Memory cell having magnetic tunnel junction and thermal stability enhancement layer

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10643680
  • Patent Number
    10,643,680
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, September 6, 2018
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 5, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
A magnetoresistive random-access memory (MRAM) device is disclosed. The device described herein has a thermal stability enhancement layer over the free layer of a magnetic tunnel junction. The thermal stability enhancement layer improves the thermal stability of the free layer, increases the magnetic moment of the free layer, while also not causing the magnetic direction of the free layer to become in plan. The thermal stability enhancement layer can be comprised of a layer of CoFeB ferromagnetic material.
Description
FIELD

The present patent document relates generally to spin-transfer torque magnetic memory (STT-MRAM) devices and, more particularly, to STT-MRAM devices having thermal stability enhancement layer that increases the thermal stability of the free layer of a magnetic tunnel junction.


BACKGROUND

Magnetoresistive random-access memory (“MRAM”) is a non-volatile memory technology that stores data through magnetic storage elements. In a type of MRAM, the magnetic storage elements comprise two ferromagnetic plates or electrodes that can hold a magnetic field and are separated by a non-magnetic material, such as a non-magnetic metal or insulator. Such a structure is called a magnetic tunnel junction (“MTJ”). In general, one of the plates has its magnetization pinned (i.e., a “reference layer”), meaning that this layer has a higher coercivity than the other layer and requires a larger magnetic field or spin-polarized current to change the orientation of its magnetization. The second plate is typically referred to as the free layer and its magnetization direction can be changed by a smaller magnetic field or spin-polarized current relative to the reference layer. Thus, the free layer is also referred to as the storage layer. MTJ's are manufactured using stacked materials, with each stack of materials forming an MTJ pillar.


MRAM devices store information by changing the orientation of the magnetization of the free layer. In particular, based on whether the free layer is in a parallel or anti-parallel alignment relative to the reference layer, either a “1” or a “0” can be stored in each MRAM cell. Due to the spin-polarized tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR) effect, the electrical resistance of the cell change due to the orientation of the magnetic fields of the two layers. The cell's resistance will be different for the parallel and anti-parallel states and thus the cell's resistance can be used to distinguish between a “1” and a “0”. One important feature of MRAM devices is that they are non-volatile memory devices, since they maintain the information even when the power is off. The two plates can be sub-micron in lateral size and the magnetization direction can still be stable with respect to thermal fluctuations.


Spin transfer torque or spin transfer switching, uses spin-aligned (“polarized”) electrons to change the magnetization orientation of the free layer in the magnetic tunnel junction. In general, electrons possess a spin, a quantized number of angular momentum intrinsic to the electron. An electrical current is generally unpolarized, i.e., it consists of 50% spin up and 50% spin down electrons. Passing a current though a magnetic layer polarizes electrons with the spin orientation corresponding to the magnetization direction of the magnetic layer (i.e., polarizer), thus produces a spin-polarized current. If a spin-polarized current is passed to the magnetic region of a free layer in the magnetic tunnel junction device, the electrons will transfer a portion of their spin-angular momentum to the magnetization layer to produce a torque on the magnetization of the free layer. Thus, this spin transfer torque can switch the magnetization of the free layer, which, in effect, writes either a “1” or a “0” based on whether the free layer is in the parallel or anti-parallel states relative to the reference layer.


MRAM devices are considered as the next generation structures for wide range of memory applications. One MRAM technology uses a perpendicular magnetic tunnel junction device. In perpendicular MTJ devices, the free and reference layers are separated by a thin insulator layer for spin polarized tunneling. The free and reference layers have a magnetic direction that is perpendicular to their planes, thus creating a perpendicular magnetic tunnel junction (pMTJ). The pMTJ configuration may provide a lower critical switching current when compared to in-plane MTJ technology, simplified layer stack structure without need of using thick antiferromagnetic layers, and reduction of the device size below 40 nm.



FIG. 1 illustrates a pMTJ stack 100 for a conventional MRAM device. As shown, stack 100 includes one or more seed layers 110 provided at the bottom of stack 100 to initiate a desired crystalline growth in the above-deposited layers. A perpendicular synthetic antiferromagnetic layer (“pSAF layer”) 120 is disposed on top of the seed layers 110. MTJ 130 is deposited on top of synthetic antiferromagnetic (SAF) layer 120. MTJ 130 includes reference layer 132, which is a magnetic layer, a non-magnetic tunneling barrier layer (i.e., the insulator) 134, and the free layer 136, which is also a magnetic layer. It should be understood that reference layer 132 is actually part of SAF layer 120, but forms one of the ferromagnetic plates of MTJ 130 when the non-magnetic tunneling barrier layer 134 and free layer 136 are formed on reference layer 132. As shown in FIG. 1, magnetic reference layer 132 has a magnetization direction perpendicular to its plane. As also seen in FIG. 1, free layer 136 also has a magnetization direction perpendicular to its plane, but its direction can vary by 180 degrees.


The first magnetic layer 114 in the perpendicular SAF layer 120 is disposed over seed layer 110. Perpendicular SAF layer 120 also has an antiferromagnetic coupling layer 116 disposed over the first magnetic layer 114. As seen by the arrows in magnetic layers 114 and 132 of perpendicular SAF 120, layers 114 and 132 have a magnetic direction that is perpendicular to their respective planes. Furthermore, a nonmagnetic spacer 140 is disposed on top of MTJ 130 and a polarizer 150 may optionally be disposed on top of the nonmagnetic spacer 140. Polarizer 150 is a magnetic layer that has a magnetic direction in its plane, but is orthogonal to the magnetic direction of the reference layer 132 and free layer 136. Polarizer 150 is provided to polarize a current of electrons (“spin-aligned electrons”) applied to pMTJ structure 100. Further, one or more capping layers 160 can be provided on top of polarizer 150 to protect the layers below on MTJ stack 100. Finally, a hard mask 170 is deposited over capping layers 160 and is provided to pattern the underlying layers of the MTJ structure 100, using a reactive ion etch (RIE) process.


As discussed, one type of MTJ is referred to as a perpendicular MTJ. In a perpendicular MTJ, the reference layer and the free layer each have a magnetic direction that is perpendicular to the plane of their respective layers. The resistance of the magnetic memory device is sensitive to the relative orientation of the magnetization vector of the free magnetic layer and the magnetization vector of the reference layer. The resistance of the magnetic memory device is highest when the magnetization vectors of the free magnetic layer and the reference layer, respectively, are in anti-parallel alignment. The resistance of the magnetic device is lowest when the magnetization vectors of the layers free magnetic layer and the reference layer, respectively, are in parallel alignment. Thus, a resistance measurement or its equivalent can determine the orientation of the magnetization vector of the free magnetic layer.


An important characteristic of MTJs is thermal stability. The thermal stability of each perpendicular MTJ, i.e., the magnetic bits, is proportional to the magnetic material volume of the MTJ for a given perpendicular anisotropy. Thermal stability of an MTJ is a factor in data retention capability. Thus, improving the thermal stability of the free layer of an MTJ is an important design consideration. Because of the relationship between the magnetic material volume of an MTJ and the perpendicular anisotropy, as MTJ pillar dimensions decreases, for example when shrinking an existing design for future generation MRAM devices, the thermal stability declines. This is highly undesirable. Unfortunately the thickness of the free layer cannot be increased at will to add more magnetic moment (volume) to enhance the thermal stability. Thus, the thermal stability of the free layer structure with a perpendicular magnetic direction cannot be enhanced simply by increasing the thickness of the material used to construct the free layer (typically CoFeB). This is because there is a limit on the thickness of CoFeB where the perpendicular anisotropy can be obtained. For CoFeB, this thickness may be around sixteen (16) Angstroms. Above this thickness, the magnetization reverses to be in plane, meaning that the MTJ will no longer be a perpendicular MTJ. Thus, the thermal stability of the perpendicular MTJ free (i.e., storage) layer cannot be enhanced by further increasing the free layer thickness.


Perpendicular magnetization direction can be achieved using surface perpendicular anisotropy (interface perpendicular magnetic anisotropy) which is an interface property of the ferromagnetic film and neighboring capping and seeding layer of non-magnetic material used for a free layer. Interface perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (IPMA) is inversely proportional to the thickness of the film. For common ferromagnetic materials, IPMA becomes strong enough to keep magnetization out of plane in the thickness range of 1.2 to 1.6 nm. However, at this thicknesses range, the magnetic moment of the free layer is small. This small magnetic moment of the free layer reduces thermal stability. On the other hand, increasing the free layer thickness lowers the IPMA, which causes the free layer to become in-plane magnetized. In a perpendicular MTJ device, this is not acceptable since it would cause degradation of the tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR) value to a level below which device can operate reliably. Thus, increasing the free layer thickness lowers the thermal stability by diminishing the perpendicular anisotropy. In addition, the device itself becomes useless, as the free layer loses its perpendicular magnetic anisotropy. This is one of the most difficult issues to address for perpendicular MTJ MRAM devices.


