This invention relates to a vacuum system for extracting a multi-phase fluid, and more particularly for extracting a multi-phase fluid from an immersion photolithography exposure tool.
Photolithography is an important process step in semiconductor device fabrication. In photolithography, a circuit design is transferred to a wafer through a pattern imaged onto a photoresist layer deposited on the wafer surface. The wafer then undergoes various etch and deposition processes before a new design is transferred to the wafer surface. This cyclical process continues, building up multiple layers of the semiconductor device.
The minimum feature that may be printed using photolithography is determined by the resolution limit W, which is defined by the Rayleigh equation as:
where k1 is the resolution factor, λ is the wavelength of the exposing radiation and NA is the numerical aperture. In lithographic processes used in the manufacture of semiconductor devices, it is therefore advantageous to use radiation of very short wavelength in order to improve optical resolution so that very small features in the device may be accurately reproduced. Monochromatic visible light of various wavelengths have been used, and more recently radiation in the deep ultra violet (DUV) range has been used, including radiation at 193 nm as generated using an ArF excimer laser.
The value of NA is determined by the acceptance angle (α) of the lens and the index of refraction (n) of the medium surrounding the lens, and is given by the equation:
NA=n sin α (2)
For clean dry air (CDA), the value of n is 1, and so the physical limit to NA for a lithographic technique using CDA as a medium between the lens and the wafer is 1, with the practical limit being currently around 0.9.
Immersion photolithography is a known technique for improving optical resolution by increasing the value of NA. With reference to
Due to outgassing from the photoresist layer and the generation of particulates during photolithography, it is desirable to maintain a steady flow of water between the lens 12 and the wafer 16. For example, as described in US 2004/0075895 the lens and wafer could be immersed in a bath of water supported by the wafer stage, with a pump used to recirculate the water within the bath. However, due to the weight of the water bath acting on the wafer stage, this technique is generally considered undesirable.
An alternative technique, as shown in
It is an object of the present invention to provide a vacuum system for extracting a stream of a multi-phase fluid from a photolithography tool and which can minimize any pressure fluctuations imparted thereby to fluid within the tool.
In a first aspect, the present invention provides a system for extracting a stream of multi-phase fluid from a photo-lithography tool, the system comprising a pumping arrangement for drawing the fluid from the tool, separating means located upstream from the pumping arrangement for separating the fluid drawn from the tool into gas and liquid phases, the pumping arrangement comprising a first pumping unit for extracting gas from the separating means and a second pumping unit for extracting liquid from the separating means, and a pressure control system for controlling the pressure within the separating means by regulating the amounts of gas and liquid therewithin.
In order to minimize any pressure fluctuations transmitted from the system back to the fluid within the tool, the pressure control system can maintain a substantially constant pressure in the separating means by regulating the amounts of liquid and gas within the separating means.
In order to control the amount of gas within the separating means, the pressure control system preferably comprises means for supplying gas to the separating means from a source thereof, and control means for controlling the flow of gas to the separating means. For example, where there is a variation in the flow of fluid into the separating means, and/or a variation in the flow of gas from the separating means, gas can be introduced into the separating means from the external source to compensate for such variations. In a preferred embodiment, the pressure control system comprises a variable flow control device, such as a butterfly or other control valve, through which gas is supplied to the separating means, with the control means being configured to vary the conductance of the valve to control the pressure within the separating means. For example, a controller may be configured to receive a signal indicative of the pressure within the separating means, and to control the conductance of the valve in dependence on the received signal. This signal may be received from a pressure sensor, capacitance manometer or other form of sensor of sufficient sensitivity to achieve the required level of pressure control.
As well as, or as an alternative to, controlling the supply of gas to the separating means, the controller is preferably configured to control the flow of gas from the separating means in dependence on the received signal. For example, another variable flow control device may be provided, through which gas is extracted from the tank by the first pumping unit, with the controller being configured to control the conductance of this variable flow control device.
In order to control the amount of liquid in the separating means, the pressure control system preferably comprises means for supplying liquid to the separating means from a source thereof, and control means for controlling the flow of liquid to the separating means. For example, in order to minimize pressure variations due to the extraction of liquid from the separating means by the second pumping unit, the control means is preferably configured to maintain a substantially constant level of liquid within the separating means. In another preferred embodiment, the liquid supply means comprises a variable flow control device such as a butterfly or other control valve, through which liquid is supplied to the separating means, with the control means being configured to vary the conductance of the valve to control the level of liquid within the separating means. For example, a controller may be configured to receive a signal indicative of the level of liquid within the separating means, and to control the conductance of the valve in dependence on the received signal. This signal may be received from a level meter, float detector, or other form of sensor of sufficient sensitivity to allow a substantially constant level of liquid to be maintained within the separating means.
