PCT Request Form is filed concurrently with this specification as part of the present application. Each application that the present application claims benefit of or priority to as identified in the concurrently filed PCT Request Form is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety and for all purposes.
Patterning of thin films is often a critical step in the fabrication of micro- and nanoscale devices, such as in semiconductor processing for the fabrication of semiconductor devices. Patterning involves lithography. In conventional photolithography, such as 193 nm photolithography, patterns are printed by emitting photons from a photon source onto a mask and printing the pattern onto a photosensitive photoresist, thereby causing a chemical reaction in the photoresist that, after development, removes certain portions of the photoresist to form the pattern.
Advanced technology nodes (as defined by the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors) include nodes 22 nm, 16 nm, and beyond. In the 16 nm node, for example, the width of a typical via or line in a Damascene structure is typically no greater than about 30 nm. Scaling of features on advanced semiconductor integrated circuits (ICs) and other devices is driving lithography to improve resolution.
Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) lithography operates on a 30 nm scale with a different light source and photoresist materials. EUV lithography can cause two types of roughness in the photoresist: high frequency roughness caused by stochastic effects from secondary electrons, and low frequency roughness (also known as “wiggling.”) due to the interactions among the size, geometry and mechanical properties of the resist materials. Both types of roughness are undesirable.
Disclosed herein are methods and apparatuses for reducing roughness of an EUV resist. Roughness is reduced by decreasing the compressive stress of the resist layer. This may be done by depositing a conformal thin film that has a less compressive, or even tensile, stress than the resist. The resulting composite stress reduces the buckling and/or bulging, and thus decreases low frequency roughness.
In one aspect of the embodiments disclosed herein, a method of reducing the roughness of an EUV resist is provided, the method including: providing to a process chamber a substrate including a patterned EUV resist having a first stress level; and depositing on the patterned EUV resist a conformal thin film having a second stress level that is less compressive than the first stress level, such that a third stress level of the patterned EUV resist resulting from the depositing of the conformal thin film is less compressive than the first stress level.
In various implementations, the substrate is a semiconductor wafer including a partially fabricated semiconductor device. In some embodiments, the conformal thin film has a thickness of no more than 2 nm. In other embodiments, the conformal thin film has a thickness of about 1 nm.
In some implementations, the conformal thin film second stress level is tensile. In other implementations, the conformal thin film second stress level is compressive.
In various embodiments, the patterned EUV resist is characterized by a line roughness that is decreased after the depositing. In some embodiments, the line roughness comprises one or more of line edge roughness (LER) and line width roughness (LWR). In various implementations, the line roughness is a low frequency line roughness. In some implementations, the low frequency line roughness has a spatial frequency of less than 0.05 nm−1. In some embodiments, the line roughness is a high frequency line roughness. In various embodiments, the high frequency line roughness has a spatial frequency of greater than 0.05 nm−1.
In some implementations, the conformal thin film comprises a Si-based dielectric. In various implementations, the dielectric is SiO2. In certain implementations, conformal thin film is deposited by ALD. In some implementations, the ALD includes plasma enhanced ALD, wherein a cycle includes flowing an oxygen plasma with a power between 10 W and 2500 W and a duty cycle between 25% and 50%.
In some embodiments, the EUV resist includes a chemically amplified resist (CAR), an organo-metal, or an organometal oxide. In various embodiments, the organo-metal oxide is an organo-tin oxide.
In some implementations, the line edge roughness decreases by an amplitude of from about 0.1 to 1 nm4 (PSD). In certain implementations, the method also includes etching the substrate layer in the process chamber after the depositing of the conformal thin film.
In another aspect of the embodiments herein, an apparatus for processing substrates is provided, the apparatus including: one or more process chambers, each process chamber comprising a substrate support; one or more gas inlets into the process chambers and associated flow-control hardware; one or more substrate handlers; and a controller having at least one processor and a memory, wherein the at least one processor and the memory are communicatively connected with one another, the at least one processor is at least operatively connected with the one or more substrate handlers and the flow-control hardware, and the memory stores computer-executable instructions for controlling the at least one processor to at least control the one or more substrate handlers and the flow-control hardware to: provide to a process chamber a substrate including a patterned EUV resist disposed on a substrate layer to be etched, the patterned EUV resist having a first stress level; and deposit on the patterned EUV resist a conformal thin film having a second stress level that is less compressive than the first stress level, such that a third stress level of the patterned EUV resist resulting from the depositing of the conformal thin film is less compressive than the first stress level.
These and other features of the disclosed embodiments will be described in detail below with reference to the associated drawings.
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the presented embodiments. Embodiments disclosed herein may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well-known process operations have not been described in detail to not unnecessarily obscure the disclosed embodiments. Further, while the disclosed embodiments will be described in conjunction with specific embodiments, it will be understood that the specific embodiments are not intended to limit the disclosed embodiments.
Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) lithography finds use in semiconductor fabrication at the 30 nm and below technology nodes. Reducing (e.g., minimizing) roughness of the resist and the resulting etch can improve process yield and device performance at increasingly smaller critical dimensions. Roughness may be measured by line edge roughness (LER) and line width roughness (LWR) of the resist and the resulting etch. Reducing (e.g., minimizing) both LER and LWR can enhance the results of the EUV lithography etch process.
Roughness can have high and low frequency components, and these components can be represented using a power spectral density (PSD) curve.
EUV lithography resists post exposure have two general categories of roughness: low frequency and high frequency. High frequency roughness is characterized by short variations in the resist and may be caused by a variety of factors, including the secondary electron that is emitted inherently in the EUV lithography process. This is the area to the right on the PSD curve 402, at about 0.1 nm−1 or higher. Low frequency roughness is longer wavelength variation in the resist, and is shown on the left part of PSD curve 402, at about 0.01 nm−1 or lower. One cause of low frequency roughness is compressive stress within the resist. Compressive stress within the resist causes it to buckle and/or bulge, creating low frequency roughness, sometimes referred to as “wiggling.”
Some solutions to reducing resist roughness include plasma treatment, carbon based deposition, silicon-oxide based deposition, and etch by-product deposition. Each of these processes has various drawbacks. Plasma treatment may reduce roughness by reflowing the resist, but also reduces the resist height and selectivity. Carbon based deposition may cause clogging at the top of the mask, interfering with the etch process. Conventional silicon-oxide based deposition is selective at high aspect ratios, affecting the critical dimension and potentially causing line breakage or merging. Etch by-product may reduce selectivity of the etch process and prevent successful transfer of the resist pattern. In addition to the various drawbacks of each approach, all of them only address high frequency roughness.
An alternative approach to reduce roughness is reducing the compressive stress within the resist layer. This may be done by depositing a conformal thin film that has a less compressive, or even tensile, stress than the resist. The resulting composite stress reduces the buckling and/or bulging, and thus decreases low frequency roughness.
The conformal thin film may be deposited by a plasma enhanced atomic layer deposition (ALD) process. By modulating the O2 plasma during the ALD process the internal stress of the conformal thin film can be altered to be less compressive/more tensile. The resulting composite resist/oxide layer has a resulting composite stress that is less compressive, and has reduced buckling and/or bulging. The conformal thin film may be 1-2 nm thick in some embodiments while still improving low frequency roughness.
The patterned EUV resist layer may be made of a variety of materials. In some embodiments the patterned EUV resist layer may be made of organic or inorganic metal oxide-containing films, such as organotin oxides, such as are available from Inpria Corp., or traditional chemically amplified resists from Dow/Rohm, Fujifilm and Shin-Etsu Polymer. The patterned EUV resists may also comprise chemically amplified resists. The patterned EUV resist layer may be 30-40 nm thick, for example.
Referring to the chamber in which the semiconductor substrate is provided in operation 102, the chamber may be in a multi-chamber apparatus or a single-chamber apparatus. The semiconductor substrate may be a silicon wafer, e.g., a 200-mm wafer, a 300-mm wafer, or a 450-mm wafer, including wafers having one or more layers of material, such as dielectric, conducting, or semi-conducting material, deposited thereon. In some embodiments, the semiconductor substrate includes a blanket layer of silicon, such as amorphous silicon, or a blanket layer of germanium.
