Method for controlling a processing system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11396699
  • Patent Number
    11,396,699
  • Date Filed
    Monday, August 19, 2019
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 26, 2022
    a year ago
Abstract
Embodiments described herein generally relate to methods for controlling a processing system. Particularly, subfab components of the processing system may be controlled based on the flow of materials into the processing system. In some embodiments, the flow of an inert gas used to dilute the effluent gases may be controlled in accordance with the flow of one or more precursor gases. Thus, the cost of running the processing system is reduced while mitigating critical EHS concerns.
Description
BACKGROUND
Field

Embodiments described herein generally relate to the manufacture of electronic devices, and more particularly, to methods for controlling a processing system.


Description of the Related Art

The manufacture of electronic devices by a processing system typically results in the creation of byproduct effluent gases. These effluent gases may contain undesirable species which may be harmful and/or hazardous. The concentration of the undesirable species in the effluent gases may be diluted, and the dilution is typically performed by subfab components, such as vacuum pumps, point-of-use (POU) abatement and heat removal devices. The subfab components are typically designed to manage worst-case risk scenarios in order to mitigate critical environmental, health and safety (EHS) concerns. As such, many subfab components may be operating continuously with virtually no downtime.


Therefore, an improved method for operating the subfab components is needed.


SUMMARY

Embodiments described herein generally relate to methods for controlling a processing system. In one embodiment, a method includes flowing a precursor gas into a processing chamber, flowing an inert gas into an exhaust line coupled to the processing chamber, and controlling the flow of the inert gas based on the flow of the precursor gas.


In another embodiment, a method includes flowing a precursor gas into a processing chamber at a first flow rate, flowing an inert gas into an exhaust line coupled to the processing chamber at a second flow rate, changing the first flow rate to a third flow rate, and changing the second flow rate to a fourth flow rate based on the changing of the first flow rate to the third flow rate.


In another embodiment, a method includes flowing a precursor gas into a processing chamber, flowing a coolant to an abatement system downstream of the processing chamber, and controlling the flowing of the coolant based on the flowing of the precursor gas.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

So that the manner in which the above recited features of the disclosure can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the disclosure, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to embodiments, some of which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this disclosure and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the disclosure may admit to other equally effective embodiments.



FIG. 1 schematically illustrates a processing system according to one embodiment.



FIG. 2 schematically illustrates a processing system according to another embodiment.





To facilitate understanding, identical reference numerals have been used, where possible, to designate identical elements that are common to the figures. It is contemplated that elements disclosed in one embodiment may be beneficially utilized on other embodiments without specific recitation.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments described herein generally relate to methods for controlling a processing system. Particularly, subfab components of the processing system may be controlled based on the flow of materials into the processing system. In some embodiments, the flow of an inert gas used to dilute the effluent gases may be controlled in accordance with the flow of one or more precursor gases. Thus, the cost of running the processing system is reduced while mitigating critical EHS concerns.


In one embodiment, a method includes flowing a precursor gas into a processing chamber, flowing an inert gas into an exhaust line coupled to the processing chamber, and controlling the flow of the inert gas based on the flow of the precursor gas.


In another embodiment, a method includes flowing a precursor gas into a processing chamber at a first flow rate, flowing an inert gas into an exhaust line coupled to the processing chamber at a second flow rate, changing the first flow rate to a third flow rate, and changing the second flow rate to a fourth flow rate based on the changing of the first flow rate to the third flow rate.


In another embodiment, a method includes flowing a precursor gas into a processing chamber, flowing a coolant to an abatement system downstream of the processing chamber, and controlling the flowing of the coolant based on the flowing of the precursor gas.



FIG. 1 schematically illustrates a processing system 100 according to one embodiment. As shown in FIG. 1, the processing system 100 may generally include a processing chamber 102 having an interior processing volume 103, one or more gas inlets 105 coupled to one or more gas sources 124, and an outlet 107 coupled to a vacuum pump 112 via an exhaust line 116. The one or more gas sources 124 may provide one or more gases to the processing chamber 102, such as precursor gases, cleaning gases, etching gases, purge gases, or the like. The vacuum pump 112 is generally used to remove materials such as effluent gases from the processing chamber 102. The vacuum pump 112, in combination with a valve 108 disposed in the exhaust line 116, can also be used to control the pressure in the processing chamber 102.


