The present invention relates to inductively-coupled plasma ion sources for focused beam systems.
Plasma ion technology is commonly used for semiconductor wafer processing. Ion sources designed to process an entire semiconductor wafer are required to provide a uniform beam of ions over a broad area, such as over a 300 mm wafer. One application of such plasma systems would be to remove photoresist. The plasma produces a reactive species, such as monatomic fluorine or oxygen, that reacts with the photoresist to turn it to ash, which is subsequently removed by the vacuum pump. Because the ashing is performed by a reactive species, rather than by sputtering, the energy of the ions impacting the work piece can be relatively low and the voltage difference between the interior of the plasma chamber and the work piece is generally low.
The requirements for plasma sources used in focused beam systems, such as a scanning electron microscope or a focused ion beam system, are significantly different requirements from those used in whole wafer processing systems. Ion or electron beams are focused to sub-micron spots. Because the focusing system typically projects a demagnified image of the virtual ion source onto the sample, the virtual ion source from which the charged particles are emitted should be small to produce a small spot on the sample. That is, the ion source should provide a relatively large number of ions coming from a small area. The energies of all the charged particles in the beam must be similar, or chromatic aberration will prevent the charged particles from focusing to a fine point.
Inductively coupled (IC) plasma sources have advantages over other types of plasma sources when used with a focusing column to form a focused beam of charged particles, i.e., ions or electrons. The inductively coupled plasma source is capable of providing charged particles within a narrow energy range, which allows the particles to be focused to a small spot. IC plasma sources, such as the one described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,241,361, to Keller et al. for a “Magnetically Enhanced, Inductively Coupled Plasma Source for a Focused Ion Beam System,” which is assigned to the assignee of the present invention and is here by incorporated by reference, include a radio frequency (RF) antenna typically wrapped around a ceramic plasma chamber. The RF antenna provides energy to maintain the gas in an ionized state within the chamber.
Focused charged particle beam systems are often used to etch or deposit material or to form an image of a work piece and the charged particles are accelerated to relatively high energies by a voltage difference between the source and the work piece. Ions in a focused ion beam typically impact the work piece with landing energies of between 5 keV and 100 keV, more typically at about 30 keV. Electron landing energies vary between about 500 eV to 5 keV for a scanning electron microscope system to several hundred thousand electron volts for a transmission electron microscope system. To reduce risk to personnel, the work piece is typically maintained at or near ground potential, and the plasma source is maintained at a high voltage, either positive or negative, depending on the particles used to form the beam. “High voltage” as used herein means positive or negative voltage greater than about 500 V above or below ground potential. For the safety of operating personnel, it is necessary to electrically isolate the high voltage components. The electrical isolation of the high voltage plasma creates several design problems that are difficult to solve in light of other goals for a plasma source design.
For example, it is desirable to place the radio frequency coils that provide power to the plasma as close as possible to the plasma to efficiently transfer power, but having a difference in voltage across a small distance leads to arcing, which can damage the system. As described above, the plasma is maintained at a high DC voltage, while the radio frequency coils are typically oscillated at an RF voltage that is high, but lower than the DC voltage of the plasma. One way to eliminate much of the voltage difference between the plasma and the coil would be to maintaining the coils at a DC bias equal to the high potential as the plasma. This solution, however, would require maintaining the power supply for the coil at the high plasma potential, which would excessively complicate the power supply design and greatly increase the cost.
The grounded Faraday shield isolates the high DC voltage plasma from the radio frequency coil potential and reduces capacitive coupling between the coil and the plasma. When the Faraday shield is located close to the dielectric plasma container, the large electric field caused by the voltage difference between the grounded shield and the plasma being biased to the necessary accelerating voltage (e.g. 30 kV) causes the possibility of a high voltage discharge which could damage the source. The presence of air trapped between the Faraday shield and the ceramic also causes the potential for arcing in that region.
