The invention relates to MOS transistors. More specifically, the invention relates to improving drive-strength and leakage of deep submicron MOS transistors when the well becomes a current source.
The advantages of dynamically adjustable threshold voltage of metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) transistors with respect to enhancing drive-current or reducing leakage current is known. U.S. Pat. No. 7,224,205, assigned to a common assignee and incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference, provides one such solution, where a diode is connected in a forward bias mode that provides a current, controlled by the transistor input, that modifies the voltage of the transistor's well. This is performed in such a way that, when the transistor is required to supply current, it has a lower threshold voltage than normal and, therefore, increases its drive capability. In the off state, the transistor's threshold is higher, leading to a better leakage characteristic. In actual implementations, the source of the well voltage modification is a forward-biased diode that delivers current to the well from the gate. The well voltage is effectively clamped by the well to a source PN junction diode. The series connection of forward biased diodes creates a voltage divider that modulates the well voltage according to the voltage applied to the gate. It is possible to design this voltage divider to effect the desired changes in well voltage with very little expenditure of current.
In actual implementations it was observed that a relatively high amount of current is sourced to a floating well from the transistor it supports. While it is desired to keep the current in the voltage-dividing diode stack low, on the order of 1 nA, it has been found in some instances that the well acts as a current source, supplying several nAs. This observed behavior is shown in
Ebina, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,521,948, suggests the use of a reverse biased PN junction to effect a dynamic threshold. However, in the presence of the currents observed above, Ebina's approach is limited to cases where the well does not operate as a current source, or where its currents are negligible. However, in a deep submicron implementation this is not be the case and, therefore, Ebina would not be applicable.
It would therefore be advantageous to provide a solution that either eliminates or makes use of the current provided by the well when operating in the current source mode.
Deep submicron wells of MOS transistors, implemented over an ungrounded well, exhibit two modes of operation: a current sink mode and a current source mode. While operation as a current sink is well understood and successfully controlled, it is also necessary to control the current provided in the current source mode of the well. A Schottky diode is connected between the well and the gate, the Schottky diode having a smaller barrier height than that of the PN junction of the well-to-source. For an NMOS transistor, current flows through the PN junction when the gate is high. When the gate is low, current flows through the Schottky diode. This difference of current flow results in a difference in transistor threshold, thereby achieving a dynamic threshold voltage using the current from the well when operating at the current source mode.
Deep submicron wells of MOS transistors, implemented over an ungrounded well, exhibit two modes of operation: a current sink mode and a current source mode. While operation as a current sink is well understood and successfully controlled, it is also necessary to control the current provided in the current source mode of the well. Accordingly, a Schottky diode is connected between the well and the gate, the Schottky diode having a smaller barrier height than that of the PN junction of the well-to-source. For a NMOS transistor, current flows through the PN junction when the gate is high. When the gate is low, current flows through the Schottky diode. This difference of current flow results in a difference in transistor threshold, thereby achieving a dynamic threshold voltage using the current from the well when, the transistor operates in the current source mode.
In an embodiment of the invention, the current supplied when the well acts as a current source is controlled by using the gate to control the well voltage.
A person skilled in the art would readily note that the descriptions herein where described with respect to a NMOS transistor. Such a person would further realize that it is straightforward to adapt the teachings herein for the purpose of PMOS transistors, with the applicable changes required due to the different polarity of the PMOS transistor. The same material CoSi2 also creates a useful Schottky diode with N-type silicon. In this case, the nominal barrier is somewhat higher, i.e. 0.64 volts, but can be reduced by controlling the well doping. It is therefore apparent that the well voltage can be modulated by at least 200 mV, which is sufficient to effect useful V
Accordingly, although the invention has been described in detail with reference to a particular preferred embodiment, persons possessing ordinary skill in the art to which this invention pertains will appreciate that various modifications and enhancements may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the claims that follow.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/533,332, filed on Sep. 19, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,683,433, and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/006,306, filed on Jan. 4, 2008, each of which is incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference thereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3921035 | Holmes | Nov 1975 | A |
4412308 | Bereron | Oct 1983 | A |
4418468 | Vora et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4616404 | Wang et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4679170 | Bourassa et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
5168337 | Muto et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5266831 | Phipps et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5365102 | Mehrotra et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5416443 | Cranford et al. | May 1995 | A |
5440243 | Lyon | Aug 1995 | A |
5559451 | Okamura | Sep 1996 | A |
5701093 | Suzuki | Dec 1997 | A |
5717237 | Chi | Feb 1998 | A |
5753955 | Fechner | May 1998 | A |
5760449 | Welch | Jun 1998 | A |
5763960 | Ceccherelli et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5804470 | Wollesen | Sep 1998 | A |
5821769 | Douseki | Oct 1998 | A |
5831451 | Bosshart | Nov 1998 | A |
5856708 | Wollesen | Jan 1999 | A |
5886381 | Frisina | Mar 1999 | A |
5985722 | Kishi | Nov 1999 | A |
6018168 | Yang | Jan 2000 | A |
6034563 | Mashiko | Mar 2000 | A |
6081107 | Marino | Jun 2000 | A |
6177703 | Cunningham | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6194276 | Chan et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198173 | Huang | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6204105 | Jung | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6204696 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6225827 | Fujii et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6232163 | Voldmann et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6294816 | Baukus et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6359477 | Pathak | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6384639 | Chen et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6411560 | Tanizaki et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6429482 | Culp et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441647 | Jeon | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6465849 | Chang et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6521948 | Ebina | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6573549 | Deng et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6593799 | De et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6600187 | Kim | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6621292 | Sakata et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6628551 | Jain | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6643199 | Tang et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6645820 | Peng et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6674123 | Kim | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6690039 | Nemati et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6693333 | Yu | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6707708 | Alvandpour et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711063 | Dejenfelt et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711088 | Hayashi et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6787850 | Pelloie | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6891389 | Walker et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6894324 | Ker et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6898116 | Peng | May 2005 | B2 |
6933573 | Ker et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6933744 | Das et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6940317 | Suga | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6958519 | Gonzalez et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6969888 | Williams et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6985026 | Toyoyama | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7064942 | Ker et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7132711 | Forbes et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7253485 | Shibahara | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7586155 | Kapoor | Sep 2009 | B2 |
20010054886 | Takahashi et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020031028 | Forbes et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020096723 | Awaka | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020153957 | Jordanov | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020154462 | Ker et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020185681 | Nakano et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020191436 | Kobayashi et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020195623 | Horiuchi | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030089951 | Ker et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030178648 | Bansal | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040004298 | Madurawe | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040022109 | Yoon et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040077151 | Bhattacharyya | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040252546 | Liaw | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050035410 | Yeo et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20070114582 | Shiu et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080048266 | Russ et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080230851 | Fukui | Sep 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
419854 | Jan 2001 | TW |
479852 | Mar 2002 | TW |
480773 | Mar 2002 | TW |
495106 | Jul 2002 | TW |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090206380 A1 | Aug 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61006306 | Jan 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11533332 | Sep 2006 | US |
Child | 12348809 | US |