Patent Grant
10309024
The present invention pertains to the methods and apparatus for simultaneous electrodeposition of two metals having substantially different standard electrodeposition potentials. Specifically, this invention pertains to the methods and apparatus for simultaneous electrodeposition of tin and silver for wafer level packaging applications.
Electrochemical deposition processes are well-established in modern integrated circuit fabrication. The movement from aluminum to copper metal lines in the early years of the twenty-first century drove a need for more sophisticated electrodeposition processes and plating tools. Much of the sophistication evolved in response to the need for ever smaller current carrying lines in device metallization layers. These copper lines are formed by electroplating the metal into very thin, high-aspect ratio trenches and vias using a methodology commonly referred to as “damascene” processing.
Electrochemical deposition is now poised to fill a commercial need for sophisticated packaging and multichip interconnection technologies known generally as wafer level packaging (WLP) and through silicon via (TSV) electrical connection technology. These technologies present their own very significant challenges.
For example, these technologies require electroplating on a significantly larger feature size scale than most damascene applications. For various types of packaging features (e.g., TSV through chip connections, redistribution wiring, fan-out wiring, or flip-chip pillars), plated features are frequently, in current technology, greater than about 2 micrometers and typically 5-100 micrometers in height and/or width (for example, pillars may be about 50 micrometers). For some on-chip structures such as power busses, the feature to be plated may be larger than 100 micrometers. The aspect ratios of the WLP features are typically about 1:1 (height to width) or lower, while TSV structures can have very high aspect ratios (e.g., in the neighborhood of about 10:1 to 20:1).
Given the relatively large amount of material to be deposited, plating speed also differentiates WLP and TSV applications from damascene applications. For many WLP applications involving copper and/or nickel deposition, features have been filled at a rate of at least about 1 micrometer/minute or more and solder is plated at a rate of about 2.5 micrometers/minute or more. Currently copper depositions rates of about 2.5 micrometers/minute are employed and solder plating rates of 3-5 micrometers/minute are used. In the future these rates are anticipated to increase to as high as 3.5 micrometers/min and 6 micrometers/min respectively. Further, independent of the plating rate, the plating must be conducted in a global and locally uniform manner on the wafer, as well as from one wafer to the next.
Still further, electrochemical deposition of WLP features may involve plating various combinations of metals such as the layered combinations or alloys of lead, tin, indium, silver, nickel, gold, palladium and copper.
While meeting each of these challenges, WLP electrofill processes must compete with conventionally less challenging and potentially less inexpensive pick and place (e.g. solder ball placement) or screen printing operations.
An apparatus and method for continuous simultaneous electroplating of two metals having substantially different standard electrodeposition potentials (e.g., for deposition of Sn Ag alloys) is provided. The apparatus includes an anode chamber for containing an anolyte comprising ions of a first, less noble metal, (e.g., tin), but not of a second, more noble, metal (e.g., silver) and an active (also called a “soluble”) anode which comprises the first metal; a cathode chamber for containing catholyte including ions of a first metal (e.g., tin), ions of a second, more noble, metal (e.g., silver), and the substrate; a separation structure positioned between the anode chamber and the cathode chamber, where the separation structure allows for the flow of ionic current (ionic communication) but substantially prevents transfer of more noble metal from catholyte to the anolyte during plating; and fluidic features and an associated controller coupled to the apparatus and configured to perform continuous electroplating, while maintaining substantially constant concentrations of metal ions, protons, anions, and generally any other plating bath component (e.g., additive or complexing agents) in the cathode chamber for extended periods of use. Specifically, concentrations of the first metal, the second metal, and of protons in catholyte can be maintained, such that each does not fluctuate by more than about 20%, such as by more than about 10% over the period of at least about 0.2 bath charge turnovers, at least about 0.5 bath charge turnovers, at least about 2 bath charge turnovers, or at least about 10 bath charge turnovers.
Concentrations of the first metal and of protons in the anolyte, in some embodiments (e.g. after reaching steady state concentrations after initial anolyte charging), can be maintained such that each does not fluctuate by more than about 20%, such as by more than about 10% over the period of at least about 0.2 bath charge turnovers, at least about 0.5 bath charge turnovers, at least about 2 bath charge turnovers, or at least about 10 bath charge turnovers. For example, in many embodiments, proton concentration in the anolyte does not fluctuate by more than about 10% over the period of at least about 0.2 bath charge turnovers, such as for a period of at least about 2 bath charge turnovers.
In addition to stability of the plating bath over extended periods of use, the provided apparatus and methods offer substantial cost savings by minimizing the use of expensive electrolyte material and generation of expensive waste containing electrolyte material, by providing a system designed to minimize or eliminate decomposition reactions in the electrolyte, and/or by regenerating metals from spent portions of electrolyte.
As it was mentioned, provided apparatus includes a separation structure, which does not permit flow of the more noble metal from the caholyte into anolyte. Suitable materials for the separation structure include ionomers, such as polyfluorinated ionomers, and cationic membrane materials, e.g., Nafion® available from Du Pont de Nemours. The ionomer may be placed on a solid support, which would provide mechanical strength to the separation structure. The separation structure is typically permeable to water and to protons, which flow through the membrane from anolyte to catholyte during electroplating. In some embodiments the separation structure is also permeable to the ions of the first metal (e.g., tin) during plating (but not necessarily in the absence of applied potential). In preferred embodiments, ions of the first metal can flow in part by forced migration (i.e. under the influence of an applied electric field) through the membrane from anolyte to catholyte during electrodeposition, while the second metal (e.g. silver) does not substantially cross the membrane during idle or during plating because its diffusion to anolyte is substantially inhibited (e.g., by the separator and/or due to complexation) and because the anodically applied electric field generally prevents any forced migration in the opposite direction (migration of a cation is from the positive anode through the anolyte to catholyte to the cathode). In one embodiment, the apparatus includes the following fluidic features and an associated controller coupled to the apparatus and configured to perform at least the following operations: deliver an acid solution to the anode chamber from a source outside the anode chamber; deliver a solution comprising ions of the first metal (e.g., tin) to the anode chamber from a source outside the anode chamber; remove a portion of the catholyte from the cathode chamber; deliver ions of a second metal (e.g., silver) to the cathode chamber (via delivery of a solution comprising ions of the second metal and/or using an auxiliary anode comprising the second metal); and deliver anolyte from the anode chamber to the cathode chamber via a conduit that is different than the separation structure.
The controller associated with the apparatus can control flow rates and delivery timing of all components introduced into the system including delivery of acid to the anolyte, delivery of ions of the first metal to the anolyte, delivery of anolyte to catholyte, and delivery of ions of the second metal to the catholyte. In addition to controlling addition of acid and first metal (e.g. tin) feed solutions to anolyte, in some embodiments the controller is configured to control the flow and delivery timing of water to the anolyte (allowing for highly concentrated acid and tin solutions to be used in acid and tin feed solutions). The controller also is configured to control either actively or passively (e.g. via displacement volume and overflow to waste of regeneration streams) the rate of removal of the catholyte from the cathode chamber. The delivery of electrolyte components can be controlled in a feed-forward predictive manner coulometrically (e.g., dosing of components such as acid, tin, silver or additives can occur after a pre-determined number of coulombs passed through the plating system). In some embodiments, the controller further receives feedback signals related to the measured concentrations of components in the plating bath (e.g., proton, tin, silver, additive or complexer concentrations in the anolyte), and adjusts delivery or removal of electrolyte components in response to received signals, e.g., either through addition of new material and/or removal of bath directly to the catholyte (catholyte direct dosing and control) or indirectly through the anolyte (indirect corrective dosing of acid and tin).
In some embodiments the apparatus includes an anolyte pressure regulator in fluid communication with the anode chamber. In some embodiments, the anolyte pressure regulator comprises a vertical column arranged to serve as a conduit through which the electrolyte flows upward before spilling over a top of the vertical column into a chamber exposed to air or inert gas at atmospheric pressure, and wherein, in operation, the vertical column provides a pressure head which maintains a substantially constant pressure throughout the anode chamber. The pressure regulator can be incorporated into an anolyte circulation loop which circulates anolyte out of the anode chamber, through the pressure regulator, and back into the anode chamber, e.g., across the anode metal. The anolyte circulation loop typically further comprises a pump outside the anode chamber, and an inlet for introducing additional fluid (including water, acid solution, and a solution comprising the ions of the first metal) into the anolyte circulation loop. Typically the apparatus will also include a source of acid and a source of ions of a first metal fluidically coupled to the anode chamber. For example, the apparatus may include an internal apparatus or may be otherwise connected to an auxiliary system (e.g., a bulk chemical delivery system) that provides a source of pressurized acid and a source of ions of a first metal fluidically coupled to the anode chamber.
Ions of the second metal (e.g., silver) are not contained within the anolyte but are delivered to the catholyte using one or both of the following systems. In a first system, the apparatus includes a source of a solution of ions of a second metal (e.g., a solution of a silver salt) outside the cathode chamber and in fluid communication with the cathode chamber. In a preferred embodiment that same solution source further contains an appropriate first-metal complexing agent or agents present such as to keep the first metal dissolved in the catholyte solution and/or to avoid oxidation of the second metal when mixed into the catholyte containing the second metal. The solution of ions of the second metal is delivered to the catholyte from the source as needed to maintain the catholyte second metal concentration In a second system, the apparatus includes an auxiliary active anode, comprising the second metal, e.g., a silver-containing anode (e.g., pure silver anode, or silver in combination with other materials). The anode is positioned in fluid communication with the cathode chamber (e.g., in the cathode chamber or in an auxiliary chamber outside the cathode chamber fluidically connected to the cathode chamber), but separate from and not in the anode chamber. The anode is connected to a power supply whose negative terminal is connected to the wafer substrate. This secondary metal anode is positively (anodically) biased during electroplating and electrochemically dissolves, providing ions of the second metal to the catholyte, in such a manner that these ions do not transfer to the anode chamber. The current applied to the secondary metal anode from the secondary metal anode power supply relative to the primary metal anode via the primary power supply should be balanced so as to maintain the concentration of second metal in the catholyte at the target concentration determined to be appropriate for delivering a target concentration of the second metal in the wafer deposit. A porous filter-like membrane may be used to avoid particles generated by the second anode from reaching the wafer. A combined apparatus having both an auxiliary silver anode and a source of silver ions feeding the catholyte can also be used.
In some embodiments the apparatus further includes an ionically resistive ionically permeable element shaped and configured to be positioned adjacent the substrate in the cathode chamber and having a flat surface that is adapted to be substantially parallel to and separated from a plating face of the substrate by a gap of about 5 millimeters or less during electroplating, wherein the ionically resistive ionically permeable element has a plurality of non-interconnected holes.
