Apparatus for attaching a cooling structure to an integrated circuit

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7477527
  • Patent Number
    7,477,527
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, March 21, 2006
    18 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 13, 2009
    15 years ago
Abstract
A method and apparatus is provided for attaching a cooling structure to the surface of an integrated circuit (IC). The attachment of the cooling structure, for example a heat sink, to the IC requires that certain pressure is applied, usually by connecting the cooling structure to a Printed Circuit Board (PCB). However, excess pressure may damage the ball grid array (BGA) that connects the IC to the PCB. Attachment of a cooling structure to the IC package substrate is provided without support from the PCB. In one embodiment, shock absorbers are also attached to the cooling structure and the PCB to prevent undesirable vibration of the heat sink mass from affecting the IC.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Technical Field


The invention relates to integrated circuits. More particularly, the invention relates to a method and apparatus for attaching a cooling structure to an integrated circuit.


2. Description of Prior Art


Heat-sink-attachment and thermal-interface-design options are based, on performance considerations, in addition to cost effectiveness. These performance considerations include functional considerations such as thermal properties, and reliability considerations such as mechanical and environmental properties. In addition, the ease and cost of assembly and disassembly of the heat sink (HS) attachment structure are important.


A typical state of the art attachment of a HS or a heat spreader to the backside of a high-power chip physically interconnects the HS structure to the system's substrate structure, namely the printed circuit board (PCB). Such a design approach is used when there is a need to produce a high enough pressure at the thermal interface between the HS and the chip. Such pressure is often needed for a satisfactory thermal performance of the interface.


Also known in the art are attachments of an HS to a package substrate (PS), rather than to the PCB. Designs of this type are not intended and, in many cases, are not even supposed to produce high pressure at the HS/chip interface. Such HS-to-package attachment designs in the current art are acceptable if a relatively low pressure, for example a pressure in the range of 5-20 psi, can ensure a satisfactory thermal management of the integrated circuit (IC) device.


However, it is becoming a more frequent requirement in the industry that a high interfacial pressure of, for example in the range of 70 psi or higher, is needed to produce and control a satisfactory thermal contact. This occurs for example, in the case where a carbon nano-tube (CNT) based HS is used and the tips of the CNTs require high pressure to bend sufficiently and provide the necessary thermal contact. Such a HS is discussed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/925,824, System and Method Using Self-Assembled Nano Structures in the Design and Fabrication of an Integrated Circuit Micro-Cooler, assigned to common assignee and which is herein incorporated by reference thereto for all that it contains. In such case the HS is typically attached to the PCB. This is usually done by using screw-based elements, with or without springs, or flat-spring-based structural elements. This approach can produce a very high pressure at the HS/chip interface providing the necessary pressure to achieve the thermal interface required. However, this approach does suffer from the shortcomings that are discussed below.


As shown in FIGS. 1a and 1b chip 110, connected in a flip-chip (FC) position, is soldered to a package substrate 140 through solder joints 120. A metal frame 130 mounted on top of the substrate 140 further secures the chip 110. The objective of such a reinforcement is to increase the flexural rigidity of the substrate 140 so that it does not bend as a result of the elevated temperature, typically is the range of 220° C. to 280° C. or so, applied to the system during the reflow soldering process. As is known, such a process is an essential part of the technology that is currently used to surface-mount IC packages on PCBs. The solder joints 120 are coupled to ball grid array (BGA) solder joints 150 through the substrate 140, the BGA solder joints 150 being soldered to the PCB 160. The BGA material is typically the most vulnerable part of the BGA package structure. Using prior art solutions, when a screw-based design is used to mount an HS on a package that is further attached to the PCB 160, it is not only the thermal interface that experiences elevated pressure, but also the BGA solder joints 150. This circumstance, favorable from the standpoint of the thermal performance of the device, can have a detrimental effect on the reliability of the BGA solder material, both on a short-term basis because of the excessive static overload, and on a long-term basis because of the significant mechanical loading added. During the system manufacturing, for example, during the reflow soldering process, and operation, for example, power cycling conditions, such a mechanical loading superimposes the thermally induced loading. The thermally induced loading is caused by the change in temperature in the structure in question which is fabricated of dissimilar materials. In addition, temperature gradients are experienced. A significant mechanical pre-stressing may worsen the mechanical performance. That is, the adhesive and/or cohesive strength of the BGA solder material is affected. In some cases, the elevated tensile forces that are applied to the PCB 160 as a result of the mounting of a HS to it can lead to local mechanical, also referred to as physical, damage of the PCB 160 and can result in electrical opens and/or shorts.