Thus, a need exists to enhance the thermal stability of the free layer of an MTJ where the thickness of the free layer does not have to be disturbed.


SUMMARY

An MRAM device is disclosed that comprises a thin layer of magnetic material having perpendicular anisotropy, referred to herein as a thermal stability enhancement (TSE) layer, deposited on a non-magnetic separation layer, where the non-magnetic separation layer is located between the free layer and the TSE layer. The TSE layer magnetization can be optimized as described herein to enhance the switching characteristics of the free layer.


In an embodiment, a magnetic device is disclosed. The embodiment comprises a bottom electrode in a first plane. The embodiment further comprises a perpendicular synthetic antiferromagnetic structure including a magnetic reference layer in a second plane, where the magnetic reference layer has a magnetization direction that is perpendicular to the second plane and having a fixed magnetization direction. The embodiment further discloses a non-magnetic tunnel barrier layer in a third plane, which is disposed over the magnetic reference layer. The embodiment further comprises a free magnetic layer in a fourth plane that is disposed over the non-magnetic tunnel barrier layer. The free magnetic layer has a magnetization vector that is perpendicular to the fourth plane and has a magnetization direction that can switch from a first magnetization direction to a second magnetization direction. The magnetic reference layer, the non-magnetic tunnel barrier layer and the free magnetic layer forming a magnetic tunnel junction. The embodiment further comprises a non-magnetic thermal stability enhancement coupling layer in a fifth plane that is disposed over the free magnetic layer. The embodiment also comprises a magnetic thermal stability enhancement layer in a sixth plane that is physically separated from the free magnetic layer and coupled to the free magnetic layer by the non-magnetic thermal stability enhancement coupling layer. The magnetic thermal stability enhancement layer has a magnetization direction that is perpendicular to the sixth plane and has a magnetization direction that can switch from the first magnetization direction to the second magnetization direction, wherein switching of the magnetic thermal stability enhancement layer from the first magnetization direction to the second magnetization direction tracks switching in the magnetic free layer. The embodiment also comprises a cap layer in a seventh plane that is disposed over the thermal stability enhancement layer.


In an aspect of the embodiment, the magnetic device further comprises a current source that directs electrical current through the cap layer in the seventh plane, the magnetic thermal stability enhancement layer in a sixth plane, the non-magnetic thermal stability enhancement coupling layer in the fifth plane, the free magnetic layer in the fourth plane, the non-magnetic tunnel barrier layer in the third plane, the magnetic reference layer in the second plane, and the bottom electrode in the first plane.


In another aspect of the embodiment, the magnetic thermal stability enhancement layer comprises a layer of CoFeB.


In another aspect of the embodiment, the magnetic thermal stability enhancement layer comprises a film of CoFeB having a thickness between 1.3 nanometers and 1.5 nanometers.


In another aspect of the embodiment, the free magnetic layer comprises CoFeB with a Ta interlayer.


In another aspect of the embodiment, the free magnetic layer has a sum thickness of 1.6 nanometers.


In another aspect of the embodiment, the perpendicular synthetic antiferromagnetic structure further comprises a first magnetic pSAF layer and a second magnetic pSAF layer, where the first magnetic pSAF layer is over the first electrode and is separated from the second magnetic pSAF layer by an exchange coupling layer.


In another aspect of the embodiment, a ferromagnetic coupling layer is in between the second magnetic pSAF layer and the magnetic reference layer.


In another aspect of the embodiment, the magnetic thermal stability enhancement layer is magnetically coupled to the free magnetic layer by the non-magnetic thermal stability enhancement coupling layer.


In another aspect of the embodiment, the non-magnetic thermal stability enhancement coupling layer comprises a layer MgO.


In another aspect of the embodiment, the layer of MgO has a thickness between 0.6-1.2 nm.


In another aspect of the embodiment, the layer of MgO has a thickness 0.7 nm.


In another aspect of the embodiment, the non-magnetic thermal stability enhancement coupling layer provides high interface perpendicular magnetic anisotropy between the magnetic thermal stability enhancement layer and free magnetic layer such that the magnetic direction of the free magnetic layer remains perpendicular to the fourth plane and the magnetic direction of the magnetic thermal stability enhancement layer remains perpendicular to the sixth plane.


In another embodiment, a magnetic device is disclosed that comprises a perpendicular magnetic tunnel junction having a magnetic reference layer and a magnetic free layer. The magnetic reference layer and the magnetic free layer are separated by a non-magnetic tunneling barrier layer. The magnetic reference layer has a fixed magnetic direction that is perpendicular to its plane. The magnetic free layer has a variable magnetic direction that can switch between a first perpendicular magnetic direction and second perpendicular magnetic direction. The first perpendicular magnetic direction and the second perpendicular magnetic direction is perpendicular to the magnetic free layer. The embodiment further comprises a magnetic thermal stability enhancement layer disposed over the magnetic free layer of the magnetic tunnel junction. The magnetic thermal stability enhancement layer comprises a magnetic material having a variable magnetic direction that can switch between the first perpendicular magnetic direction and the second perpendicular magnetic direction. In an embodiment, the switching of the magnetic thermal stability enhancement layer from the first magnetization direction to the second magnetization direction tracks switching in the magnetic free layer. The embodiment further comprises a non-magnetic thermal stability enhancement coupling layer disposed in between and physically separating the magnetic free layer of the magnetic tunnel junction and the magnetic thermal stability enhancement layer. The non-magnetic thermal stability enhancement coupling layer magnetically couples the free magnetic layer and the magnetic thermal stability coupling layer.


In aspect of the embodiment, the magnetic device further comprises an electrode and a perpendicular synthetic antiferromagnetic structure coupled to the electrode. The perpendicular synthetic antiferromagnetic structure includes the magnetic reference layer. In an aspect of this embodiment, a cap layer is disposed over the magnetic thermal stability enhancement layer.


In another aspect of the embodiment, the perpendicular synthetic antiferromagnetic structure further comprises a first magnetic pSAF layer and a second magnetic pSAF layer. The first magnetic pSAF layer is over the electrode and is separated from the second magnetic pSAF layer by a non-magnetic exchange coupling layer.


In another aspect of the embodiment, the magnetic thermal stability enhancement layer comprises CoFeB.


In another aspect of the embodiment, the magnetic thermal stability enhancement layer comprises a film of CoFeB having a thickness between 1.3 nanometers and 1.5 nanometers.


In another aspect of the embodiment, the free magnetic layer comprises CoFeB with a Ta interlayer.


In another aspect of the embodiment, the free magnetic layer has a sum thickness of 1.6 nanometers.


In another aspect of the embodiment, the magnetic device further comprises a current source that directs electrical current through the cap layer, the magnetic thermal stability enhancement layer, the non-magnetic thermal stability enhancement coupling layer, the free magnetic layer, the non-magnetic tunnel barrier layer, the perpendicular synthetic antiferromagnetic structure, and the electrode.


In another aspect of the embodiment, the non-magnetic thermal stability enhancement coupling layer provides high interface perpendicular magnetic anisotropy between the magnetic thermal stability enhancement layer and free magnetic layer such that the magnetic direction of the free magnetic layer and the magnetic direction of the magnetic thermal stability enhancement layer remain out-of-plane.


These and other objects, features, aspects, and advantages of the embodiments will become better understood with reference to the following description and accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are included as part of the present specification, illustrate the presently preferred embodiments and, together with the general description given above and the detailed description given below, serve to explain and teach the principles of the MTJ devices described herein.



FIG. 1 illustrates a perpendicular MTJ stack for an MRAM device with orthogonal polarizing layer.



FIG. 2 illustrates a process for manufacturing a magnetic device using the concepts described herein.



FIG. 3 illustrates the various layers of a magnetic device manufactured in accordance with the teachings described herein.



FIG. 4 is a graph of the thin film vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) major hysteresis loop data for various perpendicular magnetic tunnel junction devices.



FIG. 5 is a graph comparing the thermal stability of devices that have a thermal stability enhancement layer against devices without a thermal stability enhancement layer.





