The present invention relates to data storage methods and systems.
Signaling rate advances continue to outpace core access time improvement in dynamic random access memories (DRAMs), leading to memory devices and subsystems that output ever larger amounts of data per access in order to meet peak data transfer rates. In many cases, the increased data output is achieved through simple extension of the output burst length; the number of data transmissions executed in succession to output data retrieved from a given location within the memory core.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings and in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements and in which:
Memory systems and memory modules that enable more efficient use of signaling resources and reduced memory access granularity are disclosed in various embodiments. In one embodiment, two or more sets of memory devices disposed on a memory module and coupled to respective portions of a data path may be independently accessed via a shared command/address path and thus enable two or more reduced-granularity memory transactions to be carried out concurrently with the data for each transaction transferred on a respective portion of the data path. In a particular embodiment, independent access to the memory device sets coupled to respective portions of the data path is achieved by providing a separate chip-select line for each memory device set. By asserting chip-select signals on the separate chip-select lines at different times, the corresponding sets of memory device are enabled to sample commands and address values transferred via the shared command/address path at different times, in effect, time-multiplexing the shared command/address path to enable the different memory device sets to receive distinct commands and corresponding addresses. Consequently, by staggering the commands sent to each memory device, multiple independent memory access operations may be initiated and executed concurrently (i.e., at least partly overlapping in time) within the memory module, with the data transferred to or from the memory module in each memory access having reduced granularity relative to the granularity of a single memory access transaction directed to all the memory devices coupled to the complete data path. Further, because additional bandwidth may naturally become available on the command/address path as output data burst rates are extended (i.e., as signaling rates increase), the increased command/address bandwidth may be applied to convey the additional commands/addresses supplied to each additional independently accessible set of memory devices, thereby enabling full and efficient use of signaling resources. Alternative techniques for enabling independent memory access operations within sets of memory devices coupled to respective portions of the memory-module data path include, for example and without limitation, establishing different command/address sampling instants within different sets of memory devices relative to activation of a shared chip-select line, establishing different chip-select assertion polarities within different sets of memory devices, and including chip identifier values within or in association with command/address values. These and other features and techniques are disclosed in further detail below.
In one embodiment, shown in detail view 209, the memory module 203 is implemented by a printed circuit board substrate 211 having signal lines disposed thereon and extending from connector contacts 212 at an edge or other interface of the substrate 211 to memory devices, “Mem,” and thus forming the on-board portion of the command/address path (CA), component data paths (DQ-A and DQ-B), chip-select lines (CS-A and CS-B) and clock line (CLK). As shown, each memory device within a given memory set 205, 207 is coupled to a respective subset of signal lines within the component data path, DQ-A or DQ-B (the component data paths themselves being formed by subsets of the signal lines that form the overall module data path, DQ as shown in system 200), but coupled in common to the chip-select line, CS-A or CS-B, for the memory set. By contrast, the clock line and command/address path is coupled in common to (i.e., shared by) all the memory devices of the memory module. As a matter of terminology, the collective group of memory devices coupled in parallel to the data lines that constitute the full data path, DQ, is referred to herein as a memory device rank or memory rank, while the independently selectable sets of memory devices coupled to respective subsets of the data lines are referred to herein as memory device sub-ranks or memory sub-ranks. Thus, in
In clock cycle 1, the memory controller maintains chip-select line CS-A in the activated state (CS-A=‘1’) and chip-select line CS-B in the deactivated state (CS-B=‘0’), and outputs a column access command and associated address value via the command/address path. By this operation, the column access command, a column read command (RD) in this particular example, is received and executed within memory sub-rank A, but not memory sub-rank B. Accordingly, a predetermined time after receipt of the column read command (i.e., TRD, shown to be two clock cycles in this example), data retrieved within the sub-rank A memory devices 205 in response to the cycle-1 column read command is output onto component data path DQ-A. In the example shown, the output burst length includes eight transmissions (numbered 0-7) that are synchronized with successive rising and falling edges of the clock signal (Clk) so that the overall read data transmission in response to the cycle-1 column read command extends over the four clock cycles numbered 4-7. There may be more or fewer data transmissions per clock cycle in alternative embodiments. Also, in the example shown, the row activation command and column read command are shown as being received in back-to-back clock cycles. There may be one or more intervening clock cycles or fractions of clock cycles between receipt of row activation commands and column access commands in alternative embodiments.
During clock cycles 2 and 3, chip-select line CS-A is deactivated and chip-select line CS-B is activated to enable the sub-rank B memory devices, but not the sub-rank A memory devices, to receive an activate command and column read command. By this operation, an independent memory access operation, including a row activation and a column access, are initiated within the sub-rank B memory devices while the previously-initiated memory access operation within the sub-rank A memory devices is ongoing. Because the cycle 2-3 memory access commands (i.e., row activation command and column read command transmitted during clock cycles 2 and 3, respectively) are received within the sub-rank B memory devices 207 with a two-clock-cycle latency relative to receipt of the cycle 0-1 memory access commands within sub-rank A, the overall memory access within memory sub-rank B is time-staggered (i.e., time-delayed) relative to the memory access within sub-rank A, with the data retrieved within the sub-rank B memory devices in response to the cycle-3 column read command being output onto data path DQ-B starting at clock cycle 6 and extending through clock cycle 9. Thus, during clock cycles 6 and 7, data from the two independent memory accesses within memory sub-ranks A and B are output concurrently onto respective portions of the overall data path, DQ, between the memory controller 201 and memory module 203. During clock cycles 4 and 5, after sufficient time has passed to enable a new memory access within memory sub-rank A, chip-select line CS-A is re-activated and chip-select line CS-B is deactivated to initiate a new memory access operation exclusively within memory sub-rank A in response to the activation and column read commands and associated addresses driven onto the command/address path by the memory controller. Accordingly, at clock cycle 8, a TRD interval after receipt of the cycle-5 column read command, an output data burst is begun on DQ-A in response to the cycle-5 column read command, with the burst extending from clock cycle 8 to clock cycle 11 and thus concurrently with the final four transmissions of the preceding sub-rank B memory access in clock cycles 8-9. Although TRD is depicted as a two-clock-cycle interval in
Although the examples of concurrent, independent memory access operations within the A and B memory sub-ranks have been thus far described in terms of memory read operations, concurrent, independent memory write operations may also be carried out in the A and B memory sub-ranks, with write data for the operations being transmitted by the memory controller either in time-staggered fashion (e.g., as in
Reflecting on the staggered command/address sampling that results from the different sampling latencies established within the A and B memory sub-ranks, it can be seen that any assertion of the chip-select line will result in command/address sampling within both memory sub-ranks, though at different times. Accordingly, if, during a given interval, a memory operation is to be carried out within one of the memory sub-ranks, but not the other, place-holder “no-operation” commands (i.e., NOPs) may be transmitted during the command interval for the non-elected memory sub-rank. Referring to
Although embodiments of memory modules have thus far been described as having a single memory rank, a memory module may alternatively have two or more memory ranks, each memory rank or any one of them including separately accessible memory sub-ranks.
