The present disclosure relates to electronic devices and in particular to power modules.
Power devices made with silicon carbide (SiC) are expected to show great advantages as compared to those on silicon for high speed, high power and/or high temperature applications due to the high critical field and wide band gap of SiC. For devices capable of blocking high voltages, such as voltages in excess of about 5 kV, it may be desirable to have bipolar operation to reduce the drift layer resistance via conductivity modulation resulting from injected minority carriers. However, one technical challenge for bipolar devices in silicon carbide is forward voltage degradation over time, possibly due to the presence of Basal Plane Dislocations (BPD) in single crystals of silicon carbide. Thus, unipolar devices such as SiC Schottky diodes and MOSFETs are typically used for high power applications, e.g., up to 10 kV or more.
SiC DMOSFET devices with a 10 kV blocking capability have been fabricated with a specific on-resistance of about 100 mΩ×cm2. DMOSFET devices may exhibit very fast switching speeds of, for example, less than 100 ns, due to their majority carrier nature. However, as the desired blocking voltage of devices increases, for example up to 15 kV or more, the on-resistance of a MOSFET device may increase substantially, due to the corresponding increase in the drift layer thickness. This problem may be exacerbated at high temperatures due to bulk mobility reduction, which may result in excessive power dissipation.
With the progress of SiC crystal material growth, several approaches have been developed to mitigate BPD related problems. See, e.g., B. Hull, M. Das, J. Sumakeris, J. Richmond, and S. Krishinaswami, “Drift-Free 10-kV, 20-A 4H—SiC PiN Diodes”, Journal of Electrical Materials, Vol. 34, No. 4, 2005, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. These developments may enhance the development and/or potential applications of SiC bipolar devices such as thyristors, GTOs, etc. Even though thyristors and/or GTOs may offer low forward voltage drops, they may require bulky commutating circuits for the gate drive and protections. Accordingly, it may be desirable for a SiC bipolar device to have gate turn-off capability. Due to their superior on-state characteristics, reasonable switching speed, and/or excellent safe-operation-area (SOA), 4H—SiC insulated gate bipolar transistors (IGBTs) are becoming more suitable for power switching applications.
These devices are used in power modules, which operate to dynamically control large amounts of power through switching for motors, inverters, generators, and the like. There is a continuing need for power modules that are smaller and less expensive to manufacture while at the same time being capable of controlling larger loads.
A power module is disclosed that supports high current densities. The power module includes a housing with an interior chamber wherein multiple switch modules are mounted within the interior chamber. The switch modules comprise multiple transistors and diodes that are interconnected to facilitate switching power to a load. In one embodiment, at least one of the switch modules supports a current density of at least 10 amperes per cm2.
In other embodiments, at least one transistor in a switch module includes a drift layer having a first conductivity type, a well region in the drift layer having a second conductivity type opposite the first conductivity type, and a source region in the well region. The source region has the first conductivity type and defines a channel region in the well region. The source region includes a lateral source region adjacent the channel region and a plurality of source contact regions extending away from the lateral source region opposite the channel region. A body contact region having the second conductivity type is between at least two of the plurality of source contact regions and is in contact with the well region, and a source ohmic contact is in contact with the source contact regions and the body contact region.
The body contact region may include a plurality of body contact regions that are interspersed between the source contact regions. The plurality of body contact regions may be spaced apart from the channel region by the lateral source region.
The source ohmic contact may be in contact with the source region in a source contact area and the source ohmic contact may be in contact with the body contact region in a body contact region area.
In some embodiments, a ratio of a minimum dimension p1 of the contact region area to a minimum dimension w1 of the well region may be greater than 0.2. In further embodiments, the ratio of the minimum dimension p1 of the contact region area to the minimum dimension w1 of the well region may be greater than about 0.3.
The drift region may include a wide bandgap semiconductor material, such as silicon carbide.
The source region has a sheet resistance and the source ohmic contact has a sheet resistance that is greater than 75% of the contact resistance of the source region, and in some embodiments is greater than the contact resistance of the source region.
The transistor may have a reverse blocking voltage in excess of 1000 volts and a current density greater than 200 amps per square centimeter.
The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the disclosure and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this application, illustrate certain embodiment(s) of the disclosure. In the drawings:
Embodiments of the present disclosure now will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which embodiments of the disclosure are shown. This disclosure may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the disclosure to those skilled in the art. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.
It will be understood that, although the terms first, second, etc. may be used herein to describe various elements, these elements should not be limited by these terms. These terms are only used to distinguish one element from another. For example, a first element could be termed a second element, and, similarly, a second element could be termed a first element, without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. As used herein, the term “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the disclosure. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” “comprising,” “includes” and/or “including” when used herein, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
Unless otherwise defined, all terms (including technical and scientific terms) used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure belongs. It will be further understood that terms used herein should be interpreted as having a meaning that is consistent with their meaning in the context of this specification and the relevant art and will not be interpreted in an idealized or overly formal sense unless expressly so defined herein.
It will be understood that when an element such as a layer, region or substrate is referred to as being “on” or extending “onto” another element, it can be directly on or extend directly onto the other element or intervening elements may also be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being “directly on” or extending “directly onto” another element, there are no intervening elements present. It will also be understood that when an element is referred to as being “connected” or “coupled” to another element, it can be directly connected or coupled to the other element or intervening elements may be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being “directly connected” or “directly coupled” to another element, there are no intervening elements present.
Relative terms such as “below” or “above” or “upper” or “lower” or “horizontal” or “lateral” or “vertical” may be used herein to describe a relationship of one element, layer or region to another element, layer or region as illustrated in the figures. It will be understood that these terms are intended to encompass different orientations of the device in addition to the orientation depicted in the figures.
Embodiments of the disclosure are described herein with reference to cross-section illustrations that are schematic illustrations of idealized embodiments (and intermediate structures) of the disclosure. The thickness of layers and regions in the drawings may be exaggerated for clarity. Additionally, variations from the shapes of the illustrations as a result, for example, of manufacturing techniques and/or tolerances, are to be expected. Thus, embodiments of the disclosure should not be construed as limited to the particular shapes of regions illustrated herein but are to include deviations in shapes that result, for example, from manufacturing. For example, an implanted region illustrated as a rectangle will, typically, have rounded or curved features and/or a gradient of implant concentration at its edges rather than a discrete change from implanted to non-implanted region. Likewise, a buried region formed by implantation may result in some implantation in the region between the buried region and the surface through which the implantation takes place. Thus, the regions illustrated in the figures are schematic in nature and their shapes are not intended to illustrate the actual shape of a region of a device and are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure.
Some embodiments of the disclosure are described with reference to semiconductor layers and/or regions which are characterized as having a conductivity type such as n-type or p-type, which refers to the majority carrier concentration in the layer and/or region. Thus, n-type material has a majority equilibrium concentration of negatively charged electrons, while p-type material has a majority equilibrium concentration of positively charged holes. Some material may be designated with a “+” or “−” (as in n+, n−, p+, p−, n++, n−−, p++, p−−, or the like), to indicate a relatively larger (“+”) or smaller (“−”) concentration of majority carriers compared to another layer or region. However, such notation does not imply the existence of a particular concentration of majority or minority carriers in a layer or region.
An exemplary system that employs a power module is illustrated in
For now, assume the switch modules SM1-SM4 can include at least one transistor in parallel with an internal or external diode that is connected in anti-parallel with the transistor. The transistors are illustrated as metal oxide field effect transistors (MOSFETs), and the diodes are illustrated as Schottky diodes for purposes of description. The MOSFETs may be replaced with other types of transistors, such as bipolar transistors, including insulated gate bipolar transistors (IGBTs), and various kinds of field effect transistors (FETs), such as junction field effect transistors (JFETs), and high electron mobility transistors (HEMTs). Similarly, the Schottky diodes may be replaced with traditional p-n diodes.
As illustrated, switch module SM1 may include either an n-channel or p-channel MOSFET Q1 that has a Schottky diode D1 connected in anti-parallel across the drain and source terminals of the MOSFET Q1. Switch modules SM2-SM4 are similarly configured. Switch module SM2 includes an n-channel MOSFET Q2 that has a Schottky diode D2 connected in anti-parallel across the drain and source terminals of the MOSFET Q2. Switch module SM3 may include either an n-channel or p-channel MOSFET Q3 that has a Schottky diode D3 connected in anti-parallel across the drain and source terminals of the MOSFET Q3. Switch module SM4 includes an n-channel MOSFET Q4 that has a Schottky diode D4 connected in anti-parallel across the drain and source terminals of the MOSFET Q4.
