Oil, grease and solid waste contaminant removal or recovery systems are well known in the prior art. Over the past thirty years there has been a steady move towards requiring food handling facilities to have systems for servicing kitchen grease and solid waste bearing water flows. Sewer system lines can become clogged from the fats, oil and grease waste materials (hereinafter referred to as “F.O.G.”) put into the sewer system from food handling facilities. This has led more and more sewer authorities to implement fats, oils and grease control programs. These programs regulate food handling facilities and the manner in which they process F.O.G.s. The object of many of these programs is to ensure that food handling facilities remove as much of the F.O.G. as possible from the effluent flow, thereby releasing only grey water to the sewer system.
Active separators remove F.O.G. from the effluent, typically by some skimming operation. Skimming when skimming is required and not skimming when it is not required has been an issue for the art. The traditional methodology is simply to use a timer that turns on the skimming apparatus at a certain time of day and runs it for a certain period, providing the user only with control as to the time of day and duration. For installations that have very regular schedules, this may be sufficient. However, for other installations that operate on less than a regular schedule, problems can arise. Schedule variations can be as simple as the differences between weekday and weekend operation. Also, for installations such as school cafeterias that do not operate during the summer, F.O.G. will not be added to the effluent during the summer, so there is not a reason to run the separator during the summer. Nonetheless, if the separator works on a daily schedule according to its timer, it will run even if there is no F.O.G. to be removed.
One of the downsides of this operation, besides the wasted energy of skimmer operation, is that when all of the F.O.G. is removed, the water becomes exposed. There may be food solids remaining in the water that are decomposing and off-gassing foul odors. If a F.O.G. mat is allowed to remain on the water, the odor is contained within the water. Also, humidity emanating from the water can rise into the electronics and provide a challenge to the longevity of the electronics.
Water and F.O.G. both dissipate (conduct) heat, but at different rates. By heating up a sensor unit and measuring how fast it gets hot one can measure how easily the heat is dissipated in the surrounding media. This heat dissipation rate can then be indicate the whether the sensor unit is in F.O.G. or water.
One device for making water or F.O.G. determinations using thermocouples is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,828,960, which issued Nov. 9, 2010, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. However, thermocouples can be expensive and provide other challenges. For example, the effluent in which the sensor is immersed can be corrosive, since it includes a wide range of items that are discharged through kitchen sinks, including cleaning agents and bleaches. The sensor must be able to withstand such corrosive attacks in order to give reliable information over time. Also, the kitchen effluent may have a range of temperatures, a range that can vary over time even for a single installation. When boiling water is a substantial part of the effluent, a temperature based sensor such as a thermistor will react differently than when a pitcher of ice water is drained. Practical applications may involve battery power, so reducing power consumption is preferred in order to lengthen battery life.
The present invention fulfills one or more of these needs in the art by providing an apparatus for discriminating between liquids having differing thermal conductivities. A thermally conductive substrate has a resistor mounted to it with two leads to enable a current to be passed through the resistor to generate heat. A thermistor is also mounted to the substrate with two leads to enable a current to be passed through the thermistor to generate a datum indicative of thermistor temperature. An electrical insulator encapsulates the resistor, the thermistor and part of the thermally conductive substrate. A remainder of the thermally conductive substrate may extend beyond the electrical insulator to provide a thermal path from the resistor and thermistor to a liquid in which the apparatus may be immersed in some embodiments.
In one embodiment the leads of the resistor and thermistor are electrically connected to electrically conductive regions of the thermally conductive substrate. One lead of the resistor and one lead of the thermistor may both be electrically connected to a common electrically conductive region of the thermally conductive substrate. That region may be connected to ground.
The substrate may be a printed circuit board with a metal face, such as copper. The copper may be coated with gold, particularly. The remainder of the thermally conductive substrate may extend beyond the electrical insulator. The electrical insulator may be a potting compound.
The leads of the thermistor may be connected to a data gathering unit that samples the data indicative of thermistor temperature over a period of at least forty seconds and computes a ratio of temperature rise. The denominator of the ratio is the temperature rise in the first twenty seconds and the numerator of the ratio is the temperature rise in the sampled period after the first twenty seconds.
A thermal paste may be located between the thermally conductive substrate and the resistor and thermistor.
The invention may also be considered as a separator for separating F.O.G. from an effluent that contains F.O.G. and water. The separator includes a tank, an inlet to the tank for receiving effluent that contains F.O.G. and water and an outlet to allow grey water to leave the tank, the tank having a size to enable stratification to form a layer of F.O.G. in the tank on top of water in the tank. A sensor apparatus is located at a location within the tank for discriminating between F.O.G. and water at the location in the tank. The sensor apparatus includes a thermally conductive substrate, a resistor mounted to the thermally conductive substrate with two leads to enable a current to be passed through the resistor to generate heat, and a thermistor mounted to the substrate with two leads to enable a current to be passed through the thermistor to generate a datum indicative of thermistor temperature. An electrical insulator encapsulates the resistor, the thermistor and at least part of the thermally conductive substrate. A remainder of the thermally conductive substrate may extend beyond the electrical insulator to provide a thermal path from the resistor and thermistor to a liquid in the tank. Differing voltages in the thermistor can be sensed to determine if the sensor apparatus is surrounded by air, F.O.G. or water.