With respect to sample-latency, chip-select assertion polarity and/or sub-rank ID selection within the memory devices of a given memory module 621, the memory controller 607 may dynamically transition the memory module 621 or any of the memory devices within the sub-ranks 623, 625 thereon between various program settings, for example, in response detecting a threshold density of fine-grained memory access requests (i.e., a threshold number of such access requests within a given time interval or as a threshold percentage of total memory access requests) from the processing unit 601 or in response to an explicit command from the processing unit 601 to establish particular program settings.
Within the memory controller 607, parallel transaction queues 609, 611 (TQueue) are provided to queue memory access commands (and associated read and write data) directed to respective memory sub-ranks 623, 625 of a selected memory module 621. Thus, in one embodiment, transaction queue 609 is coupled, via data path DQ-A, to memory sub-rank A 623 within each of the memory modules 621, while transaction queue 611 is coupled via data path DQ-B to memory sub-rank B within each of the memory modules 621. To enable selection of a module-specific memory sub-rank, each of the transaction queues 609 and 611 is coupled via respective chip-select line to each of the memory modules. That is, in one embodiment, there are N pairs of chip-select lines, with the chip-select lines of each pair extending to distinct memory sub-ranks on a respective one of memory modules 6211-621N. Each of the transaction queues 609, 611 is additionally coupled to a respective one of internal command paths 610, 611 which are coupled, in turn, to inputs of a command path multiplexer 615. The command path multiplexer 615 responds to a source-select value, SSel, to couple either internal command path 610 or internal command path 612 to command path, CA, and thus select either transaction queue 609 or transaction queue 611 to source the commands and associated address values for a given memory transaction. In one embodiment, a mode-select value (MSel) within the memory controller 607 is used to control whether the transaction queues 609, 611 are operated in a sub-rank access mode or a unified-rank access mode. In the sub-rank access mode, the source-select value may be toggled (e.g., by control logic within the memory controller 607 or the transaction queues 609, 611) after each command output sequence from a given transaction queue to enable the alternate transaction queue to drive command path CA in the ensuing command interval. Alternatively, arbitration logic may be provided to enable arbitrated access to command path CA from the two transaction queues 609, 611. In unified-rank access mode, the command path may be driven exclusively by one transaction queue or the other, with chip-select signals for memory sub-ranks (and the data input/output circuitry within transaction queues or elsewhere within the memory controller 607) being operated in lock step instead of time-staggered. In addition to memory access commands and associated data, one or both of the transaction queues 609, 611 may output operational commands and associated data to the various memory modules 621, for example, to configure the memory devices of the module, (including programming sub-rank access functions such as sampling latency, chip-select assertion polarity, device ID, etc.), read the SPD, perform signaling calibration, refresh operations, and so forth. Such commands may be transmitted under direction of control logic within the memory controller 607 (e.g., in one or both of the transaction queues) or in response to access requests from the processing unit 601 received via host interface path 602 (which may include separate data (Data) and request components (Req) as shown or a time-multiplexed path).
Although memory modules 621 are depicted in the system of
It should be noted that the various circuits disclosed herein may be described using computer aided design tools and expressed (or represented), as data and/or instructions embodied in various computer-readable media, in terms of their behavioral, register transfer, logic component, transistor, layout geometries, and/or other characteristics. Formats of files and other objects in which such circuit expressions may be implemented include, but are not limited to, formats supporting behavioral languages such as C, Verilog, and VHDL, formats supporting register level description languages like RTL, and formats supporting geometry description languages such as GDSII, GDSIII, GDSIV, CIF, MEBES and any other suitable formats and languages. Computer-readable media in which such formatted data and/or instructions may be embodied include, but are not limited to, non-volatile storage media in various forms (e.g., optical, magnetic or semiconductor storage media) and carrier waves that may be used to transfer such formatted data and/or instructions through wireless, optical, or wired signaling media or any combination thereof. Examples of transfers of such formatted data and/or instructions by carrier waves include, but are not limited to, transfers (uploads, downloads, e-mail, etc.) over the Internet and/or other computer networks via one or more data transfer protocols (e.g., HTTP, FTP, SMTP, etc.).
When received within a computer system via one or more computer-readable media, such data and/or instruction-based expressions of the above described circuits may be processed by a processing entity (e.g., one or more processors) within the computer system in conjunction with execution of one or more other computer programs including, without limitation, net-list generation programs, place and route programs and the like, to generate a representation or image of a physical manifestation of such circuits. Such representation or image may thereafter be used in device fabrication, for example, by enabling generation of one or more masks that are used to form various components of the circuits in a device fabrication process.