The figures are not necessarily drawn to scale and the elements of similar structures or functions are generally represented by like reference numerals for illustrative purposes throughout the figures. The figures are only intended to facilitate the description of the various embodiments described herein; the figures do not describe every aspect of the teachings disclosed herein and do not limit the scope of the claims.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following description is presented to enable any person skilled in the art to create and use an STT-MRAM device using a perpendicular magnetic tunnel junction having a free layer with high thermal stability. Each of the features and teachings disclosed herein can be utilized separately or in conjunction with other features to implement the disclosed system and method. Representative examples utilizing many of these additional features and teachings, both separately and in combination, are described in further detail with reference to the attached drawings. This detailed description is merely intended to teach a person of skill in the art further details for practicing preferred aspects of the present teachings and is not intended to limit the scope of the claims. Therefore, combinations of features disclosed in the following detailed description may not be necessary to practice the teachings in the broadest sense, and are instead taught merely to describe particularly representative examples of the present teachings.


In the following description, for purposes of explanation only, specific nomenclature is set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the present teachings. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that these specific details are not required to practice the present teachings.


An embodiment of an STT-MRAM device using the present teachings will described with reference to FIGS. 2 and 3. FIG. 2 is a flow chart showing a method 200 for manufacture of an STT-MRAM device 300 using the present teachings. FIG. 3 illustrates the various layers of a STT-MRAM device 300 manufactured in accordance with the teachings described herein. It is noted that FIG. 3 is illustrated with space between each of the layers. A person having skill in the art will recognize that the gaps are for illustration purposes only, and that an actual STT-MRAM device will not have gaps between its various layers. Note that the various layers illustrated in FIG. 3 are for an exemplary device. A person having ordinary skill in the art would know that additional layers might be present or that specific layers that are illustrated might not be present in a device.


As will be discussed, STT-MRAM device 300 has a thin layer of magnetic material with perpendicular anisotropy, referred to herein as a thermal stability enhancement layer (TSE) 380. As described herein, the TSE layer is magnetically coupled to the free layer 365 of an MTJ 355 through a separation layer 375. A ferromagnetic coupling layer 345 on the opposite side of fixed magnetic reference layer 340 of MTJ 355 provides additional interfaces to achieve high IPMA, which allows the free layer to maintain an out of plane magnetization, which achieves a perpendicular TMR value above one hundred (100) percent.


To manufacture STT-MRAM device 300, in step 202, a bottom electrode 305 is fabricated on a semiconductor wafer (not shown) or other appropriate substrate structure. In an embodiment, bottom electrode 305 can comprise six TaN/CuN multilayers 310, each of which can have a thickness of six nanometers. These TaN/CuN multilayers 310 are deposited during step 204 using magnetron sputtering. Bottom electrode 305 can also comprise TaN layer 315 fabricated over the TaN/CuN multilayers 310, which in an embodiment can have a thickness of two nm. TaN layer 315 is deposited during step 206 by magnetron sputtering.


After fabricating bottom electrode 305, perpendicular synthetic antiferromagnet (pSAF) structure 320 is fabricated during step 208. As seen in FIG. 2, fabrication of pSAF 320 can include several steps, which will now be discussed. At step 210, a first magnetic pSAF layer 325 is fabricated. In an embodiment, first magnetic pSAF layer comprises a Co/Ni multilayer having perpendicular anisotropy. First magnetic pSAF layer 325 is deposited over TaN layer 315 of bottom electrode 305. First magnetic pSAF layer 325 is a magnetic layer having a magnetic direction perpendicular to its plane, as shown in FIG. 3. In an embodiment, first magnetic pSAF layer 325 comprises six Co/Ni layers, with each Co/Ni layer having a thickness of 0.8 nanometers.


Fabrication of pSAF 320 further includes step 212, where a non-magnetic exchange coupling layer 330 is deposited over first magnetic pSAF layer 325. In an embodiment, non-magnetic exchange coupling layer 330 is comprised of a Co/Ru/Co multilayer comprising a first and second 0.18 nm layer of Co separated by a 0.85 nm layer of Ru. Next, at step 214, a second magnetic pSAF layer 335 is deposited over exchange coupling layer 330. In an embodiment, second magnetic pSAF layer comprises a Co/Ni multilayer having perpendicular anisotropy. Second magnetic pSAF layer 335 is a magnetic layer having a magnetic direction perpendicular to its plane, as seen in FIG. 3. Second magnetic pSAF layer 335 can comprise four Co/Ni multilayers, with each Co/Ni multilayer having a thickness of 0.8 nanometers. As shown in FIG. 3, the magnetic directions of first magnetic pSAF layer 325 and second magnetic pSAF layer 335 are in an antiparallel arrangement with respect to each other due to antiferromagnetic coupling through exchange coupling layer 330. Note that each or either of the magnetic pSAF layers 325 and 335 in the pSAF 320 can be substituted with Co/Pt layers or combination of both Co/Ni with Co/Pt multilayers.


Fabrication of pSAF 320 further can include step 216, in which the reference layer 340 of perpendicular magnetic tunnel junction 355 is fabricated. In an embodiment, the step 216 of fabricating reference layer 340 comprises step 218, in which a ferromagnetic coupling layer 345 is deposited, and step 220, in which a fixed magnetic direction layer 350 is deposited. In an embodiment, ferromagnetic coupling layer 345 can comprise a Co/Ta multilayer, while fixed magnetic direction layer 350 can be comprised of a layer of CoFeB film and Ta, the combination of which has perpendicular anisotropy.


The Co layer of Co/Ta ferromagnetic coupling layer 345 can have a thickness of 0.21 nm and the Ta layer of Co/Ta ferromagnetic coupling layer 345 can have a thickness of 0.25 nm. Fixed magnetic direction layer 350 can comprise layers of CoFeB with a Ta interlayer. In an embodiment, fixed magnetic direction layer 350 comprises a 0.7 nm thick layer of CoFeB, a 0.25 nm layer of Ta and a 0.8 nm thick layer of CoFeB. Note that Ta interlayer can be substituted by other materials such as tungsten (W), hafnium (Hf), etc. Ferromagnetic coupling layer 345 of the reference layer 340 couples fixed magnetic direction layer 350 to second magnetic pSAF layer 335 of the perpendicular synthetic antiferromagnet structure 320, which assists in maintaining the perpendicular magnetic direction of reference layer 340, free layer 365 (to be discussed) and thermal stability enhancement layer 380 (also to be discussed).


At step 222, the remaining layers of perpendicular magnetic tunnel junction 355 are fabricated. As discussed, perpendicular magnetic tunnel junction 355 comprises a reference layer 340 and free layer 365 separated by a non-magnetic tunneling barrier layer 360. In an embodiment, non-magnetic tunneling barrier layer 360 is deposited at step 224. Non-magnetic tunneling barrier layer 360 is comprised of an insulator material, which can be an approximately one (1) nm thick layer of magnesium oxide (MgO). After depositing non-magnetic tunneling barrier layer 360, step 226 is performed, which deposits free layer 365. In these embodiments, free layer 365 can comprise CoFeB layers and Ta interlayer. In an embodiment, a first CoFeB layer has thicknesses of 1.1 nm CoFeB, the Ta layer has a thickness of 0.25 nm and the second CoFeB layer has a thickness of 0.5 nm CoFeB. Note that other materials can replace the Ta interlayer, examples of which are tungsten (W), hafnium (Hf), etc.


Both free layer 365 and reference layer 340 have perpendicular anisotropy and thus have a magnetic direction that is perpendicular to the plane of each respective layer. Depending on the logic level stored in the device, magnetic directions of the reference layer and the free layer will either be parallel or antiparallel.


At step 230, non-magnetic thermal stability enhancement coupling layer 375, the purpose of which will be discussed below, is fabricated over free layer 365 of perpendicular magnetic tunnel junction. Then, at step 232, thermal stability enhancement layer 380 is fabricated over non-magnetic thermal stability enhancement coupling layer 375. In an embodiment, thermal stability enhancement layer 380 comprises a CoFeB ferromagnetic layer having perpendicular anisotropy with a thickness between 0.35 nm and 1.5 nm, while non-magnetic thermal stability enhancement coupling layer 375 can comprise a layer of MgO, and can have a thickness that can vary from 0.6-1.2 nm. The choice of MgO thickness is selected so that different magnetic coupling strengths to free layer 365 can be achieved. For MgO thickness of about 0.6 nm to 0.75 nm, magnetic coupling of the thermal stability enhancement layer 380 to the free layer is strong, and allows optimization of the free layer stability. In one embodiment, non-magnetic thermal stability enhancement coupling layer 375 is comprised of a 0.7 nm layer of MgO. As the thickness of the MgO of the non-magnetic thermal stability enhancement coupling layer 375 increases, magnetic coupling will exponentially decrease. The thermal stability enhancement layer 380 will become less and less coupled to the free layer 365 when the thickness of the MgO of the non-magnetic thermal stability enhancement coupling layer 375 increases and finally decouples when MgO thickness exceeds approximately 1.2 nm. A non-magnetic metal or metallic layer can be substituted for the MgO used in this embodiment for the non-magnetic thermal stability enhancement coupling layer 375.


