Embodiments relate generally to the field of robotics and more particularly, to three dimensional, flexible, steerable robotic devices.
There are numerous types of steerable multi-linked probes, and such devices are utilized in a variety of different applications. Robert Sturges' U.S. Pat. No. 5,759,151, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, discloses a flexible, steerable device for conducting exploratory procedures. The device includes at least one spine, each having stiffening means for selectively rendering the spine rigid and flexible along its length. A flexible sheath surrounds the spine and is axially slidably moveable relative to the spine so that the sheath will follow and conform to the shape of a spine in the rigid state and resist further flexure when the spine is in a relaxed state. A steerable distal tip is provided on the distal end of the device. Controls for the distal tip are mounted on the proximal end of the device. Mechanisms are provided on the distal end of the device for selectively activating and deactivating the stiffening means of the spine. An instrument conduit may be mounted on the sheath. Howie Choset's U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/630,279, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, discloses a feeder mechanism for advancing and retracting both an inner core and an outer sleeve, as well as selectively applying tension to control cables used for steering and causing either the inner core or outer sleeve to transition between a rigid state and a limp state.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,610,007 to Amir Belson, et. al., incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, discloses a steerable endoscope having an elongated body with a selectively steerable distal portion and an automatically controlled proximal portion. The endoscope body is inserted into a patient and the selectively steerable distal portion is used to select a desired path within the patient's body. When the endoscope body is advanced, an electronic motion controller operates the automatically controlled proximal portion to assume the selected curve of the selectively steerable distal portion. Another desired path is selected with the selectively steerable distal portion and the endoscope body is advanced again. As the endoscope body is further advanced, the selected curves propagate proximally along the endoscope body, and when the endoscope body is withdrawn proximally, the selected curves propagate distally along the endoscope body. This creates a serpentine motion in the endoscope body allowing it to negotiate tortuous curves along a desired path through or around and between organs within the body.
For medical use and other critical applications, it is extremely important that each device not only perform as intended and within known specifications, but have repeatable performance and otherwise consistent operation from use to use. For these and other reasons, there is a need for systems, devices and methods which provide integrated calibration routines and mechanisms.
According to a first aspect, a system for performing a medical procedure, such as a TransOral Robotic Surgery (TORS) procedure, is disclosed. The system includes at least one tool comprising a proximal portion and a distal portion with a distal end. A tool support is configured to support the distal portion of the tool. A human interface device (HID) is used by an operator to manipulate the tool support. The human interface device produces control signals which are received by a controller which manipulates the tool support. In a preferred embodiment, the operator receives direct tactile feedback from the at least one tool. For example, during advancement, retraction, rotation or flexion, forces imparted on a distal portion of the tool are transmitted down the tool shaft to a handle held by the operator.
In one embodiment, the tool support comprises an inner core of links and an outer sleeve of links, each configured to transition between a limp state and a rigid state. In another embodiment, the tool support is malleable, or includes a malleable component, such as to be hand formed into a preferred shape. In another embodiment, the tool support is made rigid by one or more of: cables; temperature change; chemical change such as change to an epoxy, glue or cement, or combinations of these.
The tool support may include one or more guide holes or guide tubes configured to slidingly receive the shaft of one or more tools.
According to another aspect, a method of performing a medical procedure is disclosed.
In one aspect, a system for performing a medical procedure comprises: at least one tool comprising a proximal portion and a distal portion with a distal end; a tool support constructed and arranged to support the distal portion of the at least one tool; a human interface device constructed and arranged to create control signals based on operator input; and a controller constructed and arranged to receive the control signals and manipulate the tool support based on the received control signals.
In some embodiments, the system is constructed and arranged to perform a TORS procedure.
In some embodiments, the system is constructed and arranged to provide direct tactile feedback of forces encountered by the at least one tool.
In some embodiments, the forces are forces encountered during advancement or retraction of the at least one tool.
In some embodiments, the tool support comprises at least a malleable portion.
In some embodiments, the tool support comprises a highly articulated probe comprising at least a portion that is controllably rigid and flexible.
In some embodiments, the system further comprises at least one cable, wherein the tool support is constructed and arranged to transition between flexible and rigid when the at least one cable is tensioned.
In some embodiments, the tool support is constructed and arranged to transition between flexible and rigid by a temperature change.
In some embodiments, the tool support is constructed and arranged to transition between flexible and rigid by a chemical change.
In some embodiments, the system further comprises a substance selected from the group consisting of: an epoxy; a cement; a glue; and combinations thereof, wherein the chemical change is a chemical change to said substance.
In some embodiments, the tool support comprises at least a rigid portion.
In some embodiments, the tool support comprises at least a flexible portion.
In some embodiments, the tool support further comprises at least a rigid portion.
In some embodiments, the tool support comprises a sleeve comprising a first set of links.
In some embodiments, the set of links comprises a distal portion and the distal portion comprises at least one guide hole.
In some embodiments, the system further comprises a guide tube.
In some embodiments, the tool support further comprises an inner core surrounded by the sleeve and comprising a second set of links.
In some embodiments, the at least one second set link is shorter than at least one first set link.
In some embodiments, the tool support further comprises at least one flange surrounding at least one link of the first set of links and the at least one flange comprises at least one guide hole.
In some embodiments, the flange comprises at least two guide holes.
In some embodiments, the tool support further comprises at least two flanges surrounding at least two links of the first set of links.
In some embodiments, a first flange has a geometry different than a second flange.
In some embodiments, the tool support comprises at least three flanges surrounding at least three links of the first set of links.
In some embodiments, the at least one flange is fixedly attached to the at least one link of the first set of links.
In some embodiments, the at least one flange is rotatably attached to the at least one link of the first set of links.
In some embodiments, the at least one flange is removably attached to the at least one link of the first set of links.
In some embodiments, the first set of links includes at least one guide hole.
In some embodiments, the system further comprises a guide tube positioned into or through the at least one guide hole.
In some embodiments, the first set of links includes at least two guide holes.
In some embodiments, a first guide hole is linearly aligned with a second guide hole. In some embodiments, a first guide hole is positioned approximately 180° from a second guide hole. In some embodiments, a first guide hole is positioned approximately 120° from a second guide hole.
In some embodiments, the system further comprises a camera lens positioned approximately 120° from the first guide hole and the second guide hole.
In some embodiments, the tool support comprises a distal portion comprising at least one guide hole.
In some embodiments, the system further comprises a guide tube comprising a lumen that is collinear with the at least one guide hole.
In some embodiments, the guide tube is constructed and arranged to be inserted into the guide hole.
In some embodiments, the guide tube is fixedly attached to the guide hole.
In some embodiments, the system further comprises at least one guide tube.
In some embodiments, the tool support comprises a distal portion and the at least one guide tube is attached to said distal portion.
In some embodiments, the at least one guide tube is removably attached to said distal portion.
In some embodiments, the system further comprises a tool support introducer wherein the at least one guide tube is attached to the tool support introducer.
In some embodiments, the at least one guide tube is removably attached to the tool support introducer.
In some embodiments, the at least one guide tube comprises at least one flexible portion.
