 Russell Jun 2006 B2
7067034 Bailey, III Jun 2006 B2
7074501 Czeremuszkin Jul 2006 B2
7098453 Ando Aug 2006 B2
7109070 Behle Sep 2006 B2
7112352 Schaepkens Sep 2006 B2
7112541 Xia Sep 2006 B2
7115310 Jacoud Oct 2006 B2
7118538 Konrad Oct 2006 B2
7119908 Nomoto Oct 2006 B2
7121135 Moore Oct 2006 B2
7130373 Omote Oct 2006 B2
7150299 Hertzler Dec 2006 B2
7160292 Moorman Jan 2007 B2
7180849 Hirokane Feb 2007 B2
7183197 Won Feb 2007 B2
7188734 Konrad Mar 2007 B2
7189218 Lichtenberg Mar 2007 B2
7189290 Hama Mar 2007 B2
7193724 Isei Mar 2007 B2
7198685 Hetzler Apr 2007 B2
7206074 Fujimoto Apr 2007 B2
7244381 Chatard Jul 2007 B2
7253892 Semersky Aug 2007 B2
7286242 Kim Oct 2007 B2
7288293 Koulik Oct 2007 B2
7297216 Hetzler Nov 2007 B2
7297640 Xie Nov 2007 B2
7300684 Boardman Nov 2007 B2
7303789 Saito Dec 2007 B2
7303790 Delaunay Dec 2007 B2
7306852 Komada Dec 2007 B2
7332227 Hardman Feb 2008 B2
7338576 Ono Mar 2008 B2
7339682 Aiyer Mar 2008 B2
7344766 Sorensen Mar 2008 B1
7348055 Chappa Mar 2008 B2
7348192 Mikami Mar 2008 B2
7362425 Meeks Apr 2008 B2
7381469 Moelle Jun 2008 B2
7390573 Korevaar Jun 2008 B2
7399500 Bicker Jul 2008 B2
7404278 Wittland Jul 2008 B2
7405008 Domine Jul 2008 B2
7409313 Ringermacher Aug 2008 B2
7411685 Takashima Aug 2008 B2
RE40531 Graff Oct 2008 E
7431989 Sakhrani Oct 2008 B2
7438783 Miyata Oct 2008 B2
7444955 Boardman Nov 2008 B2
7455892 Goodwin Nov 2008 B2
7480363 Lasiuk Jan 2009 B2
7488683 Kobayashi Feb 2009 B2
7494941 Kasahara Feb 2009 B2
7507378 Reichenbach Mar 2009 B2
7513953 Felts Apr 2009 B1
7520965 Wei Apr 2009 B2
7521022 Konrad Apr 2009 B2
7534615 Havens May 2009 B2
7534733 Bookbinder May 2009 B2
RE40787 Martin Jun 2009 E
7541069 Tudhope Jun 2009 B2
7552620 DeRoos Jun 2009 B2
7553529 Sakhrani Jun 2009 B2
7555934 DeRoos Jul 2009 B2
7569035 Wilmot Aug 2009 B1
7571122 Howes Aug 2009 B2
7579056 Brown Aug 2009 B2
7586824 Hirokane Aug 2009 B2
7582868 Jiang Sep 2009 B2
7595097 Iacovangelo Sep 2009 B2
7608151 Tudhope Oct 2009 B2
7609605 Hirokane Oct 2009 B2
7618686 Colpo Nov 2009 B2
7624622 Mayer Dec 2009 B1
7625494 Honda Dec 2009 B2
7641636 Moesli Jan 2010 B2
7645696 Dulkin Jan 2010 B1
7648481 Geiger Jan 2010 B2
7682816 Kim Mar 2010 B2
7694403 Moulton Apr 2010 B2
7699933 Lizenberg Apr 2010 B2
7704683 Wittenberg Apr 2010 B2
7713638 Moelle May 2010 B2
7736689 Chappa Jun 2010 B2
7740610 Moh Jun 2010 B2
7744567 Glowacki Jun 2010 B2
7744790 Behle Jun 2010 B2
7745228 Schwind Jun 2010 B2
7745547 Auerbach Jun 2010 B1
7749914 Honda Jul 2010 B2
7754302 Yamaski Jul 2010 B2
7766882 Sudo Aug 2010 B2
7780866 Miller Aug 2010 B2
7785862 Kim Aug 2010 B2
7790475 Galbraith Sep 2010 B2
7798993 Lim Sep 2010 B2
7803305 Ahem Sep 2010 B2
7807242 Sorensen Oct 2010 B2
7815922 Chaney Oct 2010 B2
7846293 Iwasaki Dec 2010 B2
7854889 Perot Dec 2010 B2
7867366 McFarland Jan 2011 B1
7901783 Rose Mar 2011 B2
7905866 Haider Mar 2011 B2
7922880 Pradhan Apr 2011 B1
7922958 D'Arrigo Apr 2011 B2
7931955 Behle Apr 2011 B2
7932678 Madocks Apr 2011 B2
7934613 Sudo May 2011 B2
7943205 Schaepkens May 2011 B2
7947337 Kuepper May 2011 B2
7955986 Hoffman Jun 2011 B2
7960043 Harris Jun 2011 B2
7964438 Roca I Cabarrocas Jun 2011 B2
7967945 Glukhoy Jun 2011 B2
7975646 Rius Jul 2011 B2
7985188 Felts Jul 2011 B2
8025915 Haines Sep 2011 B2
3039524 Chappa Oct 2011 A1
8038858 Bures Oct 2011 B1
8056719 Porret Nov 2011 B2
8062266 McKinnon Nov 2011 B2
8066854 Storey Nov 2011 B2
8070917 Tsukamoto Dec 2011 B2
8075995 Zhao Dec 2011 B2
8092605 Shannon Jan 2012 B2
8101246 Fayet Jan 2012 B2
8197452 Harding Jun 2012 B2
8277025 Lewis Jul 2012 B2
8258486 Avnery Sep 2012 B2
8268410 Moelle Sep 2012 B2
8273222 Wei Sep 2012 B2
8313455 DiGregorio Nov 2012 B2
8323166 Haines Dec 2012 B2
8389958 Vo-Dinh Mar 2013 B2
8397667 Behle Mar 2013 B2
8409441 Wilt Apr 2013 B2
8418650 Goto Apr 2013 B2
8435605 Aitken et al. May 2013 B2
8475886 Chen et al. Jul 2013 B2
8512796 Felts Aug 2013 B2
8524331 Honda Sep 2013 B2
8592015 Bicker Nov 2013 B2
8603638 Liu Dec 2013 B2
8618509 Vo-Dinh Dec 2013 B2
8623324 Diwu Jan 2014 B2
8633034 Trotter Jan 2014 B2
8747962 Bicker Jun 2014 B2
8802603 D'Souza Aug 2014 B2
8816022 Zhao Aug 2014 B2
9068565 Alarcon Jun 2015 B2
20010000279 Daniels Apr 2001 A1
20010021356 Konrad Sep 2001 A1
20010038894 Komada Nov 2001 A1
20010042510 Plester Nov 2001 A1
20010043997 Uddin Nov 2001 A1
20020006487 O'Connor Jan 2002 A1
20020007796 Gorokhovsky Jan 2002 A1
20020070647 Ginovker Jun 2002 A1
20020117114 Ikenaga Aug 2002 A1
20020125900 Savtchouk Sep 2002 A1
20020130100 Smith Sep 2002 A1
20020130674 Logowski Sep 2002 A1
20020141477 Akahori Oct 2002 A1
20020153103 Madocks Oct 2002 A1
20020155218 Meyer Oct 2002 A1
20020170495 Nakamura Nov 2002 A1
20020176947 Darras Nov 2002 A1
20020182101 Koulik Dec 2002 A1
20020185226 Lea Dec 2002 A1
20020190207 Levy Dec 2002 A1
20030010454 Bailey, III Jan 2003 A1
20030013818 Hakuta Jan 2003 A1
20030029837 Trow Feb 2003 A1
20030031806 Jinks Feb 2003 A1
20030046982 Chartard Mar 2003 A1
20030058413 Bamhurst Mar 2003 A1
20030102087 Ito Jun 2003 A1
20030119193 Hess Jun 2003 A1
20030148028 Kimura et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030159654 Arnold Aug 2003 A1
20030215652 O'Connor Nov 2003 A1
20030219547 Arnold Nov 2003 A1
20030232150 Arnold Dec 2003 A1
20040024371 Plicchi Feb 2004 A1
20040039401 Chow Feb 2004 A1
20040040372 Plester Mar 2004 A1
20040045811 Wang Mar 2004 A1
20040050744 Hama Mar 2004 A1
20040055538 Gorokhovsky Mar 2004 A1
20040071960 Weber Apr 2004 A1
20040082917 Etzler Apr 2004 A1
20040084151 Kim May 2004 A1
20040125913 Larson Jul 2004 A1
20040135081 Larson Jul 2004 A1
20040149225 Weikart Aug 2004 A1
