The invention generally relates to methods of fabrication of integrated circuits (ICs). More specifically, the invention is a method of fabricating and integrating a metastable silicon-germanium (SiGe) base region into a heterojunction bipolar transistor (HBT).
The SiGe HBT has significant advantages over a silicon bipolar junction transistor (BJT) in gain, frequency response, noise parameters, and retains an ability to integrate with CMOS devices at relatively low cost. Cutoff frequencies (Ft) of SiGe HBT devices have been reported to exceed 300 GHz, which is favorable as compared to GaAs devices. However, GaAs devices are relatively high in cost and cannot achieve the level of integration, such as, for example, of BiCMOS devices. The silicon compatible SiGe HBT provides a low cost, high speed, low power solution that is quickly replacing other compound semiconductor devices.
Advantages of SiGe are realized by a bandgap reduction creating an energy band offset at the Si—SiGe heterojunction(s) of the HBT, thereby resulting in increased current densities for a given base-emitter bias and higher gains. Also, a lower resistivity is possible with addition of Ge to a Si lattice. The higher current densities and lower base resistance values allow improved unity gain cutoff frequencies and maximum oscillation frequencies than comparable silicon BJTs, and are comparable to other compound devices such as GaAs. However, the emitter collector breakdown voltage (especially BVCEO) is inversely proportional to the current gain (β). The structural and process changes required to enhance Ft and reduce power lead to higher and higher current gains and hence lower and lower collector-emitter breakdown voltages.
Elevated Ge fractions result in an increase in base recombination current and a reduction in current gain for a given layer thickness and doping level. This effect has been confirmed experimentally to extend beyond 30% Ge. References on detect formation in pseudomorphic SiGe with high Ge content suggests the effect will continue to increase for Ge fractions well above 40% (i.e., Kasper et al., “Properties of Silicon Germanium and SiGe:Carbon,” INSPEC, 2000). Therefore, a compromise of increasing the Ge fraction high enough to reduce current gain in high-speed devices provides a way to compensate for an inevitable increase in gain and degradation of BVCEO as basewidths continue to shrink.
However, there is a limit to how much Ge can be added to the Si lattice before excess strain relaxation and gross crystalline defects occur. A critical thickness (hc) of a SiGe layer that is lattice matched to the underlying silicon is a function of (1) percentage of Ge; (2) SiGe film thickness; (3) cap layer thickness; (4) temperature of HBT filmstack processing; and (5) temperature of thermal anneals following a silicon-germanium deposition. Above the critical thickness, hc, the SiGe film is in a metastable and/or unstable region, which implies it will relax readily with a large enough application of thermal energy. Therefore, the degree of metastability is largely a function of percent Ge, SiGe layer thickness, cap layer thickness, and process induced strain due to thermal energy. Construction of a SiGe base of a conventional SiGe HBT described to date is that of a stable, pseudomorphic, or lattice-matched layer. Contemporaneous state-of-the-art procedures include growing stable, strained or lattice-matched alloys of SiGe with carbon to prevent spreading of the boron profile in the base region.
Metastable film growth is typically avoided due to the fact that relaxation results in lattice imperfections. These imperfections result in recombination centers; hence, a reduction in minority carrier lifetime (τb) and an increase in base recombination current (IRB) occurs. If not controlled, a resultant poor crystal quality due to lattice imperfections will degrade device performance. “Bridging” defects will also lead to excessive leakage current along with extremely low current gain. The film will also be very sensitive to process induced thermal stresses and therefore will not be manufacturable. Therefore, to avoid this type of degradation, the HBT designs to date result in a device with a base region that is in the stable region of film growth, which equates to a SiGe thickness that is equal to or below the critical thickness, hc.
Properties of metastable SiGe are discussed in several papers such as D. C. Houghton, “Strain Relaxation Kinetics in Si1-xGex/Si Heterostructures,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 70, pp. 2136-2151 (Aug. 15, 1991), and G. S. Kar et al. “Effect of carbon on lattice strain and hole mobility in Si1-xGex alloys,” Dept. of Physics and Meteorology, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur 721302, India, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, Vol. 13, pp. 49-55 (2002). Further, U.S. Pat. No. 6,586,297 (“the '297 patent”) and U.S. Pat. No. 6,781,214 (“the '214 patent”), to U'Ren et at describe a “Metastable Base in a High-Performance HBT” and a “Method for Integrating a Metastable Base into a High Performance HBT and Related Structure,” respectively.
