Certain types of microelectronic devices are conventionally discouraged from manufacture because they would require joining of different materials that have not yet been bonded together with very great success. The bonding surfaces in these micro-devices are sometimes only a few microns across. Abbreviations for units used herein include “μm” for micron or micrometer (1 micron=one-thousandth of a millimeter); and “nm” for nanometer (1000 nanometers=1 micron).
There are several difficulties that arise in attempts to form useful surface bonds between different materials to be used in semiconductor device fabrication and microelectronic packaging. First, the multi-layer dielectric and metal layers that are deposited on the various substrates often cause stress which manifests as an overall wafer bow and local warpage of the substrates. One challenge of bonding these highly warped substrates is the need to place them under vacuum to force the surfaces to be flat during bonding.
Second, the different materials have different crystal lattice properties. Traditional bonding techniques use elevated temperature and pressure to join materials. However, after bonding, the composite system is cooled to room temperature for subsequent processing and then operation temperature (generally well below the bond temperature). Direct bonding offers a way to reduce the overall stress and strain and join at lower temperatures. Both metals and nonmetals possess crystal lattice unit cells, the basic structural building blocks of each material at or near the atomic level. The crystal lattice units of the different materials may differ in geometry, or they may have similar geometries, but differ in the scale of these similar units. Either way, direct face-to-face bonding between materials that have different crystal-lattice-unit cell geometries can cause strain problems at the interface. With direct bonding, the thermal fluctuation between the two materials during bonding and subsequent rising temperatures in anneal or when the device is in electrical operation, can cause two materials that are bonded together to expand at different rates as the temperature rises, due to differences in their respective coefficients of thermal expansion (CTEs).
Ideally, a first material on one side of a face-to-face bond should possess a crystalline nature that has at least one well-defined orientation with respect to the internal crystal structure of the second material, and this orientation is sometimes called single-domain epitaxy. A lattice constant is a physical dimension of the unit cells in a crystal lattice of one of the materials. Lattices in three dimensions generally have three lattice constants: a, b, and c. Matching the lattice constants between materials to be bonded at small microelectronic scales is desirable for avoiding weak and defective bonds between the two different materials.
Bonding together of different materials can also have electronic effects that are important in microelectronic devices. For example, matching the lattice structures between two different semiconductor materials can form a region of band gap change without altering crystal structure. This enables the existence of some types of optical devices, such as light-emitting diodes, and lasers. Band gap is an energy range in a solid or two bonded solids where there are no electron states, and the gap can be characterized as the energy difference between a top of the valence band and a bottom of the conduction band in semiconductors and insulators, or from another view, the energy needed to free a bound (valence) electron to become a conduction electron for conducting electrical current.
Conventional bonding together of substances with similar lattice constants, as such gallium arsenide, aluminum gallium arsenide, and aluminum arsenide has provided many breakthrough optical devices, such as LEDs, and lasers, for example. The ability to usefully bond together more diverse materials is expected to provide even more new devices of microelectronic scale.
Sometimes fabrication of a microelectronic device would only need two different materials to be reliably direct-bonded across a very thin bonding interface, without regard for the materials' electronic effects on each other, but the respective differences in CTEs and differences in their lattice constants (lattice unit cell geometries) have conventionally made joining of these materials impossible or impractical.
Techniques for joining dissimilar materials in microelectronics are provided. Example techniques include direct-bonding of dissimilar materials to each other at room temperature using a thin amorphous layer of material added to either one or both bonding surfaces of the dissimilar materials, which may be in the form of two different substrates to be joined together. Silicon oxide, silicon nitride, or silicon carbide, silicon carbonitride, silicon oxynitride, and mixtures of these dielectric materials, are examples of materials for making the thin amorphous layer, which constitutes a thin film approximately 100-1000 nm thick, for example. The dissimilar substrate materials may have significantly different coefficients of thermal expansion (CTEs) and/or significantly different crystal-lattice unit cell geometries or dimensions, conventionally resulting in too much strain to make direct-bonding feasible or reliable. Preparation of the substrates prior to direct-bonding can include adding dielectric layers to the backside of the substrates to reduce warpage, in order to render these substrates flat without a need for vacuum, thereby reducing the stress and strain at the bonding interface. These warpage reduction layers may be removed in the standard post-bond processing, after serving their purpose. After bonding, an annealing sequence achieves a well-bonded interface. The process includes a curing period at room temperature after the direct-bonding of dissimilar materials, which can strengthen the direct bonds and the resulting direct-bond energies by over 200%. A relatively low temperature anneal applied slowly at a rate of 1° C. per minute further strengthens the direct bonds. The example techniques can be utilized to direct-bond III-V semiconductors, lithium tantalate LiTaO3, or other non-silicon materials to silicon or other materials that previously presented bonding challenges, to various conventional substrates in wafer-to-wafer (W2 W), die-to-wafer (D2 W), and die-to-die (D2D) processes thereby enabling various novel optical, electrical, and acoustic devices.
This summary is not intended to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in limiting the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Certain embodiments of the disclosure will hereafter be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals denote like elements. It should be understood, however, that the accompanying figures illustrate the various implementations described herein and are not meant to limit the scope of various technologies described herein.
Overview
This disclosure describes example techniques, processes, and methods for successfully joining diverse and dissimilar materials to each other in microelectronics, and describes resulting layer structures and devices. The example processes and structures apply to materials already routinely used in semiconductor fabrication and in the microelectronic packaging arts, and to combinations of materials not conventionally used in these arts. The example techniques, processes, and methods described herein are provided for fabricating novel semiconductor and microelectronic devices, and also for fabricating conventional devices with more efficient and practical designs.
