Annular illumination method for charged particle projection optics

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6639221
  • Patent Number
    6,639,221
  • Date Filed
    Friday, January 18, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 28, 2003
    20 years ago
Abstract
A method and apparatus for aligning a charged particle beam with an aperture includes providing a hollow beam aperture device adapted for shaping a charged particle beam into a hollow charged particle beam. Then direct the charged particle beam through the aperture. Provide deflection coils for deflecting the charged particle beam relative to the aperture. Vary the current to the alignment deflection coils while measuring the aperture electrical current generated by charged particles reaching the hollow beam aperture as a function of the current to the alignment deflection coils. Then adjust the current in the alignment deflection coils based on the aperture electrical current to center the charged particle beam on the hollow beam aperture. Preferably, separate hollow beam and peripheral beam apertures with associated sensing and current are used to center the beam on respective ones of the apertures.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




This invention relates to particle imaging systems and more particularly to methods and apparatus for alignment of charged particle beam projection lithography systems.




2. Description of Related Art




A problem with using charged particle projection optics has been the adverse effects of space charge upon beam projection optics. To ameliorate such effects by enhancing charged particle projection optics, hollow beam annular illumination technology is being developed because hollow beam annular illumination technology can suppress space charge effects dramatically. Hollow beam annular illumination with its reduced space charge problems, permits high throughput charged particle lithography equipment to be produced, because with a hollow beam even a projection system which employs a high beam current can produce well focussed images.




U.S. Pat. No. 5,821,542 of Golladay for “Particle Beam Imaging System Having Hollow Beam Illumination” states that “throughput is significantly lower for e-beam exposure systems than for photoexposure systems, thus making e-beam tools too costly for general production.” The Golladay patent states further “Higher throughput in e-beam lithography systems can presently be achieved by increasing the e-beam current, but only with an unacceptable degradation in resolution. The degradation in resolution can be attributed to interactions between electrons within the electron beam. The natural repulsion between electrons, due to having charges of the same polarity, causes a number of deleterious effects which limit resolution at the workpiece . . . ” To overcome the above stated problem the Golladay patent describes a charged particle beam imaging system in which an annular aperture comprises a central circular area which is substantially non-transmissive to a beam of charged particles and a first ring shaped area which is substantially transmissive to the beam of charged particles surrounded by a second ring-shaped area which is substantially non-transmissive to the beam.




U.S. Pat. No. 5,834,783 of Muraki et al. for “Electron Beam Exposure Apparatus and Method and Device Manufacturing Method” and U.S. Pat. No. 5,973,332 of Muraki et al. for “Electron Beam Exposure Method, and Device Manufacturing Method Using Same” describe an E-beam exposure apparatus including a “hollow beam forming stop whose central portion is shielded . . . ” Muraki et al. states “Since the space charge effect of hollow electron beam (hollow cylindrical beam) is smaller than that of a nonhollow electron beam (e.g. a Gaussian beam), the electron beam can be brought to focus on the wafer to form a source image free from any blur on the wafer . . . the electron density at the peripheral portion becomes higher than that at the central portion.”




As is discussed below in more detail, even with the above described advantages of hollow beam systems, there are problems with alignment of the charged particle beam with the apertures which define the configuration of the hollow beam.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




A method and apparatus for aligning a charged particle beam with an aperture includes providing a hollow beam aperture means adapted for shaping a charged particle beam into a hollow charged particle beam. Then direct the charged particle beam through the aperture. Provide deflection coils for deflecting the charged particle beam relative to the aperture. Vary the current to the alignment deflection coils while measuring the aperture electrical current generated by charged particles reaching the hollow beam aperture as a function of the current to the alignment deflection coils. Then adjust the current in the alignment deflection coils based on the aperture electrical current measured to center the charged particle beam on the hollow beam aperture. Preferably, separate hollow beam and peripheral beam apertures with associated sensing and current are used to center the beam on respective ones of the apertures.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The foregoing and other aspects and advantages of this invention are explained and described below with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:





FIG. 1A

is a top view of a cylindrically shaped composite peripheral and hollow beam aperture for an E-beam projection system for shaping an E-beam in accordance with this invention.





FIG. 1B

is a sectional view taken along line


1


B—


1


B′ in

FIG. 1A

of the composite peripheral and hollow beam aperture of FIG.


1


A.





FIG. 1C

is a perspective sectional view, taken along line


1


B—


1


B′ in

FIG. 1A

, of the composite peripheral and hollow beam aperture of

FIG. 1A

, showing an E-beam directed onto and through the aperture.





FIGS. 2A and 2B

are similar views to those of the annular aperture in

FIGS. 1A and 1B

which show an example of a misaligned annular aperture with an alignment fabrication error.





FIG. 3A

shows a perspective view similar to

FIG. 1C

of an E-beam exposure system with the E-beam directed onto a composite aperture with a hollow beam directed onto a reticle.





FIG. 3B

shows a beam intensity distribution of a collimated E-beam entering the composite aperture of FIG.


3


A.





FIG. 3C

shows a beam intensity distribution of scan of a collimated hollow E-beam leaving the composite aperture of FIG.


3


A.





FIG. 4

is a graph showing an example of monitored aperture current amplitude of the hollow E-beam method of

FIG. 3A

which is less than the exemplary result desired.




FIGS


5


A and


5


B show alternate dual aperture embodiments of several improved methods and apparatus, in accordance with this invention, which are described below.





FIG. 5C

shows additional details of the embodiment of FIG.


5


A.





FIG. 5D

is a graph which shows an example of a bell shaped curve of current in upper E-beam of

FIGS. 5A and 5C

.





FIG. 5E

is a graph which shows an example of the narrowed aperture current profile of the intermediate E-beam monitored inside the hollow cylinder in the lower portion of the upper aperture of

FIGS. 5A and 5C

.





FIG. 5F

is a graph that shows the hollow E-beam profile of the lower aperture current of E-beam monitored in the lower aperture in

FIGS. 5A and 5C

.





FIG. 6

shows a graph of “aperture current amplitude” of current received by the peripheral aperture current monitor of FIGS.


5


A/


5


C as the E-beam is scanned across the upper, peripheral aperture with a minimum value when the E-beam is centered over the upper, peripheral aperture.





FIG. 7

shows a graph of “aperture current amplitude” of current received by an aperture current monitor of FIGS.


5


A/


5


C an intermediate E-beam is scanned across a hollow beam aperture, with a very clear maximum value when the E-beam is centered over the hollow beam aperture.





FIG. 8A

shows an aperture current monitor which includes an amplifier and an A/D converter that provide an output signal to a computer system seen in FIG.


8


B.





