Apparatus and method for delivering a plurality of waveform signals during plasma processing

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11694876
  • Patent Number
    11,694,876
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, August 9, 2022
    2 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 4, 2023
    a year ago
Abstract
Embodiments of the present disclosure generally relate to a system used in a semiconductor device manufacturing process. More specifically, embodiments provided herein generally include apparatus and methods for synchronizing and controlling the delivery of an RF bias voltage signal and a pulsed voltage waveform to one or more electrodes within a plasma processing chamber. Embodiments of the disclosure include a method and apparatus for synchronizing a pulsed radio frequency (RF) waveform to a pulsed voltage (PV) waveform, such that the pulsed RF waveform is on during a first stage of the PV waveform and off during a second stage. The first stage of the PV waveform includes a sheath collapse stage. The second stage of the PV waveform includes an ion current stage.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of United States provisional patent application Ser. No. 63/287,433, filed Dec. 8, 2021, which is herein incorporated by reference.


BACKGROUND
Field

Embodiments of the present disclosure generally relate to a system and methods used in semiconductor device manufacturing. More specifically, embodiments provided herein generally include a system and methods for synchronizing a radio frequency (RF) pulsed waveform with a pulsed voltage (PV) waveform to one or more electrodes within a processing chamber.


Description of the Related Art

Reliably producing high aspect ratio features is one of the key technology challenges for the next generation of semiconductor devices. One method of forming high aspect ratio features uses a plasma assisted etching process, such as a reactive ion etch (RIE) plasma process, to form high aspect ratio openings in a material layer, such as a dielectric layer, of a substrate. In a typical RIE plasma process, a plasma is formed in a processing chamber and ions from the plasma are accelerated towards a surface of a substrate to form openings in a material layer disposed beneath a mask layer formed on the surface of the substrate.


A typical Reactive Ion Etch (RIE) plasma processing chamber includes a radio frequency (RF) bias generator, which supplies an RF voltage to a power electrode. In a capacitively coupled gas discharge, the plasma is created by using a radio frequency (RF) generator that is coupled to the power electrode that is disposed within an electrostatic chuck (ESC) assembly or within another portion of the processing chamber. Typically, an RF matching network (“RF match”) tunes an RF waveform provided from an RF generator to deliver RF power to an apparent load of 500 to minimize the reflected power and maximize the power delivery efficiency. If the impedance of the load is not properly matched to impedance of the source (e.g., the RF generator), a portion of the forward delivered RF waveform can reflect back in the opposite direction along the same transmission line.


A number of plasma processes also utilize DC voltage pulsing schemes to control the plasma sheath disposed over the substrate that is being processed. During operation, the DC voltage pulses cause a generated plasma sheath to toggle between states that includes a thick plasma sheath and state where no plasma sheath exists. Typical, DC pulsing techniques are configured to deliver voltage pulses at a frequency greater than 50 kHz, such as greater than 400 kHz. The toggling of the plasma sheath due to the delivery DC pulsed voltage waveform results in the plasma load having different impedance values over time. It has been found that due to the interaction between the RF waveform and DC pulsed voltage waveform that are simultaneously provided during plasma processing can lead differing plasma processing results due in large part to the RF matching portion of the of the RF power delivery system's inability to adjust the RF matching point to account for the rapidly changing plasma load impedance values over time. Conventional impedance matching components and matching processes are unable to keep up with the rapid changes in magnitude of the plasma load impedance, thus causing the match to find undesirable matching points that typically leads to the generation of varying amounts of RF power that are actually delivered to the plasma load due to 1) inter-modulation distortion (IMD) of the RF signal, and 2) undesirably high reflected RF powers found at harmonics of the driven RF frequency. The inter-modulation distortion created by the interaction between the RF and DC pulsed voltage waveforms causes the amplitude of at least the RF signal to vary over time. The interaction or intermodulation between the RF and DC pulsed voltage waveforms causes additional undesirable waveform components to form at frequencies that are not just at harmonic frequencies (i.e., integer multiples) of the interacting signals, such as either of the RF or DC pulsed waveforms. The generation of the IMD components in a power delivery system will reduce the actual forward RF power that is delivered to the plasma load. Due at least to unavoidable differences in processing chamber power delivery configurations and differences in the power delivery components, the rapidly changing plasma load impedance values cause undesirable differences in the plasma processing results seen in a single plasma processing chamber, seen in similarly configured processing chambers on a single processing system, and also seen in similarly configured plasma processing chambers within different plasma processing systems within a semiconductor fabrication site. Moreover, the generated IMD components are also not easily accounted for in most power delivery systems due to the broad range of frequencies that can develop during plasma processing in the same or different processing chambers and thus will cause unexpected variations in the power actually delivered to the plasma load during plasma processing.


Thus, there is a need in the art for plasma processing devices and biasing methods that are at least able to resolve these issues outlined above.


SUMMARY

The present disclosure generally relates to a method for plasma processing comprising applying a voltage waveform to an electrode disposed in a substrate support, the voltage waveform having a first stage and a second stage, wherein the first stage includes a sheath collapse stage, and the second stage includes an ion current stage. The method further includes applying a pulsed radio frequency (RF) waveform to a reactive species to generate a plasma in a processing region of a processing chamber, and synchronizing the pulsed RF waveform to the voltage waveform such that the pulsed RF waveform is provided during one of the stages and not the other stage. In one embodiment, the pulsed RF waveform is provided during the second stage and not the first stage. In another embodiment, the pulsed RF waveform is provided during the first stage and not the second stage.


The present disclosure generally relates to a method for plasma processing comprising applying a voltage waveform to an electrode disposed in a substrate support, the voltage waveform having a first stage and a second stage, wherein the first stage includes a sheath collapse stage, and the second stage includes an ion current stage. The method further includes applying a pulsed radio frequency (RF) waveform to a reactive species to generate a plasma in a processing region of a processing chamber, and synchronizing the pulsed RF waveform to the voltage waveform such that the pulsed RF waveform is provided during one stage and not the other stage.


The present disclosure further includes a plasma processing system comprising a PV waveform generator coupled to a first electrode, a RF waveform generator coupled to a second electrode of the plasma processing system, wherein the RF waveform generator is configured to generate a plasma within the processing region, an impedance matching circuit, and a controller having a processor configured to execute computer readable instructions that cause the system to apply a PV waveform generated by the PV waveform generator, apply a RF waveform generated by the RF waveform generator and synchronize the PV waveform to the RF waveform.


Embodiments of the disclosure provide a method for plasma processing comprising applying a pulsed voltage waveform to one or more electrodes disposed in a substrate support, the voltage waveform having a first stage and a second stage, applying a pulsed radio frequency (RF) waveform to the one or more electrodes to generate a plasma in a processing region of a processing chamber, and synchronizing the pulsed RF waveform with each pulse of the pulsed voltage waveform, such that an RF waveform of the pulsed radio frequency (RF) waveform is provided only during at least a portion of the second stage of each pulse of the pulsed voltage waveform.


Embodiments of the disclosure provide a method for plasma processing comprising applying a pulsed voltage waveform to one or more electrodes disposed in a substrate support, the voltage waveform having a first stage and a second stage, applying a pulsed radio frequency (RF) waveform to the one or more electrodes to generate a plasma in a processing region of a processing chamber, and synchronizing the pulsed RF waveform with each pulse of the pulsed voltage waveform, such that an RF waveform of the pulsed radio frequency (RF) waveform is provided only during at least a portion of the first stage of each pulse of the pulsed voltage waveform.


Embodiments of the disclosure provide a plasma processing system, comprising a pulsed voltage waveform generator coupled to a first electrode; a radio frequency waveform generator coupled to a second electrode, wherein the radio frequency waveform generator is configured to generate a plasma within a processing volume of the plasma processing system; an impedance matching circuit coupled between the radio frequency waveform generator and the second electrode; and a controller. The controller having a processor configured to execute computer-readable instructions stored within memory that cause the system to: apply, by use of the pulsed voltage waveform generator, a pulsed voltage waveform to the first electrode, the pulsed voltage waveform comprising a series of voltage pulses that each comprise a first stage and a second stage; apply, by use of the radio frequency waveform generator, a pulsed radio frequency waveform to the second electrode to generate a plasma in a processing region of a processing chamber; and synchronize the pulsed RF waveform with each pulse of the pulsed voltage waveform, such that an RF waveform of the pulsed radio frequency (RF) waveform is provided only during at least a portion of the second stage of each pulse of the pulsed voltage waveform.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

So that the manner in which the above recited features of the present disclosure can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the disclosure, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to embodiments, some of which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only exemplary embodiments and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, may admit to other equally effective embodiments.



