Semiconductor substrate structure

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6737670
  • Patent Number
    6,737,670
  • Date Filed
    Friday, March 7, 2003
    21 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 18, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
A process for producing monocrystalline semiconductor layers. In an exemplary embodiment, a graded Si1−xGex (x increases from 0 to y) is deposited on a first silicon substrate, followed by deposition of a relaxed Si1−yGey layer, a thin strained Si1−zGez layer and another relaxed Si1−yGey layer. Hydrogen ions are then introduced into the strained SizGez layer. The relaxed Si1−yGey layer is bonded to a second oxidized substrate. An annealing treatment splits the bonded pair at the strained Si layer, such that the second relaxed Si1−yGey layer remains on the second substrate. In another exemplary embodiment, a graded Si1−xGex is deposited on a first silicon substrate, where the Ge concentration x is increased from 0 to 1. Then a relaxed GaAs layer is deposited on the relaxed Ge buffer. As the lattice constant of GaAs is close to that of Ge, GaAs has high quality with limited dislocation defects. Hydrogen ions are introduced into the relaxed GaAs layer at the selected depth. The relaxed GaAs layer is bonded to a second oxidized substrate. An annealing treatment splits the bonded pair at the hydrogen ion rich layer, such that the upper portion of relaxed GaAs layer remains on the second substrate.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to a production of a general substrate of relaxed Si


1−x


Ge


x


-on-insulator (SGOI) for various electronics or optoelectronics applications, and the production of monocrystalline III-V or II-VI material-on-insulator substrate.




Relaxed Si


1−x


Ge


x


-on-insulator (SGOI) is a very promising technology as it combines the benefits of two advanced technologies: the conventional SOI technology and the disruptive SiGe technology. The SOI configuration offers various advantages associated with the insulating substrate, namely reduced parasitic capacitances, improved isolation, reduced short-channel-effect, etc. High mobility strained-Si, strained-Si


1−x


Ge


x


or strained-Ge MOS devices can be made on SGOI substrates.




Other III-V optoelectronic devices can also be integrated into the SGOI substrate by matching the lattice constants of III-V materials and the relaxed Si


1−x


Ge


x


. For example a GaAs layer can be grown on Si


1−x


Ge


x


-on-insulator where x is equal or close to 1. SGOI may serve as an ultimate platform for high speed, low power electronic and optoelectronic applications.




SGOI has been fabricated by several methods in the prior art. In one method, the separation by implantation of oxygen (SIMOX) technology is used to produce SGOI. High dose oxygen implant was used to bury high concentrations of oxygen in a Si


1−x


Ge


x


layer, which was then converted into a buried oxide (BOX) layer upon annealing at high temperature (for example, 1350° C.). See, for example, Mizuno et al. IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 230-232, 2000 and Ishilawa et al. Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 75, No. 7, pp. 983-985, 1999. One of the main drawbacks is the quality of the resulting Si


1−x


Ge


x


film and BOX. In addition, Ge segregation during high temperature anneal also limits the maximum Ge composition to a low value.




U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,461,243 and 5,759,898 describe a second method, in which a conventional silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrate was used as a compliant substrate. In the process, an initially strained Si


1−x


Ge


x


layer was deposited on a thin SOI substrate. Upon an anneal treatment, the strain was transferred to the thin silicon film underneath, resulting in relaxation of the top Si


1−x


Ge


x


film. The final structure is relaxed-SiGe/strained-Si/insulator, which is not an ideal SGOI structure. The silicon layer in the structure is unnecessary, and may complicate or undermine the performance of devices built on it. For example, it may form a parasitic back channel on this strained-Si, or may confine unwanted electrons due to the band gap offset between the strained-Si and SiGe layer.




U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,906,951 and 6,059,895 describe the formation of a similar SGOI structure: strained-layer(s)/relaxed-SiGe/Si/insulator structure. The structure was produced by wafer bonding and etch back process using a P


++


layer as an etch stop. The presence of the silicon layer in the above structure may be for the purpose of facilitating Si-insulator wafer bonding, but is unnecessary for ideal SGOI substrates. Again, the silicon layer may also complicate or undermine the performance of devices built on it. For example, it may form a parasitic back channel on this strained-Si, or may confine unwanted electrons due to the band gap offset between the strained-Si and SiGe layer. Moreover, the etch stop of P


++


in the above structure is not practical when the first graded Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer described in the patents has a y value of larger than 0.2. Experiments from research shows Si


1−y


Ge


y


with y larger than 0.2 is a very good etch stop for both KOH and TMAH, as described in a published PCT application WO 99/53539. Therefore, the KOH will not be able to remove the first graded Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer and the second relaxed SiGe layer as described in the patents.




Other attempts include re-crystallization of an amorphous Si


1−x


Ge


x


layer deposited on the top of SOI (silicon-on-insulator) substrate, which is again not an ideal SGOI substrate and the silicon layer is unnecessary, and may complicate or undermine the performance of devices built on it. Note Yeo et al. IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 161-163, 2000. The relaxation of the resultant SiGe film and quality of the resulting structure are main concerns.




From the above, there is a need for a simple technique for relaxed SGOI substrate production, a need for a technique for production of high quality SGOI and other III-V material-on-insulator, and a need for a technique for wide range of material transfer.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




According to the invention, there is provided an improved technique for production of wide range of high quality material is provided. In particular, the production of relaxed Si


1−x


Ge


x


-on-insulator (SGOI) substrate or relaxed III-V or II-VI material-on-insulator, such as GaAs-on-insulator, is described. High quality monocrystalline relaxed SiGe layer, relaxed Ge layer, or other relaxed III-V material layer is grown on a silicon substrate using a graded Si


1−x


Ge


x


epitaxial growth technique. A thin film of the layer is transferred into an oxidized handle wafer by wafer bonding and wafer splitting using hydrogen ion implantation. The invention makes use of the graded Si


1−x


Ge


x


buffer structure, resulting in a simplified and improved process.




The invention also provides a method allowing a wide range of device materials to be integrated into the inexpensive silicon substrate. For example, it allows production of Si


1−x


Ge


x


-on-insulator with wide range of Ge concentration, and allows production of many III-V or II-VI materials on insulator like GaAs, AlAs, ZnSe and InGaP. The use of graded Si


1−x


Ge


x


buffer in the invention allows high quality materials with limited dislocation defects to be produced and transferred. In one example, SGOI is produced using a SiGe structure in which a region in the graded buffer can act as a natural etch stop.




The invention provides a process and method for producing monocrystalline semiconductor layers. In an exemplary embodiment, a graded Si


1−x


Ge


x


(x increases from 0 to y) is deposited on a first silicon substrate, followed by deposition of a relaxed Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer, a thin strained Si


1−z


Ge


z


layer and another relaxed Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer. Hydrogen ions are then introduced into the strained Si


z


Ge


z


layer. The relaxed Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer is bonded to a second oxidized substrate. An annealing treatment splits the bonded pair at the strained Si layer, whereby the second relaxed Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer remains on said second substrate.




