Amorphous carbon films may be used as hard masks and etch stop layers in semiconductor processing, including in memory and logic device fabrication. These films are also known as ashable hard masks (AHMs) because they may be removed by an ashing technique. As aspect ratios in lithography increase, AHMs require higher etch selectivity. Current methods of forming highly selective AHMs using plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) processes result in AHMs with high stress, limiting the AHMs' usefulness as hard masks. Accordingly, it is desirable to produce AHMs having high etch selectivity, but low stress.
Provided are novel methods of depositing ashable hard masks (AHMs) by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) that decrease stress levels and increase etch selectivity for use in semiconductor processing, including in memory and logic device fabrication. In various embodiments, the methods can involve exposing a layer on a semiconductor substrate to a process gas including a hydrocarbon precursor, and generating plasma using a dual radio frequency (RF) source by pulsing a low frequency (LF) RF power while maintaining a constant high frequency (HF) RF power during deposition by PECVD. Examples of layers on which an AHM may be deposited include dielectric layers such as oxides and nitrides, and polysilicon layers. According to various embodiments, pulsing the LF power can involve modulating between non-zero levels or switching the LF power on and off. In some embodiments, the LF power is pulsed at a frequency between about 2 Hz and about 200 Hz. Deposition may be performed at high or low process temperatures.
In one aspect, a method of depositing highly selective, low stress AHMs is provided. According to various embodiments, LF RF power is pulsed while HF RF power is constant during deposition by introduction of a precursor gas. In some embodiments, the deposited AHM has a hydrogen content of between about 10% and about 25%, for example about 18%. In certain embodiments, the deposited AHM has an etch selectivity between about 3.6 and about 4.4.
Another aspect relates to a method of forming an amorphous carbon layer on a semiconductor substrate. In various embodiments, the amorphous carbon layer is deposited using a dual RF plasma source while LF RF power is pulsed and HF power is constant. In some embodiments, the LF power is pulsed between non-zero levels. In some embodiments, the LF is pulsed by switching LF power on and off. In certain embodiments, the LF power is pulsed at a frequency between about 2 Hz and about 10 Hz. Deposition may be performed at high or low process temperatures.
Another aspect relates to an apparatus configured to process a semiconductor substrate. According to various embodiments, the apparatus includes a deposition chamber including a showerhead, a substrate support and one or more gas inlets; a dual RF plasma generator with a HF component and a LF component configured to apply RF power to the deposition chamber; and a controller. The controller is configured to control the operations in the apparatus and includes machine readable instructions for: flowing a process gas including a hydrocarbon precursor gas to the deposition chamber, applying dual frequency RF power to the deposition chamber to ignite plasma, and pulsing LF power while holding HF power constant.
These and other aspects are described further below with reference to the drawings.
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the presented embodiments. The disclosed embodiments may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well-known process operations have not been described in detail to not unnecessarily obscure the disclosed embodiments. While the disclosed embodiments will be described in conjunction with the specific embodiments, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the disclosed embodiments.
In semiconductor processing, masking methods are used to pattern and etch substrates. As substrate aspect ratios increase, the demand for highly selective hard masks increases. Masks that have high etch selectivity and yet are easy to remove without damage to the substrate are important to processing substrates. Ashable hard masks (AHMs) can be used as masks in etch stop layers or during selective etching, or where a photoresist may not be thick enough to mask the underlying layer. AHMs may also be used on glass substrates for display and other technologies.
AHMs have a chemical composition that allows them to be removed by a technique referred to as “ashing,” “plasma ashing,” or “dry stripping” once they have served their purpose. One example of an AHM is an amorphous carbon layer or film. An AHM is generally composed of carbon and hydrogen with, optionally, a trace amount of one or more dopants (e.g., nitrogen, fluorine, boron, and silicon). The bonding structure of an AHM can vary from sp2 (graphite-like) or sp3 (diamond-like), or a combination of both, depending on the deposition conditions.
