This application is a national stage filing under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Patent Application No.: PCT/SG2020/050464, filed Aug. 11, 2020, which claims priority to Singapore Patent Application No. 10201907423S, filed Aug. 13, 2019, the entire contents of all of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
The present invention relates broadly spectrometers, specifically, but not limited to, portable high-throughput spectrometers suitable for field uses.
Any mention and/or discussion of prior art throughout the specification should not be considered, in any way, as an admission that this prior art is well known or forms part of common general knowledge in the field.
Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometers are used in a wide range of sensing applications, however they are bench-top instruments typically used in controlled laboratory environments. They are essentially optical interferometers susceptible to external disturbances and contain precision optomechanical scanning mechanisms, which make them difficult to be miniaturized for portable field uses.
On the other hand, there is an increasing demand for portable spectrometers (particularly IR spectrometers) for field uses in various sensing applications in food and beverage quality assessment, environmental monitoring, precision agriculture, industrial process control, internet of things, biomedical point of care testing, and many others.
Infrared (IR) spectroscopy is widely used in chemical detection and analysis owing to its superior specificity and sensitivity. Molecules can be identified/detected by their unique optical absorption characteristics. In recent years, there is an increasing demand on portable IR spectrometers for field uses in a wide range of applications including environmental monitoring, food and drink quality assessment, Internet-of-things (IOT), pharmaceutical screening, and many others.
(i) Simplest dispersive spectrometers
As shown
(1) Detector arrays become less efficient in photon detection and also much more expensive in MIR and FIR regions.
(2) Throughput (or Etendue), i.e. the ability of an instrument to gather the light energy, is not high enough. As shown in the
(3) Distributing already limited light energy to multiple locations further weakens the signal at each pixel of the detector array. This, coupled with high dark current of the photodetector in MIR and FIR region, significantly reduces the spectrometer's SNR.
(ii) Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometers
Therefore, traditionally, FTIR spectrometers are used in MIR and FIR regions [1]. As shown in
Iσ∝∫−∞∞[I(δ)−0.5/(0)]exp(−i2πσδ)dδ, (1)
where σ is the wavenumber. FTIR has many advantages over dispersive spectrometers. The most notable ones are the multiplexing advantage (uses a single-pixel detector with multiplexed light energy falling on it thereby enhancing the SNR) and high-throughput advantage (the ability to gather more light energy compared with the dispersive spectrometers). However, FTIRs are usually bench-top instruments typically used in controlled laboratory environments. Miniaturization of those FTIRs and making them portable for field use would be very attractive for a range of applications including food quality assessment, environmental monitoring, and point of care testing. However, over the past decades, it has been seen that making a portable high-quality FTIR is challenging. The main reasons are as follows:
(1) A FTIR is essentially an optical interferometer that contains two optical paths. As shown in
(2) A FTIR also contains moving mirrors, requiring high precision alignment/positioning and which are also vulnerable to external disturbances.
(3) A FTIR's throughput, although higher than the dispersive spectrometers, is still limited. This can be understood in the following way: The FTIR's working principle requires optical beams in the interferometer to be collimated. It is shown that the maximum allowable half-angle αmax has to fulfil the following:
where δσ is the resolution in wavenumber and σmax is the maximum wavenumber of the spectrometer. Usually, this αmax is quite small, for example the input maximum divergence half-angle is 0.5° for Oriel® Modular FT-IR Spectrometers MIR8035™ [2]. Assuming a collimating lens with a focal length of 50 mm as shown in
These limitations collectively make the miniaturization of a FTIR for field uses, while maintaining its high spectral resolution at IR wavelengths, challenging.
(iii) Coded Aperture Spectrometers
Coded aperture spectrometer represents a recent development in the area of spectroscopic sensing technology [3]. As shown in
Due to the fact that detector arrays have lower pixel counts (or lower resolution) and become less efficient in photon detection and also much more expensive in MIR and FIR wavelength regions, coded aperture spectrometers are mostly used in VIS-NIR systems and not for MIR and FIR wavelengths.
(iv) Multiplexing Mask Spectrometers
Multiplexing mask spectrometers were proposed decades ago, and they are designed to sense light spectrum with a single-pixel detector and thus can be applied to IR and other wavelengths conveniently. These spectrometers can be categorized into two configurations. The first configuration (also known as singly encoded spectrometers), as shown in
Hadamard encoding) is placed immediately before or after the exit aperture to encode the light.
After the encoding, the light is collected by a collection optics and received by a single-pixel detector. The light spectrum is reconstructed from the data recorded by the single-pixel detector. This system has the multiplexing advantage (allowing multiple wavelengths to reach the detector simultaneously) but not the throughput advantages because the narrow slit limits the amount of light energy that can be collected by the spectrometer.