Although the example processes described herein can theoretically be applied and used between many and almost all solid, amorphous, and/or crystalline materials, a few materials are now described as representative examples, for the sake of description and illustration of the example processes and resulting structures.
Lithium tantalate (LiTaO3 or simply “LiT”) is a mineral and a compound of lithium, tantalum, and oxygen that possesses useful optical and electronic properties in the microelectronic arts. As a useful component of potential microelectronic devices, LiTaO3 has optical, piezoelectric, and pyroelectric properties that make it useful for nonlinear optics, passive infrared sensors and motion detectors, terahertz generation and detection, surface acoustic wave applications, cell phone applications, cooling, heating, and small scale production of neutrons (atomic particles) for the nuclear industry, for example. LiTaO3 has a relatively large thermal expansion coefficient, with thermal expansion on the order of 12 ppm that varies along different crystalline axis directions. If LiTaO3 is warped during heating it develops an internal charge imbalance, which can result in residual warpage after cooling. In a pyroelectric effect, LiTaO3 generates a temporary voltage within itself, when heated or cooled, without any imposed physical warping. Changes in temperature slightly modify positions of atoms within its crystal structure changing the polarization of the material. In a different but related piezoelectric effect, LiTaO3 also generates an electric charge in response to applied mechanical stress (the imposed warpage). These pyroelectric and piezoelectric effects of LiTaO3 should be taken into account when bonding this material to another substrate made of different material.
Analogously, lithium niobate (LiNbO3) is a compound of lithium, niobium, and oxygen. Crystals of LiNbO3 are useful as optical waveguides, in mobile phones, as piezoelectric sensors, optical modulators and in various other linear and non-linear optical applications. LiNbO3 is considered an artificially made dielectric material that does not exist in nature.
Example techniques described herein enable direct-bonding of LiTaO3 (or LiNbO3) to other semiconductor, dielectric, and insulator materials for purposes of making practical microelectronic devices. In the description which follows, LiTaO3 is described representatively for both LiTaO3 and LiNbO3 and for many other similar materials too. As above, the example techniques, processes, and methods herein can be applied between almost any solid materials, but LiTaO3 is used in the descriptions representatively, as an example of a material to be joined to other materials that are dissimilar in CTEs, lattice unit cell geometries, or other properties.
LiTaO3 has conventionally proven incompatible for direct-bonding with important semiconductor and dielectric materials such as silicon (Si), glass (amorphous silicon dioxide SiO2 and other ingredients), fused silica (glass made of pure silicon dioxide SiO2), sapphire, and other common and uncommon substrates used, or that could be used, in the semiconductor and microelectronic fabrication and packaging arts.
Example techniques described below enable practical use of LiTaO3 in microelectronic devices, especially in wafer-level fabrication of microelectronic devices, wherein the fabrication can be greatly optimized by using direct-bonding and/or direct hybrid bonding between the surfaces of the different or incompatible materials (between substrates, such as those of dies and/or wafers made of different materials being joined to make the novel or conventional microelectronic devices).
In an example process, a low temperature bonding process enables heterogeneous integration of diverse materials within a microelectronic device. This low temperature bonding process can be especially useful in fabrication processes that use substrates, such as those of dies or wafers made of two different materials that are conventionally incompatible with each other with respect to conventional direct-bonding processes.
Respective thin oxide, carbide, nitride, carbonitride, oxynitride layers 104 & 106, or combinations thereof, are deposited on one or both bonding surfaces of the first wafer 100 and the second wafer 102. The deposited oxide, carbide, nitride, carbonitride, or oxynitride layers 104 & 106 may be only 100-1000 nm thick, and serve as direct-bonding intermediaries between the wafers 100 & 102. The deposited oxide, carbide, nitride, carbonitride, or oxynitride layers 104 & 106 are a different compound than either the first material of the first wafer 100 or the second material of the second wafer 102. So the direct-bonding described herein is different than conventional direct-bonding, which is often described as molecular bonding directly between two surfaces made of the same atoms or molecules: the same material being bonded to itself across an interface.
The first wafer 100 and the second wafer 102 are then direct-bonded together at room temperature to make a joined wafer, with the thin amorphous layer of oxide, carbide, nitride, carbonitride, or oxynitride intervening at the molecular bonding interface. The amorphous layer may comprise silicon.
The joined wafer is held for approximately 48 hours to strengthen direct bonds in a passive curing stage, wherein solid crystal bonds or other bonds at the solid bonding interface are allowed to spontaneously consolidate and seek their most stable energy levels under normal molecular kinetic motion at the room temperature level.
The joined wafer is then annealed by slowly raising the ambient temperature from room temperature level to a relatively low annealing temperature of 50° C. at a temperature increase rate of about 1° C. per minute or less, to anneal the direct bonds of the joined wafer.
The direct-bonding of dissimilar materials at room temperature to make a microelectronic device can also be accomplished by creating one or more native oxide (or carbide, nitride, carbonitride, oxynitride, etc.) films 108 & 110 on one or both bonding surfaces of the first wafer 100 and second wafer 102. This can be accomplished by exposing the bonding surface(s) to a strong oxidizing solution, or oxygen plasma, for example, or other reactive agent in the cases of native carbide generation or native nitride generation.
As introduced above, challenges in heterogeneous integration of different materials within a microelectronic device are related to the differential CTEs, incompatibility of lattice unit cells at the bonding interface, as often indicated by respective lattice constants that vary greatly between materials, and differences in general material properties.
