Electrostatic chuck

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 5600530
  • Patent Number
    5,600,530
  • Date Filed
    Friday, June 10, 1994
    30 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 4, 1997
    28 years ago
Abstract
Electrostatic chucks and methods of forming the chucks are disclosed. The chucks include ceramic materials directly bonded with a layer of active braze alloy. The active alloy operates as both a conductive layer of the electrostatic chuck and a mechanism for bonding the dielectric layer to the base of the chuck. Electrical feedthroughs to the electrode may also be formed using the active alloy.
Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION AND DESCRIPTION OF AN ACTIVE ELEMENT
This invention relates to electrostatic chucks and more particularly to chucks formed by bonding ceramic members with a layer of active braze alloy. As discussed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/925,086:
It is generally recognized that metals will not bond chemically to ceramics because the metallic electronic structure is not compatible with the ionic-covalent electronic structure of ceramic materials. A different phase is thus necessary at the interface as a compatible transition between the metal and the ceramic.
With oxide ceramics, the compatible phase (i.e. chemical bond) is one of the oxides of the metal. The oxide maintains a continuous electronic structure across the interface, and a transition in bond type and bond energies between the metal and the ceramic.
A balance of bond energies and a continuous electronic structure across an interface is generally indicative of a chemical bond, whether the bonding is ionic, covalent, or metallic. These factors do, however, influence the bond microstructure. For example, when the two reacting materials or phases (ceramic/ceramic or metal/metal) have no changes in valence, then the reaction is the formation of a solid solution alloy or compound by interdiffusion. When the two reacting materials (ceramic/metal) have changes in valence, then a reduction-oxidation (redox) reaction occurs.
The driving force for a redox reaction is a favorable negative standard free energy .DELTA.G.degree..sub.R. In order to realize a favorable -.DELTA.G.degree..sub.R, it is necessary to employ materials (i.e. metals) having sufficiently high oxygen potentials to reduce the cation (i.e. ceramic) with a lower oxidation potential. Such metals are commonly referred to as active elements and include, but are not limited to, titanium, zirconium, chromium and vanadium. Adding elements such as these to a metallic brazing alloy allows the alloy to react with and wet a ceramic interface for both oxide and non-oxide ceramics.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Fabrication of semiconductor devices is a multi-step process. During processing, chucks are employed to immobilize the semiconductor wafers, despite, for example, gas pressure present at their rear, or back, faces. Such immobilization may occur either by vacuum pumping, mechanically, or electrostatically, and commercially-available chucks suitable for this purpose typically employ these principles of operation. Vacuum pumping is useful only in restricted instances, as it is ineffective when very low process chamber pressures are required.
Primarily because they are relatively inexpensive, mechanical clamps have been used widely in the semiconductor industry. Mechanical clamps physically engage the peripheries of the wafers, increasing the risk of contact damage and shielding the clamped areas from treatment or processing. This engagement may also produce debris (i.e. particles) that negatively affect wafer process yields. Mechanical clamps additionally are incapable of securing central portions of the wafers, resulting in undesirable bowing of these unsupported regions.
Electrostatic chucks, by contrast, use Coulombic forces to secure the entire rear face of a semiconductor wafer. As employed, these chucks are of two general types: monopolar and bi- (or multi-) polar. Monopolar electrostatic chucks, effectively functioning as one plate of a parallel-plate capacitor, include a thin dielectric layer coating and a single electrode supported by a base. A wafer, acting as the other capacitive plate, may then be placed over the dielectric. As a voltage is applied between the wafer and electrode, the wafer is attracted to the electrode and flattened against the adjacent dielectric material.
Multipolar electrostatic chucks typically include two or more electrodes themselves held at different electrical potentials. As a result, no net charge transfer to the wafer need occur. Existing bipolar electrostatic chucks are relatively difficult and expensive to construct, however, and may compel adjustment or balancing of the voltages present at the electrodes during processing of the wafer.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,384,918 to Abe, incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference, provides equations for the attractive force generated using electrostatic chucks. For the monopolar chuck, the attractive force "F" may be calculated as follows: ##EQU1## where .epsilon.=the dielectric constant of the dielectric
V=the applied voltage
d=the thickness of the insulator (dielectric) material
S=the area of the electrode Similarly, the attractive force for a bipolar chuck is given by: ##EQU2## In both equations (1) and (2), the attractive force exerted on the semiconductor wafer is inversely proportional to the square of the dielectric thickness.