In an embodiment of the device 300 shown in FIG. 3, thermal stability enhancement layer 380 comprises a layer of CoFeB having a thickness of 0.35 nm deposited over non-magnetic thermal stability coupling layer 375. In another embodiment, thermal stability enhancement layer 380 comprises a layer of CoFeB having a thickness between 1.3 nm and 1.5 nm. As shown in FIG. 3, thermal stability enhancement layer 380 is magnetic, has perpendicular anisotropy, and has a magnetic direction (illustrated by the arrow) perpendicular to its plane. As will also be discussed, the magnetic direction of thermal stability enhancement layer 380 can switch, and will generally track the magnetic direction of free layer 365.


As discussed, non-magnetic thermal stability coupling layer 375 can comprise an MgO layer having a thickness of 0.7 nm. The thin CoFeB thermal stability enhancement layer 380 and MgO non-magnetic thermal stability enhancement coupling layer 375 enable improved recrystallization of the MgO of non-magnetic tunneling barrier layer 360 and the CoFeB of free layer 365 of perpendicular magnetic tunnel junction 355 during the annealing process used to manufacture device 300. Enhanced recrystallization of MgO of non-magnetic tunneling barrier layer 360 and the CoFeB of free layer 365 improves the performance (including thermal stability) of the perpendicular MTJ structure 355. Note that in alternative embodiments, thermal stability enhancement layer 380 can be construed with materials other than CoFeB, such as alloys of Co, Fe, Ni, or B.


A final step 234 in the process 200 is fabrication of a capping structure over the thermal stability enhancement layer 380. Cap 385 can comprise a 2 nm TaN layer and a layer of Ru having a thickness of 10 nm.


Non-magnetic thermal stability enhancement coupling layer 375 (e.g., an MgO layer) ferromagnetically couples thermal stability enhancement layer 380 to free layer 365 and can be used to control degree of stabilization of free layer 365, thus also allowing indirect tuning of switching current needed for switching the magnetic direction of free layer 365. The thickness of thermal stability enhancement layer 380 can be adjusted (from 0.1 to 3 nm) to optimize thermal stability and switching currents for different device sizes, and the choice of such thickness will be influenced by many factors, including the thickness of the MTJ layers.


Thermal stability enhancement layer 380 improves the thermal stability of device 300, as will now be discussed with reference to FIGS. 4 and 5. FIG. 4 is a graph of the thin film vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) major hysteresis loop data for various embodiments of perpendicular magnetic tunnel junction device. Note that for these tests, the devices sizes for each were the largely the same except for the thickness of the thermal stability enhancement layer 380. The embodiments included a device having a perpendicular magnetic tunnel junction 355, but with no thermal stability enhancement layer 380. The VSM major hysteresis loop for this embodiment is labeled as curve 405. A second embodiment is a device having a perpendicular magnetic tunnel junction 355 and a thermal stability enhancement layer 380 comprising a 1.3 nanometer layer of CoFeB. The VSM major hysteresis loop for this embodiment is labeled as curve 410. A third embodiment is a device having a perpendicular magnetic tunnel junction 355 and a thermal stability enhancement layer 380 comprising a 1.5 nanometer layer of CoFeB. The VSM major hysteresis loop for this embodiment is labeled as curve 415.


To obtain this data, a DC field was applied perpendicular to the plane of each. The applied field started at −7000 Oersteds, which then decreased to 0.00 Oersteds, before rising to +7000 Oersteds, another very large magnetic field. The applied field was then decreased steadily from +7000 Oersteds to 0.00 Oersteds, before increasing to −7000 Oersteds. Positive and negative signs of the DC applied field indicate perpendicular applied field directions of the field sweep. VSM measurements, shown as normalized magnetic moment on the Y axis of the graph in FIG. 4, were taken with the DC magnetic field applied along easy magnetic axis i.e. with magnetic field oriented perpendicular to the sample plane. The magnetic direction of the perpendicular anisotropy of Co/Ni layer 325 of perpendicular synthetic antiferromagnetic structure 320, Co/Ni layer 335, CoFeB/Ta layer 350 (of reference layer 340), free layer 365 and thermal stability enhancement layer 380 are shown for various magnetic field strengths by the arrows in FIG. 4.


As can be seen in FIG. 4, when the applied magnetic field is at approximately −6500 Oersteds, the magnetic direction of first magnetic pSAF layer 325 of perpendicular synthetic antiferromagnetic structure 320, second magnetic pSAF layer 335, fixed magnetic direction layer 350 (of reference layer 340), free layer 365 and thermal stability enhancement layer 380 are all parallel to one another. As the magnetic field decreases to approximately −2500 Oersteds, which is a much larger magnetic field than an MRAM device would experience in real world application, the magnetic direction of second magnetic pSAF layer 335 and fixed magnetic direction layer 350 of reference layer 340 switches such that it is antiparallel to free layer 365. However, with a large magnetic field applied, free layer 365 has not switched.


When the applied magnetic field at approximately 0.00 Oersteds moves from negative to positive, FIG. 4 shows that the magnetic direction of free layer 365 and thermal stability enhancement layer 380 switch. The magnetic direction of second magnetic pSAF layer 335 and fixed magnetic direction layer layer 350 of reference layer 340, however, does not switch. This demonstrates that for each embodiment (e.g., devices with and without a thermal stability enhancement layer 380), the reference layer 340 does not switch. Thus, FIG. 4 shows that presence of thermal stability enhancement layer 380 does not negatively affect the performance of reference layer 340 (i.e., reference layer 340 is still difficult to switch).


As the applied magnetic field starts increasing, for example, at +5000 Oersteds, FIG. 4 shows that magnetic direction of second magnetic pSAF layer 335 and fixed magnetic direction layer 350 of reference layer 340 (and first magnetic pSAF layer 325 of perpendicular synthetic antiferromagnetic structure 320) switch such that the magnetic direction of each of these layers are parallel again. To complete the VSM major hysteresis loops for each of these embodiments, the applied magnetic field is then reduced to 0.00 Oersteds, where it is then increased, as each of the curves 405, 410 and 415 in FIG. 4 show. As is seen, the switching characteristics of each of the first magnetic pSAF layer 325 of perpendicular synthetic antiferromagnetic structure 320, second magnetic pSAF layer 335, fixed magnetic direction layer layer 350 (of reference layer 340), free layer 365 and thermal stability enhancement layer 380 are similar for this portion of the VSM hysteresis loop.


In FIG. 4, curves 405, 410 and 415 show that the magnetic direction of free layer 365 for each embodiment in this example switches at approximately 0.00 Oersteds. As also seen in FIG. 4, the magnetic moment (the Y axis) for each embodiment is increased for the embodiments having thermal stability enhancement layer 380 (see curves 410 and 415) compared to the free layer of a perpendicular MTJ device without a thermal stability enhancement layer 380 (see curve 405). Thus, both embodiments constructed with a thermal stability enhancement layer 380 over the free layer demonstrated an increase in magnetic volume of the individual perpendicular MTJ.


Non-magnetic thermal stability enhancement coupling layer 375 between thermal stability enhancement layer 380 and free layer 365 provides high interface perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (IPMA), which acts to maintain the magnetic direction of both free layer 365 and thermal stability enhancement layer 380 out-of-plane, thus ensuring that the magnetization direction of the thermal stability enhancement layer 380 and free layer 365 are perpendicular to their planes.



FIG. 5 compares performance data for devices 300 having a thermal stability enhancement layer 380 against devices without a thermal stability enhancement layer 380. The first row contains median values of coercive fields Hc (in Oersteds) versus device diameter (in nanometers). The second row shows loop shift from zero (0) Oersteds for the magnetic field acting on free layer 365, which is indicative of the magnetostatic coupling between free layer 365 and perpendicular synthetic antiferromagnet (pSAF) structure having reference layer 340. As with the tests illustrated in FIG. 4, device sizing for each example shown in FIG. 5 were the same except for the presence and thickness of thermal stability enhancement layer 380.


