Catalyst-induced growth of carbon nanotubes on tips of cantilevers and nanowires

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6755956
  • Patent Number
    6,755,956
  • Date Filed
    Monday, June 4, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 29, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
A method is described for catalyst-induced growth of carbon nanotubes, nanofibers, and other nanostructures on the tips of nanowires, cantilevers, conductive micro/nanometer structures, wafers and the like. The method can be used for production of carbon nanotube-anchored cantilevers that can significantly improve the performance of scaning probe microscopy (AFM, EFM etc). The invention can also be used in many other processes of micro and/or nanofabrication with carbon nanotubes/fibers. Key elements of this invention include: (1) Proper selection of a metal catalyst and programmable pulsed electrolytic deposition of the desired specific catalyst precisely at the tip of a substrate, (2) Catalyst-induced growth of carbon nanotubes/fibers at the catalyst-deposited tips, (3) Control of carbon nanotube/fiber growth pattern by manipulation of tip shape and growth conditions, and (4) Automation for mass production.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to carbon nanostructures and methods of growing the same, and more particularly to carbon nanostructures that are attached to catalyst dots, and catalyst-induced methods of growing carbon nanostructures, especially on the tips of cantilevers, nanowires, wafers, conductive micro/nanostructures, and the like.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Programmable Nanometer-Scale Electrolytic Metal Deposition and Depletion




A previous invention, referenced hereinabove, describes nanometer-scale deposition and/or depletion of nanostructures in liquids at preferably ambient temperature and preferably neutral pH through electric field-directed, programmable, pulsed electrolytic metal deposition or depletion.




Application of a programmable and short (ns—ms time scale) pulsing direct current source is used to control the number of atoms being deposited by the electrolytic metal reduction and deposition process. As shown in the following platinum deposition reaction at a cathode using water-soluble hexachloroplatinate, the number of electrons supplied can control the formation of metallic platinum. In electrolytic deposition, electric current and the duration of the current can control the number of electrons.






[PtCl


6


]


2−


+4e





→Pt↓+6Cl











Other water-soluble metal compounds that have been shown to be applicable include, but are not limited to: PtCl


4


, OsCl


3


, Na


2


[PtCl


6


], Na


2


[OsCl


6


], (NH


4


)


2


RuCl


6


, K


3


RuCl


6


, Na


2


IrCl


6


, (NH


4


)


3


IrCl


6


, (NH


4


)


3


RhCl


6


, K


2


PdCl


4


, (NH


4


)


2


PdCl


4


, Pd(NH


3


)


4


Cl


2


, ReCl


3


, NiCl


2


, CoCl


2


, PtO


2


, PtCl


2


, Pt(NH


3


)


4


Cl


2


, (NH


4


)


6


Mo


7


O


24


, NaAuCl


4


, KAu(CN)


2


K


2


[PtCl


4


],and K


3


Fe(CN)


6


. Combinations of two or more water-soluble metal compounds can be used sequentially or simultaneously.




As illustrated in

FIG. 1

, a programmable current source


18


is used to precisely control the number of electrons used to achieve the desired nanometer-scale electrolytic metal deposition. A non-conductive substrate


10


supports nanometer sized electrodes, also called nanowires and nanoelectrodes—cathode


12


and anode


14


—which are usually comprised of gold but can be other metals or conductive materials. Spacing between the nanoelectrode tips


13


,


15


in the range of 1-10 μm produces results that are suitable for many applications.




A preselected metal


16


is deposited onto the tip of the cathode


12


. The metal


16


is usually Pt, but can be any metal that can be deposited electrolytically. A programmable, pulsable current source


18


has electrical connections


20


,


22


to the respective nanoelectrodes


12


,


14


. A bypass circuit


24


is shown, which includes a bypass selector switch


26


and a variable resistor


28


.




Nanoelectrodes


12


,


14


represent a subset of microscopic sized structures (nanostructures) that are suitable for use. Nanostructures acting as electrodes can be of various sizes and shapes. Spacing between the two nanostructures should not exceed 50 μm, preferably 20 μm, more preferably, 10 μm, most preferably, 5 μm.