FIG. 8B

shows a computer system for controlling adjustment of E-beam alignment and centering onto the apertures by varying the current to the aligners by varying of the current through the respective apertures in

FIGS. 3A

,


5


A-


5


C as adjusted by varying the excitation current of the aligners in accordance with the algorithm in FIG.


10


A.





FIG. 9A

shows a schematic block diagram of a process for manufacture of a semiconductor chip adapted to employing the apparatus and the method of this invention.





FIG. 9B

shows a flow chart of lithography steps of

FIG. 9A

which are dominant steps in the wafer processing steps of this invention.





FIG. 10A

shows an algorithm for controlling E-beam alignment and centering onto the an aperture which is performed by varying the current to the aligners, by varying of the current through an aperture in

FIGS. 3A

,


5


A,


5


B and


5


C as adjusted by varying the excitation current of the aligners under control the computer system shown in FIG.


8


B.





FIG. 10B

shows another related algorithm which is employed with the embodiments of

FIGS. 5A-5C

where there is a lower aperture onto which the E-beam needs to be centered.











DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT





FIGS. 1A-1C

show various views of a composite peripheral and hollow electron beam annular aperture


10


for shaping an E-beam


24


into a hollow E-beam


96


/


97


for illumination (E-beam exposure) of a target comprising workpiece


60


, shown in

FIG. 3A

which is shown as a reticle.





FIG. 1A

is a top view of the cylindrically-shaped, electrically-conductive-metallic, composite peripheral-and-hollow E-beam aperture


10


connected to an electrical circuit through electrical output line


50


.





FIG. 1B

is a sectional view taken along line


1


B—


1


B′ in FIG.


1


A through the central axis of the composite peripheral and hollow E-beam aperture


10


.





FIG. 1C

is a perspective sectional view of the composite peripheral and hollow E-beam aperture


10


taken along line


1


B—


1


B′ in

FIG. 1A

with a collimated E-beam


24


projected directed onto the top


14


thereof. The collimated E-beam


24


has passed from a conventional E-beam source (not shown for convenience of illustration) through a first crossover and through a first lens L


1


which collimates the collimated E-beam


24


.




The composite aperture


10


acts as a mask blocking both the periphery of the collimated beam


24


and the center of collimated E-beam


24


thereby shaping/patterning the collimated E-beam


24


into a hollow E-beam


96


which passes through the composite aperture


10


and out of the bottom thereof and through lens L


2


which focuses collimated E-beam


24


as an E-beam


97


onto a spot


58


on a workpiece


60


shown in FIG.


3


A.




Composite aperture


10


comprises an electrically-conductive-metallic shell


11


comprising a hollow metallic cylinder


12


open on the bottom and covered by a metallic top


14


which has a coaxial, circular, central hole


14


′ therethrough. Aperture


10


also includes an electrically-conductive-metallic center pole


16


that is suspended coaxially with and inside cylinder


12


and top


14


.




The upper end of center pole


16


is located inside central hole


14


′ aligned coaxially therewith. An annular passageway for the hollow E-beam


96


is provided by the combination of the center pole


16


and the wall of central hole


14


′ since the center pole


16


is aligned coaxially with the cylinder


12


and the central hole


14


′.




The hollow E-beam


96


passes between the walls of central hole


14


′ in top


14


and the pole


16


. Inside the upper side-walls of the cylinder


12


, below the top


14


and above a set of radial struts


18


is an upper space


13


through which the hollow E-beam


96


passes.




After hollow E-beam


96


passes through the upper space


13


it reaches a set of several openings


17


between the struts


18


and the E-beam passes through openings


17


into an lower space


19


. In other words openings


17


provide interconnections between the upper space


13


and the lower space


19


inside the lower side-walls of the cylinder


12


allowing the hollow E-beam


96


to pass therethrough.




Then hollow E-beam


96


passes from lower space


19


out of cylinder


12


and through the lens L


2


which focuses the collimated E-beam


24


into a converging hollow E-beam


97


that is focused onto a very small spot


58


on a workpiece (reticle)


60


.




As indicated above, inside cylinder


12


, there are the several, radially-disposed, conductive metallic struts


18


, which are electrically and mechanically connected to cylinder


12


. Struts


18


are provided to support the center pole


16


and to conduct electrons which are collected thereby towards the electrical output line


50


. The struts


18


are secured to the inner wall of the lower end of cylinder


12


(well below the annular top


14


) and they are firmly connected to the center pole


16


both mechanically and electrically. As can be seen in

FIG. 1C

, there are openings


17


, between (aside from) the struts


18


, through which only the hollow E-beam


96


, which (as stated above) is a portion of collimated E-beam


24


, can pass.




To summarize, the composite aperture


10


includes an annular, upper aperture


15


formed between the center pole


16


and the side walls of the central hole


14


′ in top


14


. The hollow E-beam


96


passes through upper aperture


15


; while the peripheral (outer) portion


89


of collimated E-beam


24


strikes the top


14


of shell


11


and is masked thereby and the electrons striking the top


14


cause some electrical current to flow through electrical output line


50


. The central beam


88


which is the central portion of collimated E-beam


24


, i.e. the interior portion thereof, strikes the center pole


16


and is masked thereby and adds some more electrons to the electrical current flowing through the electrical output line


50


.





FIG. 3A

shows a perspective view similar to

FIG. 1C

of an upper portion of an E-beam exposure system


9


with an E-beam


21


divergent from an upper crossover


86


directed through lens Li which produces a collimated E-beam


24


consisting of electrons travelling in parallel towards the surface of the top


14


of the shell


11


of the composite aperture


10


. The hollow E-beam


96


which passes out of the composite aperture


10


is directed therefrom onto a point


58


on a workpiece (reticle)


60


. Ideally, the collimated E-beam


24


is supposed to be centered on the top


14


and the center pole


16


of composite annular aperture


10


.




Since the location (alignment) of the center pole


16


determines the shape and location of the hollow E-beam


96


, it is crucial to align a charged particle beam


21


directed onto the top surface of the composite aperture


10


with a high degree of accuracy. As shown in

FIG. 3A

, when the hollow E-beam


96


leaves the composite aperture


10


, it is focussed down by lens L


2


onto the point


58


on the workpiece (reticle)


60


.




A problem that arises is that the E-beam


21


may not be accurately centered on the composite aperture


10


, which is a significant fact because of the extremely tight tolerances of submicron devices which means that accuracy of machining in forming and assembling the components of the annular aperture


10


is crucial. I have found that the problem of alignment of E-beam


21


is attributable to machining and assembly errors that affect the location of upper aperture


15


and center pole


16


in the composite aperture


10


.