20040175961 Olsen Sep 2004 A1
20040177676 Moore Sep 2004 A1
20040195960 Czeremuszkin Oct 2004 A1
20040206309 Bera Oct 2004 A1
20040217046 Konrad Nov 2004 A1
20040217081 Konrad Nov 2004 A1
20040247948 Behle Dec 2004 A1
20040267194 Sano Dec 2004 A1
20050000962 Crawford Jan 2005 A1
20050010175 Beedon Jan 2005 A1
20050019503 Komada Jan 2005 A1
20050037165 Ahem Feb 2005 A1
20050039854 Matsuyama Feb 2005 A1
20050045472 Nagata Mar 2005 A1
20050057754 Smith Mar 2005 A1
20050073323 Kohno Apr 2005 A1
20050075611 Heltzer Apr 2005 A1
20050075612 Lee Apr 2005 A1
20050161149 Yokota Jul 2005 A1
20050169803 Betz Aug 2005 A1
20050190450 Becker Sep 2005 A1
20050196629 Bariatinsky Sep 2005 A1
20050199571 Geisler Sep 2005 A1
20050206907 Fujimoto Sep 2005 A1
20050211383 Miyata Sep 2005 A1
20050223988 Behle Oct 2005 A1
20050227002 Lizenberg Oct 2005 A1
20050227022 Domine Oct 2005 A1
20050229850 Behle Oct 2005 A1
20050233077 Lizenberg Oct 2005 A1
20050233091 Kumar Oct 2005 A1
20050236346 Whitney Oct 2005 A1
20050260504 Becker Nov 2005 A1
20050284550 Bicker Dec 2005 A1
20060005608 Kutzhoffer Jan 2006 A1
20060013997 Kuepper Jan 2006 A1
20060014309 Sachdev Jan 2006 A1
20060024849 Zhu Feb 2006 A1
20060042755 Holmberg Mar 2006 A1
20060046006 Bastion Mar 2006 A1
20060051252 Yuan Mar 2006 A1
20060051520 Behle Mar 2006 A1
20060076231 Wei Apr 2006 A1
20060086320 Lizenberg Apr 2006 A1
20060099340 Behle May 2006 A1
20060121222 Audrich Jun 2006 A1
20060121613 Havens Jun 2006 A1
20060121623 He Jun 2006 A1
20060127699 Moelle Jun 2006 A1
20060135945 Bankiewicz Jun 2006 A1
20060138326 Jiang Jun 2006 A1
20060150909 Behle Jul 2006 A1
20060169026 Kage Aug 2006 A1
20060178627 Geiger Aug 2006 A1
20060183345 Nguyen Aug 2006 A1
20060192973 Aiyer Aug 2006 A1
20060196419 Tudhope Sep 2006 A1
20060198903 Storey Sep 2006 A1
20060198965 Tudhope Sep 2006 A1
20060200078 Konrad Sep 2006 A1
20060200084 Ito Sep 2006 A1
20060210425 Mirkarimi Sep 2006 A1
20060228497 Kumar Oct 2006 A1
20060260360 Dick Nov 2006 A1
20070003441 Wohleb Jan 2007 A1
20070009673 Fukazawa et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070017870 Belov Jan 2007 A1
20070048456 Keshner Mar 2007 A1
20070049048 Rauf Mar 2007 A1
20070051629 Donlik Mar 2007 A1
20070065680 Schultheis Mar 2007 A1
20070076833 Becker Apr 2007 A1
20070102344 Konrad May 2007 A1
20070123920 Inokuti May 2007 A1
20070148326 Hastings Jun 2007 A1
20070166187 Song Jul 2007 A1
20070184657 Iijima Aug 2007 A1
20070187229 Aksenov Aug 2007 A1
20070187280 Haines Aug 2007 A1
20070205096 Nagashima Sep 2007 A1
20070215009 Shimazu Sep 2007 A1
20070215046 Lupke Sep 2007 A1
20070218265 Harris Sep 2007 A1
20070224236 Boden Sep 2007 A1
20070229844 Holz Oct 2007 A1
20070231655 Ha Oct 2007 A1
20070232066 Bicker Oct 2007 A1
20070235890 Lewis Oct 2007 A1
20070243618 Hatchett Oct 2007 A1
20070251458 Mund Nov 2007 A1
20070258894 Melker et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070259184 Martin Nov 2007 A1
20070281108 Weikart Dec 2007 A1
20070281117 Kaplan Dec 2007 A1
20070287950 Kjeken Dec 2007 A1
20070287954 Zhao Dec 2007 A1
20070298189 Straemke Dec 2007 A1
20080011232 Ruis Jan 2008 A1
20080017113 Goto Jan 2008 A1
20080023414 Konrad Jan 2008 A1
20080027400 Harding Jan 2008 A1
20080045880 Kjeken Feb 2008 A1
20080050567 Kawashima Feb 2008 A1
20080050932 Lakshmanan Feb 2008 A1
20080053373 Mund Mar 2008 A1
20080069970 Wu Mar 2008 A1
20080071228 Wu Mar 2008 A1
20080081184 Kubo Apr 2008 A1
20080090039 Klein Apr 2008 A1
20080093245 Periasamy Apr 2008 A1
20080102206 Wagner May 2008 A1
20080109017 Herweck May 2008 A1
20080110852 Kuroda May 2008 A1
20080113109 Moelle May 2008 A1
20080118734 Goodwin May 2008 A1
20080131628 Abensour Jun 2008 A1
20080131638 Hutton Jun 2008 A1
20080139003 Pirzada Jun 2008 A1
20080144185 Wang et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080145271 Kidambi Jun 2008 A1
20080187681 Hofrichter Aug 2008 A1
20080202414 Yan Aug 2008 A1
20080206477 Leontaris Aug 2008 A1
20080210550 Walther Sep 2008 A1
20080220164 Bauch Sep 2008 A1
20080223815 Konrad Sep 2008 A1
20080233355 Henze Sep 2008 A1
20080260966 Hanawa Oct 2008 A1
20080277332 Liu Nov 2008 A1
20080289957 Takigawa Nov 2008 A1
20080292806 Wei Nov 2008 A1
20080295772 Park Dec 2008 A1
20080303131 McElrea Dec 2008 A1
20080312607 Delmotte Dec 2008 A1
20080314318 Han Dec 2008 A1
20090004091 Kang Jan 2009 A1
20090004363 Keshner Jan 2009 A1
20090017217 Hass Jan 2009 A1
20090022981 Yoshida Jan 2009 A1
20090029402 Papkovsky Jan 2009 A1
20090031953 Ingle Feb 2009 A1
20090032393 Madocks Feb 2009 A1
20090039240 Van Nijnatten Feb 2009 A1
20090053491 Laboda Feb 2009 A1
20090061237 Gates Mar 2009 A1
20090065485 O'Neill Mar 2009 A1
20090069790 Yokley Mar 2009 A1
20090081797 Fadeev Mar 2009 A1
20090099512 Digregorio Apr 2009 A1
20090104392 Takada Apr 2009 A1
20090117268 Lewis May 2009 A1
20090117389 Amberg-Schwab May 2009 A1
20090122832 Feist May 2009 A1
20090134884 Bosselmann May 2009 A1
20090137966 Rueckert May 2009 A1
20090142227 Fuchs Jun 2009 A1
20090142514 O'Neill Jun 2009 A1
20090147719 Rak Jun 2009 A1
20090149816 Hetzler Jun 2009 A1
20090155490 Bicker Jun 2009 A1
20090162571 Haines Jun 2009 A1
20090166312 Giraud Jul 2009 A1
20090176031 Armellin Jul 2009 A1
20090214801 Higashi Aug 2009 A1
20090220948 Oviso et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090263668 David Oct 2009 A1
20090274851 Goudar Nov 2009 A1
20090280268 Glukhoy Nov 2009 A1
20090297730 Glukhoy Dec 2009 A1
20090306595 Shih Dec 2009 A1
20090326517 Bork Dec 2009 A1
20100021998 Sanyal Jan 2010 A1
20100028238 Maschwitz Feb 2010 A1
20100034985 Krueger Feb 2010 A1
