This invention relates to implantable medical devices, especially implantable cables and electrode arrays for stimulation, recording and interconnection.
Arrays of electrodes for neural stimulation are commonly used for a variety of purposes. Some examples include U.S. Pat. No. 3,699,970 to Brindley, which describes an array of cortical electrodes for visual stimulation. Each electrode is attached to a separate inductive coil for signal and power. U.S. Pat. No. 4,573,481 to Bullara describes a helical electrode to be wrapped around an individual nerve fiber. U.S. Pat. No. 4,837,049 to Byers describes spike electrodes for neural stimulation. Each spike electrode pierces neural tissue for better electrical contact. U.S. Pat. No. 5,215,088 to Norman describes an array of spike electrodes for cortical stimulation. U.S. Pat. No. 5,109,844 to de Juan describes a flat electrode array placed against the retina for visual stimulation. U.S. Pat. No. 5,935,155 to Humayun describes a retinal prosthesis for use with a flat retinal array.
Packaging of a biomedical device intended for implantation in the eye, and more specifically for physical contact with the retina, presents a unique interconnection challenge. The consistency of the retina is comparable to that of wet tissue paper and the biological media inside the eye is a corrosive saline liquid environment.
Thus, the device to be placed against the retina, in addition to being comprised of biocompatible, electrochemically stable materials, must appropriately conform to the curvature of the eye, being sufficiently flexible and gentle in contact with the retina to avoid tissue damage, as discussed by Schneider, et al. [see A. Schneider, T. Stieglitz, W. Haberer, H. Beutel, and J.-Uwe Meyer, “Flexible Interconnects for Biomedical Microsystems Assembly,” IMAPS Conference, Jan. 31, 2001.] It is also desirable that this device, an electrode array, provides a maximum density of stimulation electrodes. A commonly accepted design for an electrode array is a very thin, flexible circuit cable. It is possible to fabricate a suitable electrode array using discrete wires, but with this approach, a high number of stimulation electrodes cannot be achieved without sacrificing cable flexibility (to a maximum of about 16 electrodes).
Known insulators for implanted electrical circuits include polyimide and silicone dielectrics. They have limited lives once implanted. The polyimide slowly degrades upon exposure to the living tissue and allows water to reach the electrical conductor, eventually leading to at least partial electric current leakage.
Known techniques for implanted electrical circuits do not result in a hermetic package that is suitable for chronic implantation in living tissue. Therefore, it is desired to have an insulated electrical conductor that ensures that the electronic package will function for long-term implant applications in living tissue.
The preferred embodiment is an implantable insulated electrical circuit for electrical transmission within living organisms. These assemblies provide electrical conduction, isolation of the electrical conductors from the environment in the living tissue and from each other, and mechanical support for the electrical conductor. Electrical device assemblies that are commonly used for stimulation and or recording within the body benefit from the invention. Neural stimulators or sensors are of particular interest, including retinal electrode arrays. The implantable insulated electrical conductors may also be used to connect discrete components of an implanted medical device, permitting the transmission of electrical signals, power, as well as providing mechanical connection. Key attributes include good electrical insulation properties, low moisture absorption, appropriate mechanical characteristics and ease of fabrication.
Polyparaxylylene is a known polymer that has excellent implant characteristics. One example, Parylene, manufactured by Specialty Coating Systems (SCS), a division of Cookson Electronic Equipment Group, located in Indianapolis, Ind., is a preferred material. Parylene is available in various forms, such as Parylene C, Parylene D, and Parylene N, each having different properties. The preferred form is Parylene C, although it is recognized that many forms of polyparaxylylene may exist or may be developed that are suitable for this application.
The use of Parylene was mentioned, but not pursued, by Sonn and Feist. [see M. Sonn and W. M. Feist, “A Prototype Flexible Microelectrode Array for Implant-Prosthesis Applications,” Medical and Biological Engineering, 778-791, November 1974.] Stieglitz, et al. published fabrication details of similar items manufactured using polyimide. [see T. Stieglitz, H. Beutel, M. Schuettler, and J.-U. Meyer, “Micromachined, Polyimide-Based Devices for Flexible Neural Interfaces,” Biomedical Microdevices, 2:4, 283-294, 2000.] Ganesh wrote a thesis on ribbon cables for neural recording and stimulation using polyimide [see B. Ganesh, “A Polyimide Ribbon Cable for Neural Recording and Stimulation Systems,” Thesis, University of Utah, March 1998.] Parylene is widely used as an electrical insulating and barrier material in commercial electronic devices. It is well known to use Parylene as a conformal coating on printed circuit boards. While discrete wires have been coated with Parylene for implantation, such as with cochlear implants, the application of Parylene as an electrical insulator for implantable electrical circuits, as embodied by this invention, is unknown to the inventors.
The moisture vapor transmission rates compare favorably with those of other conformal coating materials. The rate for Parylene C is superior to almost all polymeric materials. The Parylenes resist room temperature chemical attack and are insoluble in organic solvents up to 150° C. Parylene C can be dissolved in chloro-napthalene at 175° C., and Parylene N is soluble at the solvent's boiling point (265° C.). The thermal properties are given in Table 1 and the electrical properties are given in Table 2.
aASTM D 149
bASTM D 257, 1 in2 mercury electrodes
cASTM D 150, 1 in2
A cross-sectional view of a preferred embodiment of the invention is presented in
A first Parylene layer 4 is deposited on the substrate 2 from a vapor phase that is produced by known techniques, such as thermal decomposition. It is known that Parylene is the polymer “polyparaxylylene” and that any source of this material may be used to implement this invention. The inventors use the term Parylene, as is common in industry practice, to indicate the class of polyparaxylylene polymers.