FIG. 1 is a schematic cross-sectional view of a processing system, according to one or more embodiments, configured to practice the methods set forth herein.



FIG. 2 illustrates two separate voltage waveforms established at a substrate disposed on a substrate support assembly of a processing chamber due to the delivery of pulsed voltage waveforms to one or more electrodes within the processing chamber, according to one or more embodiments.



FIG. 3A is a plot of a forward RF bias voltage signal and an inter-modulation distortion (IMD) signal measured along a transmission line that is coupled to the one or more electrodes of the processing chamber, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 3B illustrates an RF bias voltage signal impressed on a pulsed voltage waveform delivered through the transmission line that is coupled to the one or more electrodes of the processing chamber, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 4 is a chart illustrating the percentage of wide-band reflection seen in two different conventional plasma processing chambers, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 5A illustrates a pulsed RF bias voltage signal applied to an electrode within a processing chamber, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 5B illustrates a combined pulsed voltage waveform and pulsed RF bias voltage signal formed by the delivery of pulsed RF bias voltage signal illustrated in FIG. 5A and a pulsed voltage waveform to the one or more electrodes of the processing chamber, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 6 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for synchronizing a PV waveform and a RF bias voltage waveform in the plasma processing system, according to one embodiment.





To facilitate understanding, identical reference numerals have been used, where possible, to designate identical elements that are common to the figures. It is contemplated that elements and features of one embodiment may be beneficially incorporated in other embodiments without further recitation.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments of the present disclosure generally relate to a system used in a semiconductor device manufacturing process. More specifically, embodiments provided herein generally include apparatus and methods for synchronizing and controlling the delivery of an RF bias voltage signal and a pulsed voltage waveform to one or more electrodes within a plasma processing chamber.



FIG. 1 is a schematic cross-sectional view of a plasma processing chamber assembly 10 configured to perform one or more of the plasma processing methods set forth herein. In some embodiments, the plasma processing chamber assembly 10 is configured for plasma-assisted etching processes, such as a reactive ion etch (RIE) plasma processing. The plasma processing chamber assembly 10 can also be used in other plasma-assisted processes, such as plasma-enhanced deposition processes (for example, plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) processes, plasma-enhanced physical vapor deposition (PEPVD) processes, plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition (PEALD) processes, plasma treatment processing, plasma-based ion implant processing, or plasma doping (PLAD) processing. In one configuration, as shown in FIG. 1, the plasma processing chamber assembly 10 is configured to form a capacitively coupled plasma (CPP). However, in some embodiments, a plasma may alternately be generated by an inductively coupled source disposed over the processing region of the plasma processing chamber assembly 10. In this configuration, a coil may be placed on top of a ceramic lid (vacuum boundary) of the plasma processing chamber assembly 10.


The plasma processing chamber assembly 10 includes a processing chamber 100, a substrate support assembly 136, a gas delivery system 182, a DC power system 183, an RF power system 189, and a system controller 126. The processing chamber 100 includes a chamber body 113 that comprises a chamber lid 123, one or more sidewalls 122, and a chamber base 124. The chamber lid 123, one or more sidewalls 122, and the chamber base 124 collectively define the processing volume 129. The one or more sidewalls 122 and chamber base 124 generally include materials (such as aluminum, aluminum alloys, or stainless steel alloys) that are sized and shaped to form the structural support for the elements of the processing chamber 100 and are configured to withstand the pressures and added energy applied to them while a plasma 101 is generated within a vacuum environment maintained in the processing volume 129 of the processing chamber 100 during processing. A substrate 103 is loaded into, and removed from, the processing volume 129 through an opening (not shown) in one of the sidewalls 122. The opening is sealed with a slit valve (not shown) during plasma processing of the substrate 103. A gas delivery system 182, which is coupled to the processing volume 129 of the processing chamber 100, includes a processing gas source 119 and a gas inlet 128 disposed through the chamber lid 123. The gas inlet 128 is configured to deliver one or more processing gases to the processing volume 129 from the plurality of processing gas sources 119.


The processing chamber 100 further includes an upper electrode (e.g., a chamber lid 123) and a lower electrode (e.g., a substrate support assembly 136) disposed in a processing volume 129. The upper electrode and lower electrode are positioned to face each other. As seen in FIG. 1, in one embodiment, a radio frequency (RF) source (e.g., RF power system 189) is electrically coupled to the lower electrode. The RF source is configured to deliver an RF signal to ignite and maintain a plasma (e.g., the plasma 101) between the upper and lower electrodes. In some alternative configurations, the RF source (e.g., RF power system 189) can also be electrically coupled to the upper electrode as shown in FIG. 1.


The substrate support assembly 136 includes a substrate support 105, a substrate support base 107, an insulator plate 111, a ground plate 112, a plurality of lift pins 186, one or more substrate potential sensing assemblies 184, and a bias electrode 104. Each of the lift pins 186 are disposed through a through hole 185 formed in the substrate support assembly 136 and are used to facilitate the transfer of a substrate 103 to and from a substrate receiving surface 105A of the substrate support 105. The substrate support 105 is formed of a dielectric material. The dielectric material can include a bulk sintered ceramic material, a corrosion-resistant metal oxide (for example, aluminum oxide (AI2O3), titanium oxide (TiO), yttrium oxide (Y2O3), a metal nitride material (for example, aluminum nitride (AIN), titanium nitride (TiN)), mixtures thereof, or combinations thereof.


The substrate support base 107 is formed of a conductive material (for example aluminum, an aluminum alloy, or a stainless steel alloy). The substrate support base 107 is electrically isolated from the chamber base 124 by the insulator plate 111, and the ground plate 112 interposed between the insulator plate 111 and the chamber base 124. In some embodiments, the substrate support base 107 is configured to regulate the temperature of both the substrate support 105, and the substrate 103 disposed on the substrate support 105 during substrate processing. In some embodiments, the substrate support base 107 includes one or more cooling channels (not shown) disposed therein that are fluidly coupled to, and in fluid communication with, a coolant source (not shown), such as a refrigerant source or substrate source having a relatively high electrical resistance. In other embodiments, the substrate support 105 includes a heater (not shown) to heat the substrate support 105 and substrate 103 disposed on the substrate support 105.


A bias electrode 104 is embedded in the dielectric material of the substrate support 105. Typically, the bias electrode 104 is formed of one or more electrically conductive parts. The electrically conductive parts typically include meshes, foils, plates, or combinations thereof. Here, the bias electrode 104 functions as a chucking pole (i.e., electrostatic chucking electrode) that is used to secure (e.g., electrostatically chuck) the substrate 103 to the substrate receiving surface 105A of the substrate support 105. In general, a parallel plate like structure is formed by the bias electrode 104 and a layer of the dielectric material that is disposed between the bias electrode 104 and the substrate receiving surface 105A. The dielectric material can typically have an effective capacitance CE of between about 5 nF and about 50 nF. Typically, the layer of dielectric material (e.g., aluminum nitride (AIN), aluminum oxide (AI2O3), etc.) has a thickness between about 0.03 mm and about 5 mm, such as between about 0.1 mm and about 3 mm, such as between about 0.1 mm and about 1 mm, or even between about 0.1 mm and 0.5 mm. The bias electrode 104 is electrically coupled to a clamping network, which provides a chucking voltage thereto. The clamping network includes a DC voltage supply 173 (e.g., a high voltage DC supply) that is coupled to a filter 178A of the filter assembly 178 that is disposed between the DC voltage supply 173 and bias electrode 104. In one example, the filter 178A is a low-pass filter that is configured to block RF frequency and pulsed voltage (PV) waveform signals provided by other biasing components found within the processing chamber 100 from reaching the DC voltage supply 173 during plasma processing. In one configuration, the static DC voltage is between about −5000V and about 5000V, and is delivered using an electrical conductor (such as a coaxial power delivery line 160). In some embodiments, the bias electrode 104 can also bias the substrate 103 with the respect to the plasma 101 using one or more of the pulsed-voltage biasing schemes described in further detail below.