Therefore, due to the limitations of prior art solutions, it would be advantageous to provide an HS mounting structure, such that the BGA solder joints and the PCB do not experience the high pressure applied at the thermal HS/chip interface.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A method and apparatus is provided for attaching a cooling structure to the surface of an integrated circuit (IC). The attachment of the cooling structure, for example a heat sink, to the IC requires that certain pressure is applied, usually by connecting the cooling structure to a Printed Circuit Board (PCB). However, excess pressure may damage the ball grid array (BGA) that connects the IC to the PCB. Attachment of a cooling structure to the IC package substrate is provided without support from the PCB. In one embodiment, shock absorbers are also attached to the cooling structure and the PCB to prevent undesirable vibration of the heat sink mass from affecting the IC.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a plan view (FIG. 1a) and a section view of (FIG. 1b) of a chip mounted to a PCB (prior art);



FIG. 2 is a plan view (FIG. 2a) and a section view (FIG. 2b) of a first heat sink mounting platform in accordance with the disclosed invention;



FIG. 3 is a plan view (FIG. 3a) and a section view (FIG. 3b) of a second heat sink mounting platform in accordance with the disclosed invention; and



FIG. 4 is a plan view (FIG. 4a) and a section view (FIG. 4b) of a third heat sink mounting platform having shock absorbers.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The disclosed invention addresses the limitations of the prior art by excluding the ball grid array (BGA) solder joints, for example the BGA solder joints 150 shown in FIG. 1, from exposure to a high axial pressure. Regardless of the actual mounting pressure of a heat sink (HS) to the back side of a chip, for example chip 110, this pressure is not transmitted to the BGA solder joints 150. Specifically, there is disclosed a structural approach that enables the direct attachment of an HS to the package substrate (PS) of a chip, for example PS 140, by using a robust mounting platform (MP). In accordance with an embodiment of the disclosed invention, the MP comprises a piece of hardware that can be two- or three-dimensional and that can be any of several very different designs. A three-dimensional version can be used, for example, for a juxtaposed/multilevel package design. The MP provides sufficient real estate and structural strength so that an HS, or a heat-spreader, can be attached to it. The MP is attached to the PS 140 along PS 140 edges, as disclosed below. Such an attachment is facilitated because the PS is typically reinforced by a metal frame, for example the metal frame 130. The metal frame 130 provides a structural foundation for the successful mounting of the MP. However, if an IC package does not have a metal frame or a PS reinforcement, but the PS is still robust enough to provide a reliable support for the MP, the disclosed invention may be equally applicable.


A typical total thickness of the PS and the metal frame mounted on top of PS is about 2.6 millimeters. This thickness is sufficient to fasten the MP reliably.



FIG. 2
a and 2b provide plan (FIG. 2a) and section (FIG. 2b) views where and exemplary and non-limiting schematic 200 of a first heat sink mounting platform (MP) 210 that is screw-based. The MP 210 is a frame that encompasses an IC from its sides. On at least two opposite sides of the MP 210 there are fastening screws 220 designed to fasten the MP 210 to the PS 140 and/or the metal frame 130. Fastening screws 220 may directly connect to the PS 140 and/or the metal frame 130. However, springs such as spring element 230, may be used as well as other elements to enable such attachment. In other embodiments of the disclosed invention, a flat spring (not shown), clamp (not shown), clip (not shown) or other fastening element may be used to secure the attachment of the MP 210 to the PS 140 and/or metal frame 130. The fastening elements, regardless of type or structure, withstand a very high in-plane load before buckling or otherwise failing. The MP 210 provides ample real-estate to support an HS (not shown) and to apply the desired pressure to the back of the chip 110, without the pressure being transferred to the BGA solder joints 150.