The invention may also be considered as a method of discriminating between liquids having differing thermal conductivities. The method includes positioning a sensor at a location where it may be exposed to the liquids having differing thermal conductivities, the sensor including a thermal path from a heater and a thermistor. The thermal path may have a thermal conductivity comparable to copper. The method also includes applying heat to the sensor with the heater, reading data from the thermistor indicative of thermistor temperature repeatedly over a period of at least forty seconds, and computing a ratio of temperature rise, the denominator of the ratio being the temperature rise in the first twenty seconds of the data gathering period and the numerator of the ratio being the temperature rise in the data gathering period after the first twenty seconds. Alternatively, the computation may include taking an area under the curve of the temperature versus time. Alternately, the computation may include sampling a selected temperature rise to determine if the sensor is in one liquid or the other.
The liquids having differing thermal conductivities may be various liquids including lipids and water; petroleum oils and water; and concentrated alcohols and water.
The invention will be better understood by a reading of the Detailed Description of the Examples of the Invention along with a review of the drawings, in which:
As seen in
A potting compound 28 (seen in
A particular embodiment of the sensor uses an 8 pin AD590 Temperature Transducer (available from Analog Devices, One Technology Way, Norwood, Mass.) as the thermistor 22 and a 24 ohm resistor 24. Both have a layer of thermal paste between them and the copper on the printed circuit board to enhance thermal conductivity between them and the copper on the printed circuit board. They are glued to the copper using Loctite 401.
As seen in
In operation, the sensor 20 will be immersed in a liquid mixture that includes liquids having differing thermal conductivities, particularly immiscible liquids that stratify, so that each liquid is more or less separated from the other. An example of such stratified liquid is an effluent containing F.O.G. and water that are separated in a grease interceptor or grease trap. The sensor may also be used in other applications, such as lipids and water, petroleum oils and water, concentrated alcohols and water, etc. The sensor gauges the relative thermal conductance of the media adjacent to the resistor-thermistor components section of the circuit. The sensor can discern between petroleum oil and water layers in a container used in industrial site for separating and capturing hydraulic oils spilled into an effluent stream.
An electrical voltage is applied to the leads of the resistor 24, causing it to generate heat that is conducted through the printed circuit board 26 and out the heat sink segment 30 into the surrounding liquid. Heat also can be conducted through the potting compound or other electrical insulator that is used to encapsulate the resistor and thermistor. Initially, much of the heat will be contained in the apparatus, but over time the surrounding liquid also heats up. However the rate of heating varies depending on which liquid surrounds the sensor 20. Water conducts heat better than F.O.G. does, so if the sensor is immersed in water, the heat conducts further and faster than if the sensor is immersed in F.O.G. Since the heat moves away from the sensor faster in water than it does in F.O.G., the temperature rises faster in F.O.G. than in water. (If the sensor is in air, the heat conducts much more slowly, so the temperature rises faster than in water or F.O.G.) This different rate of rise of temperature can be measured using the thermistor 22. However, reading that temperature rise can be complicated by variations in initial effluent temperature and delays caused by the thermal mass of the sensor. Applicant has devised apparatus and methodologies to overcome those complications.
The following examples are illustrative of the apparatus and methodology:
A basic sensor 20 was created using a piece of copper 26 with a slit 27 cut in it for the AD 590 thermistor 22 to sit in. It was then electrically insulated with kapton tape and wound with Nichrome wire to be used as the heater 24. Those components were covered in a two-part epoxy in order to water- and F.O.G.-proof the unit, hold everything in place, and thermally insulate most of the unit except for the exposed probe end 30 of the copper. The probe end 30 lets heat escape in order to test how fast the surrounding media can absorb it. By keeping the exposed area relatively small, the heater also can stay small.
For this experiment, the Nichrome wire segment has a resistance of approximately 45 ohm and it is run at 5V dc, giving a power output of approximately 0.56 watt. When capturing data, 5 seconds were allowed to elapse before turning on the power supply to the nichrome wire to ensure that data would be captured correctly. The order of events during the experiment is as follows:
Throughout all starting temperature categories that were tested, the probe temperature increased by 15 degrees Celsius in F.O.G. and between 6 and 10 degrees Celsius in water.
The test was run again using different power outputs to see what the optimal heat production is, as well as testing different housings. The purpose of this experiment is to try to find out what power output would work best to differentiate between F.O.G. and water. All tests were done on water and F.O.G. that were at around room temperature and only the voltage was changed. Since the internal resistance of the heater remained constant, power increases with the square of voltage. The same timing as in the last experiment was used. The resulting data are shown in
These tests show that although the higher the power output, the greater the temperature difference between the F.O.G. and water rises to become, the rises in temperature for both F.O.G. and water are almost identical through around the 20 second mark, regardless of the power applied to the heater.