FIGS. 2A and 2B

are similar views to those of composite aperture


10


in

FIGS. 1A and 1B

, which include phantom lines which show an example of a misaligned annular aperture


10


′ due to an alignment fabrication error in the positioning of the center pole


16


.

FIG. 2A

shows a modified view of

FIG. 1A

that illustrates misalignment of the center pole


16


′ (in phantom) as contrasted to the properly aligned center pole


16


.

FIG. 2B

is a sectional view modified based on

FIG. 1B

of a composite peripheral and hollow E-beam aperture


10


′ showing the center pole


16


′ (in phantom) and the properly aligned center pole


16


.





FIGS. 2A and 2B

illustrate the contrast between a misaligned center pole


16


′ (dotted lines) in the annular aperture


15


, and a ideally aligned center pole


16


in the upper aperture


15


. Cross-section lines have been omitted for clarity of illustration. In

FIGS. 2A and 2B

, in solid lines the center pole


16


is shown in the ideal position in which it is coaxial with the composite aperture


10


. In contrast, a misaligned center pole


16


′, which is shown in phantom, will cause the hollow E-beam to have an asymmetric current distribution which makes it impossible to obtain a symmetrical E-beam current distribution.




Proper alignment of the center pole


16


is crucial to achievement of the result which is obtained when the charged particle beam


36


, which is directed onto the composite aperture


10


, is aligned with a specified degree of accuracy, since the center of the E-beam


36


must coincide with the central axis of the composite aperture


10


which is greatly affected by the geometry of the center pole


16


/


16


′ or other deviations from specifications. If the accuracy of alignment of the E-beam with the composite aperture


10


is not sufficient, the expected advantages of the hollow E-beam illumination method which is supposed to work against the problems caused by space charge effects will not be obtained or will be greatly suppressed.




Any asymmetry of the annular E-beam shape (more exactly saying, “beam current distribution”) produces larger magnitudes of aberrations due to space charge effects than we would expect from an ideally shaped annular E-beam. Also, highly controlled E-beam positioning stability onto the composite aperture


10


is important. If proper alignment does not exist, then the beam current of the E-beam will vary with time, and a serious dose error will result.




FIRST EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTION




Aperture Current Monitor




Referring again to

FIG. 3A

, to solve the above problem, I have designed a control method and a control system employing an aperture current monitor


52


which monitors current received by the composite aperture


10


, including the metallic shell


11


and the center pole


16


, via electrical output line


50


which connects the cylinder


14


to the aperture current monitor


52


.





FIG. 8A

shows the aperture current monitor


52


that including amplifier


55


and an A/D converter


56


that provide an output signal on line


53


to the Central Processing Unit (CPU) of a computer system


260


seen in FIG.


8


B.




Adjustment of Alignment




Associated with the aperture


10


there are alignment coils (upper aligners)


22


which control the E-beam position and the angle of the collimated E-beam


24


. The upper aligners


22


make it possible to align and center the collimated E-beam


24


accurately onto the aperture


10


below it.




Referring to the algorithm of

FIG. 10A

, in accordance with this invention, E-beam alignment and centering onto the composite aperture


10


is done by varying the current on lines


73


to the aligners


22


in FIG.


3


A and lines


74


/


74


′ in

FIGS. 5A and 5C

to vary the current through the composite aperture


10


in

FIG. 3A

or the upper aperture


120


/


210


in FIGS.


5


A/


5


B as adjusted by varying the excitation current of the aligners


22


or upper aligners


162


/


243


respectively under control of the computer system


260


shown in

FIG. 8B

in accordance with the algorithm in

FIG. 10A

in step


401


thereof.




The aperture current monitors


52


of

FIG. 3A

(which is illustrative of monitor


130


of

FIG. 5A

, and monitor


252


of

FIG. 5B

) are shown in detail in FIG.


8


A. Monitor


52


amplifies the signal on line


50


with amplifier


55


and converts the signal in an Analog-to-Digital (A/D) converter


56


. The output of A/D converter


56


is supplied on line


53


(which is one of several digital signal input lines


53


,


131


,


151


,


231


and


253


) to the CPU


61


of computer system


260


in




FIG.


8


A. The CPU


61


monitors the composite aperture current on line


53


and after performing the algorithm of

FIG. 10A

, CPU


61


sends a digital signal on output line


68


to a digital-to-analog (D/A) converter


70


which feeds an analog control signal output to amplifiers


72


which in this case supply an output voltage on line


73


to adjust the current through the upper aligners


22


as required by the computer system


260


.




The computer system


260


employs the algorithm shown in

FIG. 10A

to determine the value of the adjusted current in the upper aligners


22


. The CPU continues to perform the algorithm of

FIG. 10A

until the E-beam


24


is properly aligned as indicated by the voltage on line


53


in FIG.


3


A.





FIG. 10B

shows another related algorithm which is employed with the embodiments of

FIGS. 5A-5C

where there is a lower aperture


110


/


220


onto which the E-beam


194


/


294


needs to be centered.




Referring to

FIG. 8B

in conjunction with

FIG. 3A

, the line


53


from

FIG. 3A

is connected to one of the IN terminals of the CPU


61


of the process control computer control system


260


. As is the usual configuration of a computer system, the CPU


61


is connected to a display monitor


62


and a keyboard


63


as well as a random access memory (RAM)


65


and a Direct Access Storage Device (DASD) which in this case is shown as a disk drive


64


for storing data for the process control computer system


260


. A printer


78


is also connected to the CPU. The computer system


260


provides output signals on OUT line


68


to a D/A converter


70


which supplies signals via line


71


to amplifiers


72


which are connected by lines


73


to the upper aligners


22


in FIG.


3


A. The CPU


61


generates a scan of the collimated E-beam


24


from left-to-right or right-to-left which produces the curve


87


′ seen in

FIG. 3B

which is displayed on the computer display monitor


62


in FIG.


8


B. When the collimated E-beam


24


is centered on the composite aperture


10


the curve


87


′ reaches a maximum.





FIG. 3C

shows a curve


96


′ resulting from passage of collimated E-beam


24


through the composite aperture.




The flow chart of the computer program which is shown in

FIG. 10A

provides for adjustment of the current in the upper aligners in response to the output of the aperture current monitor


52


.




In step


400


, the program starts.




Then in step


401


the program generates an incremental digital change which slightly varies the excitation of the upper aperture aligners


22


.




In step


402


, the program receives the digital value of the aperture current measured by the aperture current monitor


52


, while the E-beam position is held constant at the top crossover


21


.




In step


403


, the CPU tests to determine whether the aperture current indicates that the beam is centered on the upper aperture


15


.




If NO, (the beam is not centered on the upper aperture


15


) then the program loops back on line


404


to step


401


.




