Photoresist is a light sensitive material used in certain fabrication processes to form a patterned coating on a work piece, e.g., a semiconductor wafer, during processing. After exposing the photoresist coated surface to a pattern of high energy radiation, a portion of the photoresist is removed to reveal the surface below, leaving the rest of the surface protected. Semiconductor processes such as etching, depositing, and ion implanting can be performed on the uncovered surface and the remaining photoresist. After performing one or more semiconductor processes, the remaining photoresist is removed in a strip operation.
Provided herein are methods and apparatus of hydrogen-based photoresist strip operations that reduce dislocations in a silicon wafer or other substrate. According to various embodiments, the hydrogen-based photoresist strip methods can employ one or more of the following techniques: 1) minimization of hydrogen budget by using short processes with minimal overstrip duration, 2) providing dilute hydrogen, e.g., 2%-16% hydrogen concentration, 3) minimization of material loss by controlling process conditions and chemistry, 4) using a low temperature resist strip, 5) controlling implant conditions and concentrations, and 6) performing one or more post-strip venting processes. Apparatus suitable to perform the photoresist strip methods are also provided.
A method including providing a substrate having photoresist disposed thereon to reaction chamber and exposing the substrate to a plasma generated from a process gas comprising nitrogen and hydrogen and having a hydrogen concentration [H] of between about 2% and 16% to thereby remove photoresist from the substrate. In certain embodiments, the process gas comprises molecular nitrogen (N2) and molecular hydrogen (H2). In certain embodiments, the process gas contains substantially no oxygen-containing compounds. In embodiments, wherein the hydrogen concentration is between about 2% and 10% and can be less than 8%. In some embodiments, the hydrogen concentration about 4%.
Examples of process gasses chemistries include H2/N2, H2/N2/Ar, and H2/N2/He. In some embodiments, the substrate is exposed to the plasma for a time t and the cross-product of [H] and the time t ([H]×t) is between about 50 and 2000 sccm-seconds, or about between about 50 and 500 sccm-seconds. In certain embodiments, the substrate temperature is below about 285° C., for example between about 200° C. and 250° C.
Another aspect of the disclosure provided herein is a method including providing a substrate having photoresist disposed thereon to reaction chamber; exposing the substrate to a plasma generated from a process gas comprising hydrogen to thereby remove photoresist from the substrate; and after exposing the substrate to the plasma, venting the substrate at a substrate temperature between about 200° C. and 450° C. In some embodiments, the methods further include, after venting the substrate, performing a high temperature implant drive process at a substrate temperature of at least about 800° C. The hydrogen concentration of the process gas can be 16% or greater in certain embodiments. In certain embodiments, the hydrogen concentration [H] of the process gas is less than 16%. In certain embodiments, the hydrogen concentration [H] of the process gas is less than 10%. In certain embodiments, the hydrogen concentration [H] of the process gas is less than 5%.
Another aspect of the subject matter disclosed herein is an apparatus including a plasma source, a gas inlet for introducing a gas mixture into the plasma source, a showerhead positioned downstream of the gas inlet, a substrate support downstream of the showerhead, said substrate support comprising a pedestal and temperature-controlling mechanism to control a temperature of a substrate supported on the substrate support, and, a controller for executing a set of instructions for performing the methods described herein. In some embodiments, the set of instructions include instructions to introduce a gas mixture to the gas inlet comprising nitrogen and hydrogen and having a hydrogen concentration [H] of between about 2% and 16%. In some embodiments, the set of instructions includes instruction to maintain the temperature of the substrate at about 285° C. or less.
In the following detailed description of the present invention, numerous specific embodiments are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, as will be apparent to those skilled in the art, the present invention may be practiced without these specific details or by using alternate elements or processes. In other instances well-known processes, procedures and components have not been described in detail so as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the present invention.
In this application, the terms “work piece”, “semiconductor wafer”, “wafer” and “partially fabricated integrated circuit” will be used interchangeably. One skilled in the art would understand that the term “partially fabricated integrated circuit” can refer to a silicon wafer during any of many stages of integrated circuit fabrication thereon. The following detailed description assumes the invention is implemented on a wafer. However, the invention is not so limited. The work piece may be of various shapes, sizes, and materials. In addition to semiconductor wafers, other work pieces that may take advantage of this invention include various articles such as displays, printed circuit boards, and the like.
Photoresist is a light sensitive material used in certain fabrication processes to form a patterned coating on a work piece, e.g., a semiconductor wafer, during processing. After exposing the photoresist coated surface to a pattern of high energy radiation, a portion of the photoresist is removed to reveal the surface below, leaving the rest of the surface protected. Semiconductor processes such as etching, depositing, and ion implanting are performed on the uncovered surface and the remaining photoresist. After performing one or more semiconductor processes, the remaining photoresist is removed in a strip operation.
Front-End-of-Line (FEOL) fabrication processes, including p and n MOSFET and other transistor fabrication processes, DRAM storage capacitor fabrication processes, and flash floating gate fabrication processes can involve multiple lithographic patterning operations, and multiple photoresist strip processes. In some embodiments, the photoresist strip processes may be or include high dose implantation strip (HDIS) or other implant strip processes.
