Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to the field of integrated circuit fabrication, particularly to a process for improving critical dimension uniformity for integrated circuit arrays.
Description of the Related Art
In the semiconductor industries, integrated circuit (IC) devices have become faster, smaller, and more efficient. This trend has continued with the development of fabrication technology to increase circuit densities on chips.
Reducing critical dimension is one important way to increase circuit densities. The critical dimension (CD) is the dimension of the smallest geometrical features (width of interconnect line, contacts, trenches, etc.) formed during semiconductor device manufacturing. Critical dimensions need to be reduced in order to facilitate the formation of smaller features and faster, more efficient circuits.
In fabricating certain IC devices with small CD, however, pattern non-uniformity occurs due to loading effects. Some IC devices have a number of identical circuit elements arranged in multiple arrays. Such IC devices are typically formed by simultaneously forming multiple arrays on a single semiconductor substrate. In arrays formed by certain methods, the inventors have found a tendency for edge portions to have different dimensions than central portions.
The inventors have found certain processes, particularly hard mask formation and etch processes for dense feature arrays, are particularly subject to center-to-edge non-uniformities in each array. One possible source of non-uniformity may be that etchants and deposition precursors are not uniformly diffused into edge portions and central portions of arrays during an etch process that forms the arrays. Such non-uniformity occurs more significantly with denser line and space patterns. In addition, the inventors have also found spacer formation in a pitch-doubling process to result in center-to-edge non-uniformity. During the process, deposited spacers tend to be thicker in edge portions than in central portions of arrays.
Attempts have been made to prevent such non-uniformity using Optical Proximity Correction (OPC) techniques. OPC is a reticle correction technique to remedy line-end shortening, rounding, or distortion problems in photolithography. The problems are typically caused by light refraction and scattering by edges of a patterned light blocking material in a reticle. However, the attempts have not been successful in remedying the center-to-edge non-uniformity.
These and other aspects of the invention will be better understood from the Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments and from the appended drawings, which are meant to illustrate and not to limit the invention, and wherein:
In the context of this document, the term “integrated circuit (IC) device” refers to a semiconductor device, including, but not limited to, a memory device and a microprocessor. The memory device may be volatile memories such as random access memories (RAMs) or non-volatile memories such as read-only memories (ROMs). Examples of RAMs include dynamic random access memories (DRAMs) and static random access memories (SRAMs). Examples of ROMs include programmable read-only memories (PROMs), erasable programmable read-only memories (EPROMs), electrically-erasable programmable read-only memories (EEPROMs), and flash memories.
The term “semiconductor substrate” is defined to mean any construction comprising semiconductor materials, including, but not limited to, bulk semiconductor materials such as a semiconductor wafer (either alone or in integrated assemblies comprising other materials thereon) and semiconductor material layers (either alone or in integrated assemblies comprising other materials). The term “substrate” refers to any supporting substrate, including, but not limited to, the semiconductor substrates described above. Also in the context of this document, the term “layer” encompasses both the singular and the plural unless otherwise indicated.
The term, “features,” as used herein, refers to parts of a pattern, such as lines or spaces.
The term “array” refers to a regularly repeating pattern of IC elements on a semiconductor substrate. For example, a memory array typically has a number of identical memory cells in a matrix form. Logic arrays may similarly include repeating patterns of conductive lines and/or transistors.
The term, “target layer,” as used herein, refers to a layer in which arrays are formed. A target layer may be part of a semiconductor substrate. A target layer may include metal, semiconductor, and/or insulator.
It will also be appreciated that transferring a pattern from a first (e.g., masking) level to a second level involves forming features in the second level that generally correspond to features on the first level. For example, the path of lines in the second level will generally follow the path of lines on the first level. The location of other features on the second level will correspond to the location of similar features on the first level. The precise shapes and sizes of corresponding features can vary from the first level to the second level, however due, for example, to trim and growth steps. As another example, depending upon etch chemistries and conditions, the sizes of and relative spacings between the features forming the transferred pattern can be enlarged or diminished relative to the pattern on the first level, while still resembling the same initial “pattern.”