Similarly, a flat-spring-based attachment (FSA) 300 is shown in FIGS. 3a and 3b, the principle of operation is similar to those discussed with respect to FIGS. 2a and 2b and therefore, not repeated here. An MP attached directly to a PS, is further capable of relieving the BGA solder joints. For example, the BGA solder joints 150, and/or the PCB are relieved from excess loading. In this embodiment, the fastening screws may be equipped with a torque limiter that limits the amount of pressure a fastening screw applies to a spring, or directly to the PS and/or metal frame.


The curvilinear end-spring-elements (ESEs) elongated in the direction of the package edge, are attached to the screws at their tips, for example as shown in FIG. 2, provide good mechanical contact on the surface of the elements. These contacts can be reinforced, if necessary, by thin strips of a soft metal or by a metal type Velcro®, to maximize the friction at the interface between the ESEs and the PS, and/or the metal frame. The adhesion forces are due to the reaction of the stiff and robust frame structure of the MP to the elongation of the screws during MP mounting and the resulting deformation of the ESEs.


In the embodiment shown in FIGS. 3a and 3b, the reaction force is provided initially by the curved springs 330. The springs may be manufactured from initially flat spring-metal strips. The required spring design is predetermined by an appropriate calculation, for example by predictive modeling, aimed at the evaluation of the forces that such a spring imposes on the structure after it is deployed during the mounting process. The edges of the flat springs can be preliminarily bonded, or otherwise attached, to the MP, and released during the mounting process, after the frame is put onto the package structure. For instance, a low temperature melting solder, for example Indium based, can be used to bond the ends of the flat springs to the MP frame, and can then be released by heating up the system after the FSP frame is put onto the package frame. Another option is to use strings that are cut off after the FSP frame is put onto the package frame.



FIGS. 4
a and 4b provide plan (FIG. 4a) and section (FIG. 4b) views 400 of a third heat sink mounting platform having a shock absorber. The HS (not shown) is a mass placed over the chip and may be susceptible to the impact of a variety of forces. These forces may result in vibrations amplified by the HS mass and may potentially cause damage to the BGA solder joints 150. Therefore, in one embodiment of the disclosed invention the shock absorbers 432, having for example springs 434, mount the MP 410 to the PCB 160. The MP structures disclosed in FIG. 2 or 3 may be used to affix the MP to the PS or the metal frame. The MP 410 is modified by having the necessary hooks, for example protruding holes 440 to enable the attachment of the shock absorber 432. Vibrations are restrained through the operation of the shock absorber mechanism thereby preventing damage to BGA solder joints 150.


The invention disclosed herein provide various advantages over prior art solutions, that include, but are not limited to the examples set forth below. A successful attachment of the HS to the PS and/or the metal frame can be achieved without any change in the existing package structure. The ability to mount, remove, and replace the HS without damaging the package, the HS itself, or the PCB are important considerations in HS design and mounting technology, and these considerations are addressed in the invention disclosed herein. The MP is a mechanical attachment and hence is easy to install, repair, and use. Furthermore, no epoxies or other chemicals are used which shortens the production time and overcomes ergonomic problems. The thermal performance achieved using the disclosed MP is superior to prior art solution because significant pressure can be applied to mount the HS on top the chip 110 without harming the integrity of the BGA solder joints. Furthermore, the disclosed invention can be used regardless of whether an additional interface material, for example, thermal grease or phase changing material, is or is not used for improved thermal performance of the HS-to-chip interface.


Although the invention is described herein with reference to preferred embodiments, one skilled in the art will readily appreciate that other applications may be substituted for those set forth herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Specifically, the particular mounting of the MP to the PS can be achieved by using a screw-based approach/platform (SBP) and a flat-spring-based (FSP) approach, Velcro-type attachment, and others, all to be considered to be within the framework of the disclosed invention. Furthermore, while fastening screws are shown to be opposite each other, embodiments designed to provide a balanced force holding the MP in place are also envisioned and are specifically included within the spirit of the disclosed invention.


Accordingly, the invention should only be limited by the Claims included below.