If YES, (the beam is centered on the upper aperture


15


) then the program ENDs in step


405


.





FIG. 10B

is a flow chart of a computer program which provides for adjustment of the current in the lower aligners in response to the output of the aperture current monitor


152


/


230


.




In step


406


, the program starts.




Then in step


407


the program generates an incremental digital change which slightly varies the excitation of the lower aperture aligners


143


/


262


.




In step


408


, the program receives the digital value of the aperture current measured by the lower aperture current monitor


152


/


230


, while the E-beam position is held constant at the lower crossover


192


/


292


.




In step


409


, the CPU tests to determine whether the aperture current indicates that the beam is centered on the lower aperture


152


/


230


.




If NO, (the beam is not centered on the lower aperture) then the program loops back on line


410


to step


407


.




If YES, (the beam is centered on the lower aperture


110


/


220


then the program ENDs in step


411


.





FIG. 4

is a graph showing an example of monitored aperture current amplitude of the hollow E-beam method of

FIG. 3A

which is less than the exemplary result desired. As shown in

FIG. 4

, the peak of the graph expected in monitored aperture current is not very high beneath the arrow, i.e. the contrast between the peak beneath the arrow is not always sufficient to distinguish between the peaks and the valleys with sufficient certainty. Accordingly, I have discovered that since it is difficult to distinguish between optimum alignment and the peripheral alignment values to the left and the right that an alternate embodiment would be desirable to make it less difficult to align the upper E-beam


24


onto the upper aperture


15


with an optimum degree of accuracy by generating curves which are more easily interpreted by the computer system


260


of

FIG. 8B

than the curve shown in FIG.


4


.




Thus,

FIGS. 5A and 5B

show alternate dual aperture embodiments of several improved methods and apparatus, in accordance with this invention, which are described below.

FIG. 5C

shows additional details of the embodiment of FIG.


5


A.




DUAL APERTURE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION





FIGS. 5A and 5C

are very similar in that a peripheral aperture


120


is located on top and a hollow beam aperture


110


with a center pole


116


is located on the bottom. In

FIG. 5B

, the reverse configuration is employed with a hollow beam aperture


210


with a center pole


216


is located on the top and a peripheral aperture


220


located on the bottom.




The E-beam projection system


90


of

FIGS. 5A and 5C

in accordance with this invention consists of the peripheral aperture


120


(on top) which shapes the upper E-beam


187


into a narrower intermediate beam


190


/


194


and the hollow beam aperture


110


(on the bottom), which shapes the intermediate E-beam


190


/


194


into a hollow lower E-beam


196


/


197


which hits the reticle


160


at a focal point


198


. For convenience of illustration and initial description of this embodiment,

FIG. 5A

is less detailed than

FIG. 5C

, in that it omits the graphs of waveforms which are described later with reference to FIG.


5


C.




The upper, peripheral aperture


120


blocks/masks (i.e. defines) the outer periphery


188


of the upper E-beam


187


. The lower, hollow beam aperture


110


blocks/masks (i.e. defines) the inner portion


195


of the intermediate E-beam


190


/


194


, thereby producing the hollow lower E-beam


197


which is focussed by lens L


4


onto a spot


198


on the workpiece (reticle)


160


which is below the lens L


4


. In the apparatus shown in FIGS.


5


A/


5


C, the upper, peripheral aperture


120


determines the outer periphery (sets the outer limit) of the upper defined E-beam


190


; while the lower aperture


110


determines the inner periphery (sets the inner limit) of the lower defined hollow E-beam


196


.




On the other hand, referring to

FIG. 5B

, the opposite order of arrangement of the two apertures


210


/


220


also provides a hollow E-beam


290


/


296


which has the same beam shape. The description which follows immediately below applies specifically to

FIG. 5A

, but, generally it also applies to

FIG. 5B

with corresponding reversals in the sequence of the elements and the effects thereof as described below.




Referring again to

FIGS. 5A and 5C

, before each aperture


110


/


120


, there is a set of aligners


162


/


143


which are alignment coils. Each set of aligners


162


/


143


consists of at least two successive alignment coils. The first set of aligners


162


controls the position and the angle of the upper E-beam


187


. The second set of aligners


143


controls the position and the angle of the intermediate E-beam


194


. Thus the two sets of aligners


162


/


143


make it possible for the upper E-beam


187


and the intermediate E-beam


194


to be aligned accurately onto the apertures


120


/


110


below them.





FIG. 5A

is a perspective sectional view of a system


90


similar to system


9


of

FIG. 3A

with two stacked apertures, instead of one, aligned along a single E-beam column. An E-beam


210


generated by a conventional E-beam source (not shown for convenience of illustration) is projected towards an upper crossover


186


where it diverges and then passes through a collimating lens L


1


which projects a collimated E-beam


187


consisting of electrons travelling in parallel towards the surface of the top


124


of the peripheral aperture


120


on the top of the E-beam column.




Below the peripheral aperture


120


is a hollow E-beam aperture


110


. The two stacked apertures


120


/


110


substitute for the composite aperture


10


of FIG.


3


A. The peripheral aperture


120


acts as a mask blocking the periphery of the collimated beam


187


. The hollow beam aperture


110


blocks the center beam


195


of collimated E-beam


194


thereby shaping/patterning the collimated E-beam


194


into a hollow E-beam


196


which passes out of the bottom of the hollow beam aperture


110


and through lens L


4


which focuses collimated E-beam


196


as an E-beam


197


onto a spot


198


on workpiece (reticle)


160


.




The peripheral aperture


120


comprises an electrically-conductive-metallic shell


121


comprising a hollow metallic cylinder


122


open on the bottom and covered by a metallic top


124


. The top


124


has a coaxial, circular, central hole


126


therethrough. The collimated E-beam


187


passes from the peripheral aperture


120


forming a narrower collimated E-beam


190


which is projected through lens L


2


, forming converging beam


191


which passes through crossover


192


as beam


193


that passes through lens L


3


as collimated beam


194


which is projected onto the top of the hollow beam aperture


110


.




The hollow beam aperture


110


comprises an electrically-conductive-metallic shell


111


comprising a hollow metallic cylinder


112


open on the bottom and covered by a metallic top


114


. Hollow beam aperture


110


includes a top


114


surface which has a coaxial, circular, central hole


115


therethrough. The hollow beam aperture


110


also includes an electrically-conductive-metallic center pole


116


which is suspended coaxially with aperture


110


inside the cylinder


112


and top


114


. The upper end of center pole


116


is preferably located inside the central hole


115


aligned coaxially therewith. The central beam


195


which is the central portion of beam


194


is blocked by center pole


116


. An annular passageway is provided for the outer portion


196


of beam


194


which comprises a hollow E-beam. Hollow E-beam


196


is shaped by the center pole


116


in lower aperture


110


and the wall of central hole


126


in the upper, peripheral aperture


120


since the center pole


116


is aligned coaxially with the cylinders


122


and


112


and the central holes


126


and


115


.




