1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a phase-shifting mask, and in particular to a structure and method of correcting proximity effects in a tri-tone attenuated phase-shifting mask.
2. Description of the Related Art
Photolithography is a well-known process used in the semiconductor industry to form lines, contacts, and other known structures in integrated circuits (ICs). In conventional photolithography, a mask (or a reticle) having a pattern of transparent and opaque regions representing such structures in one IC layer is illuminated. The emanating light from the mask is then focused on a photoresist layer provided on a wafer. During a subsequent development process, portions of the photoresist layer are removed, wherein the portions are defined by the pattern. In this manner, the pattern of the mask is transferred to or printed on the photoresist layer.
However, diffraction effects at the transition of the transparent regions to the opaque regions can render these edges indistinct, thereby adversely affecting the resolution of the photolithography process. Various techniques have been proposed to improve the resolution. One such technique, phase-shifting, uses phase destructive interference of the waves of incident light. Specifically, phase-shifting shifts the phase of a first region of incident light waves approximately 180 degrees relative to a second, adjacent region of incident light waves to create a more sharply defined interface between the first and second regions. Thus, the boundary between exposed and unexposed portions of a photoresist illuminated through a semiconductor mask (or reticle) can be more closely defined by using phase-shifting, thereby allowing greater structure density on the IC.
As known by those skilled in the art, increasing the intensity transmission coefficient of attenuated phase-shifting region 101 could increase the performance of structures formed by the photolithographic process. In fact, optimal performance would be theoretically achieved by providing an attenuated, phase-shifting region with an optical intensity transmission coefficient approaching T=1 (in other words, the region would be transparent) yet having a phase shift of 180 degrees relative to clear region 102. In this manner, assuming partially coherent illumination, amplitude side lobes from each region would substantially cancel, thereby creating a substantially zero-intensity line at the transition between these two regions. Current material technology typically provides this phase shift with an attenuated, phase-shifting region having an optical intensity transmission coefficient of approximately T=0.4, although a higher transmission is theoretically possible and preferable.
Unfortunately, the use of this higher transmission phase-shifting material increases the risk of printing certain portions of attenuated phase-shifting region 101. Specifically, to ensure complete removal of residual photoresist, the actual dose used to remove the photoresist is typically at least twice the theoretical dose needed to remove the photoresist. This over-exposure can result in increasing the risk of printing certain larger portions of attenuated phase-shifting region 101.
To solve this problem, some masks, called tri-tone attenuated phase-shifting masks, include an opaque region within the larger portion(s) of the attenuated, phase-shifting region, wherein the opaque region blocks any unwanted light transmitted by the attenuated phase-shifting region.
Thus, forming an opaque region on an attenuated phase-shifting region advantageously allows for the use of a significantly higher optical intensity transmission coefficient for isolated structures. Unfortunately, a tri-tone phase-shifting mask exhibits strong optical proximity effects, thereby making it difficult to utilize this mask in a single common exposure for both isolated as well as crowded patterns.
Therefore, a need arises for a structure and a method for correcting optical proximity effects on a tri-tone, attenuated phase-shifting mask.
A structure and method are provided for correcting the optical proximity effects on a tri-tone phase-shifting mask. A tri-tone phase-shifting mask typically includes a plurality of attenuated phase-shifting regions formed on a transparent layer as well as opaque regions formed on the larger portions of the attenuated, phase-shifting regions to block any unwanted light transmitted by the attenuated phase-shifting regions. In this manner, the opaque regions prevent these larger portions of the attenuated phase-shifting regions from printing during the development process.
In accordance with the present invention, a rim, formed by an opaque region and an attenuated phase-shifting region, is kept at a predetermined width either for all structures of a certain type or for all structures across the mask. Typically, the rim is made as large as possible to maximize the effect of the attenuated phase-shifting region while still preventing the printing of larger portions of the attenuated phase-shifting region during the development process.
