PROCESS LIQUID COMPOSITION FOR LITHOGRAPHY AND PATTERN FORMING METHOD USING SAME

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20220251472
  • Publication Number
    20220251472
  • Date Filed
    June 24, 2020
    3 years ago
  • Date Published
    August 11, 2022
    a year ago
Abstract
Proposed is a process liquid composition for improving a lifting defect level of a photoresist pattern containing a surfactant and for reducing the number of defects of the photoresist pattern, the composition containing a surfactant and having a surface tension of 40 mN/m or less and a contact angle of 60° or smaller in the photoresist pattern having hydrophobicity represented by a contact angle of 70° or greater of water with respect to a photoresist surface in a photoresist pattern process.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a process liquid composition for alleviating a lifting defect level of a photoresist pattern and for reducing the number of defects of the photoresist pattern, the photoresist pattern having hydrophobicity represented by a contact angle of 70° or greater of water with respect to a photoresist surface in a photoresist pattern process, and to a method of forming a photoresist pattern using the process liquid composition.


BACKGROUND ART

Generally, a semiconductor is manufactured by a lithographic process in which exposure light is infrared light in a wavelength of 193 nm, 248 nm, 365 nm, or the like. There is intense competition among semiconductor manufacturers for reduction in a critical dimension (hereinafter referred to as a CD).


Accordingly, the finer pattern is to be formed, the narrower wavelength a light source needs to produce. At the present time, a lithographic technology using an extreme ultraviolet (EUV in a wavelength of 13.5 nm) is actively employed. A narrower wavelength may be realized using this lithographic technology.


However, the resistance of EUV photoresist to etching is not yet improved, and thus a photoresist pattern having a high aspect ratio still needs to be used. Accordingly, a pattern lifting defect occurs easily during development, and the number of defects is increased. Consequently, a process margin is greatly reduced in a manufacturing process.


To solve this problem, there is a demand to develop the technology for alleviating a level of a lifting defect that occurs while forming a fine pattern and for reducing the number of defects. The best way to alleviate a pattern lifting defect level and reduce the number of defects may be to improve photoresist performance. However, there is a need to consider a situation where, in practice, it is difficult to develop new photoresist having performance that is satisfactory in terms of all aspects.


There is still a need to develop new photoresist. However, attempts have been made to alleviate the pattern lifting defect level and reduce the number of defects in ways other than addressing this need.


DISCLOSURE
Technical Problem

An objective of the present invention is to develop a process liquid composition for alleviating a level of a pattern lifting defect and reducing the number of defects, the pattern lifting defect occurring after developing photoresist having hydrophobicity represented by a contact angle of 70° or greater of water with respect to a photoresist surface, and to develop a method of forming a photoresist pattern using the process liquid composition.


Technical Solution

Various surfactants are used to manufacture a water-based process liquid composition that is used during a developing process. However, according to the present invention, an effective process liquid composition was manufactured using a fluorine-based surfactant and a hydrocarbon-based anionic surfactant.


The use of a hydrocarbon-based non-ionic surfactant with a property like hydrophobicity in manufacturing the water-based process liquid composition in which ultra-pure water is mostly contained may lead to forming a hydrophobic sidewall of a photoresist and thus reducing pattern melting or collapse. However, in this case, the hydrocarbon-based non-ionic surfactants have a strong tendency to agglomerate, resulting in preventing a property of the process liquid composition from being uniform. Theretofore, there is a likelihood that the agglomerating hydrocarbon-based non-ionic surfactants will cause a defect while the process liquid composition is in use. That is, the use of the hydrocarbon-based non-ionic surfactant requires an increase in the usage amount thereof for reducing the pattern melting. Thus, there is a concern that photoresist will be damaged. In addition, the excessive use of an unsuitable surfactant for the purpose of reducing surface tension of the process liquid composition to reduce a capillary force may lead to the pattern melting and rather may further cause the pattern collapse.


In addition, in the case of a hydrocarbon-based cationic surfactant, an active group dissociates into a cation in an aqueous solution, and it is rarely ensured that metal is formed. Thus, there is a concern that a serious defect will be caused to occur in a lithographic process.


According to the present invention, it was verified that the use of the fluorine-based surfactant and the hydrocarbon-based anionic surfactant achieved the noticeable effect of alleviating the pattern lifting defect level and reducing the number of defects. The surface tension and the contact angle, which were much more decreased than in the hydrocarbon-based non-ionic surfactant, increased penetrability and spreadability, leading to contribution to formation of a fine pattern. It was recognized that this contribution resulted in the noticeable effect.


