Integrated circuit structures containing a strain-compensated compound semiconductor layer and methods and systems related thereto

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9012308
  • Patent Number
    9,012,308
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, September 3, 2013
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 21, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
A method for pseudomorphic growth and integration of an in-situ doped, strain-compensated metastable compound base into an electronic device, such as, for example, a SiGe NPN HBT, by substitutional placement of strain-compensating atomic species. The invention also applies to strained layers in other electronic devices such as strained SiGe, Si in MOS applications, vertical thin film transistors (VTFT), and a variety of other electronic device types. Devices formed from compound semiconductors other than SiGe, such as, for example, GaAs, InP, and AlGaAs are also amenable to beneficial processes described herein.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The invention generally relates to methods of fabrication of integrated circuits (ICs). More specifically, the invention is a method of fabricating and integrating a metastable silicon-germanium (SiGe) base region into a heterojunction bipolar transistor (HBT).


BACKGROUND ART

The SiGe HBT has significant advantages over a silicon bipolar junction transistor (BJT) in gain, frequency response, noise parameters, and retains an ability to integrate with CMOS devices at relatively low cost. Cutoff frequencies (Ft) of SiGe HBT devices have been reported to exceed 300 GHz, which is favorable as compared to GaAs devices. However, GaAs devices are relatively high in cost and cannot achieve the level of integration, such as, for example, of BiCMOS devices. The silicon compatible SiGe HBT provides a low cost, high speed, low power solution that is quickly replacing other compound semiconductor devices.


Advantages of SiGe are realized by a bandgap reduction creating an energy band offset at the Si—SiGe heterojunction(s) of the HBT, thereby resulting in increased current densities for a given base-emitter bias and higher gains. Also, a lower resistivity is possible with addition of Ge to a Si lattice. The higher current densities and lower base resistance values allow improved unity gain cutoff frequencies and maximum oscillation frequencies than comparable silicon BJTs, and are comparable to other compound devices such as GaAs. However, the emitter collector breakdown voltage (especially BVCEO) is inversely proportional to the current gain (β). The structural and process changes required to enhance Ft and reduce power lead to higher and higher current gains and hence lower and lower collector-emitter breakdown voltages.


Elevated Ge fractions result in an increase in base recombination current and a reduction in current gain for a given layer thickness and doping level. This effect has been confirmed experimentally to extend beyond 30% Ge. References on defect formation in pseudomorphic SiGe with high Ge content suggests the effect will continue to increase for Ge fractions well above 40% (i.e., Kasper et al., “Properties of Silicon Germanium and SiGe:Carbon,” INSPEC, 2000). Therefore, a compromise of increasing the Ge fraction high enough to reduce current gain in high-speed devices provides a way to compensate for an inevitable increase in gain and degradation of BVCEO as basewidths continue to shrink.


However, there is a limit to how much Ge can be added to the Si lattice before excess strain relaxation and gross crystalline defects occur. A critical thickness (hc) of a SiGe layer that is lattice matched to the underlying silicon is a function of (1) percentage of Ge; (2) SiGe film thickness; (3) cap layer thickness; (4) temperature of HBT filmstock processing; and (5) temperature of thermal anneals following a silicon-germanium deposition. Above the critical thickness, hc, the SiGe film is in a metastable and/or unstable region, which implies it will relax readily with a large enough application of thermal energy. Therefore, the degree of metastability is largely a function of percent Ge, SiGe layer thickness, cap layer thickness, and process induced strain due to thermal energy. Construction of a SiGe base of a conventional SiGe HBT described to date is that of a stable, pseudomorphic, or lattice-matched layer. Contemporaneous state-of-the-art procedures include growing stable, strained or lattice-matched alloys of SiGe with carbon to prevent spreading of the boron profile in the base region.


Metastable film growth is typically avoided due to the fact that relaxation results in lattice imperfections. These imperfections result in recombination centers; hence, a reduction in minority carrier lifetime (τb) and an increase in base recombination current (IRB) occurs. If not controlled, a resultant poor crystal quality due to lattice imperfections will degrade device performance. “Bridging” defects will also lead to excessive leakage current along with extremely low current gain. The film will also be very sensitive to process induced thermal stresses and therefore will not be manufacturable. Therefore, to avoid this type of degradation, the HBT designs to date result in a device with a base region that is in the stable region of film growth, which equates to a SiGe thickness that is equal to or below the critical thickness, hc.


Properties of metastable SiGe are discussed in several papers such as D. C. Houghton, “Strain Relaxation Kinetics in Si1-xGex/Si Heterostructures,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 70, pp. 2136-2151 (Aug. 15, 1991), and G. S. Kar et al. “Effect of carbon on lattice strain and hole mobility in Si1-xGex alloys,” Dept, of Physics and Meteorology, Indian institute of Technology, Kharagpur 721302, India, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, Vol. 13, pp. 49-55 (2002). Further, U.S. Pat. No. 6,586,297 (“the '297 patent”) and U.S. Pat. No. 6,781,214 (“the '214 patent”), to U'Ren et al. describe a “Metastable Base in a High-Performance HBT” and a “Method for Integrating a Metastable Base into a High Performance HBT and Related Structure,” respectively.


The '297 patent describes a heterojunction bipolar transistor that includes a metastable epitaxial silicon-germanium base on a single crystal collector and an emitter situated over a metastable epitaxial SiGe base.