In the foregoing description and in the accompanying drawings, specific terminology and drawing symbols have been set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. In some instances, the terminology and symbols may imply specific details that are not required to practice the invention. For example, the interconnection between circuit elements or circuit blocks may be shown or described as multi-conductor or single conductor signal lines. Each of the multi-conductor signal lines may alternatively be single-conductor signal lines, and each of the single-conductor signal lines may alternatively be multi-conductor signal lines. Signals and signaling paths shown or described as being single-ended may also be differential, and vice-versa. Similarly, signals described or depicted as having active-high or active-low logic levels may have opposite logic levels in alternative embodiments. As another example, circuits described or depicted as including metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) transistors may alternatively be implemented using bipolar technology or any other technology in which logical elements may be implemented. With respect to terminology, a signal is said to be “asserted” when the signal is driven to a low or high logic state (or charged to a high logic state or discharged to a low logic state) to indicate a particular condition. Conversely, a signal is said to be “deasserted” to indicate that the signal is driven (or charged or discharged) to a state other than the asserted state (including a high or low logic state, or the floating state that may occur when the signal driving circuit is transitioned to a high impedance condition, such as an open drain or open collector condition). A signal driving circuit is said to “output” a signal to a signal receiving circuit when the signal driving circuit asserts (or deasserts, if explicitly stated or indicated by context) the signal on a signal line coupled between the signal driving and signal receiving circuits. A signal line is said to be “activated” when a signal is asserted on the signal line, and “deactivated” when the signal is deasserted. Additionally, the prefix symbol “I” attached to signal names indicates that the signal is an active low signal (i.e., the asserted state is a logic low state). A line over a signal name (e.g., ‘
While the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments thereof, it will be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention. For example, features or aspects of any of the embodiments may be applied, at least where practicable, in combination with any other of the embodiments or in place of counterpart features or aspects thereof. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
This patent application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/223,031, filed Dec. 17, 2018, which in turn is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/665,284, filed Jul. 31, 2017 (now U.S. patent Ser. No. 10/191,866), which in turn is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/295,723, filed Oct. 17, 2016, which in turn is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/381,349, filed May 2, 2006, each on behalf of inventors Craig E. Hampel and Frederick A. Ware and each for “Memory Module with Reduced Access Granularity” (“parent applications”); each of these parent applications is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4377855 | Lavi | Mar 1983 | A |
4542483 | Procyk | Sep 1985 | A |
4569036 | Fujii | Feb 1986 | A |
4633434 | Scheuneman | Dec 1986 | A |
4636982 | Takemae et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4646268 | Kuno | Feb 1987 | A |
4654781 | Schwartz et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4670745 | O'Malley et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4698788 | Flannagan | Oct 1987 | A |
4700328 | Burghard | Oct 1987 | A |
4710902 | Pelley, III | Dec 1987 | A |
4740921 | Lewandowski | Apr 1988 | A |
4758993 | Takemae | Jul 1988 | A |
4766538 | Miyoshi | Aug 1988 | A |
4768157 | Chauvel et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4787858 | Killian, Jr. | Nov 1988 | A |
4796230 | Young | Jan 1989 | A |
4800525 | Shah | Jan 1989 | A |
4811302 | Koishi | Mar 1989 | A |
4825413 | Tran | Apr 1989 | A |
4837465 | Rubinstein | Jun 1989 | A |
4837743 | Chiu | Jun 1989 | A |
4843264 | Galbraith | Jun 1989 | A |
4862421 | Tran | Aug 1989 | A |
4888732 | Inoue | Dec 1989 | A |
4903344 | Inoue | Feb 1990 | A |
4961168 | Tran | Oct 1990 | A |
4982370 | Matsumoto | Jan 1991 | A |
4984196 | Tran | Jan 1991 | A |
4985867 | Ishii et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4991141 | Tran | Feb 1991 | A |
5046050 | Kertis | Sep 1991 | A |
5093806 | Tran | Mar 1992 | A |
5111434 | Cho | May 1992 | A |
5119340 | Slemmer | Jun 1992 | A |
5121358 | Slemmer | Jun 1992 | A |
5124610 | Conley | Jun 1992 | A |
5124951 | Slemmer | Jun 1992 | A |
5128897 | McClure | Jul 1992 | A |
5132931 | Koker | Jul 1992 | A |
5146592 | Pfeiffer et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5150330 | Hag | Sep 1992 | A |
5181205 | Kertis | Jan 1993 | A |
5193072 | Frenkil | Mar 1993 | A |
5193074 | Anami | Mar 1993 | A |
5214610 | Houston | May 1993 | A |
5222047 | Matsuda et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5241503 | Cheng | Aug 1993 | A |
5249165 | Toda | Sep 1993 | A |
5251178 | Childers | Oct 1993 | A |
5263002 | Suzuki | Nov 1993 | A |
5267215 | Tsujimoto | Nov 1993 | A |
5274596 | Watanabe | Dec 1993 | A |
5291444 | Scott | Mar 1994 | A |
5301162 | Shimizu | Apr 1994 | A |
5305280 | Hayano | Apr 1994 | A |
5321646 | Tomishima | Jun 1994 | A |
5337283 | Ishikawa | Aug 1994 | A |
5343438 | Choi | Aug 1994 | A |
5383159 | Kubota | Jan 1995 | A |
5390308 | Ware et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5394528 | Kobayashi et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5406526 | Sugibayashi | Apr 1995 | A |
5414662 | Foss | May 1995 | A |
5418737 | Tran | May 1995 | A |
5428389 | Ito | Jun 1995 | A |
5432743 | Kusakari | Jul 1995 | A |
5455802 | McClure | Oct 1995 | A |
5471425 | Yumitori | Nov 1995 | A |
5485430 | McClure | Jan 1996 | A |
5517456 | Chishiki | May 1996 | A |
5530814 | Wong et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5546346 | Agata et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5559970 | Sharma | Sep 1996 | A |
5587960 | Ferris | Dec 1996 | A |
5614855 | Lee et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5652870 | Yamasaki et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5655113 | Leung et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5666322 | Conkle | Sep 1997 | A |
5675180 | Pedersen | Oct 1997 | A |
