The present invention relates to a high power Light Emitting Diode (LED) package, particularly, in which the height of a sidewall is shortened to improve beam angle characteristics of emission light, increase light quantity, and prevent a molding defect of the sidewall.
A Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) does not have a light source of its own, and thus requires an external illumination, which is generally referred to as a backlight unit. The backlight unit illuminates the LCD from the back and uses a Cold Cathode Fluorescent Lamp (CCFL) or an LED as a light source.
Describing it in more detail, the LED package 10 includes an LED chip 12, cathode and anode leads 14 for supplying power to the LED chip 12 seated thereon, a package body 16 holding the leads 14 and an encapsulant 18 of a transparent resin filled into a cavity C of the package body 16 to encapsulate the LED chip 12 as shown in
Light beams L1 to L3 generated from the LED chip 12 are introduced into the light guide plate 20, and travel inside the light guide plate 20 before scattered at a dot pattern 22. When the light beam L1 is scattered upward at the dot pattern 22, it exits the light guide plate 20, thereby reaching the LCD panel 30 through the diffuser plate 26 and the prism sheet 28.
Describing the LED package 10 in more detail with reference to
When the depth d has a larger value, the height h1+h2 from the top surface of the LED chip 12 to the top surface of the encapsulant 18 also increases. This, however, brings in following problems.
First, this restricts the beam angle α of the light emitted out of the LED package 10. When the beam angle α is smaller, the backlight unit 1 should use the more LED packages 10.
Second, as can be seen from
Third, the higher sidewall 17 may cause more easily a molding defect such as a void in an upper or lower portion of the sidewall 17. This may take place particularly in a portion designated with the reference sign I in
The present invention has been made to solve the foregoing problems of the prior art and therefore an aspect of the present invention is to provide a side view LED package in which the height of a sidewall is shortened to improve beam angle characteristics of emission light, increase light quantity, and prevent a molding defect of the sidewall.
According to an aspect of the invention, a side view LED package in use for a backlight unit includes a package body having a cavity with an inner sidewall inclined between a bottom and a top; first and second lead frames arranged in the package body, the cavity of the package body exposing a portion of at least one of the first and second lead frames placed in the bottom of the cavity to outside; a light emitting diode chip mounted on the bottom of the cavity to be electrically connected to the first and second lead frames; and a transparent encapsulant arranged in the cavity surrounding the light emitting diode chip. The cavity has a depth that is larger than a mounting height of the light emitting diode chip and does not exceed six times of the mounting height.
The mounting height of the light emitting diode chip may be from 50 μm to 200 μm. Here, the depth of the cavity is preferably from 200 μm to 480 μm.
According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided an approach to reduce the height of the wires since the wires act as a factor limiting the reduction of the depth of the cavity. The side view LED package according to this aspect of the invention includes a package body having a cavity with an inner sidewall inclined between a bottom and a top; first and second lead frames arranged in the package body, the cavity of the package body exposing a portion of at least one of the first and second lead frames placed in the bottom of the cavity to outside; a light emitting diode chip mounted on the bottom of the cavity to be electrically connected to the first and second lead frames; a transparent encapsulant arranged in the cavity surrounding the light emitting diode chip; and wire for electrically connecting the light emitting diode chip to at least one of the first and second lead frames, the wire having one end connected to a bump ball of the light emitting diode chip and the other end stitch-bonded to the lead frame. Here, the depth of the cavity is from 200 μm to 480 μm.
In this case, the height of the wire from the top of the LED chip to the top of the wire can be reduced preferably to 100 μm or less, and more preferably to the order of 70 μm. Thus, the afore-described bonding is advantageous to set the cavity depth in a small value.
