The present invention relates generally to photovoltaic materials and manufacturing method. More particularly, the present invention provides a method and apparatus for thin film thermal treatment. Embodiments of the invention include a method and apparatus for holding a plurality of extra large substrates for achieving substantially uniform substrate temperature during a thermal process to form a photovoltaic absorber material, but it would be recognized that the invention may be applied for other thin-film treatment applications.
From the beginning of time, mankind has been challenged to find ways of harnessing energy. Energy comes in forms such as petrochemical, hydroelectric, nuclear, wind, biomass, solar, and more primitive forms such as wood and coal. More recently, environmentally clean and renewable source energy has been desired. Clean and renewable sources of energy also include wind, waves, biomass, and the like. Still other types of clean energy include solar energy.
Solar energy technology generally converts electromagnetic radiation from the sun to other forms of energy. These other forms of energy include thermal energy and electrical power. For electrical power applications, solar cells are often used. Although solar energy is environmentally clean and has been successful to a point, many limitations remain before it becomes widely used throughout the world. As an example, one type of solar cell uses crystalline materials, which are derived from semiconductor material ingots. These crystalline materials can be used to fabricate optoelectronic devices that include photovoltaic and photodiode devices that convert electromagnetic radiation to electrical power. However, crystalline materials are often costly and difficult to make on a large scale. Additionally, devices made from such crystalline materials often have low energy conversion efficiencies. Other types of solar cells use “thin film” technology to form a thin film of photosensitive material to be used to convert electromagnetic radiation into electrical power. Similar limitations exist with the use of thin film technology in making solar cells. That is, efficiencies are often poor. Additionally, film reliability is often poor and cannot be used for extensive periods of time in conventional environmental applications. Often, thin films are difficult to mechanically integrate with each other. These and other limitations of these conventional technologies can be found throughout the present specification and more particularly below.
As an effort to improve thin film solar cell technology, processes of manufacturing an advanced CIS and/or CIGS based photovoltaic film stack on sized substrates with planar, tubular, cylindrical, circular or other shapes have been introduced. There are various manufacturing challenges in forming the photovoltaic film stack, such as maintaining structure integrity of substrate materials, controlling chemical compositions of the ingredients in one or more precursor layers, carrying out proper reactive thermal treatment of the one or more precursor layers within a desired gaseous environment, ensuring uniformity and granularity of the thin film material during reactive thermal treatment, etc. Especially, when manufacturing the thin film based solar cell on large sized substrate, temperature uniformity across whole substrate surface is desired. While conventional techniques in the past have addressed some of these issues, they are often inadequate in various situations. Therefore, it is desirable to have improved system and method for processing thin film photovoltaic devices on planar or non-planar shaped, fixed or flexible substrates.
This invention provides a method and apparatus for holding large substrates with precursor material for thermal treatment. The method and apparatus provide an improved loading configuration for a plurality of substrates during thermal processes for manufacture of thin film based photovoltaic devices.
This invention provides a method of holding a plurality of planar substrates for thermal treatment in a tube shaped furnace having a first end and a second end. The tube shaped furnace is surrounded by heaters for conducting a thermal treatment process. The first end has a door and the second end is insulated. The method further includes providing a boat fixture having a base frame coupled to a top frame. The base frame includes two length portions and a first width portion, a second width portion, and one or more middle members connected between the two length portions. A grooved rod is mounted respectively on the first width portion, the second width portion, and each of the one or more middle members. The substrates are placed in the boat fixture so that the grooves support spaced-apart planar substrates by a desired distance. The boat fixture is loaded via a rack fixture into the tube shaped furnace for the thermal treatment process.
The method includes a substrate arrangement where each substrate is inserted alone in one groove without a front/back phase configuration, and with a minimum spacing between any neighboring substrates at least equal to a desired value, e.g. about 1 inch.
In another embodiment, the loading configuration includes a substrate arrangement where each substrate is inserted alone in one groove with a front/back surface of any substrate directly faces another front/back surface of a neighboring substrate inserted in another groove at a desired spacing.
In yet another embodiment, the loading configuration includes replacing each first grooved rod on the base frame by a second grooved rod mounted on the first width portion, the second width portion, and each of the one or more middle members. Each second grooved rod includes a second plurality of grooves in a second spatial configuration.