In another exemplary embodiment, a graded Si


1−x


Ge


x


is deposited on a first silicon substrate, where the Ge concentration x is increased from 0 to 1. Then a relaxed GaAs layer is deposited on the relaxed Ge buffer. As the lattice constant of GaAs is close to that of Ge, GaAs has high quality with limited dislocation defects. Hydrogen ions are introduced into the relaxed GaAs layer at the selected depth. The relaxed GaAs layer is bonded to a second oxidized substrate. An annealing treatment splits the bonded pair at the hydrogen ion rich layer, whereby the upper portion of relaxed GaAs layer remains on said second substrate.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIGS. 1A-1C

are block diagrams showing the process of producing a SGOI substrate in accordance with the invention;





FIGS. 2A and 2B

are infrared transmission images of an as-bonded wafer pair and a final SGOI substrate after splitting, respectively;





FIG. 3

is a TEM cross-section view of a SiGe layer that was transferred onto the top of a buried oxide;





FIG. 4

is an AFM for a transferred SGOI substrate showing surface roughness; and





FIGS. 5-8

are block diagrams of various exemplary embodiments semiconductor structures in accordance with the invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




An example of a process in which SGOI is created by layer transfer is described. The experiment was performed in two stages. In the first stage, heteroepitaxial SiGe layers are formed by a graded epitaxial growth technology. Starting with a 4-inch Si (100) donor wafer


100


, a linearly stepwise compositionally graded Si


1−x


Ge


x


buffer


102


is deposited with CVD, by increasing Ge concentration from zero to 25%. Then a 2.5 μm relaxed Si


0.75


Ge


0.25


cap layer


104


is deposited with the final Ge composition, as shown in FIG.


1


A.




The relaxed SiGe cap layer has high quality with very low dislocation defect density (less than 1E6/cm


2


), as the graded buffer accommodates the lattice mismatch between Si and relaxed SiGe. A thin layer of this high quality SiGe will be transferred into the final SGOI structure. The surface of the as-grown relaxed SiGe layer shows a high roughness around 11 nm to 15 nm due to the underlying strain fields generated by misfit dislocations at the graded layer interfaces and thus chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) is used to smooth the surface. In the second stage, the donor wafer is implanted with hydrogen ion (100 keV, 5E16 H


+


/cm


2


) to form a buried hydrogen-rich layer. After a surface clean step in a modified RCA solution, it is bonded to an oxidized


106


Si handle wafer


108


at room temperature as shown in FIG.


1


B.




The wafer bonding is one of the key steps, and the bonding energy should be strong enough in order to sustain the subsequent layer transfer in the next step. Good bonding requires a flat surface and a highly hydrophilic surface before bonding. On the other hand, the buried oxide in the final bonded structure is also required to have good electrical properties as it will influence the final device fabricated on it. In the conventional Si film transfer, thermal oxide on the donor wafer is commonly used before H


+


implantation and wafer bonding, which becomes the buried oxide in the resulting silicon-on-insulator structure.




The thermal oxide of the Si donor wafer meets all the requirements, as it has good electrical properties, has flat surface and bonds very well to the handle wafer. Unlike the Si, however, the oxidation of SiGe film results in poor thermal oxide quality, and the Ge segregation during oxidation also degrades the SiGe film. Therefore the thermal oxide of SiGe is not suitable for the SGOI fabrication. In one exemplary experiment the SiGe film will be directly bonded to an oxidized Si handle wafer. The high quality thermal oxide in the handle wafer will become the buried oxide in the final SGOI structure.




Having a flat surface after a CMP step, the SiGe wafer went through a clean step. Compared to Si, one difficulty of SiGe film is that, SiGe surface becomes rougher during the standard RCA clean, as the NH


4


OH in RCA1 solution etches Ge faster than Si. Rough surface will lead to weak bonding as the contact area is reduced when bonded to the handle wafer. In this exemplary embodiment, H


2


SO


4


—H


2


O


2


solution is used in the place of RCA1, which also meets the clean process requirement for the subsequent furnace annealing after bonding. The SiGe surface after H


2


SO


4


—H


2


O


2


clean shows better surface roughness compared to RCA1.




After this modified clean procedure, the SiGe wafer is dipped in the diluted HF solution to remove the old native oxide. It is then rinsed in DI water thoroughly to make the surface hydrophilic by forming a fresh new native oxide layer that is highly active. After spinning dry, the SiGe wafer is bonded to an oxidized handle wafer at room temperature, and then annealed at 600° C. for 3 hours. During anneal the bonded pair split into two sheets along the buried hydrogen-rich layer, and a thin relaxed Si


0.75


Ge


0.25


film


110


is transferred into the handle wafer, resulting in a SGOI substrate


112


, as shown in

FIG. 1B. A

final 850° C. anneal improves the Si


0.75


Ge


0.25


/SiO


2


bond. Thereafter, device layers


114


can be processed on the SGOI substrate


112


as shown in FIG.


1


C.





FIGS. 2A and 2B

are infrared transmission images of the as-bonded wafer pair and the final SGOI substrate after splitting, respectively. To investigate the surface of the as-transferred SGOI substrate, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) were used. The TEM cross-section view in

FIG. 3

shows a ˜640 nm SiGe layer was transferred onto the top of a 550 nm buried oxide (BOX). Surface damage is also shown clearly at the splitting surface with a damage depth of ˜100 nm.





FIG. 4

shows a surface roughness of 11.3 nm in an area of 5×5 μm


2


by AFM for the as-transferred SGOI. The data is similar to those from as-transferred silicon film by smart-cut process, and suggests that a top layer of about 100 nm should be removed by a final CMP step. After SiGe film transferring, only a thin relaxed SiGe film is removed and the donor wafer can be used again for a donor wafer. Starting from this general SGOI substrate, various device structures can be realized by growing one or more device layers on the top, as shown in FIG.


2


C. Electrical evaluation is in progress by growing a strain Si layer on the top of this SGOI substrate followed by fabrication of strained Si channel devices.




Bond strength is important to the process of the invention. AFM measurements were conducted to investigate the SiGe film surface roughness before bonding under different conditions. One experiment is designed to investigate how long the SiGe surface should be polished to have smooth surface and good bond strength, since the surface of the as-grown relaxed SiGe layer has a high roughness around 11 nm to 15 nm. Several identical 4-inch Si wafers with relaxed Si


0.75


Ge


0.25


films were CMPed with optimized polishing conditions for different times. Using AFM, the measured surface mircoroughness RMS at an area of 10 μm×10 μm is 5.5 Å, 4.5 Å and 3.8 Å, for wafer CMPed for 2 min., 4 min. and 6 min. respectively. After bonding to identical handle wafers, the tested bond strength increases with decreasing RMS. A CMP time of 6 min. is necessary for good strength.