The second configuration (also known as doubly encoded spectrometers) shown schematically in
Two designs of the second configuration are further highlighted in
For the design shown in
(1) The spatial separation of the slit images from λ1 to λN on the exit aperture plane needs to be large in order to achieve high spectral resolution, which translates to the requirement of a wide exit aperture and thus a large translational movement of the encoding mask. This makes the design implemented with motors difficult to be miniaturized for field uses.
(2) It is noted that the use of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) based mirrors and mirror arrays to replace the encoding slit masks driven by motors has gained significant interest in recent years. The encoding patterns can be implemented dynamically by switching on or off rows/columns of micromirrors. Typical designs using digital micromirror device (DMD) from Texas Instruments (TI) can be found in a number of recent publications [10] [11]. These designs can be potentially miniaturized, however, encoding only the exit aperture does not have the high throughput because the amount of light energy that can enter the spectrometer is limited severely by the narrow slit or pinhole at the entrance aperture.
For the designs shown in
(1) For the design in
(2) For the design in
Embodiments of the present invention provide methods and systems that seek to address at least one of the above problems.
In accordance with a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a spectrometer for detecting an electromagnetic (EM) wave spectrum having one or more wavelength components within a spectral band of interest, comprising:
In accordance with a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of detecting an electromagnetic (EM) wave spectrum having one or more wavelength components within a spectral band of interest, using:
Embodiments of the invention will be better understood and readily apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art from the following written description, by way of example only, and in conjunction with the drawings, in which:
Embodiments of the present invention can provide miniature spectrometers that can have one or more of the following distinct advantages.
Unlike FTIR, embodiments of the present invention are not based on optical interferometers hence they can be more robust and less sensitive to external disturbances, thus suitable for field-use.
Embodiments of the present invention can have an enlarged entrance aperture compared with a typical slit or pinhole used in a conventional grating or prism based dispersive spectrometer thus allowing a significantly enhanced light-gathering power.
Embodiments of the present invention can use a single-pixel photodetector or multiple single-pixel photodetectors hence can be cost-effectively operated at UV and/or IR wavelengths, where image sensors/detector arrays are expensive.
Embodiments of the present invention can have the multiplexing advantage hence supporting high SNR detection.
Generally, embodiments of the present invention are related to a type of spectrometers that is portable and suitable for field uses. These spectrometers according to example embodiments can have large entrance apertures and therefore have high throughput (or Etendue) resulting in high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). They also use a single-pixel (or single-element) multiplexing detection technology and therefore they can be conveniently applied with low-cost to UV, VIS, and IR spectroscopy applications.
That is, spectrometer technology according to example embodiments can be made compact/portable and yet still with a high resolution and throughput. The technology according to example embodiments is similar to FTIR in terms of using a single-element (or single-pixel) detector instead of a detector array, hence it works well at IR spectrum where detector arrays are expensive and less sensitive. Similar to FTIR, it also has the multiplexing advantage hence high SNR in detection. Different from FTIR, it is not based on an optical interferometer, hence it is less sensitive to positioning errors and external disturbances, thereby facilitating miniaturization for field use and at the same time maintaining a satisfactory spectral resolution. Last not the least, the disclosed spectrometers according to example embodiments can also have relatively large entrance apertures therefore they have the ability to gather much more optical radiation energy even when compared with FTIR spectrometers.
Also, in example embodiments of the present invention to decouple the throughput with the spectral resolution both the entrance slits and exit slits can be encoded along a direction substantially transverse to the direction of dispersion as illustrated in
In this embodiment, the first encoding pattern 612 is adjustable or programmable and the second encoding pattern 620 is fixed. However, the first encoding pattern can be fixed while the second encoding pattern is adjustable, or both encoding patterns can be adjustable in different embodiments. The adjustable encoding pattern in various embodiments can be achieved in a number of ways, for example using a programmable micromirror array such as digital mirror device (DMD) from Texas Instruments (TI) [12] or simply a moving mask placed immediately behind a fixed aperture.
On the image plane 616 of the dispersion and imaging optics 614 as shown in
After the light passing through the exit aperture 618/the second encoding pattern 620, it is collected by a light collection optics 624 and concentrated/focused on a single-pixel light detector 626. The light collection optics 624 that matches the size of the exit aperture 618 to the size of the photosensitive area on photodetector 626 can be an imaging optics or a non-imaging optics such as a light concentrator, for example a compound parabolic concentrator (CPC) [13].
