Submicron metallization using electrochemical deposition

Abstract
Methods for depositing a metal into a micro-recessed structure in the surface of a microelectronic workpiece are disclosed. The methods are suitable for use in connection with additive free as well as additive containing electroplating solutions. In accordance with one embodiment, the method includes making contact between the surface of the microelectronic workpiece and an electroplating solution in an electroplating cell that includes a cathode formed by the surface of the microelectronic workpiece and an anode disposed in electrical contact with the electroplating solution. Next, an initial film of the metal is deposited into the micro-recessed structure using at least a first electroplating waveform having a first current density. The first current density of the first electroplating waveform is provided to enhance the deposition of the metal at a bottom of the micro-recessed structure. After this initial plating, deposition of the metal is continued using at least a second electroplating waveform having a second current density. The second current density of the second electroplating waveform is provided to assist in reducing the time required to substantially complete filling of the micro-recessed structure.
Description




STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT




Not Applicable




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




An integrated circuit is an interconnected ensemble of devices formed within a semiconductor material and within a dielectric material that overlies a surface of the semiconductor material. Devices which may be formed within the semiconductor material include MOS transistors, bipolar transistors, diodes and diffused resistors. Devices which may be formed within the dielectric include thin-film resistors and capacitors. Typically, more than 100 integrated circuit die (IC chips) are constructed on a single 8 inch diameter silicon wafer. The devices utilized in each dice are interconnected by conductor paths formed within the dielectric. Typically, two or more levels of conductor paths, with successive levels separated by a dielectric layer, are employed as interconnections. In current practice, an aluminum alloy and silicon oxide are typically used for, respectively, the conductor and dielectric.




Delays in propagation of electrical signals between devices on a single dice limit the performance of integrated circuits. More particularly, these delays limit the speed at which an integrated circuit may process these electrical signals. Larger propagation delays reduce the speed at which the integrated circuit may process the electrical signals, while smaller propagation delays increase this speed. Accordingly, integrated circuit manufacturers seek ways in which to reduce the propagation delays.




For each interconnect path, signal propagation delay may be characterized by a time delay τ. See E. H. Stevens,


Interconnect Technology


, QMC, Inc., July 1993. An approximate expression for the time delay, τ, as it relates to the transmission of a signal between transistors on an integrated circuit is given by the equation:






τ=


RC


[1+(


V




SAT/




/RI




SAT


)]






In this equation, R and C are, respectively, an equivalent resistance and capacitance for the interconnect path, and I


SAT


and V


SAT


are, respectively, the saturation (maximum) current and the drain-to-source potential at the onset of current saturation for the transistor that applies a signal to the interconnect path. The path resistance is proportional to the resistivity, ρ, of the conductor material. The path capacitance is proportional to the relative dielectric permittivity, K


e


, of the dielectric material. A small value of ρ requires that the interconnect line carry a current density sufficiently large to make the ratio V


SAT/


/RI


SAT


small. It follows, therefore, that a low-ρ conductor which can carry a high current density and a low-K


e


dielectric should be utilized in the manufacture of high-performance integrated circuits.




To meet the foregoing criterion, copper interconnect lines within a low-K


e


dielectric will likely replace aluminum-alloy lines within a silicon oxide dielectric as the most preferred interconnect structure. See “Copper Goes Mainstream: Low-k to Follow”,


Semiconductor international, November


1997, pp. 67-70. Resistivities of copper films are in the range of 1.7 to 2.0 μΩcm. while resistivities of aluminum-alloy films are higher in the range of 3.0 to 3.5 μΩCm.




Despite the advantageous properties of copper, several problems must be addressed for copper interconnects to become viable in large-scale manufacturing processes.




Diffusion of copper is one such problem. Under the influence of an electric field, and at only moderately elevated temperatures, copper moves rapidly through silicon oxide. It is believed that copper also moves rapidly through low-K


e


dielectrics. Such copper diffusion causes failure of devices formed within the silicon.




Another problem is the propensity of copper to oxidize rapidly when immersed in aqueous solutions or when exposed to an oxygen-containing atmosphere. Oxidized surfaces of the copper are rendered non-conductive and thereby limit the current carrying capability of a given conductor path when compared to a similarly dimensioned non-oxidized copper path.




A still further problem with using copper in integrated circuits is that it is difficult to use copper in a multi-layer, integrated circuit structure with dielectric materials. Using traditional methods of copper deposition, copper adheres only weakly to dielectric materials.




Finally, because copper does not form volatile halide compounds, direct plasma etching of copper cannot be employed in fine-line patterning of copper. As such, copper is difficult to use in the increasingly small geometries required for advanced integrated circuit devices.




The semiconductor industry has addressed some of the foregoing problems and has adopted a generally standard interconnect architecture for copper interconnects. To this end, the industry has found that fine-line patterning of copper can be accomplished by etching trenches and vias in a dielectric, filling the trenches and vias with a deposition of copper, and removing copper from above the top surface of the dielectric by chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP). An interconnect architecture called dual damascene can be employed to implement such an architecture and thereby form copper lines within a dielectric.

FIG. 1

illustrates the process steps generally required for implementing the dual damascene architecture.




Deposition of thin, uniform barrier and seed layers into high aspect ratio (depth/diameter) vias and high aspect ratio (depth/width) trenches is difficult. The upper portions of such trenches and vias tend to pinch-off before the respective trench and/or via is completely filled or layered with the desired material.




Electrodeposition of the copper metallization has been found to be the most efficient way to deposit copper into the trenches and vias. This method has been found to impart the best electromigration resistance performance to the resulting interconnect. However, this method of depositing the copper is not without problems of its own. For example, acid copper plating solutions for copper interconnect often contain organic additives to provide improved throwing power, enhanced leveling effect, and proper deposit characteristics. Since these additives play a significant role in copper plating, the concentrations of these additives in the plating bath need to be tightly controlled to ensure consistent trench fill and film properties. The present inventors have recognized that it would be desirable to use an additive-free plating solution to improve bath control, thereby eliminate the need to monitor the concentrations of the additives. Further, they have recognized that, even in the presence of such additives, certain plating parameters must be optimized.




BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present inventors have found that application of metallization, particularly copper metallization, using low current density plating waveforms provides better trench and via filling results when compared to high current density plating waveforms. This is particularly true when additive-free plating solutions are used. However, such low current density plating waveforms are often quite slow in producing metal films of the requisite thickness. Accordingly, a low current density plating waveform is used during initial plating operations while a high current density plating waveform is used to decrease the fill time and, if desired, provide a different film morphology, some time after the initial plating operations are complete.




In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, the waveshape and its frequency are used to influence the surface morphology of the copper metallization deposit Further, high metal concentrations in the additive-free plating solutions are used to provide more effective filling of the trench and via structures.




With respect to plating solutions that include additives, the present inventors have found that the plating process may be optimized by employing low metal concentration plating solutions. Such solutions produce higher quality filling of the trenches and vias when compared with copper metallization deposited using solutions having high metal concentrations.