The metastable epitaxial SiGe base is grown in an epitaxial reactor where the metastable epitaxial SiGe base is a strained crystalline structure including a conductivity altering dopant incorporated in-situ during film growth; the dopant is added for the sole purpose of establishing a specific conductivity type. The '297 patent describes a method that includes a short thermal anneal at temperatures of 900° C. to 950° C. to avoid relaxing the metastable SiGe film layer.


The '214 patent describes a heterojunction bipolar transistor fabricated by forming a metastable epitaxial SiGe base on a collector with a concentration of germanium greater than 20 atomic percent. An emitter is then fabricated over the metastable epitaxial SiGe base. The emitter is doped with an n- or p-type impurity depending on the transistor type, npn or pnp. The HBT is then heated in a spike anneal process to maintain the metastable epitaxial silicon-germanium base as a strained crystalline structure and to diffuse the dopants to form the emitter-base junction. The metastable epitaxial SiGe base is grown in an epitaxial reactor where the metastable epitaxial SiGe base is strained crystalline structure including a dopant incorporated in-situ during film growth; the dopant is added for the sole purpose of establishing a specific conductivity type. The '214 patent describes a method that includes a short thermal anneal at temperatures of 900° C. to 950° C. to avoid relaxing the metastable SiGe film layer.


However, the methods described in these afore-mentioned references for forming a metastable SiGe film are still very susceptible to adverse effects of thermal stress such as slip dislocations and threading dislocations; all of which are associated with film relaxation. In highly metastable films, relaxation can take place during extremely short time intervals during an anneal process, depending on the degree of metastability, such as the first fraction of a second during a short anneal and/or a flash anneal process.


Therefore, what is needed is a method to grow and integrate strain-compensated metastable SiGe layers for application to a SiGe HBT. Such a method should allow a skilled artisan to, for example, control and utilize defect density for device optimization, achieve extremely high energy band offsets and grades (ΔEG(0) & ΔEG(grade)) without incurring excess “bridging” defects, such as slip or threading dislocations, and provide a method to achieve high volume manufacturability of films that would normally be unreliable and/or unrepeatable due to their extremely metastable or even unstable properties.


Each of these improvements allows the use of films that would otherwise be highly metastable (or even unstable) films in order to realize the advantages offered with high concentrations of Ge.


SUMMARY

The present invention is a method for pseudomorphic growth and integration of a strain-compensated metastable and/or unstable compound base, which may also be in-situ doped, into an electronic device, such as, for example, a SiGe NPN HBT, by substitutional and/or interstitial placement of strain-compensating atomic species. The method allows for control of defect density, and thus resultant control of minority carrier lifetime, base recombination current, base current and current gain, and breakdown. Additionally, the ability to achieve greater Ge fractions than is possible without strain compensation and maintain a strained, lattice matched film enables devices with greater energy band offsets and hence greatly improved current densities and hence significantly improved Ft and Fmax figures.


The invention also applies to strained layers in a variety of other electronic device types including strained SiGe, strained Ge, and/or strained Si in MOS applications, vertical thin film transistors (VTFT), resonant tunnel diodes (RTD), and a variety of other electronic device types. Heterojunction and heterostructure devices formed from compound semiconductors other than SiGe, such as, for example, GaAs, InP, and AlGaAs may also be amenable to beneficial processes described herein. Any strain-compensating element that will incorporate substitutionally and/or interstitially are amendable to the methods presented herein.


Elements that do not significantly affect the conductivity are oftentimes desirable. Therefore, when using strain compensating group IV semiconductors such as Si, Ge, and/or SiGe it might be desirable to avoid group II/III or group V/VI elements to avoid affecting the conductivity. However, this does not preclude the use of “conductivity altering” elements for the dual purpose of strain compensation and also to effectively alter the conductivity simultaneously.


An electronic device fabricated by the method described herein, in an exemplary embodiment, includes a substrate with a compound semiconductor film disposed over a first surface of the substrate. The compound semiconductor film is deposited in a metastable state by exceeding the critical thickness, hc, for the germanium concentration being used and the thermal cycles employed in the process after the compound semiconductor film has been formed. A substitutional strain-compensating atomic species (e.g., carbon) is added in-situ during the film growth to control defect density and avoid complete relaxation during the remainder of processing.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is an exemplary cross-section of a film stack used in forming a portion of an HBT in accordance with the present invention.



FIG. 2 is a curve depicting critical thickness as a function of Ge content.



FIG. 3 is an Xrd rocking curve of a strained, lattice-matched metastable SiGe film.



FIG. 4 is the Xrd rocking curve of FIG. 3 after a thermal anneal.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A strain-compensating atomic species is a species that, when added, alters the lattice parameter of a crystalline film from its intrinsic value. The intrinsic lattice parameter is the lattice parameter of the film or layer without the strain compensating species. For strain compensation of SiGe, one strain-compensating atomic species is carbon. One atomic percent of substitutional carbon will compensate eight percent to ten percent of Ge. Additionally, carbon can be substitutionally placed to approximately 2.5 percent in SiGe, or enough carbon to strain compensate 20 to 25 percent of Ge. Therefore, pseudomorphic strain-compensated metastable and/or unstable films with Ge levels of greater than 40 percent are possible (i.e., using four percent to five percent carbon) for electronic device use.


