Through-silicon vias (TSVs) are commonly formed in silicon wafers and/or dies during the production of integrated circuits (ICs), typically during backend processing, to allow access to the backside of the wafer circuitry. In processes utilizing SOI (silicon-on-insulator) wafers, the TSVs are formed through the bottom side of the active device structure and protrude through the active silicon and buried oxide and terminate in the silicon handle substrate. In other words, buried beneath the active circuitry during production of the silicon wafers or dies. The handle wafer substrate protects the TSVs and other delicate circuit components from damage and contamination until a user of the silicon wafer or die receives the product from the manufacturer. Upon receiving the silicon wafer, the user may then perform one or more processes on the silicon wafer to remove the handle substrate and expose the TSVs.
In certain situations, and depending on desired uses, the substrate (e.g., handle wafer) may be retained on the silicon wafer to provide continued protection and may only be removed by the purchaser after other processes have been performed on the silicon wafer to prepare the wafer for use. For example, a silicon wafer may undergo a bonding process such as direct bonding with another silicon wafer prior to having the substrate (e.g., handle wafer) removed and prior to performing chemical/mechanical polishing to expose the buried TSVs.
Manufacturing processes used to make silicon wafers may not be entirely reliable and TSVs may not be formed to an adequate depth in the silicon wafer to ensure proper operability of the TSVs. Because bonding and other processes may be done on silicon wafers before exposing the buried TSVs, silicon wafers may be changed such that they are not returnable to the manufacturer once the user is able to confirm whether the buried TSVs have been formed to an adequate depth for proper operation. Accordingly, a user may incur great losses in time, materials, processing, and cost before discovering that TSVs of a certain silicon wafer are improperly formed and, therefore, inoperable. To avoid such losses, it is desirable for a user to determine operability of TSVs before performing any further processes on a purchased silicon wafer.
Features and advantages of the present technology will be apparent from the detailed description which follows, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which together illustrate, by way of example, features of the present technology; and, wherein:
Reference will now be made to the exemplary embodiments illustrated, and specific language will be used herein to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the present technology is thereby intended.
As used herein, the term “substantially” refers to the complete or nearly complete extent or degree of an action, characteristic, property, state, structure, item, or result. For example, an object that is “substantially” enclosed would mean that the object is either completely enclosed or nearly completely enclosed. The exact allowable degree of deviation from absolute completeness can in some cases depend on the specific context. However, generally speaking the nearness of completion will be so as to have the same overall result as if absolute and total completion were obtained. The use of “substantially” is equally applicable when used in a negative connotation to refer to the complete or near complete lack of an action, characteristic, property, state, structure, item, or result.
As used herein, “adjacent” refers to the proximity of two structures or elements. Particularly, elements that are identified as being “adjacent” can be either abutting or connected. Such elements can also be near or close to each other without necessarily contacting each other. The exact degree of proximity can in some cases depend on the specific context.
An initial overview of the inventive concepts are provided below and then specific examples are described in further detail later. This initial summary is intended to aid readers in understanding the examples more quickly, but is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the examples, nor is it intended to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Disclosed herein is a test structure configured to facilitate testing of the integrity of one or more circuit TSVs associated with an integrated circuit (IC), the circuit TSVs being formed at least partially through a substrate (e.g., handle wafer) comprising an insulating layer and a conductive layer. The test structure device can include a first test TSV formed one of partially through the insulating layer, or through the insulating layer and partially through the conductive layer of the substrate and a second test TSV formed one of (1) partially through the insulating layer, or (2) through the insulating layer and partially through the conductive layer of the substrate. The first test TSV and the second test TSV can act as witness TSVs to operability of the circuit TSVs.
Further disclosed herein is an integrated circuit wafer. The integrated circuit wafer can include a substrate (e.g., handle wafer) comprising a conductive layer and an insulating layer. The integrated circuit wafer can further include one or more circuit TSVs formed at least partially through the substrate and associated with an integrated circuit (IC). The integrated circuit wafer can further include a test structure configured to facilitate testing of the integrity of the one or more circuit TSVs. The test structure can include a first test TSV formed one of (1) partially through the insulating layer, or (2) through the insulating layer and partially through the conductive layer of the substrate, and a second test TSV formed one of partially through the insulating layer, or through the insulating layer and partially through the conductive layer of the substrate. The first test TSV and the second test TSV can act as witness TSVs to the operability of the circuit TSVs.
