Method and system for at speed diagnostics and bit fail mapping

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6629281
  • Patent Number
    6,629,281
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, September 26, 2000
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 30, 2003
    20 years ago
Abstract
This invention describes a method and apparatus, contained within an integrated circuit, for isolating failure by precisely controlling the number of clocks applied during built-in self-test (BIST). A programmable clock counter, on the integrated circuit, stores a specified number of clock cycles and sends a signal to stop a BIST engine once the specified number of clock cycles have been generated. The intermediate results can then be mapped bit by bit in order to isolate the cause of failure.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The invention relates to testing integrated circuits, and, more particularly, to a method and apparatus for isolating failure by precisely controlling the number of clocks applied during built-in self-test (BIST).




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Built-in self-test (BIST) is used to test the memory arrays and logic circuits that are contained in high-end processors. BIST allows the memory arrays and logic circuits to be tested at and above system clock speeds using a locally generated pattern set that verifies functionality. Conceptually, the BIST approach is based on the realization that much of a circuit tester's electronics is semiconductor-based, just like the products it is testing, and that many of the challenges and limitations in testing lie in the interface to the device under test (DUT). The BIST approach can be described as an attempt to move many of the already semiconductor-based test equipment functions into the products under test and eliminate the complex interfacing. One of the major advantages BIST has over other means of testing memory arrays is that the operation of the test is self-contained. All of the circuitry required to execute the test at-speed is contained within the integrated circuit. Very limited external controls are needed, so BIST can be run at all levels of packaging (wafer, TCA, module and system) without requiring expensive external test equipment.




BIST utilizes a boundary-scan design-for-test (DFT) technique. The DFT technique consists of placing a scannable memory element, or boundary-scan chain, adjacent to each integrated circuit I/O so that signals at the integrated circuit boundaries can be controlled and observed using scan operations and without direct contact with the integrated circuit. Access to the boundary-scan chain as well as to most of the DFT and BIST circuitry is through a custom five-wire interface similar to the standard IEEE 1149.1 TAP approach. This interface is used to initialize and control the various BIST controllers on the integrated circuits and other DFT hardware during both system test and manufacturing test. A state machine within each integrated circuit, referred to as the self-test control macro (STCM) is used to control internal-test-mode signals and the sequencing of all test and system clocks while in test mode. Instead of testing the performance of the device at full speed through the pins, an on-chip phase-locked loop (PLL) is used to multiply the incoming tester frequency to bring it up to the operating frequency of the integrated circuit. Additional self-generated clock (SGC) circuitry is then used to generate the various system clock sequences needed to properly exercise all portions of the integrated circuit. The BIST techniques can be divided into two major categories: logic BIST (LBIST) to test at-speed the logic in the devices, and array BIST (ABIST) to provide at-speed testing of the embedded arrays (i.e., RAMs).




Today, BIST engines are used to test logic and arrays by applying a large number of test patterns and compressing the results of these test patterns into a single signature. This signature is then compared to the one and only passing signature to determine if the logic or array that was tested is “good”. If the signature does not match the expected good signature, the logic or array is considered to have failed and thus have one or more defects. There is difficulty in diagnosing what defect is causing the failing signature. It is useful to determine what the failing defect is and whether there is any defect pattern that may indicate a weak design or processing sensitivity causing the failing signature, rather than just random defects.




BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




This invention describes a method and apparatus, contained within an integrated circuit, for isolating failure by precisely controlling the number of clocks applied during built-in self-test (BIST). A programmable clock counter, on the integrated circuit, stores a specified number of clock cycles and sends a signal to stop the BIST once the specified number of clock cycles have been generated. The intermediate results can then be mapped at speed bit by bit in order to isolate the cause of failure.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




Referring now to the drawings wherein like elements are numbered alike in the several FIGURES:





FIG. 1

depicts the overall flow of the method for at speed diagnostics and bit fail mapping;





FIG. 2

depicts a hardware implementation of the at speed diagnostics and bit fail mapping invention; and





FIG. 3

depicts a timing diagram of the at speed diagnostics and bit fail mapping invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS





FIG. 1

depicts the overall flow of a method for at speed diagnostics and bit fail mapping using ABIST as an example implementation. First, in step


2


, a programmed delay is set in a programmable clock counter and next a signal to start the ABIST test is received in step


4


. This signal to start could come from a slow asynchronous tester, for example. In response to this signal, the ABIST engine starts to test the array in step


6


. While the test is being performed, the programmable clock counter is checked to see if it has reached the programmed delay. The programmable clock counter may count up from zero or down from some value to provide the programmed delay. If the programmable clock counter has not reached the programmed delay, the programmable clock counter continues running in step


10


and the value of the programmable clock counter is again checked to see if it has reached the programmed delay in step


8


. This loop of steps


8


and


10


continues and the ABIST engine continues to run until the value of the programmable clock counter reaches the programmed delay. When the programmable clock counter reaches the programmed delay, the ABIST test is halted in step


12


and the tester can scan out and examine the intermediate results in the ABIST engine


108


at step


14


.





