The embodiments disclosed herein relate to various medical devices and related components, including robotic and/or in vivo medical devices and related components. Certain embodiments include various robotic medical devices, including robotic devices that are disposed within a body cavity and positioned using a support component disposed through an orifice or opening in the body cavity. Other embodiments relate to various systems that have a robotic surgical device and a controller, wherein the device has one or more sensors and the controller has one or more motors such that the sensors transmit information that is used at the controller to actuate the motors to provide haptic feedback to a user.
Invasive surgical procedures are essential for addressing various medical conditions. When possible, minimally invasive procedures such as laparoscopy are preferred.
However, known minimally invasive technologies such as laparoscopy are limited in scope and complexity due in part to 1) mobility restrictions resulting from using rigid tools inserted through access ports, and 2) limited visual feedback. Known robotic systems such as the da Vinci® Surgical System (available from Intuitive Surgical, Inc., located in Sunnyvale, Calif.) are also restricted by the access ports, as well as having the additional disadvantages of being very large, very expensive, unavailable in most hospitals, and having limited sensory and mobility capabilities.
There is a need in the art for improved surgical methods, systems, and devices.
Discussed herein are various robotic surgical systems, including certain systems having camera lumens configured to receive various camera systems. Further embodiments relate to surgical insertion devices configured to be used to insert various surgical devices into a cavity of a patient while maintaining insufflations of the cavity.
A system of one or more computers can be configured to perform particular operations or actions by virtue of having software, firmware, hardware, or a combination of them installed on the system that in operation causes or cause the system to perform the actions. One or more computer programs can be configured to perform particular operations or actions by virtue of including instructions that, when executed by data processing apparatus, cause the apparatus to perform the actions.
In one Example, a robotic surgical system, including a robotic surgical device including a device body including a distal end; a proximal end, and a camera lumen defined within the device body, the camera lumen including (1) a proximal lumen opening in the proximal end of the device body; (2) a socket portion defined distally of the proximal lumen opening, the socket portion including a first diameter and a first coupling component; (3) an extended portion defined distally of the socket portion, the extended portion having a second, smaller diameter; and (4) a distal lumen opening in the distal end of the device body, the distal lumen opening defined at a distal end of the extended portion; first and second shoulder joints operably coupled to the distal end of the device body; a first robotic arm operably coupled to the first shoulder joint; and a second robotic arm operably coupled to the second shoulder joint; and a camera component, including a handle including a distal end configured to be positionable within the socket portion; a second coupling component configured to releasably couple with the first coupling component, thereby releasably locking the handle into the socket portion; an elongate tube operably coupled to the handle, where the elongate tube is configured and sized to be positionable through the extended portion, the elongate tube including a rigid section; an optical section; and a flexible section operably coupling the optical section to the rigid section, where the elongate tube has a length such that at least the optical section is configured to extend distally from the distal lumen opening when the camera component is positioned through the camera lumen. Other embodiments of this aspect include corresponding computer systems, apparatus, and computer programs recorded on one or more computer storage devices, each configured to perform the actions of the methods.
Implementations may include one or more of the following features. The robotic surgical system where the camera lumen further includes a seal portion defined distally of the socket portion and proximally of the extended portion. The robotic surgical system where the seal section is configured to receive a ring seal and a one-way seal. The robotic surgical system where the seal section is further configured to receive a retention component, where the ring seal is retained within the ring-seal retention component. The robotic surgical system where the ring-seal retention component includes at least one protrusion extending from an outer wall of the ring-seal retention component. The robotic surgical system where the socket portion further includes a channel defined in an inner wall of the socket portion, where the channel is configured to receive the at least one protrusion. The robotic surgical system where the handle includes a controller configured to operate the camera component. The robotic surgical system where the distal lumen opening is positioned between the first and second shoulder joints. The robotic surgical system where the optical section is configured to be tiltable at the flexible section in relation to the rigid section, where the optical section has a straight configuration and a tilted configuration. The robotic surgical system where the elongate tube is configured to be rotatable in relation to the handle. The robotic surgical system where the socket portion further includes an inner wall including a channel configured to receive an insertion device. The robotic surgical system where the camera lumen includes a proximal lumen opening in the proximal end of the device body; a socket portion defined distally of the proximal lumen opening, the socket portion including a first diameter and a first coupling component; an extended portion defined distally of the socket portion, the extended portion having a second, smaller diameter; and a distal lumen opening in the distal end of the device body, the distal lumen opening defined at a distal end of the extended portion. The robotic surgical system where the first robotic arm further includes a first arm upper arm; a first arm elbow joint; and a first arm lower arm, where the first arm upper arm is configured to be capable of roll, pitch and yaw relative to the first shoulder joint and the first arm lower arm is configured to be capable of yaw relative to the first arm upper arm by way of the first arm elbow joint. The surgical robotic system where the first robotic arm further includes at least one first arm actuator disposed within the first robotic arm. The robotic surgical system where the second robotic arm further includes a second arm upper arm; a second arm elbow joint; and a second arm lower arm, where the second arm upper arm is configured to be capable of roll, pitch and yaw relative to the second shoulder joint and the second arm lower arm is configured to be capable of yaw relative to the second arm upper arm by way of the second arm elbow joint. The surgical robotic system where the second robotic arm further includes at least one second arm actuator disposed within the second robotic arm. The surgical robotic system including a handle including a distal end configured to be positionable within the socket portion; and a second coupling component configured to releasably couple with the first coupling component, thereby releasably locking the handle into the socket portion. The surgical robotic system further including at least one PCB disposed within at least one of the first or second robotic arms and in operational communication with at least one of the first robotic arm and second robotic arm, where the PCB is configured to perform yaw and pitch functions. Implementations of the described techniques may include hardware, a method or process, or computer software on a computer-accessible medium.
In one Example, a robotic surgical system, including a robotic surgical device including a device body including a distal end; a proximal end, and a camera lumen defined within the device body; first and second shoulder joints operably coupled to the distal end of the device body; a first robotic arm operably coupled to the first shoulder joint; and a second robotic arm operably coupled to the second shoulder joint; and a camera component, including a handle including a distal end configured to be positionable within the socket portion; a second coupling component configured to releasably couple with the first coupling component, thereby releasably locking the handle into the socket portion; an elongate tube operably coupled to the handle, where the elongate tube is configured and sized to be positionable through the extended portion, the elongate tube including a rigid section; an optical section; and a flexible section operably coupling the optical section to the rigid section, where the elongate tube has a length such that at least the optical section is configured to extend distally from the distal lumen opening when the camera component is positioned through the camera lumen. Other embodiments of this aspect include corresponding computer systems, apparatus, and computer programs recorded on one or more computer storage devices, each configured to perform the actions of the methods.
Implementations may include one or more of the following features. The robotic surgical system where the camera lumen includes a proximal lumen opening in the proximal end of the device body; a socket portion defined distally of the proximal lumen opening, the socket portion including a first diameter and a first coupling component; an extended portion defined distally of the socket portion, the extended portion having a second, smaller diameter; and a distal lumen opening in the distal end of the device body, the distal lumen opening defined at a distal end of the extended portion. The robotic surgical system where the first robotic arm further includes a first arm upper arm; a first arm elbow joint; and a first arm lower arm, where the first arm upper arm is configured to be capable of roll, pitch and yaw relative to the first shoulder joint and the first arm lower arm is configured to be capable of yaw relative to the first arm upper arm by way of the first arm elbow joint. The surgical robotic system where the first robotic arm further includes at least one first arm actuator disposed within the first robotic arm. The robotic surgical system where the second robotic arm further includes a second arm upper arm; a second arm elbow joint; and a second arm lower arm, where the second arm upper arm is configured to be capable of roll, pitch and yaw relative to the second shoulder joint and the second arm lower arm is configured to be capable of yaw relative to the second arm upper arm by way of the second arm elbow joint. The surgical robotic system where the second robotic arm further includes at least one second arm actuator disposed within the second robotic arm. The surgical robotic system including a handle including a distal end configured to be positionable within the socket portion; and a second coupling component configured to releasably couple with the first coupling component, thereby releasably locking the handle into the socket portion. The surgical robotic system further including at least one PCB disposed within at least one of the first or second robotic arms and in operational communication with at least one of the first robotic arm and second robotic arm, where the PCB is configured to perform yaw and pitch functions. Implementations of the described techniques may include hardware, a method or process, or computer software on a computer-accessible medium.
In one Example, a robotic surgical system, including a robotic surgical device including a device body including a distal end; a proximal end, and a camera lumen defined within the device body, the camera lumen including (1) a proximal lumen opening in the proximal end of the device body; (2) a socket portion defined distally of the proximal lumen opening, the socket portion including a first diameter and a first coupling component; (3) an extended portion defined distally of the socket portion, the extended portion having a second, smaller diameter; and (4) a distal lumen opening in the distal end of the device body, the distal lumen opening defined at a distal end of the extended portion; first and second shoulder joints operably coupled to the distal end of the device body; a first robotic arm operably coupled to the first shoulder joint; and a second robotic arm operably coupled to the second shoulder joint; and a camera component, including an elongate tube operably coupled to the handle, where the elongate tube is configured and sized to be positionable through the extended portion, the elongate tube including a rigid section; an optical section; and a flexible section operably coupling the optical section to the rigid section, where the elongate tube has a length such that at least the optical section is configured to extend distally from the distal lumen opening when the camera component is positioned through the camera lumen. Other embodiments of this aspect include corresponding computer systems, apparatus, and computer programs recorded on one or more computer storage devices, each configured to perform the actions of the methods.
Implementations may include one or more of the following features. The surgical robotic system including a handle including a distal end configured to be positionable within the socket portion; and a second coupling component configured to releasably couple with the first coupling component, thereby releasably locking the handle into the socket portion. The surgical robotic system further including at least one PCB disposed within at least one of the first or second robotic arms and in operational communication with at least one of the first robotic arm and second robotic arm, where the PCB is configured to perform yaw and pitch functions. Implementations of the described techniques may include hardware, a method or process, or computer software on a computer-accessible medium.