In operation 102, an ashable hard mask is deposited on the layer to be etched by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD). PECVD processes involve generating plasma in the deposition chamber. As described further below with reference to
In operation 104, a photoresist layer is deposited, exposed, and developed in accordance with the desired etch pattern. In some implementations, an anti-reflective layer (ARL) may be deposited on the AHM prior to photoresist deposition.
In operation 106, the AHM is opened by etching the exposed portions of the AHM. Opening the AHM may be performed by a fluorine-rich dry etch.
Next, in operation 108, the substrate layer is selectively etched to transfer the pattern to the substrate layer. The selective etch may be performed such that the substrate layer is etch without substantially diminishing the AHM walls. Examples of etches can include radical and/or ionic-based etches. Examples of etch chemistries can include halogen-based etch chemistries such as fluorine-containing and chlorine-containing etch chemistries. For example, capacitively-coupled plasmas generated from fluorocarbon-containing process gases may be used to selectively etch oxide layers. Specific examples of process gases include CxFy-containing process gases, optionally with oxygen (O2) and an inert gas, such as C4H8/CH2F2/O2/Ar.
Lastly, in operation 110, a technique referred to as ashing, plasma ashing, or dry stripping is used to remove the AHM. Ashing may be performed by an oxygen-rich dry etch. Often, oxygen is introduced in a chamber under vacuum and RF power creates oxygen radicals in plasma to react with the AHM and oxidize it to water (H2O), carbon monoxide (CO), and carbon dioxide (CO2). Optionally, any remaining AHM residue may also be removed by wet or dry etching processes after ashing. The result is the desired patterned substrate layer.
High aspect ratio patterning uses AHMs having high etch selectivity. Etch selectivity can be determined by comparing the etch rate of the AHM layer to an underlying layer. The etch selectivity can also be approximated by determining the modulus, or rigidity, of the AHM layer. A more rigid, or higher modulus, AHM is able to withstand higher etch rates in an etch process involving more ion bombardment. Therefore, AHMs with higher modulus have higher selectivity and lower etching rate and can be used more efficiently and effectively for processing high aspect ratio semiconductor processes. The desired etch selectivity and modulus of the AHM may depend on the etching process and the composition of the underlying layers, but the correlation between etch selectivity and modulus (e.g., higher modulus for higher etch selectivity) remains the same regardless of the etching process or composition of the underlying layers. The modulus-selectivity correlation as described here applies to all types of underlying layers, including polysilicon layers, oxide layers, and nitride layers.
To date, known, highly selective AHMs have very high stress levels. Current methods to form AHMs use continuous wave RF power plasma in a PECVD process. Using continuous wave RF power results in continuous ion bombardment, which increases film density, thereby increasing etch selectivity by creating more sp3 bonds between atoms. However, continuous ion bombardment may also incorporates excessive unbound hydrogen atoms in the film and causes high ion bombardment of heavy atomic weight ions. This may increase the stress of the deposited AHM, which limits AHM applications because high stress AHMs are more likely to collapse or compress. Increased stress levels also make laser alignment more difficult.
According to various embodiments, provided herein are methods of forming AHMs that have high selectivity and low stress. These methods yield AHMs with improved selectivity at a given stress level, or a decreased stress level at a given selectivity, thus improving the AHM performance in semiconductor processing.
In some embodiments, two or more hydrocarbon precursors may be introduced. In addition to hydrocarbon precursors, a carrier gas may be used to dilute the precursor gas flow. The carrier gas may be any suitable carrier gas, including helium (He), argon (Ar), nitrogen (N2), hydrogen (H2), or a combination of any of these.
Total pressure in the deposition chamber may range from between about 1 and about 20 Torr. In some embodiments, pressure is between about 5 Torr and about 10 Torr. In some embodiments, the hydrocarbon precursor is introduced at a low partial pressure, e.g., between about 0.01 Torr and about 4 Torr, as discussed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,981,777 and 7,981,810, which are incorporated by reference herein. In certain embodiments, the partial pressure is at or below about 0.2 Torr.