The hollow E-beam


196


passes between the walls of central hole


115


in top


114


and the pole


116


. An upper space


113


is defined (inside aperture


110


) by the upper side-walls of the cylinder


112


, below the top


114


and above a set of radial struts


118


through which the hollow E-beam


196


passes. After the hollow E-beam


196


passes through the upper space


113


it reaches a set of several openings


117


between the struts


118


. Openings


117


(indicated between the struts


118


by phantom lines) connect the upper space


113


to a lower space


119


inside the lower side-walls of the cylinder


112


allowing the hollow E-beam


196


to pass therethrough.




Then, the hollow E-beam


196


passes from lower space


119


out of cylinder


112


and through the lens L


4


which focuses the collimated E-beam


124


into a converging hollow E-beam


197


which is focused onto a very small spot


198


on a workpiece (reticle)


160


.




As indicated above, inside cylinder


112


, there are the several, radially-disposed, conductive metallic struts


118


, which are electrically and mechanically connected to cylinder


112


. Struts


118


are provided to support the center pole


116


and to conduct electrons which are collected thereby towards the electrical output line


150


. The struts


118


are secured to the inner wall of the lower end of cylinder


112


(well below the annular top


114


) and they are firmly connected to the center pole


116


both mechanically and electrically. The openings


117


, between (aside from) the struts


118


permit only the hollow E-beam


196


, which (as stated above) is a portion of collimated E-beam


194


to pass therethrough.




As stated above, the central beam


195


, i.e. the interior portion, of collimated E-beam


194


from lens L


3


, strikes the center pole


116


and is masked thereby. The central beam


195


provides a current of electrons which flow through the electrical output line


150


to the hollow beam aperture current monitor


152


. Monitor


152


supplies an electrical output current to line


153


to the CPU in FIG.


8


B.




To summarize, the peripheral aperture


120


includes upper opening


126


and the peripheral (outer) portion


188


of collimated E-beam


187


strikes the top


124


of shell


121


and is masked thereby. The electrons striking top


124


cause some electrical current to flow through electrical output line


128


, and the narrower, collimated E-beam


190


passes out of peripheral aperture


120


.




The hollow beam aperture


110


includes an opening


115


between the center pole


116


and the side walls of the central hole in top


114


. The hollow E-beam


196


passes through the hole


115


in hollow beam aperture


110


and out below aperture


110


to lens L


4


.




Ideally, the collimated E-beam


187


is supposed to be centered on the top


124


of the shell


121


and lower, along the column, the collimated E-beam


194


is supposed to be centered on the top


114


of the shell


111


.




Since the location (alignment) of the center pole


116


determines the shape and location of the hollow E-beam


196


, it is crucial to align a charged particle beam


194


directed onto the top surface of the hollow beam aperture


110


with a high degree of accuracy. Ideally, the collimated E-beam


194


is supposed to be centered on the top


114


of the shell


111


and the center pole


116


of the hollow beam aperture


110


. As shown a in

FIG. 5C

, when the hollow E-beam


196


leaves the hollow beam aperture


110


, it is focussed down by lens L


4


onto the point


198


on the workpiece (reticle)


160


.




A problem that arises is that the E-beam


194


may not be accurately centered on the hollow beam aperture


110


, which is a significant fact because of the extremely tight tolerances of submicron devices which means that accuracy of machining in forming and assembling the components of the hollow beam aperture


110


is crucial. I have found that the problem of alignment of E-beams


194


is attributable to machining and assembly errors which affect the location of the upper aperture


115


and the center pole


116


in the hollow beam aperture


110


.




The hollow E-beam


196


which passes out of hollow beam aperture


112


is directed therefrom onto a point


198


on a workpiece (reticle)


160


.





FIG. 5B

is a perspective sectional view similar to

FIG. 5A

of a system


90


′ which also includes two stacked apertures aligned along a single E-beam column. On the top of the E-beam column, there is a hollow E-beam aperture


210


and therebelow is a peripheral E-beam aperture


220


. The two stacked apertures


210


/


220


substitute for the apertures


120


/


110


of FIG.


5


A.




In

FIG. 5B

, an E-beam


310


diverging from an upper crossover


286


passes through a collimating lens L


1


thereby projecting a collimated E-beam


287


consisting of electrons travelling in parallel towards the surface of the top of an electrically-conductive-metallic center pole


216


.




The upper hollow beam aperture


210


comprises an electrically-conductive-metallic shell


211


comprising a hollow metallic cylinder


212


open on the bottom and covered by a metallic top


214


. The top


214


surface has a coaxial, circular, central, hole


215


therethrough. The hollow beam aperture


210


also includes an electrically-conductive-metallic center pole


216


which is suspended coaxially with aperture


210


by struts


218


inside the cylinder


212


and top


214


.




The upper end of center pole


216


is preferably located inside the central hole


215


aligned coaxially with cylinder


212


and central hole


215


. Center pole


216


blocks the central portion


288


of collimated E-beam


287


while the hollow E-beam


290


(the outer portion


290


of beam


287


) passes through an annular hole/passageway provided by the central hole


215


and the center pole


216


in the hollow beam aperture


210


. In summary, the hollow E-beam


290


was shaped by the center pole


216


in the hollow beam aperture


210


.




Since the location (alignment) of the center pole


216


determines the shape and location of the hollow E-beam


290


, it is crucial to align a charged particle beam


287


directed onto the top surface of the hollow beam aperture


215


with a high degree of accuracy. Ideally, the collimated E-beam


287


is supposed to be centered on the top


214


of the shell


211


and the center pole


216


of the hollow beam aperture


215


.




As indicated above, inside cylinder


212


, there are the several, radially-disposed, conductive metallic struts


218


, which are electrically and mechanically connected to cylinder


212


. Struts


218


are provided to support the center pole


216


and to conduct electrons which are collected thereby towards the electrical output line


250


. The struts


218


are secured to the inner wall of the lower end of cylinder


212


(well below the annular top


214


) and they are firmly connected to the center pole


216


both mechanically and electrically. The openings


217


, between (aside from) the struts


218


permit only the hollow E-beam


290


, which (as stated above) is a portion of collimated E-beam


287


to pass therethrough towards lenses L


2


, L


3


and peripheral shell


221


.