One or more flexible tubes are preferably used to convey fluid (single and/or multi-phase) between the components of the system. For example, a flexible tube may be used to convey the multi-phase fluid to the separating means. Further flexible tubes may also be used to convey the single phase streams from the separating means to respective pumping units. This can minimize the transmission of vibrations generated during use of the system back to the fluid within the tool.
In another aspect of the present invention, a method is provided for extracting a stream of multi-phase fluid from a photo-lithography tool, the method comprising the steps of: connecting a pumping arrangement to the tool via an extraction tank; operating the pumping arrangement to draw the fluid from the tool; separating the fluid drawn from the tool into gas and liquid phases within the extraction tank, the pumping arrangement extracting separately gas and liquid from the extraction tank; and controlling the pressure within the extraction tank by regulating the amounts of gas and liquid therewithin.
Features described above in relation to system aspects of the invention are equally applicable to method aspects, and vice versa.
With reference to
The tank 32 is configured to separate the liquid and gas phases within the fluid received from the tool. In this example, the fluid received from the tool comprises a mixture of clean dry air (CDA) and ultra-pure water, and so the tank 32 contains any suitable material and/or structure for affecting the separation of the CDA from the water. However, the tank 32 may be configured to separate a different liquid-gas mixture received from the tool. For example, the liquid may comprise an aqueous or non-aqueous solution, and the gas may be other than CDA.
The pumping arrangement comprises a first pumping unit 36 for extracting gas from the tank 32, and a second pumping unit 38 for extracting liquid from the tank 32.
The first pumping unit 36 may comprise any suitable pump for extracting the gas from the tank 32, and is preferably chosen for compatibility with the gas extracted from the tank 32, which is likely to be saturated with liquid vapour, for minimum transmission of pressure fluctuations back to the gas contained in the tank 32, and for relatively long maintenance periods. In this embodiment, the first pumping unit 36 may conveniently comprise an air-powered ejector pump or a water-based liquid ring pump for extracting CDA from the tank 32. In order to inhibit the transfer of vibrations to the tank 32 during use, the first pumping unit 36 is connected to the tank using flexible tubing 40. As the gas exhaust from the first pumping unit 36 may be saturated or supersaturated with liquid vapour, in this embodiment water vapour, a separator vessel 42 may be connected to the exhaust of the first pumping unit 36, the vessel 42 containing any suitable material and/or structure for affecting the separation of water vapour from the CDA. The water extracted from the CDA is exhaust to a drain, and the CDA is vented to the atmosphere.
The second pumping unit 38 may comprise any suitable pump for extracting the liquid from the tank 32, and is preferably chosen for compatibility with the liquid extracted from the tank 32 and for relatively long maintenance periods. In this embodiment where the liquid is water, the second pumping unit 38 may conveniently comprise a water-powered ejector pump or a diaphragm pump for extracting water from the tank 32. In order to inhibit the transfer of vibrations to the tank 32 during use, the second pumping unit 38 is connected to the tank using flexible tubing 44. The internal diameter of the flexible tubing 44 may be chosen to restrict the flow rate of liquid from the tank 32 to the second pumping unit 38. Alternatively, or in addition, a fixed or variable flow restrictor may be located between the tank 32 and the second pumping unit 38.
In order to minimize any pressure fluctuations transmitted from the system 30 back to the fluid within the tool, the system 30 includes a pressure control system for maintain a substantially constant pressure in the tank 32. In this embodiment, this is achieved by regulating the amounts of liquid and gas within the tank 32.
