This technology herein relates to photolithography, and more particularly to applications of semiconductor nano-sized particles in photolithography, and even more particularly to applications of semiconductor nano-sized particles as highly refractive media in immersion lithography, as anti-reflection coating, as pellicle, and as sensitizer in UV photoresists.
Not applicable.
Lithography
Generally, lithography is used to transfer a specific pattern onto a surface. Lithography can be applied to transfer a variety of patterns including, for example, painting, printing, and the like. More recently, lithographic techniques have become widespread for use in “microfabrication”—a major (but non-limiting) example of which is the manufacture of integrated circuits such as computer chips.
In a typical microfabrication operation, lithography is used to define patterns for miniature electrical circuits. Lithography defines a pattern specifying the location of metal, insulators, doped regions, and other features of a circuit printed on a silicon wafer or other substrate. The resulting circuit can perform any of a number of different functions. For example, an entire computer can be placed on a chip.
A primary lithography system includes a wafer stepper, a photomask and photoresist. A wafer stepper generally consists of a ultraviolet (UV) light source, a photomask holder, an optical system for projecting and demagnifying the image of the mask onto a photoresist-coated wafer, and a stage to move the wafer. Conventional lithography also generally requires a photomask—a quartz substrate with chrome patterns on one surface. The chrome patterns form a perfect master of the pattern to be inscribed on one layer of a chip. Also it requires photoresist to receive the light pattern generated by the mask.
Improvements in lithography have been mainly responsible for the explosive growth of computers in particular and the semiconductor industry in general. The major improvements in lithography are mainly a result of a decrease in the minimum feature size (improvement in resolution). This improvement allows for an increase in the number of transistors on a single chip (and in the speed at which these transistors can operate). For example, the computer circuitry that would have filled an entire room in 1960's technology can now be placed on a silicon “die” the size of a thumbnail. A device the size of a wristwatch can contain more computing power than the largest computers of several decades ago.
The resolution of a photolithography system is described by the Rayleigh equation:
d=k1λ/NA
where d is the minimum feature size, λ is the wavelength, NA is the numerical aperture of the optical system and k1 is a constant determined by a specific system. For a certain wavelength and a certain optical design, the only way to improve the resolution is to increase the numerical aperture. The numerical aperture is defined as:
NA=n sin θ
where n is the refraction index of the relative medium and θ is the half angle of the cone of rays received by the entrance pupil. High NA indicates high light collecting or light focusing power. It is rather straightforward to see that the resolution is proportional the refractive index of the medium.
Semiconductor Nano-Sized Particles
Nano-sized particles are loosely defined as powders with small diameters for example ranging from a few hundred nanometers or less down to a few angstroms. Since they have generally only been the focus of research in the last two decades, there is little standardization, and they take many different names including quantum dot, quantum sphere, quantum crystallite, nano-crystal, micro-crystal, colloidal particle, nano-cluster, Q-particle or artificial atom. Due to their small size, they often possess dramatically different physical properties compared to their bulk counterparts. Nano-sized particles have a wide range of applications including metallurgy, chemical sensors, pharmaceuticals, painting, and cosmetics. As a result of the rapid development in synthesis methods in the last two decades, they have now entered into microelectronic and optical applications. Nano-sized particles with sizes less than 5 nm have been synthesized from a variety of semiconductors, examples include C, Si, Ge, CuCl, CuBr, CuI, AgCl, AgBr, AgI, Ag2S, CaO, MgO, ZnO, ZnS, HgS, ZnSe, CdS, CdSe, CdTe, HgTe, PbS, BN, AlN, GaN, GaP GaAs, GaSb, InP, InAs, InxGa1-xAs, SiC, Si1-xGex, Si3N4, ZrN, CaF2, YF3, Al2O3, SiO2, TiO2, Cu2O, Zr2O3, SnO2, YSi2, GaInP2, Cd3P2, Fe2S, Cu2S, CuIn2S2, MoS2, In2S3, Bi2S3, CuIn2Se2, In2Se3, HgI2, PbI2, Lanthanoids oixides, etc. They have revealed very interesting optical properties.