The example direct-bonding process that utilizes a step of creating a native oxide layer (or carbide layer, nitride layer, carbonitride, oxynitride, etc.) aims to take advantage of two or more substrates made of different materials that have specific advantages provided by the properties of devices that can be fabricated on each respective different type of substrate, now joined in one device by the example direct-bonding process. The example low temperature bonding technique enables multiple integration possibilities for a broad field of electronic devices.
In an implementation, the example process begins by thermally equilibrating the different materials to be direct-bonded together with each other and with the environment. In other words, the direct-bonding process begins with all materials and the environment at the same temperature, providing an equilibrium of molecular kinetic energy among the materials being used. This equilibrium controls/prevents uncontrolled flows of heat energy between materials or across the bonding interface during the initial contact of bonding surfaces during the direct-bonding process, resulting in exquisite homogeneity of the direct-bonds formed at small scale, and results in exquisite control of the example process. In other words, the careful equilibrium of temperature at the start of this example direct-bonding process can ultimately ensure a very uniform bonded interface, at the molecular level. In one implementation, this uniformity of the direct-bonded interface is limited only by the degree of flatness achievable on the surfaces to be direct-bonded together prior to contact between the two surfaces.
The example direct-bonding is performed at room temperature, and then held at room temperature for up to 48 hours or more for curing, even before an annealing step, to greatly increase bond energy: the bond strength that will be present after a subsequent annealing step is completed.
For example, with wafers that have large differences from each other with respect to CTEs, the wafers are kept at room temperature for a period of time after direct-bonding for a curing that allows bond energy to increase even before elevating the temperature during annealing to speed up the bond energy increase. Bond strengths of 1000 mJ/m2 or greater have been measured with this example room temperature curing technique.
Some example processes for direct-bonding dissimilar materials at room temperature use a thin intermediary layer less than 1 micron thick (between approximately 100-1000 nm) as an “adapter” layer between diverse oxides, carbides, nitrides, carbonitrides, or oxynitrides for the direct-bonding. This thin intermediary layer may be an amorphous oxide layer, such as silicon dioxide (SiO2), with a thickness dimension within the range above, less than 1 micron thick. Silicon dioxide films can be grown by a plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) system using liquid tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) as the source of Si, or by TEOS photochemical decomposition, for example.
At block 302, a material such as TEOS-derived amorphous SiO2 is deposited onto one or both of the LiTaO3 wafer, substrate, or surface and/or the silicon wafer, substrate, or surface. The layer of oxide material may have a deposited thickness of approximately 100-1000 nm (0.1-1.0 microns).
At block 304, the respective surfaces of LiTaO3 and SiO2, one or both of these surfaces covered with the thin amorphous film of oxide, carbide, nitride, carbonitride, and/or oxynitride, are planarized by chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) to a smooth, flat surface. Asperities including defects and rough spots that would cause bonding voids can be removed at this step.
At block 306, the respective wafers, substrates, or surfaces may be cleaned with scrubbing by PVA brush, and a deionized (DI) water rinse.
At block 308, the respective wafers, substrates, or surfaces may be cleaned with a Megasonic SC1 process, rinsed with DI water and spin-dried on a Goldfinger® processing tool, for example, for megasonic wave particle removal without etching.
At block 310, the wafers, substrates, or surfaces are plasma-activated with nitrogen plasma in RIE mode, for example with a −200 to −300 volt bias. This nitrogen plasma activation with such parameters may be unique when applied to LiTaO3 direct-bonding.
At block 312, the wafers, substrates, or surfaces are spray-rinsed with 29% NH4OH (aqueous ammonia). This rinse with 29% NH4OH may also be a unique process when applied to the LiTaO3 direct-bonding. The NH4OH rinsing helps to remove particles from the wafers, substrates, or surfaces. In some cases, depending on materials, the NH4OH rinsing can help to increase bond energy. The wafers, substrates, or surfaces may be spin-dried on a spin bonder tool, for example.
At block 314, the wafers, substrates, or surfaces are contacted with each other for direct-bonding at room temperature, with the LiTaO3 wafer, for example, loaded as the top wafer. Infrared (IR) drying lamps are not used to avoid excessive bowing and warping upon bonding. The room temperature bonding also avoids excessive bowing of the wafers. Likewise, heating during spin drying could also cause bowing of the LiTaO3, which does not fully relax after cooling due to pyroelectric charge build up in the LiTaO3 material, so such heated spin-drying after direct bonding may be avoided.
At block 316, the wafers (or bonded substrates or bonded surfaces) are held at room temperature for 48 hours, as an example duration, to allow bond strength to increase before slowly elevating temperature for the subsequent annealing step. The bonding strength increases in relation to the time duration allowed for the room temperature curing, as shown in
At block 318, the temperature of the direct-bonded wafers, substrates, or surfaces are ramped slowly up slowly to 50° C. in an oven, in a temperature elevation process of less than 1 degree ° C. per minute. This relatively low temperature annealing step avoids slippage of the bonds that are being strengthened, and minimizes bowing of the wafers (substrates or surfaces) being annealed.
At block 402, a representative material such as TEOS-derived amorphous SiO2, or a thin amorphous layer of a carbide, nitride, carbonitride, or oxynitride dielectric, is deposited onto one or both of the LiTaO3 wafer, substrate, or surface and/or the sapphire wafer, substrate, or surface. The thin layer of the amorphous material, such as the oxide, carbide, nitride, carbonitride, or oxynitride may have a deposited thickness of approximately 100-1000 nm.