In another experiment, two identical 4-inch Si wafers with relaxed Si


0.75


Ge


0.25


films were CMPed for 8 min. After two cleaning steps in H


2


SO


4


:H


2


O


2


solution and one step in diluted HF solution, one wafer was put in a new H


2


SO


4


:H


2


O


2


(3:1) solution and another in a new NH


4


OH:H


2


O


2


:H


2


O (1:1:5), i.e. the conventional RCA1 solution, both for 15 min. The resultant wafers were tested using AFM. The wafer after H


2


SO


4


:H


2


O


2


solution shows a surface roughness RMS of 2 Å at an area of 1 μm×1 μm, which after NH


4


OH:H


2


O


2


:H


2


O shows 4.4 Å. Clearly, the conventional RCA clean roughens the SiGe surface significantly, and H


2


SO


4


:H


2


O


2


should be used for SiGe clean.




In yet another experiment, the clean procedure is optimized before bonding. For direct SiGe wafer to oxidized handle wafer bonding (SiGe-oxide bonding), several different clean procedures were tested. It has been found that the H


2


SO


4


:H


2


O


2


(2˜4:1) solution followed by DI water rinse and spin dry gives good bond strength. Alternatively, one can also deposit an oxide layer on the SiGe wafer and then CMP the oxide layer. In this case SiGe/oxide is bonded to an oxidized handle wafer, i.e. oxide-oxide bonding. Among different clean procedures, it was found that NH


4


OH:H


2


O


2


:H


2


O clean and DI water rinse following by diluted HF, DI water rinse and spin dry gives very good bond strength.





FIG. 5

is a block diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a semiconductor structure


500


in accordance with the invention. A graded Si


1−x


Ge


x


buffer layer


504


is grown on a silicon substrate


502


, where the Ge concentration x is increased from zero to a value y in a stepwise manner, and y has a selected value between 0 and 1. A second relaxed Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


506


is then deposited, and hydrogen ions are implanted into this layer with a selected depth by adjusting implantation energy, forming a buried hydrogen-rich layer


508


. The wafer is cleaned and bonded to an oxidized handle wafer


510


. An anneal treatment at 500˜600° C. splits the bonded pair at the hydrogen-rich layer


508


. As a result, the upper portion of the relaxed Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


506


remains on the oxidized handle wafer, forming a SGOI substrate. The above description also includes production of Ge-on-insulator where y=1.




During the wafer clean step prior to bonding, the standard RCA clean for the silicon surface is modified. Since the NH


4


OH in standard RCA1 solution etches Ge faster than Si, the SiGe surface will become rough, leading to a weak bond. A H


2


SO


4


—H


2


O


2


solution is used in the place of RCA1, which also meets the clean process requirement for the subsequent furnace annealing after bonding. The SiGe surface after the H


2


SO


4


—H


2


O


2


clean showed better surface roughness compared to RCA1. After the modified RCA clean, the wafers are then immersed in another fresh H


2


SO


4


—H


2


O


2


solution for 10 to 20 min. H


2


SO


4


—H


2


O


2


renders the SiGe surface hydrophilic. After a rinse in DI wafer and spin drying, the SiGe wafer is bonded to an oxidized handle wafer at room temperature immediately, and then annealed at 500˜600° C. for wafer splitting.





FIG. 6

is a block diagram of another exemplary embodiment of a semiconductor structure


600


. The structure


600


includes a graded Si


1−x


Ge


x


buffer layer


604


grown on a silicon substrate


602


, where the Ge concentration x is increased from zero to 1. Then a relaxed pure Ge layer


606


and a III-V material layer


608


, such as a GaAs layer, are epitaxially grown on the Ge layer. Hydrogen ions are implanted into the GaAs layer


608


with a selected depth by adjusting implantation energy, forming a buried hydrogen-rich layer


610


. The wafer is cleaned and bonded to an oxidized handle wafer


612


. An anneal treatment splits the bonded pair at the hydrogen-rich layer


610


. As a result, the upper portion of the GaAs layer


608


remains on the oxidized handle wafer, forming a GaAs-on-insulator substrate.




FIG.


7


. is a block diagram of yet another exemplary embodiment of a semiconductor structure


700


. A graded Si


1−x


Ge


x


buffer layer


704


is grown on a silicon substrate


702


, where the Ge concentration x is increased from zero to a selected value y, where y is less than 0.2. A second relaxed Si


1−z


Ge


z


layer


706


is deposited, where z is between 0.2 to 0.25. Hydrogen ions are implanted into the graded Si


1−x


Ge


x


buffer layer


704


with a selected depth, forming a buried hydrogen-rich layer


708


within layer


704


. The wafer is cleaned and bonded to an oxidized handle wafer


710


. An anneal treatment at 500˜600° C. splits the bonded pair at the hydrogen-rich layer


708


.




As a result, the upper portion of the graded Si


1−x


Ge


x


buffer layer


704


and the relaxed Si


1−z


Ge


z


layer


706


remains on the oxidized handle wafer


710


. The remaining graded Si


1−x


Ge


x


buffer layer


704


is then selectively etched by either KOH or TMAH. KOH and TMAH etch Si


1−x


Ge


x


fast when x is less 0.2, but becomes very slow when x is larger than 0.2. Thus, the graded Si


1−x


Ge


x


buffer layer


704


can be etched selectively, leaving the relaxed Si


1−z


Ge


z


layer


706


on the insulating substrate


710


and forming a relaxed SGOI substrate. In this process, the thickness of the relaxed Si


1−z


Ge


z


film


706


on the final SGOI structure is defined by film growth, which is desired in some applications.





FIG. 8

is a block diagram of yet another exemplary embodiment of a semiconductor structure


800


. A graded Si


1−x


Ge


x


buffer layer


804


is grown on a silicon substrate


802


, where the Ge concentration x is increased from zero to a selected value y between 0 and 1. A second relaxed Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


806


is deposited, followed by a strained Si


1−z


Ge


z


layer


808


and another relaxed Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


810


. The thickness of layers


806


,


808


, and


810


, and the value z are chosen such that the Si


1−z


Ge


z


layer


808


is under equilibrium strain state while the Si


1−y


Ge


y


layers


806


and


810


remain relaxed. In one option, hydrogen ions may be introduced into the strained Si


1−z


Ge


z


layer


808


, forming a hydrogen-rich layer


812


. The wafer is cleaned and bonded to an oxidized handle wafer


814


. The bonded pair is then separated along the strained Si


1−z


Ge


z


layer


808


.




Since the strain makes the layer weaker, the crack propagates along this layer during separation. The separation can be accomplished by a variety of techniques, for example using a mechanical force or an anneal treatment at 500˜600° C. when the hydrogen is also introduced. See, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,033,974 and 6,184,111, both of which are incorporated herein by reference. As a result, the relaxed Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


810


remains on the oxidized handle wafer, forming a relaxed SGOI substrate. The thickness of layers


806


,


808


, and


810


, and the value z may also be chosen such that there are a good amount of dislocations present in the Si


1−z


Ge


z


layer


808


while the top Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


810


remains relaxed and having high quality and limited dislocation defects.




