The present disclosure relates to substrate processing, and more particularly to systems and methods for controlling etch uniformity in substrate processing.
The background description provided here is for the purpose of generally presenting the context of the disclosure. Work of the presently named inventors, to the extent it is described in this background section, as well as aspects of the description that may not otherwise qualify as prior art at the time of filing, are neither expressly nor impliedly admitted as prior art against the present disclosure.
Substrate processing systems may be used to treat substrates such as semiconductor wafers. Example processes that may be performed on a substrate include, but are not limited to, chemical vapor deposition (CVD), atomic layer deposition (ALD), conductor etch, and/or other etch, deposition, or cleaning processes. A substrate may be arranged on a substrate support, such as a pedestal, an electrostatic chuck (ESC), etc. in a processing chamber of the substrate processing system. During etching, gas mixtures including one or more precursors may be introduced into the processing chamber and plasma may be used to initiate chemical reactions.
The substrate support may include a ceramic layer arranged to support a wafer. For example, the wafer may be clamped to the ceramic layer during processing. The substrate support may include an edge ring arranged around an outer portion (e.g., outside of and/or adjacent to a perimeter) of the substrate support. The edge ring may be provided to confine plasma to a volume above the substrate, protect the substrate support from erosion caused by the plasma, etc.
A substrate support in a substrate processing system includes an inner portion and an outer portion. The inner portion is positioned below a gas distribution device configured to direct first process gases toward the inner portion. The outer portion includes an edge ring positioned around an outer perimeter of the inner portion to at least partially surround the inner portion and a substrate arranged on the inner portion. The edge ring is configured to be raised and lowered relative to the inner portion, and to direct second process gases toward the inner portion. A controller determines distribution of material deposited on the substrate during processing and, based on the determined distribution, selectively adjusts a position of the edge ring and selectively adjusts flow of at least one of the first process gases and the second process gases.
A method for processing a substrate in a substrate processing system includes providing a substrate support having an inner portion and an outer portion. The inner portion positioned below a gas distribution device, and the outer portion includes an edge ring positioned around an outer perimeter of the inner portion to at least partially surround the inner portion and a substrate arranged on the inner portion. The method further includes directing first process gases toward the inner portion using the gas distribution device, directing second process gases toward the inner portion using the edge ring, determining distribution of material deposited on the substrate during processing, selectively adjusting a position of the edge ring upward or downward relative to the inner portion, and selectively adjusting flow of at least one of the first process gases and the second process gases.
Further areas of applicability of the present disclosure will become apparent from the detailed description, the claims and the drawings. The detailed description and specific examples are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure.
The present disclosure will become more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings, wherein:
In the drawings, reference numbers may be reused to identify similar and/or identical elements.
A substrate support in a substrate processing system may include an edge ring. An upper surface of the edge ring may extend above an upper surface of the substrate support, causing the upper surface of the substrate support (and, in some examples, an upper surface of a substrate arranged on the substrate support) to be recessed relative to the edge ring. This recess may be referred to as a pocket. A distance between the upper surface of the edge ring and the upper surface of the substrate may be referred to as a “pocket depth.” Generally, the pocket depth is fixed according to a height of the edge ring relative to the upper surface of the substrate. If a different pocket depth is required, the edge ring must be manually replaced, which may be limited by wafer handling constraints, process constraints, chamber constraints, etc.
Some aspects of etch processing may vary due to characteristics of the substrate processing system, the substrate, gas mixtures, etc. For example, flow patterns, and therefore an etch rate and etch uniformity, may vary according to the pocket depth of the edge ring, edge ring geometry (i.e., shape), etc. In some example processes, overall etch rates vary as the distance between the upper surface of the substrate and the bottom surface of the gas distribution device increases. Further, the etch rates may vary from the center of the substrate to an outer perimeter of the substrate. For example, at an outer perimeter of the substrate, sheath bending and ion tilt can cause shallow trench isolation (STI) tilt, and chemical loading associated with reactive species (e.g., etchants and/or deposition precursors) can cause hard mask critical dimension roll off. Further, material such as etch by-products can be redeposited on the substrate. Etch rates may vary according to other process parameters including, but not limited to, gas velocities across the upper surface of the substrate. For example, parameters associated with the injection of various process gases (e.g., including injection from center nozzles, side tuning nozzles, etc.) that may affect process results include, but are not limited to, gas flow rates, gas species, injection angle, injection position, etc.