In some embodiments, the layers on the substrate may be patterned. Substrates may have “features” such as via or contact holes, which may be characterized by one or more of narrow and/or reentrant openings, constrictions within the feature, or high aspect ratios. The feature may be formed in one or more of the above described layers. One example of a feature is a hole or via in a semiconductor substrate or a layer on the substrate. Another example is a trench in a substrate or layer. In various embodiments, the feature may have an under-layer, such as a barrier layer or adhesion layer. Non-limiting examples of under-layers include dielectric layers and conducting layers, silicon oxides, silicon nitrides, silicon carbides, metal oxides, metal nitrides, metal carbides, and metal layers.
At operation 104 a conformal thin film is deposited onto the semiconductor substrate. The conformal thin film may comprise a variety of materials. In some embodiments the conformal thin film is silicon oxide. In other embodiments the conformal thin film may be silicon nitride. The conformal thin film may also be made of carbon based oxides. In various embodiments the conformal thin film is made of a material that will not be removed during a subsequent etch of the substrate. The conformal thin film may be less than 3 nm thick, less than 2 nm thick, 1-2 nm thick, or about 2 nm thick. The thickness is insufficient to adversely affect the critical dimension of the features being fabricated. By varying the conditions of the deposition, the conformal thin film can be designed to have different levels of internal stress. In some embodiments, the conformal thin film has an internal tensile stress. In other embodiments, the conformal thin film has a lower compressive stress than that of the patterned EUV resist.
In some embodiments the conformal thin film may be deposited by plasma enhanced ALD. Generally, ALD is a technique that deposits thin layers of material using sequential self-limiting reactions. ALD may be performed using any suitable technique. In various embodiments, ALD may be performed with plasma, or may be performed thermally. Also, operation 104 may be performed in cycles, i.e. referred to herein as an “ALD cycle.”
Referring to
The concept of an “ALD cycle” is relevant to the discussion of various embodiments herein. Generally an ALD cycle is the minimum set of operations used to perform a surface deposition reaction one time. The result of one cycle is production of at least a partial silicon-containing film layer on a substrate surface, such as the semiconductor substrate material of operation 104. Typically, an ALD cycle includes operations to deliver and adsorb at least one reactant to the substrate surface, and then react the adsorbed reactant with one or more reactants to form the partial layer of film. The cycle may include certain ancillary operations such as sweeping one of the reactants or byproducts and/or treating the partial film as deposited. Generally, a cycle contains one instance of a unique sequence of operations. As an example, an ALD cycle may include the following operations: (i) delivery/adsorption of a silicon-containing precursor, (ii) purging of silicon-containing precursor from the chamber, (iii) delivery of a second reactant (e.g., an oxidant) and a plasma, and (iv) purging of plasma from the chamber.
In accordance with this disclosure, mid-batch conditioning purging may be used at appropriate intervals between ALD cycles to increase batch sizes. According to various embodiments, the deposition/mid-bath conditioning purge cycles may be repeated throughout the batch until the maximum accumulation limit is reached.
In some embodiments, the films deposited by ALD may be highly conformal. Conformality of films may be measured by the step coverage. Step coverage may be calculated by comparing the average thickness of a deposited film on a bottom, sidewall, or top of a feature to the average thickness of a deposited film on a bottom, sidewall, or top of a feature. For example, step coverage may be calculated by dividing the average thickness of the deposited film on the sidewall by the average thickness of the deposited film at the top of the feature and multiplying it by 100 to obtain a percentage.
Unlike a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) technique, ALD processes use surface-mediated deposition reactions to deposit films on a layer-by-layer basis. In one example of an ALD process, a substrate surface, including a population of surface active sites, is exposed to a gas phase distribution of a first precursor, such as a silicon-containing precursor, in a dose provided to a process chamber housing the substrate. Molecules of this first precursor are adsorbed onto the substrate surface, including chemisorbed species and/or physisorbed molecules of the first precursor. It should be understood that when the compound is adsorbed onto the substrate surface as described herein, the adsorbed layer may include the compound as well as derivatives of the compound. For example, an adsorbed layer of a silicon-containing precursor may include the silicon-containing precursor as well as derivatives of the silicon-containing precursor. In certain embodiments, an ALD precursor dose partially saturates the substrate surface. In some embodiments, the dose phase of an ALD cycle concludes before precursor contacts the substrate to evenly saturate the surface. Typically, the precursor flow is turned off or diverted at this point, and only purge gas flows. By operating in this sub-saturation regime, the ALD process reduces the cycle titre and increases throughput. However, because precursor adsorption is not saturation limited, the adsorbed precursor concentration may vary slightly across the substrate surface. Examples of ALD processes operating in the sub-saturation regime are provided in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/061,587, filed Oct. 23, 2013, titled “SUB-SATURATED ATOMIC LAYER DEPOSITION AND CONFORMAL FILM DEPOSITION,” which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, After a first precursor dose, the reactor is then evacuated to remove any first precursor remaining in gas phase so that only the adsorbed species remain. A second reactant, such as an oxygen or nitrogen-containing gas, is introduced to the reactor so that some of these molecules react with the first precursor adsorbed on the surface. In some processes, the second precursor reacts immediately with the adsorbed first precursor. In other embodiments, the second precursor reacts only after a source of activation is applied temporally. The reactor may then be evacuated again to remove unbound second precursor molecules. Additional ALD cycles may be used to build film thickness.
In some implementations, the ALD methods include plasma activation, such as when the second reactant is delivered to a chamber. As described herein, the ALD method and apparatuses described herein may be conformal film deposition (CFD) methods, which are described generally in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/084,399 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,728,956), filed Apr. 11, 2011, and titled “PLASMA ACTIVATED CONFORMAL FILM DEPOSITION,” and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/084,305, filed Apr. 11, 2011, and titled “SILICON NITRIDE FILMS AND METHODS,” which are herein incorporated by reference in its entireties. Additional examples of ALD processes are described in Puurunen, “Surface chemistry of atomic layer deposition: for the trimethylaluminum/water process”, 97 J. Applied Physics 12301 (2005), which is herein incorporated by reference for the purpose of providing description for suitable ALD processes.
In some embodiments, a carrier gas, such as N2, Ar, Ne, He, and combinations thereof, may be continuously flowed. The carrier gas may be used as a purge gas. The inert gas may be provided to assist with pressure and/or temperature control of the process chamber, evaporation of a liquid reactant, more rapid delivery of the reactant and/or as a sweep gas for removing process gases from the process chamber and/or process chamber plumbing.
In an adsorption operation of an ALD cycle, the substrate may be exposed to a film precursor, such as silicon tetrachloride (SiCl4) or an aminosilane, to adsorb onto the substrate surface. In some embodiments, the film precursor may be a silicon-containing precursor. In some embodiments the film precursor is bis(tertiary-butyl-amino)silane (BTBAS). In some embodiments, the film precursor, such as SiCl4, may be adsorbed onto about 60% of the substrate surface. In various embodiments, when the film precursor is flowed to the chamber, the film precursor adsorbs onto active sites on the surface of the substrate, forming a thin layer of the film precursor on the surface. In various embodiments, this layer may be less than a monolayer.
After adsorption, the chamber may be optionally purged to remove excess precursor in gas phase that did not adsorb onto the surface of the substrate. Purging may involve a sweep gas, which may be a carrier gas used in other operations or a different gas. In some embodiments, purging may involve evacuating the chamber.
In a second reactant delivery operation of an ALD cycle, the substrate may be exposed to a second reactant and, optionally, a plasma. In various embodiments, the second reactant is oxygen (O2) or nitrogen (N2) or combinations thereof. In some embodiments where a silicon oxide layer is deposited, oxygen is used as the second reactant. In some embodiments, second reactant flow and the plasma are both turned on. In some embodiments, second reactant flow may be turned on prior to turning on the plasma to, for example, allow the second reactant flow to stabilize.