The '297 patent describes a heterojunction bipolar transistor that includes a metastable epitaxial silicon-germanium base on a single crystal collector and an emitter situated over a metastable epitaxial SiGe base.
The metastable epitaxial SiGe base is grown in an epitaxial reactor where the metastable epitaxial SiGe base is a strained crystalline structure including a conductivity altering dopant incorporated in-situ during film growth; the dopant is added for the sole purpose of establishing a specific conductivity type. The '297 patent describes a method that includes a short thermal anneal at temperatures of 900° C. to 950° C. to avoid relaxing the metastable SiGe film layer.
The '214 patent describes a heterojunction bipolar transistor fabricated by forming a metastable epitaxial SiGe base on a collector with a concentration of germanium greater than 20 atomic percent. An emitter is then fabricated over the metastable epitaxial SiGe base. The emitter is doped with an n- or p-type impurity depending on the transistor type, npn or pnp. The HBT is then heated in a spike anneal process to maintain the metastable epitaxial silicon-germanium base as a strained crystalline structure and to diffuse the dopants to form the emitter-base junction. The metastable epitaxial SiGe base is grown in an epitaxial reactor where the metastable epitaxial SiGe base is strained crystalline structure including a dopant incorporated in-situ during film growth; the dopant is added for the sole purpose of establishing a specific conductivity type. The '214 patent describes a method that includes a short thermal anneal at temperatures of 900° C. to 950° C. to avoid relaxing the metastable SiGe film layer.
However, the methods described in these afore-mentioned references for forming a metastable SiGe film are still very susceptible to adverse effects of thermal stress such as slip dislocations and threading dislocations; all of which are associated with film relaxation. In highly metastable films, relaxation can take place during extremely short time intervals during an anneal process, depending on the degree of metastability, such as the first fraction of a second during a short anneal and/or a flash anneal process.
Therefore, what is needed is a method to grow and integrate strain-compensated metastable SiGe layers for application to a SiGe HBT. Such a method should allow a skilled artisan to, for example, control and utilize defect density for device optimization, achieve extremely high energy band offsets and grades (ΔEG(0) & ΔEG(grade)) without incurring excess “bridging” defects, such as slip or threading dislocations, and provide a method to achieve high volume manufacturability of films that would normally be unreliable and/or unrepeatable due to their extremely metastable or even unstable properties.
Each of these improvements allows the use of films that would otherwise be highly metastable (or even unstable) films in order to realize the advantages offered with high concentrations of Ge.
The present invention is a method for pseudomorphic growth and integration of a strain-compensated metastable and/or unstable compound base, which may also be in-situ doped, into an electronic device, such as, for example, a SiGe NPN HBT, by substitutional and/or interstitial placement of strain-compensating atomic species. The method allows for control of defect density, and thus resultant control of minority carrier lifetime, base recombination current, base current and current gain, and breakdown. Additionally, the ability to achieve greater Ge fractions than is possible without strain compensation and maintain a strained, lattice matched film enables devices with greater energy band offsets and hence greatly improved current densities and hence significantly improved Ft and Fmax figures.
The invention also applies to strained layers in a variety of other electronic device types including strained SiGe, strained Ge, and/or strained Si in MOS applications, vertical thin film transistors (VTFT), resonant tunnel diodes (RTD), and a variety of other electronic device types. Heterojunction and heterostructure devices formed from compound semiconductors other than SiGe, such as, for example, GaAs, InP, and AlGaAs may also be amenable to beneficial processes described herein. Any strain-compensating element that will incorporate substitutionally and/or interstitially are amendable to the methods presented herein.
Elements that do not significantly affect the conductivity are oftentimes desirable. Therefore, when using strain compensating group IV semiconductors such as Si, Ge, and/or SiGe it might be desirable to avoid group II/III or group V/VI elements to avoid affecting the conductivity. However, this does not preclude the use of “conductivity altering” elements for the dual purpose of strain compensation and also to effectively alter the conductivity simultaneously.