Even though one exemplary embodiment provides for strain reduction, a strain compensating atomic species with a larger lattice constant than either Si or Ge could be added to purposely increase strain. This type of strain modification would be suitable as well, for instance as a tool for bandgap and/or lattice engineering; defect engineering could make good use of strain modification as well. Strain modification would also be useful for enhancing carrier mobility in a “strain-compensated film” and any adjacent film layers.


The method described herein differs from previous methods for formation of a SiGe HBT due to an emphasis on intentional growth of a metastable and/or unstable base layer and a calculated incorporation of substitutional and/or interstitial carbon. The substitutional and/or interstitial carbon strain compensates an HBT base region to avoid strain relaxation, and allows defectivity engineering to decouple current gain from IC and Ft enhancement, along with integrating downstream thermal anneal processes thus avoiding excess carbon diffusion and maintaining the film in a strained state.


With reference to FIG. 1, an exemplary film stack 100 used in forming a strain-compensated metastable layer of an HBT includes a substrate 101, an epitaxial layer 103, an elemental seed layer 105, a strain-compensated metastable SiGe base region 107, an elemental cap layer 109, and a polysilicon emitter layer 111. One skilled in the art will recognize that other materials may be employed for the emitter layer 111 such as, for example, polySiGe.


In a specific exemplary embodiment, the substrate 101 is a p-type, 20 Ω-cm <100> silicon wafer. The epitaxial layer 103 is grown by LPCVD and can be either p-type or n-type depending on the technology application and the requirements for breakdown voltages and collector resistance. Arsenic and/or phosphorous may be doped into the epitaxial layer 103 and the substrate 101 to provide a low resistance collector region. The arsenic and phosphorous may be diffused or implanted. If implanted, one skilled in the art will recognize that the energy and dose of the implant must be determined by specific technology requirements for collector resistance, breakdown voltages, etc. A skilled artisan will also recognize that other methods may be employed to dope this region, such as diffusion or LPCVD (in-situ doping).


In the case of a silicon substrate 101, prior to growth, the silicon growth surface should be cleaned (typically with a wet chemistry such as hydrofluoric acid) to remove any native oxidation and surface contaminants. The elemental seedlayer 105, the metastable base region 107, and the elemental cap layer 109 may be fabricated during the same LPCVD process. Temperatures in the range of 500° C. to 900° C. are typically employed for epitaxial growth of each layer. Silane (SiH4) and germane (GeH4) are typical gases for silicon and SiGe deposition. Diborane (B2H6) and arsine (AsH3) are common p- and n-type dopant sources. Hydrogen (H2) may be utilized as a carrier gas, however other gases such as helium may be used.


In another specific exemplary embodiment, the substrate 101 is a <100> p-type silicon wafer, boron doped to a concentration of approximately 1015 atoms/cm. Alternatively, the substrate 101 could also be, for example, an n-type silicon wafer or a substrate comprised of a compound semiconducting material such as silicon-germanium of either p-type or n-type conductivity. The substrate 101 may also be silicon-on-insulator (SOI) or silicon germanium-on-insulator. The epitaxial layer 103 is deposited to a thickness of between 0.3/m and 2/m, followed by the elemental seed layer 105. The epi layer is typically added as a low doped region to tailor breakdown voltages and/or collector resistance.


In this embodiment, the elemental seed layer 105 is comprised of silicon, which is epitaxially grown to a thickness range of 10 nm to 100 nm, although other semiconducting materials may be employed, such as silicon germanium with very low Ge content. The strain-compensated metastable SiGe layer 107 is deposited to a thickness greater than the critical thickness, hc, followed by the elemental cap layer 109 comprised of, for example, silicon.


The critical thickness, hc, is determined based on atomic percentage of Ge within an upper and lower bound of a metastable region. This critical thickness determination is based on historical work of People/Bean and Matthews/Blakeslee, and is known in to one of skill in art.


As an example, FIG. 2 shows that for a film with 20% Ge, the critical thickness, hc, according to the Van de Merwe curve (shown in The calculation of critical layer thickness versus lattice mismatch for GexSi1-x/Si strained-layer heterostructures,” R. People and J. C. Bean, Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 47, No. 3, p. 322, 1 Jul. 1985 (hereinafter “1985 People/Bean”) and Erratum: The calculation of critical layer thickness versus lattice mismatch for GexSi1-x/Si strained-layer heterostructures,” R. People and J. C. Bean, Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 49, No. 4, p. 229, 28 Jul. 1986 (hereinafter 1986 People/Bean”)), a portion of which is reproduced in FIG. 2, is defined by the bottom edge of the metastable region is approximately 20 nm, while a film with 28% Ge has an hc of only 9 nm. Therefore, to grow a fully “strain compensated” film with 28% Ge that is also 20 nm thick, carbon may be added to reduce the lattice parameter and strain compensate 8% of Ge. The addition of 1% of carbon throughout the SiGe lattice of a 20 nm, 28% Ge film will reduce the strain to a level that approximates that of a 20 nm, 20% Ge film. However, one skilled in the art will recognize that it might be technologically desirable to provide only enough carbon to partially strain compensate, for example, adding 0.5% carbon for purposes of defect engineering. Alternatively, 2% carbon may be added for purposes of adding thermal processing robustness.



FIG. 2 also shows a portion of the Matthews, Blakeslee curve from “1985 People/Bean” and a portion of the corrected Matthews/Blakeslee curve from “1986 People/Bean.”


Additionally, one may desire to grow a film that resides well into the metastable region, and then to only partially compensate the film so-as to maintain a certain degree of metastability for defect and/or lattice engineering.