The collimated, hollow E-beam


290


passes from the hollow beam aperture


210


as a collimated hollow E-beam which is projected through lens L


2


, forming converging hollow E-beam


291


which passes through crossover


292


as E-beam


293


that passes through lens L


3


as hollow, collimated E-beam


294


which is projected onto the top of the peripheral aperture


220


.




The peripheral aperture


220


comprises an electrically-conductive-metallic shell


221


comprising a hollow metallic cylinder


222


defining a hollow space


225


that is open on the bottom and covered by a metallic top


224


. The top


224


has a coaxial, circular, central hole


226


therethrough.




The peripheral aperture


220


acts as a mask blocking the periphery of the collimated hollow E-beam


294


. The peripheral aperture


220


blocks the periphery of collimated E-beam


294


thereby shaping/patterning the collimated E-beam


294


into a narrower hollow E-beam


296


. In other words, the central portion


296


of the hollow E-beam


296


passes between the walls of central hole


226


in top


224


, while the peripheral portions of E-beam


296


are blocked by the metallic top


224


.




The narrower hollow E-beam


296


passes out of the bottom of the peripheral aperture


220


and through lens L


4


which focuses collimated E-beam


296


into a converging hollow E-beam


297


that is focused onto a very small a spot


298


on a workpiece (reticle)


260


.




As stated above, the peripheral portion


295


(the outer portion) of collimated E-beam


294


from lens L


3


strikes the


224


and is masked thereby. The peripheral beam


295


provides a current of electrons which flow through the electrical output line


228


to the hollow beam aperture current monitor


230


. Monitor


230


supplies an electrical output current to line


231


to the CPU in FIG.


8


B.




To summarize, the lower, peripheral aperture


220


includes an upper opening


226


and the peripheral (outer) portion


295


of collimated E-beam


294


strikes the top


224


of shell


221


and is masked thereby and the electrons striking the top


224


cause some electrical current to flow through electrical output line


228


, and the inner E-beam


296


portion of collimated E-beam


294


passes through the lower, peripheral aperture


220


.




The lower aperture


220


includes an opening


225


between the side walls of the peripheral shell


221


. The hollow E-beam


296


passes through the lower aperture


220


. Ideally, the collimated E-beam


296


is supposed to be centered on the top


124


of the shell


121


and lower, along the column, the collimated E-beam


194


is supposed to be centered on the top


224


of the shell


221


.




As shown in

FIG. 5B

, when the hollow E-beam


296


leaves the hollow beam aperture


220


, it is focussed down by lens L


4


as beam


297


onto the point


298


on the workpiece (reticle)


260


. The problem that arises is that E-beam


294


may not be accurately centered on hollow beam aperture


220


, which is a significant fact because of the extremely tight tolerances of submicron devices which means that accuracy of machining in forming and assembling the components of the hollow beam aperture


210


is crucial.




I have found that the problem of alignment of E-beams


194


is attributable to machining and assembly errors which affect the location of the upper aperture


215


and center pole


216


in hollow beam aperture


210


. The hollow E-beam


196


which passes out of the hollow beam aperture


210


is directed therefrom through peripheral aperture


220


onto the point


298


on the workpiece (reticle)


260


.




E-beam alignment and centering onto each aperture


210


/


220


is accomplished by monitoring current through the respective apertures with the monitors


130


/


152


which are shown in

FIGS. 5A and 5C

. Similarly, referring again to the embodiment in

FIG. 5B

, E-beam alignment and centering onto each aperture


210


/


220


is accomplished by monitoring current through the respective apertures with the monitors


252


/


230


.




MONITORING OF APERTURE CURRENT




Monitoring of aperture current will be discussed with reference to

FIGS. 5A

,


5


C and

FIGS. 5D-5F

.





FIG. 5D

is a graph which shows an example of the bell shaped curve


187


′ of current in upper E-beam


187


.





FIG. 5E

is a graph which shows an example of the narrowed aperture current profile


190


′ of the intermediate E-beam


190


monitored inside the hollow cylinder


121


in the lower portion of the upper, peripheral aperture


120


of

FIGS. 5A and 5C

.





FIG. 5F

is a graph which shows the hollow E-beam profile


196


′ of the lower aperture current of E-beam


196


monitored in the lower aperture


110


in FIG.


5


C. By controlling the deflection of the upper E-beam


187


to “minimize” the monitored current intercepted by the upper, peripheral aperture


120


and at the same time by controlling the deflection of the intermediate E-beam


194


to “maximize” monitored current intercepted by the lower aperture


110


, we can align and center the beams


187


/


194


onto apertures


120


/


110


.




An important goal in this invention, which is that a portion of the charged particle beam should hit the center pole


116


of the second aperture


110


, but should not hit the top


114


of the metallic shell


111


, i.e. the peripheral portion of the lower, hollow beam aperture


110


. If that goal is met, we get a very good peak in monitored aperture current (good contrast) in each of the apertures


120


/


110


. We can independently control the beam position on apertures


120


/


110


, i.e. we can control alignment of the inner periphery and the outer periphery of the E-beam


187


/


194


by using the corresponding set of aligners


162


or


143


with certain high accuracy.




Referring to

FIG. 8B

in conjunction with FIGS.


5


A/


5


C lines


131


/


153


from

FIG. 5A

are connected to IN terminals of the CPU


61


of the process control computer control system


60


. The computer system


260


provides output signals on OUT lines


74


/


74


′ to a D/A converter


70


which supplies signals via line


71


to amplifiers


72


which are connected by lines


73


to the upper aligners


22


in FIG.


3


A.





FIG. 6

shows a graph of “aperture current amplitude” of current received by the peripheral aperture current monitor


130


of FIGS.


5


A/


5


C as the E-beam


187


is scanned across the upper, peripheral aperture


120


with a minimum value when the E-beam


187


is centered over the aperture


120


.





FIG. 7

shows a graph of “aperture current amplitude” at the second aperture current monitor


152


of FIGS.


5


A/


5


C as intermediate E-beam


194


is scanned from across the second, hollow beam aperture


110


, with a very clear maximum value when the E-beam


194


is centered over aperture


110


.





FIG. 9A

shows a block diagram of a process for producing a semiconductor chip adapted to employing the apparatus and method of this invention. The semiconductor fabrication method of

FIG. 9A

comprises mainly a wafer production step P


10


(or wafer preparation step) which produces a finished wafer in step P


11


, a mask production step P


20


(or mask preparation step) which produces a finished reticle, mask in step P


21


, a wafer processing step P


12


, an assembly step P


40


yielding a chip P


41


and an inspection step P


42


. Each step comprises several substeps as will be well understood by those skilled in the art. Among these main steps, the wafer processing step P


12


is a most important step to achieve the specified finest pattern width and registration limit. In this step, the designed circuit patterns are stacked successively on the wafer from step P


11


and many operative semiconductor chips like memory devices are formed on the wafer from step P


11


.