While multiple embodiments are disclosed, still other embodiments of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, which shows and describes illustrative embodiments of the invention. As will be realized, the invention is capable of modifications in various obvious aspects, all without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the drawings and detailed description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature and not restrictive.
The various systems and devices disclosed herein relate to devices for use in medical procedures and systems. More specifically, various embodiments relate to various medical devices, including robotic devices and related methods and systems.
It is understood that the various embodiments of robotic devices and related methods and systems disclosed herein can be incorporated into or used with any other known medical devices, systems, and methods.
It is understood that the various embodiments of robotic devices and related methods and systems disclosed herein can be incorporated into or used with any other known medical devices, systems, and methods. For example, the various embodiments disclosed herein may be incorporated into or used with any of the medical devices and systems disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,968,332 (issued on Mar. 3, 2015 and entitled “Magnetically Coupleable Robotic Devices and Related Methods”), U.S. Pat. No. 8,834,488 (issued on Sep. 16, 2014 and entitled “Magnetically Coupleable Surgical Robotic Devices and Related Methods”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/617,232 (filed on Feb. 9, 2015 and entitled “Robotic Surgical Devices and Related Methods”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/966,741 (filed on Dec. 28, 2007 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Devices for Surgical Visualization and Device Manipulation”), U.S. Patent Application 61/030,588 (filed on Feb. 22, 2008), U.S. Pat. No. 8,343,171 (issued on Jan. 1, 2013 and entitled “Methods and Systems of Actuation in Robotic Devices”), U.S. Pat. No. 8,828,024 (issued on Sep. 9, 2014 and entitled “Methods and Systems of Actuation in Robotic Devices”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/454,035 (filed Aug. 7, 2014 and entitled “Methods and Systems of Actuation in Robotic Devices”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/192,663 (filed Aug. 15, 2008 and entitled Medical Inflation, Attachment, and Delivery Devices and Related Methods”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/018,530 (filed Feb. 8, 2016 and entitled “Medical Inflation, Attachment, and Delivery Devices and Related Methods”), U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,440 (issued on Mar. 10, 2015 and entitled “Modular and Cooperative Medical Devices and Related Systems and Methods”), U.S. Pat. No. 8,679,096 (issued on Mar. 25, 2014 and entitled “Multifunctional Operational Component for Robotic Devices”), U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,981 (issued on Nov. 10, 2015 and entitled “Multifunctional Operational Component for Robotic Devices”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/936,234 (filed on Nov. 9, 2015 and entitled “Multifunctional Operational Component for Robotic Devices”), U.S. Pat. No. 8,894,633 (issued on Nov. 25, 2014 and entitled “Modular and Cooperative Medical Devices and Related Systems and Methods”), U.S. Pat. No. 8,968,267 (issued on Mar. 3, 2015 and entitled “Methods and Systems for Handling or Delivering Materials for Natural Orifice Surgery”), U.S. Pat. No. 9,060,781 (issued on Jun. 23, 2015 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Devices Relating to Surgical End Effectors”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/745,487 (filed on Jun. 22, 2015 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Devices Relating to Surgical End Effectors”), U.S. Pat. No. 9,089,353 (issued on Jul. 28, 2015 and entitled “Robotic Surgical Devices, Systems, and Related Methods”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/800,423 (filed on Jul. 15, 2015 and entitled “Robotic Surgical Devices, Systems, and Related Methods”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/573,849 (filed Oct. 9, 2012 and entitled “Robotic Surgical Devices, Systems, and Related Methods”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/738,706 (filed Jan. 10, 2013 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Devices for Surgical Access and Insertion”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/833,605 (filed Mar. 15, 2013 and entitled “Robotic Surgical Devices, Systems, and Related Methods”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/661,465 (filed Mar. 18, 2015 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Devices for Surgical Access and Insertion”), Ser. No. 13/839,422 (filed Mar. 15, 2013 and entitled “Single Site Robotic Devices and Related Systems and Methods”), U.S. Pat. No. 9,010,214 (issued on Apr. 21, 2015 and entitled “Local Control Robotic Surgical Devices and Related Methods”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/656,109 (filed on Mar. 12, 2015 and entitled “Local Control Robotic Surgical Devices and Related Methods”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/208,515 (filed Mar. 13, 2014 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Devices Relating to Robotic Surgical Devices, End Effectors, and Controllers”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/210,934 (filed Mar. 14, 2014 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Devices Relating to Force Control Surgical Systems), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/212,686 (filed Mar. 14, 2014 and entitled “Robotic Surgical Devices, Systems, and Related Methods”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/334,383 (filed Jul. 17, 2014 and entitled “Robotic Surgical Devices, Systems, and Related Methods”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/853,477 (filed Sep. 14, 2015 and entitled “Quick-Release End Effectors and Related Systems and Methods”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/938,667 (filed Nov. 11, 2015 and entitled “Robotic Device with Compact Joint Design and Related Systems and Methods”), and U.S. Patent Application 62/338,375 (filed May 18, 2016 and entitled “Robotic Surgical Devices, Systems, and Related Methods”), and U.S. Pat. No. 7,492,116 (filed on Oct. 31, 2007 and entitled “Robot for Surgical Applications”), U.S. Pat. No. 7,772,796 (filed on Apr. 3, 2007 and entitled “Robot for Surgical Applications”), and U.S. Pat. No. 8,179,073 (issued May 15, 2011, and entitled “Robotic Devices with Agent Delivery Components and Related Methods”), all of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Certain device and system implementations disclosed in the applications listed above can be positioned within a body cavity of a patient in combination with a support component similar to those disclosed herein. An “in vivo device” as used herein means any device that can be positioned, operated, or controlled at least in part by a user while being positioned within a body cavity of a patient, including any device that is coupled to a support component such as a rod or other such component that is disposed through an opening or orifice of the body cavity, also including any device positioned substantially against or adjacent to a wall of a body cavity of a patient, further including any such device that is internally actuated (having no external source of motive force), and additionally including any device that may be used laparoscopically or endoscopically during a surgical procedure. As used herein, the terms “robot,” and “robotic device” shall refer to any device that can perform a task either automatically or in response to a command.
Certain embodiments provide for insertion of the present invention into the cavity while maintaining sufficient insufflation of the cavity. Further embodiments minimize the physical contact of the surgeon or surgical users with the present invention during the insertion process. Other implementations enhance the safety of the insertion process for the patient and the present invention. For example, some embodiments provide visualization of the present invention as it is being inserted into the patient's cavity to ensure that no damaging contact occurs between the system/device and the patient. In addition, certain embodiments allow for minimization of the incision size/length. Further implementations reduce the complexity of the access/insertion procedure and/or the steps required for the procedure. Other embodiments relate to devices that have minimal profiles, minimal size, or are generally minimal in function and appearance to enhance ease of handling and use.
Certain implementations disclosed herein relate to “combination” or “modular” medical devices that can be assembled in a variety of configurations. For purposes of this application, both “combination device” and “modular device” shall mean any medical device having modular or interchangeable components that can be arranged in a variety of different configurations. The modular components and combination devices disclosed herein also include segmented triangular or quadrangular-shaped combination devices. These devices, which are made up of modular components (also referred to herein as “segments”) that are connected to create the triangular or quadrangular configuration, can provide leverage and/or stability during use while also providing for substantial payload space within the device that can be used for larger components or more operational components. As with the various combination devices disclosed and discussed above, according to one embodiment these triangular or quadrangular devices can be positioned inside the body cavity of a patient in the same fashion as those devices discussed and disclosed above.
Certain embodiments disclosed or contemplated herein can be used for colon resection, a surgical procedure performed to treat patients with lower gastrointestinal diseases such as diverticulitis, Crohn's disease, inflammatory bowel disease and colon cancer. Approximately two-thirds of known colon resection procedures are performed via a completely open surgical procedure involving an 8- to 12-inch incision and up to six weeks of recovery time. Because of the complicated nature of the procedure, existing robot-assisted surgical devices are rarely used for colon resection surgeries, and manual laparoscopic approaches are only used in one-third of cases. In contrast, the various implementations disclosed herein can be used in a minimally invasive approach to a variety of procedures that are typically performed ‘open’ by known technologies, with the potential to improve clinical outcomes and health care costs. Further, the various implementations disclosed herein can be used for any laparoscopic surgical procedure in place of the known mainframe-like laparoscopic surgical robots that reach into the body from outside the patient. That is, the less-invasive robotic systems, methods, and devices disclosed herein feature small, self-contained surgical devices that are inserted in their entireties through a single incision in the patient's abdomen. Designed to utilize existing tools and techniques familiar to surgeons, the devices disclosed herein will not require a dedicated operating room or specialized infrastructure, and, because of their much smaller size, are expected to be significantly less expensive than existing robotic alternatives for laparoscopic surgery. Due to these technological advances, the various embodiments herein could enable a minimally invasive approach to procedures performed in open surgery today.
As shown in
In the exemplary implementation as shown, each of the arms 14, 16 also has an end effector 30, 32 operably coupled to the distal end of the forearm 14B, 16B. An end effector can also be referred to herein as an “operational component,” and various embodiments will be discussed herein below in further detail.
In one implementation, each of the arms 14, 16 has six degrees of freedom. That is, as explained in further detail below, each arm 14, 16 has three degrees of freedom at the shoulder joint 26, 28, one degree of freedom at the elbow joint 14C, 16C, and two degrees of freedom at the end effector 30, 32 (which can be, in certain embodiments, rotated—end effector roll—and opened/closed). As such, the six degrees of freedom of each arm 14, 16 are analogous to the degrees of freedom of a human arm, which also has three degrees of freedom at the shoulder and one at the elbow. One advantage of an arm having four degrees of freedom (with an end effector having two degrees of freedom) is that the end effector can have multiple orientations at the same Cartesian point. This added dexterity allows the surgeon or other user more freedom and a more intuitive sense of control while operating the device.