Further disclosed herein is a method of configuring an integrated circuit wafer. The method can include providing a substrate (e.g., handle wafer) comprising a conductive layer and an insulating layer. The method can further include forming a plurality of holes one of partially through the insulating layer, or through the insulating layer and partially through the conductive layer of the substrate. The plurality of holes can comprise at least one or more circuit holes associated with an integrated circuit (IC). The plurality of holes can further include a first test hole and a second hole of a test structure, the test structure being configured to facilitate testing of the integrity of one or more circuit TSVs formed using the one or more circuit holes. The method can further include lining, at least partially, the substrate within the plurality of holes with an electrically insulating material. The method can further include removing a portion of the electrically insulating material to expose a portion of the substrate within the first test hole and the second test hole. The method can further include filling the plurality of holes with a conductive material to respectively form a plurality of TSVs, comprising one or more circuit TSVs, the first test TSV, and the second test TSV, from the one or more circuit holes, the first test hole, and the second test hole. The first and second test TSVs can act as witness TSVs to the operability of the circuit TSVs.
Further disclosed herein is a method of testing an integrated circuit wafer as described herein. The method can include electrically connecting the first test TSV to the second test TSV using an electrical probe and measuring an electrical property (e.g., an electrical resistance or an electrical conductance) between the first test TSV and the second test TSV through the conductive layer to determine the integrity of the first and second test TSVs, and to witness the integrity of the circuit TSVs. The method can further include establishing that the circuit TSVs are inoperable when an electrical property measured between the first and second test TSVs is outside of a predetermined value range, and establishing that the circuit TSVs are operable when at least one electrical property measured between the first and second test TSVs is within the predetermined value range.
To further describe the present technology, examples are now provided with reference to the figures. In electronics, integrated circuits (ICs) are often formed on a silicon wafer (sometimes referred to as a slice or substrate). A wafer is a thin slice of a semiconductor material used for the fabrication of ICs. The wafer serves as the substrate for microelectronic devices built in and upon the wafer to form the various ICs. The wafer typically undergoes any number of microfabrication processes, such as doping, ion implantation, etching, thin-film deposition of various materials, and photolithographic patterning, in order to form the ICs. Finally, once the individual microcircuits are formed on the wafer, the wafer can be separated into individual ICs by wafer dicing, after which, the separate ICs can be used for a variety of intended purposes.
To illustrate the problem solved by the principles described herein, a brief overview of a silicon wafer with integrated circuits formed thereon will be described with respect to
Once ICs 12 are formed on the substrate 11, the wafer 10 may be diced or cut along one or more dicing streets to separate the ICs 12 from other ICs 12 on the wafer 10 into separate dies with each die comprising one or more ICs. The cutting or dicing separates the ICs 12 from unused wafer material or unused substrate 11. As shown, the areas outside of the ICs 12 can be dicing streets 14. For example, the wafer 10 can include a plurality of vertical dicing streets 14a and a plurality of horizontal dicing streets 14b. Although all of the possible dicing streets may not be indicated in
Individual ICs 12 formed on the substrate 11 can be configured as shown in the cross-sectional view shown in
The cover layer 16 (e.g., silicon substrate sometimes referred to as a handle wafer) can be removed from the wafer 10 and ICs 12 by any chemical, mechanical, or other known process for material removal from a circuit wafer. The TSVs 22 can further be exposed by any known suitable process such as chemical mechanical polishing (CMP). The process of material removal and TSV exposure is not intended to be limited by this disclosure in any way.
