The present application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/714,735, filed Sep. 7, 2005 entitled Shallow Trench Isolation Structures And Methods For Forming The Same, which application is hereby incorporated by reference.
The present invention relates generally to isolation structures for integrated circuits, and more particularly to shallow trench isolation structures and methods for forming the same.
Integrated circuit devices typically include a number of active devices, such as transistors formed in a substrate, such as a silicon (Si) wafer, that are separated from one another by isolation structures. Isolation structures help to ensure that active devices can be individually controlled by preventing current flow between adjacent devices. Without sufficient isolation, leakage paths can occur between active devices, leading to a number of undesirable effects.
One commonly employed structure used to isolate elements in an integrated circuit is a shallow trench isolation (STI) structure.
In particular, conventional methods or processes of forming a STI structure 100 involve depositing a pad oxide 108 and LPCVD (low pressure chemical vapor deposition) nitride layer (not shown in
One problem with conventional STI structures 100 and methods for forming the same is variation in pad oxide 108 thicknesses. Pad oxide thickness is especially critical for transistor threshold voltage (Vt) variation since channel and well implants are done through the pad oxide after the LPCVD nitride layer has been stripped. There are a number of causes for the variation in pad oxide 108 thickness, including variation of nitride to oxide selectivity across the bathlife of a phosphoric bath used to strip the LPCVD nitride layer. For example, in some process flows pad oxide thickness can vary from 70 Å to 135 Å depending on the bathlife of the phosphoric bath. By bathlife it is meant the number of substrates or lots or batches of substrates previously processed in the bath.
Another cause of variation in pad oxide 108 thicknesses arises from tendency of existing LPCVD batch processing techniques to deposit an undesired LPCVD nitride layer on a backside of the substrate. This backside LPCVD nitride layer if not removed generates stresses in the substrate due to coefficient of thermal expansion mismatches that can damage if not destroy the substrate. Typically, the backside LPCVD nitride layer is removed in the phosphoric bath at the same time the front side LPCVD nitride layer is stripped. However, this requires an overetch, which, depending on bathlife, further exacerbates loss or variation in pad oxide 108 thickness.
Finally, due to batch processing and long deposition time of LPCVD nitride deposition in a furnace, there is lack of flexibility of controlling different nitride thicknesses for various process applications. It will be appreciated that this variation in nitride thicknesses can lead to variation in pad oxide 108 thicknesses independent of bathlife.
Another problem with conventional methods for forming STI structures 100 is defectivity. In particular, the LPCVD nitride layer, which is used as a hardmask for forming the deep STI trenches, is deposited in a furnace, does not meet particle and defectivity requirements as devices shrink to smaller line widths.
Prior efforts to avoid some of the above problems with LPCVD nitride by using PECVD (plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition) nitride have not proven successful. In particular, conventional methods for forming STI structures utilize an in-situ O2 strip to strip any remaining resist following nitride mask open etch which can lead to nitride pinch-off in which the oxide underlying the nitride is under, leading in some instances to a loss of the nitride altogether, and significantly damaging the field oxide mask. An example, of nitride pinch-off is illustrated in
Accordingly, there is a need for a STI structure and a method of forming the same, which significantly reduces variations in pad oxide thickness, and defects in the nitride layer, thereby enabling tailoring of the hardmask dimensions as devices are scaled. There is a further need for an STI process that reduces or eliminates nitride formation on the backside of the substrate, which requires a pad oxide damaging overetch, while substantially avoiding potentially field oxide mask damaging nitride pinch-off.
The present invention provides a solution to these and other problems, and offers further advantages over conventional STI structures and methods of forming the same.
These and various other features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent upon reading of the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and the appended claims provided below, where:
The present invention is directed generally to isolation structures, and more particularly, to shallow trench isolation (STI) structures and methods for forming the same.
The STI structures and methods of the present invention is particularly useful in advanced technologies having high device densities and devices having reduced line widths, such as to isolate N+/N+ and N+/P+ devices for sub 0.25 um process flows.
In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be evident, however, to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures, and techniques are not shown in detail or are shown in block diagram form in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring an understanding of this description.
Reference in the description to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the invention. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification do not necessarily all refer to the same embodiment. The terms “to couple” and “to electrically couple” as used herein may include both to directly connect and to indirectly connect through one or more intervening components.
Briefly, in one aspect the process or method of the present invention involves integrating a PECVD (plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition) nitride into a STI fabrication process in place of a conventional LPCVD (low pressure CVD) nitride. PECVD nitride exhibits much lower defectivity than LPCVD nitride, which is critical for obtaining higher yields as line-widths scale down. In addition, the inventive method uses a dry etch in place of the conventional phosphoric bath used to strip the STI nitride, thereby substantially eliminating the variation in pad oxide thickness due to variation of nitride to oxide selectivity across a bathlife of the phosphoric bath. Also, depositing PECVD nitride eliminates deposits on backsides of substrate or wafer, thereby eliminating the need for overetch or stripping of the nitride in conventional STI fabrication methods. Finally, the process of the present invention utilizes a fluorine based plasma that is selective to the oxide of the pad oxide to strip any remaining resist, thereby eliminating the need for an in-situ oxygen (O2) strip, and substantially avoiding potentially field oxide mask damaging nitride pinch-off.
