Patent Grant
11882242
This invention relates generally to the platform as a service field, and more specifically to a new and useful system and method for a work distribution service in the platform as a service field.
Call centers and customer care centers today build complex infrastructure to manage distributing customer calls and requests to workers that can respond to the customers. In other industries, companies must build similar infrastructure to serve other problems of work distribution. Developing such infrastructure is costly to develop and maintain. Thus, there is a need in the platform as a service field to create a new and useful system and method for a work distribution service. This invention provides such a new and useful system and method.
The following description of preferred embodiments of the invention is not intended to limit the invention to these preferred embodiments, but rather to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use this invention.
1. System for a Work Distribution Service
As shown in
The system is preferably implemented as a work distribution service of a multi-tenant infrastructure. The system may alternatively be used as a single tenant instance (e.g., an on premise solution). As a single tenant implementation, the system preferably retains the flexibility provided in a similar multi-tenant version so that a developer can customize the single tenant implementation for a developer's own purpose. The system may additionally be implemented in combination with or in cooperation with a communication platform 107. The communication platform is preferably used in the execution of communications based applications. For example, the communication platform can facilitate execution of automated call logic such as in U.S. Pat. No. 8,306,021 issued on 6 Nov. 2012, which is hereby incorporated in its entirety by this reference. The system and/or a second communication platform may communicate over a variety of different communication protocols and mediums such as voice (e.g., PSTN, SIP, WebRTC, etc.), video, screen sharing, text messaging (e.g., SMS, proprietary IP based messaging, etc.), media messaging (e.g., MMS, proprietary IP based messaging, etc.), email, fax, and/or any suitable communications protocol. The system may alternatively be applied to any suitable problem with challenges in matching a work item to a worker that can work on the work item. For example, the system can additionally be applied to crowd sourced services such as vehicular ride-share platforms, service booking products, question/solution applications, and/or any suitable problem relating to the pairing of a pool of workers with worker requests.
As a multitenant infrastructure, the system can additionally include an account system within which an account record or records are stored to maintain individual account instance implementations. An account can include various operational settings and preferences. Also management of workers, work items, work distribution workflows, collections, and/or media can be scoped within an associated account. Herein, an account (or more specifically a developer account or managing account) defines the controlling account for at least one particular set of workflow for distributing work items to workers. The system preferably functions to allow a variety of different accounts address distinct work distribution problems in a flexible and customized manned.
The worker application programming interface (API) 160 of a preferred embodiment functions to enable a worker endpoint to interface with the system. Additionally, other suitable sources of worker related metadata may communicatively interface with the system through the worker API. For example, an external presence service may supply presence metadata about a set of workers. The worker API 160 is preferably a REST API but may alternatively be SOAP or any suitable type of API. Preferably worker status is maintained for each worker of each account instance that is instantiated and executing on the platform. The worker API 160 in one variation may be used over a realtime communication channel established between the system and a set of worker endpoints. The realtime communication channel can be a webRTC media channel, a websocket, or a channel using any suitable realtime communication protocol. The realtime communication channel may additionally integrate with a work distribution interface 190. A work distribution interface can be integrated within the worker API 160 or may alternatively be separate interface.
A worker endpoint 140 can include a worker application endpoint 141 and a media endpoint 142. A worker application endpoint is preferably a client application accessible by the system 100 over an internet protocol channel. The worker application endpoint 141 may be configured by an account holder to provide any suitable functionality. For example, user interfaces may be displayed allowing a worker to login, set status, display information relating to a current or past work item, append meta-data to the work item (to be saved internally or synchronized with the system), stream realtime worker attributes (e.g., geolocation information) or provide any suitable customized functionality. The worker application endpoint 141 can be a desktop application, a mobile application, an embedded application of a device (e.g., a wearable computer), or any suitable form of an application. In one variation, the worker application endpoint 141 may be provided by the system entity in part or whole. For example, a worker application SDK could be provided to facilitate easier integration with the system. Similarly, the functionality of the worker application endpoint 141 can be embedded within a separate application such as a client communication application used to make IP-based voice/video calls. As one example, the worker application endpoint 141 is used as a call center application—the application is used to connect and inform a worker about a current customer work request. In another example, the worker application endpoint 141 is a mobile application used by volunteer drivers within a car share program—the application is used to assign the driver to a customer requesting a ride.
The worker endpoint 140 can additionally include a media endpoint 142 such as a voice endpoint (e.g., a PSTN phone number or SIP address), video endpoint, screen-sharing endpoint, messaging endpoint (e.g., endpoint for SMS, MMS, or IP-based messaging), and/or any suitable type of media endpoint. In one variation, a client based media endpoint can be integrated directly into the worker application endpoint 141. The status of the media endpoint 142 may additionally be integrated with the worker API 160 such that status can be updated based on media endpoint activity. For example, when a worker ends a call and hangs up, the worker status can be set to available.
The worker state server 180 of the preferred embodiment functions to maintain and monitor worker status and properties. The worker state server 180 is preferably in communication with a worker endpoint (e.g., 140) through the worker API (e.g., 160). As described above, other information sources can interface with the system 100; the worker state server 180 can include additional interfaces to access the additional information sources. The worker state server 180 can store worker related information. Workers are preferably stored in association with a parent managing account that manages the account instance within the system 100. Multiple accounts each have independent pools or collections of workers. In one variation, a collection of workers can be made public or shared across accounts.
The work item API 150 of the preferred embodiment functions as an interface through which work items can be added to the system. A work item (e.g., the work item in of
In one implementation, a work item (e.g., the work item 111 of
The set of work collections 110 of the preferred embodiment function to store pending work items (e.g., the work item 111). A work collection can have some natural priority and operational logic that define default behavior such as executing a first in first out type dequeuing methodology. The collection can be a queue, a bin, a set, a list, or any suitable collection. The collection is more preferably ordered in response to prioritization specified by the work distribution processing engine 120. The collection may alternatively be an unordered collection of work items.
The work distribution processing engine 120 of the preferred embodiment functions to process queued/added work items in coordination with the worker resources. The work distribution processing engine 120 can be triggered in response to work item activity (e.g., a new work item), worker activity (e.g., change in worker status), or collection status (e.g., volume of work items), and/or any suitable event. In a preferred embodiment, the work distribution processing engine works on a selected work item. The work distribution processing engine preferably includes a component to process a workflow instruction document. A workflow instruction document (e.g., 121 of
2. Method for a Work Distribution Service
A method for a work distribution service of a preferred embodiment can include collecting worker status S100, adding work items to a collection S200, prioritizing work items in the collection through developer directives S300, and distributing a work item to a worker according to priority of the work item in the collection S400. The method functions to provide a set of programmable primitives and tools usable by a variety of applications to facilitate matching requests to entities that can fulfill the requests. The method is preferably applied in the case of matching user-based workers to work. One exemplary usage, would be for a customer service application pairing customers to company representatives. The method may alternatively be used in matching any two items. The workers are preferably characterized as being a limited resource such as people, businesses, machines, or any suitable entity capable of fulfilling a work item request. The method preferably utilizes a programmable worker interface (e.g., 160) through which information can be obtained from a worker and delivered to the worker; a programmable work item interface (e.g,. 150) through which work items are added to the system; and a distribution processing engine interface (e.g., 170 of
The method is preferably implemented within a multitenant platform as described above, but may alternatively use any suitable system. When applying the method for a specific account instance within the platform, a single entity can control supplying the work items and the workers to fulfill the work requests. However, the flexibility of the method can enable any number of parties to participate within a single account instance. For example, one account instance of the method can allow work items to be retrieved from a plurality of different sources and parties (authenticated on behalf of the account), and similarly the pool of workers may come from yet another source or sources. The method functions to connect sources of work requests and workers to fulfill the work.
Herein, the method is described as it could be used in communications-based work distribution application (e.g., call centers, customer support applications, etc.), but the method may alternatively be applied more generally to any suitable application of assigning a work request to a pool of workers.
Block Sioo, which includes collecting worker status, functions to monitor and manage workers' capability to fulfill a work item. Block Sioo preferably includes receiving worker status update through a worker API (e.g,. 160). The worker API is preferably a REST API but may alternatively be SOAP or any suitable type of API. Preferably worker status is performed for each account instance that is instantiated and executing on the platform and for each worker of those account instances. Collecting worker status can further include establishing a realtime communication channel with a client application of a worker. The realtime communication channel can be communicated through webRTC, a websocket, or any suitable realtime communication protocol. In one variation, the realtime communication channel is used for pushing work items requests to a worker application endpoint in addition to collecting worker status. Additionally, worker status can be collected through secondary channels. For example, presence information can be obtained from an outside source. Outside sources are preferably associated with a worker through some unique identifier.
Worker status can be collected based on API calls (via API 160) made to a worker resource (of the worker sate server 180). A worker resource is preferably a data object, record, or set of data properties stored within an endpoint state server (e.g., 180). A worker resource can include a unique identifier, account properties, worker information, status, a status callback reference, group information, attributes, and/or any suitable properties. A unique identifier can be an alphanumeric code or any suitable identifying label to identify the worker when making calls. The account properties can include a secure identifier of the account or subaccount managing the work distribution instance. Worker information can include worker based information such as name, gender, and other suitable properties. The status property preferably defines the state of the worker. Status preferably includes at least two classes of state: available and unavailable. Other status states can include offline, online, idle, busy, and/or any suitable form of status. The status callback reference can include a URI and/or a method that defines a resource that can be notified upon status change in the status. The group information can include classification, labels, tags, or other associations to which the worker belongs. The group information can be used to map an organizational map to the worker such as which business department(s) the worker works under. The attributes property is preferably a customizable set of attributes. The attributes in one implementation are defined as a JSON object but may alternatively be an XML object or any suitable data interchange format. The properties within the attributes field can be arbitrarily set. For example, a customer service application may include a language field which can be set with a set of languages the worker can speak and the proficiency at each language, seniority level which can be set with a value indicating how junior or senior the worker is, and a skills field including tags for any special skills the worker may have. A worker resource can be updated at any suitable time. As mentioned above, a realtime communication channel may be established and used in updating worker attributes and/or other properties. As one example, a driver based application may continuously or frequently update the geolocation information of a driver by updating a location attribute. Any API calls made in the method can further include authenticating parameters, which are used to verify authenticity of the API calls.