20100075077 Bicker et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100086808 Nagata Apr 2010 A1
20100089097 Brack Apr 2010 A1
20100104770 Goudar Apr 2010 A1
20100105208 Winniczek Apr 2010 A1
20100132762 Graham, Jr. Jun 2010 A1
20100145284 Togashi Jun 2010 A1
20100149540 Boukherroub Jun 2010 A1
20100174239 Yodfat Jul 2010 A1
20100174245 Halverson Jul 2010 A1
20100178490 Cerny Jul 2010 A1
20100186740 Lewis Jul 2010 A1
20100190036 Komvopoulos Jul 2010 A1
20100193461 Boutroy Aug 2010 A1
20100195471 Hirokane Aug 2010 A1
20100204648 Stout Aug 2010 A1
20100230281 Park Sep 2010 A1
20100231194 Bauch Sep 2010 A1
20100237545 Haury Sep 2010 A1
20100273261 Chen Oct 2010 A1
20100275847 Yamasaki Nov 2010 A1
20100279397 Crawford Nov 2010 A1
20100298738 Felts Nov 2010 A1
20100298779 Hetzler Nov 2010 A1
20110037159 McElrea Feb 2011 A1
20110046570 Stout Feb 2011 A1
20110056912 Magsuyama Mar 2011 A1
20110065798 Hoang Mar 2011 A1
20110079582 Yonesu Apr 2011 A1
20110093056 Kaplan Apr 2011 A1
20110111132 Wei May 2011 A1
20110117202 Bourke, Jr. May 2011 A1
20110117288 Honda May 2011 A1
20110137263 Ashmead Jun 2011 A1
20110152820 Chattaraj Jun 2011 A1
20110159101 Kurdyumov et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110160662 Stout Jun 2011 A1
20110160663 Stout Jun 2011 A1
20110174220 Laure Jul 2011 A1
20110186537 Rodriguez San Juan et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110220490 Wei Sep 2011 A1
20110253674 Chung Oct 2011 A1
20110313363 D'Souza et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110319758 Wang Dec 2011 A1
20110319813 Kamen Dec 2011 A1
20120003497 Handy Jan 2012 A1
20120004339 Chappa Jan 2012 A1
20120021136 Dzengeleski Jan 2012 A1
20120031070 Slough Feb 2012 A1
20120035543 Kamen Feb 2012 A1
20120052123 Kurdyumov et al. Mar 2012 A9
20120053530 Zhao Mar 2012 A1
20120058351 Zhao Mar 2012 A1
20120065612 Stout Mar 2012 A1
20120097527 Kodaira Apr 2012 A1
20120097870 Leray Apr 2012 A1
20120108058 Ha May 2012 A1
20120123345 Felts May 2012 A1
20120141913 Lee Jun 2012 A1
20120143148 Zhao Jun 2012 A1
20120149871 Saxena Jun 2012 A1
20120171386 Bicker Jul 2012 A1
20120175384 Greter Jul 2012 A1
20120183954 Diwu Jul 2012 A1
20120205374 Klumpen Aug 2012 A1
20120231182 Stevens Sep 2012 A1
20120234720 Digregorio Sep 2012 A1
20120252709 Felts Oct 2012 A1
20130041241 Felts Feb 2013 A1
20130046375 Chen Feb 2013 A1
20130057677 Weil Mar 2013 A1
20130072025 Singh Mar 2013 A1
20130081953 Bruna et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130190695 Wu Jul 2013 A1
20130209704 Krueger Aug 2013 A1
20130264303 Andersen Oct 2013 A1
20130296235 Alarcon Nov 2013 A1
20140010969 Bicker Jan 2014 A1
20140052076 Zhao Feb 2014 A1
20140054803 Chen Feb 2014 A1
20140099455 Stanley Apr 2014 A1
20140110297 Trotter Apr 2014 A1
20140147654 Walther May 2014 A1
20140151320 Chang Jun 2014 A1
20140151370 Chang Jun 2014 A1
20140187666 Aizenberg Jul 2014 A1
20140190846 Belt Jul 2014 A1
20140221934 Janvier Aug 2014 A1
20140251856 Larsson Sep 2014 A1
20140251859 Weikart et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140305830 Bicker Oct 2014 A1
20150165125 Foucher Jun 2015 A1
20150224263 Dugand Aug 2015 A1
20160186009 Goto Jun 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (350)
Number Date Country
414209 Oct 2006 AT
504533 Jun 2008 AT
2002354470 May 2007 AU
2085805 Dec 1992 CA
2277679 Jul 1997 CA
2355681 Jul 2000 CA
2571380 Jul 2006 CA
2718253 Sep 2009 CA
2268719 Aug 2010 CA
2879732 Jan 2014 CA
1245439 Feb 2000 CN
2546041 Apr 2003 CN
1436104 Aug 2003 CN
1639775 Jul 2005 CN
1711310 Dec 2005 CN
2766863 Mar 2006 CN
1898172 Jan 2007 CN
101035630 Sep 2007 CN
201002786 Jan 2008 CN
101147813 Mar 2008 CN
201056331 May 2008 CN
102027159 Apr 2011 CN
102036814 Apr 2011 CN
102414343 Apr 2012 CN
102581274 Jul 2012 CN
102917805 Feb 2013 CN
1147836 Apr 1969 DE
1147838 Apr 1969 DE
3632748 Apr 1988 DE
3908418 Sep 1990 DE
4214401 Mar 1993 DE
4204082 Aug 1993 DE
4316349 Nov 1994 DE
4438359 May 1996 DE
19707645 Aug 1998 DE
19830794 Jan 2000 DE
19912737 Jun 2000 DE
10010831 Sep 2001 DE
10154404 Jun 2003 DE
10201110 Oct 2003 DE
10242698 Mar 2004 DE
10246181 Apr 2004 DE
10353540 May 2004 DE
102004017236 Oct 2005 DE
102006061585 Feb 2008 DE
102008023027 Nov 2009 DE
0121340 Oct 1984 EP
0221005 May 1987 EP
0275965 Jul 1988 EP
0284867 Oct 1988 EP
0306307 Mar 1989 EP
0329041 Aug 1989 EP
0343017 Nov 1989 EP
0396919 Nov 1990 EP
0482613 Oct 1991 EP
0484746 Oct 1991 EP
0495447 Jul 1992 EP
0520519 Dec 1992 EP
0535810 Apr 1993 EP
0375778 Sep 1993 EP
0571116 Nov 1993 EP
0580094 Jan 1994 EP
0603717 Jun 1994 EP
0619178 Oct 1994 EP
0645470 Mar 1995 EP
0697378 Feb 1996 EP
0709485 May 1996 EP
0719877 Jul 1996 EP
0728676 Aug 1996 EP
0787824 Aug 1997 EP
0787828 Aug 1997 EP
0814114 Dec 1997 EP
0251812 Jan 1998 EP
0833366 Apr 1998 EP
0879611 Nov 1998 EP
0940183 Sep 1999 EP
0962229 Dec 1999 EP
0992610 Apr 2000 EP
1119034 Jul 2001 EP
0954272 Mar 2002 EP
1245694 Oct 2002 EP
1388594 Jan 2003 EP
1317937 Jun 2003 EP
1365043 Nov 2003 EP
1367145 Dec 2003 EP
1388593 Feb 2004 EP
1439241 Jul 2004 EP
1447459 Aug 2004 EP
1990639 Feb 2005 EP
1510595 Mar 2005 EP
1522403 Apr 2005 EP
1901067 Aug 2005 EP
1507894 Dec 2005 EP
1507723 Mar 2006 EP
1653192 May 2006 EP
1810758 Jul 2007 EP
1356260 Dec 2007 EP
1870117 Dec 2007 EP
1881088 Jan 2008 EP
1507887 Jul 2008 EP
1415018 Oct 2008 EP
1756565 Jul 2009 EP
2199264 Nov 2009 EP
1388594 Jan 2010 EP
2178109 Apr 2010 EP
1507895 Jul 2010 EP
2218465 Aug 2010 EP
2243751 Oct 2010 EP
2251671 Nov 2010 EP
2261185 Dec 2010 EP
2369038 Sep 2011 EP
1960279 Oct 2011 EP
2444771 Apr 2012 EP
2602354 Jun 2013 EP
2639330 Sep 2013 EP
891892 Nov 1942 FR
752822 Jul 1956 GB
1363762 Aug 1974 GB