In accordance with one feature of the present invention, a photolithographic mask includes a plurality of structures. Some of the structures are formed with a transparent region, an opaque region, and an attenuated region. The opaque region and the attenuated region form an attenuated rim having a predetermined width. In the present invention, the width of this rim is substantially the same in the subset of structures.
In one embodiment, the transparent region provides approximately a 0 degree phase shift and has an optical intensity transmission coefficient greater than approximately 0.9, whereas the attenuated region provides approximately a 180 degree phase shift and has an optical intensity transmission coefficient between approximately 0.3 and approximately 1.0. In this embodiment, the opaque region has an optical intensity transmission coefficient of less than approximately 0.01.
In accordance with another feature of the present invention, a method of forming a plurality of structures in a tri-tone attenuated phase-shifting mask is provided. A subset of the structures are formed by a first region and a second region, wherein the first region has a phase shift relative to the second region of 180 degrees. The method includes positioning a third region within a boundary for the second region, thereby forming a rim of the second region. The third region prevents the second region from printing during the development process. In accordance with the invention, a predetermined rim width for the subset of structures is provided to correct for optical proximity.
In one embodiment, the first region includes a transparent region, the second region includes an attenuated region, and the third region includes an opaque region. In this embodiment, the method further includes dividing the border for the second region into a plurality of first segments, each first segment including two dissection points. A subset of the dissection points is projected onto a border for the third region, thereby forming a plurality of second segments At this point, optical proximity correction is provided for the subset of structures, wherein if an optical proximity correction moves a first segment, then a corresponding second segment moves. A modified border for the third region is determined based on a modified second region formed after optical proximity correction.
In one embodiment, determining the modified border for the third region includes downsizing the modified second region and then upsizing the downsized second region. For example, the modified second region can be downsized by twice the predetermined rim width and then upsized by the predetermined rim width. In another example, the modified second region is downsized by the predetermined rim width and then any resulting mousebites in the downsized second region are eliminated. In yet another example, the amount of downsizing and subsequent upsizing can be adjusted as a function of the optical proximity correction applied (i.e. size of the hammerhead, bias, serif, etc.). In yet another example, the amount of downsizing and subsequent upsizing takes into account any side-lobe printing that could occur inside the structure.
In another embodiment of the invention, optical proximity correction is provided for the subset of structures, however the border for the third region is not changed during this correction. Once again, the modified border for the third region is determined based on a modified second region formed after optical proximity correction. In one embodiment, the modified border for the third region is determined by downsizing the modified second region and then upsizing the downsized second region. For example, the modified second region can be downsized by twice the predetermined rim width and then upsized by the predetermined rim width. In another example, the amount of downsizing and subsequent upsizing can be adjusted as a function of the optical proximity correction applied (i.e. size of the hammerhead, bias, serif, etc.). In yet another example, the amount of downsizing and subsequent upsizing takes into account any side-lobe printing that could occur inside the structure. In yet another example, the modified second region is downsized by the predetermined rim width and then any resulting mousebites in the downsized second region are eliminated.
In accordance with another feature of the present invention, a method of fabricating a tri-tone attenuated phase-shifting mask includes the steps of forming a transparent layer and an attenuated layer, wherein a phase shift of the attenuated layer relative to the transparent layer is approximately 180 degrees. The attenuated layer is patterned, wherein a transition from a transparent portion to an attenuated portion defines an edge of a structure on the mask. An opaque layer is formed and patterned, wherein for each structure on the mask including an opaque portion, the opaque portion is located a predetermined distance from the edge.
The patterning of the attenuated and opaque layers is preceded by simulating optical proximity correction for the structures. In one embodiment, a transition from the opaque portion to the attenuated portion defines an edge of a rim, wherein simulating optical proximity correction includes moving segments of the edge of the rim if corresponding segments of the edge of the structure move. At this point, the attenuated portion can be downsized and then upsized. In one example, the attenuated portion can be downsized by twice the predetermined distance and then upsizing by the predetermined distance. In another example, the attenuated portion is downsized by the predetermined distance. In yet another example, the amount of downsizing and subsequent upsizing can be adjusted as a function of the optical proximity correction applied (i.e. size of the hammerhead, bias, serif, etc.). In yet another example, the amount of downsizing and subsequent upsizing takes into account any side lobe printing that could occur inside the structure.