Semiconductor materials have the so called bandgaps. The electron band below the bandgap is call valence band (VB) and the electron band above the bandgap is called conduction band (CB). The manifestation of a bandgap in optical absorption is that only photons with energy larger than the bandgap are absorbed. A photon with sufficient energy excites an electron from the top of valence band to the bottom of conduction band, leaving an empty state, a hole, at the top of the valence band.
There are several major advantages of using semiconductor nano-sized particles in photolithography. First, the bandgap of semiconductor nano-sized particles can be tailored by their size. In a certain range the smaller the size, the larger the bandgap. The bandgap determines the working wavelength.
Second, the refractive index can be very high near the bandgap. Actually some semiconductors have the highest refractive indices. For example wurzite TiO2 has a refractive index of 2.4, and wurzite GaN has a refractive index about 2.6 near the bandgap. The refractive indices of common optical materials such as fused silica and quartz used in the UV lithography are around 1.5. This high refractive index is desirable for highly refractive medium immersion lithography and optical coating.
Third, nano-sized particles can be easily coated onto optics or wafers in the form of a thin film. They are, therefore, very simple to handle and produce much less contamination. Because of the polycrystalline nature of nano-sized particle films, there is less concern about matching the thermal expansion coefficients between the coating and the optics. Applying nano-sized particles by coating provides least disturbance to the existing lithography system.
Fourth, semiconductors nano-sized particles can reach sizes much smaller than the working wavelength. Currently, a large number of semiconductors can be fabricated into nano-sized particles smaller than 5 nm in diameter. Hence the scattering from the nanoparticles is negligible and size fluctuation of nano-sized particles does not affect the final scattered and transmitted light.
Fifth, in a broad sense semiconductors can possess bandgaps as high as 12 eV, corresponding to a wavelength of 100 nm. For 157 nm lithography and beyond, few materials can withstand the radiation except certain semiconductors. Nano-sized particles offer a solution for the optics in these wavelengths.
Lastly, many semiconductor nano-sized particles can be produced rather inexpensively. Therefore, the overall cost will likely be lower than conventional methods.
We propose several applications of semiconductor nano-sized particles in lithography. Such as highly refractive medium in immersion lithography, optical coating, pellicle material, and sensitizer in photoresists.
These and other features and advantages will be better and more completely understood by referring to the following detailed description of presently preferred illustrative embodiments in conjunction with the drawings, of which:
a is an exemplary illustrative non-limiting photoresist with semiconductor nano-sized particles as sensitizer;
b shows the exemplary physical process in which photo-generated electron or hole are transferred out of the particle via surface bonded acceptor or donor; and
c demonstrates the exemplary illustrative physical process, i.e. Auger photo-ionization, in which electrons or holes are ejected out the particle as a result of the incoming photon.
It is shown in the Rayleigh equation that the resolution of a lithography system is proportionally dependant on the refractive index of the relevant medium. There are several examples of achieving high resolution by immersion in high refractive index liquid materials. However, the fact that all liquids used in the liquid immersion lithography have refractive index smaller than 1.5 limits the final achievable resolution. Solid immersion lithography has been proposed to achieve higher refractive index.
Nano-sized particles, as mentioned before, could offer much higher refractive indices. Therefore, nano-sized particles, or mixtures of nano-sized particles with certain liquid, polymer, gel or solid material can improve the resolution in both liquid and solid immersion lithography.
A first exemplary illustrative non-limiting application of nano-sized particle as highly refractive medium in lithography is demonstrated in
This high light collecting efficiency offers great advantages to the lithography system. First, if the geometry of the entire optical system is kept the same, this added layer will increase the final resolution by a factor of n. If the numerical aperture, i.e. the resolution, is kept the same, then the diameter of the optical system can be reduced by a factor of n and therefore the overall cost of the system can be reduced. In particularly, in programmable lithography, reduced size of optics means increase in the throughput by roughly n2 (see “Photolithographic System For Exposing A Wafer Using A Programmable Mask” by G. Cooper et. al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,291,110 B1).