An electronic device fabricated by the method described herein, in an exemplary embodiment, includes a substrate with a compound semiconductor film disposed over a first surface of the substrate. The compound semiconductor film is deposited in a metastable state by exceeding the critical thickness, hc, for the germanium concentration being used and the thermal cycles employed in the process after the compound semiconductor film has been formed. A substitutional strain-compensating, atomic species (e.g., carbon) is added in-situ during the film growth to control defect density and avoid complete relaxation during the remainder of processing.
A strain-compensating atomic species is a species that, when added, alters the lattice parameter of a crystalline film from its intrinsic value. The intrinsic lattice parameter is the lattice parameter of the film or layer without the strain compensating species. For strain compensation of SiGe, one strain-compensating atomic species is carbon. One atomic percent of substitutional carbon will compensate eight percent to ten percent of Ge. Additionally, carbon can be substitutionally placed to approximately 2.5 percent in SiGe, or enough carbon to strain compensate 20 to 25 percent of Ge. Therefore, pseudomorphic strain-compensated metastable and/or unstable films with Ge levels of greater than 40 percent are possible (i.e., using four percent to five percent carbon) for electronic device use.
Even though one exemplary embodiment provides for strain reduction, a strain compensating atomic species with a larger lattice constant than either Si or Ge could be added to purposely increase strain. This type of strain modification would be suitable as well, for instance as a tool for bandgap and/or lattice engineering; defect engineering could make good use of strain modification as well. Strain modification would also be useful for enhancing carrier mobility in a “strain-compensated film” and any adjacent film layers.
The method described herein differs from previous methods for formation of a SiGe HBT due to an emphasis on intentional growth of a metastable and/or unstable base layer and a calculated incorporation of substitutional and/or interstitial carbon. The substitutional and/or interstitial carbon strain compensates an HBT base region to avoid strain relaxation, and allows defectivity engineering to decouple current gain from IC and Ft enhancement, along with integrating downstream thermal anneal processes thus avoiding excess carbon diffusion and maintaining the film in a strained state.
With reference to
In a specific exemplary embodiment, the substrate 101 is a p-type, 20 Ω-cm <100> silicon wafer. The epitaxial layer 103 is grown by LPCVD and can be either p-type or n-type depending on the technology application and the requirements for breakdown voltages and collector resistance. Arsenic and/or phosphorous may be doped into the epitaxial layer 103 and the substrate 101 to provide a low resistance collector region. The arsenic and phosphorous may be diffused or implanted. If implanted, one skilled in the art will recognize that the energy and dose of the implant must be determined by specific technology requirements for collector resistance, breakdown voltages, etc. A skilled artisan will also recognize that other methods may be employed to dope this region, such as diffusion or LPCVD (in-situ doping).
In the case of a silicon substrate 101, prior to growth, the silicon growth surface should be cleaned (typically with a wet chemistry such as hydrofluoric acid) to remove any native oxidation and surface contaminants. The elemental seedlayer 105, the metastable base region 107, and the elemental cap layer 109 may be fabricated during the same LPCVD process. Temperatures in the range of 500° C. to 900° C. are typically employed for epitaxial growth of each layer. Silane (SiH4) and germane (GeH4) are typical gases for silicon and SiGe deposition. Diborane (B2H6) and arsine (AsH3) are common p- and n-type dopant sources. Hydrogen (H2) may be utilized as a carrier gas, however other gases such as helium may be used.
In another specific exemplary embodiment, the substrate 101 is a <100> p-type silicon wafer, boron doped to a concentration of approximately 1015 atoms/cm3. Alternatively, the substrate 101 could also be, for example, an n-type silicon wafer or a substrate comprised of a compound semiconducting material such as silicon-germanium of either p-type or n-type conductivity. The substrate 101 may also be silicon-on-insulator (SOI) or silicon germanium-on-insulator. The epitaxial layer 103 is deposited to a thickness of between 0.3 μm and 2 μm, followed by the elemental seed layer 105. The epi layer is typically added as a low doped region to tailor breakdown voltages and/or collector resistance.