5689472 | Tanaka et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5717871 | Hsieh et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5717901 | Sung et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5748561 | Hotta | May 1998 | A |
5751657 | Hotta | May 1998 | A |
5787267 | Leung et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5793998 | Copeland et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801985 | Roohparvar et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5852725 | Yen | Dec 1998 | A |
5864505 | Higuchi | Jan 1999 | A |
5875132 | Ozaki | Feb 1999 | A |
5881017 | Matsumoto et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892981 | Wiggers | Apr 1999 | A |
5893927 | Hovis | Apr 1999 | A |
5903509 | Ryan et al. | May 1999 | A |
5933387 | Worley | Aug 1999 | A |
5936885 | Morita | Aug 1999 | A |
5958033 | Schubert et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963488 | Inoue | Oct 1999 | A |
5982981 | Satoh | Nov 1999 | A |
5995438 | Jeng et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5996051 | Mergard | Nov 1999 | A |
6018478 | Higuchi | Jan 2000 | A |
6034878 | Osaka et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047347 | Hansen et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049855 | Jeddeloh | Apr 2000 | A |
6050983 | Moore et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6065092 | Roy | May 2000 | A |
6075728 | Inoue | Jun 2000 | A |
6125157 | Donnelly et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6138185 | Nelson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141273 | Ku et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144220 | Young et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6160750 | Shieh | Dec 2000 | A |
6163491 | Iwamoto et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6185149 | Fujioka et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6240039 | Lee et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240040 | Akaogi et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6247084 | Apostol et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
RE37409 | Richardson et al. | Oct 2001 | E |
6311313 | Camporese et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6356975 | Barth et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363454 | Lakhani et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366995 | Vilkov et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393543 | Vilkov et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6396764 | Holland | May 2002 | B1 |
6434081 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446158 | Karabatsos | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6587917 | Simmons | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6591349 | Steinman et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6618791 | Dodd et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625687 | Halbert et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6678204 | Nagashima et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6680736 | Cho | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6687796 | Laine et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6725316 | Gans | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6742098 | Halbert et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6748556 | Storino et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754120 | Bellows et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6813688 | Wu et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825841 | Hampel et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6854042 | Karabatsos | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6877079 | Yoo et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6885572 | Fujisawa | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6895474 | Ryan et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6920540 | Hampel et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7039782 | Garrett, Jr. et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7187572 | Perego et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7254075 | Woo et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7266667 | Oh | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7280428 | Ware et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7281079 | Bains et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7363422 | Perego et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7369444 | Perego et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7386696 | Jakobs et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7505356 | Ware et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7729151 | Tsern et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7907470 | Ware et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8028144 | Hampel et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8050134 | Ware et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8364926 | Hampel et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8918669 | Ware et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9256557 | Hampel et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
10191866 | Hampel et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
20010037428 | Hsu | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20030009612 | Latta | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030048616 | Ko et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030052885 | Hampel et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030174573 | Suzuki et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030197201 | Yanagawa | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040019756 | Perego et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040037133 | Park et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040073772 | Hokenek et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040105292 | Matsui | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040120197 | Kondo et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040120210 | Lee | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040177210 | Choi | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040221186 | Lee et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040225853 | Lee et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040256638 | Perego et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050015539 | Horii et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050071581 | Dodd | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050083721 | Hampel et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050152210 | Park et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050182885 | Matsui et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060004976 | Rader | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060039227 | Lai et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047899 | Iida et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060067146 | Woo et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060072366 | Ware et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070268765 | Woo et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080028135 | Rajan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080062807 | Ware et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090157994 | Hampel et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100211748 | Perego et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20150235679 | Arai | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20170286331 | Kobayashi | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20210019182 | Duong | Jan 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1214515 | Apr 1999 | CN |
102005021894 | Jan 2006 | DE |
0339224 | Nov 1989 | EP |
0887737 | Dec 1998 | EP |
0910091 | Apr 1999 | EP |
1248267 | Oct 2002 | EP |
2367400 | Apr 2002 | GB |
05-290573 | May 1993 | JP |
07-262767 | Oct 1995 | JP |
H09-231760 | Sep 1997 | JP |
10-172283 | Jun 1998 | JP |
2000-082287 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2003-007052 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003-223785 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2003-317474 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2004-005856 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004-139552 | May 2004 | JP |
WO-1991-016680 | Oct 1991 | WO |
WO-2004-034401 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO-2006-039106 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO-2009-089301 | Jul 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Aimoto et al., “SP23.3 A 7168GIPS 3.84GB/s 1W Parallel Image-Processing RAM Integrating a 16Mb DRAM and 128 Processors,” ISSCC, Feb. 1996, pp. 372-373/476. 3 pages. |
Amendment and Response dated Apr. 20, 2010 re U.S. Appl. No. 12/392,071. 12 pages. |
Chang, Kun-Yung, “Design of a CMOS Asymmetric Serial Link,” A Dissertation Submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering and the Committee on Graduate Studies of Stanford University, Aug. 1999. 133 pages. |
CN Board Opinion dated Dec. 1, 2011 re CN Application No. 200580045523.7. 8 pages. (With Translation). |
CN Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2010 re Rejection Decision for CN Application No. 200580045523.7. 14 pages. (With Translation). |
CN Office Action dated Mar. 24, 2010 re CN Application No. 200580045523.7, Includes Text of the Second Office Action and Translation. 14 pages. (With Translation). |
CN Response dated Jun. 3, 2010 re CN Patent Application No. 200580045523.7. 11 pages. (With Translation). |
Communication Regarding the Expiry of the Time Limit Within Which Notice of Opposition May be Filed dated Sep. 15, 2010 in EP Application No. 05799571.4-2210. 1 page. |
Cuppu, V., et al. “A Performance Comparison of Contemporary DRAM Architectures”, Proceedings of the 26th International Symposium on Computer Architecture, Atlanta, GA, May 2-4, 1999; [International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA)], Los Alamitos, CA; IEEE Comp. Soc, US, vol. Conf. 26, May 2, 1999 (May 2, 1999), pp. 222-233, XP000887620 ISBN: 978-0-7695-0171-0 12 pages. |
Elpida Memory Inc., “User's Manual: New Features of DDR3 SDRAM,” Document E1503E10 (Ver.1.0), published Mar. 2009. 18 pages. |
EP Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Oct. 19, 2016 re: EP Appln. No. 11179126.5. 5 Pages. |
EP Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, dated Jul. 30, 2010 in EP Application No. 05852108.8-2210. 6 pages. |
EP Examination Report dated Apr. 24, 2013 in EP Application No. 11184623.4. 7 pages. |
EP Examination Report dated Jul. 29, 2013 re EP Application No. 11168736.4. 10 pages. |
EP Examination Report dated Jun. 3, 2013 in EP Application No. 05852180.8. 8 pages. |
EP Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 27, 2012 re EP Application No. 11168734.9. 9 pages. |
EP Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 27, 2012 re EP Application No. 11168735.6. 9 pages. |
EP Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 28, 2012 re EP Application No. 11168736.4. 11 pages. |
EP Extended Search Report dated Dec. 30, 2011 re EP Application No. 11179126.5. 10 pages. |
EP Extended Search Report dated Dec. 30, 2011 re EP Application No. 11184623.4. 9 pages. |
EP Extended Search Report dated Jan. 2, 2012 re EP Application No. 11184627.5. 7 pages. |
EP Office Action dated Apr. 24, 2013 in EP Application No. 11179126.5. 9 pages. |
EP Office Action dated Apr. 24, 2013 in EP Application No. 11184627.5. 7 pages. |
EP Office Action dated Feb. 6, 2012 re EP Application No. 11179126.5. 2 pages. |
EP Office Action dated Mar. 23, 2012 re EP Application No. 05852180.8. 5 pages. |
EP Office Communication dated Aug. 1, 2013 in EP Application 11168735.6. 23 pages. |
EP Office Communication dated Aug. 1, 2013 re EP Application No. 11168734.9. 24 pages. |
EP Office Communication dated Jan. 11, 2012 re EP Application No. 07782931.5. 7 pages. |
EP Office Communication dated Nov. 24, 2010 re EP Application No. 09167223.8. 6 pages. |
EP Official Communication dated Sep. 27, 2012 in EP Application No. 09167223.8-1233. 2 pages. |
EP Provision of the Minutes Rule 124(4) EPC dated Jan. 27, 2014 re EP Application No. 07782931.5. 12 pages. |
EP Response dated Oct. 8, 2013 in EP Application No. 05852180.8, Includes New Claims (Highlighted and Clear copies) and New Description pp. 2, 2a, and 2b (Highlighted and Clear copies). 47 pages. |
EP Response dated Apr. 15, 2010 to the Official Communication dated Oct. 5, 2009 re EP Application No. 07783931.5-1233. 25 pages. |
EP Response dated Apr. 4, 2011 to the Official Communication dated Nov. 24, 2010 re EP Application No. 09167223.8, Includes New Claims (Highlighted & Clear Copy) and Cross-Reference of New Claims. 41 pages. |
EP Response dated Aug. 29, 2012 to the Official Communication dated Mar. 27, 2012, Application No. 11168735.6. 21 pages. |
EP Response dated Dec. 10, 2013 in EP Application No. 07782931.5, Includes the Main Request and Auxiliary Requests I-IV (Clear and Highlighted Copies). 63 pages. |
EP Response dated Feb. 3, 2011 to the Official Communication dated Jul. 30, 2010 re EP Application No. 05852180.8. 33 pages. |
EP Response dated Feb. 5, 2014 in EP Application No. 11168736.4, Includes New Claims (Clear and Highlighted Copies) and New Description pages (Clear and Highlighted Copies). 30 pages. |
