The present invention relates generally to in-mold decoration. A process for forming a patterned thin film on a substrate for in-mold decoration is disclosed.
In-mold decoration (IMD) has emerged as an increasingly popular set of techniques for decorating injection-molded parts. IMD techniques are used to incorporate text, numbers, legends, other symbols and information, and purely decoratively designs into injection molded parts such as telephones and other consumer electronics, automobile dashboards, containers and packaging for consumer products, and indeed the full spectrum of injection molded parts.
IMD typically involves creating an in-mold decoration film (IMD film or IMD decorated film) comprising the image to be transferred to or integrated with a surface of the injection-molded part. In a typical in-mold transfer process, a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film is treated with a release agent (to facilitate image transfer) and then coated with a durable layer to provide oil and scratch resistance. The decoration is then printed and/or otherwise formed on the treated and coated PET film, followed by coating the film with an adhesive (e.g., hot melt or polyurethane adhesive) to form the in-mold transfer film. The film is then inserted into the injection mold prior to injection of the molten resin, and the decoration (or other image) is transferred from the PET film to the injection-molded item. In a typical in-mold insert process, the decoration or other image is not transferred from the IMD decorated film to the injection-molded item but instead the IMD decorated film is bonded to and becomes a part of the injection-molded item. In one typical in-mold insert process, a polycarbonate (PC) substrate is used. The decoration or other image to be included on the injection-molded item is printed or otherwise formed on a surface of the PC substrate. The patterned substrate is then coated with a thin protective layer (to protect the ink from damage during the injection process) to provide the IMD decorated film.
In some cases, IMD techniques may be used to apply or incorporate into an injection-molded item a decoration or other image that comprises a patterned metal thin film or other thin film material. In one approach, such a patterned thin film design is incorporated by forming a patterned metal thin film layer on the IMD decorated film. One typical prior art approach to fabricating an in-mold decoration film comprising a patterned metal thin film involves the use of photolithographic techniques and chemical etching. The typical photolithographic process comprises several time consuming and high cost steps including (1) forming an unpatterned metal thin film layer (2) coating the metal thin film with photoresist; (3) patterning the photoresist by image-wise exposing it through a photomask to, for example, ultraviolet light; (4) “developing” the patterned image by removing the photoresist from either the exposed or the unexposed areas, depending on the type of photoresist used, to uncover the metal thin film in areas from which it is to be removed (i.e., areas where no thin film material is to be located); (5) using a chemical etching process to remove the thin film from the areas from which the photoresist has been removed; and (6) stripping the remaining photoresist to uncover the patterned thin film structures.
Certain of the processing steps under the photolithographic approach, such as the image-wise exposure, are time consuming and require careful registration and alignment of the mask and the moving target area. In addition, development and stripping of photoresist and treatment of waste from the chemical etching process may be time consuming and expensive, in addition to potentially posing an environmental hazard. The chemical etching process also tends to result in a less shiny metal surface, which is often undesirable for high-end decoration applications.
Therefore, there is a need for a process for forming patterned thin film structures on a plastic substrate for use as an IMD decorated film that does not require the use of photolithography or chemical etching.
The present invention will be readily understood by the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate like structural elements, and in which:
A detailed description of a preferred embodiment of the invention is provided below. While the invention is described in conjunction with that preferred embodiment, it should be understood that the invention is not limited to any one embodiment. On the contrary, the scope of the invention is limited only by the appended claims and the invention encompasses numerous alternatives, modifications and equivalents. For the purpose of example, numerous specific details are set forth in the following description in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. The present invention may be practiced according to the claims without some or all of these specific details. For the purpose of clarity, technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the invention has not been described in detail so that the present invention is not unnecessarily obscured.
A process for forming a patterned thin film structure on a substrate is disclosed. In one embodiment, the thin film material may be conductive, non-conductive, or semi-conductive. In one embodiment, the patterned thin film structure comprises a metallic or metal-based design formed on a polymer substrate for use as an IMD decorated film. A pattern is printed with a masking coating or an ink, on the substrate, the pattern being such that, in one embodiment, the desired thin film structures will be formed in the areas where the printed masking coating is not present, i.e., a negative image of thin film structure to be formed is printed. The masking layer comprises 5–80% by weight, preferably 10–60% by weight based on dried weight of the masking layer, of re-dispersible particulates uniformly dispersed in a binder that is soluble or dispersible in the stripper composition used in the subsequent stripping process. A re-dispersible particulate is defined as a particulate that is dispersible in the stripping solution used to remove the masking coating/ink. A particulate that is not re-dispersible tends to result in undesirable scum or dirty background after stripping. A thin film is deposited uniformly by, for example, vapor deposition or sputtering, onto the substrate preprinted with the masking ink. The thin film on the masking coating as well as the masking coating are then removed in the subsequent stripping step.