1513426 Jun 1978 GB
1566251 Apr 1980 GB
2210826 Jun 1989 GB
2231197 Nov 1990 GB
2246794 Feb 1992 GB
2246795 Feb 1992 GB
2387964 Oct 2003 GB
56027330 Mar 1981 JP
58154602 Sep 1983 JP
59087307 May 1984 JP
59154029 Sep 1984 JP
S61183462 Aug 1986 JP
S62180069 Aug 1987 JP
S62290866 Dec 1987 JP
63124521 May 1988 JP
1023105 Jan 1989 JP
H01225775 Sep 1989 JP
1279745 Nov 1989 JP
2501490 May 1990 JP
3183759 Aug 1991 JP
H03260065 Nov 1991 JP
H03271374 Dec 1991 JP
4000373 Jan 1992 JP
4000374 Jan 1992 JP
4000375 Jan 1992 JP
4014440 Jan 1992 JP
H04124273 Apr 1992 JP
H0578844 Mar 1993 JP
H05263223 Oct 1993 JP
6010132 Jan 1994 JP
6289401 Oct 1994 JP
7041579 Feb 1995 JP
7068614 Mar 1995 JP
7126419 May 1995 JP
7-304127 Nov 1995 JP
8025244 Jan 1996 JP
8084773 Apr 1996 JP
H08296038 Nov 1996 JP
9005038 Jan 1997 JP
10008254 Jan 1998 JP
10-130844 May 1998 JP
11-108833 Apr 1999 JP
11106920 Apr 1999 JP
H11256331 Sep 1999 JP
11344316 Dec 1999 JP
2000064040 Feb 2000 JP
2000109076 Apr 2000 JP
2001033398 Feb 2001 JP
2001231841 Aug 2001 JP
2002177364 Jun 2002 JP
2002206167 Jul 2002 JP
2002371364 Dec 2002 JP
2003171771 Jun 2003 JP
2003-268550 Sep 2003 JP
2003294431 Oct 2003 JP
2003305121 Oct 2003 JP
2004002928 Jan 2004 JP
2004008509 Jan 2004 JP
2004043789 Feb 2004 JP
2004100036 Apr 2004 JP
2004156444 Jun 2004 JP
2004168359 Jun 2004 JP
2004169087 Jun 2004 JP
2004203682 Jul 2004 JP
2004-253683 Sep 2004 JP
2004307935 Nov 2004 JP
2005035597 Feb 2005 JP
2005043285 Feb 2005 JP
2005132416 May 2005 JP
2005160888 Jun 2005 JP
2005-200044 Jul 2005 JP
2005200044 Jul 2005 JP
2005-241524 Sep 2005 JP
2005271997 Oct 2005 JP
2005290561 Oct 2005 JP
2006-064416 Mar 2006 JP
2006111967 Apr 2006 JP
2006160268 Jun 2006 JP
2006-224992 Aug 2006 JP
2006249577 Sep 2006 JP
2007050898 Mar 2007 JP
2007231386 Sep 2007 JP
2007246974 Sep 2007 JP
2008174793 Jul 2008 JP
2009-062620 Mar 2009 JP
2009062620 Mar 2009 JP
2009079298 Apr 2009 JP
2009084203 Apr 2009 JP
2009185330 Aug 2009 JP
2010155134 Jul 2010 JP
2010270117 Dec 2010 JP
2012149278 Aug 2012 JP
2012210315 Nov 2012 JP
2012526921 Nov 2012 JP
2013233716 Nov 2013 JP
5362941 Dec 2013 JP
10-2005-0100367 Oct 2005 KR
10-2006-0029694 Apr 2006 KR
10-0685594 Feb 2007 KR
1530913 Dec 1989 SU
200703536 Jan 2007 TW
WO9324243 Dec 1993 WO
WO9400247 Jan 1994 WO
WO9426497 Nov 1994 WO
WO9524275 Sep 1995 WO
WO9711482 Mar 1997 WO
WO9713802 Apr 1997 WO
WO98-27926 Jul 1998 WO
WO9845871 Oct 1998 WO
WO9917334 Apr 1999 WO
WO9941425 Aug 1999 WO
WO9945984 Sep 1999 WO
WO9945985 Sep 1999 WO
WO9947192 Sep 1999 WO
WO9950471 Oct 1999 WO
WO0038566 Jul 2000 WO
WO0104668 Jan 2001 WO
WO0125788 Apr 2001 WO
WO0154816 Aug 2001 WO
WO0156706 Aug 2001 WO
WO0170403 Sep 2001 WO
WO0222192 Mar 2002 WO
WO03033426 Apr 2002 WO
WO0243116 May 2002 WO
WO0249925 Jun 2002 WO
WO02056333 Jul 2002 WO
WO02072914 Sep 2002 WO
WO02076709 Oct 2002 WO
02100928 Dec 2002 WO
WO03014415 Feb 2003 WO
WO03038143 May 2003 WO
WO03040649 May 2003 WO
WO03044240 May 2003 WO
2004044039 May 2004 WO
WO2005035147 Apr 2005 WO
WO2005052555 Jun 2005 WO
WO2005051525 Jun 2005 WO
WO2005094214 Oct 2005 WO
WO2005103605 Nov 2005 WO
WO2006012281 Feb 2006 WO
WO2006017186 Feb 2006 WO
WO2006027568 Mar 2006 WO
WO2006029743 Mar 2006 WO
WO2006044254 Apr 2006 WO
WO2006048650 May 2006 WO
WO2006048276 May 2006 WO
WO2006048277 May 2006 WO
WO2006069774 Jul 2006 WO
2006121556 Nov 2006 WO
WO2006135755 Dec 2006 WO
WO2007028061 Mar 2007 WO
WO2007035741 Mar 2007 WO
WO2007036544 Apr 2007 WO
WO2007081814 Jul 2007 WO
WO2007089216 Aug 2007 WO
WO2007112328 Oct 2007 WO
WO2007120507 Oct 2007 WO
WO2007133378 Nov 2007 WO
WO2007134347 Nov 2007 WO
WO2008014438 Jan 2008 WO
WO2008024566 Feb 2008 WO
WO2008040531 Apr 2008 WO
WO2008047541 Apr 2008 WO
WO2008067574 Jun 2008 WO
WO2008071458 Jun 2008 WO
WO2008093335 Aug 2008 WO
2008121478 Oct 2008 WO
WO2009015862 Feb 2009 WO
WO2009020550 Feb 2009 WO
WO2009021257 Feb 2009 WO
WO2009030974 Mar 2009 WO
WO2009030975 Mar 2009 WO
WO2009030976 Mar 2009 WO
WO2009031838 Mar 2009 WO
WO2009040109 Apr 2009 WO
WO2009053947 Apr 2009 WO
WO2009112053 Sep 2009 WO
WO2009117032 Sep 2009 WO
WO2009118361 Oct 2009 WO
WO2009158613 Dec 2009 WO
WO2010047825 Apr 2010 WO
WO2010095011 Aug 2010 WO
WO2010132579 Nov 2010 WO
WO2010132581 Nov 2010 WO
WO2010132584 Nov 2010 WO
WO2010132585 Nov 2010 WO
WO2010132589 Nov 2010 WO
WO2010132591 Nov 2010 WO
WO2010034004 Nov 2010 WO
WO2010132579 Nov 2010 WO
WO2010132579 Nov 2010 WO
WO2010132589 Nov 2010 WO
WO2010132591 Nov 2010 WO
WO2011029628 Mar 2011 WO
WO20011059823 May 2011 WO
WO2011007055 Jun 2011 WO
WO2011080543 Jul 2011 WO
WO2011082296 Jul 2011 WO
WO2011090717 Jul 2011 WO
WO2011143329 Nov 2011 WO
WO2011143509 Nov 2011 WO
WO2011143509 Nov 2011 WO
WO2011137437 Nov 2011 WO
WO2011143329 Nov 2011 WO
WO2011159975 Dec 2011 WO
WO2012003221 Jan 2012 WO
WO2012009653 Jan 2012 WO
WO2012166515 Dec 2012 WO
WO2013045671 Apr 2013 WO
WO2013071138 May 2013 WO
WO2013071138 May 2013 WO
WO2013106588 Jul 2013 WO
WO2013170044 Nov 2013 WO
WO2013170052 Nov 2013 WO
WO2014008138 Jan 2014 WO
WO2014012039 Jan 2014 WO
WO2014012052 Jan 2014 WO
WO2014012072 Jan 2014 WO
WO2014012078 Jan 2014 WO
WO2014012079 Jan 2014 WO
WO2014014641 Jan 2014 WO
WO2014059012 Apr 2014 WO
WO2014071061 May 2014 WO
WO2014078666 May 2014 WO
WO2014085346 Jun 2014 WO
WO2014085348 Jun 2014 WO
WO2014134577 Sep 2014 WO
WO2014144926 Sep 2014 WO
WO2014164928 Oct 2014 WO
WO2015049972 Apr 2015 WO
WO2016057068 Apr 2016 WO
WO2016094387 Jun 2016 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (197)
Entry
US 5,645,643 A, 07/1997, Thomas (withdrawn)
Korean Patent Office, Office Action dated Jun. 21, 2016 in Patent Application No. 10-2011-7028713.
