1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to semiconductor technology. More particularly, the present invention relates to memory cell technology and to resistive random access memory cell technology. The present invention relates to low leakage resistive random access memory cells.
The contents of co-pending application Ser. No. 15/374,957 filed Dec. 9, 2016 entitled LOW LEAKAGE RESISTIVE RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY CELLS AND PROCESSES FOR FRABRICATING SAME; and co-pending application Ser. No. 15/374,957 filed Dec. 9, 2016 entitled THREE-TRANSISTOR RESISTIVE RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY CELLS are expressly incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
2. The Prior Art
Resistive random access memory (ReRAM) push-pull memory cells make an attractive configuration memory for advanced field-programmable gate array (FPGA) integrated circuits due to their small size and scalability. Examples of ReRAM memory devices and. memory cells configured from those devices are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,415,650.
A ReRAM device is basically two metal plates, one of which serves as a metal ion source, separated by a solid electrolyte. The solid electrolyte has two states. In a first state (an “on” state), ions from the metal ion source have been forced into the electrolyte by placing a DC voltage having a first polarity across the ReRAM device and having a sufficient potential to drive metal ions from the ion-source plate into the electrolyte. In the first state, the ions form a conductive bridge through the solid electrolyte across which electrons can pass fairly easily. As the electrolyte becomes increasingly populated with metal ions, its resistivity, and hence the resistivity of the entire ReRAM device decreases. In a second state (an “off state), the electrolyte has been virtually depleted of ions by placing a DC voltage having a polarity opposite to that of the first potential and a potential sufficient to drive the metal ions from the electrolyte back into the ion-source plate across the ReRAM device, In the second state, absence of the ions makes it difficult for electrons to pass through the solid electrolyte. As the population of metal ions in the electrolyte decreases, its resistivity, and hence the resistivity of the entire ReRAM device increases. Amorphous silicon is a solid electrolyte and it is a leading candidate today for use in ReRAM devices.
ReRAM devices are often employed in a push-pull configuration to form a ReRAM memory cell as shown in
The ReRAM devices 12 and 14 are connected in series between a pair of complementary bitlines (BL) 16 (BL!) 18. Persons of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the value of the potentials applied to (BL) 16 and (BL!) 18 will be selected as a function of the particular feature size and other aspects of the technology employed. Typical operating voltages that are applied to (BL) 16 and (BL!) 18 are 1.5V and 0V, respectively.
In operation, one of ReRAM devices 12 and 14 will be set to its “on” state and the other will be set to its “off” state. Depending on which one of the ReRAM devices 12 and 14 is “on” and which one is “off” switch node 20 will either be pulled up to the voltage on BL 16 or pulled down to the voltage on BL! 18.
The gate of a switch transistor 22 is coupled to a switch node 20. The drain of the switch transistor 22 is connected to a first programmable node 24 and the source of the switch transistor is connected to a second programmable node 26. The first programmable node 24 can be connected to the second programmable node 26 by turning on the switch transistor 22.
If ReRAM device 12 is in its “on” state and ReRAM device 14 is in its “off” state, switch node 20 is pulled up to the voltage on BL 16, and switch transistor 22 will be turned on. If ReRAM device 12 is in its “off” state and ReRAM device 14 is in its “on” state, switch node 20 is pulled down to the voltage on BL! 18, and switch transistor 22 will be turned off. Persons of ordinary skill in the art will note that the entire potential between (BL) 16 and (BL!) 18 will exist across the one of ReRAM devices 12 and 14 that is in the “off” state.
A programming transistor 28 has a gate coupled to a word line (WL) 30. The drain of programming transistor 28 is connected to switch node 20 and its source is connected to a word line source (WLS) 32. In a typical application, ReRAM devices 12 and 14 are first erased (set to their “off” state) and then one of them is programmed (set to its “on” state) as described herein with reference to
Referring now to
The switch transistor 22 is oriented orthogonally to the programming transistor 28 and polysilicon line 48 forms its gate. The source 26 and drain 24 regions of the switch transistor 22 are located in planes behind and in front of the plane of
ReRAM device 12 is formed between a second segment 52 of the first layer (M1) of metal interconnect and a first segment 54 of a second layer (M2) of metal interconnect. An inter-metal contact 56 is shown connecting ReRAM device 12 to the first segment 54 of the second layer (M2) of metal interconnect. A second segment 58 of the second layer (M2) of metal interconnect serves as the bitline BL 16 and is connected to the second segment 52 of the first layer (M1) of metal interconnect by an inter-metal contact 60.