A subfab component, such as a pump 114, may be utilized to pump an inert gas, such as nitrogen gas, into the exhaust line 116 via a conduit 115 in order to dilute the effluent gases. The diluted effluent gases may be fed into an abatement system 113 downstream of the processing chamber 102. Conventionally, the pump 114 is operated continuously and the flow of the inert gas is set at a maximum value. The dilution of the effluent gases reduces the risk that accidental leaks will result in a pyrophoric reaction. However, large flows of inert gases call for more abatement energy to process the diluted effluent gases. In order to reduce the cost of operating the subfab components and to abate the effluent gases more efficiently, a controller 106 may be utilized.


The controller 106 may be coupled to receive a flow rate or flow rates from the one or more gas sources 124 or a mass flow controller (not shown) located in the conduit between the one or more gas sources 124 and the processing chamber 102. The controller 106 may be also coupled to send set points to the subfab components, such as the pump 114. The subfab components, such as the pump 114, may be controlled by the controller 106 based on the flow of the gases from the one or more gas sources 124 into the processing chamber 102. In one embodiment, the flow of an inert gas used to dilute the effluent gases may be controlled in accordance with the flow of one or more precursor gases into the processing chamber 102. In some embodiments, PID type algorithms may be utilized to control the flow of the inert gas used to dilute the effluent gases based on the flow of one or more precursor gases. For example, the flow of the inert gas may be set in proportion to the flow of the precursor gases. In one embodiment, a silane based precursor gas is flowed into the processing chamber 102 from the gas source 124. Because the harmful or hazardous species in the effluent gases are produced as a result of having the silane based precursor gas, the flow of the silane based precursor gas may be used to control the subfab components. During processing, the silane based precursor gas may be flowed into the processing chamber 102 at a first flow rate, which is sent to the controller 106. The controller 106 may signal the pump 114 to inject an inert gas, such as nitrogen gas, into the exhaust line 116 via the conduit 115 at a second flow rate based on the first flow rate of the silane based precursor gas. If the flow rate of the silane based precursor gas is increased or decreased, the flow rate of the inert gas pumped into the exhaust line 116 may be adjusted accordingly by the controller via the pump 114, for example in proportion to the flow rate of the silane based precursor gas. For example, if the flow rate of the silane based precursor gas is decreased, the flow rate of the inert gas is also decreased. In addition, if the flow of the silane based precursor gas into the processing chamber 102 is paused, the flow of the inert gas into the exhaust line 116 may be also stopped. By varying the flow rate of the inert gas into the exhaust line 116 based on the flow rate of the silane based precursor gas, the cost of operating the subfab components, such as the pump 114, is reduced. Additionally, the efficiency of abating the diluted effluent gases is improved.


It should be noted that in an embodiment wherein the flow rate of inert gas is controlled in proportion to the flow rate of a precursor gas, such as the silane based precursor gas above, the proportionality may be dynamically adjusted based on process requirements. For example, at very low flow rates of the silane based precursor, the proportionality of the inert gas flow rate may be reduced, and at high flow rates of the silane based precursor, the proportionality of the inert gas flow rate may be increased. In this way, flow rate of the inert gas may be controlled in proportion to the flow rate of the precursor gas, but the flow rate of the inert gas may increase faster than the flow rate of the precursor gas to mitigate the increased risk associated with increased flow rates of precursor gases.


In some cases, the flow rate of inert gas may be based on flow rates of more than one precursor gas. For example, a first flow rate may be determined based on a flow rate of a first precursor, a second flow rate may be determined based on a flow rate of a second precursor, and the flow rate of inert gas may be determined by a combination of the first flow rate and the second flow rate. The first flow rate may be determined in proportion to the flow rate of the first precursor, or by any combination of proportional, integral, or derivative control. The second flow rate may likewise be determined in proportion to the flow rate of the second precursor, or by any combination of proportional, integral, or derivative control. The combination of the first flow rate and the second flow rate may be simple addition, or may be linear or non-linear combination that reflects, for example, different levels of risk associated with the different precursors. If the first precursor has a higher level of risk than the second precursor, that higher level of risk may be reflected by a different proportionality constant for determining the first flow rate and the second flow rate, or by a linear or non-linear combination that weighs the risk of the first precursor more than that of the second precursor.


