The production of semiconductor devices at decreasing geometries and at lower costs has long been recognized as one of the key contributing factors to the widespread benefits of the digital age. The cost of a semiconductor device is set largely by the size of the substrate, the cost of materials that are consumed as the substrate is processed, and by the amount of capital overhead that is assignable to each part. The first two contributors to cost can be reduced by decreasing the size of the device, and by utilizing readily available materials. Capital overhead costs can be decreased by using readily available manufacturing equipment, and through the development of processing techniques that eliminate the need for more exotic equipment and reduce the time it takes to build each device. These processing techniques are sometimes associated with distinctive manufacturing features that provide evidence of how the device was made.
A self-aligned gate is a manufacturing feature that is indicative of a particular processing technique that can be described with reference to
In addition to reducing the number of processing steps required, a self-aligned gate process produces an additional benefit in that the resulting device has superior characteristics when compared to devices formed according to certain alternative processing methodologies. The performance of a transistor is directly impacted by the interdependence of the gate, channel, source, and drain regions of the transistor. In particular, it is important to tightly control the location of the source-channel and drain-channel junctions relative to the gate of the transistor. As the same mask is used to form both the gate stack and the source and drain regions in a self-aligned gate process, errors resulting from the misalignment of two different masks are eliminated. The self-aligned gate process therefore provides for both a more cost effective and functionally superior device.
In one embodiment, a method comprises forming a gate on a semiconductor on insulator wafer. The semiconductor on insulator wafer comprises a device region, a buried insulator, and a substrate. The method also comprises applying a treatment to the semiconductor on insulator wafer using the gate as a mask. The treatment creates a treated insulator region in the buried insulator. The method also comprises removing at least a portion of the substrate. The method also comprises selectively removing the treated insulator region from the buried insulator to form a remaining insulator region after removing the portion of the substrate.
In another embodiment, a method comprises forming a gate on a semiconductor on insulator wafer. The semiconductor on insulator wafer comprises a device region, a buried insulator, and a substrate. The exemplary method further comprises applying a treatment to the semiconductor on insulator wafer using the gate as a mask. The treatment creates a treated insulator region in the buried insulator. The exemplary method also comprises removing at least a portion of the substrate. The exemplary method also comprises, selectively removing the treated insulator region from the buried insulator to form a remaining insulator region after removing that portion of the substrate.
In another embodiment, a semiconductor device comprises a gate formed on a semiconductor on insulator wafer. The semiconductor on insulator wafer comprises a device region and a buried insulator. The gate is formed on a top side of the device region. The device region is less than 100 nanometers thick. The semiconductor device also comprises a deposited layer located: (i) in an excavated region of the buried insulator; (ii) on a back side of the device region; and (iii) along a vertical edge of a remaining region of the buried insulator. A vertical edge of the gate is aligned to the vertical edge of the remaining region of the buried insulator within a margin of error. The margin of error is less than 80 nanometers.
As used herein and in the appended claims, the “top” of SOI structure 200 references a top surface 208 while the “bottom” of SOI structure 200 references a bottom surface 209. This orientation scheme persists regardless of the relative orientation of the SOI structure 200 to other frames of reference, and the removal of layers from, or the addition of layers to the SOI structure 200. Therefore, the active layer 206 is always “above” the insulator layer 205. In addition, a vector originating in the center of active layer 206 and extending towards the bottom surface 209 will always point in the direction of the “back side” of the SOI structure 200 regardless of the relative orientation of the SOI structure 200 to other frames of references, and the removal of layers from, or the addition of layers to the SOI structure 200.
Reference now will be made in detail to embodiments of the disclosed invention, one or more examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Each example is provided by way of explanation of the present technology, not as a limitation of the present technology. In fact, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that modifications and variations can be made in the present technology without departing from the spirit and scope thereof. For instance, features illustrated or described as part of one embodiment may be used with another embodiment to yield a still further embodiment. Thus, it is intended that the present subject matter covers all such modifications and variations within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
Active device layer 206 of semiconductor on insulator (SOI) structure 200 is a critical region in terms of the performance of the semiconductor device of which structure 200 is a part. In order to create active devices with a desired characteristic, efforts need to be taken to protect the device layer from processing steps that introduce excessive variation into the active layer. For example, it is generally beneficial to not disrupt the interface between active device layer 206 and insulator layer 205. In particular, in the region of active device layer 206 in which a channel is to be formed, the interruption of this interface may create dangling bonds that will alter the relationship of the voltage in the gate electrode of gate 207 to the current in the channel region, and may deleteriously degrade the mobility of carries in the channel resulting in a device that cannot operate at high frequency. However, benefits can arise from patterning the insulator layer 205 from the back side such that different materials can be placed in close proximity to the channel of an active device without overly disrupting the active layer. For example, thermal dissipation layers can be placed in close proximity to the channel regions of active devices in active device layer 206 to channel heat away from the active devices. As another example, strain layers can be deposited in close proximity to the channel regions of the active devices to enhance the mobility of carriers in the channel. As a further example, electrical contacts can be formed through a patterned insulator that need to be aligned with contact regions that lie in or above active device layer 206.