Another exemplary illustrative implementation is shown in
Another exemplary illustrative non-limiting arrangement is to coat the numerical aperture limiting optics. In an imaging system the numerical aperture is usually limited by the entrance optics. In some systems, the numerical aperture may be limited by some intermediated optics. To improve the overall NA, the specific optics may be coated with highly refractive semiconductor nano-sized particles containing material.
Another exemplary illustration is to fill the entire optical system with semiconductor nano-sized particles or mixture of nano-sized particle with liquid, polymer, gel or solid. Light spreads more in the low refractive index material than in the high refractive index material, filling up the entire space with high refractive index material confines the light path to a tighter distribution. Therefore, it can reduce the diameter of the optical design further. This is particularly important to the programmable lithography because smaller optics increase the throughput, see “Photolithographic System For Exposing A Wafer Using A Programmable Mask” by G. Cooper et. al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,291,110 B1.
For certain wavelengths in lithography such as 193 nm and 157 nm, few materials can withstand the highly energetic radiation except some wide bandgap semiconductors such as MgO and AlN. The high refractive index in these semiconductors also offers certain advantages. For example, it will require less thickness to achieve certain optical path, which is defined as refractive index times the thickness. Smaller thickness in turn results in less absorption.
An exemplary illustration of applying semiconductor nano-sized particles for optical coating is the anti-reflection coating of optical lenses, as demonstrated in
Another exemplary illustration is to use the semiconductor nano-sized particles as pellicle materials. A pellicle provides protection for a photomask against dust particles. The pellicle itself may be transparent to the light and have certain mechanical strength. For 193 nm pellicle, nano-sized particles such as MgxZn1-xO, BN, AlN, CaF2, MgF2, SiO2, may be used as candidate materials. For 157 nm lithography, AlN, SiO2 nano-sized particles may be used as candidate materials. Few hundred micrometers of close-packed nano-sized particles may be grown on a substrate, such as thin glass plate using suitable methods. High pressure may be applied after the deposition to assure mechanical strength. Then the substrate can be etched away by selective etching, such as HF acid etching, leaving the free standing film as the pellicle.
An exemplary illustration of applying semiconductor nano-sized particles as a sensitizer in photoresist is shown in
If nano-sized particles are small enough, multi-body interactions such as Auger photo-ionization can be significant. As depicted in
While the technology herein has been described in connection with exemplary illustrative non-limiting embodiments, the invention is not to be limited by the disclosure. The invention is intended to be defined by the claims and to cover all corresponding and equivalent arrangements whether or not specifically disclosed herein.