The programmable, pulsable current source


18


can be of any suitable construction. Keithley Model 220 programmable current source or the latest Keithley Model 2400 series of Source Meters (available from Keithley Instruments, Inc., 28775 Aurora Road, Cleveland, Ohio 44139, or on the Internet at www.keithley.com) are already capable of supplying a minimum of about 9400 electrons per pulse [500 fA×3 ms×electron/(1.60×10


−19


C)], which could translate to a deposition of 2350 platinum atoms per pulse based on the stoichiometry of the deposition reaction. If this amount of platinum is deposited on the end of a nanowire with a 10 nm×10 nm cross section, 2350 platinum atoms per pulse can translate into about 1 nm of metal deposition (2.6 layers of platinum atoms) per pulse. The programmable, pulsable current source


18


should be capable of controlling the process so that nanometer metal deposition or depletion as precise as about 1500 metal atoms per pulse can be achieved. A preferable range is contemplated to be 1500×10


14


atoms per pulse, although the skilled artisan will recognize that the method can operate well beyond this range.




The bypass circuit


24


is preferably added to fine-tune the electron flow for even more precise control of deposition or depletion—the addition or removal of monolayers or submonolayers of atoms—that can be achieved. The bypass circuit


24


is used to divert some of the electricity away from the nanoelectrodes


12


,


14


in order to deposit or deplete fewer metal atoms per pulse. For example, when the impedance of the variable resistor


28


is adjusted to 50% of the impedance between the two nanoelectrodes


12


,


14


, two thirds of the 9400 electrons per pulse can be drained through the bypass circuit


24


. In this case, the electrolytic metal deposition can be controlled to a step as precise as 780 platinum atoms (3130 electrons) per pulse, which can be translated to a deposition of 0.87 layer of platinum atoms


16


on a 10- by 10-nm surface at the tip of the cathodic nanoelectrode


12


. By allowing a greater portion of the current to flow through the bypass circuit


24


, it is possible to control deposition of metal 16 atoms as precise as 100 atoms per pulse. A preferable range for this extremely finely controlled deposition is contemplated to be 100-2500 atoms per pulse, although the skilled artisan will recognize that the method can operate well beyond this ultrafine deposition range.




The bypass circuit


24


can also protect the nanometer structure from electrostatic damage, especially when the structure is dry. For example, after desired programmable electrolytic metal deposition is achieved as illustrated in

FIG. 1

, the bypass circuit


24


should remain connected with the nanostructures


12


and


14


while the programmable pulsing current source can then be removed. As long as the bypass circuit remains connected with the nanostructures


12


and


14


, any electrostatic charges that might be created during wash and dry of the nanostructures will be able to flow through the bypass circuit


24


that, in this case, comprises the closed switch


26


, the variable resistor


28


, and wires that connect the switch


26


and the variable resistor


28


with the nanoelectrodes


12


,


14


. This prevents accumulation of electrostatic charges at any one of electrodes against the other electrode from occurring, thus eliminating the possibility of electrostatic damage at the nanometer gap between the tips


13


,


15


of the nanoelectrodes


12


,


14


.




A special nanostructural arrangement can be used to control the initiation point(s) of nanometer bonding. Special structural arrangements of the nanowire electrodes can be made by various lithographic techniques (e.g., photolithography and electron-beam lithography) to control the initiation point(s) of the electrolytic metal deposition. As shown in

FIG. 2

, multiple nanowire cathodes


12


,


12


′ should have respective tips


13


,


13


′ pointing to the respective tips


15


,


15


′ of nanowire anode


14


so that the strongest electric field is therebetween. Spacing of the multiple nanowire cathodes


12


,


12


′ should be regulated to ensure deposition of metal


16


,


16


′ at the desired cathode location, because the electric field (E) is a vector that is strongly dependent on distance (r):






E∝r


−2








Electrolytic metal-dissolving reactions are applied to deplete metal—open nanometer gaps and control gap size as shown in FIG.


3


. By conducting the reversal of the metal deposition reaction with sodium chloride solution instead of hexachloroplatinate as an electrolytic substrate, metallic platinum at the anode tip(s)


16


can be electrolytically depleted via dissolution in a controllable way according to the following reaction:






Pt+6Cl





→[PtCl


6


]


2−


+4e











This metal-dissolution reaction should also be able to control the gap size between the nanoelectrode tips


13


,


15


. The site and the extent of electrolytic metal depletion can also be controlled by proper selection of the desired polarity of the electric field and by use of a programmable current source with a bypass circuit, as described herein.




The salient features of the method described hereinabove may be applied in full, in part, or in any combination. Any number of nanostructures can be simultaneously bonded or dissolved on a particular substrate.




For metal deposition, the nanostructure to be metal-deposited does not have to be metal. The method can be used to connect any conductive nanowires such as, for example, nanotubes, especially carbon nanotubes, because of their capability for nanometer electrolytic metal deposition.