The camera component 18, as shown in
According to one embodiment,
In various implementations, the electrical connectors 50, 52 can provide robot power and bus communications required for robot functionality, including power and communications connectors, bipolar cautery connectors and monopolar cautery connectors, such as LEMO® push-pull circular connectors. In certain implementations, three connectors can be provided. In the implementation of
According to these implementations, the opening 60 is in fluid communication with a lumen 62 that is defined through the length of the body 12. The lumen 62 is configured to receive the camera component 18 and has a receiving portion (also referred to herein as a “socket portion” or “socket”) 62A, a seal portion 62B, and an extended portion 62C.
In certain implementations, the socket portion 62A is configured to be “tight fitting,” that is, it is configured to mate with the camera component 18 handle 40 to react or resist all loads or prevent all rotational and translational motion. In various implementations, the latch 56 is disposed within the socket portion 62A so as to be capable of coupling to the clasping portion 72 of the camera component 18.
In various implementations, a seal or seals 63A, 63B are provided in the seal portion 62B, so as to maintain a fluidic seal around the camera 18 as it is disposed in the lumen 62. The seal portion 62B is distal in relation to the receiving portion 62A and is configured to house a seal or seals 63A, 63B against the wall 68 of the lumen 62, as is described in relation to
In the implementation depicted in
As described below, in these implementations, when the seals are installed, the O-ring carrier seal 63B compresses on the lip 63A1 of the first seal 63A, thereby creating a seal against the inner wall of the housing (shown at 67). The use of first and second seals 63A, 63B in certain implementations provides certain advantages described herein. In situations when the camera component 18 is not present, the pressure from the abdominal cavity will cause the one-way duck bill seal 63A to close and prevent the loss of that pressure. In situations where the camera present, the camera and tube 42 will cause duck bill seal 63A to be open and allow passage into the lumen 62, while the O-ring 65 and O-ring carrier seal 63A will seal against the rigid camera tube 42 and lumen 62, respectively, to maintain cavity pressure. It is understood that further implementations are of course possible.
As shown in
More specifically, the channel 66 is defined in the lumen 62 with a longitudinal length 66A and a radial length 66B. In certain implementations, the channel 66 is tapered along the longitudinal length 66A. As such, a protrusion 67A is positioned in the longitudinal length 66A and the insertion component 15 is advanced distally until the protrusion 67A reaches the end of the longitudinal length 66A. At this point, the insertion component 15 can be rotated around its longitudinal axis such that the protrusion 67A is advanced along the radial length 66B. As shown in
As shown in
In one embodiment, the handle 40 is configured to contain local electronics for video transmission, along with actuators and associated mechanisms (as are best shown in relation to
According to one implementation, the rigid section 42A of the tube 42 is substantially rigid and contains appropriate wires and optical fibers as necessary to operably couple to the optical component in the optical section 42C to the handle 40. The substantial rigidity of the rigid section 42A allows for easy manipulation of the tube 42, including easy insertion into the lumen 62.
The flexible section 42B, in accordance with one embodiment, is configured to allow for movement of the optical section 42C between a straight configuration in
Accordingly, various implementations of the camera component 18 of this implementation have two mechanical degrees of freedom: pan (look left/right) and tilt (look up/down). In use, the camera component 18 has pan and tilt functionality powered and controlled by the actuators and electronics in the handle 40. In various implementations, the handle 40 further comprises a button 70 and camera clasp 72 configured to mate with the latch 56, as is shown in further detail in
The tilt functionality relates to tilting the optical section 42C such that the camera 48 is oriented into the desired workspace, as is discussed further in relation to
As shown in the implementations of
As discussed above,
As shown in
The implementation of
In various implementations, the plunger 88 end 88A is aligned with a slot 90A in the lead screw nut 90, which is linearly translated in response to camera tilt, as is described in further detail below. In these implementations, slot 90A and plunger 88 alignment only occurs when the camera tube 42 is in the “straight” orientation. In these implementations, the plunger is also fixedly attached to a trigger arm 92, such that when the arm is displaced—even slightly—the arm triggers a limit switch 94, initiating a “go-straight” subroutine, thereby straightening the camera. It is understood that the length of plunger 88 in these implementations is such that it is unable to enter the slot 90A when the camera is tilted (as described below in relation to
It is understood that in certain implementations, the “go-straight” subroutine is triggered in response to the actuation of the button 70, regardless of whether the plunger end 88A enters the slot 90A. In these implementations, and as best shown in
As best shown in the implementation of
As shown in
The first tilt cable 120A is depicted in
As such, in this implementation of
The pan functionality is accomplished via rotation of the tube 42 around the longitudinal axis of the tube 42 as shown by arrow D in
As such, in the implementation of
In these implementations, the pan assembly (generally at 128) has a ground slot 136 (which does not rotate) and a pan shaft slot 138 (which rotates), both being configured such that wires (not shown) may pass through the slots 136, 138 safely and not be damaged during pan actuation.
For example, as is shown in
The implementation of
In the implementation of
In various embodiments, and as shown generally in
In the implementation of
In contrast to
In one embodiment, certain of the internal components depicted in
The transmission gear 212 is coupled to a driven gear 214, which is fixedly coupled to the shaft 216. A magnet holder 218 containing a magnet is also operably coupled to the transmission gear 212. The holder 218 and magnet are operably coupled to a magnetic encoder (not shown). It is understood that the magnet holder 218, magnet, and magnetic encoder (and those similar components as discussed elsewhere herein in relation to other joints) are components of an absolute position sensor that is the same as or substantially similar to one or more of the absolute position sensors disclosed in U.S. Provisional Application 61/680,809, filed on Aug. 8, 2012, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The shaft 216 is fixedly coupled at its distal end to a rotatable pitch housing 220 (as best shown in
According to one implementation, certain other internal components depicted in
In this embodiment, these two axes of rotation are coupled. That is, if solely rotation around axis A (pure yaw) is desired, then the “pitch drive train” (the pitch motor 230 and all coupled gears and components required to achieve rotation around axis B) must match the speed of the “yaw drive train” (the yaw motor 204 and all coupled gears and components required to achieve rotation around axis A) such that there is no relative angular displacement between the pitch housing 220 and the rotation gear 244. In contrast, if solely rotation around axis B (pure pitch) is desired, then the yaw drive train must hold position while the pitch drive train is actuated.
In one implementation as shown in
As also described herein, each link (body, upper arm, and forearm) can also contain Printed Circuit Boards (PCBs) that have embedded sensor, amplification, and control electronics. For example, in certain implementations, identical PCBs 168, 250, 290, 320, 328 are used throughout where each one controls two motors. One PCB is in each forearm and upper arm and two PCBs are in the body. Each PCB also has a full 6 axis accelerometer-based Inertial Measurement Unit and temperature sensors that can be used to monitor the temperature of the motors. Each joint can also have either an absolute position sensor or an incremental position sensor or both. In certain implementations, the some joints contain both absolute position sensors (magnetic encoders) and incremental sensors (hall effect). Joints 5 & 6 only have incremental sensors. These sensors are used for motor control. The joints could also contain many other types of sensors. A more detailed description of one possible method is included here.
In one embodiment, certain of the internal components depicted in
The rotation of the shoulder link 26 around axis Z3 causes the right upper arm 14A (and thus the forearm 14B) to rotate in relation to the body 12. According to one embodiment, this rotation adds an additional degree of freedom not provided in prior two-armed surgical devices.
According to one implementation, certain of the internal components depicted in
As shown in
As set forth below, each forearm 14B, 16B also has two electrically isolated cautery circuits, enabling both bipolar and monopolar cautery end effectors. Certain embodiments are configured to allow for easy removal and replacement of an end effector (a “quick change” configuration). Further embodiments contain sealing elements that help to prevent fluid ingress into the mechanism.
According to one implementation, certain of the internal components depicted in
The rotation, in one aspect, is created as follows. As best shown in
In one embodiment, certain of the internal components depicted in
According to one implementation, the end effector 300 can be quickly and easily coupled to and uncoupled from the forearm 14B in the following fashion. With both the roll and drive axes fixed or held in position, the end effector 300 can be rotated, thereby coupling or uncoupling the threads 310A. That is, if the end effector 300 is rotated in one direction, the end effector 300 is coupled to the forearm 14B, and if it is rotated in the other direction, the end effector 300 is uncoupled from the forearm 14B.
Various implementations of the system 10 are also designed to deliver energy to the end effectors 300 so as to cut and coagulate tissue during surgery. This is sometimes called cautery and can come in many electrical forms as well as thermal energy, ultrasonic energy, and RF energy all of which are intended for this robot. Here electrosurgical cautery is described as an example.
In accordance with one embodiment, and as shown in
In these implementations, the channel A components are set forth in the forearm 14B as shown. A PCB 328 is electrically isolated from lead A 342 and/or lead B 344 a cautery power line (such as discussed below) that is coupled to an external power source. The PCB 328 is further electrically coupled to at least one flex tape 330A, 330B which is in electronic communication with the motors 301, 312. As such, energizing lead A in the cautery line 342 energizes channel A in the bipolar cautery end effector 300.
As is shown in
In various implementations, the stator assembly 347 contains the two stator hoops 345A, 345B. The assembly 347 is fixed to the forearm 14B and does not move. The rotor assembly 343 contains two rotor rings 341A, 341B. The rotor 343 is held concentric to the stator 347 through a bearing assembly (not shown) and is free to rotate within the stator 347. Each rotor ring 341A, 341B has a pair of leaf spring contacts (best shown in
In these implementations, the rotor rings 341A, 341B extend into the rotor assembly, and the end effectors have a corresponding pair of tool contacts 330, 332 disposed toward the proximal end. These tool contacts 330, 332 contacts can also have leaf spring protrusions.