Methods for depositing a metal into a micro-recessed structure in the surface of a microelectronic workpiece are disclosed. The methods are suitable for use in connection with additive free as well as additive containing electroplating solutions. In accordance with one embodiment, the method includes making contact between the surface of the microelectronic workpiece and an electroplating solution in an electroplating cell that includes a cathode formed by the surface of the microelectronic workpiece and an anode disposed in electrical contact with the electroplating solution. Next, an initial film of the metal is deposited into the micro-recessed structure using at least a first electroplating waveform having a first current density. The first current density of the first electroplating waveform is provide to enhance the deposition of the metal at a bottom of the micro-recessed structure. After the this initial plating, deposition of the metal is continued using at least a second electroplating waveform having a second current density. The second current density of the second electroplating waveform is provided to assist in reducing the time required to substantially complete filling of the micro-recessed structure.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a scanning electron microscope (“SEM”) photograph showing a cross-section of a metallization layer plated exterior to a semiconductor substrate wherein the metallization layer was deposited using a plating bath without organic additives and using a low-current plating waveform.





FIG. 2

is a SEM photograph showing a cross-section of a metallization layer plated exterior to a semiconductor substrate wherein the metallization layer was deposited using a plating bath without organic additives and using a high current density plating waveform.




FIGS.


3


(


a


)-(


d


) are SEM photographs showing cross-sections of metallization layers plated exterior to respective semiconductor substrates wherein the metallization layers were deposited using incremental depositions at different current densities and thicknesses.





FIG. 4

is a SEM photograph showing a cross-section of a metallization layer plated exterior to a semiconductor substrate wherein the metallization layer was deposited using a pulse reverse waveform.





FIG. 5

is a SEM photograph showing a cross-section of a metallization layer plated exterior to a semiconductor substrate wherein the metallization layer was deposited using a two-step waveform comprised of an initial waveform having a low-current density followed by a further waveform having high-current density.





FIG. 6

is a SEM photograph showing a cross-section of a metallization layer plated exterior to a semiconductor substrate wherein the metallization layer was plated using the two-step waveform used to plate the metallization layer of

FIG. 5

, but wherein plating solution had a high copper concentration.





FIGS. 7 and 8

are SEM photographs showing cross-sections of metallization layers plated exterior to respective semiconductor substrates wherein the layers were deposited using a one-step waveform in a plating bath having organic additives.





FIG. 9

is a SEM photograph showing a cross-section of a metallization layer plated exterior to a semiconductor substrate wherein the metallization layer was plated using the one-step waveform used in the metallization process of

FIGS. 7 and 8

, but wherein the copper concentration of the plating solution has been reduced.




FIGS.


10


(


a


)-


10


(


c


) are FIB photographs showing cross-sections of metallization layers plated exterior to respective semiconductor substrates wherein the metallization layers were plated using a plating bath having organic additives, and wherein the photographs illustrate the effect of seed layer quality on the plating process.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




The present invention can be understood with reference to the experiments disclosed herein. Although the experiments were performed in connection with the plating of a metal comprising copper, it will be recognized that the teachings disclosed herein are so applicable to the electroplating of other metals. All the experiments were performed on 200 mm wafers using a plating tool, such as a plating tool available from Semitool, Inc., of Kalispell, Mont. Three plating baths were examined. The first one, bath


1


(either 24 g/L or 36 g/L copper) had no organic additives. The bath


2


(Additive A) and the bath


2


(Additive B) contain organic additives from different vendors.




Good trench fill was obtained at low current density of 4 mA/cm


2


for copper concentrations from 15 to 36 g/L. It is believed that the high micro-throwing power at low current density due to low concentration polarization is responsible for such trench fill at high copper concentrations.

FIG. 1

presents a scanning electron microscope (“SEM”) cross-section obtained from bath


1


with 24 g/L copper. Voidfree fill was obtained for 0.5 μ wide, 2:1 aspect ratio trench. The waveshape used was a forward pulse with 1 ms on and 1 ms off (WF


1


). It was found that the waveshape was not significant for fill as long as the current density was low. As seen from

FIG. 1

, rough surface or large grains were observed with 4 mA/cm


2


, implying that grain growth was the principal mechanism for the deposition as opposed to the formation of new nuclei. The copper deposit becomes smoother with high current density (40 mA/cm


2


) as shown in FIG.


2


. However, the fill at this higher current is not as good and seam voids were seen in the trench.




In view of the characteristics of the low current density and high current density waveforms, the present inventors have found that such waveforms can be combined during a single electroplating process whereby the advantages associated with each waveform are exploited to provide a submicron electroplating process that meets the process characteristics (void filling and time for filling) required to make it commercially viable. To this end, an electroplating waveform having low current density is used during the initial phases of the trench and/or via filling stage of the process. At some time subsequent to such initial filling, the electroplating waveform transitions to a higher current density waveform to complete the electroplating process and reduce the total time required for the process.




To understand how the copper was deposited inside trench and via features, incremental deposition at different current densities and thicknesses, represented as Ampere-minutes (A-min), was conducted. The results are compared in FIGS.


3


(


a


)-(


d


). At low current density, large grains were seen (FIGS.


3


(


a


) and (


b


)). As the thickness increased from 1.26 to 3.78 A-min, enhanced growth at the bottom of the trench is achieved, probably explaining why good fill was obtained in

FIG. 1

at low current density. As such, the low-current density value should be chosen to provide enhanced growth of the copper metallization layer at the lower portions of the feature into which the copper metallization is deposited. At high current density (40 mA/cm


2


, FIGS.


3


(


c


) and (


d


)), the deposit is smooth and very conformal. Compared to

FIG. 2

, where seam voids are observed, conformal plating is not sufficient to guarantee void-free fill because the top part of the trench is often pinched off first leaving voids inside.




It is believed that the seam voids illustrated in these figures resulted from the overplating of copper deposit at the top of the feature due to its high current distribution. It is expected that the overplated copper will be preferentially removed if a reverse pulse is included in the waveshape. However, the addition of reverse pulses did not improve the trench fill as shown in

FIG. 4

where seam voids were still observed even with a pulse reverse waveshape.




Therefore, an initial low current density approach is necessary for gap fill if no-additive bath is used. In addition to good trench fill, initial low current is helpful to improve the contact to the seed layer, particularly when the seed layer is very thin. However, the drawback of low current is its long processing time. To circumvent this, a plating recipe with multiple steps is preferred in which a low current plating waveform is used to fill the small feature and, possibly, to enhance the seed layer, and then a high current plating waveform is used to finish the process and to provide smooth surface for one or more subsequent CMP processes.





FIG. 5

shows a cross-section obtained with a two-step waveform of 4 mA/cm


2


followed by 32 mA/cm


2


. An improvement in gap fill was observed. Using the same two-step waveform, an increase in the copper concentration (36 g/L) provided significant improvement of the fill process as illustrated in FIG.