The switch modules SM1 and SM3 are considered on the “high” side, and the switch modules SM2 and SM4 are considered on the “low” side of the power module. The drains of MOSFETs Q1 and Q3 and the cathodes of diodes D1 and D3 are coupled together and to the power supply PS1. The source of MOSFET Q1, the anode of diode D1, the drain of MOSFET Q2, and the cathode of diode D2 are coupled together and to a first terminal of the motor M1. The source of MOSFET Q3, the anode of diode D3, the drain of MOSFET Q4, and the cathode of diode D4 are coupled together and to a second terminal of the motor M1. Finally, the sources of MOSFETs Q2 and Q4 and the anodes of diodes D2 and D4 are coupled to ground. The gates of MOSFETs Q1-Q4 are respectively driven by control signals S1-S4, which are provided by the control system CS1. Assume the motor M1 may be driven in both forward and reverse directions.
For forward operation, assume control signals S1-S4 are configured to turn on MOSFETs Q2 and Q3 and turn off MOSFETs Q1 and Q4, which corresponds to driving the motor M1 in a forward direction. As illustrated in
To control the speed or torque, one or both of the MOSFETs Q2 and Q3 may be switched off and on at a duty cycle that corresponds to the speed or torque desired from the motor M1. As a result, the voltage supplied to the motor M1 is pulse width modulated, wherein the on-to-off switching ratio of the MOSFETs Q2 and Q3 dictates the average voltage presented to the Motor M1. The inductive nature of the motor M1 tries to keep the forward current if constant, and as a result, averages the voltage presented to the motor M1 to a level corresponding to the on-to-off switching ratio of the MOSFETs Q2 AND Q3. The average voltage presented to the motor M1 dictates the forward current if that is passed through the motor M1, and thus, controls the actual speed or torque of the motor M1.
For reverse operation, assume control signals S1-S4 are configured to turn on MOSFETs Q1 and Q4 and turn off MOSFETs Q2 and Q3. As illustrated in
As described above, the various MOSFETs Q1-Q4 may be turned on and off at a relatively high frequency to provide pulse width modulated voltage to the motor M1 for either forward or reverse operation as well as to switch from forward operation to reverse operation. When a pair of MOSFETs, such as MOSFETs Q2 and Q3 transition from an on-state to an off-state during forward operation, the forward current if continues to flow through the motor M1 after the MOSFETs Q2 and Q3 are turned off, due to the electromagnetic field that is present in the inductive windings of the motor M1. At this point, all of the MOSFETs Q1-Q4 are off, yet the forward current if remains flowing through the motor M1. Since the forward current if cannot flow through any of the MOSFETS Q1-Q4 to a lower potential node, one or more of the Schottky diodes D1 though D4 may become forward biased and provide a path for the forward current if to flow to either ground or the power supply PS1.
To increase the power handling of a switch module SM1-SM4, each of the MOSFETs Q1-Q4 may represent an array of effectively parallel transistors. Similarly, each of the Schottky diodes D1-D4 may represent an array of effectively parallel diodes. This concept is represented in
As illustrated, switch module SM1 includes an array of MOSFETs Q11-Q1N, which are effectively coupled in parallel, such that the drains are all coupled together and to the power supply PS1; the sources are all coupled together and to the motor M1 and switch module SM2; and the gates are coupled together and to the control system C1 (control signal S1). The Schottky diodes D11-D1N are coupled in anti-parallel across the drain and sources of the MOSFETs Q11-Q1N. The number (N) of MOSFETs Q11-Q1N and Schottky diodes D11-D1N may range from two to more than 100, depending on the capability of each individual device and the application. Notably, there may be two or more Schottky diodes D1 for each MOSFET Q1, even though there is only a one-to-one relationship in the illustration.
The necessary interconnects between the components on the printed circuit boards PCB1 and PCB2 are provided by metal traces (not shown) on the printed circuit boards PCB1 and PCB2. Bond wires may be used to make connections between the printed circuit boards PCB1 and PCB2 and one more connectors or buses B1 and B2. For example, bus B1 may be used to connect switch modules SM2 and SM4 to ground, and bus B2 may be used to connect switch modules SM1 and SM3 to the power supply PS1. These or other connectors may be used for the control signals S1-S4. The printed circuit boards PCB1 and PCB2 may be mounted to a mounting structure that is affixed to the housing H1. As illustrated, the mounting structure is a planar heat sink HS1 that also functions to dissipate heat generated by the switch modules SM1-SM4.
Again, the H-bridge configuration of the power module is just one of many available designs for power modules, especially those used to drive inductive loads. Alternatives to the H-bridge configuration for the power module include a half-H bridge and like known power switching or control circuits.
Regardless of the type of configuration of the power module, one metric for measuring the power handling capabilities of the device is current density of one of the switch modules SM1-SM4. This switch module current density is defined as the ratio of the maximum average current that a single switch module SM1-SM4 can handle to the interior area of the housing H1 that is allocated to the single switch module SM1-SM4. For the illustrated example, there are four switch modules SM1-SM4 of equal size. As such, the interior area of the housing H1 that is allocated to a single switch module SM1-SM4 is one-fourth (¼) the total interior area of the housing H1.
For example, assume the interior area of the housing H1 is 100 cm2, and the maximum average current handling of one of the switch modules SM1-SM4 is 250 amperes. As such, the interior area of the housing H1 that is allocated to a single switch module SM1-SM4 is one-fourth of 100 cm2, or 25 cm2. The switch module current density is calculated by dividing the maximum average current handling of 250 amperes by the interior area of the housing H1 that is allocated to the single switch module SM1-SM4, which yields 10 amperes/cm2.
The interior area of the housing H1 is defined as the maximum (two-dimensional) cross-sectional area of the interior of the housing H1 wherein the plane of measurement is along the plane in which one or more printed circuit boards PCB1 and PCB2 or one or more semiconductor die that provide the switch modules SM1-SM4 reside. For the illustrated example in
The following description outlines several transistor configurations that can be used in the power module as MOSFETs Q1N-Q4N or alternatives thereto. Other transistor configurations may be employed. Some embodiments of the disclosure provide silicon carbide (SiC) insulated gate devices that are suitable for high power and/or high temperature applications.
In a MOSFET device, current passing through a channel of the device from the drain to the source is regulated by applying a voltage to the gate. The gate is insulated from the channel by a gate insulator, such as silicon dioxide. As the voltage on the gate terminal is increased, current passing through the device may increase.
In particular, as the drain current ID passing through the device increases, the amount of voltage dropped over the source resistance RS increases in direct proportion.
As shown in
Thus, as the drain current increases the portion of the gate voltage that is being used to maintain the channel decreases, which may cause the device to go into saturation at a lower level of drain-to-source voltage. Accordingly, a high source resistance can adversely affect the operation of a MOSFET or other insulated gate controlled device.
A unit cell 10 of a MOSFET structure according to some embodiments is shown in
The structure further includes a p+ well region 18 and an n+ source region 20 that may be formed by selective implantation of, for example, aluminum and nitrogen, respectively. The junction depth of the p+ well region 18 may be about 0.5 μm, although other depths are possible. The structure 10 further includes a p+ contact region 22 that extends from a surface of the drift layer 14 into the p+ well region 18. A junction termination (not shown) may be provided around the device periphery.
All of the implanted dopants may be activated by annealing the structure at a temperature of about 1600° C. with a silicon over pressure and/or covered by an encapsulation layer such as a graphite film. A high temperature anneal may damage the surface of the silicon carbide epitaxy without these conditions. The silicon overpressure may be provided by the presence of silane, or the close proximity of silicon carbide coated objects that provide a certain amount of silicon overpressure. Alternatively or in combination with silicon overpressure, a graphite coating may be formed on the surface of the device. Prior to annealing the device to activate the implanted ions, a graphite coating may be applied to the top/front side of the structure in order to protect the surface of the structure during the anneal. The graphite coating may be applied by a conventional resist coating method and may have a thickness of about 1 μm. The graphite coating may be heated to form a crystalline coating on the drift layer 14. The implanted ions may be activated by a thermal anneal that may be performed, for example, in an inert gas at a temperature of about 1600° C. or greater. In particular the thermal anneal may be performed at a temperature of about 1600° C. in argon for 5 minutes. The graphite coating may help to protect the surface of the drift layer 14 during the high temperature anneal.
The graphite coating may then be removed, for example, by ashing and thermal oxidation.
After implant annealing, a field oxide of silicon dioxide (not shown) having a thickness of about 1 μm may be deposited and patterned to expose the active region of the device.
