The present invention relates to a production of a general substrate of relaxed Si1-xGex-on-insulator (SGOI) for various electronics or optoelectronics applications, and the production of monocrystalline III-V or II-VI material-on-insulator substrate.
Relaxed Si1-xGex-on-insulator (SGOI) is a very promising technology as it combines the benefits of two advanced technologies: the conventional SOI technology and the disruptive SiGe technology. The SOI configuration offers various advantages associated with the insulating substrate, namely reduced parasitic capacitances, improved isolation, reduced short-channel-effect, etc. High mobility strained-Si, strained-Si1-xGex or strained-Ge MOS devices can be made on SGOI substrates.
Other III-V optoelectronic devices can also be integrated into the SGOI substrate by matching the lattice constants of III-V materials and the relaxed Si1-xGex. For example a GaAs layer can be grown on Si1-xGex-on-insulator where x is equal or close to 1. SGOI may serve as an ultimate platform for high speed, low power electronic and optoelectronic applications.
SGOI has been fabricated by several methods in the prior art. In one method, the separation by implantation of oxygen (SIMOX) technology is used to produce SGOI. High dose oxygen implant was used to bury high concentrations of oxygen in a Si1-xGex layer, which was then converted into a buried oxide (BOX) layer upon annealing at high temperature (for example, 1350° C.). See, for example, Mizuno et al. IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 230-232, 2000 and Ishilawa et al. Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 75, No. 7, pp. 983-985, 1999. One of the main drawbacks is the quality of the resulting Si1-xGex film and BOX. In addition, Ge segregation during high temperature anneal also limits the maximum Ge composition to a low value.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,461,243 and 5,759,898 describe a second method, in which a conventional silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrate was used as a compliant substrate. In the process, an initially strained Si1-xGex layer was deposited on a thin SOI substrate. Upon an anneal treatment, the strain was transferred to the thin silicon film underneath, resulting in relaxation of the top Si1-xGex film. The final structure is relaxed-SiGe/strained-Si/insulator, which is not an ideal SGOI structure. The silicon layer in the structure is unnecessary, and may complicate or undermine the performance of devices built on it. For example, it may form a parasitic back channel on this strained-Si, or may confine unwanted electrons due to the band gap offset between the strained-Si and SiGe layer.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,906,951 and 6,059,895 describe the formation of a similar SGOI structure: strained-layer(s)/relaxed-SiGe/Si/insulator structure. The structure was produced by wafer bonding and etch back process using a P++ layer as an etch stop. The presence of the silicon layer in the above structure may be for the purpose of facilitating Si-insulator wafer bonding, but is unnecessary for ideal SGOI substrates. Again, the silicon layer may also complicate or undermine the performance of devices built on it. For example, it may form a parasitic back channel on this strained-Si, or may confine unwanted electrons due to the band gap offset between the strained-Si and SiGe layer. Moreover, the etch stop of P++ in the above structure is not practical when the first graded Si1-yGey layer described in the patents has a y value of larger than 0.2. Experiments from research shows Si1-yGey with y larger than 0.2 is a very good etch stop for both KOH and TMAH, as described in a published PCT application WO 99/53539. Therefore, the KOH will not be able to remove the first graded Si1-yGey layer and the second relaxed SiGe layer as described in the patents.
Other attempts include re-crystallization of an amorphous Si1-xGex layer deposited on the top of SOI (silicon-on-insulator) substrate, which is again not an ideal SGOI substrate and the silicon layer is unnecessary, and may complicate or undermine the performance of devices built on it. Note Yeo et al. IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 161-163, 2000. The relaxation of the resultant SiGe film and quality of the resulting structure are main concerns.
From the above, there is a need for a simple technique for relaxed SGOI substrate production, a need for a technique for production of high quality SGOI and other III-V material-on-insulator, and a need for a technique for wide range of material transfer.
According to the invention, there is provided an improved technique for production of wide range of high quality material is provided. In particular, the production of relaxed Si1-xGex-on-insulator (SGOI) substrate or relaxed III-V or II-VI material-on-insulator, such as GaAs-on-insulator, is described. High quality monocrystalline relaxed SiGe layer, relaxed Ge layer, or other relaxed III-V material layer is grown on a silicon substrate using a graded Si1-xGex epitaxial growth technique. A thin film of the layer is transferred into an oxidized handle wafer by wafer bonding and wafer splitting using hydrogen ion implantation. The invention makes use of the graded Si1-xGex buffer structure, resulting in a simplified and improved process.