For metal depletion, the nonmetallic ions do not have to be Cl





. Any anions, such as F





and CN





, that can electrolytically dissolve metals (Pt, Pd, Au, etc.) may be used as alternative versions of the method.




Carbon Nanotubes/Fibers and Catalyst-induced Growth on 2-D Surfaces




Patterned growth of individual and mutiple vertical aligned carbon nanotubes and fibers has been experimentally demonstrated on a nanocatalyst-doped two-dimensional surface. See Merkulov, V. I., D. H. Lowndes, Y. Y. Wei, G. Eres, and E. Voelkl (2000) “Patterned growth of individual and multiple vertically-aligned carbon nanotubes,”


Appl. Phys. Lett.


76, 3555.




Carbon nanotubes possess a number of unique properties, some of which make carbon nanotubes ideally suited for use as probe tips in scanning probe microscopy (SPM). Firstly, single-wall carbon nanotubes have intrinsically small diameters (˜1.4 nm), which allow significant improvement of lateral resolution compared to conventional Si, SiN or other tips, which typically have diameters of at least 10-20 nm. Secondly, carbon nanotubes have very high aspect ratios, AR (AR=length/diameter), which provides the ability to measure deep and near-vertical features, especially those having a sidewall slope that cannot be reproduced accurately using conventional tips. Thirdly, carbon nanotubes exhibit high mechanical strength and flexibility and therefore will not break easily upon crashing into a sample surface, which is a fairly common accident in SPM. Fourthly, some carbon nanotubes are electrically conducting, which permits their use for high-resolution scanning tunneling microscopy (STM). Finally, carbon nanotubes can be chemically selectively modified by attaching organic (or other) molecules at their ends, which creates the possibility of using them as functional probes to detect a particular property or molecule of interest.




Multi-wall carbon nanotubes are somewhat larger in diameter than single-wall carbon nanotubes but they share many of the same properties, to varying degrees. Single-wall carbon nanotubes and multi-wall carbon nanotubes differ primarily in their diameter and morphology. A single-wall carbon nanotube can be thought of as a one-atom-thick sheet of carbon atoms, arranged in the hexagonal graphitic crystal structure, that is rolled up and its edges joined seamlessly (edge atoms overlapping) to form a cylinder. A multi-wall carbon nanotube consists of two or more such concentric cylinders.




Closely related to carbon nanotubes are carbon nanofibers. Carbon nanofibers differ from single-wall carbon nanotubes and multi-wall carbon nanotubes mainly in their crystalline perfection, i.e. the graphite lattice contains many structural defects so that different layers (of a multi-walled fiber) can be either interrupted or joined to one another (or both types of defect can occur at different locations along the length or around the periphery of the fiber). One consequence of these defects is that the electrical properties of carbon nanofibers are not as good as for carbon nanotubes. Carbon nanofibers are synthesized at somewhat lower temperatures than carbon nanotubes and their lower growth temperature is responsible in part for these defects. However, we have recently demonstrated that carbon nanofibers also can be grown with sufficiently small diameter to be of interest for scanning probes. Furthermore, there may be future situations for which a low growth temperature is desirable, e.g. sufficiently low-temperature growth will be compatible with on-board electronic circuitry.




The advantages of carbon nanotubes as scanning probes have been demonstrated by placing carbon nanotubes at the end of a conventional Si tip. The carbon nanotubes were either attached to the tip by electrical and mechanical means in an optical or scanning electron microscope or were grown directly on a tip using conventional high-temperature chemical vapor deposition (CVD) along with catalytic pore formation. However, these procedures have a number of disadvantages: (a) the carbon nanotubes first must be grown at high temperatures and separated, cleaned and cut to length; (b) in most cases it is difficult to adjust the length of the nanotube tip and to obtain a strong, reliable attachment; and (c) these complicated manipulations of carbon nanotubes are impractical in an industrial environment or for large-scale production. See the following: Dai, H., J. H. Hafner, A. G. Rinzler, D. T. Colbert, and R. E. Smalley, Nature 384, 147 (1996); Nishijima, H., S. Kamo, Seiji Akita, Y. Nakayama, K. I. Hohmura, S. H. Yoshimura, and K. Takeyasu, (1999) Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 4061; and Hafner, J. H., C. Li Cheung, and C. M. Lieber (1999) Nature 398, 761.




OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION




Accordingly, objects of the present invention include: provision of methods of fabricating carbon nanostructures, especially for use as scanning probe tips; methods of growing perpendicularly oriented carbon nanostructures directly on the tips of scanning probe cantilevers, nanowires, conductive micro/nanostructures, wafer substrates and the like, particularly with precise control of crucial tip parameters (shape, position and length) and mechanically very strong connections to the substrates. Further and other objects of the present invention will become apparent from the description contained herein.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, the foregoing and other objects are achieved by a method growing a carbon nanostructure, which includes the steps of:




a. providing a substrate;




b. depositing a catalyst dot onto the substrate; and




c. growing a carbon nanostructure on the catalyst dot.




In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, an article comprising a substrate having an adherent metal dot disposed thereon, the metal dot having a carbon nanostructure disposed thereon.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is an illustration of deposition of platinum (Pt) on a gold nanostructure.





FIG. 2

is an illustration of deposition of platinum (Pt) on multiple gold nanostructures.





FIG. 3

is an illustration of depletion of platinum (Pt) from a gold nanostructure.





FIG. 4

is an illustration of a carbon nanostructure attached to a catalyst-tipped cantilever in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 5

is an illustration of programmable precision electrolytic deposition of a nanocatalyst (catalyst dot) onto the tip of a conductive cantilever in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 6



a


is an illustration of catalyst dots on tips of cantilevers in a reaction chamber in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 6



b


is an illustration of catalyst-induced growth of vertically aligned carbon nanostructures on the catalyst dots in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.





FIGS. 7



a


-


7




d


are SEM micrographs of experimental demonstrations of deposition of catalyst dots and growth thereon of carbon nanostructures in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 8



a


illustrates an array of slightly flattened and catalyst-deposited tips of cantilevers and/or nanowires oriented upwardly against the direction of the gravity in a carbon-nanostructure-growth chamber in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 8



b


is an illustration of catalyst-induced, upward growth of vertically aligned carbon nanostructures on the catalyst dots in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 9

is an illustration of an automation system for programmable electrolytic deposition of catalyst dots onto the tips of conductive cantilevers in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 10

is an illustration of carbon nanostructure-based micrometer/nanometer electro-mechanical sensors and devices in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.











For a better understanding of the present invention, together with other and further objects, advantages and capabilities thereof, reference is made to the following disclosure and appended claims in connection with the above-described drawings.




DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




The above-described previous invention can be used in one of the key steps of the present invention, to deposit metallocatalysts for carbon nanostructure growth at the tips of nanowires and/or conductive cantilevers.

FIG. 4

shows a basic conductive substrate


31


having deposited thereon a tip


45


thereof a small amount (dot)


33


of catalyst and a carbon nanostructure


35


extending therefrom. The substrate


31


can be a nanowire, a cantilever, a micro/nanometer structure, a wafer, or any other suitable structure made of any material. The catalyst “dot”


33


is the necessary material for inducing the catalytic growth of a single carbon nanostructure at a predetermined location. The catalyst dot


33


can be monometallic, metallic, nonmetallic, or any material that produces desired carbon nanostructure growth.




The present invention applies generally to carbon nanotubes (including both single-wall carbon nanotubes and multi-wall carbon nanotubes) and also to carbon nanofibers, needles, whiskers, and the like. Therefore, all nanoscale carbon structures are henceforth referred to using the inclusive general term “carbon nanostructures”.




The present invention can be used for production of carbon nanostructure-anchored cantilevers that can significantly improve the performance (such as resolution) of conventional scanning probe microscopy, for example, atomic force microscopy (AFM), scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), etc. The present invention can be used also in many other processes of micro and/or nanofabrication with carbon nanostructures.




Some features of the present invention are:




1. Proper selection of metal catalyst(s), for example, Co, Ni, and Fe, and preferably programmable, pulsed electrolytic deposition of the desired specific catalysts precisely at the tips of nanowires and/or conductive cantilevers;




2. Catalyst-induced growth of carbon nanostructures at the catalyst-deposited tips;




3. Control of carbon nanostructure growth pattern by manipulation of tip shape and growth conditions; and




4. Automation for mass production.




These and other features of the present invention are described as follows.