During ion implantation, dopant ions, e.g., ions of boron, boron difluoride, indium, gallium, thallium, phosphorous, arsenic, antimony, bismuth, carbon, xenon, argon or germanium, are accelerated toward a work piece target. The ions implant in exposed regions of the work piece as well as in the remaining photoresist surface. The process may form well regions (source/drain), lightly doped drain (LDD), halo implant regions, and doubled diffused drain (DDD) regions, as well as other implanted regions. The ion implant impregnates the resist with the implant species and depletes the surface of hydrogen. The outer layer or crust of the resist forms a carbonized layer that may be much denser than the underlying bulk resist layer. These two layers have different thermal expansion rates and react to stripping processes at different rates.
The difference between the outer layer and bulk layer is quite pronounced in post high-dose ion implant resist. In high-dose implantation, the ion dose may be greater than 1×1015 ions/cm2 and the energy may be from 10 KeV to greater than 100 KeV. Traditional HDIS processes employ oxygen chemistries where monatomic oxygen plasma is formed away from the process chamber and then directed at the work piece surface. The reactive oxygen combines with the photoresist to form gaseous by-products which is removed with a vacuum pump. For HDIS, additional gases are needed to remove the implanted dopants with oxygen.
Primary implant strip considerations include strip rate, amount of residue, and film loss of the exposed and underlying film layer. Residues are commonly found on the substrate surface after implant and stripping. They may result from sputtering during the high-energy implant, incomplete removal of crust, and/or oxidation of implant atoms in the resist. After stripping, the surface should be residue free or substantially residue free to ensure high yield and eliminate the need for additional residue removal processing. Residues may be removed by overstripping, i.e., a continuation of the strip process past the point nominally required to remove all photoresist. Unfortunately, in conventional implant strip operations, overstripping sometimes removes some of the underlying functional device structure. At the device layer, even very little silicon loss from the transistor source/drain regions may adversely affect device performance and yield, especially for ultra shallow junction devices fabricated at the <32 nm design rule or below.
In some embodiments, the methods and apparatus may be used to efficiently and effectively to remove photoresist materials after high-dose ion implantation. The methods and apparatus are not limited to high-dose implant strip (HDIS). The methods and apparatus are also not limited to any particular category of dopants implanted. For instance, described methods and apparatus may be effectively used with stripping after medium or low dose implant. Although specific dopant ions such as boron, arsenic, and phosphorous are discussed, the described methods and apparatus may be effectively used to strip resist impregnated with other dopants, such as nitrogen, oxygen, carbon, germanium, and aluminum. Further, the methods and apparatus are not limited to post-implant removal of photoresist, but may also be used to remove photoresist that has not undergone an implantation.
The methods and apparatus described herein employ hydrogen-based chemistries to remove photoresist and/or related residues. In some embodiments, the chemistries include hydrogen with an optional gas such as nitrogen, helium, argon and the like with substantially no oxidant or fluorine-based chemistries. In some other embodiments, the chemistries may include an oxygen-containing compound and/or a fluorine containing compound.
The strip processes described herein generally involve generating a plasma from a plasma from a gas including various component gases. As indicated, the strip chemistries described herein are hydrogen-based. Molecular hydrogen (H2) is typically a main component of the plasma-generating gas. In some embodiments, the strip chemistry for one or more of the operations of an overall strip process is generated from a gas consisting essentially of H2 and N2.
While hydrogen-based strip chemistries such as H2/N2 chemistries have resulted in clean, fast and effective removal of photoresist, certain hydrogen-based strip processes have been unexpectedly found to cause dislocations or other defects in silicon substrates during FEOL fabrication. These defects can compromise device integrity. Formation of dislocation in the Si crystal can be detrimental to device performance. In some cases dislocations can negate the positive effects of lattice straining and slow the device. In other cases dislocations can cause yield loss. In yet other cases, dislocations can create a device reliability problem, affecting long term operation. The methods and apparatus described herein provide effective photoresist stripping while reducing or minimizing defects.
The substrate is then exposed to an ion implant process. During ion implant, the surface of the work piece or wafer is implanted with dopant ions. The process may be, for example, a plasma-immersion ion implantation (PIII) or ion beam implantation. The ions bombard the substrate surface, including the exposed silicon layer 101 and the photoresist 103. With high energy ion implantation, small amounts of the underlying material 107 may be sputtered to the photoresist sidewalls. See
At the exposed silicon layer 101, a doped region 109 is created. The ion energy or intensity of the bombardment determines the depth or thickness of the doped region. The density of the ion flux determines the extent of doping. The ions also impregnate the photoresist surface creating a crust layer 105. The crust layer 105 may be carbonized and highly cross-linked polymer chains. The crust is usually depleted of hydrogen and impregnated with the implant species. The crust layer 105 is denser than the bulk resist layer 103. The relative density depends on the ion flux while the thickness of the crust layer depends on the ion energy.
This crust layer 105 is harder to strip than the bulk photoresist 103 below. Removal rates of the crust layer may be 50% or 75% slower than the underlying bulk photoresist. The bulk photoresist contains relatively high levels of chemically bonded nitrogen and some of its original casting solvent. At elevated wafer temperature, e.g., above 150° C. to above 200° C., the bulk resist can outgas and expand relative to the crust layer. The entire photoresist can then “pop” as the underlying bulk photoresist builds up pressure under the crust. Photoresist popping is a source of particles and process defects because the residues are especially hard to clean from the wafer surface and chamber internal parts. With high-dose ion implantation, the density difference between the crust and underlying bulk photoresist layer is even higher. The crust may also be thicker.