In particular, FIG. 5 compares coercive fields (Hc) for a device having no thermal stability enhancement layer 380 (column 1), a device having a thermal stability enhancement layer 380 with a thickness of 1.3 nanometers (column 2), and a device having a thermal stability enhancement layer 380 with a thickness of 1.5 nanometers (column 3). As is known, coercive field (Hc) is a good indicator for thermal stability (which is difficult to measure directly). Devices 300 having widths of 60 nm, 70 nm, 90 nm and 100 nm were fabricated and tested for each embodiment. As is easily seen, devices 300 having a 1.3 nanometer thick thermal stability enhancement layer 380 have significantly improved thermal stability when compared to devices without such a layer. Likewise, devices 300 having a 1.5 nm thick thermal stability enhancement layer 380 further improve thermal stability. Indeed, as seen in FIG. 5, coercive fields (Hc) for devices with thermal stability enhancement layers 380 increase from approximately 100 Oersteds to approximately 400 Oersteds. This demonstrates that the thermal stability of perpendicular magnetic tunnel junctions is improved when thermal stability enhancement layer 380 is present.


At the same time as coercivity Hc increases, critical switching currents are not increased in a manner that might cause performance issues, which is contrary to what a person having ordinary skill in the art would expect from such a large volume of magnetization. This can be seen in Table 1. In particular, Table 1 shows the critical switching parameters for the same test devices used to collect the data in FIG. 5:

















1.3 nm
1.5 nm


Parameter
No TSE Layer
TSE Layer 380
TSE Layer 380







Jc0+/−
2.1/2.1
4.3/5.6
5.2/6.5


Vc0+/−
0.36/0.54
0.61/0.94
 0.7/0.91


Delta+/−
20/22
34/32
30/40


TMR %
100
97
97


Ra Ωμm2
12.3
13
13









In Table 1, Jc0 is the critical switching current density. Vc0 is critical switching voltage. Delta is the thermal stability factor. TMR is the tunneling magnetoresistance. RA is the resistance area product of the tunnel junction. Note also that “+/−” indicates the positive/negative direction of the perpendicular voltage applied to the test devices. As the data in Table 1 demonstrates, an MRAM memory cell having a perpendicular MTJ and a thermal stability enhancement layer 380, where the thickness of thermal stability enhancement layer 380 and free layer 365 have a combined thickness of 3 nm, achieves both out of plane magnetization and low critical switching currents.


Note that the embodiment discussed in the context of FIG. 3 has a thermal stability enhancement layer 380 constructed of CoFeB, the thermal stability enhancement layer 380 can also be constructed using a variety of other ferromagnetic materials, examples of which are Co, Ni, Fe, and their alloys. In particular CoFeB (Ms˜1200 emu/cc) or CoFe (Ms˜1500 emu/cc) can be used. By use of or proper alloying of these materials, one can achieve desired magnetization values for the thermal stability enhancement layer 380, and thus be able to control ferromagnetic coupling strength and degree of the thermal stability of the free layer.


MRAM devices 300 having perpendicular magnetic tunnel junctions and thermal stability enhancement layers 380 as described herein can be fabricated using thin film deposition. Layer stacks are deposited by means of conventional DC and RF sputtering methods using commercially available Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD) tools. Layer stacks can be annealed after deposition at 300° C., 1 hour soak time without magnetic field.


In sum, one aspect of the present teachings is forming a magnetic layer that is magnetically coupled to the free layer of a perpendicular magnetic tunnel junction. This magnetic layer, described herein as the TSE layer, has a magnetization direction perpendicular to its plane, and separated from the free layer of an MTJ with a non-magnetic separation layer.


A person of skill will understand that the above disclosure maps only particular embodiments. It should be further understood that intervening layers can occur even when one layer is described as having been placed over, is covering, or is on top of another layer. That understanding applies to the claims. It should further be understood that while the MTJ pillars have been depicted in two-dimensional cross sections, they are three dimensional objects and the layers discussed may cover the three dimensional top, all sides, and all surrounding valley portions of the MTJ pillars.


It should also be appreciated to one skilled in the art that a plurality of devices 300 can be manufactured and provided as respective bit cells of an STT-MRAM device. In other words, each device 300 can be implemented as a bit cell for a memory array having a plurality of bit cells.


The above description and drawings are only to be considered illustrative of specific embodiments, which achieve the features and advantages described herein. Modifications and substitutions to specific process conditions can be made. Accordingly, the embodiments in this patent document are not considered as being limited by the foregoing description and drawings.