Precursor gas flow rates depend on the particular deposition chamber and substrate. Examples of flow rates used for four 300 mm substrates are between about 200 sccm and about 4,000 sccm of acetylene, between about 1,000 sccm and about 20,000 sccm of hydrogen, and between about 1000 sccm and about 20,000 sccm of helium.
The flow rates and RF powers disclosed herein are for a four-station tool configured for 300 mm wafers. Power levels and flow rates generally scale linearly with the number of stations and substrate area. The flow rates and powers may be represented on a per area basis, e.g., 2500 W may also be represented as 0.884 W/cm2.
The methods described herein may be used with any appropriate process temperature to obtain desired AHM characteristics, with examples ranging from about 50° C. to about 550° C. Process temperature can affect the stress, selectivity, and transparency at least in part due to sp2 bond versus sp3 bond formation. Higher temperatures favor sp2 rich amorphous carbon network formation as the high temperatures enable easy breakage of C—H bonds and subsequent diffusion of hydrogen. For example, films deposited at temperatures above about 500° C. may have significantly more sp2 CH and CH2 bonds compared to sp3 bonds, with increased carbon content and higher density, which correlate with increased etch selectivity. However, these films may not be suitable for thick hard mask applications due to the lower optical bandgap and of sp2 carbon. For example, at 2 kÅ and above, the films may not be transparent enough for mask alignment. For example, 633 nm lasers may typically be used for transparent films and less transparent films. U.S. Pat. No. 7,981,810, referenced above, provides process conditions for deposition of selective and transparent AHM's at lower temperatures and/or dilute hydrocarbon precursor flows. AHM's deposited at lower temperatures, e.g., below about 400° C. may have more less sp2 bonding compared to film deposited at higher temperatures.
Next, in operation 206, an ashable hard mask is deposited on the substrate by a PECVD process by igniting plasma using a dual RF plasma source that includes a low frequency (LF) component and a high frequency (HF) component. In some embodiments, the methods of the embodiments use LF RF power to generate high energy ion bombardment. Low frequency RF power refers to an RF power having a frequency between about 100 kHz and about 2 MHz. In some embodiments, pulsing frequency may be limited by the operation capability of the LF generator. In some embodiments, LF RF power has an RF power with a frequency of about 400 kHz, for example 430 kHz. During deposition, in some embodiments, the LF power ranges between about 0.001 W/cm2 and about 0.05 W/cm2, as expressed in W per cm2 of substrate surface area. In some embodiments, the LF power ranges between about 0 and about 1.25 W/cm2. High frequency RF power refers to an RF power having a frequency between about 2 MHz and about 60 MHz. In some embodiments, HF RF power has an RF power with a frequency of about 13.56 MHz. During deposition, in some embodiments, the HF power per substrate area ranges between about 0.001 W/cm2 and about 0.05 W/cm2. In some embodiments, the HF power per substrate area ranges between about 0.05 W/cm2 to 1.25 W/cm2.
Next, in operation 208, the LF power is pulsed while HF power is constant. In various embodiments, the LF power is pulsed by switching the LF power on and off. In certain embodiments, the LF power is pulsed between about 0 W/cm2 and about 0.05 W/cm2. In various embodiments, the LF power is pulsed by switching the LF between non-zero power levels. In some embodiments, the LF power is pulsed between about 0 W/cm2 and about 0.02 W/cm2. In many embodiments, the powers of the HFRF and LFRF are sufficient to maintain a plasma.
Duty cycle (the fraction of time during which the LF is on or at high power) for LF pulsing ranges from about 10% to about 70%. In various embodiments, the LF power is pulsed at a frequency of between about 2 Hz and about 10 Hz. In some embodiments, the LF power is pulsed at a frequency of at least about 10 Hz, or at least about 20 Hz, or at least about 100 Hz, or at least about 200 Hz.
