Method and apparatus for uniform electroplating of integrated circuits using a variable field shaping element

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6402923
  • Patent Number
    6,402,923
  • Date Filed
    Monday, March 27, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 11, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
An electrochemical reactor is used to electrofill damascene architecture for integrated circuits. A shield is used to screen the applied field during electroplating operations to compensate for potential drop along the radius of a wafer. The shield establishes an inverse potential drop in the electrolytic fluid to overcome the resistance of a thin film seed layer of copper on the wafer.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The present invention pertains to the field of electrochemical reactors and, particularly, to their use in electroplating metal films on wafers for use in making integrated circuits. More specifically, a specialized mask or shield is used to vary the electric field at the wafer during the electroplating operation to increase a uniformity of thickness in the layer being deposited.




2. Statement of the Problem




Integrated circuits are formed on wafers by well known processes and materials. These processes typically include the deposition of thin film layers by sputtering, metal-organic decomposition, chemical vapor deposition, plasma vapor deposition, and other techniques. These layers are processed by a variety of well known etching technologies and subsequent deposition steps to provide a completed integrated circuit.




A crucial component of integrated circuits is the wiring or metalization layer that interconnects the individual circuits. Conventional metal deposition techniques include physical vapor deposition, e.g., sputtering and evaporation, and chemical vapor deposition techniques. Some integrated circuit manufacturers are investigating electrodeposition techniques to deposit primary conductor films on semiconductor substrates.




Wiring layers have traditionally been made of aluminum and a plurality of other metal layers that are compatible with the aluminum. In 1997, IBM introduced technology that facilitated a transition from aluminum to copper wiring layers. This technology has demanded corresponding changes in process architecture towards damascene and dual damascene architecture, as well as new process technologies.




Copper damascene circuits are produced by initially forming trenches and other embedded features in a wafer, as needed for circuit architecture. These trenches and embedded features are formed by conventional photolithographic processes. A barrier layer, e.g., of tantalum or tantalum nitride, is next deposited. An initial seed or strike layer of copper about 125 nm thick is then deposited by a conventional vapor deposition technique. Thickness of this seed layer may vary and it is typically a thin conductive layer of copper or tungsten. The seed layer is used as a base layer to conduct current for electroplating thicker films. The seed layer functions as the cathode of the electroplating cell as it carries electrical current between the edge of the wafer and the center of the wafer including fill of embedded structures, trenches or vias. The final electrodeposited thick film should completely fill the embedded structures, and it should have a uniform thickness across the surface of the wafer.




Generally, in electroplating processes, the thickness profile of the deposited metal is controlled to be as uniform as possible. This uniform profile is advantageous in subsequent etchback or polish removal steps. Prior art electroplating techniques are susceptible to thickness irregularities. Contributing factors to these irregularities are recognized to include the size and shape of the electroplating cell, electrolyte depletion effects, hot edge effects and the terminal effect and feature density.




The seed layer initially has a significant resistance radially from the edge to the center of the wafer because the seed layer is initially very thin. This resistance causes a corresponding potential drop from the edge where electrical contact is made to the center of the wafer. These effects are reported in L. A. Gochberg, “Modeling of Uniformity and 300-mm Scale-up in a Copper Electroplating Tool”,


Proceedings of the Electrochemical Society


(Fall 1999, Honolulu Hawaii); and E. K. Broadbent, E. J. McInerney, L. C. Gochberg, and R. L. Jackson, “Experimental and Analytical Study of Seed Layer Resistance for Copper Damascene Electroplating”,


Vac. Sci.


&


Technol.


B17, 2584 (November/December 1999). Thus, the seed layer has a nonuniform initial potential that is more negative at the edge of the wafer. The associated deposition rate tends to be greater at the wafer edge relative to the interior of the wafer. This effect is known as the ‘terminal effect.’