The basic operation principle of the spectrometer 600 according to the example embodiments is described as follows. As shown in
yj=cΣk=1Nwjkxk, (3)
where yj is the measured detector signal for the jth encoding pattern, c is a system constant determined by for example detector sensitivity, and xk is the light intensity of the kth spectral component at the entrance aperture (i.e. the light spectrum to be determined). Next, the first encoding pattern is set at the (j+1)th pattern to repeat the process, until a complete set of M measurements are done. Alternatively, the above equations, for j=1˜M, can be expressed in a matrix form (here, the constant c is dropped because only relative intensities are important for the light spectrum):
Y=WX, (4)
where Y is the measure vector (M×1) containing signals from the photodetector 626, X is the vector (N×1) containing N spectral components, and W is the weighting matrix (M×N) that is determined by the encoding scheme used or the patterns 612, 620 used at the entrance and exit apertures. There are several ways to solve the above equation for the light spectrum X depending on the number of measurements recorded:
(a) if M=N, then X=W−1Y, and W−1 is the inverse matrix of W. It can be shown that the best way of the encoding pattern design should follow a Hadamard matrix for 1 and −1 weightages and a S-matrix for 0 and 1 weightages [9].
(b) if M<N (i.e. fewer measurements are made than the unknowns), the light spectrum X can be solved using compressive sensing algorithms [14], provided that the light spectrum has to be sparse in some bases.
(c) if M>N (i.e. more measurements are made than the unknowns), the light spectrum X may be obtained using a number of approaches including Moore-Penrose generalized inverse. [15]
In the following description, an approach with M=N is used according to a preferred embodiment, which means that the number of measurements is equal to the number of unknown spectral components in the light spectrum. The extension of the approaches to M≠N cases according to different embodiments will be appreciated by a person skilled in the art.
First, the case that the entrance aperture defines a single slit 700 as shown in
As shown in
In the second preferred way to implement a spatially encoded slit as shown in
Suppose that the first encoding pattern is set at the jth pattern (j=1˜N), and ajm (m=1˜N) denotes the weightage of the mth pixel (either transparent “1” or opaque “0”) in this encoding pattern as shown in
yj=Σm=1NΣn=1Najmxnbmn=Σm=1NΣn=1Najmbmnxn. (5)
Next, the first encoding pattern is then set to the (j+1)th pattern until a complete set of N measurements is done. This process again results in a set of N linear equations with N unknowns, which can be conveniently expressed in a matrix form:
Y=ABX, (6)
where Y is the measure vector (N×1) containing measured signals from the single-pixel detector, X is the vector (N×1) containing N spectral components, A and B are encoding matrices (both having a dimension of N×N) that are dependent respectively of the first and second encoding patterns.
The choice of the matrices A and B according to a preferred embodiment will now be described. Let A=SN and B=SNT, where SN is a cyclic S-Matrix of order N, and T denotes matrix transpose. The following characteristics of a cyclic S-matrix can be used to immediately reconstruct the light spectrum X, and also estimate the average mean square error in this reconstruction. One has [9]:
SNSnT=(IN+JN)(N+1)/4, (7)
(SNSNT)−1=4IN/(N+1)−4JN/(N+1)2, (8)
where IN is a N×N identity matrix and JN is a N×N matrix with all its elements equal to 1. The reconstruction of the light spectrum can be carried out using:
X=(SNSNT)−1Y=[4IN/(N+1)−4JN/(N+1)2]Y. (9)
The average mean square error in this reconstruction can be estimated using [9]:
ε=(σ2/N)Trace{(SNSNTSNSNT)−1}, (10)
where σ2 is the variance of the noise in each measurement and trace{ } denotes the trace of a matrix, which is the sum of the entire diagonal elements. For a large number N, Trace {(SNSNTSNSNT)−1} is approximately equal to 16/N, which indicates that the average mean square error or noise in the reconstructed spectrum is indeed reduced to ε=16σ2/N2 using the proposed approach with Eq. (9). Evidently, this reconstruction noise is much smaller than the error or noise σ2 in the spectrum when it is chosen to measure the spectrum components individually one by one. This is in fact the multiplexing advantage according to this example embodiment, similar to a FTIR, which advantageously guarantees the enhanced SNR.