Mexican Patent Office, Office Action dated Jun. 7, 2016 in Patent Application No. MX/a/2011/012038 (3 pages).
Japanese Patent Office, Notice of Reasons for Refusal, Patent Application No. 2013-510276, dated Mar. 8, 2016 (15 pages).
European Patent Office, Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, in Application No. 13 726 337.2, dated Dec. 2, 2016 (6 pages).
Allison, H.L., The Real Markets for Transparent Barrier Films, 37th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1994, ISBN 1-878068-13-X, pp. 458.
Bailey, R. et al., Thin-Film Multilayer Capacitors Using Pyrolytically Deposited Silicon Dioxide, IEEE Transactions on Parts, Hybrids, and Packaging, vol. PHP-12, No. 4, Dec. 1976, pp. 361-364.
Banks, B.A., et al., Fluoropolymer Filled SiO2 Coatings; Properties and Potential Applications, Society of Vacuum Coaters, 35th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1992, ISBN 1-878068-11-3, pp. 89-93.
Baouchi, W., X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Study of Sodium Ion Migration through Thin Films of SiO2 Deposited on Sodalime Glass, 37th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1994, ISBN 1-878068-13-X, pp. 419-422.
Boebel, F. et al., Simultaneous In Situ Measurement of Film Thickness and Temperature by Using Multiple Wavelengths Pyrometric Interferometry (MWPI), IEEE Transaction on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 6, No. 2, May 1993, pp. 112-118.
Bush, V. et al., The Evolution of Evacuated Blood Collection Tubes, BD Diagnostics—Preanalytical Systems Newsletter, vol. 19, No. 1, 2009.
Chahroudi, D., Deposition Technology for Glass Barriers, 33rd Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1990, ISBN 1-878068-09-1, pp. 212-220.
Chahroudi, D., et al., Transparent Glass Barrier Coatings for Flexible Film Packaging, Society of Vacuum Coaters, 34th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1991, ISBN 1-878068-10-5, pp. 130-133.
Chahroudi, D., Glassy Barriers from Electron Beam Web Coaters, 32nd Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1989, pp. 29-39.
Czeremuszkin, G. et al., Ultrathin Silicon-Compound Barrier Coatings for Polymeric Packaging Materials: An Industrial Perspective, Plasmas and Polymers, vol. 6, Nos. 1/2, Jun. 2001, pp. 107-120.
Ebihara, K. et al., Application of the Dielectric Barrier Discharge to Detect Defects in a Teflon Coated Metal Surface, 2003 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 36 2883-2886, doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/36/23/003, IOP Electronic Journals, http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0022-3727/36/23/003, printed Jul. 14, 2009.
Egitto, F.D., et al., Plasma Modification of Polymer Surfaces, Society of Vacuum Coaters, 36th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1993, ISBN 1-878068-12-1, pp. 10-21.
Erlat, A.G. et al., SIOx Gas Barrier Coatings on Polymer Substrates: Morphology and Gas Transport Considerations, ACS Publications, Journal of Physical Chemistry, published Jul. 2, 1999, http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp990737e, printed Jul. 14, 2009.
Fayet, P., et al., Commercialism of Plasma Deposited Barrier Coatings for Liquid Food Packaging, 37th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1995, ISBN 1-878068-13-X, pp. 15-16.
Felts, J., Hollow Cathode Based Multi-Component Depositions, Vacuum Technology & Coating, Mar. 2004, pp. 48-55.
Felts, J.T., Thickness Effects on Thin Film Gas Barriers: Silicon-Based Coatings, Society of Vacuum Coaters, 34th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1991, ISBN 1-878068-10-5, pp. 99-104.
Felts, J.T., Transparent Barrier Coatings Update: Flexible Substrates, Society of Vacuum Coaters, 36th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1993, ISBN 1-878068-12-1, pp. 324-331.
Felts, J.T., Transparent Gas Barrier Technologies, 33rd Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1990, ISBN 1-878068-09-1, pp. 184-193.
Finson, E, et al., Transparent SiO2 Barrier Coatings: Conversion and Production Status, 37th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1994, ISBN 1-878068-13-X, pp. 139-143.
Flaherty, T. et al., Application of Spectral Reflectivity to the Measurement of Thin-Film Thickness, Opto-Ireland 2002: Optics and Photonics Technologies and Applications, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 4876, 2003, pp. 976-983.
Hora, R., et al., Plasma Polymerization: A New Technology for Functional Coatings on Plastics, 36th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1993, ISBN 1-878068-12-1, pp. 51-55.
Izu, M., et al., High Performance Clear CoatTM Barrier Film, 36th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1993, ISBN 1-878068-12-1, pp. 333-340.
Jost, S., Plasma Polymerized Organosilicon Thin Films on Reflective Coatings, 33rd Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1990, ISBN 1-878068-09-1, pp. 344-346.
Kaganowicz, G., et al., Plasma-Deposited Coatings—Properties and Applications, 23rd Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1980, pp. 24-30.
Kamineni, V. et al., Thickness Measurement of Thin Metal Films by Optical Metrology, College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering, University of Albany, Albany, NY.
Klemberg-Sapieha, J.E., et al., Transparent Gas Barrier Coatings Produced by Dual Frequency PECVD, 36th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1993, ISBN 1-878068-12-1, pp. 445-449.
Krug, T., et al., New Developments in Transparent Barrier Coatings, 36th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1993, ISBN 1-878068-12-1, pp. 302-305.
Kuhr, M. et al., Multifunktionsbeschichtungen für innovative Applikationen von Kunststoff-Substraten, HiCotec Smart Coating Solutions.
Kulshreshtha, D.S., Specifications of a Spectroscopic Ellipsometer, Department of Physics & Astrophysics, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007, Jan. 16, 2009.
Krug, T.G., Transparent Barriers for Food Packaging, 33rd Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1990, ISBN 1-878068-09-1, pp. 163-169.
Lee, K. et al., The Ellipsometric Measurements of a Curved Surface, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 44, No. 32, 2005, pp. L1015-L1018.
Lelait, L. et al., Microstructural Investigations of EBPVD Thermal Barrier Coatings, Journal De Physique IV, Colloque C9, supplément au Journal de Physique III, vol. 3, Dec. 1993, pp. 645-654.
Masso, J.D., Evaluation of Scratch Resistant and Antireflective Coatings for Plastic Lenses, 32nd Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1989, p. 237-240.
Misiano, C., et al., New Colourless Barrier Coatings (Oxygen & Water Vapor Transmission Rate) on Plastic Substrates, 35th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1992, ISBN 1-878068-11-3, pp. 28-40.
Misiano, C., et al., Silicon Oxide Barrier Improvements on Plastic Substrate, Society of Vacuum Coaters, 34th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1991, ISBN 1-878068-10-5, pp. 105-112.