One solution to the end effect would be to deposit a thicker seed layer having less potential drop from the center of the wafer to the edge, however, thickness uniformity of the final metal layer is also impaired if the seed layer is too thick. Another alternative is to have a seed layer that is thicker in the center than at the edge. However, necking of the seed layer in the thicker area may cause filling problems.

FIG. 1

shows a prior art seed layer


100


made of copper formed atop barrier layer


102


and a dielectric wafer


104


. A trench or via


106


has been cut into wafer


104


. Seed layer


100


thickens in mouth region


108


with thinning towards bottom region


110


. The thickness of seed layer


100


is a limiting factor on the ability of this layer to conduct electricity in the amounts that are required for electroplating operations. Thus, during electrodeposition, the relatively thick area of seed layer


100


at mouth region


108


can grow more rapidly than does the relatively thin bottom region


110


with the resultant formation of a void or pocket in the area of bottom region


110


once mouth region


108


is sealed. This is particularly true when bottom-up filling chemistries are not employed or other mitigating factors prevent bottom-up filling chemistries from producing void-free features.





FIG. 2

shows an ideal seed layer


200


made of copper formed atop barrier layer


202


and a dielectric wafer


204


. A trench or via


206


has been cut into wafer


204


. Ideal seed layer


200


has three important properties:




1. Good uniformity in thickness and quality across the entire horizontal surface


208


of wafer


204


;




2. Excellent step coverage exists in via


206


consisting of continuous conformal amounts of metal deposited onto the sidewalls; and




3. In contrast to

FIG. 1

, there is minimal necking in the mouth region


210


. It is difficult or impossible to obtain these properties in seed layers having a thickness greater than about 120 nm to 130 nm over features smaller than 0.15 μm.




The electroplating of a thicker copper layer should begin with a layer that approximates the ideal seed layer


200


shown in FIG.


2


. The electroplating process will exacerbate any problems that exist with the initial seed layer due to increased deposition rates in thicker areas that are better able to conduct electricity. The electroplating process must be properly controlled or else thickness of the layer will not be uniform, there will develop poor step coverage, and necking of embedded structures can lead to the formation of gaps of pockets in the embedded structure.




A significant part of the electroplating process is the electrofilling of embedded structures. The ability to electrofill small, high aspect ratio features without voids or seams is a function of many parameters. These parameters include the plating chemistry; the shape of the feature including the width, depth, and pattern density; local seed layer thickness; local seed layer coverage; and local plating current. Due to the requisite thinness of the seed layers, a significant potential difference exists between the metal phase potential at the center of a wafer and the metal phase potential at the edges of a wafer. Poor sidewall coverage in embedded structures, such as trench


106


in

FIG. 1

, develops higher average resistivity for current traveling in a direction that is normal to the trench. See S. Meyer et al., “Integration of Copper PVD and Electroplating for Damascene Feature Electrofilling”


Proceeding of Electrochemical Society, Session on Interconnects


&


Contact Metallization Symposium


(Fall 1999, Honolulu Hawaii). Due to these factors in combination, there is a finite range of current densities over which electrofilling can be performed. If the electrical resistivity is too large in the metal phase, it may be impossible to fill a structure at the wafer center without using the present invention.




Manufacturing demands are trending towards circumstances that operate against the goal of global electrofilling of embedded structures and thickness uniformity. Industry trends are towards thinner seed films, larger diameter wafers, increased pattern densities, and increased aspect ratio of circuit features. The trend towards thinner seed layers is required to compensate for an increased percentage of necking in smaller structures, as compared to larger ones. For example,

FIG. 3

shows a comparison between etched versus seeded features for a Novellus Systems Inc. HCM PVD process. A 45° line is drawn to show no necking, but the data shows necking as the seeded feature width rolls downward in the range from 0.3 μm to 0.15 μm.