Precursor gas flow can also be pulsed in a synchronized or non-synchronized manner with respect to LF power pulsing. Gas pulsing may be combined with RF pulsing, which may further alter the film properties to improve etch selectivity. For example, the process gas may be pulsed with a duty cycle of 50%, or with a pulse width of 0.5 seconds. According to various embodiments, the pulse frequency of the process gas is between about 0.05 Hz to about 1 Hz.
In some embodiments, HF and LF RF components can be pulsed in a synchronized manner. If an HF component is pulsed, it is pulsed from high to low power and not turned off to avoid plasma sheath collapse. Alternatively, pulsing only LF RF power may be advantageous to form more stable plasma.
Pulsing LF power relaxes ion and atom impinging on the layer, resulting in less stress on the layer. Such relaxation of ion and atom impinging on the layer optimizes densification of the film and reduces the hydrogen content in the layer. Thus, the stress on the layer is reduced.
According to various embodiments, the deposited AHMs have etch selectivity between about 3.6:1 and about 4.4:1 relative to the underlying layer. In some embodiments, the deposited AHMs have a hydrogen content of about 18%. In some embodiments, the deposited AHMs have a hydrogen content less than about 15%, less than about 10%, or less than about 5%.
In some embodiments, the deposited AHM has a modulus to stress ratio of 1:1. In some embodiments, the modulus of the deposited AHM is about 70 GPa and a stress is about −80 MPa.
Referring to
Apparatus
Embodiments can be implemented in a plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) reactor. Such a reactor may take many different forms. Various embodiments are compatible with existing semiconductor processing equipment—in particular, PECVD reactors such as Sequel™ or Vector™ reactor chambers available from Lam Research Corporation. The various embodiments may be implemented on a multi-station or single station tool. In specific embodiments, the 300 mm Lam Vector™ tool having a 4-station deposition scheme or the 200 mm Sequel™ tool having a 6-station deposition scheme are used.
Generally, the apparatus will include one or more chambers or reactors that each include one or more stations. Chambers will house one or more wafers and are suitable for wafer processing. The one or more chambers maintain the wafer in a defined position or positions, by preventing rotation, vibration, or other agitation. In some embodiment, a wafer undergoing AHM deposition is transferred from one station to another within a chamber during the process. For example, a 2000 Å AHM deposition may occur entirely at one station, or 500 Å of film may be deposited at each of four stations in accordance with various embodiments. Alternatively, any other fraction of the total film thickness may be deposited at any number of stations. In various embodiments where more than one AHM is deposited, more than one station may be used to deposit each AHM layer. During processing, each wafer is held in place by a pedestal, wafer chuck, and/or other wafer holding apparatus. For certain operations where the wafer is to be heated, the apparatus may include a heater such as a heating plate.
Within the reactor, a wafer support 418 holds a substrate 416. The pedestal typically includes a chuck, a fork, or lift pins to hold and transfer the substrate during and between the deposition and/or plasma treatment reactions. The chuck may be an electrostatic chuck, a mechanical chuck or various other types of chuck as are available for use in the industry and/or research.
The process gases are introduced via inlet 412. Multiple source gas lines 410 are connected to manifold 408. The gases may be optionally premixed. Appropriate valving and mass flow control mechanisms are employed to ensure that the correct gases are delivered during the process. In case the chemical precursor(s) is delivered in the liquid form, liquid flow control mechanisms are employed. The liquid is then vaporized and mixed with other process gases during its transportation in a manifold heated above its vaporization point before reaching the deposition chamber.
Process gases exit chamber 400 via an outlet 422. A vacuum pump 426 (e.g., a one or two stage mechanical dry pump and/or a turbomolecular pump) draws process gases out and maintains a suitably low pressure within the reactor by a close loop controlled flow restriction device, such as a throttle valve or a pendulum valve.
The following examples are provided to further illustrate aspects of various embodiments. These examples are provided to exemplify and more clearly illustrate aspects and are not intended to be limiting. Radio frequency (RF) power levels described below are for a four-station tool configured for 300 mm wafers.