The invention also provides a method allowing a wide range of device materials to be integrated into the inexpensive silicon substrate. For example, it allows production of Si1-xGex-on-insulator with wide range of Ge concentration, and allows production of many III-V or II-VI materials on insulator like GaAs, AlAs, ZnSe and InGaP. The use of graded Si1-xGex buffer in the invention allows high quality materials with limited dislocation defects to be produced and transferred. In one example, SGOI is produced using a SiGe structure in which a region in the graded buffer can act as a natural etch stop.
The invention provides a process and method for producing monocrystalline semiconductor layers. In an exemplary embodiment, a graded Si1-xGex (x increases from 0 to y) is deposited on a first silicon substrate, followed by deposition of a relaxed Si1-y Gey layer, a thin strained Si1-zGez layer and another relaxed Si1-yGey layer. Hydrogen ions are then introduced into the strained Si1-zGez layer. The relaxed Si1-yGey layer is bonded to a second oxidized substrate. An annealing treatment splits the bonded pair at the strained Si layer, whereby the second relaxed Si1-yGey layer remains on said second substrate.
In another exemplary embodiment, a graded Si1-xGex is deposited on a first silicon substrate, where the Ge concentration x is increased from 0 to 1. Then a relaxed GaAs layer is deposited on the relaxed Ge buffer. As the lattice constant of GaAs is close to that of Ge, GaAs has high quality with limited dislocation defects. Hydrogen ions are introduced into the relaxed GaAs layer at the selected depth. The relaxed GaAs layer is bonded to a second oxidized substrate. An annealing treatment splits the bonded pair at the hydrogen ion rich layer, whereby the upper portion of relaxed GaAs layer remains on said second substrate.
An example of a process in which SGOI is created by layer transfer is described. The experiment was performed in two stages. In the first stage, heteroepitaxial SiGe layers are formed by a graded epitaxial growth technology. Starting with a 4-inch Si (100) donor wafer 100, a linearly stepwise compositionally graded Si1-xGex buffer 102 is deposited with CVD, by increasing Ge concentration from zero to 25%. Then a 2.5 μm relaxed Si0.75Ge0.25 cap layer 104 is deposited with the final Ge composition, as shown in FIG. 1A.
The relaxed SiGe cap layer has high quality with very low dislocation defect density (less than 1E6/cm2), as the graded buffer accommodates the lattice mismatch between Si and relaxed SiGe. A thin layer of this high quality SiGe will be transferred into the final SGOI structure. The surface of the as-grown relaxed SiGe layer shows a high roughness around 11 nm to 15 nm due to the underlying strain fields generated by misfit dislocations at the graded layer interfaces and thus chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) is used to smooth the surface. In the second stage, the donor wafer is implanted with hydrogen ion (100 keV, 5E16 H+/cm2) to form a buried hydrogen-rich layer. After a surface clean step in a modified RCA solution, it is bonded to an oxidized 106 Si handle wafer 108 at room temperature as shown in FIG. 1B.
The wafer bonding is one of the key steps, and the bonding energy should be strong enough in order to sustain the subsequent layer transfer in the next step. Good bonding requires a flat surface and a highly hydrophilic surface before bonding. On the other hand, the buried oxide in the final bonded structure is also required to have good electrical properties as it will influence the final device fabricated on it. In the conventional Si film transfer, thermal oxide on the donor wafer is commonly used before H+ implantation and wafer bonding, which becomes the buried oxide in the resulting silicon-on-insulator structure.
The thermal oxide of the Si donor wafer meets all the requirements, as it has good electrical properties, has flat surface and bonds very well to the handle wafer. Unlike the Si, however, the oxidation of SiGe film results in poor thermal oxide quality, and the Ge segregation during oxidation also degrades the SiGe film. Therefore the thermal oxide of SiGe is not suitable for the SGOI fabrication. In one exemplary experiment the SiGe film will be directly bonded to an oxidized Si handle wafer. The high quality thermal oxide in the handle wafer will become the buried oxide in the final SGOI structure.