In one implementation, the method could include providing a worker endpoint application (e.g., 140 of
Block S200, which includes adding a work item (e.g., in of
In one preferred implementation, a work item represents an incoming or outgoing communication. If the work item is an asynchronous communication (e.g., an SMS, MMS, email, fax, IP message, and the like) then the contents of the communication may be included within a content attribute of the work item. If the work item is an incoming synchronous communication, the work item can include any metadata related to the communication such as an originating phone number or endpoint address, and the work item can include a reference to the media. Adding a work item to a collection may include holding, parking, or otherwise managing in-session, established media before being distributed to a worker. If the work item is made in association with a live customer call, then the customer call session can be set to be handled according to an application defined for that state of call waiting. In one variation, all work items are enqueued and processed before being assigned to a worker. In another variation, work items may be enqueued if there is no worker available—if a worker is available, the work request may be automatically distributed to an available worker. When adding the work item to a collection, the collection may be a default collection, but the collection may alternatively be a specified collection. Multiple collections may be maintained. The distribution processing stage can act on the different collections in any suitable manner.
In one variation, adding work items to a collection includes adding a work item through an application programming interface (e.g., the work item API 150 of
As mentioned above, the work distribution platform may be implemented in combination with a communication platform (e.g., 107) and/or any suitable type of secondary platform. The secondary application may include functionality or a mechanism to execute or trigger application instructions. In the communication platform (e.g,. 107), a set of telephony instructions can be used to instruct a communication router on how to interact and/or route the communication. The set of secondary platform instructions or triggers may include a work enqueue instruction. The enqueue instruction is used to trigger the queueing of a specified platform item. The enqueue instruction preferably results in a work item being generated and optionally a media item if required. For example, a telephone call may be handled within the communication platform (e.g., 107). At some point during the call an enqueue instruction may be encountered. The enqueue instruction can include properties such as a routing rule URI to fetch a workflow instruction document. The properties of the call can be packaged into a work item and added to a collection (e.g., by using the work item API 150). Additionally, the media of the call could be temporarily distributed to a wait-state application. The work item will include a reference to the communication session in the wait-state application. When distributed to a worker, the communication session is preferably transitioned to the worker.
Other suitable interfaces can be created to manage additional or alternative forms of interfacing with the collection of work items. For example, an email interface could be created wherein an account could direct inbound email messages through the email interface of the work distribution system, and the emails could be added as work items.
Block S300, which includes prioritizing work items in the collection through developer directives functions to apply work item ordering and selection. Block S300 is preferably invoked upon enqueueing or adding a work item. Alternatively, the enqueued work items can be polled periodically, upon worker status changes, or according to any suitable event. Prioritizing work items preferably includes processing queued work items according to the developer directives. The developer directives are preferably a set of workflow instructions defining workflow and logic in prioritizing, assigning, and/or distributing a work item to a worker. Developer directives are preferably included in a workflow instruction document—a workflow instruction document (e.g., 121 of
One type of heuristic is distribution prioritization, which may be based on origin of a work item (e.g., who is the work item for), the history of the work item (e.g., how long has the work item been queued, how many times has it been queued), worker properties, or any suitable type of prioritization. In an example of user-prioritization, work items can be prioritized based on the user profiles associated with the work items. The user profiles in this example can be customers of a developer account. As an example, there may exist three tiers of user profiles: free, basic plan, and premium plan. The work requests items can be prioritized in order from highest to lowest as premium, basic, and free through customizing a workflow instruction document as shown in
As another heuristics, prioritization can apply expanding targets, which functions to attempt to match each work item with the best worker while ensuring the service level targets are met consistently. As shown in
In one variation, the workflow instruction document is a local configuration. An account, prior to use of the method, can set a workflow instruction document or otherwise define the sorting directives. A pre-defined workflow instruction document can be used globally within an account instance. The pre-defined workflow instruction may alternatively be assigned to a particular collection, to work items with a particular property, or assigned in any suitable manner. In another variation, the workflow instruction document is preferably retrieved in an external application server (e.g., one controlled and operated in accordance with an account holder) through a remote procedural call (RPC) type request and response model. As shown in
In alternative embodiments, the method may be implemented without granular customization of prioritization. The work distribution processing engine can use internal prioritization heuristics such as those mentioned above. A set of prioritization hooks could be built into the work distribution processing engine such that an account instance could selectively invoke different heuristics.
Block S400, which includes distributing a work item to a worker according to priority of the work item in the collection functions to deliver a work item to a worker endpoint. In response to the prioritizing of work items, a pairing of a work item and a worker is preferably selected. The selection is preferably based upon the defined logic of selecting a targeted worker. When a pairing of a work item and worker is established, the work item is delivered to the worker endpoint. As mentioned above, a worker application endpoint (e.g., 141) can have an established realtime communication channel to the work distribution system 100. The work item (e.g., 111) and the associated properties are preferably pushed or otherwise transmitted to the worker application endpoint (e.g., 141). In some variations, the work item (e.g., 111) may be delivered to a media endpoint (e.g., 142) in addition to or instead of a worker application endpoint (e.g., 141). In one variation, the work item of an asynchronous communication can include the media content of the associated communication. The media content could be transmitted to the worker application endpoint 141, but the media content may alternatively be delivered over the original medium as the incoming communication or over any suitable protocol. For example, an inbound SMS message to a customer service center is queued as a work item containing a content property indicating the SMS content. When a worker is assigned to the work item, the SMS content can be detected and the work item is delivered as an SMS message. In another variation, a work item can include a reference to external media content. The external media content can be simultaneously transmitted to a media endpoint 142 of a worker. For example, an incoming phone call to a customer service center triggers a creation and queuing of a work item, the caller is directed to a wait-state application to handle the call session while waiting for assignment to a worker. When a worker is selected, the work item and related metadata may be delivered to a worker application endpoint 141, and the caller is redirected and connected with a media endpoint 142 of the worker. In the case of outbound communications associated with a work item, the intended destination is preferably characterized in the properties of the work item. When the work item is delivered to the worker application endpoint 141, a communication can be established with the destination endpoint. Alternatively, both the worker and the destination can be called and merged.
If work item is distributed to a worker, but the worker does not respond to the work item, the method may include redistributing the work item and updating the worker status. For example, if a call associated with a work item is directed to the worker, but the worker never picks up or responds to the call, the status of the worker can be updated to ‘not ready’. The worker may be required to update status again before being assigned to a work item. In another variation, a nonresponsive callback may be defined so that the response can be developer defined.
In some cases, a worker may be unable to complete or fully fulfill the work item. The worker endpoint could be configured to enable a work item to be returned or re-entered in the system to be redistributed. In one variation, the work item could be programmatically added as a new work item preferably with attributes to indicate how to better distribute the work to a more qualified worker. However, the work item may be re-entered (e.g., with the same work item), wherein the method automatically weights the prioritization of distributing the work item to a qualified worker. The workflow instructions can include mechanisms that can be applied to logging such as marking preference level for different work distribution options.
Additionally the method may include work distribution logging, which functions to collect and provide access to worker, work, and collection analytics. Logging can record individual worker statistics (e.g., number of work items, rate of work items, distribution of types of work items), success of routing (e.g., are work items distributed to preferred, secondary, or last-resort workers), collection statistics (e.g., utilization capacity, distribution of work item properties), and/or any suitable type of information.
3. System for a Multi-Tenant Work Distribution Platform
Multi-Tenant
The system 700 provides a multitenant platform meaning that the work distribution platform can be used for the processing of one or more applications of a plurality of external systems. Each external system (e.g., 770) has at least one work distribution account at the system 700. For example, a call center service provider, CRM service provider, and a vehicular ride-share platform can each have work distribution accounts at the system 700. As another example, multiple different call center service providers can each have work distribution accounts at the system 700. As yet another example, a vehicular ride-share service, a service booking platform, and a question/solution application can each have work distribution accounts at the system 700. In the example embodiment of
Modules
As shown in
In the example embodiment of
In the example embodiment of
External Systems
The system 700 is communicatively coupled to at least a first external system 770 via the worker API module 702, the work item API module 704, and a workflow API module 707 of the work distribution engine 706. In an implementation, the external system 770 is communicatively coupled to the system 700 via the distribution API module 710.
In the example embodiment, the external system 770 is at least one of a customer service system, a CRM system, a call center system, a service provider system, a vehicular ride-share system, a service booking system, a question/solution system, and any other type of external system that pairs a pool of workers with worker requests.
The external system 770 includes an application server 771 and worker endpoints 772 and 773. In the example embodiment, the worker endpoints 772 and 773 are similar to the worker endpoint 140 of
The worker endpoints 772 and 773 each correspond to a respective worker of the external system 770. In an implementation, each of the worker endpoints 772 and 773 include a worker application endpoint (e.g., 774, 775) and a media endpoint (e.g., 776, 777). In the example embodiment, the worker application endpoints 774 and 775 are similar to the worker application endpoint 141 of
In an implementation, each of the worker endpoints 772 and 773 is associated with at least one processing unit that stores and executes machine-readable instructions of a worker application (e.g., 1916 of
In the example embodiment, worker application endpoints include at least one of a Websocket Server Endpoint, a REST API endpoint of the distribution API 190, and an WebRTC datachannel. In the example embodiment, media endpoints include at least one of a PSTN endpoint, a SIP endpoint, and a WebRTC datachannel. In some embodiments, endpoints include e-mail addresses.
Multi-Tenant Account Module 701
The multi-tenant account module 701 functions to manage work distribution accounts of the system 700, provide authorization for account management access to access a work distribution account, bill for account use, and perform fraud detection. In the example embodiment, the account module 701 is constructed to manage account records for accounts and sub-accounts of each of the external systems of the work distribution platform (of the system 700). The account module 701 is constructed to provide authorization for account management access, billing for account use, and fraud detection. The account module 701 associates operational settings and preferences for each account record, including work distribution settings and preferences. The account module 701 associates at least one set of work distribution primitives with each account record. In the example embodiment, work distribution primitives include: 1) workers, 2) work items, 3) work distribution workflows, and 4) work collections.