These dislocation defects in the Si


1−z


Ge


z


layer


808


can then act as hydrogen trap centers during the subsequent step of introducing ions. The hydrogen ions may be introduced by various ways, such as ion implantation or ion diffusion or drift by means of electrolytic charging. The value of z may be chosen in such a way that the remaining Si


1−z


Ge


z


layer


808


can be etched selectively by KOH or TMAH. The layers


806


and


810


may also be some other materials, for example pure Ge, or some III-V materials, under the condition that the Ge concentration x in the graded Si


1−x


Ge


x


buffer layer


804


is increased from zero to 1.




After all the semiconductor-on-insulator substrate obtained by the approaches described above, various device layers can be further grown on the top. Before the regrowth, CMP maybe used to polish the surface.




Although the present invention has been shown and described with respect to several preferred embodiments thereof, various changes, omissions and additions to the form and detail thereof, may be made therein, without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. A semiconductor structure comprising:a substrate including an insulator layer; a first layer of relaxed Si1−xGex disposed over the insulator layer, wherein x has a value in the range of 0.1 to 1; and a second layer disposed over the substrate, the second layer comprising a material selected from the group consisting of GaAs, AlAs, ZnSe, InGaP, and strained Si1−yGey wherein y has a value different from the value of x.
  • 2. A semiconductor structure comprising:a substrate; and a plurality of layers disposed over the substrate, the layers comprising: a graded Si1−xGex buffer layer, the graded buffer layer having a Ge concentration x, wherein x has a value that increases from zero to a value y; a first relaxed, layer comprising Si1−yGey; and a separation layer comprising at least one material selected from the group consisting of strained Si1−zGez with z≠y, III-V materials, and II-VI materials.
  • 3. The structure of claim 1 wherein the value of x is in the range of 0.3 to 1.
  • 4. A semiconductor structure comprising:a substrate; a first layer of relaxed Si1−xGex disposed over the substrate, x having a value in the range of 0.1 to 1; a second layer disposed over the substrate, the second layer comprising at least one material selected from the group consisting of GaAs, AlAs, ZnSe, InGaP, and strained Si1−yGey wherein y has a value different from the value of x; and a plurality of ions disposed in at least one of the first layer and the second layer.
  • 5. The structure of claim 4 wherein the ions comprise at least one of hydrogen H+ ions and H2+ ions.
  • 6. The structure of claim 2 wherein a surface of the structure has a root mean square surface roughness of less than about 11 angstroms.
  • 7. The structure of claim 2, further comprising:a second relaxed layer.
  • 8. The structure of claim 7 wherein the second relaxed layer comprises relaxed Si1−wGew and w is substantially equal to y.
  • 9. The structure of claim 7 wherein y is approximately equal to 1 and the second relaxed layer comprises at least one material selected from the group consisting of Ge, GaAs, AlAs, ZnSe, and InGaP.
  • 10. The structure of claim 2, further comprising:a plurality of ions disposed in the structure.
  • 11. The structure of claim 10 wherein the ions comprise at least on of hydrogen H+ ions and H2+ ions.
  • 12. The structure of claim 10 wherein the ions are disposed in the separation layer.
  • 13. The structure of claim 10 wherein the separation layer comprises a strained layer and the ions are disposed in one of the graded buffer layer and the first relaxed layer.
  • 14. The structure of claim 2, further comprising:an oxide layer disposed over the plurality of layers.
  • 15. The structure of claim 2, further comprising:a device integrated into at least a portion of the plurality of layers.
  • 16. The semiconductor structure of claim 2 wherein the separation layer comprises a strained layer.
  • 17. The semiconductor structure of claim 2 wherein the separation layer comprises a defect layer.
  • 18. A semiconductor structure comprising:a substrate comprising silicon; an insulating layer disposed over the substrate; and a relaxed Si1−xGex layer disposed over the insulating layer, the relaxed Si1−xGex layer having a uniform composition and a dislocation defect density of less than 106/cm2.
  • 19. The structure of claim 18 wherein a Ge concentration x of the relaxed layer is in the range of zero to 1.
  • 20. The structure of claim 19 wherein the Ge concentration x is in the range of 0.3 to 1.
  • 21. The structure of claim 18, further comprising:a device layer disposed over the relaxed Si1−xGex layer.
  • 22. The structure of claim 18 wherein the device layer comprises at least one material selected from the group consisting of strained Si, strained Si1−yGey with y≠x, III-V materials, and II-VI materials.
  • 23. The structure of claim 18, further comprising:a device disposed within at least a portion of the relaxed Si1−xGex layer.
  • 24. A semiconductor structure comprising:a relaxed Si1−yGey layer disposed on a substrate; and a buried layer defined by implanted ions disposed in the relaxed Si1−yGey layer.
  • 25. A semiconductor structure comprising:a first heterostructure including: a graded Si1−xGex buffer layer disposed on a first substrate, the graded Si1−xGex buffer layer having a Ge concentration x increasing from zero to a value y; a relaxed Si1−yGey layer disposed on the graded Si1−xGex buffer layer; and a buried layer defined by implanted ions disposed in one of said graded Si1−xGex buffer layer and relaxed Si1−yGey layer.
  • 26. The semiconductor structure of claim 25 wherein the implanted ions comprise at least one of H+ ions and H2+ ions.
  • 27. The semiconductor structure of claim 25 wherein a surface of the structure has a roughness less than about 11 nanometers.
  • 28. The semiconductor structure of claim 25, further comprising:an oxide layer disposed over the first heterostructure.
  • 29. The semiconductor structure of claim 25 wherein the first heterostructure is bonded to a second substrate, defining a second heterostructure.
  • 30. The semiconductor structure of claim 29 wherein the second substrate comprises an insulator layer and the first heterostructure is bonded to the insulator layer.
  • 31. The semiconductor structure of claim 30 wherein the insulator layer comprises an oxide layer.
  • 32. A semiconductor structure comprising:a substrate; and a semiconductor layer bonded to the substrate, the semiconductor layer having a surface roughness of less than about 11.3 nanometers.
  • 33. The semiconductor structure of claim 32 wherein the semiconductor layer comprises at least one of relaxed Si1−yGey, GaAs, AlAs, ZnSe, and InGaP.
  • 34. The semiconductor structure of claim 33 wherein the semiconductor layer comprises a surface damage layer.
  • 35. The semiconductor structure of claim 33 wherein the surface damage layer has a thickness of less than about 100 nanometers.
  • 36. The semiconductor structure of claim 32, further comprising:a device disposed within at least a portion of the semiconductor layer.
  • 37. A semiconductor structure comprising:a first heterostructure including: a graded Si1−xGex buffer layer disposed on a first substrate, the graded Si1−xGex buffer layer having a Ge concentration x increasing from zero to 1; a relaxed Ge layer disposed on the graded Si1−xGex buffer layer; a semiconductor layer disposed on the relaxed Ge layer; and a buried layer disposed within at least one of the graded Si1−xGex buffer layer, the semiconductor layer, and the relaxed Ge layer, the buried layer being defined by ions.
  • 38. The semiconductor structure of claim 37 wherein the implanted ions comprise at least one of H+ ions and H2+ ions.
  • 39. The structure of claim 37 wherein the first heterostructure is bonded to a second substrate, thereby defining a second heterostructure.
  • 40. The semiconductor structure of claim 39 further comprising:a device disposed within at least a portion of the semiconductor layer.
  • 41. A semiconductor structure comprising:a first heterostructure including: a graded Si1−xGe x buffer layer disposed on a first substrate, the graded Si1−xGex buffer layer having a Ge concentration x increasing from zero to a value y; a relaxed Si1−zGez layer disposed on the graded Si1−xGex buffer layer, z being greater than y; and a buried layer defined by ions disposed within the graded Si1−xGex buffer layer.
  • 42. The semiconductor structure of claim 41 wherein the implanted ions comprise at least one of H+ ions and H2+ ions.
  • 43. The semiconductor structure of claim 41 wherein the first heterostructure is bonded to a second substrate, defining a second heterostructure.
  • 44. The semiconductor structure of claim 41, further comprising:a device disposed within at least a portion of the semiconductor layer.
  • 45. A semiconductor structure comprising:a substrate; and a relaxed Si1−zGez layer bonded to the substrate, wherein a surface of the Si1−zGez layer is defined by a selective etch.
  • 46. A semiconductor structure comprising:a first heterostructure including: a graded Si1−xGex buffer layer disposed on a first substrate, wherein the graded Si1−xGex buffer layer has a Ge concentration x increasing from zero to a value y; a relaxed Si1−yGey layer disposed on the graded Si1−xGex buffer layer; a separation layer disposed on the relaxed Si1−y Gey layer; a second relaxed layer disposed over the separation layer; and a plurality of ions disposed in at least one of the graded buffer layer, the relaxed layer, the separation layer, and the second relaxed layer.
  • 47. The semiconductor structure of claim 46 wherein the implanted ions comprise at least one of H+ ions and H2+ ions.
  • 48. The semiconductor structure of claim 46 wherein the first heterostructure is bonded to a second substrate, defining a second heterostructure.
  • 49. The semiconductor structure of claim 48 further comprising:a device disposed within at least a portion of the second heterostructure.
  • 50. A semiconductor structure comprising:a first heterostructure including: a layer structure comprising: a graded Si1−xGex buffer layer disposed on a first substrate, wherein the Ge concentration x increases from zero to a value y, and a relaxed Si1−zGez layer disposed over the graded Si1−xGex buffer layer, wherein z is substantially equal to or greater than y; and a buried layer disposed in the layer structure.
  • 51. The structure of claim 50 wherein the buried layer comprises implanted ions.
  • 52. The structure of claim 50 wherein the implanted ions comprise at least one of hydrogen H+ ions and H2+ ions.
  • 53. The structure of claim 50, wherein the first heterostructure is bonded to a second substrate to define a second heterostructure.
Parent Case Info