According to further another aspect of the invention, there is provided an approach to design a cavity suitably in view of the convenience in the filling process of transparent and encapsulating liquid resin with respect to a relatively low depth and the formability of molding for a package body. The side view LED package of this aspect includes a package body having a cavity with an inner sidewall inclined between a bottom and a top; first and second lead frames arranged in the package body, the cavity of the package body exposing a portion of at least one of the first and second lead frames placed in the bottom of the cavity to outside; a light emitting diode chip mounted on the bottom of the cavity to be electrically connected to the first and second lead frames; and a transparent encapsulant arranged in the cavity surrounding the light emitting diode chip. Here, the depth of the cavity may be from 200 μm to 480 μm, the cavity may have a first width in a shorter axial direction and a second width in a longer axial direction perpendicular to the shorter axial direction, and the second width of the cavity may be from 1.5 mm to 1.7 mm at the bottom of the cavity. In view of the inclination angle of the sidewall, the second width of the cavity is preferably from 2.0 mm to 2.5 mm at a top end of the cavity.
The above and other objects, features and other advantages of the present invention will be more clearly understood from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
The present invention will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which preferred embodiments of the invention are shown.
Referring to
The LED package 100 according to this embodiment of the invention has an improvement in the cavity C in order to improve light quantity and beam angle. The height of a sidewall of the LED package 100, that is, the depth d of the cavity C is set to be larger than the height t of the LED chip 102 but not exceeding six (6) times of the same. Considering a typical LED chip mounting height (e.g., in the range from 50 μm to 200 μm), the depth d of the cavity C is set to be 200 μm to 480 μm. This is remarkably smaller than the cavity depth (600 μm to 650 μm) of the afore-described conventional LED package 10 (see
Accordingly, the beam angle of light emitted out of the LED package 100 can be improved to be advantageously applied to the backlight unit. Describing it in more detail, in case of application to the backlight unit, LED packages with a larger beam angle can be decreased in number with respect to those with a smaller beam angle.
This structure also lowers the probability of light generated from the LED chip 102 to collide against the sidewall 107 so that light absorption/scattering by the sidewall 107 can be reduced to increase light quantity emitted out of the LED package 100.
Furthermore, with reduction in the depth d of the cavity C, the sidewall 107 is also lowered in height. This can advantageously prevent a molding defect designated with the reference sign I in
With the LED package 100 of this embodiment adjusted in the depth d of the cavity C, it is possible to improve the performance of the LED package 100 as a light source and reduce any defects in the injection molding as well.
In general, as shown in
In this case, the cavity depth is required to be larger than the wire height h11+t so that the wires W provided as an electrically connecting member can be arranged inside the transparent encapsulant. Like this, the wires W become a factor limiting the reduction of the depth d of the cavity C. In order to overcome this problem, an aspect of the invention provides an approach to reduce the height of the wires.
Now a wire bonding inside the LED package will be described with reference to
Each of
Referring to
With this type of wire bonding, the height h′11 of the wire W from the LED chip 102 to the top of the wire loop can be decreased to 150 μm. However, it is difficult to decrease the height h′11 of the wire W further. This is because the wire should be looped to a specific height above the LED chip 102 after bonded the LED chip 102.
On the contrary, referring to
In this arrangement, the height h″11 of the wire above the LED chip 102 can be further reduced from that shown in
That is, when the wire bonding processes shown in
In the wire bonding of
With the wire bonding as described above, it is possible to reduce the height necessary for the wire bonding remarkably from the prior art and thus decrease the cavity depth d remarkably.
Accordingly, with the wire bonding structure as shown in
The cavity depth d may be preferably 200 μm or more to ensure a suitable thickness of transparent resin, which will encapsulate the LED chip and/or wires not to be exposed to the external environment, considering the total height h″11+t of the wire W or the maximum mounting height of the LED chip in a case where the wire bonding structure is not adopted.
Considering a following transparent resin filling process, to further promote effects resulting from the improvement in the cavity, the cavity depth is more preferably 250 μm to 400 μm, and still more preferably on the order of 300 μm.
As another aspect, the invention provides an approach to suitably control the width of the cavity in view of the resin filling process for the transparent encapsulant and the percent defective in the injection molding of the package body.
Referring to the side view LED package 100 shown in
In general, the cavity has a first width in the shortest width direction (i.e., transverse width) and a second width P in the longest width direction (i.e., longitudinal width) perpendicular to the transverse direction. In this case, the resin filling process can be carried out efficiently.