In some embodiments, the at least one guide tube comprises at least one rigid portion.
In some embodiments, the at least one guide tube comprises at least one flexible portion and at least one rigid portion.
In some embodiments, the tool support comprises a distal portion comprising a distal end.
In some embodiments, the distal portion comprises a distal link.
In some embodiments, the distal link is constructed and arranged to be rotated.
In some embodiments, the distal portion further comprises a camera component selected from the group consisting of: a camera such as a CCD; a lens; a fiber optic; and combinations thereof.
In some embodiments, the camera component comprises a center and said center is positioned off center from a central axis of the distal portion.
In some embodiments, the distal end comprises a diameter and said camera component center is positioned at least 25% of the diameter from the central axis.
In some embodiments, the system further comprises a guide hole wherein the camera component is constructed and arranged to move in synchrony with an axis of the guide hole.
In some embodiments, the distal portion further comprises at least one light element.
In some embodiments, the at least one light element comprises at least one LED.
In some embodiments, the at least one light element is constructed and arranged to emit one or more of: visible light; infrared light; and ultraviolet.
In some embodiments, the distal portion further comprises at least one tool channel and exit hole.
In some embodiments, the tool support comprises an outer sleeve and an inner core, and wherein the tool channel extends proximally between the outer sleeve and the inner core.
In some embodiments, the at least one tool channel is constructed and arranged to supply a tool to the distal end of the tool support.
In some embodiments, the distal end is constructed and arranged to minimize reflections of visible light.
In some embodiments, the distal end comprises a matte surface.
In some embodiments, the distal end comprises a dark color.
In some embodiments, the distal end comprises a color approximating black.
In some embodiments, the distal portion comprises at least one recess along its length.
In some embodiments, the at least one tool comprise a shaft and wherein the recess is constructed and arranged to allow said shaft to pass therethrough.
In some embodiments, the tool support comprises a highly articulated probe, comprising: an outer sleeve comprising a first plurality of links; an inner core comprising a second plurality of links; a first cable extending through either said plurality of links of the inner core or said plurality of links of the outer sleeve and a plurality of cables running through the other of said plurality of links of the inner core or said plurality of links of the outer sleeve.
In some embodiments, the system further comprises a feeder assembly constructed and arranged to alternate each of said inner core and outer sleeve between a limp mode and a rigid mode, for advancing and retracting said inner core and outer sleeve, and for steering at least one of said inner core and outer sleeve.
In some embodiments, the controller comprises a CPU.
In some embodiments, the controller comprises a cable tensioning assembly.
In some embodiments, the controller comprises a temperature modifying assembly.
In some embodiments, the controller comprises a delivery device.
In some embodiments, the controller is constructed and arranged to deliver one or more of: epoxy; cement; and glue.
In some embodiments, the at least one tool comprises a handle attached to the at least one tool proximal portion.
In some embodiments, the handle comprises a control.
In some embodiments, the control is selected from the group consisting of: a trigger; a knob; a lever; a button; a lock; and combinations thereof.
In some embodiments, the control is constructed and arranged to perform one or more of the following actions; operate the at least one tool such as to apply power to the at least one tool; and move a potion of the at least one tool such as to advance, retract or rotate a portion of the tool.
In some embodiments, the at least one tool distal portion comprises a functional element.
In some embodiments, the functional element is selected from the group consisting of: grasper; cutter; ablater; cauterizer; drug delivery element; radiation source; sensor such as an EKG electrode, pressure sensor or blood sensor; magnet; heating element; cryogenic element; and combinations thereof.
In some embodiments, the at least one tool distal portion is a steerable.
In some embodiments, the at least one tool comprises a rigid portion proximal said steerable tool distal portion.
In some embodiments, the at least one tool comprises a flexible portion proximal said rigid portion.
In some embodiments, the at least one tool comprises a flexible portion proximal said steerable tool distal portion.
In some embodiments, the at least one tool comprises a rigid portion proximal said tool flexible portion.
In some embodiments, the at least one tool comprises a rigid portion between said tool steerable portion and said tool flexible portion.
In some embodiments, the system further comprises a tool holder constructed and arranged to attach to the at least one tool proximal portion.
In some embodiments, the tool holder comprises mounting means.
In some embodiments, the mounting means is configured to rapidly release.
In some embodiments, the mounting means is configured to rapidly rotate.
In some embodiments, the tool holder is constructed and arranged to operably position the at least one tool.
In some embodiments, the tool holder is constructed and arranged to allow the distal portion to advance and/or retract when the at least one tool is attached to the tool holder.
In some embodiments, the tool holder is constructed and arranged to allow the distal portion to rotate when the at least one tool is attached to the tool holder.
In some embodiments, the tool holder is constructed and arranged to prevent movement of at least a portion of the at least one tool when the at least one tool is attached to the tool holder.
In some embodiments, the human interface device is constructed and arranged to simultaneously advance and steer the tool support.
In some embodiments, the tool support comprises an outer sleeve comprising a first set of links and an inner core comprises a second set of links.
In some embodiments, the system is constructed and arranged to advance and steer the outer sleeve simultaneously based on input from the human interface device.
In some embodiments, the outer sleeve comprises a distal end and the inner core comprises a distal end and wherein the system is constructed and arranged to advance the outer sleeve distal end up to approximately 2.5 cm beyond the inner core distal end.
In some embodiments, the system is constructed and arranged to advance the inner core distal end up to the outer sleeve distal end without operator input after the outer sleeve has been simultaneously advanced and steered.
In some embodiments, the human interface device comprises a haptic controller.
In some embodiments, the system further comprises a console.
In some embodiments, the human interface device is attached and/or integral to the console.
In some embodiments, the console comprises a user interface.
In some embodiments, the system further comprises a second tool comprising a proximal portion and a distal portion with a distal end.
In some embodiments, the tool support is further constructed and arranged to support the second tool distal portion.
In some embodiments, the system further comprises a tool support introducer comprises a tube constructed and arranged to slidingly receive the tool support.
In some embodiments, the tool support introducer is constructed and arranged for insertion into the esophagus.
In some embodiments, the tool support introducer further comprises at least one guide tube.
In some embodiments, the at least one guide tube comprises a rotatable coupler along its length.
In some embodiments, the rotatable coupler is constructed and arranged to frictionally engage and gravitationally support the at least one guide tube.
In some embodiments, the rotatable coupler is constructed and arranged to lock the at least one guide tube such that movement is prevented when a force is applied to the at least one guide tube.
In some embodiments, the rotatable coupler comprises a cam lock.
In some embodiments, the cam is operably attached to a lever.
In some embodiments, the at least one guide tube comprises a flared proximal end.
In some embodiments, the tool support tube comprises at least one radially extending side lobe.
In some embodiments, the tool support comprises a proximal end comprising two or more projections constructed and arranged to guide and/or orient insertion of the tool support.
In some embodiments, the tool support tube comprises a proximal portion and a distal portion.
In some embodiments, the tool support further comprises a second proximal portion different than the first proximal portion.
In some embodiments, the tool support further comprises a second distal portion different than the first distal portion.