At block 404, the respective surfaces of oxide-covered LiTaO3 and/or oxide-covered SiO2 (or nitride, carbide, carbonitride, oxynitride, etc.), are planarized by chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) to a smooth, flat surface. Asperities, such as defects and rough spots, that would cause bonding voids can be removed at this step.
At block 406, the respective wafers, substrates, or surfaces may be cleaned with PVA brush scrubbing and deionized (DI) water.
At block 408, the respective wafers, substrates, or surfaces may be cleaned with a Megasonic SC1 process, rinsed with DI water and spin-dried on a Goldfinger® processing tool, for example, for megasonic wave particle removal without etching.
At block 410, the wafers, substrates, or surfaces are plasma-activated with nitrogen plasma in RIE mode, for example with a −200 to −300 volt bias.
At block 412, the wafers, substrates, or surfaces are spray-rinsed with 29% NH4OH (aqueous ammonia, or ammonium hydroxide). This rinse with 29% NH4OH may be a unique process when applied to the LiTaO3 direct-bonding. The NH4OH rinsing removes particles from the wafers, substrates, or surfaces. In some cases, depending on materials, the NH4OH rinsing increases bond energy. The wafers, substrates, or surfaces may be spin-dried on a spin bonder tool, for example.
At block 414, the wafers, substrates, or surfaces are direct-bonded to each other at room temperature, with the LiTaO3 wafer, for example, loaded as the top wafer. Infrared (IR) drying lamps are not used to avoid excessive bowing and warpage upon bonding. The room temperature bonding also avoids excessive bowing of the wafers. Likewise, heating during spin drying may cause bowing of the LiTaO3, which does not fully relax after cooling due to pyroelectric charge build up in the LiTaO3 material, and such heating may be avoided at this step.
At block 416, the wafers (or substrates or surfaces) are held at room temperature for at least 48 hours, as an example duration, to allow bond strength to increase and consolidate before elevating temperature for the subsequent annealing step. The bonding strength during the passive room temperature cure increases in relation to the time duration allowed, as shown in
At block 418, the temperature of the direct-bonded wafers, substrates, or surfaces are ramped up to 50° C. in an oven, at a rate of temperature increase of about 1 degree ° C. per minute, or less. Sapphire is an extremely stiff material and if the wafers are not bonded strongly enough before increasing the temperature, wafer expansion and resulting warpage can cause the wafers to separate. So this relatively low temperature annealing step avoids slippage of the bond being strengthened, and minimizes bowing of the wafers being direct-bonded together.
At block 502, a material such as TEOS-derived amorphous SiO2 (or a nitride, carbide, carbonitride, or oxynitride) is deposited onto one or both of the LiTaO3 wafer, substrate, or surface and/or the fused silica glass wafer, substrate, or surface. The thin layer of material, such as the oxide, nitride, carbide, carbonitride, or oxynitride may have a deposited thickness of approximately 100-1000 nm.
At block 504, the respective surfaces of oxide-covered LiTaO3 and/or oxide-covered SiO2, for example, are planarized by chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) to a smooth, flat surface. Asperities including defects and rough spots that would cause bonding voids can be removed at this step.
At block 506, the respective wafers, substrates, or surfaces may be cleaned with PVA brush scrubbing and deionized (DI) water.
At block 508, the respective wafers, substrates, or surfaces may be cleaned with a Megasonic SC1 process, rinsed with DI water and spin-dried on a Goldfinger® processing tool, for example, for megasonic wave particle removal without etching.
At block 510, the wafers, substrates, or surfaces are plasma-activated with nitrogen plasma in RIE mode, for example with a −200 to −300 volt bias. This nitrogen plasma activation with these parameters may be unique when applied to LiTaO3 direct-bonding.
At block 512, the wafers, substrates, or surfaces are spray-rinsed with 29% NH4OH (aqueous ammonia or ammonium hydroxide). This rinse with 29% NH4OH may be a unique process when applied to the LiTaO3 direct-bonding. The NH4OH rinsing removes particles from the wafers, substrates, or surfaces. In some cases, depending on materials, the NH4OH rinsing increases bond energy. The wafers, substrates, or surfaces may be spin-dried on a spin bonder tool, for example.
At block 514, the wafers, substrates, or surfaces are direct-bonded to each other at room temperature, with the LiTaO3 wafer, for example, loaded as the top wafer. Infrared (IR) drying lamps are not used to avoid excessive bowing and warpage upon bonding. The room temperature bonding also avoids excessive bowing of the wafers, for example. Likewise, heating during spin drying may also cause bowing of the LiTaO3, which does not fully relax after cooling due to pyroelectric charge build up in the LiTaO3 material, and such heating may be avoided.
At block 516, the wafers (or substrates or surfaces) are held at room temperature for at least 48 hours, for example, to allow bond strength to increase before elevating temperature for the subsequent annealing step. The bonding strength increases in relation to the time duration allowed for room temperature curing, as shown in
At block 518, the temperature of the direct-bonded wafers, substrates, or surfaces is ramped up to 50° C. in an oven, at a rate of temperature rise that is about 1 degree per minute, or preferably less. This relatively low-temperature annealing step avoids slippage of the bonds being strengthened, and minimizes bowing of the wafers being direct-bonded together.
At block 602, a native oxide (of silicon) or oxide patina of silicon is created on the silicon wafer. In one implementation, the native oxide may be created by first cleaning the wafer with a piranha solution of hydrogen peroxide-sulfuric acid (H2O2:H2SO4) in a ratio of 1:3, and then rinsing with water. The 1:3 H2O2:H2SO4 solution grows or creates a native oxide film on the silicon, which is conducive to forming high strength bonds in oxide-to-oxide direct-bonding.