Experimental data was collected for an embodiment of the process in
An AHM was deposited on a dielectric film on a substrate using C2H2 as a precursor and N2 and He as carrier gases. Measurements were taken for the AHM modulus and stress deposited without using LF modulation. Such data is represented by the diamond-shaped points and solid line in
Continuous wave plasma generation was used to deposit AHM using PECVD methods. The plasma source generated HF power with a frequency of 13.56 MHz, and LF power with a frequency of 430 kHz. The HF power was 0.35 W/cm2 and the LF power was 0.42 W/cm2. The LF power was not pulsed; both the HF power and LF power were on and constant during the AHM deposition.
Measurements were taken for the modulus and AHM stress deposited using LF modulation. The data is represented by circle-shaped points and dotted line in
The dual RF plasma source generated HF power with a frequency of 13.56 MHz, and LF power with a frequency of 430 kHz. The HF power was 0.35 W/cm2 and the LF power was pulsed between 0 W/cm2 and 0.42 W/cm2. The LF power was pulsed at a frequency of 2 Hz.
Stress and modulus data was taken for both the non-pulsed AHM and the pulsed-AHM and results are graphed in
Experimental data was collected for another embodiment of the process in
Data for stress and selectivity was collected for AHMs deposited using continuous wave plasma generation. The data is represented by the diamond-shaped points and the solid line in
The dual RF plasma source generated HF power with a frequency of 13.56 MHz, and LF power with a frequency of 430 kHz. The HF power was 0.22 W/cm2 and the LF power was 0.22 W/cm2. The LF power was not pulsed; both the HF power and LF power were turned on and constant during the AHM deposition.
Next, data was collected for stress and AHM etch selectivity deposited using pulsed LF PECVD. The data is represented by the circle-shaped points in
The dual RF plasma source generated HF power with a frequency of 13.56 MHz, and LF power with a frequency of 430 kHz. The HF power was 0.22 W/cm2 and the LF power was pulsed between 0 W/cm2 and 0.22 W/cm2. The LF power was pulsed at a frequency of 2 Hz.
Etch selectivity was measured for both the continuous wave and LF-pulsed AHMs. The results are graphed in
To determine the AHM's molecular composition from convention continuous wave plasma AHMs and LF-pulsed AHMs, thermal desorption spectroscopy (TDS) methods were used.
Although the foregoing embodiments have been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be apparent that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the appended claims. It should be noted that there are many alternative ways of implementing the processes, systems, and apparatus of the present embodiments. Accordingly, the present embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the embodiments are not to be limited to the details given herein.
This application claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/884,832, filed on Sep. 30, 2013, and titled “HIGH SELECTIVITY AND LOW STRESS CARBON HARDMASK BY PULSED LOW FREQUENCY RF POWER,” which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety and for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3816976 | Stork et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
4209357 | Gorin et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4274841 | Andresen et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4668261 | Chatzipetros et al. | May 1987 | A |
4673589 | Standley | Jun 1987 | A |
4863493 | Kotani et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4863760 | Schantz et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4975144 | Yamazaki et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5022959 | Itoh et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5222549 | Ishii et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5231057 | Doki et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5261250 | Missimer | Nov 1993 | A |
5378316 | Franke et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5419804 | Ojha et al. | May 1995 | A |
5470661 | Bailey et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5562952 | Nakahigashi et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5670066 | Barnes et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5792269 | Deacon et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5900288 | Kuhman et al. | May 1999 | A |
5968379 | Zhao et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5985103 | Givens et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6006797 | Bulow et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6030591 | Tom et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6035803 | Robles et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041734 | Raoux et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6066209 | Sajoto et al. | May 2000 | A |
6114259 | Sukharev et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6150719 | Saia et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6241793 | Lee et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6286321 | Glater | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6319299 | Shih et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331480 | Tsai et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6367413 | Sill et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6387819 | Yu | May 2002 | B1 |
6422918 | Avanzino et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6458516 | Ye et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6465051 | Sahin et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6478924 | Shamouilian et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6541397 | Bencher | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6573030 | Fairbairn et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6613434 | Drevillon et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6617553 | Ho et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6635185 | Demmin | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6777349 | Fu et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6787452 | Sudijono et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6787819 | Rhodes et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6884733 | Dakshina-Murthy | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6967072 | Latchford et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7064078 | Liu et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7202176 | Goto et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7205228 | Padhi et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7220982 | Campbell | May 2007 | B2 |