Tetramethylammonium hydroxide is diluted with pure water to a predetermined concentration (2.38% by weight of tetramethylammonium hydroxide is mixed with 97.62% by weight of water for use in most of the photolithographic developing processes) for use as a representative developing solution that is currently used in most of the photolithographic developing processes.


It was verified that a pattern lifting defect was caused in a case where, in a photolithographic process, a photoresist pattern having hydrophobicity represented by a contact angle of 70° or greater of water with respect to a photoresist surface was successively cleaned only with pure water after being developed. Furthermore, it was verified that, in the photolithographic process, the pattern collapse was also caused in a case where a process liquid composition resulting from tetramethylammonium hydroxide being contained in pure water was successively applied after developing or in a case where pure water was successively applied.


It could be estimated that the pattern collapse was caused because the process liquid composition containing tetramethylammonium hydroxide weakened the exposed fine pattern and because the capillary force was great and was non-uniform.


Therefore, in order to prevent the exposed-pattern collapse and to reduce the line width roughness (LWR) and the number of defects additionally required in a process, there is a need to conduct a study on an alkali substance that exerts a relatively weaker force on the exposed pattern than tetramethylammonium hydroxide.


According to the present invention, it was verified that, in a case where tetraethylammonium hydroxide, tetrapropylammonium hydroxide, and tetrabutylammonium hydroxide was used among alkali substances, not only was the pattern collapse prevented and the LWR, but the number of defects was also reduced.


According to a desirable first embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a process liquid composition for alleviating a level of a lifting defect of a photoresist pattern and for reducing the number of lifting defects of the photoresist pattern, the composition containing a surfactant and having a surface tension of 40 millinewton/meter (mN/m= 1/1000 newton/meter) or less and a contact angle of 60° or smaller in the photoresist pattern having hydrophobicity represented by a contact angle of 70° or greater of water with respect to a photoresist surface in a photoresist pattern process.


According to a more desirable second embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a process liquid composition for alleviating a level of a lifting defect of a photoresist pattern and for reducing the number of lifting defects of the photoresist pattern, the lifting defect occurring during photoresist developing, the process liquid composition containing: 0.00001 to 0.1% by weight of a fluorine-based surfactant; 0.0001 to 0.1% by weight of a hydrocarbon-based anionic surfactant; 0.0001 to 0.1% by weight of an alkali substance; and 99.7 to 99.99979% by weight of water.


According to the most desirable third embodiment of the prevent invention, there is a process liquid composition for alleviating a level of a lifting defect of a photoresist pattern and for reducing the number of lifting defects of the photoresist pattern, the lifting defect occurring during photoresist developing, the process liquid composition containing: 0.00001 to 0.1% by weight of a fluorine-based surfactant; 0.001 to 0.1% by weight of a hydrocarbon-based anionic surfactant; 0.001 to 0.1% by weight of an alkali substance; and 99.7 to 99.9979% by weight of water, the composition having a surface tension of 40 mN/m or less and a contact angle of 60° or smaller.


In the process liquid composition according to any one of the first to third embodiments, the fluorine-based surfactant may be selected from the group consisting of fluoroacryl carboxylate, fluoroalkyl ether, fluoroalkylene ether, fluoroalkyl sulfate, fluoroalkyl phosphate, fluoroacryl co-polymer, fluoro co-polymer, perfluorinated acid, perfluorinated carboxylate, perfluorianted sulfonate, and mixtures thereof.


In the process liquid composition according to any one of the second to third embodiments, wherein the hydrocarbon-based anionic surfactant may be selected from the group consisting of ammonium salt of polycarboxylic acid, sulfonate salt, sulfate ester salt, phosphoric acid ester salt, and mixtures thereof.


In the process liquid composition according to any one of the first to third embodiments, wherein the alkali substance may be selected from the group consisting of tetraethylammonium hydroxide, tetrapropylammonium hydroxide, tetrabutylammonium hydroxide, and mixtures thereof.


According to an aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of forming a photoresist pattern, the method including: (a) a step of dispensing photoresist on a semiconductor substrate and forming a photoresist film; (b) a step of exposing the photoresist film to light, developing the photoresist film, and forming a photoresist pattern; and (c) a step of cleaning the photoresist pattern with the process liquid composition.


It was thought that the pattern collapse was caused by the capillary force occurring between patterns when the patterns were cleaned with pure water after developing. However, it was experimentally recognized that only the reduction of the capillary force could neither completely prevent the pattern collapse nor reduce the number of the lifting defects.