ReRAM device 14 is formed between a third segment 62 of the first layer (M1) of metal interconnect and a third segment 64 of the second layer (M2) of metal interconnect. The third segment 64 of the second layer (M2) of metal interconnect serves as the bitline BL! 18. An inter-metal contact 66 is shown connecting ReRAM device 14 to the third segment 64 of the second layer (M2) of metal interconnect.
An inter-metal contact 68 between the first segment 54 of the second layer (M2) of metal interconnect and the third segment 62 of the first layer (M1) of metal interconnect is used to make the connection between ReRAM device 12 and ReRAM device 14. Another pair of inter-metal contacts 70 and 72 and the third segment 62 of the first layer (M1) of metal interconnect are used to make the connection between the gate 48 of the switch transistor, the drain 38 of the programming transistor 28, and the common connection of the ReRAM devices 12 and 14.
ReRAM devices in the “off” state do not exhibit infinite resistance. ReRAM devices will therefore pass a leakage current in the “off” state if a voltage is impressed across them. For most normal memory applications, bits are only read when they are addressed. A transistor may be used to block any leakage current during times when the bit is not being read, and the leakage is therefore not overly problematic.
However, when using a ReRAM cell as a configuration memory for an FPGA, the cell statically drives the gate of a switch transistor to place the switch transistor in either its “on” or “off” state. In this application, the ReRAM cell is essentially always being read. Thus, the leakage current is always present across the ReRAM device that is in the “off” state, if a voltage is impressed thereacross, and is problematic.
Current investigations of the use of ReRAM memory cells as configuration memory in FPGA integrated circuits are academic in nature and ignore the cell leakage issue which presents a practical problem inhibiting the commercial application of this technology. Because the amount of “off” state leakage is an exponential function of the reverse, or “off” state, voltage across the ReRAM device it presents a significant obstacle to commercialization of configuration memory in FPGA devices.
According to the present invention a low-leakage resistive random access memory cell includes a complementary pair of bit lines and a switch node. A first ReRAM device is connected to a first one of the bit lines. A p-channel transistor has a source connected to the ReRAM device, a drain connected to the switch node, and a gate connected to a bias potential. A second ReRAM device is connected to a second one of the bit lines. An n-channel transistor has a source connected to the ReRAM device a drain connected to the switch node, and a gate connected to a bias potential. A programming transistor has a drain connected to the switch node, a source connected to a source word line and a gate connected to a word line. A switch transistor has a gate connected to the switch node, a source connected to a first programmable node and a drain connected to a second programmable node.
Persons of ordinary skill in the art will realize that the following description of the present invention is illustrative only and not in any way limiting. Other embodiments of the invention will readily suggest themselves to such skilled persons.
By adding two transistors to the cell in accordance with the present invention, the voltage across the “off” state ReRAM cell can be significantly reduced (e.g., to 0.5V or less) while maintaining the 1.5V drive on the switch transistor in a typical application as described herein. This can be done with only a minimal increase in area. Because the leakage is an exponential function of applied voltage, reducing the voltage across the “off” state ReRAM device in accordance with the present invention dramatically reduces the leakage through the “off” state ReRAM device, significantly improving the power dissipation.
Referring now to
A second ReRAM device 14 has a first end coupled to bitline BL! 18. An n-channel transistor 84 is coupled in series with a second end of second ReRAM device 14 and has its source connected to the second end of ReRAM device 14. The drain of n-channel transistor 84 is connected to the switch node 20. Persons of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the value of the potentials applied to (BL) 16 and (BL!) 18 will be selected as a function of the particular feature size and other aspects of the technology employed. Typical operating voltages that are applied to (BL) 16 and (BL!) 18 are 1.5V and 0V, respectively.