Deposition of Catalyst Dot




Deposition of the catalyst dot


33


is preferably achieved by application of the above-described earlier invention in conjunction with the use of a liquid AFM system. As illustrated in

FIG. 5

, a solution of at least one metal catalyst compound, for example, NiCl


2


, CoCl


2


, Fe


2+


, etc., that are suitable for electrolytic deposition of the desired catalyst is added into a liquid AFM cell


39


. With the liquid AFM system, the tip


45


of a conductive AFM cantilever


31


can be aligned with the tip


47


of a nanowire or another cantilever


43


pointing up. The cathodic tip


45


to anodic tip


47


spacing can easily be controlled. Spacing of the tips


45


,


47


should be regulated to ensure deposition of a metal catalyst dot


33


at the desired cathode location, because the electric field (E) is a vector that is strongly dependent on distance (r):






E∝r


−2








Spacing between the nanoelectrode tips


45


,


47


in the range of 1-10 μm produces suitable results using the present invention. The electrolytic deposition of metal catalyst


33


is achieved by applying short (ns-ms) pulses of precisely controlled fine electric current across the two tips


45


,


47


using a programmable current source


18


and a bypass circuit


24


as described hereinabove. A preferable range for an extremely finely controlled deposition is contemplated to be 100-2500 atoms per pulse, although the skilled artisan will recognize that the present invention can operate well beyond this ultrafine deposition range. Since the deposition can be as fine as 100 atoms per pulse, extremely fine and desired deposition of nanometer metallocatalysts could be achieved precisely at the cathodic tip


45


as exemplified in the following nickel deposition reaction.






NiCl


2


+2e





→Ni↓+2Cl











Buffer Layer




A buffer layer is generally a thin-film material deposited on some substrates for at least one of several purposes, including:




1. Preventing deleterious reactions between the catalyst and substrate materials, to such an extent that they are unable to properly catalyze the growth of carbon nanostructures. For example, a buffer layer of Ti may be deposited on a Si substrate prior to deposition of a Ni catalyst dot in order to prevent the formation of Ni


2


Si at elevated temperatures necessary for carbon nanostructure growth.




2. Enhance adhesion of the catalyst dot to the substrate. For example, a buffer layer of Ti may be deposited on a Si substrate prior to deposition of a Ni catalyst dot in order to strongly enhance adhesion of the Ni to the substrate.




As such, the buffer-layer material should also be relatively non-reactive with the catalyst dot, and should adhere reasonably well to the substrate. The buffer-layer film can be deposited by any method suitable for the particular materials being used, including, for example, electron-beam evaporation, thermal evaporation, ion beam sputtering, and electrodeposition, but not restricted to these. Examples of suitable buffer layers for a silicon substrate and a nickel catalyst dot include tungsten, molybdenum, or titanium films, or a tungsten-titanium alloy film, where the latter illustrates the use of titanium to produce strong adhesion of the buffer layer to the silicon substrate, but relative inertness of the buffer layer components to the catalyst dots. For example, the micrographs of

FIGS. 7



a


,


7




b


show Ni catalyst dots deposited on Ti buffer layers on a Si substrate.




Growth of Carbon Nanostructures on Catalyst Dot




Referring now to

FIG. 6



a


, the substrates


31


with catalyst dots


33


are then placed into a reaction chamber


51


for catalyst-induced growth of carbon nanostructures


35


on the catalyst dots


33


. The reaction chamber


51


includes a combination cathode and heater plate


53


, and an anode plate


55


. A rack


57


mounted on the combination cathode and heater plate


53


supports preferably multiple substrates


31


. The rack


57


may be conductive, or it may be non-conductive with a separate electrical connection between the combination cathode and heater plate


53


and the substrates


31


(not illustrated). The substrates


31


are shown with the dots


33


facing in a downward direction in order to facilitate the growth of nanostructures


35


in a desired orientation (downward).




Referring now to

FIG. 6



b


, since the growth of carbon nanostructures


35


generally requires a specific catalyst, the growth of a carbon nanostructure


35


can be made to occur only at the catalyst dots


33


located on the tips of the substrates


31


, resulting in a desired configuration as shown. The growth of carbon nanostructures can be achieved through (but not limited to) plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PE-CVD) using a mixture of a carbonaceous gas and an etchant (fro example, acetylene and an ammoniahelium mixture).




EXAMPLE I




As illustrated in

FIGS. 7



a-d


, carbon nanostructures were grown on catalyst dots by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PE-CVD) in a vacuum chamber as described hereinabove. Upon annealing the Ni/Ti dot on the Si substrate at the elevated temperatures required for growing carbon nanostructures (≧600° C.), the Ti layer continued to adhere to Si. At or larger than a critical dot size, however, the initially continuous, disc-shaped Ni catalyst dot balled up and separated into several smaller, approximately hemispherical-shaped “sub-dots”, shown as light spots in

FIG. 7



a


. Each sub-dot subsequently provided a discrete substrate location for a separate carbon nanostructure to grow.