Certain additional processes can be carried out on the wafer 10 prior to, or after, the removal of the cover layer 16. For example, an IC 12 can be fixed or bonded, at surface 24, to another IC 12 or circuit board configured to receive the IC 12. Also, a wafer 10 can be fixed or bonded, at surface 24, to another wafer 10. To maintain protection of the TSVs 22 it can be desirable to leave the cover layer 16 intact while performing additional processing, such as bonding, on the wafer 10. Accordingly, a problem may exist that a purchaser may perform processing and bonding on a very expensive wafer 10 that changes the wafer 10 and makes the wafer 10 unreturnable to a manufacturer should a manufacturing default exist in the wafer 10. For example, a manufacturer defect may exist in that the TSVs were not adequately formed a sufficient distance (e.g., formed to a short etch depth during via formation) through the substrate 11 to be properly exposed upon removal of the cover layer 16. However, the depth and formation of the TSVs cannot be discovered until the cover layer 16 is removed, exposing the TSVs. Therefore, the user can incur significant cost in purchasing and processing a wafer 10 before discovering that the wafer was improperly manufactured and unfit for use. Such processed wafers with manufacturing defects end up fit only to be discarded, thus wasting materials, time, money, and processing energy of the user. Therefore, it would be advantageous for a user/purchaser of wafers 10 to be able to determine the operability of the TSVs 22 before performing additional processing on the wafer 10. This disclosure describes principles for achieving the goal of determining operability of the TSVs 22 in a wafer 10 upon receipt by the user, without the need of additional processing to reveal the TSVs 22 first.
An exemplary wafer 100 including a test structure according to the technology described herein is described with respect to
Once ICs 112 are formed on the substrate 110, the wafer 100 may be diced or cut along one or more dicing streets 114 to separate one or more ICs 112 from one or more other ICs 112 on the wafer 100 into separate dies with each die comprising one or more ICs 112, in this example case each die comprising a single IC 112. The cutting or dicing separates the ICs 112 from unused wafer material or unused substrate 110. As shown, the areas outside of the ICs 112 can be dicing streets 114. For example, the wafer 100 can include a plurality of vertical dicing streets 114a and a plurality of horizontal dicing streets 114b. Although all of the possible dicing streets may not be indicated in
An enlarged view of region C of the wafer 100 is illustrated in
The test structure(s) 130 can each include a first test TSV 134 formed at least partially through the substrate 110 and a second test TSV 136 formed at least partially through the substrate 110. A test structure 130 or test TSV can be formed in one or more of the dicing streets 114, including a horizontal dicing street 114b, a vertical dicing street 114a, and/or at an intersection between a horizontal dicing street 114b and a vertical dicing street 114a. Any number of test structures 130 can be formed in the dicing streets 114 of the wafer 100. It will be appreciated that the test structures 130 and associated test TSVs 134, 136 illustrated in the figures are not necessarily drawn to scale. Further any of the test TSVs, the circuit TSVs, or any combination of these, can be formed to have any suitable cross-sectional configuration and shape and are not intended to be limited to those shown.
The first test TSV 134 and the second test TSV 136 can act as “witness” TSVs to the circuit TSVs 132. As used herein, the term “witness” or “witness TSV(s)” refers to one or more test TSVs 134, 136 that are interrogated (i.e., tested) for the purpose of determining the probable integrity (i.e., the operability (or lack of operability (i.e., inoperability)) for an intended purpose) of one or more circuit TSVs 132 when the operability/inoperability of the circuit TSV 132 cannot be directly tested and its integrity determined. In other words, the witness TSVs (e.g., the first test TSV 134 and/or the second test TSV 136) interrogated and confirmed to be formed properly for the desired operability can indicate, with some degree of probability based on etch uniformity, that the circuit TSV(s) 132 in proximity to, and/or formed at the same or similar time and/or with the same or similar process, as the witness TSVs are also likely operable. Conversely, the witness TSVs (e.g., the first test TSV 134 and/or the second test TSV 136) interrogated and confirmed to be formed improperly and therefore inoperable for the intended purpose can indicate that the circuit TSV(s) 132 in proximity to, and/or formed at the same or similar time and/or with the same or similar process, as the witness TSVs are also likely inoperable. Accordingly, the witness TSVs act as a witness to the operability of the circuit TSVs 132, thereby obviating the need to directly test operability of the circuit TSVs 132.