In some embodiments the apparatus further includes a system for recovering or regenerating metals (e.g., tin and/or silver) from spent electrolyte. In some embodiments, the apparatus includes a system adapted for receiving catholyte removed from the cathode chamber and, optionally, a bath in fluid communication with the cathode chamber. The regeneration system is configured for removing silver from catholyte (e.g., by selectively electrowinning at a required potential), and then delivering the remaining silver-free solution (regenerated anolyte) which contains tin ions to the anolyte chamber. In some embodiments the system is adapted to first remove a fraction of the catholyte removed from the system, process the remaining removed fraction to remove silver therein (creating a regenerated anolyte), and then combine the regenerated anolyte with fresh anolyte to the anolyte chamber.
In some embodiments an apparatus for simultaneous electroplating of a first metal and of a second, more noble metal on a cathodic substrate, includes: (a) a cathode and anode chambers having a separation structure therebetween; and (b) a controller comprising program instructions for conducting a process comprising the steps of: (i) providing an anolyte containing ions of the first metal but not the second metal in the anode chamber comprising an active anode comprising the first metal; (ii) providing a catholyte containing ions of both the first metal and the second metal in the cathode chamber; and (iii) simultaneously plating the first and the second metal onto the substrate while substantially preventing ions of the second metal from entering the anode chamber, while delivering an acid solution to the anode chamber from a source outside the anode chamber, while delivering a solution comprising ions of the first metal to the anode chamber from a source outside the anode chamber, while removing a portion of the catholyte from the cathode chamber, while delivering ions of the second metal to the cathode chamber, while delivering anolyte from the anode chamber to the cathode chamber via a conduit other than the separation structure, wherein the apparatus is configured to maintain the concentration of protons in the catholyte such that it does not fluctuate by more than about 10% over the period of at least about 0.2 plating bath charge turnovers.
In another aspect, a system is provided, which includes an apparatus as any of the described above and a stepper, e.g., configured for photolithographic processing.
In another aspect, a continuous method of simultaneously plating a first metal and a second more noble metal onto a cathodic substrate (e.g., integrated circuit chip) is provided. The method includes the following operations: (a) providing an anolyte containing ions of the first metal but not the second metal in an anode chamber comprising an active anode comprising the first metal; (b) providing a catholyte containing ions of both the first metal and the second metal in a cathode chamber, wherein the anode chamber and the cathode chamber are separated by a separation structure therebetween; and (c) simultaneously plating the first and the second metal onto the substrate, while substantially preventing ions of the second metal from entering the anode chamber, while delivering an acid solution to the anode chamber from a source outside the anode chamber, while delivering a solution comprising ions of the first metal to the anode chamber from a source outside the anode chamber, while removing a portion of the catholyte from the cathode chamber, while delivering ions of the second metal to the cathode chamber, while delivering anolyte from the anode chamber to the cathode chamber via a conduit other than the separation structure, wherein the catholyte and anolyte comprise acid and wherein the concentration of protons in the catholyte is maintained such that it does not fluctuate by more than about 10% over the period of at least about 0.2 plating bath charge turnovers.
In some embodiments, the separation structure comprises a cationic membrane, configured for transporting protons, water, and ions of the first metal from anolyte to catholyte during plating. In some embodiments the first metal is tin, and the second metal is silver. Delivery of silver ions to the catholyte can include delivering a solution containing silver ions to the catholyte from a source outside the catholyte and/or electrochemically dissolving an auxiliary silver anode fluidically connected with the catholyte.
In some embodiments, the catholyte includes silver ions in a concentration of between about 0.5 and 1.5 grams/liter and tin ions in a concentration of between about 30 and 70 grams/liter. In some embodiments the catholyte further includes organic plating additives, while anolyte is substantially free of organic plating additives.
In some embodiments the composition of anolyte and catholyte is maintained substantially constant using a coulometric control. In some embodiments, the composition of anolyte and catholyte is maintained substantially constant using a coulometric control and feedback signals related to concentrations of electrolyte components.
In some embodiments the catholyte and anolyte contain tin (e.g., low alpha tin), and the method further includes regenerating tin from removed portions of catholyte, where such regeneration includes separating tin from silver by electrowinning silver at a controlled potential. The tin-containing silver-free solution formed after electrowinning can be delivered to the anode chamber.
In some embodiments the method includes operations of applying photoresist to the workpiece; exposing the photoresist to light; patterning the resist and transferring the pattern to the workpiece; and selectively removing the photoresist from the workpiece.
In another aspect, a non-transitory computer machine-readable medium comprising program instructions for control of an electroplating apparatus is provided. The program instructions include code for performing the methods described herein. In some embodiments the instructions include code for: providing an anolyte containing ions of the first metal but not the second metal in an anode chamber comprising an active anode comprising the first metal; providing a catholyte containing ions of both the first metal and the second metal in a cathode chamber, wherein the anode chamber and the cathode chamber are separated by a separation structure therebetween; and simultaneously plating the first and the second metal onto the substrate, while substantially preventing ions of the second metal from entering the anode chamber, while delivering an acid solution to the anode chamber from a source outside the anode chamber, while delivering a solution comprising ions of the first metal to the anode chamber from a source outside the anode chamber, while removing a portion of the catholyte, while delivering ions of the second metal to the cathode chamber, while delivering anolyte from the anode chamber to the cathode chamber via a conduit other than the separation structure, wherein the catholyte and anolyte comprise acid and wherein the concentration of protons in the catholyte is maintained such that it does not fluctuate by more than about 10% over the period of at least about 0.2 plating bath charge turnovers.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be described in more detail below with reference to the associated drawings.
Methods and apparatus provided herein are suitable for simultaneous electrodeposition of at least two metals having different electrodeposition potentials. These methods are particularly useful for depositing metals having a large difference in standard electrodeposition potentials, such as a difference of at least about 0.3 V, more preferentially 0.5 V or more. These methods will be illustrated using simultaneous electrodeposition of tin (less noble metal) and silver (more noble metal) as an example. It is understood that provided apparatus and methods can also be used for simultaneous electrodeposition of other metal combinations (including alloys and mixtures), such as combinations of tin and copper, nickel and silver, copper and silver, indium and silver, iron and nickel, gold and indium, or two metal micro-mixtures such as gold and copper or copper and nickel. Electrodeposition of more than two metals can also be accomplished. For example, known ternary lead free alloys of tin, copper and silver, can be electrodeposited using methods and apparatus provided herein.
It is noteworthy that in some embodiments, low alpha tin is employed in the plating systems provided herein as a first, less noble metal. Low alpha tin is tin of extremely high chemical purity with low alpha particle emitted levels (e.g. less than about 0.02, more preferably less than about 0.002 alpha emission counts per cm2 per hour). The combination of purity and aging of the material results in a product that does not have significant amounts of contaminants remaining that undergo radioactive alpha decay. This is significant for IC applications, because alpha emission in the semiconductor chips can cause reliability problems and can interfere with IC function. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the tin anode that is used in the provided apparatuses contains low alpha tin. Further, solutions of stannous ions delivered to the electrolyte also are low alpha tin grade. Importantly, low alpha tin in solution is a more expensive material (weight for weight) than metallic low alpha tin or silver. Therefore, it is highly advantageous that provided apparatuses and methods produce very little, if any, low alpha tin waste.
Introduction and Overview
Electrochemical deposition may be employed at various points in the integrated circuit (IC) fabrication and packaging processes. At the IC chip level, damascene features are created by electrodepositing copper within vias and trenches to form multiple interconnected metallization layers. Above the multiple metallization layers, the “packaging” of the chip begins. Various WLP structures may be employed, some of which contain alloys or other combinations of two or more metals or other components. For example, the packaging may include one or more “bumps” made from solder or related materials. In a typical example of a plated bump manufacturing, the processing starts with a substrate having a conductive seed layer (e.g. a copper seed layer) having an “underbump” diffusion barrier layer of plated nickel (e.g. 1-2 μm thick and 100 μm wide) under a film of lead tin solder plated pillar (e.g. 50 to 100 microns thick and 100 microns wide). In accordance with the methods provided herein the solder pillar is made of electrodeposited tin silver instead of lead tin. After plating, photoresist stripping, and etching of the conductive substrate copper seed layer, the pillar of solder is carefully melted or “reflowed” to create a solder “bump” or ball attached to the underbump metal. An underbump of a non-solder high melting point plated metal solder “pedestal” such as copper, nickel, or a layered combination of these two, is often created below a solder film. More recently, the squat pedestals are replaced with smaller and higher aspect ratio pillars of the high melting metals (e.g., nickel and/or copper) resulting in reduced use of solder. In this scheme, useful in achieving tight and precise feature pitch and separation control, the copper pillars may be, for example, 50 microns or less in width, features can be separated from one another by 75-100 micron center to center, and the copper may be 20-40 microns in height. On top of the copper pillar, a nickel barrier film, e.g., about 1-2 microns thick, is sometimes deposited to separate the copper from the tin-containing solder and thereby avoid a solid state reaction of copper and tin which results in formation of various undesirable bronzes. Finally, a solder layer (conventionally a Sn—Pb layer, but a Sn—Ag layer according to embodiments of this invention) typically 20-40 microns in thickness is deposited. This scheme also enables a use of reduced amount of solder for the same feature sizes, reducing the cost of solder or reducing the total amount of lead in the chip. Recently, a move away from lead-containing solders has increased in momentum due to environmental and health safety concerns. Tin-silver solder alloy bumps are of particular interest and are used as an example to describe various embodiments described herein.
Lead-tin materials provide good quality “bumps” for packaging and are very easy to plate. However, lead's toxicity is driving a movement away from its use. For example, the RoHS initiative (Directive 2002/95/EC of The European Parliament) requires entities to change from the established tin-lead process to a lead free one. Replacement bump materials include tin, tin-silver binary materials, and tin-silver-copper ternary materials. Tin alone, however, suffers from a number of fundamental limitations and causes application difficulties due to its tendency to form large single-grained balls with varying orientations and thermal expansion coefficients, and due to its tendency to form “tin wiskers” which can lead to interconnect-to-interconnect shorting. The binary and ternary materials generally perform better and alleviate some of these pure tin issues, at least in part by precipitating a large number of small grain inclusions of the non-tin component as part of the solder melt to solid state freezing process.
However, electrochemical deposition of silver-tin alloys is accomplished by a difficult process that frequently employs an inert anode. Part of the difficulty results from the very widely separated electrochemical deposition potentials of silver and tin; the standard electrochemical potentials (E0s) of the metals are separated by more than 0.9 volts (Ag+/Ag: 0.8V NHE, Sn+2/Sn: −0.15V). Stated another way, elemental silver is substantially more inert than elemental tin and therefore will electroplate out of solution first much more easily than tin.