This application is a divisional of application Ser. No. 09/928,126, filed on Aug. 10, 2001 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,573,126, which claims priority from provisional application Ser. No. 60/225,666, filed Aug. 16, 2000, now expired, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (134)
Number Name Date Kind
4010045 Ruehrwein Mar 1977 A
4710788 Dämbkes et al. Dec 1987 A
4990979 Otto Feb 1991 A
4997776 Harame et al. Mar 1991 A
5013681 Godbey et al. May 1991 A
5155571 Wang et al. Oct 1992 A
5166084 Pfiester Nov 1992 A
5177583 Endo et al. Jan 1993 A
5202284 Kamins et al. Apr 1993 A
5207864 Bhat et al. May 1993 A
5208182 Narayan et al. May 1993 A
5212110 Pfiester et al. May 1993 A
5221413 Brasen et al. Jun 1993 A
5241197 Murakami et al. Aug 1993 A
5250445 Bean et al. Oct 1993 A
5285086 Fitzgerald Feb 1994 A
5291439 Kauffmann et al. Mar 1994 A
5298452 Meyerson Mar 1994 A
5310451 Tejwani et al. May 1994 A
5316958 Meyerson May 1994 A
5346848 Grupen-Shemansky et al. Sep 1994 A
5374564 Bruel Dec 1994 A
5399522 Ohori Mar 1995 A
5413679 Godbey May 1995 A
5426069 Selvakumar et al. Jun 1995 A
5426316 Mohammad Jun 1995 A
5442205 Brasen et al. Aug 1995 A
5461243 Ek et al. Oct 1995 A
5461250 Burghartz et al. Oct 1995 A
5462883 Dennard et al. Oct 1995 A
5476813 Naruse Dec 1995 A
5479033 Baca et al. Dec 1995 A
5484664 Kitahara et al. Jan 1996 A
5523243 Mohammad Jun 1996 A
5523592 Nakagawa et al. Jun 1996 A
5534713 Ismail et al. Jul 1996 A
5536361 Kondo et al. Jul 1996 A
5540785 Dennard et al. Jul 1996 A
5596527 Tomioka et al. Jan 1997 A
5617351 Bertin et al. Apr 1997 A
5630905 Lynch et al. May 1997 A
5659187 Legoues et al. Aug 1997 A
5683934 Candelaria Nov 1997 A
5698869 Yoshimi et al. Dec 1997 A
5714777 Ismail et al. Feb 1998 A
5728623 Mori Mar 1998 A
5739567 Wong Apr 1998 A
5759898 Ek et al. Jun 1998 A
5777347 Bartelink Jul 1998 A
5786612 Otani et al. Jul 1998 A
5786614 Chuang et al. Jul 1998 A
5792679 Nakato Aug 1998 A
5808344 Ismail et al. Sep 1998 A
5847419 Imai et al. Dec 1998 A
5877070 Goesele et al. Mar 1999 A
5891769 Hong et al. Apr 1999 A
5906708 Robinson et al. May 1999 A
5906951 Chu et al. May 1999 A
5912479 Mori et al. Jun 1999 A
5943560 Chang et al. Aug 1999 A
5963817 Chu et al. Oct 1999 A
5966622 Levine et al. Oct 1999 A
5998807 Lustig et al. Dec 1999 A
6013134 Chu et al. Jan 2000 A
6033974 Henley et al. Mar 2000 A
6033995 Muller Mar 2000 A
6058044 Sugiura et al. May 2000 A
6059895 Chu et al. May 2000 A
6074919 Gardner et al. Jun 2000 A
6096590 Chan et al. Aug 2000 A
6103559 Gardner et al. Aug 2000 A
6107653 Fitzgerald Aug 2000 A
6111267 Fischer et al. Aug 2000 A
6117750 Bensahel et al. Sep 2000 A
6130453 Mei et al. Oct 2000 A
6133799 Favors, Jr. et al. Oct 2000 A
6140687 Shimomura et al. Oct 2000 A
6143636 Forbes et al. Nov 2000 A
6153495 Kub et al. Nov 2000 A
6154475 Soref et al. Nov 2000 A
6160303 Fattaruso Dec 2000 A
6162688 Gardner et al. Dec 2000 A
6184111 Henley et al. Feb 2001 B1
6191007 Matsui et al. Feb 2001 B1
6191432 Sugiyama et al. Feb 2001 B1
6194722 Fiorini et al. Feb 2001 B1
6204529 Lung et al. Mar 2001 B1
6207977 Augusto Mar 2001 B1
6210988 Howe et al. Apr 2001 B1
6218677 Broekaert Apr 2001 B1
6232138 Fitzgerald et al. May 2001 B1
6235567 Huang May 2001 B1
6242324 Kub et al. Jun 2001 B1
6249022 Lin et al. Jun 2001 B1
6251755 Furukawa et al. Jun 2001 B1
6261929 Gehrke et al. Jul 2001 B1
6266278 Harari et al. Jul 2001 B1
6271551 Schmitz et al. Aug 2001 B1
6271726 Fransis et al. Aug 2001 B1
6291321 Fitzgerald Sep 2001 B1
6313016 Kibbel et al. Nov 2001 B1
6316301 Kant Nov 2001 B1
6323108 Kub et al. Nov 2001 B1
6329063 Lo et al. Dec 2001 B2
6335546 Tsuda et al. Jan 2002 B1
6339232 Takagi Jan 2002 B1
6350993 Chu et al. Feb 2002 B1
6368733 Nishinaga Apr 2002 B1
6372356 Thornton et al. Apr 2002 B1
6399970 Kubo et al. Jun 2002 B2
6403975 Brunner et al. Jun 2002 B1
6407406 Tezuka Jun 2002 B1
6420937 Akatsuka et al. Jul 2002 B1
6425951 Chu et al. Jul 2002 B1
6429061 Rim Aug 2002 B1
6521041 Wu et al. Feb 2003 B2
6555839 Fitzgerald et al. Apr 2003 B2
20010003364 Sugawara et al. Jun 2001 A1
20020043660 Yamazaki et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020052084 Fitzgerald May 2002 A1
20020068393 Fitzgerald et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020096717 Chu et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020100942 Fitzgerald et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020123167 Fitzgerald Sep 2002 A1
20020123183 Fitzgerald Sep 2002 A1
20020123197 Fitzgerald et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020125471 Fitzgerald et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020125497 Fitzgerald Sep 2002 A1
20020140031 Rim Oct 2002 A1
20020168864 Cheng et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030003679 Doyle et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030013323 Hammond et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030025131 Lee et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030057439 Fitzgerald Mar 2003 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (40)
Number Date Country
41 01 167 Jul 1992 DE
0 514 018 Nov 1992 EP
0 587 520 Mar 1994 EP
0 683 522 Nov 1995 EP
0 828 296 Mar 1998 EP
0 829 908 Mar 1998 EP
0 838 858 Apr 1998 EP
1 020 900 Jul 2000 EP
1 174 928 Jan 2002 EP
2 342 777 Apr 2000 GB
4-307974 Oct 1992 JP
5-166724 Jul 1993 JP
7-094420 Apr 1994 JP
6-177046 Jun 1994 JP
7-106446 Apr 1995 JP
7-240372 Sep 1995 JP
10-270685 Oct 1998 JP
11-233744 Aug 1999 JP
2000-31491 Jan 2000 JP
2000-021783 Jan 2000 JP
2001319935 May 2000 JP
2002-076334 Mar 2002 JP
2002-164520 Jun 2002 JP
2002-289533 Oct 2002 JP
WO 9859365 Dec 1998 WO
WO 9953539 Oct 1999 WO