A gate oxide layer 36 may be formed by a gate oxidation process, with a final gate oxide thickness of 400-600 Å.
In particular, the gate oxide may be grown by a dry-wet oxidation process that includes a growth of bulk oxide in dry O2 followed by an anneal of the bulk oxide in wet O2 as described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,972,801, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. As used herein, anneal of oxide in wet O2 refers to anneal of an oxide in an ambient containing both O2 and vaporized H2O. An anneal may be performed in between the dry oxide growth and the wet oxide growth. The dry O2 oxide growth may be performed, for example, in a quartz tube at a temperature of up to about 1200° C. in dry O2 for a time of at least about 2.5 hours. Dry oxide growth is performed to grow the bulk oxide layer to a desired thickness. The temperature of the dry oxide growth may affect the oxide growth rate. For example, higher process temperatures may produce higher oxide growth rates. The maximum growth temperature may be dependent on the system used.
In some embodiments, the dry O2 oxide growth may be performed at a temperature of about 1175° C. in dry O2 for about 3.5 hours. The resulting oxide layer may be annealed at a temperature of up to about 1200° C. in an inert atmosphere. In particular, the resulting oxide layer may be annealed at a temperature of about 1175° C. in Ar for about 1 hour. The wet O2 oxide anneal may be performed at a temperature of about 950° C. or less for a time of at least about 1 hour. The temperature of the wet O2 anneal may be limited to discourage further thermal oxide growth at the SiC/SiO2 interface, which may introduce additional interface states. In particular, the wet O2 anneal may be performed in wet O2 at a temperature of about 950° C. for about 3 hours. The resulting gate oxide layer may have a thickness of about 500 Å.
In some embodiments, the dry O2 oxide growth may be performed at a temperature of about 1175° C. in dry O2 for about 4 hours. The resulting oxide layer may be annealed at a temperature of up to about 1175° C. in an inert atmosphere. In particular, the resulting oxide layer may be annealed at a temperature of about 1175° C. in Ar for about a time duration ranging from 30 min to 2 hours. Then the oxide layer receives an anneal in NO ambient at a temperature ranging from 1175° C. to 1300 C, for a duration ranging from 30 minutes to 3 hours. The resulting gate oxide layer may have a thickness of about 500 Å.
After formation of the gate oxide 34, a polysilicon gate 32 may be deposited and doped, for example, with boron followed by a metallization process to reduce the gate resistance. Al/Ni contacts may be deposited as the p-type ohmic source contact metal 28, and Ni as the n-type drain contact metal 26. All contacts may be sintered in a Rapid Thermal Annealer (RTA), and thick Ti/Au layers may be used for pad metals.
Referring to
As noted above, in a wide bandgap semiconductor material system, the source resistance may be more affected by the contact resistance of the source ohmic contact than by the sheet resistance of the source layer. Accordingly, to decrease the source resistance of a wide bandgap power semiconductor device, it may be desirable to decrease the contact resistance of the source ohmic contact. In general, contact resistance can be decreased by increasing the minimum dimension of the contact, which is the smallest dimension of the contact in any direction. However, simply increasing the minimum dimension of the source ohmic contact of an electronic device can undesirably increase the cell to cell spacing, or pitch, of the device. The pitch of a MOSFET device may be proportional to the width of the p-well region of the device. Increasing the pitch of the device reduces the density of the devices that can be formed on a single substrate, reducing the devices yielded and increasing manufacturing costs.
According to some embodiments, an insulated gate device layout is provided that increases the minimum dimension of the source ohmic contact without increasing the pitch of the device and/or the width of the p-well region of the device. A device layout according to some embodiments may increase the sheet resistance of the device. Such an effect may be highly undesirable in a device based on a narrow bandgap semiconductor material. However, since sheet resistance is not the dominant factor in determining source resistance of a wide bandgap device, such a tradeoff may be acceptable for wide bandgap devices. In devices according to some embodiments, a ratio of the source sheet resistance to the source contact resistance may be greater than 0.75 (i.e. Rsheet/RC>0.75). In some embodiments, the device may have a source contact resistance that is less than the source sheet resistance. That is, in some embodiments, the ratio of the source sheet resistance to the source contact resistance may be greater than 1 (i.e. Rsheet/RC>1), and in further embodiments, the ratio of the source sheet resistance to the source contact resistance may be greater than 5.
The device 100 shown in
The structure further includes a p+ well region 118 and an n+ source region 120 that may be formed by selective implantation of, for example, aluminum and nitrogen, respectively. The junction depth of the p+ well region 118 may be about 0.5 μm. The structure 100 further includes a plurality of p+ contact regions 122 that extend from a surface of the drift layer 114 into the p+ well region 118. A junction termination (not shown) may be provided around the device periphery.
Referring to
Referring to
The portion of the source contact regions 120B contacted by the source ohmic contact 134 may have a minimum dimension that is larger than the minimum dimension that can be obtained for a conventional layout such as the layout shown in
In a device having a layout as shown in
The on-resistance of a MOSFET device is affected by the drain resistance, the channel resistance and the source resistance of the device. Accordingly, reducing the source resistance of the device also reduces the on-resistance of the device.
A wide bandgap MOSFET device having a layout according to some embodiments may be capable of substantially increased saturation current due to the lower on-resistance of the device and the fact that increased current levels have less of a de-biasing effect on the gate. That is, because of the lower source resistance, less voltage will be developed over the source resistance as the drain current increases. Thus, more of the gate-to-source voltage is applied to the channel of the device.
The minimum dimension of the n-type contact area is denoted as width n1 in
An insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) device 200 according to some embodiments is illustrated in
The IGBT structure 200 further includes a p+ well region 218 and an n+ source/emitter region 220 that may be formed by selective implantation of, for example, aluminum and nitrogen, respectively. The junction depth of the p+ well region 218 may be about 0.5 μm. The structure 200 further includes a plurality of p+ body contact regions 222 that extend from a surface of the drift layer 214 into the p+ well region 218. The conductivity types may be reversed in some embodiments.
A gate contact 232 is on a gate insulator 236, a source/emitter contact 234 is on the source contact regions 220 and the body contact regions 222. A collector contact 226 contacts the substrate 210.
According to some embodiments, a transistor device may have a ratio of n1 to w1 that is greater than 0.2. In further embodiments, a transistor device may have a ratio of n1 to w1 that is greater than about 0.3. In further embodiments, a transistor device may have a ratio of n1 to w1 that is in the range of about 0.2 to 1. In further embodiments, a transistor device may have a ratio of n1 to w1 that is in the range of about 0.3 to 1. In further embodiments, transistor device may have a ratio of n1 to w1 that is greater than 0.5. For example, the minimum dimension n1 of the n-type contact area of a device having a layout according to some embodiments may be about 2 μm for a device having a minimum dimension of the implanted cell area of 6 μm.
According to some embodiments, a transistor device may have a ratio of p1 to w1 that is greater than 0.2. In further embodiments, a transistor device may have a ratio of p1 to w1 that is greater than about 0.3. In further embodiments, a transistor device may have a ratio of p1 to w1 that is greater than about 0.5. In further embodiments, a transistor device may have a ratio of p1 to w1 that is in the range of about 0.2 to 0.5. In further embodiments, a transistor device may have a ratio of p1 to w1 that is in the range of about 0.2 to 1.
Some embodiments provide transistor devices having increased current densities. Current density is defined as the total current divided by the area of the chip. For example, a wide bandgap transistor device according to some embodiments may be capable of current densities in excess of 200 A/cm2 and a blocking voltage of 1000 V or more. A wide bandgap transistor device according to further embodiments may be capable of a current of 100 A or greater at current densities in excess of 200 A/cm2, a forward voltage drop of less than 5 V and a blocking voltage of 1000 V or more. A wide bandgap transistor device according to still further embodiments may be capable of a current of 100 A or greater at current densities in excess of 300 A/cm2, a forward voltage drop of less than 5 V and a blocking voltage of 1000 V or more.
A semiconductor device according to some embodiments has a reverse blocking voltage in excess of 1000 volts and a current density greater than 200 amps per square centimeter at a current greater than 100 A.
A semiconductor device according to further embodiments has a reverse blocking voltage of 1000 volts or more and a forward current capability greater than 100 A at a forward voltage of 5 volts or less.
A metal-oxide semiconductor field effect transistor device according to some embodiments has a reverse blocking voltage of 1200 volts or more and a forward current capability greater than 100 A.
A metal-oxide semiconductor field effect transistor device according to some embodiments has a reverse blocking voltage of 1000 volts or more and a differential on-resistance less than 8 mOhms-cm2.