In an alternative embodiment, the present invention provides an apparatus for holding one or more substrates for thermal treatment. The apparatus includes a frame fixture having a substantially rectangular prism shape including a base frame, a top frame, one or more side connection bars coupled the base frame and the top frame. The base frame has two width members and one or more middle joint members connected between two length members. The apparatus further includes a first grooved rod removably mounted on each of the two width members and each of the one or more middle joint members. Each first grooved rod includes a first plurality of grooves respectively configured to support a plurality of planar substrates in a first configuration. Additionally, the apparatus includes a first grooved bar removably mounted on each of two width members of the top frame. Each first grooved bar includes a second plurality of grooves respectively aligned with the first plurality of grooves for guiding the plurality of planar substrates. Furthermore, the apparatus includes a rack structure configured to be a mechanical support of the frame fixture in a loading position inside a furnace for subjecting the plurality of planar substrates in the first configuration to one or more reactive thermal treatment processes.
In yet another alternative embodiment, the present invention provides a method for processing substrates through thermal treatments with each of their temperature difference being controlled to within 15 degrees Celsius at least during a dwell stage between ramping up or down stages. Moreover, the furnace provides an enclosed volume for subjecting a precursor film containing at least copper and indium species overlying one surface of each substrate to a gaseous selenium or sulfur species to produce a photovoltaic absorber for solar cell.
The invention provide an apparatus for holding a plurality of planar substrates overlaid with photovoltaic precursor layers in a furnace tube. The furnace tube has heaters to supply heat energy in a controlled manner. The furnace can be filled with desired gaseous species including selenium and/or sulfur for a reactive thermal treatment of the precursor layer for manufacture of photovoltaic cells. In particular, the apparatus utilizes a quartz boat fixture having a rack fixture configured with a plurality of grooves for supporting large planar (rectangular or square in most cases) glass substrates. Some embodiments of the invention provide loading configurations of a plurality of planar substrates in the boat fixture by aligning them vertically, arranging the plurality of grooves with a proper size for each one, and disposing them with an optimum spacing between each other and in periodic groups, and others. In some embodiments, the loading configurations of the substrates in the quartz boat fixture allow an effective convection flow in between the planar substrates to transfer heat energy from hotter regions to cooler regions of the each substrate during the reactive thermal treatment process.
In a specific embodiment, the temperature across each substrate is maintained substantially uniform or at least the temperature difference is controlled to be smaller than a set value. In another specific embodiment, an alternative loading configuration includes two substrates being inserted in each groove in a back-to-back manner with respective precursor layer exposed at front surface. The precursor layer of one of the two planar substrates loaded in a first groove faces the precursor layer of one of two planar substrates loaded in a neighboring groove at a predetermined distance away from one side, while the precursor layer of another one of the two planar substrates in the first groove faces the precursor layer of one of two planar substrates loaded in a neighboring groove at the predetermined distance away from an opposite side. Therefore, the number of planar substrates loaded in the quartz boat fixture is increased compared to loading one substrate only to one groove without reducing the spacing between the subjected surfaces of neighboring substrates. In a specific embodiment, the predetermined distance between the neighboring substrates is associated with the furnace tube configuration, the dimension of the substrates, the gap distance between the loaded substrates and inner wall of the furnace tube, as well as the one or more thermal treatment processes. For example, the furnace is made as tube shape for facilitating gaseous convection flow therein. The furnace tube is made of quartz material which is semi-transparent to thermal radiation from several zoned heaters around tube with temperature control for different regions. Coolers also can be added for easily ramping furnace temperature down as desired in certain stages of the thermal treatment process.
The boat fixture 140 can hold a plurality of planar substrates 150 for thermal treatment within the furnace tube 100. For example, 40 or more numbers of planar rectangular shaped substrates can be held in the boat fixture 140 at one time. Each planar substrate can have a dimension of a few tens of centimeters in width and more than 100 centimeters in length. Glass substrates with 65 cm×165 cm rectangular shape are used for manufacture of thin-film photovoltaic cells. In certain applications, smaller sized substrates in dimensions of about 20 cm×20 cm, or 20 cm×50 cm, or other form factors, can be loaded with a slight modification of the loading configuration of the boat fixture. During the thermal treatment processes, a temperature uniformity of the substrate usually is a key process parameter. As a simple indicator of the temperature uniformity, a temperature difference across the substrate, i.e., ΔT=T1−T2 can be monitored, where T1 represents a temperature near bottom region of the substrate and T2 represents a temperature near top region of the substrate. Of course, more complete temperature mapping over a whole surface may be needed.