Regarding the trend towards larger diameter wafers, it is generally understood that the deposition rate, as measured by layer thickness, can be maintained by scaling total current through the electrochemical reactor in proportion to the increased surface area of the larger wafer. Thus, a 300 mm wafer requires 2.25 times more current than does a 200 mm wafer. Electroplating operations are normally performed by using a clamshell wafer holder that contacts the wafer only at its outer radius. Due to this mechanical arrangement, the total resistance from the edge of the wafer to the center of the wafer is independent of the radius. Nevertheless, with the higher applied current at the edge of the larger wafer, which is required to maintain the same current density for process uniformity, the total potential drop from the edge to the center of the wafer is greater for the larger diameter wafer. This circumstance leads to an increased rate of deposition (layer thickness) with radius. While the problem of increasing deposition rate with radius exists for all wafers, it is exacerbated in the case of larger wafers. At sufficiently large wafer sizes, the difference in current density at the center versus the edge will lead to incomplete fill at one of those locations.




U.S. Pat. No. 4,469,566 to Wray teaches electroplating of a paramagnetic layer with use of dual rotating masks each having aligned aperture slots. Each mask is closely aligned with a corresponding anode or cathode. The alternating field exposure provides a burst of nucleation energy followed by reduced energy for a curdling effect. The respective masks and the drive mechanism are incapable of varying the distance between each mask and its corresponding anode or cathode, and they also are incapable of varying the mask surface area of their corresponding anode or cathode.




U.S. Pat. No. 5,804,052 to Schneider teaches the use of rotating roller-shaped bipolar electrodes that roll without short circuit across the surface being treated in the manner of a wiper.




None of the aforementioned patents or articles overcome the special problems of electroplating metal films for use in integrated circuits or more generally, where the electrical resistance in an underlying conductive layer changes as the layer grows and where the deposited film thickness must be uniform. There exists a need to compensate the potential drop in the seed layer to facilitate uniform electroplating and electrofilling of metalization or wiring layers for integrated circuits.




Solution




The present invention overcomes the problems that are outlined above by providing a time variable field shaping element, i.e., a mask or shield, that is placed in the electrochemical reactor to compensate for the potential drop in the seed layer. The shield compensates for this potential drop in the seed layer by shaping an inverse resistance drop in the electrolyte to achieve a uniform current distribution.




Method and apparatus of the invention involves an electrochemical reactor having a variable field-shaping capability for use in electroplating of integrated circuits. The electrochemical reactor includes a reservoir that retains an electrolytic fluid. A cathode and an anode are disposed in the reservoir to provide an electrical pathway through the electrolytic fluid. A wafer-holder contracts one of the anode and the cathode. A selectively actuatable shield is positioned in the electrical pathway between the cathode and the anode for varying an electric field around the wafer-holder during electroplating operations.




The shield can have many forms. A mechanical iris may be used to change the size of the aperture or a strip having different sizes of apertures may be shifted to vary the size of aperture that is aligned with the wafer. The shield may be raised and lowered to vary a distance that separates the shield from the wafer. The wafer or the shield may be rotated to average field inconsistencies that are presented to the wafer. The shield may have a wedge shape that screens a portion of the wafer from an applied field as the wafer rotates. The shield may also be tilted to present more or less surface area for screening effect.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

depicts a prior art seed layer deposited on a wafer to form an undesirable necked feature at the mouth of a trench;





FIG. 2

depicts an ideal seed layer that is deposited to provide uniform coverage across a trench feature, as well as on the surface of the wafer;





FIG. 3

shows data from a HCM PVD process demonstrating rolloff in a comparison between etched feature width and seeded feature width that indicates necking as a percentage of feature width increases as the etched feature width decreases;





FIG. 4

depicts a first embodiment of an electrochemical reactor according to the present invention where the shield is constructed as a mechanical iris;





FIG. 5

depicts a second embodiment of an electrochemical reactor according to the present invention where the shield is constructed as a wedge having a three dimensional range of motion; and





FIG. 6

depicts a second embodiment of an electrochemical reactor according to the present invention where the shield is constructed as a wedge that may be tilted and rotated.





