All publications, including patents and patent applications, mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety to the same extent as if each individual publication was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
The present invention relates generally to elongate robotic instruments and elongate surgical robots, such as robotic endoscopes. More particularly, it relates to methods and apparatuses for manufacturing and forming elongate robotic instruments.
The forms of elongate robotic instruments vary widely, but many elongate robotic instruments share the features of a mechanical, movable structure under some form of control. The mechanical structure or kinematic chain (analogous to the human skeleton) of an elongate robotic instrument can be formed from several links (analogous to human bones), actuators (analogous to human muscle), and joints between the links, permitting one or more degrees of freedom of motion of the links. A continuum or multi-segment elongate robotic instrument can be a continuously curving device, like an elephant trunk for example. An example of a continuum or multi-segment elongate robotic instrument is a snake-like endoscopic device.
Snake-like endoscopic devices can transfer forces from an actuator to particular sections of links in the snake-like device to effect articulation of that section or link. During articulation, these links are subjected to large stresses that can result in breakage or failure of the link and thus, failure of the endoscopic device. These failures typically occur at the weak point between links, such as at the joints.
A typical robotic link is made from a metal or alloy, such as aluminum or stainless steel. The links can be manufactured by laser cutting tubes, by laser sintering, by metal injection molding, or other processes as known in the art. Furthermore, a snake-like endoscopic device can often include several types of links, such as distal and proximal links for attachment to actuators, and intermediate links therebetween. However, manufacturing elongate robotic devices with these materials, as well as needing several different types of links for each device, can be expensive and add to the cost of an elongate robotic instrument.
An elongate robotic instrument, and more particularly a link that is used to make up the elongate robotic instrument, is therefore needed that can be manufactured efficiently and inexpensively while still being able to withstand the stresses imposed upon it during normal use.
In one embodiment, a robotic link is provided comprising a link having an outer wall surface and an inner wall surface, a pair of outer hinge portions on a first end of the link, each outer hinge portion having an inner bearing surface positioned between the inner wall surface and an outer ear, and a pair of inner hinge portions on a second end of the link, each inner hinge portion having an outer bearing surface positioned between the outer wall surface and an inner ear.
In some embodiments, the robotic link comprises a polymer. The robotic link can comprise PEEK, for example.
In one embodiment, each of the pair of outer hinge portions are diametrically opposed across the link. In another embodiment, each of the pair of inner hinge portions are diametrically opposed across the link. In some embodiments, an axis of rotation of the outer hinge portions are substantially perpendicular to an axis of rotation of the inner hinge portions.
The robotic link can further comprise a guide block positioned along each inner and outer hinge portion. In some embodiments, a tendon guide is positioned integrally within the link along each inner and outer hinge portion. The robotic link can also comprise an integrated pulley and tendon guide positioned integrally within the link along each outer hinge portion. In some embodiments, the robotic link comprises an integrated pulley and tendon guide positioned integrally within the link along each inner and outer hinge portion.
In one embodiment, the robotic link has an outer diameter of less than or equal to 19.05 millimeters (0.75 inches).
A flexible robotic instrument is provided, comprising a first link and a second link each having an outer wall surface and an inner wall surface, a pair of outer hinge portions disposed on a first end of each link, each outer hinge portion having an inner bearing surface positioned between the inner wall surface and an outer ear of each link, and a pair of inner hinge portions on a second end of each link, each inner hinge portion having an outer bearing surface positioned between the outer wall surface and an inner ear of each link, wherein the outer bearing surface of the first link is configured to slidably support the outer ear of the second link, and wherein the inner bearing surface of the second link is configured to slidably support the inner ear of the first link.
In some embodiments, the first and second links comprise a polymer. The first and second links can comprise PEEK, for example.
In one embodiment, an interior volume of the instrument is sized to accommodate at least two working channels.
In some embodiments, each of the pair of outer hinge portions are diametrically opposed across the first and second links. Similarly, each of the pair of inner hinge portions can be diametrically opposed across first and second links. In one embodiment, the outer hinge portions are substantially perpendicular to the inner hinge portions.
The flexible robotic instrument can further comprise a guide block positioned along each inner and outer hinge portion. In some embodiments, a tendon guide is positioned integrally within the first and second links along each inner and outer hinge portion. In other embodiments, the flexible robotic instrument can comprise an integrated pulley and tendon guide positioned integrally within the first and second links along each inner and/or outer hinge portion.