While “processing” through masks is described for preferred embodiments as etching to transfer a hard mask pattern into a target layer, the skilled artisan will appreciate that processing in other embodiments can comprise, e.g., oxidation, nitridation, selective deposition, doping, etc. through the masks.
Overall Patterning Process
In the above prior art method, array and peripheral regions are defined at or prior to the stage at which a pattern in the resist layer 130 is transferred into the target layer 120. Thus, the features are defined only in the array regions. According to an embodiment of the invention, however, a repeating pattern of features is first formed throughout a first region of a substrate. Then, array and peripheral regions are defined within the first region at an additional masking step.
Subsequently, the target layer 420 is processed using the patterned resist layer 430 as a mask, as shown in
In
Next, as shown in
As shown in
Although unpictured, after forming arrays as described above, the substrate will be further provided with additional layers or materials to complete IC devices. For example, each of the array regions 421 can be further processed to complete the memory arrays. The features can represent trenches, conductive lines, portions of capacitors, portions of transistors, contacts, etc.
In the method described above, a repeating pattern of features is formed throughout a first region of a substrate before using a non-critical mask to differentiate array and peripheral regions within the first region. Thus, edge non-uniformity is pushed to outermost edges of the first region, where the features are subsequently removed. Thus, features in the array regions are subject to less local loading effects. Therefore, the center-to-edge non-uniformity can be reduced.
Additional Mask on Spacers
The non-critical additional blocking mask step described above may be performed on spacers used for a pitch doubling process. “Pitch doubling” or “pitch multiplication” is one proposed method for extending the capabilities of photolithographic techniques beyond their minimum pitch. A pitch multiplication method is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,328,810, issued to Lowrey et al., the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
While the pitch is actually halved in the example above, this reduction in pitch is conventionally referred to as pitch “doubling,” or, more generally, pitch “multiplication.” Thus, conventionally, “multiplication” of pitch by a certain factor actually involves reducing the pitch by that factor. That is because pitch is used with two converse meanings: the distance between identical features in a repeating pattern (which decreases with increasing density) and the number of features per linear distance (which increases with increasing density).
As explained above, where a given pitch previously included a pattern defining one feature and one space, the same width now includes two features and two spaces. In other words, a pitch-doubled pattern is twice as dense as a conventional pattern. Similarly, when pitching doubling is applied to forming IC device arrays, resulting arrays have a pattern twice as dense as conventional arrays. Accordingly, the center-to-edge non-uniformity caused by loading effects is more serious in pitch-doubled arrays than in conventional arrays.
In view of the problem, preferred embodiments of the invention allow for improved center-to-edge uniformity in pitch-multiplied IC arrays. In a first phase of the method, photolithography and pitch multiplication are preferably used for forming a spacer pattern. The spacer pattern includes a repeating pattern of features in a first region of a substrate. The same repeating pattern is formed throughout the first region. Then, an additional non-critical mask step is performed to define a plurality of array regions and peripheral regions within the first region.
With reference to
The first hard mask layer 630 may be formed of an inorganic material. In one embodiment, the first hard mask layer 630 is formed of polysilicon, low silane oxide (LSO), silicon oxide, silicon nitride (Si3N4) or silicon oxynitride (SiOxNy). In certain embodiments, the first hard mask layer 630 may have a two-layered structure, including a silicon upper layer and an LSO lower layer or an inorganic hard mask (e.g., 600 Å of silicon or LSO) over a supplemental hard mask layer such as transparent carbon (t-C). It should be noted that the material for the first hard mask layer 630 is chosen based on etch selectivity relative to the overlying second hard mask layer material and a spacer material which will be later described. For example, the material for the first hard mask layer 630 is preferably selectively etchable relative to the spacer material. Additionally, the (upper layer of) underlying substrate 610 is preferably selectively etchable relative to the first hard mask layer 630 such that they are of different materials. Preferably, the first hard mask layer 630 may have a thickness of between about 200 Å and about 3,600 Å, more preferably between about 600 Å and about 2,600 Å.