Shallow trench isolation (STI) structures and methods for forming the same according to various embodiments of the present invention will now be described in greater detail with reference to
The intermediate structure or device 200 further includes a thin layer of oxide known as a pad oxide 214 deposited or grown over the surface of the substrate 204, and through which the STI structure 202 is formed. As noted above, because channel and well implants are implanted through the pad oxide 214 to fabricate active elements in active areas 206a, 206b, control of pad oxide uniformity and thickness both across of a substrate 204 and between lots or batches of sequentially processed substrate is important. Control of pad oxide 214 thicknesses is especially critical to control transistor threshold voltage (Vt) variation.
The substrate 204 may include any known semiconductor material, such as Silicon, Gallium-arsenide, Germanium, Gallium-nitride, Aluminum-phosphide, and mixtures or alloys thereof. Preferably, the substrate 204 is a doped or undoped silicon-based semiconductor substrate, such as a monocrystalline silicon, silicon-germanium, silicon-on-insulator, or silicon-on-sapphire substrate.
Generally, both the pad oxide 214 and the liner oxide 212 include a thin layer or film of a thermally grown silicon-dioxide (SiO2) having a thickness of from about 10 to about 200 angstroms (Å), and more preferably at least about 125 Å.
The STI trench 208 generally have a depth of from about 2000 to about 4000 Å, and a width or cross-section between the active areas 206a, 206b, of from about 80 to about 250 nm.
Methods for fabricating STI structure according to various embodiments of the present invention will now be described in greater detail with reference to
Referring to
Referring to
Suitable PECVD tools includes, for example, a Novellus PECVD tool, commercially available from Novellus Systems, Inc. of San Jose, Calif.
Deposition of the PECVD nitride 306 is followed by a number of steps to pattern the PECVD nitride to form a hardmask, known as a Field Oxide Mask, to be used in a subsequent STI trench etch. Referring to
Next, referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Next, the STI trench is filled by forming a conformal field oxide 314 layer over the field oxide mask, the patterned PECVD nitride 306, in a gap fill step, step 414, as shown in
Referring to
Finally, the PECVD nitride 306 is etched with a high selectivity to oxide to strip the PECVD nitride and stop on the pad oxide 304, yielding the intermediate structure shown in
The advantages of the STI structure and method of the present invention over previous or conventional STI structures and methods include: (i) extending usefulness of STI to smaller scale technologies, thereby enabling use of thinner pad oxides for forming STI structures and widening the manufacturing window; (ii) lowering the number of defects in the nitride mask by replacing LPCVD nitride with PECVD based nitride film, i.e., less than about 100 defects at 0.08 μm line widths versus about 300 defects with LPCVD nitride; (iii) elimination of variation in pad oxide thickness across bathlife by replacing or adding a dry etch to the nitride etch; (iv) ability to tailor or precisely control the thickness of the deposited PECVD nitride film, thereby increasing process flexibility; and (v) a highly selective nitride etch chemistry based on a carbon-fluoride chemistry, such as CH3F, providing a selectivity to oxide of at least about 3:1, and more preferably about 5:1.
The foregoing description of specific embodiments and examples of the invention have been presented for the purpose of illustration and description, and although the invention has been described and illustrated by certain of the preceding examples, it is not to be construed as being limited thereby. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed, and many modifications, improvements and variations within the scope of the invention are possible in light of the above teaching. It is intended that the scope of the invention encompass the generic area as herein disclosed, and by the claims appended hereto and their equivalents. The scope of the present invention is defined by the claims, which includes known equivalents and unforeseeable equivalents at the time of filing of this application.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5726093 | Yoo | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5731241 | Jang et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5807789 | Chen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5811345 | Yu et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5858857 | Ho | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5866465 | Doan et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5880004 | Ho | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5950090 | Chen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6017800 | Sayama et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6048775 | Yao et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6081662 | Murakami et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6165843 | Sung | Dec 2000 | A |
| RE37158 | Lee | May 2001 | E |
| 6245684 | Zhao et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6251748 | Tsai | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6255682 | Wu | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6283131 | Chen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6323103 | Rengarajan et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6580117 | Shimizu | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6596608 | Saito | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6773975 | Ramkumar et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6825544 | Jin | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 7176138 | Chen et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7235491 | Weng et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7288482 | Panda et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 20020111046 | Park et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20030181022 | Mehrad et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20050151180 | Chiang | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20060220181 | Cheng et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2003-086568 | Mar 2003 | JP |