The gate of p-channel transistor 82 is connected to bias voltage node 86 to bias the gate with respect to its source, The gate of n-channel transistor 84 is connected to bias voltage node 88 to bias the gate with respect to its source. The bias voltages for the p-channel transistor 82 and n-channel transistor 84 to be applied to the respected bias voltage nodes 86 and 88 should be respectively chosen at design time to set the conductance of each of the p-channel and n-channel transistors so that each of ReRAM device 12 and ReRAM device 14 will have a voltage potential thereacross of between 0.25V to 0.5V more or less when it is in its “off” state. This bias voltage is nominally about 0.75V with respect to the source of the transistor for the voltages of 1.5V and 0V mentioned above, but, as noted, will vary given individual devices and processes.
A programming transistor 28 has a gate coupled to a word line (WL) 30. The drain of programming transistor 28 is connected to switch node 20 and its source is connected to a word line source (WLS) 32.
Selecting the voltage to which the ReRAM devices will be subjected in their “off” states involves an engineering tradeoff between the leakage of the off-state ReRAM device and the subthreshold conduction of the series transistor 82 or 84. The voltage selected in any particular situation will depend on the sizes and geometries of the ReRAM and transistor devices used, and the fabrication process employed. As noted, typical design tradeoffs should result in a voltage across the off-state ReRAM device in the range of 0.25V to 0.5V more or less when using operating voltages in the neighborhood of 1.5V. Higher voltages across the off-state ReRAM device will exponentially increase the ReRAM device leakage, and lower voltages will drop more of the off-state voltage across the series p-channel or n-channel transistor, causing more subthreshold conduction through the transistor. In a typical design, a current flow of no more than 100 pA more or less should be flowing through the off-state ReRAM device.
In operation, as indicated above, one of ReRAM devices 12 and 14 will be set to its “on” state and the other will be set to its “off” state. Depending on which one of the ReRAM devices 12 and 14 is “on” and which one is “off” switch node 20 will either be pulled up to the voltage on BL 16 or pulled down to the voltage on BL! 18.
The gate of a switch transistor 22 is coupled to switch node 20. The drain of the switch transistor is connected to a first programmable node 24 and the source of the switch transistor is connected to a second programmable node 26. The first programmable node 24 can be connected to the second programmable node 26 by turning on the switch transistor 22.
If ReRAM device 12 is in its “on” state and ReRAM device 14 is in its “off” state, switch node 20 is pulled up to the voltage on BL 16, and switch transistor 22 will be turned on, if ReRAM device 12 is in its “off” state and ReRAM device 14 is in its “on” state, switch node 20 is pulled down to the voltage on BL! 18, and switch transistor 22 will be turned off. Persons of ordinary skill in the art will note that the entire potential between one of (BL) 16 and (BL!) 18 and the switch node 20 will not exist across the “off” state ReRAM device but will be shared across the one of ReRAM devices 12 and 14 that is in the “off” state and the one of p-channel transistor 82 and n-channel transistor 84 connected between it and the one of bitlines (BL) 16 and (BL!) 18 with which it is associated.