An account holder (e.g., an external system having an account, or a user of the external system having a sub-account) configures and manages the work distribution primitives by using at least one of the worker API module 702, the Work Item API Module 704, and the Workflow API Module 707. In the example embodiment, an account holder configures work collections by using the workflow API Module 707. In some embodiments, an account holder configures work collections by using an API for the work collections.
In some embodiments, sets of work distribution primitives for an account are organized into primitive groups. In such embodiments, an account can have multiple primitive groups, with each primitive group having a set of workers, work items, work distribution workflows and work collections. In some embodiments, sets of work distribution primitives for an account are organized into workspaces. In such embodiments, an account can have multiple workspaces, with each workspace having a set of workers, work items, work distribution workflows and work collections.
In the example embodiment, API call requests received by the worker API module 702, the work item API module 704, and workflow API module 707 include authenticating parameters, which are used by the system 700 to verify authenticity of the API call requests. In an implementation, API call requests received by the worker API module 702, the work item API module 704, and workflow API module 707 each specify an account ID and a corresponding authentication token, and the respective module uses the account module 701 to authenticate the API call request.
In an implementation, the account module 701 uses the account ID of each API call request to bill the respective account for account use on a per API call basis.
In an implementation, the API call requests are HTTP requests.
Sub-Accounts
The account module 701 manages sub-accounts such that a hierarchy of accounts can be created. In an implementation, a work distribution account (e.g., a parent account) can create or contain multiple work distribution sub-accounts (e.g., children accounts). In an implementation, sub-accounts are created through an interface by the sub-account holder or alternatively through an API by the parent account holder. For example, an application developer may create a customer service application, and then allow end users to sign-up as customers within the developer's parent work distribution account. In an implementation, the work distribution sub-accounts operate within the scope of the parent account. In an implementation, the sub-accounts are customized by the parent account and/or customized by sub-account holder.
Fraud Detection
In the example embodiment, the account module 701 monitors, measures, and detects instances of illicit use that occur within or through the work distribution system 700. In some embodiments, a fraud scoring system monitors, measures, and detects instances of illicit use that occur within or through the work distribution system 700.
The account module 701 monitors API call requests received by the worker API module 702, the work item API module 704, and workflow API module 707 to detect fraudulent API call requests.
In an implementation, the account module 701 receives work distribution account (and sub-account) usage data (e.g., API calls), calculates a fraud score from the usage data block, detects when fraud scores of an account satisfy a fraud threshold, and takes action when a fraud score satisfies a fraud threshold block.
In an implementation, the account module 701 performs fraud detection in a manner similar to that described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,737,962, issued 27 May 2014, which is hereby incorporated in its entirety by this reference.
In an implementation, the account module 701 processes usage data to generate a metric that reflects the likelihood that illicit use of the system 700 is occurring. Fraud scores are preferably calculated for a set of fraud rules. The set of fraud rules are used to calculate a set of fraud scores (e.g., measure or indicators of fraud). Additionally, fraud thresholds can define when particular types of actions are taken. A fraud rule preferably includes a usage condition, a usage data time window, and an account age condition. The fraud rules may additionally be conditions within a single account or pattern conditions across multiple accounts. The usage conditions are particular patterns in usage data (e.g., account configuration or API call history). The usage conditions are preferably particular patterns such as some threshold on the number or percentage of events or resources that would trigger activating the fraud rule (e.g., assigning the defined fraud score for that rule). The usage condition can additionally specify conditions found across multiple accounts. For example, a usage condition may be for identical/corresponding billing information configured in more than three accounts. The usage data time window is the window that is used to define what data is analyzed. Some exemplary time windows could include the past 24 hours, the past week, the past month, the past year, or across all data (e.g., no time window). The account age condition may define for how long the rule is monitored for an account. Some illicit use scenarios may only be seen with new accounts. For example, the account age condition may configure a fraud rule to apply to an account for the first week after the account is created. If the conditions of the fraud rule are satisfied a defined score is preferably assigned. These fraud scores are preferably stored per account. If the fraud rule is defined for condition patterns across multiple accounts, the fraud score is preferably assigned to each account. The fraud score is preferably a numeric value but may alternatively be a label or any suitable construct to communicate fraud likelihood. In the example embodiment, high fraud scores indicate a greater likelihood of illicit use. In some embodiments, any suitable relationship may be defined between fraud scores and likelihood of illicit use. A fraud score is preferably associated with at least one key/identifier. The key may be an account, sub-account, an endpoint (e.g., a phone number), a credit card hash, or any suitable key. A plurality of fraud scores (e.g., one per fraud rule) is preferably calculated to monitor various entities and approaches to performing fraud in the system 700. For example, a series of fraud scores may be calculated to monitor accounts for one form of fraudulent API calls, while another series of fraud scores may be calculated to monitor credit card abuse across accounts. The fraud score is preferably indicative of activity during a specified time window, but may alternatively be an aggregate value (preferably factoring in older fraud scores to reflect multiple time windows). Calculation of fraud scores may additionally involve creating associations between subsets of the received usage data. Associations can be made based on user accounts, credit cards used to pay for accounts, endpoints or endpoint prefixes, source or destination carriers, and/or any suitable parameter that can be used to associate various data points in the usage data.
In the example embodiment, the account module 701 takes action reacting to fraud scores that indicate illicit behavior. The reaction to a fraud score may include flagging the account, throttling API call requests (or other platform usage requests) of an account, requesting additional billing information, notifying account holder, notifying an analyst of the work distribution platform, performing additional fraud detection analysis on the account, blocking particular actions on the account, or performing any suitable action. In a sub-account variation, the parent account of a sub-account is preferably notified of the sub-account illicit behavior. The notification can be an email notification, a message within a work distribution platform web platform, or notification made through the API of the work distribution platform. Account holders may have multiple sub-accounts using their service provided on top of the work distribution platform. By performing the fraud regulation by sub-accounts, the work distribution platform can avoid taking action against the parent account itself since many sub-accounts may be using the work distribution platform in a proper manner. This functions to simplify and abstract the fraud prevention aspect away from parent account holders such that the work distribution platform can handle illicit use detection.
In an implementation, the account module 701 includes a set of fraud rules (e.g., a rule set) stored using any suitable schema. The rule set preferably enables various heuristics to be configured and/or updated to keep current with the latest fraud attempts. Fraud score patterns may include thresholds for a particular fraud score or alternatively a group of fraud scores. Rule sets may be dependent on measured metrics in combination with a threshold, time period for the metrics, and account age. Alternatively, any suitable parameters may be specified to determine a rule set. Fraud score patterns may alternatively be trending patterns from a time series of related fraud scores. Fraud reactions preferably include suspending an account, blacklisting credit card numbers, blacklisting application URI's or IP's, rate-limiting services provided to an offending account, remove or adjust services provided to an offending account, flag the account for a human fraud analyst to investigate, and/or any suitable course of action. There may additionally be different level of responses based on the severity of the fraud score, and fraud reactions may be applied in stages if the fraud score does not subside.
Work Distribution Account Records
In the example embodiment, each work distribution account record includes the following fields: 1) Parent Account ID, 2) Account ID, 3) Authentication Token, 4) Account Holder Information, 5) Account Preferences, 6) Account Balance, 7) Primitive Groups, and 8) Fraud Scores. For parent accounts, the Parent Account ID is empty. For sub-accounts, the Parent Account ID indicates the parent account. The Account ID and the Authentication Token are compared with an Account ID and an Authentication Token of a received API call request to authenticate the request. Account Holder Information includes information such as, for example, account holder name, account holder contact information, account holder billing information, and the like. Account preferences include any operational settings and preferences, and work distribution settings and preferences of the account holder. Account Balance indicates billing charges for the account holder's use of the work distribution system 700, including charges for each billable API call request. Primitive Groups indicate the primitive groups configured for the account holder. In implementations in which the work distribution system uses workspaces instead of primitive groups, the account record indicates workspaces configured for each account holder. Fraud Scores indicates fraud scores calculated by the account module 701 for the account holder.
Worker API Module 702
The worker API Module 702 functions to provide a Worker API that is used by an external system (e.g., 770) to manage workers of a specified account.
Configuration and state of each worker is managed by the worker state module 703 in association with a corresponding account or sub-account. In the example embodiment, the external system uses the Worker API to configure worker attributes for each worker. In the example embodiment, a worker application associated with a worker application endpoint (e.g., 141 of
The Worker API Module 702 is constructed to process requests received from an external system (e.g., 770) to add a worker to the work distribution system 700, and requests received from an external system to remove a worker from the work distribution system 700, read a worker resource (stored in the worker state module 703) of a worker, and update a worker (e.g., update worker status, update worker attributes).
In the example embodiment, API call requests received by the worker API module 702 include authenticating parameters, which are used by the system 700 to verify authenticity of the API call requests. In an implementation, API call requests received by the worker API module 702 specify an account ID and a corresponding authentication token, and the worker API module 702 uses the account module 701 to authenticate the API call request.
Table 1 shows the API call requests (and the corresponding parameters) that are processed by the worker API module 702, in accordance with an implementation.
As shown in Table 1, in an implementation, the Add Worker API call request includes the optional parameter <Primitive Group Identifier> to specify a Primitive Group Identifier for the added worker. In an implementation, the work distribution system 700 automatically assigns a Primitive Group Identifier for the added worker based on Account Preferences of the work distribution account specified by the <Account Identifier> parameter.
Worker State Module 703
The worker state module 703 functions to receive worker state for an associated account (or sub-account) via the worker API Module 702, and manage received worker state of each worker in association with the corresponding account (or sub-account). The worker state module 703 functions to provide worker state during assignment of workers to work items.
The worker state module 703 collects worker state and stores collected worker state for a worker in a respective worker resource, as described for block Sioo.
In an implementation, each worker resource includes the following information: 1) Worker Identifier, 2) Account Identifier, 3) Primitive Group Identifier, 4) Worker Name, 5) Worker Attributes, 6) Worker Status, 7) Worker Idle Time.