One skilled in the art will recognize that data and charts such as those of FIG. 2 are meant to provide approximations, but that other means, such as Xrd rocking curves are necessary to assist in determining where an optimum degree of metastability resides for a certain film structure and/or device. With reference to FIG. 3, one skilled in the art will know that distinct “fringe rings” between the silicon peak and the “SiGe hump” are indicative of lattice matched or strained layer.


The absence of and/or “smearing” of fringes in the Xrd rocking curves will indicate a film relaxation (FIG. 4) following a thermal anneal cycle. One skilled in the art will also know that Xrd rocking curves assessed following film growth and also following the downstream thermal treatments will provide information necessary for tailoring of the strain compensation process and/or thermal processes to avoid complete strain or lattice relaxation.


Other experimental approaches may be utilized, such as putting electrical devices through electrical testing to identify the acceptable level of strain compensation for a particular device or technology. This acceptable level will be determined by device electrical parameters, especially the collector current, base current, current gain, and breakdown voltages for an HBT. Other electrical parameters may be characterized and controlled for other device types and/or technologies.


Individual processes should be characterized with experimental methods to determine where their process resides with respect to the stable/metastable/relaxed regions as depicted by theoretical and empirically derived charts such as those discussed supra. This characterization will require analysis by such means of Xrd rocking curves, device electrical tests, and SIMS (secondary ion mass spectrometry) to reveal dopant diffusion, especially of strain compensating species such as carbon.


Even without the charts, the Xrd rocking curves can provide the quantitative and qualitative data necessary for developing strain compensated films, and that the “rule of thumb” for 1% carbon to compensate 8% to 10% Ge is a generally accepted guideline. Some metastable and/or unstable films and/or devices might require more or less carbon, depending on such factors as the film geometry, thermal stresses, and physically induced stresses (from adjacent films and structures) not accounted for in contemporary theoretical and empirical bodies of knowledge. Therefore, the guidelines provided herein will facilitate a development of metastable “strain compensated” films and/or devices and are intended as a system for providing an improved process and device. The guidelines also provide greater degrees of design engineering flexibility for bandgap engineering (i.e. Jc, Ft, Fmax) and defectivity and/or lattice engineering (i.e., minority carrier lifetime engineering, base recombination current engineering, base current engineering, current gain engineering, and breakdown optimization).


With further reference to FIG. 1, the polysilicon emitter layer 111, in this exemplary embodiment, is comprised of n-type polysilicon that may be deposited to a thickness between 0.05 μm and 0.30 μm. However, other films such as polySiGe may also be employed.


A carbon precursor (for example, methane (CH4) or acetylene C2H2) is utilized during growth of the strain-compensated metastable SiGe layer 107 to add carbon. Precursors for formation of the strain-compensated metastable SiGe layer 107 include, for example, methyl silane (CH3SiH3), silane (SiH4), and germane (GeH4) for the carbon, silicon, and germanium components respectively. Hydrogen (H2) is typically employed as a carrier gas for all layer depositions. In-situ doping with a conductivity altering dopant of a thin section near the center of the strain-compensated metastable SiGe layer 107 creates a p-type neutral base region. This neutral base region is sandwiched between two SiGe setback or spacer layers (not shown). The p-type impurity may be boron, commonly supplied with a diborane (B2H6) precursor. The elemental cap layer 109 is epitaxially grown on top of the strain-compensated metastable SiGe layer 107. The elemental cap layer 109 (silicon) maintains the SiGe layer in a strained state. Cap layers are typically grown with a thickness between 0.05 μm and 0.1 μm. A skilled artisan will recognize that the cap layer maintains strain equilibrium within the SiGe layer, and that the thickness is tailored as appropriate.


A profile of the Ge associated with the strain-compensated metastable SiGe layer 107 is generally that of a trapezoid, although a skilled artisan will recognize that other Ge profiles, such as triangular, box, or profiles with curvature are possible. The polysilicon emitter layer 111 may be, for example, n-type in-situ doped polysilicon. Arsine (ASH3) may be used as an n-type dopant precursor employing hydrogen as a carrier gas for the process. The emitter layer 111 may be monocrystalline, polycrystalline, amorphous, or a compound material of a mono, poly, or amorphous construction. In a specific exemplary embodiment, a SiGe deposition temperature is in the range of 550° C. to 650° C., although temperatures less than 600° C. may be preferred for many advanced fabrication processes in general, with a processing pressure range of 1 torr to 100 torr. Pseudomorphic SiGe growth is possible at higher temperatures, such as up to or even exceeding 900° C.


Although the present invention is described in terms of exemplary embodiments, a skilled artisan will realize that techniques described herein can readily be adapted to other forms of fabrication techniques and devices. For example, the strain-compensation techniques could be applied to other technologies such as FinFET, surround gate FET, vertical thin film transistors (VTFT), hyper-abrupt junctions, resonant tunnel diodes (RTD), and optical waveguides for photonics. Therefore, profiles, thicknesses, and concentrations of the strain-compensated metastable SiGe layer 107 can be selected to accommodate a variety of needs. The metastable SiGe layer 107 could also be strain compensated with other elements, which may induce a diminished diffusivity for a given dopant type.