The offstate leakage in some ReRAM devices is a strong function of the reverse or “off” state voltage applied to the structure. The p-channel transistor 82 and n-channel transistor 84 serve to reduce the offstate voltage across the ReRAM devices to which they are directly connected to minimize the leakage. When ReRAM device 12 is in its “off” state and ReRAM device 14 is in its on state, the source of n-channel transistor 84 is at the voltage on bitline BL! (e.g., 0V) and its gate is at the voltage provided at bias voltage node 88, which for ease of understanding is shown as an exemplary 0.75V. Under these conditions, n-channel transistor 84 is turned on hard because its gate-to-source voltage is at the voltage of bias voltage node 88, and switch node 20 is pulled down to the voltage of bitline BL! (e.g., 0V). As a result, switch node 20 is pulled down to the voltage at bitline BL! (e.g., 0V). The gate of p-channel transistor 82 is at the voltage of bias voltage node 86, shown as an exemplary 0.75V. The source of p-channel transistor 84 is at around 1V more or less because the 1.5V between the bitline BL 16 and the switch node 20 is divided across the off-state ReRAM device 12 and the p-channel transistor 82 such that no more than about 0.25 to 0.5V more or less is across ReRAM device 12 to maintain the leakage current at, or below, the target maximum. Under these conditions the gate-to-source voltage of p-channel transistor 82 is only about −0.25V more or less and p-channel transistor 82 is operating in its subthreshold region as explained above in relation to
When ReRAM device 12 is in its on state and ReRAM device 14 is in its off state, the source of p-channel transistor 82 is at the voltage on bitline BL (e.g., 1.5V) and its gate is at the voltage provided at bias voltage node 88, which for ease of understanding is shown as an exemplary 0.75V. Under these conditions, p-channel transistor 82 is turned on hard because its gate-to-source voltage is −0.75V, i.e. the voltage of bias voltage node 88 less the voltage at bitline BL 16 (e.g. 1.5V), and switch node 20 is pulled up to the voltage on bitline BL. The gate of n-channel transistor 84 is at the voltage of bias voltage node 88, shown as an exemplary 0.75V. The source of n-channel transistor is at 0.5V more or less because the 1.5V between the bitline BL! 18 (0V) and the switch node 20 (1.5V) is divided across the off-state ReRAM device 14 and the n-channel transistor 84 such that only about 0.25 to 0.5V more or less is across ReRAM device 14 to maintain the leakage current at, or below, the target maximum. Under these conditions the gate-to-source voltage of n-channel transistor 84 is only around 0.25V more or less and n-channel transistor 84 is operating in its subthreshold region as explained above in relation to
The bias voltage for bias voltage nodes 86 and 88 are set responsive to the inherent off-state resistance of the associated ReRAM device 12 or 14 so as to achieve the desired off-state potential thereacross, particular such that only about 0.25V to 0.5V, more or less, is across ReRAM device 12 or 14.
Persons of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the voltage values used in the above description of the operation of the ReRAM memory cell 80 are nominal values presented for the purposes of illustration.
Referring now to
ReRAM cell 80 is formed in a semiconductor substrate 90, which, as understood by persons of ordinary skill in the art, could be a substrate or a well region formed within a semiconductor substrate on t which the integrated circuit containing it is fabricated. In the example shown in
ReRAM devices 12 and 14 are connected as a push-pull ReRAM cell. The ReRAM device 12 is formed on a segment 92 of a lower metal layer in the integrated circuit. The other end of ReRAM device 12 is connected to a bitline (BL) formed from a segment 94 of an upper metal layer by an inter-metal via 96. In the embodiment shown in
The transistors for the ReRAM cell 80 are formed in the substrate 90 and are separated from one another by isolations regions, shown as shallow trench isolation (STI) regions 98. P-channel transistor 82 is formed in n-well 100 (which is biased at the highest voltage in the circuit so as to never become forward biased) and has a source 102 connected to the metal segment 92 by via 104. The drain 106 of p-channel transistor 82 is connected to a segment 108 of the lower metal layer by a via 110. Segment 108 forms a part of the switch node 20 (
The ReRAM device 14 is formed on a segment 114 of the lower metal layer (M1) in the integrated circuit. The other end of ReRAM device 14 is connected to a bitline (BL!) formed from a segment 116 of the upper metal layer (M2) by an inter-metal via 118.
Segment 114 is connected to the source 120 of the n-channel transistor 84 by a via 122. The drain 124 of the n-channel transistor 84 is connected to the segment 108 by via 126. The gate of n-channel transistor 84 is formed from a polysilicon line 128 that is connected to a Bias 2 node to bias n-channel transistor 84 at about 0.75 V with respect to its source when the ReRAM memory cell is operated at a supply voltage of about 1.5V, as described above.
The switch transistor 22 of ReRAM cell 80 has a channel region 130 underneath its gate which is formed from a polysilicon segment 132. Polysilicon segment 132 is connected to metal segment 134 by via 136. As shown in
N-channel programming transistor 28 has its source 138 connected to metal segment 140 by a via 142, serving as the word line source (WLS) 32 of the ReRAM cell 80. The drain 144 of programming transistor 28 is connected to metal segment 146 by a via 148. As shown in
Referring now to
The table of
The voltages listed in
Before programming any of the ReRAM cells, they are all erased by placing both of the ReRAM devices in the ReRAM cells to their “off” states.