Described herein are hydrogen-containing plasma strip processes that can be used to strip photoresist after ion implantation or other post-patterning processing. For example, the methods and apparatus described herein can be implemented for post halo implant resist strip. The methods and apparatus reduce dislocations in a Si or other substrate that can compromise device integrity. As noted above, in certain embodiments, the hydrogen-containing plasmas may or may not contain other reactive species such as oxygen and fluorine species. Without being bound by a particular theory, it is believed that dislocations are more liable to be formed with hydrogen-based plasmas that do not contain oxygen, fluorine, or other species that can react with hydrogen. However, in some embodiments, the approaches described herein may be advantageously used with hydrogen-based plasmas that include oxygen, fluorine and other reactive species as well as those that do not.
According to various embodiments the hydrogen-based resist strip processes employ one or more of the following techniques: 1) minimization of hydrogen budget by using short processes with minimal overstrip duration, 2) providing dilute hydrogen, e.g., 2%-16% H2, 3) minimization of material loss by controlling process conditions and chemistry, 4) using a low temperature resist strip, 5) controlling implant conditions and concentrations, and 6) performing one or more post-strip venting processes. These are discussed below.
The process 200 continues at block 205 with bulk resist strip end point detection. Block 205 can involve infrared detection, optical detection, emission detection or other appropriate detection method. The process 200 continues at block 207 with an overstrip operation. In some embodiments, the overstrip chemistry and process conditions are the same as used for the bulk photoresist strip in block 203. In some other embodiments, block 205 may involve using a different chemistry, component concentration, or process conditions than used in block 203. Examples include using a lower temperature, or hydrogen concentration than in block 203.
An overstrip operation can be measured as a percent duration of the bulk strip operation. At least part of a Si wafer or other substrate is covered by resist until the end point. During overstrip, the substrate may be particularly vulnerable to dislocations caused by a hydrogen-based chemistry. The duration of the over strip step is determined experimentally and may be different at different mask levels and implant steps. In some embodiments, overstrip duration ranges from about 0 to 200% of the time to end point, for example, 0 to 50%, or 0 to 20%. Minimizing the overstrip also reduces thermal budget and substrate exposure to plasma.
In some embodiments, hydrogen absorption into the Si or other substrate is reduced by diluting the hydrogen with nitrogen or another inert gas. For example, hydrogen concentration [H] may be between about 2% and 16%, as measured in volumetric flow percentage.
While a strip process gas having [H] of 16% produces a clean that is fast and effective at removing stringers and other residue, it may cause dislocations in the substrate. Accordingly, in some embodiments, a strip process gas having an [H] of less than 16% is used, e.g., between 2% and 15% or 2% and 10%, to reduce defects. In some embodiments, the [H] is less than 8% or 5%.
In certain embodiments, hydrogen in the strip process gas is controlled to modulate the incorporation of hydrogen in the system as well as modulating bonding. This can be implemented by using a cross product [H]×time of between about 1 and 2400 sccm-seconds per layer, with [H] measured in volumetric flow and t. For example, [H]×time may be between about 50 and 2000 sccm-seconds, e.g., between 50 and 1000 sccm-seconds per layer, or between about 50 and 500 sccm-seconds per pass through the strip apparatus. Note that according to various embodiments, a strip operation having a cross product within these ranges may or may not also have an [H] of less than 16% as described above.
In some embodiments, a strip operation is performed a temperature between 100° C. and 400° C. In some embodiments, the temperature is below about 285° C., e.g., between 200° C. and 285° C., or between about 200° C. and 250° C. Both hydrogen absorption into the Si crystal, hydrogen diffusion inside the crystal, the formation of Si—H and Si—H2 bonds and dislocation formation and propagation may be affected by temperature. Kink pair formation and motion may be affected by temperature. Low temperature and in particular low thermal budget (defined as the product of time and temperature in units of s·K) may have a strong effect of the kinetics of dislocations formation and propagation. Without being bound to a particular theory, it believed that rates of hydrogen diffusion and/or formation of Si—H and Si—H2 bonds may exhibit Arrhenius behavior, exponentially related to temperature, with linear dependence on time and concentration. Accordingly, a process temperature of between 200° C. and 285° C., or between about 200° C. and 250° C. in some embodiments can reduce one or more mechanisms that may contribute comprising device integrity. The overall thermal budget may then be determined by minimizing material loss while leaving the substrate clean of residue.
In some embodiments, implant conditions and concentrations are controlled.
In the same or other embodiments as described above, a venting process can be performed after one or more hydrogen-based photoresist strip processes.
Returning to
Inlet Gas
A hydrogen-containing gas, typically including molecular hydrogen, is introduced to the plasma source. The gas introduced to the plasma source contains the chemically active species that will be ionized or otherwise in the plasma source to form a plasma. As indicated above, in certain embodiments, an inlet gas may consist essentially of molecular hydrogen and one or more inert gases such as nitrogen. In some embodiments, the inlet gas includes no oxygen-containing compound. In some embodiments, the inlet gas includes only oxygen-containing compounds that are weak oxidants. One having ordinary skill in the art will understand that that trace amounts of other species may be present. The gas introduced to the plasma source may be premixed, partially mixed or unmixed.
Plasma Generation
Various types of plasma sources may be used in accordance with the invention, including RF, DC, and microwave based plasma sources. In a preferred embodiment, a downstream RF plasma source is used. Example RF plasma power for a 300 mm wafer ranges between about 300 Watts to about 10 Kilowatts. In some embodiments, the RF plasma power is between about 2000 Watts and 5000 Watts, e.g., 3500 W.