Having a flat surface after a CMP step, the SiGe wafer went through a clean step. Compared to Si, one difficulty of SiGe film is that, SiGe surface becomes rougher during the standard RCA clean, as the NH4OH in RCA1 solution etches Ge faster than Si. Rough surface will lead to weak bonding as the contact area is reduced when bonded to the handle wafer. In this exemplary embodiment, H2SO4—H2O2 solution is used in the place of RCA1, which also meets the clean process requirement for the subsequent furnace annealing after bonding. The SiGe surface after H2SO4—H2O2 clean shows better surface roughness compared to RCA1.
After this modified clean procedure, the SiGe wafer is dipped in the diluted HF solution to remove the old native oxide. It is then rinsed in DI water thoroughly to make the surface hydrophilic by forming a fresh new native oxide layer that is highly active. After spinning dry, the SiGe wafer is bonded to an oxidized handle wafer at room temperature, and then annealed at 600° C. for 3 hours. During anneal the bonded pair split into two sheets along the buried hydrogen-rich layer, and a thin relaxed Si0.75Ge0.25 film 110 is transferred into the handle wafer, resulting in a SGOI substrate 112, as shown in
Bond strength is important to the process of the invention. AFM measurements were conducted to investigate the SiGe film surface roughness before bonding under different conditions. One experiment is designed to investigate how long the SiGe surface should be polished to have smooth surface and good bond strength, since the surface of the as-grown relaxed SiGe layer has a high roughness around 11 nm to 15 nm. Several identical 4-inch Si wafers with relaxed Si0.75Ge0.25 films were CMPed with optimized polishing conditions for different times. Using AFM, the measured surface mircoroughness RMS at an area of 10 μm×10 μm is 5.5 Å, 4.5Å and 3.8 Å, for wafer CMPed for 2 min., 4 min. and 6 min. respectively. After bonding to identical handle wafers, the tested bond strength increases with decreasing RMS. A CMP time of 6 min. is necessary for good strength.
In another experiment, two identical 4-inch Si wafers with relaxed Si0.75Ge0.25 films were CMPed for 8 min. After two cleaning steps in H2SO4:H2O2 solution and one step in diluted HF solution, one wafer was put in a new H2SO4:H2O2 (3:1) solution and another in a new NH4OH:H2O2:H2O (1:1:5), i.e. the conventional RCA1 solution, both for 15 min. The resultant wafers were tested using AFM. The wafer after H2SO4:H2O2 solution shows a surface roughness RMS of 2 Å at an area of 1 μm×1 μm, which after NH4OH:H2O2:H2O shows 4.4 Å. Clearly, the conventional RCA clean roughens the SiGe surface significantly, and H2SO4:H2O2 should be used for SiGe clean.
In yet another experiment, the clean procedure is optimized before bonding. For direct SiGe wafer to oxidized handle wafer bonding (SiGe-oxide bonding), several different clean procedures were tested. It has been found that the H2SO4:H2O2 (2˜4:1) solution followed by DI water rinse and spin dry gives good bond strength. Alternatively, one can also deposit an oxide layer on the SiGe wafer and then CMP the oxide layer. In this case SiGe/oxide is bonded to an oxidized handle wafer, i.e. oxide-oxide bonding. Among different clean procedures, it was found that NH4OH:H2O2:H2O clean and DI water rinse following by diluted HF, DI water rinse and spin dry gives very good bond strength.
During the wafer clean step prior to bonding, the standard RCA clean for the silicon surface is modified. Since the NH4OH in standard RCA1 solution etches Ge faster than Si, the SiGe surface will become rough, leading to a weak bond. A H2SO4—H2O2 solution is used in the place of RCA1, which also meets the clean process requirement for the subsequent furnace annealing after bonding. The SiGe surface after the H2SO4—H2O2 clean showed better surface roughness compared to RCA1. After the modified RCA clean, the wafers are then immersed in another fresh H2SO4—H2O2 solution for 10 to 20 min. H2SO4—H2O2 renders the SiGe surface hydrophilic. After a rinse in DI wafer and spin drying, the SiGe wafer is bonded to an oxidized handle wafer at room temperature immediately, and then annealed at 500˜600° C. for wafer splitting.