Claims
  • 1. Apparatus for supporting attachment of a mass to an integrated circuit (IC) which in turn, is mounted on top of a printed circuit board (PCB) and which is coupled thereto via a plurality of solder joints comprising: a frame having inner dimensions to allow for the placement of said frame around the IC; anda plurality of fasteners protruding from said frame at each of said frame sides;wherein said fasteners are adjustable to fasten said frame to said IC without support from said PCB, said fasteners applying a pressure sufficient to attach a mass attached to said IC, without transferring pressure to said solder joints that couple said IC to said PCB.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising: a spring element attached at an edge of said fastener.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 2, future comprising: a coating at the edges of said spring element that are in contact with the IC package, said coating to enhancing the friction between said spring element and said IC package.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the pressure applied to said mass is greater than 50 pounds per square inch.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 1, said solder joints comprising ball grid array (BGA) solder joints.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 1, said mass comprising any of a heat sink and a heat spreader.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 6, said heat sink is comprising: carbon nano-tubes having edges that are pressed to said IC to establish thermal conductivity therefrom.
  • 8. The apparatus of claim 1, said IC comprising a high-power IC.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 1, each of said plurality of fasteners having a corresponding fastener of said plurality of fastener positioned in a substantially opposite direction therefrom.
  • 10. The apparatus of claim 1, said fasteners further comprising torque limiters.
  • 11. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising: a plurality of shock absorbers coupled between said frame and said PCB.
  • 12. Apparatus for supporting attachment of a mass to an integrated circuit (IC) which in turn, is mounted on top of a printed circuit board (PCB), and which is coupled thereto comprising: a frame having inner dimensions to allow for the placement of said frame around said IC; anda plurality of fasteners protruding from each side of said frame, an edge of each fastener being attached to at least one flat fastening spring;wherein when said flat fastening spring is released they serve to fasten said frame to said IC without support from said PCB, and apply a pressure that is sufficient to attach a mass to said IC without said pressure to solder joints that couple said IC to said PCB.
  • 13. The apparatus of claim 12, further comprising: bonding points on an inner portion of said frame for the edges of said flat fastening spring.
  • 14. The apparatus of claim 13, said bonding points comprising low-melting point temperature material.
  • 15. The apparatus of claim 14, said low-melting point material comprising Indium.
  • 16. The apparatus of claim 12, further comprising: a coating on the edges of said flat fastening spring that are in contact with said IC package, said coating enhancing friction between said spring element and said IC package.
  • 17. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein the pressure applied to said mass is greater than 50 pounds per square inch.
  • 18. The apparatus of claim 12, said solder joints comprising ball grid array (BGA) solder joints.
  • 19. The apparatus of claim 12, said mass comprising any of a heat sink and a heat spreader.
  • 20. The apparatus of claim 19, said heat sink comprising carbon nano-tubes the edges of which are pressured to the IC for the purpose of achieving the desired thermal conductivity.
  • 21. The apparatus of claim 12, said IC comprising a high-power IC.
  • 22. The apparatus of claim 12, each of said plurality of having a corresponding fastener of said plurality of fastener positioned in a substantially the opposite direction therefrom.
  • 23. The apparatus of claim 12, further comprising: a plurality of shock absorbers coupled between said frame and said PCB.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority from U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/663,225, filed on Mar. 21, 2005, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by this reference thereto.