The introduction of the Faraday shield between the plasma chamber and the antenna also inevitably leads to the antenna being placed further away from the plasma vessel, which can cause complications including arcing from the antenna to the shield and from the shield to the plasma. Furthermore, Faraday shields may have sharp edges which cause additional high voltage management concerns.
Not only is high voltage management a design challenge for a plasma source for a focused ion beam system, heat management is also a challenge. The energy applied to the plasma chamber generates heat in the plasma chamber and in the radio frequency coils. While a compact plasma source is desirable for beam formation, the more compact and powerful the plasma source, the hotter the source becomes and therefore the greater the need to efficiently dissipate the heat. The high voltage can also make cooling difficult, which can limit the density of the plasma used. These conflicting requirements make the design of an ICP source very challenging. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/182,925, which is assigned to the assignee of the present invention, describes a liquid cooled plasma source for a focused charged particle beam system.
The Faraday shield can complicate the cooling methods. Fluids in contact with the shield must not erode or oxidize the shield, and the choice of cooling fluid may also be limited by the dielectric concerns associated with the high voltage management at the sharp edges of the Faraday shield.
M. Dickson, et al., “Radial Uniformity of an External-Coil Ionized Physical Vapor Deposition Source,” J. Vac. Sci. Tech. B 16(2) (1998), describes a plasma system for ionized physical vapor deposition of metal onto wafers. The plasma ions bombard a metal target, and the metal sputtered from the target are ionized and directed toward the wafer below by the plasma sheath. Because the sputtered metal from the target will quickly form an electrical path around the inside of the quartz chamber, a water-cooled metal Faraday shield is used inside the plasma chamber. The Faraday shield within the plasma chamber acts as a baffle for sputtered metal and protects the dielectric walls of the plasma chamber from thick deposits of metal film. The water-cooling lines are electrically isolated from ground and connected through isolated radio frequency power feedthroughs. The large, wafer scale plasma chamber of M. Dickson, et al., facilitates the engineering of the Faraday shield within the large plasma chamber.
An object of the invention is to reduce capacitive coupling to the plasma in charged particle beam systems in order to have a desirably low energy spread for beam forming purposes.
This invention provides a Faraday shield within the plasma chamber of a focusing charged particle beam system, with the Faraday shield either biased to the plasma potential or a substantial fraction of it.
The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of the present invention in order that the detailed description of the invention that follows may be better understood. Additional features and advantages of the invention will be described hereinafter. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the conception and specific embodiments disclosed may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other structures for carrying out the same purposes of the present invention. It should also be realized by those skilled in the art that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.
For a more thorough understanding of the present invention, and advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Designing a plasma source typically entails many tradeoffs to meet conflicting design requirements. Embodiments of the invention can provide excellent coupling between the RF coil and the plasma, efficient cooling of the plasma chamber, and excellent capacitive screening, all of which can help produce an inductively-coupled plasma that is dense, quiescent, and at a high potential.
The description below describes a plasma source for a focused ion beam system, but a plasma source of the present invention can be used for an electron beam system, or other system. For purposes of the present invention, the terms shield, Faraday shield, electrostatic shield, and capacitive shield are equivalent.
A preferred embodiment uses a Faraday shield that is internal to the plasma chamber, that is, a Faraday shield within the walls of the plasma chamber. Prior art plasma sources for focused beam systems have not used an internal split Faraday shield because the design difficulties, such as excessive heating and were known, while the extent of the advantages of an internal shield for a system with probe-forming optics was not appreciated. Applicants have found several advantages to having an internal Faraday shield. Eliminating the external Faraday shield, the radio frequency coils can be placed closer to the plasma tube, leading to higher coupling efficiency. Applicants also found that an internal Faraday shield allows for more flexibility in designing a cooling system because the space outside the plasma tube is clearer. Also, the erosion of the shield material caused by the interaction with the cooling fluid is avoided. Unlike the system of M. Dickson, et al., there is no metal target in the plasma chamber to function as a sputtering source and typically no metal ions in the plasma. The Faraday shield in most embodiments of the present invention is not liquid cooled. The plasma source of the present invention is used as a source of ions for a probe forming system, that is, the ions leave the plasma chamber and are formed into a beam that is focused onto a sample. Unlike the system of M. Dickson, et al., the work piece is not placed in the plasma chamber.