In an alternative embodiment as illustrated in
In a specific embodiment, the boat fixture 140 has a base frame 145 and a top frame 146, although only side view is shown in
Additionally,
As used herein, the “crescent” means a “shape produced when a circular disk has a segment of another circle removed from its edge, so that what remains is a shape enclosed by two circular arcs of different diameters which intersect at two points,” although there can be variations, modifications, and alternatives, according to one or more embodiments. For example, some descriptions or definitions can be found in public information website such as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crescent. As an example, the term can include one or more crescent shaped members, although there can also be partial crescent shaped members.
As used herein, “top”, “bottom”, “open”, “close”, have their plain meanings for illustrating the configuration used in the exemplary figures in the specification and should not be treated as a claimed limitation. Similarly, the terms “lower” and/or “upper” are to be interpreted by ordinary meaning, and do not have any specific reference regarding to the direction of gravity according to one or more embodiments. In some embodiments, the terms lower and/or upper can be reference to gravity, although there can be some general variations, modifications, and alternatives.
Referring to
In an embodiment, on each of the plurality of planar substrates one or more over layers has formed on a front surface through some thin-film processes. For example, a precursor layer including copper species, indium species, and/or indium-gallium species may be formed on the front surface of each substrate using a sputtering technique. The substrates are then loaded into the furnace tube for subjecting the precursor layer to subsequent thermal treatment. In an embodiment, the precursor layer can be reactively treated in a gaseous environment within the furnace tube containing selenide species, or sulfide species, and nitrogen species, etc. When the furnace tube temperature is ramped up the substrates are heated and so do the working gases within the furnace tube. The heated gaseous selenium species, which may flow around following internal convection flow, react with the copper-indium-gallium species in the precursor layer overlying the substrates. The thermal treatment process may include several steps for temperature ramping up, dwelling, and ramping down. As a result of the reactive process, the precursor layer is transformed to a photovoltaic film stack containing copper indium (gallium) diselenide (CIGS) compound, which can be served as an absorber layer of a thin-film photovoltaic cell. More detail descriptions about the thermal treatment process for forming the CIGS photovoltaic film stack of thin film solar cells can be found in U.S. Patent Application No. 61/178,459 titled “Method and System for Selenization in Fabricating CIGS/CIS Solar Cells” filed on May 14, 2009 by Robert Wieting, commonly assigned to Stion Corporation of San Jose and hereby incorporated by reference.
In another embodiment, each of the plurality of planar substrates is disposed into the quartz boat fixture 140 in a loading configurations. The loading configurations can be customized using a few grooved rods or bars mounted on a frame structure of the quartz boat fixture.
In an embodiment, the present invention provides a method for loading planar substrates in a predetermined configuration. Firstly, the method provides a plurality of equally spaced grooves. Secondly, the method provides inserting the planar substrates into the grooves with an increased spacing 215 between two neighboring planar substrates beyond that of two neighboring grooves by intentionally skipping one or more grooves. When the plurality of planar substrates in this loading configuration is subjected to a reactive thermal treatment within a gaseous environment inside the tube shaped furnace 200, the advantage of having a relative wide spacing 215 between two neighboring substrates is to have sufficient spatial room for vertical convection flow. In a specific embodiment with the substrates in vertical orientation, the hotter work gas within the furnace tube 200 is carried by the convection flow upwards while colder gas flows down along the substrate surfaces. Wider spacing between the planar substrates can facilitate the interflowing which helps to improve temperature uniformity of each loaded substrate, especially during quick temperature ramping up or down processes. For example, when the substrates are heated from relative low temperatures which are increased in a ramping-up process via the plurality of heaters (not shown) associated with the furnace tube 200, convection in between the substrates plays more important role in heat transfer than radiation. At higher temperatures radiation will dominate convection and major heat transfer within the substrate is not highly dependent on substrate spacing. In another example, the larger substrate spacing naturally reduces the total number of substrates loadable with a fixed dimension of the furnace tube 200. Therefore, substrate spacing may need to be optimized and pre-determined. Once a desired spacing between substrates is determined the corresponding grooves pattern can be built into the grooved bar or grooved rod just for installing onto the boat fixture for loading substrates in a desired configuration.