In another embodiment, simulating optical proximity correction includes moving segments of the edge of the structure while fixing the edge of the rim. The attenuated portion can be downsized and then upsized. As indicated above, the downsizing and upsizing can be based on predetermined distances, a function of optical proximity correction, or adjusted to minimize any internal side lobe printing.
In accordance with another feature of the invention, a semiconductor mask comprises a plurality of structures. A subset of the structures includes a first region having an optical intensity transmission coefficient greater than 0.9, a second region having an optical intensity transmission coefficient of less than 0.01, and a third region having an optical intensity transmission coefficient between approximately 0.3 and approximately 1.0. In the present invention, the second region and the third region form a rim having a predetermined width, wherein the width is substantially the same in the subset of structures.
In accordance with another feature of the present invention, computer software for simulating a tri-tone attenuated phase-shifting mask is provided. The mask includes a plurality of structures, a subset of the structures including a transparent region, an opaque region, and an attenuated region. The opaque region and the attenuated region form a rim. The computer software includes means for analyzing optical proximity correction for the subset of the structures and means for providing a substantially similar rim width in the subset of the structures. In one embodiment, the means for providing includes means for dividing a first edge of the attenuated region into a plurality of first segments, means for dividing a second edge of the opaque region into a plurality of second segments, wherein each second segment corresponds to certain first segment, and means for determining whether a second segment moves with its corresponding first segment during optical proximity correction. The means for providing can also include means for downsizing the attenuated region and then upsizing the attenuated region to generate the substantially similar rim width. Alternatively, the means for providing can include means for downsizing the attenuated region to generate the substantially similar rim width.
In accordance with the present invention, an attenuated rim, an area defined by subtracting an opaque region from an attenuated phase-shifting region, is kept at a predetermined width across a tri-tone attenuated phase-shifting mask, thereby correcting for optical proximity effects. Typically, the attenuated rim is made as large as possible to maximize the effect of the attenuated phase-shifting region while still preventing the printing of larger portions of the attenuated phase-shifting region during the development process.
To create the desired attenuated rim, each edge associated with a transition between the attenuated phase-shifting region and the clear region is divided into segments, wherein each segment includes at least one evaluation point. For example,
An evaluation point 305 is located between two adjacent dissection points, i.e. in the middle of a segment or at some other designated position (such as, ⅔ of the distance from a dissection point positioned at a corner). Note that multiple evaluation points on each segment could increase the accuracy of the correction process, but adds complexity to the process. Therefore, for ease of explanation, each segment in the embodiment described herein includes a single evaluation point.