Also, although process steps and techniques are described in detail, a skilled artisan will recognize that other techniques and methods may be utilized, which are still included within a scope of the appended claims. For example, there are several techniques used for depositing and doping a film layer (e.g., chemical vapor deposition, plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition, molecular beam epitaxy, atomic layer deposition, etc.). Although not all techniques are amenable to all film types described herein, one skilled in the art will recognize that multiple and alternative methods may be utilized for depositing or otherwise forming a given layer and/or film type. Additionally, many industries allied with the semiconductor industry could make use of the strain-compensation technique. For example, a thin-film head (TFH) process in the data storage industry, an active matrix liquid crystal display (AMLCD) in the flat panel display industry, or the micro-electromechanical industry (MEM) could readily make use of the processes and techniques described herein. The term “semiconductor” should thus be recognized as including the aforementioned and related industries. The drawing and specification are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: growing a compound semiconductor layer on a substrate with a first thickness such that the compound semiconductor layer is in a metastable state, wherein the metastable state is obtained by setting the first thickness to exceed a critical thickness of an elemental concentration associated with a first element included in the compound semiconductor;determining an amount by which the elemental concentration of the first element exceeds a base concentration of the first element corresponding to a stable state of the compound semiconductor layer at the first thickness;determining a concentration of a strain-compensating atomic species that is configured to strain compensate, at the first thickness, the amount by which the elemental concentration of the first element exceeds the base concentration of the first element; andadding the strain-compensating atomic species to the compound semiconductor layer during growth of the compound semiconductor layer, at the determined concentration to maintain the compound semiconductor layer in a strained state at the first thickness.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the compound semiconductor layer includes a silicon-germanium (SiGe) layer, and wherein the elemental concentration includes a germanium (Ge) concentration.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein growing the compound semiconductor layer in a metastable state on the substrate comprises: growing the silicon-germanium layer having a thickness in an order of 20 nano-meters with a concentration of germanium in the silicon-germanium layer in an order of 28%.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein adding the strain-compensating atomic species comprises: adding the strain-compensating atomic species at an atomic species concentration in an order of 1%.
  • 5. The method of claim 3, wherein a ratio of the concentration of the atomic species and the concentration of germanium ranges from 1:8 to 1:10.
  • 6. The method of claim 3, wherein growing the silicon-germanium layer comprises one of: applying a deposition temperature that is in a range of 550° C. to 650° C., orapplying a deposition temperature that is less than 600° C. with a processing pressure range of 1 torr to 100 torr.
  • 7. The method of claim 2, wherein the strain-compensating atomic species is an interstitial strain-compensating atomic species, a substitutional strain-compensating atomic species, or a combination thereof.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the substitutional strain-compensating atomic species is carbon (C).
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein forming the silicon-germanium layer comprises: utilizing a methyl-silane (CH3SiH3) precursor for addition of the carbon;utilizing silane (SiH4) precursor for addition of silicon; andutilizing germane (GeH4) precursor for addition of germanium,wherein hydrogen is employed as a carrier gas for all layer depositions.
  • 10. The method of claim 7, wherein the strain-compensating atomic species is a conductivity altering element.
  • 11. The method of claim 7, wherein the substitutional strain-compensating atomic species is a p-type impurity added near a center of the compound semiconductor layer to create a p-type neutral base region, the compound semiconductor layer forming a strain-compensated metastable layer.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the compound semiconductor layer is one of gallium-arsenide (GaAs), indium-phosphide (InP), or aluminum-gallium-arsenide (AlGaAs).
  • 13. The method of claim 1, wherein the strained state is a partially-strained state.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, comprising: prior to growing the compound semiconductor layer, forming an epitaxial layer on the substrate;forming an elemental seed layer on the epitaxial layer; andafter growing the compound semiconductor layer, forming an elemental cap layer on top of the compound semiconductor layer, wherein the compound semiconductor layer is located between the elemental seed layer and the elemental cap layer.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein the substrate includes a silicon (Si) substrate and wherein one or more of the epitaxial layer, the elemental seed layer, the compound semiconductor layer and the elemental cap layer are formed using an LPCVD process employing temperatures in a range between 500° C. and 900° C.
  • 16. The method of claim 14, wherein the substrate includes a <100> p-type silicon wafer, and wherein the substrate is boron-doped to a concentration in an order of 1015 atoms/cm3.
  • 17. The method of claim 14, comprising: forming a polysilicon emitter layer on top of the elemental cap layer, wherein the elemental cap layer has an elemental cap layer thickness that is configured to maintain strain equilibrium within the compound semiconductor layer.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the polysilicon emitter layer includes one of polysilicon-germanium or n-type polysilicon deposited to a thickness between 0.05 μm and 0.30 μm, and wherein the elemental cap layer thickness is in a range between 0.05 μm and 0.1 μm.
  • 19. The method of claim 1, comprising applying the compound semiconductor layer for manufacturing an electronic device, wherein the electronic device is one of a heterojunction bipolar transistor (HBT), metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOS), vertical thin layer transistor (VTFT), or resonant tunnel diode (RTD).
  • 20. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the concentration of a strain-compensating atomic species comprises: determining, using Xrd rocking curves, a degree of metastability for the compound semiconductor layer; andanalyzing, using Xrd rocking curves, dopant diffusion corresponding to the strain-compensating atomic species.
Parent Case Info