In alternative embodiments, other parameters affecting the effectiveness of heat transfer or subsequently the substrate temperature uniformity include time (or heater/cooler ramping rate) and thermal mass or total number of the loaded substrates. These parameters are also interrelated. For example, when total number of substrates is increased for seeking higher production yield, it actually demands a wider substrate spacing 215 for effective convection flow which ends up reducing the total number of substrates loadable. For the substrates with dimensions as large as 65×165 cm, high temperature difference (ΔT) can lead to warping and breaking of the substrate. A uniform temperature is desired for uniformity of thin-film process, precursor reactions, and of course, better performance of the devices. For example, a ΔT less than 15 degrees Celsius may be desired during dwell stage of the thermal treatment process while the ΔT may become as large as 100 degree Celsius during ramping up/down stage if the ramping rate is high. Therefore, one or more embodiments of the present invention include using a simulation model to determine a trend of changing the loading configuration and how it affect the temperature uniformity. In an embodiment, the model is scaled down from a real system by using a smaller substrate and furnace size in order to reduce the computation time. The substrates in the model are 20 cm×50 cm instead of the full size of 65 cm×165 cm. The substrate thickness and spacing are also correspondingly scaled, and totally only 16 substrates are fit in the model with their substrate spacing set at a range from 0.5 inches to several inches. The time scale is substantially reduced so that the ramp rates can be faster than the real system. The behavior trends of this model closely track those of the full size system, although absolute values of temperatures across the substrates may be off the true values from a real system. For example, the scaled system is simulated for the tube shaped furnace 200 loaded with a quartz boat 240 including the grooved rods 248 and grooved bars 249 having a specific groove configuration with a selected spacing. This simulation model can be used as a guide for the real system implementation and finally help to determine an optimized loading configuration for a specific number of substrates. In a specific implementation, a “Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)” software is used for analyzing the convection fluid flow and computing heat transfer response of a simulation model system based on the scaled structure parameters. In particular, a commercially available program named CFdesign™ by Blue Ridge Numerics, Inc. is applied by adjusting input parameters for system, materials, boundary, and initial conditions. Of course, other general purpose computational fluid dynamics simulation software may be used.
In a specific embodiment, the plurality of grooves is arranged in a periodic group in this alternative loading configuration. Each group includes at least a first groove and a second groove being disposed at a predetermined spacing away from the first groove. The spacing in between can be smaller, equal to, or greater than a size of a single groove. Each group is disposed to be physically next to its neighboring group so that the first groove of the group is next to a second groove of its neighboring group on one side and the second groove of the group is next to a first groove of its neighboring group on another side. Each groove is configured to let one substrate being inserted. For example, a substrate 311 is inserted in the first groove 351 of the first group and substrate 312 is inserted in the second groove 352 of the group with a spacing 315 away from the substrate 311. The spacing 315 is substantially determined by the spacing between the first groove 351 and second groove 352. In addition, the first groove 353 of a very next group is disposed physically next to the second groove of the first group. Arranged in periodic fashion, the second groove 354 of the very next group is also disposed at the spacing away from the first groove 353. Correspondingly, each groove of the very next group can be inserted in a substrate 313 (in groove 353), or a substrate 314 (in groove 354).
In another specific embodiment, the loading configuration described in
In a specific embodiment, each of the plurality of grooves 451 is configured to be able to fit in a pair of planar substrates in a back-to-back loading configuration. In a specific embodiment, the spacing is a single constant for all neighboring grooves, although it can be varied along the grooved rod or bar from its end to its middle. Again, in this configuration the substrate loading is performed with its front/back phase configured. Depending on embodiments, each substrate 411 can be a glass panel for manufacturing photovoltaic cells. In one implementation, the glass substrate has a front surface being covered by several films of materials including a precursor layer formed on top while leaving its back surface a bare glass. A plurality of these substrates is loaded in the furnace tube fixture 400 for subjecting the precursor layers to one or more reactive thermal treatment processes and forming a photovoltaic absorber. Therefore, only front surface of each planar substrate with the precursor layer on top needs to be exposed to ambient reactive gas within the furnace tube and the back side of the same substrate can be physically touched with another back side of another substrate, and both these two substrates can be inserted into a single groove (with a enlarged size). For example, substrate 411 and substrate 412 are inserted together in a back-to-back configuration into a first groove. A second groove is disposed a distance away from the first groove. The front side 1A of substrate 412 would be facing front side 2A of another one of two substrates that are inserted back-to-back together in the second groove. The groove-to-groove spacing is configured to be sufficiently large so that the substrate spacing 415 (i.e., 1A-2A spacing) is equal to or greater than a predetermined value. Because of the thermal process involves chemical reaction between solid phase film material (the precursor layer) on the substrates and gaseous phase material filled in the furnace tube, larger spacing between those vertically disposed substrates can facilitate convection flow in between during the reactive thermal treatment processes. This specific configuration minimizes the back-back spacing (substantially equal to zero) so that more spatial room is provided for increasing front-front spacing 415 between two substrates disposed in neighboring grooves and for loading more substrates in such a configuration.