Mount, E, Measuring Pinhole Resistance of Packaging, Corotec Corporation website, http://www.convertingmagazine.com, printed Jul. 13, 2009.
Murray, L et al., The Impact of Foil Pinholes and Flex Cracks on the Moisture and Oxygen Barrier of Flexible Packaging.
Nelson, R.J., et al., Double-Sided QLF® Coatings for Gas Barriers, Society of Vacuum Coaters, 34th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1991, ISBN 1-878068-10-5, pp. 113-117.
Nelson, R.J., Scale-Up of Plasma Deposited SiOx Gas Diffusion Barrier Coatings, 35th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1992, ISBN 1-878068-11-3, pp. 75-78.
Novotny, V. J., Ultrafast Ellipsometric Mapping of Thin Films, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 37, No. 02A, Feb. 1994, pp. 187-188.
Rüger, M., Die Pulse Sind das Plus, PICVD-Beschichtungsverfahren.
Schultz, A. et al., Detection and Identification of Pinholes in Plasma-Polymerised Thin Film Barrier Coatings on Metal Foils, Surface & Coatings Technology 200, 2005, pp. 213-217.
Stchakovsky, M. et al., Characterization of Barrier Layers by Spectroscopic Ellipsometry for Packaging Applications, Horiba Jobin Yvon, Application Note, Spectroscopic Ellipsometry, SE 14, Nov. 2005.
Teboul, E., Thi-Film Metrology: Spectroscopic Ellipsometer Becomes Industrial Thin-Film Tool, LaserFocusWorld, http://www.laserfocusworld.com/display_article, printed Jul. 14, 2009.
Teyssedre, G. et al., Temperature Dependence of the Photoluminescence in Poly(Ethylene Terephthalate) Films, Polymer 42, 2001, pp. 8207-8216.
Tsung, L. et al., Development of Fast CCD Cameras for In-Situ Electron Microscopy, Microsc Microanal 14(Supp 2), 2008.
Wood, L. et al., A Comparison of SiO2 Barrier Coated Polypropylene to Other Coated Flexible Substrates, 35th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1992, ISBN 1-878068-11-3, pp. 59-62.
Yang, et al., Microstructure and tribological properties of SiOx/DLC films grown by PECVD, Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 194, Issue 1, Apr. 20, 2005, pp. 128-135.
An 451, Accurate Thin Film Measurements by High-Resoluiton Transmission Electron Microscopy (HRTEM), Evans Alalytical Group, Version 1.0, Jun. 12, 2008, pp. 1-2.
Benefits of TriboGlide, TriboGlide Silicone-Free Lubrication Systems, http://www.triboglide.com/benfits.htm, printed Aug. 31, 2009.
Australian Government, IP Australia, Patent Examination Report No. 1, in Application No. 2010249031, dated Mar. 13, 2014. (4 pages).
Australian Government, IP Australia, Patent Examination Report No. 1, in Application No. 2013202893, dated Mar. 13, 2014. (4 pages).
European Patent Office, Communication pursuant to Article 93(3) EPC, in Application No. 11 731 554.9 dated Apr. 15, 2014. (7 pages).
PCT, Notification Concerning Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability, in International application No. PCT/US2012/064489, dated May 22, 2014. (10 pages).
PCT, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, in International application No. PCT/US2013/071750, dated Apr. 4, 2014. (13 pages).
PCT, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, in International application No. PCT/US2014/019684, dated May 23, 2014. (16 pages).
PCT, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, in International application No. PCT/US2014/023813, dated May 22, 2014. (11 pages).
European Patent Office, Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, in Application No. 11 736 511.4, dated Mar. 28, 2014.
PCT, Notification Concerning Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability, in International application No. PCT/US2011/042387, dated Jan. 17, 2013. (7 pages).
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, Notification of the First Office Action, in Application No. 201180032145.4, dated Jan. 30, 2014. (16 pages).
PCT, Notification Concerning Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability, in International application No. PCT/US2011/044215, dated Jan. 31, 2013. (14 pages).
Da Silva Sobrinho A S et al., “Transparent barrier coatings on polyethylene terephthalate by single-and dual-frequency plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition”, Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology; Part A, AVS/AIP, Melville, NY, US, vol. 16, No. 6, Nov. 1, 1998 (Nov. 1, 1998), pp. 3190-3198, XP01200471, ISSN: 0734-2101, DOI: 10.1116/1.581519 (9 pages).
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, Notification of the Third Office Action, in Application No. 201080029201.4, dated Jul. 7, 2014 (15 pages).
PCT, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, in International application No. PCT/US2014/029531, dated Jun. 20, 2014 (12 pages).
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, Notification of the Third Office Action, with translation, in Application No. 201080029199.0, dated Jun. 27, 2014 (19 pages).
Intellectual Property Office of Singapore, Invitation to Respond to Written Opinion, in Application No. 2012083077, dated Jun. 30, 2014 (12 pages).
PCT, Notification of Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability, in International application No. PCT/US13/40368, dated Jul. 16, 2014 (6 pages).
Australian Government, IP Australia, Patent Examination Report No. 1, in Application No. 2012318242, dated Apr. 30, 2014. (6 pages).
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, Notification of the First Office Action, in Application No. 201180023461.5, dated May 21, 2014. (25 pages).
European Patent Office, Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, in Application No. 10162758.6 dated May 27, 2014. (7 pages).
Australian Government, IP Australia, Patent Examination Report No. 1, in Application No. 2011252925, dated Sep. 6, 2013 (3 pages).
Coating Syringes, http://www.triboglide.com/syringes.htm, printed Aug. 31, 2009.
Coating/Production Process, http://www.triboglide.com/process.htm, printed Aug. 31, 2009.
Munich Exp, Materialica 2005: Fundierte Einblicke in den Werkstofsektor, Seite 1, von 4, ME095-6.
Schott Developing Syringe Production in United States, Apr. 14, 2009, http://www.schott.com/pharmaceutical_packaging, printed Aug. 31, 2009.
Sterile Prefillable Glass and Polymer Syringes, Schott forma vitrum, http://www.schott.com/pharmaceutical_packaging.
Transparent and recyclingfähig, neue verpackung, Dec. 2002, pp. 54-57.
European Patent Office, Communication with European Search Report, in Application No. 10162758.6, dated Aug. 19, 2010.
Griesser, Hans J., et al., Elimination of Stick-Slip of Elastomeric Sutures by Radiofrequency Glow Discharge Deposited Coatings, Biomed Mater. Res. Appl Biomater, 2000, vol. 53, 235-243, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
European Patent Office, Communication with extended Search Report, in Application No. EP 10162761.0, dated Feb. 10, 2011.
European Patent Office, Communication with partial Search Report, in Application No. EP 10162758.6, dated Aug. 19, 2010.
European Patent Office, Communication with extended Search Report, in Application No. EP 10162758.6, dated Dec. 21, 2010.
Yang, et al., Microstructure and tribological properties of SiOx/DLC films grown by PECVD, Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 194 (2005), Apr. 20, 2005, pp. 128-135.
European Patent Office, Communication with extended European search report, in Application No. EP10162756.0, dated Nov. 17, 2010.
Prasad, G.R. et al., “Biocompatible Coatings with Silicon and Titanium Oxides Deposited by PECVD”, 3rd Mikkeli International Industrial Coating Seminar, Mikkeli, Finland, Mar. 16-18, 2006.
European Patent Office, Communication with extended European search report, in Application No. EP10162757.8, dated Nov. 10, 2010.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, in PCT/US2010/034568, dated Jan. 21, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, in PCT/US2010/034571, dated Jan. 26, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, in PCT/US2010/034576, dated Jan. 25, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, in PCT/US2010/034577, dated Jan. 21, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, in PCT/US2010/034582, dated Jan. 24, 2011.
European Patent Office, Communication with Extended Search Report, in Application No. EP 10162755.2, dated Nov. 9, 2010.
European Patent Office, Communication with Extended Search Report, in Application No. EP 10162760.2, dated Nov. 12, 2010.
PCT, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority with International Search Report in Application No. PCT/US2010/034586, dated Mar. 15, 2011.
Shimojima, Atsushi et al., Structure and Properties of Multilayered Siloxane-Organic Hybrid Films Prepared Using Long-Chain Organotrialkoxysilanes Containing C=C Double Bonds, Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2007, vol. 17, pp. 658-663, © The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2007.