The wafer processing steps P


12


comprises a step of thin film formation wherein a dielectric layer for insulation is formed or a metallic layer for lead lines and for electrodes is formed. An oxidization step can be employed to oxidize the thin film or the wafer substrate. A lithography step P


31


involves use of the reticle/mask P


21


to form a photoresist or other resist pattern to process the thin film or wafer substrate selectively, a selected set of process steps P


32


including etching the thin film or wafer substrate and implanting ions or impurities into the thin film or wafer substrate using the resist pattern from step P


31


as a mask. There is the conventional resist stripping step to remove the resist from the wafer and chip inspection step. As indicated at P


34


, the wafer processing steps P


30


are repeated as many times as necessary to make a semiconductor chip be operable as designed, as will be understood by those skilled in the art.





FIG. 9B

shows a flow chart of lithography steps P


31


of

FIG. 9A

which are dominant steps in the wafer processing steps P


12


/P


30


adapted for employment with the method and apparatus of this invention. Lithography steps P


31


comprise a resist-coat step P


311


in which the wafer substrate is coated with resist on circuit elements formed in a previous steps. An exposure step P


312


then exposes the wafer coated with resist through the reticle/mask of step P


21


employing a deflector in accordance with this invention. A resist development step P


313


follows for developing the resist exposed in exposure step P


312


followed by a resist annealing step P


314


performed to enhance durability of the resist pattern produced in step P


313


.




While this invention has been described in terms of the above specific embodiment(s), those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modifications within the spirit and scope of the appended claims, i.e. that changes can be made in form and detail, without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly all such changes come within the purview of the present invention and the invention encompasses the subject matter of the claims which follow.