In some embodiments, the tool support introducer further comprises an attachment mechanism.
In some embodiments, the system further comprises an intubation tube.
In some embodiments, the tool support is constructed and arranged to be positioned anterior to the intubation tube in the esophagus.
In some embodiments, the operator is a clinician.
In some embodiments, the clinician is a surgeon.
In another aspect, a method of performing a surgical procedure comprises: selecting the system of any embodiments described herein; and manipulating the tool support to position the at least one tool.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises placing the tool support in a curvilinear configuration and transitioning the tool support to a rigid state.
In some embodiments, transitioning the tool support to a rigid state comprises placing one or more cables in tension.
In some embodiments, transitioning the tool support to a rigid state comprises freezing at least a portion of the tool support.
In some embodiments, transitioning the tool support to a rigid state comprises hardening one or more of: cement; epoxy; glue; and combinations thereof.
In some embodiments in a system as described in reference to the figures, the tool shafts exit the patient's mouth and travel in a superior direction.
In some embodiments in a system as described in reference to the figures, the tool support shaft exits the patient's mouth and does not travel in a superior direction.
In some embodiments in a system as described in reference to the figures, the tool support shaft exits the patient's mouth and travels in an inferior direction.
In another aspect, a tool support is described in reference to the embodiments described herein.
In another aspect, a method of performing a medical procedure is described in reference to the system of any of the embodiments described herein.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate various embodiments of the present inventive concepts, and together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the inventive concepts. In the drawings:
Reference will now be made in detail to the present embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.
Provided herein is a system for performing a medical procedure including one or more tools that are operably attached to a tool support. An operator, such as a clinician, operates a human interface device (HID) to manipulate or otherwise control the tool support. A controller receives signals from the HID and controls the tool support based on these signals.
Referring now to
HID 150, typically a haptic controller, joystick, track ball, mouse, or other control device known to those of skill in the art of robotics or other electromechanical device control. HID 150 includes handle 151 configured to manipulate distal end 31 of probe 10.
Outer sleeve 30 includes near its distal end, guide tube 339a and guide tube 339b, each including at least one lumen, not shown, but configured to slidingly receive the distal portion of one or more tools, also not shown but described in detail herebelow. Guide tubes 339a and 339b may be flexible, rigid, or include flexible and rigid portions.
Feeder 110 is mounted to table T via support 111. Alternatively or additionally, feeder 110 may be mounted to console 160 or a separate support device.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Also as shown in
Distal link 31 also includes recesses 38a and 38b which allow shafts 230a and 230b of tools 200a and 200b, respectively, to pass therethrough. Distal link 31 is provided with a chamfered or rounded edge 34 such as to avoid trauma to tissue during insertion into the human body.
Distal link 31 can be constructed to minimize reflections of visible light, for example, distal link 31 can be a matte material and/or a dark color, such as black.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Introducer 300 includes lumen 301 extending from its proximal end 311 to its distal end 312. Lumen 301 is sized to slidingly receive a tool support of the present disclosure, such as probe 10 of
Introducer 300 includes two guide tubes comprising proximal portions 340a and 340b, and distal portions 341a and 341b (not shown but located behind upper shaft 310a), connected with rotating couplers 330a and 330b, respectively. Rotatable couplers 330a and 330b, typically frictionally engaged ball joints configured to provide gravitational support, may be detachable. Rotatable couplers 330a and 330b frictionally engage the guide tubes such that guide tube proximal portions 340a and 340b are supported and free to move relative to the rotation means within coupler 330a and 330b, respectively. Rotatable couplers 330a and 330b can be locked once the guide tubes are in a desired position and orientation relative to the user. In a locked state, couplers 330a and 330b prevent movement of the guide tubes when a force is applied, such as a force applied during manipulation of a tool. Funnels 342a and 342b are configured to ease insertion of the distal portion of one or more tools, and are attached to guide tube proximal portions 340a and 340b, respectively.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Tools 200a and 200b include shafts 230a and 230b, respectively, which have been inserted through guide holes 37a and 37b of flanges 36. Tools 200a and 200b include working ends 220a and 220b, respectively.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Introducer 300 includes two guide tubes 339a and 339b, each configured for insertion of the shaft of a tool, not shown but typically a tool configured to controllably manipulate and/or operate one or more of: a grasper; a cutter; an ablater; a cauterizer; a drug delivery element; a radiation source; a sensor such as an EKG electrode, a pressure sensor or blood sensor; a magnet; a heating element; a cryogenic element; and combinations of these. Alternatively or additionally, guide tubes 339 and 339 may be configured for insertion of an additional guide tube, such as a semi-rigid guide tube or a flexible guide tube that can extend and provide support beyond the distal ends of guide tube 339a or 339b. Guide tubes 339a and 339b are connected to lockable, rotatable couplers 400a and 400b, respectively. Couplers 400a and 400b, typically cam-lockable ball joints, may be detachable. Coupler 400a includes an actuator, lever 401a. Movement of lever 401a in one direction, for example, a downward direction relative to a user, rotates cam sleeve 402a to apply a force that linearly displaces cam 403a which closes gap 405a, locking ball 406a in place, thus placing guide tube 339a in a locked state. In this locked state, movement of guide tube 339a is prevented, including when a force is applied, such as a when a force is applied during manipulation of a tool whose shaft has been inserted through guide tube 339a.
Conversely, movement of lever 401a in the opposite direction, i.e. an upward direction relative to the user, rotates cam sleeve 402a to release the force applied to cam 403a allowing cam 403a to linearly displace in the opposite direction, increasing gap 405a. The increase in gap 405a releases the force applied to ball 406a, placing guide tube 339a in an unlocked state. In this unlocked state, guide tube 339a remains frictionally engaged with coupler 400a, such that guide tube 339a is gravitationally supported but free to move (e.g. by the hand of an operator) relative to ball 406a. Additionally, coupler 400a may include a screw, including screw head 407a, that is fixed in place, such as via an adhesive, to prevent loosening. Screw head 407a can provide a bearing surface for cam sleeve 402a. Coupler 400a includes insert 404a that provides a surface against which cam 403a translates.
Coupler 400b components are similar to that of coupler 400a, for example, coupler 400b includes lever 401b, gap 405b, and ball 406b. Additionally, the functionality of the coupler 400b and its components are typically the same or similar to that of coupler 400a.