In another embodiment, a masking layer is first uniformly coated on the substrate and a tie or anchoring material that is difficult to strip from the substrate, is printed in a pattern onto the masking layer. The tie coat has a good adhesion to both the masking layer and the thin film to be deposited on the patterned substrate. The thin film material not deposited on the tie coat is then selectively stripped, leaving behind the patterned thin film design. In this case, the desired thin film structure is formed in the areas where the printed tie material is present, i.e., a positive image of the thin film structure is printed.
Any suitable printing techniques, such as flexographic, driographic, electro photographic, and lithographic printing, may be used to print the ink pattern on the substrate. In certain applications, other printing techniques, such as stamping, screen printing, gravure printing, ink jet, and thermal printing may be suitable, depending on the resolution required. In addition, the masking coating or ink does not need to be optically contrasted with the substrate, and can be colorless.
In one embodiment, the masking coating or ink comprises a re-dispersible particulate. In one embodiment, the masking coating or ink comprises 5–80% by weight, preferably 10–60% by weight based on dried weight of the masking layer, of a re-dispersible particulate and a binder soluble or dispersible in the stripper composition. In one embodiment, the masking coating or ink comprises a water-soluble or water-dispersible polymer as a binder. Typical examples of water soluble polymers include, but are not limited to, polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyvinyl pyridine, polyacrylic acid, polymethacrylic acid, polyacrylamide, polyethylene glycol, poly(ethylene-co-maleic anhydride), poly (vinyl ether-co-maleic anhydride), poly(styrene-co-maleic anhydride), poly(butyelene-co-itaconic acid), PEOX, polystyrene sulfonate, cellulose derivatives such as hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, methyl cellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose, xanthan gum, gum Arabic, gelatin, lecitin, and their copolymers. In one such embodiment, the water-dispersible polymer comprises a water- or alkaline-dispersible wax, polyolefin, or acrylic latexes or dispersions. In one embodiment, the masking coating or ink comprises a solvent-soluble or solvent-dispersible polymer as a binder. In one embodiment, the masking coating or ink comprises a re-dispersible particulate derived from silica, CaCO3, CaSO4, BaSO4, Al2O3, TiO2, hollow-spheres, non-film-forming latexes or dispersions, inorganic pigment(s), or organic pigment(s). In one embodiment, the masking coating or ink comprises a re-dispersible particulate comprising a polymeric or polymeric composite particle. In one embodiment, including a re-dispersible particulate in the masking coating or ink facilitates subsequent stripping of the masking coating or ink. In one embodiment, including a re-dispersible particulate in the masking coating or ink facilitates subsequent stripping of the masking coating or ink by reducing the thickness or integrity of the masking coating or ink layer and/or improving the permeation of a stripping solvent into the masking coating or ink layer during stripping.
In step 106, a thin film of material is deposited on the patterned surface of the substrate. In one embodiment, the thin film material may be conductive, non-conductive, or semi-conductive. In one embodiment, vapor deposition is used to deposit the thin film of material on the patterned side of the substrate in step 106. In such an embodiment, aluminum, copper, or any material suitable for being deposited as a thin film through vapor deposition or spraying may be used as the thin film material. In one alternative embodiment, the thin film material is deposited by sputter coating the patterned side of the substrate with the thin film material. In such an embodiment, indium tin oxide (ITO), zinc sulfide, gold, silver, copper, iron, nickel, zinc, indium, chromium, aluminum-doped zinc oxide, gadolinium indium oxide, tin oxide, or fluorine-doped indium oxide, or any other material suitable for being deposited in a thin film through sputter coating may be used.