FIG. 7



c


shows several carbon nanostructures extending from the multiple sub-dots. This configuration may be desirable for some applications, and not so for other applications.




Below the critical dot size only a single Ni dot was formed, as shown in

FIG. 7



b


, resulting in a single nanostructure, as shown in

FIG. 7



d


. The critical dot size, and the size of its resulting Ni droplet, depended primarily upon the choice of the buffer layer between the catalyst and the substrate, the type and thickness of the catalyst metal used, and the carbon nanostructure annealing/growth temperature.




For growth of a single carbon nanostructure at 700C. using an initially 15 nm thick Ni catalyst film on a Ti buffer layer on Si, the critical dot size (diameter) is usually about 350 nm. The diameter of the finished Ni dot is about a factor of 3 smaller than the initially formed Ni dot, i.e. ˜100 nm in the above example. The change in diameter occurs mainly because the Ni dot “balls up” and becomes generally hemispherical in shape during the plasma heating process, in place of its initial flat, disk-like shape. The skilled artisan will recognize that little or no Ni is lost from the dot during this process. If it were, then it might be uncontrollably re-deposited elsewhere, resulting in carbon nanostructure growth at other than the desired locations.




Smaller catalyst dots can be obtained. This is significant because the carbon nanostructure diameter, which should be as small as possible for high-resolution scanning probe microscopy (SPM), is generally governed by the size (diameter) of the catalyst dot. By making initial catalyst dots having diameters no larger than 30 nm—easily possible with electron beam lithography (EBL)—it is possible to grow carbon nanostructures having diameters of less than 10 nm, including single-wall carbon nanotubes having diameters as small as about 1.4 nm. Since the programmable-electrolytic-pulsed deposition technique can perform deposition as fine as about 100 atoms per pulse, an extremely fine (nanometer) catalyst dot can be deposited onto a substrate. Use of such a fine nanometer dot of catalyst should be able to grow carbon nanostructures having diameters of less than 10 nm, including single-wall carbon nanotubes having diameters as small as about 1.4 nm. However, higher growth temperature (900-1000° C.) will probably be required for the growth of these extremely fine carbon nanotubes.




For carbon nanostructure growth, a mixture of a carbonaceous gas and an etchant (for example, acetylene and an ammonia-helium mixture) is used as the gas source in the reaction chamber


51


. The etchant (basically a source of atomic hydrogen) is needed to etch away graphitic carbon film that continuously forms during the carbon nanostructure growth from the plasma discharge. The additional unwanted carbon would otherwise passivate the catalyst metal and thereby prevent the formation of carbon nanostructures if it were not removed.




In contrast to using a conventional heating technique wherein substrate is indirectly heated by using hot filament PE-CVD, in the method of the present invention the substrates


31


are heated directly by placing them on a heater plate


53


, which also can serve as the cathode of the plasma discharge. This technique has the advantages that it can easily be scaled up for large-area deposition and the substrate temperature is easily controlled. For example, an array of cantilevers


31


can be patterned with dots


33


as described hereinabove and then placed on the heater plate


53


to simultaneously grow all of the highly uniform carbon nanostructures


35


as shown in

FIG. 6



b


. The length of the carbon nanostructures


35


can be controlled by controlling the duration of the PE-CVD process.




Just prior to carbon nanostructure growth, ammonia is introduced into the chamber


51


and plasma is created. Any plasma forming energy can be used, for example, dc glow discharge, radio-frequency (rf), and microwave. After the plasma is started, acetylene is introduced and growth of carbon nanostructure


35


begins. However, other carbonaceous and etchant gases could be used, e.g. methane, nitrogen, and hydrogen gases. Each catalyst dot


33


initiates the formation of a single carbon nanostructure as shown in

FIGS. 7



a-d


. The catalyst dot


33


resides on top of the carbon nanostructure as the carbon nanostructure grows and provides for its continued catalytic growth. The carbon nanostructures normally are oriented perpendicular to the substrate. The mechanism for their vertical alignment is not fully understood; one possibility is that they align along the direction of the plasma discharge (electric field direction). However, by changing the direction of the discharge at the substrate (e.g. by tilting the substrate or tilting/moving the anode) carbon nanostructures can be grown at other angles to the substrate.




EXAMPLE II




Arrays of single carbon nanostructures were successfully grown directly on commercial SiN contact-mode AFM cantilevers utilizing the two-step process described above.