7223526 | Fairbairn et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7235478 | Geng et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7271106 | Abatchev et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7288484 | Goto et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7314506 | Vininski et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7323401 | Ramaswamy et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7381644 | Subramonium et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7399712 | Graff | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7495984 | Kim et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7576009 | Lee et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7803715 | Haimson et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7820556 | Hsu et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7915166 | Yu et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7955990 | Henri et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7981777 | Subramonium et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
7981810 | Subramonium et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8110493 | Subramonium et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8114782 | Graff | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8129281 | Cheung et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8227352 | Yu et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8309473 | Hsu et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8435608 | Subramonium et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8563414 | Fox et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8569179 | Graff | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8664124 | Graff | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8669181 | Yu et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8962101 | Subramonium et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9240320 | Subramonium et al. | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9304396 | Shamma et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9320387 | Reddy et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
20010021491 | Chen et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020182848 | Joseph et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020185151 | Qingyuan et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030044532 | Lee et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030106647 | Koshiishi et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030124859 | Cheung | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040000534 | Lipinski | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040016972 | Singh et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040018750 | Sophie et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040023502 | Tzou et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040058517 | Nallan et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040140506 | Singh et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040180551 | Biles et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040224504 | Gadgil | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040266195 | Dokumaci et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050042889 | Lee et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050054202 | Pan et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050098119 | Burger et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050112506 | Czech et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050129935 | Kunitake et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050130404 | Moghadam et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050167394 | Liu et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050202683 | Wang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050260411 | Ravi | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050287771 | Seamons et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060019486 | Yu et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060091559 | Nguyen et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060154086 | Fuller et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060154477 | Geng et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060197881 | Kang et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060205223 | Smayling | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060231524 | Liu et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060246373 | Wang | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070032054 | Ramaswamy et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070048674 | Wells | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070054500 | Bencher | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070059913 | King et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070072112 | Prokopowicz et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070077780 | Wang et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070105303 | Busch et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070125762 | Cui et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070128538 | Fairbairn et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070140029 | Kim et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070166546 | Ichikawa et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070166979 | Wang et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070202640 | Al-Bayati et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070247073 | Paterson et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070249172 | Huang et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080073636 | Kim | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080083916 | Kim | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080128907 | Yang et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080200003 | Hong et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080242912 | Letessier et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080254639 | Graff | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080254641 | Kobayashi et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080264803 | Agrawal | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090176174 | Chen et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090182180 | Huang et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090305516 | Hsu et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100151691 | Henri et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100297853 | Hsu et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110236594 | Haverkamp et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110236600 | Fox et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110244142 | Cheng et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120149207 | Graff | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120196446 | Graff | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130109188 | Kim | May 2013 | A1 |