In another specific embodiment, the loading configuration described in
The simulation results also include effects of geometric form factors of the system on the temperature distribution for each substrate 610. Although the absolute values may be off the real system, trends of changes associated with at least some system parameters including the furnace dimension/shape, substrate dimension, total number of loaded substrates (thermal mass), spacing between neighboring substrates, etc. can be determined. In a specific embodiment, a trend of change associated with the substrate spacing for a particular loading configuration shown in
This loading configuration takes advantage of the substrate samples with only single-side surface subjected to the reactive thermal treatment. According to embodiments of the present invention, the substrates 710 are glass substrates with front surface pre-coated by several thin-film materials including bottom electrode film and an exposed precursor film overlying the electrode film and the opposite back surface may be simply a bare glass. During reactive thermal treatment processes, only the precursor film needs to be exposed to work gases filled in the volume of the furnace 700. Therefore, placing the back surface of a planar substrate against another back surface of another planar substrate certainly will not affect the expected treatment of the precursor film on the front surface while allowing more room for adjusting the spacing between the front surfaces containing precursor films. In another embodiment, this loading configuration allows increasing the total number of loaded substrates without reducing the spacing between the precursor films on the front surfaces from a neighboring pair of substrates. As a result, the loading configuration helps to enhance system production yield because of more substrates can be loaded for treatment in one setting but still allows sufficient room for gaseous species to flow between the subjected precursor film surfaces and induce an effective thermal convection good for substrate temperature uniformity. Again this is modeled using a system with reduced dimension or total number of loaded substrates. Although the absolute values regarding the loading configuration and resulted temperature difference across each substrates may not match real system, a trend of change can be determined and provide guidance for optimizing processing parameters of actual system depending on one or more embodiments. Of course, there are many variations, alternatives, and modifications.
While the present invention has been described using specific embodiments, it should be understood that various changes, modifications, and variations to the method utilized in the present invention may be effected without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined in the appended claims. For example, the tubular shaped furnace is illustrated as an example. In addition to use an optimized loading configuration for the plurality of substrates, a carefully optimized heating/cooling supply system and heater/cooler configuration can also significantly improve temperature uniformity across the substrates as large as about 2 feet by 5 feet or greater for thin-film photovoltaic devices. Additionally, although the above embodiments described have been applied to reactive thermal treatment for forming CIS and/or CIGS photovoltaic film stack on the substrate, other thin-film based reactive thermal treatment processes certainly can also be benefited from the embodiments, without departing from the invention described by the claims herein. Depending on the embodiment, the present method can also be applied to silicon based photovoltaic devices.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/367,211, filed Jul. 23, 2010, commonly assigned, and hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety herein for all purpose.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3520732 | Nakayama et al. | Jul 1970 | A |
3828722 | Reuter et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3975211 | Shirland | Aug 1976 | A |
4062038 | Cuomo et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4204933 | Barlow et al. | May 1980 | A |
4213781 | Noreika et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4239553 | Barnett et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4263336 | Thompson et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4332974 | Fraas | Jun 1982 | A |
4335266 | Mickelsen et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4347436 | Fukuda et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4441113 | Madan | Apr 1984 | A |
4442310 | Carlson et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4461922 | Gay et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4465575 | Love et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4471155 | Mohr et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4499658 | Lewis | Feb 1985 | A |
4502225 | Lin | Mar 1985 | A |
4507181 | Nath et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4517403 | Morel et al. | May 1985 | A |
4518855 | Malak | May 1985 | A |
4542255 | Tanner et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4581108 | Kapur et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4589194 | Roy | May 1986 | A |
4598306 | Nath et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4599154 | Bender et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4611091 | Choudary et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4612411 | Wieting et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4623601 | Lewis et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4625070 | Berman et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4638111 | Gay | Jan 1987 | A |
4661370 | Tarrant | Apr 1987 | A |
4663495 | Berman et al. | May 1987 | A |
4705912 | Nakashima et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4724011 | Turner et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4727047 | Bozler et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4751149 | Vijayakumar et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4775425 | Guha et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4793283 | Sarkozy | Dec 1988 | A |
4798660 | Ermer et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4816082 | Guha et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4816420 | Bozler et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4865999 | Xi et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4873118 | Elias et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4915745 | Pollock et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4950615 | Basol et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4968354 | Nishiura et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4996108 | Divigalpitiya et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5008062 | Anderson et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5011565 | Dube et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5028274 | Basol et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5039353 | Schmitt | Aug 1991 | A |
5045409 | Eberspacher et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5069727 | Kouzuma et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5078803 | Pier et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5125984 | Kruehler et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5133809 | Sichanugrist et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5137835 | Karg | Aug 1992 | A |