The second hard mask layer 640 may be formed of amorphous carbon and may serve as a sacrificial or mandrel layer for forming spacers. A preferred type of amorphous carbon is a colorless, transparent carbon that facilitates photo alignment to underlying layers. Preferably, the second hard mask layer 640 may have a thickness of between about 600 Å and about 2,000 Å, more preferably between about 1,000 Å and about 1,400 Å. Details of a pitch doubling process employing multiple hard mask layers beneath the mandrel layer are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/214,544 to Tran et al., filed Aug. 29, 2005, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Thus, while illustrated with two hard mask layers, the processes described herein can employ a greater number or fewer hard mask layers.
In addition, a resist layer 650 is provided over the second hard mask layer 640. A material for the resist layer 650 is selected based on the type of lithography used for patterning the resist layer 650. Examples of such lithography include, but are not limited to, ultraviolet (UV) lithography, extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography, X-ray lithography and imprint contact lithography. The UV lithography includes 157 nm photolithography, 193 nm photolithography, and 248 nm photolithography. The 248 nm photolithography is also referred to as “Deep Ultraviolet (DUV)” lithography. In the illustrated embodiment, DUV photolithography is used for patterning the resist layer 650. The resist layer 650 is formed of a DUV resist which is commercially available. A skilled artisan will appreciate that the material of the layers may be varied depending on lithography, availability of selective etch chemistries and IC design.
Optionally, a bottom anti-reflective coating (BARC) layer (not shown) may be provided between the resist layer 650 and the second hard mask layer 640. BARCs, which are typically organic, enhance the resolution by preventing reflections of the ultraviolet (UV) radiation that activates the photoresist. BARCs are widely available, and are usually selected based upon the selection of the resist material and the UV wavelength. BARCs, which are typically polymer-based, are usually removed along with the overlying photoresist. The optional BARC layer preferably has a thickness of between about 200 Å and about 600 Å, more preferably between about 300 Å and about 500 Å.
In
Subsequently, as shown in
Next, as shown in
Preferred methods for spacer material deposition include chemical vapor deposition, e.g., using O3 and TEOS to form silicon oxide, and atomic layer deposition, e.g., using a silicon precursor with an oxygen or nitrogen precursor to form silicon oxides and nitrides, respectively. Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) has the advantages of both low temperature deposition and high conformality. The thickness of the layer 660 is preferably determined based upon the desired width of the spacers 662 (
With reference to
With reference to
Thus, pitch multiplication has been accomplished. In the illustrated embodiment, the pitch of the spacers 662 is roughly half that of the photoresist lines and spaces (
Next, in a second phase of methods according to the preferred embodiments, an additional blocking mask 670 is provided over exposed surfaces, including the first hard mask layer 630 and the top and sidewalls of the spacers 662 as shown in
Subsequently, spacers in the peripheral regions 603 are etched using the patterned mask 670, preferably selectively relative to the underlying first hard mask. During this step, the spacers in the peripheral regions 603 are etched away as shown in
As shown in
Next, a pattern provided by the spacers 662 is transferred into the first hard mask layer 630 as shown in
Then, a pattern in first hard mask layer 630 is transferred into the target layer 620 to form arrays. The pattern transfer is performed by etching the target layer 620 using the patterned first hard mask layer 630 as a mask. The etch process is preferably a dry, anisotropic etch process. Although unpictured, after forming the arrays as described above, the substrate is further processed with additional layers or materials to complete IC devices.