In some configurations, the substrate support assembly 136, further includes an edge control electrode 115. The edge control electrode 115 is formed of one or more electrically conductive parts. The electrically conductive parts typically include meshes, foils, plates, or combinations thereof. The edge control electrode 115 is positioned below the edge ring 114 and surrounds the bias electrode 104 and/or is disposed a distance from a center of the bias electrode 104. In general, for a processing chamber 100 that is configured to process circular substrates, the edge control electrode 115 is annular in shape, is made from a conductive material, and is configured to surround at least a portion of the bias electrode 104. In one configuration, when viewing the substrate supporting surface of the substrate support assembly 136 in a plan view, the bias electrode 104 is surrounded by or circumscribed by the edge control electrode 115, and is not in direct electrical contact with the edge control electrode 115. As seen in FIG. 1, the edge control electrode 115 is positioned within a region of the substrate support 105, and is biased by use of a pulsed voltage (PV) waveform generator 175. In one configuration, as schematically shown in FIG. 1, the edge control electrode 115 is biased by splitting part of the signal provided from the PV waveform generator 175 to the bias electrode 104. In another configuration, the edge control electrode 115 is coupled to and biased by use of a PV waveform generator 175 (not shown in FIG. 1) that is different from the PV waveform generator 175 used to bias electrode 104. In this configuration, the voltage waveform signals provided from the PV waveform generators 175 can be separately adjusted, and thus have different waveform characteristics, while also being synchronized by use of a synchronization signal provided from the system controller 126, or one of the RF or PV waveform generators, to allow the RF waveform to be provided during the same stage within the synchronized PV waveform pulses provided by each of the PV waveform generators 175.


The DC power system 183 includes the DC voltage supply 173, the PV waveform generator 175, and a current source 177. The RF power system 189 includes a radio frequency (RF) waveform generator 171, impedance matching circuit 172, and a RF filter 174. In one example, as shown in FIG. 1, a power delivery line 163 electrically connects the output of the RF waveform generator 171 to an impedance matching circuit 172, an RF filter 174 and substrate support base 107. As previously mentioned, during plasma processing, the DC voltage supply 173 provides a constant chucking voltage, while the RF waveform generator 171 delivers an RF signal to the processing region, and the PV waveform generator 175 establishes a PV waveform at the bias electrode 104. Applying a sufficient amount of RF power to an RF bias voltage signal, which is also referred to herein as a RF waveform, is provided to an electrode (e.g., substrate support base 107) so as to cause the plasma 101 to be formed in the processing volume 129 of the processing chamber 100. In one configuration, the RF waveform has a frequency range between about 1 MHz and about 200 MHz, such as between 2 MHz and 40 MHz.


In some embodiments, the DC power system 183 further includes a filter assembly 178 to electrically isolate one or more of the components contained within the DC power system 183. Power delivery line 160 electrically connects the output of the DC voltage supply 173 to a filter assembly 178. Power delivery line 161 electrically connects the output of the PV waveform generator 175 to the filter assembly 178. Power delivery line 162 connects the output of the current source 177 to the filter assembly 178. In some embodiments, the current source 177 is selectively coupled to the bias electrode 104 by use of a switch (not shown) disposed in the power delivery line 162, so as to allow the current source 177 to deliver a desired current to the bias electrode 104 during one or more stages (e.g., ion current stage) of the voltage waveform generated by the PV waveform generator 175. As seen in FIG. 1, the filter assembly 178, includes multiple separate filtering components (i.e., discrete filters 178A-178C) that are each electrically coupled to the output node via power delivery line 164. In an alternative configuration, the filter assembly 178 includes one common filter electrically coupled to the output node via power delivery line 164. The power delivery lines 160-164 include electrical conductors that include a combination of coaxial cables, such as a flexible coaxial cable that is connected in series with a rigid coaxial cable, an insulated high-voltage corona-resistant hookup wire, a bare wire, a metal rod, an electrical connector, of any combination of the above.


The system controller 126, also referred to herein as a processing chamber controller, includes a central processing unit (CPU) 133, a memory 134, and support circuits 135. The system controller 126 is used to control the process sequence used to process the substrate 103. The CPU is a general-purpose computer processor configured for use in an industrial setting for controlling the processing chamber and sub-processors related thereto. The memory 134 described herein, which is generally non-volatile memory, can include random access memory, read-only memory, hard disk drive, or other suitable forms of digital storage, local or remote. The support circuits 135 are conventionally coupled to the CPU 133 and comprises cache, clock circuits, input/output subsystems, power supplies, and the like, and combinations thereof. Software instructions (program) and data can be coded and stored within the memory 134 for instructing a processor within the CPU 133. A software program (or computer instructions) readable by CPU 133 in the system controller 126 determines which tasks are performable by the components in the plasma processing chamber assembly 10.


Typically, the program, which is readable by the CPU 133 in the system controller 126 includes code, which, when executed by the CPU 133, performs tasks relating to the plasma processing schemes described herein. The program may include instructions that are used to control the various hardware and electrical components within the plasma processing chamber assembly 10 to perform the various process tasks and various process sequences used to implement the methods described herein. In one embodiment, the program includes instructions that are used to perform one or more of the operations described below in relation to FIGS. 9 and 10.



FIG. 2 illustrates two separate voltage waveforms established at a substrate 103 disposed on the substrate receiving surface 105A of the substrate support assembly 136 of a processing chamber due to the delivery of pulsed voltage waveforms to the bias electrode 104 of the processing chamber, according to one or more embodiments. Waveform 225 is an example of a non-compensated pulsed voltage (PV) waveform established at the substrate 103 during plasma processing. Waveform 230 is an example of a compensated pulsed voltage (PV) waveform established at the substrate 103 by applying a negative slope waveform to the bias electrode 104 of the processing chamber during an “ion current stage” portion of the PV waveform cycle by use of the current source 177. The compensated pulsed voltage (PV) waveform can alternatively be established by applying a negative voltage ramp during the ion current stage of the pulsed voltage waveform generated by the PV waveform generator 175.


In FIG. 2 waveforms 225, and 230, include two main stages: an ion current stage and a sheath collapse stage. Both portions (the ion current stage and the sheath collapse stage) of the waveforms 225 and 230, can be alternately and/or separately established at the substrate 103 during plasma processing. At the beginning of the ion current stage, a drop in voltage at the substrate 103 is created, due to the delivery of a negative portion of a PV waveform (e.g., ion current portion) provided to the bias electrode 104 by the PV waveform generator 175, which creates a high voltage sheath above the substrate 103. The high voltage sheath allows the plasma generated positive ions to be accelerated towards the biased substrate during the ion current stage, and thus, for RIE processes, controls the amount and characteristics of the etching process that occurs on the surface of the substrate during plasma processing. In some embodiments, it is desirable for the ion current stage to generally include a region of a pulsed voltage waveform that achieves a voltage at the substrate that is stable or minimally varying throughout the stage, as illustrated in FIG. 2 by waveform 230. One will note that significant variations in voltage established at the substrate during the ion current stage, such as shown by the positive slope in the waveform 225, will undesirably cause a variation in the ion energy distribution (IED) and thus cause undesirable characteristics of the etched features to be formed in the substrate during an RIE process.



FIG. 3A is a plot 301 of a forward RF voltage waveform 331 and an inter-modulation distortion (IMD) generated RF voltage waveform 326 measured along a transmission line, such as transmission line 163 or 166 in FIG. 1. In one example, the plot 301 was generated from measurements made at a frequency of 40 MHz +/−400 kHz at a node within the RF power system 189 due to the delivery and interaction created between an RF voltage waveform 326 provided from the RF power system 189 at a frequency of about 40.68 MHz and a pulsed voltage waveforms provided from the DC power system 183, which are both illustrated in FIG. 3B. The plot 301 includes an envelope 370 of the forward RF voltage waveform 331, and an envelope 376 of the IMD generated RF voltage waveform 326 all created by an interaction between the delivery of RF bias voltage waveform provided from the components within a RF power system 189 and pulsed voltage waveforms provided from the PV waveform generator of the DC power system 183.


During processing, the forward RF voltage waveform 331 is applied to the load (e.g., gas) in the processing volume 129 of the processing chamber 100 through the transmission line, such as transmission line 165 (FIG. 1). If the impedance of the load is not properly matched to impedance of the source (e.g., RF signal generator), a portion of the waveform can reflect back in the opposite direction along the same transmission line. Thus, to prevent a substantial portion of the waveform from reflecting back along the transmission line, it is necessary to find a match impedance by adjusting one or more of the components with the impedance matching circuit 172 and/or adjusting the frequency of the RF bias waveform supplied by the RF waveform generator 171 to match the impedance of the load to the source during plasma processing. To properly match the impedance, the forward RF voltage and reflected RF voltage are measured at the driven RF frequency at a node within the RF power system 189. Measurements made using a conventional RF power delivery system using a conventional RF power delivery method allows the formation of the envelope 370 of the forward RF voltage waveform 331 and the envelope 376 of the IMD generated RF voltage waveform 326 that is not at one of the harmonic frequencies of the driven RF frequency. As illustrated in FIG. 3A, the magnitude of the envelope 376 of the IMD generated RF voltage waveform 326 undesirably varies over time and varies from a point that is near the magnitude of the envelope 370 of the forward RF voltage waveform 331 to a magnitude of the envelope 376 of the IMD generated RF voltage waveform 326 that is near a zero RF power.