The excessive use of the unsuitable surfactant for the purpose of reducing the surface tension of the process liquid composition to reduce the capillary force may lead to the pattern melting and rather may further cause the pattern collapse or increase the number of lifting defects.


In order to alleviate the level of the pattern lifting defect and reduce the number of the pattern lifting defects, it is important to select a surfactant that reduces the surface tension of the process liquid composition and at the same time prevents the melting of the photoresist pattern.


The process liquid composition according to the present invention exerts an enhancing effect on the photoresist and particularly achieves the effect of alleviating the level of the pattern lifting defect and the number of the pattern lifting defects, the pattern lifting defect occurring while developing photoresist having hydrophobicity represented by a contact angle of 70° or greater of water with respect to a photoresist surface.


Advantageous Effects

The process liquid composition according to the present invention achieves the effect of alleviating the level of the pattern lifting defect and the number of the pattern lifting defects, the effect that cannot be achieved only with photoresist when a pattern is formed using the photoresist having hydrophobicity represented by a contact angle of 70° or greater of water with respect to a photoresist surface. The photoresist forming method including the step of cleaning the photoresist pattern with the process liquid composition can achieve the effect of greatly reducing manufacturing cost.







BEST MODE

The present invention will be described in more detail below.


The present invention, which is the result of conducting much research over a long period of time, relates to a “process liquid composition for alleviating a lifting defect level of a photoresist pattern and reducing the number of defects of the photoresist, the process liquid composition containing: 0.00001 to 0.1% by weight of a fluorine-based surfactant selected from the group consisting of fluoroacryl carboxylate, fluoroalkyl ether, fluoroalkylene ether, fluoroalkyl sulfate, fluoroalkyl phosphate, fluoroacryl co-polymer), fluoro co-polymer, perfluorinated acid, perfluorinated carboxylate, perfluorianted sulfonate, and mixtures thereof; 0.0001 to 0.1% by weight of an anionic surfactant selected from the group consisting of ammonium salt of polycarboxylic acid, sulfonate salt, sulfate ester salt, phosphoric acid ester salt, and mixtures thereof; 0.0001 to 0.1% by weight of an alkali substance selected from the group consisting of tetraethylammonium hydroxide, tetrapropylammonium hydroxide, tetrabutylammonium hydroxide, and mixtures thereof; and 99.7 to 99.99979% by weight of water”. Composition components of the process liquid composition according to the present invention and a composition ratio between the components thereof were specified as shown in Embodiments 1 to 60. Composition components and a composition ratio that were in contrast with the above-mentioned composition components and composition ratio, respectively, were specified as shown in Comparative Examples 1 to 12.


Desired embodiments of the present invention and comparative examples for comparison therewith will be described below. However, the desired embodiments described below of the present invention are only exemplary, and the present invention is not limited thereto.


MODE FOR INVENTION
Embodiment 1

A process liquid composition for alleviating a collapse level of a photoresist pattern, which contains 0.001% by weight of fluoroacryl carboxylate, 0.01% by weight of ammonium salt of polycarboxylic acid, and 0.005% by weight of tetrabutylammonium hydroxide, was manufactured using the following method.


0.001% by weight of fluoroacryl carboxylate, 0.01% by weight of ammonium salt of polycarboxylic acid, and 0.005% by weight of tetrabutylammonium hydroxide were added into a remaining amount of distilled water and stirred for 5 hours. Then, the resulting liquid was caused to pass through a filter with a size of 0.01 μm to remove fine-sized soluble-solid impurities. In this manner, the process liquid composition for alleviating the collapse level of the photoresist pattern was manufactured.


Embodiments 2 to 60

Process liquid compositions for alleviating a defect level of a photoresist pattern that was the same as a defect level of a photoresist pattern in Embodiment 1 were manufactured according to composition components and component ratios therebetween that were specified as shown in Tables 1 to 12.


Comparative Example 1

Usually, distilled water that was to be used as a cleaning solution in the last process among semiconductor manufacturing processes was prepared.


Comparative Examples 2 to 12

For comparison with embodiments, process liquid compositions were manufactured, as in Embodiment 1, according to the composition components and the component ratios therebetween that were specified as shown in Tables 1 to 12.


Experimental Examples 1 to 60 and Comparative Experimental Examples 1 to 12

Measurements of pattern lifting defect levels and number-of-defects reduction ratios were performed on silicon wafers, patterns on which were formed in Embodiments 1 to 60 and Comparative Examples 1 to 12. The measurements are described as Experimental Examples 1 to 60 and Comparative Experimental Examples 1 to 12. The results of the measurements are shown in Table 13.