As a consequence of these mathematical relationships, numerous efforts to decrease the thickness of the dielectric layer have been made. U.S. Pat. No. 4,480,284 to Tojo, et al., also incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference, mentions several such efforts, including using an adhesive agent to bond a mica, polyester, or barium titanate dielectric layer to an electrode disc and making the dielectric layer by an anodic treatment of metallic material. As discussed in the Tojo, et al. patent, however, the dielectric layers formed using these processes typically lack uniform thicknesses and flat surfaces and, in some cases, may crack over time. This unreliability is magnified when coupled with the expense associated with these complicated processes, reducing the commercial value of the processing technology.
The Tojo, et al. patent itself purports to disclose a method of forming a more reliable dielectric layer for use with an electrostatic chuck. According to the patent, aluminum oxide (i.e. alumina), titanium dioxide, or barium titanate (or mixtures thereof) is flame-sprayed on an electrode plate to create the dielectric layer. Because the rough surface generated using the flame spray process lacks sufficient dielectric strength, the layer is impregnated with plastic material. To reduce warping and cracking, the dielectric layer and electrode have substantially the same coefficient of thermal expansion.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a relatively low cost, easily-assembled electrostatic chuck. The chuck's dielectric layer exhibits high reliability under various conditions, enhancing its commercial usefulness as a substitute for those employed in existing mono- and multipolar electrostatic chucks. The layer may also be thinned to a thickness impractical for separately fabricated dielectric layers yet acceptable to allow the generation of adequate attractive force. The present invention additionally permits greater design flexibility and formation of large-sized electrostatic chucks if desired.
The invention generally comprises forming an electrostatic chuck by directly bonding (typically) planar ceramic discs or men, hers with a layer of active braze alloy. This single-step assembly presents numerous advantages over existing approaches, including use of commonly-available and relatively inexpensive components for the dielectric layer and remainder of the chuck. Employing similarly inexpensive pattern screen technologies for bonding patterns enhances formation of flexible geometries as well, and use of an active alloy allows electrical feedthroughs to the chuck electrode to be created. The active alloy functions not only as the electrode, but also as the mechanism for bonding the dielectric layer to the base of the electrostatic chuck.
Because the active alloy and ceramic have different coefficients of thermal expansion, the present invention also improves the integrity of the dielectric layer by generating net compressive surface stresses in the ceramic. Depending on the active alloy selected, a sufficiently high-temperature bond may be created to allow the electrostatic chuck to be used at temperatures above those commonly utilized for chucks formed through, for example, organic adhesive methods. Appropriate patterns and thicknesses of active alloy may also enhance the uniformity of the radio frequency field in plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition equipment.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide an electrostatic chuck formed by bonding ceramic materials with a layer of active alloy.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an electrostatic chuck in which an active alloy acts as both a conductive layer and the means by which a dielectric layer is bonded to the base of the chuck.
It is also an object of the present invention to provide an electrostatic chuck in which flexible geometries may be formed by patterning the active alloy.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide an electrostatic chuck in which the active alloy also accomplishes formation of electrical feedthroughs to the chuck electrode.
Other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will be apparent with reference to the remainder of the written portion and the drawings of the application.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional, partially schematicized view of a typical electrostatic chuck shown in connection with a sample and power source.
FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of a monopolar electrostatic chuck of the present invention.
FIG. 2A, similar to FIG. 4 of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/925,086, is a cross-sectional view of an exemplary feedthrough which may form part of the electrostatic chucks of the present invention.
FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of a bipolar electrostatic chuck of the present invention.
FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of a first alternate embodiment of the electrostatic chuck of FIG. 3.
FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of a second alternate embodiment of the electrostatic chuck of FIG. 3.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION
FIG. 1 illustrates a common monopolar electrostatic chuck 10, including electrode plate 14 and dielectric layer 18. Also shown in FIG. 1 are power source 22 and a sample 26 such as (but not limited to) a semiconductor wafer. When chuck 10 is in use, negative terminal 30 of power source 22 is electrically connected to electrode plate 14 and positive terminal 34 is electrically connected to sample 26, thereby generating an electric field between the electrode plate 14 and the sample 26. Dielectric layer 18, in turn, is polarized, with its lower surface 38 becoming positively charged and its upper surface 42 becoming negatively charged. The resulting polarization electrostatically attracts sample 26 toward electrode plate 14, securing it against dielectric layer 18. The same effect, moreover, results when the polarity is reversed.
Illustrated in FIG. 2 is an exemplary monopolar electrostatic chuck 46 of the present invention. Like chuck 10, chuck 46 comprises a dielectric layer 50 and an electrode 54. Chuck 46 also includes base 58, in which may be formed feedthrough 62. Unlike chuck 10, however, electrode 54 is an active braze alloy, while dielectric layer 50 and base 58 are typically ceramic materials such as (but not limited to) alumina, silicon nitride, aluminum nitride, barium titanate, or calcium titanate. For example, in some embodiments of the invention consistent with FIG. 2, dielectric layer 50 and base 58 are made essentially of (i.e. 94.0-99.8%) polycrystalline alumina, and electrode 54 is formed of an active alloy consisting essentially of one of the following (in weight percent):
(1) 0-97.5% Au, 0-15.5% Ni, 0-93.25% Ag, 0-35.25% Cu,
0-2.25% Ti, 0-12.5% In, 0-2% Al, 0-1% Sn, 0-3% Si,
0-0.75% Mo, 0-1.75% V (preferably 58-60% Ag,
26.25-28.25% Cu, 12-13% In, 1-1.5% Ti, provided as Incusil ABA.TM.);
(2) 62-64% Ag, 33.25-35.25% CU, 0.75-1.25% Sn, 1.5-2.0% Ti (Cusin-1 ABA.TM.);
(3) 62-64% Ag, 34.25-36.25% Cu, 1.5-2.0% Ti (Cusin ABA.TM.);
(4) 92.25%-93.25% Ag, 4.5-5.5% Cu, 0.75-1.25% Al, 1-1.5% Ti (Silver ABA.TM.);
(5) 92.25-93.25% Cu, 1.75-2.25% Al, 2.75-3.25% Si, 2-2.5 Ti (Copper ABA.TM.);
(6) 95.9-96.9% Au, 2.5-3.5% Ni, 0.5-0.7% Ti (Gold ABA.TM.);
(7) 81-83% Au, 14.5-16.5% Ni, 0.5-1.0% Mo, 1.5-2.0% V (Nioro ABA.TM.);
(8) 64-66% Ag, 1.75-2.5% Ti, 31.5-34.25% CU (Cusil ABA.TM.); or
(9) nominally 70% Ti, 15% Cu, 15% Ni (Ticuni ABA.TM.).
Although other active alloys may also be utilized in conjunction with the present invention, the listed alloys are commercially available from Wesgo, Inc., 477 Harbor Boulevard, Belmont, Calif. 94002. As with the other alloys suitable for use as electrode 54, they have a sufficiently active element to react chemically with the surface of ceramic (or other) materials chosen for dielectric layer 50 and base 58. Use of such active alloys is, moreover, a significant feature of the present invention, as the alloys function as both the conductive layer (electrode 54) of chuck 46 and the means by which dielectric layer 50 and base 58 bond.