5154777 | Blackmon et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5180686 | Banerjee et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5211824 | Knapp | May 1993 | A |
5217564 | Bozler et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5231047 | Ovshinsky et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5248345 | Sichanugrist et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5259883 | Yamabe et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5261968 | Jordan | Nov 1993 | A |
5298086 | Guha et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5336381 | Dalzell, Jr. et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5336623 | Sichanugrist et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5346853 | Guha et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5397401 | Toma et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5399504 | Ohsawa | Mar 1995 | A |
5421909 | Ishikawa et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5436204 | Albin et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5445847 | Wada et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5474939 | Pollock et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5482571 | Yamada et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5501744 | Albright et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5512107 | van den Berg | Apr 1996 | A |
5528397 | Zavracy et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5536333 | Foote et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5578103 | Araujo et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5578503 | Karg et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5589006 | Itoyama et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5622634 | Noma et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5626688 | Probst et al. | May 1997 | A |
5665175 | Safir | Sep 1997 | A |
5676766 | Probst et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5698496 | Fastnacht et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5726065 | Szlufcik et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5738731 | Shindo et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5855974 | Wu et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5858819 | Miyasaka | Jan 1999 | A |
5868869 | Albright et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5925228 | Panitz et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5948176 | Ramanathan et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5977476 | Guha et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5981868 | Kushiya et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5985691 | Basol et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6001744 | Doi | Dec 1999 | A |
6040521 | Kushiya et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6048442 | Kushiya et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6077722 | Jansen et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6092669 | Kushiya et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6107562 | Hashimoto et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6127202 | Kapur et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134049 | Spiller et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6160215 | Curtin | Dec 2000 | A |
6166319 | Matsuyama | Dec 2000 | A |
6169246 | Wu et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6172297 | Hezel et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6258620 | Morel et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6288325 | Jansen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6294274 | Kawazoe et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6307148 | Takeuchi et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310281 | Wendt et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6323417 | Gillespie et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328871 | Ding et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
RE37512 | Szlufcik et al. | Jan 2002 | E |
6335479 | Yamada et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6361718 | Shinmo et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6372538 | Wendt et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6380480 | Norimatsu et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6423565 | Barth et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6537845 | McCandless et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6632113 | Noma et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6635307 | Huang et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6653701 | Yamazaki et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6667492 | Kendall | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6690041 | Armstrong et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6692820 | Forrest et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6784492 | Morishita | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6852920 | Sager et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6878871 | Scher et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6974976 | Hollars | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7122398 | Pichler | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7179677 | Ramanathan et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7194197 | Wendt et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7220321 | Barth et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7235736 | Buller et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7252923 | Kobayashi | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7265037 | Yang et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7303788 | Kataoka et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7319190 | Tuttle | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7364808 | Sato et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7441413 | Bae et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7442413 | Zwaap et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7544884 | Hollars | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7576017 | Tuttle | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7736755 | Igarashi et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7741560 | Yonezawa | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7846750 | Boyer | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7855089 | Farris, III et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7863074 | Wieting | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7863518 | Terakawa et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7875945 | Krasnov et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7910399 | Wieting | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7955891 | Wieting | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7960204 | Lee | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7993954 | Wieting | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7993955 | Wieting | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7998762 | Lee et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8003430 | Lee | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8008110 | Lee | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8008111 | Lee | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8008112 | Lee | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8017860 | Lee | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8026122 | Lee | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8142521 | Wieting | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8168463 | Wieting | May 2012 | B2 |