Column A represents the voltages applied to erase (turn off) all upper ReRAM devices in the cells. When the voltages listed in column A of the table are applied to the array of
Column B represents the voltages applied to erase all lower ReRAM devices in the cells. When the voltages listed in column B of the table are applied to the array of
Once all of the ReRAM cells have been erased, each ReRAM cell may be programmed to turn it “on” thereby turning on its associated switch transistor or to turn it “off” thereby turning off its associated switch transistor. As described below, the programming is accomplished responsive to the proper bias of the bitlines, word lines and respective programming transistor.
Column C represents the voltages applied to turn on the ReRAM cell at R1C1 by turning on the upper ReRAM device 12-1-1 in that cell to pull up the switch node to turn on the switch transistor. When the voltages listed in column C of the table are applied to the array of
Programming transistor 28-1-2 has 0V on its source, 2.5V on its gate and will be turned on, driving the switch node 22-1-2 in ReRAM cell R1C2 to 0V. Because BL2 and BL2! both have 0V on them, both ReRAM devices 12-1-2 and 14-1-2 in ReRAM cell R1C2 will have 0V across them and will not be programmed.
Programming transistors 28-2-1 and 28-2-2 each has 0V on its gate and will be turned off. The switch nodes 22-2-1 and 22-2-2 in ReRAM cells R2C1 and R2C2 will be either floating or at the potential on both bitlines BL2 and BL2! if one of the ReRAM devices in those cells has been programmed. Since bitlines BL2 and BL2! are both at 0V, no ReRAM devices in cells R2C1 and R2C2 in the second row of the array will be programmed.
Column D represents the voltages applied to turn off the ReRAM cell at R1C1 by turning on the lower ReRAM device 14-1-1 in that cell to pull down the switch node 22-1-1 to turn off the associated switch transistor. When the voltages listed in column D of the table are applied to the array of
Programming transistor 28-1-2 has 1.8V on its source, 2.5V on its gate and will be turned on, driving the switch node 22-1-2 in ReRAM cell R1C2 to 1.8V. Because BL2 and BL2! both have 1.8V on them, both ReRAM devices 12-1-2 and 14-1-2 in ReRAM cell R1C2 will have 0V across them and will not be programmed.
Programming transistors 28-2-1 and 28-2-2 each has 0V on its gate and will be turned off. The switch nodes 22-2-1 and 22-2-2 in ReRAM cells R2C1 and R2C2 will be either floating or at the potential on both bitlines BL2 and BL2! if one of the ReRAM devices in those cells has been programmed. All bitlines are at 1.8V, but because the switch nodes 22-2-1 and 22-2-2 are either floating or at the potential of bitlines BL2 and BL!2, no ReRAM devices in cells R2C1 and R2C2 in the second row of the array will be programmed.
Column E represents the voltages applied to turn on the ReRAM cell at R1C2 by turning on the upper ReRAM device 12-1-2 in that cell to pull up the switch node 22-1-2 to turn on the associated switch transistor. The conditions are similar to those for column C, except that the source of programming transistor 28-1-2 is now at 1.8V and is turned on (and the source of transistor 28-1-1 is now at 0V) and ReRAM device 12-1-2 is programmed because it has 0V at its top end and 1.8V on its bottom end. ReRAM device 14-1-2 will also have a voltage of 1.8V across it, but its bottom end is more negative than its top end and therefore ReRAM device 14-1-2 will not be programmed. Persons of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the ReRAM cells in the second row of the array are not programmed for the reasons set forth in the explanation of the column C conditions.
Column F represents the voltages applied to turn off the ReRAM cell at R1C2 by turning on the lower ReRAM device 14-1-2 in that cell to pull down the switch node 22-1-2 to turn off the associated switch transistor. When the voltages listed in column F of the table are applied to the array of
Programming transistor 28-1-1 has 1.8V on its source, 2.5V on its gate and will be turned on, driving the switch node 22-1-1 in ReRAM cell R1C1 to 1.8V. Because BL1 and BL1! both have 1.8V on them, both ReRAM devices 12-1-1 and 14-1-1 in ReRAM cell R1C1 will have 0V across them and will not be programmed.