One method of creating chuck 46 includes forming two ceramic discs and placing between them a sheet of an active alloy. The assembly is then brazed to bond the two ceramic discs using the active alloy. Conventional grinding techniques subsequently may be employed to reduce the thickness of one of the ceramic discs to between 0.004-0.010", a common thickness range for dielectric layer 50. Although, e.g., polycrystalline alumina will not normally retain its integrity at such reduced thicknesses, the active alloy uniformly holds each alumina grain in place to permit successful thinning to occur. Thus, the present invention avoids the need to use more expensive dielectric layer alternatives such as single crystal sapphire, allowing substitution of lower-cost ceramic materials instead (although sapphire may continue to be used if desired). Because the active alloy has a higher coefficient of thermal expansion than the alumina discs, brazing them also creates compressive stress in the alumina surfaces, which assist in maintaining the integrity of the layer during the grinding process.
In some embodiments, the two ceramic discs are 99.5% alumina initially one-eighth inch thick and of either one, three and one-half, or eight inch diameter, and the active alloy is a sheet of Copper ABA.TM. approximately 0.002" thick. Whichever of the two discs is thinned ultimately becomes dielectric layer 50, with the other denominated base 58. As noted above, the active alloy functions as electrode 54.
FIG. 2 also details feedthrough 62 which, if present, provides an electrically-conductive path through base 58 while excluding the passage of solid, liquids, and gasses. Discussed more fully in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/925,086, feedthrough 62 may itself comprise an active alloy wire or other contact 66 intended to react chemically with (ceramic) base 58. FIG. 2A, for example, taken from the co-pending application, depicts a feedthrough preform (contact 66) and article (base 58) heated for a predetermined time and temperature to achieve a brazing reaction at the interface between the inner surface of insertion hole (opening 70) of the article and the outer surface of the preform.
FIGS. 3-5 illustrate exemplary bipolar electrostatic chucks 74 of the present invention. As with chuck 46, chucks 74 include dielectric layer 78 and base 82, each of which may be formed of a ceramic material. Unlike monopolar chuck 46, however, an active alloy is interposed between only portions of dielectric layer 78 and base 82, with other portions remaining unbonded. As shown in FIGS. 3-5, therefore, a non-conductive area 86 separates (dual) electrodes 90, each of which may be electrically connected to a feedthrough 94 through base 82. In FIGS. 3 and 5, area 86 is an air-filled space. Alternatively, area 86 may be filled with an organic or inorganic dielectric filler 98 such as epoxy or alumina-filled organometallic suspensions injected through port 102 in base 82 (FIG. 4). Peripheral areas 106 between dielectric layer 78 and base 82 may also contain filler 98 (FIGS. 4-5). Those skilled in the art will recognize that using pattern screen technologies for bonding patterns and an active alloy paste permits formation of other geometries, including those for multipolar electrostatic chucks. As described below, six pole chucks have been formed.
The following examples, although not intended to limit the scope or spirit of the appended claims, provide additional information concerning the present invention:
EXAMPLE 1
Two 3.5" diameter, 0.25" thick essentially polycrystalline alumina wafers were bonded with a layer of an active braze alloy paste composed substantially of, by weight, 92.25-93.25% Cu, 1.75-2.25% Al, 2.75-3.25% Si, and 2-2.5% Ti (Copper ABA.TM.). The alloy layer was 0.003" thick, and the thickness of the upper ceramic layer was thereafter thinned to 0.004" by grinding. When evaluated as part of an electrostatic chuck under tests to 1 kV, the assembly performed well.
EXAMPLE 2
An 8" diameter, 0.375" thick essentially polycrystalline alumina disc was bonded to a similar disc using a 0,003" thick sheet (foil) of Copper ABA.TM.. The top surface was thereafter thinned to 0.007" thick and the assembly evaluated as part of an electrostatic chuck. The chuck not only performed well at tests to 1.5 kV, but, because of the integrity of the dielectric layer, exhibited resistance greater than 10.sup.11 ohms at that voltage as well.
EXAMPLE 3
Two rectangular plates of 0.125" thick essentially polycrystalline alumina were bonded using a pattern-screened paste composed substantially of, by weight, 62-64% Ag, 34.25-36.25 Cu, and 1.5-2.0 Ti (Cusin ABA.TM.). After bonding, the dielectric layer was thinned successfully to a thickness ranging between 0.020" and 0.002". Unbrazed areas were supported with non-conductive polymerizable material, and feedthroughs were produced with active braze alloy wire melted into holes in the ceramic material. A rear face pigtail of copper also was used.
