The present invention relates to an isolation technique, and more particularly, to a semiconductor device using one or more slots added to an isolation region surrounding an inductor for isolation improvement.
Inductors are indispensable to many circuits. However, an inductor of one circuit may be interfered with an inductor of another circuit due to mutual inductance. Specifically, when two inductors are brought in proximity with each other, the magnetic field in one of the inductors tends to link with the other, which further leads to the generation of current and voltage in the other inductor. This property of an inductor which affects or changes the current and voltage in the other inductor is called mutual inductance. A typical inductor isolation improvement technique is to increase the distance between two inductors. However, when the typical inductor isolation improvement technique is employed, the circuit design suffers from a strict layout constraint due to such a long safety distance between inductors. Thus, there is a need for an innovative inductor isolation design which is capable of achieving isolation improvement to meet the isolation requirement under a shorter safety distance.
One of the objectives of the claimed invention is to provide a semiconductor device using one or more slots added to an isolation region surrounding an inductor for isolation improvement.
According to a first aspect of the present invention, an exemplary semiconductor device is disclosed. The exemplary semiconductor device includes a metal layer, a ground plane formed on the metal layer, a first inductor formed on the metal layer, and a first isolation region formed on the metal layer and arranged to separate the first inductor from the ground plane. The first isolation region includes a first main area and at least one first slot. The first main area surrounds the first inductor. The at least one first slot is extended from the first main area.
According to a second aspect of the present invention, an exemplary semiconductor device is disclosed. The exemplary semiconductor device includes a metal layer, a ground plane formed on the metal layer, the first inductor formed on the metal layer, the second inductor formed on the metal layer, and a first isolation region formed on the metal layer and arranged to separate the first inductor from the ground plane. A shape of the first isolation region is configured to reduce a coupling coefficient of mutual inductance between the first inductor and the second inductor.
These and other objectives of the present invention will no doubt become obvious to those of ordinary skill in the art after reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment that is illustrated in the various figures and drawings.
Certain terms are used throughout the following description and claims, which refer to particular components. As one skilled in the art will appreciate, electronic equipment manufacturers may refer to a component by different names. This document does not intend to distinguish between components that differ in name but not in function. In the following description and in the claims, the terms “include” and “comprise” are used in an open-ended fashion, and thus should be interpreted to mean “include, but not limited to . . . ”. Also, the term “couple” is intended to mean either an indirect or direct electrical connection. Accordingly, if one device is coupled to another device, that connection may be through a direct electrical connection, or through an indirect electrical connection via other devices and connections.
It should be noted that positions and size of slots 116_1-116_3 shown in
The principle of using at least one slot implemented in the isolation region 112 to improve isolation of the inductor 108 is described with reference to the accompanying drawings. Please refer to
Compared to an inductor isolation improvement technique that places a shielding ring around an on-chip inductor, the proposed inductor isolation improvement technique does not have an impact on the quality factor of the on-chip inductor, does not shift an inductance value of the on-chip inductor, and can have isolation improvement much larger than 10 dB. Compared to an inductor isolation improvement technique that uses an 8-shaped inductor as an on-chip inductor, the proposed inductor isolation improvement technique does not suffer from self-cancellation deconstruction caused by unbalanced fields of the 8-shaped inductor, and therefore can work well when the isolation requirement is tough.
The position of the at least one slot depends on a relative position between the inductor (e.g., victim) 108 and the inductor (e.g., aggressor) 106. For example, regarding trimming of the coupling coefficient K, the position of one slot (e.g., any of slots 116_1, 116_2, and 116_3) can be determined by a simple trial and error method. However, this is for illustrative purposes only, and is not meant to be a limitation of the present invention.
The size of the at least one slot depends on a compensation range of the coupling coefficient K. For example, the size of one slot (e.g., any of slots 116_1, 116_2, and 116_3) can be configured by a metal option. The size of one slot (e.g., any of slots 116_1, 116_2, and 116_3) is not reconfigurable after the metal option is selected and then manufactured in the foundry.
The configurable slot array 408 includes a plurality of slots 410_1, 410_2, 410_3, 410_4, 410_5. The effective size of the configurable slot array 408 is decided by a metal option 412. In this example, the metal option 412 is fabricated in the foundry, and is connected to the ground plane 401 and separates the slots 410_3, 410_4, 410_5 from the slots 410_1, 410_2, where each of the slots 410_3, 410_4, 410_5 is surrounded by the ground voltage and may be regarded as a part of the ground plane 401. Hence, the effective size of the configurable slot array 408 depends on sizes of the slots 410_1, 410_2 only. In other words, the effective size of the configurable slot array 408 depends on the number of slots that are not disabled by the metal option 412. With a proper design of the metal option 412, the effective size of the configurable slot array 408 can meet the requirement of reducing or minimizing the coupling coefficient K for isolation improvement of the inductor 402.