US Referenced Citations (108)
Number Name Date Kind
4466618 Angelini Aug 1984 A
4611869 Bonnefoy Sep 1986 A
4932052 Lo Jun 1990 A
5060543 Warheit Oct 1991 A
5217094 Walter et al. Jun 1993 A
5713690 Corbin, Jr. et al. Feb 1998 A
5808236 Brezina et al. Sep 1998 A
5818700 Purinton Oct 1998 A
5837081 Ting Nov 1998 A
5932925 McIntyre Aug 1999 A
5965267 Nolan Oct 1999 A
5990552 Xie et al. Nov 1999 A
6015081 Okabayashi et al. Jan 2000 A
6156256 Kennel Dec 2000 A
6180874 Brezina et al. Jan 2001 B1
6231744 Ying May 2001 B1
6232706 Dai May 2001 B1
6340822 Brown Jan 2002 B1
6359288 Ying Mar 2002 B1
6361861 Gao Mar 2002 B2
6373703 Johnson et al. Apr 2002 B2
6383923 Brown May 2002 B1
6386890 Bhatt et al. May 2002 B1
6392887 Day et al. May 2002 B1
6395991 Dockerty et al. May 2002 B1
6407922 Eckblad Jun 2002 B1
6417563 Halderman et al. Jul 2002 B1
6432740 Chen Aug 2002 B1
6449155 Colbert et al. Sep 2002 B1
6504292 Choi Jan 2003 B1
6591658 Yedur et al. Jul 2003 B1
6618251 Ishimine Sep 2003 B2
6713151 Dean Mar 2004 B1
6724906 Naksen et al. Apr 2004 B2
6756026 Colbert Jun 2004 B2
6800886 Awano Oct 2004 B2
6821415 Sharb Nov 2004 B2
RE38677 Blomquist Dec 2004 E
6853068 Djekic Feb 2005 B1
6855376 Hwang Feb 2005 B2
6856016 Searls Feb 2005 B2
6856511 Viernes et al. Feb 2005 B1
6859367 Davison Feb 2005 B2
6862962 Delbrugge et al. Mar 2005 B1
6864571 Arik Mar 2005 B2
6880799 Mrozek Apr 2005 B2
6891724 De Lorenzo May 2005 B2
6892652 Jalbert et al. May 2005 B2
6900580 Dai May 2005 B2
6910666 Burr Jun 2005 B2
6921462 Montgomery Jul 2005 B2
6924335 Fan Aug 2005 B2
6930884 Cromwell et al. Aug 2005 B2
6955800 Resasco et al. Oct 2005 B2
6962823 Empedocles Nov 2005 B2
6965513 Montgomery Nov 2005 B2
6989325 Uang Jan 2006 B2
6998358 French et al. Feb 2006 B2
7008604 Smalley Mar 2006 B2
7011771 Gao Mar 2006 B2
7029646 Margrave Apr 2006 B2
7033647 Tang et al. Apr 2006 B2
7052666 Colbert May 2006 B2
7096580 Gonzalez et al. Aug 2006 B2
7289335 Callahan et al. Oct 2007 B2
7293994 Brodsky et al. Nov 2007 B2
7323358 Cromwell Jan 2008 B1
20020090501 Tobita Jul 2002 A1
20020100581 Knowles Aug 2002 A1
20020130407 Dahl Sep 2002 A1
20020145194 O'Conner Oct 2002 A1
20020163079 Awano Nov 2002 A1
20030111333 Montgomery Jun 2003 A1
20030117770 Montgomery Jun 2003 A1
20030231471 De Lorenzo Dec 2003 A1
20040005736 Searls Jan 2004 A1
20040013598 McElrath Jan 2004 A1
20040053053 Jiang Mar 2004 A1
20040101468 Liu May 2004 A1
20040136161 Miyamura et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040146560 Whiteford Jul 2004 A1
20040150100 Dubin Aug 2004 A1
20040152240 Dangelo Aug 2004 A1
20040182600 Kawabata Sep 2004 A1
20040184241 De Lorenzo Sep 2004 A1
20040191158 Liu et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040218362 Amaro Nov 2004 A1
20040261978 Zhan Dec 2004 A1
20040261987 Zhang Dec 2004 A1
20040265489 Dubin Dec 2004 A1
20040266063 Montgomery Dec 2004 A1
20040266065 Zhang Dec 2004 A1
20050006754 Arik Jan 2005 A1
20050037204 Osiander Feb 2005 A1
20050046017 Dangelo Mar 2005 A1
20050061496 Matabayas Mar 2005 A1
20050067693 Nihei Mar 2005 A1
20050092464 Leu May 2005 A1
20050116336 Chopra Jun 2005 A1
20050136248 Leu Jun 2005 A1
20050139642 Koning Jun 2005 A1
20050139991 White Jun 2005 A1
20050150887 Taya Jul 2005 A1
20050167647 Huang Aug 2005 A1
20050224220 Li Oct 2005 A1
20050238810 Scaringe Oct 2005 A1
20050260412 Gardner Nov 2005 A1
20050269726 Matabayas, Jr. Dec 2005 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (4)
Number Date Country
1329953 Aug 2003 EP
WO 03054958 Jul 2003 WO
WO 03072679 Sep 2003 WO
WO 03107419 Dec 2003 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20060238990 A1 Oct 2006 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60663225 Mar 2005 US