WO 0048239 Aug 2000 WO
WO 0054338 Sep 2000 WO
WO 01022482 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0154202 Jul 2001 WO
WO 0193338 Dec 2001 WO
WO 0199169 Dec 2001 WO
WO 0213262 Feb 2002 WO
WO 0215244 Feb 2002 WO
WO 0227783 Apr 2002 WO
WO 0247168 Jun 2002 WO
WO 02071488 Sep 2002 WO
WO 02071491 Sep 2002 WO
WO 02071495 Sep 2002 WO
WO 02082514 Oct 2002 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (94)
Entry
IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 32, No. 8A, Jan. 1990, “Optimal Growth Technique and Structure for Strain Relaxation of Si-Ge Layers on Si Substrates,” pgs. 330-331.
Maszara, “Silicon-On-Insulator by Wafer Bonding: A Review,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, No. 1 (Jan. 1991) pp. 341-347.
Chang et al., “Selective Etching of SiGe/Si Heterostructures,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, No. 1 (Jan. 1991) pp. 202-204.
Fitzgerald et al., “Totally Relaxed GexSil-x Layers with Low Threading Dislocation Densities Grown on Si Substrates,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 59, No. 7 (Aug. 12, 1991) pp. 811-813.
Fitzgerald et al., “Related GexSil-x structures for III-V integration with Si and high mobility two-dimensional electron gases in Si,” AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974 (1992) American Vacuum Society, pp. 1807-1819.
Feijoo et al., “Epitaxial Si-Ge Etch Stop Layers with Ethylene Diamine Pyrocatechol for Bonded and Etchback Silicon-on-Insulator,” Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 23, No. 6 (Jun. 1994) pp. 493-496.
Ismail, “Si/SiGe High-Speed Field-Effect Transistors,” Electron Devices Meeting, Washington, D.C. (Dec. 10, 1995) pp. 20.1.1-20.1.4.
Sadek et al., “Design of Si/SiGe Heterojunction Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Transistors,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices (Aug. 1996) pp. 1224-1232.
Usami et al., “Spectroscopic study of Si-based quantum wells with neighboring confinement structure,” Semicon. Sci. Technol. (1997) (astract).
König et al., “Design Rules for N-Type SiGe Hetero FETs,” Solid State Electronics, vol. 41, No. 10 (1997), pp. 1541-1547.
Maiti et al., “Strained-Si heterostructure field effect transistors,” Semicond. Sci. Technol., vol. 13 (1998) pp. 1225-1246.
Borenstein et al., “A New Ultra-Hard Etch-Stop layer for High Precision Micromachining,” Proceedings of the 1999 12th IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMs) (Jan. 17-21, 1999) pp. 205-210.
Ishikawa et al., “SiGe-on-insulator substrate using SiGe alloy grown Si(001),” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 75, No. 7 (Aug. 16, 1999) pp. 983-985.
Mizuno et al., “Electron and Hold Mobility Enhancement in Strained-Si MOSFET's on SiGe-on-Insulator Substrates Fabricated by SIMOX Technology,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 21, No. 5 (May 2000) pp. 230-232.
Yeo et al., “Nanoscale Ultra-Thin-Body Silicon-on-Insulator P-MOSFET with a SiGe/Si Heterostructure Channel,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 21, No. 4 (Apr. 2000) pp. 161-163.
Hackbarth et al., “Alternatives to thick MBE-grown relaxed SiGe buffers,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 369, No. 1-2 (Jul. 2000) pp. 148-151.
Barradas et al., “RBS analysis of MBE-grown SiGe/(001) Si heterostructures with thin, high Ge content SiGe channels for HMOS transistors,” Modern Physics Letters B (2001) (abstract).
Zhang et al., “Demonstration of a GaAs-Based Compliant Substrate Using Wafer Bonding and Substrate Removal Techniques,” Electronic Materials and Processing Research Laboratory, Department of Electrical Engineering, University Park, PA 16802 (1998) pp. 25-28.
Bruel, “Silicon on Insulator Material Technology,” Electronic Letters, vol. 13, No. 14 (Jul. 6, 1995) pp. 1201-1202.
Bruel et al., “®Smart Cut: A Promising New SOI Material Technology,” Proceedings 1995 IEEE International SOI Conference (Oct. 1995) pp. 178-179.
Ishikawa et al., “Creation of Si-Ge-based SIMOX structures by low energy oxygen implantation,” Proceedings 1997 IEEE International SOI Conference (Oct. 1997) pp. 16-17.
Huang et al., “High-quality strain-relaxed SiGe alloy grown on implanted silicon-on-insulator substrate,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 76, No. 19 (May 8, 2000) pp. 2680-2682.
Armstrong et al., “Design of Si/SiGe Heterojunction Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Transistors,” IEDM Technical Digest (1995) pp. 761-764.
Armstrong, “Technology for SiGe Heterostructure-Based CMOS Devices”, Ph.D Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1999) pp. 1-154.
Augusto et al., “Proposal for a New Process Flow for the Fabrication of Silicon-Based Complementary MOD-MOSFETs without Ion Implantation,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 294, No. 1-2 (1997) pp. 254-258.
Bouillon et al., “Search for the optimal channel architecture for 0.18/0.12 μm bulk CMOS Experimental study,” IEEE (1996) pp. 21.2.1-21.2.4.
Bufler et al., “Hole transport in strained Sil-x Gex alloys on Sil-yGey substrates,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 84, No. 10 (Nov. 15, 1998) pp. 5597-5602.
Burghartz et al., “Microwave Inductors and Capacitors in Standard Multilevel Interconnect Silicon Technology”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44, No. 1 (Jan. 1996) pp. 100-104.
Canaperi et al., “Preparation of a relaxed Si-Ge layer on an insulator in fabricating high-speed semiconductor devices with strained expitaxial films,” International Business Machines Corporation, USA (2002) (abstract).
Carlin et al., “High Efficiency GaAs-on-Si Solar Cells with High Voc Using Graded GeSi Buffers,” IEEE (2000) pp. 1006-1011.