In some embodiments, the optional plasma is an in-situ plasma, such that the plasma is formed directly above the substrate surface in the chamber. In various embodiments, the plasma may be an inductively coupled plasma or a capacitively coupled plasma. An inductively coupled plasma may be set at a plasma between about 50 W and about 2000 W. In some embodiments, the plasma may be turned on and off according to duty cycles (DC), where the plasma power is cycled on and off. In some embodiments, the duty cycle could vary between 25% and 50%, meaning the plasma is turned on between 25% and 50% of the operation time. In some embodiments, a bias may be applied between about 0V and about 500V. During delivery of the second reactant, the film precursor, such as SiCl4, is turned off. The substrate may be exposed to the second reactant and the optional plasma for a duration that exceeds a time for plasma to interact with all precursors adsorbed on the substrate surface, forming a continuous film atop the substrate surface.
After the second reactant delivery operation, the chamber may be purged, such as by introducing a carrier or inert gas. Conditions for this operation may be any of those described above for purge processes.
In various embodiments, ALD cycles may be repeated. For example, operations for ALD may be performed for about 5 to about 70 cycles. Any suitable number of deposition cycles may be included to deposit a desired film thickness of the deposited film. In some embodiments, an ALD cycle may deposit about 1 Å per cycle. Depending on the exposure time of the operations, each cycle may deposit a film, such as a silicon oxide or silicon oxynitride film, having a thickness between about 0.05 Å and about 5 Å. In some embodiments, about two to about three cycles of ALD may be performed per minute. In some embodiments, more than about three cycles may be performed per minute, such as in chambers with inlets positioned to be closer to the substrate.
Returning to
Example process conditions for depositing a conformal thin film as shown in
In some embodiments conformal thin film 305 is silicon oxide deposited using plasma enhanced ALD. Alterations to the plasma enhanced ALD process can deposit a thin film that has varying levels of internal stress, from compressive to tensile. By depositing a thin film that has less compressive stress than the resist, the thin film counteracts the compressive stress of the resist and reduces the buckling and/or bulging that may occur, resulting in less low frequency roughness. In other embodiments a different dielectric material may be used, so long as it has a less compressive stress than the resist.
Chart 412 provides additional information related to graph 402. Rows 414-417 demonstrate the correlation between process conditions, internal thin film stress, and PSD values at a spatial frequency of 0.01 nm−1. Roughness with a spatial frequency of 0.01 nm−1 is considered a low frequency roughness, and thus lower PSD values at this spatial frequency generally correlate with reduced low frequency roughness. Row 414 correlates with line 404, showing data for the EUV resist without any conformal thin film, with a PSD value of 13.4 nm4. Row 415 correlates with line 405, showing data for a conformal thin film deposited on the EUV resist at 75 W 50% DC, which had an internal stress of +25 MPa (Positive numbers are tensile stress, while negative numbers denote compressive stress) and a resulting PSD value of 5.4 nm4, a 60% improvement over the PSD value of the EUV resist without the conformal thin film. Row 416 correlates with line 406, showing data for a conformal thin film deposited on the EUV resist at 300 W 50% DC, which had an internal stress of −25 MPa and a resulting PSD value of 8.12 nm4, a 40% improvement. Finally, row 417 correlates with line 407, showing data for a conformal thin film deposited on the EUV resist at 75 W 3% DC, which had an internal stress of −46 MPa and a PSD value of 11.5 nm4, marking a 14% improvement over the original PSD value of the EUV resist without a conformal thin film.
As is clear from the graph and chart, the EUV resist with a conformal thin film having the greatest tensile stress had the lowest PSD value, and therefore lowest LER. EUV resists without any conformal thin film or a conformal thin film with less tensile stress had larger PSD values, and hence greater LER.
Chart 612 provides additional information related to graph 602. Rows 614-617 provide stress, PSD values at a spatial frequency of 0.01 nm−1, and percentage improvement of the PSD value before etching, and percentage improvement of the PSD value after etching. Roughness with a spatial frequency of 0.01 nm−1 is considered a low frequency roughness, and thus lower PSD values at this spatial frequency generally correlate with reduced low frequency roughness. Row 614 shows data for the EUV resist layer without a conformal thin film and before etching. Row 615 shows data for the target layer after etching using an EUV resist layer without a conformal thin film. Row 616 shows data for a conformal thin film deposited on the EUV resist at 75 W 50% DC, which had an internal stress of +25 MPa (Positive number correlate to tensile stress, while negative numbers denote compressive stress). Finally, row 617 shows data for a conformal thin film deposited on the EUV resist at 75 W 3% DC, which had an internal stress of −46 MPa.
Columns 618 and 619 demonstrate the improvement from using a conformal thin film as disclosed herein. The values in column 618 represent the improvement in the PSD value of an EUV resist having a conformal thin film compared to an EUV resist without a conformal thin film. These numbers are the same as those shown in
As is clear from the graph and chart, EUV resists with conformal thin films having greater tensile stress had smaller PSD values, and therefore less LER, than EUV resists without a conformal thin film or conformal thin films with less tensile stress. The reduction in LER of the EUV resist can then be translated to the target layer during subsequent etch processes, reducing the LER and LWR of etched features.
Apparatus
The system includes a bias RF generator 720, which can be defined from one or more generators. If multiple generators are provided, different frequencies can be used to achieve various tuning characteristics. A bias match 718 is coupled between the RF generators 720 and a conductive plate of the assembly that defines the chuck 716. The chuck 716 also includes electrostatic electrodes to enable the chucking and dechucking of the wafer. Broadly, a filter and a DC clamp power supply can be provided. Other control systems for lifting the wafer off of the chuck 716 can also be provided.
A first gas injector 704 provides two different channels to inject two separate streams of process gases or liquid precursor (in vapor form) to the chamber from the top of the chamber. It should be appreciated that multiple gas supplies may be provided for supplying different gases to the chamber for various types of operations, such as process operations on wafers, waterless auto-cleaning (WAC) operations, and other operations. A second gas injector 710 provides another gas stream that enters the chamber through the side instead of from the top.
In the embodiment of
The various ways of injecting gases into the chamber have been described to illustrate that the etch gases and/or the liquid precursor can be provided into the chamber from various locations. In some cases, only the injector 704 is used. In other cases, only the side injector 710 is used. In other cases, both the injector 704 and the side injector 710 may be used. In one configuration, manifolds 722 control which gases are supplied to each of the three different gas lines. Manifolds 722 allow for any type of gas (reactant, tuning, precursor, etc.) to be provided to any of the three different gas lines. In some embodiments tuning gases can include gases such as oxygen (O2) or helium (He). The gases may be sent into the chamber without mixing, or be mixed with other gases before introduction into the chamber.
A vacuum pump 730 is connected to the chamber 732 to enable vacuum pressure control and removal of gaseous byproducts from the chamber during operational plasma processing. A valve 726 is disposed between exhaust 724 and the vacuum pump 730 to control the amount of vacuum suction being applied to the chamber.
The dielectric window 706 can be defined from a ceramic material or a ceramic-type material. Other dielectric materials are also possible, so long as they are capable of withstanding the conditions of a semiconductor etching chamber. Typically, chambers operate at elevated temperatures ranging between zero degrees Celsius and approximately 200 degrees Celsius. The temperature will depend on the etching process operation and specific recipe. The chamber 732 will also operate at vacuum conditions in the range of between about 1 mTorr (mT) and about 500 mTorr (mT). As used herein, the terms “about” and “approximately” mean that the specified parameter can be varied within a reasonable tolerance, e.g., ±20%.
Although not all specifically shown, chamber 732 is typically coupled to facilities when installed in either a clean room or a fabrication facility. Facilities include plumbing that provide, among other things, processing gases, vacuum, temperature control, and environmental particle control. These facilities are coupled to chamber 732, when installed in the target fabrication facility. Additionally, chamber 732 may be coupled to a transfer chamber that will enable robotics to transfer semiconductor wafers into and out of chamber 732 using automation.
A programmable controller 708 is provided for controlling the operation of the chamber 732 and its associated components. Broadly speaking, the controller 708 can be programmed to execute a chamber operation defined by a recipe. A given recipe may specify various parameters for the operation, such as the application of power to the TCP cads, the flow of gas into the chamber, and the application of vacuum. It should be appreciated that the timing, duration, magnitude, or any other adjustable parameter or controllable feature can be defined by a recipe and carried out by the controller to control the operation of the chamber 732 and its associated components. Additionally, a series of recipes may be programmed into the controller 708. In one embodiment, the recipe is configured to process etch operations and includes one or cycles of an atomic layer deposition (ALDr) process performed in between each of the etch operations.