Any process for forming a thin film layer on the patterned substrate may be used, including without limitation by laminating, electroplating, sputtering, vacuum deposition, or combinations of more than one process for forming a thin film onto a plastic substrate. Useful thin film conductors include metal conductors such as, for example, aluminum, copper, zinc, tin, molybdenum, nickel, chromium, silver, gold, iron, indium, thallium, titanium, tantalum, tungsten, rhodium, palladium, platinum and/or cobalt, etc., and metal oxide conductors such as indium tin oxide (ITO) and indium zinc oxide (IZO), as well as alloys or multilayer composite films derived from the aforementioned metals and/or metal oxides. Further, the thin film structures described herein may comprise either a single layer thin film or a multi-layer thin film. Useful plastic substrates include epoxy resins, polyimide, polysulfone, polyarylether, polycarbonate (PC), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyethylene terenaphthalate (PEN), poly(cyclic olefin), and their composites. For in-mold decoration, the substrate is typically coated with a release layer (not shown), which is subsequently overcoated with a durable layer (not shown). A pattern of masking coating is printed onto the durable layer. The printed multilayer film is then overcoated by, for example, vapor deposition or sputtering, with a thin film.
In step 108 of the process shown in
In one embodiment, low molecular weight additives such as plasticizers, surfactants, and residual monomers or solvents in the masking coating/ink may cause defects or micro-porosity in the metal coated on the ink, accelerating exposure of the masking coating to the solvent. The present disclosure contemplates that any suitable combination of coating/ink, thin film, and stripping process may be used, without limiting the applicability of the present disclosure in any way, and without limiting the present disclosure to any particular stripping mechanism or theory. With respect to the process shown in
The process described above does not require the use of photolithography and selective etching of the conductive layer to define patterned thin film structures on a substrate. Instead, the ink pattern is used to define, prior to the deposition of the thin film material, the shape of the thin film structures to be formed. Depending on the durable layer used in the in-mold decoration film, a simple solvent, such as water, aqueous solutions, alcohols, ketones, esters, DMSO, or many other common organic solvents or solvent mixture, may be used to strip away the ink and the thin film material formed on top of the ink pattern. An aqueous stripper is preferred because of the environmental issues. The patterned thin film structures may be formed via a roll-to-roll process that is not as time consuming, not as expensive, and does not generate as much toxic chemical waste as the photolithographic and chemical etching techniques used in prior art photolithographic processes.
As noted above, the techniques described herein may be used in one embodiment to create an IMD decorated film comprising a patterned metallization or other patterned thin film layer.
In
While
As is apparent from the above discussion, thin film structures of any shape or size may be formed simply by defining through use of the printed pattern areas on the substrate on which thin film structures are to be formed.
In one embodiment of the process illustrated in
In one embodiment of the processes illustrated in
In one embodiment of the processes illustrated in
In one embodiment of the processes illustrated in
The ability to strip away the masking coating/ink lines after deposition of the metal thin film using a simple stripping process that is not destructive of the thin film formed in the areas where the coating/ink pattern is not present (such as but not limited to the solvent and physical peeling processes described above) facilitates a continuous fabrication process, such as a roll to roll fabrication process, because no time consuming batch processes such as image-wise exposure and development of photoresist, etching away portions of a thin film layer not covered by photoresist, or using solvents requiring special handling or conditions to remove a photoresist layer after etching, are required. By saving time and using less expensive materials, the process described herein is much less costly than other processes typically used to form on a polymer substrate the types of structures described herein. The presence of a redispersible particulate in the masking coating/ink significantly improves the blocking resistance of the coated film and in turn widens the process window of the roll-to-roll process. Moreover, the redispersible particulate greatly improves the strip-ability of the thin film deposited on the masking coating/ink.
As shown in
The alternative process shown in
In another alternative but preferred process, a semi-finished IMD film comprising a substrate, a release layer, and a durable layer with a poor affinity toward the thin film may be used. In one such embodiment, a surface treatment, tie coating or primer coating such as a UV curable polymer layer, having good adhesion to both the durable layer and the thin film may be used. In this case, the thin film on the uncoated areas will be removed in the stripping process to reveal the design on the top of the surface treatment or primer coating. This alternative process is similar to that shown in
Under the process shown in
In one embodiment, a physical stripping process such as peeling is used to reveal the patterned thin film structures. For example, an adhesive tape having an appropriate cohesion strength and adhesion strength to ITO is laminated onto an ITO/PET film pre-printed with a masking coating/ink. A subsequent peeling will remove the ITO either on the area printed with masking ink or on the area without the ink depending on the cohesion strength of the ink and the adhesion strengths at the ink-PET and ITO-PET interfaces. This stripping technique may be used with any of the processes described above.