Next, the case where the entrance aperture 900 has an extended area as shown in
Again, it is assumed that the 2D first encoding pattern 902a, 902b at this extended entrance aperture 900 is set at the jth pattern (j=1˜N) and let ajm(i) (m=1˜N) denote the weightage of the encoding pattern of the mth pixel in the ith slit (or from the 2D array point of view, it is the weightage of the pixel with row number m and column number i) as shown in
The encoded entrance aperture is then imaged by the dispersion and imaging optics to its image plane where the second encoding pattern is located. Because the entrance aperture now contains multiple encoded slits, the second encoding pattern is then slightly different from the encoding pattern shown in
Without loss of generality, let one consider the ith encoded slit in this entrance aperture as indicated in
As was stated before, the entrance aperture is uniformly illuminated according to the example embodiments and the intensity of the light spectral component is xn for wavelength λn. To model the percentage of the light power incident on this ith slit that can be transmitted through the first and second encoder and reach the single-pixel photodetector, an integer l is defined as follows:
l=floor{(i−1)βΔ/D}, (11)
where the function floor{x} rounds the object x to the nearest integer in the direction of negative infinity and D is the pixel width in the second encoding pattern. The total power incident on the ith slit that can be transmitted through is then:
Pji=c{α2iΣm=1NΣn=1Najm(i)bm(1+n)xn+α1iΣm=1NΣn=1Najm(i)bm(l+n+1)xn}, (12)
where i denotes the ith slit, j represents the condition that the first encoder is set at the jth pattern, c is a constant related to the area of the encoding pixels as well as the losses in the optical system, and α1i and α2i are the two coefficients representing the percentage contributions from the two adjacent encoding columns. α1i and α2i can be estimated as follows:
The light power Pji reaching the single-pixel detector results in a signal,
yji=ηPji=ηc{α2iΣm=1NΣn=1Najm(i)bm(l+n)xn+α1iΣn=1NΣn=1Najm(i)bm(l+n+1)xn}, (15)
where η is the sensitivity of the photodetector. In the above equation (15), the assumption that ri is independent of wavelength is made. This assumption however does not lose any generality, because the spectral dependent sensitivity of a photodetector can always be calibrated and subsequently removed using a light source with a known spectrum. Since the application we consider here is spectroscopy, the relative values of xn is important whereas their absolute values are not. Therefore, the constants ηc in Eq. (15) can be dropped resulting in a simpler form:
yji=α2iΣm=1NΣn=1Najm(i)bm(l+n)xn+α1iΣm=1NΣn=1Najm(i)bm(l+n+1)xn. (16)
When a full set of N measurements are completed (i.e. the first encoding pattern has adjusted for N times from j=1 to j=N), the above linear equations can be expressed in a matrix form as:
Yi=α2iA(i)(BRl)X+αiiA(i)(BRl+1)X, (17)
where Yi is the vector containing the measured signals that are contributed from the ith slit, X is the vector containing the light spectrum, A(i) and B are encoding matrices that are dependent respectively of the first and second encoding patterns, and R is the shift matrix defined as follows:
Rl=RRR . . . R, i.e. matrix multiplication by/times. Eq. (17) is obtained based on the facts that (i) the periodicity of the second encoder, i.e. bm(n+N)=bmn and (ii) the properties of the shift matrix that:
Again, one can design the first and second encoding pattern such that the matrix A(i) and B are circulant, according to example embodiments. Then, according to characteristics of circulant matrices, AB is also a circulant matrix. Utilizing the properties of circulant and shift matrices, we can easily obtain that (A(i)B)Rl=Rl(A(i)B), therefore, Eq. (17) can be rewritten as:
Yi=α2iRlA(i)BX+α1iRl+1A(i)BX. (20)
Considering the fact that the entrance aperture contains multiple encoded slit, the overall signal output from the single-pixel detector Z is then:
Z=ΣiYi. (21)
The light spectrum can then be reconstructed from Eq. (21). Before the details of this spectrum reconstruction are discussed, the throughput and spectrum resolution trade-off in existing grating-based dispersive spectrometer systems will be considered and to facilitate understanding how the approach according to example embodiments can successfully overcome this trade-off limitation.
A typical existing dispersive spectrometer 1100 is schematically illustrated in
Advantageously, the above-mentioned trade-off however does not exist in embodiments of the present invention, because the entrance aperture can contain multiple encoded slits. In the spectrometer system according to example embodiments, the image width of a single slit (βΔ) can be chosen to be smaller than the spot size such that it does not affect the spectral resolution and the number of resolvable spectral components is thus equal to L/S and consequently the spectrometer can be made to achieve high spectral resolution. The throughput of the spectrometer system is, however, determined by the total area of the entrance aperture and not by the area of a single slit. And because embodiments of the present invention can have a number of slits in the entrance aperture, the throughput of the spectrometer according to example embodiments can also still be high despite the fact that the spectrometer according to example embodiments is designed to have a high spectral resolution.
Below one of the possible designs of encoding patterns according to example embodiments is described to validate that the light spectrum can be readily reconstructed using Eq. (21). It should be noted that the present invention is not limited to those examples and there are many possible designs of the encoding patterns that can achieve the same goal of reconstructing the spectrum with Eq. (21) in various other example embodiments, as will be appreciated by a person skilled in the art.