To act as witness TSVs, the first test TSV 134 and the second test TSV 136 can be formed at or close to the same time as the circuit TSVs 132. Additionally, or alternatively, the first test TSV 134 and the second test TSV 136 can be formed in the substrate 110 of the wafer 100 using the same, or at least a portion of the same, process used to form the circuit TSVs 132 in the substrate 110 of the wafer 100. The test TSVs 134 and 136 can be formed using the same or similar processes used to form circuit TSVs 132 (e.g., etching the via, lining the via with oxide, filling the via with tungsten, and using chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) to planarize the structure as shown in
Furthermore, any number of test structures 130, each with one or more associated test TSVs 134, 136, can be formed in the dicing streets 114 of the wafer 100. It may be advantageous to add more test structures 130 because those test structures 130 (including the test TSVs 134 and 136) that are closer to the circuit TSVs 132 whose integrity is being determined are likely more reliable as witnesses to the circuit TSVs 132 than test structures 130 that are farther away from the circuit TSVs 132. Accordingly, any desired number of test structures can be formed in the dicing streets 114 of the wafer 100, and any single test structure 130, or a combination of test structures 130, can be systematically interrogated to determine the integrity of any given circuit TSV 132, or number of circuit TSVs 132. Indeed, it is likely that the probability that a circuit TSV 132 in question will have the same integrity as that of an interrogated test TSV will increase the closer the test TSV is to the circuit TSV in question. It will further be appreciated that the test structures 130 can also be placed in areas that are not the dicing streets. For example, test TSVs 134 and 136 can be formed in areas of an IC that are not covered by circuitry, thereby allowing access to the test TSVs. Alternatively, a designated dummy or test circuit (e.g., one of the ICs 112 shown in
The formation, including proper and improper formation, of the TSVs (including circuit TSVs 132, first test TSV 134, and/or second test TSV 136) is illustrated and discussed with reference to
The circuit TSV 132a can be formed through one or more layers of the substrate 110. The circuit TSV 132a can be disposed in a circuit TSV hole 148a defined through one or more layers of the substrate 110 by a material removal process, such as etching. The circuit TSV 132a can be at least partially insulated from one or more layers of the substrate 110 by at least partially lining the substrate 110 within the circuit TSV hole 148a with a lining 150a comprising an electrically insulating material, such as silicon oxide. Although the exemplary TSV is a circuit TSV 132a, it will be appreciated that the first test TSV 134 and the second test TSV 136 can be formed in the same way to at least partially insulate the first test TSV 134 and the second test TSV 136 from the substrate 110. For example, similar to the circuit TSV 132a, the first test TSV 134 and the second test TSV 136 can be at least partially lined with a lining 150a comprising an electrically insulating material, such as silicon oxide, to at least partially insulate the first test TSV 134 and the second test TSV 136 from one or more layers of the substrate 110. To provide conductance capability for each of the TSVs, the lined circuit TSV holes of each TSV can be filled with a conductive material 152a, such as tungsten.
To ensure proper operability of the circuit TSV 132a, or any TSV, the TSV should be formed at least through layers 142, 144, and 146 and at least partially through the conductive layer 140. The circuit TSV 132a should be formed to a depth that allows the conductive material 152a to reach at least to the conductive layer 140. As used herein, the term “partially through” when referring to forming a hole or TSV through a specified layer is intended to mean that the hole or TSV reaches the layer sufficiently to allow the conductive material 152a to reach at least the surface of the specified layer, no matter the degree or length of penetration into the specified layer. In other words, even if little to no actual penetration into the specified layer is accomplished, if the conductive material, TSV, or hole reaches a surface of the specified layer, it can be said that the hole, conductive material, or TSV is formed “partially through” the specified layer.