EP Response dated Feb. 6, 2014 in EP Application No. 11168734.9, Includes New Claims (Highlighted and Clear Copies) and New Description pages. 26 pages. |
EP Response dated Feb. 6, 2014 in EP Application No. 11168735.6, Includes New Claims (Highlighted and Clear Copies) and New Description pages. 23 pages. |
EP Response dated Jul. 20, 2012 to the Official Communication dated Jan. 11, 2012 in EP Application No. 07782931.5-1233, Includes New Claims (Clear and Highlighted Copies). 23 pages. |
EP Response dated Jul. 22, 2015 in EP Application No. 11168735.6, Includes Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings. 10 pages. |
EP Response dated Jul. 23, 2015 in EP Application No. 05852180.8, Includes Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings. 14 pages. |
EP Response dated Jul. 30, 2012 In response to the Official Communication dated Feb. 6, 2012 and to the Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 30, 2012, in EP Application No. 11 184 623.4, Includes New Claims (Clear and Highlighted Copies). 29 pages. |
EP Response dated Jul. 30, 2012 in Response to the Official Communication dated Feb. 6, 2012 and to the Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 30, 2012, in EP Application No. 11 184 627.5, Includes New Description pp. 2, 2a, and 22. 13 pages. |
EP Response dated Jul. 30, 2012 to the Official Communication dated Feb. 6, 2011 and the extended European Search Report dated Dec. 30, 2011, in EP Application No. 11 179 126.5, Includes New Claims (Clear and Highlighted Copies). 26 pages. |
EP Response dated Nov. 4, 2013 in EP Application No. 11179126.5, Includes New Claims (Clear and Highlighted copies). 19 pages. |
EP Response dated Nov. 4, 2013 in EP Application No. 11184623.4, Includes New Claims (Clear and Highlighted copies). 20 pages. |
EP Response dated Nov. 4, 2013 in EP Application No. 11184627.5, Includes New Claims (Clear and Highlighted versions). 17 pages. |
EP Response dated Sep. 6, 2012 to the Official Communication dated May 2, 2012, Application No. 11168734.9. 22 pages. |
EP Response dated Sep. 6, 2012 to the Official Communication dated May 2, 2012, Application No. 11168736.4. 27 pages. |
EP Response dated Sep. 6, 2012 to the Official Communication dated Mar. 23, 2012, Application No. 05852180.8. 19 pages. |
EP Response to Official Communication dated Aug. 29, 2012, in EP Application No. 11168735.6, Includes New Claims (Clear and Highlighted Copies). 19 pages. |
EP Response to the Decision to Refuse European Patent Application of Nov. 14, 2012, dated Mar. 22, 2013 in EP Application No. 09 167 223.8. 71 pages. |
EP Response to the Official Communication of Jan. 31, 2012 and the telephone call with Mr. Wolff of Sep. 21, 2012, dated Sep. 24, 2012 in EP Application No. 09167223.8. 11 pages. |
EP Response dated Feb. 21, 2017 in Response to the Official Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Oct. 19, 2016 re: EP Appln. No. 11179126.5. 14 Pages. |
EP Submission dated Feb. 3, 2012 in Response to the Official Communication dated Jan. 31, 2012 re EP Application No. 09167223.8. 4 pages. |
EP Submission dated Jan. 15, 2014 in EP Application No. 07782931.5, Includes Auxiliary Request V (Clear and Highlighted copies). 9 pages. |
EP Submission dated Jul. 31, 2012 in EP Application No. 11179126.5. 1 page. |
EP Submission dated Jul. 31, 2012 in EP Application No. 11184627.5. 1 page. |
EP Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings dated Apr. 27, 2012 re EP Application No. 09167223.8. 1 page. |
EP Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings dated Aug. 17, 2015 in EP Application No. 11168734.9. 8 pages. |
EP Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings dated Aug. 17, 2015 in EP Application No. 11168736.4. 9 pages. |
EP Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings re EP Application No. 09167223.8 dated Jan. 31, 2012. 8 pages. |
Fairchild Semiconductor, “Design Optimization Techniques for Double Data Rate SDRAM Modules,” Jul. 2000. 6 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Jul. 7, 2010 re U.S. Appl. No. 12/392,071. 15 pages. |
First CN Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2009 in CN Application No. 200580045523.7. 5 pages. |
First EP Examination Report dated Oct. 5, 2009, re EP Application No. 07 782 931.5-1233. 5 pages. |
Fujisawa et al., “An 8.4ns Column-Access 1.3Gb/s/pin DDR3 SDRAM with an 8:4 Multiplexed Data-Transfer Scheme,” Feb. 7, 2006, IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, Session 8, DRAM and TCAM, 8.4. 10 pages. |
Fujitsu Limited, “Memory CMOS 8 x 256K x 32 Bit Double Data Rate FCRAM, MB81N643289-50/-60,” pp. 1-56, Fujitsu Semiconductor Data Sheet, Advance Info., AEO.5E. 57 pages. |
Garrett, Jr., Billy, U.S. Appl. No. 09/837,307, filed Apr. 17, 2007, re Application and Figures As Filed. 54 pages. |
Giacalone et al., “SP23.2: A 1MB, 100MHz Integrated L2 Cache Memory with 128b Interface and ECC Protection,” IEEE ISSCC, Feb. 1996, pp. 370-371/475. 3 pages. |
Hampel, Craig, U.S. Appl. No. 11/381,349, filed May 2, 2006, re Reply Brief in Response to Examiner's Answer dated Feb. 8, 2010. 6 pages. |
Hampel, Craig, U.S. Appl. No. 12/392,071, filed Feb. 24, 2009, re Office Action dated Feb. 17, 2011. 19 pages. |
Hampel, Craig, U.S. Appl. No. 11/381,349, filed May 2, 2006 re Information Disclosure Statement dated Jan. 25, 2011. 1 page. |
Hirose et al., “A 20-ns 4-Mb CMOS SRAM with Hierarchical Word Decoding Architecture,” IEEE, Oct. 1990, pp. 1068-1072, vol. 25, No. 5. 8 pages. |
IEEE 100 The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standards Terms, Seventh Edition. Critical piece first to Cross bar switch (p. 252). |
Information Disclosure Statement and RCE dated Sep. 29, 2010, re: U.S. Appl. No. 12/391,873. 5 pages. |
Information Disclosure Statement dated Jun. 17, 2011 re U.S. Appl. No. 13/019,785 includes Terminal Disclaimers. 14 Pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Chapter 1) dated Apr. 12, 2007, re International Application No. PCT/US2005/032770. 6 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Chapter I) dated Jun. 7, 2007, re International Application No. PCT/US2005/042722. 10 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Chapter II) dated Apr. 9, 2010 re Int'l. Application No. PCT/US07/67814. 7 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Apr. 9, 2010 re Int'l. Application No. PCT/US07/67814. 7 pages. |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2007/067814, dated Feb. 29, 2008. 18 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 26, 2006 in International Application No. PCT/US2005/032770. 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 4, 2006 in International Application No. PCT/US2005/028728. 5 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 10, 2006 in International Application No. PCT/US2005/042722. 15 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US/2005/032770, dated Jan. 26, 2006. 12 pages. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees from the International Searching Authority in International Application PCT/US2007/067814, dated Dec. 17, 2007. 8 pages. |