FIG. 7

depicts yet another electrochemical cell having a shield formed as a semi-iris or bat-wing configuration; and





FIG. 8

is a plot of normalized area of a wafer covered by the shield shown in FIG.


7


.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




Mechanical Iris Embodiment





FIG.4

depicts an electrochemical reactor


400


according to a first embodiment of the present invention. A reservoir


402


contains a conventional electrolytic fluid or electroplating bath


404


. An anode


406


and a cathode


408


establish an electrical pathway


410


through the electrolytic fluid


404


. The anode is typically made of the metal being plated, which is compatible with the electrolytic fluid


404


and is preferably copper for purposes of the invention. It can also be composed of a nonreactive or dimensionally stable anode, such as Pt, Ti, or other materials known in the art. As shown in

FIG. 4

, cathode


408


is formed as a clamshell holding device that retains wafer


412


by placing the wafer in electrical contact with cathode-wafer holder


408


only at the outer radius


414


of wafer


412


. The anode/wafer holder


408


also rotates as a turntable by the action of a mechanical drive mechanism M in preferred embodiments for the purpose of averaging field variances that are presented to the wafer


412


during electroplating operations. The concept of shielding a wafer during electrodeposition is also disclosed in application Ser. No. 08/968,814, which is incorporated by reference to the same extent as though fully disclosed herein.




Wafer


412


may be any semiconducting or dielectric wafer, such as silicon, silicon-germanium, ruby, quartz, sapphire, and gallium arsenide. Prior to electroplating, wafer


412


is preferably a silicon wafer having a copper seed layer


200


atop a Ta or Ti nitride barrier layer


202


with embedded features


206


, as shown in FIG.


2


.




A mechanical shield


416


is placed in electrical pathway


410


. This particular shield


416


presents a circular iris or aperture


418


. The structural components for the manufacture of mechanical shield


414


, as well as its method of operation, are known in the art of camera manufacturing where a plurality of overlapping elongated elements (not depicted in

FIG. 4

) are interconnected to form a substantially circular central opening that varies depending upon the azimuthal orientation of the respective elongated elements. Shield


416


is made of materials that resist attack by the electrolytic fluid


404


. These materials are preferably high dielectrics or a composite material including a coating of a high dielectric to prevent electroplating of metal onto the shield


416


due to the induced variation in potential with position of the shield within the bath. Plastics may be used including polypropylene, polyethylene, and fluoro-polymers, especially polyvinylidine fluoride.




A plurality of field lines


420




a


,


420




b


, and


420




c


show the mechanism that shield


416


uses to compensate for the radial drop in potential across the surface of wafer


412


along radial vector


422


. Due to the fact that shield


416


prevents the passage of current along electrical pathway


410


except through iris


418


, the field lines


420




a


-


420




c


curve towards outer radius


414


to provide an inverse potential drop in electrolytic fluid


404


compensating for the potential drop along radial vector


422


. Thus, the current is concentrated at the center of the wafer, which is in vertical alignment with iris


418


. The potential drop along radial vector


422


changes with time as the copper plating on wafer


412


increases in thickness. The increased thickness reduces the total potential drop in the copper following radial vector


422


.




There is a corresponding need to move or change the shape of shield


416


in a continuous manner to offset the variable potential drop along radial vector


422


. This movement can be accomplished by two mechanisms that are implemented by a controller


424


and a central processor


426


. According to a first mechanism, controller


422


increases the diameter D


2


of iris


418


to provide a more direct route to the wafer with less curvature of field lines


420




a-c


along electrical pathway


410


. According to a second mechanism, controller


424


injects a neutral pressurized gas from a source P into reservoir


402


. Shield


416


contains an air bladder or trapped bubbles (not depicted in

FIG. 4

) that withstand a reduction in volume due to the increase in pressure. Shield


414


loses buoyancy and, consequently, falls relative to wafer


412


with an increase in dimension


425


separating wafer


412


from shield


416


. The increase in dimension


425


requires field lines


420




a


-


420




c


to bend less sharply before contacting wafer


412


with the corresponding effect of concentrating less current at the center of wafer


412


. Alternatively, a mechanical drive mechanism (not depicted in

FIG. 4

) may be used to raise and lower shield


412


to vary the dimension


425


separating shield


416


from wafer


412


.