In use, when the end effector 300 is properly seated within the rotor 343, the leaf spring protrusions of the end effector tool contacts 330, 332 press against the internal circumference of the rotor rings 341A, 341B, so as to form an electrical connection. Additionally, the rotor can have as “arrow shaped” protrusions along its internal surface, to create a lead in, so it is self aligning when you install the tool, while the end effector can have matching cut outs. In these implementations, when the end effector is inserted the protrusions and cut outs mate, such that they form a torque transfer feature between the end effector and the rotor assembly. In this way, when the rotor spins via the roll motor, the end effector spins with it. Thus there is no relative motion between the rotor assembly and the end effector 300.
In one implementation, as shown in
In these implementations, the end effector 300A, 300B has at least one fluidic seal interface that helps to prevent fluid ingress into the forearm 14B. One such mechanism is a single-piece housing 322 according to one embodiment. As best shown in
In the specific embodiment of the bi-polar tool 300A of
In the specific embodiment of the bi-polar tool 300B of
Various implementations of the system have a monopolar cautery power line 350 (as shown in
In the implementation of
As shown in
It is understood that large or “bulky” membranes can interfere with the operation of the camera component 18, particularly for membranes 400 having a belt, as has been previously described. In various implementations, the presently disclosed membrane 400 addresses camera interference. As discussed herein in relation to
In various implementations, the sleeves 400 can be fabricated by cutting a pattern out of a thin film extrusion, such that a 2D pattern is cut out of a flat piece of plastic and the sleeve is then formed by bonding the 2D pieces together, such as by ultrasonic welding. Alternatively, thermal bonding or adhesives may be used to create the sleeve. In yet a further alternative, a molding process may be utilized to create these sleeve, as has been previously described. This can include dip molding, injection molding, or other known molding options. It is understood that the permanent sleeves can be made of thicker plastic or other material than disposable sleeves to enhance durability.
As is shown in
Turning to the implementations of
In further implementations, and as shown in
In the implementations of
In certain implementations, and as shown in
In the implementations of
In use,
As shown in
As shown in
In use, according to one embodiment as shown in
According to one embodiment as best shown in
One embodiment of an exemplary GUI 530 is depicted in
In certain embodiments, the virtual connection between the console 502 and device 10 as described above can be interrupted using a “clutch.” In one specific implementation, the clutch can be activated using a button 520 on the GUI 530. Alternatively, the user can activate the clutch by depressing one of the foot pedals 512. The clutch is activated to break the virtual connection described above, thereby disconnecting the device 10 from the console 502 such that the device 10 and its components enter a “frozen” or “paused” state in which the components of the device 10 remain in the last position the components were in when the clutch was activated and until the clutch is deactivated. This clutch feature can be utilized for several different reasons. For example, the clutch feature can be used in an emergency pausing situation in which the device 10 components are moving toward a position which one or more of the components might damage the internal tissues of the patient and the clutch activation prevents that. In another example, the clutch feature can be used to reset the virtual connection in the same way that a computer mouse is lifted off the mousepad to reset the connection between the mouse and the cursor on the computer screen. In other words, the clutch feature can be used to reposition the hand controllers to a more desirable position while pausing the device 10.
Certain system embodiments disclosed or contemplated herein can also have hand controllers (such as controllers 518 discussed above) that feature haptic feedback. That is, the hand controllers (such as controllers 518) have haptic input devices, which are made up of motors operably coupled to the hand controllers such that the motors can be actuated to apply force to the controllers (such as controllers 518), thereby applying force to the user's hands that are grasping the controllers. This force applied to the user's hands that is created by the haptic input devices is called haptic feedback and is intended to provide information to the user. For example, one use of haptic feedback is to indicate to the user a collision between the robotic arms. In another example, the haptic feedback is used to indicate to the user that the robotic device or one of its components (such as one of the arms) is approaching or has reached its reachable or dexterous workspace.
In these implementations, and as best shown in
In this specific embodiment as best shown in
Once possible use of the system is shown in
For example, the user can enter tele-op mode (box 630) such that the haptic input devices (described in detail in relation to
In tele-op mode, these positions are set (boxes 632 and 634), such any movements of the controllers will directly correspond with the movement of the device 10, and any force applied to the device 10 will cause a corresponding force to be applied back to the user through the controllers. However, in certain situations, the user may desire to re-orient the hand controllers relative to the console without causing a corresponding change in the movement of the device.
When the system is paused (box 636) the system is “locked” (boxes 638 and 640), such that the hand controllers 518 are locked in place. No movement or commands to the device 10 are being sent, such that the device 10 holds position regardless of what the user does to the hand controllers, meaning that even if the user overpowers the haptic locks and moves the hand controllers, the robot will not move.
In further implementations, to move the controllers independently, the user can engage the clutch (box 642) so as to disengage the translation of the controllers only (box 644) while the device arms 14, 16 and controllers maintain a fixed orientation (box 646). When the clutch 512 is disengaged (box 648) the robot and hand controllers are then virtually re-connected, so as to again fix translation and orientation between the controllers and device.
In these implementations, the workspace can be defined (box 650) when the device 10 is positioned. As discussed above, the translational movement of the arms and controllers is limited by the workspace boundry (box 650), and the orientation movements are aligned with a valid vector (box 652) to ensure safety and precision.
In certain implementations, the haptic lock can be also interrupted by other functions such as “camera clutch” (box 654), where the two hand controllers can move together. In these implementations, it may be necessary to re-orient the hand controllers and/or device arms relative to the position and/or orientation of the camera. That is, as would be understood, because the camera is capable of pan and tilt functions, the camera has a specific frame of reference with regard to the workspace and device 10. In certain implementations, the console depicts this frame of reference, and the translation and/or orientation of the arms and controllers are fixed relative to the camera orientation. When the camera is moved, it may be necessary to re-orient the controllers and/or arms relative to the second camera frame of reference, which can be designated by a. Accordingly, it is possible to urge the hand controls in various directions (such as horizontally relative to the ground), but cause a corresponding vertical motion of the robot arms, in circumstances where the device and camera are pointed straight down. Other versions of this workflow are possible.
The various embodiments are disclosed in additional detail in the attached figures, which include some written description therein.
Further, according to certain embodiments, a device as shown and described in the attached figures is inserted into the patient using the following procedure.
First, an incision is made through the abdominal wall using standard techniques. In this embodiment an incision of length 2.5″ is required to create a suitable orifice for the system to pass through.
Next, a retractor is placed in the incision. In this embodiment, an Applied Medical Alexis Wound Retractor (http://www.appliedmedical.com/Products/Alexis.aspx) is utilized. It consists of a thin walled (<0.005″) flexible tubular membrane with rigid ring shaped end caps. Once the distal ring is inserted into the patient, the proximal ring is rolled to take up the excess slack in tube and pull the wound open.
Then, a port is placed on the retractor. In this embodiment, a modified Applied Medical Gel port (http://www.appliedmedical.com/Products/Gelport.aspx) is utilized. The port is capable of maintain a pressure differential such that insufflation of the abdominal cavity may be achieved. The port is capable of having items (ie robot) plunged through it while maintaining this pressure differential/gas seal. This port consists of a rigid ring which mechanically clamps to the external rigid ring of the retractor. This clamp is capable of sealing to the ring, preserving insufflation pressure. The port further consists of a pair of circular gel membranes. Each membrane is ˜0.75″ thick. Each membrane has a slit through it. The slit has length of ˜50% of the membrane diameter. When assembled, the slit of membrane 1 is rotated 90 degrees with respect to the slit of membrane 2. Due to the gel/conforming nature of the membranes, a seal is maintained against oddly shaped objects as they pass through the slits of the membranes and into the abdominal cavity.
According to one alternative embodiment relating to the port, a lattice of non-elastic cords is embedded in the membranes, mitigating doming/blowout as a result of the internal pressure. In a further alternative, a thin film of a rigid/puncture resistant polymer was deposited at the interface of membrane 1 and 2. The purpose of this polymer is to prevent the end effectors of the robot from puncturing membrane 2 after it passes through the slit in membrane 1.
Once the retractor and gel port are in place, the robot may be inserted into the patient.
Next, a camera (a robot camera as disclosed in the attached figures or an auxiliary camera) is inserted through an auxiliary port to view the insertion.
Next, the insertion/extraction mode of the robot is activated from the GUI.
After that, the robot and/or system determines a path from its current state to its insertion pose (arms straight down), and the operator steps through this path to achieve the required pose.
Subsequently, the operator inserts the robot into the patient (through the gel port and through the retractor port) until the elbow joints of the robot clear the interior surface of the abdominal wall.
After that, the operator steps through the insertion path until the elbows reach their end point (90 degrees). The operator then further inserts the robot into the patient until the shoulder joints clear the interior surface of the abdominal wall. The operator continues to step through the insertion path until the robot achieves its “ready” pose (arms in a nominal operating position), at which point, the surgical procedure can proceed.