In the illustrated embodiment, two hard mask layers 630, 640 are employed for a pattern transfer from the resist 650 into the target layer 620. In other embodiments, only one hard mask layer or more than two hard mask layers may be used between a resist and a target layer for a pattern transfer.
In certain embodiments, the blocking mask 670 may also serve to remove or cut spacer loop ends. As described above, spacers are formed on sidewalls of features or lines, for examples, the features of the second hard mask layer 640 in
Additional Mask on Spacers in Damascene Process
In another embodiment, the additional mask step described above may be performed for a pitch doubling process in conjunction with a process for forming a damascene structure. A “damascene” structure refers to a structure having metal structures inlaid within recesses formed in a layer of dielectric. The metal may constitute an interconnect line. The inlaid metal of the damascene structure is typically isolated within trenches by means of a chemical-mechanical planarization or polishing (CMP) process. In a conventional damascene process, trenches are first defined lithographically in a dielectric layer. Then, a metal is deposited to fill the trenches. Subsequently, excess metal is removed by CMP.
With reference to
In addition, a resist layer 750 is provided and patterned over the second hard mask layer 740. In
Subsequently, as shown in
Next, as shown in
Preferred methods for spacer material deposition include chemical vapor deposition, e.g., using O3 and TEOS to form silicon oxide, and atomic layer deposition, e.g., using a silicon precursor with an oxygen or nitrogen precursor to form silicon oxides and nitrides, respectively. The thickness of the layer 760 is preferably determined based upon the desired width of the spacers 762 (
With reference to
With reference to
Next, in a second phase of methods according to the preferred embodiments, an additional blocking mask 770 is provided over exposed surfaces, including the first hard mask layer 730 and the top and sidewalls of the spacers 762 as shown in
Subsequently, the additional mask 770 (a non-critical mask with large dimensions) is patterned to open array regions 702, as shown in
Subsequently, the first hard mask layer 730 in the array regions 702 is etched through the patterned mask layer 770 and the patterned spacers 762, as shown in
Next, the blocking mask 770 overlying the spacers 762 in the peripheral regions 703 is removed using any suitable process. In addition, the spacers 762 are removed using an etch process, as shown in
Next, the line and space pattern of the first hard mask layer 730 is transferred into the target layer 720, as shown in
In the illustrated embodiment, two hard mask layers 730, 740 are employed for a pattern transfer from the resist 750 into the target layer 720. In other embodiments, only one hard mask layer or more than two hard mask layers may be used for a pattern transfer between a resist and a target layer. In certain embodiments, a pattern in the spacer layer 760 (
The blocking mask 770 can also be used for blocking spacer loop ends of the live (array) features, such that these portions of the patterns are not etched into the dielectric target layer 720.
Additional Mask on Hard Mask
Referring to
With reference to
In the illustrated embodiment, the hard mask layer 830 will be used to transfer a pattern from the resist layer 840 into the target layer 820. The hard mask layer 830 may be formed of an organic material, preferably amorphous carbon. A preferred type of amorphous carbon is a colorless, transparent carbon that facilitates photo alignment to underlying layers. The hard mask layer 830 may have a thickness of between about 1,000 Å and about 4,000 Å, more preferably between about 2,000 Å and about 3,000 Å. In certain embodiments, the hard mask layer 830 may have an upper hard mask and a lower hard mask. The upper hard mask may be formed of amorphous carbon. The lower hard mask may be formed of polysilicon, silane oxide, silicon oxide, or silicon nitride. The lower hard mask may have a two-layered structure, including a silicon top layer and a silane oxide bottom layer.
In certain embodiments in which a photolithographic process is used for patterning the resist 840, a bottom anti-reflective coating (BARC) layer (not shown) may optionally be provided between the hard mask layer 830 and the resist 840. BARCs are widely available, and are usually selected based upon the selection of the resist material and the UV wavelength. The BARC layer may have a thickness of between about 200 Å and about 1,000 Å, more preferably between about 300 Å and about 600 Å. An additional hard mask layer (not shown) may also be provided over the hard mask layer to provide excellent pattern transfer fidelity. The additional hard mask layer may be formed of a DARC.