Programming transistors 28-2-1 and 28-2-2 each has 0V on its gate and will be turned off. The switch nodes 22-2-1 and 22-2-2 in ReRAM cells R2C1 and R2C2 will be either floating or at the potential on both bitlines BL1 and BL1! if one of the ReRAM devices in those cells has been programmed. All bitlines are at 1.8V, but because the switch nodes 22-2-1 and 22-2-2 are either floating or at the potential of bitlines BL1 and BL2!, no ReRAM devices in cells R2C1 and R2C2 in the second row of the array will be programmed.
Column G represents the voltages applied to turn on the ReRAM cell at R2C1 by turning on the upper ReRAM device 12-2-1 in that cell to pull up the switch node 22-2-1 to turn on the associated switch transistor. Column H represents the voltages applied to turn off the ReRAM cell at R2C1 by turning on the lower ReRAM device 14-2-1 in that cell to pull down the switch node 22-2-1 to turn off the associated switch transistor. Column I represents the voltages applied to turn on the ReRAM cell at R2C2 by turning on the upper ReRAM device 12-2-2 in that cell to pull up the switch node 22-2-2 to turn on the associated switch transistor. Column J represents the voltages applied to turn off the ReRAM cell at R2C1 by turning on the lower ReRAM device 14-2-2 in that cell to pull down the switch node 22-2-1 to turn off the associated switch transistor. From the conditions described with reference to columns C through F for programming the ReRAM cells in the first row of the array to either their “on” or “off” states, persons of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate from
Referring now to
ReRAM cell 160 includes a first ReRAM device 12 having a first end coupled to bitline BL 16. A p-channel transistor 82 is coupled in series with a second end of first ReRAM device 12 and has its source connected to the second end of ReRAM device 12. The drain of p-channel transistor 82 is connected to a switch node 20.
A second ReRAM device 14 has a first end coupled to bitline BL! 18. An n-channel transistor 84 is coupled in series with a second end of second ReRAM device 14 and has its source connected to the second end of ReRAM device 14. The drain of n-channel transistor 84 is connected to the switch node 20. Persons of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the value of the potentials applied to (BL) 16 and (BL!) 18 will be selected as a function of the particular feature size and other aspects of the technology employed. Typical operating voltages that are applied to (BL) 16 and (BL!) 18 are 1.5V and 0V, respectively.
The gate of p-channel transistor 82 is connected to bias voltage node 86 to bias the gate with respect to its source. The gate of n-channel transistor 84 is connected to bias voltage node 88 to bias the gate with respect to its source. As with the ReRAM cell 80 of
The difference between ReRAM cell 160 and ReRAM cell 80 of
ReRAM cell 160 is larger than ReRAM cell 80, as it requires another programming transistor, but has the advantage that the cell can be programmed and erased using a current path that does not include the p-channel and n-channel bias transistors 82 and 84, and switch node 20, allowing higher currents to be used during programing. The bias of switch node 20 is irrelevant during programming and erasing. During programming, the cell to be programmed or erased is selected using the WL and WLS lines 30 and 32, and the choice of which of ReRAM devices 12 and 14 is to be programmed or erased is selected by applying the appropriate voltages to bitlines BL 16 and BL! 18.