In one example design, let the matrix A(i) in Eq. (20) be the same for all i, or A(i)=A, which means that all slits in the entrance aperture are all encoded with the same pattern. Then, the Eq. (20) becomes,
Yi=β2iRlABX+α1iRl+1ABX, (22)
Furthermore, let A=SN, where SN is a cyclic S-Matrix of order N. In other words, all entrance slits are adjusted in the same way according to the same cyclic S-Matrix. This adjustable encoder for the entrance aperture according to the example embodiment can be readily implemented using, for example, either a MEMS micromirror array or a movable mask in combination with a fixed aperture opening, the latter of which is illustrated schematically in
As was pointed out before, the entrance aperture according to example embodiments contains a number of narrow virtual slits, each having a small width of Δ. At the exit aperture plane, the dispersed image of one slit at each wavelength is thus shifted by a distance of βΔ from that of its neighboring one at the same wavelength along the direction of dispersion. βΔ is much smaller than the pixel size D in example embodiments, as shown. In fact, one can treat the design according to example embodiments such that D/(βΔ) is an integer p, i.e. p=D/(βΔ), and the integer p is larger than 1. Then, the relative positions of the images of the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd virtual slits and so on at the second encoder plane are illustrated in
For the 1st slit, i=1, l=0, α11=0, α21=1, and,
Y1=R°ABX, (23)
where R° is equal to the identity matrix I. For the 2nd slit, i=2, l=0, α12=1/p, α22=(p−1)/p, and,
Similarly, for the 3rd slit, i=3, l=0, α13=2/p, α23=(p−2)/p, and,
Continuing this way, for the pth slit, i=p, l=0, α1p=(p−1)/p, α2p=1/p, and
Then, for the next (p+1)th slit, i=p+1, l=1, α1p+1=1, and,
Yp+1=R1ABX. (27)
For the (p+2)th slit, i=p+2, l=1, α1p+2=1/p, α2p+2=(p−1)/p, and,
Following this pattern, it can be readily seen that if there is a total number of (pq+1) slits, where q is also an integer and q>1, then an overall signal Z from the single-pixel detector that is a summation of all signals contributed from all the slits. And, Z can be written as follows,
Simplifying the above, one can have,
Since p>>1, we further have the following approximation,
Consider the fact that spectrum vector X concerns about the relative intensity, the number p that is wavelength independent can be dropped, resulting in,
Defining the following circulant matrix C,
where the first row of C is determined by,
Then, the Eq. (32) can be then rewrite to the following form, where the matrix A=SN and B=SNT have also been taken into consideration,
Z=CABX=CSNSNTX. (35)
Since C is a circulant matrix, it is generally not singular if N is an odd number which is usually the case for cyclic S matrices. Then C is invertible, and C−1 can be readily computed using the method provided in ref [16]. Evidently, the light spectrum X can be conveniently calculated from the above equation,
X=(SNSNT)−1C−1Z=[4IN/(N+1)−4JN/(N+1)2]C−1Z. (36)
With reference again to the schematic of a spectrometer 600 according to an example embodiment shown in
The design shown in
Other example embodiments are now described to preferably achieve detection using single-pixel detectors with small photosensitive areas. As shown in
Additionally, as shown in
It should be noted that although squares and rectangles are used to denote schematically the encoding pixels of the first and second encoders in the schematic drawings illustrating the various described embodiments, they are not necessarily to be so in practice. In fact, using a distorted encoding pattern might be advantageous in some embodiments, especially for the second encoder. This can be understood in the following way. Suppose one uses straight-line slits and square or rectangle encoding pixels in these slits to form the first encoder at the entrance aperture, the images of these slits might be distorted on the exit aperture plane due to the residual aberrations of the dispersion and imaging system. In this case, as shown in
In summary, embodiments of the present invention can provide a method and resulting system to construct a type of new optical spectrometers, which uses single-pixel detectors instead of detector arrays and encodes both entrance and exit apertures to gain the advantages of high throughput, high spectral resolution, and at the same time, ease of miniaturization for portable field uses. Both entrance and exit apertures are encoded along a direction substantially transverse to the dispersion direction to decouple the throughput with the spectral resolution such that the spectrometer can be conveniently designed with high performance in a compact package. MEMS technology can be further utilized to achieve the miniaturization of the spectrometer. The applications of such spectrometers can be quite broad.
In one embodiment, a spectrometer for detecting an electromagnetic (EM) wave spectrum having one or more wavelength components within a spectral band of interest is provided, comprising an entrance aperture; a dispersion and imaging optics containing at least one dispersion element; an exit aperture; a collection optics; and at least one single-pixel detector, each single-pixel detector sensitive to one or more of the wavelength components; wherein the entrance aperture comprises at least one entrance slit that is spatially encoded along a direction substantially transverse to a direction of dispersion of the dispersion and imaging optics; wherein the dispersion and imaging optics is configured to create dispersed images of the entrance aperture on a plane of the exit aperture, such that respective images at the different wavelength components are offset by different amounts of displacements along the direction of dispersion; wherein the exit aperture comprises a plurality of exit slits arranged in the direction of dispersion, wherein each exit slit is spatially encoded along the direction substantially transverse to the direction of dispersion; wherein the collection optics is configured to gather a total EM wave energy that enters the entrance aperture and exits the exit aperture to one of the at least one single-pixel detectors; wherein at least one of an encoding pattern of the at least one entrance slits and an encoding pattern of the plurality of exit slits is adjustable and configured to be changed for a number of times; the spectrometer further comprising a measurement unit configured to measure the output of the at least one detector for respective ones of the number of times for reconstructing the EM wave spectrum.