Next, as shown in
Subsequently, as shown in
After the pattern transfer, the resist layer 840 overlying the patterned hard mask 830 is removed by any conventional method. In
As shown in
Subsequently, in
Next, a pattern in the hard mask layer 830 is transferred into the target layer 820, as shown in
Additional Mask on Hard Mask in Damascene Process
In
As shown in
Subsequently, the hard mask layer 930 is etched through openings of the resist layer 940, as shown in
Next, as shown in
Subsequently, the blocking non-critical mask 950 is patterned to define the array regions 902 and peripheral regions 903. As shown in
Next, as shown in
IC Array Devices
Another aspect of the invention provides an IC device having arrays made by the method described above. The method may be preferably used for fabricating IC device arrays having features which have a critical dimension of less than 100 nm, more preferably less than 60 nm and a line density of between about 5 lines/μm (100 nm nodes) and about 20 lines/μm (25 nm nodes).
A resulting IC device array preferably has optimal center-to-edge uniformity. In the context of this document, the center-to-edge uniformity is expressed in terms of center-to-edge deviation. The term “center-to-edge deviation,” as used herein, refers to a measure of a degree of disparity in feature widths provided that features of the same width are transferred from a resist into center and edge portions of an IC array. The deviation is denoted as percentage of a difference of an edge feature width relative to a center feature width. For example, a center-to-edge deviation of 10% is obtained if features of the same width result in 100 nm-width in a center portion and 110 nm-width in an edge portion, or 100 nm-width in a center portion and 90 nm-width in an edge portion. Preferably, the resulting IC device array has a center-to-edge line width deviation of between about 0% and about 5%, more preferably between about 0% and about 1%.
Another aspect of the invention provides an electronic device including IC arrays made by the method described above. The electronic device may also include a system including a microprocessor and/or a memory device. Such a system may be a computer system, an electronic system, or an electromechanical system.
The electronic device may include, but is not limited to consumer electronic products, electronic circuits, electronic circuit components, parts of the consumer electronic products, electronic test equipments, etc. The consumer electronic products may include, but are not limited to, a mobile phone, a telephone, a television, a computer monitor, a computer, a hand-held computer, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a microwave, a refrigerator, a stereo system, a cassette recorder or player, a DVD player, a CD player, a VCR, an MP3 player, a radio, a camcorder, a camera, a digital camera, a portable memory chip, a washer, a dryer, a washer/dryer, a copier, a facsimile machine, a scanner, a multi functional peripheral device, a wrist watch, a clock, etc. Further, the electronic device may include unfinished intermediate products.
In the embodiments described above, a pattern of features is formed across multiple arrays and intervening peripheries (and outer borders). Then, a pattern is removed from the peripheries (conventional patterning) or blocked from transfer to substrate (damascene) using a non-critical blocking mask which is inexpensive and easy to pattern. For pitch doubling embodiments, the blocking mask can also double in function to chop spacer loop ends (conventional patterning) or prevent spacer loop ends from transferring into substrate (damascene). The embodiments have advantage of pushing non-uniformities of arrays out to peripheral regions where they will be rendered nonoperative or removed by blocking mask.
Thus, according to one aspect, a method is provided for patterning integrated circuit (IC) device arrays. The method comprises forming a repeating pattern of features in a masking layer across a first region of a substrate. A blocking mask is applied over the features in the masking layer. The blocking mask differentiates array regions of the first region from peripheral regions of the first region. The pattern of features in the array regions is transferred into the substrate.
According to another aspect, a method is provided for forming memory device arrays. The method comprises forming a repeating pattern of features in a first layer across a first region of a substrate. A second layer is applied over the features in the first layer. The second layer is configured to cover a plurality of array regions within the first region and to open non-array regions within the first region outside the array regions, thereby exposing features in the non-array regions. The exposed features in the non-array regions of the first layer are removed while the second layer covers the plurality of array regions.