A semiconductor device having a blocking voltage less than 1000 V and configured to pass forward current at a current density greater than 200 amps per square centimeter at a forward voltage drop of 5 V or less.
Some embodiments may enable wide bandgap transistor devices to achieve drain currents of 100 Amps or higher at a drain to source voltage that is less than 4 Volts in a device having a cell pitch of less than 20 μm. Some embodiments may enable wide bandgap transistor devices to achieve drain currents of 100 Amps or higher at a drain to source voltage that is less than 4 Volts in a device having a cell pitch of less than 10 μm. Some embodiments may enable wide bandgap transistor devices to achieve drain currents of 80 Amps or higher at a drain to source voltage that is less than 5 Volts in a device having a cell pitch of less than 10 μm.
An IGBT device according to some embodiments with a voltage blocking capability of 10 kV or greater may have a differential specific on-resistance of less than 14 mOhm-cm2 with a forward voltage drop of 5.2 V or less at a current density of 100 A/cm2.
A p-type insulated gate bipolar transistor (p-IGBT) device 300 according to some embodiments is illustrated in
The p-IGBT structure 300 further includes an n+ well region 318 and a p+ source/emitter region 320 that may be formed by selective implantation of, for example, nitrogen and aluminum, respectively. The junction depth of the n+ well region 318 may be about 0.5 μm. The structure 300 further includes a plurality of n+ body contact regions 322 that extend from a surface of the drift layer 314 into the n+ well region 318.
A gate contact 332 is on a gate insulator 336, a source/emitter contact 334 is on the source contact regions 320 and the body contact regions 322. A collector contact 326 contacts the substrate 310.
A 4H—SiC p-IGBT as shown in
Accordingly, a p-IGBT according to some embodiments may have a reverse blocking voltage that is greater than about 10 kV, and in some cases greater than about 13 kV, and that has a forward current capability greater than 5 Amps.
It will be appreciated that although some embodiments of the disclosure have been described in connection with silicon carbide IGBT and MOSFET devices having n-type drift layers, the present disclosure is not limited thereto, and may be embodied in devices having p-type substrates and/or drift layers. Furthermore, the disclosure may be used in many different types of devices, including but not limited to insulated gate bipolar transistors (IGBTs), MOS controlled thyristors (MCTs), insulated gate commutated thyristors (IGCTs), junction field effect transistors (JFETs), high electron mobility transistors (HEMTs), etc.
In the drawings and specification, there have been disclosed typical embodiments of the disclosure and, although specific terms are employed, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation, the scope of the disclosure being set forth in the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/533,254 filed Sep. 11, 2011, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The present application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/108,440 filed May 16, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,142,662, which is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/102,510, filed May 6, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,029,945, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3439189 | Petry | Apr 1969 | A |
3629011 | Tohi et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
3924024 | Naber et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
4160920 | Courier de Mere | Jul 1979 | A |
4242690 | Temple | Dec 1980 | A |
4466172 | Batra | Aug 1984 | A |
4581542 | Steigerwald | Apr 1986 | A |
4644637 | Temple et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4811065 | Cogan | Mar 1989 | A |
4875083 | Palmour | Oct 1989 | A |
4927772 | Arthur et al. | May 1990 | A |
4945394 | Palmour et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4946547 | Palmour et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5005462 | Jasper et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5011549 | Kong et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5028977 | Kenneth et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5032888 | Seki | Jul 1991 | A |
5111253 | Korman et al. | May 1992 | A |
5155289 | Bowles et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5170231 | Fujii et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5170455 | Goossen et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5184199 | Fujii et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5192987 | Khan et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5200022 | Kong et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5210051 | Carter, Jr. | May 1993 | A |
5270554 | Palmour | Dec 1993 | A |
5292501 | Degenhardt et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5296395 | Khan et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5348895 | Smayling et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5371383 | Miyata et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5384270 | Ueno et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5385855 | Brown et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
RE34861 | Davis et al. | Feb 1995 | E |
5393993 | Edmond et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5393999 | Malhi et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5396085 | Baliga | Mar 1995 | A |
5459107 | Palmour et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5468654 | Harada et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5479316 | Smrtic et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5488236 | Baliga et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5506421 | Palmour | Apr 1996 | A |
5510281 | Ghezzo et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5510630 | Agarwal et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5523589 | Edmond et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5539217 | Edmond et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5545905 | Muraoka et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5587870 | Anderson et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5629531 | Palmour et al. | May 1997 | A |
5703383 | Nakayama | Dec 1997 | A |
5710059 | Rottner et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5726463 | Brown et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5726469 | Chen | Mar 1998 | A |
5734180 | Malhi | Mar 1998 | A |
5739564 | Kosa et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5763905 | Harris et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5776837 | Palmour et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5804483 | Harris et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814859 | Ghezzo et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5831288 | Singh et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5837572 | Gardner et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5851908 | Harris et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5877041 | Fuller et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5877045 | Kapoor et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885870 | Maiti et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5914500 | Bakowski et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5917203 | Bhatnagar et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5939763 | Hao et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5960289 | Tsui et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5969378 | Singh et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5972801 | Lipkin et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976936 | Miyajima et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5977605 | Bakowsky et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6020600 | Miyajima et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6025233 | Terasawa et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6025608 | Harris et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6028012 | Wang | Feb 2000 | A |
6040237 | Bakowski et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6048766 | Gardner et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6054352 | Ueno et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6054728 | Harada et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6063698 | Tseng et al. | May 2000 | A |
6083814 | Nilsson et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091108 | Harris et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096607 | Ueno et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6100169 | Suvorov et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104043 | Hermansson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6107142 | Suvorov et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117735 | Ueno et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6121633 | Singh et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6133587 | Takeuchi et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6136727 | Ueno et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6136728 | Wang | Oct 2000 | A |
6165822 | Okuno et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6180958 | Cooper, Jr. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190973 | Berg et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6204135 | Peters et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6204203 | Narwankar et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211035 | Moise et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218254 | Singh et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218680 | Carter, Jr. et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221700 | Okuno et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228720 | Kitabatake et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6238967 | Shiho et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239463 | Williams et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239466 | Elasser et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246076 | Lipkin et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252258 | Chang et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252288 | Chang | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6297100 | Kumar et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6297172 | Kashiwagi | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6303508 | Alok | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310775 | Nagatomo et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6316791 | Schörner et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6316793 | Sheppard et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6329675 | Singh et al. | Dec 2001 | B2 |