A method for producing a semiconductor structure with self-aligned back side features can be described with reference to the flow chart in
SOI structure 400 in
SOI structure 400 in
Process 300 continues with step 302 in which a treatment is applied to the SOI wafer using the gate as a mask. The treatment forms a treated insulator region in the buried insulator layer. In specific approaches, the treatment is applied to the top side of the SOI wafer. For example, the treatment could comprise the diffusion of dopant ions into the active layer and buried insulator. As another example, the treatment could comprise an ion implant to dope the buried insulator layer. The treatment uses the gate as a mask such that the treatment is effectively self-aligned. However, the gate could be used as either a negative or positive mask such that the treated insulator region could be formed in the buried insulator layer below the gate, or outside the lateral scope of the gate. The treatment could be applied in a wafer level process such that multiple gates on multiple devices would provide the pattern for the treated insulator layer. In situations in which the gate acted as a negative mask, the first exposure would prime the insulator layer that was outside the lateral scope of the gate to withstand a second processing step meant to ultimately form the treated insulator region within the lateral scope of the gate. In a particular example, the treatment will be a self-aligned ion implant into a buried oxide layer of a silicon on oxide wafer to form a doped region of the buried oxide that is aligned with, but outside the lateral scope of, the channels of the wafer.
SOI structure 400 in
Ion bombardment 412 could comprise various ion implant species. For example, the bombardment could comprise boron, phosphorous, or arsenic. In particular, the ion bombardment 412 could comprise dopant ions having a lower atomic weight than carbon and greater than lithium. In specific approaches, ion bombardment 412 will be conducted through regions of a silicon active device layer that may ultimately form the source and drain regions of a FET or the emitter of an IGBT. As such, the dopant ions can be chosen to minimize damage to these regions. While dopant ions that have low atomic weights are less likely to damage the active layer as they pass through, they are also less likely to be effective in treating the buried insulator to the extent that it can be selectively processed. Dopant ions with atomic weights that are less than carbon, but greater than lithium, are less likely to damage the active region as they pass through, while at the same time retaining their efficacy as the creators of a treated insulator region.
Process 300 continues with step 303 in which a portion of the substrate is removed. In specific approaches, the substrate is removed from the back side of the SOI wafer to expose the buried insulator layer. The substrate can be removed by a grinding process and may involve the application of a chemical-mechanical polish (CMP) processing step. The substrate could be removed in a single step or a multiple step process. In particular, a rapid grind could be applied to remove a majority of the substrate, while a slower process with higher selectivity to the buried insulator, such as a wet etch, could be applied as a second step. During step 303, the wafer may be held in place by a vacuum chuck or an alternative handler such that the back side of the SOI wafer could be readily accessed. Alternatively, the SOI wafer could be held in place by a handle wafer attached to the top side of the SOI wafer.
Process 300 can include an addition step 304 in which a handle wafer is bonded to the SOI wafer after the treatment is applied to the SOI wafer in step 302. The handle wafer can be bonded to the top side of the SOI wafer. The bond can be a permanent bond or a temporary bond. In situations where the bond is temporary, the SOI wafer may be transferred to another permanent handle wafer at a later time. The handle wafer can provide a stabilizing force to the active device layer of the SOI wafer while the substrate is removed in step 303. In addition, the handle wafer can serve as a permanent feature of the overall SOI structure such that the handle wafer continues to provide a stabilizing force to the active device layer after the substrate is removed. The handle wafer can comprise a trap rich layer as described in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 8,466,036 and its related patents. The handle wafer can also comprise additional active or passive devices that can be electrically coupled to the active device layer of the SOI wafer.