While the preferred embodiments of the devices and methods have been described in reference to the environment in which they were developed, they are merely illustrative of the principles of the present inventive concepts. Modification or combinations of the above-described assemblies, other embodiments, configurations, and methods for carrying out the inventive concepts, and variations of aspects of the inventive concepts that are obvious to those of skill in the art are intended to be within the scope of the claims. In addition, where this application has listed the steps of a method or procedure in a specific order, it may be possible, or even expedient in certain circumstances, to change the order in which some steps are performed, and it is intended that the particular steps of the method or procedure claim set forth herebelow not be construed as being order-specific unless such order specificity is expressly stated in the claim.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/368,257 filed Jul. 28, 2010, which is incorporated herein by reference, in its entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2011/044811 | 7/21/2011 | WO | 00 | 9/17/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/015659 | 2/2/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3060972 | Sheldon | Oct 1962 | A |
3557780 | Sato | Jan 1971 | A |
3572325 | Bazell et al. | Mar 1971 | A |
3583393 | Takahashi | Jun 1971 | A |
3625200 | Muller | Dec 1971 | A |
3638973 | Poletti | Feb 1972 | A |
3643653 | Takahashi et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3703968 | Uhrich et al. | Nov 1972 | A |
3739770 | Mori | Jun 1973 | A |
3790002 | Germond et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
3892228 | Mitsui | Jul 1975 | A |
3920972 | Corwin, Jr. et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
4078670 | Francois et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4108211 | Tanaka | Aug 1978 | A |
4150329 | Dahlstrom | Apr 1979 | A |
4221997 | Flemming | Sep 1980 | A |
4259876 | Belyanin et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4260319 | Motoda et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4299533 | Ohnaka | Nov 1981 | A |
4351323 | Ouchi et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4432349 | Oshiro | Feb 1984 | A |
4445184 | Noguchi | Apr 1984 | A |
4474174 | Petruzzi | Oct 1984 | A |
4475375 | Hill | Oct 1984 | A |
4479914 | Baumrucker | Oct 1984 | A |
4494417 | Larson et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4496278 | Kaise | Jan 1985 | A |
4502830 | Inaba et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4517963 | Michel | May 1985 | A |
4531885 | Molaug | Jul 1985 | A |
4535207 | Lindqvist | Aug 1985 | A |
4564179 | Hollingsworth | Jan 1986 | A |
4600355 | Johnson | Jul 1986 | A |
4655257 | Iwashita | Apr 1987 | A |
4661032 | Arai | Apr 1987 | A |
4666366 | Davis | May 1987 | A |
4700693 | Lia et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4706001 | Nakashima et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4726355 | Okada | Feb 1988 | A |
4780045 | Akeel et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4787369 | Allred, III et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4790294 | Allred, III et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4796607 | Allred, III et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4804897 | Gordon et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4805477 | Akeel | Feb 1989 | A |
4806066 | Rhodes et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4830569 | Jannborg | May 1989 | A |
4831547 | Ishiguro et al. | May 1989 | A |
4838859 | Strassmann | Jun 1989 | A |
4863133 | Bonnell | Sep 1989 | A |
4864888 | Iwata | Sep 1989 | A |
4873965 | Danieli | Oct 1989 | A |
4888708 | Brantmark et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4900218 | Sutherland | Feb 1990 | A |
4941457 | Hasegawa | Jul 1990 | A |
4943296 | Funakubo et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4947827 | Opie et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4949927 | Madocks et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4950116 | Nishida | Aug 1990 | A |
4956790 | Tsuchihashi et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4979949 | Matsen, III et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4998916 | Hammerslag et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5005558 | Aomori | Apr 1991 | A |
5006035 | Nakashima et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5012169 | Ono et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5037391 | Hammerslag et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5044063 | Voellmer | Sep 1991 | A |
5046375 | Salisbury, Jr. et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5064340 | Genov et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5078140 | Kwoh | Jan 1992 | A |
5086401 | Glassman et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5105819 | Wollschlager et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5108368 | Hammerslag et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5143475 | Chikama | Sep 1992 | A |
5167221 | Chikama | Dec 1992 | A |
5174277 | Matsumaru | Dec 1992 | A |
5176126 | Chikama | Jan 1993 | A |
5178129 | Chikama et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5179935 | Miyagi | Jan 1993 | A |
5180276 | Hendrickson | Jan 1993 | A |
5193963 | McAffee et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5195968 | Lundquist et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5200679 | Graham | Apr 1993 | A |
5201325 | McEwen et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5203380 | Chikama | Apr 1993 | A |
5203772 | Hammerslag et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5217003 | Wilk | Jun 1993 | A |
5217453 | Wilk | Jun 1993 | A |
5236432 | Matsen, III et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5251611 | Zehel et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5254088 | Lundquist et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5257669 | Kerley et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5266875 | Slotine et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5271381 | Ailinger et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5297443 | Wentz | Mar 1994 | A |
5318526 | Cohen | Jun 1994 | A |
5327905 | Avitall | Jul 1994 | A |
5337732 | Grundfest et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5386741 | Rennex | Feb 1995 | A |
5448989 | Heckele | Sep 1995 | A |
5524180 | Wang et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5759151 | Sturges | Jun 1998 | A |
6080181 | Jensen et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6120433 | Mizuno et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6132368 | Cooper | Oct 2000 | A |
6223100 | Green | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6234958 | Snoke et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6270453 | Sakai | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6346072 | Cooper | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6440061 | Wenner et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6450948 | Matsuura et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6743239 | Kuehn et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6837846 | Jaffe et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6837847 | Ewers et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6916306 | Jenkins et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
7182764 | Jenkins et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7217246 | Stone | May 2007 | B1 |