Accordingly, varying the configuration of the edge ring (e.g., including edge ring height and/or geometry) may modify the gas velocity profile across the surface of the substrate. Similarly, adjusting parameters associated with the injection of various process gases may also affect process results. For example only, gas injection parameters may include, but are not limited to, gas flow, gas species, injection angle, injection position, etc. Variable depth edge ring systems and methods according to the principles of the present disclosure combine adjusting the edge ring height and adjusting the parameters of process gas injection during substrate processing to control etch uniformity. In this manner, gas flow recirculation and the associated by-product deposition can be modulated.
For example, the edge ring may be coupled to an actuator configured to raise and lower the edge ring in response to a controller, user interface, etc. In one example, a controller of the substrate processing system controls the height of the edge ring during a process, between process steps, etc. according to a particular recipe being performed and associated gas injection parameters. The controller may be configured to adjust gas injection parameters accordingly. For example only, the controller may store data (e.g., a lookup table) that indexes edge ring height, etc. to one or more parameters associated with process gas injection. The data may further associate the edge ring height and gas injection parameters with etch by-product distribution across the substrate. The data may correspond to predetermined (e.g., calibrated or programmed) data, data provided by a user via an interface, etc. In this manner, a desired etch uniformity can be achieved by dynamically adjusting the edge ring height and gas injection parameters during processing according to the etch by-product distribution. In some examples, the edge ring may include gas injection nozzles for injecting additional side tuning gases.
Referring now to
For example only, the upper electrode 104 may include a gas distribution device such as a showerhead 109 that introduces and distributes process gases. The showerhead 109 may include a stem portion including one end connected to a top surface of the processing chamber. A base portion is generally cylindrical and extends radially outwardly from an opposite end of the stem portion at a location that is spaced from the top surface of the processing chamber. A substrate-facing surface or faceplate of the base portion of the showerhead includes a plurality of holes through which process gas or purge gas flows. Alternately, the upper electrode 104 may include a conducting plate and the process gases may be introduced in another manner.
The substrate support 106 includes a conductive baseplate 110 that acts as a lower electrode. The baseplate 110 supports a ceramic layer 112. In some examples, the ceramic layer 112 may comprise a heating layer, such as a ceramic multi-zone heating plate. A thermal resistance layer 114 (e.g., a bond layer) may be arranged between the ceramic layer 112 and the baseplate 110. The baseplate 110 may include one or more coolant channels 116 for flowing coolant through the baseplate 110.
An RF generating system 120 generates and outputs an RF voltage to one of the upper electrode 104 and the lower electrode (e.g., the baseplate 110 of the substrate support 106). The other one of the upper electrode 104 and the baseplate 110 may be DC grounded, AC grounded or floating. For example only, the RF generating system 120 may include an RF voltage generator 122 that generates the RF voltage that is fed by a matching and distribution network 124 to the upper electrode 104 or the baseplate 110. In other examples, the plasma may be generated inductively or remotely. Although, as shown for example purposes, the RF generating system 120 corresponds to a capacitively coupled plasma (CCP) system, the principles of the present disclosure may also be implemented in other suitable systems, such as, for example only transformer coupled plasma (TCP) systems, CCP cathode systems, remote microwave plasma generation and delivery systems, etc.