SOI structure 420 in
Various additional layers can be added to SOI wafer 401 to lie in-between active layer 406 and handle wafer 422. These layers can include metallization for routing signals between active devices in active device layer 406. The number of steps that lie between different approaches that are in accordance with cross sections 400 and 420 can include any kind of processing associated with variant technologies such as CMOS or BiCMOS. In specific approaches, standard CMOS fabrication will continue after step 302 and continue up to the deposition of inter-level dielectric, at which point step 304 can be executed. In other approaches, any number of additional wafers may be added to the top side of the SOI wafer before step 304 is executed. These additional wafers can contain trap rich layers and may also include additional passive and active circuitry that can be coupled to the circuitry in active device layer 407 using direct metal contacts, through silicon vias (TSVs), or similar structures.
SOI structure 440 in
Process 300 continues with step 305 in which the treated insulator region is selectively removed from the buried insulator layer. The removal of the treated insulator region from the insulator layer forms a remaining insulator region. As the gate was used to pattern the treated insulator region, the remaining insulator region will be aligned to the gate and lie under the active region of the SOI structure underneath the gate. A benefit of this approach is that the insulator region is thereby patterned without the need for an additional mask.
The insulator can be removed in step 305 using any process that is selective to the treated insulator region. Thus the removal process is linked to the treatment applied in step 302. As a particular example, the treatment could be the implantation of boron ions into a buried insulator layer comprising silicon dioxide to form a doped oxide, and the removal process could be a hydrofluoric etch delivered in vapor form that would remove the doped oxide and leave the untreated silicon dioxide in place. The selective removal process could comprise a wet hydrofluoric etch or a vapor hydrofluoric etch. In The insulator could alternatively be removed using a plasma etch.
SOI structure 460 in
In alternative approaches, the selective removal process in step 305 will result in a negative pattern to that of the treatment applied in step 302. In an alternative step, just prior to step 305, the entire insulator region could undergo a second treatment after being exposed by the removal of the substrate, and then be acted upon by a selective removal process such that only the insulator region that was treated in step 302 would remain. In these approaches, the first treatment serves to counteract the effect of the second treatment such that only those portions of the insulator that did not receive the first treatment would remain after the application of the selective removal process.
Although SOI structure 460 illustrates treated insulator region 421 as having been completely removed in certain places, the treated insulator region could instead by removed to various degrees at different points along the lateral expanse of the back side of the SOI structure. As mentioned previously, the treatment from step 302 could be targeted to a specific depth of the buried insulator region such that treated insulator region 421 did not extend through the entire vertical expanse of the original buried insulator. For example, if the treatment from step 302 was targeted to just cover the back half of the insulator layer, the selective removal in step 305 could result in only half of the insulator region being removed at specific points in the overall pattern such that remaining insulator region 461 would be a raised plateau surrounded by an expanse of thinned remaining insulator.
Process 300 continues with step 306 in which a layer is deposited. The layer can be deposited on the back side of the SOI wafer. The layer can be formed on the remaining insulator region. The layer can be deposited via a blanket deposition or it can be a targeted deposition. The deposition step can use a mask, or it can rely only on the pattern formed by the remaining insulator region. The deposition can include a chemical enhanced vapor deposition (CVD), plasma enhanced CVD, atomic layer deposition (ALD), dielectric spin or sprat coating, or a high density plasma deposition (HDP). Alternatively, the layer could be formed by bringing the SOI wafer into contact with a conforming layer of material that would conform to the shape of the remaining insulator region. The conforming layer could be brought into contact using an additional wafer.
Cross section 480 in
In contrast to example illustrated in
Certain benefits accrue to approaches in which the edges of remaining insulator region 461 can be reliably aligned to gate 408. The processes described with reference to
As mentioned previously, layer 481 can be a strain inducing layer. The strain inducing layer can be a compressive or tensile film. The strain inducing layer can also induce strain in active device layer 407 through a lattice mismatch effect. For example, the strain inducing layer 481 could comprise silicon germanium while active device layer 407 comprised silicon in which case the mismatch of the two materials would induce strain in active device layer 407. The strain inducing layer can enhance the mobility of carriers in the device by inducing strain 505 in channel region 503. Strain layer 481 enhances the mobility of carriers in channel region 503, and thereby enhances the performance of devices formed in device layer 407. A strain layer benefits from being more closely aligned with the channel region because it is thereby able to more directly exert stain on the devices while at the same time not directly overlapping the channel region and deleteriously altering the behavior of the device.