The large deposition potential difference between silver and tin can be and often is reduced by keeping the concentration of the nobler element (silver) as low as possible and the base (less noble) element (tin) as high as possible. Such a change in thermodynamic potential would follow the Nernst equation, with its logarithmic voltage vs. concentration dependence. However, that equation predicts only a ˜0.06V decrease in potential for each order of magnitude decrease in concentration for a one electron change process (e.g. Ag+, and proportionately less for multi-electron processes), and therefore is not able to fully compensate for the potential difference of such widely differing metals. Furthermore, the rate of deposition, as dictated by boundary layer theory, decreases linearly with concentration, and therefore maintaining significant levels of the nobler element in the film deposit inherently requires its concentration to be substantial (e.g. >0.1 g/L) in the plating solution. Hence, typically, the concentration of nobler element is relatively low but not insignificant in the plating solution, and the deposition processes are controlled in a manner whereby silver concentration in the bath is carefully controlled and silver is plated at its diffusion limiting rate (i.e., at its limiting current).
Another relevant issue in the silver tin system is the oxidation of base metal ion to a higher oxidation state by a direct homogeneous or indirect heterogeneous reaction with an oxidizing agent. Potential oxidizing agents include the nobler bath element (e.g. Ag+), dissolved molecular oxygen in an acidic medium, or a bath organic additive. In particular, the stannous (Sn+2) ion has the potential to be oxidized to a stannic ion (Sn+4) or other Sn4+-containing species by these oxidizers, as shown by half-reactions (1), (2), and (3).
Sn+2→Sn+4+2e− (Eo=+0.15V) (1)
Ag++e− →Ag (Eo=0.799V) (2)
O2+4H++4e→2H2O (Eo=1.29V NHE) (3)
Again, a low concentration of dissolved oxygen and silver would reduce the potential driving force for such a reaction. Also, as indicated above, one will not be able to reduce the concentration of silver in the bath sufficiently to substantially reduce the driving potential to a low enough value. Further, as discussed below, in the absence of employing the various features disclosed herein, an inert anode (also called a “dimensionally stable anode”) must be used, and that inherently creates substantial amounts of dissolved oxygen (by the reverse of the above reaction). The influence of the oxygen reaction can be partially alleviated by adding an oxygen getter as an additive to the plating solution (e.g. hydroquinone), but the amount of oxygen generated by an inert anode will quickly overcome any oxygen getting capacity of the additive to the bath. To combat the more noble metal (silver) faradic displacement, one can use a strong complexing (e.g., chelating) agent to reduce the amount of “free” silver ion and correspondingly shift the reaction in the desired direction. A very strong and electrochemically and chemically stable complexing agent with a complexation reaction constant of 10−11 or 10−12 would be required to decrease the potential of the silver ion reduction reaction to that of the stannous to stannic couple.
Another issue in the deposition of the Sn—Ag couple is that in the conventional systems it is not possible to use an active anode of the less noble member (tin) as it will undergo oxidation in the presence of the nobler ion (silver) in solution. The associated displacement reaction rules out the possibility of using a tin containing active anode, since direct displacement of the metallic tin will occur spontaneously, depleting the already small concentration of silver in the bath rapidly. The potential of the anode during corrosion remains equal to that of the less noble component tin even after silver has been plated onto the anode, and so the silver can not be re-oxidized easily or efficiently.
However, the use of an inert anode has several quite negative ramifications as further described below. One is that the plating bath chemistry is not balanced. The oxygen evolution reaction at the anode (according to reaction 4) continually increases the acidity of the bath. At the same time, the depletion of tin and silver requires replenishment by adding more salts. Without a large volume bath bleeding process, which may be difficult to control, the total ionic concentration can exceed the solubility limits of dissolved ions, and the bath must be depleted to avoid precipitation. This is both financially and environmentally undesirable. Also, the stannous (Sn2+) to stannic (Sn4+) oxidation reaction can occur at the anode in parallel with the oxygen evolution reaction. Stannic ion is considered to be insoluble except in very concentrated halide-containing acid. However, halides are unsuitable in a silver plating solution because silver halides are insoluble. A typical tin silver plating bath, such as that based on methanesulfonic acid and methanesulfonate metal salts, can not dissolve stannic oxide and therefore will continuously create conditions for the precipitation of stannic oxide (by reaction with water and dissolved oxygen generated electrolytically, (4)).
2H2O+Sn+2→4H++O2+4e−+Sn+2→4H++SnO2+2e− (4)
This results in reduced cell efficiency requiring additional metal salt to be added, as well as a particle-laden plating bath which is undesirable for defect control and/or can necessitate constant filtration and filter changes.
Hence, these and other challenges result in frequent plating bath changes, non-uniform silver concentration in the plated material, and relatively slow plating (typically less than 3 micrometers/minute).
Various embodiments described herein pertain to plating silver-tin compositions. However, it should be understood that the principles described with respect to these embodiments apply equally to electrochemical deposition of other multi-component materials, and particularly to those in which two or more of the electrodeposited materials have widely separated, electrochemical deposition potentials (e.g., E0s separated by at least about 0.3 volts, more preferably 0.5 volts). Other than in the specific compositions and conditions set forth below, references to tin can be replaced with “less noble metal” and references to silver can be replaced with “more noble metal.” Additionally it should be understood that the principles described herein can be applied to processes for electrodepositing three or more separate elements, at least two of which are have electrochemical deposition potentials separated by a wide margin, e.g., at least about 0.5 volts.
Apparatus and Methods
Problems discussed above are addressed, in some embodiments, by providing an apparatus that is capable of using an active (consumable) anode containing the less noble metal (e.g. tin), where the active anode substantially does not come into contact with the ions of a more noble metal (e.g. silver) during plating. To this end, the plating cell contains a cathode chamber configured for holding catholyte and a substrate (which is cathodically biased during plating) and an anode chamber configured for holding anolyte and the anode, where the anode chamber and the cathode chamber are separated by a separation structure, and where the anolyte contained in the anode chamber is substantially free of metal ions of the nobler metal. In some embodiments the anolyte is also substantially free of plating bath additives known in the art, including grain refiners, brighteners, levelers, suppressors, and noble metal complexing agents. The anolyte is electrolyte that contacts the anode and has a composition appropriate for contacting the anode and allowing it to create a soluble anode metal species upon electrochemical dissolution of the anode. In the case of tin, the suitable anolyte should preferably be either highly acidic (preferably with pH of less than 2) and/or contain a tin complexing agent (e.g. a chelator such as an oxalate anion). Conversely, the catholyte is electrolyte that contacts the cathode and has a composition appropriate for that role. For tin/silver plating, one exemplary catholyte would contain acid (e.g., methanesulfonic acid), a salt of tin (e.g., tin methanesulfonate), silver complexed with a silver complexer (e.g., silver complex with a thiol-containing complexer), and a grain refiner (e.g. polyethyleneclycol (PEG), hydroylated cellulose, gelatin, peptone, etc.). The separator helps maintain the distinct compositions of the anolyte and the catholyte within the electroplating chamber, even during electroplating, by selectively excluding certain electrolyte components from passage through the separator. For example, the separator can prevent the ions of a nobler metal from flowing from catholyte to anolyte. The term “flow” as used herein encompasses all types of ion movement.
The following principles can be employed in designing an electroplating apparatus and/or process suitable for plating a composition containing a more noble element and a less noble element: (1) the less noble element is provided in the anode chamber, (2) a soluble compound of the more noble element (e.g., a salt of that element, often in a complexed form) is blocked from transport from the cathode chamber to the anode chamber, e.g., by the separator and (3) the soluble compound of the more noble element is applied to the cathode chamber only (not to the anode chamber). In a preferred embodiment, the less noble element is provided at least via a consumable anode containing that element (and can be also provided in solution in addition to consumable anode), which is electrochemically dissolved during plating.
The method described herein is illustrated by
As indicated, various embodiments described herein employ some mechanism to keep the more noble metal ions (silver in the examples) from reaching the anode. Such mechanism may also exclude organic plating additives such as accelerators, suppressors, complexers, grain refiners, and/or levelers from contacting the anode. If silver ions were to contact a tin anode, they would simply deposit on tin anode and be continually extracted from solution. Concurrently, the tin would be corroded and tin ions would enter the electrolyte by a displacement reaction. Once silver metal deposits on the tin anode, it cannot be easily removed electrolytically. So long as tin metal is available in the anode and exposed to the solution, generally the applied potential can never become sufficiently anodic to strip it off the silver.
The suitable compositions of anolyte and catholyte are provided in non-limiting examples below.
Composition of Anolyte
In various examples—employing a plated metal composition of about 1-3% silver and 97-99% tin—the anolyte may have the following composition at start up. Composition at start up in some embodiments may be different than the composition of anolyte during steady state operation in continuous plating. Concentrations of tin in electrolyte refer to concentrations of tin ions (without anion) throughout the description.
Tin—160-240 g/l
Silver—none
Acid—40-140 g/l acid (based on methanesulfonic acid (MSA))
Organic additives—none
Tin—230 g/L
Silver-None
Acid—80 g/L as MSA
Organic Additive:
In example 2, the anolyte contains organic additives. In a typical operation of an apparatus provided herein, a portion of the anolyte is directed from the anode chamber to the cathode chamber via a fluidic conduit other than the separator. This anolyte to catholyte stream is important in maintaining the balance of the plating bath and is referred to as a cascade stream, while addition of anolyte to catholyte is referred to cascading. Thus, an anolyte containing plating additives is cascaded to the cathode chamber, where the plating additives improve electrodeposition of metals. The concentrations of additives in the anolyte are set, in many embodiments, to be approximately equal to or greater than those used in the catholyte. In a preferred embodiment having anolyte with an additive, the concentrations of the additives are set at a level so that after addition of the cascaded anolyte stream to the catholyte and addition of any silver-containing solution to the catholyte to maintain silver content, the net result is a concentration of additives at or below the target concentration of additives in the catholyte. Due to the use of the tin anode and its associated much lower oxidation potential than that of an inert anode, the presence of additives in the anolyte is generally not detrimental to the overall process.
If the concentration of the tin is lower and of acid is higher in the anolyte initially, based on what would be overall mass balance for the various system concentration and flows, initially in operation, the anolyte acidity will generally increase and the anolyte tin ion concentration will generally decrease. This is due in part to the higher mobility of protons compared to tin ions. Eventually a steady state will be reached.
Tin: 230 g/L (as tin methanesulfonate)
Acid: 50 g/L (as methanesulfonic acid)
Silver: None
Additives: None
Tin: 50-150 g/L (as tin methanesulfonate)
Acid: 180-350 g/L (as methanesulfonic acid)
Silver: None
Additives: None
Tin: 70 g/L (as tin methanesulfonate)
Acid: 230 g/L (as methanesulfonic acid)
Silver: None
Additive:
In example 5 (as with the anolyte composition of example 2), when the additive is added in the anolyte feed, the additives are generally introduced at a concentration equal to or greater than those present in the catholyte so that they will be near the target additive level in the catholyte after dilution with addition of diluting solution of dissolved silver to the catholyte.