A gas delivery system 130 includes one or more gas sources 132-1, 132-2, . . . , and 132-N (collectively gas sources 132), where N is an integer greater than zero. The gas sources supply one or more precursors and mixtures thereof. The gas sources may also supply purge gas. Vaporized precursor may also be used. The gas sources 132 are connected by valves 134-1, 134-2, . . . , and 134-N (collectively valves 134) and mass flow controllers 136-1, 136-2, . . . , and 136-N (collectively mass flow controllers 136) to a manifold 140. An output of the manifold 140 is fed to the processing chamber 102. For example only, the output of the manifold 140 is fed to the showerhead 109.
A temperature controller 142 may be connected to a plurality of heating elements, such as thermal control elements (TCEs) 144 arranged in the ceramic layer 112. For example, the heating elements 144 may include, but are not limited to, macro heating elements corresponding to respective zones in a multi-zone heating plate and/or an array of micro heating elements disposed across multiple zones of a multi-zone heating plate. The temperature controller 142 may be used to control the plurality of heating elements 144 to control a temperature of the substrate support 106 and the substrate 108.
The temperature controller 142 may communicate with a coolant assembly 146 to control coolant flow through the channels 116. For example, the coolant assembly 146 may include a coolant pump and reservoir. The temperature controller 142 operates the coolant assembly 146 to selectively flow the coolant through the channels 116 to cool the substrate support 106.
A valve 150 and pump 152 may be used to evacuate reactants from the processing chamber 102. A system controller 160 may be used to control components of the substrate processing system 100. A robot 170 may be used to deliver substrates onto, and remove substrates from, the substrate support 106. For example, the robot 170 may transfer substrates between the substrate support 106 and a load lock 172. Although shown as separate controllers, the temperature controller 142 may be implemented within the system controller 160. In some examples, a protective seal 176 may be provided around a perimeter of the bond layer 114 between the ceramic layer 112 and the baseplate 110.
The substrate support 106 includes an edge ring 180. The edge ring 180 according to the principles of the present disclosure is moveable (e.g., moveable upward and downward in a vertical direction) relative to the substrate 108. For example, the edge ring 180 may be controlled via an actuator responsive to the controller 160 as described below in more detail. The edge ring 180 may be adjusted during substrate processing in accordance with gas injection parameters. In some examples, the edge ring 180 may include gas injection nozzles for injecting additional side tuning gases.
Referring now to
A region 312 between an upper bound 316 and a lower bound 320 may therefore correspond to a tunable range of by-product distribution achievable by adjusting a position of (i.e., raising and lowering) the edge ring. For example, the upper bound 316 may correspond to an example maximum amount of by-product distribution achievable and the lower bound 320 may correspond to an example minimum amount of by-product distribution achievable. The by-product distribution may be further adjusted by selectively adjusting center-injected gas flow and side-injected gas flow. The edge ring height and gas flow can be dynamically adjusted during processing to achieve a desired by-product distribution 324 for a predetermined period.
For example, the system controller 160 may store data, such as a model, that associates an average by-product distribution for each region of a substrate with various parameters including, but not limited to, edge ring position, side-injected gas flow, center-injected gas flow, gas species, edge ring shape, etc. The data may include data indicative of the by-product distributions 304 and 308 for a plurality of different edge ring positions, process gas injection flow rates, gas species, etc. For example only, the data, including the average by-product distributions, may be determined based on estimates, models, post-processing analyses of previous substrates, etc. Accordingly, for a given set of parameters that are not adjustable during processing (e.g., edge ring shape, desired by-product distribution, etc.), the controller 160 is configured to calculate associated parameters that can be adjusted during processing to achieve the desired by-product distribution (e.g., edge ring height and respective amounts of center-injected and side-injected gas flow). In some examples, the controller 160 may dynamically calculate the by-product distribution during processing and make adjustments accordingly. For example, as shown in
Accordingly, processing may begin with the edge ring in a first position and with respective center-injected and side-injected gas flow rates, resulting in relatively greater by-product distribution in the edge region of the substrate and relatively less by-product distribution in the center region of the substrate. The system controller 160 may then cause the edge ring to be lowered (or raised) to a second position while also adjusting respective flow rates of the center-injected and side-injected gases. For example, the edge ring may be lowered while decreasing (or completely shutting off) the flow rate of the center-injected gas and increasing the flow rate of the side-injected gas, resulting in relatively less by-product distribution in the edge region of the substrate and relatively greater by-product distribution in the center region of the substrate. Adjusting the respective flow rates may include completely turning off the center-injected or side-injected gas flow, beginning processing with the center-injected or side-injected gas flow turned off and subsequently turning on the center-injected or side-injected gas flow, etc.
