This application is related to the following co-pending and commonly-assigned U.S. patent application, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in their respective entirety: “METHOD FOR FORMING THIN FILM HEADS USING A TRI-LAYER ANTI-REFLECTION COATING FOR PHOTOLITHOGRAPHIC APPLICATIONS AND A STRUCTURE THEREOF” to Webb et al., having U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/135,663.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to photolithographic techniques used in thin-film head (TFH) processing. More particularly, the present invention relates to metal-dielectric bi-layer anti-reflective coatings that minimize pattern distortion due to reflections from neighboring features.
2. Description of Related Art
Thin-film magnetic recording heads have gained wide acceptance in the data storage industry. A thin-film recording head has a small, precisely formed structures that are formed using several thin-film deposition approaches. Manufacturers seek to form the geometry of the recording heads with high precision, and to thereby achieve geometries that provide magnetic field patterns suitable for writing narrow tracks of recorded data.
Typically, the lithographic technique deposits alternating layers of conductive and insulating materials onto a substrate by an evaporation, sputtering, plating, or other deposition technique that provides precise control of the deposition thicknesses. Chemical etching, reactive ion etching (RIE), or other mechanisms shape and form the deposited layers into a pole-tip assembly having the desired geometry. Thus, the head structure is a multi-layer lithographically fabricated device.
Although existing lithographic techniques work sufficiently well to provide head structures, e.g., pole-tip assemblies, with feature sizes suitable for current data storage capacity, these lithographic techniques are limited as to the small feature sizes that they can produce.
Thin film heads require sharply defined photoresist patterns because these patterns are used to define the locations (and density) of structures formed. In a thin film process, a thin layer of photoresist may be applied to the surface of a wafer. The wafer is heated in a process called soft baking, wherein partial evaporation of photoresist solvents evaporate. A mask is then aligned over the wafer, wherein the mask allows light to pass through its clear areas and be blocked by opaque areas during a light exposure step. However, during the exposure step, light reflects from the surface of an underlying substrate (or neighboring features) over which the photoresist is formed. For example, materials that are used to formed the thin film head structure are highly reflective, e.g., copper, tantalum and alloys of nickel, iron and cobalt. Reflections from the surface of the substrate underlying the photoresist also causes deleterious effects that limit the resolution of photolithographic photoresist patterning.
These deleterious effects are caused during the development step by light passing through the photoresist at least twice, rather than only once. This occurs because light is reflected from a surface of the underlying substrate and components (or features) and passes back through the photoresist layer a second time. The chemical structure of the photoresist changes differently when light passes through the photoresist more than once. A portion of the light, already reflected from the surface of the underlying substrate can also reflect again from the surface of the photoresist, passing back through the photoresist yet again. In fact, standing light waves can result in the photoresist from superpositioning of incident and reflected light rays. These reflections result in process latitude and control problems.
The reflection of the light reduces the sharpness of the resulting photoresist pattern. A portion of the light reflected obliquely from the surface of the underlying substrate can also be again reflected obliquely from the surface of the photoresist. As a result of such angular reflections, the light can travel well outside those photoresist regions underlying the transmissive portions of the photolithographic mask. This potentially causes photoresist exposure well outside those photoresist regions underlying transmissive portions of the photolithographic mask. This problem results in a less sharply defined photoresist pattern that limits the density of structures formed on the integrated circuit.
The problem occurring from such reflections during the exposure step have been addressed by applying a bottom anti-reflective coating (BARC). The BARC layer minimizes reflected light during the photoexposure step thereby resulting in more faithfully reproduced trench walls. However, in most anti-reflective coatings, the anti-reflective layers need to be fine-tuned for greater process latitude. Thus, the thickness of the layers of the anti-reflective coating must be precisely controlled to obtain proper absorption of the reflected light in a particular application. Also, some BARCs are spun-on to wafers. When these spun-on coatings are applied over features with significant topography, the thickness of the coating varies. This can compromise their effectiveness as a BARC and make subsequent processing (removal) difficult or impossible.
In addition, after photoresist exposure, a BARC must be cleared from the developed-away regions of the photoresist. This may be performed using RIE, wet chemistry, sputter etch, ion milling, etc. Thinner, more uniformly distributed, BARCs permit quick removal within minimum “over etch.” This is important since these processes may have the undesired side-effect of consuming some of the critical dimension (CD) budget because they (depending on materials choices and chemistry) consume photoresist or re-deposit non-volatile BARC-byproducts on the photoresist sidewalls.
It can be seen that there is a need to create an effective anti-reflective layer to make subsequent processing easier.
It can also be seen that there is a need to provide a thinner anti-reflective layer with wider process latitude.