Showerhead Assembly
According to various embodiments, the plasma gas is distributed to the work surface via a showerhead assembly. The showerhead assembly may be grounded or have an applied voltage to attract some charge species while not affecting the flow of neutral species to the wafer, e.g., 0-1000 watt bias. Many of the electrically charged species in the plasma recombine at the showerhead. The assembly includes the showerhead itself which may be a metal plate having holes to direct the plasma and inert gas mixture into the reaction chamber. The showerhead redistributes the active hydrogen from the plasma source over a larger area, allowing a smaller plasma source to be used. The number and arrangement of the showerhead holes may be set to optimize strip rate and strip rate uniformity. If the plasma source is centrally located over the wafer, the showerhead holes are preferably smaller and fewer in the center of the showerhead in order to push the active gases toward the outer regions. The showerhead may have at least 100 holes. Suitable showerhead includes the Gamma xPR showerhead or the GxT drop-in showerhead available from Novellus Systems, Inc. of San Jose, Calif. In embodiments in which there is no showerhead assembly, the plasma enters the process chamber directly.
Process Chamber
The process chamber may be any suitable reaction chamber for the strip operation being performed. It may be one chamber of a multi-chambered apparatus or it may simply be a single chamber apparatus. The chamber may also include multiple stations where different wafers are processed simultaneously. The process chamber may be the same chamber where the implant, etch, or other resist-mediated process takes place. In other embodiments, a separate chamber is reserved for the strip. Process chamber pressure may range from about 600 mTorr to 2 Torr. In certain embodiments, the pressure ranges from about 0.9 Ton to 1.5 Torr.
The process chamber includes one or more processing stations on which strip operations are performed. In certain embodiments, the one or more processing stations includes a preheat station, at least one strip station, and an over-ash station. The wafer support is configured to support the wafer during processing. The wafer support may also transfer heat to and from the wafer during processing to adjust the wafer temperature as necessary. In certain embodiments, the wafer is supported on a plurality of minimum contacts and does not physically contact the wafer support surface plane. A spindle picks up the wafer and transfers the wafer from one station to another.
Another aspect of the disclosure is an apparatus configured to accomplish the methods described herein. A suitable apparatus includes hardware for accomplishing the process operations and a system controller having instructions for controlling process operations in accordance with the present invention. Machine-readable media may be coupled to the controller and contain instructions for controlling process conditions for these operations. The system controller will typically include one or more memory devices and one or more processors configured to execute the instructions so that the apparatus will perform a method in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. Machine-readable media containing instructions for controlling process operations may be coupled to the system controller. In
Instructions for controlling process operations may be hardcoded or software. In some embodiments, the system controller includes programs, which can include logic of any form. For example, it can include logic hard coded on digital signal processors and similar processers that have specific algorithms implemented as hardware. It can also include software of firmware instructions that may be executed on a general purpose computer.
Suitable plasma chambers and systems include the Gamma 2100, 2130 I2CP (Interlaced Inductively Coupled Plasma), G400, and GxT offered by Novellus Systems, Inc. of San Jose, Calif. Other systems include the Fusion line from Axcelis Technologies Inc. of Rockville, Md., TERA21 from PSK Tech Inc. in Korea, and the Aspen from Mattson Technology Inc. in Fremont, Calif. Additionally, various strip chambers may be configured onto cluster tools. For example, a strip chamber may be added to a Centura cluster tool available from Applied Materials of Santa Clara, Calif.
The apparatus/process described hereinabove may be used in conjunction with lithographic patterning tools or processes, for example, for the fabrication or manufacture of semiconductor devices, displays, LEDs, photovoltaic panels and the like. Typically, though not necessarily, such tools/processes will be used or conducted together in a common fabrication facility. Lithographic patterning of a film typically comprises some or all of the following steps, each step enabled with a number of possible tools: (1) application of photoresist on a workpiece, i.e., substrate, using a spin-on or spray-on tool; (2) curing of photoresist using a hot plate or furnace or UV curing tool; (3) exposing the photoresist to visible or UV or x-ray light with a tool such as a wafer stepper; (4) developing the resist so as to selectively remove resist and thereby pattern it using a tool such as a wet bench; (5) transferring the resist pattern into an underlying film or workpiece by using a dry or plasma-assisted etching tool; and (6) removing the resist using a tool such as an RF or microwave plasma resist stripper.
While this invention has been described in terms of a few preferred embodiments, it should not be limited to the specifics presented above. Many variations on the above-described preferred embodiments may be employed.