When the procedure is complete, device extraction follows the above sequence in reverse.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, persons skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application 62/200,563, filed Aug. 3, 2015 and entitled “Robotic Surgical Devices, Systems, and Related Methods,” which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3870264 | Robinson | Mar 1975 | A |
3989952 | Timberlake et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4246661 | Pinson | Jan 1981 | A |
4258716 | Sutherland | Mar 1981 | A |
4278077 | Mizumoto | Jul 1981 | A |
4538594 | Boebel et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4568311 | Miyaki | Feb 1986 | A |
4623183 | Amori | Nov 1986 | A |
4736645 | Zimmer | Apr 1988 | A |
4771652 | Zimmer | Sep 1988 | A |
4852391 | Ruch et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4896015 | Taboada et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4897014 | Tietze | Jan 1990 | A |
4922755 | Oshiro et al. | May 1990 | A |
4922782 | Kawai | May 1990 | A |
4990050 | Tsuge et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5019968 | Wang et al. | May 1991 | A |
5108140 | Bartholet | Apr 1992 | A |
5172639 | Wiesman et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5176649 | Wakabayashi | Jan 1993 | A |
5178032 | Zona et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5187032 | Sasaki et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5187796 | Wang et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5195388 | Zona et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5201325 | McEwen et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5217003 | Wilk | Jun 1993 | A |
5263382 | Brooks et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5271384 | McEwen et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5284096 | Pelrine et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5297443 | Wentz | Mar 1994 | A |
5297536 | Wilk | Mar 1994 | A |
5304899 | Sasaki et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5307447 | Asano et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5353807 | DeMarco | Oct 1994 | A |
5363935 | Schempf et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5382885 | Salcudean et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5388528 | Pelrine et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5436542 | Petelin et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5441494 | Oritz | Aug 1995 | A |
5458131 | Wilk | Oct 1995 | A |
5458583 | McNeely et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5458598 | Feinberg et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5471515 | Fossum et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5515478 | Wang | May 1996 | A |
5524180 | Wang et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5553198 | Wang et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5562448 | Mushabac | Oct 1996 | A |
5588442 | Scovil et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5620417 | Jang et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5623582 | Rosenberg | Apr 1997 | A |
5624380 | Shuichi et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624398 | Smith et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5632761 | Smith et al. | May 1997 | A |
5645520 | Nakamura et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5657429 | Wang et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5657584 | Hamlin | Aug 1997 | A |
5672168 | de la Torre et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5674030 | Sigel | Oct 1997 | A |
5728599 | Rosteker et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5736821 | Suyaman et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5754741 | Wang et al. | May 1998 | A |
5762458 | Wang et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769640 | Jacobus et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5791231 | Cohn et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5792135 | Madhani et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797538 | Heaton et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797900 | Madhani et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5807377 | Madhani et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5808665 | Green | Sep 1998 | A |
5815640 | Wang et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5825982 | Wright et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5841950 | Wang et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5845646 | Lemelson | Dec 1998 | A |
5855583 | Wang et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5876325 | Mizuno et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5878193 | Wang et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5878783 | Smart | Mar 1999 | A |
5895417 | Pomeranz et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5906591 | Dario et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907664 | Wang et al. | May 1999 | A |
5910129 | Koblish et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5911036 | Wright et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5971976 | Wang et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5993467 | Yoon | Nov 1999 | A |
6001108 | Wang et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007550 | Wang et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6030365 | Laufer | Feb 2000 | A |
6031371 | Smart | Feb 2000 | A |
6058323 | Lemelson | May 2000 | A |
6063095 | Wang et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066090 | Yoon | May 2000 | A |
6102850 | Wang et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6106521 | Blewett | Aug 2000 | A |
6107795 | Smart | Aug 2000 | A |
6132368 | Cooper | Oct 2000 | A |
6132441 | Grace | Oct 2000 | A |
6139563 | Cosgrove, III et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6156006 | Brosens et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159146 | El Gazayerli | Dec 2000 | A |
6162171 | Ng et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
D438617 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2001 | S |
6206903 | Ramans | Mar 2001 | B1 |
D441076 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2001 | S |
6223100 | Green | Apr 2001 | B1 |
D441862 | Cooper et al. | May 2001 | S |
6238415 | Sepetka et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240312 | Alfano et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241730 | Alby | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6244809 | Wang et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246200 | Blumenkranz et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
D444555 | Cooper et al. | Jul 2001 | S |
6286514 | Lemelson | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292678 | Hall et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293282 | Lemelson | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296635 | Smith et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309397 | Julian et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309403 | Minoret et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312435 | Wallace et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321106 | Lemelson | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327492 | Lemelson | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331181 | Tierney et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6346072 | Cooper | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6352503 | Matsui et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364888 | Niemeyer et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371952 | Madhani et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6394998 | Wallace et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6398726 | Ramans et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6400980 | Lemelson | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408224 | Lemelson | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6424885 | Niemeyer et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432112 | Brock et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6436107 | Wang et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441577 | Blumenkranz et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6450104 | Grant et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6450992 | Cassidy, Jr. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6451027 | Cooper et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6454758 | Thompson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459926 | Nowlin et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463361 | Wang et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468203 | Belson | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6468265 | Evans et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470236 | Ohtsuki | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6491691 | Morley et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6491701 | Nemeyer et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6493608 | Niemeyer et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496099 | Wang et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6508413 | Bauer et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6512345 | Borenstein | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6522906 | Salisbury, Jr. et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6544276 | Azizi | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6548982 | Papanikolopoulos et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6554790 | Moll | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6565554 | Niemeyer | May 2003 | B1 |
6574355 | Green | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6587750 | Gerbi et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6591239 | McCall et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594552 | Nowlin et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6610007 | Belson et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6620173 | Gerbi et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6642836 | Wang et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6645196 | Nixon et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6646541 | Wang et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6648814 | Kim et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6659939 | Moll et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6661571 | Shioda et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671581 | Niemeyer et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6676684 | Morley et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6684129 | Salisbury, Jr. et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685648 | Flaherty et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6685698 | Morley et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6687571 | Byme et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6692485 | Brock et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6699177 | Wang et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6699235 | Wallace et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6702734 | Kim et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6702805 | Stuart | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6714839 | Salisbury, Jr. et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6714841 | Wright et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6719684 | Kim et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6720988 | Gere et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6726699 | Wright et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728599 | Wright et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730021 | Vassiliades, Jr. et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6731988 | Green | May 2004 | B1 |
6746443 | Morley et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6764441 | Chiel et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6764445 | Ramans et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6766204 | Niemeyer et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6770081 | Cooper et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6774597 | Borenstein | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6776165 | Jin | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6780184 | Tanrisever | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6783524 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785593 | Wang et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788018 | Blumenkranz | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6792663 | Krzyzanowski | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6793653 | Sanchez et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6799065 | Niemeyer | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6799088 | Wang et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6801325 | Farr et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6804581 | Wang et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6810281 | Brock et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6817972 | Snow | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6817974 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6817975 | Farr et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6820653 | Schempf et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6824508 | Kim et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6824510 | Kim et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6832988 | Sprout | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6832996 | Woloszko et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836703 | Wang et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6837846 | Jaffe et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6837883 | Moll et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6839612 | Sanchez et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6840938 | Morley et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6852107 | Wang et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6858003 | Evans et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6860346 | Burt et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6860877 | Sanchez et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6866671 | Tierney et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6870343 | Borenstein et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6871117 | Wang et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6871563 | Choset et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6879880 | Nowlin et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6892112 | Wang et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6899705 | Niemeyer | May 2005 | B2 |