To overcome the limitations in the prior art described above, and to overcome other limitations that will become apparent upon reading and understanding the present specification, the present invention discloses a method for forming thin film heads using a bi-layer anti-reflection coating for photolithographic applications and a structure thereof.
The present invention solves the above-described problems by providing conformal bi-layer bottom anti-reflection coatings that includes an absorbing layer, which has an extinction coefficient (k) not equal to zero for a predetermined wavelength, and a dielectric layer, which has a substantially zero absorption for a predetermined wavelength.
A method for forming thin film magnetic heads in accordance with the principles of the present invention includes forming a dielectric layer on a surface and forming an absorption layer on the dielectric layer, wherein the absorption layer and dielectric layer are conformal to the surface and wherein the dielectric/absorption layer comprises one combination selected from Ta/Al2O3, Ta/SiO2, Ta/TiO2, Ta/Ta2O5, Ta/Cr2O3, Ta/Si3N4, Ti/Al2O3, Ti/SiO2, Ti/TiO2, Ti/Ta2O5, Ti/Cr2O3, Ti/Si3N4, Cr/Al2O3, Cr/SiO2, Cr/TiO2, Cr/Ta2O5, Cr/Cr2O3, Cr/Si3N4,Al/Al2O3, Al/TiO2, Al/Ta2O5, Al/Cr2O3, Al/Si3N4, Ni/Al2O3, Ni/SiO2, Ni/TiO2, Ni/Ta2O5, Ni/Cr2O3, Ni/Si3N4, Ir/Al2O3, Ir/SiO2, Ir/TiO2, Ir/Ta2O5, Ir/Cr2O3, and Ir/Si3N4.
A bi-layer bottom anti-reflection coating for minimizing pattern distortion in photolithography in accordance with the principles of the present invention includes a dielectric layer of a first thickness formed on a surface and an absorption layer of a second thickness formed on the dielectric layer, wherein the absorption layer and dielectric layer are conformal to the surface and wherein the dielectric/absorption layer comprises one combination selected from Ta/Al2O3, Ta/SiO2, Ta/TiO2, Ta/Ta2O5, Ta/Cr2O3, Ta/Si3N4, Ti/Al2O3, Ti/SiO2, Ti/TiO2, Ti/Ta2O5, Ti/Cr2O3, Ti/Si3N4, Cr/Al2O3, Cr/SiO2, Cr/TiO2, Cr/Ta2O5, Cr/Cr2O3, Cr/Si3N4, Al/Al2O3, Al/TiO2, Al/Ta2O5, Al/Cr2O3, Al/Si3N4, Ni/Al2O3, Ni/SiO2, Ni/TiO2, Ni/Ta2O5, Ni/Cr2O3, Ni/Si3N4, Ir/Al2O3, Ir/SiO2, Ir/TiO2, Ir/Ta2O5, Ir/Cr2O3, and Ir/Si3N4.
A bottom anti-reflection structure in accordance with the principles of the present invention includes a conductive layer formed on a surface, a dielectric layer of a first thickness formed the conductive layer, an absorption layer of a second thickness formed on the dielectric layer, wherein the absorption layer and dielectric layer are conformal to the surface and a photoresist layer formed on the absorption layer, wherein light is fully absorbed between the surface and the photoresist layer and wherein the dielectric/absorption layer comprises one combination selected from Ta/Al2O3, Ta/SiO2, Ta/TiO2, Ta/Ta2O5, Ta/Cr2O3, Ta/Si3N4, Ti/Al2O3, Ti/SiO2, Ti/TiO2, Ti/Ta2O5, Ti/Cr2O3, Ti/Si3N4, Cr/Al2O3, Cr/SiO2, Cr/TiO2, Cr/Ta2O5, Cr/Cr2O3, Cr/Si3N4, Al/Al2O3, Al/TiO2, Al/Ta2O5, Al/Cr2O3, Al/Si3N4, Ni/Al2O3, Ni/SiO2, Ni/TiO2, Ni/Ta2O5, Ni/Cr2O3, Ni/Si3N4, Ir/Al2O3, Ir/SiO2, Ir/TiO2, Ir/Ta2O5, Ir/Cr2O3, and Ir/Si3N4.
A thin film magnetic head in accordance with the principles of the present invention is formed by a method that includes forming a dielectric of a first thickness on a surface and forming an absorption layer of a second thickness on the dielectric layer, wherein the absorption layer and dielectric layer are conformal to the surface and wherein the dielectric/absorption layer comprises one combination selected from Ta/Al2O3, Ta/SiO2, Ta/TiO2, Ta/Ta2O5, Ta/Cr2O3, Ta/Si3N4, Ti/Al2O3, Ti/SiO2, Ti/TiO2, Ti/Ta2O5, Ti/Cr2O3, Ti/Si3N4, Cr/Al2O3, Cr/SiO2, Cr/TiO2, Cr/Ta2O5, Cr/Cr2O3, Cr/Si3N4, Al/Al2O3, Al/TiO2, Al/Ta2O5, Al/Cr2O3, Al/Si3N4, Ni/Al2O3, Ni/SiO2, Ni/TiO2, Ni/Ta2O5, Ni/Cr2O3, Ni/Si3N4, Ir/Al2O3, Ir/SiO2, Ir/TiO2, Ir/Ta2O5, Ir/Cr2O3, and Ir/Si3N4.