6


.




The effect of copper concentration on the gap fill for acidic baths with additives was examined using bath


2


disclosed above.

FIG. 7

illustrates a metallization way are plated from such a bath using a 1-step waveform at 20 mA/cm


2


.

FIG. 8

is a cross-section obtained at 20 mA/cm


2


with 20 g/L copper in the solution. Although the surface of the deposit was smooth, similar to bath


3


, voids were observed in the trench at this copper concentration. As the copper concentration decreased from 20 to 10 g/L, void-free fill was obtained as in FIG.


9


. The better gap fill at lower copper concentration in the presence of organic additives is different from that obtained for additive-free bath in which high copper provided better gap fill. This implies a different controlling mechanism for copper growth in the presence of additives. Similar to those obtained from additive-free bath, pulse reverse was found to produce voids and rough surface in this bath with additives.




FIGS.


10


(


a


)-(


c


) illustrates the effect of seed layer on the gap fill. The center voids (

FIG. 10



a


) are formed when the top of the feature is pinched off before the filling is completed. The overhanging of the seed layer at the top of the feature, due to the line-of-sight deposition inherent in the PVD process, is often the main reason for the center voids and the insufficient suppressor of copper growth at the top of the trench during the plating is the other one. The former needs the optimization of the PVD process to deposit a conformal layer and may possibly require a combination of PVD process and other techniques such as CVD or electrochemical deposition for small features. The latter calls for the optimization of the plating process by changing the bath composition and plating waveform.




The bottom and sidewall voids (FIG.


10


(


b


)) are mainly attributed to the insufficient coverage of the seed layer. Copper oxide is always formed on the seed layer prior to the plating when the wafer is exposed to air. This oxide is readily removed, and the underlying copper can be chemically etched when the wafer is in contact with the acidic plating solution. This may lead to the exposure of the barrier layer to the solution and result in the formation of bottom or sidewall voids. There are ways to eliminate these voids either by having a thick layer in the feature or using less aggressive plating solutions for the copper plating. By optimizing the seed layer, void-free gap fill was achieved as in FIG.


10


(


c


).




An aspect of the present invention provides a method for depositing a metal into a micro-recessed structure on the surface of a microelectronic workpiece. The method entails making contact between the surface of the microelectronic workpiece and the electroplating solution in an electroplating cell, the electroplating cell including a cathode formed by the surface of the microelectronic workpiece and an anode disposed in electrical contact with the electroplating solution. An initial film of the metal is deposited into the micro-recessed structure using a first current density for a first predetermined period of time. In one embodiment, the first current density is selected to enhance deposition of the metal at a bottom of the micro-recessed structure. After the initial deposition, deposition of the metal is continued for a second period of time using a second current density. In one aspect of the invention, the second current density is selected to reduce the time required to substantially complete filling of the micro-recessed structure. In another aspect of the invention, the second current density is substantially higher than the first current density used during initial deposition. In one embodiment of the invention, the ratio of the first current density to the second current density is about 1:8. In another embodiment, the ratio between the first current density and the second current density is about 1:10.




In a still further aspect of the present invention, the concentration of metal ions, such as copper, in the electroplating solution is selected at a first concentration level for use in an electroplating bath including organic additives, or at a second higher concentration level for use in an electroplating bath that is substantially free of organic additives that are typically used, such as levelers or brighteners. In the instance of the substantially additive free bath, the metal concentration is suitably between 15 grams per liter and 36 grams per liter.