As described above, one or more process stations may be included in a multi-station processing tool.
The depicted processing chamber 814 includes four process stations, numbered from 1 to 4 in the embodiment shown in
In some embodiments, system controller 850 controls all of the activities of process tool 800. System controller 850 executes system control software 858 stored in mass storage device 854, loaded into memory device 856, and executed on processor 852. Alternatively, the control logic may be hard coded in the controller 850. Applications Specific Integrated Circuits, Programmable Logic Devices (e.g., field-programmable gate arrays, or FPGAs) and the like may be used for these purposes. In the following discussion, wherever “software” or “code” is used, functionally comparable hard coded logic may be used in its place. System control software 858 may include instructions for controlling the timing, mixture of gases, gas flow rates, chamber and/or station pressure, chamber and/or station temperature, wafer temperature, target power levels, RF power levels, substrate pedestal, chuck and/or susceptor position, and other parameters of a particular process performed by process tool 800. System control software 858 may be configured in any suitable way. For example, various process tool component subroutines or control objects may be written to control operation of the process tool components used to carry out various process tool processes. System control software 858 may be coded in any suitable computer readable programming language.
In some embodiments, system control software 858 may include input/output control (IOC) sequencing instructions for controlling the various parameters described above. Other computer software and/or programs stored on mass storage device 854 and/or memory device 856 associated with system controller 850 may be employed in some embodiments. Examples of programs or sections of programs for this purpose include a substrate positioning program, a process gas control program, a pressure control program, a heater control program, and a plasma control program.
A substrate positioning program may include program code for process tool components that are used to load the substrate onto pedestal 818 and to control the spacing between the substrate and other parts of process tool 800.
A process gas control program may include code for controlling gas composition (e.g., silicon-containing gases, oxygen-containing gases, and purge gases as described herein) and flow rates and optionally for flowing gas into one or more process stations prior to deposition in order to stabilize the pressure in the process station. A pressure control program may include code for controlling the pressure in the process station by regulating, for example, a throttle valve in the exhaust system of the process station, a gas flow into the process station, etc.
A heater control program may include code for controlling the current to a heating unit that is used to heat the substrate. Alternatively, the heater control program may control delivery of a heat transfer gas (such as helium) to the substrate.
A plasma control program may include code for setting RF power levels applied to the process electrodes in one or more process stations in accordance with the embodiments herein.
A pressure control program may include code for maintaining the pressure in the reaction chamber in accordance with the embodiments herein.
In some embodiments, there may be a user interface associated with system controller 850. The user interface may include a display screen, graphical software displays of the apparatus and/or process conditions, and user input devices such as pointing devices, keyboards, touch screens, microphones, etc.
In some embodiments, parameters adjusted by system controller 850 may relate to process conditions. Non-limiting examples include process gas composition and flow rates, temperature, pressure, plasma conditions (such as RF bias power levels), etc. These parameters may be provided to the user in the form of a recipe, which may be entered utilizing the user interface.
Signals for monitoring the process may be provided by analog and/or digital input connections of system controller 850 from various process tool sensors. The signals for controlling the process may be output on the analog and digital output connections of process tool 800. Non-limiting examples of process tool sensors that may be monitored include mass flow controllers, pressure sensors (such as manometers), thermocouples, etc. Appropriately programmed feedback and control algorithms may be used with data from these sensors to maintain process conditions.
System controller 850 may provide program instructions for implementing the above-described deposition processes. The program instructions may control a variety of process parameters, such as DC power level, RF bias power level, pressure, temperature, etc. The instructions may control the parameters to operate in-situ deposition of film stacks according to various embodiments described herein.
The system controller 850 will typically include one or more memory devices and one or more processors configured to execute the instructions so that the apparatus will perform a method in accordance with disclosed embodiments. Machine-readable media containing instructions for controlling process operations in accordance with disclosed, embodiments may be coupled to the system controller 850.
In some implementations, the system controller 850 is part of a system, which may be part of the above-described examples. Such systems can include semiconductor processing equipment, including a processing tool or tools, chamber or chambers, a platform or platforms for processing, and/or specific processing components (a wafer pedestal, a gas flow system, etc.). These systems may be integrated with electronics for controlling their operation before, during, and after processing of a semiconductor water or substrate. The electronics may be referred to as the “controller,” which may control various components or subparts of the system or systems. The system controller 850, depending on the processing conditions and/or the type of system, may be programmed to control any of the processes disclosed herein, including the delivery of processing gases, temperature settings (e.g., heating and/or cooling), pressure settings, vacuum settings, power settings, radio frequency (RE) generator settings, RF matching circuit settings, frequency settings, flow rate settings, fluid delivery settings, positional and operation settings, wafer transfers into and out of a tool and other transfer tools and/or load locks connected to or interfaced with a specific system.
Broadly speaking, the system controller 850 refers to electronics having various integrated circuits, logic, memory, and/or software that receive instructions, issue instructions, control operation, enable cleaning operations, enable endpoint measurements, and the like. The integrated circuits may include chips in the form of firmware that store program instructions, digital signal processors (DSPs), chips defined as application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), and/or one or more microprocessors, or microcontrollers that execute program instructions (e.g., software). Program instructions may be instructions communicated to the system controller 850 in the form of various individual settings (or program files), defining operational parameters for carrying out a particular process on or for a semiconductor wafer or to a system. The operational parameters may, in some embodiments, be part of a recipe defined by process engineers to accomplish one or more processing steps during the fabrication of one or more layers, materials, metals, oxides, silicon, silicon dioxide, surfaces, circuits, and/or dies of a wafer.
The system controller 850, in some implementations, may be a part of or coupled to a computer that is integrated with, coupled to the system, otherwise networked to the system, or a combination thereof. For example, the system controller 850 may be in the “cloud” or all or a part of a fab host computer system, which can allow for remote access of the wafer processing. The computer may enable remote access to the system to monitor current progress of fabrication operations, examine a history of past fabrication operations, examine trends or performance metrics from a plurality of fabrication operations, to change parameters of current processing, to set processing steps to follow a current processing, or to start a new process. In some examples, a remote computer (e.g. a server) can provide process recipes to a system over a network, which may include a local network or the Internet. The remote computer may include a user interface that enables entry or programming of parameters and/or settings, which are then communicated to the system from the remote computer. In some examples, the system controller 850 receives instructions in the form of data, which specify parameters for each of the processing steps to be performed during one or more operations. It should be understood that the parameters may be specific to the type of process to be performed and the type of tool that the system controller 850 is configured to interface with or control. Thus as described above, the system controller 850 may be distributed, such as by including one or more discrete controllers that are networked together and working towards a common purpose, such as the processes and controls described herein. An example of a distributed, controller for such purposes would be one or more integrated circuits on a chamber in communication with one or more integrated circuits located remotely (such as at the platform level or as part of a remote computer) that combine to control a process on the chamber.
Without limitation, example systems may include a plasma etch chamber or module, a deposition chamber or module, a spin-rinse chamber or module, a metal plating chamber or module, a clean chamber or module, a bevel edge etch chamber or module, a physical vapor deposition (PVD) chamber or module, a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) chamber or module, an ALD chamber or module, an atomic layer clean (ALC) chamber or module, an ion implantation chamber or module, a track chamber or module, and any other semiconductor processing systems that may be associated or used in the fabrication and/or manufacturing of semiconductor wafers.
As noted above, depending on the process step or steps to be performed by the tool, the system controller 850 might communicate with one or more of other tool circuits or modules, other tool components, cluster tools, other tool interfaces, adjacent tools, neighboring tools, tools located throughout a factory, a main computer, another controller, or tools used in material transport that bring containers of wafers to and from tool locations and/or load ports in a semiconductor manufacturing factory.
An appropriate apparatus for performing the methods disclosed herein is further discussed and described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/084,399 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,728,956), filed Apr. 11, 2011, and titled “PLASMA ACTIVATED CONFORMAL FILM DEPOSITION”; and Ser. No. 13/084,305, filed Apr. 11, 2011, and titled “SILICON NITRIDE FILMS AND METHODS,” each of which is incorporated herein in its entireties.