The Electroplating Bath


404






The electroplating bath


404


is a conventional bath that typically contains the metal to be plated together with associated anions in an acidic solution. Copper electroplating is usually performed using a solution of CuSO


4


dissolved in an aqueous solution of sulfuric acid. In addition to these major constituents of the electroplating bath


404


, it is common for the bath to contain several additives, which are any type of compound added to the plating bath to change the plating behavior. These additives are typically, but not exclusively, organic compounds that are added in low concentrations ranging from 20 ppm to 400 ppm.




Three types of electroplating bath additives are in common use, subject to design choice by those skilled in the art. Suppressor additives retard the plating reaction and increase the polarization of the cell. Typical suppressors are large molecules having a polar center such as an ionic end group, e.g., a surfactant. These molecules increase the surface polarization layerand prevent copper ion from readily adsorbing onto the surface. Thus, suppressors function as blockers. Suppressors cause the resistance of the surface to be very high in relation to the electroplating bath. Trace levels of chloride ion may be required for suppressors to be effective.




Accelerator additives are normally catalysts that accelerate the plating reaction. Accelerators may be rather small molecules that perhaps contain sulphur, and they need not be ionic. Accelerators adsorb onto the surface and increase the flow of current. Accelerators may occur not as the species directly added tot he electroplating bath, but as breakdown products of such molecules. In either case, the net effect of accelerators is to increase current flow and accelerate the reaction when such species are present or become present through chemical breakdown.




Levelers behave like suppressors but tend to be more electrochemically active (i.e., are more easily electrochemically transformed) than suppressors typically being consumed during electroplating. Levelers also tend to accelerate plating on depressed regions of the surface undergoing plating, thus, tending to level the plated surface.




Wedge Shield Embodiment





FIG. 5

depicts a second embodiment of the invention including an electrochemical reactor


500


. Electrochemical reactor


500


is identical to electrochemical reactor


400


, except for differences between a wedge-shaped shield


502


and iris shield


414


(see FIG.


4


). For simplicity in

FIG. 5

, only wedge-shaped shield


502


is depicted in relationship to wafer


412


from a bottom view on electrical pathway


410


. Wedge-shaped shield is formed as an isosceles triangle presenting an angle θ towards the central portion of wafer


412


. A pair of stepper motor-driven screw assemblies


504


and


506


are actuated by controller


424


to impart X and Y motion to wedge-shaped shield


502


. Thus, a relatively larger or relatively smaller surface area of wafer


412


is screened from the applied field by X-Y motion of wedge-shaped shield


502


. A third stepper motor-screw assembly (not depicted in

FIG. 4

) may be provided to impart a Z range of motion in a third dimension.




Tilted Wedge Shaped Shield





FIG. 6

depicts a third embodiment of the invention including an electrochemical reactor


600


from a side elevational view. Electrochemical reactor


600


is identical to electrochemical reactor


400


, except for differences between a wedge-shaped shield


602


and wedge-shaped shield


502


. Wedge-shaped shield


602


differs from wedge-shaped shield


502


because wedge-shaped shield


602


is canted at an angle φ determined with respect to a line


602


running parallel to a chord taken across wafer


412


. Wedge-shaped shield


602


may also be rotated at an angle a about an axis


604


to vary the surface area that is presented to wafer


412


.




Semi-Iris Shield




The shields may take on any shape including that of bars, circles, elipses and other geometric designs.

FIG. 7

depicts an electrochemical reactor


700


that is identical to electrochemical reactor


400


, except for differences between the shields.