While embodiments and applications of this invention have been shown and described, it would be apparent to those skilled in the art that many more modifications than mentioned above are possible without departing from the inventive concepts herein. The invention, therefore, is not to be restricted except in the spirit of the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/268,704 filed Dec. 17, 2015, the contents of which are incorporated in this disclosure by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4758745 | Elgamal et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4873459 | El Gamal et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4904338 | Kozicki | Feb 1990 | A |
5229963 | Ohtsuka et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5254866 | Ogoh | Oct 1993 | A |
5314772 | Kozicki et al. | May 1994 | A |
5463583 | Takashina | Oct 1995 | A |
5500532 | Kozicki | Mar 1996 | A |
5537056 | McCollum | Jul 1996 | A |
5542690 | Kozicki | Aug 1996 | A |
5557137 | Cohen | Sep 1996 | A |
5576568 | Kowshik | Nov 1996 | A |
5587603 | Kowshik | Dec 1996 | A |
5625211 | Kowshik | Apr 1997 | A |
5682389 | Nizaka | Oct 1997 | A |
5729162 | Rouy | Mar 1998 | A |
5761115 | Kozicki et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5770885 | Kim et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5801415 | Lee et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812452 | Hoang | Sep 1998 | A |
5896312 | Kozicki et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5914893 | Kozicki et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5986322 | McCollum et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6063663 | Caprara et al. | May 2000 | A |
6084796 | Kozicki et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6100560 | Lovett | Aug 2000 | A |
6137725 | Tassan et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144580 | Murray | Nov 2000 | A |
6222774 | Tanzawa et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6324102 | McCollum | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6326651 | Manabe | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6348365 | Moore et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6356478 | McCollum | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6388324 | Kozicki | May 2002 | B2 |
6418049 | Kozicki et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6437365 | Hawley et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6469364 | Kozicki | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6487106 | Kozicki | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6635914 | Kozicki et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6709887 | Moore et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6768687 | Kaihatsu | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6784476 | Greeley et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6798692 | Kozicki et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6815784 | Park et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825489 | Kozicki | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6847073 | Kanaya | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6849891 | Hsu et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6864500 | Gilton | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6865117 | Kozicki | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6891769 | McCollum et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6914802 | Kozicki | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6927411 | Kozicki | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6940745 | Kozicki | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6955940 | Campbell et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6970383 | Han et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6985378 | Kozicki | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6998312 | Kozicki et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7006376 | Kozicki | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7061036 | Kajiyama | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7078295 | Jeon et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7101728 | Kozicki et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7120053 | Atsumi et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7120079 | McCollum et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7126837 | Banachowicz et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7142450 | Kozicki et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7145794 | Kozicki | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7169635 | Kozicki | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7180104 | Kozicki | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7187610 | McCollum et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7227169 | Kozicki | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7232717 | Choi et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7245535 | McCollum et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7288781 | Kozicki | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7294875 | Kozicki | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7301821 | Greene et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7339232 | Seo et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7368789 | Dhaoui et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7372065 | Kozicki et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7385219 | Kozicki et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7402847 | Kozicki et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7405967 | Kozicki et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7430137 | Greene et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7499360 | McCollum et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7511532 | Derharcobian et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7519000 | Caveney et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7560722 | Kozicki | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7675766 | Kozicki | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7692972 | Sadd et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7728322 | Kozicki | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7763158 | Kozicki | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7816717 | Ozaki | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7839681 | Wang et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7928492 | Jeon et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7929345 | Issaq | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8269203 | Greene et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8269204 | Greene et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8415650 | Greene et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8531866 | Ikegami et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8735211 | Greeley et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
9128821 | Chen et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9704573 | Hecht | Jul 2017 | B1 |