Jedec, “Minutes of Meeting No. 71, JC-42.3 Committee on RAM Memories,” including Proposal to Add Number of Banks Option to the Mode Register for 64M SDRAM, Joint Electron Device Engineering Council (JEDEC), May 25, 1994, New York, pp. 1-14 plus Attachment T. 8 pages. |
JP Office Action dated Dec. 7, 2012 in JP Application No. 2007-543517, Includes English Translation. 19 pages. |
JP Office Action dated Jun. 19, 2012 for JP Application No. 2009-510005. 6 Pages. (With Translation). |
JP Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2011 re JP Application No. 2007-543517. 18 pages. (With Translation). |
JP Response (Argument and Amendment) dated Jun. 7, 2013 in JP Application No. 2007-543517, Includes English Translation. 28 pages. |
JP Response dated Apr. 26, 2012 re JP Application No. 2007-543517. 9 pages. |
JP Response dated Apr. 26, 2012, re Argument and Amendment to the Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2011 in JP Application No. 2007-543517. 21 pages. (With Translation). |
JP Response dated Oct. 19, 2012 for Application No. 2009-510005 (100079108). 11 Pages. |
Kirihata et al., “A 390-mm2, 16-Bank, 1-Gb DDR SDRAM with Hybrid Bitline Architecture,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 34, No. 11, Nov. 1999, pp. 1580-1588. 10 pages. |
Koike et al., “SP23.1: A 60ns 1Mb Nonvolatile Ferroelectric Memory with Non-Driven Cell Plate Line Write/Read Scheme,” ISSCC, Feb. 10, 1996, pp. 368-379/475. 3 pages. |
Konishi et al., “Session XVIII: Static RAMs, FAM 18.6: A 64Kb CMOS RAM,” IEEE International Solid State Circuits Conference, Feb. 12, 1982, pp. 258-259. 3 pages. |
KR Office Action dated May 9, 2012 re KR Application No. 2007-7014584. 4 pages. (With Translation). |
KR Response (Argument and Amendment) dated May 31, 2013 in KR Application No. 2007-7014584, Includes English Translation of Argument and Claims. 133 pages. |
KR Response (Argument/Amendment) dated Jun. 18, 2012 in KR Application No. 10-2007-7014584. 123 pages. |
Malviya et al., “Module Threading Technique to Improve DRAM Power and Performance,” D&R Industry Articles, dated Mar. 11, 2011, Copyright 2009. 9 pages. |
Masumoto, Rodney T., “Configurable On-Chip RAM Incorporated Into High Speed Logic Array,” Proceedings of the IEEE 1985 Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, May 20-23, 1985, pp. 240-243. 6 pages. |
Micron Technology, Inc., “256Mb: x32 GDDR3 DRAM, MT44H8M32—2 MEG x 32 x 4 Banks,” GDDR3_1.fm-Rev A, Jun. 2003. 68 pages. |
Micron Technology, Inc., “Designing for High-Density DDR2 Memory,” Technical Note, TN-47-16, Rev. B., Dec. 2009. 10 pages. |
Micron Technology, Inc., “DRAM Data Book,” Preliminary 1997. 71 pages. |
Micron Technology, Inc., “Graphics DDR3 DRAM,” Advance, 256 Mb x 32 GDDR3 DRAM, © 2003, pp. 1-67. 67 pages. |
Micron Technology, Inc., “Micron Synchronous DRAM 128Mb: x32 SDRAM,” pp. 1-52, Rev. 9/00. 52 pages. |
Micron Technology, Inc., “Synchronous DRAM,” Rev. Apr. 1996. 43 pages. |
Minutes of Meeting No. 70, JC-42.3 Committee on RAM Memories, Mar. 9, 1994, Orlando, Florida. 41 pages. |
Nakamura et al., “FA14.2: A 29ns 64Mb DRAM with Hierarchical Array Architecture,” ISSCC, Feb. 1995, pp. 246-247/373. 3 pages. |
Nitta et al., “SP23.5: A 1.6GB/s Data-Rate 1Gb Synchronous DRAM with Hierarchical Square-Shaped Memory Block & Distributed Bank Architecture,” IEEE ISSCC Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 376-377, 477, Feb. 10, 1996. 3 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 1, 2010 re U.S. Appl. No. 12/392,071. 13 pages. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due dated Aug. 4, 2011 re U.S. Appl. No. 12/392,071. 22 pages. |
Nvidia Corporation, “GeForce3: Lightspeed Memory Architecture,” Technical Brief, pp. 1-9. 11 pages. |
Office Communication dated Mar. 29, 2010, re Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences Docketing Notice (Appeal No. 2010-005060). 2 pages. |
Official Communication with Extended European Search Report for EP Application No. 09167223.8-1233, dated Oct. 6, 2009. 8 pages. |
Rambus Inc., “Micro-Threading,” dated Apr. 3, 2011, found online at rambus.com/in/.../microthreading.html. 4 pages. |
Response dated Jan. 7, 2011 to the Notice of Appeal filed Oct. 7, 2010 re U.S. Appl. No. 12/392,071, Includes Request for Continued Examination. 15 pages. |
Response dated May 17, 2011 to the Office Action dated Feb. 17, 2011 re U.S. Appl. No. 12/392,071. 26 pages. |
Response to Office Action of May 5, 2009, dated Oct. 5, 2009, re U.S. Appl. No. 11/767,863, filed Jun. 25, 2007. 20 pages. |
Response to the Official Communication dated Jan. 31, 2012 (Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings), dated Aug. 28, 2012 in EP Application No. 09167223.8. 55 pages. |
Saeki et al., “SP 23.4: A 2.5 ns Clock Access 250MHz 256Mb SDRAM with a Synchronous Mirror Delay,” IEEE ISSCC Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 374-375, 476, Feb. 10, 1996. 3 pages. |
Sakata et al., “Two-Dimensional Power-Line Selection Scheme for Low Subthreshold-Current Multi-Gigabit DRAM's,” IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, vol. 29, No. 8, Aug. 1994, pp. 887-893. 9 pages. |
Samsung Electronics, “SDRAM Device Operations,” 1999. 42 pages. |
Satoh et al., “A 209K-Transistor ECL Gate Array with RAM,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 24, No. 5, Oct. 1989, pp. 1275-1281. 7 pages. |
Schuette, Michael, “Rambus/Kingston Threaded DDR3 Modules,” dated Oct. 8, 2009, last updated Oct. 24, 2009. 8 pages. |
Standards Information Network, IEEE Press, “The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standards Terms,” Copyright 2000, IEEE 100, Seventh Edition, p. 252. 2 pages. |
Sugibayashi et al., “A 30-ns 256-Mb DRAM with a Multidivided Array Structure,” IEEE, Nov. 1993, pp. 1092-1098, vol. 28, No. 11. 8 pages. |
Sugibayashi et al., “WP3.5: A 30ns 256Mb DRAM with Multi-Divided Array Structure,” ISSCC Feb. 1993, pp. 50-51/262. 3 pages. |
Takase et al., “A 1.6-Gbyte/s DRAM with Flexible Mapping Redundancy Technique and Additional Refresh Scheme,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 34, No. 11, Nov. 1999, pp. 1600-1606. 7 pages. |
Takase et al., “WP 24.1 A 1.6GB/S DRAM with Flexible Mapping Redundancy Technique and Additional Refresh Scheme,” ISSCC99/Session 24/Paper, Toshiba Corp., WP 24.1, Feb. 17, 1999. 2 pages. |