The amount of liquid contained in the tank 32 is maintained at a substantially constant level by a controller 46, thereby maintaining a substantially constant volume of gas in the tank 32. The controller 46 is connected to a sensor 48 for detecting the amount of liquid with the tank 32. The sensor 48 may comprise, for example, a level meter, float meter or other form of suitable sensor. The sensor 48 outputs a signal to the controller 46 indicative of the level of the liquid within the tank 32. In response to this signal, the controller 46 outputs to a variable flow control device 50 located between the tank 32 and a pressurised external liquid source 52 connected to the tank 32 a signal which causes the device 50 to vary the flow of liquid, in this embodiment water, to the tank 32. For example, the device 50 may be a butterfly or other control valve having a conductance that can be varied in dependence on, preferably in proportion to, the signal received from the controller 46. By varying the flow rate of the water to the tank from the external source 52, the controller 46 can compensate for any variation in the flow rate of fluid to the tank 32 from the tool and/or any variation in the rate of extraction of liquid from the tank 32 by the second pumping unit 38, and thus maintain the liquid in the tank 32 at a substantially constant level. The controller 46 may be arranged to process the signal received from the sensor 48 to compensate for any ripples generated in the surface of the liquid during use.
With the gas occupying a substantially constant volume within the tank 32, any variations in the amount of gas contained in the multi-phase fluid received from the tank, and/or any in the rate of extraction of gas from the tank 32 by the first pumping unit 36, and any temperature fluctuations within the tank 32, could vary the pressure of the gas within the tank 32, and impart pressure and flow fluctuations to the fluid in the tool. The pressure control system is therefore configured to maintain a substantially constant pressure within the tank 32 by also regulating the amount of gas within the tank 32.
To achieve this, the pressure control system comprises a controller 54 connected to a sensor 56 for detecting the gas pressure with the tank 32. The sensor 56 may comprise, for example, a pressure sensor, a capacitance manometer or other form of sensor of sufficient sensitivity to achieve the required level of pressure control. The sensor 56 outputs a signal to the controller 54 indicative of the gas pressure within the tank 32. In response to this signal, the controller 54 outputs to a variable flow control device 58 located between the tank 32 and a pressurised external gas source 60 connected to the tank 32 a signal which causes the device 58 to vary the flow of gas, in this embodiment CDA, to the tank 32. A further variable flow control device 62 may be located between the tank 32 and the first pumping unit 36 and configured to receive a signal from the controller 54 to vary the flow of gas from the tank 32. For example, the devices 58, 62 may also be butterfly or other control valves having a conductance that can be varied in dependence on, preferably in proportion to, the signal received from the controller 54. By controlling the flow of gas into and out from the tank 32, the controller 54 can maintain a substantially constant gas pressure within the tank 32.
System 30 provides the capability of extracting a multi-phase fluid from the immersion lithography tool while minimizing any pressure fluctuations imparted thereby to the fluid within the tool.
While the foregoing description and drawings represent the preferred embodiments of the present invention, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the true spirit and scope of the present invention.
The present application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/469,389, filed Aug. 26, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/187,166, filed Jul. 20, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,830,440, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/340,326, filed Dec. 19, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,164,734, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/869,191, filed on Jun. 16, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,481,867. The entire content of each of the foregoing applications is herein fully incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3314219 | Griffin, III et al. | Apr 1967 | A |
3573975 | Dhaka et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
3648587 | Stevens | Mar 1972 | A |
3675395 | Baranowski | Jul 1972 | A |
4315760 | Bij De Leij | Feb 1982 | A |
4346164 | Tabarelli et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4390273 | Loebach et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4396705 | Akeyama et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4466253 | Jaster | Aug 1984 | A |
4480910 | Takanashi et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4509852 | Tabarelli et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4641679 | Arnaudeau et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4696684 | Shen | Sep 1987 | A |
4704140 | Kujala | Nov 1987 | A |
4730634 | Russell | Mar 1988 | A |
4886530 | Dussourd | Dec 1989 | A |
5040020 | Rauschenbach et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5312552 | Norman | May 1994 | A |
5610683 | Takahashi | Mar 1997 | A |
5715039 | Fukuda et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5825043 | Suwa | Oct 1998 | A |
5900354 | Batchelder | May 1999 | A |
6033475 | Hasebe et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6191429 | Suwa | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6236634 | Lee et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6560032 | Hatano | May 2003 | B2 |
6600547 | Watson et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6603130 | Bisschops et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6633365 | Suenaga | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6716268 | Molyneux et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6788477 | Lin | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6954256 | Flagello et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7053983 | Tokita | May 2006 | B2 |