In such a configuration, when the conductive layer 140 is removed by material removal and/or subject to chemical mechanical polishing, the conductive material 152a should be exposed, ensuring proper electrical communication through the circuit TSV 132a to the IC. However, as illustrated in
In contrast,
The operability and inoperability of the circuit TSVs 132a and 132b are illustrated with reference to
In contrast, as illustrated in
The test TSVs (i.e., first test TSV 134 and second test TSV 136) can serve to remedy such problems by facilitating quasi-testing (not direct testing, but testing via one or more proxy or witness TSVs) of the circuit TSVs 132 before any processing or irreparable material removal is done to any parts of the wafer 100 containing the TSVs. In other words, one or more test TSVs can act as witness TSVs to indicate the likely operability of one or more circuit TSVs 132 through interrogating the test TSVs to determine their integrity (i.e., operability). In one example, to facilitate interrogation and testing of the test TSVs 134, 136, the test TSVs 134, 136 can be formed in accessible areas of the wafer 100 and can be configured to be conductive with other portions of the wafer 100 before the conductive layer 140 is removed. This can be accomplished by forming the test TSVs 134, 136 with a slightly different process than the circuit TSVs 132. For example, one such process for forming the circuit TSVs 132 is illustrated in
Conversely, an example process for forming the test TSVs 134 and 136 is illustrated in
Having been formed with similar processes or at the same time as the circuit TSVs 132, the first test TSV 134 and the second test TSV 136 will likely be formed to the same or similar depth within the substrate 110 to the circuit TSVs 132. Accordingly, the depth of the first test TSV 134 and the second test TSV 136 will be indicative of, and witness, the depths of the circuit TSVs 132. In other words, if an electrical property (at least one of an electrical conduction or an electrical resistance) measured between the first test TSV 134 and the second test TSV 136 through the conductive layer 140 (e.g., doped silicon substrate) is within a predetermined value range, then the test TSVs 134 and 136 are formed to a sufficient depth within the substrate 110. With the test TSVs 134 and 136 formed to a sufficient depth within the substrate 110, it is likely that the circuit TSVs 132 are also formed to a sufficient depth to be operable.
However, if an electrical property (at least one of an electrical conduction or an electrical resistance) measured between the first test TSV 134 and the second test TSV 136 through the conductive layer 140 (e.g., doped silicon substrate) is outside a predetermined value range, then the test TSVs 134 and 136 are not formed to a sufficient depth or not properly formed within the substrate 110. With the test TSVs 134 and 136 not being formed properly or to a sufficient depth within the substrate 110, it is likely that the circuit TSVs 132 are also not formed properly or to a sufficient depth to be operable, therefore indicating that the circuit TSVs 132 are inoperable. In other words, the test TSVs 134 and 136 act as witnesses to the depths, operability, and/or inoperability of the circuit TSVs 132.
It is to be appreciated that no specific limitation as to a range of predetermined values measured between test TSVs 134 and 136 is intended by this disclosure. As many different applications may have different desired levels of electrical conductance, resistance, or other electrical properties, it is not the intention of this disclosure to limit the range of what would be an acceptable value measured for an electrical property between test TSVs 134 and 136. Such ranges may be determined by those skilled in the art who may be using the test structures as described herein depending on to which applications or circuits the test structures are applied.
To provide an example, it is understood that if no electrical conductance is measured between test TSVs 134 and 136, then there is no electrical connection between the test TSVs 134 and 136, indicating that the test TSVs, and therefore circuit TSVs 132, are inoperable. Therefore, it can be said that an electrical conduction of zero is outside of the predetermined value range of conductance because at least some level of conductance is desired between the test TSVs 134 and 136 for the IC to be operable. Similarly, if substantially infinite electrical resistance is measured between test TSVs 134 and 136, then there is also little to no electrical connection between the test TSVs 134 and 136, indicating that the test TSVs, and therefore circuit TSVs 132, are inoperable. Therefore, it can be said that an electrical resistance substantially equal to infinity is outside of the predetermined value range for resistance because a lower level of resistance is desired to allow conductance between the test TSVs 134 and 136 for the IC to be operable.