At block 604, the surface of the silicon wafer with native oxide is rinsed in a Megasonic deionized water process and can be spun and rinsed dry on a Goldfinger® processing tool, for example.
At block 606, the surface of the LiTaO3 wafer (only) is plasma-activated with nitrogen plasma in RIE mode with a −200 to −300 volt bias.
At block 608, both wafers are spray-rinsed with deionized water. The silicon wafer is rinsed with water to avoid pitting the silicon and native oxide surface, although the native oxide may be enough to protect the silicon surface, in which case use of NH4OH solution to enhance direct-bonding may be preferred. Although the LiTaO3 wafer is usually cleaned with water, cleaning with NH4OH solution can also be performed. In some cases, rinsing with the NH4OH increases direct-bond energies to more complete potential. The wafers are then spin-dried, for example on a bonder tool.
At block 610, the wafers are direct-bonded together at room temperature with the LiTaO3 wafer loaded as the top wafer, for example. Infrared drying lamps are generally avoided to prevent excessive bowing and warpage upon direct-bonding. Room temperature direct-bonding also avoids excessive bowing of the wafers. Heating during the spin-drying could cause bowing of the LiTaO3 wafer, which does not fully relax after cooling due to pyroelectric charge build-up in the LiTaO3 material, so can be avoided at this step.
A block 612, the joined and direct-bonded wafers are held at room temperature for at least 48 hours or more to allow bond strength to increase before elevating the temperature in a subsequent annealing step. The bond strength increases in relation to the duration of the room temperature cure, as shown in
At block 614, the joined and direct-bonded wafers are warmed and heated in an oven up to a temperature of approximately 50° C. to anneal, at a rate of temperature increase that is 1 degree ° C. per minute, or less. This relatively low-temperature anneal applied gradually avoids slippage of the direct-bonds and minimizes bowing and warpage.
At block 702, the LiTaO3 wafer and a sapphire wafer are cleaned with a piranha solution of hydrogen peroxide and sulfuric acid (H2O2:H2SO4) in a ratio of 1:3, and then rinsed with water.
At block 704, the surfaces of the wafers are rinsed in a Megasonic deionized water process and can be spun and rinsed dry on a Goldfinger® processing tool, for example.
At block 706, the surface of sapphire wafer is plasma-activated with oxygen in RIE mode with a −200 to −300 volt bias, and the surface of the LiTaO3 wafer is plasma-activated with oxygen or nitrogen plasma in RIE mode with a −200 to −300 volt bias.
At block 708, the wafers are spray-rinsed with 29% NH4OH solution to remove particles and to enhance the bond energies possible in the direct-bonding process. The wafers may be spun dry.
At block 710, the wafers are contacted together for the direct-bonded at room temperature with the LiTaO3 wafer loaded as the top wafer, for example. Infrared drying lamps may be avoided to prevent excessive bowing and warpage upon direct-bonding. The room temperature direct-bonding avoids excessive bowing of the wafers as well as allows stronger direct-bonds to form across the dissimilar materials. Heating during the spin drying would cause bowing of the LiTaO3 wafer, which does not fully relax after cooling due to pyroelectric charge build-up in the LiTaO3 material, so this heating may be omitted. However, the built-up pyroelectric charge may be discharged or dissipated by connecting an electrical circuit to parts of the LiTaO3 wafer, or by electrically shorting, shunting, or grounding the LiTaO3 wafer with an external conductor. Discharging the built-up pyroelectric charge may relieve bowing or warping of the LiTaO3 wafer.
A block 712, the joined and direct-bonded wafers are held at room temperature for at least 48 hours or more to allow bond strength to increase before elevating temperature in a subsequent annealing step. The bond strength increases with greater time at room temperature, as shown in
At block 714, the joined and direct-bonded wafers are warmed and heated in an oven up to 50° C. to anneal, at a rate of temperature increase of about 1 degree ° C. per minute, or less. This relatively low-temperature anneal applied gradually avoids slippage of the direct-bonds and minimizes bowing and warpage.
At block 802, the LiTaO3 wafer and a fused silica glass wafer are cleaned with a piranha solution of hydrogen peroxide and sulfuric acid (H2O2:H2SO4) in a ratio of 1:3, and then rinsed with water.
At block 804, the surfaces of the wafers are rinsed in a Megasonic deionized water process and can be spun and rinsed dry on a Goldfinger® processing tool, for example.
At block 806, the bonding surfaces of fused silica glass wafer and the LiTaO3 wafer are plasma-activated with oxygen plasma or nitrogen plasma in RIE mode with a −200 to −300 volt bias.
At block 808, the bonding surfaces of the wafers are spray-rinsed with 29% NH4OH solution to remove particles and to enhance bond energy of direct-bonding. The wafers may be spun dry.
At block 810, the wafers are direct-bonded together at room temperature with the LiTaO3 wafer loaded as the top wafer, for example. Infrared drying lamps are avoided to prevent excessive bowing and warpage. Room temperature direct-bonding is used to avoid excessive bowing of wafers. Heating during the spin drying would cause bowing of the LiTaO3 wafer, and can be avoided. Built-up pyroelectric charge in the LiTaO3 wafer may be discharged or dissipated by connecting an electrical circuit to parts of the LiTaO3 wafer, or by electrically shorting, shunting, or grounding the LiTaO3 wafer with an external conductor. Discharging the built-up pyroelectric charge may relieve a bowing tendency or warping of the LiTaO3 wafer due to these effects.