Claims
  • 1. A method of forming a magnetic device, comprising fabricating a bottom electrode in a first plane;fabricating a perpendicular synthetic antiferromagnetic structure, wherein the perpendicular synthetic antiferromagnetic structure includes a magnetic reference layer in a second plane, the magnetic reference layer having a magnetization direction that is perpendicular to the second plane and having a fixed magnetization direction;fabricating a non-magnetic tunnel barrier layer in a third plane such that the nonmagnetic tunnel barrier is disposed over the magnetic reference layer;fabricating a free magnetic layer in a fourth plane such that the free magnetic layer is disposed over the non-magnetic tunnel barrier layer, the free magnetic layer having a magnetization vector that is perpendicular to the fourth plane and having a magnetization direction that can switch from a first magnetization direction to a second magnetization direction, the magnetic reference layer, the non-magnetic tunnel barrier layer and the free magnetic layer forming a magnetic tunnel junction;fabricating a non-magnetic thermal stability enhancement coupling layer in a fifth plane such that the non-magnetic thermal stability enhancement coupling layer is disposed over the free magnetic layer, the non-magnetic thermal stability enhancement coupling layer being comprised of an insulator material;fabricating a magnetic thermal stability enhancement layer in a sixth plane such that the magnetic thermal stability enhancement layer is physically separated from the free magnetic layer of the magnetic tunnel junction and coupled to the free magnetic layer by the non-magnetic thermal stability enhancement coupling layer, the magnetic thermal stability enhancement layer having a magnetization direction that is perpendicular to the sixth plane and having a magnetization direction that can switch from the first magnetization direction to the second magnetization direction, wherein switching of the magnetic thermal stability enhancement layer from the first magnetization direction to the second magnetization direction tracks switching in the magnetic free layer; andfabricating a cap layer in a seventh plane such that the cap layer is disposed over the thermal stability enhancement layer;wherein the step of fabricating the perpendicular synthetic antiferromagnetic structure comprises:fabricating a first magnetic pSAF layer;fabricating an exchange coupling layer over the first magnetic pSAF layer; andfabricating a second magnetic pSAF layer, wherein the first magnetic pSAF layer is over the first electrode and is separated from the second magnetic pSAF layer by the exchange coupling layer;fabricating a ferromagnetic coupling layer in between the second magnetic pSAF layer and the magnetic reference layer.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the magnetic thermal stability enhancement layer comprises a layer of CoFeB.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the magnetic thermal stability enhancement layer comprises a film of CoFeB having a thickness between 1.3 nanometers and 1.5 nanometers.
  • 4. The method of claim 3 wherein the free magnetic layer comprises CoFeB with a Ta interlayer.
  • 5. The method of claim 4 wherein the free magnetic layer has a sum thickness of 1.6 nanometers.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the non-magnetic thermal stability enhancement coupling layer comprises a layer MgO.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the layer of MgO has a thickness between 0.6-1.2 nm.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the layer of MgO has a thickness 0.7 nm.
  • 9. A method of manufacturing a magnetic device, comprising: fabricating a perpendicular magnetic tunnel junction having a magnetic reference layer, a non-magnetic tunneling barrier layer and a magnetic free layer, the magnetic reference layer and the magnetic free layer separated by the non-magnetic tunneling barrier layer, the magnetic reference layer having a fixed magnetic direction that is perpendicular to its plane, the magnetic free layer having a variable magnetic direction that can switch between a first perpendicular magnetic direction and second perpendicular magnetic direction, wherein the first perpendicular magnetic direction and the second perpendicular magnetic direction is perpendicular to the magnetic free layer;fabricating a non-magnetic thermal stability enhancement coupling layer over the magnetic free layer of the magnetic tunnel junction; andfabricating a magnetic thermal stability enhancement layer over the magnetic thermal stability enhancement coupling layer, the magnetic thermal stability enhancement layer comprising a magnetic material having a variable magnetic direction that can switch between the first perpendicular magnetic direction and the second perpendicular magnetic direction, wherein switching of the magnetic thermal stability enhancement layer from the first magnetization direction to the second magnetization direction tracks switching in the magnetic free layer, wherein the non-magnetic thermal stability enhancement coupling layer is in between and physically separates the magnetic free layer of the magnetic tunnel junction and the magnetic thermal stability enhancement layer, the non-magnetic thermal stability enhancement coupling layer magnetically coupling the free magnetic layer and the magnetic thermal stability coupling layer, the non-magnetic thermal stability enhancement coupling layer being comprised of an insulator material;wherein the magnetic thermal stability enhancement layer comprises a film of CoFeB having a thickness between 1.3 nanometers and 1.5 nanometers; andwherein the free magnetic layer comprises CoFeB layers with a Ta interlayer.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, further comprising: fabricating an electrode onto a substrate;fabricating a perpendicular synthetic antiferromagnetic structure over the electrode, the perpendicular synthetic antiferromagnetic structure including the magnetic reference layer; andfabricating a cap layer disposed over the magnetic thermal stability enhancement layer.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the fabricating the perpendicular synthetic antiferromagnetic structure step comprises; fabricating a first magnetic pSAF layer;fabricating a non-magnetic exchange coupling layer over the first magnetic pSAF layer; andfabricating a second magnetic pSAF layer, where the first magnetic pSAF layer is separated from the second magnetic pSAF layer by the non-magnetic exchange coupling layer.
  • 12. The method of claim 9 wherein the magnetic thermal stability enhancement layer comprises CoFeB.
  • 13. The method of claim 1 wherein the free magnetic layer has a sum thickness of 1.6 nanometers.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/656,398, filed Jul. 21, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/157,783, filed May 18, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,741,926, which claims the benefit of Provisional Application No. 62/287,994, filed Jan. 28, 2016. The present application also claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/287,494. Priority to this provisional application is expressly claimed, and the disclosure of the provisional application is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (322)
Number Name Date Kind
341801 Fox May 1886 A
5541868 Prinz Jul 1996 A
5629549 Johnson May 1997 A
5640343 Gallagher et al. Jun 1997 A
5654566 Johnson Aug 1997 A
5691936 Sakakima et al. Nov 1997 A
5695846 Lange et al. Dec 1997 A
5695864 Slonczewski Dec 1997 A
5732016 Chen et al. Mar 1998 A
5856897 Mauri Jan 1999 A
5896252 Kanai Apr 1999 A
5966323 Chen et al. Oct 1999 A
6016269 Peterson et al. Jan 2000 A
6055179 Koganei et al. Apr 2000 A
6097579 Gill Aug 2000 A
6124711 Tanaka et al. Sep 2000 A
6134138 Lu et al. Oct 2000 A
6140838 Johnson Oct 2000 A
6154349 Kanai et al. Nov 2000 A
6172902 Wegrowe et al. Jan 2001 B1
6233172 Chen et al. May 2001 B1
6243288 Ishikawa et al. Jun 2001 B1
6252798 Satoh et al. Jun 2001 B1
6256223 Sun Jul 2001 B1
6272036 You et al. Aug 2001 B1
6292389 Chen et al. Sep 2001 B1
6347049 Childress et al. Feb 2002 B1
6376260 Chen et al. Apr 2002 B1
6385082 Abraham et al. May 2002 B1
6436526 Odagawa et al. Aug 2002 B1
6458603 Kersch et al. Oct 2002 B1
6493197 Ito et al. Dec 2002 B2
6522137 Sun et al. Feb 2003 B1
6532164 Redon et al. Mar 2003 B2
6538918 Swanson et al. Mar 2003 B2
6545906 Savtchenko et al. Apr 2003 B1
6563681 Sasaki et al. May 2003 B1
6566246 deFelipe et al. May 2003 B1
6603677 Redon et al. Aug 2003 B2
6653154 Doan et al. Nov 2003 B2
6654278 Engel et al. Nov 2003 B1
6677165 Lu et al. Jan 2004 B1
6710984 Yuasa et al. Mar 2004 B1
6713195 Wang et al. Mar 2004 B2
6714444 Huai et al. Mar 2004 B2
6744086 Daughton et al. Jun 2004 B2
6750491 Sharma et al. Jun 2004 B2
6765824 Kishi et al. Jul 2004 B2
6773515 Li et al. Aug 2004 B2
6777730 Daughton et al. Aug 2004 B2
6785159 Tuttle Aug 2004 B2
6812437 Levy et al. Nov 2004 B2
6829161 Huai et al. Dec 2004 B2
6835423 Chen et al. Dec 2004 B2
6838740 Huai et al. Jan 2005 B2
6842317 Sugita et al. Jan 2005 B2
6847547 Albert et al. Jan 2005 B2
6887719 Lu et al. May 2005 B2
6888742 Nguyen et al. May 2005 B1
6902807 Argoitia et al. Jun 2005 B1
6906369 Ross et al. Jun 2005 B2
6920063 Huai et al. Jul 2005 B2
6933155 Albert et al. Aug 2005 B2
6958927 Nguyen et al. Oct 2005 B1
6967863 Huai Nov 2005 B2
6980469 Kent et al. Dec 2005 B2
6985385 Nguyen et al. Jan 2006 B2
6992359 Nguyen et al. Jan 2006 B2
6995962 Saito et al. Feb 2006 B2
7002839 Kawabata et al. Feb 2006 B2
7005958 Wan Feb 2006 B2
7006375 Covington Feb 2006 B2
7009877 Huai et al. Mar 2006 B1
7041598 Sharma May 2006 B2
7045368 Hong et al. May 2006 B2
7149106 Mancoff et al. Dec 2006 B2
7170778 Kent et al. Jan 2007 B2
7190611 Nguyen et al. Mar 2007 B2
7203129 Lin et al. Apr 2007 B2
7227773 Nguyen et al. Jun 2007 B1
7262941 Li et al. Aug 2007 B2
7307876 Kent et al. Dec 2007 B2
7324387 Bergemont et al. Jan 2008 B1
7335960 Han et al. Feb 2008 B2
7351594 Bae et al. Apr 2008 B2
7352021 Bae et al. Apr 2008 B2
7376006 Bednorz et al. May 2008 B2
7378699 Chan et al. May 2008 B2
7449345 Horng et al. Nov 2008 B2
7476919 Hong et al. Jan 2009 B2
7502249 Ding Mar 2009 B1
7573737 Kent et al. Aug 2009 B2
7598555 Papworth-Parkin Oct 2009 B1
7619431 DeWilde et al. Nov 2009 B2
7630232 Guo Dec 2009 B2
7643332 Leuschner Jan 2010 B2
7679155 Korenivski Mar 2010 B2
7911832 Kent et al. Mar 2011 B2
7936595 Han et al. May 2011 B2
7986544 Kent et al. Jul 2011 B2
8014193 Nakayama et al. Sep 2011 B2
8279663 Nakayama et al. Oct 2012 B2
8279666 Dieny et al. Oct 2012 B2
8334213 Mao Dec 2012 B2
8357982 Kajiyama Jan 2013 B2
8363465 Kent et al. Jan 2013 B2
8456883 Liu Jun 2013 B1
8488375 Saida et al. Jul 2013 B2
8492881 Kuroiwa et al. Jul 2013 B2
8508979 Saida et al. Aug 2013 B2
8535952 Ranjan et al. Sep 2013 B2
8574928 Satoh et al. Nov 2013 B2
8576616 Saida et al. Nov 2013 B2
8582355 Saida et al. Nov 2013 B2
8617408 Balamane Dec 2013 B2
8716817 Saida et al. May 2014 B2
8737122 Saida et al. May 2014 B2
8737137 Choy et al. May 2014 B1
8779537 Huai Jul 2014 B2
8823118 Horng Sep 2014 B2
8852760 Wang et al. Oct 2014 B2
8860156 Beach Oct 2014 B2
8878317 Daibou et al. Nov 2014 B2
9019754 Bedeschi Apr 2015 B1
9025368 Saida et al. May 2015 B2
9082888 Kent et al. Jul 2015 B2
9117995 Daibou et al. Aug 2015 B2
9129690 Park et al. Sep 2015 B2
9159342 Kudo et al. Oct 2015 B2
9245608 Chen et al. Jan 2016 B2
9263667 Pinarbasi Feb 2016 B1
9299918 Daibou et al. Mar 2016 B2
9337412 Pinarbasi et al. May 2016 B2
9362486 Kim et al. Jun 2016 B2
9378817 Lee et al. Jun 2016 B2
9379314 Park Jun 2016 B2
9406876 Pinarbasi Aug 2016 B2
9472282 Lee et al. Oct 2016 B2
9472748 Kuo et al. Oct 2016 B2
9484527 Han et al. Nov 2016 B2
9548445 Lee et al. Jan 2017 B2
9589616 Meng et al. Mar 2017 B2