Claims
  • 1. A method for depositing a metal into a micro-recessed structure in the surface of a microelectronic workpiece, the method comprising:making contact between the surface of the microelectronic workpiece and an electroplating solution in an electroplating cell, the electroplating cell including a cathode formed by the surface of the microelectronic workpiece and an anode disposed in electrical contact with the electroplating solution; depositing an initial film of the metal into the micro-recessed structure using a first current density for a first predetermined period of time, the first current density assisting to enhance deposition of the metal at a bottom of the micro-recessed structure; continuing deposition of the metal beginning at least some time after the first predetermined period of time using a second current density, the second current density assisting to reduce the time required to substantially complete filling of the micro-recessed structure, the second current density being greater than the first current density.
  • 2. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the electroplating solution is substantially free of organic additives and has a first predetermined concentration of the metal that is to be electroplated that is higher than a second predetermined concentration suitable for use in a plating bath including organic additives.
  • 3. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the metal that is to be plated comprises copper.
  • 4. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the ratio between the first current density and the second current density is about 1:10.
  • 5. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the ratio between the first current density and the second current density is about 1:8.
  • 6. A method for depositing a metal into a micro-recessed structure in the surface of a microelectronic workpiece, the method comprising:making contact between the surface of the microelectronic workpiece and an electroplating solution in an electroplating cell, the electroplating cell including a cathode formed by the surface of the microelectronic workpiece and an anode disposed in electrical contact with the electroplating solution; depositing an initial film of the metal into the micro-recessed structure using a first current density for a first predetermined period of time to enhance growth of the metal at the bottom of the micro-recessed structure; at least substantially completing the fill of the micro-recessed structure using a second current density for a second predetermined period of time, the second current density being substantially higher than the first current density.
  • 7. A method as claimed in claim 6 wherein the electroplating solution is free of organic additives and has a first predetermined concentration of metal ions that are to be deposited in the micro-recessed structure that is higher than a second predetermined concentration of metal ions that would be used for deposition in the presence of organic additives.
  • 8. A method as claimed in claim 7 wherein the first predetermined period of time is on the order of 30 seconds.
  • 9. A method as claimed in claim 6 wherein the metal that is to be plated comprises copper.
  • 10. A method as claimed in claim 7 wherein the electroplating solution comprises a concentration of the metal that is between about 15 g/L and 36 g/L.
  • 11. A method as claimed in claim 9 wherein the electroplating solution comprises a concentration of copper that is between about 15 g/L and 36 g/L.
  • 12. A method as claimed in claim 6 wherein the ratio between the first current density and the second current density is about 1:10.
  • 13. A method as claimed in claim 6 wherein the ratio between the first current density and the second current density is about 1:8.
  • 14. A method as claimed in claim 6 wherein the first electroplating waveform is a pulsed waveform.
  • 15. A method of claim 1, wherein the micro-recessed structure has a sub-micron width.
  • 16. The process of claim 15, wherein the micro-recessed structure has a width of approximately 0.5 microns.
  • 17. The process of claim 15, wherein the micro-recessed structure has an aspect ratio of 2:1.
  • 18. The process of claim 6, wherein the initial film of metal deposited using the first current density has a first morphology, and the second metal deposited using the second current density has a second morphology that is different than the first morphology.
  • 19. The process of claim 6, further comprising depositing a thin seed layer on the microelectronic workpiece prior to deposition of the initial film deposition of the initial film enhancing the thin seed layer.
  • 20. The method of claim 6, further comprising, after processing the micro-recessed structure with the second electroplating waveform, processing the micro-recessed structure using a third electroplating waveform including a reverse current pulse to remove overfill.
  • 21. A method for depositing a metal onto the surface of a microelectronic workpiece, the method comprising:placing the surface of the microelectronic workpiece in contact with an electroplating solution including a metal ion to be deposited and that is substantially free of organic additives; supplying plating power between the surface of the microelectronic workpiece and an anode disposed in contact with the electroplating solution to deposit metal onto the surface of the microelectronic workpiece, wherein metal is first deposited in an initial amount using a first current density for a first predetermined period of time to enhance growth of the metal at the bottom of the micro-recessed structure, and then additional metal is deposited onto the initial amount of metal using a second current density for a second predetermined period of time, the second current density being substantially higher than the first current density, wherein the concentration of the metal ion in the electroplating solution is provided at a first predetermined concentration level that is higher than a second predetermined concentration level that would be utilized for metal deposition in the presence of organic additives.
  • 22. A method of depositing a metal layer on a semiconductor wafer comprising:depositing a seed layer on a surface of the water; immersing the water in an electrolytic solution containing metal ions; biasing the wafer negatively with respect to the electrolytic solution so as to create a current flow at a first nominal current density between an anode and the wafer to thereby deposit a plated layer electrolytically on the seed layer of the wafer for enhancing growth of the metal at the bottom of the micro-recessed structure; and increasing the current flow to a second nominal current density greater than the first nominal current density after a predetermined time period has elapsed.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of International PCT Application No. PCT/US99/23187, filed Oct. 5, 1999, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/103,061. filed Oct. 5, 1998, and is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/018,783, filed Feb. 4, 1998, the disclosures of which are hereby expressly incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (208)