6902560 | Morley et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6905460 | Wang et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6905491 | Wang et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6911916 | Wang et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6917176 | Schempf et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6933695 | Blumenkranz | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936001 | Snow | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6936003 | Iddan | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936042 | Wallace et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6943663 | Wang et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6949096 | Davison et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6951535 | Ghodoussi et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6965812 | Wang et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6974411 | Belson | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6974449 | Niemeyer | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6979423 | Moll | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6984203 | Tartaglia et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6984205 | Gazdzinski | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6991627 | Madhani et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6993413 | Sunaoshi | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6994703 | Wang et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6994708 | Manzo | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6997908 | Carrillo, Jr. et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7025064 | Wang et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7027892 | Wang et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7033344 | Imran | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039453 | Mullick | May 2006 | B2 |
7042184 | Oleynikov et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7048745 | Tierney et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7053752 | Wang et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7063682 | Whayne et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7066879 | Fowler et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066926 | Wallace et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7074179 | Wang et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7077446 | Kameda et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7083571 | Wang et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7083615 | Peterson et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7087049 | Nowlin et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7090683 | Brock et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7097640 | Wang et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7105000 | McBrayer | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7107090 | Salisbury, Jr. et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7109678 | Kraus et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7118582 | Wang et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7121781 | Sanchez et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7125403 | Julian et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7126303 | Farritor et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7147650 | Lee | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155315 | Niemeyer et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7169141 | Brock et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7182025 | Ghorbel et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7182089 | Ries | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7199545 | Oleynikov et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7206626 | Quaid, III | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7206627 | Abovitz et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7210364 | Ghorbel et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7214230 | Brock et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7217240 | Snow | May 2007 | B2 |
7239940 | Wang et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7250028 | Julian et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7259652 | Wang et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7273488 | Nakamura et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7311107 | Harel et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7339341 | Oleynikov et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7372229 | Farritor et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7447537 | Funda et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7492116 | Oleynikov et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7566300 | Devierre et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7574250 | Niemeyer | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7637905 | Saadat et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7645230 | Mikkaichi et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7655004 | Long | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7670329 | Flaherty et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7731727 | Sauer | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7762825 | Burbank et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7772796 | Farritor et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785251 | Wilk | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785333 | Miyamoto et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7789825 | Nobis et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7794494 | Sahatjian et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7865266 | Moll et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7960935 | Farritor et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8021358 | Doyle et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8179073 | Farritor et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8353897 | Doyle et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
9089353 | Farritor | Jul 2015 | B2 |
20010018591 | Brock et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010049497 | Kalloo et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020003173 | Bauer et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013601 | Nobles et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026186 | Woloszka et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020038077 | de la Torre et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020065507 | Azizi | May 2002 | A1 |
20020091374 | Cooper | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103417 | Gazdzinski | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111535 | Kim et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120254 | Julien et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128552 | Nowlin et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140392 | Borenstein et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147487 | Sundquist et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151906 | Demarais et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156347 | Kim et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020171385 | Kim et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020173700 | Kim et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020190682 | Schempf et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030020810 | Takizawa et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030045888 | Brock et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065250 | Chiel et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030089267 | Ghorbel et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030092964 | Kim et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097129 | Davison et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030100817 | Wang et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030114731 | Cadeddu et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030135203 | Wang et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139742 | Wampler et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030144656 | Ocel et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030167000 | Mullick | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030172871 | Scherer | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030179308 | Zamorano et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030181788 | Yokoi et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030229268 | Uchiyama et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030230372 | Schmidt | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040117032 | Roth et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024311 | Quaid | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034282 | Quaid | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034283 | Quaid | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034302 | Abovitz et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040050394 | Jin | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040070822 | Shioda et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040099175 | Perrot et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102772 | Baxter et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106916 | Quaid et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111113 | Nakamura et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040138525 | Saadat | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138552 | Harel et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040140786 | Borenstein | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153057 | Davison | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040173116 | Ghorbel et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040176664 | Iddan | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040215331 | Chew et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225229 | Viola | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040254680 | Sunaoshi | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267326 | Ocel et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050014994 | Fowler et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021069 | Feuer et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050029978 | Oleynikov et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043583 | Killmann et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049462 | Kanazawa | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050054901 | Yoshino | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050054902 | Konno | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050064378 | Toly | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065400 | Banik et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050083460 | Hattori et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050095650 | Khalili et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050096502 | Khalili | May 2005 | A1 |
20050143644 | Gilad et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154376 | Riviere et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165449 | Cadeddu et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177026 | Hoeg | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050283137 | Doyle et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288555 | Binmoeller | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288665 | Woloszko | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060020272 | Gildenberg | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060046226 | Bergler et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060119304 | Farritor et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149135 | Paz | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060152591 | Lin | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155263 | Lipow | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060195015 | Mullick et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060196301 | Oleynikov et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060198619 | Oleynikov et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060241570 | Wilk | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241732 | Denker et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060253109 | Chu | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060258954 | Timberlake | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070032701 | Fowler et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043397 | Ocel et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055342 | Wu et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070080658 | Farritor et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070106113 | Ravo | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123748 | Meglan | May 2007 | A1 |
20070142725 | Hardin et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156019 | Larkin et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156211 | Ferren et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167955 | De La Menardiere et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070225633 | Ferren et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225634 | Ferren et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070241714 | Oleynikov et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244520 | Ferren et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250064 | Darois et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255273 | Fernandez et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080004634 | Farritor et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015565 | Davison | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015566 | Livneh | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033569 | Ferren et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080045803 | Williams | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058835 | Farritor et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080058989 | Oleynikov et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071289 | Cooper | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080103440 | Ferren et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080109014 | Pena | May 2008 | A1 |
20080111513 | Farritor et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080119870 | Williams et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080132890 | Woloszko et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080161804 | Rioux et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080164079 | Ferren et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183033 | Bern et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080221591 | Farritor et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080269557 | Marescaux et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269562 | Marescaux et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090020724 | Paffrath | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024142 | Ruiz Morales | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090048612 | Farritor et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090054909 | Farritor et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090069821 | Farritor et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076536 | Rentschler et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090137952 | Ramamurthy et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090143787 | De La Pena | Jun 2009 | A9 |