EXAMPLE 4
Two 5.2" diameter, 0.300" thick essentially polycrystalline alumina discs were bonded with Cusin-1 ABA.TM. paste applied in a star-shaped pattern that defined six separate electrode areas. Each electrode was attached to a nickel wire contact using active braze alloy. The active dielectric surface of the chuck was finished to a thickness of 0.009", and the thickness of the overall assembly was 0.125". Organic dielectric infiltrants were used in between electrode patterned areas. The chuck clamped a silicon wafer effectively at voltages from 500-1000 V without failure.
EXAMPLE 5
A 5.9" diameter, 0.089" thick ceramic electrostatic chuck was produced using screened Cusin ABA.TM. braze alloy to bond two ceramic members initially each 0.125" thick. The alloy produced a bipolar electrode having a concentric pattern. These electrodes were connected to the rear face of the chuck with active alloy feedthroughs that passed through the ceramic to nickel-copper alloy termination pins. Organic infiltrants sealed the edges. The dielectric surface of the chuck was 0.006" thick and grooved to allow passage of gasses in use.
EXAMPLE 6
A 2.5" diameter monopolar electrostatic chuck was produced with an active braze alloy paste feedthrough contact through the backside ceramic and a 0.006" thick top dielectric layer. An inorganic dielectric sealant was used in areas where the braze alloy electrode was not placed, permitting the chuck to operate to temperatures of 600.degree. C. The initial thicknesses of the ceramic members from which the chuck was formed were 0.4" and 0.125", respectively, and the sealant comprised commercial inorganic liquids (silica and phosphate bonds) mixed with a very fine alumina powder to create a thermoset ceramic cement.
The foregoing is provided for purposes of illustration, explanation, and description of embodiments of the present invention. Modifications and adaptations to these embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art and may be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.
Claims
  • 1. An electrostatic chuck comprising:
  • a. first and second members;
  • b. an electrode comprising a metal interposed between and bonding portions of the first and second members by chemically reacting with them; and
  • c. a non-conductive material, selected from the group consisting of inorganic dielectric filler and organic dielectric filler, interposed between portions of the first and second members not bonded by the metal.
  • 2. An electrostatic chuck according to claim 1 further comprising means, extending through the second member, for electrically connecting the electrode to a power supply.
  • 3. An electrostatic chuck according to claim 2 in which the electrically connecting means comprises an opening defined by the second member and an active alloy inserted into the opening.
  • 4. An electrostatic chuck according to claim 1 in which the non-conductive material is a dielectric filler consisting of epoxy.
  • 5. An apparatus for securing a semiconductor wafer for processing, comprising:
  • a. first and second ceramic members, the first ceramic member defining a conductive feedthrough and a pork;
  • b. an active braze alloy interposed between and bonding portions of the first and second ceramic members, the active braze alloy having a coefficient of thermal expansion greater than that of the first and second ceramic members;
  • c. dielectric filler injected through the port and interposed between the portions of the first and second members not bonded by the active braze alloy; and
  • d. means, electrically connected to the conductive feedthrough, for applying an electrical potential difference between the semiconductor wafer and active braze alloy and immobilizing the semiconductor wafer by electrostatic force.
  • 6. An apparatus according to claim 5 in which at least one of the first and second ceramic members comprises material selected from the group consisting of silicon nitride, aluminum nitride, barium titanate, calcium titanate, and sapphire.
  • 7. An electrostatic chuck comprising:
  • a. first and second ceramic members, the first ceramic member defining a port;
  • b. an electrode comprising a metal interposed between and bonding at least portions of the first and second ceramic members by chemically reacting with them; and
  • c. dielectric filler injected through the port and interposed between the portions of the first and second ceramic members not bonded by the metal.
  • 8. An electrostatic chuck according to claim 7 further comprising means, extending through the second member, for electrically connecting the electrode to a power supply.