7575548 | Takemoto | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7789875 | Brock et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7850642 | Moll et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7854109 | Zubiate et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7854738 | Lee et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7867241 | Brock et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7918845 | Saadat et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7946546 | Zubiate et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8075476 | Vargas | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8100031 | Zubiate et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8192422 | Zubiate et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8459138 | Zubiate et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
9011318 | Choset et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9591964 | Choset et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
20010013764 | Blumenkranz et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020133174 | Charles et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020161281 | Jaffe et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030135203 | Wang et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040138525 | Saadat et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138529 | Wiltshire et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040193146 | Lee et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050033287 | Sra | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050065397 | Saadat et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050090811 | Doyle et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050113640 | Saadat et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050215992 | Jenkins et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216033 | Lee et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228224 | Okada | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060052664 | Julian et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060258906 | Binmoeller | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070299387 | Williams et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080027279 | Abou El Kheir | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080119868 | Sharp et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080163603 | Zubiate et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080188869 | Weitzner et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080245173 | Schwerin et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090030428 | Omori et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090171151 | Choset et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090287043 | Naito et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100063354 | Hashimoto et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100160735 | Bakos | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100160736 | Padget et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100204713 | Ruiz Morales | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100224022 | Choi et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100280325 | Ibrahim et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110028790 | Farr et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110056320 | Zubiate et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110152613 | Zubiate et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110184241 | Zubiate et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110213384 | Jeong | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110313243 | Zubiate et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120209073 | McWeeney et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130150673 | Kakehashi | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140088356 | Matsuo et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20150164491 | Choset et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20160174816 | Choset et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20170156569 | Choset et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
653922 | Nov 2005 | EP |
1015068 | Sep 2011 | EP |
H08117238 | May 1996 | JP |
2000037390 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2004181031 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2006087687 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2008504072 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2008540041 | Nov 2008 | JP |
2006124880 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2006083306 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2009149421 | Dec 2009 | WO |
201050771 | May 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report dated Apr. 6, 2012, issued in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2011/044811. |
PCT ISRWO dated May 19, 2014, issued in International application No. PCT/US2014/010808. |
Expo-70 Robot—Vadim Matskevich's students, http://cyberneticzoo.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Expo-70-MK-1969-02-p31-3.pdf, 1969. |
Conductor Robot, http://cyberneticzoo.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Ticket-robot-russian-1973.pdf, 1973. |
Michael L. Rhodes, “Computer Graphics and an Interactive Stereotactic System for CT-Aided Neurosurgery”, IEEE Computer Graphics and Application, Computer Graphics in Medicine & Biology, 1983, p. 31-37. |
Lee E. Weiss, Arthur C. Sanderson, Charles P. Neuman, “Dynamic Sensor Based Control of Robots with Visual Feedback”, IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, 1987, p. 404-417. |
Jean-Jacques E. Slotine, Weiping Li, “Composite adaptive control of robot manipulators”, Automatica; Nonlinear Systems Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, U.S.A., 1989, p. 509-519. |
Weiping Li, Jean-Jacques E. Slotine, “An indirect adaptive robot controller”, Systems & Control Letters; Nonlinear Systems Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139, U.S.A., 1989, p. 259-266. |
Xu Hongbin, “Stability and performance robustness analysis of hybrid control for robot manipulators”, Journal of UEST of China, vol. 22 No. 5, Oct. 1993, p. 501-505. |
Francois Chaumette, Patrick Rives, Bernard Espiau, “Positioning of A Robot With Respect to An Object, Tracking It and Estimating Its Velocity by Visual Servoing”, IEEE International Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1991, p. 2248-2253. |
A.V. Timofejev, N.V. Ivanova, “Expert System of the Control Programs Designing of Adaptive Robots”, The Lenigrand Institute of Aircraft Instrumentation, 1991, p. 912-915. |
W Szczepiński, “Theory of polyhedrons of positioning accuracy of manipulators”, Mechanism and Machine Theory; Institute of Fundamental Technological Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, 00-049 Warsaw, Swietokrzyska 21, Poland, 1991, p. 697-709. |
Junji Furusho, Hiroshi Nagao, Naruse Makoto, “Multivariable Root Loci of Control Systems of Robot Manipulators with Flexible Driving Systems* : Distortion Feedback”, JSME International Journal, 1992, p. 65-73. |
Potemkin, E., Astafurov, P., Osipov, A., Malenkov, M., Mishkinyuk, V., Sologub, P., “Remote-controlled robots for repair and recovery in the zones of high radiation levels”, Robotics and Automation, IEEE, 1992, p. 80-82. |
S. L. Shishkin, “Adaptive control of a biped robot walking across a horizontal plane”, International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, 1992, p. 259-264. |
Henk Nijmeijer, “Global regulation of robots using only position measurements”, Systems and Control Letters; Department of Electrical Engineering, Mechatronics Research Centre Twente, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands, 1992, p. 289-293. |
Hitoshi Maekawa, Kazuhito Yokoi, Kazuo Tanie, Makoto Kaneko, Nobuo Kimura, Nobuaki Imamura, “Development of a three-fingered robot hand with stiffness control capability”, Mechatronics; Mechanical Engineering Laboratory, 1992, p. 483-494. |