This application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/415,013 filed Mar. 31, 2009; which is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/792,377 filed Mar. 4, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,524,616 issued Apr. 28, 2009; which application claims the benefit of priority from provisional application No. 60/451,240 filed Mar. 4, 2003; the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference. This application is related to U.S. Pat. No. 6,291,110 B1, Cooper et al. entitled “Photolithographic System For Exposing A Wafer Using A Programmable Mask”; and commonly-assigned U.S. Pat. No. 7,510,818 entitled “Reversible Photobleachable Materials Based On Nano-Sized Semiconductor Particles And Their Optical Applications” to Z. Chen et. al.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4253728 | Venkatesan et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
5121256 | Corle et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5187715 | Weisbuch et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5281840 | Sarma | Jan 1994 | A |
6005707 | Berggren et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6291110 | Cooper et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6440637 | Choi et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6455103 | Mennig et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6819845 | Lee et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6826144 | Ichihara et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6927002 | Hattori et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
20020027647 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020182541 | Gonsalves | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030047816 | Dutta | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030064532 | Chen | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030071983 | Hung et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030117598 | Case et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030119962 | Border et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030129545 | Kik et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030227249 | Mueller et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040075895 | Lin | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040152011 | Chen et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050173682 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1303358 | Jul 2001 | CN |
0023231 | Feb 1981 | EP |
07-220990 | Aug 1995 | JP |
2001057329 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2051940 | Jan 1996 | RU |
948994 | Aug 1982 | SU |
1204623 | Jan 1986 | SU |
WO9325611 | Dec 1993 | WO |
WO0004593 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO0006495 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO03009058 | Jan 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Brus, L.E,. J. Chem. Phys., 79(11), “A simple model for the ionization potential, electron affinity, and aqueous redox potentials of small semiconductor crystallites,” 5566-71 (Dec. 1, 1983). |
Efros, Al.L et al., “Interband absorption of light in a semiconductor sphere,” Sov. Phys. Semicon., 16:772-78 (Jul. 1982). |
Empedocles, S.A. et al., “Quantum-Confined Stark Effect in Single CdSe Nanocrystallite Quantum Dots,” Science, 278, 2114 (Dec. 19, 1997). |
English translation of JP 07-220990 (Aug. 1995). |
Gribkovskii , P., V.A. Zyulkov, A.E. Kazachenko, and S.A. Tikhomirov, “OpticalNnonlinearity of Semiconductor Microcrystal CdSxSe1-x Under the Action of Picosecond and Nanosecond Llaser Pulses”, 1988, Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) 158: 359-66. |
Kageshima, H. et al., “InGaAs/GaAs photorefractive multiple quantum well device in quantum confined Stark geometry.” Appl. Phys. B 72, 685-689(2001). |
Kambe et al., “Refractive Index Engineering of Nano-Polymer Composites,” NanoGram Corporation, Fremont, CA and SRI International, Chemical Science and Technology Lab, Menlo Park, CA (Spring 2001). |
Kornowski, A. et al., “Preparation and Photophysics of Strongly Luminescing Cd3P2 Quantum Dots”, J. Phys. Chem, 1996, 100: 12467-71. |
Murray, C.B. et al., “Sythesis and Characterization of Monodisperse Nanocrystals and Closed-Packed Nanocyrstal Assemblies,” Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci., 30:545-610 (2000). |
Nagase, et al., “Super-Resolution Effect of Semiconductor-Doped Glass,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 38 (1999), pp. 1665-1668, Part 1, No. 3B (Mar. 1999). |
Noharet, Bertrand, “Harnessing light with semiconductor Spatial Light Modulators,” Aperturen—Surfaces and Imaging, vol. 1-2001, pp. 12-13, XP002363385 (2001). |
Nomura, S. et al., “Clearly resolved exciton peaks in CdSxSe1-x microcrystallites by modulation spectroscopy”, Sol. Stat. Comm., 73: 425-9 (1990). |
Office Action issued in Chinese Patent Application 200480012054 4, including English language translation, 2009. |
Ooki, Hiroshi et al., “Experimental study on non-linear multiple exposure method,” SPIE vol. 3051, pp. 85-93, Santa Clara, California (Mar. 12-14, 1997). |
Sclafani, A. et al., “Effect of silver deposits on the photocatalytic activity of titanium dioxide samples for the dehydrogenation or oxidation of 2-propanol,” J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 1991, 59, 181. |
Shibuya, Masato et al., “Performance of Resolution Enhancement Technique Using Both Multiple Exposure and Nonlinear Resist,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 33 (1994), pp. 6874-6877, Part 1, No. 12B (Dec. 1994). |
Supplementary European search report for European application No. EP 04 80 9308 9 (Jul. 2, 2009). |
Zimin, L.G. et al., “Room-temperature Optical Nonlinearity in Semiconductor-doped Glasses”, Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) 150:653-6 (1988). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110281221 A1 | Nov 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60451240 | Mar 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12415013 | Mar 2009 | US |
Child | 13189143 | US | |
Parent | 10792377 | Mar 2004 | US |
Child | 12415013 | US |