6344663 | Slater, Jr. et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6344676 | Yun et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6365462 | Baliga | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6365932 | Kouno et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6388271 | Mitlehner et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6399996 | Chang et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6420225 | Chang et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429041 | Ryu et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6448160 | Chang et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6455892 | Okuno et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6475889 | Ring | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6515303 | Ring | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6524900 | Dahlqvist et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6534367 | Peake et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6548333 | Smith | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6551865 | Kumar et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6573534 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6593620 | Hshieh et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6610366 | Lipkin | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6627539 | Zhao et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6649497 | Ring | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6653659 | Ryu et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6696705 | Barthelmess et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6703642 | Shah | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6743703 | Rodov et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6767843 | Lipkin et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6861723 | Willmeroth | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6936850 | Friedrichs et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6946739 | Ring | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6956238 | Ryu et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6974720 | Sumakeris et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6979863 | Ryu | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7026650 | Ryu et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7074643 | Ryu | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7118970 | Das et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7125786 | Ring et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7221010 | Ryu | May 2007 | B2 |
7230275 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7253031 | Takahashi et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7276747 | Loechelt et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7279115 | Sumakeris | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7304363 | Shah | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7365363 | Kojima et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7381992 | Ryu | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7407837 | Tsuji | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7425757 | Takubo | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7498633 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7528040 | Das et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7544963 | Saxler | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7548112 | Sheppard | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7649213 | Hatakeyama et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7687825 | Zhang | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7728402 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7829402 | Matocha et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7855384 | Yamamoto et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7855464 | Shikano | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8035112 | Cooper et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8541787 | Zhang | Sep 2013 | B2 |
9029945 | Ryu et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9142662 | Ryu et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
20010011729 | Singh et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010033502 | Blair et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010050383 | Hatade et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010055852 | Moise et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020030191 | Das et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038891 | Ryu et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020047125 | Fukuda et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020071293 | Eden et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020072247 | Lipkin et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020102358 | Das et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020121641 | Alok et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020125482 | Friedrichs et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020125541 | Korec et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020185679 | Baliga | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030025175 | Asano et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030107041 | Tanimoto et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030137010 | Friedrichs et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030178672 | Hatakeyama et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030201455 | Takahashi et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040016929 | Nakatsuka et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040041229 | Chol et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040082116 | Kub et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040183079 | Kaneko et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040207968 | Martin et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040211980 | Ryu | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040212011 | Ryu | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040227231 | Maly et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040256659 | Kim et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040259339 | Tanabe et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050012143 | Tanaka et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050082542 | Sumakeris | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050104072 | Slater, Jr. et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050139936 | Li | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050151138 | Slater, Jr. et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050152100 | Rodriguez et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050181536 | Tsuji | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050230686 | Kojima et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050275055 | Parthasarathy et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060011128 | Ellison et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060055027 | Kitabatake et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060060884 | Ohyanagi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060071295 | Chang | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060086997 | Kanaya et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060108589 | Fukuda et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060211210 | Bhat et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060216896 | Saito et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060244010 | Saxler | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060255423 | Ryu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060261347 | Ryu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060261876 | Agarwal et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060267021 | Rowland et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060270103 | Das et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070066039 | Agarwal et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070090415 | Ronsisvalle | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070096081 | Sugawara | May 2007 | A1 |
20070114606 | Hoshino et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070120148 | Nogome | May 2007 | A1 |
20070164321 | Sheppard et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070241427 | Mochizuki et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070262324 | Kaneko | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080001158 | Das et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080006848 | Chen et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080029838 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080048258 | de Fresart et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080105949 | Zhang et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080191304 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080224316 | Kroeninger et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080230787 | Suzuki et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080251793 | Mazzola et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080258252 | Shimizu et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080277669 | Okuno et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080296771 | Das et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090008709 | Yedinak et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090039498 | Bayerer | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090095979 | Saito et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090101918 | Uchida et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090121319 | Zhang et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090146154 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090168471 | Tsugawa et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090212301 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090225578 | Kitabatake | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090272982 | Nakamura et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090289262 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100032685 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100133549 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100133550 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100140628 | Zhang | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100163888 | Saggio et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100244047 | Hull et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100295062 | Uchida et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110012132 | Otsuka et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110018004 | Shimizu et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110018040 | Smith et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110058293 | Pardoen et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110101375 | Zhang | May 2011 | A1 |