Composition of Anolyte Feed
The composition of the anolyte feed is typically higher in acid and lower in tin than the steady state anolyte concentrations. In many embodiments anolyte feed has tin concentration of about 70-120 g/L, and acid concentration of about 180 to 250 g/L (as MSA). This is due to the necessity of supply acid to the anolyte to allow for maintenance of the pH in the anode chamber below 2 (so that tin remains dissolved in anolyte) and makeup for the protons that are removed continuously during plating from the anode chamber to the cathode chamber due to selective electromigration through the separator. Protons have a significantly higher mobility relative to the heavy metal tin, which generally has a small, and sometime even negligible, ion mobility through the separator, depending on the specific properties of the separator. The rate of addition of anolyte feed (time averaged feed flow rate) depends and scales with the amount of metal being plated (charge per wafer and wafers per hour) in the plating operation. Typically, a controller configured to control anolyte feed dosings is controlled coulometrically and is capable of adjust anolyte feed flow in response to a pre-determined number of Coulombs passed through the system, or the number of substrates processed, or after pre-determined time elapsed.
Composition of the Catholyte
In various examples—employing a plated metal composition of about 1-3% silver and about 98% tin—the catholyte may have the following composition at start up.
Silver—0.5 to 1.5 g/l silver ions
Tin—30-80 g/l tin ions
Acid—70-180 or more g/l acid (based on sulfuric acid or methane sulfonic acid). This high acid level provides a very high conductivity to facilitate plating and improves current distributions on the wafer.
Organic additives—grain refiners, noble metal complexers, brighteners, accelerators, suppressors, and/or levelers. Examples of suitable grain refiners include but are not limited to PEG, hydroxylated cellulose, gelatin, and peptone. Accelerators, suppressors, brighteners and levelers, are organic bath additives capable of selectively enhancing or suppressing rates of deposition of metal on different surfaces of the wafer features, thereby improving the uniformity of deposition.
Complexing agents, suitable for complexing silver include aromatic thiols or sulfide compounds including thiophenol, mercaptophenol, thiocresol, nitrothiophenol, thiosalicylic acid, aminothiophenol, benzenedithiophenol, mercaptopyridine. 4,4-thiodiphenol, 4,4-aminodiphenyl sulfide, thiobisthiophenol, 2,2-diaminodiphenyl disulfide, 2,2-dithiodibenzoic acid, ditolyl disulfide and 2,2-dipyridyl disulfide. These complexing agents may be used as silver complexers at low pH and are suitable for use in tin-silver plating baths (e.g., baths containing methanesulfonic acid).
Continuous Electroplating
In a preferred embodiment, a method for continuous electroplating, in which plating bath chemistry can be stable over prolonged periods of use is provided. Specifically, concentrations of the first metal, the second metal, and of protons in catholyte can be maintained, such that each does not fluctuate by more than about 20%, such as by more than about 10% over the period of at least about 0.2 bath charge turnovers, at least about 0.5 bath charge turnovers, at least about 2 bath charge turnovers, or at least about 10 bath charge turnovers. Further, except during startup transients, concentrations of the first metal and of protons in the anolyte can be maintained such that each does not fluctuate by more than about 20%, such as by more than about 10% over the period of at least about 0.2 bath charge turnovers, at least about 0.5 bath charge turnovers, at least about 2 bath charge turnovers, or at least about 10 bath charge turnovers. For example, in many embodiments, proton concentration in the catholyte does not fluctuate by more than about 10% over the period of at least about 0.2 bath charge turnovers, such as for a period of at least about 2 bath charge turnovers.
One exception to anolyte concentration consistency targets noted above will occur if, during the initial startup with a new bath, the tool is charged with anolyte having a substantially different concentration than that which the anolyte eventually will achieve after processing wafers via the system wide mass balance (the anolyte steady state values). One may decide to operate in this anolyte-transient fashion so as to minimize the complexity of having to produce and insert a unique solution composition for the anolyte chamber at startup. Typically the anolyte feed stream is relatively richer in acid (to allow for proton migration across the cell separator) and relatively poorer in tin compared to the anolyte steady state values. During plating, the anolyte is continuously reducing its acid concentration and increasing its tin concentration due to tin production from the active anode and preferential migration of protons through the separator. So, if one initially charges the anolyte with acid-rich steady state feed stream concentrations, some time must pass before the concentration in the anolyte will reach the tin rich steady state concentrations In some embodiments, alternatively one can charge the anode chamber with a solution of a tin-rich solution having a concentration that is different than the anolyte feed concentrations and corresponding to the steady state acid and tin target concentrations, thereby avoiding any transient anolyte behavior and influence of that transient anolyte on catholyte concentrations.
One (1.0) bath charge turnover corresponds to a state in which an electroplating tool has passed an amount of charge through the plating cell and the catholyte contained or circulated therein, such as to plate an amount of metal (e.g. tin) equal to the total amount of metal contained in the catholyte. In those embodiments, where the cathode chamber is fluidically connected to a reservoir containing catholyte, the catholyte encompasses both the electrolyte in the plating cell and in the reservoir (also referred to as the “plating bath”). To further clarify and illustrate this meaning, the following example is provided. If a plating tool contains a plating bath (reservoir) with a volume of 50 liters, and a plating cell which contains catholyte fluid held within the cell equal to 10 liters, the total catholyte volume is 50+10=60 L. If we further assume that the catholyte contains a first metal (tin) at a concentration of 70 g/L, then the total amount of tin contained in the tool's catholyte at all times will be 70 g/L×60 L=4200 g (and be substantially the same throughout the operation). When 4200 g of tin have been electroplated, the catholyte has undergone one bath charge turnover. The bath charge turnover concept allows one to maintain a consistent metric of plating bath use across baths and tools of different sizes and tools used for plating of various metals. It is noted that a bath charge turnover should not be confused with a bath fluidic turnover. The latter is the fractional number of times a bath has had is volume exchanged with new material (i.e. replenished and refreshed, or bleed and feed with new material).
In other words a single bath charge turnover corresponds to the state of tool operation wherein, starting with a “fresh bath”, the amount of metal deposited since the fresh bath was installed equals the amount of metal contained in the in the catholyte of the tool (including both that in the cell and in any auxiliary baths). From a practical matter, in the case of tin silver plating, the difference between the amount of total metal plated vs. the amount of tin plated is relatively small. In other cases where the two metals' concentrations in the deposits are similar, bath charge turnover would correspond to the total amount of both metals extracted from catholyte to the substrate in comparison to the amount initially present in the catholyte. When the term “bath charge turnover” is applied to a system which employs bleed and feed (continuous addition and removal of electrolyte), it is understood that the atoms of metal being plated need not necessarily be the same atoms that were originally present in the bath (e.g., metal ions delivered from the feed stream can be plated)—however the amount of metal or metals plated should correspond to the amount of metal or metals originally present in the catholyte held in the cell and reservoir (if a catholyte-containing reservoir is part of a plating system.
The continuous method compares favorably to batch processes in that the plating bath does not need to be disposed of and the tool reconfigured for extremely long periods of use and in that concentrations of bath components can be maintained stable for long periods of use, such that many thousands of substrates (e.g., 2000 or more) can be processed sequentially under substantially the same bath concentration conditions without dumping the bath. Typically an inert anode bath operation can run no more than 2 bath charge turnovers before the bath is no longer useful (for example, due to the acid concentration reaching its upper limits, such that the total dissolved solids or the total organic additives have exceeded their solubility).
The provided design and operating parameters provide long lived plating baths (anolyte and catholyte) that maintain a steady state composition. The stable composition provides good wafer-to-wafer plating uniformity over many wafers without requiring a change of the plating bath. In some embodiments (e.g. with wafer substrates having only 1-10% exposed wafer open area), roughly 1-5% of the plating bath is replaced via bleed and feed over the course of one day. In other embodiments with substrates having large plating surface areas (e.g. 15-30% wafer open area), 10-20% of the plating bath is replaced via bleed and feed over the course of the day. In general, when a tool having an inert anode, and the tool having an active anode provided herein are compared, and when both tools use a bleed and feed method in order to maintain time constant bath properties, about 40% or less of the amount of expensive low-alpha soluble tin must be fed to the active anode tool described herein than in a tool that uses an inert anode. Thus, a tool operating according to embodiments provided herein is significantly more efficient and in this tool there is relatively less cost associated with preparing and transporting the electrolyte. There is also relatively smaller amounts of potentially high-value low alpha tin waste produced. This should further be compared to the situation encountered when using conventional batch processes which employ inert anodes. In some circumstances (depending on batch bath lifetimes) the current invention cost of operation is superior to inert anode batch operations. And inert anode-based processes can generate ever increasing concentrations of acid and oxygen and/or salt which cannot be easily removed, typically limiting the life of the plating bath to a couple “charge turnovers.”
It should be pointed out that while all sources of low alpha tin are expensive, sources in which the tin is provided in a pre-formulated plating solution are particularly expensive. Put another way, generally the commercial cost per gram of low-alpha tin metal is much less than the cost of tin per gram in a low alpha tin ion solution. Therefore, it is desirable to use low alpha tin metal or oxide as a low alpha tin metal source. Particularly, the use of a tool that employs low alpha tin anodes appears to be particularly attractive due to the lower cost. However, there are additional benefits to using a tin anode system over a tin solution along with a dimensionally stable anode. The silver can also be recovered from the electrolyte and reconstituted into the silver ion feed solution (these electrolyte feed solutions are sometimes referred to as metal concentrates or, virgin makeup solutions, or “VMS”).
Most (but not all) current processes for depositing tin-silver alloys employ batch processing with an inert anode. An inert anode is sometimes referred to as a dimensionally stable anode because it does not change shape during its useful life. It typically includes a surface coating of an inert material such as a rhodium-platinum alloy and takes the form of a screen or mesh. Unfortunately, acid and oxygen are generated at the dimensionally stable anode. Thus, the total free acid in the electrolyte continuously increases and small oxygen bubbles must be separated to avoid coating of the wafer surface and blocking plating (oxygen bubble defects). The inert anode can also oxidize the bath additive, complexers, and stannous ion to stannic ion as discussed above. Eventually the acid concentration becomes so great and the plating bath becomes so concentrated and degraded that it must be diluted and/or replaced. While a high acid concentration is desirable for many types of electrodeposition, changes in concentration result in changing wafer performance over the life of the bath which affects within die uniformity and within feature shape. Because the electrolyte composition varies over the life of the bath, wafer-to-wafer processing is not consistent. In a typical batch process, fresh electrolyte has an acid concentration of about 100 g/l methane sulfonic acid which increases over the life of the bath to about 250 to 300 g/l. Periodically, tin and silver anions are added to the bath but their anions are not consumed, so the acid concentration and concentrations of additive breakdown products continue to increase. A bath used in a conventional process is good for about 1.5 to 2 charge turnovers (this can be extended slightly with dilution at the end of life) before reaching an acid concentration of about 300 g/l, at which time it must be replaced.