The apparatus/process described herein may be used in conjunction with lithographic patterning tools or processes, for example, for the fabrication or manufacture of semiconductor devices, displays, LEDs, photovoltaic panels and the like. Typically, though not necessarily, such tools/processes will be used or conducted together in a common fabrication facility. Lithographic patterning of a film typically includes some or all of the following operations, each operation enabled with a number of possible tools: (1) application of photoresist on a workpiece, i.e., substrate, using a spin-on or spray-on tool; (2) curing of photoresist using a hot plate or furnace or UV curing tool; (3) exposing the photoresist to visible or UV or x-ray light with a tool such as a wafer stepper; (4) developing the resist so as to selectively remove resist and thereby pattern it using a tool such as a wet bench; (5) transferring the resist pattern into an underlying film or workpiece by using a dry or plasma-assisted etching tool; and (6) removing the resist using a tool such as an RF or microwave plasma resist stripper.
Although the foregoing embodiments have been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be apparent that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the appended claims. It should be noted that there are many alternative ways of implementing the processes, systems, and apparatus of the present embodiments. Accordingly, the present embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the embodiments are not to be limited to the details given herein.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2020/023146 | 3/17/2020 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2020/190941 | 9/24/2020 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3442648 | Smith et al. | May 1969 | A |
3513010 | Notley et al. | May 1970 | A |
3529963 | Marchese et al. | Sep 1970 | A |
3576755 | Patella et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
3720515 | Stanley | Mar 1973 | A |
4241165 | Hughes et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4328298 | Nester | May 1982 | A |
4341592 | Shortes et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4590149 | Nakane et al. | May 1986 | A |
4738748 | Kisa | Apr 1988 | A |
4806456 | Katoh | Feb 1989 | A |
4834834 | Ehrlich et al. | May 1989 | A |
4842989 | Taniguchi et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4845053 | Zajac | Jul 1989 | A |
4940854 | Debe | Jul 1990 | A |
5077085 | Schnur et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5322765 | Clecak et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5445988 | Schwalke | Aug 1995 | A |
5534312 | Hill et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5914278 | Boitnott et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5925494 | Horn | Jul 1999 | A |
5976993 | Ravi et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6017553 | Burrell et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6045877 | Gleason et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6162577 | Felter et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6179922 | Ishikawa et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6261938 | Beauvais et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6290779 | Saleh et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6348239 | Hill et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6444277 | Law et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6448097 | Singh et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6573030 | Fairbairn et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6607867 | Kim et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6797439 | Alpay | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6841341 | Fairbairn et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6841943 | Vahedi et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7169440 | Balasubramaniam et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7223526 | Fairbairn et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7307695 | Hazenberg et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7335462 | Fairbairn et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7608367 | Aigeldinger et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
8318575 | Lehnert et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8465903 | Weidman et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8536068 | Weidman et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8552334 | Tappan et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8664124 | Graff | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8664513 | Pfenninger et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8703386 | Bass et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8709551 | Fox et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8741394 | Haverkamp et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8808561 | Kanarik | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8883028 | Kanarik | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8883405 | Shiobara | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8895415 | Fox et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
9023731 | Ji et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9261784 | Wuister et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9310684 | Meyers et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9551924 | Burkhardt et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9576811 | Kanarik et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9632411 | Michaelson et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9778561 | Marks et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9823564 | Stowers et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9996004 | Smith et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10025179 | Meyers et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10228618 | Meyers et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10297440 | Yamazaki | May 2019 | B2 |
10416554 | Meyers et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10514598 | Marks et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10580585 | Snaith et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10627719 | Waller et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10642153 | Meyers et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10649328 | Stowers et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10732505 | Meyers et al. | Aug 2020 | B1 |
10775696 | Meyers et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10782610 | Stowers et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10787466 | Edson et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10796912 | Shamma et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10831096 | Marks et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
11209729 | Marks et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11257674 | Shamma et al. | Feb 2022 | B2 |
11314168 | Tan et al. | Apr 2022 | B2 |
11705332 | Kuo | Jul 2023 | B2 |
20010024769 | Donoghue et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020017243 | Pyo | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020180372 | Yamazaki | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030008246 | Cheng et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030183244 | Rossman | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040113087 | Ikeda et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040175631 | Crocker et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040191423 | Ruan et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040213563 | Irie | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050167617 | Derra et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050208389 | Ishibashi et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050253077 | Ikeda et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060001064 | Hill et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060068173 | Kajiyama et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060147818 | Lee | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060151462 | Lee et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060166537 | Thompson et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060172530 | Cheng et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060175558 | Bakker et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060287207 | Park et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070017386 | Kamei | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070037410 | Chang et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070074541 | Badding et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070117040 | Brock et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070181816 | Ikeda et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070212889 | Abatchev et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070287073 | Goodwin | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080070128 | Wu et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080157011 | Nagai et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090153826 | Sewell et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090197086 | Rathi et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090208880 | Nemani et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090239155 | Levinson et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090286402 | Xia | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090305174 | Shiobara et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090317742 | Toriumi et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090321707 | Metz et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090325387 | Chen et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100022078 | Rockenberger et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100131093 | Yokoyama et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100197135 | Ishizaka | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100266969 | Shiraishi et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100297847 | Cheng et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100304027 | Lee et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100310790 | Chang et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110059617 | Mitchell et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110104595 | Hayashi et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110117702 | Rietzler et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110198756 | Thenappan et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110201210 | Sato et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110209725 | Kim et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120068347 | Isobayashi et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120088193 | Weidman et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120088369 | Weidman et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120090547 | Wang et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120126358 | Arnold et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120142172 | Fox et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120193762 | Lin et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120202357 | Sato et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120208125 | Hatakeyama | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120223418 | Stowers et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120322011 | Wu et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130023124 | Nemani et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130109186 | Zhang | May 2013 | A1 |