Cheng et al., “Electron Mobility Enhancement in Strained-Si n-MOSFETs Fabricated on SiGe-on-Insulator (SGOI) Substrates,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 22, No. 7 (Jul. 2001) pp. 321-323.
Cheng et al., “Relaxed Silicon-Germanium on Insulator Substrate by Layer Transfer,” Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 30, No. 12 (2001) pp. L37-L39.
Cullis et al, “Growth ripples upon strained SiGe epitaxial layers on Si and misfit dislocation interactions,” Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology A, vol. 12, No. 4 (Jul./Aug. 1994) pp. 1924-1931.
Currie et al., “Controlling Threading Dislocation in Ge on Si using Graded SiGe Layers and Chemical-Mechanical Polishing,” vol. 72 No. 14 (Apr. 6, 1998) pp. 1718-1720.
Currie et al., “Carrier mobilities and process stability of strained Si n- and p-MOSFETs on SiGe virtual substrates,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 19, No. 6 (Nov./Dec. 2001) pp. 2268-2279.
Eaglesham et al., “Dislocation-Free Stranski-Krastanow Growth of Ge on Si(100),” Physical Review Letters, vol. 64, No. 16 (Apr. 16, 1999) pp. 1943-1946.
Fischetti et al., “Band structure, deformation potentials, and carrier mobility in strained Si, Ge, and SiGe alloys,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 80, No. 4 (Aug. 15, 1996) pp. 2234-2252.
Fischetti, “Long-range Coulomb interactions in small Si devices. Part II. Effective electron mobility in thin-oxide structures,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 89, No. 2 (Jan. 15, 2001) pp. 1232-1250.
Fitzgerald et al., “Dislocation dynamics in relaxed graded composition semiconductors,” Materials Science and Engineering B67 (1999) pp. 53-61.
Garone et al., “Silicon vapor phase epitaxial growth catalysis by the presence of germane,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 56, No. 13 (Mar. 26, 1990) pp. 1275-1277.
Gray and Meyer, “Phase-Locked Loops”, Analysis and Design of Analog Integrated Circuits (1984) pp. 605-632.
Grutzmacher et al., “Ge segregation in SiGe/Si heterostructures and its dependence on deposition technique and growth atmosphere,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 63, No. 18 (Nov. 1, 1993) pp. 2531-2533.
Hackbarth et al., “Strain relieved SiGe buffers for Si-based heterostructure field-effect transistors,” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 201/202 (1999) pp. 734-738.
Herzog et al., “SiGe-based FETs: buffer issues and device results,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 380 (2000) pp. 36-41.
Höck et al., “Carrier mobilities in modulation doped Sil-xGex heterostructures with respect to FET applications,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 336 (1998) pp. 141-144.
Höck et al., “High hole mobility in Si0.17 Ge0.83 channel metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors grown by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 76, No. 26 (Jun. 26, 2000) pp. 3920-3922.
Höck et al., “High performance 0.25 μm p-type Ge/SiGe MODFETs,” Electronics Letters, vol. 34, No. 19 (Sep. 17, 1998) pp. 1888-1889.
Huang et al., “The Impact of Scaling Down to Deep Submicron on CMOS RF Circuits”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 33, No. 7, Jul., 1998, pp. 1023-1036.
“2 Bit/Cell EEPROM Cell Using Band to Band Tunneling for Data Read-Out,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 35, No. 4B (Sep. 1992) pp. 136-140.
Ismail et al., “Modulation-doped n-type Si/SiGe with inverted interface,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 65, No. 10 (Sep. 5, 1994) pp. 1248-1250.
Kearney et al., “The effect of alloy scattering on the mobility of holes in a Sil-xGex quantum well,” Semicond. Sci Technol., vol. 13 (1998) pp. 174-180.
Kim et al., “A Fully Integrated 1.9-GHz CMOS Low-Noise Amplifier,” IEEE Microwave and Guided Wave Letters, vol. 8, No. 8 (Aug. 1998) pp. 293-295.
Koester et al., “Extremely High Transconductance Ge/Si0.4Ge0.6 p-MODFET's Grown by UHV-CVD,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 21, No. 3 (Mar. 2000) pp. 110-112.
König et al., “P-Type Ge-Channel MODFET's with High Transconductance Grown on Si Substrates,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 14, No. 4 (Apr. 1993) pp. 205-207.
König et al., “SiGe HBTs and HFETs,” Solid-State Electronics, vol. 38, No. 9 (1995) pp. 1595-1602.
Kuznetsov et al., “Technology for high-performance n-channel SiGe modulation-doped field-effect transistors,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B 13(6) (Nov./Dec. 1995) pp. 2892-2896.
Larson, “Integrated Circuit Tecnology Options for RFIC's—Present Status and Future Directions”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circutis, vol. 33, No. 3, Mar. 1998, pp. 387-399.
Lee et al., “CMSO RF Integrated Circuits at 5 GHz and Beyond”, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 88, No. 10 (Oct. 2000) pp. 1560-1571.
Lee et al., “Strained Ge channel p-type metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors grown on Sil-xGex/Si virtual substrates,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 79, No. 20 (Nov. 12, 2001) pp. 3344-3346.
Lee et al., “Strained Ge channel p-type MOSFETs fabricated on Sil-xGex/Si virtual substrates,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., vol. 686 (2002) pp. A1.9.1-A1.9.5.
Leitz et al., “Channel Engineering of SiGe-Based Heterostructures for High Mobility MOSFETs,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., vol. 686 (2002) pp. A3.10.1-A3.10.6.
Leitz et al., “Dislocation glide and blocking kinetics in compositionally graded SiGe/Si,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 90, No. 6 (Sep. 15, 2001) pp. 2730-2736.