In addition to the shielding effect, the internal Faraday shield also effectively extends the contact area of the bias potential along the axis of the plasma containment, and as such, provides better biasing of the plasma and leads to less possibility of bias voltage differences along the plasma chamber axis, resulting in a better energy spread. It is preferable to have a single electrical connection provide bias both to the Faraday shield and the extraction aperture.
The focusing column that focuses the charged particles extracted from the plasma source typically includes a beam defining aperture 210, deflectors 212, and at least one lens 214 for focusing the particles onto the sample 216.
Finally, step 308 involves extracting charged particles from the plasma chamber using extraction optics and focusing the charged particles onto a workpiece. A cooling fluid can also be provided in the exterior of the plasma chamber in order to cool the plasma chamber. Other cooling methods, such as the use of a non-circulating coolant or heat tubes, are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/165,556 of Kellogg, et al. for “Encapsulation of Electrode in Solid Media for use in Conjunction with Fluid High Voltage Isolation,” which is assigned to the assignee of the present invention. The cooling methods described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/165,556 can be used with the internal Faraday shield described herein.
A typical prior art Faraday shield is well grounded and located on the exterior of the plasma chamber, resulting in rapid electric potential drops between the plasma region and the shield. These rapid electric potential drops impose limitations on the materials inserted between the plasma region and the conductive Faraday shield. In the prior art, only materials with sufficiently large dielectric strength to prevent arcing can be inserted in this region. However, because the present invention has internal Faraday shield 444, which is biased to a target potential, essentially any type of material can be used within space 422 because there are no rapid potential drops and arcing is significantly reduced. Dielectric breakdown resulting from the cooling fluid can thus be prevented by having an internal shield, and a wide variety of cooling fluids, even those without adequate dielectric constants, can be used to cool plasma chamber 402. As used herein, a “fluid” can comprise a liquid or a gas.
Typically, the cooling method involves a liquid coolant which is chosen to be free of gaseous bubbles or other impurities which could present the opportunity for field enhancement and gaseous electric discharge. The cooling fluid should also have sufficient heat capacity to prevent the plasma chamber 402 from overheating without requiring a large fluid flow that requires a large pump that would consume excessive power. The plasma chamber outer wall 406 is typically maintained at a temperature of less than about 50° C.
The internal Faraday shield 444 passes the radio frequency energy from RF coils 446 to energize the plasma while reducing the capacitive coupling between radio frequency coils 446 and plasma 412. In some embodiments, the Faraday shield 444 is protected from physical damage by being substantially encapsulated in a solid dielectric media, such as ceramic, glass, resin, or polymer, to eliminate high voltage discharge. RF coils 446 may be hollow and cooled by flow of a fluid coolant through the internal passages 447 in the coils. Alternatively, coolant can flow over the exterior of the RF coils. The plasma chamber coolant system may also pump fluid coolant through the coils, or the coils can have an independent cooling system.
In some embodiments of the invention, the shield is a split Faraday shield. The internal Faraday shield is wrapped around to form a cylindrical shape.
Some embodiments of the invention comprise:
a plasma source including:
one or more focusing lenses for focusing charged particles from the plasma source onto a sample.
In some embodiments, the system includes a biasing electrode for electrically biasing the conductive shield to a desired voltage.
In some embodiments, the conductive shield comprises a layer coated onto the interior wall of the plasma chamber.
In some embodiments, the conductive shield comprises a thin conductive foil inserted within the plasma chamber.
In some embodiments, the charged particle beam system further comprising a cooling fluid surrounding and in thermal contact with at least a portion of the plasma chamber. In some embodiments, the cooling fluid comprises air or a liquid.
In some embodiments, the conductive shield is maintained at substantially the same voltage as the exterior boundary of the plasma sheath.