This application claims benefit under 35 USC §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/528,029, filed Aug. 26, 2011, which is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4201579 | Robinson et al. | May 1980 | A |
4357203 | Zelez | Nov 1982 | A |
4699689 | Bersin | Oct 1987 | A |
4861424 | Fujimura et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4961820 | Shinagawa et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5122225 | Douglas | Jun 1992 | A |
5158644 | Cheung et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5292393 | Maydan et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5354386 | Cheung et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5593541 | Wong et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5626678 | Sahin et al. | May 1997 | A |
5633073 | Cheung et al. | May 1997 | A |
5651860 | Li | Jul 1997 | A |
5660682 | Zhao et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5707485 | Rolfson et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5767021 | Imai et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5773201 | Fujimura et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5792269 | Deacon et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5811358 | Tseng et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814155 | Solis et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5817406 | Cheung et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5820685 | Kurihara et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5830775 | Maa et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5844195 | Fairbairn et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5895272 | Li | Apr 1999 | A |
5900351 | Lutsic et al. | May 1999 | A |
5908672 | Ryu et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5911834 | Fairbairn et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5968324 | Cheung et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5980770 | Ramachandran et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6013574 | Hause et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6030901 | Hopper et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6039834 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6045618 | Raoux et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6054379 | Yau et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6072227 | Yau et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077764 | Sugiarto et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083852 | Cheung et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6086952 | Lang et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6098568 | Raoux et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6107184 | Mandal et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6121091 | Wang | Sep 2000 | A |
6125788 | Hills et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6127262 | Huang et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6129091 | Lee et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6130166 | Yeh | Oct 2000 | A |
6156149 | Cheung et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6162323 | Koshimizu | Dec 2000 | A |
6171945 | Mandal et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177347 | Liu et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184134 | Chaudhary et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6187072 | Cheung et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193802 | Pang et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6194628 | Pang et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6203657 | Collison et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6204192 | Zhao et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209484 | Huang et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230652 | Tanaka et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6242350 | Tao et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245690 | Yau et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6277733 | Smith | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281135 | Han et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287990 | Cheung et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6303523 | Cheung et al. | Oct 2001 | B2 |
6306564 | Mullee | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6319842 | Khosla et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324439 | Cheung et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6340435 | Bjorkman et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6342446 | Smith et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348725 | Cheung et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6350701 | Yamazaki | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6352936 | Jehoul et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358573 | Raoux et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361707 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6365516 | Frenkel et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6395092 | Sugiarto et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6413583 | Moghadam et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426304 | Chien et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432830 | Merry | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6448187 | Yau et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6465964 | Taguchi et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6511903 | Yau et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6511909 | Yau et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6517913 | Cheung et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6537422 | Sakuma et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6537929 | Cheung et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6541282 | Cheung et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6555472 | Aminpur | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6562544 | Cheung et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6562690 | Cheung et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6569257 | Nguyen et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6593247 | Huang et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6596655 | Cheung et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6632735 | Yau et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638875 | Han et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6656832 | Pan et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6660656 | Cheung et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6660663 | Cheung et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6663715 | Yuda et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6667244 | Cox et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6669858 | Bjorkman et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6680164 | Nguyen et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6680420 | Pang et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6689930 | Pang et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6693043 | Li et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6709715 | Lang et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6720132 | Tsai et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730593 | Yau et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6734115 | Cheung et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6743737 | Yau et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6764940 | Rozbicki et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6770556 | Yau et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6777173 | Chen et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6787452 | Sudijono et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6797188 | Shen et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6800571 | Cheung et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6806207 | Huang et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6837967 | Berman et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6848455 | Shrinivasan et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6858153 | Bjorkman et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6869896 | Cheung et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6900135 | Somekh et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6902682 | Shang et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6930061 | Cheung et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7023092 | Yau et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7070657 | Cheung et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7074298 | Gondhalekar et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7160821 | Huang et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7186648 | Rozbicki et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7202176 | Goto et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7205249 | Cheung et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7227244 | Bjorkman et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7256134 | Kim et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7288484 | Goto et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7297635 | Toda et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7344993 | Balasubramaniam et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7390755 | Chen et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7432209 | Delgadino et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7465680 | Chen et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7468326 | Chen et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7556712 | Yi et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7560377 | Cheung et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7569492 | Chen et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7585777 | Goto et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7595005 | Balasubramaniam | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7597816 | Chang et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7601272 | Nguyen et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7628864 | Moriya et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7651949 | Jo | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7740768 | Goto et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7799685 | Savas | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8034176 | Tsukamoto et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8058178 | Goto et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8058181 | Chen et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8097527 | Yang | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8129281 | Cheung et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8173547 | Winniczek et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8193096 | Goto et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8435895 | Chen et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8444869 | Goto et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8591661 | Cheung et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8598037 | Winniczek et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8641862 | Goto et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8716143 | Cheung et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8721797 | Cheung et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
9373497 | Chen et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
20010014529 | Chen et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010027023 | Ishihara | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020000202 | Yuda et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020005392 | Luo et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020039625 | Powell et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020045331 | Aminpur | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020072016 | Chen et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078976 | Nguyen | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020081854 | Morrow et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020090827 | Yokoshima | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111041 | Annapragada et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020132486 | Williams et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020139775 | Chang et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151156 | Hallock et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020153099 | Wang et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020185151 | Qingyuan et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020185226 | Lea et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020187643 | Gu et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020197870 | Johnson | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030036284 | Chou et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030045115 | Fang | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030045131 | Verbeke et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040084412 | Waldfried et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040209469 | Harada et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040237997 | Rui et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040245091 | Karim et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040248414 | Tsai et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050022839 | Savas et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050026430 | Kim et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050079723 | Niimi et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050106888 | Chiu et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050158667 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050196967 | Savas et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060046482 | Verhaverbeke | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060051881 | Ditizio | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060102197 | Chiang et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060138399 | Itano et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060141758 | Naumann et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060154471 | Minami | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060163202 | Shimitz | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060182875 | Ose et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060191478 | Gondhalekar et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060201623 | Yoo | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060289384 | Pavel et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070037396 | Verhaverbeke | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070040172 | Kawakami et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070068900 | Kim et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070144673 | Yeom | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070173066 | Kokura et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070178698 | Okita et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070224826 | Delgadino et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070235137 | Tsukamoto et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070281491 | Kamp | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080026589 | Hubacek et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080044995 | Kang et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080102646 | Kawaguchi et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080160729 | Krueger et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080248656 | Chen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080286697 | Verhaverbeke et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090053901 | Goto et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090056875 | Goto et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090061623 | Chang et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090117746 | Masuda | May 2009 | A1 |
20090200268 | Tappan et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090221148 | Udo et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090277472 | Rivkin et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090277871 | Berry et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100015812 | Nishikawa | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100062591 | Lin et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100130017 | Luo et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100216312 | Yamamoto et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100308463 | Yu et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110006034 | Hilkene et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110031493 | Yamazaki et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110139175 | Cheung et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110139176 | Cheung et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110143548 | Cheung et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110223756 | Schaeffer | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120211462 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120211473 | Goto et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130157465 | Chen et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140080309 | Park et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140120733 | Cheung et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140182619 | Goto et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150332933 | Cheung et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150357202 | Thedjoisworo et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1402316 | Mar 2003 | CN |
1720349 | Jan 2006 | CN |
1815697 | Aug 2006 | CN |
1868043 | Nov 2006 | CN |
101015042 | Aug 2007 | CN |
101057314 | Oct 2007 | CN |
101131928 | Feb 2008 | CN |
0 304 068 | Feb 1989 | EP |
1 077 476 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1081754 | Jul 2001 | EP |
1 956 638 | Aug 2008 | EP |
2300303 | Oct 1996 | GB |
S64-048418 | Feb 1989 | JP |
H01-200628 | Aug 1989 | JP |
H05-275326 | Oct 1993 | JP |
H06-208972 | Jul 1994 | JP |
08-293487 | Nov 1996 | JP |
H09-36099 | Feb 1997 | JP |
H10-209118 | Aug 1998 | JP |
H11-087307 | Mar 1999 | JP |