J.D. Moon, D.W. Cho, “A component mode synthesis applied to mechanisms for an investigation of vibration”, Journal of Sound and Vibration; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pohang Institute of Science and Technology, Pohang, Korea, 1992, p. 67-79. |
Timopheev, A.V., Prokhorov, D.V., “Neural networks processing systems in recognition and control problems ”, Neuroinformatics and Neurocomputers; IEEE, 1992, p. 820-828. |
Jianguo Fu, Naresh K. Sinha, “An iterative learning scheme for motion control of robots using neural networks: A case study”, Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 1993, p. 375-398. |
Troccaz, J. Lavallee, S. Hellion, E., “A passive arm with dynamic constraints: a solution to safety problems in medical robotics”, Systems Engineering in the Service of Humans', Conference Proceedings, 1993, p. 166-171. |
Swarup, M. Gopal, “Comparative study on linearized robot models”, Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 1993, p. 287-300. |
H. Azaria, A. Dvir, “Algorithm optimization using a rule-based system. A case study: The Direct Kinematic Solution in robotics”, Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 1993, p. 309-324. |
Erick Garcia-Benitez; Stephen Yurkovich; Kevin M. Passino, “Rule-Based Supervisory Control of a Two-Link Flexible Manipulator”, Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, 1993, p. 195-213. |
K. Periyasamy, V. S. Alagar, T. D. Bui, “A formal framework for design and verification of robotic agents”, Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 1993, p. 173-200. |
S. Nicosia, A. Tornambé, P. Valigi, “State estimation in robotic manipulators: Some experimental results”, Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems,, 1993, p. 321-351. |
Dimitrios M. Emiris, Vassilios D. Tourassis, “Singularity-robust decoupled control of dual-elbow manipulators”, Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 1993, p. 225-243. |
M.M. Bayoumi, “Adaptive Control of Robots with Rigid Links: A Status Report”, Department of Electrical Engineering, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada (IEEE), 1993, p. 232-236. |
Y. Edan, B. A. Engel, G. E. Miles, “Intelligent control system simulation of an agricultural robot”, Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 1993, p. 267-284. |
Chun-Yi Su, “Adaptive sliding mode control of nonlinear robotic systems with time-varying parameters”, Systems and Control Letters; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C. Canada V8W 3P6, 1993, p. 35-41. |
Yalou Huang; Guizhang Lu, “Force Analysis and Hybrid Control Scheme for Multiple Robot Manipulators”, Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Research Laboratories; Dept of Computer and System Sciences; Nankai University, China (Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems in Japan), 1993, p. 1530-1534. |
C.M. Lim; T. Hiyama, “Experimental implementation of a fuzzy logic control scheme for a servomotor”, Mechatronics; Department of Electronic Engineering, Ngee Ann Polytechnic, Singapore 2159 Singapore. |
E. Al-Gallaf, A.J. Allen, K. Warwick, “Dextrous hands: Issues relating to a four-finger articulated hand”, Mechatronics; Department of Cybernetics, School of Engineering and Information Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, Berks RG6 2AY, U.K., 1993, p. 329-342. |
A. Swarup, M. Gopal, “On robustness of decentralized control for robot manipulators”, Robotics and Autonomous Systems; Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi—110016, India, 1993, p. 109-112. |
L. Behera, M. Gopal, Santanu Chaudhury, “Trajectory tracking of robot manipulator using Gaussian networks”, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110 016, India, 1993. |
E. V. Panteley, A. A. Stotsky, “Adaptive trajectory/force control scheme for constrained robot manipulators”, International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, 1993, p. 489-496. |
Filaretov, V.F., “A Synthesis of Adaptive Control Systems for Industrial Robots ”, Electronic Mfg Technology Symposium, 1993, p. 168-171. |
S. Zenkevich, A. Maximov, A. Nazarova, A. Korshunov, “Control of robot-based assembly cell ”, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences , 1993, p. 418-427. |
D.E. Whitney, “The Mathematics of Coordinated Control of Prosthetic Arms and Manipulators”, Asme Publication, 1972. |
Shapiro, “Digital Technology Enables Robots to See”, Computer Design, 1978. |
Bejczy, A. K., Salisbury, Jr., J. K., “Kinesthetic Coupling Between Operator and Remote Manipulator”, Advances in Computer Technology, 1980. |
“An Improved CT-Aided Stereotactic Neurosurgery Technique”, Fifth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, 1981, p. 591-595. |
Michael L. Thodes, Ph.D, “Stereotactic Neurosurgery Using 3D Image Data From Computed Tomography”, Journal of Medical Systems, 1982, p. 106-118. |
Salisburg, Jr., J. Kenneth, “Kinematic and Force Analysis of Articulated Hands”, 1982. |
“Minicomputer Control Robot's Six Electrohydraulic Servoactuators”, Hydraulics & Pneumatics, 1982, p. 53-58. |
F.M. Kulakov, “Modeling Robot Control in Assembly Operations”, Modern Robot Engineering, Moscow, MIR Publishers, 1982, p. 100-116. |
Bejczy et al., “Controlling Remote Manipulators Through Kinesthetic Coupling”, Computers in Mechanical Engineering, 1983, p. 48-60. |
L.E. Weiss, “Dynamic Visual Servo Control of Robots: an adaptive image-based approach, Technical Report”, Carnegie Mellon, 1984. |
Dennis E. Bullard, “CT-Guided Stereotactic Biopsies Using a Modified Grame and Gildenberg Techniques”, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 1984, p. 590-595. |
M. Caporali et al., “Design and Construction of a Five Fingered Robotic Hand”, Robotics Age, 1984, p. 14-20. |
Salisbury, Jr., J. K., “Design and Control of an Articulated Hand”, International Symposium on Dessign and Synthesis, 1984. |
L. Dade Lunsford, M.D., “Stereotactic Exploration of the Brain in the Era of Computed Tomography”, Surg. Neurol, 1984, p. 222-230. |
Jacobsen, S.C., Iversen, E.K., Knutti, D. F., Johnson, R.T., Biggers, K. B., “Design of the Utah/MIT Dexterous Hand”, Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1986. |
S. Hayati, M. Mirmirani, “Improving the Absolute positioning Accuracy of Robot Manipulators”, Journal of Robotic Systems, 1986, p. 397-413. |
Vertut, J., Coiffet, P., “Teleoperations and Robotics Evolution and Development”, Robot Technology, 1986, p. 191-194. |
L.E. Weiss; A.C. Sanderson, “Dynamic Sensor-based Control of Robots with Visual Feedback”, IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, 1987, p. 5. |
Townsend, W.T., Salisbury, Jr. J. K., “The Effect of Coulomb Friction and Stiction on Force Control”, Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1987. |
P. Rives, F. Chaumette, B. Espiau, “Visual Servoing Based on a Task Function Approach”, International Symposium on Experimental Robotics (Canada), 1989. |
B.L. Davies, R.D. Hibberd, A. Timoney, J.E.A. Wickham, “A surgeon robot for prostatectomies”, Proc. of 2nd Int. Conference on Robotics in Medicine (UK), 1989. |
J.T. Feddema, C.S.G. Lee, O.R. Mitchell, “Automatic selection of image features for visual servoing of a robot manipulator”, Conf. IEEE Robotics and Automation (USA), 1989, p. 14-19. |
J.T. Feddema, O.R. Mitchell, “Vision-Guided Servoing with Feature-Based Trajectory Generation”, IEEE Transaction on Robotics and Automation, 1989. |
Pierre J. de Smet, Eugene I. Rivin, Yongle Lou, D. Kegg, “Robot Performance as Influenced by Mechanical System”, CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology, 1990, p. 383-386. |
Mills, J.K., “Hybrid actuation of robotic manipulators: an integral manifold control approach”, Intelligent Control, IEEE, 1990, p. 817-823. |
John T. Feddema, C. S. George Lee, “Adaptive Image Feature Prediction and Control for Visual Tracking with A Hand-eye Coordinated Camera”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, man, and Cybernetics, 1990, p. 1172-1183. |