20110193412 | Lacarnoy | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110199792 | Friebe et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110246794 | Liao | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110292617 | Darroman et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120025263 | Yamaguchi | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120044720 | Shea et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20130001703 | Sugawara | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130248883 | Das et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130307500 | Nojiri et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3942640 | Aug 1990 | DE |
19809554 | Sep 1998 | DE |
19832329 | Feb 1999 | DE |
19900171 | Jul 1999 | DE |
10036208 | Feb 2002 | DE |
0176778 | Apr 1986 | EP |
0372412 | Jun 1990 | EP |
0389863 | Oct 1990 | EP |
0637069 | Feb 1995 | EP |
0735591 | Oct 1996 | EP |
0837508 | Apr 1998 | EP |
0865085 | Sep 1998 | EP |
1058317 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1361614 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1460681 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1503425 | Feb 2005 | EP |
1693896 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1806787 | Jul 2007 | EP |
1845561 | Oct 2007 | EP |
2015364 | Jan 2009 | EP |
2124257 | Nov 2009 | EP |
2432014 | Mar 2012 | EP |
60240158 | Nov 1985 | JP |
1117363 | May 1989 | JP |
03034466 | Feb 1991 | JP |
03157974 | Jul 1991 | JP |
3225870 | Oct 1991 | JP |
08264766 | Oct 1996 | JP |
H08340103 | Dec 1996 | JP |
09205202 | Aug 1997 | JP |
11191559 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11238742 | Aug 1999 | JP |
11261061 | Sep 1999 | JP |
11266017 | Sep 1999 | JP |
11274487 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2000049167 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000082812 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2000106371 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000252461 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2000252478 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2002314099 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2004363328 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2007258742 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2008277400 | Nov 2008 | JP |
2009003111 | Jul 2009 | JP |
2010010505 | Jan 2010 | JP |
2010183840 | Aug 2010 | JP |
2011030424 | Feb 2011 | JP |
2012156548 | Aug 2012 | JP |
9603774 | Feb 1996 | WO |
9708754 | Mar 1997 | WO |
9717730 | May 1997 | WO |
9739485 | Oct 1997 | WO |
9802916 | Jan 1998 | WO |
9802924 | Jan 1998 | WO |
9808259 | Feb 1998 | WO |
9832178 | Jul 1998 | WO |
9963591 | Dec 1999 | WO |
0013236 | Mar 2000 | WO |
0178134 | Oct 2001 | WO |
2004020706 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2004079789 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2005020308 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2006135031 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007040710 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2009128382 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2010004715 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010074275 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2013036370 | Mar 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT/JP2009/003111. |
Agarwal, A.K. et al., “700-V Assymetrical 4H-SiC Gate Turn-Off Thyristors (GTO's),” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 18, No. 11, Nov. 1997, pp. 518-520. |
Author Unknown, “Definition of Overlap,” The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition, 2003, 3 pages, http://www.thefreedictionary.com/overlap. |
Chang, H.R. et al., “500-V n-Channel Insulated-Gate Bipolar Transistor with a Trench Gate Structure,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 36, No. 9, Sep. 1989, pp. 1824-1829. |
Miura, Naruhisa et al., “Successful Development of 1.2 kV 4H-SiC MOSFETs with the Very Low On-Resistance of 5 mΩm2,” Proceedings of the 18th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices & IC's, Jun. 4-8, 2006, 4 pages, Naples Italy. |
Richmond, J.T. et al., “Hybrid 4H-SiC MOS Gated Transistor (MGT)”, DARPA Contract #N00014-99-C-0377, 2002, 6 pages. |
Salem, T.E. et al., “High-Temperature High-Power Operation of a 100 A SiC DMOSFET Module,” Twenty-Fourth Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, Copyright: 2009, pp. 653-657. |
Shenoy, Jayarama N. et al., “High-Voltage Double-Implanted Power MOSFET's in 6H-SiC”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, Mar. 1997, vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 93-95. |
Tamaki, Tomohiro et al., “Optimization of ON-State and Switching Performances for 15-20-kV 4H-SiC IGBTs,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 55, No. 8, Aug. 2008, pp. 1920-1927. |
Tan, J. et al., “High-Voltage Accumulation-Layer UMOSFET's in 4H-SiC”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, Sep. 1998, vol. 49, No. 12, pp. 487-489. |
Tone, Kiyoshi et al., “4H-SiC Normally-Off Vertical Junction Field-Effect Transistor With High Current Density,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 24, No. 7, Jul. 2003, pp. 463-465. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,440, mailed Aug. 2, 2012, 23 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/102,510, mailed Aug. 2, 2012, 32 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,440, mailed Jan. 17, 2013, 36 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/102,510, mailed Feb. 12, 2013, 27 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,440, mailed Mar. 25, 2013, 4 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/102,510, mailed Apr. 19, 2013, 3 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/102,510, mailed Jun. 20, 2013, 28 pages. |
Casady, J.B. et al., “900 V DMOS and 1100 V UMOS 4H-SiC Power FETs”, Northrop Grumman Science and Technology Center, 1997, 2 Pages. |
Agarwal et al., “9kV, 1x33 cm SiC Super GTO technology development for pulse power,” Pulsed Power Conference, 2009, presented Jun. 28-Jul. 2, 2009, pp. 264-269. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/27255 mailed Jun. 13, 2012, 10 pages. |
“Insulated-gate bipolar transistor,” Wikipedia, accessed Jun. 21, 2010, 6 pages. |
Agarwal et al., “ 1400 V 4H-SiC power MOSFETs,” Materials Science Forum, vol. 264-268, 1998, presented Sep. 1997, pp. 989-992. |
Agarwal et al., “1.1 kV 4H-SiC power UMOSFET's,” Electron Device Letters, vol. 18, No. 12, Dec. 1997, pp. 586-588. |
Agarwal et al., “Investigation of lateral RESURF, 6H-SiC MOSFETs,” Materials Science Forum, vol. 338-342, 2000, presented Oct. 10-15, 1999, pp. 1307-1310. |
Agarwal et al., “Temperature dependence of Fowler-Nordheim current in 6H-and 4H-SiC MOS capacitors,” Electron Device Letters, vol. 18, No. 12, Dec. 1997, pp. 592-594. |
Suvorov, A.V. et al., “4H-SiC self-aligned implant-diffused structure for power DMOSFETs,” Materials Science Forum, vol. 338-342, 2000, presented Oct. 10-15, 1999, pp. 1275-1278. |
Agarwal et al., “A critical look at the performance advantages and limitations of 4H-SiC power UMOSFET structures,” IEEE International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs, May 20-23, 1996, pp. 119-122. |
Asano et al., “Dynamic characteristics of 6.2kV high voltage 4H-SiC pn diode with low loss,” Transactions of the Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan, Part D Inst. Electr. Eng. Japan, vol. 123D, No. 5, May 2003, pp. 623-627. |
Ayalew, T., “Dissertations of Tesfaye Ayalew,” Section 4.4.3.1 MPS Diode Structure, SiC Semiconductor Devices Technology, Modeling, and Simulation, Jan. 2004, 2 pages. |
Baliga, “Insulated gate bipolar transistor,” Power Semiconductor Devices (book), PWS Publishing Company, Boston, MA, 1996, pp. 426-502. |
Baliga, “Power MOSFET,” Power Semiconductor Devices (book), PWS Publishing Company, Boston, MA, 1996, pp. 335-425. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US2008/010538, mailed Dec. 22, 2008, 13 pages. |
Bhatnagar et al., “Comparison of 6H-SiC, 3C-SiC, and Si for power devices,” Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 40, No. 3, Mar. 1993, pp. 645-655. |
Buchner et al., “Laser recrystallization of polysilicon for improved device quality,” Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol. 35, 1989, presented Aug. 29-Sep. 2, 1988, pp. 289-294. |
Capano, M.A. et al., “Ionization energies and electron mobilities in phosphorus- and nitrogen-implanted 4H-silicon carbide,” IEEE ICSCRM Conference, Research Triangle Park, NC, Oct. 10-13, 1999, 4 pages. |
Chakraborty et al., “Interface properties of N2O-annealed SiO2/SiC system,” IEEE Hong Kong Electron Devices Meeting, Jun. 24, 2000, pp. 108-111. |
Chang et al., “Observation of a non-stoichiometric layer at the silicon dioxide-silicon carbide interface: effect of oxidation temperature and post-oxidation processing conditions,” Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, vol. 640, 2001, presented at 2000 MRS Fall Meeting, 6 pages. |
Chen et al. “Theoretical Analysis of Current Crowding Effect in Metal/AlGaN/GaN Schottky Diodes and Its Reduction by Using Polysilicon in Anode,” Chin. Phys. Lett., vol. 24, No. 7, Jun. 25, 2007, pp. 2112-2114. |
Chinese Office Action dated Jan. 22, 2010, corresponding to Chinese Patent Application No. 200780029460.5, 7 pages. |
Cho et al. “Improvement of charge trapping by hydrogen post-oxidation annealing in gate oxide of 4H-SiC metal-oxide-semiconductor capacitors,” Applied Physics Letters. vol. 77, No. 8, Aug. 21, 2000, pp. 1215-1217. |
Chung et al. “Effects of anneals in ammonia on the interface trap density near the band edges in 4H-silicon carbide metal-oxide-semiconductor capacitors,” Applied Physics Letters. vol. 77, No. 22, Nov. 27, 2000, pp. 3601-3603. |
Chung et al., “The Effect of Si:C Source Ratio on Si02/SiC Interface State Density for Nitrogen Doped 4H and 6H-SiC,” Materials Science Forum, 2000, presented Oct. 10-15, 1999, vols. 338-342, pp. 1097-1100. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2004/004982, dated Jul. 22, 2004, 28 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US01/30715, mailed Jun. 5, 2002, 9 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US01/42414, mailed Apr. 23, 2002, 10 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US02/11691 mailed Dec. 17, 2002, 9 pages. |
Alok, D. et al., “Process Dependence of Inversion Layer Mobility in 4HSiC Devices,” Materials Science Forum, vols. 338-342, 2000, presented Oct. 10-15, 1999, pp. 1077-1080. |