20090163929 | Yeung et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171373 | Farritor et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090234369 | Bax et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090236400 | Cole et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240246 | Devill et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090247821 | Rogers | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090248038 | Blumenkranz et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090281377 | Newell et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090305210 | Guru et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100010294 | Conlon et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100016659 | Weitzner et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100016853 | Burbank | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100042097 | Newton et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100056863 | Dejima et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069710 | Yamatani et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069940 | Miller et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100081875 | Fowler | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100139436 | Kawashima et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100198231 | Manzo et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100204713 | Ruiz | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100245549 | Allen et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100262162 | Omori | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100292691 | Brogna | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100318059 | Farritor et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110015569 | Kirschenman et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110020779 | Hannaford et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110071347 | Rogers et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071544 | Steger et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110077478 | Freeman et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110098529 | Ostrovsky et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110152615 | Schostek et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110224605 | Farritor et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110230894 | Simaan | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110237890 | Farritor et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238080 | Ranjit et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110264078 | Lipow | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110270443 | Kamiya et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120035582 | Nelson et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120109150 | Quaid et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120116362 | Kieturakis | May 2012 | A1 |
20120179168 | Farritor | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120253515 | Coste-Maniere et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130041360 | Farritor | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130131695 | Scarfogliero et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130345717 | Scarfogliero et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20140046340 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140058205 | Frederick et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140039515 | Mondry et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140221749 | Grant | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140303434 | Farritor et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150051446 | Farritor et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20170078583 | Haggerty | Mar 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1082821918 | Dec 2012 | CN |
102010040405 | Mar 2012 | DE |
1354670 | Oct 2003 | EP |
2286756 | Feb 2011 | EP |
2286756 | Feb 2011 | EP |
2329787 | Aug 2011 | EP |
2563261 | Mar 2013 | EP |
2004144533 | May 1990 | JP |
5115425 | May 1993 | JP |
200716235 | Jun 1993 | JP |
2006507809 | Sep 1994 | JP |
07 136173 | May 1995 | JP |
7306155 | Nov 1995 | JP |
08-224248 | Sep 1996 | JP |
2001500510 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001505810 | May 2001 | JP |
2003220065 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2004322310 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004180781 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004329292 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2006508049 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2009-106606 | May 2009 | JP |
2010-533045 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2010-536436 | Dec 2010 | JP |
2011-504794 | Feb 2011 | JP |
2011-045500 | Mar 2011 | JP |
2011-115591 | Jun 2011 | JP |
WO 199221291 | May 1991 | WO |
WO 0189405 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 2002082979 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 2002100256 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 2005009211 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2005044095 | May 2005 | WO |
WO 2006052927 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2006 005075 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO 2006079108 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO2006079108 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2007011654 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2007111571 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO 2007149559 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2009023851 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2009144729 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO2010042611 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO2010046823 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO201050771 | May 2010 | WO |
WO 2011118646 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO 2011135503 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO 2011135503 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO 2011075693 | Jul 2012 | WO |
WO 2013009887 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO 2014011238 | Jan 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Abbott et al., “Design of an Endoluminal Notes Robotic System,” from the Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE/RSJ Int'l Cont on Intelligent Robot Systems, San Diego, CA, Oct. 29-Nov. 2, 2007, pp. 410-416. |
Allendorf et al., “Postoperative Immune Function Varies Inversely with the Degree of Surgical Trauma in a Murine Model,” Surgical Endoscopy 1997; 11:427-430. |
Ang, “Active Tremor Compensation in Handheld Instrument for Microsurgery,” Doctoral Dissertation, tech report CMU-RI-TR-04-28, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon Unviersity, May 2004, 167pp. |
Applicant Amendment after Notice of Allowance under Rule 312, filed Aug. 25, 2008, in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/695,944, 6pp. |
Applicant Response to Office Action dated Apr. 17, 2007, in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/552,379, filed Aug. 8, 2007, 7 pp. |
Applicant Response to Office Action dated Aug. 18, 2006, in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/398,174, filed Nov. 7, 2006, 8pp. |
Applicant Response to Office Action dated Aug. 21, 2006, in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/403,756, filed Nov. 21, 2006, 52pp. |
Applicant Response to Office Action dated Oct. 29, 2007, in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/695,944, filed Jan. 22, 2008, 6pp. |
Atmel 8005X2 Core, http://www.atmel.com, 2006, 186pp. |
Bailey et al., “Complications of Laparoscopic Surgery,” Quality Medical Publishers, Inc., 1995, 25pp. |
Ballantyne, “Robotic Surgery, Telerobotic Surgery, Telepresence, and Telementoring,” Surgical Endoscopy, 2002; 16: 1389-1402. |
Bauer et al., “Case Report: Remote Percutaneous Renal Percutaneous Renal Access Using a New Automated Telesurgical Robotic System,” Telemedicine Journal and e-Health 2001; (4): 341-347. |
Begos et al., “Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: From Gimmick to Gold Standard,” J Clin Gastroenterol, 1994; 19(4): 325-330. |
Berg et al., “Surgery with Cooperative Robots,” Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, Feb. 2007, 1 pg. |
Breda et al., “Future developments and perspectives in laparoscopy,” Eur. Urology 2001; 40(1): 84-91. |
Breedveld et al., “Design of Steerable Endoscopes to Improve the Visual Perception of Depth During Laparoscopic Surgery,” ASME, Jan. 2004; vol. 126, pp. 1-5. |
Breedveld et al., “Locomotion through the Intestine by means of Rolling Stents,” Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, 2004, pp. 1-7. |
Calafiore et al., Multiple Arterial Conduits Without Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Early Angiographic Results,: Ann Thorac Surg, 1999; 67: 450-456. |
Camarillo et al., “Robotic Technology in Surgery: Past, Present and Future,” The American Journal of Surgery, 2004; 188: 2S-15. |
Cavusoglu et al., “Telesurgery and Surgical Simulation: Haptic Interfaces to Real and Virtual Surgical Environments,” in McLaughliin, M.L, Hespanha, J.P., and Sukhatme, G., editors. Touch in virtual environments, IMSC Series in Multimedia 2001, 28pp. |
Cavusoglu et al., “Robotics for Telesurgery: Second Generation Berkeley/UCSF Laparoscopic Telesurgical Workstation and Looking Towards the Future Applications,” Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 2003; 30(1): 22-29. |
Chanthasopeephan et al., (2003), “Measuring Forces in Liver Cutting: New Equipment and Experimenal Results,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering 31: 1372-1382. |
Choi et al., “Flexure-based Manipulator for Active Handheld Microsurgical Instrument,” Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS), Sep. 2005, 4pp. |
Cuschieri, “Technology for Minimal Access Surgery,” BMJ, 1999, 319: 1-6. |
Dakin et al., “Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems,” Surg Endosc., 2003; 17: 574-579. |
Dumpert et al., “Improving in Vivo Robot Visioin Quality,” from the Proceedings of Medicine Meets Virtual Realtiy, Long Beach, CA, Jan. 26-29, 2005. 1 pg. |
Dumpert et al., “Stereoscopic In Vivo Surgical Robots,” IEEE Sensors Special Issue on In Vivo Sensors for Medicine, Jan. 2007, 10 pp. |
Examiner Interview Summary dated Aug. 6 and Aug. 12, 2008, in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/695,944, 1 pg. |
Examiner Interview Summary dated May 9, 2008, in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/695,944, 1 pg. |
Examiner Interview Summary dated Nov. 30, 2006, in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/398,174, 2pp. |
Falcone et al., “Robotic Surgery,” Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2003, 46(1): 37-43. |
Faraz et al., “Engineering Approaches to Mechanical and Robotic Design for Minimaly Invasive Surgery (MIS),” Kluwer Academic Publishers (Boston), 2000, 13pp. |
Fearing et al., “Wing Transmission for a Micromechanical Flying Insect,” Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference to Robotics & Automation, Apr. 2000; 1509-1516. |
Fireman et al., “Diagnosing small bowel Crohn's desease with wireless capsule endoscopy,” Gut 2003; 52: 390-392. |
Flynn et al., “Tomorrow's Surgery: micromotors and microbots for minimally invasive procedures,” Minimally Invasive Surgery & Allied Technologies. |
Franklin et al., “Prospective Comparison of Open vs. Laparoscopic Colon Surgery for Carcinoma: Five-Year Results,” Dis Colon Rectum, 1996; 39: S35-S46. |
Fraulob et al., “Miniature assistance module for robot-assisted heart surgery,” Biomed. Tech. 2002, 47 Suppl. 1, Pt. 1: 12-15. |
Fukuda et al., “Mechanism and Swimming Experiment of Micro Mobile Robot in Water,” Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1994: 814-819. |
Fukuda et al., “Micro Active Catheter System with Multi Degrees of Freedom,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 1994, pp. 2290-2295. |
Fuller et al., “Laparoscopic Trocar Injuries: A Report from a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) Systematic Technology Assessment of Medical Products (STAMP) Committe,” U.S. Food and Drug Adminstration, available at http://www.fdaJ:?;ov, Finalized: Nov. 7, 2003; Updated: Jun. 24, 2005, 11 pp. |
Grady, “Doctors Try New Surgery for Gallbladder Removal,” The New York Times, Apr. 20, 2007, 3 pp. |
Guber et al., “Miniaturized Instrumetn Systems for Minimally Invasive Diagnosis and Therapy,” Biomedizinishe Technic. 2002, Band 47, Erganmngsband 1:. |
Patronik et al., “Development of a Tethered Epicardial Crawler for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Therapies,” IEEE, pp. 239-240. |
Patronik et al., “Crawling on the Heart: A Mobile Robotic Device for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Interventions,” MICCAI, 2004, pp. 9-16. |
Patronik et al., “Preliminary evaluation of a mobile robotic device for navigation and intervention on the beating heart,” Computer Aided Surgery, 10(4): 225-232, Jul. 2005. |
Peirs et al., “A miniature manipulator for integration in a self-propelling endoscope,” Sensors and Actuators A, 2001, 92: 343-349. |
Peters, “Minimally Invasive Colectomy: Are the Potential Benefits Realized?” Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 751-756. |
Phee et al., “Analysis and Development of Locomotion Devices for the Gastrointestinal Tract,” IEEE Transaction on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 49, No. 6, Jun. 2002, pp. 613-616. |
Phee et al., “Development of Microrobotic Devices for Locomotion in the Human Gastrointestinal Tract,” International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Robotics and Autonomous Systems (CIRAS 2001), Nov. 28-30, 2001, Singapore. |
Platt et al., “In Vivo Robotic Cameras can Enhance Imaging Capability During Laparoscopic Surgery,” in the Proceedings of the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Scientific Conference, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, Apr. 13-16, 2005, I pg. |
Preliminary Amendment filed Apr. 11, 2007, in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/403,756, 7 pp. |
Preliminary Amendment filed Jul. 30, 2008, in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/171,413, 4 pp. |
RCE and Amendment filed Jun. 13, 2007, in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/403,756, 8 pp. |
Rentschler et al., “Mobile In Vivo Biopsy and Camera Robot,” Studies in Health and Infonnalics Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, vol. 119., pp. 449-454, IOS Press, Long Beach, CA, 2006e. |
Rentschler et al., Mobile In Vivo Biopsy Robot, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Orlando, Florida, May 2006, pp. 4155-4160. |
Rentschler et al., “Miniature in vivo Robots for Remote and Harsh Environments,” IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, Jan. 2006; 12(1): 66-75. |
Rentschler et al., “An In Vivo Mobile Robot for Surgical Vision and Task Assistance,” Journal of Medical Devices, Mar. 2007, vol. 1: 23-29. |
Rentschler et al., “In vivo Mobile Surgical Robotic Task Assistance,” 1 pg. |
Rentschler et al., “In vivo Robotics during the NEEMO 9 Mission,” Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, Feb. 2007, I pg. |
Rentschler et al., “In Vivo Robots for Laparoscopic Surgery,” Studies in Health Technology and Infonnatics—Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, ISO Press, Newport Beach, CA, 2004a, 98: 316-322. |
Rentschler et al., “Mechanical Design of Robotic In Vivo Wheeled Mobility,” ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 2006a, I-II. |
Rentschler et al., “Mobile In Vivo Camera Robots Provide Sole Visual Feedback for Abdominal Exploration and Cholecystectomy,” Journal of Surgical Endoscopy, 20-I: 135-138, 2006b. |
Rentschler et al., “Mobile In Vivo Robots Can Assist in Abdominal Exploration,” from the Proceedings of the Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Scientific Conference, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, Apr. 13-16, 2005b. |
Rentschler et al., “Modeling, Analysis, and Experimental Study of In Vivo Wheeled Robotic Mobility,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 22 (2): 308-321, 2005c. |