Rafiqul I. Noorani, “Microcomputer-based robot arm control”, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 1990, p. 450-455. |
Elysseev S., Kuznetzov, N., Lukyanov A., “Control of Robot Vibrations”, 1990. |
C. Samson, B. Espiau, “Robot Control: The Task Function Approach”, Oxford Univ., 1990. |
Adams, L, Krybus, W., Meyer-Ebrecht, D., Rueger, R., Gilsbach, J.M., Moesges, R., Schloendorff, G., “Computer Assisted Surgery”, IEEE Computer Graphics and Application, 1990, p. 43-51. |
B. Espiau, F. Chaumette, P. Rives, “A new approach to visual servoing in robotics”, Research Report; IRISA/INRIA (France), 1990. |
Korikov, Anatoliim, Syriamkin, Vladimiri, Titov, Vitaliis, “Correlation robot vision systems”, 1990, p. 264. |
Sadegh N, Hopowitz R, “Stability and robustness analysis of a class of adaptive controller for robotic manipulator”, The International Journal of Robotics Research, 1990. |
Rocheleau, D.N., Crane, C.D., III, “Development of a graphical interface for robotic operation in a hazardous environment”, Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1991, p. 1077-1081. |
J.C. Latombe, “Robot Motion Planning”, The Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991. |
Kubota, T., Sato, M., Harashima, F., “Visual Control of Robotic Manipulator Based on Neural Networks”, Industrial Electronics, IEEE, 1992, p. 490-496. |
Nakamura, H., Shimada, T., Kobayashi, H., “An inspection robot for feeder cables-snake like motion control”, Industrial Electronics, Control, Instrumentation, and Automation, 1992, p. 849-852. |
P. Kazanzides, J. Zuhars, B. Mittelsstadt, R.H. Taylor, “Force sensing and control for a surgical robot”, IEEE conference on Robotics and Automation (Nice), 1992, p. 612-617. |
Vsevolod I. Astafyev Farus, Yakutsk, Russia Yuri M. Gorsky, “Homeostatics”, Cybernetics and applied systems, 1992, p. 7-22. |
S. Lavallee, J. Troccaz, L. Gaborit, A.L. Benabid, D. Hoffman, “Image guided operating robot: A clinical application in stereotactic neurosurgery”, IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation (Nice), 1992. |
H.A. Paul, B. Mittelstadt, W.L. Bargar, B. Musits, R.H. Taylor, P. Kazanzides, J. Zuhars, B. Williamson, W. Hanson, “A surgical robot for total hip replacement surgery”, IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation (Nice), 1992, p. 606-611. |
R.H. Taylor, et. al, Augmentation of Human Precision in Computer-Integrated Surgery, Innov. Tech. Biol. Med., 1992. |
Takashi Matsui, Mochizuki Yoshihiro, Effect of Positive Angular Velocity Feedback on Torque Control of Hydraulic Actuator, JSME international journal, 1992, p. 406-412. |
Ph, Cinquin, et. al, IGOR: Image Guided Operating Robot. Methodology, Medical Applications, Results, Innov. Tech. Biol. Med., 1992, p. 1048-1049. |
Heung-Joo Jeon, Bum-Hee Lee, Robot Motion Planning for Time-Varying Obstacle Avoidance Using the Distance Function, 1992, p. 1429-1438. |
Bose, B., Kalra, A.K., Thukral, S., Sood, A., Guha, S.K., Anand, S., Tremor Compensation for Robotics Assisted Microsurgery, Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1992, p. 1067-1068. |
Kenneth L. Hillsley, Stephen Yurkovich, Vibration Control of a Two-Link Flexible Robot Arm, Dynamics and Control, 1993, p. 261-280. |
Canudas de Wit, C., Ortega, R., Seleme, S.I., Robot Motion Control Using Induction Motor Drives, Robotics and Automation, 1993, p. 533-538. |
Alberto Rovetta, Xia Wen, Telemanipulation Control of a Robotic Hand With Cooperating Fingers by Means of Telepresence With a Hybrid Virtual-Real Structure, RoManSy 9: Proceedings of the Ninth CISM-IFToMM Symposium on Theory and Practice of Robots and Jul. 7, 1992. |
James K. Mills, Hybrid Actuator for Robot Manipulators: Design, Control and Performance, Robotics and Automation, IEEE Conference, 1993, p. 19-38. |
Pietro Fanghella, Carlo Galletti, An Approach to Symbolic Kinematics of Multiloop Robot Mechanisms, RoManSy9, 1993, p. 33-40. |
Yozo Fujino, Pennung Warnitchai, B.M. Pacheco, Active Stiffness Control of Cable Vibration, Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1993, p. 948-953. |
Ng, W.S. Davies, B.L. Hibberd, R.D. Timoney, A.G., Robotic Surgery, Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 1993, p. 120-125. |
J.L. Dallaway, R.M. Mahoney, R.D. Jackson, R.G. Gosine, An Interactive Robot Control Environment for Rehabilitation Applications, Robotica, 1993, p. 541-551. |
Giulio E. Lancioni, Domenico Bellini, Doretta Oliva, “A robot to provide multi-handicapped blind persons with physical guidance and activity choices”, Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 1993, p. 337-348. |
Melzer A, Schurr MO, Kunert W, Buess G, Voges U, Meyer JU., Intelligent Surgical Instrument System ISIS. Concept and Preliminary Experimental Application of Components and Prototypes, Endosc Surg Allied Technol., 1993, p. 165-170. |
John G. Hunter, Jonathan M. Sackier, Minimally Invasive Surgery, McGraw Hill, Inc., Health Professions Division, 1993. |
Zhao Yu-shan Gu Liang-xian , Generalized Dynamic Model for Multibodies Manipulator, 1993. |
F.M. Kulakov, Russian Research on Robotics, Intelligent Autonomous Systems, 1995, p. 53-62. |
Shevtsova N.A., Faure A., Klepatch A.A., Podladchikova L.N., Rybak I.A. , Model of Foveal Visual Preprocessor, Intelligent Robots and Computer Vision XIV: Algorithms, Techniques, Active Vision, and Materials Handling, 1995, p. 588-596. |
Reynolds, O., “On Efficiency of Belts or Straps as Communicators of Work”, The Engineer, 1874, p. 396. |
Swift, H. W., “Power Transmission by Belts: An Investigation of Fundamentals”, The Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 1928. |
Smith, G. A. et al., “Surgery”, 1950, p. 817-821. |
“Baby Robot”, http://cyberneticzoo.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Ticket-robot-russian-1973.pdf, 1970. |
Rajac, “Variable-Pitch Transfer Mechanism”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, 1974. |
ZH Luo , “Theoretical and Experimental Study on Control of Flexible Robot Arms Using Direct Strain Feedback”, 1992. |
Bu Yonghong, Wang Yi, “The Identification of Geometric Link Parameters of Robot Manipulators”, ACTA Automatica Sinica, 1992. |
Zheng Nanning Wang Long Hu chao Liu Jianqin, “Improved BP Neural Net and Its Application to Handwritten Numeral Recognition”, 1992. |
Stefano Chiaverini, Bruno Siciliano, Olav Egeland, Robot Control in Singular Configurations—Analysis and Experimental Results, Experimental Robotics II, 1993, p. 25-34. |
Antonio Bicchi, J. Kenneth Salisbury, David L. Brock, Experimental Evaluation of Friction Characteristics With an Articulated Robotic Hand, Experimental Robotics II, 1993, p. 153-167. |
Claudio Melchiorri, Gabriele Vassura, Mechanical and Control Issues for Integration of an Arm-Hand Robotic System, Experimental Robotics II, 1993, p. 136-152. |
Andrew K. Rist, Ellen Y. Lin, Bartholomew O. Nnaji, Ralph Application for Surface Mount Assembly, International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 1993, p. 27-52. |
R.H. Taylor, et. al, A Model-Based Optimal Planning and Execution System With Active Sensing and Passive Manipulation for Augmentation of Human-Precision in Computer-Integrated Surgery, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences; Experimental Robo. |
Nobuyuki Furuya, Masatomo Matubara, An Algorithm of Motor Control by Software Servo System (2nd Report): Application to 4-AXES Scara Robot, Journal of the Japan Society of Precision Engineering , 1993, p. 423-428. |
H.S. Moon, S.Y. Lee, S.J. Na, A Study on Selection of Gas Metal Arc Welding Parameters of Fillet Joints Using Neural Network, Journal of the Korean Welding Society, 1993, p. 151-160. |
Byong Suk Kim, Computer—Assisted System for Accident Analysis and Mul—Function Protection in Industrial Robot, Papersearch.net (Korean Studies Information Co.), 1993, p. 61-64. |