7125438 | Skoglund et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7292313 | Poon et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7379155 | Mertens et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7481867 | Harpham et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
8164734 | Harpham et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8830440 | Harpham et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8934082 | Mertens et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
20020020821 | Van Santen et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020163629 | Switkes et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030123040 | Almogy | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030174408 | Rostalski et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040000627 | Schuster | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040021844 | Suenaga | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040069330 | Rolfson | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040075895 | Lin | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040109237 | Epple et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040114117 | Bleeker | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040119954 | Kawashima et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040125351 | Krautschik | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040135099 | Simon et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040136494 | Lof et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040154641 | Montierth | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040160582 | De Smit et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040165159 | Lof et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040207824 | Lof et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040211920 | Derksen et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050024609 | De Smit et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050048220 | Mertens et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050110973 | Streefkerk et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050132914 | Mulkens et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050134815 | Van Santen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050134817 | Nakamura | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050140948 | Tokita | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050225734 | De Smit et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060038968 | Kemper et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060082746 | Mertens et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060152697 | Poon et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070139628 | Nagasaka et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070195301 | Nagasaka | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070222957 | Nagasaka et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070222967 | Poon et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070263195 | Nagasaka et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080259292 | Mertens et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080266533 | Nagasaka et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
206 607 | Feb 1984 | DE |
221 563 | Apr 1985 | DE |
224448 | Jul 1985 | DE |
242880 | Feb 1987 | DE |
0023231 | Feb 1981 | EP |
0418427 | Mar 1991 | EP |
0 605 103 | Jul 1994 | EP |
1039511 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1 486 827 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1 489 462 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1 491 957 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1 528 433 | May 2005 | EP |
1 571 701 | Sep 2005 | EP |
2474708 | Jul 1981 | FR |
58-202448 | Nov 1983 | JP |
59-19912 | Feb 1984 | JP |
62-065326 | Mar 1987 | JP |
62-121417 | Jun 1987 | JP |
63-157419 | Jun 1988 | JP |
04-305915 | Oct 1992 | JP |
04-305917 | Oct 1992 | JP |
05-62877 | Mar 1993 | JP |
06-124873 | May 1994 | JP |
07-132262 | May 1995 | JP |
07-220990 | Aug 1995 | JP |
08-000907 | Jan 1996 | JP |
08-316125 | Nov 1996 | JP |
10-228661 | Aug 1998 | JP |
10-255319 | Sep 1998 | JP |
10-303114 | Nov 1998 | JP |
10-340846 | Dec 1998 | JP |
11-176727 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2000-058436 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2001-091849 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2002-257137 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002257138 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2004-165666 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004-193252 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004-282023 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2004-289126 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2004-289127 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2004-320016 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2004-320017 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005-005713 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2005-057278 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2005-101488 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005-175176 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005-191344 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2005-223315 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2005-268759 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2005-277363 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2006-060223 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2006-165500 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2007-504662 | Mar 2007 | JP |
1996-0024699 | Jul 1996 | KR |
2004-0044119 | May 2004 | KR |
2004-0047713 | Jun 2004 | KR |
9949504 | Sep 1999 | WO |
03077036 | Sep 2003 | WO |
03077037 | Sep 2003 | WO |