A block 812, the joined and direct-bonded wafers are held at room temperature for at least 48 hours or more to allow bond strength to increase before elevating temperature in a subsequent annealing step. The bond strength increases with more time held at room temperature, as shown in
At block 814, the joined and direct-bonded wafers are warmed and heated in an oven up to a temperature of 50° C. to anneal, at a rate of temperature increase of about 1 degree ° C. per minute, or less. This relatively low-temperature anneal applied slowly avoids slippage of the direct-bonds and minimizes bowing and warping.
To further refine the example direct-bonding processes at room temperature that use no discrete deposited layer of oxide, carbide, nitride, carbonitride, or oxynitride material, an oxygen plasma activation can sometimes yield higher bond strength than nitrogen plasma activation, particularly when bonding LiTaO3 to sapphire. However, nitrogen plasma activation may work better for bonding LiTaO3 to silicon without the discrete deposited oxide layer intermediary between wafers.
Annealing of direct-bonds between LiTaO3 and silicon may attain higher bond strength with higher temperature. Nominally, direct-bonded wafers that have cured at room temperature for up to 48 hours are heated to 50° C. in an oven at rate of temperature increase than is about 1 degree ° C. per minute, or less. In the case of forming a native oxide, nitride, carbide, carbonitride, oxynitride, on one or both bonding surfaces as an intermediary for direct-bonding the dissimilar materials, after the annealing step at a gradual temperature increase up to 50° C., the temperature of the joined wafers can be further ramped up to 100° C. at a rate of temperature increase that is about 1 degree ° C. per minute or less to increase the bond strength even further, without significant increase in bowing or warping of the wafers, as shown in
Both the example processes that deposit a discrete thin oxide, carbide, nitride layer, carbonitride, and/or oxynitride on one or both wafers as an intermediary for direct-bonding between dissimilar materials of the respective wafers at room temperature, and on the other hand, the example processes that form a native oxide (or carbide, nitride, carbonitride, or oxynitride) on one or both surfaces of the wafers by oxidizing native materials of a first wafer and/or second wafer can direct-bond diverse materials together at room temperature. Curing at room temperature for up to 48 hours or even beyond greatly strengthens the direct bonds formed in either case.
The materials of the first wafer and second wafer to be direct-bonded together at room temperature may have significantly different CTEs and lattice constants. The dissimilar materials to be used in a given microelectronic device constructed by the example processes described herein may be managed with thin film engineering principles for balancing wafer warpage of the two wafers, due to the difference in the materials used. Likewise, different thicknesses of the different materials of the two wafers can be leveraged for the two wafers of different thicknesses of the different materials to cancel out each other's bowing and warping. In an implementation, for the materials discussed herein, the bowing or warpage in general is assumed or calculated to be in the range of 25 μm per inch of diameter down to 10 μm per inch of diameter.
The example processes described above can be used to make stacks of wafers of different materials for a microelectronic device or package. The various stack layers can also be used to make multiple stacks of integrated circuits combined with other optical and acoustic devices, with or without direct-bonding between all the layers present.
In the foregoing description and in the accompanying drawings, specific terminology and drawing symbols have been set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the disclosed embodiments. In some instances, the terminology and symbols may imply specific details that are not required to practice those embodiments. For example, any of the specific dimensions, quantities, material types, fabrication steps and the like can be different from those described above in alternative embodiments. Moreover, the description of the techniques and devices with regard to wafers could be employed in D2D, D2 W, or W2 W applications. The term “coupled” is used herein to express a direct connection as well as a connection through one or more intervening circuits or structures. The terms “example,” “embodiment,” and “implementation” are used to express an example, not a preference or requirement. Also, the terms “may” and “can” are used interchangeably to denote optional (permissible) subject matter. The absence of either term should not be construed as meaning that a given feature or technique is required.
Various modifications and changes can be made to the embodiments presented herein without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the disclosure. For example, features or aspects of any of the embodiments can be applied in combination with any other of the embodiments or in place of counterpart features or aspects thereof. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
While the present disclosure has been disclosed with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having the benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate numerous modifications and variations possible given the description. It is intended that the appended claims cover such modifications and variations as fall within the true spirit and scope of the disclosure.