2000-286248 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2001-110775 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001-189305 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2001-308078 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2003-100718 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003-264170 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2005-268312 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2006-073612 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2006-351594 | Dec 2006 | JP |
2007019367 | Jan 2007 | JP |
2007-53344 | Mar 2007 | JP |
2007-109744 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2007-515781 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007-266610 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2008-218997 | Sep 2008 | JP |
2008-300704 | Dec 2008 | JP |
2010-098279 | Apr 2010 | JP |
10-2004-0103073 | Dec 2004 | KR |
387097 | Apr 2000 | TW |
200535277 | Nov 2005 | TW |
WO 2004051702 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004102640 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2005017983 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2006028858 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO 2011071980 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO 2011072042 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO 2011072061 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO 2012018375 | Feb 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Kikuchi et al., Native Oxide Removal on Si Surfaces by NF3-Added Hydrogen and Water Vapor Plasma Downstream Treatment, Jpn J. Appl. Phys. vol. 33 (1994), pp. 2207-2211, Part 1, No. 4B, Apr. 1994. |
Woody K. Chung, “Downstream Plasma Removal of Mobile Ion Impurity From SIO2”, Published Proceedings of the 8th International Plasma Processing Symposium, Fall 1990, 7 pages. |
Woody K, Chung, “Low Damage, Downstream RF Plasma Ashing of High Energy, Heavily Doped Implanted Resists,” Semicon Korea, Dec. 1989. |
A. Kalnitsky and W. K. Chung, “Characterization and Optimization of a Single Wafer Downstream Plasma Stripper,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 135, No. 9, Sep. 1988, pp. 2338-2341. |
Goto et al , “Enhanced Stripping of Low-K Films Using Downstream Gas Mixing,” Novellus Systems, Inc., U.S. Appl. No. 10/890,653, filed Jul. 13, 2004. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/890,653 mailed Jul. 27, 2005. |
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/890,653 mailed Jan. 10, 2006. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/890,653 mailed Jun. 26, 2006. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/890,653 mailed Oct. 11, 2006. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/890,653 mailed Apr. 5, 2007. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/890,653 mailed Jun. 15, 2007. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/890,653 mailed Jul. 23, 2007. |
Goto et al., “Enhanced Stripping of Low-K Films Using Downstream Gas Mixing,” Novellus Systems, Inc., U.S. Appl. No. 11/011,273, filed Dec. 13, 2004. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/011,273 mailed Nov. 28, 2006. |
Goto et al , “Enhanced Stripping of Low-K Films Using Downstream Gas Mixing,” Novellus Systems, Inc., U.S. Appl. No. 11/712,253, filed Feb. 27, 2007, pp. 1-28. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/712,253 mailed Dec. 23, 2008. |
Goto, ct al., “Photoresist Strip Method for Low-K Dielectrics,” U.S. Appl. No. 11/859,727, filed Sep. 21, 2007. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/859,727 mailed Oct. 6, 2008. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/859,727 mailed May 1, 2009. |
Goto, et al., “High Dose Implantation Strip (HDIS) in H2 Base Chemistry,” Novellus Systems, Inc., U.S. Appl. No. 12/251,305, filed Oct. 14, 2008. |
Goto, et al., “Photoresist Strip Method for Low-K Dielectrics,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/533,461, filed Jul. 31, 2009. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/712,253 mailed Jul. 17, 2009. |
Chen, et al., “Method for Post-Etch Cleans,” U.S. Appl. No. 10/137,096, May 1, 2002. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/137,096 mailed Jul. 11, 2003. |
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/137,096 mailed Jul. 27, 2007. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/137,096 mailed Jan. 15, 2008. |
Chen, et al., “Method for Post-Etch Cleans,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/111,095, filed Aug. 28, 2008. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/111,095 mailed Aug. 25, 2008. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/111,095 mailed Apr. 3, 2009. |
Chen, et al., “Method for Post-Etch Cleans,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/502,130, filed Jul. 31, 2009. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/712,253 mailed Jan. 29, 2010. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/548,801 mailed Feb. 17, 2010. |
Cheung, et al., “Plasma Based Photoresist Removal System for Cleaning Post Ash Residue,” U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930, filed May 12, 2005. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Sep. 13, 2006. |
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Mar. 8, 2007. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Mar. 19, 2007. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Jun. 29, 2007. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Dec. 10, 2007. |
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Jul. 21, 2008. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Mar. 20, 2009. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Sep. 17, 2009. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Feb. 26, 2010. |
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Sep. 9, 2010. |
S. Wolf and R.N. Tauber, (Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era, vol. 1—Process Technology, Lattice Press, 1986), pp. 539-543. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/533,461 mailed Nov. 5, 2010. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/502,130 mailed Dec. 8, 2010. |
Cheung, et al. “Ultra Low Silicon Loss High Dose Implant Strip,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,582, filed Dec. 11, 2009. |
Cheung, et al. “Low Damage Photoresist Strip Method for Low-K Dielectrics,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,601, filed Dec. 11, 2009. |
Cheung, et al. “Enhanced Passivation Process to Protect Silicon Prior to High Dose Implant Strip,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/963,503, filed Dec. 8, 2009. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/712,253 mailed Mar. 1, 2011. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed May 10, 2011. |
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/533,461 mailed May 26, 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2010/059388 mailed Jun. 27, 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2010/059547 mailed Jul. 13, 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2010/059517 mailed Jul. 14, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/533,461 mailed Aug. 12, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/502,130 mailed Aug. 12, 2011. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/251,305 mailed Nov. 2, 2011. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/786,230 mailed Nov. 10, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Oct. 28, 2011. |
Chen, et al., “Methods for Stripping Photoresist and/or Cleaning Metal Regions,” U.S. Appl. No. 11/696,633, filed Apr. 7, 2007. |
Office Action mailed Dec. 15, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/696,633. |
Office Action mailed May 26, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/696,633. |
Final Office Action mailed Sep. 20, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/696,633. |
Office Action mailed Jun. 6, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/696,633. |
Final Office Action mailed Sep. 28, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/696,633. |
Office Action mailed Jan. 27, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/696,633. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/251,305 mailed Feb. 17, 2012. |
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/786,230 mailed Apr. 26, 2012. |
Singapore Written Opinion and Search Report mailed Feb. 2, 2012, for Application No. 201104086-2. |
Office Action mailed Mar. 30, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,601. |
Goto, et al., “High Dose Implantation Strip (HDIS) in H2 Base Chemistry,” Novellus Systems, Inc., U.S. Appl. No. 13/462,660, filed May 2, 2012. |
Final Office Action mailed May 15, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/696,633. |
Office Action mailed Jul. 27, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/963,503. |
US Final Office Action, dated Sep. 5, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,601. |