(1) Verification of Pattern Lifting Prevention


After exposure energy and focus were split, among a total of 89 blocks, the number of blocks in which a pattern did not collapse was measured using a critical dimension-scanning electron microscope (CD-SEM, manufactured by Hitachi, Ltd).


(2) Number-of-Lifting-Defects Reduction Ratio


Counting of the number A of defects was performed on a photoresist pattern that was rinsed with each process liquid composition sample, using surface defect observation equipment (manufactured by KLA-Tencor Corporation). A value of 100 was assigned to the number B of defects that resulted when the photoresist pattern was rinsed only with pure water. Then, the number A of defects was expressed as a ratio to the number B of defects, that is, as (AB)×100.


The number of defects that resulted when rinsing was performed only with pure water was defined as 100. The degree to which the number of defects was decreased (improved) or increased (degraded) when compared with the number of defects resulting from rinsing only with pure water was expressed as a reduction ratio.


(3) Transparency


Transparency of the manufactured process liquid composition was checked with the naked eye and was marked as a transparent or opaque process liquid composition.


(4) Surface Tension and Contact Angle


A surface tension and a contact angle of each of the process liquid compositions were measured using a surface tension measuring instrument [the K100 Force Tensiometer manufactured by KRÜSS GmbH] and a contact angle measuring instrument [the DSA-100 Drop Shape Analyzer manufactured by KRÜSS GmbH].














TABLE 1









Surfactant
Surfactant
Alkali substance
Distilled water

















Content

Content

Content

Content




(% by

(% by

(% by

(% by



Name
weight)
Name
weight)
Name
weight)
Name
weight)



















Embodiment 1
Fluoroacryl
0.001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9840



carboxylate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 2
Fluoroalkyl
0.001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9840



ether

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 3
Fluoroalkylene
0.001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9840



ether

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 4
Fluoroalkyl
0.001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9840



sulfate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 5
Fluoroalkyl
0.001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9840



phosphate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 6
Fluoroacryl
0.001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9840



co-polymer

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 7
Fluoro
0.001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9840



co-polymer

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 8
Perfluorinated
0.001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9840



acid

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 9
Perfluorinated
0.001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9840



carboxylate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 10
Perfluorianted
0.001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9840



sulfonate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Comparative






Distilled
100


Example 1






water


Comparative




Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9950


Example2




hydroxide

water





















TABLE 2









Surfactant
Surfactant
Alkali substance
Distilled water

















Content

Content

Content

Content




(% by

(% by

(% by

(% by



Name
weight)
Name
weight)
Name
weight)
Name
weight)



















Embodiment 11
Fluoroacryl
0.001
Sulfonate
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9840



carboxylate

salt

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 12
Fluoroalkyl
0.001
Sulfonate
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9840



ether

salt

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 13
Fluoroalkylene
0.001
Sulfonate
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9840



ether

salt

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 14
Fluoroalkyl
0.001
Sulfonate
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9840



sulfate

salt

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 15
Fluoroalkyl
0.001
Sulfonate
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9840



phosphate

salt

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 16
Fluoroacryl
0.001
Sulfonate
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9840



co-polymer

salt

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 17
Fluoro
0.001
Sulfonate
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9840



co-polymer

salt

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 18
Perfluorinated
0.001
Sulfonate
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9840



acid

salt

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 19
Perfluorinated
0.001
Sulfonate
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9840



carboxylate

salt

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 20
Perfluorianted
0.001
Sulfonate
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9840



sulfonate

salt

hydroxide

water





















TABLE 3









Surfactant
Surfactant
Alkali substance
Distilled water

















Content

Content

Content

Content




(% by

(% by

(% by

(% by



Name
weight)
Name
weight)
Name
weight)
Name
weight)



















Embodiment 21
Fluoroacryl
0.00001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.98499



carboxylate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 22
Fluoroacryl
0.0001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9849



carboxylate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 1
Fluoroacryl
0.001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9840



carboxylate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 23
Fluoroacryl
0.01
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9750



carboxylate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 24
Fluoroacryl
0.1
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.8850



carboxylate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Comparative
Fluoroacryl
1
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
98.9850


Example 3
carboxylate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water





















TABLE 4









Surfactant
Surfactant
Alkali substance
Distilled water

















Content

Content

Content

Content




(% by

(% by

(% by

(% by



Name
weight)
Name
weight)
Name
weight)
Name
weight)



