In some embodiments, the conductive shield is electrically isolated and during operation is maintained at substantially the same electrical potential as the external boundary of the plasma sheath.
In some embodiments, the conductive shield is maintained at a voltage having a magnitude of between 500V and 100 kV or between 5000V and 50000V.
In some embodiments, the plasma is biased to produce a landing energy of the charged particles of between 500 eV and 100 keV.
In some embodiments, the conductive shield and plasma are maintained at an electrical potential different from ground potential.
In some embodiments, the conductive shield is a split Faraday shield and in some embodiments, the split Faraday shield is wrapped around to form a cylindrical shape within the plasma chamber.
In some embodiments, plasma temperature is kept low enough to avoid sputtering of the conductive shield within the plasma chamber.
In some embodiments, the conductive shield distributes heat from the plasma to the walls of the plasma chamber.
In some embodiments, the conductor for providing radio frequency energy into the plasma chamber includes internal passages for passage of a cooling fluid.
Some embodiments of the invention include a method of operating an inductively coupled plasma source including a plasma chamber comprising:
providing radio frequency energy into the plasma chamber from at least one conductive coil to maintain a plasma in the plasma chamber;
providing a conductive shield to reduce capacitative coupling between the source of the radio frequency and the plasma;
maintaining the plasma and the conductive shield at an electrical potential different from ground potential;
extracting charged particles from the plasma chamber; and
focusing the charged particles into a beam and directing the beam onto or near a workpiece.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises providing a cooling fluid to cool the plasma chamber.
In some embodiments, providing a conductive shield includes providing a conductive shield coated onto the interior wall of the plasma chamber.
In some embodiments, providing a conductive shield includes providing a conductive material inserted into the interior of the plasma chamber.
Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions, and alterations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Moreover, the scope of the present application is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments of the process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, means, methods and steps described in the specification. As one of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate from the disclosure of the present invention, processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps, presently existing or later to be developed that perform substantially the same function or achieve substantially the same result as the corresponding embodiments described herein may be utilized according to the present invention. Accordingly, the appended claims are intended to include within their scope such processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps. The terms “including” and “comprising” are used in the claims below an open-ended fashion, and thus should be interpreted to mean “including, but not limited to . . . .”
This application is a Divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/277,072, filed Oct. 19, 2011, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4362632 | Jacob | Dec 1982 | A |
4503329 | Yamaguchi et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4659899 | Welkie et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4676194 | Satou et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4805555 | Itoh | Feb 1989 | A |
4856457 | Knauer | Aug 1989 | A |
4859908 | Yoshida et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4870284 | Hashimoto et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4886969 | Knauer | Dec 1989 | A |
4935623 | Knauer | Jun 1990 | A |
5008537 | Toita et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5019712 | Knauer | May 1991 | A |
5036252 | Lob | Jul 1991 | A |
5108535 | Ono et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5188705 | Swanson et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5270552 | Ohnishi et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5435850 | Rasmussen | Jul 1995 | A |
5573595 | Dible | Nov 1996 | A |
5614711 | Li et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5647945 | Matsuse et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5681418 | Ishimaru | Oct 1997 | A |
5686796 | Boswell et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5825035 | Mizumura et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5827786 | Puretz | Oct 1998 | A |
5850083 | Koikari et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5851413 | Casella et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5945677 | Leung et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6017221 | Flamm | Jan 2000 | A |