In accordance with one feature of the present invention, if an evaluation point 305 is moved to correct for optical proximity effects, then the segment associated with that evaluation point is moved at the same time. This technique as well as the positioning of the dissection and evaluation points are described in detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/675,582, entitled “Dissection Of Corners In A Fabrication Layout For Correcting Proximity Effects”, filed on 29 Sep. 2000; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/676,197, entitled “Dissection Of Edges With Projection Points In A Fabrication Layout For Correcting Proximity Effects”, filed on 29 Sep. 2000; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/676,375, entitled “Dissection of Printed Edges From A Fabrication Layout For Correcting Proximity Effects”, filed on 29 Sep. 2000; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/676,356, entitled “Selection Of Evaluation Point Locations Based On
Proximity Effects Model Amplitudes For Correcting Proximity Effects In A Fabrication Layout”, filed on 29 Sep. 2000, all of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Structure 300 further includes an opaque region 306 formed on attenuated phase-shifting region 302. In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, attenuated phase-shifting region 302 can be made of molybdenum silicide having a thickness of 50 to 200 nanometers and opaque region 306 can be made of chromium also having a thickness of 50 to 200 nanometers. In other embodiments of the invention, attenuated phase-shifting region 302 can be made of chrome oxy-nitride, chrome oxy-fluoride, zirconium silicide, silicon nitride, and aluminum oxide. Of importance, opaque region 306 need not be opaque by itself, but should have a thickness that in combination with the thickness of attenuated phase-shifting region 302 has an intensity transmission coefficient of approximately T<0.01. Other materials for opaque region 306 could include, for example, silicon, chromium oxynitride, aluminum, tungsten, and titanium. Note that the clear region (not shown in
In this embodiment, as described above in reference to
At this point, optical proximity correction is performed on the structure in step 430. In accordance with this embodiment, if a segment of an edge 301 moves because of an optical proximity correction, then the corresponding segment of edge 401 (identified by the projected dissection and evaluation points) also moves. Of importance, optimizing optical proximity correction for a structure may take multiple iterations. In other words, after each iteration, a print simulation can be performed on the structure to determine if the placement of the evaluation points (
At this point, the layout of attenuated phase-shifting region 302A can be used to create the desired layout for opaque region 306A in step 440. In one embodiment, the layout of attenuated phase-shifting region 302A is sized down and then sized up. Depending on the magnitude of the downsizing and upsizing, this operation can eliminate OPC features, such as hammerhead 406 and outer serifs 405, as well as any portion(s) of attenuated phase-shifting region 302A not having an associated opaque region 306A (for example, the portion of attenuated phase-shifting region 302A between hammerhead 406 and inner serif 408). Advantageously, this operation can also ensure that the resulting opaque layout is free of any “mousebites”, such as portions 407 (
In one illustrative downsizing and upsizing operation, attenuated region 302A could be downsized by 2× the rim width W and upsized by 1× the rim width W. However, if the optical proximity correction provides large hammerheads (or other OPC features), then the downsizing could be 3× the rim width W and the upsizing could be 2× the rim width W. Thus, in another operation, the downsizing and upsizing is adjusted as a function of the optical proximity corrections being applied. In yet another embodiment of the invention, the above-described downsizing and upsizing operation is replaced by a step of downsizing by 1× the rim width W and then eliminating any mousebites. Finally, in another embodiment, any size correction takes into account side lobe printing that may occur inside the feature.
In one embodiment, steps 430 and 440 can be repeated until the width W of attenuated rim 409 is within tolerance (+/− a predetermined distance d, wherein d is based on the layout and tools in use). Steps 410–430 can be performed using any optical proximity correction (OPC) tool (current OPC tools include, but are not limited to, the Photolynx, iN Tandem, and SiVL tools from Numerical Technologies, Inc., the Dracula tool from Cadence Design Systems Inc., the Hercules tool from Avant! Corp., or the Calibre tool from Mentor Graphics Corp.). These OPC tools could be rule-based, model-based, or a combination of the two (i.e. certain segments using a rule, other segments using a model). Step 440 can be performed using any standard DRC (design rule checking) tool (current DRC tools include, but are not limited to, the dw-2000 from Design Workshop, the Hercules tool from Avant! Corp., the Dracula, Vampire, or Assura tools from Cadence Design Systems, or the Calibre tool from Mentor Graphics Corp.).