9728712 Kardasz et al. Aug 2017 B2
9741926 Pinarbasi et al. Aug 2017 B1
9773540 Zang et al. Sep 2017 B2
9773974 Pinarbasi et al. Sep 2017 B2
9777974 Kamitani et al. Oct 2017 B2
9818464 Saida et al. Nov 2017 B2
9853206 Pinarbasi et al. Dec 2017 B2
10008248 Buhrman et al. Jun 2018 B2
10026892 Pinarbasi et al. Jul 2018 B2
10032978 Schabes et al. Jul 2018 B1
10229724 el Baraji et al. Mar 2019 B1
10236047 Ryan et al. Mar 2019 B1
10236048 Tzoufras et al. Mar 2019 B1
10236439 Schabes et al. Mar 2019 B1
10270027 Gajek et al. Apr 2019 B1
10360961 Tzoufras et al. Jul 2019 B1
20020090533 Zhang et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020105823 Redon et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020132140 Igarashi et al. Sep 2002 A1
20030117840 Sharma et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030151944 Saito Aug 2003 A1
20030197984 Inomata et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030218903 Luo Nov 2003 A1
20040012994 Slaughter et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040061154 Huai et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040094785 Zhu et al. May 2004 A1
20040125649 Durlam et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040130936 Nguyen et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040257717 Sharma et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050041342 Huai et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050051820 Stojakovic et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050063222 Huai et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050104101 Sun et al. May 2005 A1
20050128842 Wei Jun 2005 A1
20050136600 Huai Jun 2005 A1
20050158881 Sharma Jul 2005 A1
20050174702 Gill Aug 2005 A1
20050180202 Huai et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050184839 Nguyen et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050201023 Huai et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050237787 Huai et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050280058 Pakala et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060002184 Hong et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060018057 Huai Jan 2006 A1
20060044703 Inomata et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060049472 Diao et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060087880 Mancoff et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060092696 Bessho May 2006 A1
20060132990 Morise et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060227465 Inokuchi et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070019337 Apalkov et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070047294 Panchula Mar 2007 A1
20070096229 Yoshikawa et al. May 2007 A1
20070242501 Hung et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080031035 Rodmacq et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080049488 Rizzo Feb 2008 A1
20080112094 Kent et al. May 2008 A1
20080151442 Mauri et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080151614 Guo Jun 2008 A1
20080164547 Higo Jul 2008 A1
20080185670 Kajiyama Aug 2008 A1
20080259508 Kent et al. Oct 2008 A2
20080273274 Kojima et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080297292 Viala et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090015958 Nakamura et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090046501 Ranjan et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090072185 Raksha et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090091037 Assefa et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090098413 Kanegae Apr 2009 A1
20090161421 Cho et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090209050 Wang et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090209102 Zhong et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090231909 Dieny et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090244792 Nakayama et al. Oct 2009 A1
20100019333 Zhao et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100124091 Cowburn May 2010 A1
20100193891 Wang et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100232206 Li Sep 2010 A1
20100246254 Prejbeanu et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100271870 Zheng et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100290275 Park et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100304204 Routkevitch et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110001108 Greene et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110032645 Noel et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110058412 Zheng et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110089511 Keshtbod et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110121417 Li May 2011 A1
20110133298 Chen et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110141804 Apalkov et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110149632 Chen et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110216436 Igarashi Sep 2011 A1
20110235217 Chen et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110305077 Higo et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120012952 Chen Jan 2012 A1
20120052258 Op Debeeck et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120069649 Ranjan et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120120520 Childress et al. May 2012 A1
20120155156 Watts Jun 2012 A1
20120156390 Araki Jun 2012 A1
20120181642 Prejbeanu et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120188818 Ranjan et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120228728 Ueki et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120280336 Jan Nov 2012 A1
20120280339 Zhang et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120294078 Kent et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120299133 Son et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130001506 Sato et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130001652 Yoshikawa et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130021841 Zhou et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130062714 Zhu Mar 2013 A1
20130075845 Chen et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130119495 Vetro et al. May 2013 A1
20130157385 Jung et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130181305 Nakayama et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130244344 Malmhall et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130267042 Satoh et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130270523 Wang et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130270661 Yi et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130307097 Yi et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130341801 Satoh et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140009994 Parkin et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140036573 Ishihara et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140042571 Gan et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140048896 Huang et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140070341 Beach et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140087483 Ohsawa Mar 2014 A1
20140093701 Sahoo et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140103472 Kent et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140103473 Kent et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140131824 Kitagawa et al. May 2014 A1
20140159175 Lee et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140169085 Wang et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140177316 Otsuka et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140217531 Jan Aug 2014 A1
20140252439 Guo Sep 2014 A1
20140252519 Kim Sep 2014 A1
20140264671 Chepulskyy et al. Sep 2014 A1
20150008550 Min et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150056368 Wang et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150171315 Gan et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150171316 Park et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150279904 Pinarbasi Oct 2015 A1
20150287910 Lu Oct 2015 A1
20150357015 Kent et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150372687 Buhrman et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160027999 Pinarbasi et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160087193 Pinarbasi et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160093798 Kim et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160099405 Zimmer et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160111634 Lee et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160126452 Kuo et al. May 2016 A1
20160126453 Chen et al. May 2016 A1
20160163965 Han et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160163973 Pinarbasi Jun 2016 A1
20160181508 Lee et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160218278 Pinarbasi et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160276006 Ralph et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160284762 Wang et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160315118 Kardasz et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160315259 Kardasz et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160372656 Pinarbasi et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170018705 Harms et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170025472 Kim et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170033156 Gan et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170033283 Pinarbasi et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170033742 Akerman Feb 2017 A1
20170047107 Berger et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170084826 Zhou et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170222132 Pinarbasi et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170236570 Kent et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170324029 Pinarbasi et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170331032 Chen et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170331033 Kardasz et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170346002 Pinarbasi et al. Nov 2017 A1
20180047894 Pinarbasi et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180076382 Park et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180114898 Lee Apr 2018 A1
20180205001 Beach et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180248110 Kardasz et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180248113 Pinarbasi et al. Aug 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (58)
Number Date Country
2766141 Jan 2011 CA
101036195 Sep 2008 CN
102334207 Jan 2012 CN
102959693 Mar 2013 CN
105706259 Jun 2016 CN
105917480 Aug 2016 CN
106062979 Oct 2016 CN
107750382 Mar 2018 CN
107851712 Mar 2018 CN
1345277 Sep 2003 EP
3298636 Mar 2018 EP
2817998 Jun 2002 FR
2832542 May 2003 FR
2910716 Jun 2008 FR
H10-4012 Jan 1998 JP
H11-120758 Apr 1999 JP
H11-352867 Dec 1999 JP
2001-195878 Jul 2001 JP
2002-261352 Sep 2002 JP
2002-357489 Dec 2002 JP
2003-318461 Nov 2003 JP
2005-044848 Feb 2005 JP
2005-150482 Jun 2005 JP
2005-535111 Nov 2005 JP
4066477 Mar 2006 JP
2006-128579 May 2006 JP
2008-098365 Apr 2008 JP
2008-524830 Jul 2008 JP
2008-192832 Aug 2008 JP
2009-027177 Feb 2009 JP
2012-004222 Jan 2012 JP
2013-012546 Jan 2013 JP
2013-048210 Mar 2013 JP
2013-219010 Oct 2013 JP
2014-022751 Feb 2014 JP
2014 039061 Feb 2014 JP
5635666 Dec 2014 JP
2015-002352 Jan 2015 JP
2017-510989 Apr 2017 JP
2017-527097 Sep 2017 JP
2017-532752 Nov 2017 JP
10-2014-0115246 Sep 2014 KR
10-2015-0016162 Feb 2015 KR
WO 2009080636 Jul 2009 WO
WO 2011005484 Jan 2011 WO
WO 2013027406 Feb 2013 WO
WO 2014062681 Apr 2014 WO
WO 2015153142 Oct 2015 WO
WO 2016011435 Jan 2016 WO
WO 2016014326 Jan 2016 WO
WO 2016048603 Mar 2016 WO
WO 2016171800 Oct 2016 WO
WO 2016171920 Oct 2016 WO
WO 2016204835 Dec 2016 WO
WO 2017019134 Feb 2017 WO
WO 2017030647 Feb 2017 WO
WO 2017131894 Aug 2017 WO