6127275 | Flamm | Oct 2000 | A |
6228176 | Chu et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239404 | Lea et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6280563 | Baldwin, Jr. et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6385977 | Johnson | May 2002 | B1 |
6425953 | Johnson | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6447636 | Qian et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459066 | Khater et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6491742 | Johnson | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6545420 | Collins et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6554953 | Daviet | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6639226 | Morio et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6743481 | Hoehn et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6753538 | Musil et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6758948 | Johnson | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6768120 | Leung et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6770836 | Kwon et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6806650 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6833051 | Kazumi et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6897157 | Liang et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6926935 | Arjavac et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6975072 | Leung et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7084407 | Ji et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7176469 | Leung et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7220963 | Gross | May 2007 | B2 |
7241361 | Keller et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7298091 | Pickard et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7442942 | Takahashi et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7629590 | Horsky et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7670455 | Keller et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7691243 | Vukovic | Apr 2010 | B2 |
20010009353 | Patterson et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010022158 | Brcka | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020023899 | Khater et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020175869 | Wilcoxson et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030024900 | Johnson | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030062840 | Moroz | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030168588 | Brailove et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040036032 | Leung et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040104683 | Leung et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040140054 | Johnson | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040262237 | Kornbrekke et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050103623 | Tolmachev et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050183667 | Keller et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060045987 | Chandler et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060060566 | Puech | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060272775 | Horsky et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070034154 | Fink | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070108395 | Horsky et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070181257 | Comendant | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070278417 | Horsky et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080067430 | Hershkowitz et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080080659 | Leung et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080142735 | Chandler et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080220596 | Olander et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080314871 | Toth et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090008239 | Sorensen et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090266984 | Hirano | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090309018 | Smith et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100044580 | Boswell et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100126964 | Smith et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100243889 | Faber et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100301211 | Miller | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110044418 | Stubbers et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110049382 | Miller et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110084207 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110091000 | Stubbers et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110163068 | Utlaut et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120280136 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
