This invention relates to apparatus and methods for uniformly removing material across the whole width of a substrate by plasma etching to expose the ends of buried, filled vias or other buried features.
The problem of end point detection is well known in the plasma etch industry and various techniques have been developed to detect the point at which a substrate has been etched to the desired depth, so that the etch process can be halted. In typical applications, features are etched through a mask layer into the underlying layer or layers. The detection of the end point (the reaching of the desired etch depth) tends to be based on two distinct technologies. In one, the apparatus or operator is looking for a change in chemistry at the point at which the etch breaks through from one layer to another. This may arise from a change in the chemistry of the actual layers built up in the device or thin etch stop layer may be deliberately deposited between two layers so as to induce a change in chemistry. In early days the etch was simply carried on for a fixed time. More sophisticated and faster techniques have been developed over the years. The second technique is based on reflectometry or interferometry which rely on the upper surface of the substrate (e.g. the hard mask) forming a reference surface against which the depth of the etched structure may be judged.
Recently, 3-D device integration schemes have started to produce new challenges for process equipment. A possible process and equipment flow is shown in
Traditionally, this might all have been done by chemical mechanical polishing but there are advantages in performing the later stages of the step using a plasma etch process. US-B2-7416648 is an example of such a process. However, because the substrate is etched across its width, there is no reference surface by means of which reflectometry or interferometry could be used. Equally, the buried features are so small (typically 10 μm diameter), and form such a small part of the total area of the etch face, that any change in chemistry is too small to detect. The whole top surface etching process is schematically illustrated in
From one aspect the invention consists in a method of etching the whole width of a substrate, typically in the absence of a masking layer, to expose the ends of buried features, e.g. filled vias, including:
From a second aspect, the invention consists in a method of etching the whole width of a substrate to expose buried features, (e.g. filled vias) including:
It will be understood that in each of these processes the problems of the lack of reference surface and the lack of significant plasma chemistry change have been overcome.
The step of modifying the etch includes changing the process conditions or stopping the etch.
It is particularly preferred that the etch face is illuminated at an acute angle and in either case step (c) may include using a camera to capture the reflected or scattered light for producing an output signal and an edge detector filter for detecting the appearance of edges from the camera output signal.
The camera may be positioned for receiving light reflected or scattered at an acute angle.
The edge detector filter may be a Sobel filter.
From a further aspect the invention consists in etching apparatus for etching a substrate across its width to expose buried features, (e.g. filled vias) including:
(a) an etch chamber for etching a substrate;
(b) a support for a substrate for retaining the substrate in a generally horizontal position with a face to be etched exposed;
(c) an illumination source mounted at an acute angle with respect to the support for illuminating the face;
(d) a camera for capturing light reflected or scattered from the face at an acute angle;
(e) an edge detector coupled to the camera for detecting the appearance of at least one edge on the face; and
(f) a controller for controlling the etch operation of the chamber and stopping the etch in response to the detection of an edge.
The edge detector may utilise a Sobel filter.
It will be understood that the edge detector could be replaced by any suitable non-homogeneity detector for detecting non-homogeneity in the appearance of the face. However due to the orthogonal arrangement used in the lay-out of vias on a wafer the use of a Sobel filter or filters is particularly useful for edge detection.
Although the invention has been defined above it is to be understood it includes any inventive combination of the features set out above or in the following description.
The invention may be performed in various ways and is a specific embodiment will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Windows 12, 13 are formed in respective opposed walls 11 of the chamber 10. An illumination source 14 illuminates a part of the surface of an exposed face 15 of the substrate 16. Scattered radiation 17 passes to a camera 18 through the window 13 and is detected by the camera 18.
There are a large number of image detection techniques which could be used to distinguish successive images detected by the camera to determine the change of the face 15 from a homogeneous face to non-homogeneous face, as a result of the appearance of the upper surfaces of buried features. For simplicity these features will be treated as being filled vias for the rest of this description. These are for example illustrated at 19 in
The advantages of this can be seen in
Sobel filters are well known in the art but for ease of understanding of the present invention they utilise a Sobel operator which is a discrete differentiation operator, computing an approximation of the gradient of the image intensity function. In practice they apply to sequence a vertical and horizontal filter to an image. The intensities of the images are then processed to enhance the appearance of the edges of the features in the image. Preferably this sequence is carried out throughout the etch process. This is illustrated for the region of the wafer for which the images in
Positioning the camera at a shallow angle to the wafer means that the topography of the wafer is enhanced in the image relative to viewing directly from above. In a simplistic way one might see the slightly exposed tips 20 of the filled vias 19 as casting individual shadows. The more inclined the illumination, the greater the length of the shadow and the increased changed in the intensity gradient.
Components 22 and 23 will usually form part of the controller for the etch apparatus.
This method is further illustrated in
Further images are provided in
It will be understood that the Applicants' approach overcomes the loss of a reference surface and the lack of significant changes in plasma chemistry and, in the use of edge detectors, enables a particularly economic end point detection process and apparatus to be achieved.
This is a Divisional of U.S. non-provisional patent application Ser. No. 13/674,482, filed Nov. 12, 2012, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, and issued on Apr. 29, 2014 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,709,268.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5728253 | Saito | Mar 1998 | A |
6509960 | Johnson | Jan 2003 | B2 |
8045145 | Bakker | Oct 2011 | B1 |
20040069747 | Patel | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040207836 | Chhibber | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050011611 | Mahoney | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050020073 | Perry | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050264796 | Shaw | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060191865 | Nishimura | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20080032429 | Chen | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090139576 | Crenshaw | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20130137195 | Ansell | May 2013 | A1 |
20150235368 | Kakuma | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160045841 | Kaplan | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0653621 | Nov 1994 | EP |
H03196625 | Aug 1991 | JP |
2001319922 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2001332534 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2003004644 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2005159008 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2010010242 | Jan 2010 | JP |
2010519772 | Jun 2010 | JP |
WO9923472 | May 1999 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Japanese Office Action in Related Japanese Appication No. 2012-250063 Dated Nov. 24, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140174658 A1 | Jun 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61559252 | Nov 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13674482 | Nov 2012 | US |
Child | 14195887 | US |