Work Item API Module 704
The work item API Module 704 functions to provide a Work Item API that is used by an external system (e.g., 770 of
In the example embodiment, the work item API module 704 (in conjunction with the work collections module 705) adds work items to a collection, as described for block S200 of
The work item API Module 704 is constructed to process requests received from an external system to add work items to the work distribution system 700, and requests received from an external system to remove, read, and modify work items included in the work distribution system 700.
In the example embodiment, an external system adds a work item by sending a Work Item API ADD request to the work distribution system 700. The ADD request specifies an account (or sub-account), work item attributes, and workflow information. In an implementation, the work collections module 705 stores work item resources for each added work item. In an implementation, a work item resource is at least one of a data object, record, or set of data properties stored within the work collections module 705. In an implementation, each work item resource includes the following information: 1) Work Item Identifier, 2) Account Identifier, 3) Primitive Group Identifier, 4) Workflow Information, 5) Work Item Attributes, 6) Work Item Age, 7) Work Item Priority, 8) Work Collection Identifier, and 9) Assignment Status.
In an implementation, the Work Item Identifier is a unique identifier assigned to the work item by the work distribution system 700. The Account Identifier and the Primitive Group Identifier identify the work distribution account and the primitive group, respectively, associated with the work item. The Workflow Information indicates the workflow information provided for the work item in the Work Item API ADD request that adds the work item to the system 700. The Work Item Attributes indicates the work item attributes provided for the work item in the Work Item API ADD request that adds the work item to the system 700. The Work Collection Identifier identifies the work collection to which the work distribution system 700 has added the work item. The Work Item Age indicates an amount of time the work item has resided in the work collection identified by the Work Collection Identifier. The Work Item Priority indicates the priority value assigned to the work item. In an implementation, if no priority has been assigned to the work item, the Work Item Priority is empty. The Assignment Status indicates the status of assignment of the work item to a worker of the system 700. In an implementation, the Assignment Status indicates one of the following states: 1) the work item is waiting to be assigned to a worker, 2) a worker of the system 700 has been assigned to the work item, but the worker has not yet confirmed receipt of the work item, and 3) a worker has been assigned to the work item and the worker has confirmed receipt of the work item, and 4) the work item has been cancelled before being assigned a worker. In an implementation, in a case where a worker has been assigned to the work item, the Assignment Status indicates the assigned worker.
In the example embodiment, work item attributes are used to prioritize the work item and allocate a worker to the work item. In the example embodiment, work item attributes are also used at worker endpoints (e.g,. 140 of
In an implementation, the work distribution system 700 uses the workflow information to access a workflow instruction document of the external system (e.g,. 770) that added the work-item. The work distribution platform 700 uses the workflow instruction document to assign a priority to the work item and to assign a worker to the work item. In an implementation, the workflow information is a URI that identifies a resource at the external system (e.g., 770) that provides the workflow instruction document for the added work item.
In an implementation, the work collections module 705 stores work collection resources for each added work collection. In an implementation, a work collection resource is at least one of a data object, record, or set of data properties stored within the work collections module 705. In an implementation, each work collection resource includes the following information: 1) Work Collection Identifier, 2) Account Identifier, 3) Primitive Group Identifier, and 4) Work Collection Name.
In an implementation, the Work Collection Identifier is a unique identifier assigned to the work collection by the work distribution system 700.
In the example embodiment, API call requests received by the work item API module 704 include authenticating parameters, which are used by the system 700 to verify authenticity of the API call requests. In an implementation, API call requests received by the work item API module 704 specify an account ID and a corresponding authentication token, and the work item API module 704 uses the account module 701 to authenticate the API call request.
Table 2 shows the API call requests (and the corresponding parameters) that are processed by the work item API module 704, in accordance with an implementation.
In an implementation, the work distribution system 700 responds to a Work Item API ADD request by providing the requestor (e.g., the external system 770) with a Work Item Identifier in the case of a successful ADD operation, or an error message in a case of an unsuccessful ADD operation.
In an implementation, the Add Work Item API call request includes the optional parameters <Work Collection Identifier> and <Primitive Group Identifier> to specify one or both of a Work Collection Identifier and a Primitive Group Identifier for the added work item. In an implementation, the work distribution system 700 automatically assigns a Work Collection Identifier and a Primitive Group Identifier for the added work item based on Account Preferences of the work distribution account specified by the <Account Identifier> parameter.
In an implementation, the Add Work Collection API call request includes the optional parameter <Primitive Group Identifier> to specify a Primitive Group Identifier for the added work collection.
In an implementation, the work distribution system 700 automatically assigns a Primitive Group Identifier for the added work collection based on Account Preferences of the work distribution account specified by the <Account Identifier>parameter.
Work Collections Module 705
In the example embodiment, the work collections Module 705 functions to manage sets of work collections of all accounts and sub-accounts of the work distribution system 700. In an implementation, a set of work collections is a primitive group. In an implementation, a set of work collections is a workspace.
In the example embodiment, a pending work item (e.g., a work item that is added to the system 700 but not assigned to a worker) of an account (or sub-account) resides in a work collection of the account (or sub-account), and the work collection module 705 manages the work collections of the system 700. In the example embodiment, each account and sub-account of the work distribution system 700 has a set of one or more work collections, and the work collections module 705 manages the sets of work collections of all accounts and sub-accounts of the work distribution platform 700.
In the example embodiment, work collections 1551 to 1559 are similar to the work collections 110 of
The work collections 1551 to 1559 include work items 1561 to 1575 as shown in
In an implementation, the work collection sets 1541 and 1542 are associated with an account (e.g., the account 1401 of
In the example embodiment, an account holder manages work collections by using the workflow API Module 707. In some embodiments, an account holder manages work collections by using an API for the work collections. In some embodiments, the work distribution system 700 manages work collections according to workflow instructions.
In the example embodiment, each work collection can be configured to specify operational logic. In some embodiments, each work collection is constructed to include an attribute that specifies an expression that defines worker selection criteria for work items residing in the work collection, and a corresponding external system configures the worker selection criteria by using at least one REST API.
In an implementation, the work collection is a queue. In some implementations, the work collection is at least one of a queue, a bin, a set and a list.
In an implementation, a work item residing in a work collection is ordered in accordance with a priority assigned to the work item by the work distribution system 700 based on a workflow instruction corresponding to the workflow information of the work item.
In some implementations, at least one work collection of the system 700 is an unordered collection of work items.
Work Distribution Processing Engine 706
In the example embodiment, the work distribution processing Engine 706 functions to assign priorities to work items of the system 700 and assign workers to work items of the system 700.
In the example embodiment, the work distribution processing Engine 706 includes a workflow API module 707, a work distribution module 708, and a workflow instruction module 709. In some implementations, the work distribution processing engine 706 includes the distribution API module 710. In some implementations, the work distribution system does not include a distribution API module.
Workflow API Module 707
In an implementation, the workflow API module 707 functions to provide a workflow instruction document request to the system 770, the request identifying a URI (Uniform Resource Identifier) that identifies a resource of the external system 770 that provides the workflow instruction document for the work item. In an implementation, the system 770 responds to the workflow instruction document request by providing the workflow API module 707 with a work instruction document response in accordance with the workflow API. In an implementation, a workflow instruction document response in accordance with the workflow API includes the Workflow Instruction Document. In an implementation, the workflow instruction document response in accordance with the workflow API includes the Workflow Instruction Document and an Assignment Callback, and responsive to assignment of a worker to the work item, the work distribution system 700 provides assignment information to the external system 770 via the Assignment Callback.
In the example embodiment, API call requests received by the workflow API module 707 include authenticating parameters, which are used by the system 700 to verify authenticity of the API call requests. In an implementation, API call requests received by the workflow API module 707 specify an account ID and a corresponding authentication token, and the workflow API module 707 uses the account module 701 to authenticate the API call request.
In an implementation, the workflow API module 707 functions to provide a Workflow API that is used by an external system to manage workflow instructions of a specified account. The workflow API module 707 is constructed to process requests received from an external system to add a workflow instruction to the work distribution system 700, and requests received from an external system to remove a workflow instruction from the work distribution system 700, read a workflow instruction, and update a workflow instruction.
Table 3 shows the API call requests (and the corresponding parameters) that are processed by the workflow API module 707, in accordance with an implementation.
As shown in Table 3, in an implementation, the Add Workflow Instruction API call request includes the optional parameter <Primitive Group Identifier> to specify a Primitive Group Identifier for the added workflow instruction. In an implementation, the work distribution system 700 automatically assigns a Primitive Group Identifier for the added workflow instructions based on Account Preferences of the work distribution account specified by the <Account Identifier> parameter.
Work Distribution Module 708
In the example embodiment, the work distribution module 708 functions to assign priorities to work items of the system 700 and assign workers to work items of the system 700.
Workflow Instruction Module 709
In the example embodiment, the workflow instruction module 709 functions to manage workflow instructions of the work distribution system 700.
API Call Request Queuing
In the example embodiment, the worker API module 702, the work item API module 704, and the workflow API module 707 each place received API call requests in a respective API call request queue.
In an implementation, API call requests are serviced at a rate suitable for the current capacity of the work distribution system 700. The servicing rate may alternatively be adjusted according to the number of requests in the respective API call request queue. In an implementation, an API call request is placed in a respective API call request queue when capacity is exceeded or alternatively placed in the queue for every request or based on any suitable rule.
In an implementation API call requests of different work distribution accounts (and sub-accounts) are ordered in the respective queue in a staggered or alternating fashion. In some implementations, account holders have priority based on at least one of a service plan, a first-come-first-serve policy, a type of call request, and any suitable type of policy.
In some implementations, the worker API module 702, the work item API module 704, and the workflow API module 707 each have an API call request queue dedicated to requests of a single account holder, API call requests are organized into an API call request queue for each account holder, and dequeueing occurs in an alternating fashion between the plurality of API call request queues.
Communication Platform 711
In the example embodiment, the communication platform 711 functions to provide telephony communication to the work distribution system 700 via a REST API, and generates outgoing telephony communication initiated via the REST API. In the example embodiment, the communication platform 711 is external to the work distribution system 700. In some embodiments, the communication platform is internal to the work distribution system 700.