However, when the longitudinal width of the cavity is increased excessively, injection molding may readily cause defects to the package body 107 as illustrated in and described with reference to
The inventors have investigated the percent defective in the injection molding of resultant packages by increasing the cavity longitudinal width from 2.0 mm to 3.0 mm with other factors remaining the same. As a result, it was found that the percent defective in the injection molding sharply rises when the cavity longitudinal width P1 exceeds 2.5 mm as in the graph shown in
In view of such results, the longitudinal width P1 at the top of the cavity C is set preferably from 2.0 mm to 2.5 mm. Considering the angle of the inner sidewall inclined for reflection, the longitudinal width P2 at the bottom of the cavity C is set preferably from 1.5 mm to 1.7 mm.
Like this, when the cavity longitudinal width P (P1, P2) is controlled together with the cavity depth d, a more excellent side view LED package can be provided.
In
As seen from
As a difference, the side view LED package of the invention had a cavity depth of 300 μm and the conventional side view LED package had a cavity depth of 650 μm.
Observing beam angle characteristics of the LED packages, the LED package of the invention had beam angles of 114.2° in X axis (width direction of the LED package) and 115.3° in Y axis (thickness direction of the LED package perpendicular to the width direction). On the other hand, the conventional LED package had beam angles of 111.5° in X axis and 91.7° in Y axis. From these numeric values, it is apparent that the beam angle characteristics were improved in the invention.
Three versions of the LED package of the invention were produced and beam angles according to the individual LED package versions were observed.
The LED package in
The LED package in
The LED package in
In the side view LED package of the invention as described hereinbefore, the height of the sidewall is shortened to improve beam angle characteristics of emission light, increase light quantity, and prevent a molding defect of the sidewall.
While the present invention has been described with reference to the particular illustrative embodiments and the accompanying drawings, it is not to be limited thereto but will be defined by the appended claims. It is to be appreciated that those skilled in the art can substitute, change or modify the embodiments into various forms without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10-2005-0113834 | Nov 2005 | KR | national |
This application is a Continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/603,839, filed on Nov. 24, 2006, which claims priority to, and the benefit of, Korean Patent Application No. 10-2005-113834 filed on Nov. 25, 2005, in the Korean Intellectual Property Office, the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6335548 | Roberts et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6864166 | Yin et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6897490 | Brunner et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
20040046242 | Asakawa | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040075100 | Bogner et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040080938 | Holman | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040120155 | Suenaga | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040240203 | Matsumura et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050017259 | Han et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050023538 | Ishii et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050077623 | Roberts et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050133939 | Chikugawa et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050242365 | Yoo | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060092665 | Kim et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070120234 | Kim et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080239724 | Moriyama et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090283792 | Kim et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090321779 | Kim et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10602555 | Mar 2005 | CN |
1630133 | Jun 2005 | CN |
199 01 916 | Aug 1999 | DE |
102 28 634 | Jan 2004 | DE |
10 2005 008 339 | Oct 2005 | DE |
63-200551 | Aug 1988 | JP |
4-14943 | Feb 1992 | JP |
07-176791 | Jul 1995 | JP |
H08-264842 | Oct 1996 | JP |
10-242529 | Sep 1998 | JP |
11-074561 | Mar 1999 | JP |
2000138397 | May 2000 | JP |
2001-015542 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2002-270859 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2003-008072 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003-008072 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003-347345 | May 2003 | JP |
2003-168824 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003-209293 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003218401 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003-282957 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2003-347345 | Dec 2003 | JP |
2003-347600 | Dec 2003 | JP |
2004-095969 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2004-165541 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004-207688 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004-288827 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2004-363537 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2005-050838 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2005-050838 | Feb 2005 | JP |