Rentschler et al., “Natural Orifice Surgery with an Endoluminal Mobile Robot,” The Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons, Dallas, TX, Apr. 2006d, 14 pp. |
Rentschler et al., “Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of In Vivo Wheeled Mobility,” ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences: 28th Biennial Mechanisms and Robotics Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, Sep. 28-Oct. 2, 2004, pp. 1-9. |
Rentschler et al., “Toward In Vivo Mobility,” Studies in Health Technology and Infonnatics—Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, ISO Press, Long Beach, CA, 2005a, III: 397-403. |
Response to Rule 312 Amendment in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/695,944, dated Jan. 12, 2009, 2 pp. |
Riviere et al., “Toward Active Tremor Canceling in Handheld Microsurgical Instruments,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Oct. 2003, 19(5): 793-800. |
Rosen et al., “Force Controlled and Teleoperated Endoscopic, Grasper for Minimally Invasive Surgery—Experimental Performance Evaluation,” IEEE Transactions of Biomedical Engineering, Oct. 1999; 46(10): 1212-1221. |
Rosen et al., “Objective Laparoscopic Skills Assessments of Surgical Residents Using Hidden Markov Models Based on Haptic Information and Tool/Tissue Interactions,” Studies in Health Technology and Infonnatics—Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, Jan. 2001, 7 pp. |
Rosen et al., “Spherical Mechanism Analysis of a Surgical Robot for Minimally Invasive Surgery—Analytical and Experimental Approaches,” Studies in Health Technology and Informatics-Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, pp. 442-448, Jan. 2005. |
Rosen et al., “Task Decomposition of Laparoscopic Surgery for Objective Evaluation of Surgical Residents' Learning Curve Using Hidden Markov Model,” Computer Aided Surgery, vol. 7, pp. 49-61, 2002. |
Rosen et al., “The Blue Dragon—A System of Measuring the Kinematics and the Dynamics of Minimally Invasive Surgical Tools In-Vivo,” Proc. of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Washington, DC, pp. 1876-1881, May 2002. |
Ruurda et al., “Robot-Assisted surgical systems: a new era in laparoscopic surgery,” Ann R. Coll Surg Engl., 2002; 84: 223-226. |
Ruurda et al., “Feasibility of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery,” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 2002; 12(1):41-45. |
Sackier et al., “Robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery,” Surgical Endoscopy, 1994; 8: 63-66. |
Salky, “What is the Penetration of Endoscopic Techniques into Surgical Practice?” Digestive Surgery, 2000; 17:422-426. |
Satava, “Surgical Robotics: The Early Chronicles,” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 2002; 12(1): 6-16. |
Schippers et al., (1996) “Requirements and Possibilities of Computer-Assisted Endoscopic Surgery,” In: Computer Integrated Surgery: Technology and Clinical Applications, pp. 561-565. |
Schurr et al., “Robotics and Telemanipulation Technologies for Endoscopic Surgery,” Surgical Endoscopy, 2000; 14: 375-381. |
Schwartz, “In the Lab: Robots that Slink and Squirm,” The New York Times, Mar. 27, 2007, 4 pp. |
Sharp LL-151-3D, http://www.sharp3d.com, 2006, 2 pp. |
Slatkin et al., “The Development of a Robotic Endoscope,” Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 162-171, 1995. |
Smart Pill “Fastastic Voyage: Smart Pill to Expand Testing,” http://www.smartpilldiagnostics.com, Apr. 13, 2005, 1 pg. |
Southern Surgeons Club (1991), “A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies,” N. Eng. 1 Med. 324 (16): 1073-1078. |
Stefanini et al., “Modeling and Experiments on a Legged Microrobot Locomoting in a Tubular Compliant and Slippery Environment,” Int. Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 25, No. 5-6, pp. 551-560, May-Jun. 2006. |
Stiff et al.., “Long-term Pain: Less Common After Laparoscopic than Open Cholecystectomy,” British Journal of Surgery, 1994; 81: 1368-1370. |
Strong, et al., “Efficacy of Novel Robotic Camera vs. a Standard Laproscopic Camera,” Surgical Innovation vol. 12, No. 4, Dec. 2005, Westminster Publications, Inc., pp. 315-318. |
Suzumori et al., “Development of Flexible Microactuator and its Applications to Robotics Mechanisms,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1991: 1622-1627. |
Taylor et al., “A Telerobotic Assistant for Laparoscopic Surgery,” IEEE Eng Med Biol, 1995; 279-287. |
Tendick et al.. (1993), “Sensing and Manipulation Problems in Endoscopic Surgery: Experiment, Analysis, and Observation,” Presence 2( 1): 66-81. |
Palm, William, “Rapid Prototyping Primer” May 1998 (revised Jul. 30, 2002) (http://www.me.psu.edu/lamancusa/rapidpro/primer/chapter2.htm). |
Stoianovici et al., “Robotic Tools for Minimally Invasive Urologic Surgery”, Jan. 1, 2002, pp. 1-17. |
Cleary et al., “State of the Art in Surgical Rootics: Clinical Applications and Technology Challenges”, “Computer Aided Surgery”, Jan. 1, 2002, pp. 312-328, vol. 6. |
Green, “Telepresence Surgery”, Jan. 1, 1995, Publisher: IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability from related case PCT/US2007/014567, dated Jan. 8, 2009, 11 pp. |
International Search report and Written Opinion from international application No. PCT/US2012/41911, dated Mar. 13, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from international application No. PCT/US12/46274, dated Sep. 25, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from international application No. PCT/US2007/089191, dated Nov. 10, 2008, 20 pp. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion from international application No. PCT/US07/14567, dated Apr. 28, 2008, 19 pp.” |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of international application No. PCT/US2008/069822, dated Aug. 5, 2009, 12 pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of international application No. PCT/US2008/073334, dated Jan. 12, 2009, 11 pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of international application No. PCT/US2008/073369, dated Nov. 12, 2008, 12 pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US11/46809, dated Dec. 8, 2011. |
Ishiyama et al., “Spiral-type Micro-machine for Medical Applications,” 2000 International Symposium on Micromechatronics and Human Science, 2000: 65-69. |
Jagannath et al., “Peroral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long-term survival in a porcine model,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2005; 61(3): 449-453. |
Kalloo et al., “Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2004; 60(1): 114-117. |
Kang et al., “Robotic Assistants Aid Surgeons During Minimally Invasive Procedures,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, Jan.-Feb. 2001; pp. 94-104. |
Kantsevoy et al., “Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2005; 62(2): 287-292. |
Kantsevoy et al., “Transgastric endoscopic splenectomy,” Surgical Endoscopy, 2006; 20: 522-525. |
Kazemier et al. (1998), “Vascular Injuries During Laparoscopy,” J. Am. Coli. Surg. 186(5): 604-5. |
Kim, “Early Experience with Telemanipulative Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using da Vinci,” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 2002; 12(1):33-40. |
Ko et al., “Per-Oral transgastric abdominal surgery,” Chinese Journal of Digestive Diseases, 2006; 7: 67-70. |
Lafullarde et al., “Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication: Five-year Results and Beyond,” Arch/Surg, Feb. 2001; 136:180-184. |
Leggett et al. (2002), “Aortic injury during laparoscopic fundoplication,” Surg. Endoscopy 16(2): 362. |
Li et al. (2000), “Microvascular Anastomoses Performed in Rats Using a Microsurgical Telemanipulator,” Comp. Aid. Surg. 5: 326-332. |
Liem et al., “Comparison of Conventional Anterior Surgery and Laparoscopic Surgery for Inguinal-hernia Repair,” New England Journal of Medicine, 1997; 336 (22): 1541-1547. |
Macfarlane et al., “Force-Feedback Grasper Helps Restore the Sense of Touch in Minimally Invasive Surgery,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 1999; 3: 278-285. |
Mack et al., “Present Role of Thoracoscopy in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Diseases of the Chest,” Ann Thorac Surgery, 1992; 54: 403-409. |
Mack, “Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery,” JAMA, Feb. 2001; 285(5): 568-572. |
Mei et al., “Wireless Drive and Control of a Swimming Microrobot,” Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International conference on Robotics & Automation, May 2002: 1131-1136. |
Melvin et al., “Computer-Enhanced vs. Standard Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery,” J Gastrointest Surg 2002; 6: 11-16. |
Menciassi et al., “Locomotion of a Leffed Capsule in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Theoretical Study and Preliminary Technological Results,” IEEE Int. Conf. on Engineering in Medicine and Biology, San Francisco, CA, pp. 2767-2770, Sep. 2004. |
Menciassi et al., “Robotic Solutions and Mechanisms for a Semi-Autonomous Endoscope,” Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE/RSJ Intl. Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Oct. 2002; 1379-1384. |
Menciassi et al., “Shape memory alloy clamping devices of a capsule for monitoring tasks in the gastrointestinal tract,” J. Micromech. Microeng, 2005, 15: 2045-2055. |
Meron, “The development of the swallowable video capsule (M2A),” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2000; 52 6: 817-819. |
Micron, http://www.micron.com, 2006, I/4-inch VGA NTSC/PAL CMOS Digital Image Sensor, 98 pp. |
Midday Jeff et al., “Material Handling System for Robotic natural Orifice Surgery”, Proceedings of the 2011 Design of medical Devices Conference, Apr. 12-14, 2011, Minneapolis, MN, 4 pages. |
Miller, Ph.D., et al., “In-Vivo Stereoscopic Imaging System with 5 Degrees-of-Freedom for Minimal Access Surgery,” Dept. of Computer Science and Dept. of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, 7 pp. |
Munro (2002), “Laparoscopic access: complications, technologies, and techniques,” Curro Opin. Obstet. Gynecol., 14(4): 365-74. |
Nio et al., “Efficiency of manual vs robotical (Zeus) assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of standardized tasks,” Surg Endosc, 2002; 16: 412-415. |
Office Action dated Apr. 17, 2007, received in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/552,379, 5 pp. |
Office Action dated Apr. 3, 2009, received in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,516, 43 pp. |
Office Action dated Aug. 18, 2006, received in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/398,174, 6 pp. |
Office Action dated Aug. 21, 2006, received in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/403,756, 6 pp. |
Office Action dated Oct. 29, 2007, received in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/695,944, 6 pp. |
Office Action dated Oct. 9, 2008, received in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,441, 4 pp. |
Oleynikov et al., “In Vivo Camera Robots Provide Improved Vision for Laparoscopic Surgery,” Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (CARS), Chicago, IL, Jun. 23-26, 2004b. |
Oleynikov et al., “In Vivo Robotic Laparoscopy,” Surgical Innovation, Jun. 2005, 12(2): 177-181. |
Oleynikov et al., “Miniature Robots Can Assist in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy,” Journal of Surgical Endoscopy, 19-4: 473-476, 2005. |
O'Neill, “Surgeon takes new route to gallbladder,” The Oregonian, Jun. 2007, 2 pp. |
Orlando et al., (2003), “Needle and Trocar Injuries in Diagnostic Laparoscopy under Local Anesthesia: What is the True Incidence of These Complications?” Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques 13(3): 181-184. |
Park et al., “Trocar-less Instrumentation for Laparoscopy: Magnetic Positioning of Intra-abdominal Camera and Retractor,” Ann Surg, Mar. 2007; 245(3): 379-384. |
Park et al., “Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery: cholecystectomy and cholecystogastric anastomosis (videos),” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2005; 61(4): 601-606. |
Tendick et al., “Applications of Micromechatronics in Minimally Invasive Surgery,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 1998; 3(1): 34-42. |
Thomann et al., “The Design of a new type of Micro Robot for the Intestinal Inspection,” Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE Intl. Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Oct. 2002: 1385-1390. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/180,960, filed Feb. 2000. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/956,032, filed Aug. 15, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/983,445, filed Oct. 29, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/990,062, filed Nov. 26, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/990,076, filed Nov. 26, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/990,086, filed Nov. 26, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/990,106, filed Nov. 26, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/990,470, filed Nov. 27, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/025,346, filed Feb. 1, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/030,588, filed Feb. 22, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/030,617, filed Feb. 22, 2008. |
Way et al., (editors), “Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery,” Churchill Livingstone Inc., 1995, 14 pp. |
Wolfe et al., “Endoscopic Cholecystectomy: An analysis of Complications,” Arch. Surg. Oct. 1991; 126: 1192-1196. |
Worn et al., “Espirit Project No. 33915: Miniaturised Robot for Micro Manipulation (MINIMAN)”, Nov. 1998; http://www.ipr.ira.ujka.de/-microbot/miniman. |
Yu et al., “Microrobotic Cell Injection,” Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 2001; 620-625. |
Yu, Bsn, Rn, “M2ATM Capsule Endoscopy a Breakthrough Diagnostic Tool for Small Intestine Imagining,” vol. 25, No. 1, Gastroenterology Nursing, pp. 24-27. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of international application No. PCT/US2010/061137, dated Feb. 11, 2011, 10 pp. |
Abbou et al., “Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy with a Remote Controlled Robot,” The Journal of Urology, Jun. 2001, 165: 1964-1966. |
Glukhovsky et al., “The development and application of wireless capsule endoscopy,” Int. J. Med. Robot. Comput. Assist. Surgery, 2004; I (1): 114-123. |
Gong et al., Wireless endoscopy, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2000; 51(6): 725-729. |
Hanly et al., “Value of the SAGES Learning Center in introducing new technology,” Surgical Endoscopy, 2004; 19(4):477-483. |
Hanly et al., “Robotic Abdominal Surgery,” The American Journal of Surgery 188 (Suppl.to Oct. 1994): 19S-26S, 2004. |
Heikkinen et al., “Comparison of laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication two years after operation: A prospective randomized trial,” Surgical Endoscopy, 2000; 14: 1019-1023. |
Hissink, “Olympus Medical develops capsule camera technology,” Dec. 2004, accessed Aug. 29, 2007, http://www.letsgodigital.org , 3 pp. |
Horgan et al., “Technical Report: Robots in Laparoscopic Surgery,” Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2001; 11(6): 415-419. |
Franzino, “The Laprotek Surgical System and the Next Generation of Robotics,” Surg Clin North Am, 2003 83(6): 1317-1320. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170035526 A1 | Feb 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62200563 | Aug 2015 | US |