As another example, for a certain application, a user may desire a resistance of 1 ohm or less when testing the operability of a TSV for a specific intended purpose. In this case, if the resistance measured between TSVs 134 and 136 to be 1 ohm or less, it can be said that the TSVs 134 and 136 are operable, and therefore the circuit TSVs 132 are witnessed to be operable as well. However, if the resistance is measured to be outside of the 1 ohm or less range (e.g., greater than 1 ohm), the TSVs 134 and 136 are inoperable for their intended purpose, and therefore the circuit TSVs 132 are witnessed to be inoperable as well. Similarly, for a certain application, a user may desire a conductance of 1 S or greater when testing the operability of a TSV for a specific intended purpose. In this case, if the conductance measured between TSVs 134 and 136 is 1 S or greater, it can be said that the TSVs 134 and 136 are operable, and therefore the circuit TSVs 132 are witnessed to be operable as well. However, if the conductance is measured to be outside of the 1 S or greater range (e.g., less than 1 S), the TSVs 134 and 136 are inoperable for their intended purpose, and therefore the circuit TSVs 132 are witnessed to be inoperable as well.
A configuration in which the TSVs (whether circuit TSVs or test TSVs) are formed to a sufficient depth is shown in
Alternatively, if an electrical property, such as an electrical resistance or conductance, cannot be measured between the first test TSV 134 and the second test TSV 136 through the conductive layer 140 (or is measured to be outside of a certain desired predetermined value range), then it can be concluded that the test TSVs 134, 136 are not formed to a sufficient depth within the substrate 110. With the test TSVs 134, 136 not being formed to a sufficient depth within the substrate 110, it is likely that the circuit TSVs 132 are also not formed to a sufficient depth, and it can be presumed or deduced (i.e., established) that these are inoperable.
A configuration in which the TSVs (whether circuit TSVs or test TSVs) are not formed to a sufficient depth is shown in
The exemplary configurations described above test the presence of, test the level of, or allow for the identifying of an absence of an electrical property between a single first test TSV 134 and a single second test TSV 136. However, other configurations are possible. For example, a first array of test TSVs comprising the first test TSV can be formed and tested in conjunction with a second array of test TSVs comprising the second test TSV.
The number of TSVs present in an array is not intended to be limited by this disclosure and can be any desired number.
A method for configuring and testing the integrity of an integrated circuit (IC) wafer is described with reference to
A method of testing integrity of TSVs in the wafer configured in method 500 can include further steps of interrogating the first and second test TSVs, such as by electrically connecting the first test TSV to the second test TSV using an electrical probe. The method and the interrogating can further include measuring the presence or identifying the absence of an electrical property (e.g., an electrical resistance or a related property thereof (at least one of electrical conductance, or another property)) between the first test TSV and the second test TSV through the conductive layer to determine the integrity of the first and second test TSVs, and to witness the integrity of the circuit TSVs. The method can further include establishing that the circuit TSVs are inoperable when missing, reduced, or diminished (i.e., outside of a desired predetermined value range) electrical resistance or related property (e.g., electrical conductance) is measured between the first and second test TSVs, and/or establishing that the circuit TSVs are operable when an electrical resistance or related property is measured between the first and second test TSVs at or within a desired predetermined value level or range.
Reference was made to the examples illustrated in the drawings and specific language was used herein to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the technology is thereby intended. Alterations and further modifications of the features illustrated herein and additional applications of the examples as illustrated herein are to be considered within the scope of the description.
Although the disclosure may not expressly disclose that some embodiments or features described herein can be combined with other embodiments or features described herein, this disclosure should be read to describe any such combinations that would be practicable by one of ordinary skill in the art. The use of “or” in this disclosure should be understood to mean non-exclusive or, i.e., “and/or,” unless otherwise indicated herein.
Furthermore, the described features, structures, or characteristics can be combined in any suitable manner in one or more examples. In the preceding description, numerous specific details were provided, such as examples of various configurations to provide a thorough understanding of examples of the described technology. It will be recognized, however, that the technology can be practiced without one or more of the specific details, or with other methods, components, devices, etc. In other instances, well-known structures or operations are not shown or described in detail to avoid obscuring aspects of the technology.
Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or operations, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features and operations described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims. Numerous modifications and alternative arrangements can be devised without departing from the spirit and scope of the described technology.