Number Name Date Kind
2443599 Chester Jun 1948 A
3267010 Creutz et al. Aug 1966 A
3328273 Creutz et al. Jun 1967 A
3658663 Fukanuma et al. Apr 1972 A
3664933 Clauss May 1972 A
3706635 Kowalski Dec 1972 A
3715289 Cope, Jr. Feb 1973 A
3716462 Jensen Feb 1973 A
3727620 Orr Apr 1973 A
3770598 Creutz Nov 1973 A
3862891 Smith Jan 1975 A
3878066 Dettke et al. Apr 1975 A
3894918 Corby et al. Jul 1975 A
3930963 Polichette et al. Jan 1976 A
3990926 Konicek Nov 1976 A
4000046 Weaver Dec 1976 A
4027686 Shortes et al. Jun 1977 A
4030015 Herko et al. Jun 1977 A
4043877 Littwin Aug 1977 A
4065374 Asami et al. Dec 1977 A
4092176 Kozai et al. May 1978 A
4100054 DuRocher Jul 1978 A
4110176 Creutz, et al. Aug 1978 A
4113492 Sato et al. Sep 1978 A
4134802 Herr Jan 1979 A
4250004 Miles et al. Feb 1981 A
4272335 Combs Jun 1981 A
4279948 Kukanskis et al. Jul 1981 A
4315059 Raistrick et al. Feb 1982 A
4336114 Mayer et al. Jun 1982 A
4376685 Watson Mar 1983 A
4384930 Eckles May 1983 A
4385978 Prusak May 1983 A
4401521 Ohmura et al. Aug 1983 A
4405416 Raistrick et al. Sep 1983 A
4428815 Powell et al. Jan 1984 A
4435266 Johnston Mar 1984 A
4443117 Muramoto et al. Apr 1984 A
4475823 Stone Oct 1984 A
4489740 Rattan et al. Dec 1984 A
4510176 Cuthbert et al. Apr 1985 A
4514265 Rao et al. Apr 1985 A
4518678 Allen May 1985 A
4519846 Aigo May 1985 A
4539222 Anderson, Jr. et al. Sep 1985 A
4576689 Makkaev et al. Mar 1986 A
4624749 Black et al. Nov 1986 A
4687552 Early et al. Aug 1987 A
4693805 Quazi Sep 1987 A
4732785 Brewer Mar 1988 A
4781801 Frisby Nov 1988 A
4810333 Gulla et al. Mar 1989 A
4869971 Nee et al. Sep 1989 A
4879007 Wong Nov 1989 A
4891069 Holtzman et al. Jan 1990 A
4898647 Luce et al. Feb 1990 A
4951601 Maydan et al. Aug 1990 A
4959278 Shimauchi et al. Sep 1990 A
4979464 Kunze-Concewitz et al. Dec 1990 A
4990224 Mahmoud Feb 1991 A
5000827 Schuster et al. Mar 1991 A
5021129 Arbach et al. Jun 1991 A
5039381 Mullarkey Aug 1991 A
5055425 Leibovitz et al. Oct 1991 A
5084412 Nakasaki Jan 1992 A
5091339 Carey Feb 1992 A
5115430 Hahne et al. May 1992 A
5135636 Yee et al. Aug 1992 A
5145571 Lane et al. Sep 1992 A
5151168 Gilton et al. Sep 1992 A
5155336 Gronet et al. Oct 1992 A
5160600 Patel et al. Nov 1992 A
5162260 Leibovitz et al. Nov 1992 A
5164332 Kumar Nov 1992 A
5207883 Borrione et al. May 1993 A
5209817 Ahmad et al. May 1993 A
5222310 Thompson et al. Jun 1993 A
5224504 Thompson et al. Jul 1993 A
5230743 Thompson et al. Jul 1993 A
5252807 Chizinsky Oct 1993 A
5256274 Poris Oct 1993 A
5259407 Tuchida et al. Nov 1993 A
5277985 Li et al. Jan 1994 A
5284548 Carey et al. Feb 1994 A
5290361 Hayashida et al. Mar 1994 A
5302464 Nomura et al. Apr 1994 A
5306895 Ushikoshi et al. Apr 1994 A
5314756 Tagaya May 1994 A
5316974 Crank May 1994 A
5328589 Martin Jul 1994 A
5349978 Sago et al. Sep 1994 A
5368711 Poris Nov 1994 A
5372848 Blackwell et al. Dec 1994 A
5377708 Bergman et al. Jan 1995 A
5391517 Gelatos et al. Feb 1995 A
5397741 O'Connor et al. Mar 1995 A
5403468 Nakakoji et al. Apr 1995 A
5409587 Sandhu et al. Apr 1995 A
5411076 Matsunaga et al. May 1995 A
5429733 Ishida Jul 1995 A
5431803 DiFranco et al. Jul 1995 A
5441618 Matsuda et al. Aug 1995 A
5443865 Tisdale et al. Aug 1995 A
5447599 Li et al. Sep 1995 A
5472502 Batchelder Dec 1995 A
5482891 Shieh et al. Jan 1996 A
5484518 Goldberg Jan 1996 A
5516416 Canaperi et al. May 1996 A
5549808 Farooq et al. Aug 1996 A
5567267 Kazama et al. Oct 1996 A
5576052 Arledge et al. Nov 1996 A
5584971 Komino Dec 1996 A
5605615 Goolsby et al. Feb 1997 A
5608943 Konishi et al. Mar 1997 A
5612254 Mu et al. Mar 1997 A
5625170 Poris Apr 1997 A
5627102 Shinriki et al. May 1997 A
5639316 Cabral, Jr. et al. Jun 1997 A
5600532 Michiya et al. Jul 1997 A
5650082 Anderson Jul 1997 A
5651823 Parodi et al. Jul 1997 A
5651865 Sellers Jul 1997 A
5660472 Peuse et al. Aug 1997 A
5674787 Zhao et al. Oct 1997 A
5677244 Venkatraman Oct 1997 A
5681443 Ameen et al. Oct 1997 A
5685970 Ameen et al. Nov 1997 A
5693563 Teong Dec 1997 A
5695810 Dubin et al. Dec 1997 A
5705223 Bunkofske Jan 1998 A
5707466 Atwater et al. Jan 1998 A
5718813 Drummond et al. Feb 1998 A
5719447 Gardner Feb 1998 A
5723028 Poris Mar 1998 A
5723387 Chen Mar 1998 A
5730854 Martin Mar 1998 A
5747355 Konuma et al. May 1998 A
5763953 IIjima et al. Jun 1998 A
5779799 Davis Jul 1998 A
5801444 Aboelfotoh et al. Sep 1998 A
5802856 Schaper et al. Sep 1998 A
5814557 Venkatraman et al. Sep 1998 A
5824599 Schacham-Diamand et al. Oct 1998 A
5873992 Glezen et al. Feb 1999 A
5882498 Dubin et al. Mar 1999 A
5891513 Dubin et al. Apr 1999 A
5892207 Kawamura et al. Apr 1999 A
5893752 Zhang et al. Apr 1999 A
5897368 Cole, Jr. et al. Apr 1999 A
5908543 Matsunami et al. Jun 1999 A
5913147 Dubin et al. Jun 1999 A
5932077 Reynolds Aug 1999 A
5937142 Moslehi et al. Aug 1999 A
5939788 McTeer Aug 1999 A
5969422 Ting et al. Oct 1999 A
5972192 Dubin et al. Oct 1999 A
5989406 Beetz, Jr. et al. Nov 1999 A
5989623 Chen et al. Nov 1999 A
6001730 Farkas et al. Dec 1999 A
6015749 Liu et al. Jan 2000 A
6017820 Ting et al. Jan 2000 A
6036836 Peeters et al. Mar 2000 A
6037257 Chiang et al. Mar 2000 A
6043153 Nogami et al. Mar 2000 A
6062424 Schacham-Diamond May 2000 A
6066892 Ding et al. May 2000 A
6069068 Rathore et al. May 2000 A
6072160 Bahl Jun 2000 A
6072163 Armstrong et al. Jun 2000 A
6073681 Getchel et al. Jun 2000 A
6074544 Reid et al. Jun 2000 A
6086680 Foster et al. Jul 2000 A
6099712 Ritzdorf et al. Aug 2000 A
6100195 Chan et al. Aug 2000 A
6107192 Subrahmanyan et al. Aug 2000 A
6108937 Raaijmakers Aug 2000 A
6113771 Landau et al. Sep 2000 A
6121141 Woo et al. Sep 2000 A
6123825 Uzoh et al. Sep 2000 A
6126761 DeHaven et al. Oct 2000 A
6126989 Robinson et al. Oct 2000 A
6130415 Knoot Oct 2000 A
6136163 Cheung et al. Oct 2000 A
6139697 Chen et al. Oct 2000 A
6139703 Hanson et al. Oct 2000 A
6157106 Tietz et al. Dec 2000 A
6184121 Buchwalter et al. Feb 2001 B1
6184137 Ding et al. Feb 2001 B1
6197181 Chen Mar 2001 B1
6197688 Simpson Mar 2001 B1
6228768 Woo et al. May 2001 B1
6254758 Koyama Jul 2001 B1
6277263 Chen Aug 2001 B1
6278089 Young et al. Aug 2001 B1
6280183 Mayur et al. Aug 2001 B1
6290833 Chen Sep 2001 B1
6297154 Gross et al. Oct 2001 B1
6309524 Woodruff et al. Oct 2001 B1
6319831 Tsai et al. Nov 2001 B1
6471913 Weaver et al. Oct 2002 B1
6508920 Ritzdorf et al. Jan 2003 B1
20010042689 Chen Nov 2001 A1