In some examples, the controller 160 may be configured to perform a sequence of predetermined adjustments for a particular process. For example, in a first predetermined period, the controller 160 may adjust the edge ring to a first height while selecting first respective center-injected and side-injected gas flow rates. In a second predetermined period, the controller 160 may adjust the edge ring to a second height while selecting second respective center-injected and side-injected gas flow rates. In this manner, a process or processing step may be segmented into two or more predetermined periods having respective edge ring positions and gas flow rates.
Referring now to
Referring now to
The substrate support 500 is positioned below a gas distribution device such as a showerhead 520. The showerhead 520 includes a center portion 524 and may optionally include an outer portion 528. The center portion 524 includes center gas nozzles 532 arranged to direct process gases downward directly above the substrate 504. The outer portion 520 may include side-tuning gas nozzles 536 arranged to direct process gases toward outer edges of the substrate 504.
In some examples, the edge ring 516 includes edge ring nozzles 540. The edge ring nozzles 540 may be provided instead of or in addition to side-tuning gas nozzles 536 in the outer portion 528 of the showerhead 520. The edge ring nozzles 540 are arranged to provide additional side-tuning gases to further control by-product distribution as described above in
Characteristics of the edge ring nozzles 540 may differ for different processes, processing chambers, etc. Example characteristics of the edge ring nozzles 540 that may be modified include, but are not limited to, quantity, size, shape, and injection angle. Accordingly, in addition to adjusting edge ring position, gas flow, etc., by-product distribution can be further controlled by selecting an edge ring with edge ring nozzles 540 having desired characteristics. In some examples, a shape of the edge ring 516 may vary to further control by-product distribution. For example, although shown with a rectangular inner diameter 556, the inner diameter 556 may be beveled, curved, etc. in other examples.
Referring now to
At 612, the method 600 begins a process or processing step. At 616, the method 600 determines whether the processing step is complete. If true, the method 600 ends at 620. If false, the method 600 continues to 624. At 624, the method 600 determines whether to adjust parameters related to control of by-product distribution as described above with respect to
At 628, the method 600 (e.g., the system controller 160) adjusts the edge ring position and/or gas flow rates. In some examples, the method 600 adjusts the edge ring position and the gas flow rates to predetermined values (e.g., based on a time elapsed since the process/processing step began). In other examples, the method 600 may calculate or estimate (e.g., based on current and previous edge ring positions, gas flow rates, etc.) by-product distribution in various regions of the substrate and adjust the edge ring position and/or gas flow rates accordingly. The method 600 then continues to 616.
The foregoing description is merely illustrative in nature and is in no way intended to limit the disclosure, its application, or uses. The broad teachings of the disclosure can be implemented in a variety of forms. Therefore, while this disclosure includes particular examples, the true scope of the disclosure should not be so limited since other modifications will become apparent upon a study of the drawings, the specification, and the following claims. It should be understood that one or more steps within a method may be executed in different order (or concurrently) without altering the principles of the present disclosure. Further, although each of the embodiments is described above as having certain features, any one or more of those features described with respect to any embodiment of the disclosure can be implemented in and/or combined with features of any of the other embodiments, even if that combination is not explicitly described. In other words, the described embodiments are not mutually exclusive, and permutations of one or more embodiments with one another remain within the scope of this disclosure.