  • 9. An electrostatic chuck according to claim 8 in which the electrically connecting means comprises an opening defined by the second member and an active alloy inserted into the opening.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/925,086 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,368,220), filed Aug. 4, 1992, entitled "Sealed Conductive Active Alloy Feedthroughs," and of published International Application No. PCT/GB93/01551 (International Publication No. WO 94/03923), filed Jul. 22, 1993 designating the United States (which designation thereafter was abandoned), and having the same title, which applications are incorporated herein in their entireties by this reference.

US Referenced Citations (63)
Number Name Date Kind
2121590 Espe Jun 1938
2897424 Waring Jul 1959
3150678 Nuber Sep 1964
3197682 Klass et al. Jul 1965
3253200 Klass et al. May 1966
3401628 Fredrickson Sep 1968
3436109 Loose Apr 1969
3517437 Szobanya Jun 1970
3662455 Anderson May 1972
3746896 Gruner Jul 1973
3858097 Polye Dec 1974
3901772 Guillotin et al. Aug 1975
3916270 Wachtler et al. Oct 1975
3929426 Blust et al. Dec 1975
3983401 Livesay Sep 1976
3993509 McGinty Nov 1976
4163168 Ishikawa et al. Jul 1979
4184188 Briglia Jul 1980
4345299 Ho Aug 1982
4371588 Kyle Feb 1983
4384918 Abe May 1983
4412133 Eckes et al. Oct 1983
4480284 Tojo et al. Oct 1984
4502094 Lewin et al. Feb 1985
4507975 Bittner et al. Apr 1985
4520421 Sakitani et al. May 1985
4551192 Di Milia et al. Nov 1985
4554611 Lewin Nov 1985
4591535 Mizuhara May 1986
4623513 Mizuhara Nov 1986
4645218 Ooshio et al. Feb 1987
4665463 Ward et al. May 1987
4667110 Kariya May 1987
4692836 Suzuki Sep 1987
4716649 Bittner et al. Jan 1988
4723863 Takagi et al. Feb 1988
4724510 Wicker et al. Feb 1988
4733632 Ohmi et al. Mar 1988
4735866 Moorhead Apr 1988
4751609 Kasahara Jun 1988
4771730 Tezuka Sep 1988
4835344 Iyogi et al. May 1989
4864461 Kasahara Sep 1989
4883745 Mizuhara Nov 1989
4912838 Goto et al. Apr 1990
4962441 Collins Oct 1990
5055964 Logan et al. Oct 1991
5073716 Clemens et al. Dec 1991
5095759 Mizuhara et al. Mar 1992
5103367 Horwitz et al. Apr 1992
5117121 Watanabe et al. May 1992
5129572 Keilberth Jul 1992
5151845 Watanabe et al. Sep 1992
5155652 Logan et al. Oct 1992
5194697 Hegner et al. Mar 1993
5241216 Webster Aug 1993
5280156 Niori et al. Jan 1994
5315473 Collins et al. May 1994
5334344 Hegner et al. Aug 1994
5368220 Mizuhora et al. Nov 1994
5382469 Kubota et al. Jan 1995
5413360 Atari et al. May 1995
5426558 Sherman Jun 1995
Foreign Referenced Citations (121)
Number Date Country
0049588 Apr 1982 EPX
005811 Jul 1982 EPX
0074691 Mar 1983 EPX
0113928 Jul 1984 EPX
0115074 Aug 1984 EPX
0138254 Apr 1985 EPX
0080535 Aug 1985 EPX
0171011 Feb 1986 EPX