The adjustable encoding pattern of the at least one entrance slits and/or of the plurality of exit slits may be implemented using microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) technology. The adjustable encoding pattern of the at least one entrance slits and/or of the plurality of exit slits may be implemented using MEMS micromirror arrays.
The adjustable encoding pattern of the at least one entrance slits and/or of the plurality of exit slits may be implemented using a movable mask placed in the vicinity of a fix aperture opening. The movable mask may be moveable along a preferred direction, and the preferred direction is along the direction of dispersion or perpendicular to the direction of dispersion or any other directions. The movable mask may be suspended by springs, and the mask is configured to be driven into an oscillatory motion at its natural frequency to gain the advantage of high-speed and large area encoding.
The dispersion and imaging optics and the collection optics may be configured to share, in part or in whole, the same optics elements. The encoding pattern of the plurality of exit slits may be configured to be operated in a reflection mode.
The collection optics may comprise imaging collection optics forming an image of the at least one dispersion element on a photosensitive area of the at least one single-pixel detector. The spectrometer may comprise a first field lens B placed adjacent the exit aperture to further decrease the image on the photosensitive area of the at least one single-pixel detector or reduce the size of the collection optics.
The spectrometer may further comprise a second field lens placed adjacent the entrance aperture to image an exit pupil of preceding optics onto the at least one dispersion element.
The spectrometer may comprise non-imaging collection optics such as a concentrator concentrating light from the exit aperture onto a photosensitive area of the at least one single-pixel detector. The non-imaging collection optics may comprise a plurality of concentrators, each concentrating a portion of the light from the exit aperture onto a photosensitive area of respective one of a plurality of detectors.
The encoding pixels for at least the exit aperture may be configured to match distorted images of the slits of the entrance aperture.
The entrance aperture may comprise a plurality of entrance slits with no gaps or with narrow, non-zero gaps therebetween.
The exit aperture may comprise a plurality of exit slits with no gaps or with narrow, non-zero gaps therebetween.
Embodiments of the present invention can have one or more of the following features and associated benefits/advantages.
That is, the spectrometer system according to example embodiments can have one or more of the following distinct advantages.
Compared with dispersive spectrometers, it has the advantages of FTIR spectrometers, namely the multiplexing advantage hence supporting high SNR detection and the use of single-element photodetector hence being capable of cost-effective operation at IR wavelengths.
Compared with FTIR spectrometers, it has the advantages of dispersive spectrometers. More specifically, the technology is not based on optical interferometers hence is more robust and less sensitive to external disturbances, thus facilitating miniaturization for field uses.
Most importantly, the proposed spectrometer system has a significantly larger entrance aperture compared with either a dispersive grating spectrometer or a FTIR spectrometer, thus allowing it to gather more light power and subsequently provide enhanced SNR.
Embodiments of the present invention can thus potentially enable high spectral resolution portable IR spectrometers that may facilitate on-site detection and analysis of materials in real-time. Due to the advantages stated above, the spectrometer constructed based on this invention shall be robust, less sensitive to external disturbances, high spectral resolution within the spectral band of interest, and high throughput (i.e. the ability to gather more light energy). Embodiments of the present invention can be constructed with relatively low cost. The application opportunities include stand-alone handheld modules or portable spectrometer modules in combination with smart phones for a range of new possibilities for sensing in agriculture, environment monitoring, healthcare, industrial process monitoring, and many others.
For example, embodiments of the present invention could be used to develop handheld IR or Raman spectrometers with high spectral resolution for field uses in a range of applications include, but are not limited to, industrial process control, materials (especially polymers and plastics) identification and verification, environment monitoring, sensors for internet of things
(IoTs), biomedical point of care testing, food and beverage quality assessment, analysis of coatings and films, forensics and law enforcement, as well as pharmaceutical research and drug development.
Aspects of the systems and methods described herein such as the movement of components of the spectrometer and the analysis of the detected signal may be implemented as functionality programmed into any of a variety of circuitry, including programmable logic devices (PLDs), such as field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), programmable array logic (PAL) devices, electrically programmable logic and memory devices and standard cell-based devices, as well as application specific integrated circuits (ASICs). Some other possibilities for implementing aspects of the system include: microcontrollers with memory (such as electronically erasable programmable read only memory (EEPROM)), embedded microprocessors, firmware, software, etc. Furthermore, aspects of the system may be embodied in microprocessors having software-based circuit emulation, discrete logic (sequential and combinatorial), custom devices, fuzzy (neural) logic, quantum devices, and hybrids of any of the above device types.