Takase et al., “WP 24.1: A 1.6GB/s DRAM with Flexible Mapping Redundancy Technique and Additional Refresh Scheme,” IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, 1999. 8 pages. |
Ware et al., “Micro-threaded Row and Column Operations in a DRAM Core,” Rambus White Paper, Mar. 2005. 7 pages. |
Ware et al., U.S. Appl. No. 12/391,873, filed Feb. 24, 2009, re Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due dated Aug. 31, 2010. 10 pages. |
Ware et al., U.S. Appl. No. 12/391,873, filed Feb. 24, 2009, re Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due dated Nov. 3, 2010. 11 pages. |
Ware et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/019,785, filed Feb. 2, 2011, re Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due dated Jun. 29, 2011. 14 pages. |
Ware, Frederick A., “Direct RDRAM 256/288-Mbit (512Kx16/18x32s) Data Sheet,” Preliminary Information, Rambus Inc., Document DL0060 Version 0.90, 1999, pp. 1-66. 66 pages. |
Ware, Frederick re U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,846, filed Nov. 15, 2011 re Information Disclosure Statement submitted Nov. 17, 2011. 7 Pages. |
Ware, Frederick re U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,846, filed Nov. 15, 2011 re Information Disclosure Statement submitted Sep. 22, 2011. 9 Pages. |
Ware, Frederick, U.S. Appl. No. 10/998,402, filed Nov. 29, 2004, re Amendment dated Feb. 2, 2011. 1 page. |
Ware, Frederick, U.S. Appl. No. 10/998,402, filed Nov. 29, 2004, re Amendment dated Jan. 11, 2011. 10 pages. |
Ware, Frederick, U.S. Appl. No. 10/998,402, filed Nov. 29, 2004, re Amendment/Response to Office Action submitted Aug. 4, 2011. 12 pages. |
Ware, Frederick, U.S. Appl. No. 10/998,402, filed Nov. 29, 2004, re Appeal Brief dated Apr. 6, 2010. 28 pages. |
Ware, Frederick, U.S. Appl. No. 10/998,402, filed Nov. 29, 2004, re Corrected Response submitted Feb. 22, 2012 to the Office Action dated Nov. 23, 2011. 17 pages. |
Ware, Frederick, U.S. Appl. No. 10/998,402, filed Nov. 29, 2004, re Final Office Action dated Nov. 23, 2011. 33 pages. |
Ware, Frederick, U.S. Appl. No. 10/998,402, filed Nov. 29, 2004, re Notice of Appeal dated Oct. 11, 2010. 1 page. |
Ware, Frederick, U.S. Appl. No. 10/998,402, filed Nov. 29, 2004, re Office Action dated Feb. 8, 2011. 3 pages. |
Ware, Frederick, U.S. Appl. No. 10/998,402, filed Nov. 29, 2004, re Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2010. 17 pages. |
Ware, Frederick, U.S. Appl. No. 10/998,402, filed Nov. 29, 2004, re Office Action dated Mar. 11, 2011. 37 pages. |
Ware, Frederick, U.S. Appl. No. 10/998,402, filed Nov. 29, 2004, re Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2012. 36 pages. |
Ware, Frederick, U.S. Appl. No. 10/998,402, filed Nov. 29, 2004, re Response submitted Feb. 22, 2012 to the Office Action dated Nov. 23, 2011, Includes Request for Continued Examination. 21 pages. |
Ware, Frederick, U.S. Appl. No. 10/998,402, filed Nov. 29, 2004 re Information Disclosure Statement mailed Jan. 11, 2011. 3 Pages. |
Ware, Frederick, U.S. Appl. No. 10/998,402, filed Nov. 29, 2004 re Supplemental Information Disclosure Statement mailed Apr. 5, 2010. 3 Pages. |
Ware, Frederick, U.S. Appl. No. 11/767,863, filed Jun. 25, 2007, re Final Office Action dated Mar. 1, 2010. 17 pages. |
Ware, Frederick, U.S. Appl. No. 11/767,863, filed Jun. 25, 2007, re Final Office Action dated Nov. 25, 2011. 30 pages. |
Ware, Frederick, U.S. Appl. No. 11/767,863, filed Jun. 25, 2007, re Notice of Appeal from the Examiner to The Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences dated Jul. 30, 2010. 1 page. |
Ware, Frederick, U.S. Appl. No. 11/767,863, filed Jun. 25, 2007, re Office Action dated Apr. 7, 2010. 3 pages. |
Ware, Frederick, U.S. Appl. No. 11/767,863, filed Jun. 25, 2007, re Office Action dated Mar. 10, 2011. 23 pages. |
Ware, Frederick, U.S. Appl. No. 11/767,863, filed Jun. 25, 2007, re Office Action dated Mar. 22, 2012. 34 pages. |
Ware, Frederick, U.S. Appl. No. 11/767,863, filed Jun. 25, 2007, re Response to Notice of Appeal submitted Dec. 24, 2010. 18 pages. |
Ware, Frederick, U.S. Appl. No. 11/767,863, filed Jun. 25, 2007, re Response to Office Action dated Mar. 10, 2011. 15 pages. |
Ware, Frederick, U.S. Appl. No. 11/767,863, filed Jun. 25, 2007 re Information Disclosure Statement mailed Jan. 11, 2011. 3 Pages. |
Ware, Frederick, U.S. Appl. No. 11/767,863, filed Jun. 25, 2007, re Response After Final Office Action dated Mar. 24, 2010. 15 pages. |
Ware, Frederick, U.S. Appl. No. 13/019,785, filed Feb. 2, 2011, re Response dated Mar. 12, 2011 to the Office Action dated Feb. 16, 2011, Includes Replacement Figures. 5 pages. |
Ware, Frederick, U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,846, filed Nov. 15, 2011, re Preliminary Amendment submitted Nov. 16, 2011, Includes Terminal Disclaimer(s). 19 pages. |
Ware, Frederick, U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,846, filed Sep. 22, 2011, re Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Jan. 17, 2012. 5 pages. |
Ware, Frederick, U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,846, filed Sep. 22, 2011, re Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due dated Dec. 6, 2011. 47 pages. |
Yamashita et al., “FA 15.2: A 3.84 GIPS Integrated Memory Array Processor LSI with 64 Processing Elements and 2-Mb SRAM,” IEEE International Solid-State Circuit Conference, pp. 260-261, Feb. 1994. 3 pages. |
Yoo et al., “17.7: A 1.8V 700Mb/s/pin 512Mb DDR-II SDRAM with On-Die Termination and Off-Chip Driver Calibration”, ISSCC, Feb. 2003, pp. 312-313, 495, 250-251, 535. 6 pages. |
Yoo et al., “A 150 MHZ 8-Banks 256M Synchronous DRAM with Wave Pipelining Methods,” IEEE ISSCC, Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 250-251, 374, Feb. 17, 1995. 3 pages. |
Yoo et al., “SP23.6 A 32-Bank 1Gb DRAM with 1GB/S Bandwidth,” ISSCC, Feb. 1996, pp. 378-379/477. 3 pages. |
Yoon et al., “A 2.5V 333Mb/pin 1Gb Double Data Rate SDRAM,” ISSCC Digest of Technical Papers, Feb. 17, 1999. 11 pages. |
Zhao et al., “TA 11.6: An 18Mb, 12.3GB/S CMOS Pipeline-Burst Cache SRAM with 1.54Gb/pin,” IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, 1999. 10 pages. |
Zheng et al., “Decoupled DIMM: Building High-Bandwidth Memory System Using Low-Speed DRAM Devices,” ISCA '09, dated Jun. 20-24, 2009. 12 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210049115 A1 | Feb 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16223031 | Dec 2018 | US |
Child | 17009102 | US | |
Parent | 15665284 | Jul 2017 | US |
Child | 16223031 | US | |
Parent | 15295723 | Oct 2016 | US |
Child | 15665284 | US | |
Parent | 11381349 | May 2006 | US |
Child | 15295723 | US |