In this embodiment, as described above in reference to
However, note that these segments may not necessarily have moved as much as the corresponding segments in
At this point, the layout of attenuated phase-shifting region 302B can be used to create the desired layout for opaque region 306B in step 530. In one embodiment, the layout of attenuated phase-shifting region 302B is downsized and then upsized. This downsizing/upsizing operation eliminates any OPC features and ensures that the resulting opaque layout is free of any “mousebites”. In one embodiment, steps 520 and 530 can be repeated until the width W of the attenuated rim is within tolerance, based on the layout and tools in use. Note that eventually, the layouts of attenuated phase-shifting region 302B and opaque region 306B in
Steps 510–520 can be performed using any optical proximity correction (OPC) tool (current OPC tools include, but are not limited to, the Photolynx, iN Tandem, and SiVL tools from Numerical Technologies, Inc., the Dracula tool from Cadence Design Systems Inc., the Hercules tool from Avant! Corp., or the Calibre tool from Mentor Graphics Corp.). These OPC tools could be rule-based, model-based, or a combination of the two (i.e. certain segments using a rule, other segments using a model). Step 530 can be performed using any standard DRC (design rule checking) tool (current DRC tools include, but are not limited to, the dw-2000 from Design Workshop, the Hercules tool from Avant! Corp., the Dracula, Vampire, or Assura tools from Cadence Design Systems, or the Calibre tool from Mentor Graphics Corp.).
Note that in one illustrative downsizing and upsizing operation, attenuated region 302B could be downsized by 2× the rim width W and upsized by 1× the rim width W. However, if the optical proximity correction provides large hammerheads (or other OPC features), then the downsizing could be increased to 3× the rim width W and the upsizing could be correspondingly increased to 2× the rim width W. Thus, the downsizing and upsizing can be adjusted as a function of the optical proximity corrections being applied. In yet another embodiment of the invention, the above-described downsizing and upsizing operation can be replaced by a step of downsizing by 1× the rim width W and then eliminating any mousebites. Finally, in another embodiment, any size correction can take into account side lobe printing that may occur inside the feature.
The above-described embodiments are meant to be illustrative of the invention and not limiting. Modifications, alternatives, and variances to these embodiments may be apparent to those skilled in the art. For example, a mask fabricated according to the present invention could be used not only for optical lithography, but also for lithography based on other irradiation types, such as hard X-rays (typical wavelengths around 1 nanometer, wherein the mask is used in a transmission mode) or soft X-rays (also known as EUV, or extreme ultra violet, with typical wavelengths of approximately 10 nanometers, wherein the mask is used in a reflection mode)(note that a partially reflective material could also shift the light phase 180 degrees, either by a height differential or material composition difference).
In optical lithography, a mask of the present invention can be used with various wavelengths, including, for example, 436 nanometers, 365 nanometers, 248 nanometers, 193 nanometers, 157 nanometers, and 126 nanometers. In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, the stepper illumination setting can be optimized for a given pattern type/size. For example, on-axis illumination could be used for isolated contacts, whereas off-axis illumination could be used for dense patterns (thereby changing the constant k of the equation to calculate rim width W).
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, the rim width is constant for similar structures, but not necessarily for different structures. For example, a first rim width could be determined as optimal for one type of structure, such as a line, and a second rim width could be determined as optimal for another type of structure, such as a contact. These different rim widths could be preserved locally or globally across the integrated circuit.
Finally, although the above embodiments may typically provide for attenuated phase-shifting regions having a transmission coefficient between approximately 0.3 and approximately 0.9, other embodiments could include attenuated phase-shifting regions much greater than 0.9. Accordingly, the present invention is intended to include all such modifications, alternatives, and variances that fall within the scope of the appended claims.