Spatial and functional relationships between elements (for example, between modules, circuit elements, semiconductor layers, etc.) are described using various terms, including “connected,” “engaged,” “coupled,” “adjacent,” “next to,” “on top of,” “above,” “below,” and “disposed.” Unless explicitly described as being “direct,” when a relationship between first and second elements is described in the above disclosure, that relationship can be a direct relationship where no other intervening elements are present between the first and second elements, but can also be an indirect relationship where one or more intervening elements are present (either spatially or functionally) between the first and second elements. As used herein, the phrase at least one of A, B, and C should be construed to mean a logical (A OR B OR C), using a non-exclusive logical OR, and should not be construed to mean “at least one of A, at least one of B, and at least one of C.”
In some implementations, a controller is part of a system, which may be part of the above-described examples. Such systems can comprise semiconductor processing equipment, including a processing tool or tools, chamber or chambers, a platform or platforms for processing, and/or specific processing components (a wafer pedestal, a gas flow system, etc.). These systems may be integrated with electronics for controlling their operation before, during, and after processing of a semiconductor wafer or substrate. The electronics may be referred to as the “controller,” which may control various components or subparts of the system or systems. The controller, depending on the processing requirements and/or the type of system, may be programmed to control any of the processes disclosed herein, including the delivery of processing gases, temperature settings (e.g., heating and/or cooling), pressure settings, vacuum settings, power settings, radio frequency (RF) generator settings, RF matching circuit settings, frequency settings, flow rate settings, fluid delivery settings, positional and operation settings, wafer transfers into and out of a tool and other transfer tools and/or load locks connected to or interfaced with a specific system.
Broadly speaking, the controller may be defined as electronics having various integrated circuits, logic, memory, and/or software that receive instructions, issue instructions, control operation, enable cleaning operations, enable endpoint measurements, and the like. The integrated circuits may include chips in the form of firmware that store program instructions, digital signal processors (DSPs), chips defined as application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), and/or one or more microprocessors, or microcontrollers that execute program instructions (e.g., software). Program instructions may be instructions communicated to the controller in the form of various individual settings (or program files), defining operational parameters for carrying out a particular process on or for a semiconductor wafer or to a system. The operational parameters may, in some embodiments, be part of a recipe defined by process engineers to accomplish one or more processing steps during the fabrication of one or more layers, materials, metals, oxides, silicon, silicon dioxide, surfaces, circuits, and/or dies of a wafer.
The controller, in some implementations, may be a part of or coupled to a computer that is integrated with the system, coupled to the system, otherwise networked to the system, or a combination thereof. For example, the controller may be in the “cloud” or all or a part of a fab host computer system, which can allow for remote access of the wafer processing. The computer may enable remote access to the system to monitor current progress of fabrication operations, examine a history of past fabrication operations, examine trends or performance metrics from a plurality of fabrication operations, to change parameters of current processing, to set processing steps to follow a current processing, or to start a new process. In some examples, a remote computer (e.g. a server) can provide process recipes to a system over a network, which may include a local network or the Internet. The remote computer may include a user interface that enables entry or programming of parameters and/or settings, which are then communicated to the system from the remote computer. In some examples, the controller receives instructions in the form of data, which specify parameters for each of the processing steps to be performed during one or more operations. It should be understood that the parameters may be specific to the type of process to be performed and the type of tool that the controller is configured to interface with or control. Thus as described above, the controller may be distributed, such as by comprising one or more discrete controllers that are networked together and working towards a common purpose, such as the processes and controls described herein. An example of a distributed controller for such purposes would be one or more integrated circuits on a chamber in communication with one or more integrated circuits located remotely (such as at the platform level or as part of a remote computer) that combine to control a process on the chamber.
Without limitation, example systems may include a plasma etch chamber or module, a deposition chamber or module, a spin-rinse chamber or module, a metal plating chamber or module, a clean chamber or module, a bevel edge etch chamber or module, a physical vapor deposition (PVD) chamber or module, a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) chamber or module, an atomic layer deposition (ALD) chamber or module, an atomic layer etch (ALE) chamber or module, an ion implantation chamber or module, a track chamber or module, and any other semiconductor processing systems that may be associated or used in the fabrication and/or manufacturing of semiconductor wafers.