According to yet another aspect, a method is provided for forming a system. The method comprises forming a repeating pattern of features in a first layer across a first region of a substrate. A second layer is applied over the features in the first layer. The second layer is configured to open a plurality of active regions within the first region and to cover inactive regions within the first region outside the active regions, thereby exposing patterns of features in the plurality of active regions. The exposed patterns of features in the plurality of active regions of the first layer are transferred into a third layer underlying the first layer.
According to another aspect, an integrated circuit device is provided. The device comprises an array of lines having a line density of between about 5 lines/μm and about 20 lines/μm. The array has a center-to-edge line width deviation of between about 0% and about 5%.
According to yet another aspect, an intermediate integrated circuit structure is provided. The structure comprises a substrate comprising a plurality of array regions and peripheral regions surrounding and between the array regions. The structure also includes a first layer formed over the substrate. The first layer comprises a repeating pattern of features across both the array and peripheral regions.
Although this invention has been described in terms of certain preferred embodiments, other embodiments that are apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, including embodiments that do not provide all of the features and advantages set forth herein, are also within the scope of this invention. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention is defined only by reference to the appended claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/716,702, filed Dec. 17, 2012, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/360,738, filed Jan. 27, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,334,211), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/411,401, filed Apr. 25, 2006 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,488,685), the disclosures of which is hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties herein. This application is related to and incorporates the following by reference in their entireties: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/931,772 to Abatchev et al., filed Aug. 31, 2004; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/934,778 to Abatchev et al., filed Sep. 2, 2004; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/214,544 to Tran et al., filed Aug. 29, 2005.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4234362 | Riseman | Nov 1980 | A |
4419809 | Riseman et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4432132 | Kinsbron et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4502914 | Trumpp et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4508579 | Goth et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4570325 | Higuchi | Feb 1986 | A |
4648937 | Ogura et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4716131 | Okazawa et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4776922 | Bhattacharyya et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4803181 | Buchmann et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4838991 | Cote et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
5013680 | Lowrey et al. | May 1991 | A |
5047117 | Roberts | Sep 1991 | A |
5053105 | Fox, III | Oct 1991 | A |
5117027 | Bernhardt et al. | May 1992 | A |
5268330 | Givens et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5328810 | Lowrey et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5330879 | Dennison | Jul 1994 | A |
5470661 | Bailey et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5514885 | Myrick | May 1996 | A |
5593813 | Kim | Jan 1997 | A |
5670794 | Manning | Sep 1997 | A |
5741719 | Kim | Apr 1998 | A |
5753546 | Koh et al. | May 1998 | A |
5789320 | Andricacos et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5795830 | Cronin et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5830332 | Babich et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5858620 | Ishibashi et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5895740 | Chien et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899746 | Mukai | May 1999 | A |
5998256 | Juengling | Dec 1999 | A |
6004862 | Kim et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010946 | Hisamune et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6020255 | Tsai et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6042998 | Brueck et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6057573 | Kirsch et al. | May 2000 | A |
6063688 | Doyle et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071789 | Yang et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6110837 | Linliu et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6124212 | Fan et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6143476 | Ye et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6150678 | Tung et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157575 | Choi | Dec 2000 | A |
6204168 | Naik et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6207490 | Lee et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211044 | Xiang et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6288454 | Allman et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6291334 | Somekh | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297554 | Lin | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6335257 | Tseng | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348380 | Weimer et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6362057 | Taylor, Jr. et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6383907 | Hasegawa et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6395613 | Juengling | May 2002 | B1 |