20130216956 | Kishioka et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140057454 | Subramonium et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140199628 | Edelstein et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140239462 | Shamma et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140273469 | Wahl et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140273473 | Schmid et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150093915 | Reddy et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2853313 | Oct 2004 | FR |
62019539 | Jan 1987 | JP |
08-152262 | Jun 1996 | JP |
382671 | May 1973 | SU |
WO 2005048367 | May 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
US Office Action, dated May 15, 2015, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/270,001. |
US Final Office Action, dated Aug. 4, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/974,808. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Oct. 23, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/974,808. |
Taiwan Office Action, dated May 8, 2014, issued in TW Application No. 098142631. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/185,757, filed Feb. 20, 2014, entitled PECVD Films for EUV Lithography. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/160,399, filed Jun. 14, 2011, entitled “Methods of Depositing Highly Selective Transparent Ashable Hardmask Films” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/612,382, filed Dec. 18, 2006, entitled “Methods of Improving Ashable Hardmask Adhesion to Metal layers”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/849,208, filed Aug. 31, 2007, entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Plasma-Based Deposition”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/856,364, filed Apr. 3, 2013, entitled “Methods of Depositing Smooth and Conformal Ashable Hard Mask Films”. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Oct. 4, 2006, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,269. |
US Office Action, dated Dec. 14, 2006, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,269. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated May 7, 2007, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,269. |
US Office Action, dated Aug. 27, 2007, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,269. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 7, 2008, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,269. |
US Office Action, dated Nov. 22, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/048,967. |
US Office Action, dated Apr. 18, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/048,967. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Oct. 7, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/048,967. |
US Office Action dated, Dec. 27, 2007, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/449,983. |
US Final Office Action, dated Jul. 9, 2008, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/449,983. |
US Office Action, dated Jan. 5, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/449,983. |
US Final Office Action, dated Sep. 15, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/449,983. |
US Office Action, dated Jun. 21, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/449,983. |
US Final Office Action, dated Dec. 30, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/449,983. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 16, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/449,983. |
US Office Action, dated Jun. 1, 2007, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/612,382. |
US Office Action, dated Oct. 9, 2007, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/612,382. |
US Final Office Action, dated May 13, 2008, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/612,382. |
US Office Action, dated Aug. 19, 2008, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/612,382. |
US Final Office Action, dated Feb. 24, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/612,382. |
US Final Office Action, dated May 12, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/612,382. |
US Final Office Action, dated Dec. 9, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/612,382. |
US Office Action, dated Mar. 26, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/612,382. |
US Office Action dated Nov. 20, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/710,652. |
US Final Office Action dated Apr. 15, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/710,652. |
US Office Action dated Aug. 5, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/710,652. |
US Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 24, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/710,652. |
US Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/032,392. |
US Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 25, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/032,392. |
US Office Action, dated Jan. 5, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/710,377. |
US Office Action, dated Aug. 19, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/710,377. |
US Office Action, dated Mar. 31, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/710,377. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 22, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/710,377. |
US Office Action, dated Sep. 3, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/849,208. |
US Final Office Action, dated Apr. 12, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/849,208. |
US Final Office Action, dated Sep. 14, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/849,208. |
US Final Office Action, dated Apr. 24, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/849,208. |
US Office Action, dated Feb. 28, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/974,808. |
US Office Action, dated Oct. 19, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/163,670. |