Of course the underlying device technologies may be provided in a variety of component types, e.g., metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) technologies like complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS), bipolar technologies like emitter-coupled logic (ECL), polymer technologies (e.g., silicon-conjugated polymer and metal-conjugated polymer-metal structures), mixed analog and digital, etc.
The above description of illustrated embodiments of the systems and methods is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the systems and methods to the precise forms disclosed. While specific embodiments of, and examples for, the systems components and methods are described herein for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of the systems, components and methods, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize.
The teachings of the systems and methods provided herein can be applied to other processing systems and methods, not only for the systems and methods described above.
The elements and acts of the various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments. These and other changes can be made to the systems and methods in light of the above detailed description.
In general, in the following claims, the terms used should not be construed to limit the systems and methods to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification and the claims, but should be construed to include all processing systems that operate under the claims. Accordingly, the systems and methods are not limited by the disclosure, but instead the scope of the systems and methods is to be determined entirely by the claims.
Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the description and the claims, the words “comprise,” “comprising,” and the like are to be construed in an inclusive sense as opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense; that is to say, in a sense of “including, but not limited to.” Words using the singular or plural number also include the plural or singular number respectively. Additionally, the words “herein,” “hereunder,” “above,” “below,” and words of similar import refer to this application as a whole and not to any particular portions of this application. When the word “or” is used in reference to a list of two or more items, that word covers all of the following interpretations of the word: any of the items in the list, all of the items in the list and any combination of the items in the list.
[1] R. J. Bell, Introductory Fourier Transform Spectroscopy, Academic Press, New York and London, 1972.
[2] http://sa-photonics.com/products/spectroscopy-systems/modular-ir-fourier-spectrometers-2/
[3] M. E. Gehm, S. T. McCain, N. P. Pitsianis, D. J. Brady, P. Potuluri, and M. E. Sullivan, “Static two-dimensional aperture coding for multimodal, multiplex spectroscopy,” Applied Optics, Vol. 45, No. 13, p. 2965 (2006).
[4] R. N. Ibbett, D. Aspinall, and J. F. Grainger, “Real-Time Multiplexing of Dispersed Spectra in Any Wavelength Region,” Applied Optics, Vol. 7, No. 6, p. 1089 (1968).
[5] M. J. E. Golay, “Static multislit spectrometry, and its application to the panoramic display of infrared spectra,” J.O.S.A, Vol. 41, p 468 (1951).
[6] A. Girard, “Spectrometre a Grilles,” Applied Optics, Vol. 2, No. 1, p. 79 (1963).
[7] M. Harwit, P. G. Phillips, T. Fine, and N. J. A. Sloane, “Doubly Multiplexed Dispersive Spectrometers,” Applied Optics, Vol. 9, No. 5, p. 1149 (1970).
[8] M. Harwit, P. G. Phillips, L. W. King, and D. A. Briotta Jr., “Two Asymmetric Hadamard Transform Spectrometers,” Applied Optics, Vol. 13, No. 11, p. 2669 (1974).
[9] M. Harwit and N. J. A. Sloane, “Hadamard Transform Optics,” Academic Press, New York, 1979.
[10] Z. Lu, J. Zhang, H. Liu, J. Xu, and J. Li, “The Improvement on the Performance of DMD Hadamard Transform Near-Infrared Spectrometer by Double Filter Strategy and a New Hadamard Mask,” Micromachines 2019, 10, 149; doi:10.3390/mi10020149.
[11] P. Nelson, “DLP®Technology for Spectroscopy,” white paper from TI, online: http://www.ti.com/lit/wp/d1pa048a/d1pa048a.pdf [12] B. Lee, “Introduction to ±12 Degree Orthogonal Digital Micromirror Devices (DMDs),” online document from TI, http://www.ti.com/lit/an/dlpa008b/dlpa008b.pdf [13] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonimaging_optics [14] E. J. Candès, J. K. Romberg, and T. Tao, “Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements,” Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 59 (8), p. 1207-1223 (2006).
[15] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore%E2%80%93Penrose_inverse
[16] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circulant_matrix [17] J. A. Decker Jr., “Experimental Realization of the Multiplex Advantage with a Hadamard-Transform Spectrometer,” Applied Optics, Vol. 10, No. 3, p. 510 (1971).