J. I. Arocena, R. W. Daniel, P. Elosegui, End Point Control of Compliant Robots, Experimental Robotics II, 1993, p. 435-449. |
Ho Kyung Kim, Nonlinear Static Analysis and Determination of Initial Equilibrium States of Suspension Bridges, 1993, p. 177-186. |
Gimdongha, imhyeongyo (Dong Ha Kim, Hyeon Kyo Lim) , Safe Speed Limit of Robot Arm During Teaching and Maintenance Work, 1993, p. 64-70. |
Chang-Boo Kim, Seung-Hoon Lee, Inverse Dynamic Analysis of a Flexible Robot Arm With Multiple Joints by Using the Optimal Control Method, Journal of the Korean Society of Precision Engineering , 1993, p. 133-140. |
Chang-Soo Han, The Optimum Design of A 6 D.O.F. Fully-Parallel Micromanipulator for Enhanced Robot Accuracy, Journal of the Korean Society of Precision Engineering , 1993, p. 42-51. |
Nicholas Jackson, The Story Behind the Russian Robot Collie Patent Sketches, The Atlantic, 2011. |
Oh Joong Chan, Jong Sik Boong, Choi Ko Bong, Kwon Key Jo, Design a Mobile Robot's Tracking Control System Using Fuzzy Theory, Sung Kyun Kwan Univ., 1992, p. 112-115. |
Sang-Gwon Lim, Jin-Won Lee, Yong-Ky Moon, Dong-Lyeol Jeon, Sang-Hyun Jin, In-Hwan Oh, Dong-Il Kim, Sung-Kwun Kim, Development of AC Servo Motor Controller for Industrial Robot and CNC Machine System, Control R/D Team, Samsung Electronics, 1992, p. 1211-1214. |
E.S. Jeon, S.H. Park, J.E. Oh, Singylarty Control of Robot Wrist Joints Using Euler Parameters, Journal of the Korean Society of Precision Engineering , 1992, p. 11-152. |
Yoon Seok Chang, Hakil Kim, Motion Estimation of Moving Objects Using Frequency Domain Transforms, 1992, p. 92-99. |
Nam Gu Lee, Chong Soo Lee, Chong Kug Park, Dynamic Hybrid Position/Force Controller for Two Cooperating Robots, 1992, p. 103-107. |
Jong-Wu Moon, Jeung Park, Chong-Xuk Park, Adaptibe Control of a Flexible Robot Manipulator—Using ARMA Prediction Model, 1992, p. 122-127. |
Dae-Gab Gweon, Choong-Min Jung, Development of a Robot Wrist for the Assembly of Chamferless Parts, Journal of the Korean Society of Precision Engineering , 1992, p. 36-43. |
Fumio Harashima, Yaskuhiko Dote, Sensor-Based Robot Systems, Proc. IEEE Int. Symposium; Muroran Institute of Tech. (Japan), 1992, p. 10-19. |
Chang-Boo Kim, Seung-Hoon Lee, Formulation of the Equation of Motion for Flexible Robotics Arms by Using the Finite Element Method, Inha Univ., Daewoo Heavy Industries Ltd, 1992, p. 233-238. |
Jin-Geol Kim, A Study on the Robust Digital Tracking Control of a Robot With Flexible Joints, Journal of the Korean Society of Precision Engineering , 1992, p. 92-100. |
Han-Sig Lee, The Prospects for the Future on Research of Flexible Automation and Robot System, 1992, p. 37-38. |
Young Hood Joo, Seok Joo Yi, San Yeob Cha, Kwang Bang Woo, Hyung Woo Yoon, Gun Woong Hae, Sung Kwun Kim, A Study on Optimal Navigation of Autonomous Mobile Robot, Production of Eng. Division, Samsung Electronics Co., 1992, p. 128-133. |
H. C. Shen, W. P. Yan, G. E. Taylor, Intelligent Sensory Decision-Making for Error Identification in Autonomous Robotics Systems, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 1993, p. 377-384. |
Morris R. Driels, W. Swayze, S. Potter, Full-Pose Calibration of a Root Manipulator Using a Coordinate-Measuring Machine, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 1993, p. 34-41. |
M. Wu, B. C. Jiang, Y. R. Shiau, Controlling a Robot's Position Using Neural Networks, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 1993, p. 216-226. |
Joachim O. Berg, Path and Orientation Accuracy of Industrial Robots, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 1993, p. 29-33. |
Shaheen Ahmad, Mohamed Zribi, Lyapunov-Based Control Design for Multiple Robots Handling a Common Object, Dynamics and Control, 1993, p. 127-157. |
S.D. Park, K.W. Jeong, W.K. Chung, Y. Youm, Development of a Control Method Using Both Electric and Pneumatic Actuators for a Heavy Load Handing Robot, Journal of the Korean Society of Precision Engineering , 1993, p. 14-21. |
Nicolay V. Kim, Algorithms of Observation Information Synthesis, International Conference on Electronics, Informations and Communications, 1993, p. 120-124. |
Sung Do Chi, Seok Pil Lee, Wang Jae Lee, San Hui Park, Hierarchical Design of Intelligent Robot System, Hankuk Aviation Univ., Yonsel Univ., 1993, p. 213-216. |
Cai Zi-Xing, Jiang Zhiming, High-Level Expert System-Based Robot Planning, 1993. |
Yong-Deuk Seo, Dong-Joon Choi, Ki-Sang Hong, Hong Joeng, The Development of Intelligent Robot Using Vision and Speech Recognition System, Department of EE, Postech, 1993, p. 39-44. |
Jae-Hun Jung, Yong-Hyun Jung, Jong-Mo Kim, Suck-Gyu Lee, Dal-Hae Lee, Motion Control of Autonomous Mobile Robot With Fuzzy Algorithm, Yeungnam Univ., 1993, p. 362-365. |
Jin-Seob Choi, Dong-Won Kim, Sung-Mo Yang, A Study on the Pseudoinverse Kinematic Motion Control of 6-Axis Arc Welding Robot, Journal of the Korean Society of Precision Engineering , 1993, p. 170-177. |
A Study on a Basic System Configuration for the PC Interface and the Robot Trajectory Generation, 1993, p. 354-358. |
G.T. Yang, S.D. Ahn, S.C. Lee, Tip Position Control of Flexible Robot Arm by Self-Tuning Fuzzy Algorithm, Chonbuk Univ., 1993, p. 213-217. |
Jeong Park, Hoe-Young Yoo, The Study of the Method of Position Control for the One-Link Flexible Robot Arm, 1993, p. 57-60. |
Asea Industrial Robot System IRb-60, 1975, p. 1-8. |
Robots Take a Hold on Production, 1982, p. 122-129. |
M. Peter Heilburn, M.D., J., Preliminary Experience With Brown-Robert-Wells (BRW) Computerized Tomography Stereotaxis Guidance System, Neurourgery, 1983, p. 217-221. |
International Machine Intelligence Robot System Users Manual, International Machine Intelligence, 1983. |
Orbitran Wafer Handling Robot, Genmark Automation, 1989, p. 2,3,4. |
H Kojima, R Toyama, Development of Wall Cleaning Robot, 1992. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 28, 2012, issued in related International Application No. PCT/US2012/040414. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 27, 2013, issued in related International Application No. PCT/US2012/054802. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 25, 2013, issued in related International Application No. PCT/US2012/070924. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 31, 2012, issued in related International Application No. PCT/US2011/060214. |
Australia Office Action dated Jun. 19, 2014, issued in related Australia Application No. 2011283048. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 9, 2013, issued in related International Application No. PCT/US2013/054326. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 30, 2012, issued in related International Application No. PCT/US2011/057282. |
Office Action and English summary from Japanese application 2013-521833 dated Mar. 24, 2015. |
Office Action dated Dec. 27, 2015 issued in corresponding Japan Application No. 2013-521833, with English language summary. |
Office Action issued in related Israeli Application No. 224420, dated Mar. 31, 2016 and English summary. |
Extended European Search Report dated Oct. 31, 2016 issued in corresponding European Application No. 11812965.9. |
Japanese Final Office Action dated Nov. 15, 2016 issued in corresponding Japanese Application No. 2013-521833, with English language summary. |
Korean Office Action dated Aug. 30, 2017 issued in corresponding Korean Application No. 10-2013-7004589, with English language summary. |
Australian Office Action dated Oct. 30, 2017 issued in corresponding Australian Application No. 2016202130. |
Canadian Office action dated Oct. 26, 2017 issued in corresponding Canadian Application No. 2,806,278. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140012287 A1 | Jan 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61368257 | Jul 2010 | US |