Dahlquist et al. “A 2.8kV, Forward Drop JBS Diode with Low Leakage,” Materials Science Forum, vols. 338-342, 2000, presented Oct. 10-15, 1999, pp. 1179-1182. |
Das, “Fundamental Studies of the Silicon Carbide MOS Structure,” Thesis, Purdue University, Dec. 1999, 150 pages. |
Dastidar, “A Study of P-Type Activation in Silicon Carbide,” Thesis, Purdue University, May 1998, 92 pages. |
Demeo et al., “Thermal Oxidation of SiC in N20”, J. Electrochem. Soc., vol. 141, No. 11, Nov. 1994, pp. L 150-L 152. |
Del Prado et al., “Full Composition Range Silicon Oxynitride Films Deposited by ECR-PECVD at Room Temperatures,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 343-344, Apr. 1999, p. 437-440. |
Dimitrijev et al., “Nitridation of Silicon-Dioxide Films Grown on 6H Silicon Carbide”, IEEE Electronic Device Letters, vol. 18, No. 5, May 5, 1997, pp. 175-177. |
Extended European Search Report for application No. 09177558.5 mailed Feb. 22, 2010, 6 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for application No. 09163424.6 mailed Apr. 9, 2010, 10 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for application No. 07120038.0 mailed Jun. 16, 2008, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report corresponding to European Application No. 07112298.0 mailed Feb. 18, 2009, 12 pages. |
Fisher, C.A. et al., “The performance of high-voltage field relieved Schottky barrier diodes”, IEEE Proceedings Section A, vol. 132, Pt. I, No. 6, Dec. 1985, pp. 257-260. |
Fukuda et al., “Improvement of Si02/4H-SiC Interface Using High-Temperature Hydrogen Annealing at Low Pressure and Vacuum Annealing,” Japan Society of Applied Physics, vol. 38, Apr. 1999, pp. 2306-2309. |
Fukuda et al. “Improvement of Si02/4H-SiC Interface by Using High Temperature Hydrogen Annealing at 1000° C.,” Extended Abstracts of the International Conference on Solid State Devices and Materials. Japan Society of Applied Physics, Tokyo, Japan, Sep. 1998, pp. 100-101. |
Chung, G.Y. et al., “Effect of nitric oxide annealing on the interface trap densities near the band edges in the 4H polytype of silicon carbide,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 76, No. 13, Mar. 27, 2000, pp. 1713-1715. |
Chung, G.Y. et al., “Improved Inversion Channel Mobility for 4H-SiC MOSETs Following High Temperature Anneals in Nitric Oxide,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 22, No. 4, Apr. 2001, pp. 176-178. |
Li, H.F. et al., “Improving Si02 Grown on P-Type 4H-SiC by NO Annealing,” Materials Science Forum, vols. 264-268, 1998, presented Sep. 1997, pp. 869-872. |
“The Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor (IGBT),” Device Modelling Group, University of Glasgow School of Engineering, http://www.elec.gla.ac.uk, Feb. 14, 2007, 3 pages. |
Hubel, K., “Hybrid design improves diode robustness and boosts efficiency,” Compoundsemiconductor.net, May 24, 2006, 8 pages. |
Hull et al., “Drift-Free 10-kV, 20-A 4H-SiC PiN Diodes,” Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 34, No. 4, Apr. 2005, pp. 341-344. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US2007/010192, mailed Sep. 23, 2008, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US2010/020071 mailed Mar. 26, 2010, 14 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion corresponding to International Application No. PCTUS2009/065251 mailed Jun. 1, 2010, 14 pages. |
Jamet, et al. “Physical properties of N20 and NO-nitrided gate oxides grown on 4H SiC,” Applied Physics Letters. vol. 79, No. 3, Jul. 16, 2001, pp. 323-325. |
Ueno, K. et al., “Counter-Doped MOSFET's of 4H-SiC,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 20, No. 12, Dec. 1999, pp. 624-626. |
Ueno, K. et al., “4H-SiC MOSFET's Utilizing the H2 Surface Cleaning Technique,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 19, No. 7, Jul. 1998, pp. 244-246. |
Ueno, K. et al., “The Guard-Ring Termination for the High-Voltage SiC Schottky Barrier Diodes,” IEEE Electron Device Letters. vol. 16. No. 7, Jul. 1995, pp. 331-332. |
Kinoshita et al., “Guard Ring Assisted RESURF: A New Termination Structure Providing Stable and High Breakdown Voltage for SiC Power Devices,” Technical Digest of ISPSD '02, vol. 14, 2002, presented Jun. 4-7, 2002, pp. 253-256. |
Kobayashi et al. “Dielectric Breakdown and Current Conduction of Oxide/Nitride/Oxide Multi-Layer Structures,” 1990 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology, presented Jun. 4-7, 1990, pp. 119-120. |
Krishnaswami et al., “High Temperature characterization of 4H-SiC bipolar junction transistors”, Materials Science Forum, Aedermannsfdorf, Switzerland, vol. 527-529, Jan. 1, 2006, pp. 1437-1440. |
Lipkin, L.A. et al., “Low interface state density oxides on p-type SiC,” Materials Science Forum, vols. 264-268, 1998, presented Sep. 1997, pp. 853-856. |
Lai et al., “Interface Properties of N20-Annealed NH3-Treated 6H-SiC MOS Capacitor,” IEEE Hong Kong Electron Devices Meeting, Jun. 26, 1999, pp. 46-49. |
Leonhard et al. “Long term stability of gate-oxides on n- and p-type silicon carbide studied by charge injection techniques,” Materials Science Engineering, vol. 46, No. 1-3, Apr. 1997, pp. 263-266. |
Levinshtein et al., “On the homogeneity of the turn-on process in high voltage 4H-SiC thyristors”, Solid-State Electronics, vol. 49, No. 2, Feb. 1, 2005, pp. 233-237. |
Lipkin et al. “Insulator Investigation on SiC for Improved Reliability,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. vol. 46, No. 3, Mar. 1999, pp. 525-532. |
Lipkin et al. “Challenges and State-of-the-Art of Oxides on SiC,” Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, vol. 640, 2001, presented Nov. 2000, 10 pages. |
Losee et al., “Degraded Blocking Performance of 4H-SiC Rectifiers Under High dV/dt Conditions,” Proceedings of 17th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices & ICs, May 23-26, 2005, 4 pages. |
Losee et al., “High-Voltage 4H-SiC PiN Rectifiers with Single-Implant, Multi-Zone JTE Termination”, Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs, 2004 Proceedings. ISPSB '04, May 24-27, 2004, pp. 301-304. |
Das, M. M et al., “A 13 kV 4H-SiC N-Channel IGBT with Low Rdiff,on and Fast Switching,” International Conference on Silicon Carbide and Related Materials (ICSCRM), Otsu, Japan, Oct. 14-19, 2007, 4 pages. |
Das, M. et al., “High Mobility 4H-SiC Inversion Mode MOSFETs Using Thermally Grown, NO Annealed Si02,” IEEE Device Research Conference, Denver, Colorado, Jun. 19-21, 2000, 3 pages. |
Capano, M.A. et al., “Surface Roughening in Ion Implanted 4H-Silicon Carbide,” Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 214-218, Mar. 1999, pp. 214-218. |
Das, M. et al., “Inversion Channel Mobility in 4H- and 6H-SiC MOSFETs,” IEEE Semiconductor Interface Specialists Conference, San Diego, California, Dec. 3-5, 1998, 2 pages. |
Ma et al., “Fixed and trapped charges at oxide-nitride-oxide heterostructure interfaces formed by remote plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition,” Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology B, vol. 11, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 1993, pp. 1533-1540. |
Mondal et al., “An Integrated 500-V Power DSMOSFET/Antiparallel Rectifier Device with Improved Diode Reverse Recovery Characteristics,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 23, No. 9, Sep. 2002, pp. 562-564. |
Motorola, “Power MOSFET Transistor Data,” 4th edition, Motorola, Inc., 1989, 6 pages. |
Mutin, P., “Control of the Composition and Structure of Silicon Oxycarbide and Oxynitride Glasses Derived from Polysiloxane Precursors,” Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, vol. 14, No. 1, Mar. 1999, pp. 27-38. |
Myer-Ward et al., “Turning of Basal Plane Dislocations During Epitaxial Growth on 4 degree off-axis 4h-SiC,” European Conference on Silicon Carbide and Related Materials, Barcelona, Spain, Sep. 7-11, 2008, 4 pages. |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion for PCT/US2010/026632 mailed Oct. 8, 2010, 16 pages. |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion for PCT/US2010/035713 mailed Jul. 27, 2010, 14 pages. |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion for PCT/US2010/042075 mailed Sep. 24, 2010, 15 pages. |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion for PCT/US2010/028612 mailed Jun. 17, 2010, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion for PCT/US2008/004239, mailed Mar. 2, 2009, 14 pages. |
Tobin, P.J. et al., “Furnace formation of silicon oxynitride thin dielectrics in nitrous oxide (N20): the role of nitric oxide (NO),” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 75, No. 3, Feb. 1, 1994, pp. 1811-1817. |
Shenoy, P.M. et al., “The Planar 6H-SiC ACCUFET: A New High-Voltage Power MOSFET Structure,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 18, No. 12, Dec. 1997, pp. 589-591. |
Lai, P.T. et al., “Effects of nitridation and annealing on interface properties of thermally oxidized Si02/SiC metal-oxide-semiconductor system,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 76, No. 25, Jun. 2000, pp. 3744-3746. |
Palmour et al., “SiC Device Technology: Remaining Issues,” Diamond and Related Materials, vol. 6, No. 10, Aug. 1997, pp. 1400-1404. |
Palmour, “Silicon Carbide npnp Thyristors,” NASA Technical Briefs—Electronics and Computers, Dec. 1, 2000, John H. Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio (US), http://www.Techbriefs.com/comgonenUcontenUarticle/7031-lew-16750?tmgl=comgonent&grint=1&gage= retrieved on Feb. 10, 2010). |
Panknin et al., “Electrical and microstructural properties of highly boron-implantation doped 6H-SiC”, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 89 No. 6, Mar. 15, 2001, pp. 3162-3167. |
Pantelides et al., “Atomic-Scale Engineering of the SiC-Si02 Interface,” Materials Science Forum, vols. 338-342, 2000, presented Oct. 10-15, 1999, pp. 1133-1136. |
Patel, R., et al., “Phosphorus-Implanted High-Voltage N + P 4H-SiC Junction Rectifiers,” 1998 International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices & ICs, Jun. 3-6, 1998, pp. 387-390. |
Zhang, Q. et al., “12 kV 4H-SiC p-IGBTs with Record Low Specific On-Resistance” presented at: International Conference on Silicon Carbide and Related Materials (ICSCRM), Otsu, Japan, Oct. 14-19, 2007, 4 pages. |
Schorner, R. et al., “Significantly Improved Performance of MOSFETs on Silicon Carbide Using the 15R-SiC Polytype,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 20, No. 5, May 1999, pp. 241-244. |
Schorner, R. et al., “Rugged Power MOSFETs in 6H-SiC with Blocking Capability up to 1800 V,” Materials Science Forum, vols. 338-342, 2000, presented Oct. 10-15, 1999, pp. 1295-1298. |