FIG. 3B illustrates an example of a pulsed voltage waveform 321 delivered to the bias electrode 104 (FIG. 1) and a pulsed voltage waveform 322 delivered to the edge control electrode 115 (FIG. 1) that both further include a higher frequency of a RF voltage waveform 326 (e.g., 40 MHz RF signal) impressed on top of the pulsed voltage waveforms 321 and 322. As discussed above in relation to FIG. 2, the pulsed voltage waveforms include two main stages: an ion current stage, and a sheath collapse stage. Both portions (the ion current stage and the sheath collapse stage) of the pulsed voltage waveforms, are established at the substrate 103 during plasma processing. As noted above, in an RIE process the etching process primarily occurs during the second stage (e.g., the ion current stage) of the pulsed voltage waveform. Variations in the IMD generated RF power component as seen in FIG. 3A during both stages of the pulsed voltage waveform, which can cause substrate-to-substrate and/or chamber-to-chamber process result variations, and can cause damage to hardware components within the chamber and RF power system 189.



FIG. 4 is a chart illustrating the percentage of wide-band reflection as seen in two different conventional plasma processing chambers. Wide-band reflection percentage is used to measure the amount of reflected power (i.e., amount of power that was not provided to the load), due to IMD and harmonic reflections found in the plasma processing system, versus the amount of forward RF power provided from the RF source. Curve 405 illustrates the percentage of reflected RF power as function of the magnitude of the pulsed voltage waveform applied to an electrode within a first processing chamber 460. Curve 410 illustrates the percentage of reflected RF power as function of the magnitude of the pulsed voltage waveform applied to an electrode within a second processing chamber 470, wherein the first and second processing chambers are substantially similarly configured and the plotted results were created by performing the same plasma processing recipes in each processing chamber. As illustrated in chart 400, by use of a conventional RF power delivery system that utilizes a conventional RF power delivery method the percentage of RF power delivered to the load will vary from chamber to chamber, and especially at high pulsed waveform voltages. As seen in FIG. 4, the percentage of energy lost to IMD increases as the voltage level of a pulsed voltage waveform voltage is increased, which is determined by the magnitude of the voltage established at the substrate during the ion current stage of the pulsed voltage waveform. Both curves 405 and 410 increase to a maximum percentage between about 4kV and 8 kV. In this example, a plasma process that included the delivery of an RF power of about 1500 W, a chamber pressure of 9 mTorr, a pulsed voltage repetition frequency of 1000 Hz, and 59% DC power duty cycle, the percentage of energy lost to IMD seen within RF power delivery components in the first processing chamber 460 increased from about 2kV to a peak at about 4.5kV, and then started to fall off at voltages greater than 4.5 kV. Alternately, when the same process recipe was run in the second processing chamber 470, the percentage of reflected RF power formed in the second processing chamber 470 increases from about 2kV to about 6kV, and then falls off at about 7kV. In this example, the difference in the reflected RF between the first processing chamber 460 to the second processing chamber 470 can be about 8 percent at the more desirable higher pulsed waveform voltage levels.



FIG. 5A illustrates a pulsed RF waveform 501 applied to an electrode disposed within a processing chamber. The pulsed RF waveform 501 includes two stages: a RF power delivery stage 512 in which RF power is provided to an electrode within the processing chamber for a first period time (TON) and a RF power “off” stage 517 in which no RF power is provided to the electrode for a second period of time (TOFF). FIG. 5B illustrates a plot of a pulsed voltage waveform and the pulsed RF bias voltage signal that are combined due to the delivery of the delivery of the pulsed RF bias voltage signal illustrated in FIG. 5A and a pulsed voltage waveforms 521 and 522, according to one embodiment. As similarly discussed in relation to pulsed voltage waveforms 321 and 322 in FIG. 3B, in one example, the pulsed voltage waveforms 521 and 522 are provided to one or more electrodes within the processing chamber, such as the bias electrode 104 and edge control electrode 115, respectively.


As shown in FIGS. 5A and 5B, the pulsed RF waveform 501 is synchronized with the delivery of at least one of the pulsed voltage waveforms 521 and 522, and overlaps with at least a portion of the pulsed voltage waveforms during the ion current stage. As shown, the RF power delivery stage 512, and thus the only time the impedance matching circuit 172 is utilized to deliver the RF power provided from the RF waveform generator 171 is during the stable portion of the provided pulsed voltage waveform. The delivery of the RF power during the stable, and from an RIE etching point of view the key stage in which most of the etching occurs, will prevent the impedance matching circuit 172 from trying to find a match point when the impedance of the load is rapidly changing between and during the different stages of the delivery of the pulsed voltage waveform. It is believed that by pulsing the RF waveform on during the ion current stage, and off during the sheath collapse stage will improve the performance of the impedance matching circuit by limiting the amount of impedance variation seen by the impedance matching circuit 172 when the RF power is provided to an electrode within the processing chamber 100. Thus, if the RF power is not pulsed, and maintained at a constant power as shown in FIG. 3B, the measured reflected RF power varies in magnitude between the sheath collapse stage 327 and the ion current stage as seen in the FIG. 3A. Therefore, in one embodiment of the disclosure provided herein, the pulsed RF waveform 501 comprises an RF signal that is provided for a significant portion of the ion current stage of the pulsed voltage waveform. In some embodiments, the duration of the RF power delivery stage 512 is configured to last the complete length of the ion current stage. In one configuration, the RF power provided during the RF power delivery stage 512 is synchronized, by use of the system controller 126, so that the RF power is provided within a region of the pulsed voltage waveform that extends between the ion current stage start 332 and the ion current stage end 333. In one configuration the PV waveform generator, and the RF power source behave in master slave relationship. Wherein the master will provide a timing signal (e.g., square wave TTL signal) that triggers the slave to deliver a waveform at a desired time. For example, the PV waveform generator is the master and the RF power source is the slave so that the RF waveform is delivered during a desired portion of the PV waveform. For example, the RF power source is the master, and the PV waveform generator is the slave so that the PV waveform signal is delivered during a desired portion of the RF waveform.


In some embodiments, where the RF waveform is only delivered during sheath collapse stage, the ion energy distribution function (IEDF) will be narrower than the case where the RF waveform is delivered during ion current stage, since the energy broadening effect provided to the ions in the plasma due to the delivery of the RF waveform not occurring while the sheath is formed, which is the stage where the plasma generated ions are being accelerated towards the substrate surface. Use of this RF waveform delivery method enables a more precise control of ion energy during the ion current stage of the waveform pulse.


In an alternative configuration, the pulsed RF waveform 501 is synchronized with the delivery of at least one of the pulsed voltage waveforms 521 and 522, and overlaps with at least a portion of the pulsed voltage waveforms during the sheath collapse stage. By pulsing the RF waveform on during the sheath collapse stage, and off during the ion current stage, the performance of the impedance matching circuit will improve by limiting the amount of impedance variation seen by the impedance matching circuit 172 when the RF power is provided to an electrode within the processing chamber 100. Thus, in one embodiment of the disclosure provided herein, the pulsed RF waveform 501 comprises an RF signal that is provided for a significant portion of the sheath collapse stage of the pulsed voltage waveform.


In some embodiments, as shown in FIG. 5B, the duration of the RF power delivery stage 512 is configured to only include a portion of the duration of the ion current stage. In this case, the RF power delivery stage 512 is synchronized, by use of the system controller 126, so that RF power is delivered after a first time delay (TDELAY) has elapsed from the ion current stage start 332 and is stopped so that a second time delay (TPD), or post-RF power delivery time delay, can elapse before the ion current stage end 333 has been reached and the next pulsed voltage waveform starts to be generated by the PV waveform generator 175. The first time delay (TDELAY) can vary from about 1% to about 20% of the total length of the ion current stage of the pulsed voltage waveform, and can be helpful to reduce the variation in the IMD generated reflected power generated during the delivery of the RF waveform due to the natural variation (i.e., “ringing”) found in the pulsed voltage waveform during the transition from the sheath collapse stage to the ion current stage. The second time delay (TPD) can vary from about 0% to about 10% of the total length of the ion current stage of the pulsed voltage waveform, and can be helpful to reduce any variation in the IMD generated reflected power due to the variation in the start to the transition from the ion current stage to the sheath collapse stage. In one example, the second time delay (TPD) is between 0.1% and 10% of the total length of the ion current stage of the pulsed voltage waveform. In some embodiments, the ion current stage accounts for between about 30% and about 95% of the total period (TTP) of the pulsed voltage waveform, and is typically greater than about 80% of the total period of the pulsed voltage waveform. The pulsed voltage waveform can include a series of voltage pulses that are delivered at a repetition frequency that is greater than or equal to 100 kHz, such as greater than 200 kHz, or greater than 400 kHz, or even in a range between 100 kHz and 500 kHz. In one example, the total period (TTP) of the pulsed voltage waveform is about 2.5 microseconds (μs). Whether the RF waveform is provided during the sheath collapse stage or the ion current stage, the IMD power back to the generator can be greatly reduced, for example by more than five times, which can allow the generator to reach higher delivered power before stressing the output amplifier components within the generator.



FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating a method for synchronizing the PV waveform and the RF waveform in the plasma processing chamber, such as the processing chamber 100 of FIG. 1. The method 600 includes a method of processing a substrate by applying a PV waveform to an electrode, applying a pulsed RF waveform to an electrode, and synchronizing the pulsed RF waveform to the PV waveform.


At activity 602, the method 600 includes applying a PV waveform to an electrode, such as the bias electrode 104. The PV waveform can include a series of voltage pulses, wherein each pulse of the series of pulse includes a first stage and a second stage. The first stage includes a sheath collapse stage, and the second stage includes an ion current stage that are established at the substrate during processing. As noted in FIG. 5B and also discussed above, the sheath collapse stage includes a large capacitance measured at the substrate, while the ion current stage includes a small capacitance measured at the substrate.


At activity 604, the method 600 includes generating a plasma in a processing volume of a processing chamber. In some embodiments, a pulsed RF waveform is used to ignite one or more gas species flowed into the processing volume 129 of a processing chamber 100 to form a plasma over a substrate disposed on a supporting surface of a substrate support by delivering an RF signal to one or more electrodes within the processing chamber 100. In some cases, the RF waveform 501 includes an RF signal that has a frequency between 1 MHz and 60 MHz. In one example, the RF waveform 501 includes an RF signal that has a frequency of 40 MHz. Activities 602 and 604 can be completed substantially simultaneously, or in any desired order.


At activity 606, the method 600 includes synchronizing the pulsed RF waveform with the PV waveform. As discussed above, the pulsed RF waveform is pulsed so that the RF power delivery stage 512 of the pulsed RF waveform is synchronized with at least one stage of PV waveform. In one embodiment, to perform the task of synchronizing the pulsed RF waveform and a pulsed voltage waveform the system controller 126 delivers one or more control signals to the RF waveform generator 171 and a PV waveform generator 175 so that the timing of the delivery of each of the waveforms generated by these components can be synchronized, such as synchronized as similarly described above in relation to FIG. 5A-5B. Alternately, in another embodiment, the RF waveform generator 171 acts as a master device and thus sends a control signal to a PV waveform generator 175 so that the timing of the delivery of each of the waveforms generated by these components can be synchronized. In another embodiment, the PV waveform generator 175 acts as a master device and thus sends a control signal to the RF waveform generator 171 so that the timing of the delivery of each of the waveforms generated by these components can be synchronized.


The activities performed in method 600 can be performed for a period of time to allow a desirable plasma process to be performed on a substrate disposed within the plasma processing chamber.


While the foregoing is directed to embodiments of the present disclosure, other and further embodiments of the disclosure may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, and the scope thereof is determined by the claims that follow.