In one embodiment, the process of
In one embodiment, the process shown in
In one embodiment, the water based stripper for ITO stripping could be a surfactant solution such as JEM-126 (sodium tripolyphosphate, sodium silicate, nonyl phenol ethoxylate, ethylene glycol monbutyl ether and sodium hydroxide), detergent formulation 409, hydroproxide, and developer Shipley 453, etc.
In one embodiment, the ITO stripping rate depends on the solvent concentration, solvent temperature, and the position of the substrate film relative to the ultrasound transducer.
In one embodiment, prior to the ITO sputter deposition, the ink printed PET surface is pre-treated with an appropriate plasma. In one embodiment, such plasma pretreatment minimizes the generation of micro-cracks on the patterned ITO structures during the ITO stripping process. In addition, such plasma pre-treatment may in one embodiment prevent ITO residue from being generated on the printed ink area as a result of removal of part of the printed ink pattern due to high-energy plasma, which may generate ITO residue on the printed ink area during the stripping process.
In order to eliminate the optical impact of minor ink residue appearing on the stripped ITO surface, in one embodiment a colorless ink printed on the PET surface is preferred.
Any of the foregoing techniques for forming a patterned thin film design on a substrate may be used to form a patterned metallization layer on a plastic substrate to provide an IMD decorated film including such a patterned metallization layer in its design. The techniques are applicable, without limitation, to both in-mold transfer and in-mold insert IMD.
The additional examples listed below (identified as Embodiments A through F to facilitate comparison) further illustrate the benefits, in terms of the patterning of thin film and the related manufacturing and handling processes, e.g., of including in the masking coating/ink a re-dispersible particulate as described herein, such as in the processes described above in connection with
In an Embodiment A, the following masking layer composition was used for aluminum (Al) metal thin film patterning: 5.5 grams Celvol 203S (PVA from Celanese, Dallas, Tex., LMW, 87% hydrolysis), 5.5 grams PVP K-30 (from ISP Corp., Wayne, N.J.), and 0.1 grams of Xanthan Gum (from Allchem, Inc., Dalton, Ga.) were dissolved slowly at room temperature into 39.2 grams of de-ionized water. To the masking composition, 0.23 grams of Silwet L-7608 (from OSi Specialties, Middlebury, Conn.), was added. The resultant solution was used as the masking coating/ink for printing a pattern on a substrate for metallization, e.g., as described herein.
In an Embodiment B, the following masking layer composition was used for aluminum (Al) metal thin film patterning: 3.0 grams of 20% dispersed silica (Sylojet 703C, from Grace Davison, Columbia, Md.) was diluted with 36.2 grams of de-ionized water. To this solution, 5.2 grams Celvol 203S, 5.2 grams PVP K-30 and 0.1 grams of Xanthan Gum were added slowly at room temperature then mixed at high shear rate. Finally, 0.23 grams of Silwet L-7608 was added. The resultant solution was used as the masking coating/ink for printing a pattern on a substrate for metallization, e.g., as described herein.
In Embodiments C-F, the same procedure and binders of Embodiment B were used, except that the weight percent of Silica in the dried films were changed to 10% in Embodiment C, 30% in Embodiment D, 60% in Embodiment E, and 80% in Embodiment F.
For purposes of comparison, all of the masking solutions in the above-described Embodiments A–F were screen printed on to a 2 mil Melinex 453 PET film (ICI, UK) through a 330 mesh stencil to form a negative masking pattern. The roll-up properties of the printed film were evaluated by the blocking resistance at ambient and 50° C./80% RH conditions. The printed PET film was uniformly coated with an Al layer of 50 to 60 nm thickness by vapor deposition. Positive Al pattern was developed in water by selectively stripping off the Al layer on the masking layer to generate positive Al pattern on the area that was not printed with the masking layer. The stripability or stripping selectivity is determined by the sharpness and shininess of the resultant Al image. The results are listed in Table 1 below (with the embodiment to which the data in each row applies indicated by the letter in the first column):
It can be seen from Table 1 that the addition of the particulate silica from 5 wt % to 80 wt % based on the dried masking film improves significantly both blocking resistance of the masking layer and the stripability of the Al layer on the masking layer. The presence of the particulate dispersion in the masking layer also resulted in highly shiny Al lines with fine line width and excellent integrity.