US Office Action, dated Feb. 14, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/163,670. |
US Office Action, dated Jul. 6, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/163,670. |
US Final Office Action dated Oct. 18, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/163,670. |
US Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 3, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/163,670. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Nov. 2, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/334,220. |
US Supplemental Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 8, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/334,220. |
US Office Action, dated Aug. 19, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/133,223. |
US Final Office Action, dated Dec. 21, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/133,223. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 2, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/133,223. |
US Office Action, dated Nov. 9, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/786,842. |
US Final Office Action, dated Apr. 19, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/786,842. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 20, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/786,842. |
US Office Action, dated Aug. 10, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/766,721. |
US Final Office Action, dated Mar. 14, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/766,721. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 28, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/766,721. |
US Office Action, dated Jun. 1, 2007, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/263,148. |
US Final Office Action, dated Oct. 24, 2007, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/263,148. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 18, 2008, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/263,148. |
US Office Action, dated May 2, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/263,148. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Oct. 13, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/263,148. |
US Office Action, dated Feb. 15, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/371,184. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 1, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/371,184. |
US Office Action, dated Oct. 9, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/372,363. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 30, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/372,363. |
Korean Office Action, dated Jun. 1, 2010, issued in Application No. 2009/0048358. |
Callegari et al. (1993) “Optical properties of hydrogenated amorphous-carbon film for attenuated phase-shift mask applications,” J.Vac. Sci. Technol. B 11(6):2697-2699. |
Grill, A. (1999) “Diamond-like carbon: state of the art,” Diamond and Related Materials 8,pp. 428-434. |
Grill, A. (1999) “Plasma-deposited diamondlike carbon and related materials,” IBM Journal of Research and Development, vol. 43, ½, http://research.ibm.com/journal/rd/431/grill.html.,14 pp. |
Grill, et al. (1990) “Diamondlike carbon films by rf plasma-assisted chemical vapor deposition from acetylene,” IBM J. Res. Develop., 34(6):849-857. |
Holmes et al. (1987) “Trimethylsilylacetylene”, Organic Syntheses, Coll. vol. 8, p. 606; vol. 65, p. 61. |
Ikeda et al. (1992) “Top-PECVD”: A New Conformal Plasma Enhanced CVD Technology using TEOS, Ozone and Pulse-modulated RF Plasma, IEEE, pp. 11.2.1-11.2.4. |
Jacobsohn et al. (1998) “Hydrogenated Carbon-Nitrogen Films Obtained by PECVD Using Acetylyne and Nitrogen As Precursor Gases,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 498: 283-288. |
Kragler et al. (1995) “Scanning tunneling microscopy based lithography employing amorphous hydrogenated carbon as a high resolution resist mask,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 67(8):1163-1165. |
Kreupl, Franz et al. (2008) “Carbon-Based Resistive Memory,” presented at IEDM, submitted Jun. 26, 2008; accepted Aug. 4, 2008, 4 pages. |
Lemaire, P.J., Walker, K.L., Kranz, K.S., Huff, R.G. and DiMarcello, F.V. “Diffusion of Hydrogen Through Hermetic Carbon Films on Silica Fibers,” AT&T Bell Laboratories, 600 Mountain Avenue, Murray Hill, NJ 07974. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 172:85-96 © 1990 Materials Research Society. |
Muhl et al. (1999) “A Review of the Preparation of Carbon Nitride Films,” Diamond and Related Materials, 8: 1809-1830. |
Ong, Soon-Eng et al. (2007) “Temperature effect on bonding structures of amorphous carbon containing more than 30at.% silicon,” Diamond & Related Materials, 16:1823-1827. |
Van de Ven et al. (1990) “Advantages of Dual Frequency PECVD for Deposition of ILD and Passivation Films,” VLSI Multilevel Interconnection Conference Proceedings, Seventh International IEEE, 194-201. |
Voronkin et al. (1994) “Structure and mechanical properties of a-C:H films deposited onto polymer substrates: Diamond and Related Materials,” 4:5-9. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/053,987, filed Feb. 25, 2016, entitled “PECVD Films for EUV Lithography.”. |
US Office Action, dated Aug. 6, 2015, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/185,757. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Nov. 25, 2015, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/185,757. |
US Final Office Action, dated Oct. 9, 2015, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/270,001. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 23, 2015, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/270,001. |
US Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 22, 2015, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/856,364. |
Korean Office Action, dated Sep. 15, 2015, issued in KR Application No. 10-2009-0123999. |
Singapore Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 15, 2015 issued in SG 201300974-1. |
FABTECH news release: “New Product: Ashable hard mask process from Novellus targets high aspect ratio etch,” (Jun. 28, 2007), 2 pages. |
Matheson brochure: “PICO-TRAP™ AHM: Ultra-Purification System for PECVD of Amorphous Carbon Films,” (Apr. 2010), Matheson, 2pp. |
Subramonium et al., “Low Temperature Ashable Hardmask (AHM™) Films for sub-45nm Patterning,” citation information unavailable, no date available, 3pp. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150093908 A1 | Apr 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61884832 | Sep 2013 | US |