8178370 | Lee et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8183066 | Lee et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8217261 | Wieting | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8263494 | Patterson | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8287942 | Huang et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
20020002992 | Kariya et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020004302 | Fukumoto | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020061361 | Nakahara | May 2002 | A1 |
20020063065 | Sonoda et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030075717 | Kondo et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030089899 | Lieber et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030188777 | Gaudiana et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030230338 | Menezes | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040063320 | Hollars | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040084080 | Sager et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040095658 | Buretea et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040110393 | Munzer et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040161539 | Miyakawa | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040187917 | Pichler | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040191949 | Iwata et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040191950 | Nakamura et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040245912 | Thurk et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040252488 | Thurk | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040256001 | Mitra et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050074915 | Tuttle et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050098205 | Roscheisen et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050109392 | Hollars | May 2005 | A1 |
20050164432 | Lieber et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050194036 | Basol | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050223570 | Yonezawa et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050287717 | Heald et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060034065 | Thurk | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060040103 | Whiteford et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060051505 | Kortshagen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060096536 | Tuttle | May 2006 | A1 |
20060096537 | Tuttle | May 2006 | A1 |
20060096635 | Tuttle | May 2006 | A1 |
20060102230 | Tuttle | May 2006 | A1 |
20060112983 | Parce et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060130890 | Hantschel et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060160261 | Sheats et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173113 | Yabuta et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060174932 | Usui et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060219288 | Tuttle | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060219547 | Tuttle | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060220059 | Satoh et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060249202 | Yoo et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060267054 | Martin et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070004078 | Alberts | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070006914 | Lee | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070089782 | Scheuten et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070116892 | Zwaap et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116893 | Zwaap et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070151596 | Nasuno et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070163643 | Van Duren et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070169810 | Van Duern et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070193623 | Krasnov | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070209700 | Yonezawa et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070243657 | Basol et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070264488 | Lee | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070283998 | Kuriyagawa et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070289624 | Kuriyagawa et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080029154 | Mishtein et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080032044 | Kuriyagawa et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080041446 | Wu et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080057616 | Robinson et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080092945 | Munteanu et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080092953 | Lee | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080092954 | Choi | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080105294 | Kushiya et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080110491 | Buller et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080110495 | Onodera et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080115827 | Woods et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080121264 | Chen et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080121277 | Robinson et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080204696 | Kamijima | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080210303 | Lu et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080216886 | Iwakura | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080280030 | Van Duren et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080283389 | Aoki | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090021157 | Kim et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090058295 | Auday et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090084438 | den Boer et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090087940 | Kushiya | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090087942 | Meyers | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090145746 | Hollars | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090217969 | Matsushima et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090223448 | Sakai et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234987 | Lee et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090235983 | Girt et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090235987 | Akhtar et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090293945 | Peter | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100081230 | Lee | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100087016 | Britt et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100087026 | Winkeler et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100087027 | Wieting | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100096007 | Mattmann et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100101648 | Morooka et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100101649 | Huignard et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100122726 | Lee | May 2010 | A1 |