Embodiment 25
Fluoroalkyl
0.00001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.98499



ether

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 26
Fluoroalkyl
0.0001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9849



ether

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 2
Fluoroalkyl
0.001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9840



ether

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 27
Fluoroalkyl
0.01
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9750



ether

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 28
Fluoroalkyl
0.1
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.8850



ether

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Comparative
Fluoroalkyl
1
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
98.9850


Example 4
ether

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water





















TABLE 5









Surfactant
Surfactant
Alkali substance
Distilled water

















Content

Content

Content

Content




(% by

(% by

(% by

(% by



Name
weight)
Name
weight)
Name
weight)
Name
weight)



















Embodiment 29
Fluoroalkylene
0.00001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.98499



ether

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 30
Fluoroalkylene
0.0001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9849



ether

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 3
Fluoroalkylene
0.001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9840



ether

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 31
Fluoroalkylene
0.01
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9750



ether

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 32
Fluoroalkylene
0.1
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.8850



ether

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Comparative
Fluoroalkylene
1
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
98.9850


Example 5
ether

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water





















TABLE 6









Surfactant
Surfactant
Alkali substance
Distilled water

















Content

Content

Content

Content




(% by

(% by

(% by

(% by



Name
weight)
Name
weight)
Name
weight)
Name
weight)



















Embodimen 33
Fluoroalkyl
0.00001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.98499



sulfate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 34
Fluoroalkyl
0.0001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9849



sulfate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 4
Fluoroalkyl
0.001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9840



sulfate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 35
Fluoroalkyl
0.01
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9750



sulfate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 36
Fluoroalkyl
0.1
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.8850



sulfate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Comparative
Fluoroalkyl
1
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
98.9850


Example 6
sulfate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water





















TABLE 7









Surfactant
Surfactant
Alkali substance
Distilled water

















Content

Content

Content

Content




(% by

(% by

(% by

(% by



Name
weight)
Name
weight)
Name
weight)
Name
weight)



















Embodiment 37
Fluoroalkyl
0.00001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.98499



phosphate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 38
Fluoroalkyl
0.0001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9849



phosphate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 5
Fluoroalkyl
0.001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9840



phosphate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 39
Fluoroalkyl
0.01
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9750



phosphate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 40
Fluoroalkyl
0.1
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.8850



phosphate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Comparative
Fluoroalkyl
1
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
98.9850


Example 7
phosphate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water





















TABLE 8









Surfactant
Surfactant
Alkali substance
Distilled water

















Content

Content

Content

Content




(% by

(% by

(% by

(% by



Name
weight)
Name
weight)
Name
weight)
Name
weight)



















Embodiment 41
Fluoroacryl
0.00001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.98499



co-polymer

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 42
Fluoroacryl
0.0001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9849



co-polymer

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 6
Fluoroacryl
0.001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9840



co-polymer

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 43
Fluoroacryl
0.01
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9750



co-polymer

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 44
Fluoroacryl
0.1
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.8850



co-polymer

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Comparative
Fluoroacryl
1
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
98.9850


Example 8
co-polymer

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water





















TABLE 9









Surfactant
Surfactant
Alkali substance
Distilled water

















Content

Content

Content

Content




(% by

(% by

(% by

(% by



Name
weight)
Name
weight)
Name
weight)
Name
weight)



















Embodiment 45
Fluoro
0.00001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.98499



co-polymer

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 46
Fluoro
0.0001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9849



co-polymer

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 7
Fluoro
0.001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9840



co-polymer

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 47
Fluoro
0.01
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9750



co-polymer

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 48
Fluoro
0.1
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.8850



co-polymer

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Comparative
Fluoro
1
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
98.9850


Example 9
co-polymer

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water





















TABLE 10









Surfactant
Surfactant
Alkali substance
Distilled water

















Content

Content

Content

Content




(% by

(% by

(% by

(% by



Name
weight)
Name
weight)
Name
weight)
Name
weight)



















Embodiment 49
Perfluorinated
0.00001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.98499



acid

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 50
Perfluorinated
0.0001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9849



acid

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 8
Perfluorinated
0.001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9840



acid

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 51
Perfluorinated
0.01
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9750



acid

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 52
Perfluorinated
0.1
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.8850



acid

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Comparative
Perfluorinated
1
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
98.9850


Example 10
acid

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water





















TABLE 11









Surfactant
Surfactant
Alkali substance
Distilled water

















Content

Content

Content

Content




(% by

(% by

(% by

(% by



Name
weight)
Name
weight)
Name
weight)
Name
weight)



