A storage device in accordance with the principles of the present invention includes at least one data storage medium mounted for simultaneous rotation about an axis, at least one magnetic head mounted on an actuator assembly for reading and writing data on the at least one data storage medium and an actuator motor for moving the at least one magnetic head relative to the at least one data storage medium, wherein the head is formed using a photoresist process and wherein at least one stage in the photoresist process includes forming a bi-layer anti-reflective coating for minimizing pattern distortion in photolithography, the forming the bi-layer anti-reflective coating including forming a dielectric layer on a surface and forming an absorption layer on the dielectric layer, wherein the absorption layer and dielectric layer are conformal to the surface and wherein the dielectric/absorption layer comprises one combination selected from Ta/Al2O3, Ta/SiO2, Ta/TiO2, Ta/Ta2O5, Ta/Cr2O3, Ta/Si3N4, Ti/Al2O3, Ti/SiO2, Ti/TiO2, Ti/Ta2O5, Ti/Cr2O3, Ti/Si3N4, Cr/Al2O3, Cr/SiO2, Cr/TiO2, Cr/Ta2O5, Cr/Cr2O3, Cr/Si3N4, Al/Al2O3, Al/TiO2, Al/Ta2O5, Al/Cr2O3, Al/Si3N4, Ni/Al2O3, Ni/SiO2, Ni/TiO2, Ni/Ta2O5, Ni/Cr2O3, Ni/Si3N4, Ir/Al2O3, Ir/SiO2, Ir/TiO2, Ir/Ta2O5, Ir/Cr2O3, and Ir/Si3N4.
These and various other advantages and features of novelty which characterize the invention are pointed out with particularity in the claims annexed hereto and form a part hereof. However, for a better understanding of the invention, its advantages, and the objects obtained by its use, reference should be made to the drawings which form a further part hereof, and to accompanying descriptive matter, in which there are illustrated and described specific examples of an apparatus in accordance with the invention.
Referring now to the drawings in which like reference numbers represent corresponding parts throughout:
In the following description of the exemplary embodiment, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration the specific embodiment in which the invention may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized as structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.
The present invention is a photolithographic technique used in thin-film head (TFH) processing. More particularly, a bottom anti-reflective coating (BARC) is used to minimize pattern distortion due to reflections from neighboring features. In photolithographic applications for thin film heads, a BARCs according to the present invention minimizes critical dimension and exposure variations.
Bottom anti reflective coating 150 may be deposited, before the photoresist 160, to prevent the reflection of light that passes through the photoresist 160, reflected off the substrate 110, reflective material 120, or other reflective features, and back into the photoresist 160, where it can interfere with incoming light and cause the resist to be unevenly exposed. Further, as the industry transitions to light with shorter wavelengths—from 248 nm to 150 nm and beyond, the challenges of minimizing reflections increase. Accordingly, as the wavelengths become shorter, the reflectivity of the substrate becomes higher, and as a result there are more problems with interference effects that affect the ability to get consistency in resist patterns.
Thus, one embodiment of the present invention resolves the problem by adding a BARC 150 to minimize pattern distortion due to reflections from neighboring features. The BARC 150 minimizes critical dimensions and exposure variations due to photoresist thickness (swing curve) effects. However, to be effective a BARC 150, the BARC 150 must have appropriate complex refractive index (ñ=n+ik, wherein n+ik is the real and imaginary parts of the complex refractive index ñ) and thickness so that reflections between substrate 110 (and/or reflective material 120) and photoresist 160 are fully damped. Thus, such a BARC 150 may be positioned between the substrate 110 and the photoresist 160 in photolithographic applications.
In embodiments of the present invention, a structure of a bi-layer BARC 150 consists of a first BARC layer 130, which is a dielectric layer such as AL2O3, SiO2, TiO2, Ta2O5, Cr2O3, Si3N4 etc. that has a substantially zero absorption, and a second BARC layer 140, which is an absorbing layer such as Ta, Ti, Cr, Al, Ni, Ir etc. that has an extinction coefficient (k) not equal to zero.