20130129995 | Ouattara et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130157177 | Yu et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130177847 | Chatterjee et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130224652 | Bass et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130316518 | Hollister et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130330928 | Ishikawa et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130330932 | Rangarajan et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140014745 | Burrows et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140120688 | Booth, Jr. et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140134827 | Swaminathan et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140170563 | Hatakeyama | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140170853 | Shamma et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140175617 | Antonelli et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140193580 | Tiron et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140209015 | Yamada et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140220489 | Kozuma et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140239462 | Shamma et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140268082 | Michaelson et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140272726 | Chang | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140357064 | Fox et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150041809 | Arnold et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150056542 | Meyers et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150077733 | Huang et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150079393 | Freedman et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150125679 | Ishikawa | May 2015 | A1 |
20150132965 | Devilliers et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150152551 | Yamaguchi et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150170957 | Tsao | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150194343 | Chi et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150217330 | Haukka et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150221519 | Marks et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150243520 | Park | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150303064 | Singer et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150332922 | Chien et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160011505 | Stowers et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160011516 | Devilliers | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160035631 | Lee et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160086864 | Fischer et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160116839 | Meyers et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160118246 | Kang et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160135274 | Fischer et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160179005 | Shamma et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160216606 | Meyers et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160284559 | Kikuchi et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160293405 | Matsumoto et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160314964 | Tang et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160329206 | Kumar et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160357107 | Buchberger, Jr. et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160365248 | Mebarki et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160379824 | Wise et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170010535 | Fujitani et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170069462 | Kanarik et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170102612 | Meyers et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170146909 | Smith et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170154766 | Ogihara et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170162522 | Chang et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170168398 | Zi et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170176858 | Hirano | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170184961 | Nakagawa et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170192357 | Carcasi et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170261850 | Stowers et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180004083 | Marks et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180012759 | Smith et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180039172 | Stowers et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180039182 | Zi et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180046086 | Waller et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180061663 | Chandrashekar et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180082960 | Bellotti et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180122648 | Kim et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180151350 | Li | May 2018 | A1 |
20180166278 | Belyansky et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180224744 | Bae et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180233362 | Glodde et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180307137 | Meyers et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180308687 | Smith et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180314167 | Chang et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180337046 | Shamma et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180350879 | Sel et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180354804 | Venkatasubramanian et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190027357 | Girard et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190043731 | Bristol et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190094175 | Merriman et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190094685 | Marks et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190115206 | Kim | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190129307 | Kwon et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190137870 | Meyers et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190153001 | Cardineau et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190157066 | Zhou | May 2019 | A1 |
20190163056 | Maes et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190172714 | Bobek et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190187556 | Park et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190198338 | Kim et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190244809 | Ono | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190259601 | De Silva | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190308998 | Cardineau et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190315781 | Edson et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190315782 | Edson et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190332014 | Ookubo et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190333777 | Hsieh et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190341256 | Shankar | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190348292 | Dutta et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190352776 | Parikh | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190369489 | Meyers et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190391486 | Jiang et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190393035 | O'Meara | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200051781 | Fujimura et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200064733 | Meyers et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200066536 | Yaegashi | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200089104 | Marks et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200124970 | Kocsis et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200174374 | Liao et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200176246 | Huotari et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200209756 | Waller et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200239498 | Clark et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200241413 | Clark et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200257196 | Meyers et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200292937 | Stowers et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200393765 | Sakanishi | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210013034 | Wu et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210366792 | Fulford et al. | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20210397085 | Weidman et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20220013399 | Rondon et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220020584 | Volosskiy et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220035247 | Tan et al. | Feb 2022 | A1 |
20220043334 | Tan et al. | Feb 2022 | A1 |
20220075260 | Marks et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220122846 | Shamma et al. | Apr 2022 | A1 |
20220216050 | Yu et al. | Jul 2022 | A1 |
20220244645 | Tan et al. | Aug 2022 | A1 |
20220299877 | Weidman et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20220308454 | Weidman et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20220308462 | Berney et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20220342301 | Weidman et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20220344136 | Peter et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20220365434 | Nardi et al. | Nov 2022 | A1 |
20230031955 | Yu et al. | Feb 2023 | A1 |
20230045336 | Yu et al. | Feb 2023 | A1 |
20230107357 | Dictus et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230185196 | Weidman et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230259025 | Hansen et al. | Aug 2023 | A1 |
20230266662 | Marks et al. | Aug 2023 | A1 |
20230266664 | Hansen et al. | Aug 2023 | A1 |
20230266670 | Hansen et al. | Aug 2023 | A1 |
20230273516 | Marks et al. | Aug 2023 | A1 |
20230288798 | Hansen et al. | Sep 2023 | A1 |
20230314946 | Hansen et al. | Oct 2023 | A1 |
20230343593 | Nagabhirava et al. | Oct 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1904727 | Jan 2007 | CN |
102610516 | Jul 2012 | CN |
103119695 | May 2013 | CN |
103243310 | Aug 2013 | CN |
105579906 | May 2016 | CN |
106876251 | Jun 2017 | CN |
107611012 | Jan 2018 | CN |
108351586 | Jul 2018 | CN |
108351594 | Jul 2018 | CN |
108388079 | Aug 2018 | CN |
109521657 | Mar 2019 | CN |
109976097 | Jul 2019 | CN |
111258190 | Jun 2020 | CN |
1123423 | Aug 2007 | EP |
2256789 | Dec 2010 | EP |
2608247 | Jun 2013 | EP |
3230294 | Oct 2017 | EP |
3258317 | Dec 2017 | EP |
H07106224 | Apr 1995 | JP |
H08339950 | Dec 1996 | JP |
H10209133 | Aug 1998 | JP |
2003213001 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003532303 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2004006798 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2005504146 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2006253282 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2009192350 | Aug 2009 | JP |
2010016083 | Jan 2010 | JP |
2010016314 | Jan 2010 | JP |
2010531931 | Sep 2010 | JP |
2010239087 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2011520242 | Jul 2011 | JP |
2011529126 | Dec 2011 | JP |
2012142481 | Jul 2012 | JP |
2012173315 | Sep 2012 | JP |
2012185485 | Sep 2012 | JP |
5055743 | Oct 2012 | JP |
2013096011 | May 2013 | JP |
2013517600 | May 2013 | JP |
2013526061 | Jun 2013 | JP |
2013145874 | Jul 2013 | JP |
5544914 | Jul 2014 | JP |
2014521111 | Aug 2014 | JP |
5705103 | Apr 2015 | JP |
2015201622 | Nov 2015 | JP |
2016131238 | Jul 2016 | JP |
2016208027 | Dec 2016 | JP |
2017045869 | Mar 2017 | JP |
2017108053 | Jun 2017 | JP |
2018518688 | Jul 2018 | JP |
2019500490 | Jan 2019 | JP |
2019506730 | Mar 2019 | JP |
2019053305 | Apr 2019 | JP |
2019135755 | Aug 2019 | JP |
2019192814 | Oct 2019 | JP |
960000375 | Jan 1996 | KR |
100841495 | Jun 2008 | KR |
20090042059 | Apr 2009 | KR |
20130093038 | Aug 2013 | KR |
20140106442 | Sep 2014 | KR |
20170066225 | Jun 2017 | KR |
20180054917 | May 2018 | KR |
20190085654 | Jul 2019 | KR |
201224190 | Jun 2012 | TW |
I365354 | Jun 2012 | TW |
201241555 | Oct 2012 | TW |
I494689 | Aug 2015 | TW |
201729006 | Aug 2017 | TW |
201734025 | Oct 2017 | TW |
201907445 | Feb 2019 | TW |