In one embodiment, an in-mold decoration film, such as described above in connection with
In one embodiment, an in-mold decoration film, such as described above in connection with
In one embodiment, an in-mold decoration film, such as described above in connection with
In one embodiment, the adhesive layer comprising an in-mold decoration film, such as described above in connection with
In one embodiment, a multilayer film formed as described in the four paragraphs immediately above was fed into an injection mold, and PMMA resin was injection molded onto the adhesive layer. The durable layer and patterned Al layer were transferred completely onto the molded pieces after the release film was peeled off.
Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be apparent that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the appended claims. It should be noted that there are many alternative ways of implementing both the process and apparatus of the present invention. Accordingly, the present embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention is not to be limited to the details given herein, but may be modified within the scope and equivalents of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 10/422,557, filed Apr. 23, 2003, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Said application Ser. No. 10/422,557 claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/375,902, filed Apr. 24, 2002, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3612758 | Evans et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
3668106 | Ota | Jun 1972 | A |
3697679 | Hathaway | Oct 1972 | A |
3935334 | Narui et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
4022927 | Pfeiffer et al. | May 1977 | A |
4071430 | Liebert | Jan 1978 | A |
4078935 | Nakagiri et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4093534 | Carter et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4119483 | Hubsch et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4217182 | Cross | Aug 1980 | A |
4285801 | Chiang | Aug 1981 | A |
4345000 | Kawazoe et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4368281 | Brummett et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4420515 | Amon et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4495981 | Kindlmann et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4586980 | Hirai et al. | May 1986 | A |
4643912 | Nakagawa et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4655897 | DiSanto et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4663192 | Hatakeyama | May 1987 | A |
4680103 | Beilin et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4714631 | Aufderheide | Dec 1987 | A |
4741988 | Van der Zande et al. | May 1988 | A |
4910045 | Giesecke et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4977013 | Ritchie et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4995718 | Jachimowicz et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5102497 | Hamaguchi et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5177476 | DiSanto et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5276438 | DiSanto et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5279511 | DiSanto et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5310778 | Shor et al. | May 1994 | A |
5368902 | Todd et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5380362 | Schubert | Jan 1995 | A |
5403518 | Schubert | Apr 1995 | A |
5436034 | Giesecke et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5460922 | Swirbel et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5495981 | Warther | Mar 1996 | A |
5573711 | Hou et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5589100 | Grasso | Dec 1996 | A |
5699097 | Takayama et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5795527 | Nakamura et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5835174 | Clinkeman et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5837609 | Todd et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5888372 | Bollens et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5914806 | Gordon, II et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5930026 | Jacobson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5961804 | Jacobson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976405 | Clinkeman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6017584 | Albert et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6037058 | Clinkeman et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6067185 | Albert et al. | May 2000 | A |
6080606 | Gleskova et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6111598 | Faris | Aug 2000 | A |
6113810 | Hou et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6117300 | Carbin et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120588 | Jacobson | Sep 2000 | A |
6120839 | Comiskey et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6131512 | Verlinden et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6140025 | Imai et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6172798 | Albert et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184856 | Gordon, II et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6232950 | Albert et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6252624 | Yuasa et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6294218 | Igel et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6312304 | Duthaler et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327072 | Comiskey et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6337761 | Rogers et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6392786 | Albert | May 2002 | B1 |
6426143 | Voss et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6490021 | Koyama | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6507376 | Nakamura | Jan 2003 | B1 |
20020083858 | MacDiarmid et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020126249 | Liang et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020182544 | Chan-Park et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030038772 | De Boer et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 390 465 | Oct 1990 | EP |
1 089 117 | Apr 2001 | EP |
2207289 | Jan 1989 | GB |
57-177029 | Oct 1982 | JP |
59-171930 | Sep 1984 | JP |
03 084521 | Oct 1991 | JP |
09 254 332 | Sep 1997 | JP |
WO 9956171 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 0036465 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0060410 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0167170 | Sep 2001 | WO |
0201281 | Jan 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040112237 A1 | Jun 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60375902 | Apr 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10422557 | Apr 2003 | US |
Child | 10665992 | US |