In this embodiment, the elemental seed layer 105 is comprised of silicon, which is epitaxially grown to a thickness range of 10 nm to 100 nm, although other semiconducting materials may be employed, such as silicon germanium with very low Ge content. The strain-compensated metastable SiGe layer 107 is deposited to a thickness greater than the critical thickness, hc, followed by the elemental cap layer 109 comprised of, for example, silicon.
The critical thickness, hc, is determined based on atomic percentage of Ge within an upper and lower bound of a metastable region. This critical thickness determination is based on historical work of People/Bean and Matthews/Blakeslee, and is known in to one of skill in art.
As an example,
Additionally, one may desire to grow a film that resides well into the metastable region, and then to only partially compensate the film so-as to maintain a certain degree of metastability for defect and/or lattice engineering.
One skilled in the art will recognize that data and charts such as those of
The absence of and/or “smearing” of fringes in the Xrd rocking curves will indicate a film relaxation (
Other experimental approaches may be utilized, such as putting electrical devices through electrical testing to identify the acceptable level of strain compensation for a particular device or technology. This acceptable level will be determined by device electrical parameters, especially the collector current, base current, current gain, and breakdown voltages for an HBT. Other electrical parameters may be characterized and controlled for other device types and/or technologies.
Individual processes should be characterized with experimental methods to determine where their process resides with respect to the stable/metastable/relaxed regions as depicted by theoretical and empirically derived charts such as those discussed supra. This characterization will require analysis by such means of Xrd rocking curves, device electrical tests, and SIMS (secondary ion mass spectrometry) to reveal dopant diffusion, especially of strain compensating species such as carbon.
Even without the charts, the Xrd rocking curves can provide the quantitative and qualitative data necessary for developing strain compensated films, and that the “rule of thumb” for 1% carbon to compensate 8% to 10% Ge is a generally accepted guideline. Some metastable and/or unstable films and/or devices might require more or less carbon, depending on such factors as the film geometry, thermal stresses, and physically induced stresses (from adjacent films and structures) not accounted for in contemporary theoretical and empirical bodies of knowledge. Therefore, the guidelines provided herein will facilitate a development of metastable “strain compensated” films and/or devices and are intended as a system for providing an improved process and device. The guidelines also provide greater degrees of design engineering flexibility for bandgap engineering (i.e. Jc, Ft, Fmax) and defectivity and/or lattice engineering (i.e., minority carrier lifetime engineering, base recombination current engineering, base current engineering, current gain engineering, and breakdown optimization).
With further reference to
A carbon precursor (for example, methane (CH4) or acetylene (C2H2) is utilized during growth of the strain-compensated metastable SiGe layer 107 to add carbon. Precursors for formation of the strain-compensated metastable SiGe layer 107 include, for example, methyl silane (CH3SiH3), silane (SiH4), and germane (GeH4) for the carbon, silicon, and germanium components respectively. Hydrogen (H2) is typically employed as a carrier gas for all layer depositions. In-situ doping with a conductivity altering dopant of a thin section near the center of the strain-compensated metastable SiGe layer 107 creates a p-type neutral base region. This neutral base region is sandwiched between two SiGe setback or spacer layers (not shown). The p-type impurity may be boron, commonly supplied with a diborane (B2H6) precursor. The elemental cap layer 109 is epitaxially grown on top of the strain-compensated metastable SiGe layer 107. The elemental cap layer 109 (silicon) maintains the SiGe layer in a strained state. Cap layers are typically grown with a thickness between 0.05 μm and 0.1 μm. A skilled artisan will recognize that the cap layer maintains strain equilibrium within the SiGe layer, and that the thickness is tailored as appropriate.
A profile of the Ge associated with the strain-compensated metastable SiGe layer 107 is generally that of a trapezoid, although a skilled artisan will recognize that other Ge profiles, such as triangular, box, or profiles with curvature are possible. The polysilicon emitter layer 111 may be, for example, n-type in-situ doped polysilicon. Arsine (ASH3) may be used as an n-type dopant precursor employing hydrogen as a carrier gas for the process. The emitter layer 111 may be monocrystalline, polycrystalline, amorphous, or a compound material of a mono, or amorphous construction. In a specific exemplary embodiment, a SiGe deposition temperature is in the range of 550° C. to 650° C., although temperatures less than 600° C. may be preferred for many advanced fabrication processes in general, with a processing pressure range of 1 torr to 100 torr. Pseudomorphic SiGe growth is possible at higher temperatures, such as up to or even exceeding 900° C.