Different combinations of the type of treatment applied to the insulator layer, and the type of strain layer deposited create different kinds of strain in channel region 503. As mentioned previously, depending upon the treatment applied to the insulator layer, the gate could be used as either a negative or positive mask such that the treated insulator region could be formed in the insulator layer below the gate, or outside the lateral scope of the gate. The strain induced by the strain layer can also be considered to exhibit a negative or positive strain in that the deposited film can be compressive or tensile respectively. Notably, this characteristic of the film can be independent of the pattern on which the film is applied. Therefore, the combination of independently positive or negative straining films with positive or negative patterns creates the potential for four different configurations that produce two different strain profiles (i.e., a negative film with a negative pattern creates a positive strain, both negative and positive combinations create a negative strain, and a positive film with a negative pattern creates a positive strain). This ability to achieve a given strain profile using different combinations provides a degree of freedom to the designer in that certain kinds of insulator treatment or strain layer materials can be avoided for cost or concerns regarding technical feasibility.
Additional variants of layer 481 also benefit from being tightly aligned to gate 408. For example, since channels are one of the largest sources of heat in a semiconductor device, thermal dissipation layers benefit from being closely aligned to the channel region in order to minimize the distance through which the heat must diffuse before being efficiently removed from the device. At the same time, it is important to keep the buried insulator in place below the channel as a thermal dissipative layer is generally a less effective substitute for the original buried insulator.
After step 306, additional processing steps can be conducted to connect to the circuitry in active device layer 407 as well as to package the final device. For example, the deposited layer could be patterned and etched to form contacts to devices in active device layer 407 to allow external connect. In addition, back side metallization can be formed on the back side of the SOI wafer to provide for interconnection between different circuit components in device layer 407. For example, the back side metallization may be used to connect a transistor to another transistor, a transistor to a diode, or a transistor to a passive component.
Any of the processing steps described with reference to process 300 can likewise be applied to method 600 as these processing steps continue.
Method 600 continues with step 601 in which the treated insulator is removed from the buried insulator layer. An example of this processing step is illustrated by SOI structure 760 in
Method 600 continues with either step 602 or 603. In step 602, a portion of the exposed device region is removed. The device region can be removed using remaining buried insulator 706 as a mask, or an additional mask may be used instead. The etchant used to etch device region 407 can perform an isotropic etch and may also involve a specific chemical etchant that is selective to second buried insulator 704. In step 603, a layer of material is deposited on the back side of the wafer. Step 603 can be conducted in accordance with any of the variations of step 306 discussed above.
Insulator layer 406 in
The dual gate structure illustrated in
Deposited layer 481 can take on any of the characteristics described above with reference to
Although some embodiments in the above disclosure were specifically illustrated by cross sections wherein a gate structure is used as the mask for an initial treatment of an SOI insulator layer, other features can be used to mask the initial treatment instead. Indeed, any feature to which back side alignment is desired could be used to pattern the applied treatment. Depending upon the characteristics of the feature, the material used to define the feature could be used as a mask itself, or the actual mask used to pattern that feature can be used as the mask for the initial treatment. As a particular example, the mask used to pattern TSVs in the SOI wafer could also be used to apply a treatment to the insulator. Such an approach would be useful in situations where the TSVs were intended to be connected through the back side insulator.