Singh, R. et al., “High Temperature, High Current, 4HSiC Accu-DMOSFET,” Materials Science Forum, vols. 338-342, 2000, presented Oct. 10-15, 1999, pp. 1271-1274. |
Rao et al., “Al and N Ion Implantations in 6H-SiC,” Silicon Carbide and Related Materials, 1996, presented in 1995, Kyoto, Japan, pp. 521-524. |
Rao et al. “P-N Junction Formation in 6H-SiC by Acceptor Implantation into N-Type Substrate,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B., vol. 106, Dec. 2, 1995, pp. 333-338. |
Rao et al. “Silane overpressure post-implant annealing of A1 dopants in SiC: Cold wall CVD apparatus”, Applied Surface Science, vol. 252, No. 10, Mar. 15, 2006, pp. 3837-3842. |
Rao, “Maturing ion-implantation technology and its device applications in SiC”, Solid State Electronics, vol. 47, No. 2, Feb. 2003, pp. 213-222. |
Ryu et al., “27 mQ-cm2, 1.6 kV Power DiMOSFETs in 4H-SiC,” 14 International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices & ICs 2002, Jun. 4-7, 2002, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 22 pages. |
Sridevan, S. et al., “Lateral N-Channel Inversion Mode 4H-SiC MOSFET's,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 19, No. 7, Jul. 1998, pp. 228-230. |
Sridevan, S. et al., “On the Presence of Aluminum in Thermally Grown Oxides on 6H-Silicon Carbide,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 17, No. 3, Mar. 1996, pp. 136-138. |
Sze, Semiconductor Devices: Physics and Technology (book), 2nd Edition, John Wiley and Sons, 2002, pp. 130. |
Pantelides, “Atomic Scale Engineering of SiC Dielectric Interfaces,” DARPA/MTO High Power and ONR Power Switching MURI Reviews, Rosslyn, VA, Aug. 10-12, 1999, 20 pages. |
Senzaki et al., “Effects of Pyrogenic Reoxidation Annealing on Inversion Channel Mobility of 4H-SiC Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistor Fabricated on (1120) Face,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Japan Society of Applied Physics, vol. 40, No. 11 B, Part 2, Nov. 2001, pp. L 1201-L 1203. |
Singh et al., “Planar Terminations in 4H-SiC Schottky Diodes with Low Leakage and High Yields,” IEEE International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs, 1997, presented May 26-29, 1997, pp. 157-160. |
Stengl et al., “Variation of lateral doping—a new concept to avoid high voltage breakdown of planar junctions,” International Electron Devices Meeting, Washington, DC, Dec. 1-4, 1985, pp. 154-157. |
Stengl et al., “Variation of Lateral Doping as a Field Terminator for High-Voltage Power Devices,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. ED-33, No. 3, Mar. 1986, pp. 426-428, XP000836911. |
Streetman, “Bipolar Junction Transistors,” Solid State Electronic Devices (book), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ., 1980, pp. 228-284. |
Sugawara et al., “3.6 kV 4H-SiC JBS Diodes with Low RonS,” Materials Science Forum, vols. 338-342, No. 2, 2000, presented Oct. 10-15, 1999, pp. 1183-1186, XP-000944901. |
Sundaresan et al., “Ultra-low resistivity A1+ implanted 4H-SiC obtained by microwave annealing and a protective graphite cap,” Solid-State Electronics, vol. 52, No. 1, Jan. 2008, pp. 140-145. |
Suzuki et al., “Effect of Post-oxidation-annealing in Hydrogen on Si02/4H-SiC Interface,” Materials Science Forum, vols. 338-342, 2000, presented Oct. 10-15, 1999, pp. 1073-1076. |
Sze, S.M., Physics of Semiconductor Devices (book), John Wiley & Sons, 1981, pp. 383-390. |
Thomas et al., “Annealing of Ion Implantation Damage in SiC Using a Graphite Mask,” Material Research Society Symposium Proceedings, San Francisco, California, vol. 572, Apr. 5-8, 1999, pp. 45-50. |
Treu et al., “A Surge Current Stable and Avalanche Rugged SiC Merged pn Schottky Diode Blocking 600V Especially Suited for PFC Applications,” Materials Science Forum, vols. 527-529, 2005, presented Sep. 18-23, 2005, pp. 1155-1158. |
Vathulya, V.R. et al., “Characterization of Channel Mobility on Implanted SiC to Determine Polytype Suitability for the Power DIMOS Structure,” Electronic Materials Conference, Santa Barbara, CA, Jun. 30-Jul. 2, 1999, 13 pages. |
Vathulya, V.R. et al., “A Novel 6H-SiC Power DMOSFET with Implanted P-Well Spacer,” IEEE Electronic Device Letters, vol. 20, No. 7, Jul. 1999, pp. 354-356. |
Afanasev, V.V. et al., “Intrinsic SiC/Si02 Interface States,” Physica Status Solidi (a), vol. 162, Jul. 1997, pp. 321-337. |
Vassilevski et al., “Protection of selectively implanted and patterned silicon carbide surfaces with graphite capping layer during post-implantation annealing,” Institute of Physics Publishing, Semiconductor Science and Technology, vol. 20, No. 3, Mar. 2005, pp. 271-278. |
Vassilevski et al., “High Voltage Silicon Carbide Schottky Diodes with Single Zone Junction Termination Extension,” Materials Science Forum, vols. 556-557, 2007, presented Sep. 3-7, 2007, pp. 873-876. |
Wang et al., “High Temperature Characteristics of High-Quality SiC MIS Capacitors with 0/N/0 Gate Dielectric,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 47, No. 2, Feb. 2000, pp. 458-462. |
Williams et al., “Passivation of the 4H-SiC/Si02 Interface with Nitric Oxide,” Materials Science Forum, vols. 389-393, 2002, presented Fall 2001, Tsukuba, Japan, pp. 967-72. |
Xu et al., “Improved Performance and Reliability of N20-Grown Oxynitride on 6H-SiH,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 21, No. 6, Jun. 2000, pp. 298-300. |
Li et al., “High Voltage (3 kV) UMOSFETs in 4H-SiC,” Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 49, No. 6, Jun. 2002, pp. 972-975. |
Wang et al., “Accumulation-Mode SiC Power MOSFET Design Issues,” Materials Science Forum, vols. 338-342, 2000, presented Oct. 10-15, 1999, pp. 1287-1290. |
Yilmaz, “Optimization and Surface Charge Sensitivity of High Voltage Blocking Structures with Shallow Junctions,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 38, No. 3, Jul. 1991, pp. 1666-1675. |
Zhang et al., “Design and Fabrication of High Voltage IGBTs on 4H-SiC”, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs, Naples, Italy, Jun. 4-8, 2006, 1-4 pages. |
Zhang et al., “A 10-kV Monolithic Darlington Transistor with βforced of 336 in 4H-SiC,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 30, No. 2, Feb. 2009, pp. 142-144. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/051429 mailed Nov. 22, 2012, 15 pages. |
Baliga, Power Semiconductor Devices (book), Chapter 7, PWS Publishing, Boston, MA, 1996, 93 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2012/051429, mailed Mar. 20, 2014, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/037977, mailed Sep. 15, 2014, 11 pages. |
Hull, Brett A. et al., “Performance of 60 A, 1200 V 4H-Sic DMOSFETs,” Materials Science Forum, vol. 615-617, 2009, Trans Tech Publications, pp. 749-752. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/893,998, mailed May 19, 2015, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/277,820, mailed Jun. 16, 2015, 13 pages. |
Kazuhiro, I. et al., “Simultaneous Formation of Ni/Al Ohmic Contacts to Both n- and p-Type 4H-SiC,” Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 37, No. 11, 2008, TMS, pp. 1674-1680. |
Extended European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 12782360.7, mailed Oct. 7, 2014, 7 pages. |
Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-509288, mailed Nov. 25, 2014, 10 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2012/027255, mailed Nov. 21, 2013, 7 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/102,510, mailed Nov. 29, 2013, 22 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/102,510, mailed Feb. 6, 2014, 3 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/102,510, mailed Mar. 13, 2014, 10 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/102,510, mailed Aug. 29, 2014, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/102,510, mailed Jan. 12, 2015, 9 pages. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 13/102,510, mailed Mar. 26, 2015, 4 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,440, mailed Dec. 30, 2013, 104 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,440, mailed Jun. 24, 2014, 69 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,440, mailed Jan. 14, 2015, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,440, mailed Jun. 2, 2015, 16 pages. |
Reason for Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-529750, mailed Apr. 15, 2015, 8 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/893,998, mailed Jul. 29, 2015, 3 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/893,998, mailed Jan. 2, 2015, 7 pages. |
First Office Action and Search Report for Chinese Patent Application No. 201280055081.4, mailed Feb. 1, 2016, 31 pages. |
Decision of Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-529750, mailed Feb. 26, 2016, 6 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2014/037977, mailed Nov. 26, 2015, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for No. PCT/US2015/030853, mailed Nov. 5, 2015, 15 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/893,998, mailed Jan. 4, 2016, 12 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/277,820, mailed Nov. 27, 2015, 9 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/893,998, mailed May 17, 2016, 12 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/277,820, mailed May 25, 2016, 6 pages. |
Report of Reexamination before Appeal for Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-529750, mailed Aug. 18, 2016, 6 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/893,998, mailed Aug. 31, 2016, 3 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/893,998, mailed Dec. 15, 2016, 9 pages. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201280055081.4, issued Nov. 8, 2016, 20 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for No. PCT/US2015/030853, mailed Nov. 24, 2016, 10 pages. |
Berning, David W. et al., “High-Voltage Isolated Gate Drive Circuit for 10 kV, 100 A SiC MOSFET/JBS Power Modules,” IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting, Oct. 5-9, 2008, IEEE, pp. 1-7. |
Grider, David et al., “10kV/120 A SiC DMOSFET Half H-Bridge Power Modules for 1 MVA Solid State Power Substation,” IEEE Electric Ship Technologies Symposium (ESTS), Apr. 10-13, 2011, IEEE, pp. 131-134. |
Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 12762112.6, mailed Feb. 1, 2017, 4 pages. |
Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 13/893,998, mailed Jan. 10, 2017, 6 pages. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 13/893,998, mailed Jan. 25, 2017, 6 pages. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 13/893,998, mailed Feb. 16, 2017, 6 pages. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 13/893,998, mailed Mar. 14, 2017, 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130207123 A1 | Aug 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61533254 | Sep 2011 | US |