This nonprovisional patent application claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/693,671 to Fountain et al., filed Jul. 3, 2018 and incorporated by reference herein, in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3175025 | Geen et al. | Mar 1965 | A |
3423823 | Ansley | Jan 1969 | A |
4612083 | Yasumoto et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4818728 | Rai et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
5451547 | Himi et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5668057 | Eda et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5747857 | Eda et al. | May 1998 | A |
5753536 | Sugiyama et al. | May 1998 | A |
5771555 | Eda et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6080640 | Gardner et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6180496 | Farrens et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6423640 | Lee et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6465892 | Suga | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6495398 | Goetz | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502271 | Epshteyn | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6645828 | Farrens et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6877209 | Miller et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6887769 | Kellar et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6908027 | Tolchinsky et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6908832 | Farrens et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7037804 | Kellar et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7045453 | Canaperi et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7105980 | Abbott et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7109092 | Tong | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7126212 | Enquist et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7192841 | Wei et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7193423 | Dalton et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7213314 | Abbott et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7230512 | Carpenter et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7335572 | Tong et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7466022 | Miller et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7602070 | Tong et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7750488 | Patti et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7803693 | Trezza | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8035464 | Abbott et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8183127 | Patti et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8349635 | Gan et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8377798 | Peng et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8441131 | Ryan | May 2013 | B2 |
8476165 | Trickett et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8482132 | Yang et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8501537 | Sadaka et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8524533 | Tong et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8620164 | Heck et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8647987 | Yang et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8697493 | Sadaka | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8716105 | Sadaka et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8735219 | Enquist et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8802538 | Liu | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8809123 | Liu et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8975158 | Plach et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8988299 | Kam et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9093350 | Endo et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9142517 | Liu | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9171756 | Enquist et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9184125 | Enquist et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9224704 | Landru | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9230941 | Chen et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9257399 | Kuang et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9299736 | Chen et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9312229 | Chen et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9331149 | Tong et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9337235 | Chen et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9368866 | Yu | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9385024 | Tong et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9394161 | Cheng et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9437572 | Chen et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9443796 | Chou et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9461007 | Chun et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9496239 | Edelstein et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9536848 | England et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9559081 | Lai et al. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9620481 | Edelstein et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9656852 | Cheng et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9698126 | Enquist et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9723716 | Meinhold | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9728521 | Tsai et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9741620 | Uzoh et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9799587 | Fujii et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9852988 | Enquist et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9881882 | Hsu et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9893004 | Yazdani | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9899442 | Katkar | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9929050 | Lin | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9941241 | Edelstein et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9941243 | Kim et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9960142 | Chen et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10002844 | Wang et al. | Jun 2018 | B1 |
10026605 | Doub et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
9953941 | Enquist | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10075657 | Fahim et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10177735 | Ruby et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10204893 | Uzoh et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10269756 | Uzoh | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10276619 | Kao et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10276909 | Huang et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10418277 | Cheng et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10446456 | Shen et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10446487 | Huang et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10446532 | Uzoh et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10454447 | Solal et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10508030 | Katkar et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10522499 | Enquist et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10707087 | Uzoh et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10727219 | Uzoh et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10784191 | Huang et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10790262 | Uzoh et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10840135 | Uzoh | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10840205 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10854578 | Morein | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10879212 | Uzoh et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10886177 | DeLaCruz et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10892246 | Uzoh | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10923408 | Huang et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10923413 | DeLaCruz | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10950547 | Mohammed et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10964664 | Mandalapu et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10985133 | Uzoh | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10991804 | DeLaCruz et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10998292 | Lee et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11011494 | Gao et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11011503 | Wang et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11031285 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11037919 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11056348 | Theil | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11069734 | Katkar | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11088099 | Katkar et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11127738 | DeLaCruz et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11158606 | Gao et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11171117 | Gao et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11176450 | Teig et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11256004 | Haba et al. | Feb 2022 | B2 |
11264357 | DeLaCruz et al. | Mar 2022 | B1 |
11276676 | Enquist et al. | Mar 2022 | B2 |
11329034 | Tao et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
11348898 | DeLaCruz et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
11355443 | Huang et al. | Jun 2022 | B2 |
20010037995 | Akatsu | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020030198 | Coman et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020048900 | Lo et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020068396 | Fitzergald | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030022412 | Higgins et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030030119 | Higgins, Jr. et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040084414 | Sakai et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20060057945 | Hsu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060076559 | Faure et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060121696 | Shiota et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060138907 | Koizumi | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060199353 | Kub et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060255341 | Pinnington et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060273068 | Tussot et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060284167 | Augustine | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070096294 | Ikeda et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070111386 | Kim et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070222048 | Huang | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070295456 | Gudeman et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20090004822 | Murakami et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090042356 | Takayama et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090068831 | Enquist et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090191719 | Dupont | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090321869 | Fukuoka | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20110053339 | Ozawa | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110128399 | Fujii | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110290552 | Palmateer et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120003813 | Chuang et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120028440 | Castex et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120077329 | Broekaart | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120119224 | Tai et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120168792 | Kang et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120183808 | Tong | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120212384 | Kam et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120270231 | Smith | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130130473 | Ben Mohamed | May 2013 | A1 |