An electrical conductor 6 is deposited by a known physical vapor deposition method, such as sputtering or evaporation. While the preferred embodiment is to an electrical conductor 6 that is comprised of one material, it is clear that the electrical conductor 6 may also be comprised of layers of several materials. Alternatively, the conductor 6 or combination thereof may be deposited by other known methods, such as direct write, plating, or electrophoresis. The electrical conductor 6 is patterned by known techniques, such as lift-off or etching. The electrical conductor 6 may be comprised of a single metal or in an alternate embodiment, from several metals that may be layered or alloyed, that are selected from a group of electrically conductive biocompatible materials having favorable electrochemical characteristics, such as titanium, platinum, gold, iridium, and their alloys. Multiple metals may be used in order to achieve desired characteristics. For example, adhesion and barrier layers are commonly used in electronics where individual metal layers are combined to yield a more functional circuit stack. These electrical conduction paths, traces, bond pads, and electrode sites are formed prior to depositing a second layer of Parylene 8 to the device. Typical thicknesses of each Parylene layer are in the range of 0.5 to 50 microns, and preferably are about 3 to 15 microns thick. An alternate embodiment uses metals that are not biocompatible, so long as they are completely encapsulated by the surrounding structural elements and thus do not contact living tissue.
In an alternate embodiment, non-biocompatible materials, such as chrome, silver, or copper may be used as the electrical conductor 6. The electrical conductor 6 is then coated with a biocompatible, hermetic coating in the exposed aperture 6 area. This coating is preferably titanium nitride, although in alternative embodiments it may be an electrically conductive biocompatible metal, such as titanium, platinum, gold, iridium, or their alloys. The Parylene layers cover and protect the rest of the electrical conductor 6.
Apertures 10 are patterned by known techniques, such as by dry etching or laser ablation, or by reactive ion etching. The apertures 10 permit electrical conduction to either tissue or a connected implanted device. The apertures 10 define an electrode area on the electrical conductor 6.
The rigid substrate 2 is removed by known techniques, such as mechanical separation or etching, where mechanical separation is the preferred technique.
As a further embodiment of the invention, adhesion between the first layer of Parylene 4 and the second layer of Parylene 8 is preferably improved by one or more of the following techniques:
(a) Silane application between Parylene layers.
(b) Chemical modification of the Parylene surface to create an energetic, a reactive, or an amorphous surface (Parylene is amorphous as deposited).
(c) Roughening of the Parylene surface.
(d) Thermal compression of the Parylene layers.
Techniques (b) and (c) can used to improve the metal to Parylene adhesion, if applied prior to metal deposition.
More than one electrical conductor 6 may be deposited adjacent to the Parylene. Additional metal layers may be deposited that are protected by additional Parylene layers, such that a multilayered higher density electrical circuit is achieved.
A further alternative embodiment,
In an alternative embodiment, not illustrated, one applies a first polymer coating, preferably polyimide, prior to depositing the first Parylene layer, such that beginning with the rigid substrate, the layers are, polymer layer (preferably polyimide)—first Parylene layer—electrical conductor—second layer of Parylene.
In yet another embodiment, not illustrated, a polymer coating, preferably of polyimide is applied between the Parylene layer and the electrical conductor.
In further embodiments, not illustrated, a polymer coating, preferably of polyimide is deposited on either side of the second layer of Parylene, either in the presence or absence of a polymer coating on the first layer of Parylene.
Obviously, many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that, within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/638,989, US Publication No. 20070158100, filed Aug. 11, 2003 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,380,326, which claims the benefit of U.S. provisional Application No. 60/402,591 filed on Aug. 9, 2002, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
This invention was made with government support under grant No. R24EY12893-01, awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3699970 | Brindley et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3977392 | Manley | Aug 1976 | A |
4573481 | Bullara et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4837049 | Byers et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
5067491 | Taylor et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5109844 | De Juan, Jr. et al. | May 1992 | A |
5215088 | Normann et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5476496 | Strandberg et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5720099 | Parker et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5935155 | Humayan et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6374143 | Berrang et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6400989 | Eckmiller | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6458157 | Suaning | Oct 2002 | B1 |
7146221 | Krulevitch et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
20020187260 | Sheppard et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030109903 | Berrang et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
M. Sonn and W. M. Feist, “A Prototype Flexible Microelectrode Array for Implant-Prosthesis Applications,” Medical and Biological Engineering, 778-791, Nov. 1974. |
T. Stieglitz, H. Beutel, M. Schuettler, and J.-U. Meyer, “Micromachined, Polyimide-Based Devices for Flexible Neural Interfaces,” Biomedical Microdevices, 2:4, 283-294, 2000. |
B. Ganesh, “A Polyimide Ribbon Cable for Neural Recording and Stimulation Systems,” Thesis, University of Utah, Mar. 1998. |
A. Schneider, T. Stieglitz, W. Haberer, H. Beutel, and J.-Uwe Meyer, “Flexible Interconnects for Biomedical Microsystems Assembly”, IMAPS Conference, Jan. 31, 2001. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060225274 A1 | Oct 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60402591 | Aug 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10638989 | Aug 2003 | US |
Child | 11441993 | US |