As noted above, depending on the process step or steps to be performed by the tool, the controller might communicate with one or more of other tool circuits or modules, other tool components, cluster tools, other tool interfaces, adjacent tools, neighboring tools, tools located throughout a factory, a main computer, another controller, or tools used in material transport that bring containers of wafers to and from tool locations and/or load ports in a semiconductor manufacturing factory.
The present disclosure is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/241,393, filed on Aug. 19, 2016. The entire disclosure of the application referenced above is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4374698 | Sanders et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4431477 | Zajac | Feb 1984 | A |
4793897 | Dunfield et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
5329965 | Gordon | Jul 1994 | A |
5605179 | Strong, Jr. et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5660673 | Miyoshi | Aug 1997 | A |
5662143 | Caughran | Sep 1997 | A |
5744695 | Forbes | Apr 1998 | A |
5762714 | Mohn et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5907221 | Sato et al. | May 1999 | A |
6022809 | Fan | Feb 2000 | A |
6042687 | Singh et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044534 | Seo et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6060400 | Oehrlein et al. | May 2000 | A |
6074959 | Wang et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6152168 | Ohmi et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6206976 | Crevasse et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210593 | Ohkuni | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6376386 | Oshima | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6492774 | Han et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6589352 | Yudovsky et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6709547 | Ni | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6736931 | Collins et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6744212 | Fischer et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6818560 | Koshimizu et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6841943 | Vahedi et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6896765 | Steger | May 2005 | B2 |
6898558 | Klekotka | May 2005 | B2 |
6962879 | Zhu et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7129171 | Zhu et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7288482 | Panda et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7309646 | Heo et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7311784 | Fink | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7338907 | Li et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7481944 | Nozawa | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7736998 | Morita | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7757541 | Monkowski et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7758698 | Bang et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7882800 | Koshiishi | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7968469 | Collins et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8137463 | Liu et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8552334 | Tappan et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8555920 | Hirata et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8592328 | Hausmann et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8889024 | Watanabe et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8956980 | Chen et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8999106 | Liu et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9011637 | Yamamoto | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9051647 | Cooperberg et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9059678 | Long et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9142391 | Yamamoto | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9318343 | Ranjan et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9471065 | Koyomogi et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9640409 | Yang et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
10410832 | Zhang | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10504738 | Lin | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10510516 | Lin | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10651015 | Angelov | May 2020 | B2 |
10699878 | Caron | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10825659 | Treadwell | Nov 2020 | B2 |
20010002581 | Nishikawa et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010004903 | Ohmi et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010013363 | Kitayama et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020038669 | Yamagishi et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020042205 | McMillin et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020045265 | Bergh et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020046991 | Smith et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020048536 | Bergh et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020072240 | Koike | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020088542 | Nishikawa et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020160125 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020174905 | Latino et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020175144 | Hung et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030201069 | Johnson | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030236592 | Shajii et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236638 | Shajii et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236643 | Shajii et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040053428 | Steger | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040089240 | Dando et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040094206 | Ishida | May 2004 | A1 |