Claims
  • 1. A method for plasma processing comprising: applying a pulsed voltage waveform to one or more electrodes disposed in a substrate support, the pulsed voltage waveform comprising a series of voltage pulses that each comprise a first stage and a second stage;applying a pulsed radio frequency (RF) waveform to the one or more electrodes to generate a plasma in a processing region of a processing chamber; andsynchronizing the pulsed RF waveform with each pulse of the pulsed voltage waveform, such that an RF waveform of the pulsed RF waveform is provided only during at least a portion of the second stage of each pulse of the pulsed voltage waveform.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the first stage includes a sheath collapse stage and the second stage includes an ion current stage.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the series of voltage pulses are delivered at a frequency that is greater than or equal to 100 kHz.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the pulsed RF waveform comprises a series of RF pulses that are delivered at a frequency that is equal to the frequency of the series of voltage pulses.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the applying the pulsed voltage waveform to one or more electrodes further comprises: applying a first pulsed voltage waveform to a first electrode disposed in the substrate support;applying a second pulsed voltage waveform to a second electrode disposed in the substrate support, wherein the first and second pulsed voltage waveforms each have a first stage and a second stage; andsynchronizing the application of the first stages and the second stages of the first and second pulsed voltage waveforms to the first and second electrodes, respectively,wherein the synchronizing the pulsed RF waveform with each pulse of the pulsed voltage waveforms further comprises synchronizing the pulsed RF waveform with each pulse of the first pulsed voltage waveform and synchronizing the pulsed RF waveform with each pulse of the second pulsed voltage waveform.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the first electrode is surrounded by the second electrode.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the RF waveform of the pulsed RF waveform is provided after a first time delay has elapsed, wherein the first time delay begins at an end of the first stage of each pulse of the pulsed voltage waveform.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the first time delay has a length that is between 1% and 20% of the total length of the second stage of the pulsed voltage waveform.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein first stage of each pulse of the pulsed voltage waveform is started after a second time delay has elapsed, wherein the start of the second time delay begins at an end of the period in which the RF waveform of the pulsed RF waveform is provided during the at least a portion of the second stage.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the second time delay has a length that is between 0.1% and 10% of the total length of the second stage of the pulsed voltage waveform.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the second stage includes a sheath collapse stage and the first stage includes an ion current stage.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the pulsed voltage waveform is positive during the first stage.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, wherein the pulsed voltage waveform is negative during the second stage.
  • 14. The method of claim 1, wherein an impedance matching circuit disposed between an RF generator and one of the one or more electrodes matches the impedance of a load to the impedance of the RF generator during the second stage of each pulse of the pulsed voltage waveform when the pulsed voltage waveform is provided to one of the one or more electrodes.
  • 15. A method for plasma processing comprising: applying a pulsed voltage waveform to a first electrode disposed in a substrate support disposed within a plasma processing chamber, the pulsed voltage waveform comprising a series of voltage pulses that each comprise a first stage and a second stage;applying a pulsed radio frequency (RF) waveform to a second electrode disposed within the plasma processing chamber to generate a plasma in a processing region of a processing chamber; andsynchronizing the pulsed RF waveform with each pulse of the pulsed voltage waveform, such that an RF waveform of the pulsed RF waveform is provided only during at least a portion of the second stage of each pulse of the pulsed voltage waveform.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, wherein the pulsed voltage waveform is positive during the first stage.
  • 17. The method of claim 15, wherein the pulsed voltage waveform is negative during the second stage.
  • 18. The method of claim 15, wherein the first stage includes a sheath collapse stage and the second stage includes an ion current stage.
  • 19. The method of claim 15, wherein the series of voltage pulses are delivered at a frequency that is greater than or equal to 100 kHz and less than or equal to 500 kHz.
  • 20. The method of claim 19, wherein the applied RF waveform is provided at a frequency between 1 MHz and 200 MHz.
  • 21. A method for plasma processing comprising: synchronizing a pulsed radio frequency (RF) waveform with each voltage pulse of a pulsed voltage waveform that comprises a first stage and a second stage, such that an RF waveform of the pulsed RF waveform is provided only during at least a portion of the second stage of each voltage pulse of the pulsed voltage waveform, wherein the synchronizing comprises: applying the pulsed voltage waveform to a first electrode disposed in a substrate support disposed within a plasma processing chamber; andapplying the pulsed RF waveform to a second electrode disposed within the plasma processing chamber to generate a plasma in a processing region of a processing chamber.
  • 22. The method of claim 21, wherein the pulsed voltage waveform is positive during the first stage.
  • 23. The method of claim 21, wherein the pulsed voltage waveform is negative during the second stage.
  • 24. The method of claim 21, wherein the first stage includes a sheath collapse stage and the second stage includes an ion current stage.
  • 25. The method of claim 21, wherein the series of voltage pulses are delivered at a frequency that is greater than or equal to 100 kHz and less than or equal to 500 kHz.
  • 26. The method of claim 25, wherein the applied RF waveform is provided at a frequency between 1 MHz and 200 MHz.
US Referenced Citations (467)
Number Name Date Kind
4070589 Martinkovic Jan 1978 A
4340462 Koch Jul 1982 A
4464223 Gorin Aug 1984 A
4504895 Steigerwald Mar 1985 A
4585516 Corn et al. Apr 1986 A
4683529 Bucher, II Jul 1987 A
4931135 Horiuchi et al. Jun 1990 A
4992919 Lee et al. Feb 1991 A
5099697 Agar Mar 1992 A
5140510 Myers Aug 1992 A
5242561 Sato Sep 1993 A
5449410 Chang et al. Sep 1995 A
5451846 Peterson et al. Sep 1995 A
5464499 Moslehi et al. Nov 1995 A
5554959 Tang Sep 1996 A
5595627 Inazawa et al. Jan 1997 A
5597438 Grewal et al. Jan 1997 A
5610452 Shimer et al. Mar 1997 A
5698062 Sakamoto et al. Dec 1997 A
5716534 Tsuchiya et al. Feb 1998 A
5770023 Sellers Jun 1998 A
5796598 Nowak et al. Aug 1998 A
5810982 Sellers Sep 1998 A
5882424 Taylor et al. Mar 1999 A
5928963 Koshiishi Jul 1999 A
5933314 Lambson et al. Aug 1999 A
5948704 Benjamin et al. Sep 1999 A
5997687 Koshimizu Dec 1999 A
6043607 Roderick Mar 2000 A
6051114 Yao et al. Apr 2000 A
6055150 Clinton et al. Apr 2000 A
6074518 Imafuku et al. Jun 2000 A
6089181 Suemasa et al. Jul 2000 A
6099697 Hausmann Aug 2000 A
6110287 Arai et al. Aug 2000 A
6117279 Smolanoff et al. Sep 2000 A
6125025 Howald et al. Sep 2000 A
6133557 Kawanabe et al. Oct 2000 A
6187685 Hopkins et al. Feb 2001 B1
6198616 Dahimene et al. Mar 2001 B1
6201208 Wendt et al. Mar 2001 B1
6214162 Koshimizu Apr 2001 B1
6252354 Collins et al. Jun 2001 B1
6277506 Okamoto Aug 2001 B1
6309978 Donohoe et al. Oct 2001 B1
6313583 Arita et al. Nov 2001 B1
6355992 Via Mar 2002 B1
6358573 Raoux et al. Mar 2002 B1
6367413 Sill et al. Apr 2002 B1
6392187 Johnson May 2002 B1
6395641 Savas May 2002 B2
6413358 Donohoe Jul 2002 B2
6423192 Wada et al. Jul 2002 B1
6433297 Kojima et al. Aug 2002 B1
6435131 Koizumi Aug 2002 B1
6456010 Yamakoshi et al. Sep 2002 B2
6483731 Isurin et al. Nov 2002 B1
6535785 Johnson et al. Mar 2003 B2
6621674 Zahringer et al. Sep 2003 B1
6664739 Kishinevsky et al. Dec 2003 B1
6733624 Koshiishi et al. May 2004 B2
6740842 Johnson et al. May 2004 B2
6741446 Ennis May 2004 B2
6777037 Sumiya et al. Aug 2004 B2
6808607 Christie Oct 2004 B2
6818103 Scholl et al. Nov 2004 B1
6849154 Nagahata et al. Feb 2005 B2
6861373 Aoki et al. Mar 2005 B2
6896775 Chistyakov May 2005 B2
6917204 Mitrovic et al. Jul 2005 B2
6947300 Pai et al. Sep 2005 B2
6962664 Mitrovic Nov 2005 B2
6972524 Marakhtanov et al. Dec 2005 B1
7016620 Maess et al. Mar 2006 B2
7046088 Ziegler May 2006 B2
7059267 Hedberg et al. Jun 2006 B2
7104217 Himori et al. Sep 2006 B2
7115185 Gonzalez et al. Oct 2006 B1
7126808 Koo et al. Oct 2006 B2
7183177 Al-Bayati et al. Feb 2007 B2
7206189 Reynolds, III Apr 2007 B2
7218872 Shimomura May 2007 B2
7226868 Mosden et al. Jun 2007 B2
7265963 Hirose Sep 2007 B2
7312974 Kuchimachi Dec 2007 B2
7415940 Koshimizu et al. Aug 2008 B2
7479712 Richert et al. Jan 2009 B2
7509105 Ziegler Mar 2009 B2
7512387 Glueck Mar 2009 B2
7535688 Yokouchi et al. May 2009 B2
7586210 Wiedemuth et al. Sep 2009 B2
7588667 Cerio, Jr. Sep 2009 B2
7601246 Kim et al. Oct 2009 B2
7609740 Glueck Oct 2009 B2
7618686 Colpo et al. Nov 2009 B2
7633319 Arai Dec 2009 B2
7645341 Kennedy et al. Jan 2010 B2
7692936 Richter Apr 2010 B2
7700474 Cerio, Jr. Apr 2010 B2
7705676 Kirchmeier et al. Apr 2010 B2
7706907 Hiroki Apr 2010 B2
7718538 Kim et al. May 2010 B2
7740704 Strang Jun 2010 B2
7758764 Dhindsa et al. Jul 2010 B2
7761247 van Zyl Jul 2010 B2
7782100 Steuber et al. Aug 2010 B2
7821767 Fujii Oct 2010 B2
7825719 Roberg et al. Nov 2010 B2
7888240 Hamamjy et al. Feb 2011 B2
7898238 Wiedemuth et al. Mar 2011 B2
7929261 Wiedemuth Apr 2011 B2
RE42362 Schuler May 2011 E
7977256 Liu et al. Jul 2011 B2
8052798 Moriya et al. Nov 2011 B2
8055203 Choueiry et al. Nov 2011 B2
8083961 Chen et al. Dec 2011 B2
8110992 Nitschke Feb 2012 B2
8128831 Sato et al. Mar 2012 B2
8133347 Gluck et al. Mar 2012 B2