Although the present invention is described in terms of exemplary embodiments, a skilled artisan will realize that techniques described herein can readily be adapted to other forms of fabrication techniques and devices. For example, the strain-compensation techniques could be applied to other technologies such as FinFET, surround gate FET, vertical thin film transistors (VTFT), hyper-abrupt junctions, resonant tunnel diodes (RTD), and optical waveguides for photonics. Therefore, profiles, thicknesses, and concentrations of the strain-compensated metastable SiGe layer 107 can be selected to accommodate a variety of needs. The metastable SiGe layer 107 could also be strain compensated with other elements, which may induce a diminished diffusivity for a given dopant type.
Also, although process steps and techniques are described in detail, a skilled artisan will recognize that other techniques and methods may be utilized, which are still included within a scope of the appended claims. For example, there are several techniques used for depositing and doping a film layer (e.g., chemical vapor deposition, plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition, molecular beam epitaxy, atomic layer deposition, etc.). Although not all techniques are amenable to all film types described herein, one skilled in the art will recognize that multiple and alternative methods may be utilized for depositing or otherwise forming a given layer and/or film type.
Additionally, many industries allied with the semiconductor industry could make use of the strain-compensation technique. For example, a thin-film head (TFH) process in the data storage industry, an active matrix liquid crystal display (AMLCD) in the flat panel display industry, or the micro-electromechanical industry (MEM) could readily make use of the processes and techniques described herein. The term “semiconductor” should thus be recognized as including the aforementioned and related industries. The drawing and specification are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 11/268,154, entitled, “Methods for Growing Strain-Compensated Metastable Compound Films (As Amended)” filed on Nov. 7, 2005, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4459739 | Shepard et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4652183 | Veltri et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4701423 | Szluk | Oct 1987 | A |
4908325 | Berenz | Mar 1990 | A |
5137838 | Ramde et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5155571 | Wang et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5177583 | Endo et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5241214 | Herbots | Aug 1993 | A |
5331659 | Ohata et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5378901 | Nii | Jan 1995 | A |
5466949 | Okuno | Nov 1995 | A |
5569538 | Cho | Oct 1996 | A |
5620907 | Jalali-Farahani et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5661059 | Liu et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5686350 | Lee et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5804834 | Shimoyama et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5856685 | Nakayama | Jan 1999 | A |
5906708 | Robinson et al. | May 1999 | A |
5906951 | Chu et al. | May 1999 | A |
5965931 | Wang et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6059895 | Chu et al. | May 2000 | A |
6064081 | Robinson et al. | May 2000 | A |
6087683 | King et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6107647 | Matsumoto et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6165891 | Chooi et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6323108 | Kub et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6399970 | Kubo et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6512252 | Takagi et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6521041 | Wu et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6531369 | Ozkan et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6552375 | Swanson et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6586297 | U'Ren et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6593625 | Chritiansen et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6656809 | Greenberg et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6667489 | Suzumura et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6670542 | Sakata et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6670654 | Lanzerotti et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6680494 | Gutierrez-Aitken et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6709903 | Christiansen et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6744079 | Jagannathan et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6746902 | Maa et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6750484 | Lippert et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6759694 | Hsu et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6780796 | Maa et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6781214 | U'Ren et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6787822 | Nuyen | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6841457 | Bedell et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6855649 | Christiansen et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6855963 | Chu et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6858541 | Horning | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6876010 | Fitzgerald | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6900115 | Todd | May 2005 | B2 |
6906400 | Delhougne et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6927140 | Soman et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936910 | Ellis-Monaghan et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6963089 | Shi et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6992004 | Besser et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6995430 | Langdo et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7074623 | Lochtefeld et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7091114 | Ito et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7227176 | Wu et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7273799 | Todd | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7495250 | Enicks | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7517768 | Soman et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7550758 | Enicks | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7569913 | Enicks | Aug 2009 | B2 |