Tests were run to determine whether or not a difference could be made if the sensor was heated at 2 W for 5, 10, and 15 seconds. The temperature curves looked more or less identical. However, it was learned that even with insulators making up most of the mass of the sensor, it is better to keep the insulator as small as possible to keep a low thermal mass, as reducing the mass also reduces the amount the sensor needs to be heated.
In further testing, an external heating element was turned on for 5 minutes to raise the starting temperature of the fluid being tested. Thirty seconds were given between heating and testing to allow temperatures to stabilize before starting the experiment again.
Due to the nature of the automation, actual temperature readings were not taken to relate the raw data out to temperature. However, it is known that datum 241 of the raw data (vertical scale numbers on
The following table shows measured D1, D2, and percent change for above graphed temperature curves:
This embodiment uses a 24 ohm resistor for the heating element on 3V giving 0.375 watts of heat, which gives a discernible difference between curves for F.O.G. and water. Assuming the sensor will eventually run off of 12V, a 380 ohm resistor would be a good choice to get around the same wattage. This embodiment has an NTC thermistor with 100 k ohms at room temperature. A 100 k ohm resistor gives a high accuracy at room temperature range but not at high temperatures. When used with a 50 k ohms resistor, the sensor seems to be able to read all relevant temperature ranges. This embodiment provides a low profile, ease of assembly, and low thermistor cost. The PCB is roughly 0.25 inches wide. Smaller sizes work better than larger sizes in order to reduce thermal mass.
The graph of
A suitable potting material is 823C Epoxy from MG Chemicals. The epoxy is chemically resistant, waterproof, and can cure at room temperature. The potting compound performs a few basic functions in the sensor. It holds everything in place, electrically insulates the traces, and makes it so that the environment cannot harm the sensor. Lastly, it helps act as a thermal insulator and therefore decreases the thermal leakage in undesired directions.
Another embodiment shown in
Another encapsulation technique is shown in
As noted, the sensor unit is deployed in a liquid, and the task is to determine if the liquid is of one layer of stratification or another. Other ways to use the data can also be used to make this determination. For example, the area under the curves of the data depicted in the graphs for a given period of time can be computed and compared with other collected data, such as stored data. Averages of the temperature values over the set period can also be computed and such comparisons made from the computed averages.
An embodiment provides the sensors positioned at differing heights in a grease trap tank or other passive separator, such as Thermaco's Trapzilla® grease trap, shown in
Rods 12 and 14 are supported by lid 68 and each have a sensor as described above near their bottoms. The remainder of the column lengths of the rods can be made up of conduit for carrying wires to the top and for supporting the sensor at the correct depth within the tank. Rods 12, 14 are of differing length, and the sensors each indicate whether water or FOG is present at its height within the tank. When the F.O.G. capacity of the tank is approaching, attached electronics can generate a signal to call for pumping the F.O.G. from the tank. The longer rod 14 preferably terminates at the level where the tank is considered to be 75% full of F.O.G., and the shorter one is at the 50% level. Other locations in the tank can be used.
The sensors can also be used with active separators that do skimming, such as Thermaco's Big Dipper® separators shown in
The thermistors are useful on the active F.O.G. removal units, such as the Big Dipper. As seen in
Certain modifications and improvements will occur to those skilled in the art upon reading the foregoing description. It should be understood that all such modifications and improvements have been omitted for the sake of conciseness and readability, but are properly within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3025962 | Williams | Sep 1958 | A |
3923655 | McKinney | Dec 1975 | A |
4832711 | Christel, Jr. et al. | May 1989 | A |
4972709 | Bailey, Jr. et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5705055 | Holloway, Jr. et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5946967 | Russell | Sep 1999 | A |
6014076 | Luzzader | Jan 2000 | A |
6108212 | Lach | Aug 2000 | A |
6251286 | Gore | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6619118 | Keck | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6879935 | Keck | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7828960 | Batten et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7854051 | Batten et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
9095162 | Xia | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9139457 | Hatten | Sep 2015 | B2 |
20050109682 | Mazurek et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20090071243 | Camp | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090159355 | Garwood et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090320265 | Batten et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20110068060 | Hatten | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110232381 | Al-Absi et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120106112 | Knies | May 2012 | A1 |
20120221288 | Ioannidis | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20150118373 | Xia | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150293032 | Babichenko | Oct 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202748633 | Feb 2013 | CN |
2336502 | Mar 1992 | RU |
WO 2017035220 | Mar 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Search Report of Counterpart PCT Application PCT/US 2018/041422. |
Sensor Smartserv Grease Brochure, Intelligent Grease Management, p. 1-4. |
VL53L1 a Flight Sense™ Product ST life. Augmented 2017 STMicroelectrionics p. 1-3. |
VL53L0X World Smallest Time-of-Flight ranging and gesture detection senor ST life.augmented 2016 STMicroelectronics, p. 1-40. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190137423 A1 | May 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62565541 | Sep 2017 | US | |
62530437 | Jul 2017 | US |