8140292 Wendt Mar 2012 B2
8217299 Ilic et al. Jul 2012 B2
8221582 Patrick et al. Jul 2012 B2
8236109 Moriya et al. Aug 2012 B2
8284580 Wilson Oct 2012 B2
8313612 McMillin et al. Nov 2012 B2
8313664 Chen et al. Nov 2012 B2
8333114 Hayashi Dec 2012 B2
8361906 Lee et al. Jan 2013 B2
8382999 Agarwal et al. Feb 2013 B2
8383001 Mochiki et al. Feb 2013 B2
8384403 Zollner et al. Feb 2013 B2
8399366 Takaba Mar 2013 B1
8419959 Bettencourt et al. Apr 2013 B2
8422193 Tao et al. Apr 2013 B2
8441772 Koshikawa et al. May 2013 B2
8456220 Thome et al. Jun 2013 B2
8460567 Chen Jun 2013 B2
8542076 Maier Sep 2013 B2
8551289 Nishimura et al. Oct 2013 B2
8632537 McNall, III et al. Jan 2014 B2
8641916 Yatsuda et al. Feb 2014 B2
8685267 Yatsuda et al. Apr 2014 B2
8704607 Yuzurihara et al. Apr 2014 B2
8716114 Ohmi et al. May 2014 B2
8716984 Mueller et al. May 2014 B2
8796933 Hermanns Aug 2014 B2
8809199 Nishizuka Aug 2014 B2
8821684 Ui et al. Sep 2014 B2
8828883 Rueger Sep 2014 B2
8845810 Hwang Sep 2014 B2
8884523 Winterhalter et al. Nov 2014 B2
8884525 Hoffman et al. Nov 2014 B2
8895942 Liu et al. Nov 2014 B2
8907259 Kasai et al. Dec 2014 B2
8916056 Koo et al. Dec 2014 B2
8926850 Singh et al. Jan 2015 B2
8979842 McNall, III et al. Mar 2015 B2
8993943 Pohl et al. Mar 2015 B2
9011636 Ashida Apr 2015 B2
9042121 Walde et al. May 2015 B2
9053908 Sriraman et al. Jun 2015 B2
9101038 Singh et al. Aug 2015 B2
9105452 Jeon et al. Aug 2015 B2
9123762 Lin et al. Sep 2015 B2
9147555 Richter Sep 2015 B2
9150960 Nauman et al. Oct 2015 B2
9209032 Zhao et al. Dec 2015 B2
9209034 Kitamura et al. Dec 2015 B2
9210790 Hoffman et al. Dec 2015 B2
9228878 Haw et al. Jan 2016 B2
9254168 Palanker Feb 2016 B2
9355822 Yamada et al. May 2016 B2
9384992 Narishige et al. Jul 2016 B2
9396960 Ogawa et al. Jul 2016 B2
9404176 Parkhe et al. Aug 2016 B2
9412613 Manna et al. Aug 2016 B2
9490107 Kim et al. Nov 2016 B2
9495563 Ziemba et al. Nov 2016 B2
9496150 Mochiki et al. Nov 2016 B2
9503006 Pohl et al. Nov 2016 B2
9536713 Van Zyl et al. Jan 2017 B2
9564287 Ohse et al. Feb 2017 B2
9576810 Deshmukh et al. Feb 2017 B2
9593421 Baek et al. Mar 2017 B2
9601319 Bravo et al. Mar 2017 B1
9607843 Rastogi et al. Mar 2017 B2
9637814 Bugyi et al. May 2017 B2
9644221 Kanamori et al. May 2017 B2
9651957 Finley May 2017 B1
9663858 Nagami et al. May 2017 B2
9666447 Rastogi et al. May 2017 B2
9673027 Yamamoto et al. Jun 2017 B2
9673059 Raley et al. Jun 2017 B2
9728429 Ricci et al. Aug 2017 B2
9741544 Van Zyl Aug 2017 B2
9761419 Nagami Sep 2017 B2
9786503 Raley et al. Oct 2017 B2
9799494 Chen et al. Oct 2017 B2
9805916 Konno et al. Oct 2017 B2
9805965 Sadjadi et al. Oct 2017 B2
9812305 Pelleymounter Nov 2017 B2
9831064 Konno et al. Nov 2017 B2
9852890 Mueller et al. Dec 2017 B2
9865471 Shimoda et al. Jan 2018 B2
9872373 Shimizu Jan 2018 B1
9881820 Wong et al. Jan 2018 B2
9922806 Tomura et al. Mar 2018 B2
9929004 Ziemba et al. Mar 2018 B2
9941097 Yamazawa et al. Apr 2018 B2
9972503 Tomura et al. May 2018 B2
10041174 Matsumoto et al. Aug 2018 B2
10042407 Grade et al. Aug 2018 B2
10063062 Voronin et al. Aug 2018 B2
10074518 Van Zyl Sep 2018 B2
10085796 Podany Oct 2018 B2
10090191 Tomura et al. Oct 2018 B2
10102321 Povolny et al. Oct 2018 B2
10109461 Yamada et al. Oct 2018 B2
10115567 Hirano et al. Oct 2018 B2
10115568 Kellogg et al. Oct 2018 B2
10176970 Nitschke Jan 2019 B2
10176971 Nagami Jan 2019 B2
10181392 Leypold et al. Jan 2019 B2
10199246 Koizumi et al. Feb 2019 B2
10217618 Larson et al. Feb 2019 B2
10217933 Nishimura et al. Feb 2019 B2
10229819 Hirano et al. Mar 2019 B2
10249498 Ventzek et al. Apr 2019 B2
10269540 Carter et al. Apr 2019 B1
10276420 Ito et al. Apr 2019 B2
10282567 Miller et al. May 2019 B2
10283321 Yang et al. May 2019 B2
10290506 Ranjan et al. May 2019 B2
10297431 Zelechowski et al. May 2019 B2
10304668 Coppa et al. May 2019 B2
10312056 Collins et al. Jun 2019 B2
10320373 Prager et al. Jun 2019 B2
10332730 Christie Jun 2019 B2
10340123 Ohtake Jul 2019 B2
10348186 Schuler et al. Jul 2019 B2
10354839 Alt et al. Jul 2019 B2
10373811 Christie et al. Aug 2019 B2
10381237 Takeda et al. Aug 2019 B2
10387166 Preston et al. Aug 2019 B2
10388544 Ui et al. Aug 2019 B2
10410877 Takashima et al. Sep 2019 B2
10431437 Gapinski et al. Oct 2019 B2
10438797 Cottle et al. Oct 2019 B2
10446453 Coppa et al. Oct 2019 B2
10447174 Porter, Jr. et al. Oct 2019 B1
10460916 Boyd, Jr. et al. Oct 2019 B2
10483100 Ishizaka et al. Nov 2019 B2
10510575 Kraus et al. Dec 2019 B2
10522343 Tapily et al. Dec 2019 B2
10553407 Nagami et al. Feb 2020 B2
10580620 Carducci et al. Mar 2020 B2
10593519 Yamada et al. Mar 2020 B2
10658189 Hatazaki et al. May 2020 B2
10665434 Matsumoto et al. May 2020 B2
10672589 Koshimizu et al. Jun 2020 B2
10672596 Brcka Jun 2020 B2
10672616 Kubota Jun 2020 B2
10707053 Urakawa et al. Jul 2020 B2
10707086 Yang et al. Jul 2020 B2
10707090 Takayama et al. Jul 2020 B2
10714372 Chua et al. Jul 2020 B2
10720305 Van Zyl Jul 2020 B2
10748746 Kaneko et al. Aug 2020 B2
10755894 Hirano et al. Aug 2020 B2
10763150 Lindley et al. Sep 2020 B2
10773282 Coppa et al. Sep 2020 B2
10774423 Janakiraman et al. Sep 2020 B2
10790816 Ziemba et al. Sep 2020 B2
10811227 Van Zyl et al. Oct 2020 B2
10811296 Cho et al. Oct 2020 B2
10896807 Fairbairn et al. Jan 2021 B2
10904996 Koh et al. Jan 2021 B2
10923320 Koh et al. Feb 2021 B2
10923321 Dorf et al. Feb 2021 B2
10923367 Lubomirsky et al. Feb 2021 B2
10923379 Liu et al. Feb 2021 B2
10978274 Kubota Apr 2021 B2
10991554 Zhao et al. Apr 2021 B2
10998169 Ventzek et al. May 2021 B2
11011349 Brouk et al. May 2021 B2
11095280 Ziemba et al. Aug 2021 B2
11108384 Prager et al. Aug 2021 B2
20010000032 Shamouilian et al. Jun 2001 A1
20010000091 Shan et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010000337 Ino et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020000699 Kaji et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020000788 Chu et al. Jun 2002 A1
20030000260 Hiramatsu et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030000298 Knoot et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030000520 Parsons Mar 2003 A1
20030000799 Long et al. May 2003 A1
20030000913 Jeschonek et al. May 2003 A1
20030137791 Arnet et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030001513 Tsuchiya et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030001650 Yamamoto Sep 2003 A1
20030002010 Johnson Oct 2003 A1
20040000409 Koshiishi et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040000666 Larsen Apr 2004 A1
20040001125 Quon Jun 2004 A1
20040002232 Iwami et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050000229 Howard Feb 2005 A1
20050000398 Roche et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050000925 Kouznetsov May 2005 A1
20050000981 Amann et al. May 2005 A1
20050001515 Mahoney et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050001521 Isurin et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050002869 Nakazato et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060000759 Fischer Apr 2006 A1
20060001307 Herchen Jun 2006 A1
20060001398 Kim Jun 2006 A1
20060001718 Roche et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060002191 Asakura Oct 2006 A1
20060002785 Stowell Dec 2006 A1
20070001137 Higashiura et al. May 2007 A1
20070001149 Vasquez et al. May 2007 A1
20070001969 Wang et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070002843 Todorov et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070002858 Howald Dec 2007 A1
20080000125 Gerhardt et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080000371 Yonekura et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080001068 Ito et al. May 2008 A1
20080001354 Kadlec et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080001602 Koo et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080001855 Walther et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080002105 Kouznetsov Sep 2008 A1
20080002364 Sakao Oct 2008 A1
20080002522 Kurachi et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080002727 Kwon et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080002895 Lee et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090000165 French et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090000594 Mizuno et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090000786 Kojima et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090002952 Shannon et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100000186 Collins et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100000252 Ehiasarian et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100001184 Matsuyama May 2010 A1
20100130018 Tokashiki et al. May 2010 A1
20100001549 Fischer et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100001934 Cho et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100271744 Ni et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100003269 Maeda et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110009999 Zhang Jan 2011 A1
20110100954 Satake May 2011 A1
20110001435 Lee et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110001577 Willwerth et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110001776 Lee et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110002814 Lee et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110002983 Kanegae et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120000004 Miller et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120000813 Sano et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120000883 Ranjan et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120000979 Willwerth et al. Apr 2012 A1
20130000594 Marakhtanov et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130000874 Bodke et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130002139 Liao et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130002148 Valcore, Jr. et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130003409 Tappan et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130003447 Nishizuka Dec 2013 A1
20140000574 Yang et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140000776 Young et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140001098 Singleton et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140001253 Kirchmeier et al. May 2014 A1
20140001548 Gaff et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140001771 Thach et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140002631 Chen et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140349033 Nonaka et al. Nov 2014 A1