20010035863 | Kimura | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020008289 | Murota et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020081861 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020105015 | Kubo et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020185686 | Christiansen et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030040130 | Mayur et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030080394 | Babcock et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030082882 | Babcock et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030098465 | Suzumura et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030129802 | Lanzerotti et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030132453 | Greenberg et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140844 | Maa et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030143783 | Maa et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030146448 | U'Ren et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030159644 | Yonehara et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030201468 | Christiansen et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030218189 | Christiansen et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040009649 | Kub et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040031979 | Lochtefeld et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040048439 | Soman et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040048447 | Kondo | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040063293 | Greenberg et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040079989 | Kaneko et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040087119 | Maa et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040164336 | Weimer et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040222486 | Ellis-Monaghan et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040227158 | Delhougne | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040251458 | Mizushima et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040253776 | Hoffmann et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050045905 | Chu et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050045962 | Iwata et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050048745 | Todd | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050051798 | Lanzerotti et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050051861 | Shi et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050092235 | Brabant et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050112857 | Gluschenkov et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050127392 | Chu et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050181555 | Haukka et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050191911 | Greenberg et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050230705 | Taylor | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050233534 | Lanzerotti et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050250289 | Babcock et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050280103 | Langdo et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060011906 | Bedell et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060030093 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060068557 | Ochimizu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060121692 | Shiota et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060151787 | Chen et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060157733 | Lucovsky et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060186510 | Lochtefeld et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060231862 | Otsuka et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060273392 | Ito et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060284165 | Berger et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060292809 | Enicks et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070048992 | Hosokawa et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070054460 | Enicks et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070087507 | Liu et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070096142 | Tachibana et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070102834 | Enicks et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070105335 | Fitzgerald | May 2007 | A1 |
20070148890 | Enicks et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070262295 | Enicks | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070290193 | Tucker | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080050883 | Enicks | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080099754 | Enicks | May 2008 | A1 |
20080099840 | Enicks | May 2008 | A1 |
20080099882 | Enicks | May 2008 | A1 |
20080237716 | Enicks et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090258478 | Enicks | Oct 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO-2007001672 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO-2007001672 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO-2007056708 | May 2007 | WO |
WO-2007056708 | May 2007 | WO |
WO-2007079372 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO-2007079372 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO-2007133949 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2008024587 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO-2008024587 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO-2008054957 | May 2008 | WO |
WO-2008054967 | May 2008 | WO |
WO-2008054967 | May 2008 | WO |
WO-2008057692 | May 2008 | WO |
WO-2008057692 | May 2008 | WO |