64014849 | Jan 1989 | JP |
3272549 | Dec 1991 | JP |
6176725 | Jun 1994 | JP |
7312201 | Nov 1995 | JP |
7335163 | Dec 1995 | JP |
2004-537830 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2008-128887 | Jun 2008 | JP |
2009140762 | Jun 2009 | JP |
2010225411 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2011-142081 | Jul 2011 | JP |
WO2005038821 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO2007149727 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO2008094297 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO2009148648 | Dec 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Mao, D., et al., “Ionized physical vapor deposition of titanium nitride: Plasma and film characterization,” Journal of Vacuum Science Technology A, 2002, pp. 379-387, vol. 20, No. 2. |
Dickson, M., et al., “Radial uniformity of an external-coil ionized physical vapor deposition source,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, Mar./Apr. 1998, pp. 523-531, vol. 16, No. 2. |
Johnson, Wayne L., “Electrostatically-Shielded Inductively-Coupled RF Plasma Sources,” High Density Plasma Sources: Design and Physics and Performance, Popov, Oleg, A., Ed., 1995, pp. 100-148. |
“CeramTec High Voltage Isolator Catalog,” CeramTec North America Corporation, accessed Feb. 29, 2008, pp. OP1019-OP1033. |
Hahto, S.K., et al., “Multicusp ion source with external rf antenna for production of protons,” Review of Scientific Instruments, Feb. 2004, pp. 355-359, vol. 75, No. 2. |
Hayes, A.V., et al., “Recent advances in Veeco's radio frequency ion sources for ion beam materials processing applications (abstract),” Review of Scientific Instruments, Feb. 2002, p. 880, vol. 73, No. 2. |
“IMG-31 / IGPS-31 Microwave Ion Source / Power Supply,” Kimball Physics Inc., accessed Apr. 4, 2011, pp. 2-9-2-10. |
Iwai, H., et al., “A Study of Charge Compensation for Insulator Samples in AES by Low Energy Ion Beam Irradiation,”Journal of Surface Analysis, 1999, 4 pages, vol. 5, No. 1. |
Jiang, X., et al., “Mini rf-driven ion sources for focused ion beam systems,” Review of Scientific Instruments, Apr. 2003, pp. 2288-2292, vol. 74, No. 4. |
Ji, Qing, et al., “Development of focused ion beam systems with various ion species,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B: Beam Interactions with Materials & Atoms, 2005, pp. 335-340, vol. 241. |
Leung, K., “Radio-Frequency Driven Sources,” The Physics and Technology of Ion Sources, 2nd Edition, Ian G. Brown (Ed.), Nov. 2004, pp. 163-175, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany. |
Mordyk, Serhiy, et al., “High-plasma-density helicon source for ion beam application,” 13th International Congress on Plasma Physics, May 22-26, 2006, pp. OP1181-OP1184, Kiev, Ukraine. |
Mukherjee, S.K., et al., “Mechanical Design of the Prototype H Ion Source for the Spallation Neutron Source,” Proceedings of the 1999 Particle Accelerator Conference, New York, 1999, pp. 1914-1916. |
Nabhiraj, P.Y., et al., “Design of High Current RF Ion Source for Micromachining Applications,” APAC 2007, Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology (RRCAT), Indore, India, pp. 262-264. |
Okada, Katsuyuki, et al., “Diagnostics of Low Pressure Inductively Coupled VHF Plasma Used for Nanostructured Carbon Deposition,” 28th International Conference of Phenomena in Ionized Gases, Jul. 15-20, 2007, Prague, Czech Republic, pp. OP1210-OP1211. |
“Plasma Controller, Oxford Scientific ‘OSPreyRF’,” Oxford Scientific Instruments for Innovators, accessed Apr. 4, 2011, p. OP1212. |
Panagopoulos, Theodoros, et al., “Plasma sheath model and ion energy distribution for all radio frequencies,” Journal of Applied Physics, Apr. 1, 1999, pp. 3435-3443, vol. 85, No. 7. |
Welton, R.F., et al., “RF-Plasma Coupling Schemes for the SNS Ion Source,” Radio Frequency Power in Plasmas: 15th Topical Conference on Radio Frequency Power in Plasmas. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2003, pp. 431-438, vol. 694. |
Welton, R.F., et al., “The design of high power, external antennas for radio frequency multicusp ion sources,” Review of Scientific Instruments, May 2004, pp. 1789-1792, vol. 75, No. 5. |
“RFVII Brochure,” RFVII Incorporated, accessed Feb. 29, 2008, pp. OP0996-OP1005. |
Speth, E., et al., “Overview of RF Source Development at IPP,” CCNB-Meeting at Padua, Italy, Jun. 5-6, 2003, pp. 1-29. |
Sobolewski, Mark, et al., “Ion energy distributions and sheath voltages in a radio-frequency-biased, inductively coupled, high-density plasma reactor,” Journal of Applied Physics, Apr. 15, 1999, pp. 3966-3975, vol. 85, No. 8. |
Sobolewski, Mark, et al., “Measurements and modeling of ion energy distributions in high-density, radiofrequency biased CF4 discharges,” Journal of Applied Physics, May 15, 2002, pp. 6303-6314, vol. 91, No. 10. |
Wagenaars, Erik, “Plasma Breakdown of Low-Pressure Gas Discharges,” Nov. 30, 2006, pp. 6-7, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands. |