FIG. 2

depicts an exemplary hardware implementation of at speed diagnostics and bit fail mapping using ABIST as an example. A START_ABIST_DELAY signal


102


is applied to a latch device


104


. In an exemplary embodiment, the latch device


104


includes a plurality of shift register latches (SRLs) connected in series. The latch device


104


effectively delays the START_ABIST_DELAY signal


102


and generates both a synchronous START_ABIST signal


106


and a synchronous COUNTER signal


110


. The START_ABIST signal


106


starts the ABIST engine


108


to initiate the self test. The COUNTER signal


110


starts the programmable clock counter


112


that has been programmed with a programmable delay. Once the programmable clock counter


112


reaches the programmable delay, a STOP_ABIST signal


114


is generated which causes the ABIST engine


108


to stop.





FIG. 3

illustrates an exemplary timing diagram of at speed diagnostics and bit fail mapping using ABIST as an example. First, the START_ABIST_DELAY signal


102


is received, from a slow asynchronous tester, for example. Some time after the START_ABIST_DELAY signal


102


goes high, both the START_ABIST signal


106


will drop and the COUNTER signal


110


will rise in the exact same cycle in response to an output of latch device


104


. When START_ABIST signal


106


drops, the ABIST engine


108


will start to test the array. When the COUNTER signal


110


rises, the programmable clock counter


112


will start counting and count until the programmed delay is reached. When the programmable clock counter


112


reaches the programmed delay, the programmable clock counter


112


will raise the STOP_ABIST signal


114


. When the STOP_ABIST signal


114


goes high, this stops the ABIST engine


108


. At this point, the. tester can scan out and examine the intermediate result in the ABIST engine


108


. Thus, by changing the programmed delay in the programmable clock counter


112


, the entire array could be bit mapped cycle by cycle to determine which bit or bits are failing in the array and whether the defects are random or indicate a design or process sensitivity.




Although the above discussion focuses on ABIST, those skilled in the art will recognize that this technique could be applied to any self-test engine, such as LBIST or other ABIST designs, as a means of isolating failures by precisely controlling the number of clocks applied during the self-test.




Since the design is contained on the integrated circuit that is being tested and utilizes the clock system on the integrated circuit, a slow inexpensive tester can be used to start the test and the test can be performed at system clock speeds and thus be used to diagnose difficult AC defects. Also, since this solution is contained entirely on the integrated circuit, it can be used at higher levels of packaging such as MCM and system test, where no high-speed tester interface is available.




While preferred embodiments have been shown and described, various modifications and substitutions may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the present invention has been described by way of illustration and not limitation.



Claims
  • 1. A method of testing an integrated circuit comprising a built-in self test (BIST) engine, said method comprising:receiving a BIST start signal; delaying said BIST start signal; initiating said BIST engine in response to said delayed BIST start signal; initiating a programmable clock counter in response to said delayed BIST start signal, said programmable clock counter and said BIST engine being initiated at the same time, said programmable clock counter generating a BIST stop signal upon reaching a delay; stopping said BIST engine in response to said BIST stop signal; and mapping output of said BIST engine, bit by bit, to isolate a cause of failure.
  • 2. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein said BIST is an array built-in-self-test (ABIST).
  • 3. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein said BIST is a logic built-in self-test (LBIST).
  • 4. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein said delay is programmable.
  • 5. A built-in self-test (BIST) apparatus contained within an integrated circuit, said apparatus comprising:a BIST engine for performing said BIST, said BIST engine located on said integrated circuit, said BIST engine delaying a BIST start signal and initiating said BIST in response to said delayed BIST start signal and ending said BIST in response to a stop BIST stop signal; and a programmable clock counter located on said integrated circuit, said programmable clock counter being initiated in response to said delayed BIST start signal and generating said BIST stop signal upon reaching a delay; said programmable clock counter and said BIST engine being initiated at the same time.
  • 6. The apparatus as recited in claim 5, wherein said BIST is an array built-in self-test (ABIST) machine.
  • 7. The apparatus as recited in claim 5, wherein said BIST is a logic built-in self-test (LBIST) machine.
  • 8. The apparatus as recited in claim 5, wherein said delay is programmable.
US Referenced Citations (22)
Number Name Date Kind
4482953 Burke Nov 1984 A
5138619 Fasang et al. Aug 1992 A
5404332 Sato et al. Apr 1995 A
5568437 Jamal Oct 1996 A
5570375 Tsai et al. Oct 1996 A
5633877 Shephard et al. May 1997 A
5644699 Yoshida Jul 1997 A
5673273 Almy Sep 1997 A
5740412 Chan et al. Apr 1998 A
5745500 Damarla et al. Apr 1998 A
5771242 Adams et al. Jun 1998 A
5796745 Adams et al. Aug 1998 A
5805789 Huott et al. Sep 1998 A
5883843 Hii et al. Mar 1999 A
5912901 Adams et al. Jun 1999 A
5982189 Motika et al. Nov 1999 A
5987632 Irrinki et al. Nov 1999 A
6073258 Wheater Jun 2000 A
6330681 Cote et al. Dec 2001 B1
6393594 Anderson et al. May 2002 B1
6425103 Phan Jul 2002 B1
6438722 Bailey et al. Aug 2002 B1