Embodiment 53
Perfluorinated
0.00001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.98499



carboxylate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 54
Perfluorinated
0.0001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9849



carboxylate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 9
Perfluorinatrf
0.001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9840



carboxylate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 55
Perfluorinated
0.01
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9750



carboxylate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 56
Perfluorinated
0.1
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.8850



carboxylate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Comparative
Perfluorinated
1
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
98.9850


Example 11
carboxylate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water





















TABLE 12









Surfactant
Surfactant
Alkali substance
Distilled water

















Content

Content

Content

Content




(% by

(% by

(% by

(% by



Name
weight)
Name
weight)
Name
weight)
Name
weight)



















Embodiment 57
Perfluorianted
0.00001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.98499



sulfonate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 58
Perfluorianted
0.0001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9849



sulfonate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 10
Perfluorianted
0.001
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9840



sulfonate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 59
Perfluorianted
0.01
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.9750



sulfonate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Embodiment 60
Perfluorianted
0.1
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
99.8850



sulfonate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water


Comparative
Perfluorianted
1
Ammonium salt of
0.01
Tetrabutylammonium
0.005
Distilled
98.9850


Example 12
sulfonate

polycarboxylic acid

hydroxide

water









Experimental Examples 1 to 60 and Comparative Experimental Examples 1 to 12

Measurements of the pattern lifting defect level, the number-of-defects reduction ratio, the transparency, the contact angle, and the surface tension were performed on the silicon wafers, the patterns on which were formed in Embodiments 1 to 60 and Comparative Examples 1 to 12. The measurements are described as Experimental Examples 1 to 60 and Comparative Experimental Examples 1 to 12. The results of the measurements are shown in Table 13.


(1) Verification of Pattern Lifting Prevention


After exposure energy and focus were split, among a total of 89 blocks, the number of blocks in which a pattern dis not collapse was measured using the critical dimension-scanning electron microscope (CD-SEM, manufactured by Hitachi, Ltd).


(2) Number of Lifting Defects


Counting of the number A of defects was performed on a photoresist pattern that was rinsed with each process liquid composition sample, using the surface defect observation equipment (manufactured by KLA-Tencor Corporation). A value of 100 was assigned to the number B of defects that resulted when the photoresist pattern was rinsed only with pure water. Then, the number A of defects was expressed as a ratio to the number B of defects, that is, as (AB)×100.


(3) Transparency


Transparency of the manufactured process liquid composition was checked with the naked eye and was marked as a transparent or opaque process liquid composition.


(4) Contact Angle and Surface Tension


A surface tension and a contact angle of each of the process liquid compositions were measured using the contact angle measuring instrument [the DSA-100 Drop Shape Analyzer manufactured by KRÜSS GmbH] and the surface tension measuring instrument [the K100 Force Tensiometer manufactured by KRÜSS GmbH].















TABLE 13







The number
Number-






of blocks
of-defects



with no
reduction

Contact
Surface



lifting
ratio
Trans-
angle
tension



defects
(%)
parency
(°)
(mN/m)





