Carbon Nanostructure Growth on Flattened Tips




As described above, the catalyst dot


33


can be deposited onto very sharp tip


45


, which is preferably pointing directly downward, as shown in

FIG. 4

, to achieve downward carbon nanostructure growth. Upward carbon nanostructure growth is best achieved with a slightly different technique, using a flat tip


83


, as shown in

FIGS. 8



a


,


8




b


. If a sharp tip


45


is inverted (with the tip pointing upwardly) during the heating process for nanostructure growth, the catalyst dot


33


may have a tendency slide down the side of the cantilever


31


, resulting in carbon nanostructure growth in a lateral direction. Even slight displacement of the dot


33


can produce undesirable results. As shown in

FIGS. 8



a


,


8




b


, a catalyst dot


33


on a flat tip


83


is unlikely to slide down the side of an inverted cantilever


31


. It is contemplated that a flat tip


83


may be a particularly suitable structure for an automated system to locate before depositing the catalyst dot


33


.




Further information about catalyst-assisted growth of vertically aligned carbon nanotubes/fibers can be found in the following publication:




Merkulov, V. I., D. H. Lowndes, Y. Y. Wei, G. Eres, and E. Voelkl (2000) “Patterned growth of individual and multiple vertically-aligned carbon nanotubes,”


Appl Phys. Lett


. 76, 3555.




Automation for Mass Production.




All of the methods described hereinabove can be automated for high-volume mass production of carbon nanostructures for scanning probe microscopy and other needs. For example, the deposition of a catalyst dot


33


(generally with a size range from a few hundred to several thousand catalyst atoms) on a tip


45


,


83


by the programmable precision deposition technique described hereinabove can be completed within a few microseconds.





FIG. 9

shows a system similar to those illustrated earlier, but with added features for automation. A non-conductive rack


61


successively moves substrates


31


into position (in the direction of the arrow) where a contact


63


energizes the substrate


31


to deposit a catalyst dot


33


thereon. By use of an automated process such as illustrated in

FIG. 9

, it is possible to move a large array of substrates


31


in and out of the deposition chamber within a second. It is contemplated that use of an automated programmable electrolytic deposition process should be able to place catalyst dots


33


on substrate tips


45


,


83


at a rate of more than 3000 tips per hour.




Following mass production of catalyst dots


33


on substrate tips


45


,


83


, and within a much larger batch reaction chamber than the reaction chamber


51


shown in

FIGS. 6



a


,


6




b


,


8




a


,


8




b


, the catalyst-assisted growth of carbon nanostructures on thousands of catalyst-deposited tips can be completed within about 15 minutes per batch. Therefore, the present invention is highly suitable for mass production and commercial use.




The present invention can be used for production of carbon-nanostructure cantilevers that can significantly improve the performance (such as resolution) of the current technology in the art of scanning probe microscopy (AFM, EFM etc).




The present invention is also valuable to the micrometer- and/or nanometer-fabrication of any devices that require controlled placement of carbon nanostructures on conductive tips of micro and/or nanometer structures in general. For example, use of the present invention can create carbon nanostructures that can be used for development of micro/nanometer sensors and/or electromechanical devices.

FIG. 10

is an example wherein opposing pairs of nanoelectrodes (


73


,


73


′,


73


″ and respective


75


,


75


′,


75


″) are pre-fabricated on a nonconductive (e.g., silicon oxide) substrate


71


by, for example, e-beam lithographic techniques. Catalyst dots


33


,


33


′,


33


″ are then deposited onto the tips of nanoelectrodes


73


,


73


′,


73


″ as described hereinabove. The substrate


71


is then placed into the PE-CVD reaction chamber wherein carbon nanostructures


35


,


35


′,


35


″ are grown on the respective dots


33


,


33


′,


33


″.




It has been demonstrated that static and dynamic mechanical deflections (shown by arrows in

FIG. 10

) can be electrically induced in anchored carbon nanostructures and that the use of the harmonic vibration resonances of carbon nanostructures can weigh individual particles in the femtogram-to-picogram size range.




It is possible to use carbon-nanostructure-based devices such as that shown in

FIG. 10

to detect molecular explosion, chemical reaction, or other microscale or nanoscale event


81


, which can have important applications, for example, security applications at airports and other facilities.




Moreover, carbon nanostructure-based devices can be used to detect other analytes, for example, aerosols, chemical and biological warfare components, and the like.




The above examples illustrate the controllable use of carbon nanostructures made in accordance with the present invention to create a new class of micro/nanometer sensors and devices.