In the example embodiment, the communication platform 711 is used in the execution of communications based applications. For example, the communication platform can facilitate execution of automated call logic such as in U.S. Pat. No. 8,306,021 issued on 6 Nov. 2012, which is hereby incorporated in its entirety by this reference. In the example embodiment, the communication platform 711 is a telephony communication platform. In some embodiments, the communication platform is any suitable type of communication platform.
In some implementations, the system 700 receives work items from the communication platform 711 via the work item API module 704.
4. Method for a Multi-Tenant Work Distribution Platform
As shown in
In the example embodiment of
Block 810, which includes assigning a priority to a first work item of a first external system, functions to assign the priority to the work item (e.g., the work item 1561 of
As shown in
Block S811, which includes accessing a workflow instruction document specified by the workflow information of the work item, functions to control the work distribution module 708 to access the workflow instruction document by using the workflow instruction module 709. In the example embodiment, the workflow instruction document (e.g., 1000 of
In the example embodiment, the external system (e.g., 770 of
The prioritization function of
In an implementation, the workflow instruction module 709 receives the workflow instruction document from the external system 770 via the workflow instruction API module 707. In an implementation, the workflow instruction module 709 stores the workflow instruction document received from the external system. In an implementation, the workflow instruction module 709 uses the workflow information (e.g., 1103 of
In an implementation, if a workflow instruction document corresponding to the workflow information is stored by the workflow instruction module 709 prior to block S811, then the workflow instruction module 709 accesses the stored workflow instruction document at block S811 instead of receiving the workflow instruction document from the external system 770. In an implementation, if a workflow instruction document corresponding to the workflow information is stored by the workflow instruction module 709 prior to block S811 and a configuration parameter configures the workflow instruction module 709 to access stored workflow instruction documents when available, then the workflow instruction module 709 accesses the stored workflow instruction document at block S811 instead of receiving the workflow instruction document from the external system 770; otherwise if the configuration parameter configures the workflow instruction module to retrieve the workflow instruction document from the external server regardless of whether the document is stored by the workflow instruction module 709, then the workflow instruction module 709 receives the workflow instruction document from the external system 770.
Block S812, which includes applying the prioritization function (e.g., the prioritization function 1010 of
Reverting to
In an implementation, the external system 770 generates the work item based on a telephony communication received by the external system 77o.
In an implementation, the work item attributes of the work item are specified by the external system 770 via the work item API module 704, and the worker attributes are specified by the external system 770 via the worker API module 702.
As shown in
Block S821, which includes selecting the work item from a work collection in which the work item resides, functions to control the work distribution module 708 to select the work item (e.g., 1561 of
In some implementations, the work items residing in the work collection are unordered, and responsive to a request for selection of a work item by the work distribution module 708, the work collections module 705 provides the work distribution module 708 with a work item based on at least one of a FIFO (First In First Out) selection technique, a LIFO (Last In First Out) selection technique, attributes of the work items, and any other suitable work item selection technique.
In an implementation, the work collection is a queue. In some implementations, the work collection is at least one of a queue, a bin, a set and a list.
Block S822, which includes accessing the workflow instruction document, functions to functions to control the work distribution module 708 to access the workflow instruction document (e.g., 1000 of
During processing of the work item 1101 by using the workflow instruction document 1000, the workflow distribution module 708 determines that the work item 1101 and a worker having a “English” attribute with a value greater than 10, “retentionSkill” attribute with a value greater than 15, and a “location” attribute having a “California” value match the assignment expression 1040
Block S823, which includes determining a first available worker, functions to control the work distribution module 708 to determine a first available worker (e.g., a worker associated with one of worker endpoints 772 and 773 of
The work distribution module 708 accesses worker state for all workers associated with the work distribution account corresponding to the first work item. In some implementations, the work distribution module 708 accesses worker state for all workers associated with both the work distribution account and a workspace corresponding to the first work item. In some implementations, the work distribution module 708 accesses worker state for all workers associated with both the work distribution account and a primitive group corresponding to the first work item.
By accessing worker state for a work item based on a matching work distribution account, account holders can configure the pool of workers available to process the work items of the account holder. In other words, not only can an account holder mange generation of work items and workflow of work item assignment to workers, the account holder can also manage the pool of workers available for processing of the work items. In this manner, the work distribution system 700 provides a multi-tenant platform in which each account holder of the work distribution platform can manage their own pool of workers. In some implementations, workers can be used across accounts, with workers managed by a first account holder being available to process work items of a different account holder.
By accessing worker state for a work item based on a matching work distribution account and workspace or primitive group, account holders can configure the pools of workers for each workflow. For example, an account holder can have a primitive group (or workspace) for a sales workflow and a primitive group (or workspace) for a support workflow, and the account holder can configure different pools of workers for each of the support workflow and the sales workflow.
As another example, an account holder can have a primitive group (or workspace) for each sub-account, and the account holder can configure different pools of workers for each sub-account. For example, in a case of an account holder that provides work distribution sub-accounts for each customer of the account holder, the account holder can configure different pools of workers for each of the account holder's customers.
The distribution module 708 accesses the worker state by using the worker state module 703.
Block S824, which includes applying a distribution function to the work item (e.g., 1561 of
In an implementation, the distribution function (e.g., 1030
In an implementation, the worker state for each worker indicates an idle time for the worker, and the work distribution module 708 applies the distribution function to available workers based on idle time of each of the workers, such that a worker with a longer idle time is identified as an assignment candidate before other workers with shorter idle times.
Block S825, which includes assigning the first available worker to the work item, functions to control the work distribution module 708 to assign the first available worker to the work item responsive to a determination by the work distribution module 708 that the first available worker matches the work item.
In an implementation, the assignment expression includes a plurality of assignment sub-expressions, and in a case where the work item does not match any available worker based on a first assignment sub-expression, the work distribution module 708 determines whether any available workers match the work item based on a different sub-expression of the assignment expression. In an implementation, a plurality of sub-expressions are ordered, and the work distribution module 708 evaluates sub-expressions of the assignment expression according to the order of the sub-expressions in the assignment expression.
In an implementation, the work distribution module 708 records an assignment of the first available work item to the first work item.
In an implementation, the work distribution module 708 provides assignment information to the external system (e.g., 770 of
In an implementation, the assignment information specifies at least the worker attributes of the worker and the work item attributes of the work item.
The external system processes the work item responsive to receipt of the assignment information from the work distribution system 700.
In an implementation, external system 770 processes the work item by providing at least one work processing instruction to the work distribution system 770, and responsive to completion of processing of the work item by the worker, the work distribution system updates the worker state of the worker to include an available status such that the worker can be assigned to a new work item by the work distribution system 770.
In an implementation, the work processing instruction includes an instruction to provide information of the work item to a worker endpoint (e.g., one of 772 and 773 of
In some implementations, the external system 770 processes the work item by providing information of the work item to a worker endpoint (e.g., one of 772 and 773 of
In an implementation, the first work item is delivered to a worker endpoint of the worker assigned to the first work item, in a manner similar to that described above for block S400 of
In some implementations, the Work Distribution Processing Engine 706 performs the heuristics described herein for block S300 of
5. Method for a Multi-Tenant Work Distribution Platform
As shown in
In the example embodiment of
Block 1610, which includes assigning a priority to a work item of an external system, functions to assign the priority to the work item (e.g., the work item 1561 of
As shown in
As shown in
6. System Architecture: Work Distribution System
The bus 1701 interfaces with the processors 1701A-1701N, the main memory (e.g., a random access memory (RAM)) 1722, a read only memory (ROM) 1704, a processor-readable storage medium 1705, a display device 1707, a user input device 1708, and a network device 1711.
The processors 1701A-1701N may take many forms, such as ARM processors, X86 processors, and the like.
In some implementations, the system 700 includes at least one of a central processing unit (processor) and a multi-processor unit (MPU).
As described above, the processors 1701A-1701N and the main memory 1722 form a processing unit 1799. In some embodiments, the processing unit includes one or more processors communicatively coupled to one or more of a RAM, ROM, and machine-readable storage medium; the one or more processors of the processing unit receive instructions stored by the one or more of a RAM, ROM, and machine-readable storage medium via a bus; and the one or more processors execute the received instructions. In some embodiments, the processing unit is an ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuit). In some embodiments, the processing unit is a SoC (System-on-Chip). In some embodiments, the processing unit includes one or more of the account module 701, the worker API module 702, the worker state module 703, the work item API module 704, the work collections module 705, the work distribution engine 706, and the distribution API module 710.
The network adapter device 1711 provides one or more wired or wireless interfaces for exchanging data and commands between the system 1700 and other devices, such as devices of the external system 770 of
Machine-executable instructions in software programs (such as an operating system, application programs, and device drivers) are loaded into the memory 1722 (of the processing unit 1799) from the processor-readable storage medium 1705, the ROM 1704 or any other storage location. During execution of these software programs, the respective machine-executable instructions are accessed by at least one of processors 1701A-1701N (of the processing unit 1799) via the bus 1701, and then executed by at least one of processors 1701A-1701N. Data used by the software programs are also stored in the memory 1722, and such data is accessed by at least one of processors 1701A-1701N during execution of the machine-executable instructions of the software programs.
The processor-readable storage medium 1705 is one of (or a combination of two or more of) a hard drive, a flash drive, a DVD, a CD, an optical disk, a floppy disk, a flash storage, a solid state drive, a ROM, an EEPROM, an electronic circuit, a semiconductor memory device, and the like. The processor-readable storage medium 1705 includes an operating system 1712, software programs 1713, device drivers 1714, the account module 701, the worker API module 702, the worker state module 703, the work item API module 704, the work collections module 705, the work distribution engine 706, and the distribution API module 710.
7. System Architecture: Application Server of External System
The processor-readable storage medium 1805 includes an operating system 1812, software programs 1813, device drivers 1814, and application modules 1815. In an implementation, the application modules 1815 are constructed to manage work items by using the work item API of the work item API module 704 and manage workflow instructions by using the workflow API of the workflow API module 707, as described herein.