20020000271 Ritzdorf et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020022363 Ritzdorf et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020043466 Dordi et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020074233 Ritzdorf et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020102837 Ritzdorf et al. Aug 2002 A1
20030045095 Ritzdorf et al. Mar 2003 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (38)
Number Date Country
99804128 Mar 1999 CN
0 751 567 Jan 1997 EP
0 881 673 Dec 1998 EP
99905771 Feb 1999 EP
99912827 Mar 1999 EP
99954748 Oct 1999 EP
0 964 433 Dec 1999 EP
0 982 771 Mar 2000 EP
1 069 213 Jan 2001 EP
2 285 174 Dec 1994 GB
52-16433 Jul 1975 JP
57073953 Oct 1980 JP
5916993 Jul 1982 JP
58182823 Oct 1983 JP
60-219741 Aug 1984 JP
59-136950 Nov 1985 JP
63118093 May 1988 JP
1008396 Jan 1989 JP
4131395 May 1992 JP
4280993 Oct 1992 JP
5-142262 Jun 1993 JP
6017291 Jan 1994 JP
2000-536908 Mar 1999 JP
2000-574753 Aug 2001 JP
10-2000-7008286 Mar 1999 KR
9906323 Feb 1999 SG
200004296-0 Mar 1999 SG
88104516 Mar 1999 TW
89120978 Mar 1999 TW
WO 9104213 Apr 1991 WO
WO 9712079 Apr 1997 WO
WO 9827585 Jun 1998 WO
WO 9947731 Mar 1999 WO
WO 9940615 Aug 1999 WO
WO 9947545 Sep 1999 WO
WO 0020662 Oct 1999 WO
WO 0061837 Oct 2000 WO
WO 0159815 Aug 2001 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (111)
Entry
Tomov, I.V. et al. “Recovery and recrystallization of electrodeposited bright copper coatings at room temperature. II. X-ray investigation of primary recrystalliation,” Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 1985, pp. 887-894, vol. 15, Chapman and Hall Ltd.
Wolf, Stanley, “Low-k-Dielectrics,”Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era, vol. 4: Deep Submicron Process Thechnology, 2002, pp. 639-670, vol. 4, Lattice Press, Sunset Beach.
Alkire, Richard, “Transient Behavior during Electrodeposition onto a Metal Strip of High Ohmic Resistance, ” J. Electrochemical Society: Electrochemical Science, Dec. 1971, pp. 1935-1941, vol. 118, No. 12.
Lanzi, Oscar et al. “Terminal Effect at a Resistive Electrode under Tafel Kinetics, ” J. Electrochemical Society, Apr. 1990, pp. 1139-1143, vol. 137, No. 4.
Matlosz, M. et al. “Nonuniform Current Distribution and Thickness during Electrodeposition onto Resistive Substrates, ” J. Electrochemical Society, Mar. 1992, pp. 752-761, vol. 139, No. 3.
Newman, John, “Anaylsis and Stimulation of Electrochemical Systems, ” http://www.cchem.berkeley,edu/˜jsngrp/newman -cv.htm, accessed Jan. 12, 2004.
Tobias, Charles, W., Order Regarding the Court's Construction of Disputed Claim Term in Novellus' U.S. Patent No. 6,074,544 (4 pgs.).
Reply to Patent Owner's Statement Under 37 CFR §1.535, (21 pgs.).
Declaration of John Newman, (15 pgs.).
Appendix No. 2, Summary of Prior Art References, (4 pgs.).
U.S. Patent No. 6,074,544 Invalidity Claim Chart, (27 Pgs.).
Transmittal of Correction of Request for Ex Parte Reexamination; In Re Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,074,544; Reexamination Control No.: 90/006,689; Jul. 14, 2003 (2 pgs.).
Correction of Request for Ex Parte Reexamination; In Re Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,074,544; Reexamination Control No.: 90/006,689; Jul. 14, 2003 (10 pgs.).
Office Action mailed Apr. 4, 2003 for Application No. 09/880,715; First Named Inventor: Thomas L. Ritzdorf (14 pgs.).
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination; Patent No. 6,075,544; Jul. 1, 2003 (12 pgs.).
Transmittal of Request for Ex Parte Reexamination; Patent No. 6,075,544; Jul. 1, 2003; (2 pgs.).
Reexamination Communication Transmittal Form; Patent No. 6,074,544; Reexamination Control No. 90/006,689; Sep. 15, 2003 (6 pgs.).
Notice of Reexamination Request Filing Date; Reexamination Control No. 90/006,689; Patent No. 6,074,544; Jul. 30, 2003.
Notice of Assignment of Reexamination Request; Reexamination Control No. 90/006,689; Patent No. 6,074,544; Jul. 30, 2003.
Patent Owner's Statement Under 37 CFR §1.530, (11 pgs.).
Preliminary Amendment with Patent Owner's Statement; (15 pgs.).
Information Disclosure Citation in a Patent; Patent No. 6,074,544; Applicant: Jonathan D. Reid; (2 pgs.).
Ahn, E. C. et al. “Adhesion Reliability of Cu-Cr Alloy Films to Polyimide” Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, 1996, vol. 427, pp. 141-145, Materials Research Society.
Alers, G. B. et al., “Trade-off between reliability and post-CMP defects during recrystallization anneal for copper damascene interconnects” IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium, 2001, pp. 350-354.
Ali, Hassan O. et al. “A Review of Electroless Gold Deposition Processes,” Gold Bull (1984) pp. 118-127, 17(4).
Benedetti, A.V. et al., “Electrochemical Studies of Copper, Copper-Aluminum and Copper-Aluminum-Silver Alloys: Impedance Results in 0.5M NaCl,” Electrochimica Acta (Mar. 1995) pp. 000, vol. 40, Great Britain.
Bindra, Perminder et al., “Fundamental Aspects of Electroless Copper Plating,” Electroless Plating Fundamentals & Applications (Jan. 1990) pp. 289-375, Noyes Data Corporation/Noyes Publications.
Carel, R., Thompson, C.V., Frost, H.J., Material Research Society Symposium, vol. 343, Materials Research Society (1994).
Cook, M. and Richards, T., “The Self-Annealing of Copper,” J. Inst. Metals, vol. LXX, pp. 159-173, (1943).
Despic, Aleksandar R., “Deposition and Dissolution of Metals and Alloys, Part B: Mechanisms, Kinetics, Texture, and Morphology,” Comprehensive Treatise of Electrochemistry vol. 7: Kinetics and Mechanisms of Electrode Processes (1983) pp. 451-527, Plenum Press, New York and London.
DeSilva, Melvin J. et al., “A Novel Seed Layer Scheme to Protect Catalytic Surfaces for Electroless Deposition,” J. Electrochem. Soc. (Nov. 1996) pp. 3512-3516, vol. 143, No. 11.
Dubin, V.M. et al., “Copper Plating Techniques For ULSI Metallization,” Advanced Metallization and Interconnect Systems for ULSI Application in 1997: Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, (Jan. 1998) pp. 405-411, Materials Research Society, Warrendale.
Dubin, V. et al., “Copper Electroplating for On-chip Metallization,” 11 pgs, Advanced Micro Devices, Sunnyvale, California.
Dubin, V.M. et al., “Selective and Blanket Electroless Copper Deposition for Ultralarge Scale Integration,” J. Electrochem. Soc. (Mar. 1997) pp. 898-908, vol. 144, No. 3, The Electrochemical Society, Inc., Pennington, NJ.
Dubin, V.M., Shacham-Diamand, Y., Zhao, B., Vasudev, P.K. and Ting, C.H., “Sub-Half Micron Electroless Cu Metallization,” Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, vol. 427, San Francisco, CA (1996).
Edelstein, D. et al., “Full Copper Wiring in a Sub-0.25μm CMOS ULSI Technology,” IEEE< pp. 773-776, 1997.
Field, D.P., Sanchez, J. JR., Besser, P.R., Dingley, D.J., “Analysis of Grain-Boundary Structure in Al-Cu Interconnects,” J. Appl., Phys., 82(5) (Sep. 1, 1997).