While there has been shown and described what are at present considered the preferred embodiments of the invention, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be prepared therein without departing from the scope of the inventions defined by the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A method of growing a carbon nanostructure comprising the steps of:a. providing a substrate having thereon at least two electrically conductive nanostructures spaced no more than about 50 μm apart; and b. depositing a catalyst dot on at least one of said nanostructures by electric field-directed, programmable, pulsed electrolytic metal deposition; and c. growing a carbon nanostructure on said catalyst dot.
  • 2. A method in accordance with claim 1 wherein said substrate comprises at least one of the group consisting of a nanowire, a cantilever, a conductive micro/nanometer structure, and a wafer.
  • 3. A method in accordance with claim 1 wherein said growing step further comprises a plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition method.
  • 4. A method in accordance with claim 1 wherein said carbon nanostructure is grown in a direction perpendicular to a surface of said substrate.
  • 5. A method in accordance with claim 1 wherein said carbon nanostructure is grown on a flat-tipped surface having an upward-facing catalyst dot.
  • 6. A method in accordance with claim 1 wherein said carbon nanostructure further comprises as least one of the group consisting of a single-wall carbon nanotube, a multi-wail carbon nanotube, a carbon nanofiber, a carbon needle, and a carbon whisker.
  • 7. A method in accordance with claim 1 wherein said depositing step further comprises an automated process.
  • 8. A method in accordance with claim 1 wherein said growing step further comprises an automated process.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/694,978 filed on Oct. 24, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,447,663 entitled “Programmable Nanometer-Scale Electrolytic Metal Deposition and Depletion”, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.

Government Interests

The United States Government has rights in this invention pursuant to contract no. DE-AC05-00OR22725 between the United States Department of Energy and UT-Battelle, LLC.

US Referenced Citations (1)
Number Name Date Kind
20020180306 Hunt et al. Dec 2002 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
1 129 990 Sep 2001 EP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (15)
Entry
Merkulov, V. I., D. H. Lowndes, Y. Y. Wei, G. Eres, and E. Voelkl (2000) “Patterned growth of individual and multiple vertically-aligned carbon nanotubes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 3555.
Dai, H., J. H. Hafner, A. G. Rinzler, D. T. Colbert, and R. E. Smalley, Nature 384, 147 (1996).
Nishijima, H., S. Kamo, Seiji Akita, Y. Nakayama, K. I. Hohmura, S. H. Yoshimura, and K. Takeyasu, (1999) Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 4061.
Hafner, J. H., C. Li Cheung, and C. M. Lieber (1999) Nature 398, 761.
Ren, Z. F., Z. P. Huang, J. W. Xu, J. H. Wang, P. Bush, M. P. Siegal, and P. N. Provencio (1998) Science 282, 1105.
Baker, R. T. K. (1989) Carbon 27, 315.
Chen, Y., D. T. Shaw, and L. Guo (2000) Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 2469.
Ren, Z. F. et al, “Growth of a Single Freestanding Multiwall Carbon Nanotube on each Nanonickel Dot,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 75 ( No. 8), pp. 1086-88, ( Aug. 12, 1999).
F.G.Tarntair et al, “High Current Density Field Emission from Arrays of Carbon Nanotubes & Diamond-Clad Si Tips,” J. Vac.Sci.Technol.B, vol. 18 ( No.3).
Chris Bower et al, “Nucleation & Growth of Carbon Nanotubes by Microwave Plasma Chemical Vapor Deposition,” Applied Physics Ltrs., vol. 77 ( No. 17). ( Oct. 23, 2000).
Z. F. Ren et al, “Large Arrays of Well-Aligned Carbon Nanotubes,”.
Suk Jae Chung et al, “Novel Plasma Chemical Vapor Deposition Method of Carbon Nanotubes at Low Temperature for Field Emission Display Application,” Diamond & Related Materials 10 (2001), pp. 248-253.
H. Cui et al, “Aligned Carbon Nanotubes via Microwave Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition,” Mat.Res.Soc.Symp.Proc.
Y,C.Choi et al, “Controlling the Diameter, Growth Rate and Density of Vertically Aligned Carbon Nanotubes Synthesized by Microwave Plasma-Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition,” Appl. Physics Ltrs., vol. 76 ( No. 17), pp. 2367-69, ( Apr. 24, 2000).
H. Cui et al, “Deposition of Aligned Bamboo-Like Carbon Nanotubes via Microwave Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition,” Jl. of Applied Physics, vol. 88 ( No. 10), pp. 6072-74, ( Nov. 15, 2000).
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/694978 Oct 2000 US
Child 09/873928 US