Experimental
80
25
transparent
49
22


Example 1


Experimental
78
30
transparent
55
25


Example 2


Experimental
78
35
transparent
52
22


Example 3


Experimental
77
35
transparent
57
23


Example 4


Experimental
77
40
transparent
56
23


Example 5


Experimental
75
55
transparent
57
26


Example 6


Experimental
72
62
transparent
58
30


Example 7


Experimental
73
60
transparent
52
29


Example 8


Experimental
76
55
transparent
54
27


Example 9


Experimental
75
48
transparent
53
25


Example 10


Experimental
77
30
transparent
50
22


Example 11


Experimental
78
38
transparent
55
28


Example 12


Experimental
78
42
transparent
53
24


Example 13


Experimental
77
44
transparent
58
27


Example 14


Experimental
76
58
transparent
56
26


Example 15


Experimental
76
64
transparent
58
30


Example 16


Experimental
71
74
transparent
59
33


Example 17


Experimental
72
59
transparent
53
32


Example 18


Experimental
74
61
transparent
54
29


Example 19


Experimental
74
52
transparent
54
28


Example 20


Experimental
64
44
transparent
60
39


Example 21


Experimental
70
38
transparent
55
29


Example 22


Experimental
77
28
transparent
42
19


Example 23


Experimental
76
30
transparent
36
15


Example 24


Experimental
58
50
transparent
59
40


Example 25


Experimental
65
36
transparent
57
33


Example 26


Experimental
75
32
transparent
52
22


Example 27


Experimental
74
33
transparent
49
19


Example 28


Experimental
60
55
transparent
59
37


Example 29


Experimental
68
42
transparent
56
28


Example 30


Experimental
75
38
transparent
49
19


Example 31


Experimental
73
39
transparent
45
16


Example 32


Experimental
61
52
transparent
60
36


Example 33


Experimental
67
44
transparent
58
30


Example 34


Experimental
74
37
transparent
54
21


Example 35


Experimental
73
38
transparent
50
17


Example 36


Experimental
60
60
transparent
59
37


Example 37


Experimental
65
49
transparent
57
31


Example 38


Experimental
73
42
transparent
54
20


Example 39


Experimental
73
44
transparent
52
17


Example 40


Experimental
59
77
transparent
60
38


Example 41


Experimental
67
65
transparent
58
32


Example 42


Experimental
71
58
transparent
55
23


Example 43


Experimental
70
60
transparent
53
20


Example 44


Experimental
52
80
transparent
60
40


Example 45


Experimental
60
69
transparent
60
34


Example 46


Experimental
68
64
transparent
56
27


Example 47


Experimental
66
65
transparent
55
24


Example 48


Experimental
61
82
transparent
57
38


Example 49


Experimental
69
73
transparent
55
35


Example 50


Experimental
72
62
transparent
50
24


Example 51


Experimental
71
65
transparent
48
20


Example 52


Experimental
63
68
transparent
58
39


Example 53


Experimental
70
62
transparent
56
33


Example 54


Experimental
74
55
transparent
51
23


Example 55


Experimental
73
56
transparent
50
22


Example 56


Experimental
61
57
transparent
60
38


Example 57


Experimental
68
50
transparent
55
29


Example 58


Experimental
72
49
transparent
50
20


Example 59


Experimental
71
50
transparent
48
18


Example 60


Comparative
46
100
transparent
89
70


Experimental


Example 1


Comparative
40
95
transparent
58
67


Experimental


Example 2


Comparative
58
150
transparent
35
14


Experimental


Example 3


Comparative
54
172
transparent
50
19


Experimental


Example 4


Comparative
52
184
transparent
44
16


Experimental


Example 5


Comparative
51
186
opaque
47
16


Experimental


Example 6


Comparative
50
180
opaque
49
16


Experimental


Example 7


Comparative
51
210
opaque
53
20


Experimental


Example 8


Comparative
50
235
opaque
54
22


Experimental


Example 9


Comparative
50
170
opaque
46
38


Experimental


Example 10


Comparative
52
168
opaque
49
21


Experimental


Example 11


Comparative
51
174
opaque
47
18


Experimental


Example 12









From the comparison of Experimental examples 1 to 60 with Comparative Experimental examples 1 to 12, it could be seen that, when the number of blocks in which a pattern did not collapse was 50 or greater and the number-of-defects reduction ratio was 90% or less, a more improved result were obtained than in Comparative Experimental Example 1.


It could be seen that the pattern lifting defect level was much more alleviated and the number of defects was much more reduced in Experimental Examples 1 to 60 than in Comparative Experimental Examples 1 to 12. The process liquid composition that was used in Experimental Examples 1 to 60 contained: 0.00001 to 0.1% by weight of a fluorine-based surfactant selected from among fluoroacryl carboxylate, fluoroalkyl ether, fluoroalkylene ether, fluoroalkyl sulfate, fluoroalkyl phosphate, fluoroacryl co-polymer, fluoro co-polymer, perfluorinated acid, perfluorinated carboxylate, and perfluorianted sulfonate; 0.0001 to 0.1% by weight of an anionic surfactant selected from among polycarboxylate salt, sulfonate salt, sulfate ester salt, and phosphoric acid ester salt; 0.0001 to 0.1% by weight of an alkali substance selected from among tetraethylammonium hydroxide, tetrapropylammonium hydroxide, and tetrabutylammonium hydroxide; and 99.7 to 99.99979% by weight of water.