6423474 | Holscher | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6455372 | Weimer | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6475684 | Ki | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6475867 | Hui et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6500756 | Bell et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6514884 | Maeda | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6522584 | Chen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6534243 | Templeton | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6548385 | Lai | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6548396 | Naik et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6559017 | Brown et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6566280 | Meagley et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6573030 | Fairbairn et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6602642 | Liu et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6602779 | Li et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6620715 | Blosse et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6632741 | Clevenger et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6638441 | Chang et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6667237 | Metzler | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6673684 | Huang et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6686245 | Mathew et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6689695 | Lui et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6706571 | Yu et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6709807 | Hallock et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6734107 | Lai et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6744094 | Forbes | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6762449 | Uchiyama et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6773998 | Fisher et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6794699 | Bissey et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6800930 | Jackson et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6818141 | Plat et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6830853 | Tzu et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6835662 | Erhardt et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6867116 | Chung | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6875703 | Furukawa et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6878300 | Allen, III | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6893972 | Rottstegge et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6898780 | Egorov et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6916594 | Bok | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6922230 | Govil et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6924191 | Liu et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6955961 | Chung | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6962867 | Jackson et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6995437 | Kinoshita | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7015124 | Fisher et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7034408 | Schloesser | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7074668 | Park et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7084071 | Dakshina-Murthy et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7151040 | Tran et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7183142 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7183205 | Hong | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7183597 | Doyle | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7202174 | Jung | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7208379 | Venugopal et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7253118 | Tran et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7271107 | Marks et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7288445 | Bryant et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7291560 | Parascandola et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7378727 | Caspary et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7416837 | Nozaki | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7435536 | Sandhu et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7442976 | Juengling | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7455956 | Sandhu et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7537866 | Liu | May 2009 | B2 |
7655387 | Sandhu et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7851135 | Jung | Dec 2010 | B2 |
20010005631 | Kim et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20020013055 | Yamaguchi | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020042198 | Bjarnason et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020045308 | Juengling | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020063110 | Cantell et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068243 | Hwang et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020094688 | Mitsuiki | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020127810 | Nakamura et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030006410 | Doyle | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030044722 | Hsu et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030109102 | Kujirai et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030119307 | Bekiaris et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030127426 | Chang et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030157436 | Manger et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030207207 | Li | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030207584 | Sivakumar et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030215978 | Maimon et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030216050 | Golz et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030230234 | Nam et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040000534 | Lipinski | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040005778 | Kronke | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040017989 | So | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040018738 | Liu | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040023475 | Bonser et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040023502 | Tzou et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040041189 | Voshell et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040043623 | Liu et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040053475 | Sharma | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040079988 | Harari | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040106257 | Okamura et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040171211 | Lee et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040235255 | Tanaka et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050017989 | Huang | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050064727 | Lee | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050074949 | Jung et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050112812 | Jang | May 2005 | A1 |