Sone, Hayato et al., Picogram Mass Sensor Using Resonance Frequency Shift of Cantilever, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 43, No. 6A, 2004, pp. 3648-3651, © The Japan Society of Applied Physics.
Sone, Hayato et al., Femtogram Mass Sensor Using Self-Sensing Cantilever for Allergy Check, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 45, No. 3B, 2006, pp. 2301-2304, © The Japan Society of Applied Physics.
Mallikarjunan, Anupama et al, The Effect of Interfacial Chemistry on Metal Ion Penetration into Polymeric Films, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. vol. 734, 2003, © Materials Research Society.
Schonher, H., et al., Friction and Surface Dynamics of Polymers on the Nanoscale by AFM, STM and AFM Studies on (Bio)molecular Systems: Unravelling the Nanoworld. Topics in Current Chemistry, 2008, vol. 285, pp. 103-156, © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Lang, H.P., Gerber, C., Microcantilever Sensors, STM and AFM Studies on (Bio)molecular Systems: Unravelling the Nanoworld. Topics in Current Chemistry, 2008, vol. 285, pp. 1-28, © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Sahagian, Khoren; Larner, Mikki; Kaplan, Stephen L., “Altering Biological Interfaces with Gas Plasma: Example Applications”, Plasma Technology Systems, Belmont, CA, In SurFACTS in Biomaterials, Surfaces in Biomaterials Foundation, Summer 2013, 18(3), p. 1-5.
Daikyo Cyrystal Zenith Insert Needle Syringe System, West Delivering Innovative Services, West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., 2010.
Daikyo Crystal Zenigh Syringes, West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., www. WestPFSsolutions.com, #5659, 2011.
Zhang, Yongchao and Heller, Adam, Reduction of the Nonspecific Binding of a Target Antibody and of Its Enzyme-Labeled Detection Probe Enabling Electrochemical Immunoassay of Antibody through the 7 pg/mL—100 ng/nL (40 fM-400 pM) Range, Department of Chemical Engineering and Texas Materials Institute, University of Texas at Austin, Anal. Chem. 2005, 7, 7758-7762. (6 pages).
Principles and Applications of Liquid Scintillation Counting, LSC Concepts—Fundamentals of Liquid Scintillation Counting, National Diagnostics, 2004, pp. 1-15.
Chikkaveeraiah, Bhaskara V. and Rusling, Dr. James, Non Specific Binding (NSB) in Antigen-Antibody Assays, University of Connecticut, Spring 2007. (13 pages).
Sahagian, Khoren; Larner, Mikki; Kaplan, Stephen L., “Cold Gas Plasma in Surface Modification of Medical Plastics”, Plasma Technology Systems, Belmont, CA, Publication pending. Presented at SPE Antec Medical Plastics Division, Apr. 23, 2013, Ohio.
Lipman, Melissa, “Jury Orders Becton to Pay $114M in Syringe Antitrust Case”, © 2003-2013, Portfolio Media, Inc., Law360, New York (Sep. 20, 2013, 2:53 PM ET), http://www.law360.com/articles/474334/print?section=ip, [retrieved Sep. 23, 2013].
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birefringence, page last modified Sep. 18, 2013 at 11:39. [retrieved on Oct. 8, 2013]. (5 pages).
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confocal_microscopy, page last modified Aug. 28, 2013 at 11:12. [retrieved on Oct. 8, 2013]. (4 pages).
Wang, Jun et al., “Fluorocarbon thin film with superhydrophobic property prepared by pyrolysis of hexafluoropropylene oxide”, Applied Surface Science, vol. 258, 2012, pp. 9782-9784 (4 pages).
Wang, Hong et al., “Ozone-Initiated Secondary Emission Rates of Aldehydes from Indoor surfaces in Four Homes”, American Chemical Society, Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 40, No. 17, 2006, pp. 5263-5268 (6 pages).
Lewis, Hilton G. Pryce, et al., “HWCVD of Polymers: Commercialization and Scale-Up”, Thin Solid Films 517, 2009, pp. 3551-3554.
Wolgemuth, Lonny, “Challenges With Prefilled Syringes: The Parylene Solution”, Frederick Furness Publishing, www.ongrugdelivery.com, 2012, pp. 44-45.
History of Parylene (12 pages).
SCS Parylene HTX brochure, Stratamet Thin Film Corporation, Fremont, CA, 2012, retrieved from the Internet Feb. 13, 2013, http://www.stratametthinfilm.com/parylenes/htx. (2 pages).
SCS Parylene Properties, Specialty Coating Systems, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, 2011. (12 pages).
Werthheimer, M.R., Studies of the earliest stages of plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition of SiO2 on polymeric substrates, Thin Solid Films 382 (2001) 1-3, and references therein, United States Pharmacopeia 34. In General Chapters <1>, 2001.
Gibbins, Bruce and Warner, Lenna, The Role of Antimicrobial Silver Nanotechnology, Medical Device & Diagnostic Industry, Aug. 205, pp. 2-6.
MTI CVD Tube Furnace w Gas Delivery & Vacuum Pump, http://mtixtl.com/ MiniCVDTubeFurnace2ChannelsGasVacuum-OTF-1200X-S50-2F.aspx (2 pages).
Lab-Built HFPO CVD Coater, HFPO Decomp to Give Thin Fluorocarbon Films, Applied Surface Science 2012 258 (24) 9782.
Technical Report No. 10, Journal of Parenteral Science and Technology, 42, Supplement 1988, Parenteral Formulation of Proteins and Peptides: Stability and Stabilizers, Parenteral Drug Association, 1988.
Technical Report No. 12, Journal of Parenteral Science and Technology, 42, Supplement 1988, Siliconization of Parenteral Drug Packaging Components, Parenteral Drug Association, 1988.
European Patent Office, Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC, in Application No. 10 162 760.2-1353, dated Oct. 25, 2013. (366 pages).
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Difluorocarbene, page last modified Feb. 20, 2012 at 14:41. [retrieved on Sep. 7, 2012]. (4 pages).
D'Shaughnessy, W.S., et al., “Initiated Chemical Vapor Deposition of a Siloxane Coating for Insulation of Neutral Probes”, Thin Solid Films 517 (2008) 3612-3614. (3 pages).
Denler, et al, Investigations of SiOx-polymer “interphases” by glancing angle RBS with Li+ and Be+ions, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physical Research B 208 (2003) 176-180, United States Pharmacopeia 34. In General Chapters <1>, 2003.
PCT, Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and Annex to Form PCT/ISA/206 Communication relating to the results of the partial international search in International application No. PCT/US2013/071750, dated Feb. 14, 2014. (6 pages).
PCT, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, in International application No. PCT/US2013/62247, dated Dec. 30, 2013. (13 pages).
PCT, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, in International application No. PCT/US2013/043642, dated Dec. 5, 2013. (21 pages).
Japanese Patent Office, Notice of Reason(s) for Rejection in Patent application No. 2012-510983, dated Jan. 7, 2014. (6 pages).
Chinese Patent Office, Notification of the Second Office Action in Application No. 201080029199.0, dated Jan. 6, 2014. (26 pages).
Chinese Patent Office, Notification of the First Office Action in Application No. 201180023474.2, dated Dec. 23, 2013. (18 pages).
PCT, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, in International application No. PCT/US2013/067852, dated Jan. 22, 2014. (9 pages).
PCT, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, in International application No. PCT/US2013/064121, dated Mar. 24, 2014. (8 pages).
PCT, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, in International application No. PCT/US2013/070325, dated Mar. 24, 2014. (16 pages).
Patent Cooperation Treaty, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority with International Search Report in Application No. PCT/US2012/064489, dated Jan. 25, 2013.
Danish Patent and Trademark Office, Singapore Written Opinion, in Application No. 201108308-6, dated Dec. 6, 2012.
Danish Patent and Trademark Office, Singapore Search Report, in Application No. 201108308-6, dated Dec. 12, 2012.
Tao, Ran et al., Condensationand Polymerization of Supersaturated Monomer Vapor, ACS Publications, 2012 American Chemical Society, ex.doi.org/10.1021/la303462q/Langmuir 2012, 28, 16580-16587.
State Intellectual Property Office of Teh People's Republic of China, Notification of First Office Action in Application No. 201080029201.4, dated Mar. 37, 2013. (15 pages).