In one embodiment, the flexible robotic instrument has an outer diameter of less than or equal to 19.05 millimeters (0.75 inches).
The flexible robotic instrument can further comprise a plurality of actuation tendons.
In one embodiment, the first and second link of the flexible robotic instrument can articulate up to approximately +/−30 degrees individually.
A method of manufacturing a robotic link is provided, comprising introducing a polymer into a mold, and recovering from the mold a link having an outer wall surface and an inner wall surface, a pair of outer hinge portions on a first end of the link, each outer hinge portion having an inner bearing surface positioned between the inner wall surface and an outer ear, the link also having a pair of inner hinge portions on a second end of the link, each inner hinge portion having an outer bearing surface positioned between the outer wall surface and an inner ear.
The patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application with color drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.
As will be described in more detail below, the front link 108 and middle link 110 are manufactured to provide features for coil tube and actuation tendon terminations, and the middle link 110 and back link 112 are manufactured to provide pulley features for the coil tubes and actuation tendons.
In order to reduce manufacturing costs, various implementations of the robotic links described herein can be made of a plastic or polymer. In one embodiment, the robotic links are polyaryletheretherketone (PEEK). The robotic links can be formed or manufactured by injection molding a polymer into a mold and then recovering a link from the mold, or by other methods as known in the art. The mold can be preformed to provide a link having any or all of the features described herein.
It can be seen in
When the inner hinge portion of one robotic link is joined to the outer hinge portion of another robotic link, the outer ear 336 rests in and is supported by the outer bearing surface 338, and the inner ear 340 rests in and is supported by the inner bearing surface 334. In some embodiments, the inner and outer bearing surfaces 334 and 338 are cup shaped or curved bearing surfaces, and the outer and inner ears 336 and 340 are sized to fit flush within and against their respective mating bearing surfaces, thus minimizing friction between each ear and bearing surface while maximizing the strength of the joint. Furthermore, the outside surface 341b of the inner ear of one link can be in slidable contact with the inside surface 341a of the outer ear of a mated link, which provides additional support to strengthen the joint formed when two links are coupled.
This inner/outer hinge portion configuration allows the distal pair of hinges of a first link to engage with the proximal pair of hinges of a second link. Each adjacent link can then be coupled to the next at the hinges to form a pivot joint, such as by inserting a pin, rivet, etc, through a hole in the hinges, for example. It should be understood that when the inner hinge portion of a one link is coupled to the outer hinge portion of another link, a rivet or other fixation device (not shown) can additionally secure the hinge portions together. When two links are mated in this way, the inner and outer ears slide on their associated bearing surfaces, which provides an effective load distribution when the links are axially compressed (e.g., such an axial load is not solely borne by hinge pins that hold the two links together). In addition, the sliding mated inner and outer hinge portions provide effective lateral load capacity.
When the inner and outer hinge portions pictured in
In operation, pulling each of the respective actuation tendons will increase the tension in the pulled tendon and cause the segment to articulate in the direction of the pulled tendon as the links articulate at their respective hinges. Additionally, when one tendon is tensioned, the opposite tendon in the segment can be slacked to accommodate movement of the segment, especially the tendon positioned 180 degrees or opposite from the tensioned tendon.
In the illustrative link embodiments shown and described above, the same interchangeable link design can be used for both the boundary and intermediate portions of a segment. Thus, manufacturing costs are further reduced by eliminating the need for different link designs, and so using a single design that can be inexpensively manufactured by, e.g., injection molding, for all links in the kinematic chain. Various other link designs may also be used.
This design has the additional advantages of saving costs by reducing the number of parts, simplifying assembly, increasing available lumen/working channel volume within the robotic instrument, allowing helixed actuation tendons (if helixed) to propagate during assembly more easily, and avoiding restriction of local slack of the helixed tendons during articulation.