0260150 Mar 1988 EPX
0278741 Aug 1988 EPX
0297227 Jan 1989 EPX
0339903 Nov 1989 EPX
0351701 Jan 1990 EPX
0360529 Mar 1990 EPX
0473930 Mar 1992 EPX
0486966A1 May 1992 EPX
0498752 Aug 1992 EPX
0498852A1 Aug 1992 EPX
2455360 Nov 1980 FRX
2520930 Aug 1983 FRX
2554288 Mar 1985 FRX
1098727 Aug 1961 DEX
2806761 Sep 1978 DEX
3013352 Nov 1980 DEX
2950039 Jul 1981 DEX
3439371 May 1985 DEX
3344679 Jan 1987 DEX
53-125065 Nov 1978 JPX
57-54341 Mar 1982 JPX
57-73934 May 1982 JPX
57-187947 Nov 1982 JPX
58-24143 Feb 1983 JPX
58-102537 Mar 1983 JPX
58-48434 Mar 1983 JPX
58-48421 Mar 1983 JPX
28-123381 Jul 1983 JPX
58-190037 Nov 1983 JPX
60-5539 Jan 1985 JPX
60-79725 May 1985 JPX
60-110133 Jun 1985 JPX
60-157232 Aug 1985 JPX
60-150632 Aug 1985 JPX
60-197335 Oct 1985 JPX
60-235423 Nov 1985 JPX
60-261377 Dec 1985 JPX
61-270046 Nov 1986 JPX
61-260949 Nov 1986 JPX
62-18727 Jan 1987 JPX
62-29140 Feb 1987 JPX
62-54637 Mar 1987 JPX
62-78846 Apr 1987 JPX
62-72136 Apr 1987 JPX
62-120932 Jun 1987 JPX
62-120931 Jun 1987 JPX
62-172737 Jul 1987 JPX
63-25706 May 1988 JPX
63-131536 Jun 1988 JPX
63-194345 Aug 1988 JPX
63-283037 Nov 1988 JPX
63-308340 Dec 1988 JPX
64-18236 Jan 1989 JPX
1-98218 Apr 1989 JPX
1-152727 Jun 1989 JPX
1-161716 Jun 1989 JPX
1-177368 Jul 1989 JPX
1-185176 Jul 1989 JPX
1-187939 Jul 1989 JPX
1-227454 Sep 1989 JPX
1-241839 Sep 1989 JPX
1-251735 Oct 1989 JPX
1-274938 Nov 1989 JPX
1-296639 Nov 1989 JPX
1-321136 Dec 1989 JPX
1-315935 Dec 1989 JPX
1-315158 Dec 1989 JPX
1-313954 Dec 1989 JPX
1-310554 Dec 1989 JPX
1-298721 Dec 1989 JPX
2-27748 Jan 1990 JPX
2-144934 Jun 1990 JPX
2-206147 Aug 1990 JPX
2-196442 Aug 1990 JPX
3-3250 Jan 1991 JPX
3-3252 Jan 1991 JPX
3-3249 Jan 1991 JPX
3-102820 Apr 1991 JPX
3-102814 Apr 1991 JPX
3-108354 May 1991 JPX
3-147843 Jun 1991 JPX
3-147844 Jun 1991 JPX
3-145151 Jun 1991 JPX
3-152953 Jun 1991 JPX
3-163849 Jul 1991 JPX
3-194948 Aug 1991 JPX
3-181117 Aug 1991 JPX
3-217043 Sep 1991 JPX
3-211725 Sep 1991 JPX
3-236255 Oct 1991 JPX
3-227554 Oct 1991 JPX
3-255626 Nov 1991 JPX
3-255625 Nov 1991 JPX
3-283445 Dec 1991 JPX
4-3957 Jan 1992 JPX
4-146639 May 1992 JPX
4-147642 May 1992 JPX
4-132239 May 1992 JPX
4-147643 May 1992 JPX
4-170371 Jun 1992 JPX
4-180552 Jun 1992 JPX
4-180553 Jun 1992 JPX
4-186863 Jul 1992 JPX
1156875 Jul 1969 GBX
1424875 Feb 1976 GBX
2050064 Dec 1980 GBX
2068122 Aug 1981 GBX
2106325 Apr 1983 GBX
2147459 May 1985 GBX
2149697 Jun 1985 GBX
2154365 Sep 1985 GBX
WO8809054 Nov 1988 WOX
WO9011610 Oct 1990 WOX
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
J. T. Klomp, Bonding of Metals to Ceramics and Glasses (1972).
Abstract of Japanese Patent Application No. 58-190037 (Nov. 5, 1983).
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 925086 Aug 1992