While the specification has been described in detail with respect to specific embodiments of the invention, it will be appreciated that those skilled in the art, upon attaining an understanding of the foregoing, may readily conceive of alterations to, variations of, and equivalents to these embodiments. These and other modifications and variations to the present invention may be practiced by those skilled in the art, without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention, which is more particularly set forth in the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3472712 | Bower | Oct 1969 | A |
3475234 | Kerwin et al. | Oct 1969 | A |
4053916 | Cricchi et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4939568 | Kato et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5229647 | Gnadinger | Jul 1993 | A |
5372952 | Aronowitz et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5376579 | Annamalai | Dec 1994 | A |
5434750 | Rostoker et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5489792 | Hu et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5580802 | Mayer et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5777365 | Yamaguchi et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5793107 | Nowak | Aug 1998 | A |
5880010 | Davidson | Mar 1999 | A |
5955767 | Liu et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5955781 | Joshi et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5999414 | Baker et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6025252 | Shindo et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6027958 | Vu et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6080608 | Nowak | Jun 2000 | A |
6110769 | Son | Aug 2000 | A |
6121659 | Christensen et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6153912 | Holst | Nov 2000 | A |
6180487 | Lin | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6180985 | Yeo | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190985 | Buynoski | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191476 | Takahashi et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6229187 | Ju et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6320228 | Yu | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6335214 | Fung | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6352882 | Assaderaghi et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6437405 | Kim | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6483147 | Lin | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6498370 | Kim et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6531753 | Lin | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6566240 | Udrea et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6573565 | Clevenger et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6635909 | Clark et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6680240 | Maszara | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6703684 | Udrea et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6740548 | Darmawan | May 2004 | B2 |
6759714 | Kim et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6833587 | Lin | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6847098 | Tseng et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6889429 | Celaya et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6900501 | Darmawan | May 2005 | B2 |
6900518 | Udrea et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6927102 | Udrea et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7052937 | Clevenger et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7109532 | Lee et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7119431 | Hopper et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7135766 | Costa et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7211458 | Ozturk et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7227205 | Bryant et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235439 | Udrea et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7238591 | Lin | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7244663 | Kirby | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7259388 | Langdo et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7262087 | Chidambarrao et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7381627 | Bernstein et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7402897 | Leedy | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7411272 | Udrea et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7452761 | Zhu et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7485571 | Leedy | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7541644 | Hirano et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7550338 | Steegen et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7579262 | Hoentschel et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7713842 | Nishihata et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7745277 | Chidambarrao et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7759220 | Henley | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7763534 | Smayling et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7772649 | Cheng et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7782629 | Graydon et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7888606 | Sakamoto et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7906817 | Wu et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7977221 | Ninomiya et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8013342 | Bernstein et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8048773 | Yamazaki et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8106456 | Khater | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8232597 | Stuber et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8293614 | Chu et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8357975 | Stuber et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8367512 | Fu et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
20020027271 | Vaiyapuri | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020041003 | Udrea et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020079507 | Shim et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020086465 | Houston | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020089016 | Joly et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020163041 | Kim | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020175406 | Callahan | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030085425 | Darmawan | May 2003 | A1 |
20030107084 | Darmawan | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040051120 | Kato | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040145058 | Marty et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040150013 | Ipposhi | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040232554 | Hirano et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040245627 | Akram | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040251557 | Kee | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050124170 | Pelella et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050230682 | Hara | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050236670 | Chien et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050263753 | Pelella et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060022264 | Mathew et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060065935 | Vandentop et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060183339 | Ravi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060189053 | Wang et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060243655 | Striemer et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070018247 | Brindle et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070029553 | Ozturk et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070085131 | Matsuo et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070181992 | Lake | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070190740 | Furukawa et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070254457 | Wilson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080035970 | Wang | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080050863 | Henson et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080081481 | Frohberg et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080128900 | Leow et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080150100 | Hung et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080165521 | Bernstein et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080283995 | Bucki et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080288720 | Atwal