Leitz et al., “Hole mobility enhancements in strained Si/Sil-yGey p-type metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors grown on relaxed Sil-xGex (x<y) virtual substrates,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 79, No. 25 (Dec. 17, 2001) pp. 4246-4248.
Li et al., “Design of high speed Si/SiGe heterojunction complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistors with reduced short-channel effects,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol., vol. 20 No. 3 (May/Jun. 2002) pp. 1030-1033.
Lu et al., “High Performance 0.1 μm Gate-Length P-Type SiGe MODFETs and MOS-MODFET's”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 47, No. 8 (Aug. 2000) pp. 1645-1652.
Kummer et al., “Low energy plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition,” Materials Science and Engineering B89 (2002) pp. 288-295.
Meyerson et al., “Cooperative Growth Phenomena in Silicon/Germanium Low-Temperature Epitaxy,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 53, No. 25 (Dec. 19, 1988) pp. 2555-2557.
Mizuno et al., “Advanced SOI-MOSFETs with Strained-Si Channel for High Speed CMOS-Electron/Hole Mobility Enhancement,” 2000 Symposium on VLSI Technology, Digest of Technical Papers, Honolulu, (Jun. 13-15), IEEE New York, NY, pp. 210-211.
Mizuno et al., “High Performance Strained-Si p-MOSFETs on SiGe-on-Insulator Substrates Fabricated by SIMOX Technology,” IEEE IDEM Technical Digest (1999) pp. 934-936.
Nayak et al., “High-Mobility Strained-Si PMOSFET's”; IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 43, No. 10 (Oct. 1996) pp. 1709-1716.
O'Neill et al., “SiGe Virtual substrate N-channel heterojunction MOSFETS,” Semicond. Sci. Technol., vol. 14 (1999) pp. 784-789.
Papananos, “Low Noise Amplifiers in MOS Technologies,” and “Low Noise Tuned-LC Oscillator,” Radio-Frequency Microelectronic Circuits for Telecommunication Applications (1999) pp. 115-117, 188-193.
Parker et al., “SiGe heterostructure CMOS circuits and applications,” Solid State Electronics, vol. 43 (1999) pp. 1497-1506.
Ransom et al., “Gate-Self-Aligned n-channel and p-channel Germanium MOSFET's,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 38, No. 12 (Dec. 1991) pp. 2695.
Reinking et al., “Fabrication of high-mobility Ge p-channel MOSFETs on Si substrates,” Electronics Letters, vol. 35, No. 6 (Mar. 18, 1999) pp. 503-504.
Rim et al., “Enhanced Hole Mobilities in Surface-channel Strained-Si p-MOSFETs”; IEDM, 1995, pp. 517-520.
Rim et al., “Fabrication and Analysis of Deep Submicron Strained-Si N-MOSFET's”; IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 47, No. 7 (Jul. 2000) pp. 1406-1415.
Rim, “Application of Silicon-Based Heterostructures to Enhanced Mobility Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistors”, Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University (1999) pp. 1-184.
Robbins et al., “A model for heterogeneous growth of Sil-xGex films for hydrides,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 69, No. 6 (Mar. 15, 1991) pp. 3729-3732.
Schäffler, “High-Mobility Si and Ge Structures,” Semiconductor Science and Technology, vol. 12 (1997) pp. 1515-1549.
Sugimoto et al., “A 2V, 500 MHz and 3V, 920 MHz Low-Power Current-Mode 0.6 μm CMOS VCO Circuit,” IEICE Trans. Electron., vol. E82-C, No. 7 (Jul. 1999) pp. 1327-1329.
Tement et al., “Metal Gate Strained Silicon MOSFET's for Microwave Integrated Circuits”, IEEE (Oct. 2000) pp. 38-43.
Tweet et al., “Factors determining the composition of strained GeSi layers grown with disilane and germane,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 65, No. 20 (Nov. 14, 1994) pp. 2579-2581.
Welser et al., “Electron Mobility Enhancement in Strained-Si N-Type Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistors,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 15, No. 3 (Mar. 1994) pp. 100-102.
Welser et al., “Evidence of Real-Space Hot-Electron Transfer in High Mobility, Strained-Si Multilayer MOSFETs,” IEEE IDEM Technical Digest (1993) pp. 545-548.
Welser et al., “NMOS and PMOS Tranistors Fabricated in Strained Silicon/Relaxed Silicon-Germanium Structures,” IEEE IDEM Technical Digest (1992) pp. 1000-1002.
Welser, “The Application of Strained Silicon/Relaxed Silicon Germanium Heterostructures to Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistors,” Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University (1994) pp. 1-205.
Wolf et al., “Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era,” vol. 1 Process Technology (1986) pp. 384-386.
Xie et al., “Semiconductor Surface Roughness: Dependence on Sign and Magnitude of Bulk Strain,” The Physical Review Letters, vol. 73, No. 22 (Nov. 28, 1994) pp. 3006-3009.
Xie et al., “Very high mobility two-dimensional hole gas in Si/GexSil-x/Ge structures grown by molecular beam eiptaxy,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 63, No. 16 (Oct. 18, 1993) pp. 2263-2264.
Xie, “SiGe Field effect transistors,” Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 25 (1999) pp. 89-121.
Tsang et al., “Measurements of alloy composition and strain in thin Gex Sil-x layers,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 75 No. 12 (Jun. 15, 1994) pp. 8098-8108.
Sakaguchi et al., “ELTRAN® by Splitting Porous Si Layers,” Proc. 195th Int. SOI Symposium, vol. 99-3, Electrochemical Society (1999) pp. 117-121.
Yamagata et al., “Bonding, Splitting and Thinning by Porous Si in ELTRAN®; SOI-Epi Wafer™,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., vol. 681E (2001) pp. 18.2.1-18.2.10.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/225666 Aug 2000 US