The invention generally related to a semiconductor device and method of manufacture and, more particularly, to a semiconductor device and method of manufacture which imposes tensile and compressive stresses in the device during fabrication.
Mechanical stresses within a semiconductor device substrate can modulate device performance. That is, stresses within a semiconductor device are known to enhance semiconductor device characteristics. Thus, to improve the characteristics of a semiconductor device, tensile and/or compressive stresses are created in the channel of the n-type device (e.g., NFETs) and/or p-type devices (e.g., PFETs). However, the same stress component, either tensile stress or compressive stress, discriminatively affects the characteristics of an n-type device and p-type device.
For example, it has been known that a device exhibits better performance characteristics when formed on a silicon layer (or cap) that is epitaxially grown on a SiGe layer that has relaxed on top of the silicon substrate. In this system, the silicon cap is subject to biaxial tensile strain. When epitaxially grown on silicon, an unrelaxed SiGe layer will have a lattice constant that conforms to that of the silicon substrate. Upon relaxation (through a high temperature process for example) the SiGe lattice constants approaches that of that of its intrinsic lattice constant which is larger than that of silicon. A fully relaxed SiGe layer has a lattice constant close to its intrinsic value. When the silicon is epitaxially grown thereon, the silicon layer conforms to the larger lattice constant of the relaxed SiGe layer and this applies physical biaxial stress (e.g., expansion) to the silicon layer being formed thereon. This physical stress applied to the silicon layer is beneficial to the devices (e.g., CMOS devices) formed thereon because the expanded silicon layer increases n-type performance while a higher Ge content in the SiGe layer improves p-type performance.
In order to maximize the performance of both NFETs and PFETs within integrated circuit (IC) chips, the stress components should be engineered and applied differently for NFETs and PFETs. That is, because the type of stress which is beneficial for the performance of an NFET is generally disadvantageous for the performance of the PFET. More particularly, when a device is in tension (e.g., in the direction of current flow in planar device), the performance characteristics of the NFET are enhanced while the performance characteristics of the PFET are diminished. To selectively create tensile stress in an NFET and compressive stress in a PFET, distinctive processes and different combinations of materials are used.
For example, a trench isolation structure has been proposed for forming the appropriate stresses in the NFETs and PFETs, respectively. When this method is used, the isolation region for the NFET device contains a first isolation material which applies a first type of mechanical stress on the NFET device in a longitudinal direction (e.g., parallel to the direction of current flow) and in a transverse direction (e.g., perpendicular to the direction of current flow). Further a first isolation region and a second isolation region are provided for the PFET and each of these isolation regions applies a unique mechanical stress on the PFET device in the transverse and longitudinal directions.
Alternatively, liners on gate sidewalls have been proposed to selectively induce the appropriate stresses induce the appropriate stresses in the channels of the FET devices (see, Ootsuka et al., IEDM 2000, p. 575, for example). By providing liners the appropriate stress is applied closer to the device than the stress applied as a result of the trench isolation fill technique.
While these methods do provide structures that have tensile stresses being applied to the NFET device and compressive stresses being applied along the longitudinal direction of the PFET device, they may require additional materials and/or more complex processing and thus, resulting in higher costs. Further, the level of stress that can be applied in these situations is typically moderate (i.e., on the order of 100s MPa). Therefore, it is desired to provide more cost-effective and simplified methods for creating large tensile and compressive stresses in the channels NFET and PFET, respectively.
In a first aspect of the invention, a method of manufacturing a semiconductor structure includes forming, simultaneously, a layered structure with an underlying stress inducing material, in a p-type field-effect-transistor (PFET) channel region and a n-type field-effect-transistor (NFET) channel region. The method further includes protecting the NFET channel region while forming a layer over the underlying stress inducing material of the PFET channel region to reduce the stress effect in the PFET channel region. An island is etched in the NFET channel region and the PFET channel region, creating a higher resultant stress component in the NFET channel region. A stress inducing material is formed in etched portions of the PFET channel region creating an opposite stress component in the PFET channel region than in the NFET channel region.
In another aspect of the invention, a method of manufacturing a semiconductor structure is provided. The method includes forming a stress-inducing layer on a substrate in an NFET region and a PFET region and forming a top layer over the stress-inducing layer in the NFET region and the PFET region. The top layer is of a different thickness in the NFET region and the PFET region. Trenches are etched into sides of the PFET region and the NFET region. Upon etching, the elastic edge relaxation of the stress-inducing layer creates a tensile stress in the channel region. The thin top layer results in higher tensile stress in the NFET channel region and the thick top layer results in very small tensile stress in the PFET channel region. The trenches are filled with a first material for the NFET region and a second material for the PFET region. The second material creates a compressive stress in the PFET region.