This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/901,867 filed Oct. 11, 2010, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 11/268,154, entitled, “Methods for Growing Strain-Compensated Metastable Compound Films” (as amended) filed on Nov. 7, 2005, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (138)
Number Name Date Kind
4213781 Noreika et al. Jul 1980 A
4459739 Shepard et al. Jul 1984 A
4652183 Veltri et al. Mar 1987 A
4701423 Szluk Oct 1987 A
4908325 Berenz Mar 1990 A
5137838 Ramde et al. Aug 1992 A
5155571 Wang et al. Oct 1992 A
5177583 Endo et al. Jan 1993 A
5202284 Kamins et al. Apr 1993 A
5241214 Herbots Aug 1993 A
5331659 Ohata et al. Jul 1994 A
5378901 Nii Jan 1995 A
5466949 Okuno Nov 1995 A
5569538 Cho Oct 1996 A
5620907 Jalali-Farahani Apr 1997 A
5661059 Liu et al. Aug 1997 A
5686350 Lee et al. Nov 1997 A
5804834 Shimoyama et al. Sep 1998 A
5856685 Nakayama Jan 1999 A
5906708 Robinson et al. May 1999 A
5906951 Chu et al. May 1999 A
5965931 Wang et al. Oct 1999 A
6059895 Chu et al. May 2000 A
6064081 Robinson et al. May 2000 A
6087683 King et al. Jul 2000 A
6107647 Matsumoto et al. Aug 2000 A
6165891 Chooi et al. Dec 2000 A
6323108 Kub et al. Nov 2001 B1
6399970 Kubo et al. Jun 2002 B2
6512252 Takagi et al. Jan 2003 B1
6521041 Wu et al. Feb 2003 B2
6531369 Ozkan et al. Mar 2003 B1
6552375 Swanson et al. Apr 2003 B2
6586297 U-Ren et al. Jul 2003 B1
6593625 Christiansen et al. Jul 2003 B2
6656809 Greenberg et al. Dec 2003 B2
6667489 Suzumura et al. Dec 2003 B2
6670542 Sakata et al. Dec 2003 B2
6670654 Lanzerotti et al. Dec 2003 B2
6680494 Gutierrez-Aitken et al. Jan 2004 B2
6709903 Christiansen et al. Mar 2004 B2
6744079 Jagannathan et al. Jun 2004 B2
6746902 Maa et al. Jun 2004 B2
6750484 Lippert et al. Jun 2004 B2
6759694 Hsu et al. Jul 2004 B1
6780796 Maa et al. Aug 2004 B2
6781214 U'Ren et al. Aug 2004 B1
6787822 Nuyen Sep 2004 B1
6841457 Bedell et al. Jan 2005 B2
6855649 Christiansen et al. Feb 2005 B2
6855963 Chu et al. Feb 2005 B1
6858541 Horning Feb 2005 B2
6876010 Fitzgerald Apr 2005 B1
6900115 Todd May 2005 B2
6906400 Delhougne et al. Jun 2005 B2
6927140 Soman et al. Aug 2005 B2
6936910 Ellis-Monaghan et al. Aug 2005 B2
6963089 Shi et al. Nov 2005 B2
6992004 Besser et al. Jan 2006 B1
6995430 Langdo et al. Feb 2006 B2
7074623 Lochtefeld et al. Jul 2006 B2
7091114 Ito et al. Aug 2006 B2
7227176 Wu et al. Jun 2007 B2
7273799 Todd Sep 2007 B2
7495250 Enicks Feb 2009 B2
7517768 Soman et al. Apr 2009 B2
7550758 Enicks Jun 2009 B2
7569913 Enicks Aug 2009 B2
20010035863 Kimura Nov 2001 A1
20020008289 Murota et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020081861 Robinson et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020105015 Kubo et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020185686 Christiansen et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030040130 Mayur et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030080394 Babcock et al. May 2003 A1
20030082882 Babcock et al. May 2003 A1
20030098465 Suzumura et al. May 2003 A1
20030129802 Lanzerotti et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030132453 Greenberg et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030140844 Maa et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030143783 Maa et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030146448 U'Ren et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030159644 Yonehara et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030201468 Christiansen et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030218189 Christiansen et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030219954 Baba Nov 2003 A1
20040009649 Kub et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040031979 Lochtefeld et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040048439 Soman et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040048447 Kondo Mar 2004 A1
20040063293 Greenberg et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040079989 Kaneko et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040087119 Maa et al. May 2004 A1
20040164336 Weimer et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040222486 Ellis-Monaghan et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040227158 Delhougne et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040251458 Mizushima et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040253776 Hoffman et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050045905 Chu et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050045962 Iwata et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050048745 Todd Mar 2005 A1
20050051798 Lanzerotti et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050051861 Shi et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050092235 Brabant et al. May 2005 A1
20050112857 Gluschenkov et al. May 2005 A1
20050127392 Chu et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050181555 Haukka et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050191911 Greenberg et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050230705 Taylor Oct 2005 A1
20050233534 Lanzerotti et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050250289 Babcock et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050280103 Langdo et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060011906 Bedell et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060030093 Zhang et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060068557 Ochimizu et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060121692 Shiota et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060151787 Chen et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060157733 Lucovsky et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060186510 Lochtefeld et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060231862 Otsuka et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060273392 Ito et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060284165 Berger et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060292809 Enicks et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070048992 Hosokawa et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070054460 Enicks Mar 2007 A1
20070087507 Liu et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070096142 Tachibana et al. May 2007 A1
20070102834 Enicks et al. May 2007 A1
20070105335 Fitzgerald May 2007 A1
20070148890 Enicks et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070262295 Enicks Nov 2007 A1
20070290193 Tucker Dec 2007 A1
20080050883 Enicks Feb 2008 A1
20080099754 Enicks May 2008 A1
20080099840 Enicks May 2008 A1
20080099882 Enicks May 2008 A1