Universal link 702 further includes integrated pulley and tendon guide 704, which has a pulley portion 706 and a tendon guide portion 708. The pulley portion can have a flat surface to reduce friction (the flat surface minimized contact area with a tendon passing over it), or alternatively the pulley portion can include a groove. The integrated pulley and tendon guide 704 combines the features of both the pulleys (e.g., pulley wheels 242 and pulley slots 243 in
In the embodiment of
The universal links described herein integrate all the features that are necessary for intermediate links and all the features that are needed in boundary links into a single link. Advantages of this design include: lower tooling costs (only one link is needed therefore only one tool needs to be made); the pulley has been integrated, and there is no bonding necessary of a separate pulley to the link; the pulley has a flat surface instead of a groove, which substantially reduces friction; the pulley has been implemented in such a way that derailing of the cable is very difficult due to the fact that the cable takes the shortest distance between lumens; even under compression/slack of the actuation tendons, the cables do not derail since they are guided and aligned by the lumens; and, all of the features have been implemented in such a way that the link can be manufactured by injection molding, which reduces the manufacturing cost substantially while maintaining the strength necessary for a robotic instrument.
Aspects of various embodiments include: dimensioning and design of the part to make it mass-manufacturable by injection molding while still withstanding the high compressive loading that occurs inside robotic endoscopes; double knee-joint to resolve compressive loading during articulation, integrated static pulley; flat pulley surface to reduce friction; and, integrated design of cable routing features that allows the same part to be used as a segment boundary and passive link.
As for additional details pertinent to the present invention, materials and manufacturing techniques may be employed as within the level of those with skill in the relevant art. The same may hold true with respect to method-based aspects of the invention in terms of additional acts commonly or logically employed. Also, it is contemplated that any optional feature of the inventive variations described may be set forth and claimed independently, or in combination with any one or more of the features described herein. Likewise, reference to a singular item, includes the possibility that there are plural of the same items present. More specifically, as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “and,” “said,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. It is further noted that the claims may be drafted to exclude any optional element. As such, this statement is intended to serve as antecedent basis for use of such exclusive terminology as “solely,” “only” and the like in connection with the recitation of claim elements, or use of a “negative” limitation. Unless defined otherwise herein, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. The breadth of the present invention is not to be limited by the subject specification, but rather only by the plain meaning of the claim terms employed.
This application is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/662,645, (filed Jul. 28, 2017 titled “ROBOTIC LINKAGE”), which is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/172,127 (filed Jun. 2, 2016; titled “ROBOTIC LINKAGE”; now U.S. Pat. No. 9,737,199), which is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/615,941 (filed Nov. 10, 2009; titled “ROBOTIC LINKAGE”; now U.S. Pat. No. 9,687,986), which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/615,897 (filed Nov. 10, 2009; titled “ROBOTIC LINKAGE”; now abandoned), and which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119 of U.S. Patent Application No. 61/113,453 (filed Nov. 11, 2008; titled “ROBOTIC LINKAGE”), each of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
616672 | Kelling | Dec 1898 | A |
2510198 | Tesmer | Jun 1950 | A |
3060972 | Sheldon et al. | Oct 1962 | A |
3190286 | Stokes | Jun 1965 | A |
3266059 | Stelle | Aug 1966 | A |
3270641 | Gosselin | Sep 1966 | A |
3456514 | Gebendinger | Jul 1969 | A |
3497083 | Victor et al. | Feb 1970 | A |
3557780 | Masaaki | Jan 1971 | A |
4347837 | Hosono | Sep 1982 | A |
4686963 | Cohen | Aug 1987 | A |
4834069 | Umeda | May 1989 | A |
5174277 | Matsumaru | Dec 1992 | A |
5178129 | Chikama et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5448989 | Heckele | Sep 1995 | A |
5624380 | Takayama et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
6817974 | Cooper | Nov 2004 | B2 |
9687986 | Pistor et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9737199 | Pistor et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
20040138525 | Saadat et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050197536 | Banik | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050250990 | Le | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20090099420 | Woodley et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090216083 | Durant et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100116080 | Pistor et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20180008125 | Pistor et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Vertut, Jean and Phillipe Coiffet, Robot Technology: Teleoperation and Robotics Evolution and Development, English translation, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Inglewood Cliffs, NJ, USA 1986, vol. 3A, 332 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200015658 A1 | Jan 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61113453 | Nov 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15662645 | Jul 2017 | US |
Child | 16577366 | US | |
Parent | 15172127 | Jun 2016 | US |
Child | 15662645 | US | |
Parent | 12615941 | Nov 2009 | US |
Child | 15172127 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12615897 | Nov 2009 | US |
Child | 12615941 | US |