PCT, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, in International application No. PCT/US2013/040380, dated Sep. 3, 2013. (13 pages).
PCT, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, in International application No. PCT/US2013/040368, dated Oct. 21, 2013. (21 pages).
PCT, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, in International application No. PCT/US2013/048709, dated Oct. 2, 2013. (7 pages).
Coclite A.M. et al., “On the relationship between the structure and the barrier performance of plasma deposited silicon dioxide-like films”, Surface and Coatings Technology, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 204, No. 24, Sep. 15, 2010 (Sep. 15, 2010), pp. 4012-4017, XPO27113381, ISSN: 0257-8972 [retrieved on Jun. 16, 2010] abstract, p. 4014, right-hand column—p. 4015, figures 2, 3.
Brunet-Bruneau A. et al, “Microstructural characterization of ion assisted Sio2 thin films by visible and infrared. ellipsometry”, Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology: Part A, AVS/AIP, Melville, NY, US, vol. 16, No. 4, Jul. 1, 1998 (Jul. 1, 1998), pp. 2281-2286, XPO12004127, ISSN: 0734-2101, DOI: 10.1116/1.581341, p. 2283, right-hand column—p. 2284, left-hand column, figures 2, 4.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, Notification of Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability, in Application No. PCT/US2010/034576, dated Sep. 14, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, Notification of Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability, in Application No. PCT/US2010/034568, dated Sep. 14, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Search Report and Written Opinion, in Application No. PCT/US2011/036358, dated Sep. 9, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Search Report and Written Opinion, in Application No. PCT/US2011/036340, dated Aug. 1, 2011.
MacDonald, Gareth, “West and Daikyo Seiko Launch Ready Pack”, http://www.in-pharmatechnologist.com/Packaging/West-and-Daikyo-Seiko-launch-Ready-Pack, 2 pages, retrieved from the Internet Sep. 22, 2011.
Kumer, Vijai, “Development of Terminal Sterilization Cycle for Pre-Filled Cyclic Olefin Polymer (COP) Syringes”, http://abstracts.aapspharmaceutica.com/ExpoAAPS09/CC/forms/attendee/index.aspx?content=sessionInfo&sessionId=401, 1 page, retrieved from the internet Sep. 22, 2011.
Quinn, F.J., “Biotech Lights Up the Glass Packaging Picture”, http://www.pharmaceuticalcommerce.com/frontEnd/main.php?idSeccion=840, 4 pages, retrieved from the Internet Sep. 21, 2011.
Wen, Zai-Qing et al., Distribution of Silicone Oil in Prefilled Glass Syringes Probed with Optical and Spectroscopic Methods, PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology 2009, 63, pp. 149-158.
ZebraSci—Intelligent Inspection Products, webpage, http://zebrasci.com/index.html, retrieved from the internet Sep. 30, 2011.
Google search re “cyclic olefin polymer resin” syringe or vial, http://www.google.com/search?sclient=psy-ab&hl=en&lr=&source=hp&q=%22cyclic+olefin+polymer+resin%22+syringe+OR+vial&btnG=Search&pbx=1&oq=%22cyclic+olefin+polymer+resin%22+syringe+OR+vial&aq, 1 page, retrieved from the internet Sep. 22, 2011.
Taylor, Nick, “West to Add CZ Vials as Glass QC Issues Drive Interest”, ttp://twitter.com/WestPharma/status/98804071674281986, 2 pages, retrieved from the Internet Sep. 22, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Preliminary Examining Authority, Notification of Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability, in international application No. PCT/US2010/034571, dated Jun. 13, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Preliminary Examining Authority, Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority, in international application No. PCT/US2010/034586, dated Aug. 23, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Preliminary Examining Authority, Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority, in international application No. PCT/US2010/034568, dated May 30, 2011.
Silicone Oil Layer, Contract Testing, webpage, http://www.siliconization.com/downloads/siliconeoillayercontracttesting.pdf, retrieved from the internet Oct. 28, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, Notification of Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability, in PCT/US2010/034577, dated Nov. 24, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, Notification of Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability, in PCT/US2010/034582, dated Nov. 24, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, Notification of Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability, in PCT/US2010/034586, dated Dec. 20, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, in PCT/US2011/036097, dated Dec. 29, 2011.
“Oxford instruments plasmalab 80plus”, XP55015205, retrieved from the Internet on Dec. 20, 2011, URL:http://www.oxfordplasma.de/pdf_inst/plas_80_pdf.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, in PCT/US2011/044215, dated Dec. 29, 2011.
European Patent Office, Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, in Application No. 10 162 758.6-1234, dated May 8, 2012 (6 pages).
Hanlon, Adriene Lepiane, Pak, Chung K., Pawlikowski, Beverly A., Decision on Appeal, Appeal No. 2005-1693, U.S. Appl. No. 10/192,333, dated Sep. 30, 2005.
Arganguren, Mirta I., Macosko, Christopher W., Thakkar, Bimal, and Tirrel, Matthew, “Interfacial Interactions in Silica Reinforced Silicones,” Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, vol. 170, 1990, pp. 303-308.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Preliminary Examining Authority, Notification of Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability, in international application No. PCT/US2011/036097, dated Nov. 13, 2012.
PCT, Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority, in International application No. PCT/USUS13/048709, dated Sep. 30, 2014 (4 pages).
PCT, Notification of Transmittal of the International Preliminary Report on Patentability, in International application No. PCT/USUS13/048709, dated Oct. 15, 2014 (7 pages).
PCT, Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority, in International application No. PCT/USUS13/064121, dated Nov. 19, 2014 (8 pages).
PCT, Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority, in International application No. PCT/USUS13/064121, dated Nov. 21, 2014 (7 pages).
Intellectual Property Corporation of Malaysia, Substantive Examintion Adverse Report (section 30(1)/30(2)), in Application No. PI 2011005486, dated Oct. 31, 2014 (3 pages).
Patent Office of the Russian Federation, Official Action, in Application No. 2011150499, dated Sep. 25, 2014 (4 pages).
Instituto Mexicano de la Propiedad Indutrial, Official Action, in Appilcation No. MX/a/2012/013129, dated Sep. 22, 2014 (5 pages).
Australian Government, Patent Examination Report No. 2 in Application No. 2010249031 dated Apr. 21, 2015.
Japanese Patent Office, Notice of Reasons for Refusal in application No. 2013-510276, dated Mar. 31, 2015.
Bose, Sagarika and Constable, Kevin, Advanced Delivery Devices, Design & Evaluation of a Polymer-Based Prefillable Syringe for Biopharmaceuticals With Improved Functionality & Performance, JR Automation Technologies, May 2015.
Hopwood J Ed—CRC Press: “Plasma-assisted deposition”, Aug. 17, 1997 (Aug. 17, 1997), Handbook of Nanophase Materials, Chapter 6, pp. 141-197, XP008107730, ISBN: 978-0-8247-9469-9.
PCT, Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority, International application No. PCT/SU2013/071752, dated May 6, 2015.
Hlobik, Plastic Pre-Fillable Syringe Systems (http://www.healthcarepackaging.com/package-type/Containers/plastic-prefillablesyringe-systems, Jun. 8, 2010).
PCT, Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority, in International application No. PCT/US2013/071750, dated Jan. 20, 2015 (9 pages).
PCT, Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority, in International application No. PCT/US2013/064121, dated Nov. 21, 2014 (7 pages).
Japanese Patent Office, Decision of Rejection in Application No. 2012-510983, dated Jan. 20, 2015 (4 pages).
Australian Government, IP Australia, Patent Examination Report No. 1, in Application No. 2010249033, dated Dec. 19, 2014 (7 pages).
Australian Government, IP Australia, Patent Examination Report No. 1, in Application No. 2011252925, dated Dec. 2, 2014 (3 pages).
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, Notification of the Fourth Office Action in Application No. 201080029199.0, dated Mar. 18, 2015 (15 pages).
Reh, et al., Evaluation of stationary phases for 2-dimensional HPLC of Proteins—Validation of commercial RP-columns, Published by Elsevier B.V., 2000.
L. Martinu, O. Zabeida, and J.E. Klemberg-Sapieha, “Plasma-Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition of Functional Coatings”, Handbook of Deposition Technologies for Films and Coating, Chapter 9, pp. 392-464, 2010.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190015561 A1 Jan 2019 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62206637 Aug 2015 US