7. System Architecture: Worker Endpoint Device
In an implementation, the processors 1901A-1901N, main memory 1922, read only memory (ROM) 1904, processor-readable storage medium 1905, display device 1907, user input device 1908, network device 1911, and processing unit 1999 are similar to the processors 1701A-1801N, main memory 1722, read only memory (ROM) 1704, processor-readable storage medium 1705, display device 1707, user input device 1708, network device 1711, and processing unit 1799 of
The processor-readable storage medium 1905 includes an operating system 1912, software programs 1913, device drivers 1914, and a worker endpoint application module 1915. The worker endpoint application module 1915 includes a worker application endpoint module 1916 and a media endpoint module 1917.
The worker endpoint application module 1915 corresponds to the worker endpoint 772, the worker application endpoint module 1916 corresponds to the worker application endpoint 774, and the media endpoint module 1916 corresponds to the media endpoint 776 of
In an implementation, the worker endpoint application module 1915 is constructed to manage a worker associated with the worker endpoint 772 of
The systems and methods described herein with respect to a “first work item” and a “first external system” function in a similar manner with respect to other work items and external systems.
The system and method of the preferred embodiment and variations thereof can be embodied and/or implemented at least in part as a machine configured to receive a computer-readable medium storing computer-readable instructions. The instructions are preferably executed by computer-executable components preferably integrated with the work distribution system. The computer-readable medium can be stored on any suitable computer-readable media such as RAMs, ROMs, flash memory, EEPROMs, optical devices (CD or DVD), hard drives, floppy drives, or any suitable device. The computer-executable component is preferably a general or application specific processor, but any suitable dedicated hardware or hardware/firmware combination device can alternatively or additionally execute the instructions.
As a person skilled in the art will recognize from the previous detailed description and from the figures and claims, modifications and changes can be made to the preferred embodiments of the invention without departing from the scope of this invention defined in the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 17/117,624, filed 10 Dec. 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/383,303, filed 12 Apr. 2019, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/979,073, filed 14 May 2018, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/450,883, filed 6 Mar. 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/099,931, filed 15 Apr. 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/659,332, filed 16 Mar. 2015, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/953,562, filed on 14 Mar. 2014, all of which are incorporated in their entirety by this reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5274700 | Gechter et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5335269 | Steinlicht | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5526416 | Dezonno et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5581608 | Jreij et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5598457 | Foladare et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5867495 | Elliott et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5934181 | Adamczewski | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5978465 | Corduroy et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6026440 | Shrader et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6034946 | Roginsky et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6094681 | Shaffer et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6138143 | Gigliotti et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6185565 | Meubus et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6192123 | Grunsted et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6206564 | Adamczewski | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6223287 | Douglas et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6232979 | Shochet | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6269336 | Ladd et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6314177 | Davis | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6317137 | Rosasco | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6363065 | Thornton et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6373836 | Deryugin et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6425012 | Trovato et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6426995 | Kim et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6430175 | Echols et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6434528 | Sanders | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6445694 | Swartz | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6445776 | Shank et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6459913 | Cloutier | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6463414 | Su et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6493558 | Bernhart et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6496500 | Nance et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6501739 | Cohen | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6501832 | Saylor et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6507875 | Mellen-Garnett et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6571245 | Huang et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6574216 | Farris et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6577721 | Vainio et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6600736 | Ball et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6606596 | Zirngibl et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6614783 | Sonesh et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6625258 | Ram et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6625576 | Kochanski et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6636504 | Albers et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6662231 | Drosset et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6704785 | Koo et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6707889 | Saylor et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6711129 | Bauer et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6711249 | Weissman et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6738738 | Henton | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6757365 | Bogard | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6765997 | Zirngibl et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6768788 | Langseth et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6771955 | Imura et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6778653 | Kallas et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6785266 | Swartz | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6788768 | Saylor et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6792086 | Saylor et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6792093 | Barak et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6798867 | Zirngibl et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6807529 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6807574 | Partovi et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6819667 | Brusilovsky et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6820260 | Flockhart et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6829334 | Zirngibl et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6831966 | Tegan et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6834265 | Balasuriya | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6836537 | Zirngibl et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6842767 | Partovi et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6850603 | Eberle et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6870830 | Schuster et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6873952 | Bailey et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6874084 | Dobner et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6885737 | Gao et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6888929 | Saylor et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6895084 | Saylor et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6898567 | Balasuriya | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6912581 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6922411 | Taylor | Jul 2005 | B1 |
| 6928469 | Duursma et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6931405 | El-shimi et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6937699 | Schuster et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6940953 | Eberle et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6941268 | Porter et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6947417 | Laursen et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6947988 | Saleh et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6961330 | Cattan et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6964012 | Zirngibl et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6970915 | Partovi et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6977992 | Zirngibl et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6981041 | Araujo et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6985862 | Strom et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6999576 | Sacra | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7003464 | Ferrans et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7006606 | Cohen et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7010586 | Allavarpu et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7020685 | Chen et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7039165 | Saylor et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7058042 | Bontempi et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7062709 | Cheung | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7065637 | Nanja | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7076037 | Gonen et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7076428 | Anastasakos et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7089310 | Ellerman et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7103003 | Brueckheimer et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7103171 | Annadata et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7106844 | Holland | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7111163 | Haney | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7136932 | Schneider | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7140004 | Kunins et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7143039 | Stifelman et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7197331 | Anastasakos et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7197461 | Eberle et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
| 7197462 | Takagi et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7197544 | Wang et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7225232 | Elberse | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7227849 | Rasanen | Jun 2007 | B1 |
| 7245611 | Narasimhan et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7260208 | Cavalcanti | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7266181 | Zirngibl et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
| 7269557 | Bailey et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
| 7272212 | Eberle et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7272564 | Phillips et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7277851 | Henton | Oct 2007 | B1 |
| 7283515 | Fowler | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7286521 | Jackson et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
| 7287248 | Adeeb | Oct 2007 | B1 |
| 7289453 | Riedel et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7296739 | Mo et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
| 7298732 | Cho | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7298834 | Homeier et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
| 7308085 | Weissman | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7308408 | Stifelman et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
| 7324633 | Gao et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7324942 | Mahowald et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
| 7328263 | Sadjadi | Feb 2008 | B1 |
| 7330463 | Bradd et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
| 7330890 | Partovi et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
| 7340040 | Saylor et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7349714 | Lee et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7369865 | Gabriel et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7370329 | Kumar et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7373660 | Guichard et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
| 7376223 | Taylor et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7376586 | Partovi et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
| 7376733 | Connelly et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7376740 | Porter et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
| 7412525 | Cafarella et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7418090 | Reding et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7428302 | Zirngibl et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7440898 | Eberle et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
| 7447299 | Partovi et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
| 7454459 | Kapoor et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
| 7457249 | Baldwin et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7457397 | Saylor et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
| 7473872 | Takimoto | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7486780 | Zirngibl et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7496054 | Taylor | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7496188 | Saha et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7496651 | Joshi | Feb 2009 | B1 |
| 7500249 | Kampe et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7505951 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7519359 | Chiarulli et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7522711 | Stein et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
| 7536454 | Balasuriya | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7552054 | Stifelman et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
| 7571226 | Partovi et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
| 7606868 | Le et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
| 7613287 | Stifelman et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
| 7623648 | Oppenheim et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
| 7630900 | Strom | Dec 2009 | B1 |
| 7631310 | Henzinger | Dec 2009 | B1 |
| 7644000 | Strom | Jan 2010 | B1 |
| 7657433 | Chang | Feb 2010 | B1 |
| 7657434 | Thompson et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7668157 | Weintraub et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7672275 | Yajnik et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7672295 | Andhare et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
| 7675857 | Chesson | Mar 2010 | B1 |
| 7676221 | Roundtree et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7685280 | Berry et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7685298 | Day et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7715547 | Ibbotson et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7716293 | Kasuga et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7742499 | Erskine et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
| 7779065 | Gupta et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7809125 | Brunson et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7875836 | Imura et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7882253 | Pardo-Castellote et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7920866 | Bosch et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7926099 | Chakravarty et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
| 7929562 | Petrovykh | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7936867 | Hill et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
| 7949111 | Harlow et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7962644 | Ezerzer et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
| 7979555 | Rothstein et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7992120 | Wang et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
| 8023425 | Raleigh | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8024785 | Andress et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8045689 | Provenzale et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8046378 | Zhuge et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
| 8046823 | Begen et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
| 8069096 | Ballaro et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
| 8078483 | Hirose et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
| 8081744 | Sylvain | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8081958 | Soderstrom et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8103725 | Gupta et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8126128 | Hicks, III et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
| 8126129 | Mcguire | Feb 2012 | B1 |
| 8130750 | Hester | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8139730 | Da Palma et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8145212 | Lopresti et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8149716 | Ramanathan et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8150918 | Edelman et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
| 8156213 | Deng et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
| 8165116 | Ku et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8166185 | Samuel et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8169936 | Koren et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8175007 | Jain et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8185619 | Maiocco et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
| 8196133 | Kakumani et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8204479 | Vendrow et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8214868 | Hamilton et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8233611 | Zettner | Jul 2012 | B1 |
| 8238533 | Blackwell et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8243889 | Taylor et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8249552 | Gailloux et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
| 8266327 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8295272 | Boni et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8306021 | Lawson et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8315198 | Corneille et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8315620 | Williamson et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
| 8319816 | Swanson et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
| 8326805 | Arous et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
| 8346630 | Mckeown | Jan 2013 | B1 |
| 8355394 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8413247 | Hudis et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8417817 | Jacobs | Apr 2013 | B1 |
| 8429827 | Wetzel | Apr 2013 | B1 |
| 8438315 | Tao et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
| 8462670 | Chien | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8467502 | Sureka et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8477926 | Jasper et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8503639 | Reding et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8503650 | Reding et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8509068 | Begall et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8532686 | Schmidt et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8542805 | Agranovsky et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8543665 | Ansari et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8547962 | Ramachandran et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8565117 | Hilt et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8572391 | Golan et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8576712 | Sabat et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8577803 | Chatterjee et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8582450 | Robesky | Nov 2013 | B1 |
| 8594626 | Woodson et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
| 8601136 | Fahlgren et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
| 8611338 | Lawson et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8613102 | Nath | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8621598 | Lai et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8649268 | Lawson et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8656452 | Li et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8667056 | Proulx et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