FIG. 7

is a bottom view of cell


700


including a wafer


701


, which functions as the cell cathode and is masked with shields


702


,


704


,


706


,


707


and


708


respectively having pairs of curved sides


710


,


712


,


714


,


716


,


718


, and


720


extending from the center of the wafer


701


to the edges of the wafer


701


. The curved sides


710


and


720


have a radius of curvature of about six inches. The curved sides


710


and


720


each have an inner end


722


that, as depicted, is aligned with the center of the wafer


701


, but may be shifted in any radial or vertical direction, e.g., to radial distances A


1


through A


10


. The outer ends


724


and


726


of the curved sides


710


and


720


are aligned with the radially outboard edge of wafer


701


. The line connecting to the inner end


722


and the outer end


724


of the curved side


710


and the line connecting to the inner end


722


and the outer end


726


of the curved side


720


form an angle of about 180°.




The curved sides


712


and


718


have a radius of curvature of about 8.4 inches for a 200 mm wafer. The curved sides


712


and


718


have inner and outer ends similar to the inner and center ends of the curved sides


710


and


720


except that the lines connecting the inner end and the outer end of each curved side form an angle of about 90°. The curved sides


714


and


716


have a radius of curvature of about 14.4 inches. Similarly, for the curved sides


714


and


716


, the lines connecting the inner end and the outer end of each curved side form an angle of about 60°. Shields having this type of shape are referred to herein as semi iris arc shields with curved sides.





FIG. 8

depicts a plot of normalized unmasked surface area on wafer


701


with various shields installed including no shield; shields


702


and


708


in combination; shields


702


,


708


,


704


and


706


in combination; and shields


702


,


708


,


704


,


706


and


707


in combination. The curves show that the percentage of masked surface area as a function of distance from the center of the wafer


701


has a parabolic shape, which can be selectively configured to compensate for nonlinear current drop in thin films on the face of wafer


701


.




The shields that are shown and described in

FIGS. 4-7

may be used alone or in combination. For example, multiple iris shields like shield


414


of

FIG. 4

may be stacked in succession along electrical pathway


410


, or shield


414


may be stacked in succession with shield


502


and shield


602


.




Those skilled in the art will understand that the preferred embodiments described above may be subjected to apparent modifications without departing from the true scope and spirit of the invention. The inventors, accordingly, hereby state their intention to rely upon the Doctrine of Equivalents, in order to protect their full rights in the invention.