WO 2017151735 Sep 2017 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (89)
Entry
NonFinal Office Action dated Jan. 15, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/862,788.
Final Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/242,419; 19 pages.
Final Office Action dated Jun. 9, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/814,038; 19 pages.
Final Office Action dated Aug. 2, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/674,620.
NonFinal Office Action dated Mar. 20, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/242,419; 18 pages.
NonFinal Office Action dated Sep. 11, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/492,943; 13 pages.
NonFinal Office Action dated Jan. 20, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/242,419; 17 pages.
NonFinal Office Action dated Dec. 9, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/866,359; 26 pages.
NonFinal Office Action dated Dec. 23, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/093,367; 13 pages.
NonFinal Office Action dated Jan. 25, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/097,576; 17 pages.
NonFinal Office Action dated Feb. 6, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/814,036; 22 pages.
NonFinal Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,381.
Nonfinal Office Action dated Jun. 26, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,384.
NonFinal Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,374.
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 26, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,047; 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 24, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,517.
Office Action dated Aug. 30, 2018 in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580009984.2.
Office Action dated Oct. 9, 2018 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-526761.
Berger et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/174,482, filed Jun. 6, 2016, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Bipolar Memory Write-Verify”.
Bozdag et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,047, filed Dec. 29, 2017, entitled “Three-Terminal MRAM with AC Write-Assist for Low Read Disturb”.
El Baraji et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,514, filed Dec. 30, 2017, entitled “Microwave Write-Assist in Orthogonal STT-MRAM”.
El Baraji et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,517, filed Dec. 30, 2017, entitled “Microwave Write-Assist in Series-Interconnected Orthogonal STT-MRAM Devices”.
Gajek et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/858,988, filed Dec. 29, 2017, entitled “Self-Generating AC Current Assist in Orthogonal STT-MRAM”.
Ikeda et al.; “A perpendicular-anisotropy CoFeB-MgO magnetic tunnel junction”; Nature Materials, vol. 9, Sep. 2010; pp. 721-724 (4 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 10, 2015 in PCT/US2015/021580; 12 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 30, 2015 in PCT/US2015/040700; 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 14, 2015 in PCT/US2015/047875; 13 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion datedJun. 17, 2016 in PCT/US2016/021324; 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 17, 2016 in PCT/US2016/021691; 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 15, 2016 in PCT/US2016/026473; 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 21, 2016 in PCT/US2016/027445; 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 26, 2016 in PCT/US2016/037843; 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 7, 2017 in PCT/US2016/067444; 13 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 10, 2018 in PCT/US2018/014645; 14 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 30, 2018 in PCT/US2018/014641; 13 pages.
Kardasz et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/866,359, filed Sep. 25, 2015 entitled “Spin Transfer Torque Structure for MRAM Devices Having a Spin Current Injection Capping Layer”.
Kardasz et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/091,853, filed Apr. 6, 2016, entitled “High Annealing Temperature Perpendicular Magnetic Anisotropy Structure for Magnetic Random Access Memory”.
Kardasz et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/657,498, filed Jul. 24, 2017, entitled “Spin Transfer Torque Structure for MRAM Devices Having a Spin Current Injection Capping Layer”.
Kent et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 61/715,111, filed Oct. 17, 2012, entitled “Inverted Orthogonal Spin Transfer Layer Stack”.
Koch et al., “Thermally Assisted Magnetization Reversal in Submicron-Sized Magnetic Thin Films”; Physical Review Letters; The American Physical Society; vol. 84, No. 23; Jun. 5, 2000, pp. 5419-5422 (4 pages).
Lee et al., “Analytical investigation of spin-transfer dynamics using a perpendicular-to-plane polarizer”; Applied Physics Letters; American Institute of Physics; vol. 86, (2005); pp. 022505-1 to 022505-3 (3 pages).
“Magnetic Technology Sprintronics, Media and Interface”; Data Storage Institute, R&D Highlights; Sep. 2010; 3 pages.
Martens et al., “Thermally Induced Magnetic Switching in Thin Ferromagnetic Annuli”; NSF grants PHY-0351964 (DLS); 2005; 11 pages.
Martens et al., “Magnetic Reversal in Nanoscopic Ferromagnetic Rings”; NSF grants PHY-0351964 (DLS); 2006; 23 pages.
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 27, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/097,576; 22 pages.
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 16, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/814,036; 16 pages.
Pinarbasi et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/341,185, filed Jul. 25, 2014, entitled “Method for Manufacturing MTJ Memory Device”.
Pinarbasi et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/492,943, filed Sep. 22, 2014, entitled “Magnetic Tunnel Junction Structure for MRAM Device”.
Pinarbasi et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/814,036, filed Jul. 30, 2015, entitled “Precessional Spin Current Structure for MRAM”.
Pinarbasi et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/041,325, filed Feb. 11, 2016, entitled “Method for Manufacturing MTJ Memory Device”.
Pinarbasi et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/093,367, filed Apr. 7, 2016, entitled “Magnetic Tunnel Junction Structure for MRAM Device”.
Pinarbasi et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/097,576, filed Apr. 13, 2016, entitled “Polishing Stop Layer(s) for Processing Arrays of Semiconductor Elements”.
Pinarbasi et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/157,783, filed May 18, 2016, entitled “Memory Cell Having Magnetic Tunnel Junction and Thermal Stability Enhancement Layer”.
Pinarbasi et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/445,260, filed Feb. 28, 2017, entitled “Precessional Spin Current Structure for MRAM”.
Pinarbasi et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/445,362, filed Feb. 28, 2017, entitled “Precessional Spin Current Structure for MRAM”.
Pinarbasi et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/656,398, filed Jul. 21, 2017, entitled “Memory Cell Having Magnetic Tunnel Junction and Thermal Stability Enhancement Layer”.
Pinarbasi et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/674,620, filed Aug. 11, 2017, entitled “Polishing Stop Layer(s) for Processing Arrays of Semiconductor Elements”.
Ryan et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,015, filed Dec. 29, 2017, entitled “Shared Oscillator (STNO) for MRAM Array Write-Assist in Orthogonal STT-MRAM”.
Pinarbasi et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/794,871, filed Oct. 26, 2017, entitled “Precessional Spin Current Structure for MRAM ”.
Seo et al.; “Current-induced synchronized switching of magnetization;” Applied Physics Letters 101; 2012 American Institute of Physics; Aug. 7, 2012; 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 21, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/157,783; 36 pages.
Schabes et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/634,629, filed Jun. 27, 2017, entitled “MRAM with Reduced Stray Magnetic Fields”.
Schabes et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/862,788, filed Jan. 5, 2018, entitled “Perpendicular Magnetic Tunnel Junction Device with Skyrmionic Enhancement Layers for the Precessional Spin Current Magnetic Layer”.
Schabes et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,384, filed Dec. 30, 2017, entitled “Perpendicular Magnetic Tunnel Junction Device with Skyrmionic Assist Layers for Free Layer Switching”.
Schabes et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,381, filed Dec. 30, 2017, entitled Perpendicular Magnetic Tunnel Junction Device with Precessional Spin Current Layer Having a Modulated Moment Density.
Schabes et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,379, filed Dec. 30, 2017, entitled “Perpendicular Magnetic Tunnel Junction Device with Offset Precessional Spin Current Layer”.
Schabes et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,374, filed Dec. 30, 2017, entitled “Switching and Stability Control for Perpendicular Magnetic Tunnel Junction Device”.
Tzoufras et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/858,950, filed Dec. 29, 2017, entitled “AC Current Pre-Charge Write-Assist in Orthogonal STT-MRAM”.
Tzoufras et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,030, filed Dec. 29, 2017, entitled “AC Current Write-Assist in Orthogonal STT-MRAM”.
Final Office Action dated Nov. 8, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/445,260.
Final Office Action dated Nov. 16, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/445,362.
Final Office Action dated Dec. 13, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/091,853.
NonFinal Office Action dated Nov. 23, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,384.
NonFinal Office Action dated Nov. 26, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/858,950.
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 9, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,015.
Notice of Allowance mailed Nov. 21, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,030.
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 21, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,374.
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 30, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,514.
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 12, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/858,988.
Extended European Search Report dated Jan. 30, 2019 in EU Application No. 16812075.6.
NonFinal Office Action dated Mar. 22, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/027,739.
NonFinal Office Action dated Jun. 25, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/197,622.
NonFinal Office Action dated Aug. 15, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/674,620.
NonFinal Office Action dated Sep. 4, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/445,260.
NonFinal Office Action dated Sep. 16, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/445,362.
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 12, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,381.
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 21, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/858,950.
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 26, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/091,853.
Office Action dated Jul. 23, 2019 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-529428 (with English translation).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190006582 A1 Jan 2019 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62287994 Jan 2016 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 15656398 Jul 2017 US
Child 16123663 US
Parent 15157783 May 2016 US
Child 15656398 US