The present application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/746,369, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,653,026 B1, filed by Christophe Pierrat and Youping Zhang on Dec. 20, 2000.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4037918 | Kato | Jul 1977 | A |
4231811 | Somekh et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4426584 | Bohlen et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4456371 | Lin | Jun 1984 | A |
4812962 | Witt | Mar 1989 | A |
4890309 | Smith et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4895780 | Nissan-Cohen et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4902899 | Lin et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
5051598 | Ashton et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5182718 | Harafuji et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5208124 | Sporon-Fiedler et al. | May 1993 | A |
5241185 | Meiri et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5242770 | Chen et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5256505 | Chen et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5288569 | Lin | Feb 1994 | A |
5302477 | Dao et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5308741 | Kemp | May 1994 | A |
5316878 | Saito et al. | May 1994 | A |
5324600 | Jinbo et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5328807 | Tanaka et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5334542 | Saito et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5340700 | Chen et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5352550 | Okamoto | Oct 1994 | A |
5364716 | Nakagawa et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5424154 | Borodovsky | Jun 1995 | A |
5447810 | Chen et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5480746 | Jinbo et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5496666 | Chu et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5498579 | Borodovsky et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5503951 | Flanders et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5523186 | Lin et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5527645 | Pati et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5532090 | Borodovsky | Jul 1996 | A |
5537648 | Liebmann et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5538815 | Oi et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5539568 | Lin et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5553273 | Liebmann | Sep 1996 | A |
5553274 | Liebmann | Sep 1996 | A |
5565286 | Lin | Oct 1996 | A |
5573890 | Spence | Nov 1996 | A |
5595843 | Dao | Jan 1997 | A |
5620816 | Dao | Apr 1997 | A |
5631110 | Shioiri et al. | May 1997 | A |
5635316 | Dao | Jun 1997 | A |
5636002 | Garofalo | Jun 1997 | A |
5636131 | Liebmann et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5657235 | Liebmann et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5663017 | Schinella et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5663893 | Wampler et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5682323 | Pasch et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5702848 | Spence | Dec 1997 | A |
5705301 | Garza et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5707765 | Chen | Jan 1998 | A |
5723233 | Garza et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5725969 | Lee | Mar 1998 | A |
5740068 | Liebmann et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5761075 | Oi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5766804 | Spence | Jun 1998 | A |
5766806 | Spence | Jun 1998 | A |
5807649 | Liebmann et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815685 | Kamon | Sep 1998 | A |
5821014 | Chen et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5825647 | Tsudaka | Oct 1998 | A |
5827623 | Ishida et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5847959 | Veneklasen et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5858580 | Wang et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5862058 | Samuels et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5863682 | Abe et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5879844 | Yamamoto et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885734 | Pierrat et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5900338 | Garza et al. | May 1999 | A |
5923566 | Galan et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5958635 | Reich et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5972541 | Sugasawara et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5994002 | Matsuoka | Nov 1999 | A |
5998068 | Matsuoka | Dec 1999 | A |
6004702 | Lin | Dec 1999 | A |
6007310 | Jacobsen et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010807 | Lin | Jan 2000 | A |
6057063 | Liebmann et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066180 | Kim et al. | May 2000 | A |
6077310 | Yamamoto et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077630 | Pierrat | Jun 2000 | A |
6078738 | Garza et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6081658 | Rieger et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083275 | Heng et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6114071 | Chen et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6228539 | Wang et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6249597 | Tsudaka | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251549 | Levenson | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258493 | Wang et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6289499 | Rieger et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6312854 | Chen et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6370679 | Chang et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6420074 | Wang et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6425117 | Pasch et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6470489 | Chang et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6503666 | Pierrat | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6578188 | Pang et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6747783 | Sandstrom | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6757645 | Chang et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6861204 | Cote et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
20020035461 | Chang et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020160278 | Winder et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
195 45 163 | Jun 1996 | DE |
0 464 492 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0 653 679 | May 1995 | EP |
0 698 821 | Feb 1996 | EP |
2324169 | Oct 1998 | GB |
62067547 | Mar 1987 | JP |
7-111528 | Feb 1991 | JP |
3-80525 | Apr 1991 | JP |
3-210560 | Sep 1991 | JP |
6-67403 | Mar 1994 | JP |
8-51068 | Feb 1996 | JP |
8-236317 | Sep 1996 | JP |
2638561 | Apr 1997 | JP |
2650962 | May 1997 | JP |
10-133356 | May 1998 | JP |
11-143085 | May 1999 | JP |
WO 9745772 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9838549 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 9927420 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 9947981 | Sep 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040048170 A1 | Mar 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09746369 | Dec 2000 | US |
Child | 10658933 | US |