20050112886 | Asakawa et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050136341 | Park | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050142497 | Ryou | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050153562 | Furukawa et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050164454 | Leslie | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050167394 | Liu et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050186705 | Jackson et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050272259 | Hong | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060003182 | Lane et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060011947 | Juengling | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060024940 | Furukawa et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060024945 | Kim et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060046161 | Yin et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046200 | Abatchev et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046201 | Sandhu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046422 | Tran et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046484 | Abatchev et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060083996 | Kim | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060115978 | Specht | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060172540 | Marks et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060189150 | Jung | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060211260 | Tran et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060216923 | Tran et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060231900 | Lee et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060240361 | Lee et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060263699 | Abatchev et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060267075 | Sandhu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060273456 | Sant et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060281266 | Wells | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070026672 | Tang et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070045712 | Haller et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070048674 | Wells | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049011 | Tran | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049030 | Sandhu et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049032 | Abatchev et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049035 | Tran | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049040 | Bai et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070050748 | Juengling | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070077524 | Koh | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070148968 | Kwon et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070190762 | Franciscus Van Haren et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070210449 | Caspary et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070215874 | Furukawa et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070215960 | Zhu et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070264830 | Huang | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070275309 | Liu | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080054350 | Breitwisch et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080057610 | Lee et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080081461 | Lee et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080292991 | Wallow | Nov 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
280851 | Jul 1990 | DE |
42 36 609 | May 1994 | DE |
42 36 609 | May 1994 | DE |
0 227 303 | Jul 1987 | EP |
0 491 408 | Jun 1992 | EP |
1 357 433 | Oct 2003 | EP |
57-048237 | Mar 1982 | JP |
64-035916 | Feb 1989 | JP |
05-343370 | Dec 1993 | JP |
H8-55908 | Feb 1996 | JP |
H8-55920 | Feb 1996 | JP |
2000-208434 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2000-357736 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2004-080033 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2004-140212 | May 2004 | JP |
2004-152784 | May 2004 | JP |
2005-150333 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2006-351861 | Jan 2012 | JP |
10-1995-0034748 | Dec 1995 | KR |
10-0122315 | Sep 1997 | KR |
10-1999-0001440 | Jan 1999 | KR |
10-1999-027887 | Apr 1999 | KR |
10-2005-0052213 | Jun 2005 | KR |
WO 9415261 | Jul 1994 | WO |
WO 02099864 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 2004001799 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2004003977 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2005010973 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005034215 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2006026699 | Mar 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bergeron, et al., “Resolution Enhancement Techniques for the 90nm Technology Node and Beyond,” Future Fab International, Issue 15, Jul. 11, 2003, 4 pages. |
Bhave et al., “Developer-soluble Gap fill materials for patterning metal trenches in Via-first Dual Damascene process,” preprint of Proceedings of SPIE: Advances in Resist Technology and Processing XXI, vol. 5376, 2004, John L. Sturtevant, editor, 8 pages. |
Bruek, S.R.J., “Optical and interferometric lithography—Nanotechnology enablers,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 93, No. 10, Oct. 2005, pp. 1704 —1721. |
Cerofolini et al., “Strategies for nanoelectronics”, Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 81, pp. 405-419. |
Choi et al. “Sublithographic nanofabrication technology for nanocatalysts and DNA chips,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol., pp. 2951-2955 (Nov./Dec. 2003). |
Chung et al., “Nanoscale Multi-Line Patterning Using Sidewall Structure,” Jpn., J. App. Phys. vol. 41 (2002) Pt. 1, No. 6B, pp. 4410-4414. |
Chung et al., “Pattern multiplication method and the uniformity of nanoscale multiple lines,” J.Vac.Sci.Technol. B21(4), Jul./Aug. 2003, pp. 1491-1495. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/543,515; filed Oct. 24, 2006. |
Ex Parte Centell, unpublished decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, Mar. 4, 2005. |
Joubert et al., “Nanometer scale linewidth control during etching of polysilicon gates in high-density plasmas,” Microelectronic Engineering 69 (2003), pp. 350-357. |
Korean Notice of Preliminary Rejection (Non-Final) dated May 31, 2012 in corresponding Korean Patent Application. |
Oehrlein et al., “Pattern transfer into low dielectic materials by high-density plasma etching,” Solid State Tech., May 2000, 8 pages. |
Sheats et al., “Microlithography: Science and Technology,” Marcel Dekkar, Inc., pp. 104-105 (1998). |
U.S. Office Action issued Apr. 17, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/411,401, filed Apr. 25, 2006. |
U.S. Office Action issued Jul. 11, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/367,020, filed Mar. 2, 2006. |
U.S. Office Action issued Jun. 2, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/219,067, filed Sep. 1, 2005. |
U.S. Office Action issued Jun. 5, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/514,117, filed Aug. 30, 2006. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150035124 A1 | Feb 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13716702 | Dec 2012 | US |
Child | 14517685 | US | |
Parent | 12360738 | Jan 2009 | US |
Child | 13716702 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11411401 | Apr 2006 | US |
Child | 12360738 | US |