et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080296708 | Wodnicki et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090011541 | Corisis et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090026454 | Kurokawa et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090026524 | Kreupl et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090073661 | Wolfe et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090160013 | Abou-Khalil et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100032761 | Ding | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100035393 | Aitken et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100140782 | Kim et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100314711 | Farooq et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110006367 | Fuller et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110012199 | Nygaard et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110012223 | Molin et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110108943 | Dennard et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110140257 | Sweeney et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110241073 | Cohen et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110266659 | Wilson et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120205725 | Nygaard et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130043595 | Williams | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130049115 | Cheng et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130130479 | Stuber et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130134585 | Stuber et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130214356 | Cheng | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140035129 | Stuber et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140106494 | Bedell | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140175637 | Stuber et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140252448 | Bedell | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140342529 | Goktepeli | Nov 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1784785 | Jun 2006 | CN |
101140915 | Mar 2008 | CN |
0707388 | Apr 1996 | EP |
0986104 | Mar 2000 | EP |
2309825 | Aug 1997 | GB |
2418063 | Mar 2006 | GB |
2110974 | Apr 1990 | JP |
03011666 | Jan 1991 | JP |
04356967 | Dec 1992 | JP |
07098460 | Apr 1995 | JP |
9283766 | Oct 1997 | JP |
2001230423 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2005175306 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2006186091 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2008004577 | Jan 2008 | JP |
0225700 | Mar 2002 | WO |
2008011210 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2009045859 | Apr 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office action dated Oct. 30, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/725,403. |
Extended European Search Report dated Sep. 22, 2015 for European Patent Application No. 15171021.7. |
Notice of Allowance and Fees dated Aug. 31, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,580. |
Office Action dated Aug. 4, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/725,403. |
Office Action dated Aug. 5, 2015 for Chinese Patent Application No. 201080031818.X. |
Office Action dated Sep. 2, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/586,668. |
Official letter and search report dated Sep. 9, 2015 for Taiwanese Patent Application No. 099123131. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion—PCT/US2015/042483—ISA/EPO—Dec. 14, 2015. |
European Examination Report dated Mar. 19, 2013 for European Application No. 10 734 619.9. |
Examination report dated Nov. 29, 2013 for European Application No. 10734619.9. |
Guarini et al., “Electrical integrity of state-of-the-art 0.13 μm SOI CMOS devices and circuits transferred for three-dimensional (3D) integrated circuit (IC) fabrication,” in Electron Devices Meeting, 2002, Dec. 8-11, 2002, pp. 943-945. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 14 2010 for PCT/US2010/042026. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 14, 2010 for PCT/US2010/042028. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 22, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/US2010/042027. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 31, 2014 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/073466. |
Matloubian, M. “Smart Body Contact for SO1 MOSFETs”, SOS/SOI Technology Conference, Oct. 3-5, 1989. |
Notice of Allowance and Fees dated Aug. 19, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/725,245. |
Notice of Allowance and Fees dated Aug. 20, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/725,306. |
Notice of Allowance and Fees dated Jun. 18, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/746,288. |
Notice of Allowance and Fees dated Nov. 27, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,110. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 22, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/836,506. |
Office Action dated Apr. 23, 2014 for Chinese Patent Application No. 201080031814.1. |
Office action dated Apr. 3, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/746,288. |
Office Action dated Apr. 8, 2014 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-520758. |
Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/836,559. |
Office Action Dated Dec. 12, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/452,836. |
Office action dated Dec. 2, 2013 for Chinese Patent Application No. 201080031818.X. |
Office Action Dated Feb. 10, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/725,403. |
Office Action dated Feb. 28, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/836,559. |
Office Action dated Jan. 27, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/836,506. |
Office Action dated Jul. 10, 2014 from Chinese Patent Application No. 201080031811.8. |
Office Action dated Jul. 13, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/836,510. |
Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/725,403. |
Office Action dated Mar. 20, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/725,245. |
Office action dated Mar. 28, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/725,306. |
Office Action dated Mar. 29, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/746,288. |
Office Action dated Nov. 9, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/836,510. |
Office Action dated Nov. 5, 2013 for Chinese Patent Application No. 201080031811.8. |
Office Action dated Oct. 9, 2013 for Chinese Application No. 201080031814.1. |
Office Action dated Oct. 24, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,110. |
Office Action dated Oct. 4, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/746,288. |
Sematech Manufacturing and Reliability Challenges for 3D ICs using TSVs, Sep. 25-26, 2008, San Diego, California “Thermal and Strees Analysis Modeling for 3D Memory over Processor Stacks”, John McDonald, Rochester Polytechnic Institute. |
Sleight, Jeffry W. et al., “DC and Transient Characterization of a Compact Schottky Body Contact Technology for SOI Transistors”, IEEE Transactions on Electronic Devices, IEEE Service Center, Pisacataway, NJ, US, vol. 46, No. 7, Jul. 1, 1999. |
Tan et al., Wafer Level 3-D ICs Process Technology, 2008th ed. Springer, 2008, chapters 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, and 12 (entire). |
Notice of Allowance and Fees dated Feb. 11, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/836,559. |
Notice of Allowance and Fees dated Feb. 20, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/836,510. |
Office action dated Ferbuary 4, 2015 for Chinese patent application No. 201080031818.X. |
Office Action dated Jan. 20, 2015 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-520758. |
Office Action dated Jan. 6, 2015 for Chinese patent application No. 201080031811.8. |
Office Action dated Mar. 27, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,580. |
Office Action dated Mar. 5, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/725,403. |
Official Letter and Search Report dated Feb. 13, 2015 for Taiwanese patent application No. 99123128. |
Official Letter and Search Report dated Mar. 6, 2015 for Taiwanese Patent Application No. 99123144. |
Office Action dated Aug. 29, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/836,510. |
Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2014 for Chinese Patent Application No. 201080031818.X. |
Office Action dated Oct. 7, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/836,559. |
Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/586,668. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160042967 A1 | Feb 2016 | US |