Claims
  • 1. A method of aligning a charged particle beam with an aperture including:providing a charged particle beam, providing a hollow beam aperture means adapted for shaping a charged particle beam into a hollow charged particle beam, directing the charged particle beam through the aperture means, providing deflection coils for deflecting the charged particle beam relative to the aperture, varying the current to the alignment deflection coils, measuring the aperture electrical current generated by charged particles reaching the hollow beam aperture as a function of the current to the alignment deflection coils, and adjusting the current in the alignment deflection coils based on the aperture electrical current to center the charged particle beam on the hollow beam aperture.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 including measuring the aperture electrical current to the hollow beam aperture means with an aperture current monitor and providing a scan of the aperture electrical current.
  • 3. The method of claim 2 including providing a central pole suspended in the hollow beam aperture means.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 including:providing a central pole suspended in the hollow beam aperture means, measuring the aperture electrical current to the hollow beam aperture means including the central pole with an aperture current monitor and providing a scan of the aperture current.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 including:providing a peripheral aperture means with a large aperture for shaping the periphery of the charged particle beam, measuring the aperture electrical current generated by charged particles reaching the peripheral beam aperture as a function of the current to the alignment deflection coils, and adjusting the current in the peripheral beam alignment deflection coils based on the peripheral beam aperture electrical current to center the charged particle beam on the peripheral beam aperture.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 including:providing a peripheral aperture means with a large aperture for shaping the periphery of the charged particle beam, providing a central pole suspended in the hollow beam aperture means, measuring the aperture electrical current generated by charged particles reaching the peripheral beam aperture as a function of the current to the peripheral aperture alignment deflection coils, and adjusting the current in the alignment deflection coils based on the peripheral beam aperture electrical current to center the charged particle beam on the peripheral beam aperture.
  • 7. The method of claim 1 including:providing a peripheral aperture means with a large aperture for shaping the periphery of the charged particle beam above the hollow beam aperture means, providing a central pole suspended in the hollow beam aperture means, measuring the aperture electrical current generated by charged particles reaching the peripheral beam aperture as a function of the current to peripheral beam aperture alignment deflection coils, adjusting the current in peripheral beam alignment deflection coils based on the peripheral beam aperture electrical current to center the charged particle beam on the peripheral beam aperture, measuring the aperture electrical current generated by charged particles reaching the hollow beam aperture as a function of the current to hollow beam alignment deflection coils, and adjusting the current in the hollow beam alignment deflection coils based on the hollow beam aperture electrical current to center the charged particle beam on the hollow beam aperture.
  • 8. A method of aligning an E-beam with an aperture including:providing an E-beam, providing a shaping aperture means adapted for shaping an E-beam into a hollow E-beam, directing the E-beam through the shaping aperture means, providing deflection coils for deflecting the E-beam relative to the shaping aperture, varying the current to the alignment deflection coils, measuring the electrical current generated by electrons from the E-beam reaching the shaping aperture as a function of the current to the alignment deflection coils, and setting the current in the alignment deflection coils, to center the E-beam on the shaping aperture.
  • 9. The method of claim 8 including measuring the aperture electrical current to the hollow beam aperture means with an aperture current monitor and providing a scan of the aperture electrical current.
  • 10. The method of claim 9 including providing a central pole suspended in the hollow beam aperture means.
  • 11. The method of claim 8 including:providing a central pole suspended in the hollow beam aperture means, and measuring the aperture electrical current to the hollow beam aperture means including the central pole with an aperture current monitor and providing a scan of the aperture current.
  • 12. The method of claim 8 including:providing a peripheral aperture means with a large aperture for shaping the periphery of the E-beam, measuring the aperture electrical current generated by electrons reaching the peripheral beam aperture as a function of the current to the alignment deflection coils, and adjusting the current in the peripheral beam alignment deflection coils based on the peripheral beam aperture electrical current to center the E-beam on the peripheral beam aperture.
  • 13. The method of claim 8 including:providing a peripheral aperture means with a large aperture for shaping the periphery of the E-beam, providing a central pole suspended in the hollow beam aperture means, measuring the aperture electrical current generated by electrons reaching the peripheral beam aperture as a function of the current to the peripheral aperture alignment deflection coils, and adjusting the current in the alignment deflection coils based on the peripheral beam aperture electrical current to center the E-beam on the peripheral beam aperture.
  • 14. The method of claim 8 including:providing a peripheral aperture means with a large aperture for shaping the periphery of the E-beam above the hollow beam aperture means, providing a central pole suspended in the hollow beam aperture means, measuring the aperture electrical current generated by electrons reaching the peripheral beam aperture as a function of the current to peripheral beam aperture alignment deflection coils, adjusting the current in peripheral beam alignment deflection coils based on the peripheral beam aperture electrical current to center the E-beam on the peripheral beam aperture, measuring the aperture electrical current generated by electrons reaching the hollow beam aperture as a function of the current to hollow beam alignment deflection coils, and adjusting the current in the hollow beam alignment deflection coils based on the hollow beam aperture electrical current to center the E-beam on the hollow beam aperture.
  • 15. Apparatus for aligning a charged particle beam comprising:a hollow beam aperture means adapted for shaping a charged particle beam into a hollow charged particle beam, beam means producing a charged particle beam directed through the aperture means, deflection coils for deflecting the charged particle beam relative to the aperture, deflection current means for varying the current to the alignment deflection coils, measurement means for measuring the aperture electrical current generated by charged particles reaching the hollow beam aperture as a function of the current to the alignment deflection coils, and adjustment means for adjusting the current in the alignment deflection coils based on the aperture electrical current to center the charged particle beam on the hollow beam aperture.
  • 16. The apparatus of claim 15 including measurement means for measuring the aperture electrical current to the hollow beam aperture means with an aperture current monitor and providing a scan of the aperture electrical current.
  • 17. The apparatus of clam 15 including a central pole suspended in the hollow beam aperture means.
  • 18. The apparatus of claim 15 including:a central pole suspended in the hollow beam aperture means, and measurement means for measuring the aperture electrical current to the hollow beam aperture means including the central pole with an aperture current monitor and providing a scan of the aperture current.
  • 19. The apparatus of claim 15 including:a peripheral aperture means with a large aperture for shaping the periphery of the charged particle beam, measurement means for measuring the aperture electrical current generated by charged particles reaching the peripheral beam aperture as a function of the current to the alignment deflection coils, and adjustment means for adjusting the current in the peripheral beam alignment deflection coils based on the peripheral beam aperture electrical current into center the charged particle beam on the peripheral beam aperture.
  • 20. The apparatus of claim 15 including:a peripheral aperture means with a large aperture for shaping the periphery of the charged particle beam, a central pole suspended in the hollow beam aperture means, measurement means for measuring the aperture electrical current generated by charged particles reaching the peripheral beam aperture as a function of the current to the peripheral aperture alignment deflection coils, and adjusting means for adjusting the current in the alignment deflection coils based on the peripheral beam aperture electrical current to center the charged particle beam on the peripheral beam aperture.
  • 21. The apparatus of claim 15 including:a peripheral aperture means with a large aperture for shaping the periphery of the charged particle beam above the hollow beam aperture means, a central pole suspended in the hollow beam aperture means, measurement means for measuring the aperture electrical current generated by charged particles reaching the peripheral beam aperture as a function of the current to peripheral beam aperture alignment deflection coils, adjusting means for adjusting the current in peripheral beam is alignment deflection coils based on the peripheral beam aperture electrical current to center the charged particle beam on the peripheral beam aperture, measurement means for measuring the aperture electrical current generated by charged particles reaching the hollow beam aperture as a function of the current to hollow beam alignment deflection coils, and adjusting means for adjusting the current in the hollow beam alignment deflection coils based on the hollow beam aperture electrical current to center the charged particle beam on the hollow beam aperture.
  • 22. Apparatus for aligning a E-beam comprising:a hollow beam aperture means adapted for shaping a E-beam into a hollow E-beam, beam means producing a E-beam directed through the aperture means, deflection coils for deflecting the E-beam relative to the aperture, deflection current means for varying the current to the alignment deflection coils, measurement means for measuring the aperture electrical current generated by electrons reaching the hollow beam aperture as a function of the current to the alignment deflection coils, and adjustment means for adjusting the current in the alignment deflection coils based on the aperture electrical current to center the E-beam on the hollow beam aperture.
  • 23. The apparatus of claim 22 including measurement means for measuring the aperture electrical current to the hollow beam aperture means with an aperture current monitor and providing a scan of the aperture electrical current.
  • 24. The apparatus of claim 23 including a central pole suspended in the hollow beam aperture means.
  • 25. The apparatus of claim 22 including:a central pole suspended in the hollow beam aperture means; and measurement means for measuring the aperture electrical current to the hollow beam aperture means including the central pole with an aperture current monitor and providing a scan of the aperture current.
  • 26. The apparatus of claim 22 including:a peripheral aperture means with a large aperture for shaping the periphery of the E-beam, measurement means for measuring the aperture electrical current generated by electrons reaching the peripheral beam aperture as a function of the current to the alignment deflection coils, and adjustment means for adjusting the current in the peripheral beam alignment deflection coils based on the peripheral beam aperture electrical current to center the E-beam on the peripheral beam aperture.
  • 27. The apparatus of claim 22 including:a peripheral aperture means with a large aperture for shaping the periphery of the E-beam, a central pole suspended in the hollow beam aperture means, measurement means for measuring the aperture electrical current generated by electrons reaching the peripheral beam aperture as a function of the current to the peripheral aperture alignment deflection coils, and adjusting means for adjusting the current in the alignment deflection coils based on the peripheral beam aperture electrical current to center the E-beam on the peripheral beam aperture.
  • 28. The apparatus of claim 22 including:a peripheral aperture means with a large aperture for shaping the periphery of the E-beam above the hollow beam aperture means, a central pole suspended in the hollow beam aperture means, measurement means for measuring the aperture electrical current generated by electrons reaching the peripheral beam aperture as a function of the current to peripheral beam aperture alignment deflection coils, adjusting means for adjusting the current in peripheral beam alignment deflection coils based on the peripheral beam aperture electrical current to center the E-beam on the peripheral beam aperture, measurement means for measuring the aperture electrical current generated by electrons reaching the hollow beam aperture as a function of the current to hollow beam alignment deflection coils, and adjusting means for adjusting the current in the hollow beam alignment deflection coils based on the hollow beam aperture electrical current to center the E-beam on the hollow beam aperture.
US Referenced Citations (14)
Number Name Date Kind
4947413 Jewell et al. Aug 1990 A
5311026 Saitou et al. May 1994 A
5500312 Harriot et al. Mar 1996 A
5663568 Waskiewicz Sep 1997 A
5821542 Golladay Oct 1998 A
5834783 Muraki et al. Nov 1998 A
5973332 Muraki et al. Oct 1999 A
5981962 Groves et al. Nov 1999 A
6023067 Stickel et al. Feb 2000 A
6087669 Suzuki Jul 2000 A
6326633 Nakasuji Dec 2001 B2
6441384 Kojima Aug 2002 B1
6472672 Muraki Oct 2002 B1
6515409 Muraki et al. Feb 2003 B2
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
11-287610 Oct 1999 JP
2000-012454 Jan 2000 JP
2000-100891 Apr 2000 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Pfeiffer et al. “Projection reduction exposure with variable axis immersion lenses: Next generation lithography”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B 17(6), pp. 1-7 (Nov./Dec. 1999).