Furthermore, in another aspect of the invention, a semiconductor structure is provided that includes a PFET and NFET channel formed in a substrate such as, for example, a Si layer. The PFET and NFET devices have a layered structure of the same materials in the channel region. A top layer of the same materials in the PFET channel region is thicker than a top layer of the NFET channel region. Trenches of the PFET channel region and the NFET channel region is different.
a through 1i represent a fabrication process to form a device in accordance with the invention;
a illustrates a location of stress in a NFET device according to the invention;
b shows a graph of stress as a function of longitudinal distance to the center of the gate of the NFET device in accordance with the invention; and
This invention is directed to a semiconductor device and method of manufacture, which provides tensile stress in the NFET channel and compressive stress in the PFET channel of the CMOS. In embodiments of the invention, the stresses formed in the NFET and PFET channel can be achieved on a same substrate using similar processing steps, thus reducing the overall material costs and time for producing such device. In embodiments, channels are formed in the silicon layer in the area of the formation of the NFETs and PFETs. The channels of the devices are then separately and selectively treated such that while one device is covered, the other device can be etched and filled to obtain desired properties. By applying these techniques, tensile or compressive forces result in the overlying epitaxially grown layers in the channels of the NFETs and PFETs, respectively. In one embodiment, the overlying silicon layer of the PFETs are allowed to grow thicker than its homologous layer of the NFET. This fabrication process of the invention results in devices with improved channel properties.
a through 1i represent a fabrication process to form a device according to the invention. In
In embodiments, the thicknesses of the layers are in various ranges. For example, the BOX 12 may be between 1200 Å and 1600 Å, and the silicon layer 14 may be between 10 Å and 1000 Å, preferably 700 Å in thickness. Additionally, the SiGe layer 16 may be between 50 Å and 500 Å, 90 Å and 500 Å and preferably 400 Å. It should be understood, though, that the thickness of these layers can vary, depending on the various design parameters of the device.
In implementation, the pseudomorphic SiGe layer 16 is epitaxially grown in a conventional manner. The Ge content may be greater than 0% in ratio to the Si content, with a range of between 20% to 30% being contemplated by the invention. The silicon layer 18 on the pseudomorphic SiGe layer 16 can be deposited in a conventional manner via any selective epitaxial silicon formation technique, for example rapid thermal chemical vapor deposition (RTCVD) or molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) may be used to epitaxially grow device quality silicon.
b shows the separated channels (or device regions) formed by shallow trench isolation (STI) 20. The insulating trenches 20 are formed by conventional patterning processes including lithography and etching steps. For example, the stacked layers 14, 16, 18 are patterned to form STIs 20 using standard techniques of pad oxidation, pad nitride deposition, lithography based patterning, reactive ion etching (RIE) of the stacked layers, to the buried oxide. A liner deposition, fill deposition, and chemical mechanical polish, for example, can then be used to form the STI 20. The STI formation process is well known in the art.
c depicts a modification to the Si layer 16 of the PFET stack. In this process, a mask 22 is placed over the NFET region. Epitaxial Si is selectively grown on the Si layer 18 in the PFET region, resulting in a seamless new Si layer 24. The newly formed layer 24 is allowed to differ in its thickness compared to the top Si layer 16 in the NFET region. Preferably, the Si layer 24 is thicker than the Si layer 16 of the NFET region, with a range for the Si layer 24 being between 200 Å and 600 Å, with a delta of at least 100 Å between NFET Si layer 18 and PFET Si layer 24.
d through 1i show the fabrication process of the gate structures, including the source and drain (S/D) regions for the NFET and PFET channel, respectively. Referring to
Referring to
f depicts the device after epitaxial silicon 32 is selectively grown in the S/D trenches between the gate island formed by the SiGe and Si layers. In view of the above described dimensions, the resulting gate island results in a longitudinal size between 500 Å and 1000 Å, preferably 800 Å. The pseudomorphic SiGe layer 16 within the gate island in the NFET region exercises a tensile stress onto the epitaxially grown silicon 18 in the channel region resulting in improved NFET device characteristics.
g—analogous to
h depicts the filled S/D trenches of the PFET device. In contrast to the NFET region, these trenches are filled with SiGe 34, which is grown epitaxially and, in one embodiment, substantially flush with layer 24. The longitudinal dimensions of these elements are similar to those described above for the NFET region. The PFET gate island formed by layers 16 and 24 have a resulting size of 500 Å to 1000 Å, preferably 800 Å. The SiGe material 34 induces a compressive stress on the Si channel of the PFET device, resulting in improved PFET device characteristics.
i shows the fabricated CMOS device. The ratio of the eSiGe material 34 can vary between any germanium above 0% with respect to the total amount of silicon and germanium in the trench.
a illustrates the locations of the stresses in an NFET device according to the invention. As shown in
b illustrates the course of stress as a function of longitudinal distance to the center of the gate of the NFET device. For a Ge content of 20% and a thickness of Si layer 18 of 200 Å, the current invention provides tensile stresses in the range of 300 MPa. In one implementation, the preferred range of the longitudinal stress component (stress in direction of current flow from source to drain) in the Si layer 18, is preferred to be greater than 100 MPa.