The apparatus described herein has an intricate combination of fluidic features and an associated controller, which are configured to provide a continuous process with a stable bath chemistry. The apparatus is designed to operate with a separating structure, which is permeable to protons, water, and optionally, to tin ions during plating, where all three of these species flow from the anode chamber to the cathode chamber during plating. As it was mentioned above, silver ions substantially do not cross from catholyte to anolyte during plating. These properties of the separator cause a number of unique challenges for maintaining mass, volume, and pressure balance in the plating system. These challenges are addressed by providing fluidic features and an associated controller, coupled to the apparatus and configured to deliver an acid solution to the anode chamber from a source outside the anode chamber; deliver a solution comprising ions of the first metal (e.g., tin) to the anode chamber from a source outside the anode chamber; remove a portion of the catholyte from the cathode chamber; deliver ions of a second metal (e.g., silver) to the cathode chamber (via delivery of a solution comprising ions of the second metal and/or using an auxiliary anode comprising the second metal); and deliver anolyte from the anode chamber to the cathode chamber via a conduit that is different from the separation structure.
Tin, in the absence of strong complexing agents or anions (e.g. cyanides or oxalates), requires a strongly acidic environment (generally less than pH 2) to remain in solution. Tin is very soluble in acidic solutions of methanesulfonic acid (as tin methanesulfonate). One can consider use of high pH solutions, but in the presence of strong tin complexing agents the potential for tin deposition shifts further negative, making it increasingly difficult to plate without causing the electrolysis of water. Therefore, in many embodiments, a highly acidic tin solution is desirable. Silver is relatively soluble in methanesulfonic acid (but not significantly as a sulfate), and with the use of a silver complexing agent, the reduction potential of complexed silver can be brought to within about 0.3V of tin. However, being a large and heavy ion, tin's ionic mobility is about 15 times smaller than that of a proton in the electrolyte and generally 30-50 times smaller within a cationic membrane. Since it is desirable to have relatively high acidity in the anolyte to maintain tin solubility and the due to naturally higher proton mobility, the fractional ionic current carried by tin across the separator is generally small (about 20% or less) in many embodiments. Therefore, to maintain acidity and tin in solution in the anolyte, acid must be added to the anolyte. That acid carries most (in some cases almost all) of the ionic current across the separator, and this migration of protons (combined with electrochemical dissolution of the tin anode) results in a continuously increasing tin and decreasing acid concentration in the anolyte. To combat the tendency for the pH to rise in the anolyte, the tendency of tin to accumulate in the anolyte and not to transport to the catholyte and to prevent tin from precipitating out of solution in the anolyte, a high concentration acid anolyte feed is introduced together with periodic removal of a relatively low acid/high tin (in concentration) anolyte material before the precipitation occurs. The tin generated by the anode and dissolved in the anolyte is physically moved to the catholyte (to the cathode chamber of the cell or a reservoir) via a fluidic conduit other than the separator, where the fluidic conduit may be equipped with a pump. In other words, anolyte solution is directed from the anode chamber to the cathode chamber or to a catholyte-containing reservoir (“cascade” stream). This process maintains the balance and stability of the system and enables a continuous stable operation.
Among the various effects addressed by this cascading and bleed and feed operations are the following:
1. depletion of acid relative to tin ions from the anolyte
2. electroosmotic drag—The cations passing through the separator from anolyte to catholyte are coordinated with water molecules and drag some water with them, resulting in a depletion of water in the anode chamber. A continuous increase in concentration of anolyte and an unsustainable pressure difference could build up if electroosmotic drag is not addressed. It is noted that in many embodiments provided herein there is no net osmotic transfer of water in the opposite direction (from catholyte to anolyte), and in many embodiments ionic strength difference between anolyte and catholyte is not as great as to cause osmotic effects, while electroosmotic drag of water from anolyte to catholyte can be pronounced.
3. gradual increase in tin concentration in the anode and cathode chambers. Approximately 100% of the charge passed through the anode will go to producing tin ions (in the case of a consumable anode). Only 98% of the same charge passed through the cathode will plate tin ions. Depending on the operators' compositional target, about 2% of the charge through to the cathode will plate silver. This problem is not as significant when a silver anode is employed as a source of silver ions.
4. organic additives are consumed or broken down—levelers are typically consumed in the deposit and/or broken down. Accelerator and brighteners decompose and are gradually lost.
5. silver complexing agents need to be replenished. These typically contain thiols, sulfides, sulfonamides, mercaptans or other organic moieties that can become oxidized during normal operation.
An example of a suitable apparatus for plating in accordance with embodiments provided herein is illustrated in
In the apparatus 200, an anode 210, which is a consumable tin anode, is typically located in a lower region of the plating cell 205. A semiconductor wafer 215 is positioned in catholyte retained in the catholyte chamber 225 and is rotated during plating by a wafer holder 220. Rotation can be bidirectional. In the depicted embodiment the plating cell 205 has a lid 221 over the cathode chamber. The semiconductor wafer is electrically connected to a power supply (not shown) and is negatively biased during electroplating, such that it serves as a cathode. The active tin anode is connected to the positive terminal of the power supply. A separator 250 which is at a minimum cationically conductive for protons and inhibits direct fluid flow transfer between the anolyte and catholyte chambers, is located between the anode and the wafer (the cathode) as it separates and defines an anode chamber 245 and a cathode chamber 225. The isolated anodic region of the plating cell is often referred to as a Separated Anode Chamber (SAC). An electroplating apparatus having a SAC is described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 6,527,920 issued on Mar. 4, 2003 to Mayer et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,890,416 issued on May 10, 2005 to Mayer et. al., and U.S. Pat. No. 6,821,407 issued Nov. 23, 2004 to Reid et al., which are herein incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Separator 250 allows selective cationic communication between the separated anode chamber and the cathode chamber, while preventing any particles generated at the anode from entering the proximity of the wafer and contaminating it. The separator, as mentioned, allows flow of protons, from anolyte to catholyte during plating. Further, the separator may allow passage of water from anolyte to catholyte, which moves along with the protons. In some embodiments, the separator is also permeable to tin ions during plating, where the tin ions will move from anolyte to catholyte, when potential difference is applied (but not in the absence of potential difference). The separator may also be useful in prohibiting anionic and non-ionic species such as bath additives from passing though the separator and being degraded at the anode surface, and as such, in some embodiments, the anolyte contained in the anode chamber remains substantially free of organic additive species (such as accelerators, levelers, suppressors, grain refiners, and silver complexers) present in the catholyte that are used to control within wafer, within die or within feature uniformity or various metrological properties.
The separator having these properties can include an ionomer, e.g., a cationic polyfluorinated polymer having sulphonate groups, such as the commercially available product made by DuPont de Nemours provided under the trade name Nafion. The ionomer can be mechanically reinforced, e.g., by incorporation of reinforcing fibers within the ionomer membrane, or externally by a mechanical construct, and can reside on a mechanically strong support such as. a solid material with drilled holes to create a reticulated structure, or a continuously sintered microporous material, e.g., a microporous sheet material such as Porex™.
It has been demonstrated that some cationic ionomer membranes, such as the sulfonated tetrafluorethylene based fluoropolymers like that developed in the late 1960's by Dupont under the tradename Nafion, effectively block essentially all transport of silver and stannous ions by diffusion. Data demonstrating Nafion's effectiveness was collected. Silver and tin ions are relatively large, which may cause steric hindrance in their movement through the membrane's hydrated pores. In one of the tests, on one side of the cationic membrane, silver complexing agent, silver ions, tin ions (both as methanesulfonate salts), MSA, and plating additive were present. On the other side of the membrane is a solution containing only MSA (no tin, acid, complexer, or additives). The solution on the tin and silver free side of the membrane was continuously stirred and samples were periodically withdrawn and measured by inductive coupled plasma (ICP) for even low level trace amounts of silver and tin ions. No potential difference was applied in this test. Chemical analysis for the presence of additive and complexer indicated that these species were not detected (minimum detection limit for these is estimated to be about 10% of that present in the initial solutions). Further, a nearly perfect inhibition of diffusive transport for the silver and tin metals and at least good suppression of the organic components transference, was observed. It has been also demonstrated that Nafion membrane, while blocking stannous ions transfer via a diffusion mechanism in the absence of potential difference, permits transfer of stannous ions via a migration mechanism during electroplating. This test was done by placing an inert anode in the tin and silver solution side of the membrane, and a platinum cathode in the initially acid-only side of the system, and measuring the change in acid and tin in both sides of the cell. The results show that about 10-15 percent of the current is carried by tin under the situation where the total ionic strength of the two side is equivalent but the tin concentration is 200 g/L and acid 50 g/L on the anolyte side.
Silver transport to the anolyte (which is present in the catholyte as a complex) can be limited by selecting appropriate silver complexes with large effective ionic radii. Complexing agents with strong binding energies and low free silver bath content are preferred because the thermal energy to break the complex bond is lacking and the concentration and diffusion of the relatively smaller free ion will be thereby limited. In general larger silver complexes will exhibit smaller bulk diffusion coefficients. But while high complexing strength materials are generally preferred, since silver deposition is a diffusion limited process, a balance must be considered. Smaller bulk diffusion coefficient will result in a lower diffusion limited deposition rate at the same bulk silver concentration and so high silver content is required to compensate, leading to no net benefit. In some embodiments, silver complexer with effective ionic radii between 6-20 Å and bulk diffusion coefficients between 2E-6 and 1E-7 cm2/sec appear to be optimal.
As it was mentioned, the anolyte contains ions of tin and protons but is substantially free of silver ions. During plating, the current is carried through the separator by protons, thereby depleting the anolyte of acid. Further, water is typically carried with the protons through the separator during plating, thereby reducing the volume of anolyte. Stannous ion can also travel through the separator during plating in this embodiment (even though the separator may be impermeable to stannous ion in the absence of potential difference). These conditions can lead to precipitation of tin-containing species in the anolyte, in the absence of active fluidic control of the system (including the ability to replace removed protons and to remove increasing concentrations of tin such as tin to maintain tin concentration and acidity).
In the depicted embodiment, the apparatus includes the following fluidic features that are configured to maintain balance in the continuous plating system.