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10201907423S | Aug 2019 | SG | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/SG2020/050464 | 8/11/2020 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2021/029827 | 2/18/2021 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3578980 | Decker et al. | May 1971 | A |
3720469 | Harwit | Mar 1973 | A |
5416325 | Buontempo | May 1995 | A |
7505130 | Brady et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7652765 | Geshwind et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
8144320 | Potuluri et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
10222260 | McQuilkin et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
20140268139 | Smith | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103090971 | May 2013 | CN |
WO-2009046904 | Apr 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Vickers, Thomas J., Charles K. Mann, and Jianxiong Zhu. “Hadamard multiplex multichannel spectroscopy to achieve a spectroscopic power distribution advantage.” Applied spectroscopy 45.1 (1991): 42-49 (Year: 1991). |
Book Ref.: Robert John Bell, “Introductory Fourier Transform Spectroscopy”, 1972 Academic Press pp. 33-44. |
Book Ref.: Martin Harwit, et al. “Hadamard Transform Optics”, 1979, Academic Press pp. 44-62. |
Candes et al., “Stable Signal Recovery from Incomplete and Inaccurate Measurements”, Feb. 2005 Revised Jun. 2005, (15 Pages). |
Decker, “Experimental Realization of the Multiplex Advantage with a Hadamard-Transform Spectrometer”, Applied Optics vol. 10 No. 3, Mar. 1971, pp. 510-514. |
DeVerse et al., “An improved Hadamard encoding mask for multiplexed Raman imaging using single channel detection”, Journal of Molecular Structure vol. 521, 2000, dated Apr. 13, 1999, pp. 77-88. |
Edgar et al., “Simultaneous real-time visible and infrared video with single-pixel detectors”, Scientific Reports, website: www.nature.com/scientificreports, May 22, 2015, (8 Pages). |
Gehm et al., “Satic two-dimensional aperture coding for multimodal, multiplex spectroscopy”, Applied Optics vol. 45 No. 13, May 1, 2006 , pp. 2965-2974. |
Girard, “Spectrometre a Grilles”, Applied Optics vol. 2 No. 1, Jan. 1963, pp. 79-88. |
Golay, “Static Multislit Spectrometry and Its Application to the Panoramic Display of Infrared Spectra”, Journal of the Opical Society of America vol. 41, No. 7, Jul. 1951, pp. 468-472. |
Hartwit et al., “Two Asymmetric Hadamard Transform Spectrometers”, Applied Optics vol. 13, No. 13, Nov. 1974, pp. 2669-2674. |
Harwit et al., “Doubly Multiplexed Dispersive Spectrometers”, Applied Optics vol. 9 No. 5, May 1970, pp. 1149-1154. |
Huang et al., “Miniaturized NIR Spectrometer Based on Novel MOEMS Scanning Tilted Grating”, Sep. 20, 2018, Micromachines vol. 9 No. 478, (9 Pages). |
Ibbett et al., “Real-Time Multiplexing of Dispersed Spectra in Any WavelengthRegion”, Applied Optics vol. 7 No. 6, Jun. 1968, pp. 1089-1094. |
Lu et al., “The Improvement on the Performance of DMD Hadamard Transform Near-Infrared Spectrometer by Double Filter Strategy and a New Hadamard Mask”, Micromachines vol. 10 No. 147, 2019 (13 Pages). |
Pt Serviam Abadimurni, “MIR8035™ FT-IR Spectrometer”, website: https://sa-photonics.com/products/spectroscopy-systems/modular-ir-fourier-spectrometers-2/, obtained Oct. 31, 2019 (5 Pages). |
Sun et al., “Improving the signal-to-noise ratio of single-pixel imaging using digital microscanning”, Optics Express vol. 24 No. 10, May 16, 2016 (10 Pages). |
Texas Instruments, “DLP® Technology for Spectroscopy”, White Paper DLPA048A, Feb. 2014 Revised Aug. 2016, (9 Pages). |
Texas Instruments, “Introduction to ±12 Degree Orthogonal Digital Micromirror Devices (DMDs)”, Chapter 1 DLPA008A, Feb. 2018 (13 Pages). |
Wikipedia, “Circulant matrix” website: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circulant_matrix, obtained Oct. 31, 2019, (5 Pages). |
Wikipedia, “Moore-Penrose inverse”, website: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore-Penrose_inverse, obtained Oct. 31, 2019, (11 Pages). |
Wikipedia, “Nonimaging optics”, website: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonimaging_ optics, obtained Oct. 31, 2019, (12 Pages). |
Xu et al., “SNR analysis and Hadamard mask modification of DMD Hadamard Transform Near-Infrared spectrometer”, Optics Communications 383, 2017, pp. 250-254. |
Singapore Patent Office Search report and Written opinion for the Application No. 11202113373T dated on Aug. 11, 2023 (8 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/SG2020/050464 dated Nov. 20, 2020 (8 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220381611 A1 | Dec 2022 | US |