In addition, it could be seen that, desirably, effects of alleviating the pattern lifting defect level and reducing the number of defects was much more increased in the experimental examples 1 to 60 than in Comparative Experimental Examples 1 to 12. The process liquid composition that was used in Experimental Examples 1 to 60 contained: 0.0001 to 0.1% by weight of a fluorine-based surfactant selected from among fluoroacryl carboxylate, fluoroalkyl ether, fluoroalkylene ether, fluoroalkyl sulfate, fluoroalkyl phosphate, fluoroacryl co-polymer, fluoro co-polymer, perfluorinated acid, perfluorinated carboxylate, and perfluorianted sulfonate; 0.001 to 0.1% by weight of a hydrocarbon-based anionic surfactant selected from among polycarboxylate salt, sulfonate salt, sulfate ester salt, and phosphoric acid ester salt; 0.001 to 0.1% by weight of an alkali substance selected from among tetraethylammonium hydroxide, tetrapropylammonium hydroxide, and tetrabutylammonium hydroxide; and 99.7 to 99.9979% by weight of water.


In addition, it could be seen that, more desirably, effects of alleviating the pattern lifting defect level and reducing the number of defects was much more increased in the experimental examples 1 to 60 than in Comparative Experimental Examples 1 to 12. The process liquid composition that was used in Experimental Examples 1 to 60 contained: 0.001 to 0.1% by weight of a fluorine-based surfactant selected from among fluoroacryl carboxylate, fluoroalkyl ether, fluoroalkylene ether, fluoroalkyl sulfate, fluoroalkyl phosphate, fluoroacryl co-polymer, fluoro co-polymer, perfluorinated acid, perfluorinated carboxylate, and perfluorianted sulfonate; 0.01 to 0.1% by weight of a hydrocarbon-based anionic surfactant selected from among polycarboxylate salt, sulfonate salt, sulfate ester salt, and phosphoric acid ester salt; 0.01 to 0.1% by weight of an alkali substance selected from among tetraethylammonium hydroxide, tetrapropylammonium hydroxide, and tetrabutylammonium hydroxide; and 99.7 to 99.979% by weight of water.


The result of measuring the collapse level of the photoresist pattern in Embodiment 1 for evaluation, was that the number of blocks in which the pattern did not collapse was 80.


The result of measuring the collapse level of the photoresist pattern in Comparative Experimental Example 1 for evaluation, was that the number of blocks in which the pattern did not collapse was 46.


The specific aspects of the present invention are described in detail above. It would be apparent to a person of ordinary skill in the art to which the present invention pertains that this specific description is only for the desired embodiments and do not impose any limitation on the scope of the present invention. Therefore, a substantial scope and a scope equivalent thereto must be defined by the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A process liquid composition for alleviating a lifting defect level of a photoresist pattern and for reducing the number of defects of the photoresist pattern, the composition containing a surfactant, and having a surface tension of 40 mN/m or less and a contact angle of 60° or smaller in the photoresist pattern having hydrophobicity represented by a contact angle of 70° or greater of water with respect to a photoresist surface in a photoresist pattern process.
  • 2. The process liquid composition of claim 1, comprising: 0.00001 to 0.1% by weight of a fluorine-based surfactant;0.0001 to 0.1% by weight of a hydrocarbon-based anionic surfactant;0.0001 to 0.1% by weight of an alkali substance; and99.7 to 99.99979% by weight of water.
  • 3. The process liquid composition of claim 2, comprising: 0.00001 to 0.1% by weight of a fluorine-based surfactant;0.001 to 0.1% by weight of a hydrocarbon-based anionic surfactant;0.001 to 0.1% by weight of an alkali substance; and99.7 to 99.9979% by weight of water.
  • 4. The process liquid composition of claim 3, wherein the fluorine-based surfactant is selected from the group consisting of fluoroacryl carboxylate, fluoroalkyl ether, fluoroalkylene ether, fluoroalkyl sulfate, fluoroalkyl phosphate, fluoroacryl co-polymer, fluoro co-polymer, perfluorinated acid, perfluorinated carboxylate, perfluorianted sulfonate, and mixtures thereof.
  • 5. The process liquid composition of claim 3, wherein the hydrocarbon-based anionic surfactant is selected from the group consisting of ammonium salt of polycarboxylic acid, sulfonate salt, sulfate ester salt, phosphoric acid ester salt, and mixtures thereof.
  • 6. The process liquid composition of claim 3, wherein the alkali substance is selected from the group consisting of tetraethylammonium hydroxide, tetrapropylammonium hydroxide, tetrabutylammonium hydroxide, and mixtures thereof.
  • 7. A method of forming a photoresist pattern, the method comprising: (a) dispensing photoresist on a semiconductor substrate and forming a photoresist film;(b) exposing the photoresist film to light, and developing the photoresist film to form a a photoresist pattern; and(c) cleaning the photoresist pattern with the process liquid composition of claim 1.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
10-2019-0086818 Jul 2019 KR national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/KR2020/008141 6/24/2020 WO