In the embodiment depicted in
The apparatus (in both embodiments shown in
The apparatus further contains fluidic features configured to add acid and stannous ion to the anolyte. Addition of acid and stannous ion can be accomplished at any desired point—directly to the anode chamber, to the lines of the anolyte circulation loop, or to the pressure regulator, as depicted in
The apparatus further includes a fluidic conduit 259, configured for delivering anolyte containing acid and stannous ion from the anode chamber to the cathode chamber or to the reservoir 290 containing surplus catholyte (in the embodiment of
The cathode chamber of the apparatus, depicted in the embodiments shown in
Further, the apparatus includes an outlet in the cathode chamber and associated fluidic features 261, configured to remove a portion of the catholyte from the cathode chamber. This stream is referred to as a “bleed” stream and typically contains silver ions, tin ions, acid, complexer and additives (such as grain refiners, brighteners, suppressors, accelerator and leveler). This stream is significant for maintaining overall mass and volume balance of the plating cell. In the embodiment depicted in
Fluidic features, referred to herein, may include but are not limited to fluid conduits (including lines and weirs), fluid inlets, fluid outlets, valves, level sensors and flow meters. As can be appreciated, any of the valves may include manual valves, air controlled valves, needle valves, electronically controlled valves, bleed valves and/or any other suitable type of valve.
A controller 270 is coupled to the apparatus and is configured to control all aspects of plating including parameters of feeding anolyte and catholyte, bleeding the catholyte, delivering anolyte to catholyte, etc. Specifically the controller is configured to monitor and control parameters (e.g. current, charge passed, bath levels, flow rates, and timing of dosing) related to need for addition of acid to anolyte, stannous ions to anolyte, water to anolyte, silver ions to catholyte, additive to the catholyte, complexer to the catholyte, delivery of anolyte to catholyte, and of bleeding (removal) of catholyte.
The controller can be configured for coulometric control of the plating process. For example, bleed-and-feed and cascading can be controlled, based on the amount of Coulombs passed through the system. In specific examples, dosing of acid, and stannous ion to anolyte, dosing of silver to catholyte, cascading of anolyte to catholyte, and bleed from the catholyte can be initiated after a pre-determined number of Coulombs passed through the system. In some embodiments, these are controlled, in response to pre-determined time that has elapsed, or in response to the number of substrates processed. In some embodiments, dosing of water to compensate for evaporation is made periodically (feed forward time based) and/or in a feedback mode based on changes in measured bath volume.
In some embodiments, the controller is also configured to adjust parameters of the system (such as flow rates in the mentioned streams, and timing of dosing) in response to feedback signals received from the system. For example, concentrations of plating bath components can be monitored in anolyte and/or catholyte using a variety of sensors and titrations (e.g., pH sensors, voltammetry, acid or chemical titrations, spectrophotometric sensors, conductivity sensors, density sensors, etc.). In some embodiments the concentrations of electrolyte components are determined externally using a separate monitoring system, which reports them to the controller. In other embodiments raw information collected from the system is communicated to the controller which conducts concentration determinations from the raw data. In both cases the controller is configured to adjust dosing parameters in response to these signals and/or concentrations such as to maintain homeostasis in the system. Further, in some embodiments, volume sensors, fluid level sensors, and pressure sensors may be employed to provide feedback to the controller.
Two illustrative examples of a balance of catholyte and anolyte suitable for a system, depicted in
Catholyte:
Catholyte composition: 70 g/L Sn+2 as a salt of methanesulfonic acid;
Catholyte Bleed:
Catholyte containing stannous ion, silver ion, methanesulfonic acid, the TS-202 grain refiner, and TS-SLG silver complexer is bled as necessary.
Anolyte:
Amount of tin dissolved from the tin anode into anolyte per day: 494 Ahr/day, 2.21 g/Ahr, 1.1 Kg/day of tin;
Anolyte Additions:
If one were to plate a larger amount of material (e.g. 2 times than shown above) in a day and wanted to use a catholyte and anolyte having concentrations as above, then one can increase the flow rates of each streams proportionately and the system will remain in balance. If one wishes to use different catholyte and/or anolyte concentrations, a system-wide mass balance is calculated to determine appropriate suitable inlet and outlet mass and volumetric flow rate.
Plating was performed in an apparatus having two plating cells and one bath (reservoir). Tin-silver having 2.5% of silver by weight was plated at a deposition rate of 3.8 micrometers a minute, to a thickness of about 100 micrometers. Open area on the substrate was 20% and plating diameter on the substrate was 296.5 mm. The amount of charge passed through the system per wafer was 16365 Col/wafer. The maximum output was 3.5 wafers/hour with 84 wafers plated per day.
Catholyte/bath (input):
Volume: 50 L
Catholyte composition: 70 g/L Sn+2 as a salt of methanesulfonic acid;
Anolyte composition (input):
Stannous ion concentration: 230 g/L;
Methanesulfonic acid concentration: 50 g/L;
Amount of tin dissolved from the tin anode into anolyte per day: 2.21 g/Ahr, 844.3 g/day of tin;
Anolyte Additions:
The apparatus, such as described in
In some embodiments, an apparatus which has a combination of features shown in
In many embodiments the spent electrolyte (e.g., catholyte from the bleed stream, 261 or the catholyte drained from the reservoir 290) is not discarded but at least a portion thereof is regenerated and is reused in the plating apparatus. The regeneration process removes the more noble metal from the spend electrolyte (e.g. silver). In other cases the additive and acid concentrations are reduced or removed. A system configured for regenerating tin and/or silver to form solutions that are suitable for reintroduction to the electrolyte, can be physically coupled to the plating apparatus and may be fluidically connected with electrolyte (e.g. regenerated electrolyte can be directed into the anolyte feed stream). In other embodiments, the regeneration system may be separate from the plating apparatus and the regeneration apparatus can produce a regeneration feed stock (e.g. manufactured remotely feed back to the tool, such as delivered and stored in containers which can be then placed onto the tool or a bulk chemical deliver system connected to the tool). The regeneration system typically includes a station configured for receiving spent electrolyte (e.g. catholyte bleed stream) and separating silver from the tin solution. The regeneration system can further include a station configured for preparing tin and silver solutions that are suitable for reuse in the plating apparatus.
One of the embodiments of an apparatus having a regeneration system for tin is shown in
In an alternative silver extraction process, a portion of catholyte (typically equal to about the volume of catholyte additions) is removed from the spent solution (e.g., cathode chamber or reservoir bleed stream) and disposed of. The remaining portion of the spent solution is contacted with tin metal having large surface area. For example, the solution can be passed through a reaction vessel containing high surface are tin metal or tin metal bed (fixed or fluidized bed of metal particles, spheres, etc.), whereby the silver is displaced with tin by the process of electrolyte displacement.
2Ag++Sn→2Ag (extracted)+Sn+2
The tin metal in the extraction vessel is typically low alpha tin metal, so that the solution created maintains its low alpha properties. The fluid may be passed once or may pass multiple times through the bed of tin in the silver extraction vessel until the extraction process is complete. This displacement reaction process is the same one we purposely avoid in the cell (silver is made not to contact the tin anode) so that silver is not removed from the catholyte and is present to be deposited on the wafer. But here it is used to regenerate silver-free solution that is introduced into the silver free anolyte chamber, and silver is added back into the system in the catholyte.
The apparatuses described in
As it was mentioned, in some embodiments the anode chamber is coupled to a pressure regulator which is capable of equalizing the pressure in the anode chamber with atmospheric pressure. Such pressure-regulating mechanism is described in detail in U.S. application Ser. No. 13/051,822 titled “ELECTROLYTE LOOP FOR PRESSURE REGULATION FOR SEPARATED ANODE CHAMBER OF ELECTROPLATING SYSTEM” filed on Mar. 18, 2011 and naming Rash et al. as inventors, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety and for all purposes.
In operation, anolyte from a separated anode chamber such as chamber 245 shown in
The electrolyte pushed into center column 504 flows upward to a top 505 of column 504, where it spills over into an annular gap 528 and comes into contact with a filter 510. In various embodiments, gap 528 is relatively small to facilitate efficient filtering. As an example, gap 528 may be about 0.1 to 0.3 inches wide. Note that filter 510 is sealed to column 504 at, for example, the base of filter 510. An o-ring may be employed for this purpose. Note also that the depicted design includes an interstitial space 508 directly above the top 505 of column 504. This provides room for accommodating transient electrolyte surges out of column 504.
The pressure head of electrolyte in column 504 is responsible for maintaining a constant pressure within the separated anode chambers of the plating cells serviced by pressure regulator 502. Effectively, it is the height of central column 504 (at least the height above the electrolyte in the plating cell(s)) that dictates the pressure experienced by the electrolyte in the separated anode chambers. Of course, the pressure within these anode chambers is also influenced by the pump which drives recirculation of electrolyte from pressure regulator 502 and into the separated anode chambers.
The electrolyte flowing out of the top of column 504 encounters filter 510, as mentioned. The filter is preferably configured to remove any bubbles or particles of a certain size from the electrolyte flowing up through and out of column 504. The filter may include various pleats or other structures designed to provide a high surface area for greater contact with the electrolyte and more effective filtering. The pleats or other high surface area structure may occupy a void region within housing 503. Electrolyte passing through filter 510 will enter into a void region 523 between housing 503 and the outside of filter 510. The fluid in this region will flow down into an accumulator 524, where it may reside temporarily as it is drawn out of regulator 502.
Specifically, in the depicted embodiment, the electrolyte passing through filter 510 is drawn out of pressure regulator 502 through an exit port 516. An exit port such as port 516 is connected to a pump which draws out the electrolyte and forces recirculation through the separated anode chamber(s).
It may be desirable for filtered electrolyte temporarily accumulating within pressure regulating device 502 to maintain a certain height in region 523. To this end, the depicted device includes level sensors 512 and 514. In certain embodiments, the system is operated under the influence of a controller such that the liquid in region 523 remains at a level between sensors 512 and 514. If the electrolyte drops below level 512, the system is in danger of having the pump run dry, a condition which could cause serious damage to the pump. Therefore, if a controller senses that the electrolyte is dropping below level 512, appropriate steps may be taken to counteract this dangerous condition. For example, the controller may direct that additional make up solution or DI water be provided into the anolyte recirculation loop.
If, on the other hand, the electrolyte rises to a level above that sensed by sensor 514, the controller may take steps to reduce the amount of recirculating anolyte by, optionally, draining a certain amount of electrolyte from the recirculation loop. This could be accomplished by, for example, directing an associated aspirators to remove electrolyte from the open flow loop. Note that pressure regulator 502 is outfitted with a separate overflow outlet 518 which will allow excess electrolyte to drain out of the pressure regulator and into a reservoir holding the plating bath. This outlet may serve as an alternative passive means of transfer from the anolyte to the catholyte as part of the cascade process. As mentioned, such reservoir (the plating bath) may provide electrolyte directly to a cathode chamber of the plating cells. Also, as mentioned, a conduit connected to exit port 518 may provide an opening to atmospheric pressure such as via connection to a trough which receives the electrolyte before flowing into a plating bath reservoir. Alternatively, or in addition, the pressure regulator may include a vent mechanism. In the depicted embodiment, an optional vent hole 526 is included under a finger of cap 520. The finger is designed to prevent spraying electrolyte from directly passing out of regulator 502.