WO-2008057695 | May 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,287, Response filed Jun. 30, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Apr. 3, 2008”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,287, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 1, 2009”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,287, Non-Final Office Action mailed Apr. 3, 2008”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,287, Non-Final Office Action mailed Nov. 4, 2008”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,287, Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 8, 2009”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,287, Response filed Jan. 23, 2008 to Restriction Requirement mailed Jan. 16, 2008”, 1 pg. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,287, Response filed Feb. 3, 2009 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Nov. 4, 2008”, 20 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,287, Response filed Sep. 1, 2009 to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 1, 2009”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,287, Restriction Requirement mailed Jan. 16, 2008”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Amendment and Response filed Sep. 7, 2007 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Jun. 7, 2007”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154 Final Office Action mailed Jul. 13, 2010”, 18 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Advisory Action mailed Jun. 14, 2010”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Amendment and Response (w/ Affidavits) filed Feb. 25, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Oct. 26, 2007”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Amendment and Response filed May 20, 2008 to Final Office Action mailed Mar. 20, 2008”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Final Office Action mailed Mar. 20, 2008.”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Final Office Action mailed Dec. 23, 2008”, 19 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Non-Final Office Action mailed Jun. 7, 2007”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Non-Final Office Action mailed Jun. 29, 2009”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Non-Final Office Action mailed Aug. 4, 2008”, 19 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Non-Final Office Action mailed Oct. 26, 2007”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Non-Final Office Action mailed Nov. 19, 2009”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Response filed Feb. 19, 2010 to Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 19, 2009”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Response filed Feb. 23, 2009 to Final Office Action mailed Dec. 23, 2008”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Response filed May 26, 2009 to Final Office Action mailed Dec. 23, 2008 and Advisory Action mailed Apr. 10, 2009”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Response filed Jun. 1, 2010 to Final Office Action mailed Apr. 1, 2010”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Response filed Sep. 29, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 29, 2009”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Response filed Dec. 4, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Aug. 4, 2008”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,797, Non-Final Office Action mailed Aug. 19, 2008”, OARN, 30 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,797, Restriction Requirement mailed May 5, 2008”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,797, Non-Final Office Action mailed Aug. 19, 2008”, 30 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,797, Notice of Allowance mailed Dec. 31, 2009”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,797, Preliminary Amendment and Response filed Jun. 4, 2008 to Restriction Requirement mailed May 15, 2008”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,797, Preliminary Amendment filed Apr. 10, 2006”, 32 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,797, Response filed Nov. 19, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Aug. 19, 2008”, 24 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,797, Supplemental Notice of Allowability Mailed Mar. 10, 2010”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/421,161, Non-Final Office Action mailed Mar. 9, 2009”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/421,161, Non-Final Office Action mailed Oct. 5, 2009”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/421,161, Response filed Jun. 9, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 9, 2009”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/467,480 , Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 12, 2010”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/467,480, Final Office Action mailed Aug. 20, 2008”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/467,480, Non-Final Office Action mailed Feb. 21, 2008”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/467,480, Notice of Allowance mailed Mar. 9, 2009”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/467,480, Notice of Allowance mailed Jul. 6, 2009”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/467,480, Response filed Jan. 21, 2008 to Restriction Requirement mailed Jan. 8, 2008”, 1 pg. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/467,480, Response filed May 21, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Feb. 21, 2008”, 18 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/467,480, Response filed Dec. 19, 2008 to Final Office Action mailed Aug. 20, 2008”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/467,480, Restriction Requirement mailed Jan. 8, 2008”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,313, Amendment and Response filed Apr. 2, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Jan. 2, 2008”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,313, Non-Final Office Action mailed Jan. 2, 2008”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,313, Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 25, 2009”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,313, Notice of Allowance mailed Jun. 2, 2008”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,313, Notice of Allowance mailed Jun. 15, 2009”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,313, Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 25, 2008”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,333, Amendment and Response filed Jun. 30, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Apr. 3, 2008”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,333, Non-Final Office Action mailed Apr. 3, 2008”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,333, Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 2, 2009”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,333, Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 8, 2008”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,333, Response filed Jun. 30, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Apr. 3, 2008”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/554,430, Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 30, 2008”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/554,430, Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 19, 2010”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/554,430, Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 