20040112538 | Larson et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040112539 | Larson et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040112540 | Larson et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040149389 | Fink | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040163601 | Kadotani | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040168719 | Nambu | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040173270 | Harris et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040200529 | Lull et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050005994 | Sugiyama et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050067021 | Bevers et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050082007 | Nguyen et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050155625 | Jangjian et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050199342 | Shajii et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050241763 | Huang et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060011237 | Tison et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060060141 | Kamaishi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060097644 | Kono et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060124169 | Mizusawa et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060207595 | Ohmi et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060237063 | Ding et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070026684 | Parascandola et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070066038 | Sadjadi et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070158025 | Larson | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070175391 | Mizusawa | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070204797 | Fischer | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233412 | Gotoh et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070240778 | L'Bassi et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070259112 | Ishikawa et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080115834 | Geoffrion et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080121178 | Bang et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080202588 | Gold et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080202609 | Gold et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080202610 | Gold et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080223873 | Chen | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080236749 | Koshimizu et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090056629 | Katz | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090061083 | Chiang et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090061640 | Wong et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090061644 | Chiang et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090067954 | Lanee et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090095364 | Itoh et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090162952 | Liu et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090183548 | Monkowski et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090183549 | Monkowski et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090197423 | Koshimizu et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090221117 | Tan et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090236313 | Qiu et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090272717 | Pamarthy et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090320754 | Oya et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100012310 | Christensen et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100025369 | Negishi et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100030390 | Yamaguchi et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100071438 | Davis et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100144539 | Bergh et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100145633 | Yasuda | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100178770 | Zin | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100229976 | Hirata et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100264117 | Ohmi et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100269924 | Yasuda | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110019332 | Chistyakov | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110031111 | Kobayashi | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110094596 | Sugiyama et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110135821 | Ding | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110253225 | Beeby et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110265883 | Cruse et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110287631 | Yamamoto | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110303696 | Kelekar et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120031500 | Hirose et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120034786 | Dhindsa et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120097266 | Cobb et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120149213 | Nittala et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120152364 | Hashimoto et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120174990 | Yasuda | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120190208 | Ozu et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120238102 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120238103 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120244715 | Lebouitz et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120289057 | DeDontney | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120298221 | Takeuchi et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120305184 | Singh et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120328780 | Yamagishi | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130008607 | Matsumoto et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130025715 | Yamaguchi et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130029494 | Sasaki et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130029496 | Bauer et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130045605 | Wang et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130085618 | Ding | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130104996 | Oh et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130106286 | Banna et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130131300 | Olmscheid et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130145816 | Lowe | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130157388 | Grimbergen | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130220433 | Sawada et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130270997 | Zhao et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130288477 | Rieschl et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140033828 | Larson et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140080308 | Chen et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140120737 | Swaminathan et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140141621 | Ren et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140144471 | Kahlon et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140182689 | Shareef et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140213055 | Himori et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140248780 | Ingle et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140262038 | Wang et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140273460 | Reyland et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150010381 | Cai | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150017810 | Guha | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150059859 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150181684 | Banna et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150184287 | Tsung et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150287572 | Daugherty et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150340209 | Koltonski | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150371831 | Rozenzon et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160111258 | Taskar et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160181116 | Berry, III et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160211165 | McChesney | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160211166 | Yan et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160215392 | Yudovsky et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160247688 | Zhu et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170018407 | Kondo | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170032982 | Drewery et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170069511 | Yang et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170110335 | Yang et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170200586 | Treadwell et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170213758 | Rice et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170236688 | Caron et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170236694 | Eason et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170236741 | Angelov et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170236743 | Severson et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170278679 | Angelov et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170287682 | Musselman et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170287753 | Musselman et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180053629 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20190013232 | Yan et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102243977 | Nov 2011 | CN |
102315150 | Jan 2012 | CN |
103730318 | Apr 2014 | CN |
104299929 | Jan 2015 | CN |
104752141 | Jul 2015 | CN |
104851832 | Aug 2015 | CN |
105336561 | Feb 2016 | CN |
107093569 | Aug 2017 | CN |
0424299 | Apr 1991 | EP |
0838842 | Apr 1998 | EP |
H10-280173 | Oct 1998 | JP |
2001-230239 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2002-217171 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2006-344701 | Dec 2006 | JP |
2007-234867 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2012-049376 | Mar 2012 | JP |
2015201552 | Nov 2015 | JP |
20040050080 | Jun 2004 | KR |
20050008792 | Jan 2005 | KR |
20080023569 | Mar 2008 | KR |
2010-0105695 | Sep 2010 | KR |
2011-0125188 | Nov 2011 | KR |
20130137962 | Dec 2013 | KR |
20140001540 | Jan 2014 | KR |
2014-0132542 | Nov 2014 | KR |
101974420 | May 2019 | KR |
101974422 | May 2019 | KR |
506234 | Oct 2002 | TW |
201207933 | Feb 2012 | TW |
201324653 | Jun 2013 | TW |
201436089 | Sep 2014 | TW |
WO-0040776 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO-2011051251 | May 2011 | WO |
WO-2013123617 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO-2014068886 | May 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 14/945,680, John Drewery. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/013,400, Yang et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/014,539, Yang et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/399,692, Treadwell et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/427,163, filed Feb. 8, 2017, Kwame Eason et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/275,837, filed Jan. 7, 2016, Jason Lee Treadwell et al. |
Blain (Mar./ Apr. 1999) “Mechanism of nitrogen removal from silicon nitride by nitric oxide,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A, 17(2):665-667. |
Blain et al. (Jul./Aug. 1996) “Role of nitrogen in the downstream etching of silicon nitride,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A, 14(4):2151-2157. |
Bohr, Mark, “The New Era of Scaling in an SoC World” Intel Logic Technology Development; ISSCC; 2009; 66 Pages. |
Dusa, Mircean et al., “Pitch Doubling Through Dual Patterning Lithography Challenges in Integration and Litho Budgets,” Optical Microlithography XX, vol. 6520, 65200G, (2007); 10 pages. |
European Extended Search Report dated May 30, 2016 issued in EP 15 199 363.1 [LAMRP146EP]. |
First Office Action dated Aug. 2, 2018 corresponding to Chinese Patent Application No. 201710036188.9, 7 pages. |
First Office Action dated Dec. 29, 2017 corresponding to Chinese Patent Application No. 201610032252.1, 12 pages. |
Kastenmeier et al. (Nov./Dec. 1999) “Highly selective etching of silicon nitride over silicon and silicon dioxide,” J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. A, American Vacuum Society, I7 (6):3179-3184. |
Kastenmeier et al. (Sep./Oct. 1996) “Chemical dry etching of silicon nitride and silicon dioxide using CF4/02/N2 gas mixtures,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A14(5):2802-2813. |
MP125E N-470 Linear Drive User Manual; Version 1.1.0; Date Sep. 8, 2014; 54 Pages; Physik Instrumente (PI) GmbH & Co. KG, Auf der Roemerstr. 1, 76228 Karlsruhe, Germany. |
Oehrlein et al. (1996) “Study of plasma-surface interactions: chemical dry etching and high-density plasma etching.” Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 5:193-199. |
Tajima et al. (2013) “Room-Temperature Si Etching in NO/F2 Gases and the Investigation of Surface Reaction Mechanisms,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 117:5118-5125. |
U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 5, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/576,020 [LAMRP146]. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/106,407, filed Jan. 22, 2015, in the names of Joseph Yudovsky et al., & entitled “Injector for Spatially Separated Atomic Layer Deposition Chamber” pp. 1-68. (Year: 2015). |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/576,020 [LAMRP146]. |
U.S. Office Action dated Sep. 23, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/576,020 [LAMRP146]. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/065,497, entitled “Gas Supply Delivery Arrangement Including a Gas Splitter for Tunable Gas Flow Control,” filed Oct. 17, 2014, in the names of Mark Taskar et al. (Year: 2014). |
Yun et al. (2007) “Large Etch Rate Enhancement by NO-Iduced Surface Chemical Reaction during Chemical Dry Etching of Silicon Oxide in F2 Remote Plasmas,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 154(4):D267-D272. |
First Office Action with Translation dated Sep. 7, 2021 corresponding to Korean Patent Application No. 10-2017-0083210, 6 pages. |
First Office Action with Translation dated Oct. 7, 2021 corresponding to Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-154893, 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190362940 A1 | Nov 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15241393 | Aug 2016 | US |
Child | 16539494 | US |