Floro, J.A., Carel, R., and Thompson C.V., “Energy Minimization During Epitaxial Grain Growth Strain vs. Interfacial Energy,” Material Research Society Symposium, vol. 317, Materials Research Society (1994).
Foulke, D.G., in “Gold Plating Technology”, Reid, F. H. and Goldie, W., p67, Electrochemical Publication Limited, British Isles (1996).
Frost, H.J. and Thompson, C.V., “Microstructural Evolution in Thin Films,” presented at the Symposium on Computer Simulation of Microstructural Evolution, Toronto, Canada, Oct. 15 (1985).
Frost, H.J. and Thompson, C.V., “Modeling of Optical Thin Films,” reprint from Proceedings of SPIE (International Society for Optical Engineering, San Diego, CA 1987, printed by the Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (1988).
Frost, H.J., Thompson, C.V., and Walton, D.T., “Abnormal Grain Growth in This Films Due to Anisotropy of Free-Surface Energies,” Materials Science Forum, vols. 94-96, pp. 543-550, Trans Tech. Publications, Switzerland (1992).
Frost, H.J., Thompson, C.V., and Walton, D.T., “Grain Growth Stagnation and Abnormal Grain Growth in Thin Films,” presented at TMS-AIME Fall Meeting, Indianapolis, IN (1989).
Fujinami, T. et al., “Electroless Copper Plating on PZT Ceramic,” Plating & Surface Finishing (May 1998) pp. 100-104.
Gabe, D.R., “Principles of Metal Surface Treatment and Protection,” Second Edition (1978), Chapters 1, 2, and 8, 198 pgs, Pergamon Press, Great Britain.
Gangulee, A., “The Structure of Electroplated and Vapor-Deposited Copper Films,” Mar. 1972, vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 867-873, J. Appl. Phys..
Gangulee, A., “Structure of Electroplated and Vapor-Deposited Copper Films III. Recrystallization and Grain Growth,” Sep. 1974, vol. 45, No. 9, pp. 3749-3756, J. Appl. Phys..
Gignac, L.M. et al., “Characterization of Plated Cu Thin Film Microstructures,” Material Research Society Symposium Proceedings vol. 564: Advanced Interconnects and Contacts (Apr. 1999) pp. 373-434, Materials Research Society, Warrendale.
Gladkikh, A. et al. “Activation Energy of Electromigration in Copper Thin Film Conductor Lines” Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, 1996, vol. 427, pp. 121-126, Materials Research Society.
Gross, M.E. et al., “Microstructure and Texture of electroplated Copper in Damascene Structures,” Material Research Society Proceedings, vol. 514, 1998.
Gupta, D. “Comparative Cu Diffusion Studies in Advanced Metallizations of Cu and Al-Cu Based Thin Films,” Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, San Francisco, CA (Apr. 1994).
Harper, J.M.E. et al., “Microstructure control in semiconductor metallization,” J. Vac Sci Technology 15 (4), pp. 763-779, Jul./Aug. 1997.
Hogan, B.M., “Microstructural Stability of Copper Electroplate,” (citation unknown but believed to be published more than one year before the date of this patent application).
Kang, S. et al., “Relationship Between Texture and Surface Morphology of Copper Electrodeposits,” Plating & Surface Finishing (Oct. 1995) pp. 67-70.
Kelly, J.J. et al., “Copper Deposition in the Presence of Polyethylene Glycol: I. Quartz Crystal Microbalance Study,” J. Electrochem. Soc. (Oct. 1998) pp. 3472-3481, vol. 145, No. 10, The Electrochemical Society, Inc.
Khera, R.P., “The Basic Principles of Electrolytic Deposition,” pp. 69-84.
Kononenko, O. V. et al. “Electromigration in Submicron Wide Copper Lines” Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, 1996, vol. 427, pp. 127-132, Materials Research Society.
Krishnan, R.M. et al., “Electroplating of Copper from a Non-cyanide Electrolyte,” Plating & Surface Finishing (Jul. 1995) pp. 56-69, vol. 82, No. 7.
Kröger, R. et al., “Properties of Copper Films Prepared by Chemical Vapor Deposition for Advanced Metallization of Microelectronic Devices,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society (1999) pp. 3248-3254, vol. 146, No. 9.
Lopatin, S. et al., “Electroless Cu and Barrier Layers for Sub-Half Micron Multilevel Interconnects,” Multilevel Interconnect Technology, Conference 3214, SPIE (Oct. 1997) pp. 21-32, vol. 3214.
Lopatin, S. et al., “Extendibility of Ion-Metal Plasma and Electroplating Technologies for Damascene-Based Copper Metallization,” 7 pgs, Advanced Micro Devices, Sunnyvale.
Lopatin, S. et al., “Conformal Electroless Copper Deposition For Sub-0.5 μm Interconnect Wiring of Very High Aspect Ratio,” Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Electrochemically Deposited Thin Films (1997) pp. 271-288, vol. 96-19, The Electrochemical Society, Inc., Pennington.
Lowenheim, F.A. et al. (Eds.), “Gold” Modern Electroplating, Third Edition (1974) pp. 224-244, John Wiley * Sons, Inc., New York.
Lowenheim, Frederick, “Electroplating,” pp. 416-425, Jan. 1979.
Mak, C.Y., “Electroless Copper Deposition on Metals and Metal Silicides,” Materials Research Society Bulletin, (Aug., 1994).
Megaw, H.D. and Stokes, A.R., “Breadths of X-Ray Diffraction Lines and Mechanical Properties of Some Cold-Worked Metals,” J Inst. Metals, vol. LXXI, pp. 279-289, (1944).
Mel, Y. et al. “Thermal Stability and Interaction Between SIOF and Cu Film” Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, 1996, vol. 427, pp. 433-439, Materials Research Society.
Murarka, S.P. et al., “Copper Metallization for ULSI and Beyond,” Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences (1995) pp. 87-124, vol. 20, No. 2.
Murarka, S.P. “Metallization: Theory and Practice for VLSI and ULSI,” 256 pgs (1993) Reed Publishing (USA).
Nguyen, et al. “Interconnect and Contact Metallization”. Eds. H.S. Rathore, G.S. Mathan, C. Plougonven and C.C. Schuckert, PV 97-31, The Electrochemical Society, Inc., Pennington, NJ.
Nobe, K., “Electrodissolution Kinetics of Metals and Alloys,” (date?)17 pgs, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles.
Oskam, G. et al., “Electrochemical Deposition of Copper on a n-Si/TiN,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society (1999) pp. 1436-1441, vol. 146, No. 4.
Palmans R., et al., “Development of An Electroless Copper Deposition Bath For Via Fill Applications on Tin Seed Layers,” Advanced Metallization for ULSI Applications in 1994: Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, (Jan. 1995) pp. 87-94 Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh.
Patent Abstracts of Japan 04-120290, Apr. 21, 1992.
Pitney, Kenneth E., “Ney Contact Manual,” Electrical Contacts for Low Energy Uses, 1973.
Plötner, M., Urbansky, N., Preusz, A. and Wenzel, C., “Control of Mechanical Stresses and their Temperature Dependence in PVD CU Films,” presented at Adv. Metalliz. & Interconn. Syst. ULSI Applic. San Diego (1997).
Reed-Hall, et. al., “Physical Metallurgy Principles,” pp. 270, 286 and 287, 83rd Ed. (1991).
Reid, J.D. et al., “Impedance Behavior of a Sulfuric Acid-Cupric Sulfate/Copper Cathode Interface,” J. Electrochem Society: Electrochemical Science and Technology (Jun. 1987) pp. 1389-1394, vol. 134, No. 6.