As noted, an open loop design such as that described herein maintains a substantially constant pressure in the anode chamber. Thus, in some embodiments, it is unnecessary to monitor the pressure of the anode chamber with a pressure transducer or other mechanism. Of course, there may be other reasons to monitor pressure in the system, for example to confirm that the pump is continuing to function and circulate electrolyte.
The apparatus and processes described hereinabove may be used in conjunction with lithographic patterning tools or processes, for example, for the fabrication or manufacture of semiconductor devices. Typically, though not necessarily, such tools/processes will be used or conducted together in a common fabrication facility. Lithographic patterning of a film typically comprises some or all of the following steps, each step enabled with a number of possible tools: (1) application of photoresist on a workpiece, i.e., substrate, using a spin-on or spray-on tool; (2) curing of photoresist using a hot plate or furnace or UV curing tool; (3) exposing the photoresist to visible or UV or x-ray light through a mask using a tool such as a wafer stepper; (4) developing the resist so as to selectively remove resist and thereby pattern it using a tool such as a wet bench; (5) transferring the resist pattern into an underlying film or workpiece by using a dry or plasma-assisted etching tool; and (6) removing the resist using a tool such as an RF or microwave plasma resist stripper. This process may provide a pattern of features such as Damascene, TSV, RDL, or WLP features that may be electrofilled with silver tin using the above-described apparatus. In some embodiments, electroplating occurs after the resist has been patterned but before the resist is removed (through resist plating).
As indicated above, various embodiments include a system controller having instructions for controlling process operations in accordance with the present invention. For example, a pump control may be directed by an algorithm making use of signals from the level sensor(s) in the pressure regulating device. For example, if a signal from a lower level sensor shown in
The system controller will typically include one or more memory devices and one or more processors configured to execute the instructions so that the apparatus will perform a method in accordance with the present invention. Machine-readable media containing instructions for controlling process operations in accordance with the present invention may be coupled to the system controller.
Regeneration of Metals
As it was previously mentioned, it is desirable to regenerate some or all of one or both metals from spent electrolyte, and, preferably reuse them in the plating apparatus. A regeneration method employing electrowinning of silver was described with reference to
When acid-containing solution is added to the anode chamber and tin ion solution is transferred to the cathode chamber, as described in
The bled catholyte includes a significant amount (e.g. half or more) of the amount of low alpha tin ion that is plated, which represents a significant waste and expense. Therefore, in some embodiments, regeneration processes for recovering this high value low alpha tin ions and using them to replenish the electrolyte and recirculate them as a cascade transfer medium rather than as a waste stream, are provided.
In accordance with Pourbaix (also known as pH-stability) diagrams of uncomplexed tin and silver ions, silver ion is stable at pH levels from −2 to about 8, but tin ions are only stable at pH<2. In the complexed state, silver ions may be stable over a broader pH range. In certain embodiments, these solubility characteristics of tin and silver ions are exploited in order to isolate, separate and in some instances reconstitute the ions for reintroduction into the plating system.
Referring to
In some embodiments, the silver is also recovered, e.g. via a precipitation reaction, although this is not always necessary. In the embodiments in which silver is precipitated, at least two separate chambers are required outside the plating cell. One of these chambers is used to precipitate the tin compound (at a range of 2<pH<4 for the first chamber process fluid) and the other chamber is used to precipitate a silver compound (at a pH>8). One of ordinary skill in the art would appreciate that less than the total number of reactor vessels may be used to treat, isolate, precipitate, redissolve precipitate, etc. In one embodiment a tin concentrate solution is created by this procedure (e.g. a solution having tin ion concentration of 200-350 g/L, and acid concentration of 20-120 g/L), which is subsequently mixed with and diluted with water and acid to create a “low tin”/“high-acid” concentration as needed for the anolyte feed in the process described herein. In another embodiment, the low tin, high acid concentration solution is created, suitable for direct injection into the anolyte chamber (e.g. having tin concentration of about 70-120 g/L, acid concentration of about 180 to 250 g/L), if manufactured directly.
In all embodiments, a carbon filtration system is optionally employed to remove organic components in cases where they may precipitate in combination with the metals, for example, degraded grain refiner and complexing components from the stream bled out of the cathode chamber. If the organic compounds remain dissolved under conditions where the metal oxides or salts are formed, than they can be removed with the filtrate. In other cases, the organic additives are not removed and are circulated through the system, and the replacement of breakdown products is accomplished by continuously removing a fraction of the bleed stream to waste and adding additional additive and complexers as required. This is a natural requirement as the amount of tin in the bleed stream is generally larger than that in the feed stream, since excess tin is created at the anode vs. plated at the cathode due to the deposition of silver (an exception to this is when an active silver anode is used in the catholyte chamber).
In the embodiment described in relation to method 700 of
In the embodiment described in relation to method 800 of
In the embodiment described in relation to method 900 of
Note that in these various embodiments, the dissolution of the precipitated tin compound can be performed under conditions and in amounts such that the resulting acid solution of tin has the same concentration as a tin concentrate solution or any variety of concentration of tin and acid, and can be used as such in operating plating cells.
The final depicted regeneration process is described in relation to method 1000 of
The methods described herein can be implemented in and as an integrated part of the plating tool apparatus, i.e. they are integrated together with the plating tool, including the bath metrology and control systems. As an alternative, the bleed bath materials can be moved to a separate backroom and one can implement apparatus in the fabrication facility to regenerate the electrolytes and return them to the plating tool. By analogy, some modern fabrication facilities have sub fab back room for waste treatment and metal recovery apparatus for removing copper from the plating solution (typically involving electrowinning and ion-exchange operations), but the plating solution are not regenerated on the tool or at the facility for reuse. Rather, new solution are fed, metal is sometime recovered on site, and the remaining liquid solution are treated or removed as waste. Regeneration apparatus described herein preferably is part of the plating tool, or less favorably but suitably reside in a portion of the fabrication facility where various chemical supplies are provided to the entire fab. Examples of such supplies include supplies of fresh plating solution, deionized water, etc. The bleed material from the tool can of course also be removed from the fabrication site, and regenerated by reprocessing off site and thereafter returned to the facility, though this involves transportation of potentially large volumes of hazardous materials adding cost and logistical issues. These back room and off site procedures are still considered regeneration processes within the scope of the invention.
Referring to an example of mass balance of a plating cell under steady state operation, provided in reference to
While in many embodiments described above the separator structure includes a cation-exchange membrane, such as Nafion, in alternative embodiments the separator can have a structure as follows.
In some embodiments the separator provides a quiescent region, where no convection occurs, allowing a gentle concentration gradient of metal 2 ions (e.g., silver) to establish. This minimizes the driving force for diffusion of metal 2 ions into the anode chamber. In one embodiment, the separator includes at least one membrane that substantially blocks transport of organic electroplating additives and separator also includes a porous internal structure that maintains the electrolyte contained therein in a substantially quiescent state. In one embodiment, separator is between about 1 cm and about 5 cm thick. The separation structure is substantially rigid so as not to disturb the quiescent region. By virtue of having such a separator structure, metal 1 ions and metal 2 ions both occupy the catholyte and therefore both are plating together onto the wafer, however, virtually no metal 2 ions enter the anolyte and therefore issues with metal 2 depositing onto anode 210 are avoided.
In one implementation the separator structure includes a first membrane, a porous support, and a second membrane, where the porous support is sandwiched between the first and second membranes. In one embodiment, each of the first and the second membrane are cationic membranes, such as, but not limited to, those described in the following U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,126,798 and 6,569,299 issued to Reid et al., U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/337,147, entitled Electroplating Apparatus With Vented Electrolyte Manifold, filed Dec. 17, 2008, U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 61/139,178, entitled PLATING METHOD AND APPARATUS WITH MULTIPLE INTERNALLY IRRIGATED CHAMBERS, filed Dec. 19, 2008, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Porous support has a porous structure and is substantially rigid so as to provide a support structure for membranes above and below it. In one embodiment, the porous support is a sintered plastic material, for example, Porex™ (a brand name for sintered polymeric materials, commercially available from Porex Corporation of Fairburn, Ga.), although any porous material that is resistant to the electrolyte so as to negatively affect plating performance will suffice. Other examples include sintered porous glass, porous sintered ceramics, solgels, aerogels and the like. In one embodiment, the pores in the porous support are in the size regime of angstroms to microns. In one embodiment the pores are between about 50 Å and about 100 μm in average diameter. Hydrophillic materials with smaller pores are preferred as they are more resistive to convective flow. In this example, the quiescent region is formed by virtue of the porosity and thickness of porous support. Porous support typically, but not necessarily, has larger pore size than the membranes sandwiching it.
As mentioned, resistance to passage of metal 2 ions to the anode chamber is achieved by virtue of the quiescent region established in the separator structure.
First, diffusion through such separator will be discussed. In the example of tin and silver plating, silver ions (metal 2 ions) are introduced into the cathode chamber. The concentration difference in silver ions across the separator will drive silver ions toward the anode chamber and similarly the concentration difference in tin ions across the separator will drive tin ions toward the cathode chamber. Since the ionic radii of Sn+2 and Ag+1 are nearly the same, 112 picometers and 115 picometers, respectively, and Sn+2 ions must pass from the anode chamber through the separator structure into the cathode chamber, the pores of each of the membranes and the porous support must be large enough to allow this transport. So, diffusion of silver ions into the anode chamber, although undesirable, is possible if the only (or overriding) mode of mass transport were diffusion. The first membrane of the separation structure is the first barrier that the silver ions must traverse in order to arrive at the anode chamber. Although membranes and porous support do not have pores small enough to exclude silver ions, there is a barrier to silver ions passing through the sandwiched structure by virtue of the quiescent region established therebetween.
The second mass transport phenomenon is electromigration due to the electric field established between the cathode and the anode. This drives metal ions, both silver and tin, toward the wafer. This driving force goes against diffusion driving force for silver ions into and through the quiescent region established by the separator structure, while at the same time favors transport of tin ions through the separator structure.
Third, there are convective forces. Electrolyte is pumped into the anode chamber, and particularly onto the anode itself to prevent passivation. Additionally, the wafer is rotated in the cathode chamber, thereby setting up convective flows. Convection in the catholyte brings fresh silver ions in separator surface to maintain a relatively high concentration of silver at the separator, which concentration would be otherwise lower due to slight diffusion into the separator. Conversely convection in anode chamber clears out any silver ions at the separator interface immediately after they make their way into the anode chamber. The convection in the cathode and anode chambers maintains an artificially high concentration gradient across the separator and therefore promotes diffusion.
In some embodiments, anolyte is pumped through porous support of the separation structure in order to periodically flush any silver ions that may have entered the separator structure. By virtue of the small pore size of each of membranes in the separation structure relative to the pore size of the porous support, during these flushes, the bulk of the flushes traverse laterally through the porous support and out to an exit. In one embodiment, the exiting flushes are introduced into the catholyte and a corresponding amount of catholyte is drained. In one embodiment, these periodic flushes are performed as part of a bleed and feed process of replenishing acid and/or other electrolyte components in order to maintain steady state plating conditions.