20100197051 | Schlezinger et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100210064 | Hakuma et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100224247 | Bartholomeusz et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100233386 | Krause et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100258179 | Wieting | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100267189 | Yu et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100267190 | Hakuma et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100297798 | Adriani et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110018103 | Wieting | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110020980 | Wieting | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110070682 | Wieting | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110070683 | Wieting | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110070684 | Wieting | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110070685 | Wieting | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110070686 | Wieting | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110070687 | Wieting | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110070688 | Wieting | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110070689 | Wieting | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110070690 | Wieting | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071659 | Farris, III et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110073181 | Wieting | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110203634 | Wieting | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110212565 | Wieting | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110259395 | Wieting et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110259413 | Wieting et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110269260 | Buquing | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110277836 | Lee | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120003789 | Doering et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120018828 | Shao | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120094432 | Wieting | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120122304 | Wieting | May 2012 | A1 |
20120186975 | Lee et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120270341 | Lee et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
199878651 | Feb 1999 | AU |
200140599 | Aug 2001 | AU |
3314197 | Nov 1983 | DE |
10104726 | Aug 2002 | DE |
102005062977 | Sep 2007 | DE |
2646560 | Nov 1990 | FR |
2124826 | Feb 1984 | GB |
2000173969 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000219512 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2002167695 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2002270871 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002299670 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2004332043 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005311292 | Nov 2005 | JP |
0157932 | Aug 2001 | WO |
2005011002 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2006126598 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2007022221 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2007077171 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2008025326 | Mar 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Baumann, A., et al., Photovoltaic Technology Review, presentation Dec. 6, 2004, 18 pages. |
Chopra et al., “Thin-Film Solar Cells: An Overview”, 2004, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2004, vol. 12, pp. 69-92. |
Guillen C., “CuInS2 Thin Films Grown Sequentially from Binary Sulfides as Compared to Layers Evaporated Directly from the Elements”, Semiconductor Science and Technology, vol. 21, No. 5, May 2006, pp. 709-712. |
Huang et al., Photoluminescence and Electroluminescence of ZnS:Cu Nanocrystals in Polymeric Networks, Applied Physics, Lett. 70 (18), May 5, 1997, pp. 2335-2337. |
Huang et al., Preparation of ZnxCd1-xS Nanocomposites in Polymer Matrices and their Photophysical Properties, Langmuir 1998, 14, pp. 4342-4344. |
International Solar Electric Technology, Inc. (ISET) “Thin Film CIGS”, Retrieved from http://www.isetinc.com/cigs.html on Oct. 1, 2008, 4 pages. |
Kapur et al., “Fabrication of CIGS Solar Cells via Printing of Nanoparticle Precursor Inks”, DOE Solar Program Review Meeting 2004, DOE/GO-102005-2067, p. 135-136. |
Kapur et al., “Non-Vacuum Printing Process for CIGS Solar Cells on Rigid and Flexible Substrates”, 29th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conf., New Orleans, LA, IEEE, 2002, pp. 688-691. |
Kapur et al., “Non-Vacuum Processing of CIGS Solar Cells on Flexible Polymer Substrates”, Proceedings of the Third World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, Osaka, Japan, 2P-D3-43, 2003. |
Kapur et al., “Non-Vacuum Processing of CuIn1-xGaxSe2 Solar Cells on Rigid and Flexible Substrates using Nanoparticle Precursor Inks”, Thin Solid Films, 2003, vol. 431-432, pp. 53-57. |
Kapur et al., “Fabrication of Light Weight Flexible CIGS Solar Cells for Space Power Applications”, Materials Research Society, Proceedings vol. 668, (2001) pp. H3.5.1-H3.5.6. |
Kapur et al., “Nanoparticle Oxides Precursor Inks for Thin Film Copper Indium Gallium Selenide (CIGS) Solar Cells”, Materials Research Society Proceedings, vol. 668, (2001) pp. H2.6.1-H2.6.7. |
Mehta et al., “A graded diameter and oriented nanorod-thin film structure for solar cell application: a device proposal”, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 2005, vol. 85, pp. 107-113. |
Salvador, “Hole diffusion length in n-TiO2 single crystals and sintered electrodes: photoelectrochemical determination and comparative analysis,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 55, No. 8, pp. 2977-2985, Apr. 15, 1984. |
Srikant V., et al., “On the Optical Band Gap of Zinc Oxide”, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 83, No. 10, May 15, 1998, pp. 5447-5451. |
Yang et al., “Preparation, Characterization and Electroluminescence of ZnS Nanocrystals in a Polymer Matrix”, Journal Material Chem., 1997, vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 131-133. |
Yang et al., “Electroluminescence from ZnS/CdS Nanocrystals/Polymer Composite”, Synthetic Metals 1997, vol. 91, pp. 347-349. |
Yang et al., “Fabrication and Characteristics of ZnS Nanocrystals/Polymer Composite Doped with Tetraphenylbenzidine Single Layer Structure Light-emitting Diode”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 69, No. 3, Jul. 15, 1996, pp. 377-379. |
Ellmer et al., Copper Indium Disulfide Solar Cell Absorbers Prepared in a One-Step Process by Reactive Magnetron Sputtering from Copper and Indium Targets; Elsevier Science B.V; Thin Solid Films 413 (2002) pp. 92-97. |
Gordillo et al. “Electrical and morphological properties of low resistivity Mo thin films prepared by magnetron sputtering,” 9Brazilian Journal of Physics 36:982-985 (Sep. 2006). |
Grecu et al. “Spectroscopic Characterization of Chemical Bath Deposited Cadmium Sulphide Layers”, Journal of Optoelectronics and Advanced Matenals 6:127-132 (Mar. 2004). |
Onuma et al., Preparation and Characterization of CuInS Thin Films Solar Cells with Large Grain, Elsevier Science B.V; Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells 69 (2001) pp. 261-269. |
Palm et al. “Second generation CIS solar modules,” Solar Energy 77:757-765 (Dec. 2004). |
Scofield “Sodium diffusion, selenization, and microstructural effects associated with various molybdenum back contact layers for CIS-based solar cells” , Proceedings of the 24th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, pp. 164-167 (1995). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120021552 A1 | Jan 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61367211 | Jul 2010 | US |