Claims
  • 1. An electrochemical reactor having a variable field-shaping capability for use in electroplating thin films, comprising:a reservoir operably configured to retain an electrolytic fluid; a cathode and an anode disposed in said reservoir to provide an electrical pathway through electrolytic fluid when said electrolytic fluid is present in said reservoir; at least one of said cathode and said anode including a wafer-holder; a shield positioned in said electrical pathway between said cathode and said anode and operably configured for shielding a surface area on a wafer in said wafer-holder when said wafer is held in said wafer-holder during electroplating operations, said shield including means, operable during electroplating operations, for selectively varying a parameter selected from the group consisting of a quantity of shielded surface area, a distance separating said shield from a wafer in said wafer holder, and combinations thereof.
  • 2. The electrochemical reactor as set forth in claim 1 wherein said means for selectively varying a parameter includes a shield having an aperture and means for changing a size of said aperture.
  • 3. The electrochemical reactor as set forth in claim 2 wherein said means for changing a size of said aperture includes a mechanical iris defining said aperture.
  • 4. The electrochemical reactor as set forth in claim 2 wherein said means for changing a size of said aperture includes a strip having a plurality of different size openings.
  • 5. The electrochemical reactor as set forth in claim 1 wherein said means for selectively varying a parameter includes means for shifting said shield along said electrical pathway to vary a distance separating said wafer holder and said shield.
  • 6. The electrochemical reactor as set forth in claim 5 wherein said means for shifting said shield along said electrical pathway to vary a distance between said wafer holder and said shield includes a stepper motor-actuated screw assembly.
  • 7. The electrochemical reactor as set forth in claim 1 including means for rotating said wafer holder.
  • 8. The electrochemical reactor as set forth in claim 1 wherein said means for selectively varying a parameter includes a wedge shield.
  • 9. The electrochemical reactor as set forth in claim 8 including means for varying a position of said wedge shield with respect to said wafer holder.
  • 10. The electrochemical reactor as set forth in claim 9 wherein said means for varying a position of said wedge shield with respect to said wafer holder includes means for varying a coordinate selected from the group consisting of X coordinates, Y coordinates, Z coordinates, and combinations thereof.
  • 11. The electrochemical reactor as set forth in claim 9 wherein said means for varying a position of said wedge shield with respect to said wafer holder includes means for varying an angle of said wedge shield relative to said wafer holder.
  • 12. The electrochemical reactor as set forth in claim 1 including a computer operably configured to control operation of said means for selectively varying said parameter to provide a uniform deposition rate across a wafer in said wafer holder.
  • 13. The electrochemical reactor as set forth in claim 12 wherein said computer is configured to actuate said means for selectively varying said parameter responsive to changes in current density at said wafer holder.
  • 14. The electrochemical reactor as set forth in claim 13 wherein said computer is operably configured to actuate said means for selectively varying said parameter to provide a substantially constant current density across a wafer in said wafer holder.
  • 15. A method of electroplating films for use in integrated circuits through an electrochemical reactor having a variable field-shaping capability, said method comprising the steps of:placing a wafer in electrical contact with one of a cathode and an anode in an electrochemical reactor; conducting electricity through an electrolytic fluid between said cathode and said anode for electroplating a film onto said wafer; and actuating a shield to vary an electric field around said wafer holder during electroplating operations, wherein said step of actuating a shield includes actuating said shield during electroplating operations to vary a parameter selected from the group consisting of a quantity of shielded surface area, a distance separating said means for selectively masking a surface area from a wafer in said wafer holder, and combinations thereof.
  • 16. The method according to claim 15 wherein said shield has an aperture and said step of actuating said shield includes changing a size of said aperture to vary said quantity of shielded surface area.
  • 17. The method according to claim 16 wherein a mechanical iris defines said aperture and said step of changing said size of said aperture includes actuating said mechanical iris.
  • 18. The method according to claim 16 wherein said shield is a shiftable strip having a plurality of different size openings and said step of changing a size of said aperture includes shifting said strip relative to said wafer.
  • 19. The method according to claim 15 wherein said step of actuating said shield includes shifting said shield to vary a distance between said wafer holder and said shield.
  • 20. The method according to claim 15 including a step of rotating said wafer relative to said shield during electroplating operations.
  • 21. The method according to claim 15 wherein said step of actuating said shield includes actuating a wedge shield.
  • 22. The method according to claim 21 wherein said step of actuating said wedge shield includes varying a coordinate of said wedge shield selected form the group consisting of X coordinates, Y coordinates, Z coordinates, and combinations thereof, concomitant with rotation of said wafer.
  • 23. The method according to claim 22 wherein said step of means varying a position of said wedge shield with respect to said wafer holder includes varying an angle of said wedge shield.
  • 24. The method according to claim 15 wherein said step of actuating said shield is performed responsive to changes in current density at said wafer holder.
  • 25. The method according to claim 24 wherein said step of actuating said shield is performed to provide a substantially constant current density at said wafer holder.
US Referenced Citations (6)
Number Name Date Kind
3437578 Gibbs et al. Apr 1969 A
4469566 Wray Sep 1984 A
5804052 Schneider Sep 1998 A
6033540 Kosaki et al. May 2000 A
6132805 Moslehi Oct 2000 A
6179983 Reid et al. Jan 2001 B1