For another example, the size of one slot (e.g., any of slots 116_1, 116_2, and 116_3) can be configured by at least one metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOS) switch. Hence, the size of one slot (e.g., any of slots 116_1, 116_2, and 116_3) can be reconfigurable through adjusting an on/off state of each MOS switch.
The configurable slot array 508 includes a plurality of slots 510_1, 510_2, 510_3, 510_4, 510_5. The size of the configurable slot array 508 is decided by on/off states of a plurality of MOS switches 512_1, 512_2, 512_3, 512_4, 512_5, each having two ends connected to the ground plane 501. When the MOS switch 512_5 is turned on, the slot 510_5 is surrounded by the ground voltage and may be regarded as a part of the ground plane 501. When the MOS switches 512_4 and 512_5 are turned on, each of the slots 510_4 and 510_5 is surrounded by the ground voltage and may be regarded as a part of the ground plane 501. When the MOS switches 512_3, 512_4 and 512_5 are turned on, each of the slots 510_3, 510_4 and 510_5 is surrounded by the ground voltage and may be regarded as a part of the ground plane 501. When the MOS switches 512_2, 512_3, 512_4 and 512_5 are turned on, each of the slots 510_2, 510_3, 510_4 and 510_5 is surrounded by the ground voltage and may be regarded as a part of the ground plane 501. When the MOS switches 512_1, 512_2, 512_3, 512_4 and 512_5 are turned on, each of the slots 510_1, 510_2, 510_3, 510_4 and 510_5 is surrounded by the ground voltage and may be regarded as a part of the ground plane 501. Hence, the configurable slot array 508 has a smallest size when all of the MOS switches 512_1-512_5 are turned on, and has a largest size when none of the MOS switches 512_1-512_5 is turned on. An effective size of the configurable slot array 508 depends on the number of MOS switches that are turned off. With a proper control of the MOS switches 512_1-512_5, the effective size of the configurable slot array 508 can meet the requirement of reducing or minimizing the coupling coefficient K for isolation improvement of the inductor 502.
The coupling coefficient K of mutual inductance between the inductor (e.g., victim) 108 and the inductor (e.g., aggressor) 106 can be reduced by properly configuring the at least one slot (e.g., slots 116_1-116_3) extended from the main part 114 of the isolation region 112, which allows a shorter safety distance between the inductor (e.g., victim) 108 and the inductor (e.g., aggressor) 106. For example, a safety distance between the inductor (e.g., victim) 108 and the inductor (e.g., aggressor) 106 may be shorter than 4000 micrometers (um), and the absolute value of the coupling coefficient K may be smaller than 1000 u for meeting the isolation requirement depending on specifications of the semiconductor device. In other examples, the safety distance between the inductor (e.g., victim) 108 and the inductor (e.g., aggressor) 106 is shorter than 900 micrometers (um), and the at least one slot (e.g., slots 116_1-116_3) extended from the main part 114 of the isolation region 112 is configured to make an absolute value of the coupling coefficient K smaller than 1 u for meeting the isolation requirement. For example, with the help of the configurable slot array 408/508, an absolute value of the coupling coefficient K can be trimmed from a large value (e.g., K=10 u) to a small value (e.g., K<1 u), which is equivalent to a 20 dB-50 dB improvement. With the help of the 20 dB-50 dB improvement of the coupling coefficient K, the safety distance can be reduced from a large value (e.g., 1800 um) to a small value (e.g., 850 um), where the isolation requirement (e.g., |K|<1 u) can still be met under a condition that the distance between inductors 106 and 108 is equal to the small value (e.g., 850 um).
In the above embodiment, the proposed inductor isolation improvement technique is applied to an inductor being a victim. However, this is for illustrative purposes only, and is not meant to be a limitation of the present invention. Since an inductor is a passive component, the proposed inductor isolation improvement technique can be applied to an inductor being either a victim or an aggressor.
In some embodiments, the inductor 106 may be a part of a first digitally controlled oscillator (DCO), and the inductor 108 may be a part of a second DCO that is placed in the proximity of the first DCO, where the proposed inductor isolation improvement technique enables a shorter safety distance between the inductors 106 and 108 under a condition that the isolation requirement is met. By way of example, but not limitation, both of the first DCO and the second DCO are included in the same radio-frequency (RF) chip. However, this is for illustrative purposes only, and is not meant to be a limitation of the present invention. The inductor 106 may be a part of an oscillator, an amplifier, a balun, a transformer, a mixer or a divider. The inductor 108 may be apart of an oscillator, an amplifier, a balun, a transformer, a mixer, or a divider. In practice, any semiconductor device using the proposed inductor isolation improvement technique falls within the scope of the present invention.
Those skilled in the art will readily observe that numerous modifications and alterations of the device and method may be made while retaining the teachings of the invention. Accordingly, the above disclosure should be construed as limited only by the metes and bounds of the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/325,618, filed on Mar. 31, 2022. The content of the application is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63325618 | Mar 2022 | US |