WO-03029015 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO-2004095551 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO-2007123539 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2011081151 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO-2011087984 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO-2011137059 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO-2012048094 | Jul 2012 | WO |
WO-2013007442 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO-2014152023 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO-2016065120 | Apr 2016 | WO |
WO-2016144960 | Sep 2016 | WO |
WO-2017066319 | Apr 2017 | WO |
WO-2017109040 | Jun 2017 | WO |
WO-2017198418 | Nov 2017 | WO |
WO-2018004551 | Jan 2018 | WO |
WO-2018061670 | Apr 2018 | WO |
WO-2019163455 | Aug 2019 | WO |
WO-2019217749 | Nov 2019 | WO |
WO-2019222320 | Nov 2019 | WO |
WO-2019230462 | Dec 2019 | WO |
WO-2019241402 | Dec 2019 | WO |
WO-2020030855 | Feb 2020 | WO |
WO-2020102085 | May 2020 | WO |
WO-2020132281 | Jun 2020 | WO |
WO-2020223011 | Nov 2020 | WO |
WO-2020263750 | Dec 2020 | WO |
WO-2020264557 | Dec 2020 | WO |
WO-2021067632 | Apr 2021 | WO |
WO-2021072042 | Apr 2021 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Shestaeva et al. (“Mechanical, structural, and optical properties of PEALD metallic oxides for optical applications”, Applied Optics, vol. 56, No. 4, Feb. 1, 2017). (Year: 2017). |
Chinese First Office Action dated Jun. 26, 2018 issued in Application No. CN 201610300671.9. |
Chinese First Office Action dated May 24, 2017 issued in Application No. CN 201510053668.7. |
Chinese Second Office Action dated Feb. 28, 2018 issued in Application No. CN 201510053668.7. |
Coons et al., (2010) “Comparison of EUV spectral and ion emission features from laser-produced Sn and Li plasmas,” Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) Lithography, Proc. Of SPIE, 7636:763636-1 to 763636-7. |
Fan, Y. et al., (2016) “Benchmarking Study of EUV Resists for NXE:3300B,” Proc. of SPIE, 9776:97760W-1 to 97760W-11 [Downloaded From http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on Mar. 30, 2017]. |
FUJIFILM Corp., (Presentation) “Negative tone development process for double patterning,” 5th International Symposium on Immersion Lithography, Sep. 2008, Presentation Slides No. p. 1-p. 27. |
FUJIFILM Corp., (Safety Data Sheet) Name of Substance: n-Butyl acetate; Trade Name of Substance: FN-DP001 Ultra Pure Developer, Revision Date: Nov. 25, 2013, MSDS file: 16328_GB_EN_V2.0, pp. 1-9. |
Gangnaik, A.S. et al., (Jan. 12, 2017) “New Generation Electron Beam Resists: A Review,” Chem. Mater., 29:1898-1917. |
Gerritsen et al., (Apr. 1, 1986) “Laser-generated plasma as soft x-ray source,” J. Appl. Phys., 59(7):2337-2344. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 28, 2019 issued in Application No. PCT/US2018/032783. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 7, 2019 issued in Application No. PCT/US2018/028192. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 30, 2021 issued in Application No. PCT/US2020/023146. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 8, 2018 issued in Application No. PCT/US2018/028192. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 17, 2020 issued in Application No. PCT/US2020/023146. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 16, 2018 issued in Application No. PCT/US2018/032783. |
Japanese Decision to Grant dated Feb. 12, 2019 issued in Application No. JP 2015-016254. |
Japanese Decision to Grant dated May 3, 2021 issued in Application No. JP 2016-220096. |
Japanese First Office Action dated Oct. 30, 2018 issued in Application No. JP 2015-016254. |
Japanese First Office Action dated Sep. 15, 2020 issued in Application No. JP 2016- 220096. |
Korean Decision for Grant dated Sep. 2, 2021 issued in Application No. KR 10-2015-0015184. |
Korean First Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2020 issued in Application No. KR 10-2015-0015184. |
Korean Second Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2021 issued in Application No. KR 10-2015-0015184. |
McGinniss, Vincent D., (1978) “Light Sources,” Edited by: Pappas, S. Peter, UV Curing: Science and Technology; technology marketing corporation, 642 Westover Rd., Stamford, CT, USA; pp. 96-129. |
Rothschild, et al., “Liquid immersion lithography: Why, how, and when?” Journal Vacuum Science Technology, Nov./Dec. 2004, pp. 2877-2881. |
Santillan et al., “In Situ analysis of negative-tone resist pattern formation using organic-solvent-based developer process,” Applied Physics Express, vol. 7 (2014), pp. 016501-1-016501-4. [retrieved Sep. 20, 2017] URL: http:dx.doi.org/10.7567/APEX.7.016501. |
Spitzer et al., (Mar. 1, 1986) “Conversion efficiencies from laser-produced plasmas in the extreme ultraviolet regime,” J. Appl. Phys., 79(5):2251-2258. |
Stowers et al.; “Directly patterned inorganic hard mask for EUV lithography”; proceedings of the SPIE 7969; Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) Lithography 11, 796915-1-11 (Apr. 7, 2011), event: SPI E Advanced Lithography, 2011, San Jose California. |
Stulen, et al., “Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography” IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, vol. 35, No. 5, May 1999, pp. 694-699. |
Taiwanese First Office Action dated Aug. 10, 2020 issued in Application No. TW 105137362. |
Taiwanese First Office Action dated May 31, 2018 issued in Application No. TW 104103153. |
Taiwanese Second Office Action dated Nov. 18, 2020 issued in Application No. TW 105137362. |
TW First Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2021, in application No. TW20180116415 with English translation. |
US Final Office Action, dated Feb. 5, 2019 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/495,701. |
US Final Office Action, dated May 11, 2017, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/610,038. |
US Final Office Action, dated Sep. 10, 2018, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/691,659. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 25, 2018 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/948,109. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Aug. 22, 2017, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/610,038. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 28, 2020, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/206,959. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 10, 2020 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/979,340. |
US Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 23, 2014 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/907,742. |
US Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 16, 2014 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/907,742. |
US Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 15, 2021, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/691,508. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 19, 2019, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/691,659. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 30, 2021 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/008,095. |
US Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 9, 2021, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/691,508. |
US Office Action, dated Apr. 9, 2019, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/691,659. |
US Office Action, dated Aug. 9, 2018 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/495,701. |
US Office Action, dated Jan. 23, 2017, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/610,038. |
US Office Action, dated Mar. 18, 2021 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/008,095. |
US Office Action, dated Mar. 5, 2020, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/206,959. |
US Office Action dated May 14, 2021, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/691,508. |
US Office Action, dated May 21, 2018, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/691,659. |
US Office Action, dated Nov. 2, 2017, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/948,109. |
US Office Action dated Nov. 3, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/708,050. |
US Office Action, dated Nov. 6, 2019 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/979,340. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/593,371, inventors Zhou et al., filed Sep. 16, 2021. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/708,050, filed May 8, 2015, entitled “Methods of Modulating Residual Stress in Thin Films.” |
U.S. Supplemental Notice of Allowability dated Jan. 26, 2022, in U.S. Appl. No. 17/008,095. |
Wang, et al., “Lithography Simulation for the Fabrication of Silicon Photonic Devices with Deep-Ultraviolet Lithography” IEEE, (2012) pp. 288-290. |
Banerjee, D. et al., “Potential of Metal-Organic Frameworks for Separation of Xenon and Krypton”, Accounts of Chemical Research, 2015, vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 211-219. |
Cardineau, B. et al., “EUV Resists Based on Tin-oxo Clusters”, Advances in Patterning Materials and Processes XXXI, Proceedings Of Spie, Apr. 4, 2014, vol. 9051, pp. 335-346. |
CN Office Action dated Dec. 13, 2023 in CN Application No. 201810783756.6 with English translation. |
CN Office Action dated Jun. 1, 2023, in application No. CN201810783756 with English translation. |
CN Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2022 in Application No. CN202180002531.2 With English Translation. |
CN Office Action dated Mar. 31, 2023, in Application No. CN201880046648.9 with English translation. |
CN Office Action dated Nov. 16, 2022, in Application No. CN202180002531.2 with English translation. |
CN Office Action dated Nov. 18, 2022, in Application No. CN201810783756.6 with English translation. |
Dahuang, D., et al., Functional Thin Films and Their Deposition Preparation Techniques, Metallurgy Industrial Press, Jan. 31, 2013, pp. 450-454. [with English Translation]. |
Danilo D.E., et al., “Metal Containing Resist Readiness for HVM EUV Lithography”, Journal of Photopolymer Science and Technology, 2016, vol. 29(3), pp. 501-507. |
European Search Report dated Feb. 15, 2022, in Application No. EP21741104. |
European Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2022 in Application No. 21741104. |
Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 23, 2021, in Application No. EP19800353.5. |
Gross, R.A. et al., “Biodegradable Polymers for the Environment”, Science, Aug. 2, 2002, vol. 297, No. 5582, pp. 803-807. |
Hamley, I.W., “Nanostructure fabrication using block copolymers”, Nanotechnology. Sep. 17, 2003;14(10):R39-R54. |
Harrisson, S. et al., “RAFT Polymerization of Vinyl Esters: Synthesis and Applications”, Polymers, 2014, vol. 6, No. 5, pp. 1437-1488. |