Therefore, although not wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that by virtue of the quiescent region of the separator structure and periodic flushing of the porous support of the separator structure, virtually no silver ions enter the anode chamber during plating.
In a some embodiments, the separator between the anode and cathode chambers provides various functions which may include the following: (1) impeding passage of ions of the more noble metal (e.g., silver ions) from the cathode chamber to the anode chamber, (2) preventing organic plating additives (e.g., accelerators, suppressors, and/or levelers and their decomposition and byproducts) from passing from the cathode chamber to the anode chamber, and (3) preventing fluid from passing between the anode and cathode chambers (optional).
A separator between the anode and cathode chambers may have one or more of the following structural features: (1) pores in at least part of the structure which pores are sufficiently small to prevent fluid flow (e.g., about 50 A to 100 micrometers) and (2) a thick non-convecting portion which prevents convection within the separator (e.g., a the non-convecting portion is about 0.5 to 1 inch thick). In one specific embodiment, the separator is a sandwich structure including two sheets of a cationically conducting polymer (e.g., an ionomer such as Nafion™) straddling a porous but non-convecting section (e.g., a sintered glass or plastic). In slight variations of this embodiment, the two sheets of polymer are different materials, although they both conduct cations. Further, the porous middle section need not be a monolithic layer but may include two or more separate layers. In an alternative embodiment, the entire separator is simply a rather thick cation conducting membrane, on the order of about 0.5 to 1 inch thick.
In other alternative embodiments, the use of an inert or dimensionally stable anode is considered. The use of such anode might have the benefit of avoiding an increase in tin concentration within the anode chamber characteristic of a separated anode chamber as described above. However, a dimensionally stable anode operates at a high voltage in order to generate acid and molecular oxygen during normal plating. One unfortunate result of this is that the oxygen oxidizes the stannous ions to stannic ions, which can precipitate from the solution and throughout the cell as well as on the surfaces of the deposit, resulting in void formation. Using a dimensionally stable anode, over time, degrades the electrolyte as indicated by the transformation of the electrolyte into a dark yellow and cloudy anolyte as compared to a system in which a consumable tin anode is used, which does not suffer from this degradation. The yellow cloudy solution indicates that stannic ions are formed and they induce formation of flocculent precipitates of stannic oxide, which can precipitate and adhere to plating tool surfaces, clog filters and the like, as well as degrade the quality of the solder (creating entrapped voids in the bumps and bump failure).
Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail to facilitate understanding, the described embodiments are to be considered illustrative and not limiting. It will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that certain changes and modifications can be practiced.
This application is a division of and claims priority to the U.S. application Ser. No. 15/198,787 filed Jun. 30, 2016 (issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,982,357 on May 29, 2018), titled “ELECTROPLATING APPARATUS AND PROCESS FOR WAFER LEVEL PACKAGING” naming Mayer et al. as inventors, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/305,384 filed Nov. 28, 2011 (issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,404,194 on Jun. 7, 2012), titled “ELECTROPLATING APPARATUS AND PROCESS FOR WAFER LEVEL PACKAGING” naming Mayer et al. as inventors, which claims benefit of prior U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/418,781 filed Dec. 1, 2010, titled “ELECTROPLATING APPARATUS AND PROCESS FOR WAFER LEVEL PACKAGING” naming Mayer et al. as inventors, and of prior U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/502,590 filed Jun. 29, 2011, titled “ELECTRODEPOSITION WITH ISOLATED CATHODE AND REGENERATED ELECTROLYTE” naming Mayer as the inventor, which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety and for all purposes.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2511395 | Baier et al. | Jun 1950 | A |
| 3450605 | McGivern, Jr. | Jun 1969 | A |
| 3664440 | Elenburg | May 1972 | A |
| 4003263 | O'Rourke | Jan 1977 | A |
| 4105532 | Haines et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4111772 | Horn | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4330377 | Franks, Jr. | May 1982 | A |
| 4459185 | Obata et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4565609 | Nobel et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4767526 | Vantard | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4828657 | Fukuoka et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4944851 | Cordani et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 5039576 | Wilson | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5162079 | Brown | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5194141 | Suganuma et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5200064 | Russ et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5312539 | Thomson | May 1994 | A |
| 5403460 | Sala et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5409582 | Wimbish et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5456756 | Ramaswami et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5518957 | Kim | May 1996 | A |
| 5785833 | Vaughan | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5883762 | Calhoun et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 6063172 | Bokisa et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6120673 | Reiter et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6126798 | Reid et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6156167 | Patton et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6251255 | Copping et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6254742 | Hanson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6333275 | Mayer et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6368475 | Hanson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6391179 | Ogawa | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6454927 | Stevens et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6458262 | Reid | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6527920 | Mayer et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6551487 | Reid et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6569299 | Reid et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6709561 | Pavlov et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6726824 | Khosla | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6800187 | Reid et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6821407 | Reid et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6878245 | Gandikota et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6878258 | Kovarsky | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6890416 | Mayer et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6899803 | Matejat et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6989084 | Tench et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7178410 | Fraden et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7195702 | Bokisa, Sr. et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7273540 | Sonoda et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7622024 | Mayer et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
| 8128791 | Buckalew et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
| 8262871 | Mayer et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
| 8603305 | Rash et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 9045841 | Buckalew et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
| 9139927 | Rash et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9404194 | Mayer et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9534308 | Chua et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9982357 | Mayer et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 20020027080 | Yoskioka et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20030000842 | Matejat et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030150736 | Kovarsky | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20040000491 | Kovarsky et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040065540 | Mayer et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040217005 | Rosenfeld et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040245113 | Bokisa, Sr. et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050062169 | Dubin et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050121317 | Klocke et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050133374 | Kovarsky et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20060062169 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060081478 | Sahoda et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060086616 | Kurashina et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060144700 | Carson et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060144712 | Klocke | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20100032310 | Reid et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100116674 | Luo et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100147679 | Feng et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20110226614 | Rash et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20120000786 | Mayer et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120138471 | Mayer et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120164341 | Hakiri | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20130334052 | Chua et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140131211 | Rash et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20160312373 | Mayer et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20170137960 | Chua et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2391038 | Feb 2001 | CA |
| 1703541 | Nov 2005 | CN |
| 101307482 | Nov 2008 | CN |
| 101476150 | Jul 2009 | CN |
| 101855390 | Oct 2010 | CN |
| 0048579 | Mar 1982 | EP |
| 0048579 | Dec 1984 | EP |
| 2471977 | Jul 2012 | EP |
| S58-144495 | Aug 1983 | JP |
| 04-024440 | Apr 1992 | JP |
| 11-021692 | Jan 1999 | JP |
| 2000-219993 | Aug 2000 | JP |
| 2004-183091 | Jul 2004 | JP |
| 2004-183091 | Jul 2004 | JP |
| 2005-133187 | May 2005 | JP |
| 2007-525595 | Sep 2007 | JP |
| 5186899 | Apr 2013 | JP |
| 10-2001-0090469 | Oct 2001 | KR |
| I281516 | May 2007 | TW |
| WO9925902 | May 1999 | WO |
| WO2004044272 | May 2004 | WO |
| WO2005076977 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| WO2005116303 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| U.S. Final Office Action, dated Apr. 23, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/305,384. |
| U.S. Final Office Action, dated Feb. 2, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/590,413. |
| U.S. Final Office Action, dated Feb. 5, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/590,413. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance (Supplemental Notice of Allowability), dated Mar. 25, 2015, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/359,343. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance, dated Aug. 26, 2016, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/902,517. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance, dated Aug. 7, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/051,822. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 23, 2018, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/198,787. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 30, 2015, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/359,343. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 3, 2015, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/074,510. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 28, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/305,384. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance, dated Oct. 27, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/590,413. |
| U.S. Office Action, dated Apr. 19, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/590,413. |
| U.S. Office Action, dated Aug. 28, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/590,413. |
| U.S. Office Action, dated Aug. 6, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/590,413. |
| U.S. Office Action, dated Dec. 31, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/051,822. |
| U.S. Office Action, dated Jan. 16, 2015, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/074,510. |
| U.S. Office Action, dated Jul. 13, 2017, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/198,787. |
| U.S. Office Action, dated May 11, 2016, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/902,517. |
| U.S. Office Action, dated May 7, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/051,822. |
| U.S. Office Action, dated May 24, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/590,413. |
| U.S. Office Action, dated Oct. 8, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/305,384. |
| Chinese First Office Action dated Aug. 5, 2014 issued in Application No. CN 201110071633.8. |
| Chinese First Office Action dated Jan. 4, 2017 issued in Application No. CN 201510623134.3. |
| Chinese First Office Action dated Jul. 23, 2015 issued in Application No. CN 201310221399.1. |
| Chinese First Office Action dated Jun. 1, 2015 issued in Application No. CN 2011-1040482.0. |
| Chinese Second Office Action [brief translation] dated Mar. 20, 2015 issued in Application No. CN 201110071633.8. |
| Chinese Second Office Action dated Dec. 10, 2015 issued in Application No. CN 2011-1040482.0. |
| Korean First Office Action dated Dec. 12, 2016 issued in Application No. KR 10-2011-0024686. |
| Korean First Office Action dated Sep. 18, 2017 issued in Application No. KR 10-2011-0127675. |
| Korean Second Office Action dated Jun. 27, 2017 issued in Application No. KR 10-2011-0024686. |
| Malaysia Substantive Examination Report dated Mar. 15, 2017 issued in Application No. MY PI2013002017. |
| Malaysia Substantive Examination Report dated Sep. 15, 2017 issued in Application No. MY PI2013002017. |
| Taiwan First Office Action and Search Report dated Jan. 13, 2015 issued in Application No. TW 100109635. |
| Taiwan Office Action and Search Report dated Jan. 26, 2016 issued in Application No. TW 100144031. |
| Taiwan Office Action and Search Report dated May 2, 2016 issued in Application No. TW 104119312. |
| Taiwan Office Action and Search Report dated Sep. 4, 2015 issued in Application No. TW 100144031. |
| Taiwan Office Action dated Jun. 20, 2017 issued in Application No. TW 106100777. |
| U.S. Office Action, dated Feb. 18, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/895,911. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/895,911, filed Aug. 27, 2007, Buckalew et al. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 6, 2018, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/360,757. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/122,589, filed Sep. 5, 2018, Chua et al. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20180237933 A1 | Aug 2018 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61502590 | Jun 2011 | US | |
| 61418781 | Dec 2010 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15198787 | Jun 2016 | US |
| Child | 15958525 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13305384 | Nov 2011 | US |
| Child | 15198787 | US |