20150000020 Lill et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150000845 Yuzurihara et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150001113 Hsu et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150001168 Yamasaki et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150001709 Subramani et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150002358 Ito et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150003660 Nangoy et al. Dec 2015 A9
20160000044 Beniyama et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160000276 Parkhe et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160000560 Kim et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160000641 Fandou et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160001969 Leray et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160002412 Mavretic Aug 2016 A1
20160002845 Hirano et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160003222 Nguyen et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160003270 Ziemba et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160003513 Valcore, Jr. et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170000118 Deshmukh et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170000184 Sriraman et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170000299 Chistyakov et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170000694 Kanarik et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170000769 Engelhardt Mar 2017 A1
20170000985 Kawasaki et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170001103 Yang et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170099722 Kawasaki Apr 2017 A1
20170001624 Ye et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170001699 Ui et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170001704 Alexander et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170001789 Kamp et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170002216 Nishimura et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170002366 Caron et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170002367 Angelov et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170002500 Boswell et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170002634 McChesney et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170002786 Carter et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170003114 Park Oct 2017 A1
20170003169 Tan et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170003307 Lee et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170003584 Dorf et al. Dec 2017 A1
20170003729 Long et al. Dec 2017 A1
20180000760 Wang et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180001398 Nagashima et al. May 2018 A1
20180001905 Ueda Jul 2018 A1
20180002047 Tan et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180002189 Park et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180002945 Wang et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180003094 Okunishi et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180003506 Gomm Dec 2018 A1
20180003663 Nagami et al. Dec 2018 A1
20180003746 Hayashi et al. Dec 2018 A1
20190000273 Okunishi et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190000966 Pankratz et al. Mar 2019 A1
20190001726 Ueda Jun 2019 A1
20190001983 Tokashiki Jun 2019 A1
20190002672 Wang et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190002778 Prager et al. Sep 2019 A1
20190002957 Prager et al. Sep 2019 A1
20190002958 Okunishi et al. Sep 2019 A1
20190003189 Saitoh et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190003337 Nagami et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190003412 Thokachichu et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190003482 Okunishi Nov 2019 A1
20190003633 Esswein et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190003858 Marakhtanov et al. Dec 2019 A1
20200000161 Feng et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200000205 Shoeb et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200000243 Chan-Hui et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200000584 Engelstaedter et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200000664 Engelstaedter et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200000752 Ventzek et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200000909 Brouk et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200075290 Kawasaki et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200001061 Murphy et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200001268 Kuno et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200001610 Cui et al. May 2020 A1
20200001611 Rogers et al. May 2020 A1
20200002433 Mishra et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200002513 Kuno et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200002660 Dorf et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200002947 Kubota Sep 2020 A1
20200286714 Kubota Sep 2020 A1
20200003520 Dorf et al. Nov 2020 A1
20200003731 Prager et al. Nov 2020 A1
20200003891 Prager et al. Dec 2020 A1
20200004078 Hayashi et al. Dec 2020 A1
20200004112 Koshimizu et al. Dec 2020 A1
20210000130 Nguyen et al. Jan 2021 A1
20210000434 Koshimizu et al. Feb 2021 A1
20210000517 Dokan et al. Feb 2021 A1
20210000826 Koshiishi et al. Mar 2021 A1
20210001309 Nagaike et al. May 2021 A1
20210001400 Nagaike et al. May 2021 A1
20210002103 Ziemba et al. Jul 2021 A1
20210002727 Koshimizu Sep 2021 A1
20210002885 Ziemba et al. Sep 2021 A1
20220399183 Cui Dec 2022 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (45)
Number Date Country
102084024 Jun 2011 CN
101707186 Feb 2012 CN
101990353 Apr 2013 CN
104752134 Feb 2017 CN
983394 Mar 2000 EP
1119033 Jul 2001 EP
1214459 Jun 2002 EP
1418670 May 2004 EP
1214459 Jul 2006 EP
1691481 Aug 2006 EP
1708239 Oct 2006 EP
2096679 Sep 2009 EP
2541584 Jan 2013 EP
2580368 Apr 2013 EP
2838112 Feb 2015 EP
3086359 Oct 2016 EP
3616234 Mar 2020 EP
S5018244 Feb 1975 JP
2748213 May 1998 JP
4418424 Feb 2010 JP
5018244 Sep 2012 JP
5018244 Sep 2012 JP
Y5018244 Sep 2012 JP
2014112644 Jun 2014 JP
06741461 Aug 2020 JP
20160042429 Apr 2016 KR
201717247 May 2017 TW
2002059954 Aug 2002 WO
2008050619 May 2008 WO
2011087984 Nov 2011 WO
2014197145 Dec 2014 WO
2014124857 May 2015 WO
2015198854 Dec 2015 WO
2016002547 Jan 2016 WO
2019036587 Feb 2019 WO
2019185423 Oct 2019 WO
2019225184 Nov 2019 WO
2019239872 Dec 2019 WO
2019245729 Dec 2019 WO
2020004048 Jan 2020 WO
2020017328 Jan 2020 WO
2020051064 Mar 2020 WO
2020121819 Jun 2020 WO
2021097459 May 2021 WO
2021118862 Jun 2021 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (23)
Entry
Chang, Bingdong, “Oblique angled plasma etching for 3D silicon structures with wiggling geometries” 31(8), [085301]. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ab53fb. DTU Library. 2019, 10 pages.
Dr. Steve Sirard, “Introduction to Plasma Etching”, Lam Research Corporation. 64 pages.
Eagle Harbor Technologies presentation by Dr. Kenneth E. Miller—“The EHT Integrated Power Module (IPM): An IGBT-Based, High Current, Ultra-Fast, Modular, Programmable Power Supply Unit,” Jun. 2013, 21 pages.
Eagle Harbor Technologies presentation by Dr. Kenneth E. Miller—“The EHT Long Pulse Integrator Program,” ITPA Diagnostic Meeting, General Atomics, Jun. 4-7, 2013, 18 pages.
Eagle Harbor Technologies webpage—“EHT Integrator Demonstration at DIII-D,” 2015, 1 page.
Eagle Harbor Technologies webpage—“High Gain and Frequency Ultra-Stable Integrators for ICC and Long Pulse ITER Applications,” 2012, 1 page.
Eagle Harbor Technologies webpage—High Gain and Frequency Ultra-Stable Integrators for Long Pulse and/or High Current Applications, 2018, 1 page.
Eagle Harbor Technologies webpage—“In Situ Testing of EHT Integrators on a Tokamak,” 2015, 1 page.
Eagle Harbor Technologies webpage—“Long-Pulse Integrator Testing with DIII-D Magnetic Diagnostics,” 2016, 1 page.
Electrical 4 U webpage—“Clamping Circuit,” Aug. 29, 2018, 9 pages.
Kamada, Keiichi, et al., Editors—“New Developments of Plasma Science with Pulsed Power Technology,” Research Report, NIFS-PROC-82, presented at National Institute for Fusion Science, Toki, Gifu, Japan, Mar. 5-6, 2009, 109 pages.
Kyung Chae Yang et al., A study on the etching characteristics of magnetic tunneling junction materials using DC pulse-biased inductively coupled plasmas, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 54, 01AE01, Oct. 29, 2014, 6 pages.
Lin, Jianliang, et al.,—“Diamond like carbon films deposited by HiPIMS using oscillatory voltage pulses,” Surface & Coatings Technology 258, 2014, published by Elsevier B.V., pp. 1212-1222.
Michael A. Lieberman, “A short course of the principles of plasma discharges and materials processing”, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, 122 pages.
Michael A. Lieberman, “Principles of Plasma Discharges and Material Processing”, A Wiley Interscience Publication. 1994, 100 pages.
Prager, J.R., et al.—“A High Voltage Nanosecond Pulser with Variable Pulse Width and Pulse Repetition Frequency Control for Nonequilibrium Plasma Applications,” IEEE 41st International Conference on Plasma Sciences (ICOPS) held with 2014 IEEE International Conference on High-Power Particle Beams (BEAMS), pp. 1-6, 2014.
Richard Barnett et al. A New Plasma Source for Next Generation MEMS Deep Si Etching: Minimal Tilt, Improved Profile Uniformity and Higher Etch Rates, SPP Process Technology Systems. 2010, 4 pages.
S.B. Wang et al. “Ion Bombardment Energy and SiO 2/Si Fluorocarbon Plasma Etch Selectivity”, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A 19, 2425 (2001), 4 pages.
Wang, S.B., et al.—“Control of ion energy distribution at substrates during plasma processing,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 88, No. 2, Jul. 15, 2000, pp. 643-646.
Yiting Zhang et al. “Investigation of feature orientation and consequences of ion tilting during plasma etching with a three-dimensional feature profile simulator”, Nov. 22, 2016, 16 pages.
Zhen-hua Bi et al., A brief review of dual-frequency capacitively coupled discharges, Current Applied Physics, vol. 11, Issue 5, Supplement, 2011, pp. S2-S8.
Zhuoxing Luo, B.S., M.S, “RF Plasma Etching With A DC Bias” A Dissertation in Physics. Dec. 1994, 135 pages.
International Search Report dated Feb. 27, 2023 for Application No. PCT/US2022/047677.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20230178336 A1 Jun 2023 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
63287433 Dec 2021 US