Hench, L.L. and West, J.K., “The sol-gel process,” Chemical reviews, Jan. 1, 1990; 90(1) pp. 33-72. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Oct. 13, 2022, in PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/023493. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Oct. 13, 2022, in PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/025111. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 4, 2021, in PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/023493. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 20, 2021, in PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/025111. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 4, 2022, in Application No. PCT/US2021/058647. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 11, 2022 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2022/037733. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 8, 2020 in Application No. WO2020US38968. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 1, 2021 issued in Application No. PCT/US2019/067540. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 27, 2021 issued in Application No. PCT/US2019/060742. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 17, 2021 issued in Application No. PCT/US2021/015656. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Apr. 14, 2022 issued in Application No. PCT/US2020/053856. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Aug. 18, 2022 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/015656. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 27, 2021 in Application PCT/US2020/054730. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 5, 2023 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/034019. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 5, 2023 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/037924. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 19, 2023 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/040381. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 26, 2023 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/042103. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 26, 2023 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/042104. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 26, 2023 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/042106. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 26, 2023 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/042107. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 26, 2023 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/042108. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 6, 2022 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/038968. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 6, 2022 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/039615. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 6, 2022 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/070171. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 6, 2022 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/070172. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 6, 2022 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/070187. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 28, 2022 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/012953. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 11, 2021, for International Application No. PCT/US2020/028151. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 9, 2022, in PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/019245. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 12, 2021 issued in Application No. PCT/US2021/012953. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 10, 2020 issued in Application No. PCT/US2019/060742. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 24, 2020 issued in Application No. PCT/US2019/067540. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 22, 2019 issued in Application No. PCT/US2019/031618. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 27, 2021 issued in Application No. PCT/US2020/054730. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 31, 2020, in PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/028151. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 23, 2021 issued in Application No. PCT/US2020/053856. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 3, 2021, in PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/042108. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 4, 2021 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/042103. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 4, 2021 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/042106. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 4, 2021 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/042107. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 10, 2021, in PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/042104. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 13, 2021, in application No. PCT/US2021/037924. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 16, 2020 issued in Application No. PCT/US2020/039615. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 16, 2020 issued in Application No. PCT/US2020/070171. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 16, 2020 issued in Application No. PCT/US2020/070172. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 16, 2020 issued in Application No. PCT/US2020/070187. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 28, 2021 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/040381. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 8, 2020 issued in Application No. PCT/US2020/038968. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 15, 2021, in PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/034019. |
Joo, W. et al., “Synthesis of Unzipping Polyester and a Study of its Photochemistry”, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2019, vol. 141, No. 37, pp. 14736-14741. |
JP Office Action dated Jul. 26, 2022 in Application No. JP2021102822 With English translation. |
JP Office Action dated Nov. 15, 2022, in Application No. JP2021-176082 with English translation. |
JP Office Action dated Jun. 14, 2022, in Application No. JP20190563508 with English translation. |
JP Office Action dated Sep. 5, 2023 in Application No. JP2022-202758 with English Translation. |
Klepper, K.B. et al., “Atomic Layer Deposition of Organic-inorganic Hybrid Materials Based on Saturated Linear Carboxylic Acids”, Dalton Transactions, May 7, 2011, vol. 40, No. 17, pp. 4337-4748. |
KR Office Action dated Feb. 8, 2022, in Application No. KR10-2021-7030794 with English Translation. |
KR Office Action dated May 9, 2022, in Application No. KR1020217030794 with English translation. |
KR Office Action dated May 25, 2023, in application No. KR10-2019-7037210 with English translation. |
KR Prior Art Search Report dated Apr. 3, 2023, in application No. KR 10-2022-7029421 with English translation. |
Kwon, J., et al., “Substrate Selectivity of (tBu-Allyl)Co(C0)3 during Thermal Atomic Layer Deposition of Cobalt,” Chemistry of Materials, Mar. 27, 2012; 24(6): pp. 1025-1030. |
Lemaire, P.C., et al., “Understanding inherent substrate selectivity during atomic layer deposition: Effect of surface preparation, hydroxyl density, and metal oxide composition on nucleation mechanisms during tungsten ALD” The Journal of chemical physics, Feb. 7, 2017, 146(5):052811. |
Lu, Y., et al., “Continuous formation of supported cubic and hexagonal mesoporous films by sol-gel dip-coating” Nature, Sep. 1997, 389(6649), pp. 364-368. |
Mackus, A.J., et al. “The use of atomic layer deposition in advanced nanopatterning”, Nanoscale. Jul. 25, 2014; 6(19):10941-60. |
Mai, L. et al., “Atomic/molecular Layer Deposition of Hybrid Inorganic-organic Thin Films from Erbium Guanidinate Precursor”, Journal of Materials Science, 2017, vol. 52, No. 11, pp. 6216-6224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-0855-6. |
Meng, X., “An Overview of Molecular Layer Deposition for Organic and Organic-inorganic Hybrid Materials: Mechanisms, Growth Characteristics, and Promising Applications”, Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2017, vol. 5, pp. 18326-18378. |
Molloy, K. C., “Precursors for the Formation of Tin (IV) Oxide and Related Materials”, Journal of Chemical Research, 2008, vol. 2008, No. 10, pp. 549-554. |
Nazarov, D.V., et al., “Atomic layer deposition of tin dioxide nanofilms: A review”, Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. Jun. 1, 2015; 40(3):262-75. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 9, 2021 in U.S. Appl. No. 17/310,635. |
Rantala, et al., “New resist and underlayer approaches toward EUV lithography,” Proc. SPIE 10809, International Conference on Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography 2018, pp. 108090X-1-108090X-8. (Oct. 11, 2018). |
Sundberg, p et al., “Organic and Inorganic-organic Thin Film Structures by Molecular Layer Deposition: A Review”, Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology, 2014, vol. 5, pp. 1104-1136. |
TW Office Action dated Jan. 9, 2023 In Application No. TW20190116155 with English translation. |
TW Office Action dated Sep. 5, 2022, in Application No. TW110101388 with English translation. |
TW Office Action dated Sep. 8, 2022 in Application No. TW111123386 with English translation. |
TW Office Action dated Apr. 29, 2022 in Application No. TW110118172 with English translation. |
TW Office Action dated Aug. 9, 2023, in application No. TW109114280 with English Translation. |
TW Office Action dated Jan. 13, 2023, in Application No. TW110124741 with English translation. |
TW Office Action dated Jan. 19, 2023 in Application No. TW110141961 with English translation. |
TW Office Action dated Jul. 10, 2023 in Application No. TW109108753 with English Translation. |
TW Office Action dated Mar. 7, 2022, in Application No. TW110101388 with English translation. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated May 12, 2023 in U.S. Appl. No. 17/455,185. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Nov. 9, 2023 in U.S. Appl. No. 17/455,185. |
U.S. Non-Final office Action dated Feb. 7, 2023 in U.S. Appl. No. 17/455,185. |
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 3, 2023, in U.S. Appl. No. 17/594,744. |
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 20, 2023, in U.S. Appl. No. 18/297,989. |
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 20, 2023, in U.S. Appl. No. 18/298,003. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 22, 2022 in U.S. Appl. No. 17/310,635. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/905,754, inventors Kanakasabapathy et al., filed Sep. 6, 2022. |
U.S. Appl. No. 18/005,571 inventors Hansen et al., filed Jan. 13, 2023. |
U.S. Appl. No. 18/005,594, inventors Hansen et al., filed Jan. 13, 2023. |
U.S. Appl. No. 18/298,003, inventors Marks et al., filed Apr. 10, 2023. |
U.S. Restriction Requirement dated Nov. 14, 2022 in U.S. Appl. No. 17/455,185. |
U.S. Restriction requirement dated Aug. 4, 2023, in U.S. Appl. No. 18/297,989. |
U.S Restriction requirement dated Aug. 18, 2023 in U.S. Appl. No. 18/298,003. |
Xu, et al., “Underlayer designs to enhance the performance of EUV resists,” Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 7273, 2009, pp. 727311-1-727311-11. |
Yoon, K. et al., “Fabrication of a New Type of Organic-inorganic Hybrid Superlattice Films Combined With Titanium Oxide and Polydiacetylene”, Nanoscale Research Letters, Jan. 5, 2012, vol. 7, No. 71, 6 pages. |
Zhou, H. et al., “Molecular Layer Deposition of Functional Thin Films for Advanced Lithographic Patterning”, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2011, vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 505-511. |
CN Office Action dated Mar. 14, 2024 in CN Application No. 201810783756.6, with English Translation. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 10, 2024 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2024/013598. |
JP Office Action dated Mar. 12, 2024 in JP Application No. 2022-202758, with English Translation. |
KR Office Action dated Apr. 23, 2024 in KR Application No. 10-2016-0152489 with English translation. |
U.S. Advisory Action dated May 7, 2024 in U.S. Appl. No. 18/298,003. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Feb. 27, 2024 in U.S. Appl. No. 18/298,003. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated May 3, 2024 in U.S. Appl. No. 18/297,989. |
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated May 29, 2024 in U.S. Appl. No. 18/298,003. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 27, 2024 in U.S. Appl. No. 17/594,744. |
CN Office Action dated Jul. 23, 2024 in CN Application No. 201810783756.6 with English translation. |
CN Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2024 in CN Application No. 202080032750 with English translation. |
KR Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2024 in KR Application No. 10-2021-7033470, with English Translation. |
TW Office Action dated Jul. 23, 2024 in TW Application No. 110111878, with English Translation. |
U.S. Corrected Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 8, 2024 in U.S. Appl. No. 17/594,744. |
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 7, 2024 in U.S. Appl. No. 17/759,896. |
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 15, 2024 in U.S. Appl. No. 17/645,939. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220157617 A1 | May 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62820184 | Mar 2019 | US |