As a result, the upper portion of the graded Si1-xGex buffer layer 704 and the relaxed Si1-zGez layer 706 remains on the oxidized handle wafer 710. The remaining graded Si1-xGex buffer layer 704 is then selectively etched by either KOH or TMAH. KOH and TMAH etch Si1-xGex fast when x is less 0.2, but becomes very slow when x is larger than 0.2. Thus, the graded Si1-xGex buffer layer 704 can be etched selectively, leaving the relaxed Si1-zGez layer 706 on the insulating substrate 710 and forming a relaxed SGOI substrate. In this process, the thickness of the relaxed Si1-zGez film 706 on the final SGOI structure is defined by film growth, which is desired in some applications.
Since the strain makes the layer weaker, the crack propagates along this layer during separation. The separation can be accomplished by a variety of techniques, for example using a mechanical force or an anneal treatment at 500˜600° C. when the hydrogen is also introduced. See, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,033,974 and 6,184,111, both of which are incorporated herein by reference. As a result, the relaxed Si1-yGey layer 810 remains on the oxidized handle wafer, forming a relaxed SGOI substrate. The thickness of layers 806, 808, and 810, and the value z may also be chosen such that there are a good amount of dislocations present in the Si1-zGez layer 808 while the top Si1-yGey layer 810 remains relaxed and having high quality and limited dislocation defects.
These dislocation defects in the Si1-zGez layer 808 can then act as hydrogen trap centers during the subsequent step of introducing ions. The hydrogen ions may be introduced by various ways, such as ion implantation or ion diffusion or drift by means of electrolytic charging. The value of z may be chosen in such a way that the remaining Si1-zGez layer 808 can be etched selectively by KOH or TMAH. The layers 806 and 810 may also be some other materials, for example pure Ge, or some III-V materials, under the condition that the Ge concentration x in the graded Si1-xGex buffer layer 804 is increased from zero to 1.
After all the semiconductor-on-insulator substrate obtained by the approaches described above, various device layers can be further grown on the top. Before the regrowth, CMP maybe used to polish the surface.
Although the present invention has been shown and described with respect to several preferred embodiments thereof, various changes, omissions and additions to the form and detail thereof, may be made therein, without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/384,160, filed Mar. 7, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,737,670 that is a divisional of application Ser. No. 09/928,126, filed on Aug. 10, 2001, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,573,126 on Jun. 3, 2003, which claims priority from provisional application Ser. No. 60/225,666, filed Aug. 16, 2000, now expired, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4010045 | Ruehrwein | Mar 1977 | A |
4704302 | Bruel et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4710788 | Dämbkes et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4969031 | Kobayashi et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4987462 | Kim et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4990979 | Otto | Feb 1991 | A |
4997776 | Harame et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5013681 | Godbey et al. | May 1991 | A |
5091767 | Bean et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5155571 | Wang et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5166084 | Pfiester | Nov 1992 | A |
5177583 | Endo et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5202284 | Kamins et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5207864 | Bhat et al. | May 1993 | A |
5208182 | Narayan et al. | May 1993 | A |
5212110 | Pfiester et al. | May 1993 | A |
5221413 | Brasen et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5240876 | Gaul et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5241197 | Murakami et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5250445 | Bean et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5285086 | Fitzgerald | Feb 1994 | A |
5291439 | Kauffmann et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5298452 | Meyerson | Mar 1994 | A |
5310451 | Tejwani et al. | May 1994 | A |
5316958 | Meyerson | May 1994 | A |
5346848 | Grupen-Shemansky et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5374564 | Bruel | Dec 1994 | A |
5399522 | Ohori | Mar 1995 | A |
5413679 | Godbey | May 1995 | A |
5424243 | Takasaki | Jun 1995 | A |
5426069 | Selvakumar et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5426316 | Mohammad | Jun 1995 | A |
5439843 | Sakaguchi et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5442205 | Brasen et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5461243 | Ek et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5461250 | Burghartz et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5462883 | Dennard et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5476813 | Naruse | Dec 1995 | A |
5479033 | Baca et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5484664 | Kitahara et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5523243 | Mohammad | Jun 1996 | A |
5523592 | Nakagawa et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5534713 | Ismail et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5536361 | Kondo et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5540785 | Dennard et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5548128 | Soref et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5572043 | Shimizu et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5596527 | Tomioka et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5607876 | Biegelsen et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5617351 | Bertin et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5630905 | Lynch et al. | May 1997 | A |
5659187 | Legoues et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5683934 | Candelaria | Nov 1997 | A |
5698869 | Yoshimi et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5714777 | Ismail et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5728623 | Mori | Mar 1998 | A |
5739567 | Wong | Apr 1998 | A |
5759898 | Ek et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5777347 | Bartelink | Jul 1998 | A |
5786612 | Otani et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5786614 | Chuang et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5792679 | Nakato | Aug 1998 | A |
5808344 | Ismail et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5847419 | Imai et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5863830 | Bruel et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5877070 | Goesele et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5882987 | Srikrishnan | Mar 1999 | A |
5891769 | Hong et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5906708 | Robinson et al. | May 1999 | A |
5906951 | Chu et al. | May 1999 | A |
5912479 | Mori et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5923046 | Tezuka et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5943560 | Chang et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5963817 | Chu et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5966622 | Levine et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5993677 | Biasse et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5998807 | Lustig et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6013134 | Chu et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6013563 | Henley et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6020252 | Aspar et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6033974 | Henley et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6033995 | Muller | Mar 2000 | A |