Wang, Yicheng, et al., “Ion energy distributions in inductively coupled radio-frequency discharges in argon, nitrogen, oxygen, chlorine, and their mixtures,” Journal of Applied Physics, May 1, 1999, pp. 6358-6365, vol. 85, No. 9. |
Welton, R.F. et al., “Development and Status of the SNS Ion Source,” Proceedings of the 2003 Particle Accelerator Conference, 2003, pp. 3306-3308. |
Welton, Robert, et al., “Ion Source R&D at the SNS,” Accelerator Physics and Technology Seminar, Fermilab, Jan. 19, 2006, pp. OP1283-OP1314. |
“Xe Sputter Yields, Group 1, Li to S, O” National Physical Laboratory, May 12, 2005, pp. OP1034-OP1039. |
Coath, C.D., et al., “A high-brightness duoplasmatron ion source for microprobe secondary-ion mass spectrometry,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., Feb. 1995, pp. 1018-1023, vol. 66, No. 2. |
Coupland, J.R., et al., “A Study of the Ion Beam Intensity and Divergence Obtained from a Single Aperture Three Electrode Extraction System,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., Sep. 1973, pp. 1258-1270, vol. 44, No. 9. |
Daykin, P.N., “Electrode shapes for a cylindrical electron beam,” British Journal of Applied Physics, Jul. 1955, vol. 6, pp. 248-250. |
Harrison, E.R., “Approximate electrode shapes for a cylindrical electron beam,” British Journal of Applied Physics, Jan. 1954, vol. 5, pp. 40-41. |
Han, B.X., et al., “Evaluation and utilization of beam simulation codes for the SNS ion source and low energy beam transport development,” Review of Scientific Instruments, Feb. 4, 2008, pp. 02B904-1-02B904-5, vol. 79, No. 2. |
Henderson, S., et al., “Status of the SNS Beam Power Upgrade Project,” Proceedings of EPAC 2006, 2006, pp. 345-347, Edinburgh, Scotland. |
Hopwood, J., “A Microfabricated Inductively-Coupled Plasma Generator,” Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, Sep. 2000, pp. 309-313, vol. 9, Issue 3. |
Johnson, Wayne L., “Electrostatically-Shielded Inductively-Coupled RF Plasma Sources,” High Density Plasma Sources: Design, Physics and Performance, Jan. 14, 1997, ISBN-10: 0815513771, Chapter 3. |
Keller, R., “Ion Extraction,” The Physics and Technology of Ion Sources, The University of California, Berkeley, 1989, pp. 23-50. |
Leung, Ka-Ngo, “Plasma sources for electrons and Ion beams,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, Nov./Dec. 1999, pp. 2776-2778, vol. 17, Issue 6. |
Lieberman, Michael A., et al., “Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing,” 1994, ISBN: 0-471-00577-0, pp. 31-37 and 157-163. |
Mathew, Jose V., et al., “Subcutoff microwave driven plasma ion sources for multielemental focused ion beam systems,” Review of Scientific Instruments, 2008, pp. 063504-1-063504-5, vol. 79, No. 6. |
Smith, N. S., et al., “A High Brightness Source for Nano-Probe Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry,” Applied Surface Science, Dec. 15, 2008, pp. 1606-1609, vol. 255, Issue 4. |
Smith, N. S., et al., “High brightness inductively coupled plasma source for high current focused ion beam applications,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, Nov./Dec. 2006, pp. 2902-2906, vol. 24, No. 6. |
Steffens, P., et al., “A time-of-flight mass spectrometer for static SIMS applications,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, May/Jun. 1985, pp. 1322-1325, vol. 3, Issue 3. |
Tesch, Paul, et al., “High Current Focused Ion Beam Instrument for Destructive Physical Analysis Applications,” 34th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, Nov. 2-6, 2008, pp. 7-13, Portland, Oregon. |
Vargas-Aburto, Carlos, et al., “Development of a Quadrupole-Based Secondary-Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS) System at Lewis Research Center,” Jun. 1990, 36 pages. |
Welton, R.F., et al., “Advanced RF-Driven H-Ion Sources At the SNS,” Particle Accelerator Conference, Jun. 25-29, 2007, pp. 3774-3776. |
Welton, R.F., et al., “Ion source antenna development for the Spallation Neutron Source,” Review of Scientific Instruments, Feb. 2002, pp. 1008-1012, vol. 73, No. 2. |
Yin, Y., et al., “Miniaturization of Inductively Coupled Plasma Sources,” Plasma Science, IEEE Transactions, Oct. 1999, pp. 1516-1524, vol. 27, Issue 5. |
Welton, R.F., et al., “The continued development of the Spallation Neutron Source external antenna H-ion source,” Review of Scientific Instruments, 2010, pp. 02A727-1-02A727-3, vol. 81. |
Whitlock, Bill, “Shields, grounds and microphone cables,” 2004 Rycote Microphone Windshields Ltd., pp. 1-6. |
Wituschek, H., et al., “Investigation of extraction systems with low aberrations,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., Apr. 1992, pp. 2785-2787, vol. 63, No. 4. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150008213 A1 | Jan 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13277072 | Oct 2011 | US |
Child | 14325146 | US |