The controller 106 may include a central processing unit (CPU) 118, a memory 120, and support circuits 122 for the CPU 118. The memory 120 may be one or more of readily available memory such as random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), floppy disk, hard disk, flash, or any other form of digital storage, local or remote. The support circuits 122 are coupled to the CPU 118 for supporting the CPU 118. The support circuits 122 may include cache, power supplies, clock circuits, input/output circuitry and subsystems, and the like.



FIG. 2 schematically illustrates a processing system 200 according to one embodiment. As shown in FIG. 2, a pump 202 may be coupled to the abatement system 113 in order to pump a coolant, such as water, to the abatement system 113 downstream of the processing chamber 102. Again, conventionally the coolant may flow continuously at a maximum flow rate within the abatement system 113 to provide cooling of the abatement system 113. In order to reduce the cost of operating the pump 202, the controller 106 is electrically coupled to the pump 202 to control the flow rate of the coolant based on the flow of the gases from the one or more gas sources 124 into the processing chamber 102. The controller 106 may control the pump 202 using similar methods as for controlling the pump 114. For example, if the flow rate of the gas or gases flowing into the processing chamber 102 is decreased, the flow rate of the coolant to the abatement system 113 is also decreased. In some embodiments, the pump 114 (FIG. 1) is included in the processing system 200, and the pump 114 may be controlled by the controller 106, as described in FIG. 1.


In addition to the pumps 114, 202, the controller 106 may additionally control other subfab components, such as pump for an air handling system that generates compressed air, based on the flow of the gas or gases into the processing chamber. Thus, the subfab components that are controlled by the controller are operated more efficiently and at a lower cost.