Thus, in the structure of the invention, tensile stresses are now formed in the channel of NFET and compressive stresses are formed in the PFET. By allowing such stresses, high device performance can be achieved. In addition, with the processes of the invention, the manufacturing costs can be reduced while resulting higher yields.
While the invention has been described in terms of embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with the modification within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. For example, the invention can be readily applicable to bulk substrates.
This application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/380,689 filed on Apr. 28, 2006, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3602841 | McGroddy | Aug 1971 | A |
4665415 | Esaki et al. | May 1987 | A |
4853076 | Tsaur et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4855245 | Neppl et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4952524 | Lee et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4958213 | Eklund et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5006913 | Sugahara et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5060030 | Hoke et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5081513 | Jackson et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5108843 | Ohtaka et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5134085 | Gilgen et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5310446 | Konishi et al. | May 1994 | A |
5354695 | Leedy | Oct 1994 | A |
5371399 | Burroughes et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5391510 | Hsu et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5459346 | Asakawa et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5471948 | Burroughes et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5557122 | Shrivastava et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5561302 | Candelaria | Oct 1996 | A |
5565697 | Asakawa et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571741 | Leedy | Nov 1996 | A |
5592007 | Leedy | Jan 1997 | A |
5592018 | Leedy | Jan 1997 | A |
5670798 | Schetzina | Sep 1997 | A |
5679965 | Schetzina | Oct 1997 | A |
5683934 | Candelaria | Nov 1997 | A |
5840593 | Leedy | Nov 1998 | A |
5861651 | Brasen et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5880040 | Sun et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5940716 | Jin et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940736 | Brady et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946559 | Leedy | Aug 1999 | A |
5960297 | Saki | Sep 1999 | A |
5989978 | Peidous | Nov 1999 | A |
6008126 | Leedy | Dec 1999 | A |
6025280 | Brady et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6046464 | Schetzina | Apr 2000 | A |
6066545 | Doshi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6090684 | Ishitsuka et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6107143 | Park et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117722 | Wuu et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6133071 | Nagai | Oct 2000 | A |
6165383 | Chou | Dec 2000 | A |
6221735 | Manley et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228694 | Doyle et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246095 | Brady et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6255169 | Li et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261964 | Wu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6265317 | Chiu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6274444 | Wang | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281532 | Doyle et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6284623 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6284626 | Kim | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6319794 | Akatsu et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6361885 | Chou | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6362082 | Doyle et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368931 | Kuhn et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6403486 | Lou | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6403975 | Brunner et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406973 | Lee | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6461936 | von Ebrenwall | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6476462 | Shimizu et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6483171 | Forbes et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493497 | Ramdani et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6498358 | Lach et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501121 | Yu et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6506652 | Jan et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6509618 | Jan et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6521964 | Jan et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6531369 | Ozakan et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6531740 | Bosco et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6621392 | Volant et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6635506 | Volant et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6717216 | Doris et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6825529 | Chidambarrao et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6831292 | Currie et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6974981 | Chidambarrao et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6977194 | Belyansky et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7015082 | Doris et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7217608 | Xiang | May 2007 | B1 |
20010009784 | Ma et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020063292 | Armstrong et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020074598 | Doyle et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020086472 | Roberds et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020086497 | Kwok | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020090791 | Doyle et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030032261 | Yeh et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040158 | Saitoh | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030057184 | Yu et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030067035 | Tews et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030227013 | Currie et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040113174 | Chidambarrao et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040113217 | Chidambarrao et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040238914 | Deshpande et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040262784 | Doris et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050040460 | Chidambarrao et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050082634 | Doris et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050093030 | Doris et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050098829 | Doris et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050106799 | Doris et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050145954 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050148146 | Doris et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050194699 | Belyansky et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050221550 | Fitzgerald | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050236668 | Zhu et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050245017 | Belyanski et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050280051 | Chidambarrao et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050282325 | Belyanski et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060027868 | Doris et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060057787 | Doris et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060060925 | Doris et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060163672 | Wang et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060228851 | Sadaka et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060286736 | Orlowski et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
64-76755 | Mar 1989 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100013024 A1 | Jan 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11380689 | Apr 2006 | US |
Child | 12506770 | US |