200545199 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2005-167136 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005-181808 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2005-203748 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2005-235864 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2005-294736 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2005285899 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2005-353699 | Dec 2005 | JP |
Entry |
---|
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/550,073 dated Aug. 5, 2013. |
Japanese Decision of Rejection, with English translation, issued in Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-317172, dated Jul. 26, 2011. |
Japanese Decision to Decline Amendment, with English translation, issued in Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-317172, dated Jul. 26, 2011. |
Japanese Office Action, and English translation thereof, issued in Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-25457 dated Mar. 13, 2012. |
United States Office Action, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/510,520, dated Jun. 23, 2011. |
Japanese Office Action, and English translation thereof, issued in Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-173332 dated Jun. 5, 2012. |
European Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 06256023.0 dated Jul. 16, 2012. |
European Examination Report issued in European Patent Application No. 09075355.9 dated Jul. 11, 2012. |
Chinese Office Action, and English translation thereof, issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 200610140337.8 dated Jul. 5, 2012. |
Board Decision from the Chinese Patent Reexamination Board along with its English translation. |
Office Action dated Nov. 13, 2012, in co-pending Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-317172. |
Notice of Interrogation dated Jan. 22, 2013 issued in Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-173332. |
European Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. EP 10075610.5 dated Mar. 21, 2011. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/550,073 dated Jan. 24, 2011. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/510,520 dated Jan. 25, 2011. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/510,520 dated Feb. 4, 2010. |
Chinese Office Action with English Translation, issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 200610140337.8 dated Feb. 1, 2008. |
European Search Report issued in corresponding European Patent Application No. EP 06 25 6023, dated Mar. 12, 2007. |
Japanese Office Action issued in Application No. 2012-223229 dated Apr. 28, 2015. |
Office Action dated Jan. 12, 2015 issued in the corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201310042791.X (English translation). |
Japanese Office Action issued in Application No. 2011-25457 dated Aug. 27, 2013. |
Japanes Office Action issued in Application No. 2012-223229 dated Aug. 27, 2013. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/603,839 dated Aug. 6, 2013. |
Office Action dated Jan. 21, 2014 issued in the corresponding Japanese application No. 2006-317172. |
Office Action issued in Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-173332 dated Jun. 25, 2013. |
Office Action dated Dec. 7, 2012 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/510,520. |
Japanese Office Action, w/ English translation thereof, issued in Japanese Patent Application No. JP 2006-317172 dated Mar. 12, 2013. |
United States Office Action, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/603,839, dated Jul. 8, 2011. |
Decision of Rejection, with English translation, issued in Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-317172, dated Jul. 11, 2011. |
Decision to Decline Amendment, with English translation, issued in Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-317172, dated Jul. 11, 2011. |
Japanese Office Action, with English translation, issued in Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-173332, dated Sep. 27, 2011. |
Japanese Office Action, and English translation thereof, issued in Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-317172 dated Mar. 13, 2012. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/510,520 dated Mar. 21, 2013. |
Japanese Patent Court Decision, w/ English translation thereof, issued in Japanese Patent Application No. JP 2009-173332 dated Jan. 22, 2013. |
Japanese Office Action, with English Translation, issued in Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-317172, dated Jan. 4, 2011. |
Office Action dated Nov. 13, 2012, in co-pending Japanese Application No. 2006-317172. |
Japanese Decision of Rejection, w/ English translation thereof, issued in Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-317172, dated Jul. 26, 2011. |
Japanese Decision to Decline Amendment, w/ English translation thereof, issued in Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-317172, dated Jul. 26, 2011. |
U.S. Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/550,073, dated Jul. 19, 2011. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/603,839 dated Nov. 2, 2010. |
Japanese Office Action, w/ English translation thereof, issued in Japanese Patent Application No. JP 2006-317172 dated Jan. 4, 2011. |
European Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 10075610.5-2222, dated Mar. 21, 2011. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/603,839, dated Mar. 29, 2010. |
Japanese Office Action, w/ English translation thereof, issued in Japanese Patent Application No. JP 2006-317172 dated Apr. 20, 2010. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/603,839, dated Sep. 16, 2009. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160315239 A1 | Oct 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11603839 | Nov 2006 | US |
Child | 15201967 | US |