20130228775 | Noda | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140167230 | Kitada | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140175655 | Chen et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140225795 | Yu | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150064498 | Tong | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20160049384 | Lu et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160343682 | Kawasaki | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170036419 | Adib et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170194271 | Hsu et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170338143 | Peidous | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180175012 | Wu et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180182639 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180182666 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180190580 | Haba et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180190583 | DeLaCruz et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180219038 | Gambino et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180323177 | Yu et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180323227 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180331066 | Uzoh et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190096741 | Uzoh et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190115277 | Yu et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190123709 | Inoue et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190131277 | Yang et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190157333 | Tsai | May 2019 | A1 |
20190164919 | Hu et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190170631 | Shachar et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190198409 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190221607 | Gudeman | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190265411 | Huang et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190288660 | Goto et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190295883 | Yokokawa | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190333550 | Fisch | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190348336 | Katkar et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190385935 | Gao et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190385966 | Gao et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200006145 | Li et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200006266 | Chen et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200013637 | Haba | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200028486 | Kishino et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200035641 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200075520 | Gao et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200075534 | Gao et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200075553 | DeLaCruz et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200118973 | Wang et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200126906 | Uzoh et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200194396 | Uzoh | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200227367 | Haba et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200243380 | Uzoh et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200279821 | Haba et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200294908 | Haba et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200328162 | Haba et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200328164 | DeLaCruz et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200328165 | DeLaCruz et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200328193 | Enquist et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200335408 | Gao et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200371154 | DeLaCruz et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200395321 | Katkar et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200411483 | Uzoh et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210098412 | Haba et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210118864 | DeLaCruz et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210143125 | DeLaCruz et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210181510 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210193603 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210193624 | DeLaCruz et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210193625 | DeLaCruz et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210242152 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210296282 | Gao et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210305202 | Uzoh et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210366820 | Uzoh | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20210407941 | Haba | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20220077063 | Haba | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220077087 | Haba | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220139867 | Uzoh | May 2022 | A1 |
20220139869 | Gao et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
20220208650 | Gao et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220208702 | Uzoh | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220208723 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220246497 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Aug 2022 | A1 |
20220285303 | Mirkarimi et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20220319901 | Suwito et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20220320035 | Uzoh et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20220320036 | Gao et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20230019869 | Mirkarimi et al. | Jan 2023 | A1 |
20230036441 | Haba et al. | Feb 2023 | A1 |
20230067677 | Lee et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230069183 | Haba | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230100032 | Haba et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2002320030 | Feb 2003 | AU |
0823780 | Feb 1998 | EP |
0616426 | Sep 1998 | EP |
0591918 | Jul 1999 | EP |
1540736 | Mar 2006 | EP |
3 482 231 | Sep 2022 | EP |
2002334816 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2011200933 | Oct 2011 | JP |
2013-33786 | Feb 2013 | JP |
2018-160519 | Oct 2018 | JP |
10-2015-0097798 | Aug 2015 | KR |
10-2018-0114896 | Oct 2018 | KR |
2005-043584 | May 2005 | WO |
WO 2006100444 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO-2015191082 | Dec 2015 | WO |
WO 2017151442 | Sep 2017 | WO |
WO-2019180922 | Sep 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Takei et al., “Effects of Wafer Precleaning and Plasma Irradiation to Wafer Surfaces on Plasma-Assisted Surface-Activated Direct Bonding”, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 49 (2010): pp. 1-3 (Year: 2010). |
Suga et al., “Combined Process for Wafer Direct Bonding by Means of the Surface Activation Method”, IEEE (2004): pp. 484-490. (Year: 2004). |
Takagi et al., “Room-temperature wafer bonding of Si to LiNbO3, LiTaO3 and Gd3Ga5O12 by Ar-beam surface activation”, J. Micromech. Microeng. 11 (2001): pp. 348-352. (Year: 2001). |
Taylor et al., “A review of plasma oxidation of silicon and its applications”, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 8 (1993): pp. 1426-1433. (Year: 1993). |
Shen et al., “Structure and Magnetic Properties of Ce-Substituted Yttrium Iron Garnet Prepared by Conventional Sintering Techniques”, J Supercond (2017): pp. 937. (Year: 2017). |
Vasili et al, “Direct observation of multivalent states and 4 f → 3d charge transfer in Ce-doped yttrium iron garnet thin films”, Physical Review (2017): pp. 1-10. (Year: 2017). |
Darling, R.B., “Wafer Bonding,” EE-527: Microfabrication, Winter 2013, 12 pages. |
Mizumoto et al., “Direct Wafer Bonding and Its Application to Waveguide Optical Isolators,” Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Materials, ISSN: 1996-1944, www.mdpi.com/journal/materials, Mar. 31, 2012, 20 pages. |
“Wafer Bonding—An Overview,” ScienceDirect Topics, Journals & Books, https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/wafer-bonding, printed Jun. 27, 2019, 12 pages. |
Ker, Ming-Dou et al., “Fully Process-Compatible Layout Design on Bond Pad to Improve Wire Bond Reliability in CMOS ICs,” IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies, Jun. 2002, vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 309-316. |
Moriceau, H. et al., “Overview of Recent Direct Wafer Bonding Advances and Applications”, Advances in Natural Sciences-Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 2010, 12 pages. |
Nakanishi, H. et al., “Studies on SiO2-SiO2 Bonding with Hydrofluoric Acid. Room Temperature and Low Stress Bonding Technique for MEMS,” Tech. Research Lab., 200, Elsevier Science S.A., 8 pages. |
Oberhammer et al., “Sealing of Adhesive Bonded Devices on Wafer Level,” in Sensors and Actuators A, vol. 110, No. 1-3, pp. 407-412, Feb. 29, 2004, see pp. 407-412; and figures 1(a)-1(l), 6 pages. |
Plobi et al., “Wafer Direct Bonding: Tailoring Adhesion Between Brittle Materials,” Materials Science and Engineering Review Journal, 1999, 88 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2019/040255, dated 2019 Oct. 25, 2019, 12 pages. |
Amirfeiz et al., “Formation of silicon structures by plasma-activated wafer bonding,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2000, vol. 147, No. 7, pp. 2693-2698. |
Bengtsson, S. et al., “Low Temperature Bonding,” International Conference on Compliant & Alternative Substrate Technology, Meeting Program & Abstract Book, Sep. 29-23, p. 10. |
Farrens et al., “Chemical Free Room Temperature Wafer to Wafer Direct Bonding”, J. Electrochem. Soc., vol. 142, No. 11, Nov. 1995, pp. 3949-3955. |
Gan, Qing, “Surface activation enhanced low temperature silicon wafer bonding,” Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University, Aug. 4, 2000, 192 pages. |
Gösele, U. et al., “Semiconductor Wafer Bonding, a Flexible Approach to Materials Combinations in Microelectronics, Micromechanics and Optoelectronics”, 1997 IEEE, pp. 23-32. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 7, 2014 in PCT/US2013/057536 filed Aug. 30, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 7, 2019, in International Application No. PCT/US2018/060044, 14 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 22, 2019 in International Application No. PCT/US2018/064982, 13 pages. |
Reiche et al., “The effect of a plasma pretreatment on the Si/Si bonding behaviouir,” Electrochemical Society Proceedings, 1998, vol. 97-36, pp. 437-444. |
Taiwan Office Action dated Feb. 10, 2023, in Taiwan Application No. 108123486, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200013765 A1 | Jan 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62693671 | Jul 2018 | US |