6058044 | Sugiura et al. | May 2000 | A |
6059895 | Chu et al. | May 2000 | A |
6074919 | Gardner et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6096590 | Chan et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6103559 | Gardner et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6103597 | Aspar et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6103599 | Henley et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6107653 | Fitzgerald | Aug 2000 | A |
6111267 | Fischer et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117750 | Bensahel et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6130453 | Mei et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6133799 | Favors, Jr. et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6140687 | Shimomura et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6143636 | Forbes et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6153495 | Kub et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154475 | Soref et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6160303 | Fattaruso | Dec 2000 | A |
6162688 | Gardner et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6162705 | Henley et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6184111 | Henley et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190998 | Bruel et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191007 | Matsui et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191432 | Sugiyama et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6194722 | Fiorini et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6204529 | Lung et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6207977 | Augusto | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210988 | Howe et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218677 | Broekaert | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6225192 | Aspar et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6232138 | Fitzgerald et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6235567 | Huang | May 2001 | B1 |
6242324 | Kub et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249022 | Lin et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251751 | Chu et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251755 | Furukawa et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261929 | Gehrke et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266278 | Harari et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271551 | Schmitz et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6271726 | Fransis et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6290804 | Henley et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6291321 | Fitzgerald | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6303468 | Aspar et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6313016 | Kibbel et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6316301 | Kant | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6323108 | Kub et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6326667 | Sugiyama et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6329063 | Lo et al. | Dec 2001 | B2 |
6335546 | Tsuda et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6339232 | Takagi | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6344417 | Usenko | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6346459 | Usenko et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6350993 | Chu et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6352909 | Usenko | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6355493 | Usenko | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368733 | Nishinaga | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6368938 | Usenko | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6369438 | Sugiyama et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6372356 | Thornton et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6372593 | Hattori et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6372609 | Aga et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6387829 | Usenko et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6391740 | Cheung et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6399970 | Kubo et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6403975 | Brunner et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6407406 | Tezuka | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6410371 | Yu et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6425951 | Chu et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429061 | Rim | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445016 | An et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6448152 | Henley et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6455397 | Belford | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458672 | Henley et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6475072 | Canaperi et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6489639 | Hoke et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6514836 | Belford | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6515335 | Christiansen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6521041 | Wu et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6524935 | Canaperi et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6534381 | Cheung et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6555839 | Fitzgerald et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6573126 | Cheng et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6583015 | Fitzgerald et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6583437 | Mizuno et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6591321 | Arimilli et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6593191 | Fitzgerald | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6593625 | Christiansen et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6596610 | Kuwabara et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6597016 | Yuki et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6602613 | Fitzgerald | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6603156 | Rim | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6607948 | Sugiyama et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6624047 | Sakaguchi et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624478 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6632724 | Henley et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6635909 | Clark et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6645831 | Shaheen et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6646322 | Fitzgerald | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6649492 | Chu et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6656271 | Yonehara et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6664169 | Iwasaki et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6674150 | Takagi et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6677183 | Sakaguchi et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6677192 | Fitzgerald | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6680240 | Maszara | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6680260 | Akiyama et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6690043 | Usuda et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6703144 | Fitzgerald | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6703688 | Fitzgerald | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6706614 | An et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6706618 | Takisawa et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6707106 | Wristers et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6709903 | Christiansen et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6709909 | Mizuno et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6713326 | Cheng et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6737670 | Cheng et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6750130 | Fitzgerald | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6828214 | Notsu et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