While the foregoing is directed to embodiments, other and further embodiments may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, and the scope thereof is determined by the claims that follow.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus for controlling a processing system, comprising: a controller configured to: receive a metric indicative of a first flow rate of a first gas flowing into a processing chamber and a second flow rate of a second gas flowing into the processing chamber; andin response to the received metric, send a signal to a subfab component to inject an inert gas directly into an exhaust line at a location between the processing chamber and an abatement system downstream of the processing chamber.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the metric indicates a combination of the first flow rate and the second flow rate.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the combination of the first flow rate and the second flow rate is a linear combination.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the combination of the first flow rate and the second flow rate is a non-linear combination.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the controller is further configured to: determine a change in the first flow rate of the first gas and/or the second flow rate of the second gas flowing into the processing chamber; andchange a flow rate of the inert gas injected directly into the exhaust line by the subfab component in response to a change in the flow rate.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein the change in flow rate of inert gas is in proportion to the change in the first flow rate of the first gas and/or the second flow rate of the second gas flowing into the processing chamber.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein a proportionality of the flow rate of the inert gas to the first flow rate of the first gas and/or the second flow rate of the second gas flowing into the processing chamber is dynamically adjusted.
  • 8. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the subfab component is a pump.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation application of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/138,818, filed on Apr. 26, 2016, which claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/159,074, filed on May 8, 2015. Each of afore mentioned patent applications are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (80)
Number Name Date Kind
4488506 Heinecke Dec 1984 A
4608063 Kurokawa Aug 1986 A
4619840 Goldman et al. Oct 1986 A
5011520 Carr Apr 1991 A
5338363 Kawata et al. Aug 1994 A
5417934 Smith May 1995 A
5497316 Sierk Mar 1996 A
5759237 Li Jun 1998 A
5797195 Huling Aug 1998 A
5819683 Ikeda Oct 1998 A
5826607 Knutson et al. Oct 1998 A
5827370 Gu Oct 1998 A
5851293 Lane Dec 1998 A
6042654 Comita et al. Mar 2000 A
6287990 Cheung Sep 2001 B1
6358485 Baker Mar 2002 B1
6486081 Ishikawa et al. Nov 2002 B1
6834664 Chiang Dec 2004 B1
8539257 Schauer Sep 2013 B2
10428420 Neuber Oct 2019 B2
20010017080 Dozoretz Aug 2001 A1
20020041931 Suntola Apr 2002 A1
20020045361 Cheung Apr 2002 A1
20020094380 Holst Jul 2002 A1
20020134429 Kubota Sep 2002 A1
20030098419 Ji May 2003 A1
20030124859 Cheung Jul 2003 A1
20030198741 Uchida Oct 2003 A1
20040101460 Arno May 2004 A1
20040157347 Komiyama Aug 2004 A1
20040206237 Sherer Oct 2004 A1
20050026434 Huy et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050059261 Basceri Mar 2005 A1
20050079708 Yamasaki Apr 2005 A1
20060065120 Clements Mar 2006 A1
20060104878 Chiu May 2006 A1
20060278162 Ohmi et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070086931 Raoux Apr 2007 A1
20070108113 Urquhart May 2007 A1
20070109912 Urquhart May 2007 A1
20070110591 Urquhart May 2007 A1
20070119816 Urquhart May 2007 A1
20070183909 Kusay Aug 2007 A1
20070194470 Dedontney Aug 2007 A1
20080024762 Fang Jan 2008 A1
20080072585 Ikeda Mar 2008 A1
20080083673 Golden Apr 2008 A1
20080261116 Burton et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090018688 Chandler Jan 2009 A1
20090141583 Fanjat Jun 2009 A1
20090216061 Clark Aug 2009 A1
20090238972 Clark Sep 2009 A1
20090246105 Clark Oct 2009 A1
20100008838 Fox Jan 2010 A1
20100096110 Neuber Apr 2010 A1
20100224264 Homan Sep 2010 A1
20100258510 Hooshdaran Oct 2010 A1
20100298738 Felts Nov 2010 A1
20110011129 Briend Jan 2011 A1
20110139272 Matsumoto Jun 2011 A1
20110203310 Gomi Aug 2011 A1
20110220342 Page Sep 2011 A1
20110252899 Felts Oct 2011 A1
20110259366 Sweeney Oct 2011 A1
20110311725 Sneh Dec 2011 A1
20120204965 Loldj et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120273052 Ye Nov 2012 A1
20130008311 Ohuchi Jan 2013 A1
20130139690 Ohuchi Jun 2013 A1
20130171919 Shinohara Jul 2013 A1
20130317640 Lee Nov 2013 A1
20140080071 Koss Mar 2014 A1
20140338600 Lee Nov 2014 A1
20140352820 Nakazawa Dec 2014 A1
20150368794 Morita Dec 2015 A1
20160059185 Naito Mar 2016 A1
20160281223 Sowa Sep 2016 A1
20160326643 Neuber Nov 2016 A1
20180073137 Xavier Mar 2018 A1
20190368037 Neuber Dec 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (6)
Number Date Country
60-195028 Oct 1985 JP
2000-0067165 Nov 2000 KR
2007-0036249 Apr 2007 KR
20070036249 Apr 2007 KR
10-1383985 Apr 2014 KR
WO-2015041102 Mar 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (8)
Entry
Abreu, et al.; Causes of anomalous solid formation in the exhaust systems of low-pressure chemical vapor deposition and plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition semiconductor processes; J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 12(4); dated Jul./Aug. 1994; 5 total pages.
Choo, et al.; Spatially controllabe chemical vapor deposition; dated Dec. 2, 2003; 34 total pages.
Chandler, et al.; Solid State Technology; Insights for Electronics Manufacturing; Subfab Sync Increases Energy Savings; dated Apr. 1, 2010; 4 total pages.
McIntosh; Maintaining Abatement Efficiency While Increasing Utility Efficiency Using the Applied iSYS™ Controller dated 2013; 4 total pages.
Anand, et al.; Applied Physics Letters 107; Atmospheric pressure plasma chemical vapor deposition reactor for 100 mm wafers, optimized for minimum contamination at low gas flow rates; dated 2015; 5 total pages.
PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2016/026327; dated Jul. 27, 2016; 12 total pages.
Office Action for Taiwan Application No. 109121454 dated Apr. 27, 2021.
Taiwanese Office Action (with attached English translation) for Application No. 105111240; dated Sep. 9, 2019 7 total pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190368037 A1 Dec 2019 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62159074 May 2015 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 15138818 Apr 2016 US
Child 16544334 US