In the present invention, the effective thickness and refractive index of the bi-layer BARC structure 150 can be optimized to produce near-perfect AR properties. This optimization is possible by varying the thickness of the first 130 and second 140 BARC layers. In particular, the second BARC layer 140 may be varied on an overall percentage more that the first BARC layer 130 because of greater reflection in the first BARC layer 130. Thus, the present invention provides thinner BARC films with wider process latitude. Also, the BARC layers 130, 140 may be formed, for example, using a vacuum deposition process. The BARC layer 150 is formed by a vacuum deposition, such as chemical vapor deposition (CVD), physical vapor deposition (PVD), or ion beam deposition (IBD).
Thus, the light 290 may enter a surface that has topography, wherein part of the reflective structure's 210 surface 275 may be flat and having a first angle (not shown) of zero degrees. That means, for example, the angle of zero degrees is the same angle as the incident light 290. Also, the topology may have a second angle 285 being defined by a feature, which is not flat, but rather rises up from the surface 275 at an angle 285. The bi-layer anti-reflective coating 220, 230 that is deposited conformally over this topography is successful in greatly reducing the amount of reflected light.
The optimum ARC 380 for this particular system (Ta—AL2O3) is 5.3 nm of Ta 310 on 44.9 nm of Al2O3 320 as illustrated by the intersection of the x-axis 330 and the y-axis 340 on the graph 300. Other thickness 370, 360, 352, 350, 355, and 352 as shown on the graph 300, do not produce the optimal ARC 380. For other choices the optimum choice depends critically on the optical constants of all the materials and the wavelength.
The present invention is an improvement over other alternatives. Through its inherent conformality, it improves over spin-on BARCs (such as BARLi® Clariant) which, while effective, can have significant thickness variation (pooling) over topography which require significant CD-losing overetch during subsequent RIE processing. The present invention is an improvement over another alternative, Diamond-Like Carbon (DLC) films in that the present invention can be deposited with lower intrinsic mechanical stress. Such stress can create adhesion problems between BARC and substrate.
Also, a non-chlorine based chemistry may be used for patterning and stripping for some embodiments of the present invention. Several embodiments of the present invention will work without Cl, while others may require either Cl or alternatives as discussed above, e.g., sputter etch, milling or wet chemistry. For example, Ta, Ta2O5, SiO2 and Si3N4 are all etchable without Cl, whereas other materials may require other techniques.
A dielectric layer is then formed on the substrate layer by at least one vacuum deposition process 440. An absorption layer is formed on the dielectric layer by at least one vacuum deposition process 430. Finally, a photoresist layer is formed on the absorption layer, wherein light is fully absorbed between the substrate material and the photoresist layer 450.
With reference now to
The foregoing description of the exemplary embodiment of the invention has been presented for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. It is intended that the scope of the invention be limited not with this detailed description, but rather by the claims appended hereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4587138 | Yau et al. | May 1986 | A |
4663684 | Kamo et al. | May 1987 | A |
4714668 | Uneno et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4857373 | Carcia et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
5254373 | Barr | Oct 1993 | A |
5255260 | Yamada et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5288558 | Nothe | Feb 1994 | A |
5368908 | Ohta et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5449639 | Wei et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5659450 | Saito | Aug 1997 | A |
5698352 | Ogawa et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5728441 | Min et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5731216 | Holmberg et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5733713 | Yano et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5759746 | Azuma et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5804250 | Yang | Sep 1998 | A |
5811971 | Senda et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5831801 | Shouji et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5926740 | Forbes et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5963841 | Karlsson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5998100 | Azuma et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005277 | Liu et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010829 | Rogers et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6037276 | Lin et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6051369 | Azuma et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6086727 | Pinarbasi | Jul 2000 | A |
6088908 | Imamura et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6136679 | Yu et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6156485 | Tang et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165855 | Besser et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6200734 | Blatchford, Jr. et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6214637 | Kim et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6312780 | Kasami et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6313969 | Hattori et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6335069 | Ogawa et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6346183 | Baer et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6501618 | Kamijima et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6510024 | Otsuka et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6686272 | Lee et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6689682 | Ogle et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6720251 | van Schravendijk et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6787457 | Yanagawa et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6849538 | Kwon | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6927266 | Arase et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
20010021089 | Miyauchi et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010026425 | Miyazawa et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010041304 | Uno et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020003684 | Nakashio et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020030950 | Sano et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020044394 | Hasegawa | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020060880 | Kawabe et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020071210 | Kawabe et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078551 | Ohtsuka | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020098315 | Tabata | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020191356 | Hasegawa et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030003395 | Yuzurihara et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030011942 | Pinarbasi | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030053268 | Lin et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030058584 | Koike | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030064211 | Hirotsune et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030151851 | Sato et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
11-283212 | Oct 1999 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030203645 A1 | Oct 2003 | US |