4, 2009”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/554,430, Response and Preliminary Amendment filed Apr. 11, 2008 to Restriction Requirement mailed Mar. 13, 2008”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/554,430, Response filed Dec. 30, 2008 to Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 30, 2008”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/554,430, Restriction Requirement mailed Mar. 13, 2008”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/554,796, Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 5, 2009”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/554,796, Restriction Requirement mailed Aug. 7, 2008”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/114,571, Amendment and Response filed Feb. 5, 2009 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Nov. 5, 2008”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/114,571, Final Office Action mailed Nov. 6, 2009”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/114,571, Non-Final Office Action mailed Nov. 5, 2008”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/114,571, Notice of Allowance mailed Apr. 24, 2009”, 7 pgs. |
“Application Serial No. PCT/US07/68107 International Preliminary Report on Patentability Date Mailed Oct. 9, 2009”, 7. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Final Office Action mailed Apr. 1, 2010”, 17 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US07/68107, International Search Report mailed Oct. 23, 2007”, 1 pg. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US07/80723, International Search Report mailed Mar. 6, 2008”, 2 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US07/80723, Written Opinion mailed Mar. 6, 2008”, 5 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US07/80830, International Search Report mailed Mar. 6, 2008”, 2 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US07/80830, Written Opinion mailed Mar. 6, 2008”, 4 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US07/80994, International Search Report mailed May 7, 2008”, 2 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US07/80994, Written Opinion mailed May 7, 2008”, 6 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2006/60555, International Search Report mailed Apr. 29, 2008”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2006/60555, Written Opinion mailed Apr. 29, 2008”, 7 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2006/62603, International Search Report mailed Apr. 28, 2008”, 2 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2006/62603, Written Opinion mailed Apr. 28, 2008”, 4 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2007/068107, International Search Report mailed Oct. 23, 2007”. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2007/074232, International Search Report mailed Jun. 18, 2008”, 2 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2007/074232, Written Opinion mailed Jun. 18, 2008”, 5 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2007/080723, International Preliminary Report mailed Feb. 25, 2010”, 9 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US07/80772, International Search Report mailed Feb. 29, 2008”, 2 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US07/80772, Written Opinion mailed Feb. 29, 2008”, 6 pgs. |
Enicks, D., “A Study of Process-Induced Oxygen Updiffusion in Pseudomorphic Boron-Doped Sub-50 nm SiGeC Layers Grown by LPCVD”, Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, 8(10), (2005), G286-G289. |
Enicks, D., “Enhanced Carbon Confinement of Ultra Narrow Boron Profiles in SiGeC HBTs”, IEEE Transactions on Electronic Devices, 53(8), (2006), 6 pgs. |
Enicks, D., et al., “Thermal Redistribution of Oxygen and Carbon in Boron-Doped Pseudomorphic SiGeC Heterojunction Nanometer Base Layers”, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 153(6), (2006), G529-G533. |
Enicks, Darwin, “Pseudomorphic Growth of Sub-40 nm Si1-x-yGexCy by LPCVD with Enhanced Boron Confinement and Carrier Transport for Advanced NPN HBTs”, White Paper from Atmel Corporation, (Aug. 2003), 11 pgs. |
Enicks, Darwin G, et al., “Thermal Redistribution of Oxygen and Carbon in Sub-50 NM Strained Layers of Boron Doped SiGeC”, ECS Transactions, vol. 3, No. 7, (2006), 1087-1098. |
Gosele, U., et al., “Chapter 7 Thinning Procedures”, Science and Technology of Semiconductor Wafer Bonding, Duke University, http://www.duke.edu/web/wblich7/ch7-hpge.html#7.1, (1999), 15 pages. |
Houghton, D. C., “Strain relaxation kinetics in Si1−xGex/Si heterostructures”, J. Appl. Physics, 70(4), 1991 American Institute of Physics, Institute for Microstructural Sciences, National Research Counsel, Canada, (Aug. 15, 1991), 2136-2151. |
Kar, G. S, et al., “Effect of carbon on lattice strain and hole mobility in Si1-xGex alloys”, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 13(1), 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers, U.S., (Jan. 2002), 49-55. |
Kasper, et al., “Strain Adjustment with Thin Virtual Substrates”, Solid-State Electron. 48,, (2004), 1257. |
Kasper, E., et al., “”, Properties of Silicon Germanium and SiGe: Carbon, EMIS Datareviews Series No. 24, INSPEC, The Institute of Electrical Engineers, London, United Kingdom, (2000), 358 pgs. |
Knoll, D., et al., “Influence of the Oxygen content in SiGe on the Parameters of Si/SiGe Heterojunction Bipolar Transistors”, Journal of Electronic Materials 27(9), (1998), 1022-1026. |
Matthews, J. W., et al., “Defects in Epitaxial Multilayers”, Journal of Crystal Growth, 27, (1974), 118-125. |
Neimash, M. V., et al., “Oxygen Precipitation and Thermal Donor Formation in Pb and C Doped n-Type Czochralski Silicon”, Proceedings, Electrochemical Society—2004 Joint International Meeting, (Abstract 1075), (2004), 1 pg. |
Pavesi, L., “A Review of the Various Efforts to a Silicon Laser”, Optoelectronic Integration on Silicon—Proceedings of SPIE, (Photonic West, San Diego, CA, (2003), 15 pgs. |
People, R., “Calculation of critical layer thickness versus lattice mismatch for GexSi1-x/Si strained-layer heterostructures”, Applied Physics Letters, 47(3), (1985), 322-324. |
Rafi, J. M., et al., “Analysis of Oxygen Thermal Donor Formation in n-type Cz Silicon”, In: Analytical and Diagnostic Techniques for Semiconductor Materials, Devices, and Processes, (Electrochemical Society), (2003), 1 pg. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110073907 A1 | Mar 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11268154 | Nov 2005 | US |
Child | 12901867 | US |