20080237716 Enicks et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090258478 Enicks Oct 2009 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (15)
Number Date Country
WO2007001672 Jan 2007 WO
WO2007001672 Jan 2007 WO
WO2007056708 May 2007 WO
WO2007056708 May 2007 WO
WO2007079372 Jul 2007 WO
WO2007079372 Jul 2007 WO
WO2007133949 Nov 2007 WO
WO2008024587 Feb 2008 WO
WO2008024587 Feb 2008 WO
WO2008054957 May 2008 WO
WO2008054967 May 2008 WO
WO2008054967 May 2008 WO
WO2008057692 May 2008 WO
WO2008057692 May 2008 WO
WO2008057695 May 2008 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (103)
Entry
Enicks, D., “A Study of Process-Induced Oxygen Updiffusion in Pseudomorphic Borno-Doped Sub-50 nm SiGeC Layers Grown by LPCVD”, Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, 8(10), (2005), G286-G289.
Enicks, D., “Enhanced Carbon Confinement of Ultra Narrow Boron Profiles in SiGeC NBTs”, IEEE Transactions on Electronic Devices, 53(8), (2006).
Enicks, D., et. al., “Thermal Redistribution of Oxygen and Carbon in Boron-Doped Psudomorphic SiGeC Heterojunction Nanometer Base Layers”, Journal of Electrochemical Society, 153(6), (2006), G529-G533.
Enicks, Dwarin, “Pseudomorphic Growth of Sub-40 nm Si1-x-yGexCy by LPCVD with Enhanced Boron Confinement and Carrier Transport for Advanced NPN HBTs”, White Paper from Atmel Corporation, (Aug. 2003).
Enicks, Darwin G, et. al., “Thermal Redistribution of Oxygen and Carbon in Sub-50 NM Strained Layers of Boron Doped SiGeC,” ECS Transactions, vol. 3, No. 7, (2006), 1087-1098.
Gosele, U., et. al., “Chapter 7 Thinning Procedures”, Science and Technology Semidconductor Water Bonding, Duke University, http://www.duke.edu/web/wbl/ch7-hpge.html#7.1, (1999).
Houghton, D.C., “Strain relaxation kinetics in Si1&#8722;xGex/Si heterostructures”, J. Appl.Physics, 70(4), 1991 American Institute of Physics, Institute for Microsturctural Sciences, National Research Counsel, Canada, (Aug. 15, 1991), 2136-2151.
Kar, G.S., et. al., “Effect of carbon on lattice strain and hole mobility in Si1-xGex alloys”, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 13(1), 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers, U.S., (Jan. 2002), 49-55.
Kasper, et. al., “Strain Adjustment with Thin Virtual Substrates”, Solid-State Electron, 48, (2004), 1257.
Kasper, et. al., Properties of Silicon Germanium and SiGe: Carbon, EMIS Datareviews Series No. 24, INSPEC, The Institute of Electron Engineers, London, United Kingdom, (2000).
Knoll, D., et. al., “Influence of the Oxygen content in SiGE on the Parameters of Si/SiGe Heterjunction Bipolar Transistors”, Journal of Electronic Materials 27(9), (1998), 1022-1026.
Matthews, J.W., et. al., “Defects in Epitaxial Multilayers”, Journal of Crystal Growth, 27 (1974), 118-125.
Neimash, M.V., et. al., “Oxygen Precipitation and Thermal Donor Formation in Pb and C Doped n-Type Czochraiski Silicon,” Proceedings, Electrochemical Society—2004 Joint International Meetings, (Abstract 1075), (2004).
Pavesi, L., “A Review of the Various Efforts to a Silicon Laser,” Optoelectronic Integration of Silicon Proceddings of SPIE, (Photonic West, San Diego, CA, (2003).
People, R., “Calculation of critical layer thickness versus attic mismatch for GexSi1-x/Si strained-layer heterostructures,” Applied Physics Letters, 47(3), (1985).
Rafi, J.M. et. al., “Analysis of Oxygen Thermal Donor Formation in n-type Cz Silicon”, In: Analytical and Diagnostic Techniques for Semiconductor Materials, Devices and Processes, (Electrochemical Society), (2003).
U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,287, Response Filed Jun. 30, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Apr. 3, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,287, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 1, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,287, Non-Final Office Action mailed Apr. 3, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,287, Non-Final Office Action mailed Nov. 4, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,287, Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 8, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,287, Response Filed Jan. 23, 2008 to Restriction Requirement mailed Jan. 16, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,287, Response Filed on Feb. 3, 2009 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Nov. 4, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,287, Response Filed Sep. 1, 2009 to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 1, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,287, Restriction Requirement mailed Jan. 16, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Amendment and Response filed Sep. 7, 2007 to Non-Final Office Action mailed on Jun. 7, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Final Office Action mailed Jul. 13, 2010.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Advisory Action mailed Jun. 14, 2010.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Amendment and Response (with Affidavits) filed on Feb. 25, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action mailed on Oct. 26, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Amendment and Response filed on May 20, 2008 to Final Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Final Office Action mailed on Mar. 20, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154Final Office Action mailed on Dec. 23, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Jun. 7, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Jun. 29, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Aug. 4, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Oct. 26, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Nov. 19, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Response filed on Feb. 19, 2010 to Non-Final Office Action mailed on Nov. 19, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Response filed on Feb. 23, 2009 to Final Office Action mailed on 12-213-2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Response filed on May 26, 2009 to Final Office Action mailed on Dec. 23, 2008 and Advisory Action mailed on Apr. 10, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Response filed on Jun. 1, 2010 to Final Office Action mailed on Apr. 1, 2010.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Response filed on Sep. 29, 2009 to Non-Final Office Action mailed on Jun. 29, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Response filed on Dec. 4, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action mailed on Aug. 4, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,797, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Aug. 19, 2008—OARN.