US Office Action, dated Sep. 6, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,582. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,638, filed Oct. 17, 2011, entitled “Photoresist Strip Method for Low-K Dielectrics.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/066,587, filed Oct. 29, 2013, entitled “Low Damage Photoresist Strip Method for Low-K Dielectrics.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/370,689, filed Feb. 10, 2012, entitled “Plasma Based Photoresist Removal System for Cleaning Post Ash Residue”. |
US Office Action dated Feb. 15, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,638. |
US Office Action, dated Apr. 26, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/462,660. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 30, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/462,660. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 31, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/462,660. |
US Final Office Action, dated May 13, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,582. |
US Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief, dated Sep. 20, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,582. |
US Office Action, dated Feb. 12, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,601. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 23, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,601. |
US Final Office Action, dated Jan. 22, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/963,503. |
US Office Action, dated Aug. 23, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/963,503. |
US Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 24, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/786,230. |
US Office Action dated Feb. 22, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/370,689. |
US Final Office Action dated Aug. 20, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/370,689. |
US Office Action, dated Jul. 19, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/759,958. |
US Final Office Action, dated Nov. 12, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/759,958. |
Chinese Office Action dated Jul. 20, 2012, issued in Application No. 200810187894.4. |
Chinese Office Action dated Jun. 19, 2013, issued in Application No. 200810187894.4. |
Japanese Office Action dated Sep. 25, 2012, issued in Application No. 2009-018046. |
Japanese Description of details of Reasons for Rejection dated Oct. 9, 2012, issued in Application No. 2009-018046. |
Japanese Summary of Reasons for Rejection dated Sep. 3, 2013, issued in Application No. 2009-018046. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Jun. 21, 2012, issued in Application No. PCT/US2010/059388. |
Singapore Second Written Opinion, dated Aug. 17, 2012, issued in Application No. 201104086-2. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Jun. 21, 2012, issued in Application No. PCT/US2010/059517. |
Singapore Written Opinion, dated Jul. 15, 2013, issued in Application No. 201204092-9. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Jun. 21, 2012, issued in Application No. PCT/US2010/059547. |
Singapore Office Action dated Aug. 1, 2013 issued in Applivcation No. 201203361-9. |
European Partial Search Report dated Apr. 17, 2013 issued in Application No. 12 18 1659. |
European Partial Search Report dated Aug. 19, 2013 issued in Application No. 12 18 1659. |
Ghandhi, Sorab K., (1983) “VLSI Fabrication Principles,” by John wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 517-520. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/301,155, filed Jun. 10, 2014, entitled “Peroxide-Vapor Treatment for Enhancing Photoresist-Strip Performance and Modifying Organic Films.” |
US Office Action, dated Dec. 4, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,582. |
US Office Action, dated Aug. 13, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,582. |
US Supplemental Notice of Allowability, dated Nov. 5, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,601. |
US Office Action, dated Apr. 10, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/066,587. |
US Final Office Action, dated Oct. 9, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/066,587. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 12, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/963,503. |
US Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 17, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/370,689. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Oct. 29, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/696,633. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 28, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/759,958. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 22, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/759,958. |
Taiwan Search Report dated Feb. 17, 2014 issued in TW 097146496. |
Taiwan Office Action dated Jun. 19, 2014 issued in TW 097146496. |
Chinese First Office Action dated Sep. 24, 2014 issued in CN Application No. 201080056124.1. |
Japanese Office Action dated Nov. 11, 2014 issued in JP 2012-543229. |
Chinese First Office Action and Search Report dated Aug. 5, 2014 issued in CN 201080056102.5. |
Japanese Office Action dated Nov. 11, 2014 issued in JP 2012-543254. |
Singapore Examination Report, dated Mar. 21, 2014, issued in Application No. 201204092-9. |
Chinese First Office Action and Search Report dated Sep. 1, 2014 issued in CN 201080055428.6. |
Japanese Office Action dated Oct. 28, 2014 issued in JP 2012-543261. |
Singapore Second Written Opinion dated Apr. 5, 2014 issued in Application No. 201203361-9. |
Singapore Final Examination Report dated Nov. 3, 2014 issued in Application No. 201203361-9. |
Singapore Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 13, 2013 issued in SG 201206236-0. |
Singapore Search and Examination Report dated Jul. 7, 2014, 2014 issued in SG 201206236-0. |
Abe et al. (Aug. 2003) “Novel photoresist stripping technology using ozone/vaporized water mixture,” IEEE Trans. Semicon. Manufact., 16(3):401-408. |
De Gendt et al. (1999) “A Novel Resist and Post-Etch Residue Removal Process Using Ozonated Chemistry,” Solid State Phenomena vols. 65-66:165-168. |
Noda et al. (2003) “Development of a Photoresist Removal Method Using Ozone Gas with Water Vapor for LCD Manufacturing,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 150(9):G537-G542. |
US Final Office Action, dated Feb. 26, 2015, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,582. |
US Office Action, dated Mar. 18, 2015, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/066,587. |
US Final Office Action, dated Jul. 10, 2015, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/066,587. |
Korean Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2015, issued in Application No. 2008-0116792. |
Chinese Second Office Action dated Jun. 3, 2015 issued in CN Application No. 201080056124.1. |
Chinese Second Office Action and Search Report dated Feb. 13, 2015 issued in CN 201080056102.5. |
Taiwan Office Action dated Mar. 23, 2015, issued in Application No. 099143368. |
Taiwan Office Action [Decision] dated Jul. 14, 2015, issued in Application No. 099143368. |
Chinese Second Office Action dated Jun. 23, 2015 issued in CN 201080055428.6. |
Taiwan Office Action dated Jun. 16, 2015 issued in Application No. 099143366. |
US Office Action, dated Oct. 14, 2015, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/301,155. |
US Final Office Action, dated Mar. 16, 2016, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/301,155. |
US Office Action, dated Sep. 16, 2015, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/721,977. |
Korean Office Action dated Nov. 19, 2015, issued in Application No. 2008-0116792. |
Chinese Third Office Action dated Dec. 10, 2015 issued in CN Application No. 201080056124.1. |
Japanese Office Action (Notice of Reasons for Rejection) dated Sep. 1, 2015 issued in JP 2012-543229. |
Taiwan Office Action and Search Report, dated Nov. 20, 2015, issued in TW 099143367. |
Chinese Third Office Action dated Sep. 28, 2015 issued in CN 201080056102.5. |
Japanese Office Action [Decision of Rejection] dated Sep. 8, 2015 issued in JP 2012-543254. |
Chinese Third Office Action dated Jan. 4, 2016 issued in CN 201080055428.6. |
Chinese Fourth Office Action dated Apr. 5, 2016 issued in CN 201080055428.6. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Aug. 2, 2016, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/301,155. |
US Final Office Action, dated May 13, 2016, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/721,977. |
Chinese Fourth Office Action dated Jun. 14, 2016 issued in CN Application No. 201080056124.1. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 28, 2016, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/721,977. |
Korean Office Action [Final Rejection] dated Sep. 8, 2015, issued in Application No. KR KR 2008-0116792. |
Korean Notice of Scheduled date of Ruling mailed Oct. 18, 2016, for Application No. KR 2008-0116792. |
Japanese Office Action dated Sep. 20, 2016 issued in Application No. JP 2012-186425. |
Taiwan Office Action and Search Report dated Oct. 4, 2016 issued in Application No. TW 101130809. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130048014 A1 | Feb 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61528029 | Aug 2011 | US |