2004019128 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2004053596 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004053950 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004053951 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004053952 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004053953 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004053954 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004053955 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004053956 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004053957 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004053958 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004053959 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004055803 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2004057589 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2004057590 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2005006415 | Jan 2005 | WO |
2005015315 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2005024517 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2005111722 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2005122221 | Dec 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Communication from the European Patent Office informing of the intention to grant a EP patent for European Patent Application No. 05747245.8, dated Dec. 4, 2009. |
U.S. Office Action issued for U.S. Appl. No. 11/642,626, dated Oct. 1, 2008. |
English Translation of Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2005-301607, dated Mar. 9, 2009. |
Information Disclosure Statement as filed on Dec. 21, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/642,626. |
M. Switkes et al., “Immersion Lithography at 157 nm”, MIT Lincoln Lab, Orlando 2001-1, Dec. 17, 2001. |
M. Switkes et al., “Immersion Lithography at 157 nm”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 19, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2001, pp. 2353-2356. |
M. Switkes et al., “Immersion Lithography: Optics for the 50 nm Node”, 157 Anvers-1, Sep. 4, 2002. |
B.J. Lin, “Drivers, Prospects and Challenges for Immersion Lithography”, TSMC, Inc., Sep. 2002. |
B.J. Lin, “Proximity Printing Through Liquid”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 20, No. 11B, Apr. 1978, p. 4997. |
B.J. Lin, “The Paths to Subhalf-Micrometer Optical Lithography”, SPIE vol. 922, Optical/Laser Microlithography (1988), pp. 256-269. |
G.W.W. Stevens, “Reduction of Waste Resulting from Mask Defects”, Solid State Technology, Aug. 1978, vol. 21 008, pp. 68-72. |
S. Owa et al., “Immersion Lithography; its potential performance and issues”, SPIE Microlithography 2003, 5040-186, Feb. 27, 2003. |
S. Owa et al., “Advantage and Feasibility of Immersion Lithography”, Proc. SPIE 5040 (2003). |
Nikon Precision Europe GmbH, “Investor Relations—Nikon's Real Solutions”, May 15, 2003. |
H. Kawata et al., “Optical Projection Lithography using Lenses with Numerical Apertures Greater than Unity”, Microelectronic Engineering 9 (1989), pp. 31-36. |
J.A. Hoffnagle et al., “Liquid Immersion Deep-Ultraviolet Interferometric Lithography”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 17, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 1999, pp. 3306-3309. |
S. Owa and N. Nagasaka, “Potential Performance and Feasibility of Immersion Lithography”, NGL Workshop 2003, Jul. 10, 2003, Slide Nos. 1-33. |
A. Suzuki, “Lithography Advances on Multiple Fronts”, EEdesign, EE Times, Jan. 5, 2004. |
B. Lin, The k3 coefficient in nonparaxial λ/NA scaling equations for resolution, depth of focus, and immersion lithography, J. Microlith., Microfab., Microsyst. 1(1):7-12 (2002). |
European Search Report issued for European Patent Application No. 05256461.4-2222 dated Feb. 16, 2006. |
Information Disclosure Statement filed Apr. 19, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/785,722. |
S. Owa et al,, “Update on 193nm immersion exposure tool”, Litho Forum, International SEMATECH, Los Angeles, Jan. 27-29, 2004, Slide Nos. 1-51. |
H. Hata, “The Development of Immersion Exposure Tools”, Litho Forum, International SEMATECH, Los Angeles, Jan. 27-29, 2004, Slide Nos. 1-22. |
T. Matsuyama et al., “Nikon Projection Lens Update”, SPIE Microlithography 2004, 5377-65, Mar. 2004. |
“Depth-of-Focus Enhancement Using High Refractive Index Layer on the Imaging Layer”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 27, No. 11, Apr. 1985, p. 6521. |
B.W. Smith et al., “Immersion Optical Lithography at 193nm”, Future FAB International, vol. 15, Jul. 11, 2003. |
H. Kawata et al., “Fabrication of 0.2μm Fine Patterns Using Optical Projection Lithography with an Oil Immersion Lens”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 31 (1992), pp. 4174-4177. |
G. Owen et al., “1/8μm Optical Lithography”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 10, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 1992, pp. 3032-3036. |
H. Hogan, “New Semiconductor Lithography Makes a Splash”, Photonics Spectra, Photonics TechnologyWorld, Oct. 2003 Edition, pp. 1-3. |
U.S. Office Action issued for U.S. Appl. No. 11/785,722, dated Oct. 25, 2010. |
U.S. Office Action issued for U.S. Appl. No. 11/785,722, dated Feb. 4, 2010. |
U.S. Office Action issued for U.S. Appl. No. 11/785,722, dated Oct. 14, 2008. |
U.S. Office Action issued for U.S. Appl. No. 11/785,722, dated Apr. 17, 2008. |
Japanese Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2011 in related Japanese patent application No. 2007-516020. |
Canon KK; Abstract of JP 2002257138 entitled Static Pressure Fluid Bearing Device, Stage Device Using the Same, Exposure Device, and Manufacturing Method for Device, dated Sep. 11, 2002. |
United Kingdom Patent Office Search Report for Application No. GB 0414967.0, dated Oct. 12, 2004. |
Chinese Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2011 in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201010143405.2. |
Japanese Office Action dated Mar. 7, 2012 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-063578. |
Korean Office Action dated Apr. 23, 2013 in corresponding Korean Patent Application No. 10-2011-7011954. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170075233 A1 | Mar 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14469389 | Aug 2014 | US |
Child | 15362530 | US | |
Parent | 13187166 | Jul 2011 | US |
Child | 14469389 | US | |
Parent | 12340326 | Dec 2008 | US |
Child | 13187166 | US | |
Parent | 10869191 | Jun 2004 | US |
Child | 12340326 | US |