Ritzdorf, T. Graham, L., Jin, S., Mu, C. and Fraser, D., “Self-Annealing of Eletrochemically Deposited Copper Films in Advanced Interconnect Applications,” Proceedings of the IEEE 1998 International Interconnect Technology Conference, San Francisco, CA (Jun. 1-3, 1998).
Russell, S. W. et al., “The Effect of Copper on the Titanium-Silicon Dioxide Reaction and the Implications for Self-Encapsulating, Self-Adhering Metallization Lines”, Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, 1992, vol. 260, pp. 763-768, Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA.
Ryan, J.G. et al., “Technology Challenges for Advanced Interconnects,” Date Unknown.
Sanchez, J. Jr. and Besser, P.R., “Modeling Microstructure Development in Trench-interconnect Structures,” submitted to International Interconnect Technology Conference, Sunnyvale, CA. (Jun., 1998).
Sanchez, J. Jr., Besser, P.R., and Field, D.P., “Microstructure of Damascene Processed Al-Cu Interconnects for Integrated Circuit Applications,” presented at the Fourth International Workshop on Stress Induced Phenomena in Metallizations, Tokyo, Japan (Jun., 1997).
Sato, N., “Toward a More Fundamental Understanding of Corrosion Processes,” Corrosion (May 1989) pp. 354-367, vol. 45, No. 5.
Schlesinger, M. et al. (Eds.), “Electrodeposition of Gold,” Modern Electroplating, Fourth Edition (2000) pp. 201-225, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (USA).
Schlesinger, M. et al., “Electroless Deposition of Nickel,” Modern Electroplating, Fourth Edition (2000) pp. 667-684 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (USA).
Shacham-Diamand, Y., “Electroless Copper for Micropackaging and Ultralarge-Scale Integrated Circuit Applications,” Materials for Electronic Packaging (1995) pp. 221-240, Butterworth-Heinemann, Newton.
Shacham-Diamand, Y. et al., “Electroless Copper Deposition for ULSI,” Thin Solid Films 262 (1995) pp. 93-103.
Shacham-Diamand, Y. et al., “0.35 μm Cu-Filled Via Holes By Blanket-Deposited Electroless Copper on Sputtered Seed Layer,” 3 pgs, Sematech, Austin.
Singer, Peter, “Tantalum, Copper and Damascene: The Future of Interconnects,” Semiconductor International, Jun. 1, 1998, 8 pages.
Singer, Peter, “Nonuniformity of Copper Electroplating Studied,” Semiconductor International, Jun. 1, 1998, 2 pgs.
Smy, T. et al., “Simulation of Electroless Deposition of Cu Thin Films for Very Large Scale Integration Metallization,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society (Jun. 1997), pp. 2115-2122, vol. 144, No. 6, The Electrochemical Society, Inc.
Steigerwald, J.M. et al., “Electrochemical Potential Measurements during the Chemical-Mechanical Polishing of Copper Thin Films,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society (Jul. 1995) pp. 2379-2385, vol. 142, No. 7, The Electrochemical Society, Inc.
Stein, B., “A Practical Guide to Understanding, Measuring and Controlling Stress in Electroformed Metals,” presented at the AESF Ellectroforming Symposium, Las Vegas, NV (Mar., 1996).
Stoychev, D., Vitanova, I., Vieweger, U., “Influence of the Inclusions in Thick Copper Coatings on Their Physico-Mechanical Properties,” (citation unknown but believed to be published more than one year before the date of this patent application).
Stoychev, D.S. et al., “Recovery and recrystallization of Electrodeposited Bright Copper Coatings At Room remperature. I Microhardness in relation to Coating Structure,” Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 15,k 879-886. Chapman and Hall Ltd. (1985).
Stoychev, D.S., and Aroyo, M.S., “On the Influence of Pulse Frequency upon the Hardness of Bright Copper Electrodeposits.” (citation unknow but believed ot be published more than one year before the date of this patent application).
Stoychev, D.S., and Aroyo, M.S., “The Influence of Pulse Frequency on the Hardness of Bright Copper Electrodeposits,” Plating & Surface Finishing, pp. 26-28 (date unknown but believed to be published more than one year before the date of this patent application).
Taylor, T. et al., “Electrolyte Composition Monitoring For Copper Interconnect Applications,” Presented at 193rd Meeting of the Electrochemical Society, 26 pgs, Semitool, Inc. Kalispell.
Thompson, C.V. and Knowlton, B.D., “Designing Circuits and Processes to Optimize Performance and Reliability Metallurgy Meets Tead,” Microelectronics and Reliability, 36, p. 1683 (1996).
Thompson, C.V., “Observations of Grain Growth in Thin Films,” Microstructural Science for Thin Film Metalizations in Electronics Applications, eds. J. Sanchez, D.A. Smith and N. DeLanerolle, The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society (1988).
Thompson, C.V., and Smith, H.I., “Secondary Grain Growth in Thin Films.” Material Research Society Symposium Proc., vol. 57, Materials Research Society (1987).
Tomov, V., Stoychev, D.S., Vitanova, I.B., “Recovery And Recrystallization of Electrodeposited Bright Copper Coatings At Room Temperature. II. X-Ray Investigation Of Primary Recrystallization,”, Journal of Applied Electrochemisty, 15, 887-894. Champman and Hall Ltd. (1985).
Walton, D.T., Frost, H.J. and Thompson, C.V., “Computer Simulation of Grain Growth in Thin-Film Interconnect Lines,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., vol. 225 (1991).
Wong, C.C., Smith, H.I., and Thompson, C.V., Room Temperature Grain Growth in Thin Au Films, from Grain Boundary Structure and Related Phenomena, supplement to Transactions of Japanese Institute of Metals, 27, p. 641 (1986).
Wong, Chee C., Smith, H.I., and Thompson, C.V., “Secondary Grain Growth and Graphoepitaxy in Thin Au Films on Submicrometer-Period Gratings,” Material Research Society Symposium Proc, vol. 47, Materials Research Society (1985).
Wünsche, M. et al., “Morphology and Stability of Electrochemically Generated Copper Layers: The Effect of Electron Transfer and Nucleation Kinetics,” Circuit World (1996) pp. 4-9, vol. 22, No. 3.
Yoshiki, H. et al., “Adhesion Mechanism of Electroless Copper Film Formed on Ceramic Substrates Using ZnO Thin Film as an Intermediate Layer,” J. Electrochem. Soc. (May 1998) pp. 1430-1434, vol. 145, No. 5, The Electrochemical Society, Inc.
Yung, Edward K. et al., “Fundamental Study of Acid Copper Through-Hole Electroplating Process,” J. Electrochem. Soc. (Mar. 1989) pp. 756-767, vol. 136, No. 3, The Electrochemical Society, Inc.
Yung, Edward K. et al., “Plating of Copper into Through-Holes and Vias,” J. Electrochem. So. (Jan. 1989) pp. 206-215, vol. 136, No. 1, The Electrochemical Society, Inc.
L'Augmentation Du Courant Limite Par Les Differentes Formes D'Electrodes, 20 pgs.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/103061 Oct 1998 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent PCT/US99/23187 Oct 1999 US
Child 09/815931 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/018783 Feb 1998 US
Child PCT/US99/23187 US