20010003364 | Sugawara et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010007789 | Aspar et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020043660 | Yamazaki et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052084 | Fitzgerald | May 2002 | A1 |
20020084000 | Fitzgerald | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020096717 | Chu et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020100942 | Fitzgerald et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123167 | Fitzgerald | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020123183 | Fitzgerald | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020123197 | Fitzgerald et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020125471 | Fitzgerald et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020125497 | Fitzgerald | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020168864 | Cheng et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030003679 | Doyle et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030013305 | Sugii et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030013323 | Hammond et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030025131 | Lee et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030034529 | Fitzgerald et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030057439 | Fitzgerald | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030077867 | Fitzgerald | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030102498 | Braithwaite et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030119280 | Lee et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030127646 | Christiansen et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139000 | Bedell et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030157787 | Murthy et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030160300 | Takenaka et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030168654 | Cheng et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030178681 | Clark et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030189229 | Mouli | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199126 | Chu et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030201458 | Clark et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030203600 | Chu et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030207127 | Murthy et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030215990 | Fitzgerald et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030218189 | Christiansen et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030219957 | Kuwabara et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030227036 | Sugiyama et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030227057 | Lochtefeld et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030230778 | Park et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030232467 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040005740 | Lochtefeld et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040007724 | Murthy et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040009649 | Kub et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040012037 | Venkatesan et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040012075 | Bedell et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040014304 | Bhattacharyya | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040018699 | Boyd et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040031979 | Lochtefeld et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040031990 | Jin et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040041174 | Okihara | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040041210 | Mouli | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040048091 | Sato et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040048454 | Sakaguchi | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040051140 | Bhattacharyya | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040053477 | Ghyselen et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040075149 | Fitzgerald et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
41 01 167 | Jul 1992 | DE |
0 514 018 | Nov 1992 | EP |
0 587 520 | Mar 1994 | EP |
0 683 522 | Nov 1995 | EP |
0 828 296 | Mar 1998 | EP |
0 829 908 | Mar 1998 | EP |
0 838 858 | Apr 1998 | EP |
1 020 900 | Jul 2000 | EP |
1 174 928 | Jan 2002 | EP |
2 342 777 | Apr 2000 | GB |
61-141116 | Jun 1986 | JP |
2-210816 | Aug 1990 | JP |
3-036717 | Feb 1991 | JP |
4-307974 | Oct 1992 | JP |
5-166724 | Jul 1993 | JP |
6-177046 | Jun 1994 | JP |
6-244112 | Sep 1994 | JP |
7-106446 | Apr 1995 | JP |
7-240372 | Sep 1995 | JP |
409219524 | Aug 1997 | JP |
10-270685 | Oct 1998 | JP |
11-233744 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2000-31491 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2000-021783 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2001319935 | May 2000 | JP |
2002-076334 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002-164520 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2002-289533 | Oct 2002 | JP |
WO 9859365 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9953539 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 0048239 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0054338 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 01022482 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0154202 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0193338 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0199169 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0213262 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 0215244 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 0227783 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 0247168 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO 02071488 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 02071491 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 02071495 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 02082514 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 04006311 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 04006326 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 04006327 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 04019403 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 04019404 | Mar 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040173791 A1 | Sep 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60225666 | Aug 2000 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09928126 | Aug 2001 | US |
Child | 10384160 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10384160 | Mar 2003 | US |
Child | 10802185 | US |