| 8675493 | Buddhikot et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8688147 | Nguyen et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8695077 | Gerhard et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
| 8728656 | Takahashi et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8751801 | Harris et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8755376 | Lawson et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8767925 | Sureka et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8781975 | Bennett et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8806024 | Toba Francis et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
| 8819133 | Wang | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8825746 | Ravichandran et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8837465 | Lawson et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8838707 | Lawson et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8843596 | Goel et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8855271 | Brock et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8861510 | Fritz | Oct 2014 | B1 |
| 8879547 | Maes | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8938053 | Cooke et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8948356 | Nowack et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8964726 | Lawson et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8990610 | Bostick et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9014664 | Kim et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9015702 | Bhat | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9031223 | Smith et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9137127 | Nowack et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9141682 | Adoc, Jr. et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
| 9161296 | Parsons et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9204281 | Ramprasad et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9306982 | Lawson et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9307094 | Nowack et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9325624 | Malatack et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9338190 | Eng et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9344573 | Wolthuis et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9378337 | Kuhr | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9456008 | Lawson et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 9456339 | Hildner et al. | Sep 2016 | B1 |
| 9596274 | Lawson et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 9628624 | Wolthuis et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9632875 | Raichstein et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 10003693 | Wolthuis et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 10291782 | Wolthuis et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
| 10904389 | Wolthuis et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
| 11330108 | Wolthuis | May 2022 | B2 |
| 20010038624 | Greenberg et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010043684 | Guedalia et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010051996 | Cooper et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020006124 | Jimenez et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020006125 | Josse et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020006193 | Rodenbusch et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020025819 | Cetusic et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020057777 | Saito et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020064267 | Martin et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020067823 | Walker et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020077833 | Arons et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020126813 | Partovi et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020133587 | Ensel et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020136391 | Armstrong et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020165957 | Devoe et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020176378 | Hamilton et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020176404 | Girard | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020184361 | Eden | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020198941 | Gavrilescu et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030006137 | Wei et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030012356 | Zino et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030014665 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030018830 | Chen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030023672 | Vaysman | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030026426 | Wright et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030046366 | Pardikar et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030051037 | Sundaram et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030058884 | Kallner et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030059020 | Meyerson et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030060188 | Gidron et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030061317 | Brown et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030061404 | Atwal et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030088421 | Maes et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030097330 | Hillmer et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030097447 | Johnston | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030097639 | Niyogi et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030103620 | Brown et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030123640 | Roelle et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030149721 | Alfonso-nogueiro et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030162506 | Toshimitsu et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030195950 | Huang et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030195990 | Greenblat et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030196076 | Zabarski et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030204616 | Billhartz et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030211842 | Kempf et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030231647 | Petrovykh | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030233276 | Pearlman et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040008635 | Nelson et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040011690 | Marfino et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040044953 | Watkins et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040052349 | Creamer et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040071275 | Bowater et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040101122 | Da Palma et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040102182 | Reith et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040117788 | Karaoguz et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040136324 | Steinberg et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040165569 | Sweatman et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040172482 | Weissman et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040199572 | Hunt et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040205101 | Radhakrishnan | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040205689 | Ellens et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040213400 | Golitsin et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040216058 | Chavers et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040218748 | Fisher | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040228469 | Andrews et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040236696 | Aoki et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040240649 | Goel | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050005109 | Castaldi et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050005200 | Matenda et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050010483 | Ling | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050015505 | Kruis et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050021626 | Prajapat et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050025303 | Hostetler, Jr. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050038772 | Colrain | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050043952 | Sharma et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050047579 | Mansour | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060411 | Coulombe et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050083907 | Fishler | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050091336 | Dehamer et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050091572 | Gavrilescu et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050108770 | Karaoguz et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050125251 | Berger et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050125739 | Thompson et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050128961 | Miloslavsky et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050135578 | Ress et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050141500 | Bhandari et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050147088 | Bao et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050177635 | Schmidt et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050181835 | Lau et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050198292 | Duursma et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050228680 | Malik | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050238153 | Chevalier | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050240659 | Taylor | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050243977 | Creamer et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050246176 | Creamer et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050286496 | Malhotra et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050289222 | Sahim | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060008065 | Longman et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060008073 | Yoshizawa et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060008256 | Khedouri et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060015467 | Morken et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060021004 | Moran et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060023676 | Whitmore et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060047666 | Bedi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060067506 | Flockhart et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060080415 | Tu | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060098624 | Morgan et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060129638 | Deakin | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060143007 | Koh et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060146792 | Ramachandran et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060146802 | Baldwin et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060168334 | Potti et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060203979 | Jennings | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060209695 | Archer, Jr. et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060212865 | Vincent et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060215824 | Mitby et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060217823 | Hussey | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060217978 | Mitby et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060222166 | Ramakrishna et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060235715 | Abrams et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060256816 | Yarlagadda et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060262915 | Marascio et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060270386 | Yu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060285489 | Francisco et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070002744 | Mewhinney et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070036143 | Alt et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070038499 | Margulies et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070043681 | Morgan et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070050306 | McQueen | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070064672 | Raghav et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070070906 | Thakur | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070070980 | Phelps et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070071223 | Lee et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070074174 | Thornton | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070088836 | Tai et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070091907 | Seshadri et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070107048 | Halls et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070112574 | Greene | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116191 | Bermudez et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070121651 | Casey et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070127691 | Lert | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070127703 | Siminoff | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070130260 | Weintraub et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070133771 | Stifelman et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070147351 | Dietrich et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070149166 | Turcotte et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070153711 | Dykas et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070167170 | Fitchett et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070192629 | Saito | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070201448 | Baird et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070208862 | Fox et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070232284 | Mason et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070239761 | Baio et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070242626 | Altberg et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070255828 | Paradise | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070265073 | Novi et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070286180 | Marquette et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070291734 | Bhatia et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070291905 | Halliday et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070293200 | Roundtree et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070295803 | Levine et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080005275 | Overton et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080025320 | Bangalore et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080037715 | Prozeniuk et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080037746 | Dufrene et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080040484 | Yardley | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080049617 | Grice et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080052395 | Wright et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080091843 | Kulkarni | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080101571 | Harlow et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080104348 | Kabzinski et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080120702 | Hokimoto | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080123559 | Haviv et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080134049 | Gupta et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080139166 | Agarwal et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080146268 | Gandhi et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080152101 | Griggs | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080154601 | Stifelman et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080155029 | Helbling et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080162482 | Ahern et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080165708 | Moore et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080172404 | Cohen | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080177883 | Hanai et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080192736 | Jabri et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080201426 | Darcie | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080209050 | Li | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080212945 | Khedouri et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080222656 | Lyman | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080229421 | Hudis et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080232574 | Baluja et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080235230 | Maes | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080256224 | Kaji et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080275741 | Loeffen | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080307436 | Hamilton | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080310599 | Purnadi et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080313318 | Vermeulen et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080316931 | Qiu et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080317222 | Griggs et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080317232 | Couse et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080317233 | Rey et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090046838 | Andreasson | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090052437 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090052641 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090059894 | Jackson et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090063502 | Coimbatore et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090074159 | Goldfarb et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090075684 | Cheng et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090083155 | Tudor et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090089165 | Sweeney | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090089352 | Davis et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090089699 | Saha et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090092674 | Ingram et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090093250 | Jackson et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090125608 | Werth et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090129573 | Gavan et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090136011 | Goel | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090170496 | Bourque | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090171659 | Pearce et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090171669 | Engelsma et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090171752 | Galvin et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090182896 | Patterson et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090193433 | Maes | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090216835 | Jain et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090217293 | Wolber et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090220057 | Waters | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090221310 | Chen et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090222341 | Belwadi et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090225748 | Taylor | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090225763 | Forsberg et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090228868 | Drukman et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090232289 | Drucker et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090234965 | Viveganandhan et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090235349 | Lai et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090241135 | Wong et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090252159 | Lawson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090262725 | Chen et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090276771 | Nickolov et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090288012 | Hertel et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090288165 | Qiu et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090300194 | Ogasawara | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090316687 | Kruppa | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090318112 | Vasten | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100027531 | Kurashima | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100037204 | Lin et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100054142 | Moiso et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100070424 | Monk | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100071053 | Ansari et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100082513 | Liu | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100087215 | Gu et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100088187 | Courtney et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100088698 | Krishnamurthy | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100094758 | Chamberlain et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100103845 | Ulupinar et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100107222 | Glasser | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100115041 | Hawkins et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100138501 | Clinton et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100142516 | Lawson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100150139 | Lawson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100167689 | Sepehri-Nik et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100188979 | Thubert et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100191915 | Spencer | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100208881 | Kawamura | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100217837 | Ansari et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100217982 | Brown et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100232594 | Lawson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100235539 | Carter et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100250946 | Korte et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100251329 | Wei | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100251340 | Martin et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100265825 | Blair et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100281108 | Cohen | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100291910 | Sanding et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100299437 | Moore | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100312919 | Lee et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100332852 | Vembu et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110026516 | Roberts et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110029882 | Jaisinghani | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110029981 | Jaisinghani | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110053555 | Cai et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110078278 | Cui et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110081008 | Lawson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110083069 | Paul et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110083179 | Lawson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110093516 | Geng et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110096673 | Stevenson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110110366 | Moore et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110131293 | Mori | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110138453 | Verma et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110143714 | Keast et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110145049 | Hertel et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110149810 | Koren et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110149950 | Petit-Huguenin et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110151884 | Zhao | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110158235 | Senga | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110167172 | Roach et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110170505 | Rajasekar et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110176537 | Lawson et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110179126 | Wetherell et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110211679 | Mezhibovsky et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110251921 | Kassaei et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110253693 | Lyons et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110255675 | Jasper et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110258432 | Rao et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110265168 | Lucovsky et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110265172 | Sharma | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110267985 | Wilkinson et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110274111 | Narasappa et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110276892 | Jensen-Horne et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110276951 | Jain | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110280390 | Lawson et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110283259 | Lawson et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110289126 | Aikas et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110289162 | Furlong et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110299672 | Chiu et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110310902 | Xu | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110313950 | Nuggehalli et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110320449 | Gudlavenkatasiva | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110320550 | Lawson et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120000903 | Baarman et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120011274 | Moreman | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120017222 | May | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120023531 | Meuninck et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120023544 | Li et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120027228 | Rijken et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120028602 | Lisi et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120036574 | Heithcock et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120039202 | Song | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120059709 | Lieberman et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120079066 | Li et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120083266 | Vanswol et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120089572 | Raichstein et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120094637 | Jeyaseelan et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120101952 | Raleigh et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120110564 | Ran et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120114112 | Rauschenberger et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120149404 | Beattie et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120166488 | Kaushik et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120170726 | Schwartz | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120173610 | Bleau et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120174095 | Natchadalingam et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120179646 | Hinton et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120179907 | Byrd et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120180021 | Byrd et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120180029 | Hill et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120185561 | Klein et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120198004 | Watte | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120201238 | Lawson et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120208495 | Lawson et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120221603 | Kothule et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120226579 | Ha et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120239757 | Firstenberg et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120240226 | Li | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120246273 | Bornstein et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120254828 | Aiylam et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120266258 | Tuchman et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120281536 | Gell et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120288082 | Segall | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120290706 | Lin et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120304245 | Lawson et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120304275 | Ji et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120316809 | Egolf et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120321058 | Eng et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120321070 | Smith et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130029629 | Lindholm et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130031158 | Salsburg | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130031613 | Shanabrook et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130036476 | Roever et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130047232 | Tuchman et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130054517 | Beechuk et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130054684 | Brazier et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130058262 | Parreira | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130067232 | Cheung et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130067448 | Sannidhanam et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130097298 | Ting et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130110658 | Lyman | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130132573 | Lindblom | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130139148 | Berg et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130156024 | Burg | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130166580 | Maharajh et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130179942 | Caplis et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130201909 | Bosch et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130204786 | Mattes et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130212603 | Cooke et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130244632 | Spence et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130268676 | Martins et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130325934 | Fausak et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130328997 | Desai | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130336472 | Fahlgren et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140013400 | Warshavsky et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140025503 | Meyer et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140058806 | Guenette et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140064467 | Lawson et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140072115 | Makagon et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140073291 | Hildner et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140095627 | Romagnino | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140101058 | Castel et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140101149 | Winters et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140105372 | Nowack et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140106704 | Cooke et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140122600 | Kim et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140123187 | Reisman | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140126715 | Lum et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140129363 | Lorah et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140153565 | Lawson et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140185490 | Holm et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140254600 | Shibata et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140258481 | Lundell | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140269333 | Boerjesson | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140274086 | Boerjesson et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140282473 | Saraf et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140289391 | Balaji et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140304054 | Orun et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140317640 | Harm et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140355600 | Lawson et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140372508 | Fausak et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140372509 | Fausak et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140372510 | Fausak et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140373098 | Fausak et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140379670 | Kuhr | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150004932 | Kim et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150004933 | Kim et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150023251 | Giakoumelis et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150026477 | Malatack et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150066865 | Yara et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150081918 | Nowack et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150082378 | Collison | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150100634 | He et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150119050 | Liao et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150181631 | Lee et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150236905 | Bellan et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150264180 | Wolthuis et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150281294 | Nur et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150365480 | Soto et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150370788 | Bareket et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150381580 | Graham, III et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160011758 | Dornbush et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160028695 | Binder | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160077693 | Meyer et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160112475 | Lawson et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160112521 | Lawson et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160119291 | Zollinger et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160127254 | Kumar et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160149956 | Birnbaum et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160162172 | Rathod | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160205519 | Patel et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160226937 | Patel et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160226979 | Lancaster et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160234391 | Wolthuis et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160239770 | Batabyal et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20170208178 | Wolthuis et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170339283 | Chaudhary et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20180262620 | Wolthuis et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20190342453 | Wolthuis et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
| 20210099577 | Wolthuis et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1684587 | Mar 1971 | DE |
| 0282126 | Sep 1988 | EP |
| 1464418 | Oct 2004 | EP |
| 1522922 | Apr 2005 | EP |
| 1770586 | Apr 2007 | EP |
| 2053869 | Apr 2009 | EP |
| 2134107 | Sep 1999 | ES |
| 10294788 | Nov 1998 | JP |
| 2004166000 | Jun 2004 | JP |
| 2004220118 | Aug 2004 | JP |
| 2006319914 | Nov 2006 | JP |
| WO-9732448 | Sep 1997 | WO |
| WO-2002087804 | Nov 2002 | WO |
| WO-2006037492 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| WO-2009018489 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009124223 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| WO-2010037064 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010040010 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010101935 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| WO-2011091085 | Jul 2011 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| “Aepona's API Monetization Platform Wins Best of 4G Awards for Mobile Cloud Enabler”, 4G World 2012 Conference & Expo, [Online]. [Accessed Nov. 5, 2015]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://www.realwire.com/releases/%20Aeponas-API-Monetization>, (Oct. 30, 2012), 4 pgs. |
| “U.S. Appl. No. 14/659,332, Corrected Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 3, 2016”, 2 pgs. |
| “U.S. Appl. No. 14/659,332, Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2015”, 8 pgs. |
| “U.S. Appl. No. 14/659,332, Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 22, 2016”, 5 pgs. |
| “U.S. Appl. No. 14/659,332, Response filed Oct. 13, 2015 to Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2015”, 12 pgs. |
| “U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,931, Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 3, 2016”, 6 pgs. |
| “U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,931, Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 6, 2016”, 8 pgs. |
| “U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,931, Preliminary Amendment filed May 26, 2016”, 7 pgs. |
| “U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,931, Response filed Aug. 24, 2016 to Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 3, 2016”, 7 pgs. |
| “U.S. Appl. No. 15/450,883, Final Office Action dated Oct. 13, 2017”, 11 pgs. |
| “U.S. Appl. No. 15/450,883, Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 12, 2017”, 9 pgs. |
| “U.S. Appl. No. 15/450,883, Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 14, 2018”, 8 pgs. |
| “U.S. Appl. No. 15/450,883, Preliminary Amendment filed Apr. 6, 2017”, 5 pgs. |
| “U.S. Appl. No. 15/450,883, Response filed Jan. 16, 2018 to Final Office Action dated Oct. 13, 2017”, 7 pgs. |
| “U.S. Appl. No. 15/450,883, Response filed Jul. 10, 2017 to Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 12, 2017”, 6 pgs. |
| “U.S. Appl. No. 15/979,073, Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 15, 2018”, 7 pgs. |
| “U.S. Appl. No. 15/979,073, Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 26, 2018”, 7 pgs. |
| “U.S. Appl. No. 15/979,073, Response filed Sep. 17, 2018 to Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 15, 2018”, 7 pgs. |
| “U.S. Appl. No. 16/383,303, Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 2, 2020”, 8 pgs. |
| “U.S. Appl. No. 16/383,303, Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 15, 2020”, 6 pgs. |
| “U.S. Appl. No. 16/383,303, Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 23, 2020”, 5 pgs. |
| “U.S. Appl. No. 16/383,303, Preliminary Amendment filed Aug. 22, 2019”, 8 pgs. |
| “U.S. Appl. No. 16/383,303, Response filed Jun. 4, 2020 to Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 2, 2020”, 10 pgs. |
| “U.S. Appl. No. 17/117,624, Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2021”, 9 pgs. |
| “U.S. Appl. No. 17/117,624, Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 5, 2022”, 5 pgs. |
| “U.S. Appl. No. 17/117,624, Response filed Sep. 24, 2021 to Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2021”, 3 pgs. |
| “Archive Microsoft Office 365 Email I Retain Unified Archiving”, GWAVA, Inc., Montreal, Canada, [Online] Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.gwava.com/Retain/Retain for_Office_365.php>, (2015), 4 pgs. |
| “Complaint for Patent Infringement”, Telinit Technologies, LLC v. Twilio Inc 2:12-cv-663, (Oct. 12, 2012), 17 pgs. |
| “Ethernet to Token Ring Bridge”, Black Box Corporation, [Online] Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://blackboxcanada.com/resource/files/productdetails/17044.pdf>, (Oct. 1999), 2 pgs. |
| “Twilio Cloud Communications—APIs for Voice, VoIP, and Text Messaging”, Twilio, [Online] Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.twilio.com/docs/api/rest/call-feedback>, (Jun. 24, 2015), 8 pgs. |
| Abu-Lebdeh, et al., “A 3GPP Evolved Packet Core-Based Architecture for QoS-Enabled Mobile Video Surveillance Applications”, 2012 Third International Conference on the Network of the Future {NOF), (Nov. 21-23, 2012), 1-6. |
| Barakovic, Sabina, et al., “Survey and Challenges of QoE Management Issues in Wireless Networks”, Hindawi Publishing Corgoration, (2012), 1-29. |
| Berners-Lee, T., “RFC 3986: Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax”, The Internet Society, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986>, (Jan. 2005), 57 pgs. |
| Kim, Hwa-Jong, et al., “In-Service Feedback QoE Framework”, 2010 Third International Conference on Communication Theory. Reliability and Quality of Service, (2010), 135-138. |
| Matos, et al., “Quality of Experience-based Routing in Multi-Service Wireless Mesh Networks”, Realizing Advanced Video Optimized Wireless Networks. IEEE, (2012), 7060-7065. |
| Mu, Mu, et al., “Quality Evaluation in Peer-to-Peer IPTV Services”, Data Traffic and Monitoring Analysis, LNCS 7754, 302-319, (2013), 18 pgs. |
| Subramanya, et al., “Digital Signatures”, IEEE Potentials, (Mar./Apr. 2006), 5-8. |
| Tran, et al., “User to User adaptive routing based on QoE”, ICNS 2011: The Seventh International Conference on Networking and Services, (2011), 170-177. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20220210276 A1 | Jun 2022 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61953562 | Mar 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 17117624 | Dec 2020 | US |
| Child | 17655116 | US | |
| Parent | 16383303 | Apr 2019 | US |
| Child | 17117624 | US | |
| Parent | 15979073 | May 2018 | US |
| Child | 16383303 | US | |
| Parent | 15450883 | Mar 2017 | US |
| Child | 15979073 | US | |
| Parent | 15099931 | Apr 2016 | US |
| Child | 15450883 | US | |
| Parent | 14659332 | Mar 2015 | US |
| Child | 15099931 | US |