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,797, Restriction Requirement mailed on May 5, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,797, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Aug. 19, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,797, Notice of Allowance mailed on Dec. 31, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,797, Preliminary Application and Response filed on Jun. 4, 2008 to Restriction Requirement mailed on May 15, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,797, Preliminary Amendment filed on Apr. 10, 2006.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,797, Response Filed on Nov. 19, 2008 to Non Final Office Action mailed on Aug. 19, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,797, Supplemental Notice of Allowability Mailed on Mar. 10, 2010.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/421,161, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Mar. 9, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/421,161, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Oct. 5, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/421,161, Response Filed on Jun. 9, 2009 to Non-Final Office Action mailed on Mar. 9, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/467,480, Notice of Allowance mailed on Jan. 12, 2010.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/467,480, Final Office Action mailed on Aug. 20, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/467,480, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Feb. 21, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/467,480, Notice of Allowance mailed on 03-09-20009.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/467,480, Notice of Allowance mailed on Jul. 6, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/467,480, Response Filed on Jan. 21, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/467,480, Response Filed on May 21, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action mailed on Feb. 21, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/467,480, Response Filed on Dec. 19, 2008 to Final Office Action Mailed on Aug. 20, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/467,480, Restriction Requirement Mailed on Jan. 8, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,313, Amendment and Response Filed on Apr. 2, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action Mailed on Jan. 2, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,313, Non-Final Office Action Mailed on Jan. 2, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,313, Notice of Allowance Mailed on Feb. 25, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,313, Notice of Allowance Mailed on Jun. 2, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,313, Notice of Allowance Mailed on Jun. 15, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,313, Notice of Allowance Mailed on Sep. 25, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,333, Amendment and Response filed on Jun. 30, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action Mailed on Apr. 3, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,333, Non-Final Office Action Mailed on Apr. 3, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,333, Notice of Allowance Mailed on Jan. 2, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,333, Notice of Allowance Mailed on Sep. 8, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,333, Response Filed on Jun. 30, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action Mailed on Apr. 3, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/554,430, Non-Final Office Action Mailed on Sep. 30, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/554,430, Notice of Allowance Mailed on Jan. 19, 2010.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/554,430, Notice of Allowance Mailed on Aug. 4, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/554,430, Response and Preliminary Amendment Filed on Apr. 11, 2008 to Restriction Requirement Mailed on Mar. 13, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/554,430, Response Filed on Dec. 30, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action Mailed on Sep. 30, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/554,430, Restriction Requirement Mailed on Mar. 13, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/554,796, Notice of Allowance Mailed on Jan. 5, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/554,796, Restriction Requirement Mailed on Aug. 7, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/114,571, Amendment and Response Filed on Feb. 5, 2009 to Non-Final Office Action Mailed on Nov. 5, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/114,571, Final Office Action Mailed on Nov. 6, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/114,571, Non-Final Office Action Mailed on Nov. 5, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/114,571, Notice of Allowance Mailed on Apr. 24, 2009.
Application Serial No. PCT/US07/68107, International Preliminary Report on Patentability Date Mailed Oct. 9, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,154, Final Office Action Mailed on Apr. 1, 2010.
Application Serial No. PCT/US07/68107, International Search Report Mailed on Oct. 23, 2007.
Application serial No. PCT/US07/80723, International Search Report Mailed on Mar. 6, 2008.
Application serial No. PCT/US07/80723, Written Opinion Mailed on Mar. 6, 2008.
Application serial No. PCT/US07/80994, International Search Report Mailed on May 7, 2008.
Application serial No. PCT/US07/80994, Written Opinion Mailed May 7, 2008.
Application serial No. PCT/US2006/60555, International Search Report Mailed on Apr. 29, 2008.
Application serial No. PCT/US2006/60555, Written Opinion Mailed on Apr. 29, 2008.
Application serial No. PCT/US2006/62603, International Search Report Mailed on Apr. 28, 2008.
Application serial No. PCT/US2006/62603, Written Opinion Mailed on Apr. 28, 2008.
Application serial No. PCT/US2007/068107, International Search Report Mailed on Oct. 23, 2007.
Application serial No. PCT/US2007/07432, International Search Report Mailed on Jun. 18, 2008.
Application serial No. PCT/US2007/07432, Written Opinion Mailed on Jun. 18, 2008.
Application serial No. PCT/US2007/080723, International Preliminary Report Mailed on Feb. 20, 2010.
Application serial No. PCT/US07/80772, International Search Report Mailed on Feb. 29, 2008.
Application serial No. PCT/US07/80772, Written Opinion Mailed on Feb. 29, 2008.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140001603 A1 Jan 2014 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12901867 Oct 2010 US
Child 14016673 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11268154 Nov 2005 US
Child 12901867 US