20020003247 | Yokoyama et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030107105 | Kozicki | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030222303 | Fukuda | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040124407 | Kozicki et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050141431 | Caveney et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050225413 | Kozicki et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060028895 | Taussig et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060050546 | Roehr | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060051927 | Takami | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060086989 | Lee et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060171200 | Rinerson et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060230375 | Casey et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060238185 | Kozicki | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060291364 | Kozicki | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070045728 | Lee | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070075352 | Irie | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070108508 | Lin et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070109861 | Wang et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070121369 | Happ | May 2007 | A1 |
20070146012 | Murphy | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070165446 | Oliva et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070165532 | Retana et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080101117 | Ogura et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080113560 | Caveney et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080211540 | Fujita | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080279028 | McCollum et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090034325 | Lowrey et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090184359 | He et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198812 | Caveney et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090283740 | Kozicki et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100092656 | Kozicki | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100857 | Chen et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100135071 | Kozicki | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100149873 | Wang et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100157688 | Issaq | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100169886 | Troxel et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100208520 | Wang et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110001108 | Greene | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110001115 | Greene et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110001116 | Greene | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110002167 | McCollum | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110024821 | Wang et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110205780 | Yasuda et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120223381 | Lu et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130033921 | Tsuda et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130134378 | Liu | May 2013 | A1 |
20130234100 | An et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140071745 | Kawasumi | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140151621 | Tendulkar | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140158968 | Jo | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140175531 | Huang et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140233301 | Lu et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140246719 | Dhaoui | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140264238 | Jo | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140269008 | Baker, Jr. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150188039 | Wang | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150076439 | Saitoh et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20160133837 | Hsueh | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170345496 | Liu et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
PCT/US2016/066967, Notification of Transmittal of The International Search Report and The Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, Form PCT/ISA/220. |
Wei Yi et al: Feedback write scheme for memristive switching devices 11, Applied Physics A—Materials Science & Processing, Springer, Berlin, DE, vol. 102, No. 4, Jan. 27, 2011 (Jan. 27, 2011), pp. 973-982. |
Yi-Chung Chen et al: “The 3-D Stacking Bipolar RRAM for High Density”, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, US, vol. 11, No. 5, Sep. 1, 2012 (Sep. 1, 2012), pp. 948-956. |
International application No. PCT/US2017/054174, International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Dec. 19, 2017. |
PCT/US2016/066955, Notification of Transmittal of The International Search Report and The Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, Form PCT/ISA/220. |
PCT/US2017/062878 International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Mar. 28, 2018. |
Aratani, et al., Aratani, K. “A Novel Resistance Memory with High Scalability and Nanosecond Switching,” IEDM, 2007, pp. 783-786. |
Baek, et al., Baek, I. G. et al., “Highly Scalable Non-volatile Resistive Memory using Simple Binary Oxide Driven by Asymmetric Uni-polar Voltage Pulses, Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology,” IDEM 2004, 26 pages. |
Burr, Burr, G. W. et al., “Overview of Candidate Device Technologies for Storage-class Memory,” IBM Journal of Research & Development, 2008, vol. 52, No. 415, pp. 449-464. |
Choi, et al., Choi, S. J. et al., “Improvement of CBRAM Resistance Window by Scaling Down Electrode Size in Pure-GeTe Film,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Feb. 2009, vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 120-122. |
Fang, et al., Fang, T. N. et al, “Erase Mechanism for Copper Oxide Resistive Switching Memory Cells with Nickel Electrode,” Int'l Electron Devices Meeting, 2006, pp. 1-4. |
Greene, et al., Greene, Jonathan et al., “Antifuse Field Programmable Gate Arrays,” Proceedings of the IEEE, Jul. 1993, vol. 81, No. 7, pp. 1042-1056. |
Kund, et al., Kund, Michael et al., “Conductive Bridging RAM (CBRAM): An Emerging Non-volatile Memory Technology Scalable to Sub 20nm,” IEDM Technical Digest, Dec. 5, 2005, pp. 754-757, held in Washington, D.C. |
Lemieux, et al., Lemieux, G. et al., “Directional and Single-Driver Wires in FPGA Interconnect,” International Conference on Field-Programmable Technology (ICFPT), Dec. 2004, pp. 41-48, Brisbane, Australia. |
Meyer, Meyer, R., “Scalable Non-volatile Cross-point Memory Based on Dual-layer Oxide Memory Elements,” 9th Annual Non-volatile Memory Technology Symposium, Nov. 11-14, 2008, in Pacific Grove, CA, Unity Semiconductor Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA 94085, 41 pp. |
Meyer, et al., Meyer, R. et al., “Oxide Dual-layer Memory Element for Scalable Non-volatile Cross-point Memory Technology,” 9th Annual Non-volatile Memory Technology Symposium, Nov. 11-14, 2008, in Pacific Grove, CA, pp. 1-5. |
Sakamoto, et al., Sakamoto, T. et al., “A /Ta2O5 Solid-Electrolyte Switch with Improved Reliabiltiy,” 2007 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technogy, Jun. 12-14, 2007, pp. 38-39, held in Kyoto, JP. |
Strukov, et al., Strukov, Dimitri B. et al., “The Missing Memristor Found,” Nature, May 1, 2008, vol. 453, pp. 80-85. |
Symanczyk, Symanczyk, Ralf, “Conductive Bridging Memory Devleopment from Single Cells to 2Mbit Memory Arrays,” 8th Non-Volatile Memory Technology Symposium, Nov. 10-13, 2007, 25 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170179959 A1 | Jun 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62268704 | Dec 2015 | US |